Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20110890 Ver 1_401 Application_20111011Dennison, Laurie From: Hardison, Lyn Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 10:00 AM To: Dennison, Laurie Subject: New Express 401 application - MCAS Cherry Point Walkways & Greenspace for Range Road Attachments: MCAS Cherry Point Walkways & Greenspace for Range Road - Express 401.pdf Hi there, Today, we accepting this project into express review for State SW, Erosion Control and 401 Cert under multiple express submittal and fee of $4000. Please find attached the PCN application so that you can enter this project into BIMS for us. Let me know the project number so that I can add event dates later. A copy of the application package will be put into the mail today for your files. Thanks a bunch, Lyn PLEASE NOTE MY E-MAIL ADDRESS HAS CHANGED TO: Iyn.hardison@ncdenr.eov Lyn Hardison Environmental Assistance Coordinator NCDENR Division of Environmental Assistance & Outreach (DEAD) Customer Service - Home Washington Regional Office 943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 Phone: 252-948-3842 Fax: 252-975-3716 ff Please consider the environment before print/ng this e-mail E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. t Office Use Only, I Q o?o? fi Q? 1 04 Corps action ID no. t s " _ j DWQ project no. ?f Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 ......... .... _._._. ..... Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a Type: s) of approval sought from the Corps ® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NW P) number: 42 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes © No _.__ .. 1 d. Typ,2i ) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): i ? ? 401 Water Quality Certification -Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit -101 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization t e Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only fear Corps Permit be ,wse written approval is not required? Certification: ? Yes ® No Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. ? Yes ? No ? Yes] No 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. C 1 h. Is thr,project located within a NC DGM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? 0 Yes ? No ? Yes 2. Project Information 2a tlctme of project Walkways and Greertspace for Range Road (South) ' 2b. County: Craven 2c., -_ Nearest namicipality /town: ? Havelock 2d. Subdivision name: N/A 2e NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state N/A ?_. _project no: 3. Owner Information 3a Nwi i } on Recorded DeNd: .. Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point b . _ _ (_ -i : ?id P, i?! R_;. _ .... --- NA Federal property 3c- Iio? j- risible, Party (for LLC if ? George Radford opplic<able). 3d, Street address: PSC Box 8006 Building 4223 Access Road 3e City, state, zip: MCAS Cherry Point, NC 28533 3f. Telephone no.: 252-466-4599 - 3g. Fax no.: 252-466-2000 1 31). Cmail address: george.radford@usmc.mil No f k Page I of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version I f 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4' _ l-elep)hone n 4g. Fax no.: 41) Email address: 5. Agenticonsultant Information (if applicable) I 5a Name Steven D. Harvey, PE _._.. ------ 5b- Business name if li l (Dewberry & Davis, Inc. ( app cab e): 5n Street address: 2301 Rexwoods Drive Suite 200 5d. City, state cif: l Raleigh, NC 27607-3366 5e Telephone no. _ 919-424-3717 5f. Fax no.: 919-881-9923 5g. Email address: I sharvey@dewberry.com Page 2 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 versiur, 4. Jurisdictional Determinations Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property 1 project (including all prior phases) in the past? ® Yes ? No ? Unknown Comments: Site visit was held on May 18, 2011. Jurisdictional Determination not issued as of time of application. 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ? Preliminary ? Final 4c. If ,rho delineated the jurisdictional areas? known): Troy Shelton Agency/Consultant Company: Dewberry Other: 4d. It yus, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. Site visit was held on May 18, 2011. Jurisdictional Determination not issued at time of application. 5. Project History I 5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ? No this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ®Unknown 1 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions J 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? Yes ? No 6b. If yes, explain This project will be divided into three phases. The first phase, Range Road Site Work, will include the grading and niprovernents to the existing trail (approximately 1.0 mile of trail), driveways, signing and striping. All associated demolition and storm drainage for this portion of the trail will be included in this phase. All disturbed areas, not t) aved or graveled will be seeded and mulched or have sod installed. The second phase, Construct Range Road Running Trail, will include the paving/graveling of the 9' asphalt/gravel running trail with 1' gravel shoulders on each side, paving of driveway accesses, sidewalks, signing and striping, retaining wall and concrete low flow sections, removal of brick pavers as required for new running trail, new curbing and paving of emergonr'y vehicle accesses. All associated demolition and storm drainage for this portion of the trail will be included in this phase, as well as grading and grassing of three PT stations, landscaping and lighting. All disturbed areas not paved will I „ r ";and mulched or have sod installed. The, third phase, Construct Range Road Physical Training (PT) Field, will include grading and grassing of one Physical Training (PT) field (approximately 24,000 sf) and one PT station, grading and paving a portion of the running trail by the PT Field, sidewalks and handicap ramps, signing and striping, paving one emergency access, landscaping, irrigation and lighting, All associated demolition and storm drainage for this portion of the trail will be included in this phase. Any disturbed area not paved will be sodded or seeded and mulched. All work will be done within the same construction limits and temporary erosion control measures will not be removed until the site is stabilized. Page 4 of 11 PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): MCAS Cherry Point NC 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 34.877946 Longitude: - 76.87794 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. --- Property size: ---- Total 16.3 (disturbed area is 13.1) acres 2. Surface Waters 2a, Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc-) to proposed project: Jacks Branch, a tributary to Hancock Creek 2t 11 Vv'ater Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: ( WS-II, SC; Sw; NSW 2c. River basin: Neuse 3. Project Description F3 a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The project is located along Range Road on Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point. An existing gravel/dirt path is located on the east side of Range Road for approximately 2 1/2 mi les. The gravel/dirt path ends at Building 4413. There<; i -A -r nntl n d t th f th' i 1 R R A R R d 001 u y o P. es nan access sou o is pat t a ong ange Oa . (Ange vu is a - U p?,,VU roa -dy VVI r,rass ditches on both sides. Along this southern section of Range Road, there are five buildings with parking areas (t,vo with pervious pavers) and several fenced in areas. These existing BMPs discharge via pipes and ditches into wooded areas away from Range Road to the west and east. 3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: Total acreage of wetlands is unknown. Jurisdictional determination for the project only evaluated the area immediately adjacent to the project corridor. 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: Western extent of project runs parallel to an unnamed tributary to Jacks Branch, a tributary to Hancock Creek for approximately 2000 linear feet. 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The "Walkways and Greenspace for Range Road (South)" project is paving approximately one (1) mile of the exis"Ing (travel greenway/running trail and the addition of 1.3 miles of new paved trail. The purpose c,f thu Wa1kwoy5 and Greerispace for Range Road (South) project is to provide safe circulation for Marines and Government personnel in ,he MACG-28 area of MCAS Cherry Point. The MACG-28 area has a high Marine population density vvitii very limited circulation available for mandatory daily physical training as well as movement between facilities. Marines walk and run unsafely along the edge of Range Road daily. The greenway path layout and width has been designed by a registered North Carolina Landscape Architect primarily to allow formation runs of a Marine company, typically a 4- man wide front. The width and layout provides sufficient space for a typical 100 person Marine company to utilize. In addition, four (4) emergency access ways have bean constructed to allow ambulance to access the greenway at select locations to faUilitate the evacuation of Marine, if medically necessary. The improvements include grading ditches and extending'. culverts and adding storm structures, as well as a grass Physical Training (PT) field, sidewalks, utility extensions, landscaping, and lighting.. 3e. r)escnbe the overall project in detaiil, in biding the type of equipment to be used' The propo>ed work was evaluated to provide the least possible impact to wetlands. Silt fencing shall be prope ily installed; temporary and permanent seeding will be used to prevent discharge of sediment into v,edands nd ost < -ine waters. Construction entrance pads will serve to reduce sediment transport by vehicles off the project site. Page 3 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 200B Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ? Wetlands ?Streams - tributaries ? Buffers l ? Open Waters ? Pond Construction 2 Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. i2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number- Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impat;( Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres) Temporary T W1 ? P ? T Grading and Fill Palustrine ® Yes ® Corps ? 0 3t3 --- -- - Forested Wetland [:1 No ? DWQ . J W2 ?P?T I ? Yes ? Corps l ; ! ? No ? DWQ __ _._ W,' ? P F] T _ Yes E] ? Corps ? No ? DWQ - - W4 E] P ? T ? Yes El Corps f ? No ? DWQ W5 ?P?T ? Yes ? Corps ? No ? DWQ W6 ? P E] T ? Yes ? Corps ........ . El No ?DWQ I 'p. Total wetland impacts ( 0,38 ( 2h. Comments: Trees and shrubs will be removed from wetlands Fill material will be placed to raise the ground elevation in the vretland areas to allow all weather trail construction. See attached figures for plan and typical section of impacts. ?3. Stream Impacts ? ----?---?if there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. Via- 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e, 3f. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type Of jurisdiction i Avc-wage Im?>r-,tit number - or (PER) (Corps - 404, 10 Stream length Permanent ' or t ) intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear Temporary (T) _ ( (INT)7 other) fe t (feet) ) ??. S1 ? P El T l _ _ _ ? ? ( ? PER ? INT ? Corps ? DWQ S2 ? P [:J T ? PER El Corps El INT ? DWQ _ I S3 QP ? T El PER F-1 Corps _ ? INT ? DWQ S ?P?T ? PER El Corps -? ?INT ?DWQ C]PC] T FS 5 S6 ? P ? T _ ._- ' ? PER ?INT ? PER ? INT F-1 Carps ?DWQ ? Corps ?DWQ _j 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts Page 5 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of thp, t f S thp.n inrlivirf; mlly list all nnon %Arafcr imnnnfe kM1-A/ 4a. _ Open water 4b. Name of waterbody 4c. 4d. 4e. impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or -Temporary T 01 ?P?T _- 02 ?P?T 03 ? r 04 ?P?T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: _ - -? 5. Pond or Lake Construction If 2nd or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number ? of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 I ! P2 c ?- i Sf. Total 1 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k, Method of construction: i 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. I 6a' Project is in which protected basin? ? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other: ? Catawba ? Randleman i 61b. --'-__ T 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) I Tempor T im act required? B1 ?P?T ?NoS B2 ?P?T ---- ? Yes ?No I ? Yes B3 ?P?T _J ?No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i, Comments: Page 6 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version I D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Project limits are minimized to the maximum extent practical to allow'required work. The location and alignment of the trail was redesigned to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands. The PT field was also reloacted to avoid impacting over 1 acres of wetlands. Construction entrance pads will serveto remove: soils from construction vehicles. Silt fencing and temporary seeding will be used during construction to prevent discharge of sediment into estuarine waters. Permanent sodding and rolled erosion control product (jute matting) will be used to stabilize the site after construction to prevent discharge of sediment ?into estuarine waters. b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Proiect will avoid and minimize impacts by working within construction limits shown on drawings. Additionally, all silt fencing shall be properly installed and temporary and permanent seeding will be used to prevent discharge of sediment into adjacent I wetlands and waters. Construction entrance pads will serve to reduce sediment transaort by vehicles off the Droiect site. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for I ? Yes ® No mpacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? h It „yes, mitigation is required h4 (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps ? Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this r t? ? Payment to in-lieu fee program p ojec ? Permittee Responsible Mitigation i 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes C 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: - - --- --- - --- ? warm ? cool ?cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only, square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4f Non- ri i tl i d i acres . r pa an we an m t gation requested: acres 14g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres f 4h. Comments: 5, Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permitfee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 7 of 11 PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Lane 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, perrnittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: i Page 8 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ®Yes ? No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b If . yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: The site is being designed to meet Low Density development standards. Dedicated greenspace is being preserved as part of the Stormwater Management permit to meet the maximum 24% impervious area threshold and all drainage is ® Yes ? No designed as sheetflow away from the existing developed areas. The site areas shall be seeded or sodded. Silt fence will be utilized to control sediment during construction. Slopes have been minimized and maintain non-erosive velocities (<2 FPS). 2. Stormwater Management Plan t 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 18.8% ?2h Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Pd _ If thiC nrnipm nC1F-' rnnilirn C}nrmle,a4nr AAnnnn ri DI t4 L .; t _ a_.. _:_.: _r.?_ _I__. Ive Ir,u„ut vltlGll? 1 1QI1, 111611 FJIVVIUG Q 41161, IIC711Gi LIVU UCJUIIIJLIVII VI L11V PICl11. Stormwater drainage patterns on site are anticipated to remain basically unchanged. The roadway will continue to flow to ditches or drainage system that ultimately flows to the east side of Range Road. The running trail will be paved to drain away from existing developed areas. Stormwater will sheet flow off the trails through dedicated greenspace into wooded or vegetated areas. This project will be permitted as a single project that establishes enough dedicated greenspace within the project area to stay below the 24% Low Density threshold. MCAS Cherry Point will commit to this dedicated greenspace (or equivalent area) remaining undeveloped in the future. Both wetlands and buffer areas will be used in the overall project area calculations to achieve the 24% impervious threshold for Low Density. 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? Certified Local Government ® DWQ Stormwater Program ? DWQ 401 Unit 1 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 13a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? ? Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW I apply (check all that apply): ? USMP ? Water Supply Watershed ? Other: 3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been I ? Yes ? No E attached? I( 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ® Coastal counties ? HQW I 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ORW (check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246 ? Other: Page g of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? El Yes ® No 5. DWO 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ® Yes ? No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ® Yes ? No F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the Yes No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ? Yes ? No letter-) r Comments: i 2. Violations (DWO Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes Z No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 21 . Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s) - fi 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in Yes ® No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWO Requirement) 14a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated Ircrn the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. N/A Page 10 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? yes ©Na habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act I impacts? ? Yes No ? Raleigh 1 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Asheville `.d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? i Data from the USFWS and NCNHP,,vere utilized to determine if any endangered species exist in the area. !. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? A 2007 report titled "Essential Fish Habitat Assessment and Study of the MCAS Cherry Point's Areas of Responsibility was utilized for the EFH assessment. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) T1 ?lliJl this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal g over, nments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ? No St<.IWS (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? A 2008 report titled "MCAS Cherry Point Integrated Cultural Resources Managment Plan" was utilized for the evaluation c-)f historic and archaeological resources. None are located within or near the project area. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a t"Jill this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? --------- -T6Yes No 8b, If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Craven County, DFIRM 6433, Map 3720643:300) W. RADFORD G.?'??'. Radford vironmentai Affairs Officer direction of the Commanding Offirrer 0912 t %2' 11 Applicant/Agent's Printed Name gent's Signature D;(Aget's ignat an authorization letter front the applicant rvalild is provided j Page 11 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version . .5., , , -, . l.u,1r,%? 1xv(Au L Ivjs,t,t Ivt atlvll ulI IVIl.C1J %-IIcily rvIIII. 4 ti mot, ? r •=-2? ( ._ _?? I ,a. r • 4 A. A. L R l5 Y aA T 1 0 M ??,.:a':r. ;` ?jr aRr.'Y 7 .h'it'r t, .1"J/ v 5?' 1 - t i 1 I f?? SYIW }. tk? y!: Xil - y.,???' ?-tai: --1? .t?, 4?,. y t ? ? t.?)• ,`-, ,?, ?1,q e ?.';? _ • t tti -V A; i ;'- .? _ • tiff ?, /rf '' > j - ( v 0 A, "T A . 'VIP, P /• Ak Swim . H •?? _-? ? +- =' ...c ice- i t . •?s IV, fr,R i)(IIIIAl. I'Sf. tt!:1.}. ltrlil t:SCDH,R Rill HI CLnvLY I).t 1 t tU. f th IBS fNi?imnrm i ?t .vc the wr kk h Y)?0 1--& b.,- v. k. +N rnnLtxnx.x,gtxnol hnm? fie...:.:. i a, ti-tcitp for sk¢"?.SaKe mas be rcikx7al . ,I„ ?.:?)~,,., Thr tr.tr nx,a he m?rc d3ra a+xd.xu ip1rf u. ?.. , ?.. , hW. e, .r?n.wt?? hry k,r ,7? >K?npmc u.c of Ure ri-y..t u?p,.,,hle r,nxs. ,x.gtml nap rxic. N ,v- _ E S w Legend Project Location C r,. ,nap prodtx cd nn 21) Scp 2011 by) . Ovliene k =,.,rxlnkn[,1! All- Dcpin-W, 131,19 4:21 'Stnrnr %R AS (bar, I'u,nt GIS Stop I'rcjec0aa N(' Sls,c Plan, ('h ADSR1, GRS 14X()r 0 1,400 2,800 5,600 8,400 11,200 14,000 Feet Figure 1-2. Range Road Project Area - USGS Topo. t 'Jf c 1? p Ilk" l,l /? ld i`? (1 kt t sy 'C r I r '` "" I, ,• t _ 1" AL?t C? y? t 8 ,f ? tt t ? , 'ti E ?1r r St y t n ?? f tat k' Project Location } 4' (?r,.., _ n,J.ti\i 1t Cesry ? :I ......._ l?->, ,t it i I ti f >r 4 t 6" 0? l t r _ ;?? 1 er ?;«G 7t ?d 1 WAS It- I IWIN USE ONLY ,,.I'd i r.i r . nl FiGFf'NENGE 4NlY ?.?- ..??., „iel?ieed io the U,S. Cwvarunwt ant ne, ny ?m t r t ,?,? m,n„ae me acc.a.;y do , ,. aM ?onYUirns nitprurrng fmm pryxr;.a vend rn develop tYr datdrma may M ldl¢led ,?U'u dvia vq?il+wl itv us+u mi,ai tfl'swage of deli taMrilmS ?r7 urlanNatq t>na co-r{xaxD+hty &x UM appf(+pfyN tigi Ot dw (novxxxl wtm rasyact w pawbk il1f1K oepbyl trap atyli, cdkcum mattudWogy, arraxy d e+r mu, artl atltr emMir;NK 4-tfie to c.1-dmi. I'll n,ap (1-d-Od on: 20 Sep 2011 by J. GUMW416 t rt-wt cntal Affairs Delmnment, Bldg 4223 Sour ur. MCA5 CW(y Point GIS Map Prolctiuun: NC Stue Plane (NADS83. GRS 1990) N s 0 600 1,200 2,400 3,600 4,800 6,000 Feet Legend Project Location f( IR Of f iCLAI USE ONLY TO 0E USE() FOR REFS RINf( ONt V (}si t nr if d1, 0. 1)%(--_4 .'o hW t tt.t My Art qh-y 14?.' L-1 kb v cne xcuary cdou nfn -- arcs ad ua.htaosa ?_"hom p?ysnal -st,e a (*vRk)p rte dMnbW nvy t¢ rRfkOed w nMa wighnf The......nt be aware i>f Rain cs><vlnmsr ahl ull?„maly URb fRbptn>dYYl.ly hM Itp .1(Kv0(lY YMR Ux of it. Y rmq..vY ..Atli Yesps.;t 1c.lMxsibk xrm. au}rol mnp wnlR. ed the dvn_ nr.d uhw ._ , r ifYt to cgrta.Yr 4xa Tins m?Y;z p'.Uxetl On 20 Sep 2011 by I GmOaneih f nvirormit tal Affairs Oeplflrt nl, [31dg 4223 Soirre. MCAS Cherry Pour (AS (2010 Orttx)(>ftaography) Map Pra>)rrtnnn NC Strata Phi- (NAOS83. GRS 1980) N W.+ E 5 -v+? Legend Q Project Location 0 600 1,200 2,400 3,600 4,800 6,000 Feet Figure 1-3. Range Road Project Area - Aerial Figure 1-4. Range Road Project Area - Soils °A? ti r ? ? C,oA ? h t,cz? {r?4s IT f " ¢ ?; N f °c + x M '1 ? ;,3 y . r C ? NoB w w NoB,! Se r. F ext. , r ,1 r ; SUD MM (,. 4?; .? j ?. ? J If SuD? f r s? ?` Nof3? Se l (? ! L J yw oA t SLID i y J `yi ' il?v b ?? ?y GuA , NI)A f?? i?fr,?('CI ,u.?l(IOfI? NOf3' Nof3 ,, . Aufi. SLID AuB ?T t 41 ?14 .. ' GSA - y y. f /? • y" ~ ?? ?' ?; a YY , ? ? E??] UCH Aufi ?k_? _ Ly i (",i>A A Lid ) NoA r -Mr`1 Nof3? (?? y SUU Sufi. Nola a a, - '? NoB MM ,;ll Uri NoB t A `i JL/C ._ -., ?,. ? -? 4 .i X17 ?,/ ?•`?` SUD ?? ?^? ? ?.??Y, Ur Noli- Nob rµ IGUA -MM MM s i nu n! i if iAl (JA IN1LY' N (t Mk kLFLRENCE ONLY w. U.S. Gowrxrra and vm? c ..wdy" . ???. n ?tAxt tar tkan made b r+rra Vu atcuaey E Legend •?.?. annaam raWixns argrnarvag nam {v"tl a 1-61p the darabM may be rattectsd V5a 1 P,MUu@&,,titnxn,y kx bt Ueap(rapute sx Wtatcmdaun+ Uv of ft ,<w ae , at Project Location aKa w ?, ti i to pcnubk xrrra, orrgirrl map Kats, cW iec+,a+ nai..xowry, crnaxy d Ur Ura, arq aUnr caW,uauu +??u ?. ?, ,,, ?.aWndata 1 his map pr,ata ,,10": 20 SOP 2011 by J. GtllliMNlO Iinvlrwawnial At(airs Department, Bldg 4223 - ',' -c MCAS ffU+try Poi,$GIS (201OOrOmphOto7a^) Plop P-i- ,on_ NC Sipe Plana (NADS83, GRS 1980) 0 600 1,200 2,400 3,600 4,600 6,000 Feet i { 1 I I I .. ? ifs t I I i LL ?{ I h i}h I'I L /° w F It ? ` 1 I IE! ? I , II 3 0? N o (I, I i N s I 1 U ???_:. ?? I i I ?= - L 1 1 i u+k !? 1 . I kTi: 2 I ? o bpY6??t3 ! +) N I W?• ? ui L, ? - F I? W I r L 1 t L. ? 1 ° 1 ? 1 , =-_ ----_ • IL 00 ? N cl: ly. t a LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION, TYP. i cnn SILT FENCE, TYP. EX. BMF' FILTER) RFi,1,1 E3Mf' WETLAND LIMITS, TYP. t FILL WIDTf-F VARIES IMPACT AREA 1 W1 -P (WIDTH VARIES) NOTE: SECTION A N.T.S. SEE FIG. 1 'TYPICAL WETLAND IMPACT' FOR LOCATION OF SECTION A __ Dewberry, `:, Dewberry & Davis, inc. 011.08. !p!lrtxw0oq W" ST. PftJ. N 5616360 WETLAND IMPACT - CROSS SECTION RANGE ROAD SITE WORK NO. FIG. 2