20080229 Ver 2_Year 4 Monitoring Report Stream_20111003

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
10055 Red Run Boulevard, Suite 130
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
604 Greene Street, Suite 100
TO: Wetlands & Stormwater Branch
NC Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
ATTN: Ian McMillan
RE: Forrest Creek
We are sending via: Overnight ? Regular Mail ? Pick-Up ? Hand Delivered
The following items: ? Correspondence ? Plans ? Specifications ? Other as listed below:
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
1 9/30/11 MBI Modification + CD
1 9/30/11 Year 4 Stream Monitoring Report + CD
1 9/30/11 Year 4 Buffer Monitoring Report + CD

< ._
. T i
JE*, YWEK ;)UALI i
WETLANDS ANA STORMINATBR BkANO

These are transmitted as checked below:
. For Approval ? As Requested
? For Your Use ? For Review and Comment
REMARKS:
? Approved as Submitted ? Returned for Corrections
? Approved as Noted ? For Your Signature
Please review the enclosed Year 4 Monitoring Reports and MBI Modification request. Please let
me know if you have any questions or need any additional information.
Thank you,
Tommy Cousins
Owings Mills, MD 21117 410-356-5159 - PH 410-356-5822 - FAX
Raleigh, NC 27606 919-829-9909 - PH 919-829-9913 - FAX
Camden, SC 29020 803-432-4890 - PH 410-356-5822 - FAX
DATE: September 30, 2011
'may
COPY TO: SIGNED:
Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank
Forrest Creek Stream Restoration Site
Annual Monitoring Report
Year 4 (2011)
Orange County, North Carolina
USGS HUC: 03020201
`'

d

1
7
Prepared for:
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
909 Capability Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606-3870
Submitted: August 2011
Forrest Creek- MY4 (2011) j i=„ Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PROJECT ABSTRACT .................................................................1
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND ...........................................................................................................3
2.1 LOCATION AND SETTING ............................................................................................3
2.2 STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................3
3.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS ..............................................................4
3.1 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................4
3.1.1 Soil Data ..........................................................................................................4
3.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas ............................................................................4
3.1.3 Stem Counts ...................................................................................................5
3.1.4 Vegetation Assessment Summary ...............................................................6
3.2 CHANNEL STABILITY ASSESSMENT ............................................................................6
3.2.1 Cross Sections ......................................................................................... 6
3.2.2 Bank Full Events ...................................................................................... 7
3.2.3 Longitudinal Profiles ..................................................................................... 7
3.2.4 Channel Stability Assessment Summary .................................................... 8
3.3 SITE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................8
FIGURES
Figure 1: Project Location Map
Figure 2: Monitoring Plan View
TABLES
Table I. Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives
Table II. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table III. Project Contacts
Table IV. Preliminary Soil Data
Table V Installed Plantings
Table VI. Stem Counts by Species
Table VII. Stem Counts by Plot
Table VIII. Bankfull Events
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Vegetation Raw Data
Appendix B. Cross Sections
Appendix C. Profile Survey
Appendix D. Pebble Counts
Appendix E. Photo Logs
Appendix F. Bankfull Event Photo Log
Appendix G. Repairs
Forrest Creek- MY4 (2011) jj i=„ Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PROJECT ABSTRACT
The Forrest Creek Stream Restoration Site (Site) of the Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank (Bank) is
located in Orange County North Carolina within land owned by Milton A. Latta and Sons Dairy
Farms, Inc. A permanent conservation easement covers the restored stream and surrounding
riparian buffer. This easement defines the Site's boundaries. The Site is located on an active
dairy farm approximately seven miles northeast of Hillsborough and six miles northwest of
Durham in northeastern Orange County, North Carolina. The streams lie within USGS hydrologic
unit 03020201020020 in the Neuse River Basin. The North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ) classifies the main reach, Forrest Creek, as a WS-11 (water supply 11), HQW (high quality
water), and NSW (nutrient sensitive water).
Prior to restoration, pasture land surrounded most of the length of the project reaches and the
stream banks lacked strong rooted vegetation (e.g. woody or deep rooted herbaceous
vegetation). Due to the unlimited livestock access, lack of bank protection and partially cleared
watershed, the stream channels became entrenched within the floodplain and showed signs of
high shear stress. In this condition and with regular impacts due to cattle traffic, bank erosion
had accelerated and the variety of bed features diminished.
Two types of vegetative communities surrounded the stream reaches prior to restoration. The
first zone consisted of a mix of woody vegetation that included significant populations of
invasive species including privet (Ligustrum sinense), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), Japanese
honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), Japanese Stilt Grass (Mircostegium vimineum), Tree-of-Heaven
(Ailanthus altissima), and Princess Tree (Paulownia tomentosa). This zone covered the lower
section of the tributary to Forrest Creek and the upper section of Forrest Creek. The second
zone consisted primarily of herbaceous vegetation with scattered woody vegetation. The
woody vegetation included a mix of natural, invasive, and succession species. This zone covered
the remaining areas.
The altered conditions of the stream and the riparian buffer reduced water quality and impaired
habitat. Pasture derived nutrients flowing untreated through the riparian zone and fine silts
sloughing from the incised banks raised biochemical oxygen demand. This, with the lack of
sufficient re-oxygenating riffle features, reduced dissolved oxygen within the water column.
Water quality had also diminished due to raised turbidity and siltation from bank erosion as well
as elevated water temperatures caused by the lack of tree shading. Habitat potential had been
reduced by the diminished water quality and loss of physical habitat such as bed features,
undercut banks, and a well developed vegetative community. The Forrest Creek reach was
restored within the existing floodplain using a Priority II approach and the tributary to the
Forrest Creek reach bed was raised to the abandoned floodplain using a Priority I approach. A
portion of Forrest Creek immediately above the Forrest Creek restoration reach was enhanced
by modifying a downstream crossing that had caused partially impounded it. The crossing
modification reestablished natural flow and creating a natural channel profile. Above the
enhancement area, a section of Forrest Creek has been placed under a conversation easement
to preserve the stream channel and riparian buffer.
The stream restoration work is regulated under the Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank Mitigation
Banking Instrument (MBI) signed by the Sponsor and the US Army Corp of Engineers (USACE),
the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the NC Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ),
Forrest Creek- MY4 (2011) 1 i=„ Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
and the NC Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) all comprising the Interagency Review
Team (IRT) formerly the MBRT in accordance with Federal guidelines and regulations including
the Compensatory Mitigation losses of Aquatic Resources Final Rule, 33 CFR Parts 325 and 332
and 40 CFR Part 230. Restoration work resulted in the restoration of 6,825 linear feet,
enhancement (Level I) of 325 linear feet, and preservation of 3,005 linear feet of stream. With
the restoration, water quality has been improved due to a decrease in nutrients, turbidity, and
moderation in water temperature. Biochemical oxygen demand has been reduced through
filtering in the riparian buffer and riverine wetlands. Potential habitats have been added
through the creation of bed features and reestablishment of riparian vegetative community.
The annual monitoring work assesses the Site's streams, the Forrest Creek main channel and the
Unnamed Tributary to Forrest Creek, to determine restoration success. The monitoring plan has
been set up based on guidance provided by The Stream Mitigation Guidelines developed by the
United States Corps of Engineers - Wilmington District (McLendon, et al. 2003), version 1.2
(11/16/2006) of the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) document entitled
"Content, Format, and Data Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports", version 2.0 (3/27/2008)
of the EEP document entitled "Mitigation Plan Document Format, Data Requirements, and
Content Guidance", and the Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank Mitigation Plan (May 2008).
The monitoring will occur annually for five years. The monitoring period should include two
separate years with bankfull events. Three events have been recorded as of monitoring year 4.
Bankfull events will be verified using an installed crest stage gauge that will be inspected during
each monitoring visit. Monitoring reports will be submitted during years 1-5.
Monitoring work will include reference photographs, vegetative stem counts, materials
sampling, site survey, bankfull event documentation, and visual assessment and mapping of
significant features. Environmental Banc and Exchange, LLC (EBX) and the IRT in coordination
with the appropriate regulatory agencies will determine when stream and riparian restoration
have met success criteria. The sections below provide a framework for determining and
assessing success criteria.
Stream restoration will be considered successful through achievement of stable channel
geometry, appropriate channel materials, and lack of significant erosion. The riparian buffer will
be monitored for survivability and specific densities of planted vegetation and exclusion of
invasive species. The site will be maintained during the monitoring period to allow it to
continue on a trajectory that meets project goals and success criteria. Repairs will be completed
as necessary to reestablish channel stability and the site will be replanted if vegetation shows
signs of significant failure or if vegetative density goals contained in the MBI are not achieved.
Year 4, 2011 monitoring was completed on June 28-29, 2011. Strategies and methodologies laid
out in the Monitoring Plan will be followed for a minimum of five years of monitoring. The
stream will be monitored for stability of dimension, pattern, and profile using standard practices
including permanent cross sections, longitudinal profile, and pebble counts. Vegetative success
of associated plantings will be monitored for species diversity and survival with standardized,
permanent (10m by 10m) vegetation plots to be monitored annually for 5 years. Monitoring
data will be analyzed to determine what remedial actions, if any, are required. Any remedial
actions proposed will be detailed in the following monitoring report.
Forrest Creek- MY4 (2011) 2 i=„ Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2.1 LOCATION AND SETTING
The Forrest Creek Stream Restoration Site (Site) of the Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank (Bank) is
located in Orange County North Carolina within land owned by Milton A. Latta and Sons Dairy
Farms, Inc. A permanent conservation easement covers the restored stream and surrounding
riparian buffer. This easement defines the Site's boundaries. The Site is located approximately
seven miles northeast of Hillsborough and six miles northwest of Durham in northeastern
Orange County, North Carolina (see Figure 1). The streams lie within USGS hydrologic unit
03020201020020 in the Neuse River Basin.
The Site includes two streams. The larger reach (Forrest Creek) flows through the property from
north to south and drains a 3.6 square mile area consisting of predominantly forest and pasture
land. The smaller tributary (UT 1) flows from west to east before joining with Forrest Creek and
drains a 0.1 square mile area consisting of predominantly pasture land.
2.2 STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVES
The goals of the project relate to providing ecological improvements to the Site's streams and
riparian buffers through beneficial modifications of hydrology, water quality, and habitat.
Goals related to hydrology include:
• Re-establishing floodplain connection by raising bed elevations (UT1) or
lowering adjacent floodplain (Forrest Creek)
• Increasing flood storage by re-establishing floodplain connection
Goals related to water quality include:
• Reducing turbidity and pollution by reducing sediment and nutrient inputs
(cattle exclusion)
• Reducing water temperatures by providing shading
• Increasing / stabilizing oxygen levels by reducing BOD/COD and increasing re-
oxygenating turbulence
Goals related to habitat include:
• Improving in stream bed habitat by increasing riffle - pool diversity, reducing
sediment deposition, and improving low flow water depths
• Improving bank habitat by increasing stability and woody biomass
• Improving floodplain habitat by establishing microtopography and hydrology,
removing invasive vegetation, and increasing habitat diversity
• Improving food web dynamics by adding biomass (such as detritus, coarse
woody debris, and leaf matter) and re-establishing floodplain connection
The restoration achieves these goals through the following objectives:
• Stabilizing channel bed and banks through modifying dimension, pattern, and
profile using natural channel design
Forrest Creek- MY4 (2011) 3 i=„ Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
• Installing in-stream structures such as rock vanes, log vanes, and constructed
riffles
• Raising stream bed elevations or lowering floodplains
• Restoring soils in riparian buffer by excluding cattle and adding organic
components
• Removing invasive vegetation
• Planting native vegetation in riparian buffer
• Fencing out livestock
Together, these improvements will provide functional uplift for the watershed as a whole. The
dimension, pattern, and profile were restored using Rosgen Priority I and II restoration
approaches (Rosgen, David L. 1997). The Priority I approach was used on the UT to Forrest
Creek to raise bed elevations and reconnect the stream to the abandoned floodplain. The
Priority II approach was used on Forrest Creek to reestablish an active floodplain at the existing
bed elevation. These methods will decrease stream bank erosion, establish an active floodplain,
reduce channel stress during floods, improve aquatic habitat, and reduce fine sediments. A
portion of Forrest Creek immediately above the restoration reach was enhanced by modifying a
downstream crossing that had created ponding upstream of it. The crossing modification
reestablished natural flow and will create a natural channel profile. Above the enhancement
area, a section of Forrest Creek has been placed under conservation easement to preserve a
functional stream channel and riparian buffer.
The remaining impaired riparian buffer was planted as four (4) zones. Zones 1 and 2 are the
stream channel and bank zones consisting of tree and shrub species and native herbaceous
seeding typically found along stream banks in the region. Live stakes comprised the bulk of
installed species within these zones. Zone 3 is the riparian zone consisting of selected tree and
shrub species with a range of tolerances to inundation and saturation. Zone 4 is the transitional
zone that includes the buffer areas (subject of a separate report prepared for NCDWQ). See
Tables 1-III for more information regarding project structure, activity, history, and contacts.
3.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
3.1 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT
3.1.1 Soil Data
Preliminary soil data was gathered from the USDA Soil Survey for Orange County, NC (1977).
The site consists primarily of the Chewacla Series, a somewhat poorly drained, moderately
permeable soil that formed in recent alluvium. More information on the soil series can be found
in Table IV.
3.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas
The site is stabilized and vegetated with native woody and herbaceous species. Approximately
1,600 linear feet of the stream project along the main channel (27% of the stream project as a
whole) required remedial work due to poor soil, harsh winter conditions of 2010 (freeze/thaw
loosening of the banks immediately followed by large rain events) combined with problem areas
Forrest Creek- MY4 (2011) 4 i=„ Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
lacking vegetation. These areas were repaired according to the approved Remedial Repair Plan
and seeded and stabilized. This work has resulted in a minor disturbance to the riparian buffer
in these areas. Every effort was made to save planted trees and volunteers of significant size in
this area.
For the most part, invasive species listed in the executive summary and in the Mitigation Report
have not reestablished themselves and will continue to be monitored and noted in future
reports. Several individuals of Princess Tree (Paulownia tomentosa) were spotted at the
crossing below the confluence of the main channel and the UT during the Year 3 assessment
(2010). These were not noted during this year's assessment. Kudzu, which was previously kept
at bay by grazing cattle, has begun to establish along UT1 between Stations 119+00 and 127+00,
approximately. This population was treated twice last year (2010) and annual treatments have
been scheduled for this area. An additional small population has emerged on stream bank right
above London Lane. This area was treated once in 2010 and will be included in future
treatments. Through treatments, these invasive populations seem to be under control.
An unidentified species of Commelina (Dayflower) tends to colonize the riffle areas and shallow
areas during low flow and dry periods. These plants die back over-winter each year. Herbicide
treatments were applied last summer (2010) in attempt to prepare the stream bed for pebble
counts and survey activities. This population was still present during the 2011 monitoring
process. A more detailed discussion of the effects of these populations can be found with the
Pebble Count analysis in the Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank Stream Monitoring report.
As documented in the previously submitted Supplemental Planting Report a supplemental
planting of 600 gallon size trees was completed on February 101h, 2010 by Carolina Wetland
Services (see Table V). Findings of the 2011 monitoring activities and stems counts are
discussed in the following section.
3.1.3 Stem Counts
The Mitigation Plan specifies four planting zones to be established as follows: Zone 1 - Stream
channel; Zone 2- Stream Bank; Zone 3 - Riparian; and Zone 4 - Transitional (including buffer
areas). Live stakes were installed along the newly constructed channel within Zones 1 and 2.
Zones 2 - 4 consist of tublings, gallon and 3 gallon size plants. Native vegetation is considered
to be established when nuisance species are less than 10%. Study plots show that the
composition and density of vegetation in the restoration areas compares closely to the
reference areas, indicating restoration success for vegetation. Success will be gauged by stem
counts of planted species. Stem counts of over 320 woody stems per acre after 5 years will be
considered successful. Presence, numbers and health of desirable volunteers will be considered
before a replant will be deemed necessary. Photos taken at established photo points should
indicate maturation of riparian vegetation community. Photographs will help document the
health of the planted vegetation and the severity of any invasive or exotic species infestations.
Permanent vegetative plots have been established at 14 locations. The success of vegetation
plantings will be measured through stems counts. Height and DBH were measured at baseline
and will be measured again in year 5 to document the growth of individuals surviving from
baseline. These plots will be used to sample primarily Zones 2, 3 and 4. Each plot covers 100
square meters for tree counts. Within each plot, a 1 meter plot will be sampled to measure
herbaceous coverage. During the counts, the health of the vegetation will be noted. In addition
Forrest Creek- MY4 (2011) 5 i=„ Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
to stem counts, the samples will inventory species diversity to allow for comparison between
the reference and restoration wetlands and track the percent cover of nuisance species. The
vegetation survey will occur during the growing season. On June 28-29, 2011, the fourth year
vegetative monitoring was performed on the established vegetative plots.
3.1.4 Vegetation Assessment Summary
The success of riparian vegetation planting will be gauged by stem counts of planted species and
an assessment of community composition including (desirable) volunteers. Stem counts of over
320 trees and shrubs per acre after 5 years will be considered successful. The composition of
the vegetation community should trend toward a predominance of target species. A majority
(80%) of the target species should be present in the reforestation area in numbers and condition
conducive to continuing the species through the maturation of the community. The population
of invasive species will be kept below 10% of the total population. Photos taken at established
photo points should indicate maturation of riparian vegetation community.
The Year 4 monitoring numbers indicate approximately 78% survival and 743 stems per acre
overall. The Tributary reach maintained an overall stems per acre count of 543 not counting
volunteer species. This number was improved by supplemental plantings done prior to the 2010
growing season. The main channel reach maintained an overall stem per acre count of 463 not
including volunteer species. See Tables VI and VII for more detailed vegetation data.
Along the main channel, no plots indicated a stems per acre count of below 320. Plot 3 is
marginal at 324, considering the success criteria goal is 320 after Year 5 for a buffer site, as
opposed to the goal of 260 for many other restoration sites; however inclusion of volunteer
stems of green ash which is a target species on the planting plan increases the count to 804
stems per acre, therefore no additional supplemental planting is proposed. The 2010
supplemental planting covered the unnamed tributary only. Desirable volunteers are beginning
to contribute more significantly along UT1. Stem counts for both the main channel and the UT
in 2011 do not indicate the need for any additional replants at this time.
Along the main channel of Forrest Creek, herbaceous cover is well established. Sample plots
indicated a 100% cover for the entire reach. Cattle grasses and grasses used for stabilization are
beginning to be out competed by natural herbaceous cover such as soft rush and polygonum in
the wet areas; and narrow leaved sunflower, dog fennel and cockle burr in the drier areas.
Along the unnamed tributary, herbaceous cover is well established and more mature than on
the main channel. Sample plots indicated 100% cover throughout with similar composition to
the main channel.
Detailed vegetation survey information is located in Appendix A; including herbaceous cover,
stressed individuals, and volunteers.
3.2 CHANNEL STABILITY ASSESSMENT
3.2.1 Cross Sections
Forrest Creek- MY4 (2011) 6 i=„ Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
The stream geometry will be considered successful if the cross-section geometry, profile, and
sinuosity are stable or reach a dynamic equilibrium. It is expected that there will be minimal
changes in the designed cross sections, profile, and/or substrate composition. Changes that
may occur during the monitoring period will be evaluated to determine if they represent a
movement toward a more unstable condition (e.g. down cutting, erosion, mid-channel bars,
etc.) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (e.g. settling, vegetative
changes, coarsening of bed material, etc.).
Deviation from the design ratios will not necessarily denote failure as it is possible to maintain
stability and not stay within the design geometry. Additionally, determination of true bankfull
will be difficult until the stream has had adequate flooding events to create strong bankfull
indicators.
Morphological data used for this report was collected in June, 2011 and is shown in Appendix B.
Commelina is present in several riffles and throughout the tributary; this vegetation in the
channel at time of survey creates a slight artificial rise in bed elevation on some cross sections.
Overall the cross-section graphs for Year 4 compare well to Year 1 and Year 2 and show stable
dimension with normal, minor fluctuations.
3.2.2 Bank Full Events
Crest Stage Gages (CSG) are located on Forrest Creek and on the Tributary. Photo
documentation is shown in the Bank Full Event Photo Log in Appendix E. Rain fall data is also
presented in table form in Appendix E. A total of four bankfull events have been documented
since the submittal of the Year 1 Monitoring Report as noted in Table VI. Indicators of overbank
flow were found on both reaches during the Year 4 field assessment (see Table VIII). Significant
rain events were recorded by the on-site rain gage in May, June and July, but the CSG's were not
triggered. It is typical for CSG's to be more difficult to trigger in the summer months. At the
time of monitoring both gages were found to be water logged, and may have malfunctioned due
to debris or vegetation blockage. This was removed and the CSG was reset.
Repairs were made to the swale area above the confluence of the main channel and UT1 in
February. This repair was a hold over from Year 1 storm damage due to Hurricane Hanna.
Before and after photos of this repair are located in Appendix E.
3.2.3 Longitudinal Profiles
Profiles 1, 2, and 3 are along portions of the UT and Profiles 4 and 5 cover larger sections of
Forrest Creek. Commelina is present in almost every riffle and throughout the tributary; this
vegetation in the channel at time of survey creates a slight artificial rise in bed elevation in some
areas, particularly riffles. Overall the profile graphs for Year 4 compare well to previous years
and show a stable profile with normal, minor fluctuations.
Bed material was also sampled at five riffles throughout the project. Cross Sections T1, T3 and
T6 on the UT are located in LP 1, LP 2, and LP 3, respectively. Cross Sections 2 and 4 on Forrest
Creek are located in LP 4 and LP 5, respectively.
Forrest Creek- MY4 (2011) 7 i=„ Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Morphological data used for the profiles in this report was collected in June, 2011 and is shown
in Appendix C. Pebble count data was collected in June, 2011 and is also included in Appendix C.
3.2.4 Channel Stability Assessment Summary
Approximately 1,600 linear feet of the stream project along the main channel (27% of the
stream project as a whole) required remedial work due to poor soil and harsh winter conditions
combined with problem areas lacking vegetation. These areas have been repaired according to
the approved Remedial Repair Plan and seeded and stabilized. This work has resulted in a minor
disturbance to the riparian buffer in these areas. Every effort was made to save planted trees
and volunteers of significant size in this area. For more information on the repair work, please
refer to the attached Remedial Repair Plan and project photos.
Kudzu along UT1 near VQT2 was treated twice last year (2010) with herbicide and annual
treatments will be scheduled for this area. This invasive species appears to be under control,
and this area will be continually monitored.
Minor beaver activity was noted in late 2010 and the dams were removed. During the Year 4
field assessment, no beaver dams were noted on either channel. On-going beaver management
will be maintained as part of the monitoring requirements as discussed in the Mitigation Plan.
Other than the areas mentioned above, the remainder of the site is functioning as planned. The
pattern and profile appear to be making minor adjustments, but the overall trend is towards
long term stability. The repair areas will continue to be monitored to ensure the repairs are
successful. The addition of the soil lifts has allowed the vegetation to establish itself in these
areas, and no new erosion has presented itself.
3.3 SITE SUMMARY
The monitoring results for 2011 document that the Site is on track to achieve all of the
vegetative and stream stability success criteria specified in the MBI for the Site.
Forrest Creek- MY4 (2011) 8 i=„ Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
APPENDIX G
Repairs
P- Kimley-Horn
Forrest Creek Monitoring - MY4 (2011) h? and Associates, Inc.
Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank
Year 3 Remedial Repair Plan
Orange County, North Carolina
USGS HUC: 03020201020020
September 2010
?? k•of t ? ?Y?ti9 •R` # r
lob
. r - *.
M
M
_ ,a,
Executive Summary
On April 9t", 2010 members of the Inter-agency Review Team (IRT),
accompanied by EarthMark staff, walked the existing Forrest Creek Mitigation
Bank (FCMB) site. EarthMark staff had not walked the main channel of Forrest
Creek below the confluence of the unnamed tributary (UT) since monitoring
work was completed in September 2009. It is theorized that a particularly brutal
winter combined with poor soils below the confluence of the UT and the main
channel lead to significant damage and instability. The engineers/designers
opinion of the cause of these failures along with the proposed repair plan is
presented in more detail in the attached memorandum (Exhibit A).
Observations during the site visit indicated gravel had washed off of the
first cattle crossing (Station 200) into the easement. This was removed by our
on-site maintenance contractor in early July.
Below Cross Section 4, approximately Station 214, a large Swale feeds
into the main channel from the adjacent pasture and has been a reoccurring
problem area. The Swale itself is stable, however, upstream of this confluence
the channel has cut into the right bank and created a center bar/island. This area
also needs to be stabilized with vegetation, the soil has a low nutrient, high clay
content, rocky composition where live stakes will not take and lack of ground
cover is troublesome. The attached detail for the proposed rock vane was taken
from the original FCMB approved construction plans.
Small bare areas where live stakes have not taken and where no ground
cover has established exist all over the site. Remedial activities will address the
worst of these areas with top soil amendments and sod.
Between the last culvert crossing (Station 223) and London Lane (Station
232) many outside bends experienced some degree of stress this winter. Areas
where live stakes did not take and where no ground cover established in
previous seasons became loose and weak, sloughed off and deposited bank
sediment into the stream bed. Much of this sediment stayed in place at the toe
of the bank. This sediment can be reclaimed from the stream bed and used to
rebuild the banks, however, this soil is low-nutrient with high clay content and
will require top soil amendments.
Some areas may require more top soil for fill and soil amendments than
can be borrowed from adjacent pasture areas. Additional soil may be taken from
areas within the easement where vegetative growth is successful and indicates
acceptable soils. Within the easement these borrow areas will be left as
potential vernal pools no larger than 30 feet in diameter, as represented on the
Repair Plan map, and according to the attached detail also taken from the
original approved FCMB construction plans. Existing planted trees will be
salvaged and moved. Species that tolerate wetter conditions (i.e. river birch) will
be replanted and additional supplemental plantings will be done this winter if
necessary in all areas potentially impacted by repair work.
Exhibit A:
Engineers Opinion
Remedial Plan
Details
EMPI 1Cmley-Horn
and Associates. Inc.
Memorandum
To: Christine Coop PWS
From: Todd 5t_ John PE
Date: tune ?_ 21010
Subject: Forrest Creek Repairs
Ciee^?:. k4?OlVI.^0
.* ",
2'79
Sttuatiow
Tlws %voiter uns ParttcuWty wet and cold- There were sevml s ooe freezes
followed by lame rumff events- When ground freezes and subsequent1v thaws, it
tends to loosen the sail structure (rater expands when it freezes- forcmg soil
particles apart). If there is not a strong. dense rout s?-stem in the soil it becomes
vu nemble to ('TO$Lm This rs. phenomenon is often obsen-ed along stream banks
durmg the u-mler. It is my opunou that tlus phenomenon also contributed to the
recent erosion m certain sections of Forrest Creek- parttularh, along the north south
f cing sections of the stream between the farmroad and London Lane- The strongest
evidence for this hes in the timing of the erosion as -well as the fact that it occurred
equally along bath banks and not just in meander bends -
Recommendations:
As stack it is reconmended that the prvvarn- focus of the repairs be to replace the
eroded bags and establish Vigorous- -wood% vegetation in the batiks- Figures land
?
indicate the areas and the various proposed treatments- Toiler-Horn recommends
the use of sail lifts to repair the eroded areas. There are also some scoured areas
-wherewe have recommended soil replacement ivith coir manning- The soil should be
imported or amended to include a higher organic content. The area labeled as soil
lift bench in Fipwe 1 proposes a more substantial t t went n th a more extensive
soil lift area- possibly- supported by rock or boulders alum the upstream edge. The
soil lifts and sail replacements areas should also be vegetated. preferably- with some
interspersed brush mattresses- fascnes. harvested sod_?or Live stakes to provide
it is reco=wnded that a contractor be engaged to review the proposed repair
schemes. The contractor rwv be able to provide a better sure of the rest as well
some approaches to further reduce costs.
Preliminary opinion of cost:
The following costs were developed from estimated and measured distances (as
opposed to survey)_ All of the estimates assume obtaining tap soil from € ffsite and a
combination of dense plantings- MCluding brush mattresses- fascines_ sod- and live
stakes- The type of planting treatments used can affect the cost sic-nificandv_ The
sail lift bench meludes cost for rock or boulders as well-
Treatment linear feet
Soil lifts -,-7()
Soil lift-bench 100
Brush mattress sod 510
Soil replacement 350
Total
__ .: 6 2:A6
=rte 67, LUJJ
C
4
Y44 10,
I' N 11I
. 40'
r "t

n
*;-.I
F
G
M f 7
4- -J
i Y
L +?
L
Co
LU
m
L
v
v
?o
N ?
N ?
i O
W O
LL
C
Pp t 7
v
Q ul
00
C) c a U
N g
0.
=Q
0
? Q
?
ZN ge
yJ

111a U
w o a
a
S w

Mb? do
z Y
w

A
.
-
zzd
b°k
<
°
Mb°8fi
z &
?
E e 5''
S q6
2 -Z
Yb

Z
m
-a! Q R

a m <? tl1 w
_
N
. 5 m
12
15
LL
_ y
Q
k
- V E
S2mp
a w

Iola
es H.
_
z e
o s
h wa -
a$
C

w?

J

o \ "
O

-

ia}?i?
z< w
?
<d k
N s
_
gbh
Z.
43 $g Q ?w

°mQ
< e
U ? _? III ED

?_ _
5m z
U

-
Z
1
.P

v
.ERybx
,
i
Ao

o w

°
m
0 wz
T m..
,
1?

@

Loll
I
< va?
6o?g

io f&$
°
Sy°5=-s
Ep€£
T
x¢
k
4 E?tcs
$?`xa
F..E
rvwn'.! xe .xei'e - oioz 'ro °r a a'rvi3a-m\axN°i•^?a ?.a wei tmt?n\w..ww.vi"nu\H
Y =
U ~
m ? Y
U
Y O
U ?
O?m
?L`?
X00
W
O
Q
W ? W
=Z=
Ld L,
H 5i V)QO
?- ao?
O
Y W
C) LLJ
0 J
00
0 d >
Q W L>LJ
W W J
S (!) W
O
J
?Y °
N Z
Q
M
J
J 0
Q
M
°
W
m J
0
J 0
=

° Z
°a

> O LLJ
?Q
Q d S
X ~ W
Q
U
Y W°Q
z 0
O
-
Doe <
IL
>
d
LLJ w ZUQ H
H -W
U
YmE U
0
W U?-- Z d'
O0 C7 m
d'Z(n <

f (r
W
J
Q
I
Q
Z
O
H

Z W
r
11
1
N Z
O

W OW U
Z Z
1 F
m U ~
cn LLJ Z
Q? 'O
1--o
Ln
(nom °W
J Q° HQ
W JZ Q>
Y OQ >
O
o u
m x O
wry
O
I

O

M ?i
I O r
W

W
Z /
O r
H
mCf) cj:? U
QI- Im
Ln J Q
(nom W W
cn
Q °
J Z
U Q

z
°¢
Li
M 0 W

U Q

0 of 0w
Q

I
F-
Z<
U
J d
Q ' >QH
Q
W
Q 0 WU
?m
> W' ~

Ljj O
U
F
?
ZUn
a_
OJ _O m

0
m m
0
L
O
W

J
m
Q
W

?
J

U

w

I.
?I I I 1??
W
J 0 n Z
D _ 0
Y ~ m m
Z
J
Q
M LO
Y
O U)
Q Cl
Q J Z
m UQ
O
I
LO

O
ry
[If W
W W
d Z
O
°Z
H W
>0
Q
X 0
W
J U
O W
0 ry
m °
W
Z
J
J
0
O
d
W }
°Y D zZ J
W O H Y Q Q O=
_oo? OU m? U
OQQJ
W W H- =V
> WHO CC
Z W W O
>
C QOZJ
O D
:2 F-
Z D Q W oo?
g > Y W
?z LJZ3:
W - J Q 0
Y him J
J
Q
W
0
W
Z
Q
i
U
O
o?
W
Q a- O r
W OJ
zz ?n
W
J
m
Z ?
W ~ LLJ
LLJ
Q
D D D
W Y
m
U
D
m Y
~ W
W
or
= U
Q V
W W
? m
0
W
H
Y W
() W W
W 0 = °
[if [if cf) F--
W ° J
? >
p Q D
Y
_ 00 W of
H OU O Z
W W M
° J
W ? W m n
Z (n W
W O co
0? O F-
z UJ W w7
W J U O
mL,0?ow?0
N
O Z? W L, X w LLJ
Q J M Z:-
Jm0 °OC?m
O 0==[--=
OO o W U Q J W D
J
WZ?W n?D=O
0M<ZWL,H=
H W>? Q Z
[If W
1-- Q 0 m = ¢m 0 =
X_ --
a-::E W Z W
cl?
? Q Q W U 0°
LLJ
az=?3<wJ
LLJo>°UmU°a
0
Z-? Nr') 4 u?
W
U
O
H
H
O
Z
zr
OFF
al??
J
w
z

O
0
0
N
J
O
O Ln
0- w
a- ry
w >
w
o=
w
0

z
0-z
O
oQ
O >
Ow
ww
O O ,?
C-D

O?
F-- 0 0p w
J Si -
F- LL
> >
Qw
J z
zw O
ry
<O_z
~ U
CL 00 CL
J
?p THE
ACT
a?
E}
Y?
~?b?s??a3aNn
Div
J
O
O^
-
J
Q
Z
EM `W
J
Q
V

Exhibit B:
As-built Plans
Pages 1 through 3
B 371 HJ1vN \ ¦
1 }
5m
9.1i N 9 E
8
h
I
i
°
?Y - o a?. ? a5
F??? < Asa °5& a ?8 ? - U : $s
c,
oUl
?=gym-°=?a?
ga 'q "
Foos _°°= i
H? o
$= 'egg Q
N, \ ?' a ¢ 2p K
1:4 2 O p W
HH"
??? ?_ ??? dmm ? •w `" ¢ow?
° '° w° < Fa ?
€ d 2Y
z ok R
o°_,-11H o°ao Sro W?.yr h
Qawo?? o? ??i Q1 ID V w ?p W
Q:Z
g?? P a °s° Z O v
OR-C o?m
1 J
oa o
arW \ \\ -rc?i p?p. ?p
H ?HU
/
_ ? t1 ryo" \ V
8 8
=
?1z N
m6 ? p w I I
?o?n.d
? I
I 3
y $ C
?e § g
lit S I N R
- MAMH XNE ,
\
\
i
h
o O s
L+i O N U
O ¢ ? z ?
aNH ? ¢ U z w of Wy
Q- Q >~ w ? ???z
/ ?? !Ps `of b W w ¢?oc`?
r= ? I ? V ? ? d2Y
s, g ? ?o Q
/ } O U
nF« ? r, _?_? ?<
e o a?ww,
Ire(
MAICX XNE
I E Y ???
_ _ I V
_ I ? 9. r ! II
_ i M1 k9 / ¦`
_ ?j
,ry
gg
IA Q ti Rl
J ? PAN"" ? Q
z o
I Q.
=o ? o ? $a I am `? S
_ » a
I
I 1?
`. t?
F t6
a
I ? G J n?+ U ?
m e ?' '' y [? O N S
\ c ?- W ?22tWn
LZ.
• F-1 Q W W p R,
64 7,E
/ ? / / 1--1 U ¢ ? d 2 K
?C U W ?? W
p
O U
I
zj$g
MATCH U NE
/ _
e
4 R ? t
l,
'et y
At fZ__A_
' '`t 3e
IRA
3ws igrt yI ?illt
f 1Y
,S? P' 4 f ? :MY r r r
J 1 - of .- R.
t
jr? 4e
Before Photo 1 - Looking upstream at swale confluence (STA 215+50).
After Photo 1 - Looking downstream at swale confluence (STA 215+50).

f g.
k
NO;

S y
Before Photo 2 - Bank erosion
After Photo 2 - Bank repair using soil lifts and live stakes
I V- y41 '
a
]'w l?

Before Photo 3 - View of Forrest Creek and tributary confluence

t

After Photo 3 - View of Forrest Creek and tributary confluence

Photo 4 - During repair construction
k.

E
M1
1. ? 'SAC-'f"TC' _
'N It tA, ?V
•S.,F]' 'aT Y I I f e?}4a`bC pY` '?.
Q ,L
If IV
Photo 5 - Newly installed soils lifts and live stakes

4 ??4 Yi?R'?4
> y ,
i ?ej .ee?SSRR"
^^?
_ .r y;,yTK.f y
C
fir
.
'
?
9
y
l

Photo 6 - Log vane installation
1

•.3.

Photo 7 - Newly installed live stakes, matting, and soil amendments at tributary confluence

r
h

¦

M

?... 4

A

/ r 7
ar x ?`,

f r1

Photo 8 - Newly installed brush mattress

Photo 9 - Bank repairs using soil lifts and live stakes
r ?: x ?
1.-

a qT

.,.
y
? L ..
f f ) ,? t
l?
?ti.: i X1+.1 1
v- P
r
Boulder Wall on left bank (Photo taken: 6/28/11)
1-Ij
7- OWN
?n

he
??+ cs ,fir
Rra7. 2pk '.t8 .,: '" .C ?1 .v'1?Fs nw'
Repaired section with Soil Lifts (Photo taken: 6/28/11)
i
Forrest Creek - MY4 (2011) ? and Associates,
? and Associates, Inc.
REPAIRS PHOTO LOG

? ash ?
? r

44
Repaired section with Soil Lifts (Photo taken: 6/28/11)
1
, 21

?o
Forrest Creek - MY4 (2011) i ??, and A -Horn
and Associates, Inc.
FIGURES
P? „ Kimley-Horn
Forrest Creek Monitoring - MY4 (2011) h? and Associates, Inc.
GREEN S4 HEND ON
- r r
Q?1 ti's r
0 50 100 0 10 Z0
? CHAPEL HILL
lYlites Miles
?
Pe?rson•Rd
rn
Y
Sradsher-Rw
W°Qa•Ibo
k'• d
R?
Pimmarh•Farms_Rd
b
a rr
86
a` y
?A.
Lake orange c1
Sti
1 ?1 q ?ErJrnund-
N ?
o `?neh _ - n
cu ? ° o 0
anao-ciRr -
"«Sin r Y-Ftd
-913
0Y° trr
'?^?Keni°n•Rd
/ ?IlelAs.ft --:
a hralkPr'4u A aco?
r
L e? 5
mFv=
RV
?
m° w
a
-NY6' N
e
57
G
?` UJatKin`?R
9 1644.
f Rabbit-Dr Co?ernw-Burke•Rd 1626 1645 Miles
A
Title Vicinity Map
Project Forrest Creek Mitigation Site
Prepa?aFor: Orange County, North Carolina
LarthMark
rust. P a Ili us Date KHA Project Number Figure
8124106 012857044 1
Prepared by Jason bier
r
o
a
a fit &€ ,
to?
pg Q ,
?0?5 a°?°S b °b 4Qt??g?bg7"+,t 1 ? S
S * !I
'Jill
°??
•?5b k9'3?gg4ipI OUP ?3?p,
??I? Y S??F, I
I
I
2
g \
B } ti z `'
w
$ co ?qq
??
14
?O N ?ba p
'fx
I
B ?
F T
oil
t,? I
I -®-?
?S ? ? F 7Q1 L/L ?
uss"
WH H!
00_.3 ?"? a
l
5
a 4
i
F ?
? y
? E'I o O z`
aw ?o?
F
1 Ens®°k?
1 LIME,
I 4? I
'
Hill
n
`s ?1 Y
F p?
4q.
A F' r.
E= ?
v?Fo
FP??
z
0
f
R!P j
?8?aa
r?z1?
£ r

I
N
O?
I 3
I
t Y ? .
y?
,
'fib, W
d
1
f
W
ryy
F ?
0
I
? ? a
u
l ,
z
I
l
z?
1 0.
,
5
4
5
T V
N?
z
U
f- ? V
La
w$
?a?Y
w?
K
e?e? ab
PRIM
vg, i
Sri
Topo.d
k, I
I YS
S
2 a! ? gg?
! t !IA][ik LM [ V
E R?
1
F
1
??z I kS
oF?-? g I J [
S°a8 a?? 1 1tiy? F
d ?3`" F<o F
doa,$, a k 4
a y?P I E
i
H??K
1 ? I
E E
/ rFr
1
`?fl Og$,?
bll b? ?'S ? ???2
?b a^!nY?o?
F ? ??, ?gg
I c3
51 , it i3
z
e Q.
p? g U
I P-I w ?' E-Y ?g' G ?
8 i ? ? W Cs? ?
a
?+ I
1
F ? 4 a
aaaaa
1 k ul;
IOU
1saFy 3
3 ? - aL
s g
z IP. N
z [ ?I'F FI
?? 3 ?o?c
l
?R ? 1 , NJJ1
ti
1
00.
g '
E
f.'? ?.,??P I f GF ?e
gg°xS "o_? I 7?
des'" .<o
???_? fps Y ? >< ??
Qo3 Q _l , s
voQO 's? ?yA 1 ?g
IIA16! !?'[
I
k
F
II
H O ?
\ ? q?q < CR zws-S
1 aY wg?
,
\ ?3tS{ E
C
Hsi
P! €.
I g
1 U _
S
4 ?
S e
1 y ??
s 111 \
€s? 1 a 1 1
F5? 4 f
4 a
3 V
?=€ea
U 1 I ??
m?er <
TABLES
P? „ Kimley-Horn
Forrest Creek Monitoring - MY4 (2011) h? and Associates, Inc.
TableI.Proj ectMitigati onStructu reandObj ectives
ForrestCreekStreamRestoration--MonitoringYear4(2011)
Feature Mitigation Type Pre Construction Length/Area As Built Length/ Area Mitigation Credit Ratio Mitigation Credits
Forrest Creek Restoration 3,405 feet 3,484 feet 1:1 3,484
UT to Forrest Creek Restoration 2,436 feet 3,371 feet 1:1 3,371
Forrest Creek Enhancement 325 feet 325 feet 1.5:1 217
Forrest Creek Preservation 3,005 feet 3,005 feet 5:1 601
Total Stream Credits (SMU) 7,673
PP-=„ Kimley-Horn
Forrest Creek- MY4 (2011) ?? and Associates, Inc.
TableII.Proj ectActivityandRep ortingHistory
ForrestCreekStreamRestoration--MonitoringYear4(2011)
Activity or Report Calendar Year of Completion or Planned Completion
MBI Signed March 2007
Buffer Agreement Signed April 2008
Construction March to June 2008
Temporary /Permanent seeding March to July 2008
Containerized Plantings March to July 2008
Mitigation Plan November 2008
Year 1 Monitoring December 2008
Year 2 Monitoring October 2009
Year 3 Monitoring November 2010
Year 4 Monitoring August 2011
Year 5 Monitoring
PP-M„ Kimley-Horn
Forrest Creek- MY4 (2011) ?? and Associates, Inc.
TableIII.Proj ectContacts
ForrestCreekStreamRestoration--MonitoringYear4(2011)
Project Manager: 909 Capability Drive
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC Raleigh, NC 27606
Tommy Cousins: [phone]
Designer: 3001 Weston Parkway
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Cary, NC 27513
Todd St. John: [phone]
Daren Pait: [phone]
Construction Contractor: P.O. Box 14987
Shamrock Environmental Browns Summit, NC 27214
Corporation Mike Granson: [phone]
Planting Contractor: 550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Carolina Wetland Services Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
Joshua Frost: [phone], ext. 102
Monitoring Performers: 1960 Derita Road
Mid-Atlantic Mitigation, LLC Concord, North Carolina 28027
(MY1-MY3) Christine Cook: [phone]
Tommy Cousins: [phone]
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3001 Weston Parkway
(MY4-MY5) Cary, NC 27513
Josh Allen: [phone]
Todd St. John: [phone]
PP-=„ Kimley-Horn
Forrest Creek- MY4 (2011) ?? and Associates, Inc.
TableIV.PreliminarySoilData
ForrestCreekStreamRestoration--MonitoringYear4(2011)
Series Max Depth (in) % Clay on Surface K T OM
o/
Chewacla 60 10-27 0.28 5 1-4
PP-=„ Kimley-Horn
Forrest Creek- MY4 (2011) ?? and Associates, Inc.
TableV.InstalledPlantings
ForrestCreekStreamRestoration--MonitoringYear4(2011)

Scientific Name
Common Name Bare roots and
tublings (2008) Livestakes
(2009) Livestakes
(2009) Gallons
(2010) Gallons
(2010)
Asimina triloba Paw Paw 600
Betula nigra River Burch 600 200 120
Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 600
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 600 3775 500
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 600 200
Ilex opaca American Holly 600
lugulans nigra Black Walnut 600 120
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 600 200
Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 600 200 120
Quercus palustris Pin Oak 600 120
Quercus phellos Willow Oak 600 200 120
Salix nigra Black Willow 11,325 1,000
Total 6600 15,100 1,500 1,000 600
PP-M„ Kimley-Horn
Forrest Creek- MY4 (2011) ?? and Associates, Inc.
Table VI. Total Stem Count by Species
Forrest Creek Stream Restoration --Monitoring Year 4 (2011)

Scientific Name
Common Name
As built Year l
2008 Year 2
2009 Year 3
2010 Year 4
2011 Current percent survival
from As-built
Acer rubrum Red Maple 1
Asimina triloba Paw Paw 10 9 7 15 6 60%
Betula nigra* ** River Birch* ** 7 5 12 22 18 100%
Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 4 4 8 9 9 100%
Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 3 2 1 2 2 67%
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 12 9 8 7 6 50%
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon 1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica* Green Ash 14 11 21 45 80 100%
Ilex opaca American Holly 1 1 0 0%
Jugulans nigra** Black Walnut** 15 11 5 13 5 33%
Liquidambar styraciflua Sweetgum 10
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar 1 0 0 4 4 100%
Morus rubra Red Mulberry 1 1 1 1 2 100%
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 3
Populus deltoides Cottonwood 1
Quercus michauxii* ** Swamp Chenut Oak* ** 3 2 11 15 9 100%
Quercus palustris ** Pin Oak** 64 45 43 60 53 83%
Quercus phellos* Willow Oak 1 1 11 11 8 100%
Salix nigra Black Willow 20 7 22 31 32 100%
Salix sericea Silky Willow 1
LAmus alata Winged Elm 7
Total Total 156 108 150 235 257 78%
*5pecies included in 2009 supplemental Planting
"Species Included in 2010 supplemental Planting
Forrest Creek - MY4 (2011) rInF, and A-ssoociacm
? and Ates, Inc.
TableVII.Stemsp erAcrebyPI otandYear
ForrestCreekStreamRestoration--MonitoringYear4(2011)
Replant - Replant- MY3 W/ MY4
Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4
Year 1 Year 2 Vol. W/ Vol.
VQ1 283 202 324 445 445 445 728 445
VQ2 364 243 486 445 445 405 486 405 448
VQ3 486 364 364 364 526 324 486 324
VQ4 486 364 364 324 567 486 1174 486 890
VQ5 364 202 445 405 405 364 728 364
VQ6 324 81 647 688 688 647 931 647 809
VQ7 405 81 607 607 607 567 688 567
Average stems/acre
387 220 463 468 526 463 746 463
(Main Channel)

VQT1 647 283 688 647 647 607 850 607
VQT2 688 607 607 283 769 445 809 445 728
VQT3 647 486 486 324 688 526 728 526 728
VQT4 526 445 445 202 607 486 607 486 445
VQT5 486 324 324 324 769 688 850 688 769
VQT6 607 526 526 607 607 526 647 526 607
VQT7 486 405 405 121 526 526 567 526 526
Average stems/acre
F584 439 497 358 659 543 723 543 682
(Tributary)

Average stems/acre
486 330 480 413 593 503 734 503
Total
-= Decrease from previous MY I I= Increase from previous MY
PP-=„ Kimley-Horn
Forrest Creek- MY4 (2011) ?? and Associates, Inc.
Table VIII. Bankfull Events
Forrest Creek Stream Restoration -- Monitoring Year 4 (2011)
Site Visit Date Associated Rainfall Event Date Rainfall Amount (Inches) Method Documented
12/15/2008 Nov. 30th - Dec. 1st 1.25 CSG/Photos
4/15/2009 March 27th - 29th 1.99 CSG/Photos
6/16/2010 CSG/Photos
6/29/2011 June 28th 1.17 Photos
? and Associates, Inc.
Forrest Creek - MY4 (2011) rInF, and Associates,
APPENDIX A
Raw Vegetation Data
P- Kimley-Horn
Forrest Creek Monitoring - MY4 (2011) h? and Associates, Inc.
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 7
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ1 stems/acre = 283
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 25% water, 75% grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
4.3 0.5 Unknown sp Unknown sp
9 2.1 Quercus sp. Oak Sp.
6.9 3.9 Quercus sp. Oak Sp.
3.1 3 Quercus sp. Oak Sp.
2.2 6.8 Quercus sp. Oak Sp.
6.4 6.9 Quercus sp. Oak Sp.
10 7.6 Quercus sp. Oak Sp.
Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
6 47
4 48
3 26
3 38
3 30
3 25
3 36
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) Cow ndlAs occiates,Inc.
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 12/4/2008
Name: VQ1
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 25% water, 75 % grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
4.3 0.5 Unknown sp
9 2.1 Quercus palustris
3.1 3 Quercus palustris
2.2 6.8 Quercus palustris
10 7.6 Quercus palustris
1.5 5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua
2 5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua
2.4 8.5 Liquidambar styraciflua
stems = 5
plot size (m"2) = 100
stems/acre = 202
Common Name Condition Comments
Unknown sp Stressed
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Sweet Gum Invasive native
Sweet Gum Invasive native
Sweet Gum Invasive native
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) Cow ndlAs occiates,Inc.
Replant - Year 2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 8
Date: 5/29/2009 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ1 stems/acre = 324
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 25% water, 75% grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
9 2.1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.1 3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.2 6.8 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
10 7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.5 5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
2 5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
2.4 8.5 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
1.7 3.5 Betula nigra River Birch
6.6 8.8 Betula nigra River Birch
4.9 0 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
6.8 2.6 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
1 5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
2.3 5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
6.9 3.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0 5.2 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
4.2 6.2 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
2 6.8 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
1.2 9.5 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
Condition
stems = Vol. = 9
plot size (m"2) = 100
stems/acre = 364
Comments
Invasive native
Invasive native
Invasive native
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant
Vol.
Invasive native
Invasive native
Invasive native
Invasive native
Invasive native
Invasive native
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) r, on ndlAs occiates,Inc.
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/1/2009
Name: VQ1
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: Dog fennel; mixed cattle grasses = 85%
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
9 2.1 Quercus palustris
3.1 3 Quercus palustris
2.2 6.8 Quercus palustris
10 7.6 Quercus palustris
1.5 5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua
2 5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua
2.4 8.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus
6.6 8.8 Betula nigra
4.9 0 Quercus phellos
6.8 2.6 Robinia pseudoacacia
1 5.1 Quercus phellos
2.3 5.1 Quercus michauxii
6.9 3.9 Quercus palustris
0 5.2 Liquidambar styraciflua
4.2 6.2 Liquidambar styraciflua
2 6.8 Liquidambar styraciflua
1.2 9.5 Salix Nigra
stems = 11 stems = Vol. = 12
plot size (m"2) = 100 plot size (m"2) = 100
stems/acre = 445 stems/acre = 486
Common Name Condition Comments
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Sweet Gum Invasive native
Sweet Gum Invasive native
Green Ash Replaced Sweet gum
River Birch
Willow Oak
Black Locust Vol.
Willow Oak Replaced Sweet gum
Swamp chestnut Oak Replaced Sweet gum
Pin Oak
Sweet Gum Invasive native
Sweet Gum Invasive native
Sweet Gum Invasive native
Black Willow Replaced Sweet gum
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) Cow ndlAs occiates,Inc.
MY3
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/10/2010
Name: VQ1
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover:
x (m)
9
3.1
2.2
10
6.9
2.4
6
8
8
6.6
1.7
1
4.9
1
5.9
6.8
1.5
2
0
4.2
2
4
6.2
1.2
2.9
Dog fennel; mixed cattle grasses; 100% cover
stems =
plot size (m"2) _
stems/acre =
11 stems = Vol. _
100 plot size (m"2) _
445 stems/acre =
y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
2.1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.8 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
8.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash
2.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash
3.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash
4.2 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash
8.8 Betula nigra River Birch
3.5 Betula nigra River Birch
7.5 Betula nigra River Birch
0 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
5.1 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
4 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
2.6 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust
5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
5.2 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
6.2 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
6.8 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
10 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
10 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
9.5 Salix Nigra Black Willow
10 Quercus michauxii Swamp chestnut Oak
Percent survivial
Comments
Replaced Sweet gum
Vol
Vol
Vol
Vol.
Replaced Sweet gum
Vol.
Vol.
Invasive native
Invasive native
Invasive native
Invasive native
Invasive native
Invasive native; on the line
Invasive native; on the line
Replaced Sweet gum
on the line
18
100
728
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) r, on ndlAs occiates,Inc.
MY4
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 6/28/2011
Name: VQ1
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover:
x (m)
1.7
1
2.4
6
8
1.5
2
0
4.2
2
4
6.2
9.7
9.5
2.9
9
3.1
2.2
10
6.9
1
1.2
5
Dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses; 100% cover
stems =
plot size (m"2) _
stems/acre =
11 (w/vols) stems =
100 plot size (m"2) _
445 stems/acre =
y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
3.5 Betula nigra River Birch
7.5 Betula nigra River Birch
8.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash
2.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash
3.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash
5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
5.1 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
5.2 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
6.2 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
6.8 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
10 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
10 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
6.8 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
7.2 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
10 Quercus michauxii Swamp chestnut Oak
2.1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.8 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
5.1 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
9.5 Salix Nigra Black Willow
9.8 Salix Nigra Black Willow
Comments
Vol.
Replaced Sweet gum
Vol
Vol
Invasive native
Invasive native
Invasive native
Invasive native
Invasive native
Invasive native; on the line
Invasive native; on the line
Vol.
Vol.
on the line
Replaced Sweet gum
Replaced Sweet gum
Vol.
23
100
931
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) Cow ndlAs occiates,Inc.
VQ1
10
9
8
7
6
Swe(
5
E
4
3
2
1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 ¦ Replant (Year 1) MY2 ¦ MY3 MY4
Swamp chestnut Oak Sweet Gum
Black Willow
? Sweet Gum
River Birch
Green Ash ¦
F-I
River Birch Pill

Sweet Gum
? ?
Pin Oak Sweet Gum
F-I
Gum Willow Oak Sweet Gum

Sweet Gum Green Ash
Willow Oak Pin Oak ¦
River Birch Green Ash
? Pin Oak ?
Green Ash
¦
? Black Locust
Pin Oak

Willow Oak
Dak
6 7 8 9 10
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems =
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (m"2) _
Name: VQ2 stems/acre =
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 25% water, 75% grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
2.8 0.4 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
3.7 3 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
4.7 7 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
1.9 9 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
1.5 5.6 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
6.9 1.3 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
9.8 4.1 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
7.2 4.3 Unknown sp Unknown sp
8.3 8.3 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
9
100
364
Condition Comments
ddh (mm) Height (cm)
2 22
2 30
3 35
3 34
3 39
2 28
3 36
3 12
3 32
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) ru 1 a alas Associates, Inc.
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 12/4/2008
Name: VQ2
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 25% water, 75% grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
2.8 0.4 Quercus palustris
4.7 7 Quercus palustris
1.9 9 Quercus palustris
1.5 5.6 Quercus palustris
6.9 1.3 Quercus palustris
8.3 8.3 Quercus palustris
stems =
plot size (m"2) _
stems/acre =
Common Name
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
6
100
243
Condition Comments
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) ru 1 a alas Associates, Inc.
Replant - Year 2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 12
Date: 5/29/2009 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ2 stems/acre = 486
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 25% water, 75% grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
2.8 0.4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
4.7 7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.9 9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.5 5.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.9 1.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
8.3 8.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.6 1.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1/29/09 Replant
1.3 5.9 Betula nigra River Birch 1/29/09 Replant
4.6 7.5 Betula nigra River Birch 1/29/09 Replant
6.8 5.1 Betula nigra River Birch 1/29/09 Replant
9.4 3.2 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 1/29/09 Replant
3.7 3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) ru 1 a alas Associates, Inc.
M Y2
Project: Forrest Creek stems =
Date: 9/1/2009 plot size (m"2) _
Name: VQ2 stems/acre =
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: mixed cattle grasses, porcupine sedge, cokleburr = 90%
X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
4.7 7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.9 9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.5 5.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.9 1.3 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
8.3 8.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.6 1.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
1.3 5.9 Betula nigra River Birch
4.6 7.5 Betula nigra River Birch
6.8 5.1 Betula nigra River Birch
9.4 3.2 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
9.8 4.1 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
11
100
445
Condition Comments
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) ru 1 a alas Associates, Inc.
M Y3
Project: Forrest Creek stems =
Date: 9/10/2010 plot size (m"2) _
Name: VQ2 stems/acre =
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: narrow leaf sunflower, porcupine sedge, cokleburr; 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
4.7 7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.9 9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.5 5.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.9 1.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.6 1.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
0.9 4.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
9 8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
1.3 5.9 Betula nigra River Birch
4.6 7.5 Betula nigra River Birch
6.8 5.1 Betula nigra River Birch
9.4 3.2 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
9.8 4.1 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
10 stems = Vol. _
100 plot size (m"2) _
405 stems/acre =
Condition Comments
Vol.
Vol.
12
100
486
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) ru 1 a alas Associates, Inc.
M Y4
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 10 stems = Vol. _
Date: 6/28/2011 plot size (m"2) = 100 plot size (m"2) _
Name: VQ2 stems/acre = 405 stems/acre =
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: narrow leaf sunflower, porcupine sedge, cokleburr; 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
1.3 5.9 Betula nigra River Birch
4.6 7.5 Betula nigra River Birch
6.8 5.1 Betula nigra River Birch
2.6 1.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
0.9 4.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
9 8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
9.8 0.5 Morus rubra Red Mulberry Vol.
9.8 4.1 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
1.9 9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.9 1.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
8.9 5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Vol.
11
100
445
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) ru 1 a alas Associates, Inc.
VQ2
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
Pin Oak
Green Ash
River Birch
Pin Oak
River Birch
¦ Pin Oak River Birch F-I
Green Ash
? ¦ Swamp Che
Willow Oak
¦
Green Ash
Pin Oak
¦
nut Oak
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 ¦ Replant - Year 1 MY2 ¦ MY3 MY4
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 12
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ3 stems/acre = 486
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 60% grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
3 0.3 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw 9 89
6.4 0.1 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw 11 114
9.2 1.6 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw 10 120
7.4 4.3 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 7 84
4.5 2.8 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw 15 124
0.9 4.8 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 5 42
3 7.3 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 6 65
5.8 6.6 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw 9 107
9.7 6.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 4 23
8.2 8.7 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw 11 106
5.1 9.3 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw 11 100
2.3 9.9 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 4 65
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) CuFl a aAssociates, cInc.
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 12/4/2008
Name: VQ3
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 60% grass
x (m) y (m)
3 0.3
6.4 0.1
9.2 1.6
7.4 5.3
4.5 2.8
0.9 4.8
5.8 6.6
9.7 6.5
5.1 9.3
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) CuFl a aAs occiates,Inc.
Scientific Name
Asimina triloba
Asimina triloba
Asimina triloba
Corpus amomum
Asimina triloba
Corpus amomum
Asimina triloba
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Asimina triloba
stems =
plot size (m"2) =
stems/acre =
Common Name
Common pawpaw
Common pawpaw
Common pawpaw
Silky Dogwood
Common pawpaw
Silky Dogwood
Common pawpaw
Green Ash
Common pawpaw
9
100
364
Condition Comments
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 9
Date: 9/1/2009 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ3 stems/acre = 364
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: mixed cattle grasses, narrow leaved sunflower, soft rush = 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
3 0.3 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw
6.4 0.1 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw
9.2 1.6 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw stressed
7.4 5.3 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood
4.5 2.8 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw
0.9 4.8 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood
9.7 6.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
5.1 9.3 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw stressed
0 7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
Comments
not on previous counts but now touching the line
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) CuFl a aAssociates, cInc.
Supplemental Planting Feb 2010
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 13
Date: 2/17/2010 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ3 stems/acre = 526
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: mixed cattle grasses, narrow leaved sunflower, soft rush; 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
3 0.3 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw
6.4 0.1 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw
9.2 1.6 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw stressed
7.4 5.3 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood
4.5 2.8 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw
0.9 4.8 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood
9.7 6.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
5.1 9.3 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw stressed
0 7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak on the line
1.7 9.1 Betula nigra River Birch Replant
4.5 5.5 Unidentified at time of planting Replant Replant
8 7.3 Unidentified at time of planting Replant Replant
6.3 3.4 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw Replant
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) CuFl a aAssociates, cInc.
MY3
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 8 stems = Vol. = 12
Date: 9/10/2010 plot size (m"2) = 100 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ3 stems/acre = 324 stems/acre = 486
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: mixed cattle grasses, narrow leaved sunflower, soft rush = 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
7.4 5.3 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood
0.9 4.8 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood
9.7 6.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
9.2 1.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol
4.5 2.8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol
5.1 9.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol
7.4 4.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol
1.7 9.9 replant
0 7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak on the line
3 0.3 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw Stressed
6.4 0.1 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw
6.3 3.4 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw Stressed Healthy Replant I stomped on trying to find it
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) CuFl a aAssociates, cInc.
MY4
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 8
Date: 6/28/2011 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ3 stems/acre = 324
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: mixed cattle grasses, narrow leaved sunflower, soft rush = 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
3 0.3 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw Stressed
6.3 3.4 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw Good
4.9 9 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw Vol
1.7 9.9 Betula nigra River Birch
7.4 5.3 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood
0.9 4.8 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood
9.7 6.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
9.2 1.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol
4.5 2.8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol
5.1 9.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol
7.4 4.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol
7.5 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol
0.7 10 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol
0 0 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol
0 7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
stems = Vol. = 14
plot size (m"2) = 100
stems/acre = 567
Comments
replant
replant
on the line
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) CuFl a aAssociates, cInc.
VQ3
10
9
8
Pin
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
River Birch
Green Ash
¦ ?
¦
?ak ¦ ¦
Green A
¦ ?
¦ Silky Dogwood
Silky Dogwood ?
? Green Ash
Common pawpaw
Green Ash
F-I
Green Ash
Common pawpaw
? Common pawpaw
h
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦Baseline ¦MY1 MY2 ¦Replant ¦MY3 MY4
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 6/1/2008
Name: VQ4
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 50% Herbaceous Dicots
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
6.6 0.8 Juglans nigra
8.1 3.2 Quercus sp.
3.5 2.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1 5.4 Unknown sp
6.2 4.6 Quercus sp.
3.5 6.3 Quercus sp.
1 8 Quercus sp.
5.7 7.9 Quercus sp.
9.5 8.7 Juglans nigra
0 9.8 Salix nigra
0.6 9.7 Salix nigra
1.2 9.5 Salix nigra
stems = 12
plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 486
Common Name Condition Comments
Black Walnut
Oak sp.
Green Ash
Unknownsp
Oak sp.
Oak sp.
Oak sp.
Oak sp.
Black Walnut
Black Willow Livestake
Black Willow Livestake
Black Willow Livestake
ddh (mm) Height (cm)
8 68
3 40
9 55
4 28
2 27
4 36
3 36
3 36
7 62
40 15
38 16
17 19
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) ? ?? and lAssociates, c Inc.
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 12/4/2008
Name: VQ4
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 50% Herbaceous Dicots
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
6.6 0.8 Juglans nigra
8.1 3.2 Quercus palustris
3.5 2.7 Fraxinus Pennsylvanica
1 5.4 Unknown sp
6.2 4.6 Quercus palustris
3.5 6.3 Quercus palustris
1 8 Quercus palustris
5.7 7.9 Quercus palustris
9.5 8.7 Juglans nigra
stems =
plot size (MA 2) _
stems/acre =
Common Name
Black Walnut
Pin Oak
Green Ash
Unknownsp
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Black Walnut
9
100
364
Condition Comments
Stressed
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) ? ?? and lAssociates, c Inc.
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/1/2009
Name: VQ4
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: Dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses = 100%
X (m) y (m) Scientific Name
6.6 0.8 Juglans nigra
1 5.4 Populus deltoides
6.2 4.6 Quercus phellos
3.5 6.3 Quercus michauxii
1 8 Quercus phellos
5.7 7.9 Quercus phellos
0.6 9.7 Salix nigra
1.2 9.5 Salix nigra
6.4 0.2 Rhus glabra
stems = 7 (w/vols) stems = 9
plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 283 stems/acre = 364
Common Name
Black Walnut
Cottonwood
Willow Oak
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Willow Oak
Willow Oak
Black Willow
Black Willow
Smooth Sumac
Condition Comments
Vol.
Livestake
Livestake
Vol.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) ? ?? and lAssociates, c Inc.
Supplemental Planting Feb 2010
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 14 (w/vols) stems = 16
Date: 2/10/2010 plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
Name: VQ4 stems/acre = 567 stems/acre = 647
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: Dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses = 100%
X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
6.6 0.8 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
6.2 4.6 Quercus phellos Willow Oak Couldn't see any oaks
3.5 6.3 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak Couldn't see any oaks
1 8 Quercus phellos Willow Oak Couldn't see any oaks
5.7 7.9 Quercus phellos Willow Oak Couldn't see any oaks
0.6 9.7 Salix nigra Black Willow LS Livestake
1.2 9.5 Salix nigra Black Willow LS Livestake
0 9.8 Salix nigra Black Willow LS Livestake
6.4 0.2 Rhus glabra Smooth Sumac Vol Vol.
1 5.4 Populus deltoides Cottonwood Vol vol.
3 4.5 Betula nigra River Birch Replant Replant
5 5 Quercus phellos Willow Oak Replant Replant
9 7.8 Quercus phellos Willow Oak Replant Replant
9 5.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Replant Replant
9.5 5.5 Quercus phellos Willow Oak Replant Replant
2.5 1.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Replant
5.5 3 Betula nigra River Birch Replant Replant
6.5 2 Betula nigra River Birch Replant Replant
8.1 3.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.2 1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Replant Replant
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) ? ?? and lAssociates, c Inc.
MY3
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/10/2010
Name: VQ4
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: Dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses; 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
6.6 0.8 Juglans nigra
1.5 8.5 Juglans nigra
6.2 4.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3.5 6.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1 8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
9.5 8.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5.7 7.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3.5 2.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2.5 1.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0.2 0.8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1 2.2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.5 1.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5.5 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0.6 9.7 Salix nigra
1.2 9.5 Salix nigra
6.4 0.2 Rhus glabra
1 5.4 Populus deltoides
5.5 3 Betula nigra
3 4.5 Betula nigra
8.1 3.2 Quercus palustris
1.2 1 Quercus palustris
6 6.6 Quercus palustris
9.5 5.5 Quercus phellos
9 7.8 Quercus phellos
5 5 Quercus phellos
7.3 3.7 Quercus michauxii S
4.8 7.5 Quercus michauxii S
0 2.2 Asimina triloba
8 5.5 Platanus occidentalis
stems = 12 (w/vols) stems = 29
plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 486 stems/acre = 1174
Common Name Condition Comments
Black Walnut Stressed
Black Walnut Stressed Replant
Green Ash Vol.
Green Ash Vol.
Green Ash Vol.
Green Ash Vol.
Green Ash Vol.
Green Ash
Green Ash Replant
Green Ash Replant
Green Ash Replant
Green Ash Replant
Green Ash Replant
Black Willow LS Stressed Livestake
Black Willow LS Stressed Livestake
Smooth Sumac Vol Stressed Vol.
Cottonwood Vol vol.
River Birch
River Birch
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak Replant
Willow Oak
Willow Oak
Willow Oak
wamp Chestnut Oak Replant
wamp Chestnut Oak Replant
Common pawpaw on the line never counted
Sycamore Replant
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) ? ?? and lAssociates, c Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) ??? ndlAs occiates, Inc.
MY4
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 6/28/2011
Name: VQ4
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: Dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses; 100% cover
stems = 12 (w/vols) stems = 22
plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 486 stems/acre = 890
X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
0 2.2 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw
6.2 4.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
3.5 6.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
1 8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
9.5 8.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
5.7 7.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
3.5 2.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
2.5 1.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
0.2 0.8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
1 2.2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
4.5 1.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
5.5 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
6.6 0.8 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
1.5 8.5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
8 5.5 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore
1 5.4 Populus deltoides Cottonwood Vol
7.3 3.7 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
6 6.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
9.5 5.5 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
9 7.8 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
5 5 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
0.6 9.7 Salix nigra Black Willow LS
Condition Comments
on the line never counted
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Stressed
Stressed Replant
Replant
Vol.
Replant
Replant
Stressed Livestake
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) ? ?? and lAssociates, c Inc.
VQ4
10
9
8
7
6
E 5
4
3
Commo
2
0

ac Willow L
¦
Black Walnut
Green AshC
Green Ash
Willow Oak
Swamp Chestnut Oa
¦
Pin Oak
Green Ash

Cottonwood Vol Sycamore Willow Oak
1 Willow Oak [
River Birch
¦ U
Swamp Ches
tnut Oak

River Birch ¦ Pin Oak
?
pawpaw -
Green Ash
Green Ash
Green Ash Green Ash
Pin Oak C
en Ash Black Walnut
[1 [1
Smooth Sumac Vol
¦
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 MY2 ¦ Replant- Year 2 M MY3 MY4
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 6/1/2008
Name: VQ5
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 80% Broomsedge
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
0.3 0.2 Quercus sp.
5.9 0.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
8.5 0.3 Quercus sp.
4.4 9.4 Unknown sp
5.5 3.7 Quercus sp.
2.6 3.1 Salix nigra
1.3 5.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2.6 8.5 Quercus sp.
7.5 8.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
stems = 9
plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 364
Common Name Condition
Oak sp.
Green Ash
Oak sp.
Unknown sp
Oak sp.
Black Willow
Green Ash
Oak sp.
Green Ash
Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
3 41
4 34
2 35
8 28
3 37
4 19
5 33
3 44
2 20
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 12/4/2008
Name: VQ5
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 80% Broomsedge
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
5.9 0.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
8.5 0.3 Quercus palustris
1.3 5.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2.6 8.5 Quercus palustris
7.5 8.7 Quercus palustris
1.2 6.3 Unknown sp
2.3 6.8 Unknown sp
stems = 5 stems+ Vol. = 7
plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 202 stems/acre = 283
Common Name Condition Comments
Green Ash
Pin Oak
Green Ash
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Unknown sp Vol.
Unknown sp Vol.
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
Replant - Year 2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 11 stems+ Vol. = 16
Date: 5/29/2009 plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
Name: VQ5 stems/acre = 445 stems/acre = 647
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 80% Broom sedge
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
5.9 0.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
8.5 0.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.3 5.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
2.6 8.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.2 6.3 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol.
2.3 6.8 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol.
7.7 2.1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1/29/09 Replant
2.4 9.4 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 1/29/09 Replant
0.3 0.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
5.5 3.7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0.7 5.4 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol.
1.4 5.4 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol.
0.5 7.8 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol.
7.5 8.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
4.4 9.4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.3 9.8 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 1/29/09 Replant: mis-identified @ nursery?
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 10
Date: 9/1/2009 plot size (MA 2) = 100
Name: VQ5 stems/acre = 405
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: dog fennel, narrow leaved sun flower = 1 00%
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
5.9 0.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
8.5 0.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.3 5.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
2.6 8.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.2 6.3 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
2.3 6.8 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
2.4 9.4 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
0.3 0.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
5.5 3.7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0.7 5.4 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
1.4 5.4 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
0.5 7.8 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
7.5 8.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
4.4 9.4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.3 9.8 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.6 3.1 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon
stems+ Vol. = 16
plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 647
Comments
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY3
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/10/2010
Name: VQ5
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover
x (m)
5.9
1.3
7.5
2.3
2.6
4
7.5
8.5
0.3
2.6
5.5
4.4
6.3
2.4
1.2
0.7
1.4
0.5
1.9
stems =
plot size (MA 2) _
stems/acre =
dog fennel, narrow leaved sun flower; 100% cover
9 stems+ Vol. _
100 plot size (MA 2) _
364 stems/acre =
Y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
0.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Actually an Asmina triloba?
5.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
8.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
6.8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
3.1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
2.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
0.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Dead? Too close to fence, got hit w/herbicide
0.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
8.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
9.4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
9.8 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
9.4 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
6.3 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol.
5.4 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol.
5.4 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol.
7.8 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol.
7.9 Ulmus alata Winged Elm Vol.
18
100
728
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY4
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 6/29/2011
Name: VQ5
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover
x (m)
1.3
1.2
0.7
1.4
5.9
7.5
2.3
2.6
4
7.5
7.5
7.4
6.1
7
0.3
2.6
5.5
4.4
6.3
2.4
stems =
plot size (MA 2) _
stems/acre =
dog fennel, narrow leaved sun flower; 100% cover
9 stems+ Vol. _
100 plot size (MA 2) _
364 stems/acre =
y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
5.9 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
6.3 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
5.4 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
5.4 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
0.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
8.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
6.8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
3.1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
2.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
1.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
0.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
8 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
0.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
8.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
9.4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
9.8 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
9.4 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
Comments
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
20
100
809
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
VQ5
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
Willow Oak
Willow Oak Pin Oak ?
? ?
Pin Oak ?
F-I Buttonbush Winged Elm
¦
Green Ash
Buttonbush ?
Buttonbush reen s
? ?
Buttonbush
Green Ash
Pon nak
F-I
Green Ash
F-I
Green Ash
F-I
¦
Green Ash
in Oak Pin Oak
? ¦
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 ¦ Replant - Year 1 MY2 ¦ MY3 MY4
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems =
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (MA 2) _
Name: VQ6 stems/acre =
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 90% Annual R ye
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
1.1 1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
8.7 0.3 Quercus alba White Oak
1.5 4.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
3.8 3 Quercus alba White Oak
7.7 3.1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
5.8 7.1 Unknown sp Unknown sp
3.8 9.6 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
9.2 7 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
8
100
324
Condition Comments
ddh (mm) Height (cm)
8 55
2 19
3 33
4 20
8 51
3 32
2 17
4 38
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 12/4/2008
Name: VQ6
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 90% Annual Rye
x (m) y (m)
1.1 1
3.8 3
2.2 1.6
5 3.1
Scientific Name
Juglans nigra
Quercus michauxii
Unknown sp
Unknown sp
stems = 2 stems + Vol. = 4
plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 81 stems/acre = 162
Common Name
Black Walnut
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Unknown sp
Unknown sp
Condition Comments
Vol.
Vol.
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
Replant - Year 2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 16 stems +Vol. = 19
Date: 5/29/2009 plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
Name: VQ6 stems/acre = 647 stems/acre = 769
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 90% Annual R ye
x (m) Y (M) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
1.1 1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
3.8 3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.2 1.6 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
6.3 2.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1/29/09 Replant
4.1 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1/29/09 Replant
1.5 4.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
7.5 6.4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1/29/09 Replant
3.6 8.2 Betula nigra River Birch 1/29/09 Replant
3.4 1.9 Betula nigra River Birch 1/29/09 Replant
4.9 0.5 Sailx nigra Black Willow livestake - Replant
5.6 0.3 Sailx nigra Black Willow livestake - Replant
6.7 0.3 Sailx nigra Black Willow livestake - Replant
8.7 0.3 Sailx nigra Black Willow livestake - Replant
4.2 3.2 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon Vol.
0.5 3.8 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Vol.
5.8 7.1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.4 7.7 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 1/29/09 Replant
3.2 10 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon Vol.
3.8 9.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/1/2009
Name: VQ6
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover:
x (m)
1.1
3.8
2.2
6.3
4.1
1.5
7.5
3.6
3.4
4.9
5.6
6.7
8.7
1
4.2
0.5
5.8
6.4
3.2
3.8
9.2
stems = 17
plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 688
stems +Vol. = 21
plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 850
narrow leaved sunflower, bare spots where annual rye is gone and not grown over yet = 80% cover
y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Stressed
3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.6 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Stressed
2.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
4.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
6.4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
8.2 Betula nigra River Birch Stressed
1.9 Betula nigra River Birch Stressed
0.5 Sailx nigra Black Willow livestake
0.3 Sailx nigra Black Willow livestake
0.3 Sailx nigra Black Willow livestake
0.3 Sailx nigra Black Willow livestake
0 Sailx nigra Black Willow livestake
3.2 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon Vol.
3.8 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Vol.
7.1 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
7.7 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
10 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon Vol.
9.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Vol.
previously not counted
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY3
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/10/2010
Name: VQ6
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover:
X (m)
1.1
6.3
4.1
1.5
7.5
7.8
9.9
3.6
3.4
4.9
5.6
6.7
8.7
1
5.8
6.4
3.8
3.8
9.2
0.5
4.2
3.2
0.5
stems = 16
plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 647
narrow leaved sunflower, Dog fennel, mixed grasses; 100% cover
y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
2.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
4.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
6.4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
3.1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
2.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
8.2 Betula nigra River Birch
1.9 Betula nigra River Birch
0.5 Sailx nigra Black Willow
0.3 Sailx nigra Black Willow
0.3 Sailx nigra Black Willow
0.3 Sailx nigra Black Willow
0 Sailx nigra Black Willow
7.1 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
7.7 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
9.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore
3.8 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore
1.5 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon
10 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon
6.5 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon
Condition
Stressed
stems +Vol. = 23
plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 931
Comments
Vol.
Vol.
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
Stressed LS on the line
Stressed
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY4
Project: Forrest Creek stems =
Date: 6/28/2011 plot size (MA 2) _
Name: VQ6 stems/acre =
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: narrow leaved sunflower, Dog fennel, mixed grasses; 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
3.6 8.2 Betula nigra River Birch
3.4 1.9 Betula nigra River Birch
0.5 6.5 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon
6.3 2.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
4.1 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
7.5 6.4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
7.8 5.2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
6 5.1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
1.1 1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
9.2 7 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore
0.5 3.8 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore
3.8 9.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.8 3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.4 9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.4 7.7 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
4.9 0.5 Sailx nigra Black Willow
5.6 0.3 Sailx nigra Black Willow
6.7 0.3 Sailx nigra Black Willow
8.7 0.3 Sailx nigra Black Willow
1 0 Sailx nigra Black Willow
16 stems +Vol. = 20
100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
647 stems/acre = 809
Condition Comments
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Stressed
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
Stressed LS on the line
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
VQ6
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Persimmon

River Birch
El Willow Oak

Swamp Chestnut Oak Sycamore
Persimmon Green Ash
? ?
Green Ash

Green Ash
¦
Sycamore
F-I
Pin Oak Green Ash
¦
Green Ash Green
? ¦
River Birch
Persimmon
Black Walnut ¦
IFIJ Black W' low
lack Willow Black Willow Black Willow
Black Willow ?
? ? ?
0 1 2 3 4 5
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 ¦ Replant - Year 1 MY2 ¦ MY3 MY4
Ash
6 7 8 9 10
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems =
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (m"2) _
Name: VQ7 stems/acre =
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 100% polygonum and cocklebur
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
0.7 0.7 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
3.9 2.1 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
6.7 2.3 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
9.8 2.5 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
3.9 2.1 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
7.5 4.6 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
4.5 4.5 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
1.8 7.2 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
7.5 9 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
9.8 2.5 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
10
100
405
Condition Comments
ddh (mm) Height (cm)
3 31
5 50
4 31
4 45
3 40
3 34
3 42
3 42
3 31
4 27
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) ru 1 a alas Associates, Inc.
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 12/4/2008
Name: VQ7
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 100% polygonum and cocklebur
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
3.9 2.1 Quercus palustris
7.5 4.6 Quercus palustris
stems =
plot size (m"2) _
stems/acre =
Common Name
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
2
100
81
Condition Comments
Associates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) a alc
Replant - Year 2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 15
Date: 5/29/2009 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ7 stems/acre = 607
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 100% polygonum and cocklebur
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
7.5 4.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.5 8.2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
1.7 1.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
6.5 0.2 Betula nigra River Birch
9.5 8.8 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
6.7 2.3 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
9.8 0.8 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
9.8 2.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.7 2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.9 9.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.8 7.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0.7 0.7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.5 9 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
7.5 6.7 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
5.1 1.7 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
Comments
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant: mis-identified @ nursery?
1/29/09 Replant
1/29/09 Replant
Associates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) a alc
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 15
Date: 9/1/2009 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ7 stems/acre = 607
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: polygonum, narrow leaved sunflower, cocklebur = 100%
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
7.5 4.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.5 8.2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
1.7 1.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
6.5 0.2 Betula nigra River Birch
9.5 8.8 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
6.7 2.3 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
9.8 0.8 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
9.8 2.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.7 2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.9 9.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.8 7.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0.7 0.7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.5 9 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
7.5 6.7 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
5.1 1.7 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
Associates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) a alc
MY3
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 14 stems = Vol. = 17
Date: 9/10/2010 plot size (m"2) = 100 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ7 stems/acre = 567 stems/acre = 688
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: polygonum, na rrow leaved sunflower, cock lebur; 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
1.5 8.2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
1.7 1.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
6.5 0.2 Betula nigra River Birch
9.8 4.5 Betula nigra River Birch Vol?
9.5 8.8 Quercus phellos Willow Oak no notation made
6.7 2.3 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
3.5 3.5 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
7.5 4.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
9.8 2.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.7 2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.9 9.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.8 7.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.9 2.1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
4.5 4.5 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
7.5 6.7 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
3.7 0.3 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak Vol.
9.8 0.8 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
1.7 5.3 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak Vol.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) ru 1 a alas Associates, Inc.
MY4
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 14 stems = Vol. = 29
Date: 6/28/2011 plot size (m"2) = 100 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQ7 stems/acre = 567 stems/acre = 1174
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: polygonum, nar row leaved sunflower, cock lebur; 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
9.8 4.5 Betula nigra River Birch Vol?
1.5 8.2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
1.7 1.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
6.5 0.2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
9 7.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
6.6 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
6 9.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
5.4 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
5.2 7.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
4.1 7.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
3.9 7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
3.7 7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Stressed Vol.
2.8 9.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
1.8 9.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
0.1 7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
0.1 6.2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
1.7 6.2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
2.6 6.2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
2.7 6.1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
0.2 5.4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
1 4.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
2 4.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Stressed Vol.
0.9 0.1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol.
9.8 0.8 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
7.5 4.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
9.8 2.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.7 2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.9 9.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) GMT a alas occiates, Inc.
1.8 7.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) ru 1 a alas Associates, Inc.
VQ7
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 ¦ Replant - Year 1 MY2 ¦ MY3 MY4
Pin Oak
? Willow Oak
¦
Green Ash
F-I
Pin Oak
El Swamp C
H-stnut Q ak
.
¦

Swamp Chestnut Oak
¦
Swamp Chestnut Oak Pin Oak River Bi
¦ ? ?
Willow Oak
¦
Pin
O
Willow Oak
Pin Oak ?
¦
Green Ash
?
Pin Oak
Swamp Che
Swamp Chestnut Oak
River Birch El
¦ ?
'ch
k
:nut Oak
6 7 8 9 10
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 16
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (MA 2) = 100
Name: VQT1 stems/acre = 647
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 90% cattle grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
3 0.7 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 5 32
7.9 1 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 4 46
1.4 3.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 4 28
0.2 1.6 Salix nigra Black Willow 23 14
0.3 2.2 Salix nigra Black Willow 26 17
0.1 3.1 Salix nigra Black Willow 21 17
0.6 3.7 Salix nigra Black Willow 16 17
0.1 3.9 Salix nigra Black Willow 31 19
0.6 4.6 Salix nigra Black Willow 23 21
0.1 4.9 Salix nigra Black Willow 15 18
0.5 5.8 Salix nigra Black Willow 29 21
0.4 6.7 Salix nigra Black Willow 30 14
8.8 6.3 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 2 18
6.2 7.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 4 33
0.5 7.3 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 4 47
2.3 9.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 6 52
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek stems =
Date: 12/4/2008 plot size (MA 2) _
Name: VQT1 stems/acre =
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 90% cattle grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
3 0.7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.9 1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.4 3.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
8.8 6.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.2 7.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
0.5 7.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.3 9.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
7
100
283
Condition Comments
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
Replant - Year 2
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 17 stems + Vol. = 22
Date: 5/29/2009 plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
Name: VQT1 stems/acre = 688 stems/acre = 890
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 90% cattle grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
3 0.7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.9 1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.4 3.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
8.8 6.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.2 7.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
0.5 7.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.3 9.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
7.1 3.8 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 1/29/09 Replant
7.5 7.8 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 1/29/09 Replant
0.1 0.8 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake - Replant
0.2 1.6 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake
0.3 2.2 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake
0.5 5.8 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake
0.4 6.7 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake
0.4 7.2 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake - Replant
0.4 8.5 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake - Replant
0.8 8.8 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Vol.
2.8 5.6 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol.
3.8 5.6 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol.
4.2 7.2 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol.
5.2 4.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1/29/09 Replant
6.2 1.1 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol.
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/1/2009
Name: VQT1
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses = 100%
X (m) y (m) Scientific Name
3 0.7 Quercus palustris
7.9 1 Quercus palustris
1.4 3.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
8.8 6.3 Quercus palustris
6.2 7.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2.3 9.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
7.1 3.8 Quercus michauxii
7.5 7.8 Quercus michauxii
0.1 0.8 Salix nigra
0.2 1.6 Salix nigra
0.3 2.2 Salix nigra
0.5 5.8 Salix nigra
0.4 6.7 Salix nigra
0.4 7.2 Salix nigra
0.4 8.5 Salix nigra
2.8 5.6 Cephalanthus occidentalis
5.2 4.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
6.2 1.1 Cephalanthus occidentalis
stems = 16 stems + Vol. = 18
plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 647 stems/acre = 728
Common Name
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Green Ash
Pin Oak
Green Ash
Green Ash
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Black Willow
Black Willow
Black Willow
Black Willow
Black Willow
Black Willow
Black Willow
Buttonbush
Green Ash
Buttonbush
Condition Comments
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
Vol.
Vol.
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY3
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/10/2010
Name: VQT1
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses; 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
3 0.7 Quercus palustris
7.9 1 Quercus palustris
1.4 3.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5.2 4.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
6.2 7.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2.3 9.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
8.8 6.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3.8 5.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.2 7.2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
7.1 3.8 Quercus michauxii S
7.5 7.8 Quercus michauxii S
0.1 0.8 Salix nigra
0.2 1.6 Salix nigra
0.3 2.2 Salix nigra
0.5 5.8 Salix nigra
0.4 6.7 Salix nigra
0.4 7.2 Salix nigra
0.4 8.5 Salix nigra
6.9 6.9 Salix nigra
2.8 5.6 Cephalanthus occidentalis
6.2 1.1 Cephalanthus occidentalis
stems = 15 stems + Vol. = 21
plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 607 stems/acre = 850
Common Name
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Green Ash
Green Ash
Green Ash
Green Ash
Green Ash
Green Ash
Green Ash
wamp Chestnut Oak
wamp Chestnut Oak
Black Willow
Black Willow
Black Willow
Black Willow
Black Willow
Black Willow
Black Willow
Black Willow
Buttonbush
Buttonbush
Condition Comments
Vol
Vol
Vol
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY4
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 6/29/2011
Name: VQT1
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover:
X (m)
2.8
6.2
1.4
5.2
6.2
2.3
8.8
3.8
4.2
6.5
8.3
7.4
7.1
7.5
3
7.9
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
6.9
dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses; 100% cover
stems =
plot size (MA 2) _
stems/acre =
15 stems + Vol. _
100 plot size (MA 2) _
607 stems/acre =
y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
5.6 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
1.1 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
3.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
4.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
7.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
9.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
6.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
5.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
7.2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
8.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
3.8 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
7.8 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
0.7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0.8 Salix nigra Black Willow
1.6 Salix nigra Black Willow
2.2 Salix nigra Black Willow
5.8 Salix nigra Black Willow
6.7 Salix nigra Black Willow
7.2 Salix nigra Black Willow
8.5 Salix nigra Black Willow
6.9 Salix nigra Black Willow
Comments
Vol.
Vol.
Vol
Vol
Vol
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
livestake
Vol.
24
100
971
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
VQT1
10
9E
8
E
7E
6
5
4
3
BI
ERa
Blic
0
0
Green Ash
F-I
ack WillqMv

F-I
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Green Ash El
ack Willow Green Ash El

acamvmlln?Aj El Black Willow
? Green Ash
Black Willow ?
?
? ?
Green Ash
¦
¦ ?
Swamp Chestnut Oak
¦
¦ Green Ash
?
?
¦
ck Willow
F-I
k Willow
?
Buttonbush
Pin
Oak
Willow Pon nak F-I
E
1

? ? L
-
i
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 ¦ Replant - Year 1 MY2 ¦ MY3 MY4
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 17
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (MA 2) = 100
Name: VQT2 stems/acre = 688
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 80% Eupatorium and grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
1.2 1.3 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 37
7.8 0.2 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 2 36
8.4 2.4 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 6 53
5.5 2.1 Unknown sp Unknown sp 3 28
1.9 3.3 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 8 41
1.5 3.8 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 4 40
3.9 4.1 Betula nigra River Birch 5 62
6.2 4.2 Ilex opaca American Holly 3 34
8 4.9 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 7 32
1.9 6.2 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 4 43
4.4 6.3 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 9 20
6.7 6.8 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 7 94
9.2 6.9 Unknown sp Unknown sp 5 40
7.3 9.1 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 6 53
4.7 8.9 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 10 53
2.7 8.5 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 6 73
0.2 8 Betula nigra River Birch 5 49
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) EnFl ndiAssociates, cInc.
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 15
Date: 12/4/2008 plot size (MA 2) = 100
Name: VQT2 stems/acre = 607
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 80% Eupatorium and grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
1.2 1.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.8 0.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
8.4 2.4 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
5.5 2.1 Unknown sp Unknown sp
1.9 3.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.5 3.8 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.9 4.1 Betula nigra River Birch
6.2 4.2 Ilex opaca American Holly
8 4.9 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
1.9 6.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
4.4 6.3 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
6.7 6.8 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
9.2 6.9 Unknown sp Unknown sp
7.3 9.1 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
2.7 8.5 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) EnFl ndiAssociates, cInc.
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/1/2009
Name: VQT2
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: Dog fennel = 10 0%
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
1.2 1.3 Quercus palustris
1.9 3.3 Quercus palustris
1.5 3.8 Quercus palustris
3.9 4.1 Betula nigra
6.7 6.8 Quercus phellos
7.3 9.1 Cornus amomum
4.9 0.8 Betula nigra
1.9 6.2 Quercus palustris
stems =
plot size (MA 2) _
stems/acre =
Kudzu in plot
Common Name
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
River Birch
Willow Oak
Silky Dogwood
River Birch
Pin Oak
7
100
283
Condition Comments
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) CuFl ndiAssociates, cInc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) CuFl ndiAs occiates,Inc.
Supplemental Planting Feb 2010
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 19
Date: 2/10/2010 plot size (m12) = 100
Name: VQT2 stems/acre = 769
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: Dog fennel = 10 0% Kudzu in plot
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
1.2 1.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.9 3.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1.5 3.8 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.9 4.1 Betula nigra River Birch
6.7 6.8 Quercus phellos Willow Oak
7.3 9.1 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
4.9 0.8 Betula nigra River Birch
0.2 8 Betula nigra River Birch
5.5 2.1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
8 4.9 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
1 10 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Replant
0 9 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant
0 4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Replant
0 1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant
4 8.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Replant
3.5 5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant
4.5 5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant
8 3 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant
9 6.5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant
Comments
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) EnFl ndiAssociates, cInc.
MY3
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/10/2010
Name: VQT2
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: Dog fenne; 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
1.2 1.3 Quercus palustris
1.9 6.2 Quercus palustris
4.9 4 Quercus palustris
0 4 Quercus palustris
1 10 Cornus amomum
7.3 9.1 Cornus amomum
8 4.9 Cornus amomum
3.9 4.1 Betula nigra
4.9 0.8 Betula nigra
0.2 8 Betula nigra
6.7 6.8 Quercus phellos
9 6.5 Juglans nigra
0 9 Salix nigra
6.9 2 Salix nigra
7.8 0.2 Quercus nigra
10 4 Ulmus alata
2.5 0.5 Ulmus alata
2.5 1 Ulmus alata
0 5 Ulmus alata
6 9 Unknown
stems = 11 stems + Vol. = 20
plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 445 stems/acre = 809
Common Name
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak Replant
Silky Dogwood
Silky Dogwood
Silky Dogwood
River Birch
River Birch
River Birch
Willow Oak
Black Walnut Replant
Black Willow
Black Willow
water Oak
Winged Elm
Winged Elm
Winged Elm
Winged Elm
Unknown
Condition
Stressed
Comments
Vol?
Replant
Vol
Replant
Vol
Vol
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Vol.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) EnFl ndiAssociates, cInc.
MY4
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 6/29/2011
Name: VQT2
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: Dog fenne; 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
6 9 Asimina triloba
3.9 4.1 Betula nigra
4.9 0.8 Betula nigra
0.2 8 Betula nigra
1 10 Cornus amomum
8 4.9 Cornus amomum
9 6.5 Juglans nigra
1.2 1.3 Quercus palustris
1.9 6.2 Quercus palustris
4.9 4 Quercus palustris
9 5 Quercus palustris
6.7 6.8 Quercus phellos
0 9 Salix nigra
6.9 2 Salix nigra
10 4 Ulmus alata
2.5 0.5 Ulmus alata
2.5 1 Ulmus alata
0 5 Ulmus alata
stems = 11 stems + Vol. = 18
plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 445 stems/acre = 728
Common Name Condition Comments
Common Paw Paw Vol.
River Birch
River Birch
River Birch
Silky Dogwood Vol
Silky Dogwood
Black Walnut Replant Replant
Pin Oak
Pin Oak Stressed
Pin Oak Vol?
Pin Oak Vol
Willow Oak
Black Willow Vol
Black Willow Vol
Winged Elm Vol.
Winged Elm Vol.
Winged Elm Vol.
Winged Elm Vol.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) EnFl ndiAssociates, cInc.
VQT2
10
Blacl'
9
R
8
7
6
Winc
E 5
Pin Oa
4
3
2
1
0
Silky Dogwood
illow Unknown Silky Dogwood
er Birch ¦ ¦
Willow Oak
? Black WalnuFReplant
Pin Oak ?
? ¦
id Elm Silky Dogwood
c Replant River Birch Pin Oak
Wing
¦
F-I
¦
¦
Black Willow ¦
¦
Pin Oak
? Winged Elm
River Birch
Wing Elm ?
? water Oak
¦
d Elm
1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 MY2 ¦ Replant- Year 2 ¦ MY3 MY4
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 16
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQT3 stems/acre = 647
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 95% Solide go sp and cattle grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
2.5 0.3 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw 10 108
6.4 0.9 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 6 45
9.4 0.6 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 5 84
2.6 2.5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 9 74
0 3.1 Unknown sp Unknown sp 12 116
5 3.2 Unknown sp Unknown sp 7 52
9.5 3.5 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 8 84
2 4.8 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 6 89
3.7 5.5 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw 6 82
5.8 5.4 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 6 65
8.3 5.5 Unknown sp Unknown sp 5 61
6.4 8 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 8 107
4 7.6 Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar 7 54
2 7.3 Unknown sp Unknown sp 9 177
1.8 9.9 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 7 93
3.3 9.9 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 4 55
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) Cow ndlAs occiates,Inc.
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 12
Date: 12/4/2008 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQT3 stems/acre = 486
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 95% Solidego sp and cattle grass
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
2.5 0.3 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw
6.4 0.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
9.4 0.6 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood
2.6 2.5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
0 3.1 Unknown sp Unknown sp Nyssa? Corpus?
5 3.2 Unknown sp Unknown sp Morus rubra?
2 4.8 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
3.7 5.5 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw
6.4 8 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud
2 7.3 Unknown sp Unknown sp River Birch?
1.8 9.9 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
3.3 9.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) r, on ndlAs occiates,Inc.
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/1/2009
Name: VQT3
Size: 10m x 10m
stems =
plot size (m"2) _
stems/acre =
8
100
324
Cover: Dog Fennel, narrow leaved sunflower= 100%
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
2.5 0.3 Asimina triloba
6.4 0.9 Quercus palustris
9.4 0.6 Corpus amomum
2.6 2.5 Juglans nigra
5 3.2 Unknown sp
6.4 8 Cercis canadensis
3.3 9.9 Quercus palustris
3.5 4 Quercus palustris
Common Name
Common Pawpaw
Pin Oak
Silky Dogwood
Black Walnut
Unknown sp
Eastern Redbud
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Condition Comments
Morus rubra?
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) Cow ndlAs occiates,Inc.
Supplemental Planting Feb 2010
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 17 stems + Vol. = 19
Date: 2/10/2010 plot size (m"2) = 100 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQT3 stems/acre = 688
Size: 10m x 10m stems/acre = 769
Cover: Dog Fennel, narrow leaved sunflower= 100%
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
2.5 0.3 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw
6.4 0.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
9.4 0.6 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood
2.6 2.5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
5 3.2 Morus rubra? Red Mulberry
6.4 8 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud
3.3 9.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.5 4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0 3.1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
2 7.3 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
9.5 3.5 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud
0.2 9.3 Salix nigra Black Willow LS
0 8.2 Salix nigra Black Willow LS
0 4 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood LS
3.5 8 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant
7.5 6 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant
6 4 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant
1.5 2.5 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol
1.3 2 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol
Condition Comments
LS
LS
LS
Replant
Replant
Replant
Vol
Vol
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) r, on ndlAs occiates,Inc.
MY3
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 13 stems + Vol. = 18
Date: 9/10/2010 plot size (m"2) = 100 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQT3
Size: 10m x 10m stems/acre = 526 stems/acre = 728
Cover: Dog Fennel, narrow leaved sunflower; 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
2.5 0.3 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw
9.4 0.6 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood
2.6 2.5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
7.5 6 Liriodenron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Replant
5 3.2 Morus rubra Red Mulberry
5.8 5.4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
4 7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Vol?
3.3 9.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.4 0.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.4 8 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud
9.5 3.5 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud
0.2 9.3 Salix nigra Black Willow LS LS
0 8.2 Salix nigra Black Willow LS LS
1.5 2.5 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol Vol
1.3 2 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol Vol
0 4 Salix sericea Silky Willow LS
0.9 2 Ulmus alata Winged Elm Vol.
0.1 4 Ulmus alata Winged Elm Vol.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) Cow ndlAs occiates,Inc.
MY4
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 13 stems + Vol. = 18
Date: 6/29/2011 plot size (m"2) = 100 plot size (m"2) = 100
Name: VQT3
Size: 10m x 10m stems/acre = 526 stems/acre = 728
Cover: Dog Fennel, narrow leaved sunflower; 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
2.5 0.3 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw
6.4 8 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud Stressed
9.5 3.5 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud
9.4 0.6 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood Stressed
2.6 2.5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
7.5 6 Liriodenron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Replant
5 3.2 Morus rubra Red Mulberry
5.8 5.4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
4 7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Vol?
3.3 9.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.4 0.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0.2 9.3 Salix nigra Black Willow LS LS
0 8.2 Salix nigra Black Willow LS LS
1.5 2.5 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol Vol
1.3 2 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol Vol
0 4 Salix sericea Silky Willow LS
0.9 2 Ulmus alata Winged Elm Vol.
0.1 4 Ulmus alata Winged Elm Vol.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) Cow ndlAs occiates,Inc.
VQT3
10
Blacl
9
Black
8
7
6
E 5
} Silk
4
3
2
1
0
Pin Oak
Willow LS
F-I
illow LS
Eastern Redbud
Pin Oak
F-I
¦
Tulip Poplar
Pin Oak
¦ ? ¦
¦
Willow
Eastern Redb
Winged Elm Red Mulberry ?
F-I
Black Willow Vol
Winged Elm ? ? Black Walnut
Black Willow Vol
Pin Oak
Common Pawpaw ?
F-I
d
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 MY2 N Replant- Year 2 ¦ MY3 MY4
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 6/1/2008
Name: VQT4
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 95% Solide go sp and cockleburs
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
0.6 0.6 Cercis canadensis
2.8 0.3 Quercus sp.
7.4 0.5 Quercus sp.
9.1 2.4 Quercus sp.
6.3 2.3 Quercus sp.
3.4 2.5 Quercus sp.
7.2 5.1 Cephalanthus occidentalis
4.7 5.2 Quercus sp.
2.1 5.5 Unknown sp
0.2 6.1 Quercus sp.
2.7 7.7 Cornus amomum
5.2 7.6 Asimina triloba
0.3 8.5 Asimina triloba
stems = 13
plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 526
Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
Eastern Redbud 6 85
Oak sp. 3 35
Oak sp. 3 39
Oak sp. 2 35
Oak sp. 4 24
Oak sp. 3 36
Buttonbush 7 75
Oak sp. 4 24
Unknown sp 4 57
Oak sp. 3 30
Silky Dogwood 5 54
Common Pawpaw 7 72
Common Pawpaw 4 48
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek stems =
Date: 12/4/2008 plot size (MA 2) _
Name: VQT4 stems/acre =
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 95% Solide go sp and cockleburs
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
0.6 0.6 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud
2.8 0.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.4 0.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6.3 2.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
3.4 2.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.2 5.1 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
4.7 5.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0.2 6.1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.7 7.7 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
5.2 7.6 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw
0.3 8.5 Quercus sp Oak sp
11
100
445
Condition Comments
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek stems =
Date: 9/1/2009 plot size (MA 2) _
Name: VQT4 stems/acre =
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: cocleburr, dog fennel = 100%
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
7.4 0.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.2 5.1 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
4.7 5.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.7 7.7 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
5.2 7.6 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw
5
100
202
Condition Comments
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
Supplemental Planting Feb 2010
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 15
Date: 2/10/2010 plot size (MA 2) = 100
Name: VQT4 stems/acre = 607
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: cocleburr, dog fennel = 100%
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
7.4 0.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.2 5.1 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
4.7 5.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.7 7.7 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
5.2 7.6 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw
1 3.5 Liriodenron tulipifera Tulip Poplar
5 7 Liriodenron tulipifera Tulip Poplar
9 8 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
4 5 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw
5 2.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
5.2 1 Unidentified at time of planting Replant
6.5 3.5 Unidentified at time of planting Replant
7 3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
1 8.5 Unidentified at time of planting Replant
8.5 0.5 Unidentified at time of planting Replant
Comments
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY3
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/10/2010
Name: VQT4
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: cocleburr, dog fennel; 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
7.4 0.5 Quercus palustris
7 3 Quercus palustris
5 2.5 Quercus palustris
2.8 0.3 Quercus palustris
7.2 5.1 Liriodenron tulipifera
5 7 Liriodenron tulipifera
1 3.5 Liriodenron tulipifera
2.7 7.7 Cornus amomum
5.2 7.6 Asimina triloba
0.3 8.5 Asimina triloba
4 5 Asimina triloba
9 8 Juglans nigra
0.6 0.6 Salix nigra
1 2 Salix nigra
0.1 4 Salix nigra
stems = 12 stems + Vol. = 15
plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 486 stems/acre = 607
Common Name
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Tulip Poplar
Tulip Poplar
Tulip Poplar
Silky Dogwood
Common Pawpaw
Common Pawpaw
Common Pawpaw
Black Walnut
black willow
black willow
black willow
Condition
Stressed
Comments
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
vol.
vol.
vol.
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY4
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 6/29/2011
Name: VQT4
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: cocleburr, dog fennel; 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
2.7 7.7 Cornus amomum
7.2 5.1 Liriodenron tulipifera
5 7 Liriodenron tulipifera
1 3.5 Liriodenron tulipifera
7.4 0.5 Quercus palustris
7 3 Quercus palustris
5 2.5 Quercus palustris
2.8 0.3 Quercus palustris
0.6 0.6 Salix nigra
1 2 Salix nigra
0.1 4 Salix nigra
stems = 12 stems + Vol. = 11
plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 486 stems/acre = 445
Common Name
Silky Dogwood
Tulip Poplar
Tulip Poplar
Tulip Poplar
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
black willow
black willow
black willow
Condition Comments
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
vol.
vol.
vol.
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
VQT4
10
Con
8
7
6
E 5
} blac
4
3
2
1
0

on Pawpaw
¦ Black Walnut
Silky Dogwood
C0111111011 Pdwpdw
Tulip Poplar
¦
¦ Common Pawpaw Tulip Poplar
F-I
willow
17
Tulip Poplar
? ¦ Pin Oak
Pin Oak
black willow ¦ ? ¦ ¦

black willow Pin Oak
? Pin Oak
? ¦
-
F
I
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 MY2 ¦ Replant- Year 2 ¦ MY3 MY4
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 12
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (MA 2) = 100
Name: VQT5 stems/acre = 486
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 95% Solidego sp and cockleburs
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
0.4 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 6 42
7.9 0.1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 8 42
6.6 2.6 Betula nigra River Birch 6 59
3.1 2.3 Quercus alba White Oak 3 35
1.6 4.6 Betula nigra River Birch 6 66
4.8 5.1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 8 40
7.6 5.6 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 4 54
0.8 3.2 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 8 58
3.1 7.6 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 2 24
6 7.9 Betula nigra River Birch 6 53
8.9 8.5 Betula nigra River Birch 7 71
1.6 10 Betula nigra River Birch 5 55
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 12/4/2008
Name: VQT5
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 95% Solidego sp and cockleburs
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
0.4 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
7.9 0.1 Juglans nigra
6.6 2.6 Betula nigra
3.1 2.3 Quercus alba
1.6 4.6 Betula nigra
3.1 7.6 Quercus palustris
8.9 8.5 Betula nigra
1.6 10 Betula nigra
stems = 8
plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 324
Common Name Condition
Green Ash
Black Walnut Stressed
River Birch
White Oak
River Birch
Pin Oak
River Birch
River Birch Stressed
Comments
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek stems =
Date: 9/1/2009 plot size (MA 2) _
Name: VQT5 stems/acre =
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: narrow leaved sunflower, mixed grasses = 100%
X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
0.4 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
6.6 2.6 Betula nigra River Birch
3.1 2.3 Quercus palustris White Oak
1.6 4.6 Betula nigra River Birch
3.1 7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
8.9 8.5 Betula nigra River Birch
3.8 0.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash
9.5 6.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
8
100
324
Condition Comments
not previously counted
not previously counted
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
Supplemental Planting Feb 2010
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 19
Date: 2/10/2010 plot size (MA 2) = 100
Name
Size:
Cover:
X (m)
0.4
6.6
3.1
1.6
3.1
8.9
3.8
9.5
2.5
2.4
2
5
5
5
5
7.5
7.3
9
3.5
VQT5
10m x 10m
narrow leaved sunflower, mixed grasses = 100%
Y (m) Scientific Name
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2.6 Betula nigra
2.3 Quercus palustris
4.6 Betula nigra
7.6 Quercus palustris
8.5 Betula nigra
0.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus
6.5 Quercus palustris
8 Unidentified at time of planting
6 Quercus palustris
2.6 Quercus palustris
7 Quercus palustris
5 Quercus palustris
4.5 Unidentified at time of planting
2.5 Betula nigra
0.5 Quercus palustris
2.7 Unidentified at time of planting
8 Quercus michauxii
1.5 Quercus michauxii
stems/acre = 769
Common Name Condition Comments
Green Ash
River Birch
Pin Oak
River Birch
Pin Oak
River Birch
Green Ash not previously counted
Pin Oak not previously counted
Replant Replant
Pin Oak Replant
Pin Oak Replant
Pin Oak Replant
Pin Oak Replant
Replant Replant
River Birch Replant
Pin Oak Replant
Replant Replant
Swamp Chestnut Oak Replant
Swamp Chestnut Oak Replant
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY3
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/10/2010
Name: VQT5
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover:
X (m)
0.4
3.8
0.1
6.6
8.9
1.6
5
6
6.9
3.1
7.3
2
2.4
5
5
7.5
7.6
9
3.5
1.5
6.7
stems =
plot size (MA 2) _
stems/acre =
narrow leaved sunflower, mixed grasses, dog fennel; 100% cover
17 stems + Vol. _
100 plot size (MA 2) _
688 stems/acre =
y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash
0.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash
7 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash
2.6 Betula nigra River Birch
8.5 Betula nigra River Birch
4.6 Betula nigra River Birch
2.5 Betula nigra River Birch
7.9 Betula nigra River Birch
9.9 Betula nigra River Birch
7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
5.6 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
8 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
1.5 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
1 Acer rubrum Red Maple
1.2 Ulmus alata Winged Elm
Comments
not in base line
Vol
Replant
Vol
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Vol
Vol
21
100
850
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY4
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 17 stems + Vol. = 19
Date: 6/29/2011 plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
Name: VQT5 stems/acre = 688 stems/acre = 769
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: narrow leaved sunflower, mixed grasses, dog fennel; 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
1.5 1 Acer rubrum Red Maple Vol
6.6 2.6 Betula nigra River Birch
8.9 8.5 Betula nigra River Birch
1.6 4.6 Betula nigra River Birch
6 7.9 Betula nigra River Birch
0.4 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash
3.8 0.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash not in base line
0.1 7 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash Vol
5 0.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash Vol
7.6 5.6 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
3.5 1.5 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak Replant
3.1 7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7.3 2.7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2 2.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Replant
2.4 6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Replant
5 5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Replant
5 7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Replant
7.5 0.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Replant
6.7 1.2 Ulmus alata Winged Elm Vol
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
VQT5
10
9
8
G re
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
River Birch
River Birch
River Birch Swamp &estnut Oak
Pin Oak
F-I
n Ash Pin Oak
El --o
Pin Oak ¦
Pin Oak
¦
River Bird i LEJI
? ¦
¦
Pin Oak River Birch ?
¦
Swamp Chestnut Oak
reen Ash Red Maple ? Winged Elm
LF-Ij -F] Green Ash Pin Oak
? ?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦Baseline ¦MY1 MY2 ¦Replant-Year2 ¦MY3 MY4
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 15
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (MA 2) = 100
Name: VQT6 stems/acre = 607
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 97% Solidego sp and cockleburs
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
8.6 2.9 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 41
5.6 2.1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 4 20
3 1.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 4 29
0.4 2.7 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 7 58
4.5 4.5 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 4 35
6.9 5.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 3 33
0 5.4 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 36 25
0 6 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 18 22
0 6.7 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 13 30
0 7.3 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 20 27
0 7.8 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 29 24
0 8.4 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 20 25
3 6.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 4 29
9.3 7.6 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 35
1.9 9.5 Quercus sp. Oak sp. 3 40
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 13
Date: 12/4/2008 plot size (MA 2) = 100
Name: VQT6 stems/acre = 526
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 97% Solidego sp and cockleburs
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
8.6 2.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
5.6 2.1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
3 1.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
0.4 2.7 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
4.5 4.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0 5.4 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 6 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 6.7 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 7.3 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 7.8 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 8.4 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
3 6.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
9.3 7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/1/2009
Name: VQT6
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover
x (m)
8.6
5.6
3
0.4
4.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
9.3
1.9
5.1
stems =
plot size (MA 2) _
stems/acre =
cokleburr, dog fennel, narrow leaved sunflower = 100%
Y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
2.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
2.1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
1.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
2.7 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
4.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
5.4 Salix nigra Black Willow
6 Salix nigra Black Willow
6.7 Salix nigra Black Willow
7.3 Salix nigra Black Willow
7.8 Salix nigra Black Willow
8.4 Salix nigra Black Willow
6.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
9.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
15
100
607
Condition Comments
Livestakes
Livestakes
Livestakes
Livestakes
Livestakes
Livestakes
not previously counted
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY3
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 13 stems + Vol. = 16
Date: 9/10/2009 plot size (MA 2) = 100 )lot size (MA 2) = 100
Name: VQT6 stems/acre = 526 stems/acre = 647
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: cokleburr, dog fennel, narrow leaved sunflower; 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
8.6 2.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
9.3 7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
5.6 2.1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
3 1.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
3 6.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
6.9 5.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
4.1 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol
0.4 2.7 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
0 5.4 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 6 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 6.7 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 7.3 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 7.8 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 8.4 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
2.4 9 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol
0.8 7 Betula nigra River Birch Vol
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY4
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 13 stems + Vol. = 15
Date: 6/29/2011 plot size (MA 2) = 100 )lot size (MA 2) = 100
Name: VQT6 stems/acre = 526 stems/acre = 607
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: cokleburr, dog fennel, narrow leaved sunflower; 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
0.8 7 Betula nigra River Birch Vol
0.3 3.2 Betula nigra River Birch Vol
5.6 2.1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
3 1.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
3 6.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
6.9 5.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
4.1 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol
8.6 2.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
9.3 7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
0 5.4 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 6 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 6.7 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 7.3 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 7.8 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
0 8.4 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
VQT6
10
9
Black
BIV
Black
Black
Black
6
Black
E 5
4
3E
2
1
0
Black Willow Green Ash
illow
illow Pin Oak
illow ?
River Birch
Gree-i Ash
ii
F-I
illow
How Green Ash
Pin Oak
I ark Waln, it ¦
Green Ash Green Ash
F-I
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 MY2 ¦ MY3 MY4
Baseline
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 12
Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (MA 2) = 100
Name: VQT7 stems/acre = 486
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 95% Solidego sp
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition
1.1 0.7 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
6.8 1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
8.3 3.5 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
5.1 3.2 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
0 3.2 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
9.8 6.1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
5.4 6.2 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
0.9 6.4 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
0 7 Salix nigra Black Willow
2.7 8.7 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
8 7.5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
0.1 9.3 Quercus sp. Oak sp.
Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm)
dbh=0.5cm 21 155
7 41
3 27
dbh = 0.6 cm 26 175
4 36
7 42
9 132
5 47
30 32
3 32
5 62
3 26
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY1
Project: Forrest Creek stems =
Date: 12/4/2008 plot size (MA 2) _
Name: VQT7 stems/acre =
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: 95% Solidego sp
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name
1.1 0.7 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
6.8 1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
5.1 3.2 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
0 3.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
5.4 6.2 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
0.9 6.4 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
0 7 Salix nigra Black Willow
2.7 8.7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
8 7.5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut
0.1 9.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak
10
100
405
Condition Comments
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY2
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/1/2009
Name: VQT7
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: dog fennel, soft rush = 100%
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
1.1 0.7 Cornus amomum
5.1 3.2 Cornus amomum
5.4 6.2 Cornus amomum
3.4 8.7 Salix nigra
stems = 3 (w/ vols.) stems = 4
plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 121 stems/acre = 162
Common Name
Silky Dogwood
Silky Dogwood
Silky Dogwood
Black Willow
Condition Comments
vol.
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
Supplemental Planting Feb 2010
Project: Forrest Creek stems = 13 (w/ vols.) stems = 14
Date: 2/10/2010 plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
Name: VQT7 stems/acre = 526 stems/acre = 567
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: dog fennel, soft rush = 100%
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments
1.1 0.7 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
5.1 3.2 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
5.4 6.2 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
3.4 8.7 Salix nigra Black Willow vol. vol.
1 8 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Replant
2 3.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Replant
3 3.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Replant
3.5 8.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Replant
5 7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Replant
5.5 5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Replant
7.5 7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Replant
8 4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Replant
9 5.5 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak Replant
8 2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Replant
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY3
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 9/10/2010
Name: VQT7
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: dog fennel Dominant; 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
1.1 0.7 Cephalanthus occidentalis
5.1 3.2 Cephalanthus occidentalis
5.4 6.2 Cephalanthus occidentalis
9 5.5 Quercus michauxii
1 8 Quercus palustris
2 3.5 Quercus palustris
3 3.5 Quercus palustris
3.5 8.5 Quercus palustris
5 7 Quercus palustris
5.5 5 Quercus palustris
7.5 7 Quercus palustris
8 4 Quercus palustris
8 2 Quercus palustris
3.4 8.7 Salix nigra
stems = 13 (w/ vols.) stems = 14
plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 526 stems/acre = 567
Common Name
Buttonbush
Buttonbush
Buttonbush
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Black Willow vol.
Condition Comments
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
vol.
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
MY4
Project: Forrest Creek
Date: 6/29/2011
Name: VQT7
Size: 10m x 10m
Cover: dog fennel Dominant; 100% cover
x (m) y (m) Scientific Name
1.1 0.7 Cephalanthus occidentalis
5.1 3.2 Cephalanthus occidentalis
5.4 6.2 Cephalanthus occidentalis
9 5.5 Quercus michauxii
1 8 Quercus palustris
2 3.5 Quercus palustris
3 3.5 Quercus palustris
3.5 8.5 Quercus palustris
5.5 5 Quercus palustris
7.5 7 Quercus palustris
8 4 Quercus palustris
8 2 Quercus palustris
3.4 8.7 Salix nigra
stems = 13 (w/ vols.) stems = 13
plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100
stems/acre = 526 stems/acre = 526
Common Name
Buttonbush
Buttonbush
Buttonbush
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Black Willow vol.
Condition Comments
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
Replant
vol.
- and lAssociates, Inc.
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) PP
VQT7
10
9
8
71
6
5
4
I
3
2
1
0
¦
¦ Eh Pin Oak
Pin Oak
Pin Oak Pin Oak ¦
Buttonbush
¦
? ¦
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Pin Oak ?
Pin Oak
Pin Oak Pin Oak LLIJ
? ? Buttonbush ¦
F-I
Pin Oak

F-I
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X (m)
¦ Baseline ¦ MY1 MY2 W Replant- Year 2 ¦ MY3 MY4
APPENDIX B
Cross Sections
P- Kimley-Horn
Forrest Creek Monitoring - MY4 (2011) h? and Associates, Inc.
As-built 2008* Year 1- 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 Year 5 - 2012
Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature
0.00 591.08 BM 0.0 591.08 BM 0.00 591.08 0.00 591.08 LPIN
13.09 590.35 FP 13.09 590.63 FP 2.89 590.92 4.08 590.85
17.41 589.73 FP 17.41 589.78 FP 10.64 590.51 13.07 590.39
29.50 589.34 FP 29.50 589.16 FP 19.43 589.81 23.87 589.71
35.70 588.53 35.70 588.32 28.22 589.47 28.39 589.16 BKF
43.60 586.38 LTOE 43.60 586.33 LTOE 34.25 588.47 33.22 588.56
45.80 586.19 LEW 45.80 586.13 LEW 37.62 588.29 36.28 588.43
48.74 585.89 TW 48.74 586.01 TW 40.62 587.59 43.89 586.25
52.24 586.25 RTOE 52.24 585.76 RTOE 42.69 586.79 46.28 586.11
62.27 589.16 BKF 62.27 588.93 BKF 44.47 586.29 50.26 586.13
78.47 588.85 FP 78.47 589.09 FP 46.34 586.28 51.05 586.02 LEW
88.59 590.12 FP 88.59 590.18 FP 48.46 586.08 LEW 51.24 585.68
103.41 590.21 BM 103.41 590.31 BM 49.78 586.21 51.88 585.48
51.41 586.08 52.52 585.57
52.26 585.64 52.63 586.06 REW
53.00 585.73 53.03 586.56
53.33 586.09 REW 55.08 587.38
53.74 586.66 56.69 587.55
54.45 587.22 59.35 588.49
56.78 587.58 63.10 589.16 BKF
58.98 588.43 78.18 589.00
62.74 589.16 BKF 82.82 589.66
69.15 588.99 87.46 590.019
77.16 588.94 103.30 590.275 RPIN
82.10 589.51
85.28 589.91
88.43 590.15
96.58 590.04
103.30 590.23

XSP1-2011
592
591
590
Y
589
c
0
Y
v 588
w
587
586
585
0
Summary Data Table As-built 1\4Y1 2008 1\4Y2 2009 1\4Y3 2010 1\4Y4 2011 1\4Y5 2012
Banldull Cross Sectional Area: 58.8 64.8 56.6 58.6
Bankfull Width: 50.1 49.6 49.0 50.9
Bankfull Max Depth: 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.7

BKF ELEV: 589.16
* No as-built data was collected for this project The data taken during Year 1 monitoring
is assumed to be the as-built data for this project.
? and Associates, Inc.
Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) runand Associates,
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105
Station (ft)
As-built 2008* Year 1- 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 Year 5 - 2012
Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature
0.00 592.06 BM 0.0 592.06 BM 0.00 592.06 0.0 592.06 LPIN
13.24 591.71 FP 13.2 591.56 FP 8.64 591.77 2.3 591.96
34.89 590.70 FP 34.9 590.46 FP 19.87 591.19 29.0 590.77
42.91 589.96 40.7 590.09 BKF 26.33 590.36 37.1 590.36
49.50 587.64 LTOE 42.9 589.96 31.31 589.59 39.4 590.09 BKF
50.83 587.43 LEW 49.5 587.76 LTOE 37.39 588.92 45.8 589.36
56.08 587.44 TW 50.8 587.46 LEW 45.44 588.38 47.8 588.57
61.03 587.36 REW 56.1 587.46 TW 48.52 587.92 49.6 588.28
62.18 587.56 RTOE 61.0 587.36 REW 50.44 587.51 LEW 51.2 587.65
69.14 590.09 BKF 62.2 587.56 RTOE 51.90 587.42 52.0 587.48 LEW
77.97 590.13 FP 69.1 589.86 53.14 587.40 54.1 587.31
90.05 591.67 FP 78.0 590.66 FP 53.66 587.35 55.0 587.55
115.70 591.80 BM 90.1 591.36 FP 55.43 587.50 REW 56.4 587.48
115.7 591.86 BM 59.72 587.73 57.5 587.33
61.91 588.22 60.6 587.29
63.91 589.01 61.3 587.51 REW
65.05 589.53 62.6 587.77
65.78 590.09 BKF 64.6 588.45
67.64 590.23 67.6 589.56
70.85 591.14 71.6 590.09 BKF
79.40 591.64 82.6 590.82
93.53 591.79 91.1 591.63
107.39 591.72 95.49 591.567
115.65 591.81 115.7 591.609 RPIN

XSR2 - 2011
593
592
591
Y
590
c
0
Y
v 589
w
588
587
586
0
Summary Data Table As-built 1\4Y1 2008 1\4Y2 2009 1\4Y3 2010 1\4Y4 2011 1\4Y5 2012
Banldull Cross Sectional Area: 51.1 51.5 60.6 49.6
Bankfull Width: 27.6 31.0 37.7 32.2
Bankfull Max Depth: 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.8

BKF ELEV: 590.09
* No as-built data was collected for this project The data taken during Year 1 monitoring
is assumed to be the as-built data for this project.
? and Associates, Inc.
Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) runand Associates,
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120
Statio (ft)
As-built 2008* Year 1- 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4- 2011 Year 5 - 2012
Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature
0.00 592.56 BM 0.0 592.56 BM 0.00 592.56 0.00 592.56 LPIN
26.22 591.69 BKF 26.22 591.76 5.66 592.12 14.97 592.01
40.88 590.83 LB 27.33 591.69 BKF 13.97 592.11 28.21 591.69 BKF
52.18 589.36 LEW 40.88 590.76 LB 22.33 591.84 34.13 591.54
61.56 588.14 TW 52.18 589.46 LEW 29.65 591.58 38.79 591.08
67.76 589.26 REW 61.56 588.16 TW 37.42 590.94 45.14 590.11
75.16 591.94 LB 67.76 589.26 REW 46.67 590.17 52.44 589.64
106.73 592.65 BM 75.16 591.76 LB 49.49 589.91 53.58 589.39
106.7 592.66 BM 51.50 589.67 54.37 589.07 LEW
52.83 589.58 54.63 588.50
53.57 589.07 LEW 58.71 588.23
54.80 588.39 63.66 588.00
57.69 588.29 65.88 588.39
60.51 588.23 66.00 589.11 REW
63.41 588.06 66.61 589.59
65.22 588.45 67.08 589.69
65.91 589.12 REW 67.60 590.18
66.06 589.63 69.65 591.46
66.70 589.64 73.48 591.69 BKF
66.96 590.30 78.52 591.96
68.51 591.16 90.7 592.55
74.74 591.69 BKF 107.12 592.71 RPIN
85.19 592.16
97.28 592.46
104.23 592.46
106.70 592.65

XSP3 - 2011
593
592
591
c: 590
0
Y
v
u, 589
588
587
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110
Station (ft)
Summary Data Table As-built 1\4Y1 2008 1\4Y2 2009 1\4Y3 2010 1\4Y4 2011 1\4Y5 2012
Banldull Cross Sectional Area: 78.6 78.4 73.7 72.5
Banldull Width: 48.3 47.6 48.2 45.3
Banldull Max Depth: 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.7

BKF ELEV: 591.69
* No as-built data was collected for this project The data taken during Year 1 monitoring
is assumed to be the as-built data for this project.
? and Associates, Inc.
Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) runand Associates,
As-built 2008* Year 1- 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4- 2011 Year 5 - 2012
Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature
0.00 595.92 BM 0.00 595.92 BM -9.32 596.26 0.00 595.92 LPIN
6.31 595.64 FP 6.31 595.82 FP 0.75 596.07 5.61 596.12
13.34 594.67 FP 13.34 594.92 FP 9.46 594.91 BKF 14.46 594.98
24.61 594.57 BKF 21.03 594.57 BKF 10.01 594.84 24.98 594.71
31.17 592.74 LTOE 24.61 594.42 24.98 594.71 25.38 594.57 BKF
32.66 592.58 LEW 31.17 593.02 LTOE 31.04 593.91 29.96 593.17 LEW
34.64 592.50 TW 32.66 592.92 LEW 34.14 593.35 33.14 592.91
42.92 592.21 TW 34.64 592.82 TW 36.67 593.09 38.67 592.84
45.39 592.59 REW 42.92 592.82 TW 37.75 592.91 LEW 42.75 592.97
46.13 592.67 RTOE 45.39 592.72 REW 40.01 592.92 44.45 593.10 REW
53.15 594.23 46.13 592.82 RTOE 43.37 592.71 45.61 593.39
64.31 594.94 FP 53.15 594.42 47.12 592.73 48.04 593.93
74.00 594.87 FP 64.31 595.12 FP 48.80 592.83 REW 51.71 594.57 BKF
76.95 595.53 FP 74.00 595.12 FP 50.41 593.18 58.73 594.73
91.94 595.55 BM 76.95 595.42 FP 52.73 593.76 71.64 595.19
91.9 595.72 BM 54.85 594.35 80.82 595.81
59.47 594.75 99.0 595.29
67.89 595.12
76.41 595.80
83.3 595.81

XSR4 - 2011
Y
W
C
Q
Y
v
W
Summary Data Table As-built 1\4Y1 2008 1\4Y2 2009 1\4Y32010 1\4Y42011 1\4Y5 2012
Banlfhll Cross Sectional Area: 46.8 38.7 49.5 17.2
Bankfull Width: 33.9 34.5 53.7 26.3
Bankfull Max Depth: 2.4 1.9 2.2 1.7

BKF ELEV: 594.57
* No as-built data was collected for this project The data taken during Year 1 monitoring
is assumed to be the as-built data for this project.
? and Associates, Inc.
Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) runand Associates,
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
Station (ft)
As-built 2008* Year 1- 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 Year 5 - 2012
Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature
0.00 598.01 0.00 598.01 0.00 598.01 0.00 598.01 LPIN
14.50 597.01 FP 14.50 597.01 FP 14.41 596.98 9.02 597.42
23.06 595.58 FP 23.06 595.81 FP 20.19 596.24 16.00 596.93
31.85 595.43 31.85 595.11 20.89 596.14 BKF 22.15 596.14 BKF
31.96 595.39 LTOB 31.96 595.11 LTOB 27.21 595.37 25.73 595.70
43.68 593.70 LEW 43.68 594.11 LEW 36.18 594.69 38.30 595.16
45.54 592.96 LTOE 45.54 593.21 LTOE 39.59 594.93 41.42 594.81
50.72 591.72 TW 50.72 592.11 TW 42.24 594.59 43.09 594.54
50.74 592.10 TW 50.74 592.11 TW 43.48 594.17 44.37 593.98 LEW
52.77 592.02 TW 52.77 592.11 TW 44.49 593.75 LEW 44.76 593.28
54.96 592.57 RTOE 54.96 592.81 RTOE 46.32 592.81 47.49 592.64
56.07 593.90 REW 56.07 594.01 REW 48.34 592.39 49.73 592.00
62.41 596.14 BKF 62.41 596.14 BKF 51.06 592.14 52.70 592.07
88.18 596.59 FP 88.18 596.51 FP 53.79 592.01 55.94 593.27
95.75 597.31 FP 95.75 597.01 FP 55.98 593.84 REW 56.06 593.84 REW
99.32 597.50 FP 99.32 597.11 FP 57.23 594.45 56.52 594.51
106.66 597.60 BM 106.66 597.61 BM 61.38 595.91 58.80 595.05
65.25 596.06 62.84 596.03
71.88 596.00 80.50 596.06
80.38 596.15 84.18 596.14 BKF
88.26 596.44 85.30 596.19
106.6 597.56 93.7 596.88
125.4 596.95

XSP5 - 2011
598
597
596
Y
595
c
0
Y
v 594
w
593
592
591
0
Summary Data Table As-built 1\4Y1 2008 1\4Y2 2009 1\4Y3 2010 1\4Y4 2011 1\4Y5 2012
Banldull Cross Sectional Area: 77.3 73.2 74.4 68.4
Bankfull Width: 42.7 41.7 58.9 62.0
Bankfull Max Depth: 4.4 4.0 4.1 4.1

BKF ELEV: 596.14
* No as-built data was collected for this project The data taken during Year 1 monitoring
is assumed to be the as-built data for this project.
? and Associates, Inc.
Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) runand Associates,
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130
Station (ft)
As-built 2008* Year 1- 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 Year 5 - 2012
Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature
0.00 598.74 BM 0.00 598.74 BM 0.00 598.74 0.00 598.74 LPIN
2.85 598.41 FP 2.85 598.24 FP 4.18 598.10 BKF 8.03 598.10 BKF
7.10 597.60 FP 4.09 598.10 BKF 4.77 598.00 14.05 597.61
19.52 597.47 7.10 597.74 FP 11.01 597.47 18.72 597.54
24.91 595.71 LEW 19.52 597.34 16.42 597.27 21.62 597.20
31.42 595.57 TW 24.91 595.84 LEW 19.80 597.45 24.64 596.50
36.94 595.67 REW 31.42 595.62 TW 21.98 597.01 26.21 596.02 LEW
45.45 598.10 BKF 36.94 595.88 REW 23.37 596.46 27.09 595.83
73.93 598.89 BM 45.45 597.78 24.86 595.98 30.78 595.50
73.93 598.91 BM 26.47 596.09 LEW 32.66 595.57
29.10 595.51 36.88 595.69
31.24 595.54 37.57 596.09 REW
34.14 595.60 39.11 596.36
37.19 595.55 40.95 596.86
38.96 596.11 REW 43.63 597.64
40.12 596.25 45.93 598.10 BKF
42.46 596.73 47.56 598.39
44.14 597.16 68.06 598.91
46.18 597.83 81.15 599.12
50.59 598.15 95.60 598.96
59.71 598.48 102.79 600.18
74.9 598.89 108.0 601.74

XSR6 - 2011
602
601
600
Y
599
c
0
Y
v 598
w
597
596
595
0
Summary Data Table As-built 1\4Y1 2008 1\4Y2 2009 1\4Y3 2010 1\4Y4 2011 1\4Y5 2012
Banldull Cross Sectional Area: 55.9 56.1 59.0 48.8
Banldull Width: 41.0 49.4 45.7 37.9
Banldull Max Depth: 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6

BKF ELEV: 598.1
* No as-built data was collected for this project The data taken during Year 1 monitoring
is assumed to be the as-built data for this project.
? and Associates, Inc.
Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) runand Associates,
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110
Station (ft)
i
As-built 2008* Year I-2008 Year 2-2009 Year 3-2010 Year 4-2011 Year 5-2012
Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature
0.00 619.82 BM 0.00 619.82 BM 0.00 619.60 -0.62 620.21 RPIN
0.00 619.73 FP 0.00 619.82 FP 0.00 619.60 -0.71 619.78
9.63 619.52 FP 9.63 619.62 FP 9.63 619.39 5.66 619.68
14.46 619.56 BKF 14.46 619.56 BKF 14.46 619.32 BKF 11.52 619.54
18.44 618.71 LTOE 18.44 618.72 LTOE 18.44 618.40 14.46 619.56 BKF
20.17 618.65 TW 20.17 618.72 TW 20.17 618.33 16.53 619.00
23.05 619.07 RTOE 23.05 618.96 RTOE 23.05 618.97 17.94 618.74 LEW
26.48 619.69 26.48 619.63 26.48 619.39 18.37 618.79
40.54 619.88 FP 40.54 620.02 FP 40.54 619.90 19.15 618.78 REW
53.14 620.28 FP 53.14 620.45 FP 53.14 620.20 20.96 618.86
53.14 620.43 BM 53.14 620.45 BM 53.14 620.20 24.67 619.56 BKF
37.34 619.94
44.44 620.12
46.55 620.21
52.48 620.47 LPIN

XSRT1-2011
w
0
v
w
Station (ft)
Summary Data Table As-built MYl 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 6.0 6.1 8.3 25.9
Bankfull Width 18.0 11.7 15.7 47.3
Bankfull Max Depth: 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.5

BKF ELEV: 619.56
*No as-built data was collected for this project The data taken during Year 1 monitoring
is assumed to be the as-built data for this project.
PP- ates, Inc.
Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) 111- and A A s ssooc ? and cia
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
As-built 2008* Year 1- 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 Year 5 - 2012
Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature
0.00 619.63 BM 0.00 619.63 BM 0.00 620.10 0.00 619.63 LPIN
9.86 619.51 FP 9.86 619.23 FP 7.50 619.42 10.07 619.46
33.21 618.88 25.80 618.76 BKF 19.46 619.00 27.68 619.11
33.47 618.81 LTOB 33.21 618.55 30.92 618.84 34.40 618.83
35.84 618.76 bkf 33.47 618.54 LTOB 38.67 618.98 35.66 618.76 BKF
42.36 617.71 LTOE 35.84 618.40 41.09 618.57 39.76 618.46
44.87 617.32 TW 42.36 617.56 LTOE 42.88 618.24 41.42 618.11 LEW
44.91 617.34 TW 44.87 617.26 TW 44.12 617.89 LEW 42.56 617.74
46.72 617.74 RTOE 44.91 617.28 TW 45.03 617.76 44.35 617.56
46.80 617.78 RTOE 46.72 617.65 RTOE 46.12 617.51 45.61 617.58
50.14 618.80 RTOB 46.80 617.57 RTOE 46.76 617.52 REW 46.86 618.15 REW
50.25 618.85 50.14 618.78 RTOB 47.30 617.72 47.13 618.28
61.17 618.98 FP 50.25 618.80 48.31 618.11 48.90 618.76 BKF
72.34 620.06 FP 61.17 618.89 FP 49.56 618.43 50.09 619.05
72.34 620.07 BM 72.34 619.84 FP 51.69 618.76 BKF 50.25 619.05
72.34 619.84 BM 53.65 619.02 55.60 619.07
62.03 619.11 65.77 619.35
65.91 619.29 68.34 619.70
72.36 619.63 72.4 620.16 RPIN

XSPT2-2011 1
621
620
619
c
0
Y
w 618
617
616
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
Station (ft)
Summary Data Table As-built 1\4Y1 2008 1\4Y2 2009 1\4Y3 2010 1\4Y4 2011 1\4Y5 2012
Banldull Cross Sectional Area: 10.5 14.5 6.9 7.5
Banldull Width: 14.2 24.3 11.7 13.2
Bankfull Max Depth: 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.2

BKF ELEV: 618.76
* No as-built data was collected for this project The data taken during Year 1 monitoring
is assumed to be the as-built data for this project.
? and Associates, Inc.
Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) runand Associates,
As-built 2008* Year 1- 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4- 2011 Year 5 - 2012
Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature
0.00 609.93 BM 0.00 609.93 BM 0.00 609.93 0.00 609.93 LPIN
8.97 609.51 BKF 8.97 609.51 BKF 5.70 609.68 1.69 609.61
14.42 609.48 14.42 609.36 9.23 609.51 BKF 6.28 609.80 BF
16.15 608.90 LEW 16.15 608.98 LEW 10.69 609.44 10.45 609.55
17.16 608.58 TW 17.16 608.67 TW 14.08 609.48 14.71 609.56
18.49 608.92 REW 18.49 608.93 REW 15.47 609.24 15.11 609.51 BKF
22.39 609.66 22.39 609.63 16.04 608.95 15.86 609.41
29.60 609.38 FP 29.60 609.43 FP 16.42 609.02 LEW 16.08 609.18 LEW
37.90 610.10 BM 37.90 610.09 BM 16.54 608.78 16.52 609.07
17.57 608.77 17.29 608.71
18.24 609.00 REW 18.13 608.88
19.77 609.00 18.74 609.20 REW
21.32 609.67 19.23 609.28
23.32 609.58 21.53 609.62
28.58 609.33 23.61 609.51 BKF
34.75 609.72 30.11 609.34
37.92 610.00 37.94 610.09 RPIN

XSRT3 - 2011
Station (ft)
Summary Data Table As-built 1\4Y1 2008 1\4Y2 2009 1\4Y3 2010 1\4Y4 2011 1\4Y5 2012
Banldull Cross Sectional Area: 3.7 3.7 3.8 2.6
Banldull Width: 17.5 16.6 18.4 14.0
Banldull Max Depth: 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.8

BKF ELEV: 609.51
* No as-built data was collected for this project The data taken during Year 1 monitoring
is assumed to be the as-built data for this project.
? and Associates, Inc.
Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) runand Associates,
As-built 2008* Year 1- 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4- 2011 Year 5 - 2012
Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature
0.00 608.76 BM 0.00 608.76 BM 0.00 608.76 0.00 608.76 LPIN
3.45 607.30 FP 3.45 607.82 FP 1.55 607.94 0.02 608.40
15.04 606.59 FP 15.04 606.68 FP 9.59 606.85 3.72 607.25
20.54 606.18 20.54 606.02 17.41 606.41 9.69 606.91
22.91 605.42 LEW 22.45 605.61 BKF 19.43 606.32 19.80 606.47
25.68 604.24 TW 22.91 605.53 LEW 20.80 606.17 21.64 606.05
32.76 605.43 REW 25.68 603.99 TW 21.66 605.79 23.97 605.91 LEW
39.73 605.61 BKF 32.76 605.51 REW 22.47 605.64 LEW 24.02 605.61 BKF
40.38 605.34 FP 39.73 605.41 24.53 604.03 24.10 604.57
46.80 605.44 FP 40.38 605.41 FP 27.44 603.69 26.37 604.29
52.36 605.50 FP 46.80 605.54 FP 29.95 604.56 28.53 604.15
62.62 606.02 FP 52.36 605.71 FP 31.33 604.77 29.88 604.56
66.65 606.22 FP 62.62 606.15 FP 32.07 605.62 REW 31.62 605.25
73.54 606.78 BM 66.65 606.38 FP 36.14 605.61 BKF 31.67 605.61 BKF
73.54 606.74 BM 43.92 605.55 31.93 606.00 REW
54.50 605.59 32.81 605.79
66.92 606.21 36.61 605.63
73.53 606.76 41.86 605.63
56.5 605.86
73.6 606.84 RPIN

XSPT4 - 2011
35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
Station (ft)
Summary Data Table As-built MY12008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012
Banldull Cross Sectional Area: 10.7 10.6 12.7 8.7
Banldull Width: 32.2 26.6 28.3 7.7
Banldull Max Depth: 1.4 1.6 1.9 1.5

BKF ELEV: 605.61
* No as-built data was collected for this project The data taken during Year 1 monitoring
is assumed to be the as-built data for this project.
C-n Kimley-Horn
?/ and Associates, Inc.
As-built 2008* Year 1- 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 Year 5 - 2012
Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature
0.00 602.21 BM 0.00 602.21 BM -0.91 602.05 0.00 602.21 LPIN
0.86 601.56 FP 0.86 601.90 FP 7.62 601.50 BKF 0.01 601.66
11.30 601.64 FP 11.30 601.86 FP 16.63 601.66 8.58 601.82
20.76 601.79 20.76 601.86 20.47 601.54 13.64 601.70 BKF
24.15 600.65 LTOE 24.15 601.37 LTOE 22.53 601.38 20.47 601.54
25.81 600.53 TW 25.81 600.93 TW 23.60 600.69 21.93 600.85 LEW
27.67 600.87 RTOE 27.67 601.26 RTOE 24.75 600.36 24.01 600.52
31.88 601.70 BKF 31.88 601.70 BKF 25.52 600.37 24.57 600.53
47.49 601.84 FP 47.49 601.85 FP 26.91 600.39 25.47 600.55
60.60 601.24 FP 60.60 601.41 FP 28.01 600.54 26.07 600.70
74.71 601.87 FP 74.71 602.51 FP 28.94 600.74 26.86 600.90
74.93 602.52 BM 74.93 602.51 BM 34.33 601.33 27.79 601.49
44.84 601.32 30.26 601.48
60.54 600.95 39.05 601.11
61.94 601.54 56.55 601.70 BKF
73.98 601.61 58.61 601.77
74.58 602.46 RPIN

XSRT5 - 2011
Y
W
C
Y
N
7
y
W
Station (ft)
Summary Data Table As-built MY12008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area: 12.9 5.1 10.6 16.2
Bankfull Width: 45.6 22.4 51.4 45.1
Bankfull Max Depth: 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.2

BKF ELEV: 601.7
* No as-built data was collected for this project. The data taken during Year 1 monitoring
is assumed to be the as-built data for this project.
Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) G=Fl and Associates, and Associates, Inc.
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
As-built 2008* Year 1- 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 Year 5 - 2012
Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature
0.00 595.81 BM 0.00 595.81 BM 0.00 595.81 1.38 596.11 RPIN
0.09 595.33 FP 0.09 595.80 FP 10.48 595.50 1.38 595.87
14.85 595.57 FP 10.18 595.57 BKF 17.82 595.57 BKF 1.40 595.40
22.22 595.57 BKF 14.85 595.46 FP 24.23 595.19 8.62 595.74
25.92 594.60 LTOE 22.22 595.34 24.63 595.04 22.22 595.57 BKF
27.91 594.41 TW 25.92 594.54 LTOE 26.98 594.21 25.02 594.86
29.88 594.65 RTOE 27.91 594.14 TW 28.92 594.38 26.60 594.61 LEW
34.31 595.77 29.88 594.71 RTOE 31.06 595.02 27.37 594.00
40.31 595.68 FP 34.31 595.39 33.64 595.67 28.02 594.51 REW
53.93 595.68 FP 40.31 595.74 FP 41.21 595.91 29.37 594.78
53.93 596.22 BM 53.93 595.73 FP 49.20 595.68 32.21 595.57 BKF
53.93 596.14 BM 53.93 596.16 40.55 595.79
49.73 595.87
55.18 595.92 LPIN

XSRT6 - 2011
597
596
c
0
Y
y
W
595
594
Station (ft)
Summary Data Table As-built 1\4Y1 2008 1\4Y2 2009 1\4Y3 20 1\4Y4 10 Y4 2011 1\4Y5 2012
Banldull Cross Sectional Area: 9.4 11.1 8.9 16.5
Banldull Width: 26.1 27.2 25.1 48.4
Banldull Max Depth: 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.9

BKF ELEV: 595.57
* No as-built data was collected for this project The data taken during Year 1 monitoring
is assumed to be the as-built data for this project.
? and Associates, Inc.
Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) runand Associates,
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0
APPENDIX C
Profile Survey
P? Kimley-Horn
Forrest Creek Monitoring - MY4 (2011) h? and Associates, Inc.
622
621.5
621
620.5
620
619.5
619
618.5
618
617.5
617
616.5
Profile 1
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
2008 2009 . 2010 ? BKF -•-2011
400 450 500
Phhh- P-=Fl Forrest Creek Monitoring and Associates, and Associates, Inc.

Forrest Creek Monitoring and nd A-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Profile 3
597
596.5
596
595.5
595 - -
594.5 - '? ' -
594 - -
593.5 - -
593 -- ?.-
592.5
592
2650 2700 2750 2800 2850 2900 2950
2008 2009 2010 ? BKF X2011
Phhh- P-=Fl Forrest Creek Monitoring and Associates, and Associates, Inc.
Profile 4
597
596 -A
? -
595 -
594
593 - - - - -
592 ?•'' -
•
591 - -
•
590 1 - - I -
589 -
588
600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
2008 2009 X2010 X2011 ? BKF
Phhh- P-=Fl Forrest Creek Monitoring andA socia
and Associates, Inc.
Profile 5
592
591 -
590
589
588 •?
587 • ????`
586
585
584
350 450 550 650 750 850 950 1050 1150
2008 2009 ,2010 X2011 ? BKF
Phhh- P-=Fl Forrest Creek Monitoring andA socia
and Associates, Inc.
APPENDIX D
Pebble Counts
P? Kimley-Horn
Forrest Creek Monitoring - MY4 (2011) h? and Associates, Inc.
CrossSe ction4 (XS 4)Mate rialsSurvey
ForrestCreek--MY4
Pebble Count
Particle Size

(m m)
MY1
2008

MY2 2009

MY3 2010

MY4 2011

MY5 2012
0.062 16 17 15 18
0.13
0.25
0.5
1 2
2 5
4 7 1
6 10 6 2
8 10 8
11 3 17 3
16 4 4 11 3
22 7 7 9 5
32 13 8 5 3
45 15 10 13 5
64 15 14 4 23
90 19 12 1 24
128 8 5 1 6
180 5
256 1
362
512
1024
2048
4096
CrossSe ction2 (XS 2 )Mate rialsSurvey
ForrestCreek--MY4
Pebble Count
Particle Size
(m m)
2008
MY2 2009
MY3 2010
MY4 2011
MY5 2012
0.13
0.25
0.5
1 11
2 15
4 2 4
6 3 11 2 3
8 7 5 7 3
11 4 9 3 10
16 10 8 4 4
22 10 10 3 3
32 3 4 5 15
45 15 5 24 9
64 12 6 19 6
90 13 10 7 6
128 10 6 1 1
180 2 3
256 2
362
512
1024
2048
4096
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
oQru`L Ov0 ^ b 0 ^6 n?rl 6b ^?0 ti? ^y ry 3?
02008 02009 02010 02011 CY"
K-Ioy-H.
?o
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) . a Associates, to
CrossSe ctionTl (XST1) Mate rialsSurvey
ForrestCreek--MY4
Pebble Count
Particle Size

(m m)
MY1
2008

MY2 2009

MY3 2010

MY4 2011

MY5 2012
0.13 3 2
0.25 2 1 2
0.5
1
2 2
4 2 1 3
6 3 3 8 3
8 13 8 20 4
11 19 10 32 1
16 22 9 8 4
22 18 16 11
32 12 12 2
45 5 4 2
64 6 3 1
90 2 6
128 1
180
256 1
362
512
1024
2048
4096
CrossSe ctionT3 (XST3) Mate rialsSurvey
ForrestCreek--MY4
Pebble Count
Particle Size

(m m)
MY1
2008

MY2 2009

MY3 2010

MY4 2011

MY5 2012
0.13
0.25
0.5
1
2 3
4 2 1
6 3 5
8 1 3
11 3 6
16 4 3
22 4 5
32 12 2
45 13 4 5
64 14 3 1 3
90 11 5 1
128
180 8
256
362
512
1024
2048
4096
02008 02009 13 02011
02008 02009 02010 02011
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) . a Associates, to
CrossSe ctionT6 (XS T6)Mate rialsSurvey
ForrestCreek--MY4
Pebble Count
Particle Size

(m m)
MY1
2008

MY2 2009

MY3 2010

MY4 2011

MY5 2012
0.13 2
0.25
0.5
1
2
4 2
6 3 2 4
8 1 5 4
11 4 3 8 2
16 6 2 9 6
22 4 5 7 10
32 8 6 6 1
45 16 11 7 7
64 18 12 2 2
90 15 5
128 1 3
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
4096
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
02008 ¦2009 02010 ¦2011
K-Ioy-H.
?o
Forrest Creek -- MY4 (2011) . a Associates, to
APPENDIX E
Photo Logs
P- Kimley-Horn
Forrest Creek Monitoring - MY4 (2011) b? and Associates, Inc.
Permanent Photo Point Lo
Photo Pc
ti
.
Y' .„ x ? ' 6y 3? +1 ' 1
,4 e;" 3
Val-
70 k"
•
1 - Looking downstream from cattle crossing upstream of Edmund Latta Road (STA 200+00).
4
t`
t
?rS YYnn F? 'F

Photo Point 2 - Looking upstream from Edmund Latta Road bridge (STA 203+75).
G l
Photo Point 3 - Looking upstream from cattle crossing below the confluence of FC and UT (STA
6 L ? •.X• {
w
fief t?'.?
?ri t ?s
s
-? -
JJ tits .. ?
i
41,
r 2? i r Air
Aw_
. i
_jP
?'? ? • r ?t,? ?` ? 3 `. y' Inv ??y"t' ?G.3 ? ? "
?. ? ^ av 'fw?' s
x ?
.411 V
J,
;23+00).
Photo Point 4 - Looking downstream from cattle crossing below the confluence of FC and UT (STA 223+00).

Photo Point 5 - Looking upstream from London Lane (STA 232+00).
Photo Point 6 - Looking upstream (UT) from the cattle crossing above the confluence (STA 126+50).
)ry",
Photo Point 7 - Looking downstream (UT) from cattle crossing above Edmund Latta Road (STA 106+25).
Photo Point 8 - Looking upstream (UT) from cattle crossing above Edmund Latta Road (STA 106+25).
,f
? }!¢z ? 4 a ?. ,. ? a y? A§ n

' 14, 4 l x g , C a'+?.??t ly,s r (n >'6 n ,"r R 6 ?? ? ? 4 r
?}5
r'
F y a'.F ? y,?, "
y: V }r t'l - i
'ai'?,?`-'t°
Tai .i y, • ,?R ?,
Photo Point 9 - Looking downstream (UT) from Edmund Latta Road (STA 110+50).
M
Fw-m=fflw, 11V
n a
l
OF -
„- w,g i sa^ 4? t
0, 1-
-j, Mol
> t XA
'C'dr v,r 1%?. ,?yA?+ 4 S R + ,
t. Mr 4
y.
Photo Point 10 - Looking upstream (UT) from Edmund Latta Road (STA 110+00).

i a
r ?
a A ?E9 a g' Ali '? H t$
41 t?V VFW! i"` st ,t .WA }itf .f{
? I
'VI
rs
6 tr
.,
77
41
XS1 facing downstream
XS1 from stream right
?
f 4
y 2?
Iy ?` +
*y?TT 3

rR•a+?ir? ?u ?q '? ? by r
Y ? ?' ,FT
Y? `
.
. ,A
Py Q AS
' fy P
fg;k
41 ? 4 r
kiS?t1.??N
?w
XS1 facing upstream
XS1 from stream left
I
T?? ?' T14aa -ik` A $
-S Y T \ ? YR`?•}a ab
a
c ^c V r ? ,? vrf?
aY 3=^I ? r ikY§ '# 3
R
IN,
,
u k r gy
Eao? NS
XS2 facing downstream
cep ?„ `
-51
r' k
VF?
h is
0" 1 + a S tgt4,Z".? * R ?3

XS2 from stream right
tt"
4
Z
S

u? lu P. i
n S<r
??dkr'?7 X M rn
t
°3aif]1 ? 1. ? .. ..
1t x.
p1
s ?
l .s ???M1
R r, }
XS2 from stream left
7
1WW11QC 9 dkr?.'1
mx?.:?aas:®r
. vi-
-14
Ail
.Z s T•
yg,#
x.
XS2 facing upstream

# AM

Y

3

ser.-- ry;.

i

XS3 facing downstream
'eF
r t
i ??,,ryry? Y
XS3 from stream right
1
L yY ? ? ?

tye
??fxg
$x ? _ f
r? k
XS3 from stream left

e'vT
XS3 facing upstream

?' 4 iy, 5 Y ,ax,. 3
!C ym' 1:
?j,.., `• r: (?s [. Fir ae "? ?.
?-,'' d s h r ?i n r N _
? ,•< 41,???
XS4 facing downstream

F?
a
r? - `?arh
P \7
!1 0
±i '-
C?. rl ? A'
XS4 from stream right
XS4 from stream left
K 1
XS4 facing upstream
A(I
,.•? 4 ?9?ri i t
.3 J* bfN .?
x?r?'..: Y?Ix? 44 i
r?N
1? at •
XS5 facing downstream
/ elf?' i?M?, ; ? ?,?? '. r?5ri A?r ' • w' ??.
k'N
(?F }? 1\•}g, T.•??? M ? N '?"l. i? ?}VW ? A? SW:?y4'A?
fly i? .? `?' ?f
Y4 ; . 4 ' d l 4
XS5 from stream left
es.
AA?
•i
? 'd z C 1?
?. fk r
4
?.+': ,? t:
<}A
} P w,\
? p
XS5 facing upstream
XS5 from stream right
ItAl

"TWO,
•',7'DF
7L', '.
q„ a

g?
1 ?R3 ?. - _ k 3 r ?? A'V
Ir? A £y
I ?
l sr?

ry?mV
T
t'? r
o

c
m <T 41?
'
e a
7YJ 4 ' rR alt M

e J
? ? ?._ ? ?Ir. ? A# a " d
CI Fi. T ? r 1
i;A
:.:?1?-?xr 1 IF?t f
- t ? i ,yep +j
hr
x
a?
??RRrr ui y? '`
d p-,•? ' A P,T ;' ??Ws a o,
4 a,
° A r• P' ?
XS6 from stream left
fi
ST ? . ^
fo,
T1r 1 F.9 R Yi'YtJ'S ?•!
MORIN
.:i
z "A
y v r
Jx M a rrr
A,
{ L i ? ? !! -C . ya .try R.r ??'T rl ?N??
-./ <?i y: .pr. :' d. ff :?d?.e? . . a 4r: .? T? ? s..., +,?.:. T. . e_ ?.', f... ,
XS6 from stream right XS6 facing upstream
\F
a z s ,"'??°• ? ?p ? ASS ?? w ?"`Pe ?t?r t`
g,i
i. ArI r>r r 6 ... r, \t F:. : ?` A fkSC 'L
1 4r
wfe ."P,
pp k?4 ?. i" y .. rtekr
XST1 facing downstream
MF-
.-
?: ? ? r ?4, 4 v?? ? ? 'r 3? x r
?' e a 1 k, xw ?f n
? 'P;e,. '. SF ?r ,, ?i,1 ?tM ,xf rl ?-.-o ?if,^r? i? ?rtac
11y'Ss41"er">E4
{n,aa j frrc ?a,?t _'d? e`er ° . •
rte! `R. 4, Cs ° ..,%"h4 - ° iA' 7 s_?.4? ,..? ?Mi •: °Ji
t d' It ?; j ?s! R, IM1 °r,. `$e? v?w?r ' r.I t?,. ?,'
4,44
?g I'r O ?
XST1 from stream right
#c n99? x ? ? ? I ?
'I N
C Q1,
4
, Aloo
Y w.6..-.tom,'' K ?k
,?•ti =`' ???? -•. ' rr?w r to . ?? °a,
n
XST1 from stream left
4tr 34,
F ? 4
xg
A,-
3. i ?? y A? ??y! Sf f ,
Z-e
t j.Y ?' Yh
x # v s Rib U 1 _ Il` "yR
? e. ? pry t' ss e e yy,,
, 44
kNI,
q;
{? ??" -/ r 1 y ?rte r-•a a ?>t? 4?1
s??.• :r s 3 ??-: n??1 aR? \r?''??'s# 3 1 I;?aa. '?
per', t ??ple.,
i ; 1 d a?? ?y G o% x 'S! e Jk?' T
r Lr 1 i `5 1/ ? 1 A? o ?" I'yfs 2 v ?? 9,_: r t,
yyyy '
't R (r? 1 t'?i 5 ? V w
IO S?
,rrqq\"? y , . ,?, a h r r}}}}} 'Fir l ? i ? ? ? .
?"-.?. S?Fv.:.a f3.._;,sr',l?:r??'°`?c.?' s I%r?`???`vCe?i.+.??as? 3'.`, '??\.'??
XST1 facing upstream

I
a
4 f
S
? Y
ggrp
rf?lQ
XG t
t?
e
s+
e
# tl
y...???9yssst
drys?ti V` ^;

a
?. a rF ! k 1f" / 4??,
?? .; f } }{? ? yet
? r.
t
°e
? ??. r a re
6 ?3 C
?? z. gar v$a ?4?' ?? B ?`? ? rprF ? h Matt
¦1 ?6//yfdp6y', v0,. P I d;?yr r i „? t,arV4a
tie
4tnaa?a`vta?lA,ui'1ii`.k
?a 4A re
ff ?? w i
-7 71
rFr:,, d?tE cEJ:
! v ? X11
L N f??"Rt
4
Ala
r
XST2 facing downstream
•? ice'. r .alah y
K", V
f'A wE.
ate'" r% v4e' - r5 r ?? F 1 + b'
?. All,
ter 4
T Fa??tPlt?yr . r a
!4 !}`" ?* a erg a rpr de f r ? e ? ? v ?.?ay
..r t g'1? ??arva??{t@L? ?IWFk???G? ?'v r ??S' '? W
aSi}f91?? D• r
» i ` ? §P ?
y't,C? ??. ajt;s ? ????• I '? ? ?x ? ,i % ? `,? .
} may,, y }
XST2 from stream right

1 A r'
4 r 9' I g,,: ,T» 0 _{ A aatet
i 7 a+ 4. v?
3 t !
' x ':? * Ffd a5 , tjs 3
fi
YS' /
Syr
i' llll eie'4F Ci. .! J /r R f /fir
¢l ??*•"+jixf ?a ?4. ;c Mya.P?, s ,`"?I } s r ? } '?"'a¢,:, y G,??.. .,Y,
,?,EE=t ,.; '9 P?}l???,?w ew•l ??IM 4 Q ? ?; t h s P?
\
' tr???i^ :??l????.;,. ? } al??. n ? '?a.,?v t k ..a ?,ya??y t?:y` R .a
XST2 from stream left
{
P?
?, eeS?ttSY h'.
?? 1 ` F 4 7Kt
Cta1P.
ie z 'm
kr #? 6 ? d 41
5 ?r $ _
4 r
yM
/s aqFa
1
pR .?t ? ti
e $A??r,,i? t ??yr s B;
.r' w.8,
''EIS p,,,tjI S.
?????r` Sa'?a?xla
!a I `
T f?S

XST2 facing upstream
XST3 facing downstream
XST3 from stream right
XST3 from stream left
XST3 facing upstream
T, A
40,
,1-
XST4 facing downstream
XST4 from stream right

XST4 from stream left
XST4 facing upstream
XST5 from stream left

P
C 41 $x. ? i 8A $- F N I E

A
dd
.

T
a
'st6. 4
4 ;
>' ?f
f
f
R
?
4M
e?y '1 t
?
y
a

t

a! O.
/ '/hlA?/
( .Q O ?14C&= 1s J
+-i
* ®
? , 4
.

XST5 from stream right
XST5 facing upstream
XST5 facing downstream

NIT,

5 1

.y P' k E
3a Ty. `n y
?
li i ? .a.sD ?!R y

41

s 1 a a }

XST6 facing downstream
XST6 from stream right
XST6 from stream left
XST6 facing upstream
Vegetation Quad Photo Log
s? r? n I ?$ l 41 ? v. t ?'??F{P
` r
a i¢
VQI

4

q ?.

VQ2
' s s
{
Ow
? ' t e 1-
a v
1:4 NvA

4

K
¢¢
? y?? 9gV
??Etp4l?W?e _xlr'?`

VQ3 VQ4
i?
e ? ! i M
VQ?

t .r.'
.A? p J• z 'R' A
,

I

5Y
f5 Yi A
t',

i
ppF .
VQ6
? lY ?? r
k t a
VQ7 VQT 1

N rf*_
55

m ?

-jor
.+3k? "`i q . faa u `.

lit

VQT2

F ? j f m

VQT4
oit?
I ? 'JV ?i.
s F
,,
s f
A
VQT3
3;?y
z
a
h
4 Y
VQT5
- tip"

Ts 1t
!y
y r

J??75

..
t
d 3? n P '
j
Y(
?jfdk / C .r if +3
S ?

f?/??iAIE rY ?4 0 ? ; ? 3}?} ? y
a

VQT6

a

VQT7
APPENDIX F
Bankfull Event Photo Log
P- Kimley-Horn
Forrest Creek Monitoring - MY4 (2011) b? and Associates, Inc.
BAN KFULL EVENT LOG
Crest Stage Gauge located on the Forrest Creek main channel. Bankfull event occurred
in early June 2010
.r

r
r i9? r ?
r fi?j air
? r / yy
Lr,w ?.
? kk-?'
1 ?. I A ;
F?
Crest Stage Gauge located on the tributary to Forrest Creek. Bankfull event occurred in
early June 2010
i
Forrest Creek - MY4 (2011) ? and Associates,
? and Associates, Inc.
Over bank flow observed on June 28 on tributary and main channel

? FT,1
T t V
8,14
}?. ? `?,?i?R •'- 'fir a``
f J, T,44

Worm;
A

r» n ?trR?t n n ,! R. .
ftA
F, i 1
Over bank flow observed on June 28 on tributary and main channel
iMF,
Forrest Creek - MY4 (2011) and A -Horn
and Associates, Inc.