20110364 Ver 1_More Info Received_20110924

1111111111111111111111111111111 1111 FAST LANE PICKUP DATE PICKUP TIME
30094 82$-0303
DAY DRIVER # OF PIECES WEIGHT
f;
,, , SAME
"m AM WARM mmom law BILL TO : SHIPPER RECEIVER 3RD PARTY
r areas r am '.ww? r - ?`
?_ '?" NEXT DAY CAR VAN ROUND TRIP CHARGES
FROM TO COMPANY NAME AIL n tJE, L
WSP SELLS
15401 WESTON PARKWAY STE 100
CARY, NC 27513
STREET ADDRESS d i? el i L r I 2 ?k.
i r
CITY,.? ST ZIP
i-
CONTACT NAME f; 41
919-678-0035
PHONE #
E SIGNATURE
Y
DATE r; TIME
pj¦ WS P• S E L LS
15401 Weston Parkway, Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
T: 919.678.0035
F: 919.678.0206
www.wspsells.com
TO: NCDNER
(vision o Water Quality
512 North Salisbury Street, Floor
Raleigh,
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE 9/29/2011
JOB NO. 07-4029 PROPOSAL NO.
ATTN: Karen Higgins, Supervisor
RE: Honeycutt Creek Greenway
Honeycutt and Mine Creeks
[030401, 27-20-(1), WSIV, NSW]

11-nz- 4
WE ARE SENDING YOU ?x Attached ? Via FedEx the following items:
Via Mail
Shop Drawings Prints ? Plans ? Samples ? Specifications
Copy of Letter Change Order
Photographs Control Photographs ? Contact Prints ? Manuscripts ? Diskettes
Diapositives x See Below
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
5 9/27/11 Revised PCN
5 9/22/11 Construction Plan Sheets
1 3/2/11 Authorization Letter

THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
x For approval Approved as submitted Resubmit
For your use Approved as noted H Submit
As requested Return for corrections Return
For review and comment For your records
Control survey required Analytical aerial triangulation required
See below remarks For review and comment
? FOR BIDS DUE
REMARKS
copies for approval
copies for distribution
corrected prints
20 ? PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
WATER QUALITY
WET( ANUS AND SMRMWATER BRANC4
COPY TO: Lisa Potts, City of Raleigh
SIGNED: Ralph E. Troutman, P.E.
Gerald Pottern, RJGA

March 2, 2011
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality Wetland / 401 Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd Ste 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Authorized Agent for PCN Application
To Whom It May Concern,
This letter authorizes WSP Sells (consultant) to act as authorized agents of The City of
Raleigh in submitting a PCN application for the Honeycutt Creek Greenway in Wake
County, NC. This letter authorizes the Consultant to sign and submit a PCN for the
proposed project with the intent of securing Clean Water Act Section 404/401 and
Riparian Buffer Authorization from the US Army Corp of Engineers and NC Division of
Water Quality.
Should you have questions, please contact me at 919-996-4785 or via email at
Lisa. [e-mail].
Sincerely,
6C-104' P4-0?
Lisa Potts
Park and Greenway Planner
City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation Department
cc: Mr. Ralph Troutman, WSP Sells

PRE-CONSTRUCTION
NOTIFICATION
QR@140WRM
SEP 'L 8 2011
UENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
HONEYCUTT CREEK GREENWAY
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA

Applicant: City of Raleigh
Prepared By: Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc.
1221 Corporation Parkway, Suite 100
Raleigh, N.C. 27610
Revised PCN: September 27, 2011

M
Table of Contents
A. Title Page & Table of Contents
B. PCN Form, signed by agent
C. Agent Authorization Letter & Property Owners Table
D. Project Vicinity Map, USGS Topo and USDA Soil Maps
E. Table 1. Potential Stream and Wetland Crossings
F. Table 2. Buffer Impacts by Zone & Temp or Perm
G. Figures 1-12. Buffer, Stream and Wetland Impact Maps
H. Figure 13- 20. Wetland Impacts Close-Up Maps
1. Boardwalk Plans: 10-ft Traditional Paved and 6-ft Unpaved
J. Unavoidable Buffer Impacts Discussion
K. US-FWS Protected Species Response Letter, 02 Feb 2011 '
L. SHPO Cultural Resources Response Letter, 11 April 2011
M. FEMA CLOMR Approval Letter, 09 Sept 2011
N. ACE Wetland Data Forms
0. DWQ Stream Data Forms
R
I l- o Zrip 4
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form - version 1.3 - Dec 2008
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes (J.Shern) ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. (EEP coordination is pending) ® Yes ? No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Honeycutt Creek Greenway Trail, Longstreet Drive to Raven Ridge Road
2b. County: Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Raleigh
2d. Subdivision name: NA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: FNA
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: City of Raleigh, US-ACE, and greenway easements on many private properties.
3b. Deed Book and Page No. See attached list of property owners and PIN numbers ***
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: City of Raleigh Parks & Recreation Dept.
4b. Name: Mr. Vic Lebsock
4c. Business name
(if applicable): Raleigh Parks & Recreation Department,
Design Development Division
4d. Street address: 333 Fayetteville Street, Suite 300
4e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27601
4f. Telephone no.: 919-996-4786
4g. Fax no.: 919-807-5125
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Ralph Troutman
5b. Business name
(if applicable): WSP Sells, Inc.
5c. Street address: 15401 Weston Parkway, Suite 100
5d. City, state, zip: Cary, NC 27513
5e. Telephone no.: 919-678-0035
5f. Fax no.: 919-678-0206
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): See Attached List of Properties and PIN Numbers ***
South End: Latitude: 35.8742 Longitude: -78.6475
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): North End: Latitude: 35.9285 Longitude: -78.6060
1c. Property size: Trail length = 28,800 ft x 25' ave.corridor = 16.5 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Honeycutt Creek (trib to Falls Lake) and Mine Creek (trib to
proposed project: Crabtree Creek)
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Honeycutt Cr = WS-IV-NSW; Mine Cr = C-NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse River 03-04-01 (Honeycutt Cr) & 03-04-02 (Mine Cr)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe existing conditions on the site and general land use in the project vicinity at the time of this application:
The proposed 5.5 mile greenway trail extends from Longstreet Dr just west of Six Forks Rd in northern Raleigh northeastward to
Raven Ridge Rd in Wake County. The southern half (following Mine Cr from Longstreet Dr to Strickland Rd) contains a mix of
low to high density residential and commercial development, with narrow to wide forested buffers along the creek. The northern
half (following Honeycutt Cr from Strickland Rd to Raven Ridge Rd) contains mostly low density residential development and
forest land, with generally wider forested buffers along most of the creek. The northernmost mile is on US-ACE Falls Lake
property which is managed as public game land.

3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 0.10 acre) of wetlands exist within the proposed construction corridor, which is generally 25 feet wide from
Newton Rd north to Durant Rd (paved trail) and 6 feet wide from Durant Rd north to Raven Ridge Rd (dirt trail).
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
The Honeycutt Greenway project corridor crosses 40 drainage features, of which 24 were determined to be perennial or
intermittent streams and 16 were determined to be ephemeral stormwater channels. Of the 24 perennial or intermittent streams
in the project corridor, three have existing sidewalk crossings (no new construction) and two are in areas where construction
will affect stream buffers but not the stream channel. The remaining 19 perennial or intermittent stream segments that cross the
greenway construction corridor have a combined length of approximately 412 linear feet of streams.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project is a public greenway trail for pedestrians and bicycles, connecting the existing Mine Creek Trail at Longstreet Dr to
the Falls Lake Trail at Raven Ridge Rd. The 5.5 mile trail will be paved from Longstreet Dr north to Durant Rd, including
"wayfinding" segments using existing sidewalks, and dirt trail from Durant Rd north to Raven Ridge Rd. Bridges or
boardwalks will be installed at stream and wetland crossings where needed on all segments. The traditional paved greenway
and boardwalk trail segments (south of Durant Rd) will be 10 feet wide and require a temporary cleared construction corridor
25 feet wide along off-road segments. The dirt trail and boardwalk segments north of Durant Rd will be 4 to 6 feet wide, and
clearing for construction will not exceed 6 feet wide. This portion of the project is entirely off-road through woods.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project includes construction of 12,400 feet of new "traditional" 10-foot wide paved trail (Type 1), mostly along Mine
Creek and Honeycutt Creek between Newton Rd and Durant Rd; 7,900 feet of "wayfinding" segments (Type 2) along existing
or proposed sidewalks between Longstreet Drive and Chatterson Drive; and 8,500 feet of dirt trail (Type 3) following
Honeycutt Creek from Durant Road to Raven Ridge Rd. Clearing, construction, and restoration methods vary based upon the
type of greenway trail, as described below.
• Type 1 "traditional" greenway trails are mostly paved surfaces, interspersed with boardwalk and bridges at stream and
wetland crossings. Paved surfaces are 10 feet wide with a surface of either asphalt or concrete, and bridges and boardwalk
surfaces will also be 10 feet wide. Side-slopes will be 3H:1 V or flatter as recommended by DWQ. Type I greenways extend
from Newton Road to Clear Brook Drive, from Chatterson Drive to the existing Honeycutt Park trail, and from Clear Creek
Farm Drive (entrance to Honeycutt Park) to Durant Road.
• Type 2 "wayfinding" greenway trail segments use existing sidewalk, except along Strickland Road where an existing 5-
foot wide sidewalk will be widened to 10 feet. Wayfinding greenway segments are those along Longstreet Drive, Six Forks
Road, Newton Road, Clear Brook Drive, Mourning Dove Road, Running Cedar Trail, Strickland Road, and Carriage Tour
Lane to Chatterson Drive. These segments mainly require signage and pavement markings, with minimal construction.
• Type 3 "natural trail" greenways are soil surfaced trails where ground disturbance is minor, except for bridges or
boardwalks at stream and wetland crossings and steep slopes. Type 3 trail will extend from the corner of Durant Road and
Honeycutt Road northward to Raven Ridge Road, nearly all of which is forested. This type of trail was selected in consultation
with US-ACE and NC-WRC staff to minimize user conflicts on the US-ACE public game lands.
Corridor Clearing: Clearing for greenway trails will vary depending upon the type of trail. For Type 1 paved and boardwalk
greenways, the trail alignment and construction access has been selected to avoid and minimize impact to large trees and
wetlands, and to provide as much separation as possible from streams and riparian buffers. Forest clearing will be performed
by mechanical equipment. The cleared corridor will be generally 25 feet wide to allow 10 feet for the trail plus 15 feet for
temporary equipment access. Tree protection fencing will be installed prior to clearing to protect those trees not scheduled for
removal. Because of the narrow construction corridor, trees will be cut down first and then the stumps removed where
necessary in uplands. In wetland areas, trees will be cut at ground level and stumps left in the ground. Tree removal will be
scheduled such that silt fence can be installed by the end of each work day to cover the area cleared that day. By working in
short segments and installing silt fence daily, impacts to streams and wetlands will be minimized. As an added measure to
protect wetlands, the contractor will be required to use mats when crossing wetland areas. No crossing of streams with clearing
equipment is planned, as the contractor has access to both sides of all streams. Silt fence or combination silt fence/tree
protection fence will be placed between the work area and the adjacent stream or wetland area to keep sediment out of the
stream and wetland area. Much of the greenway between Newton Rd and Clear Brook Drive will occupy an existing City-
maintained sanitary sewer right-of-way built prior to the Neuse Buffer Rules. Existing development and/or steep slopes
preclude shifting the trail farther beyond the buffer in these areas. Proposed impacts to the remaining forest between the sewer
corridor and stream bank (Mine Creek) have been minimized in project design.
3
Clearing for Type 2 wayfinding greenways will be minimal. Several short sections require clearing including one block of
Running Cedar Trail adjacent to Strickland Road and Strickland Road from Running Cedar Trail to Carriage Tour Lane. This
area sets on the ridge line between East Fork Mine Creek and Honeycutt Creek. Active streams are more than 1,000 feet
away,and thus clearing for sidewalk in this area will impact neither stream buffers nor wetland areas. Still, erosion control
measures will be employed to contain any sediment within the construction limits.
Clearing for Type 3 dirt trail greenways will be 4 to 6 feet wide, and limited to trees less than 4 inches in diameter. The
alignment was selected in the field and surveyed to avoid larger trees. No mechanical equipment other than chain saws will be
used for clearing these trails. Trees will be cut at ground level and stumps left in the ground (in both wetlands and uplands)
and the cut remnants will be left in the woods beyond the trail for use as wildlife shelter. Leaf litter will be cleared away down
to the mineral soil surface, to define the trail location, but no soil excavation is proposed except at stream/wetland crossings
where concrete foundations for bridge or boardwalk construction are necessary.
Constructing the Greenway: Following corridor clearing and staking for Type 1 greenway construction, the contractor will
begin rough grading and building retaining walls where specified. Underground utilities will be reinforced to support
additional loads where needed. Small bull dozers, hydraulic excavators, front end loaders, dump trucks, and sheep's foot type
equipment will be used. As the greenway subgrade approaches design elevation, storm drainage pipe with outlet protection
measures will be installed. Bridge and boardwalk concrete foundations along Type 1 trails will be installed during or just after
the subgrade. Where stream crossings use pipes, the pipes will be partly buried in the stream bed to maintain the-n4v4l _
gradient. Rip rap used for energy dissipation downstream of pipes will be bedded on geotextile fabric. -
Crushed stone will be brought in by dump truck and spread by motor graders along proposed asphalt surface trail segments.
Vibratory compactors will compact the stone base to the required compaction, then paving equipment will place the asphalt.
Once the surface is paved, the 2-ft wide shoulders and slopes will be dressed and seeded. Side-slopes will be 3H:1V or flatter
as recommended by DWQ. Where concrete trail surfaces are proposed, the contractor will grade the subgrade to design
elevation, construct forms to contain the concrete, place reinforcing steel, and then pour concrete. Because of the remoteness
to the concrete greenway from public roads, the contractor will need to transport the concrete from the delivery truck to each
point of use using a Bobcat or similar small, maneuverable equipment.
At stream and wetland crossings (Type 1 and 3 greenways), silt fence will be installed between the work area and the stream.
Soil will be excavated for bridge or boardwalk foundations and removed from the site, and the concrete foundations poured.
Bridge bent piles will be installed, and concrete bent caps will be formed and poured to support the bridge. The remaining
bridge and boardwalk construction will require no further ground disturbance. Prefabricated steel bridges (for the larger stream
crossings along Mine Creek) will be delivered by truck, off loaded and set upon the bridge support bents. For the timber
boardwalk crossings (Honeycutt Creek and smaller Mine Creek tributaries), after the foundations are installed, the contractor
will cut timbers or helical anchors to the design elevation, install support girders, support beams, decking, and handrail system.
The contractor will collect all construction debris daily for disposal. All erosion and sedimentation control measures will be
regularly monitored at least weekly, immediately before a forecasted storm event, and immediately after the event.
Remediation measures will be employed to keep the measures performing as designed.
Restoration and Maintenance: Restoration of the disturbed area will commence near the end of construction. Following fine
grading, all remaining disturbed areas will be stabilized by seeding and mulching. Erosion and sedimentation control measures
will remain in working order until disturbed areas have been stabilized with new grass. No fescue or other non-native
perennials will be seeded in wetland areas. City Parks staff will maintain the greenways and take measures to mitigate any local
erosion problems that may occur. The 2-ft trail shoulder will be kept free of trees, but the remainder of the construction
corridor will be left to regenerate in natural forest (except in the existing maintained sewer right-of-way). These trails will not
carry motor vehicle traffic (other than maintenance vehicles) and thus will not become a significant source of road-runoff
pollutants, other than minor hydrocarbons from the asphalt itself. Bridge or boardwalk crossings at most of the stream wetland
crossings will minimize impacts to flow, aquatic life passage, soil compaction and vegetation.
4
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: No, not by Raleigh Parks & Recreation. There may ? Yes ? No ® Unknown
have been previous wetland or stream determinations for City
utility projects or private development along the project corridor,
but Parks & Rec has no information on any previous delineation or
permitting requests.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ? preliminary[] Final No JD prior to PCN submittal
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Gerald Pottern Other: Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ®No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ®No
6b. If yes, explain. The Honeycutt and Mine Creek greenway is part of the overall Raleigh Greenway system, but this project and
the existing trails at each end - to which it connects - each have independent utility.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers ® Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ®T W-GA
Land clearing Alluvial Hardwood ® Yes
? No ® Corps Sta 67+00
? DWQ 0.0203 T
W2 ® P ? T W-GA Alluvial Hardwood ® Yes ® Corps Sta 67+00 0.0161 P
Filled for Trail Alluvial Hardwood ? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ®T W -GB
L
d
l
i Alluvial Hardwood ® Yes
? ® Corps Sta 68+50
? 0.0060 T
c
ear
ng
an No DWQ
W4 ®P ? T W-GB
Filled for Trail Alluvial Hardwood ® Yes
? No ® Corps Sta 68+50
? DWQ 0.0203 T

W5 ® P ? T W-GC
Culvert 2-3' Ditch in
Alluvial Hardwood Yes
®N ® Corps Sta 70+70
? DWQ
0.0011 P
Alluvial Hardwood o

W6 ? P ®T W-GF Hillside Seep ® Yes ® Corps Sta 166+10
0.0019 T
Land clearing Alluvial Hardwood ? No ? DWQ

W7 OP E] T W-GF Hillside Seep ® Yes ® Corps Sta 166+10
0.0008 P
Boardwalk Alluvial Hardwood ? No ? DWQ
W8 ? P ®T W-GP
L
l
i
d Alluvial Hardwood ® Yes
? ® Corps Sta 175+30
? 0.0165 T
ear
ng
an
c No DWQ
W9 ® P ? T W-GP
B
d
lk Alluvial Hardwood ® Yes
? ® Corps Sta 175+30
? 0.0087 P
oar
wa No DWQ
W10 ? P ®T W-GQ Alluvial Scrub ? Yes ® Corps Sta 201+70 0
0039 T
Land clearing Under Powerline ® No ? DWQ .

W11 ®P ? T W-GQ
Wingwall+Riprap Alluvial Scrub
Under Powerline ? Yes
® No ® Corps Sta 201+70
? DWQ
0.0034 P
W12 ®P ? T W-GN
Boardwalk Alluvial Hardwood ® Yes
? No ® Corps Sta 308+90
? DWQ 0.0017 P

W13 ®P ? T W-GM 15,20
Boardwalk
Alluvial Hardwood ® Yes
F-] No ® Corps Sta 329+70
? DWQ
0.0015 P

W14 ®P ? T W-GM 6,102
B
d
lk All
Alluvial Hardwood ® Yes
? ® Corps Sta 331+70
? 0.0030 P
oar
wa No DWQ

2g. Total wetland impacts: 0.0874 T+P
2h. Comments: Temporary Clearing Wetland Impacts = 0.0486 acre; Permanent Fill or Pipe Wetland Impacts = 0.0231 acre;
Permanent Boardwalk Wetland Impacts = 0.0157 acre. Total permanent impact = 0.0388 acre. >> See attached Table 1 for sequential
listing of all wetlands, streams, ephemeral channels, and open water crossings in the project corridor from south to north.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - PER or
404, 10
(Corps:
stream
t
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ:
non-
404) r
(linea
Temporary (T) (INT)? (feet) feet)
S-8 ® P ? T Culvert, Sta 67+50 Mine Cr trib
Alluvial Hardwood
? Per ®Int
®Corps ?DWQ
4.0
45.0
S-26 ® PE] T Riprap, Sta 201+70 Honeycutt Cr trib
Alluvial Hardwood Per
® El Int
®Corps ?DWQ
4.0
8.5
S-28 ® P ? T Culvert, Sta 238+70 Honeycutt Cr trib
? Per ®Int
®Corps ?DWQ
5.0
56.0
Alluvial Hardwood
S-29 ® P F-1 T Culvert, Sta 238+70 Honeycutt Cr trib
Alluvial Hardwood ® Per ? Int
®Corps ?DWQ
5.0
22.0

3h. Total stream and tributary impacts: 131.5 ft
3i. Comments: Bridge or boardwalk crossings proposed on Perennial or Intermittent streams at S5, S6, S12, S14, S22, S23, S24, S25a-
b, S31,S32, S33, S34, S39, S40. Foundations will be outside OHWM, thus No stream impact at these 15 crossings. >> See attached
Table 1 for sequential listing of all wetlands, streams, ephemeral channels, and open water crossings in the project corridor.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ? P ®T Bent Tree Pond Replace existing wooden bridge Pond, Sta 172+25 0.0037 T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
0. Total open water impacts 0.0037 acre
4g. Comments: Boardwalk/bridge footings will be installed on uplands beyond normal pool in approximately the same location as the
existing bridge; no footings or other fill in waters. This impact is considered temporary.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.

Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland

b (acres)
num
er of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
Pi NA
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ® Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. Buffer impact 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
# Permanent (P) Buffer mitigation Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
or Temporary (T) Reason for impact Stream name required? (square feet) (square feet)
Mine Cr + Honeycutt Cr
B1 ? P ® T Temporary Clearing **Total all segments ? Yes ® No 15,707 22,512
Alluvial Hardwood

B2 ®P ? T Permanent Trail Mine Cr + Honeycutt Cr
Alluvial Hardwood
® Yes ? No
75,289
83,700
or Boardwalk Alluvial Hardwood
B3 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
B4 ?P?T ?Yes ?No

6h. Total buffer impacts 90,996 sq.ft 106,212 sq.ft
6i. Comments: **There are 117 Zone 1 or Zone 2 Riparian Buffer impact areas, each with Temporary and Permanent impact
measurements. See attached Table 2 for sequential listing of each riparian buffer impact in the project corridor from south
to north, by zone and temporary vs permanent impact. See also the attached "Discussion of Unavoidable Impacts and
Alternatives to Riparian Buffer Encroachment" for site-specific explanations of efforts to minimize Neuse Buffer impacts.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
RJG&A delineated and mapped all streams and wetlands along the project corridor and consulted with City greenway planners and
WSP Sells engineers during design to avoid and minimize wetland, stream and buffer impacts wherever practicable. Existing
development and steep slopes pose tight constraints along much of the stream-side corridor segments, where riparian buffer impacts
are unavoidable, especially from Newton Rd to Honeycutt Park. Between Newton Rd and Clear Brook Rd an existing cleared
sewerline right-of-way will be used for some segments, rather than clearing a new corridor through forested land farther from the
stream. Trail alignments in these areas were selected on a site-by-site basis, considering proximity of the sewer to the stream-bank,
stream-bank stability, riparian forest habitat quality, adjacent wetlands, availability of land beyond the zone 1 buffer, connectivity
with streets, schools and parks, and other site-specific decision criteria. The majority of the proposed 22 stream and 11 wetland
crossings will use boardwalks or bridges (Type 1 Traditional Greenways and Type 3 Natural Trails) or existing sidewalks (Type 2
Wayfinding Segments) to avoid and minimize impacts. There are only three areas where permanent fill or piping in wetlands is
needed (total = 0.0120 acre) and four stream segments that require a culvert and/or riprap permanent impacts (total = 131.5 ft), based
on the design engineer's determinations. See also the attached "Discussion of Unavoidable Impacts and Alternatives to Riparian
Buffer Encroachment" for site-specific explanations of efforts to minimize Neuse Buffer impacts. * * *
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Measures to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands, streams and buffers during construction include minimize clearing widths,
using existing cleared lands and sewerline rights-of-way for access and staging areas, keeping equipment and stocked materials on
the off-stream side of the construction corridors, and using modular or stick-built bridges to minimize the size of vehicles needed in
remote forested areas. See also section B.3.e above for detailed discussion of construction methods and sequence.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ® Yes ? No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ® DWQ ® Corps

c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ? Mitigation bank
® Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank -- NA
a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) ?ype Quantity
c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program -- NA
a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
b. Stream mitigation requested: 132 linear feet
c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ® warm ? cool ?cold
d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 222,179 square feet
e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.0276 acres
f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan -- NA
a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ® Yes ? No
b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact
(square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 Total Permanent for Trail, Boardwalk, or Culvert 75,289 3 225,867
Zone 2 Total Permanent for Trail, Boardwalk, or Culvert 83,700 1.5 125,550

6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 351,417
g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
In-lieu fee payment
h. Comments: Raleigh Parks & Rec will coordinate with NC-EEP regarding in-lieu fee payment for impacts.
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Paved trail segments are only 10 ft wide, so runoff will be diffuse without
level spreaders or other special diffusion devices. Paved trail shoulder slopes will be ? Yes ® No
311:1 V or flatter to prevent gullying. Trails are for pedestrian and bicycle use, so
pollutant runoff from trails should be negligible.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? NA %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: See response lb. above
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Raleigh (south of I-540) and Wake
County (north of I-540)
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? Phase II
apply (check all that apply): ® NSW
El USMP
Note: Both Mine Cr and Honeycutt Cr are NSW waters. Honeycutt Cr is also a Water ®Water Supply Watershed
Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached? NA -Not required for greenway trail. See response lb. above
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
tt
h
d?
? Yes ? No
a
ac
e
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ® Yes ? No
5b. Have all the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? [Annette Lucas reviewed] ® Yes ? No
10
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ? Yes ? No
letter.) Comments: NA
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Greenway trails provide recreational opportunities and may slightly raise property values, but do not induce urban development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. NA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? ® Yes ? No

5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
®
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? RJG&A submitted a biological assessment of expected impacts to US-FWS on 14 Jan 2011. We received a response
from John Ellis at the Raleigh FWS office concurring with our opinion that the Honeycutt Greenway project is "not likely to
adversely affect" any federally listed species. The FWS response letter is attached to the PCN ***.
11
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur In or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The project area is more than 100 miles from areas mapped by NMFS or NC-DMF as Essential Fish Habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur In or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
? Yes No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant In
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sauces did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
WSPSells submitted a scoping letter to the State Historic Preservation Office on 24 March 2011 is awaiting a response from SHPO.
Given the degree of existing urban development and disturbance from roads and utilities along the project corridor between Newton
Rd and Durant Rd, the insignificant nature of proposed trait impacts north of Durant Rd, and RJCnQA's consultation of SHPO GIS
data, we do not expect any impacts to significant cultural resources, nor a recommendation from SHPO to conduct a cultural resources
field survey. If the SHPO response letter indicates otherwise, we will promptly Inform USACE and NCDWQ.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur In a FEMA-designated 1O0-year 8oodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Portions of the greenway corridor along Mine Creek and Honeycutt Creek are in flood-prone areas mapped by FEMA, including
several proposed stream crossings. The crossing of East Fork Mine Creek does not affect published flood elevations. A No-Rise
Certification was submitted to the City of Raleigh via the July 30, 2010 report prepared by Alpha & Omega Group (subconsultant for
bridge design). A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR), also prepared by Alpha & Omega Group, was submitted to Wake
County and to FEMA in late 2010. FEMA issued a CLOMR Approval Letter on 09 Sept 2011, which is attached to this PCN..
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the fioodplaln determination?
The source of flood plain determination was published the FEMA floodptain maps depicting East Mine Fork Creek and
Honeycutt Creek.
Ralph Troutman, P.E.,
WSP Sells, Inc.
9? Z1.p-2e/1

Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Apptic nt/ ant's Signature
)Kj
(Agent's signature Is valid only on aWwrization letter from the applicant Is

Date
provided.)
12
O
`o
U
3
C
a)
7
U
A
O
C
O
2
a)
C
O
f6
m
E
0
z
z
C
O
U
a)
Y
f6
C
az
``
a)
O
a>
CL
O
CL
a
co

N O N
N N
N N
Ln N
V) N
S N

m
N
N
^
^ W
m LO
D1 LD
m M
V
Ln
w m
O
LD N
M m
O
w m
O
w
N
N
N
m

N
a
N m
N W
N LD
N m
N
0 N
p
Q U
z 0
z U
z U
z u
z u
z u
z >

x

2

x

x

2

S z

O
LD 1
-7 1
-7 l
7 1
7 C
7 H
J x
V J J W
J -
W
J -
W
J p
}
Q
Q
D' 4' OC of K K D: m
LO
0
N o O Ln m y o 00 r o -i rn o rI o 01 o c m

N ID
O V
O m
Ln
c-I w
w a
N m
Ln y
m .?
m O
N N
N N
N m
In N
N O
N O O M v

M p
N
W M
N N
00 O
N m
LA -e
N N
Ln V O
N N
m W
a N
Ln N
Ln N
m O
N N
Ln N
Ln m
N N
Ln N
o m w

0[
p 0
to 0
tD 0
LD
p
O N
LD N
lD .--1
tO .--I
LD O
lD O
LD N
lD .-?
LD rl
LD rl
lD O
LD rI
l0 rI
w
u rl
w .-I
w O
LD Q
p
p
k N
N N
N N
N
?
? N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N Z N
N N
N
N
N
N N
N
2
Q W co u u u W W u u u U u u u u U U u u u Z U u lNp lmD l?D U N
m cn z Z z w w z Z z z z Z Z z z z z z z ? z z m m m z }
a x 2 2 2 a a 2 2 x 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 tY 2 2 m m m x Q
co
o
C7
C7
C7
m
m
l7
l7
C7
17
l7
17
C7
C7
17
l7
C7
l7
17
m
l7
17
O
O
O
l7
Ln M W W W M Ln W W W w w W W W W W W W W C m m m O
w a a a o a a a a a a a a a a J J J
o a a a a a 0 o O a m
m D_ m L1 K m m w W W oc W w W m m W w W W J m w D_ D_ a oc .-i

Z LLn
O p
C a
O
p Z
O p z
o Ln 0 v v a
V) 0 w
p
Fw-
Q
w Ln
w p Z F- Ln Ln
0: Ln
(D
p U H > > W F- Ln w w
a a[
W p p O w Z Q 1~J F
CJ 'n FF
U m a 0
LL (D O w m m N > > > a' Z K p Co a
J
Q

C w

J Z
J

o a

a U

m Q

m

o Q N

00 W } } } W c
L
w W
Q

o
O
C
w
V
} lY
W m
N

u

U LY
z Z
w
a
W
Q m

m
z oo

m m w
z W
z m

m W
z L

=
Ln L Y

z F-
Z L..)

T
z Z
7 m
O p z z Q
U J
0 U ? Lan as O O xO a W
3 m 0 u
z u
z u
Z an

O 1
O o
O m
r1 co 3 3 00
O O
O w
1 N
LD o
m O o
m r'1 Ln N o
m to O LD v w - - O Q

N
o
O
m
m
m
LD r
0
0
0 O
0
0 N
v M
r H
a
0 m N
v w
o N
v r1
v
a
a
a
OO
Ln
U U N N d 2 2 00 M N 11 CL rl m r1 m m m m H m r1 r-I C C D_ '-I O
U

p
Q

p
W
U u u w
z z z se u w
u _
U U 0c
Q z a

O z
0
0 o
z 0
V) u Ln Ln u o CL
or. a " Q a J
p Z a U u u
a F -
w ? Q z u p p z z z K
Z V) Z z a O O Z Z Z p U
o ° 3 w 3 3 a 2 a W
cc U
Q

J
>
z
o
o
o
Ln
Ln
a
z a z o z o o Q Z Z J cc
L U
J J W w
u ~ ~ ~ Q L..1
_ U

O a
K

LL cW
C O wW

L cW
L 1 In
J

z J

O O
<

Q J
w
co

C J

N

W

m

n Q x

a

p a

U

0 Q

1./

0 Q

U

0 }

~

W
z a ?s ° g ° ° S 3 as 2 ? 2
g u F
o vi e i a
Z n L
i1 `
O _ C p
a L
if
Q L
n
Q
O 2 LL F O H F T LL C W 03 O_ c
C Ly 11 4S >
a 0
u ° o O 2 O O 2 2 O O 17 Q O a 0 0 0 > W w W
w Q Q }
}
F- O v) O
A O
v) O
tn N 00 y
~ w w = m J r m Tp = >
Q R Z Z z O U F

U
3
U W
w W
w W
w W
w a
2' 2 _
u
Q
a Q J
J
3
U J
J
0 W
0D 0G
H
3
LL Q
F-
u 0 > x oc o:
F cc:
H m 2 17 x m 2 x j x Z w 0 0 0 0 n
p
}
° F (7 - H a p U Ln w Q } w l7 >- w U x Z Z Z w
z z z z z z o o ° F- a < Q? o o O 5
LLn m Z a w m m m m Ln LL CC U Lail m rz w m 2 m 2 o
C
a 0 0 0 Lai O
H
v m
Ln m
W m
M m
N Ln
m N
m N
N m
v O
m N
m N
rI N
N V
O Ln
m r-4
m R
r1 N
r1 Ln
m o
.-1 m
w v
a v
00 O
ra m
00 m
a m
00 N
V

O 11
N 00
N a
In v
W v
M z
Ln m
rf N
7 o
N m
M LO
r-I It
m m
LD m
O v
M N
m H
00 v
m a
N 00
M vq
N a
M o
M m
V m
O N
Ln v
O 00
N
Z LD
LM Ln
m W
m LO
N 00
N N
m r1
m m
m M
m m
O m
O M
O a
M m
0 m
N Ln
O LD
r1 M
O Ln
rt LO
N V
I w
N m
N N
N m
M m
M m
M O
r,
Z N
O N
O N
O N
O N
O m
O 00
O m
O 00
O 00
r-I m
r1 00
i 00
O 00
1 m
-1 m
1 m
i 00
1 m 00 m m m m m 00 m O

a
n
N
N
N
N
N
N
n
r,
N
N r
N
N 1
N 1
N r
N c
N r
N r-1
N '-1
N rt
N N
N rf
N rl
N ri
N 'I
N rt
N O
m
N N rl N rl N c-I N N H N N r-I r1 N H H e-1 r1 ri N ri -4 r-I r1 c-I H rl
Z leuoll!peil leuol3!peJl £ leuoll!pejl b leuoll!peal [ I!ejl N

`o
U
3
c
N
N
U
A
N
C
O
2
a)
c
O
ca
Ln
?C
C
0
z
z
EL
Y
C
O
U
Y
ca
C
m
a)
O
a
m
0-
0
a-
-IT
co

ra-I
O
-4-4
r?-I
Ln
Ln
Ln N
Q1

m N
n U<
C4 N
n N
n lO
T LD
T w
T M
r -
L"
Ln Ol
O N
m Ol
o 01
O
N V
N -ZT
N N
rn
? n Q l0 lD W w w N
O N >
n N N N N N a
a z Z Z Z Z Z z
2 0 2 2 2 2 2 °
C7 ? l7 (.? l7 CJ C.7 F-
W

¢ 2

V W

Q W

¢ W

Q W

Q W

¢
p
O
o of cc of
m
ko
n
0
N
LO
0 o
*
0 o
rn
Ln Ln
V
N rn
w
W v
V
N c
rn
Ln w
t
M +
1-4
o o
O
N r+
N
N n
N
N o
(n
Ln
N
N o
O
N D'
O O
O O
M oo
zr
p
N CY N O M V N O n o N N N O N N m N N n
W
0 n
O
W o
O
W N
O
lD of
O of
p LA
r-1
LD N
.--I
lD Ln
c-I
<D V
.--?
LO N
O
LD rn
O
LD v
N
L
D Ln
r-1 Ln
-I Lfi
r-1 N
O Ln lfl
ri o
N Ln
.--4 Ln rn
O W
n.
o
p
p
n
N
n
N
n
N
n
N
n
N
n
N
n
N
n
N
n
N .
n
N w
n
N w
n
N w
n
N w
n
N W
n
N w
n
N u
Z w
n
N w
n
N lD
n
N Q

U
Q W U U U W W U U u u u u u u u u u u u z u u W W U
O1
Z
Z
Z
lY
lY
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
°
Z
Z
G1
T
Z N
}
of m 2

? x

c x

c of a 2 x 2 x x 2 2 2 x 2 x x 2 C
x
x
tT
2
¢
?
m
Ln o
m ?
W
J ?
W
J ?
W
J m
Ln
..L m
M
-1 c?
w
J c?
w
J c?
W
J ??
W
J c?
W
J c?
W
J L?
W
J c?
W
J ?
W
J c?
W
J c?
W
J ??
W
J c?
W
J o
cc
L ??
W
J ??
W
J o
m o
co o
m ??
w
J O
co
m O
W a
of a
Of a
or '
m
m r
b
m ¢
Of ¢
Of a
Of a
Of ¢
Of a
Of ¢
Of ¢
Of ¢
of a
K a
of a
w a
of
J a
LY ¢
K °
a O
R O
a Q
Of m
ri
F-
2 ?
O p
?
s x
Q
O 0
0 z
of Of
Q

w
O
OO
Z W
F-
Ln
L~iL
L/)
w

U J n
w
>
lY
K
p

p

D

p p
C
K
of
p
0
p

¢

Of F-

0

p 2

° LL

w

z

Q

-
oF-f

r
LFFY

F--
~KF

F-

u
W

u

f
Ln

Q w

O
L/)
a
LL of
?
a 0
°
u 0
a Do
a
? of
W
}
}
}
w
w
o
Q
of

of
J
of
LT
Lr
Z o
F- 00
o
W
W 0
W
L ?
H
G
Y °
u

of
!Y W

w u w
m
O

p
u
z
U
z oC

u w
J
U' a
W
U Q

i
lfl
00 Z

m
Ol
o
O
a z
°
2 z
°
2
Vl
0 z
°
x
O
a Ln
w
3
O
a
z
°
u
z
U
z
U
z Z

¢i
}
x

O

O 0

o
n co

ti
t.0

O

of

of
3:
w
o
w
c)
0
w
w
11
c r
N
w
o
co
0
0
O
0
co
0

N
v
Ln
m
n
r
v
m
O
Ln
m
-
c
N
v
W
w
0
c
N
v
w
14
a
-
a
-
a
-
a
C
O
O
Q
of
Ln
u U W 2 2 co m a r-i D. m m rq m N .? D_ d a r-L O
u

p
a
3
p
W
K
Z
u z z Y U
Z w

a
O Z O O w Z °
Q
v)

a u

v, v)

a Ln

a J u

?

a

u

u

u O

?-
.
of
w Ln
of Ln
Q Ln
- Ln
K p
z u p p z z z a of
z
3
° v) zO W Z Z Z Z

0

a oc of
F
O
Z
°
O
O
NO
u
Z
_ ¢ z O
W Z 0
W 0
W
d Q
t/1 Z
W Z
O J
J J
J J
W
w w
u g
x _
F-
Q F-
a F-
Q Ln
a u
c
U
C c
c
° c
c
G c
c
G
J
J
of
In
Ln
Of
N
<
Q
C)
U
U }
r
W
C
o
a
°
°
O
L
n
g
ss Q W y W
u p
o25
0
0
0
j
a
z z ? 2 2 L
of o of
w c of
w c6
N 0 a a ¢ g LL
O 2 0 0 F- °
S F F- (D } LL w c W G W a o21 > Ln a Ln 'A v) 0
w of
a F
Q >>
F O O
V) O
Ln O
V) N 0
0 y
~ IU 0 of of
a 2
J of
d }
p of
C >
Q z
of w
Z w
Z w
Z p
u w
F-

Of
u
o-
U W
W W
W W
W W
W a c
C
U F-
Q
Q a J
J
u J
J
Q W
co of

F- F

3

3

LL Q

F-
u
O J
¢ O
F >
= 2

W
F
F- C
F
F- of
F
F- K
F
F-
o_ F 2

w U
Ln
w
0
Q 2
}
or K
w
Y 2 2
Y
of }
w
J S
U
Z z - cc w
x
F 0
z
O 0
z
O 0
z
O °
u
u Ln

Z
Q
Z
of
?i
W
U
J
Q
Z
W
Z
W
z
W
z
w

S }
O
J
a
O
of
_W

W

Q
of w
J
Q
K
W
F-
a
Q
of of
Q
>
W
>
W
>
W F-

Z

In
co
Z
a
of
m
m
co
m
" J
LL
of
U c
G Q
"
m
W
of
m
2
m
C
of
of
D_
0
0
0
Q
LL
O
N
V
r-I w
Ln
o0 m
co
V LD
m
V m
N
V m
m
LD n
LD
m n
N
n m
V o
m
L N
m n
r 4 n
ri Cf
O Ln
o N
m V
-4 n
N Ln
w O
ri M
w V
V '7
00 O
e-1 Co
co M
V M
w N
't

O
z
n
LD
N
Ln
V)
LD
W
LD
m
oo
Ln
N
.?
ri
a
m 0
N
m D
m
m w
.?
m V
00
m m
LD
v tD
o
m
m
W N
rn
Ln ri
m
w [t
m
m V
m
Ln o
m
LD r-L
r,
V LD
m
LD O
m
lD m
v
n m
o
co n
Ln
a) r
o
LT CO
N
O
l In
n 1D
n w
n n
n n
n m
m rn
oo o
0o rn
oo O
o0 o
oo 0
oo LT
oo O
co N
oo O
o ry 0 r+ N r-1 N N N m m m r-I
z

o_
0
n
0
n
C
n
o
n
o
n
0
n
o
n
o
n
o
n

n
.l
n
ri
n
o
n

n
ri
n o

n o

n oo
.,
n oo
1
n oo
-1
n oo
?
n oo
-4
n co

n oo
?
n 00
-4
n o
?
n oo
,4
n o
O
00
ri ti 14 ri -1 r? r-I r? r? ti ri r-I 1 ri ri r, ri ri r4 -4 r? ri / ri r-I ri + rq
i leuoi;ipejl leuoilipejl £ leuoilipe?l b leuoiiipeil Z I!eil N

To Bayleal
4'4? t,p`,rr«u
46 tt
o z
0 lav(taL?
w
To Saylea(
hmans C rw f°aaawr" yin s,,..w??r a
l.akt LF+ :Nfw o ?' i
l MCG P'b x° i
2500 FT
i
ip
$,pF tatv?? narfmxau (,?_
a w.r, ._ ?_ ,}) a` y b rkti4 gi' ,3` n 4, o
t d Cl z:, -
,?« N,anita ?s??'- r ??k, ? wtwn\{I R ?CI??f`. 4qf `
u r
DIRT
p / }- 4a, - r `'WC M j W«tEmi.r job
?rrl
as Resrrroir _
` 4 ?aaGC'a I ? L ?r? :? i tr7uarlt
n
1W \ `` h
,xo rr+,p
. rurla Now IN
Exit-11
PAVF T
t ' ?,,? awal ay? f?fpl\?G. V 1 .`h r,ylr S'.%,,
M r(h CI ! ?M6M 1 M ?i' tr11 all
S.. tr Jr 1 "'V' 4 ??' , binxmr 4
`\fl?npl ?, Ot r , oaf tvr°oo f _
` e«?F?tIM? !! Y'.: a. M?,is? / Shop
or '
!? p a t` 2 alw ! Mt 0a t Cda [Irx^_ /( .?a .
?e ixiwr ?4 ..i*?r
Plea Ott Ned e' r?,laf W.. Y+ / 'a°4 M r• ' O , rr
SIX ta... $ P( it" lnmyruu 6 tttwr s r a hr
fd? r R? Qp
IUiiK Nurt6 ??.-i -`°!wr
`a
3aE' r'?4q r ,tt O
b ( ?x forks r i a.n`° tl ?,S • „ .» Exk-14
I St.li°x !rr xrr? ,t?Cr? Ml? L a' d
WON
Slop Gr O oFC ' ?'cr' GIr d °'? \ 1-,
IfoRUM _t "aF n 4 aoaprwauw OF i
AYWM
It I
N M Molth ~'yq ?` c , .•- _w?"?{„x. x, n r
?7Vh1?
! .a f5 ire: r
? .7 r
o % r 4
/txxl taro " / ? w>si ? 1? .
ifilnl? A,F !i14«!. as N a.f
e t
/ aW ID
t - - s tau MAlkiook
Honeycutt Greenway Project Vicinity
Map: Raleigh, Wake County NC.
?? r? ''
,
_ ,AsC
_ - J. • . �;�, \ ' 4 ��� PS`s
PSG
/ ' CCLi2
,
GAG
1.10Q'be'� ii'�;:re f OZ ` PV(t_ j1 GE02• Gid
CL
AO
i . �/ 7`Y 1 • J
c �
�'-. • PC'p• � ��` PSC , ,: ,.�.
It
C'
`t CICS \ y
LO)
Vx
GgC,2 �; ,. • \ ` l P G .." • QQ�� G\t ' moi, G\C'' y
�i .. c
CO
V.
a\ ya
JC 1.
CIC
1y
.� 2 ` � Cry, �� \ 15Y c• .--{ C �, �'::
lip
Qj
U `
CK�2
4:)' '� y Honeycutt Greenway, Southern Section
U r'
�eF \r yep / USDA Soil Survey of Wake County 1970

0 _
t•
11 • s 450 ,
31
e • r re r • •-Y - • • ,
p ♦ _ �r • u Y lt; A _..
10 100•
• '•\ .moi ♦ • � eM T� t
0.0
dr
/1 • � � ♦,moi'.• I :'• C Y '• P
M
` lt� _ •1 . Y rte -- _�. _.� y C> v ♦ , ..
e
1 / a •
p1
." •
400 .� Ctli �"�
. I \
1
`.i--350— �.��r" �----� �--•
A (f t\
it
N,
Honeycutt Greenway, Southern Section
�� USGS Topo Quadrangle: Bayleaf NC

Ge -C)
1 eGL
� f ,+1`} ..•` CeCiL��'. GeC,
/' C,`v �' • �,._ �' + ,\7 � „mow \l . , • •.
G0
CeG`L G�13t C eG V
VURA
VD
"
G
G V
+, U L GeGC �
Gel /
• � 4� � ,1 � � F , �, GeG ! l,c,
C,e G co
IoA
q
Cleo
'
�r'l
�
`
Ce
L
Ceb ��� J d
eG O t e
G eO
`:ti c3
G G�
Get'' GGryQ GP
Cps ASC�Fc \ -S_ (C c,
_
Honeycutt Greenway Middle Section
Gee USDA Soil Survey of Wake County 1970
1 -
AsCp �` ���---- •" 'ifs 3 Ge i t e�2
- — - - — ;,

?J

rr
sx'
O
p _
-r Honeycutt Greenway, Middle Section
. - ' USGS Topo Quadrangle: Bayleaf NC
cG?- •
T�
G'`O
cleP,
.. f
�Qa� "• �� _ C GAO
C)`�
f
�? c. (' �f ► kV I
i f.�.+��` � � �. - ��. • .�_..t - GLV / L C � �v
Cll�
71
e+�`"'Tl44 �'•
f9 L'
r�
;- tl
CITIy
C,
0e
Gel
�r• '' GAG •'� '� __ .._ \�
1
�Kj
1
Honeycutt Greenway, Northern Section
USDA Soil Survey of Wake County 1970
Ge
O\ kt

J

O

7
,C

0,
C_

? ? so /??C
-6011%?--y
3 y0?
4
l > 1?'??a? ?N
Honeycutt Greenway, Northern Section
USGS Topo Quadrangle: Wake Forest NC

Table 1. Potential Streams and Wetlands in the Honeycutt Creek Greenway Project Corridor.
Stream or Approx Decimal Soil or Stream Neuse ACE Jurisdic Stream or Wetland Proposed Stream or
Wetland # Station Lat +Lon Topo Map ID: Score Buffer or DWQ Description Wetland Impacts
Numbr Stream Isolated ?
Mine Creek Watershed: Paved Trail -- Longstreet Drive north to Strickland Road
S-1 15+60 35.8746 Soil Eph: 3.5 No* None Dry swale; New sidewalk on
78.6457 channel indistinct Longstreet Dr
S-2 25+60 35.8769 Soil + Topo Per: 52.0 Yes ACE 404-401 20-25' stream; Exist sidewalk on
78.6457 bedr, cobl, sand Six Forks Rd
S-3 39+00 35.8789 Soil + Topo Per: 45.5 Yes ACE 404-401 15-20' stream; Exist sidewalk on
78.6442 sand, grav Newton Rd
S-4 58+30 35.8807 Soil Eph: 7.0 No* None riprap-lined Culvert 3-pipe, 18"
78.6421 stormwater ditch HDPE, 18.2 ft
S-5 61+50 35.8815 Soil + Topo Per: 47.0 Yes ACE 404-401 15-20' stream; Bridge, no perm
78.6421 sand, grav, cobl stream impact
S-6 63+00 35.8820 Soil + Topo Per: 47.0 Yes ACE 404-401 15-20' stream; Bridge, no perm
78.6420 sand, grav, cobl stream impact
S-7 east of 35.8820 neither Eph: 10.0 No None 2' non-wetland Avoid; No Impact
63+50 78.6418 floodplain ditch
W-GA 67+00 35.8829 ---- ---- ---- ACE 404-401 bottomland WI temp = 885 sq.ft,
flag 1-12 78.6415 hardwood forest W2 perm = 701 sq.ft
S-8 67+50 35.8830 Soil Int: 24.5 Yes ACE 404-401 3-5' sandy stream Culvt 3-pipe, 24"
78.6415 at wetland edge HDPE+rock, 45 ft
W-GB 68+50 35.8832 ---- ---- ---- ACE 404-401 bottomland W3 temp = 261 sq.ft,
flag 1-16 to 70+00 78.6413 hardwood forest W4 perm = 111 sq.ft
S-9 70+50 35.8838 Soil + Topo Eph: 12.5 No* None 2-3' non-wetland Culvert 4-pipe, 16"
78.6413 floodplain ditch HDPE, 29.2 ft
W-GC
flag 1-3 70+70 35.8839
78.6413 ---- ---- ---- ACE 404-401 2-3' wetl ditch in
bottomland HW W5 perm = 49 sq.ft
HDPE Culvert, 15"
S-10 83+40 35.8863 neither Eph: 11.5 No None 2-3' non-wetland Culvert 1-pipe, 48"
78.6387 ditch / swale HDPE, 32.7 ft
S-11 85+80 35.8870 neither Eph: 10.0 No None 2-3' non-wetland Culvert 1-pipe, 16"
78.6388 ditch / swale HDPE, 21.6 ft
S-12 93+20 35.8884 Soil + Topo Per: 48.0 Yes ACE 404-401 6-12' stream; sand, Bridge, no perm
78.6376 cobl, bedr stream impact
S-13A 93+80 35.8886 neither Eph: 14.5 No None 2' non-wetld swale Boardwalk, no perm
78.6375 stream impact
S-13B 97+25 35.8891 neither Eph: 17.5 No None 2-3' non-wetld Culvert 1-pipe, 24"
78.6367 swale HDPE, 19.8 ft
S-14 99+50 35.8892 Soil Per: 34.0 Yes ACE 404-401 5-8' stream; sand, Boardwalk, no perm
78.6359 silt, cobl, bedr stream impact
S-15 119+10 35.8910 Soil Int-Per: Yes ACE 404-401 5-8' stream; sand, Exist sidewalk on
78.6361 29.0 silt, cobl, bedr Mourning Dove
S-16 128+70 35.8930 Soil Eph: 0 No* None No channel, Exist sidewalk on
78.6362 buried/piped Running Cedar
Stream or Approx Decimal Soil or Stream Neuse ACE Jurisdic Stream or Wetland Proposed Stream or
Wetland # Station Lat +Lon Topo Map ID: Score Buffer or DWQ Description Wetland Impacts
Numbr Stream Isolated ?
Honeycutt Creek Watershed: Paved Trail -- Strickland Road north to Durant Road
5-20 L111+11 35.8985 Soil er: 39.5 Yes ACE 404-401 4-6' stream; sand, No crossing, just
68 78.6312 cob], bedr buffer impact
W-GF 166+10 35.8985 ---- ____ ---- ACE 404-401 forested 3' linear W6 temp = 84 sq.ft;
.n-- t ', '70 L) I 1 .. ...........tl .,«.1 1177 - - 14 .... 4
W-GG 135.8990 ---- ACE 404-401 marsh at head of Avoid; No Impact
flag 1-15 168+50 78.6308 Bent Tree Pond
d 178.6308 1 1 Pond
S-21 dust west of 35.9003 Soil + Topo Int: 28.0 Yes
spillway 174+00 78.6305
S-22 174+50 35.9004 Soil + Topo Per: 42.5 Yes
78.6305
W-GP 175+30 35.9005
S-23 176+20 35.9008 Soil + Topo Per: 49.0 Yes
78.6310
W-GH south of 35.9012 ---- ____ ----
flag 1-10 179+50 78.6319
S-24 180+70 35.9016 Soil + Topo Per: 46.5 Yes
78.6320
W-GJ flag west of 35.9017 ---- -___ ----
1-5,50-54 181+50 78.6322
( Existing I-540 Greenway Tunnel = Sta 181+86 to 190+00 )
S-25A 190+30 35.9023 Soil Int 22.5 Yes
78.6312
S-25B 191+35 35.9024 Soil + Topo Per: 45.5 Yes
78.6310
S-26 201+70 35.9014 Soil Per: 35.5 Yes
78.6288
W-GQ 201+70 35.9014 ---- ____ ----
flag 1-18 78.6288
W-GK flag north of 35.9010 ----
1-12,20-24 209+00 78.6274
S-27 209+20 35.9010 Soil Eph:0 No*
78.6274
S-28 238+70 35.9085 Soil + Topo Int: 25.0 Yes
78.6210
S-29 251+70 35.9117 Soil Per: 40.0 Yes
78.6216
above spillway perm water impact
ACE 404-401 3-5' stream; bedr, No crossing, just
cobl, sand buffer impact
ACE 404-401 4-6' stream; sand, Boardwalk, no perm
grav, cobl, stream impact
DWQ isolated forested wetland j W8 temp = 720 sq.ft;
ACE 404-401 4-6' stream; sand, Boardwalk, no perm
grav, cobl, stream impact
ACE 404-401 forested wetland Avoid; No Impact
seep + depression
ACE 404-401 6-9' stream; sand, Boardwalk, no perm
grav, cobl, stream impact
ACE 404-401 forested wetland Avoid: No impact
seep + depression
ACE 404-401 1-2' stream; sand, Boardwalk, no perm
cobl stream impact
ACE 404-401 5-8' stream; sand, Boardwalk, no perm
grav, cobl stream impact
ACE 404-401 3-5' stream enters Wingwall + riprap at
marsh below culvt culvt out, Perm 8.5 ft
ACE 404-4011 Marsh/scrub I W 10 temp = 171 sq.ft
ACE 404-401 Headwater seep; Avoid: No impact
marsh/ scrub
None Dry swale; No structure at
channel indistinct crossing
ACE 404-401 3-5' stream; bedr, 1-pipe 48" RCP +
sand, grav, rock, Perm = 56.0 ft
ACE 404-401 4-5' stream; sand, 1-pipe 48" RCP +
grav, cobl rock, Perm = 22.0 ft

Stream or Approx Decimal Soil or Stream Neuse ACE Jurisdic Stream or Wetland Proposed Stream or
Wetland # Station Lat +Lon Topo Map ID: Score Buffer or DWQ Description Wetland Impacts
Numbr Stream Isolated ?
Honeycutt Creek Watershed: Dirt Trail -- Durant Road north to Raven Ridge Road
S-30 264+90 35.9133 neither Eph: 17.5 No None 2-3' non-wetld No structure at
78.6211 swale crossing
W-GL 268+50 35.9139 ---- --__ ---- ACE 404-401 forested 6' linear No structure at
flag 1-7 78.6206 seep wetland crossing
S-31 277+20 35.9159 Soil Per: 39.5 Yes ACE 404-401 4-5' stream; sand, Boardwalk, no perm
78.6192 grav, bedr stream impact
S-32 289+50 35.9188 Soil + Topo Per: 51.5 Yes ACE 404-401 12-18' stream; Boardwalk, no perm
78.6177 sand, grav, cobl stream impact
S-33 301+00 35.9209 Soil + Topo Per: 51.5 Yes ACE 404-401 12-18' stream; Boardwalk, no perm
78.6153 sand, grav, cobl stream impact
S-34 308+70 35.9216 Soil Per: 34.0 Yes ACE 404-401 3-5' stream; sand, 'Boardwalk, no perm
78.6139 grav, cob] stream impact
W-GN 308+90 35.9217 ---- ACE 404-401 Forested alluvial W12 perm = 72 sq.ft
flag 1-7 78.6138 wetland Boardwalk
S-35 311+20 35.9220 Soil Eph: 6.0 NO None Dry swale in No structure at
78.6133 ravine crossing
S-36 318+35 35.9233 neither Eph: 9.0 No None Dry swale in No structure at
78.6119 ravine crossing
S-37 324+50 35.9237 neither Eph: 10.0 No None Dry Swale in No structure at
78.6099 ravine crossing
S-38 & 329+70 35.9236 neither Eph: 18.0 No ACE 404-401 10' mucky stream/ W 13 perm = 66 sq.ft
W-GM 78.6085 (wetland) wetland complex No stream impact
flag 15, 20 Boardwalk
S-39 330+80 35.9237 neither Int: 20.0 No ACE 404-401 2-3' stream; sand, Boardwalk, no perm
78.6083 grav, cob] stream impact
S-40 & 331+70 35.9239 Soil Int: 28.5 Yes ACE 404-401 10' mucky stream/ W14 perm = 132 sq.ft.
W-GM
flag 6, 102 78.6081 (wetland) wetland complex 'No stream impact
Boardwalk
S-41 342+50 35.9266 neither Eph: 13.0 No None Dry swale in No structure at
78.6071 - - ravine crossing
Streams: This table includes all channels shown as streams on USGS Quads or USDA Soil Survey maps, plus
other channels not mapped by USGS or USDA for which RJG&A completed a stream rating form, and all
wetlands found during RJG&A field surveys in or adjacent to the project corridor.
* See Table in PCN Form for detailed Temporary, Permanent, and Total stream & wetland impacts.
Neuse Buffer: "No*" = Channel is ephemeral, piped or not present (RJG&A field determination), but is shown
on USDA soil survey map and DWQ must confirm that Neuse Buffer Rule does not apply.
Table 2. Honeycutt Greenway Riparian Buffer Impacts by Buffer Zone and Temporary vs Permanent Impacts
Zone -1 Impacts Zone 2 Impacts
Buffer
Impact #
Figure O
Trail Type
Stream Name Perm
Impact Temp
Impact Perm
Impact Temp
Impact
1 3 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 1,213 211
2 3 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 2,752 117
3 3 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 445 123
4 3 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 6,308 579
5 3 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 10,230 1,623
6 3 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 2,736 2,037
7 3 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 692 0
8 3 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 579 47
9 3 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 464 116
10 3 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 471 94
11 3 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 608 254
12 3 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 628 0
13 3 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 3,417 3,290
14 3 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 3,320 573
15 3 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 5,989 702
16 4 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 15,456 2,081
17 4 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 74 88
18 4 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 467 217
19 4 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 943 349
20 4 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 8,202 1,265
21 4 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 3,640 714
22 4 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 2,307 314
23 4 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 303 140
24 4 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 3,141 586
25 4 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 105 145
26 4 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 2,324 486
27 4 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 437 128
28 5 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 162 82
29 5 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 605 0
30 5 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 639 0
31 5 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 1,194 194
32 5 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 1,018 965
33 5 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 1,184 103
34 5 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 252 74
35 5 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 1,456 1,041
36 5 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 123 69
37 5 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 915 0
38 5 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 847 714
39 5 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 578 85
40 5 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 1,745 160
41 5 10-ft Paved Trail Mine Creek 190 89
Y3
Table 2. Honeycutt Greenway Riparian Buffer Impacts by Buffer Zone and Temporary vs Permanent Impacts
Zone 1 Impacts Zone 2 Impacts
Buffer
Impact #
Figure # Trail Type
Stream Name Perm
Impact Temp
Impact Perm
Impact Temp
Impact
42 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 1,821 421
43 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 849 202
44 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 3,732 0
45 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 668 0
46 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 2,767 0
47 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 958 0
48 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 3,356 0
49 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 1,388 211
50 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 2,457 362
51 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 1,478 26
52 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 925 229
53 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 1,309 266
54 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 1,663 1,276
55 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 630 0
56 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 1,121 0
57 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 1,307 0
58 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 1,397 0
59 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 533 0
60 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 486 0
61 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 666 0
62 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 843 0
63 6 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 706 0
64 7 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 911 0
65 7 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 1,720 0
66 7 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 598 38
67 7 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 401 0
68 7 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 7S6 134
69 7 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 652 114
70 7 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 792 165
71 7 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 1,756 226
72 7 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 1,126 109
73 7 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 2,246 286
74 7 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 68 91
75 8 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 359 90
76 8 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 2,419 397
77 8 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 62 74
78A 8 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 617 88
78B 8 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 972 126
78C 8 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 794 130
78D 8 10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr 407 82
79 9 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 1443 928
74
Table 2. Honeycutt Greenway Riparian Buffer Impacts by Buffer Zone and Temporary vs Permanent Impacts
Zone 1 Impacts Zone 2 Impacts
Buffer
Impact ft
Figure #
Trail Type
Stream Name Perm
Impact Temp
Impact Perm
Impact Temp
Impact
80 9 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 826 541
81 9 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 838 685
82 9 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 1825 1111
83 9 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 431 394
84 9 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 545 367
85 9 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 1204 792
86 9 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 4
87 9 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 601 400
88 9 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 182 122 157 130
89 9 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 237 155
90 9 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 35 60
91 9 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 1150 659
92 9 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 756 507
93 9 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 23
94 9 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 3615 2096
95 10 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 180 328
96 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 487 325
97 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 442 95
98 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 496 16
99 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 438 10
100 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 376 24
101 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 216 237
102 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 1526 924
103 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 1184 731
104 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 219 150
105 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 580 388
106 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 1111 265
107 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 491 0
108 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 61 420
109 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 323 0
110 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 46 48
111 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 206 48
112 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 170 50
113 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 42 42
114 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 45 47
115 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 267 23
116 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 324 32
117 6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr 42 43
Perm vs Temp Imp 75,289 15,707 83,700 22,512
Zone 1 vs 2 Impact 90,996 106,213
Total Buffer Impact 197,209
13
Fig. 1
Fig.
Fig. 9
tR
a
Fig.
7
Fig.
of theme
N.
T
0
N
ig. 4
ig. 3
Fig. 5
Figure 1. Honeycutt Greenway Key Map.
Wetland, Stream, and Riparian Buffer
Impacts.* Wake County, NC.
Inset Maps N
Trail Alignment
Feet
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
2
* See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.
S-25B
B -66
B B -67
B -68
I B -48
B -a7
B -46
W-GG
W-GF
B -45
B -44
B -49
B -69
I B -72 1
B -70
B -71
B -73
Figure 7. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk N
Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.
B-80
S
0
m
c
B-78C
B-78 B
B-78A
S-30
B-79
B-78D
S-29
Figure 8. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
® Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
kLoniker Surveyed Top of Streambank
B -77 - Boardwalk
Bridge
S-28 Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
® Wetlands
B -75 Feet
0 100 200 400
` See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.
B-94
I B-88 l
I B-87 L
B-93
B-90 \ // / 1 B-92
B-86 L-- a & I S-31
B-84 l?' I B-85
B-83
B-82
W-GL
I B-91 I
B-89
Figure 9. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
GL Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
Wake County, NC.
Roads
B-81 Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
B-80 S-30 ® Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
® Boardwalk N
Bridge
B-79 Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
* See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.
13
B-
112
rl?
1
B-111
B-110
ES-34
I B-107 I
B-106
B-109
B-105
B-104
B-103
B-102
B-93
S-33
B-108
B-101
B-100
B-99
B-98 Figure 10. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
S-32 Wake County, NC.
B-s7
Roads
B-96 Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
B-95
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk

Bridge
B-94 Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
Wetlands
a? Feet
?a 0 100 200 400
,moo
c?
'See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.
1 S-37 l
S-36
Figure 11. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
B-113
:B::11 2 ® Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
' / ? Surveyed Top of Streambank
S-34 Boardwalk
'------r-
W-GN Bridge
B-110 -- - Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
B-111 Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.
Figure 12. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetl
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
M Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
® Boardwalk
Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
K2 Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.
a
Q41
4
J
O
I S-37 I
I S-41 I
B-115 B-116 /J B-117
S-40
B-114
W-GM2

I W-GM1 I
o-
tA{
q i
`t
'
t
1

O '
3

M?

W4 :J
zo . ,..1
?r ? lJ
F
r I
1 i
sue.. ???
U
i 2
fi
/.TiN ,VFLwus
Perm = .00 ! 1 AG W?5
! E Culvert
W-B Tcn,P= .0060 Ac W-3
Perw = . 0203 AG W-1
,i

.0203 AC W-1
.016! AC W-2
to Fill
{ 4?+ ,
e ? w
fir; , ; Figure 13. Wetland Impact Close-up Maps: Wetlands GA, GB, GC
1 4 , /
f
4'ef
wY ,
NOW OR FORM
l,4'.
NOW OR FORMERLY
i'pui • b JAM: : 7: • ?.
ul•I 'NI r ? r
OR FORMERLY

dy . ,
1.
I. ,
i;
Lx '
!
!
SENT TREE
Poo
x
W
VWIVIVl Y'VR '

.I A- ?'f fr h?L Y r?
• I
4 y

NOW OR.FORMENLY

!-I
1. f I
? ?• Wma NOW OR FORN LY
?

NOW OR FORMERLY
.'rln Y• .1'AI;N
i

u, 6F'
W"6 Temp z ,0011 Ac
W-7 perm. = . 0 00$ AC.'•::..
Boardwalk
t
I
f
N
:mw AYoivEp

w)
NOW OR FORMERLY

t 1 ,..
i
?JI f-6t1W N( . j,
. 4r? - 1a ,?
NO
V)SLMh
_
?
1

`
, •
? ? + IrO
?` ' } ?' ?? 1 <
NOW OR FORMERLY

I 10 O-^7
a
_ Figure 14. Wetland Impact Close-up Maps: Wetlands GF, GG

i ,
1 r
F
} j'• ' '' ` ? ,tip ., „ ..
1 t 1 \
i
FT
`. r P
s
GREENWAY
s?a corA sTRur--Tiota
acre
AW W-S
.00%7 W-7
VF-6
yr-c
i
1 4
1
C I ' 4'
y ?
it ,' ?.z2• / ;" l F. ( (i ;A,
t.?
19,
r ?t t?
)W OR FGRMERLY? of
?. 0
1?9NT TR5E Poto
Figure 15. Wetland Impact Close-up Maps: Wetland GP }
'r

ei

ty '
GRED WAY
CON s rplWTION
, co?2RtDo? ,
1 I
/ i J
..l 11
Fi L A) I
/ VF-GH7 GHOI
1 ?1
4 { t T t ?t f.i?' tf'4_{ 'y'yww,,P
O C 1 I II/
?.DO FT
1 1 ? ??X g''? .`.e L
' Y J
Figure 16. Wetland Impact Close-up Maps: Wetlands GH, GJ
.rr•. 0
,7 ,j jt? I•,t
.t •
t t ? t t. •+ '?? ?,S
RO
/f 1
• I' ?I h,
f
X
A
z
4!
1
z

t
' ?' ? ? •I 't I,.r d 1??F
1 ??f 4
' 47
e J.
k 1
A cvnp-,0037 ac W-10
?? ? WAG YL -OOS4 aC, W--11
WinyvAl + Rip+p
c t' (;e E
&REENWAY
CON SMACTI ON
,' GoRRtD0R
?d
\ y?, Y
lop F-c
7" 711-f"
;;;' s Figure 17. Wetland Impact Close-up Maps: Wetland GQ
I rte,
? I I
j f ~ I I t'
41
Dirt Nil will
Cross, b U
i' 5f Nctwe is
' needed.
4 `v zr??pa?t - t?ohe
Dirt
100 FT
Figure 18. Wetland Impact Close-up Maps: Wetland GL
r
4
f ( 4 *`
i
W-C?J
Fem - , 00(7 A6
SWF-GN31
Boars wa" k
JF-GN4
&I YA 11 k

l?
I
?
i
t

!00 FT
ll ''
;J
1?1
C Figure 19. Wetland Impact Close-up Maps: Wetland GN
o ,
c;
i;
i,
f I _
t r}
+ Dirt Trail
i W- GM
perm .0030
yr cMlal
•? ! : 8oarduvalk
4 t02 I gfl104 uytw rwr
O ............ .....1
.GM7- ' l/f GM103 • yr Gm
f?M J 1
p~ 17/ .?. yr
_ vF GM8 r GMs
r.
yr G1123 F t i t . .
u F GMI3 • 1 ,
Lt GMl2
a vF "ez iG • . .
yr igmp r GM (' Q9
vr GH14 IN 't,
j`,f f) yr
}1
I-X r o
W-GM
Perm = . Oo 15 Ac.
Vr GMt9 VF GM16 FcardvQik
i
•1O
V. A-
vr GM16
?'. ?. ., of GM17 ?
Ib0 FT S-3$
o
40 z
0
o
Figure 20. Wetland Impact Close-up Maps: Wetland GM

. 1Ndp .Q-A{
?' f

?I ! r
F
I j ?? k '"a ? F ? b k

t ( i

T ?? N
I

F T

S
?€
NOW' WE
I.
I §
e
iail
Hsi ?
_a

J.

q?iV
A
b
9
Q?
g,
?? G
?N4 ?R

4 "? .
?

7
i
-?-.

L vt

3 a?

?, 3p
?I
k
7df ',
i
fill
11
LLI-g?
k
a?
l

F
2
?I
J-
?k? N?
r
RR
M ?{
A L
x

L.
..sG •?a
U
N
? ts
A,
?
U

W 3 AC
U
Imo-- V ?

?O

R
a
J
F-- o
Discussion of Unavoidable Impacts and Alternatives to Riparian Buffer Encroachment.
Greenway Buffer Zones Reasoning for Unavoidable Impacts
Station No. Impacted
Sta 51+19 to Zone 2 Buffer An existing apartment complex lays to the east of the proposed
Sta 52+08 greenway from Sta 50+00 to approximately Sta 67+50. Moving
the greenway out of the riparian buffer will encroach into the slope
of fill material supporting the adjacent apartment building and
_potentially jeopardize cleanouts on an existing sewer service line.
Sta 52+50 to Zone 2 Buffer Moving the greenway out of the riparian buffer would encroach
Sta 52+85 into the slope of fill material supporting the adjacent apartment
building.
Sta 52+85 to Zone 1 and Moving the greenway out of the riparian buffer would encroach
Sta 61+00 Zone 2 Buffer into the slope of fill material supporting the adjacent apartment
buildings and pool complex. The selected route protects a number
of specimen trees.
Sta 61+00 to Zone 1 Buffer Perpendicular crossing of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 61+80
Sta 61+80 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway makes a near U-turn in an area void of trees.
Sta 62+60
Sta 62+50 to Zone I Buffer Perpendicular crossing of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 63+40
Sta 63+40 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway makes perpendicular crossing of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 63+80
Sta 64+50 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway begins turning in order to minimize impacts to
Sta 66+00 upstream wetland areas and occupy a sewer easement.
Sta 66+00 to Zone 1 Buffer Greenway occupies the edge of an existing sewer easement
Sta 70+00 scheduled for clearing in the near future. Occupying the sewer
easement eliminates the need for additional clearing in order to
construct the reenwa .
Sta 70+00 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway turns away from the sewer easement to avoid sensitive
Sta 70+50 areas within the sewer easement
Sta 71+00 to Zone 1 and Greenway occupies an existing sewer easement scheduled for
Sta 79+25 Zone 2 Buffer clearing in the near future. Occupying the sewer easement
eliminates the need for additional clearing in order to construct the
greenway. At 74+50 greenway begins following an existing
cleared area within the buffers.
Sta 79+25 to Zone 1 and Greenway follows a cleared area within the buffers and makes use
Sta 83+50 Zone 2 Buffer of an existing culvert pipe. Moving outside the buffers will require
clearing of existing trees.
Sta 84+75 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway follows a cleared area within the buffers. Moving
Sta 86+25 outside the buffers will require clearing of existing trees.
Sta 87+00 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway resides within an existing greenway easement while
Sta 89+30 following a route that reserves specimen trees.
Sta 90+40 to Zone 1 Buffer Greenway follows path of least resistance leaving Old Deer Trail
Sta 90+90 to avoid specimen trees and residences.
Page 1 of 5
Sta 90+90 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail placed in existing greenway easement. Proximity of
Sta 92+90 easement to stream bank at upstream location requires crossing
East Fork Mine Creek. Buffer encroachment needed to begin
crossing.
Sta 90+90 to Zone 1 Buffer Perpendicular crossing of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 94+10
Sta 94+10 to Zone 2 Buffer Completing the perpendicular crossing of East Fork Mine Creek.
Sta 94+50
Sta 96+75 to Zone 2 Buffer Begin perpendicular crossing of tributary of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 96+95
Sta 96+95 to Zone 1 Buffer Perpendicular crossing of tributary of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 97+65
Sta 97+65 to Zone 2 Buffer End perpendicular crossing of tributary of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 97+85
Sta 98+35 to Zone 2 Buffer Begin perpendicular crossing of tributary of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 99+00
Sta 99+00 to Zone 1 Buffer Perpendicular crossing of tributary of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 100+90
Sta 100+90 to Zone 2 Buffer End perpendicular crossing of tributary of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 100+25
Sta 100+65 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail placed in existing greenway easement to avoid encroachment
Sta 101+41 onto private property the house located on the property.
Sta 159+92 to Zone 2 Buffer Steep lateral slopes are prevalent in this section of the greenway.
Sta 161+84 Specimen trees were selected for preservation and the greenway
alignment was selected to reserve these trees.
Sta 161+84 to Zone 1 Buffer Like the previous Zone 2 encroachment, steep lateral slopes and
Sta 162+35 preservation of selected trees resulted in a greenway alignment
encroaching into Zone 1. Existing development prohibited shifting
the reenwa further from the adjacent stream.
Sta 162+35 to Zone 2 Buffer Existing development and steep lateral slopes necessitate the
Sta 164+99 encroachment into Zone 2. Boardwalk commences at Sta
163+29.06 to minimize impacts and negotiate both lateral and
longitudinal slopes.
Sta 164+99 to Zone 1 Buffer Existing development (parking lot) and preservation of specimen
Sta 165+52 trees necessitate encroachment into Zone 1 with boardwalk.
Sta 165+52 to Zone 2 Buffer Existing development (parking lot) and preservation of specimen
Sta 165+85 trees necessitate encroachment into Zone 2 with boardwalk and to
commence crossing of stream feature.
Sta 165+85 to Zone 1 Buffer Zone 1 encroachment necessary to cross a small stream.
Sta 167+25
Sta 167+25 to Zone 2 Buffer Zone 2 encroachment necessary as the greenway works its way
Sta 167+73 from a stream crossing.
Sta 167+73 to Zone 1 Buffer Zone 1 buffer encroachment needed to separate greenway from
Sta 169+86 existing residential lots. Greenway meanders through an area
adjacent to a small pond but absent of trees, thus eliminating the
need for clearing. Boardwalk, begun at Sta 163+29.06, ends at Sta
169+63.58 and paved reenwa commences.
Page 2 of 5
Sta 169+86 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway encroaches Zone 2 as it makes its way out of the buffer.
Sta 170+39
Sta 170+39 to No buffer
Sta 171+04 encroachment
Sta 171+04 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway encroaches Zone 2 in existing cleared area as it begins
Sta 171+38 its alignment to cross the emergency spill way of the small pond in
the area. Begin boardwalk Sta 171+30.32.
Sta 171+38 to Zone 1 Buffer Zone 1 encroachment necessitated by the need to cross the
Sta 172+82 emergency spillway of the small pond in the area and keep
greenway within an area void of trees. End boardwalk at Sta
172+69.28 and begin paved reenwa .
Sta 172+82 to Zone 2 Buffer Zone 2 encroachment necessary as greenway leave Zone 1 and
Sta 173+05 buffers.
Sta 173+05 to No buffer
Sta 173+23 encroachment
Sta 173+23 to Zone 2 Buffer Zone 2 encroachment necessary as greenway prepares to cross
Sta 173+51 another stream.
Sta 173+51 to Zone 1 Buffer Zone 1 encroachment necessitated by the need to cross an existing
Sta 174+90 stream. End pavement at Sta 173+98.70 and begin boardwalk.
Sta 174+90 to Zone 2 Buffer Zone 2 encroachment necessary as greenway crosses stream but
Sta 174+46 then turns to cross another drainage feature.
Sta 174+46 to Zone 1 Buffer Zone 1 encroachment necessitated by the need to cross stream.
Sta 177+04 Boardwalk still employed for eenwa .
Sta 177+04 to Zone 2 Buffer Zone 2 encroachment necessary as greenway leave Zone 1 and
Sta 177+30 buffers.
Sta 177+30 to No buffer
Sta 180+06 encroachment
Sta 180+06 to Zone 2 Buffer Zone 2 encroachment necessary as greenway prepares to cross
Sta 180+29 stream on its way to existing tunnel beneath I-540.
Sta 180+29 to Zone 1 Buffer Zone 1 encroachment necessary as greenway prepares to crosses
Sta 181+07 stream on its way to existing tunnel beneath I-540
Sta 181+07 to Zone 2 Buffer Zone 2 encroachment necessary as greenway leave Zone 1 and
Sta 181+29 buffers to tie to existing tunnel beneath I-540.
Sta 181+29 to Existing I-540
Sta 190+00 tunnel
Sta 190+00 to Zone 1 Buffer Zone 1 encroachment necessitated by the need to tie to the existing
Sta 191+70 tunnel beneath I-540 and cross stream. Boardwalk begins at Sta
190+15. Greenway occupies space beneath an electrical power
transmission line which is void of trees.
Sta 191+70 to Zone 2 Buffer Zone 2 encroachment necessary as greenway leaves Zone 1.
Sta 191+90
Sta 191+90 to No buffer
Sta 192+02 encroachment
Sta 192+02 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail will be placed in an existing greenway easement and staying
Sta 192+59 within the cleared area of the electrical power transmission line.
Sta 192+59 to No buffer
Sta 201+00 encroachment
Page 3 of 5
Sta 201+00 to Zone 2 Buffer Zone 2 encroachment essential as greenway prepares to cross an
Sta 201+30 existing drainage feature.
Sta 201+30 to Zone 1 Buffer Trail crosses stream using an existing access road and culvert
Sta 202+26 laced for electrical power transmission line maintenance.
Sta 202+26 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway leaves buffers.
Sta 202+62
Sta 202+62 to No buffer
Sta 237+84 encroachment
Sta 237+84 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway needs to cross a small drainage feature as it prepares to
Sta 238+05 cross Honeycutt Road with a pedestrian crosswalk.
Sta 238+05 to Zone 1 Buffer Cross drainage feature to prepare for pedestrian crossing of
Sta 239+20 Honeycutt Road.
Sta 239+20 to Zone 2 Buffer Complete stream crossing; tie to existing pavement of Honeycutt
Sta 239+28 Road.
Sta 239+28 to No buffer
Sta 261+41 encroachment
Sta 261+41 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize removal of trees. Path to be six
Sta 263+36 feet wide, natural surface.
Sta 263+36 to No buffer
Sta 263+39 encroachment
Sta 263+39 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize removal of trees. Path to be six
Sta 263+89 feet wide, natural surface. Buffer encroachment needed to dampen
effects of lateral slope.
Sta 263+89 to Zone 1 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize removal of trees and dampen
Sta 265+28 effects of lateral slope.
Sta 265+28 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize removal of trees and dampen
Sta 265+50 effects of lateral slope. Trail headed out of buffer.
Sta 265+50 to No buffer
Sta 267+76 encroachment
Sta 267+76 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize removal of trees and dampen
Sta 268+13 effects of lateral slope.
Sta 268+13 to Zone 1 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 271+28 slopes as flat as possible.
Sta 271+28 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 271+89 slopes as flat as possible.
Sta 271+89 to Zone 1 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 272+80 slopes as flat as possible.
Sta 272+80 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 274+81 slopes as flat as possible.
Sta 274+81 to No buffer
Sta 275+15 encroachment
Sta 275+15 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 276+15 slopes as flat as possible.
Sta 276+15.65 No buffer
to Sta 276+55 encroachment
Sta 276+55 to Zone 2 Buffer Buffer encroachment necessary to cross stream
Sta 276+80
Page 4 of 5
Sta 276+80 to Zone 1 Buffer Buffer encroachment necessary to cross stream
Sta 277+58
Sta 277+58 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 279+71 slopes as flat as possible.
Sta 279+71 to Zone 1 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 280+96 slopes as flat as possible.
Sta 280+96 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 287+71 slopes as flat as possible.
Sta 287+71 to Zone 1 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 285+53 slopes as flat as possible.
Sta 285+53 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 288+89 slopes as flat as possible. Begin boardwalk Sta 288+71.33.
Sta 288+89 to Zone 1 Buffer Buffer encroachment necessary to cross Honeycutt Creek.
Sta 290+03
Sta 290+03 to Zone 2 Buffer Buffer encroachment necessary as greenway completes crossing of
Sta 290+34 Honeycutt Creek.
Sta 290+34 to No buffer
Sta 292+45 encroachment
Sta 292+45 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 292+78 slopes as flat as possible.
Sta 292+78 to Zone 1 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 295+36 slopes as flat as possible.
Sta 295+36 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 297+42 slopes as flat as possible.
Sta 297+42 to No buffer
Sta 298+04 encroachment
Sta 298+04 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 298+40 slopes as flat as possible.
Sta 298+40 to Zone 1 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 299+37.17 slopes as flat as possible.
Sta 299+37 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 300+58 slopes as flat as possible. Begin boardwalk Sta 300+08.35.
Sta 300+58 to Zone 1 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 301+47 slopes as flat as possible. Cross Honeycutt Creek
Sta 301+47 to Zone 2 Buffer Complete Honeycutt Creek crossing and move greenway away
Sta 302+00 from creek. End boardwalk Sta 301+49.35. Begin 2 feet wide
natural trail.
Sta 302+00 to No buffer End Trail at Raven Ridge Rd.
Sta 349+32 encroachment

Page 5 of 5
"TQ;r United States Department of the Interior
?Z
a
` a FISiI AND WILDLIFE SF',RVICL'1
Raleigh Field Office
Rlq?e s ?gae Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
February 2, 2011
Gerald Pottern
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc.
1221 Corporation Parkway, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27610
i\ L:: i i?)Iiey-ult
Deal- Mr. Pottern:
This letter is to irifornl you that a list of all federally-protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Dish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at litti)://www.iNvs.gov/sleigh. Therefore, ifyou have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office, fora list of federally-protected species.
OLrI' web page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1 x)73, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and it list of federal species of concernl that are known to occur in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation Willi the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence ofally
federally-listed endangered of- threatened species. A biological assessment Of eValLicit1011 may be
prepared to flrlfill that requirement and ill deternuning whether additional COIISLIItilt iOll Willi the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, Information oil the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment of
evaluation and call be Found Oil OUr web page at litti)://www.tws.gov/sleigh. ]'lease check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
1 The lean "federal species of' Concern" refers to those species which tile, Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of'concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that lice species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. Ifowever, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize udveise impacts to
federal species of concern.
Ifyour project contains suitable habitat for any ofthe federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occults, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
dcterlllillatioil, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that alight affect the species. If you determine that tile proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are 110t required to contact out- office for concurrence (unless an
F"ilviroilillental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified Ilersonnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above-referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our conl111ents are
Submitted pu1rSLlant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based oil the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally-listed endangered or threatener( species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
yo111' 1)1'oJGCt. ])lease 1'011eillber that obligiltiOlIS under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new inforlliiatio11 reveals impacts ofthis identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to agUatiC Sl)eCles,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. All erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Lund Quality Section prior to constrlictioll.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the CollSti-Lictioll
site and any nearby down-gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffos on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found oil out- website at (litti)://www.txvs.gov/sleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and CLImulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water gUallty.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
2
We 1101)e you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, I i- general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
[phone] ext. 26.
Sincerely,
?l
Pete Benjamin
Field Superviso?-
3
Q,
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Claudia Brown, Acting Administrator
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor Office of Archives and History
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary Division of Historical Resources
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary David Brook, Director
April 11, 2011
Ralph Troutman
WSP SELLS
15401 Weston Parkway
Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
Re: Honeycutt Greenway, Along Mine Creek and Honeycutt Creek, Raleigh, Wake County, ER 11-0457
Dear Mr. Troutman:
Thank you for your email of March 24, 2011, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above-referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
?VClaudia Brown
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Washington, DC M472 •' •
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program
Cooperating Technical State ?.
September 9, 2011
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. David Cooke
Manager, Wake County
337 South Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
IN REPLY REFER TO:
Case No.:
Community Name:
Community No.:
I I -04-13828
Unincorporated Areas of Wake
County, NC
370368
Dear Mr. Cooke:
We are providing our comments with this enclosed Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) on a
proposed project within your community that, if constructed as proposed, could revise the effective Flood
Insurance Study report and Flood Insurance Rate Map for your community.
If you have any questions regarding floodplain management regulations for your community or the National
Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) in general, please contact the Floodplain Administrator for your community
If you have any technical questions regarding this CLOMR, please contact the North Carolina Floodplain
Mapping Program (NCFMP) at [phone] ext. 118, or the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) Map Information eXchange (FMIX) toll free at 1-877-336-2627 (1-877-FEMA MAP). Additional
information about the NFIP is available on FEMA's website at htta://www.fema.eov/business/nrp, and
additional information about the NCFMP is available at http://www.nctloodniaps.coin.
Sincerely,

Beth A. Norton, Program Specialist
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Engineering Management Branch
Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration
List of Enclosures:
Conditional Letter of Map Revision
John K. Dorman, Program Director
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program
cc: Ms. Betsy Pearce, CFM, Wake County
Mr. Victor Lebsock, City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation
Mr. Ted L. Bartelt, P.E., Alpha & Omega Group, PC
Mr. Steve Garrett, CFM, LOMC Manager, NCFMP
ativAi-RTAJ
a
° Federal Emergency Management Agency
Washington, D.C. 20472
?qNn stio
September 9, 2011
CERTIFIED MAIL IN REPLY REFER TO:
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Case No.: 11-04-1382R
Mr. David Cooke Community: Unincorporated Areas of Wake
Manager, Wake County County, NC
337 South Salisbury Street Community No.: 370368
Raleigh, NC 27601
104
Dear Mr. Cooke:
This responds to a request that the Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) comment on the effects that a proposed project would have on the effective Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report for your community in accordance
with Part 65 of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) regulations. In a request dated October 20,
2010, Mr. Ted L. Bartelt, P.E., of the Alpha and Omega Group, PC, requested that FEMA evaluate the
effects that the proposed City of Raleigh Honeycutt Greenway Project would have on the flood hazard
information shown on the effective FIRM and FIS report. The project will include the construction of two
pedestrian bridges over Honeycutt Creek (Basin 15, Stream 31). The primary purpose of the two pedestrian
bridge crossings is to carry the City of Raleigh greenway trail from the intersection of Honeycutt Road and
Durant Road to its northern end at Raven Ridge Road. Also, the culverts at Honeycutt Road were updated
in the corrected effective/existing conditions model. In 1980, the original timber bridge (built in 1952)
was replaced by a triple-barrel 84-inch corrugated metal culvert by the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT). The proposed project will impact flooding along Honeycutt Creek (Basin 15,
Stream 31) from a point approximately 270 feet downstream of the confluence of Basin 15, Stream 33 to a
point approximately 220 feet upstream of Honeycutt Road. The area of the proposed project is shown on
North Carolina FIRM numbers 3720171800) and 37201719001, dated May 2, 2006.
All data required to complete our review of this request fora CLOMR were submitted with letters from
Mr. Bartelt.
To determine the changes in flood hazards that will be caused by the proposed project, we compare the
hydraulic modeling reflecting the proposed project (referred to as the proposed conditions model) to the
hydraulic modeling used to prepare the FIS (referred to as the effective model). If the effective model does
not provide enough detail to evaluate the effects of the proposed project, an existing conditions model must
be developed to provide this detail. This existing conditions model is then compared to the effective
model and the proposed conditions model to differentiate increases or decreases in flood hazards caused by
more detailed modeling from increases or decreases in flood hazards that will be caused by the proposed
project.
We reviewed the submitted data and the data used to prepare the effective FIRM and FIS report for your
community and determined that the proposed project meets the minimum floodplain management criteria
of the NFIP. The submitted existing conditions HEC-RAS hydraulic computer model, dated June 28,
2011, was used as the base conditions model in our review of the proposed conditions model for this
CLOMR request. We believe that, if the proposed project is constructed as shown on the submitted plans
entitled "Honeycutt Creel: Greenway," dated August 1, 2011, prepared by WSP SELLS, Inc, and the
104
1)
certified topographic work map entitled "Honeycutt Creek Flood Study", dated June 27, 2011, prepared by
Alpha & Omega Group, PC and the data listed below are received, a revision to the FIRM and FIS report
would be warranted.
The submitted existing conditions HEC-RAS hydraulic model used more up-to-date topographic
information and survey data than the effective model. Also, the crossing at Honeycutt Road was updated
in the model, as previously described. When compared to the effective model, the existing conditions
model reflects increases and decreases in the Base (I-percent annual chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs)
along Honeycutt Creek (Basin 15, Stream 31), with a maximum increase of 0.6 foot at a point just
downstream of the confluence of Basin 15, Stream 33 and a maximum decrease of 6.8 feet at a point
approximately 2,560 feet downstream of Honeycutt Road.
The proposed conditions model incorporates the proposed project into the existing conditions model.
When we compared the existing conditions model to the proposed conditions model, we determined that
the proposed project will cause increases and decreases in BFEs along Honeycutt Creek (Basin 15, Stream
31), with a maximum increase of 0.2 foot at a point approximately 4,590 feet downstream of Honeycutt
Road and maximum decrease of 0.04 foot at a point approximately 2,560 feet downstream of Honeycutt
Road.
The updated existing conditions and proposed project will have the following impacts:
Base Flood Elevations
When compared to the effective model, the proposed conditions model reflects increases and decreases in
BFEs along Honeycutt Creek (Basin 15, Stream 31). with a maximum BFE increase of 1.0 foot at a point
just downstream of Honeycutt Road and a maximum BFE decrease of 6.6 feet at a point approximately
2,560 feet downstream of Honeycutt Road.
1-Percent Annual Chance Flood lain
When compared to the effective data, the width of the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), the area that
would be inundated by the base flood, will increase and decrease along Honeycutt Creek (Basin 15, Stream
31). The maximum SFHA increase of 30 feet will occur just downstream of Honeycutt Road and a
maximum SFHA decrease of 220 feet will occur at a point approximately 2,540 feet downstream of
Honeycutt Road.
Floodway
When compared to the effective data, the width of the floodway will increase and decrease along
Honeycutt Creek (Basin 15, Stream 31), with a maximum increase of 40 feet at a point approximately
1,060 feet downstream of Honeycutt Road and a maximum decrease of 120 feet at a point approximately
2,850 feet downstream of Honeycutt Road.
Upon completion of the project, your community must submit the data listed below and request that we
make a final determination on revising the effective FIRM and FIS report.
• With this request, your community has complied with all requirements of Paragraph 65.12(x) of
the NFIP regulations. Compliance with Paragraph 65.12(b) also is necessary before FEMA can
issue a Letter of Map Revision when a community proposes to permit encroachments into the
effective regulatory floodway that will cause increases in BFE in excess of those permitted under
Paragraph 603(d)(3). Please provide evidence that your community has, prior to approval of the
proposed encroachment, adopted floodplain management ordinances that incorporate the increased
BFEs and revised floodway boundary delineations to reflect post-project conditions, as stated in
Paragraph 65.12(b).
• Detailed application and certification forms, which were used in processing this request, must be
used for requesting final revisions to the maps. Therefore, when the map revision request for the
area covered by this letter is submitted, Form 1, entitled "Overview & Concurrence Form," must
be included.
• The detailed application and certification forms listed below may be required if as-built conditions
differ from the preliminary plans. If required, please submit new forms or annotated copies of the
previously submitted forms showing the revised information.
Form 2, entitled "Riverine Hydrology & Hydraulics Form"
Form 3, entitled "Riverine Structures Form"
Hydraulic analyses, for as-built conditions, of the base flood; the 10-percent, 2-percent, and
0?-percent annual chance floods; and the regulatory floodway, together with a certified
topographic work map showing the revised floodplain and floodway boundaries, must be
submitted with Form 2.
• Effective January 13, 2010, FEMA revised the fee schedule for reviewing and processing requests
for conditional and final modifications to published flood information and maps. Under this
schedule, FEMA has not changed the initial fee for processing map revision requests involving
structural measures on alluvial fans. The initial fee for this map revision request will be $5,000
and must be received before we can begin processing the request. Payment of this fee shall be
made in the form of a check or money order, made payable in U.S. funds to the National Flood
Insurance Program, or by credit card (Visa or MasterCard only). The payment, along with the
revision application, must be forwarded to the following address:
Usina U.S. Postal Service: Using Overnight Service:
North Carolina MT-2 LOMC Depot NC MT-2 LOMC- Collection System Administrator
P.O. Box 300025 c/o Dewberry & Davis, Inc.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622-0025 2301 Rexwoods Drive, Suite 200
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
• As-built plans, certified by a registered professional engineer, of all proposed project elements.
• Evidence of notification of the property owners impacted by increases in the BF-Es, SFHA widths,
and floodway widths along Honeycutt Creek (Basin 15, Stream 31). The property owners' written
acceptance of the increases is required for the LOMR to become effective on the date of issuance.
• A copy of the public notice distributed by your community stating its intent to revise the regulatory
floodway, or a statement by your community that it has notified all affected property owners and
affected adjacent jurisdictions.
After receiving appropriate documentation to show that the project has been completed, FEMA will initiate
a revision to the FIRM and FIS report. The North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program (NCFMP) will
review all revision requests in accordance with an agreement signed with FEMA under the FEMA
4
Cooperating Technical Partners initiative. For more information on this initiative, we encourage you to
visit the dedicated portion of the FEMA Flood Hazard Mapping website at
httn://www.fenia.p-ov/r)l,in/prevent/flim/ctp main shtm or visit the NCFMP website at
littn://www.nctloodniai)s.com. Because the BFEs would change as a result of the project, a 90-day appeal
period would be initiated, during which community officials and interested persons may appeal the revised
BFEs based on scientific or technical data.
The basis of this CLOMR is, in whole or in part, a bridge project. NFIP regulations, as cited in
Paragraph 60.3(b)(7), require that communities assure that the flood-carrying capacity within the altered or
relocated portion of any watercourse is maintained. This provision is incorporated into your community's
existing floodplain management regulations. Consequently, the ultimate responsibility for maintenance of
the bridges rests with your community
This CLOMR is based on minimum floodplain management criteria established under the NFIP. Your
community is responsible for approving all floodplain development and for ensuring all necessary permits
required by Federal or State law have been received. State, county, and community officials, based on
knowledge of local conditions and in the interest of safety, may set higher standards for construction in the
I-percent annual chance floodplain. If the State, county, or community has adopted more restrictive or
comprehensive floodplain management criteria, these criteria take precedence over the minimum NFIP
criteria.
If you have any questions regarding floodplain management regulations for your community or the NFiP in
general, please contact the Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) for your community. Information on
the CCO for your community may be obtained by calling the Director, Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Division of FEMA in Atlanta. Georgia, at [phone]. If you have any technical questions regarding
this CLOMR, please contact the NCFMP at [phone] ext. 118, or the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX), toll free, at 1-877-FEMA MAP (1-877-336-2627).
Sincerely,
ka.Aor-lo?
Beth A. Norton, Program Specialist For. Luis Rodriguez, P.E., Chief
Engineering Management Branch Engineering Management Branch
Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) GA wetland
Project / Site: Honeycutt Greenway, Wetland GA on Mine Cr. Date: 08 Oct 2009
Applicant / Owner: Raleigh Parks & Recreation Date: 08 Oct 2009
Investigator: Gerald Pottem. Robert.J. Goldstein & Assoc. County: Wake
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Community ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X alluvial forest
(explain on reverse if needed)
1 1 Transect ID: GA 1-12
Pint in-
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Liaustrum sinense shrub FAC
2. Platanus occidentalis tree FACW- 9. Ilex opaca saula FAC-
3. Liquidambar styraciflua tree FAC+ 10. Corpus amomum shrub FACW+
4. Betula niQra tree FACW 11. Microstegium vimineum herb FAC+
5. Ulmus americana tree FACW 12. Juncus effusus herb FACW+
6. Acer rubrum tree FAC 13.
7. Liriodendron tulipifera tree FAC 14.
8. Smilax rotundifolia vine FAC 15.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- 92
Remarks: GA is a thinly forested depression within alluvial hardwood forest east of Mine Creek, connected to
Mine Creek by ephemeral and intermittent channels. The wetland grades upslope into non-wetland alluvial
forest„mesic mixed hardwood/pine forest, and developed land (apartments) to the east, and non-wetland levee to the
west.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
x No Recorded Data Available - Water Marks
x Drift Lines
Field Observations: x Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0-12 (in.) x Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
x Water-Stained Leaves

Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0-6 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology in GA is apparently maintained by seepage from adjacent uplands and flow from tributary
S-8, plus infrequent over-bank flooding from Mine Creek.
SOILS
GA wetland
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chewacla (Cm) + Mantachie (Me) Drainage Class: somewhat poorly
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No x
Profile Descriotion:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moi st) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 A 10 YR 4/4
8-16 B 2.5 Y 4/2 10YR 5/5 common/ distinct
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Low chroma and redox concentrations indicate hydric soil patches in some floodplain depressions such
as wetlands GA and GB. The majority of the floodplain is better drained, with higher chroma, and not hydric.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: The area enclosed by wetland boundary flags GA 1 to 12 is classified as a wetland based upon the
criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
GB wetland
Project / Site: Honeycutt Greenway, Wetland GB on Mine Cr
Applicant / Owner: Raleigh Parks & Recreation Date: 08 Oct 2009
Investigator: Gerald Pottem, Robert.J. Goldstein & Assoc. County: Wake
XTr
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Community ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X alluvial forest
(explain on reverse if needed)
1 Transect ID: GB 1-15
1 Pint in-
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Sg)ecies Stratum Indicator
Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica tree FACW
2. Platanus occidentalis tree FACW- 9. Onoclea sensibilis herb FACW
3. Liquidambar styraciflua tree FAC+ 10. Microstegium vimineum herb FAC+
4. Ligustrum sinense shrub FAC 11.
5. Lonicera jMonica vine/herb FAC- 12.
6. Vitis rotundifolia vine FAC 13.
7. Smilax rotundifolia vine
FAC 14.
_
8. Woodwardia areolata herb OBL 15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- 90
Remarks: GB is a thinly forested depression within alluvial hardwood forest east of Mine Creek, connected to
Mine Creek by intermittent channel S-8. The wetland grades upslope into non-wetland alluvial forest„mesic mixed
hardwood/pine forest, and lawn to the east, and non-wetland levee to the west.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
x No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
x Drift Lines
Field Observations: x Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:
x Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0-10 (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: -0-4 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology in GB is apparently maintained by seepage from adjacent uplands and flow from tributary
S-8, plus infrequent over-bank flooding from Mine Creek.
SOILS
GB wetland
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chewacla (Cm) + Mantachie (Me ) Drainage Class: somewhat poorly
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Dystrudents Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No x
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 A 10 YR 3/2
8-16 B 2.5 YR 4/2 common/distinct
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Low chroma and redox concentrations indicate hydric soil patches in some floodplain depressions such
as wetlands GA and GB. The majority of the floodplain is better drained, with higher chroma, and not hydric.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No_
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: The area enclosed by wetland boundary flags GB 1 to 15 is classified as a wetland based upon the
criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
GA + GB Upland
Project / Site: Honeycutt GreenwU, Wetlands GA, GB on Mine Cr
Applicant / Owner: Raleigh Parks & Recreation Date: 08 Oct 2009
Investigator: Gerald Pottem. Robert J. Goldstein & Assoc. County: Wake
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Community ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X alluvial + mesic forest
(explain on reverse if needed) Transect ID: GA, GB
Pint 111-
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant SDecies Stratum Indicator
Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica tree FACW
2. Ouercus phellos tree FACW- 9• Poystichum acrostichoides herb FAC
3. Liquidambar sWaciflua tree FAC+ 10. Microstegium vimineum herb FAC+
4. Liriodendron tulipifera tree FACU 11. Cornus florida tree FACU
4. Ligustrum sinense shrub FAC 12. Viburnum prunifolium shrub FACU
5. Lonicera Japonica vine/herb FAC- 13.
6. Vitis rotundifolia vine FAC 14.
7. Smilax rotundifolia vine FAC 15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- 67
Remarks: The non-wetland alluvial hardwood forest adjacent to wetlands GA and GB grades upslope into,mesic
mixed hardwood/pine forest and lawn to the east, and non-wetland levee to the west along Mine Creek.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
x Drift Lines
Field Observations: x Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: > 18 in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: > 12 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Sediment deposits and drift lines on the floodplain outside of the wetland depressions appear to be
from occasional events that do not result in prolonged saturation. The watershed is urbanized and probably has
frequent but brief over-bank flooding events.
SOILS
GA + GB Upland
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chewacla (Cm) + Cecil sandy loam (CeD) Drainage Class: somewhat poorly (Cm)
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic D, sv trudepts (Cm) Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No x
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 A 10Y 4/3
8-16 B 10YR 4/5
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: No hydric soil indicators on floodplain outside of depressions GA and GB (mapped as Chewacla &
Mantachie soils), nor on adjacent slopes (mapped as Cecil sandy loam). Soil profile description above is from the
floodplain east of GB and northeast of GA.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Within a Wetland? Yes_ No X
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No X
Remarks: The areas outside of GA 1-12 and GB 1-15 are classified as non-wetland based upon the criteria set
forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) GC wetland
Project / Site: Honeycutt Greenway, Wetland GC on Mine Cr Date: 08 Oct 2009
Applicant / Owner: Raleigh Parks & Recreation Date: 08 Oct 2009
Investigator: Gerald Pottem, Robert.J. Goldstein & Assoc. County: Wake
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Community ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X alluvial forest
(explain on reverse if needed) Transect ID: GC 1-3
Plot ID.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Ligustrum sinense shrub FAC
2. Woodwardia areolata herb OBL 9.
3. Liquidambar sWaciflua sule FAC+ 10.
4. Boehmeria cyclidrica herb FACW+ 11.
5. Lonicera japonica herb FAC- 12.
6. Acer rubrum same FAC 13.
7, 14.
8. 15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- 83
Remarks: GC is a linear wetland ditch 2 to 3 ft wide with sparse vegetation. It may have been a natural seep
prior to ditching and construction of a recreational area upslope to the east. GC receives flow from a corrugated
plastic pipe under this developed area. Flag GC-1 (head of wetland) is at the outlet of this pipe, and flag GC-3 (end
of wetland) is at the inlet of a short culvert beneath the sewer maintenance access road alongf the east bank of Mine
Creek..
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
x Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0-4 (in. Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
x Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Wetland GC was saturated at or near the surface during dry weather conditions, and apparently receives
constant flow from a drainage pipe under the swimming pool and recreational area to the east. It drains into Mine
Creek via a culvert under the sewer maintenance road.
SOILS
GC wetland
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chewacla soils (Cm) Drainage Class: somewhat poorly
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic D,, shpts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No x
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 A 2.5 Y 3/1
8-16 B 2.5 Y 4/1
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Mucky mineral texture and low chroma indicate hydric soil in linear wetland GC. The adjacent
floodplain is better drained, with higher chroma, and not hydric.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: The ditch segment delineated by wetland flags GC 1 to 3 is classified as a wetland based upon the
criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
Adjacent UPLAND vegetation, hydrology and soils indicators are the same as for GA and GB.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
GF wetland
Project / Site: Honeycutt Greenway, Wetland GF on Honeycutt Cr
Applicant / Owner: Raleigh Parks & Recreation Date: 14 Oct 2009
Investigator: Gerald Pottem. Robert.J. Goldstein & Assoc. County: Wake
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Community ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X Hillside seep forest
(explain on reverse if needed)
1 1 Transect ID: GF 1-3
Plot 1D.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Lieustrum sinense shrub FAC
2. Viburnum nudum shrub FACW+ 9.
3. Liguidambar styraciflua san1Q FAC+ 10.
4. Lindera benzoin shrub FACW 11.
5. Lonicera japonica herb FAC- 12.
6. Acer rubrum same FAC 13.
7, 14.
g, 15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- 83
Remarks: Wetland GF is a ditched hillside seep 3 ft wide with sparse vegetation that flows into a headwater
tributary of Honeycutt Creek above Bent Tree Pond. It is bordered by mesic hardwood forest on the slopes and a
narrow band of alluvial forest along the creek.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other _ Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0-8 (in.) x Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
x Water-Stained Leaves

Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology in GF is apparently maintained by seepage from the adjacent upland to the west. The upper
half of this seep appears to be higher than the flood elevation of the creek below. It was saturated at the surface
during dry weather in October.
SOILS
GF wetland
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wilkes soils(WwF) Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No x
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 A 2.5 Y 3/1
8-16 B 2.5 Y 4/1
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: This seep is an unmapped hydric inclusion on a slope mapped as Wilkes and Cecil soils. Mucky
mineral texture and low chroma indicate hydric soil in linear wetland GC. The adjacent slopes and narrow
floodplain are better drained, with higher chroma, and not hydric.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: The linear seep marked by wetland flags GF 1 to 3 is classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set
forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) GH wetland
Project / Site: Honeycutt Greenway, Wetland GH on Honeycutt Cr Date: 19 Oct 2009
Applicant / Owner: Raleigh Parks & Recreation Date: 19 Oct 2009
Investigator: Gerald Pottem, Robert.J. Goldstein & Assoc. County: Wake
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Community ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X alluvial forest
(explain on reverse if needed)
I I Transect ID: GH 1-10
Pint 111-
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Vaccinium corymbosum shrub FACW 9. Osmunda regalis herb OBL
2. Ilex verticillata shrub FACW 10. Boehmeria cylindrica herb FACW+
3. Liquidambar styraciflua tree FAC+ 11. Microstegium vimineum herb FAC+
4. Betula niara tree FACW 12.
5. Woodwardia areolata herb OBL 13.
6. Acer rubrum tree FAC 14.
7. Liriodendron tulipifera tree FAC 15.
8. Smilax rotundifolia vine FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- 100
Remarks: GH is a thinly forested depression within alluvial hardwood forest, east of a headwater tributary of
Honeycutt Creek, and connected to that stream by an ephemeral channel. The wetland grades upslope into non-
wetland alluvial forest„and mesic mixed hardwood forest.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
x No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:
x Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 4-12 (in.) x Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0-6 (in.) i FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology in GH is apparently maintained by seepage from adjacent uplands. It does not appear to
receive overbank flow from the creek to the west.
SOILS
GH wetland
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):_ Wehadkee & Bibb (Wo) Drainage Class: poorly
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No x
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 A 2.5 Y 3/2
8-16 B 2.5 Y 4/1 IOYR 514 common/ distinct
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Solis
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Low chroma and redox concentrations indicate hydric soil patches in this floodplain depression.
Adjacent portions of the floodplain toward the creek are better drained, with higher chroma, and not hydric.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No_
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: The area enclosed by wetland boundary flags GH Ito 10 is classified as a wetland based upon the
criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
>> Wetland GP 1-7, located 400 feet east of wetland GH = small depression, vegetation and soil
indicators similar to GH.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) GQ wetland
Project / Site: Honeycutt Greenway, Wetland GO on Honeycutt Cr Date: 29 Jun 2010
Applicant / Owner: Raleigh Parks & Recreation Date: 29 Jun 2010
Investigator: Gerald Pottem, Robert.J. Goldstein & Assoc. County: Wake
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Community ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X alluvial forest
(explain on reverse if needed) Transect ID: G 1-18
Plot IDv
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Salix nigra shrub FACW+ 9. Ludwigia palustris herb OBL
2. Baccharis halimifolia shrub FAC 10. Boehmeria cylindrica herb FACW+
3. Liquidambar styraciflua tree FAC+ 11. Juncus effusus herb FACW+
4. Pinus taeda tree FAC 12.
5. Viburnum nudum shrub FACW+ 13.
6. Acer rubrum tree FAC 14.
7. Rubus argutus shrub FACU+ 15.
8. Smilax rotundifolia vine FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- 91
Remarks: GQ is a scrubby marsh wetland beneath a powerline, periodically mowed or sprayed to exclude trees.
It is adjacent to an intermittent or barely perennial stream, and was probably alluvial forest prior to clearing for the
powerline right-of-way. It grades upslope into upland scrub and dry-mesic hardwood/pine forest.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
x No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: 0-1 (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0-8 (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
Water Marks
x Drift Lines
x Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators:
x Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
x Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology in GQ is maintained by the creek flowing through it and lateral seepage from adjacent
upland slopes. It was saturated throughout and inundated in several areas during dry weather.
SOILS
GO wPtinnrl
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):_ Wehadkee & Bibb (Wo) Drainage Class: poorly
Taxonomy (Subgroup):_ Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No x
Profile Descriotion:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munseil Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 A 2.5 Y 4/2
8-16 B 2.5 Y 511
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
-Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Low chroma and redox concentrations indicate hydric soil patches in this alluvial wetland. Adjacent
uplands are mapped as Cecil sandy loam.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: The area enclosed by wetland boundary flags GQ 1 to 18 is classified as a wetland (excluding the 2 to 5
foot wide stream channel within the wetland) based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers
Wetlands Delineation Manual.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) GM wetland
Project / Site: Honeycutt Greenway, Wetland GM on Honeycutt Cr Date: 26 Oct 2009
Applicant / Owner: Raleigh Parks & Recreation Date: 26 Oct 2009
Investigator: Gerald Pottem. Robert.J. Goldstein & Assoc. County: Wake

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No QUILU.
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Community ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X alluvial forest
(explain on reverse if needed) Transect ID: GM 1-25
and GM 100-107

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Quercus alba tree FACU 9. Pilea pumila herb FACW
2. Ilex opaca shrub FAC- 10. Boehmeria cylindrica herb FACW+
3. Liquidambar styraciflua tree FAC+ 11. Microstegium vimineum herb FAC+
4. Fagus grandifolia tree FACU 12. Viburnum nudum shrub FACW+
5. Lindera benzoin shrub FACW 13.
6. Acer rubrum tree FAC 14.
7. Liriodendron tulipifera tree FACU 15.
8. Smilax 0auca vine FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- 67
Remarks: GM is a thinly forested depression within alluvial hardwood forest, at the confluence of three
drainageways (one ephemeral, two intermittent) flowing northwest into Honeycutt Creek. The wetland grades
upslope into non-wetland alluvial forest and mesic mixed hardwood forest. The mix of mature "upland" trees and
"wetland" shrubs and herbs suggest that this wetland may be relatively young, possibly due to Falls Lake Dam.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
x No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
x Drift Lines
Field Observations: x Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:
x Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 4-16 (in.) x Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0-9 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology in GM is apparently maintained by seepage from adjacent uplands and flow from three
small tributaries. It may also receive backwaters from Falls Lake after large storms.
SOILS
GM wetland
Map Unit Name
Series and Phase): Chewacla soils (Cm) Drainage Class: somewhat poorly
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Dvstrudepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No x
Profile Descriotion:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 A 2.5 Y 3/2
8-16 B 2.5 Y 4/1 10YR 514 common/ distinct
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Low chroma and redox concentrations indicate hydric soil patches in this floodplain depression.
Adjacent portions of the floodplain are better drained, with higher chroma, and not hydric.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: The area between wetland boundary flags GM Ito 25 and GM 100 to 107 is classified as a wetland
based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. The wetland
continues northwest of GM-25 and GM-100, which is not a delineated wetland boundary
>> Wetland GN, located 2100 feet southwest of GM, has vegeattaion, hydrology and soil indicators similar
to GM.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 S--1
Date: $? OCT 7,007 Project: HOn JCUH C5-reeehW& Latitude: 3$'. $7'?6
Evaluator: GeraI4 PWerK Site: Loot jsTreet DriVe Longitude: if 8. 6qs
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent tj County: klarke.. Other e.g. West
.g. Quad Name: 1? t?yf(I
1fZ19or erennial if 2: X
1,10
7
A._ Geomorphology (Subtotal Ab ent Weak
- Moderate :'-Strong
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 - 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle pool sequence
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0
0
1 2
2 3
3
5. Active//relic floodplain 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches- - - - 2 _
3 -
7. Braided channel -
0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
._............. ---------
98 Natural levees 0
- - 1 2
2 3
3
0. Headcuts i
11. Grade controls 0.5 1 1.5

--_.._-..._..
12. Natural valley or drainageway
.
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. --

0
_-
No

1 1.5

Yes = 3
man-mace queries are not rates; see arscussions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = 0 .5 }
14, Groundwater flow/discharge 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or O 1 2

Water in channel-- dry or growing_season 3
16. Leaflltter 1.5 1 0.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0,5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
__....__..---..._._.....- ..........
....--...._...._._._. 0

.._..._.__..__. .5 1 1.5

19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? ..........._._ _.__ _
No 0
Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloqv (Subtotal = T)..7 )
20". Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channe! 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish -- 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3 --
24. Fish --_ - 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
- ----- ............._....._........_...._ .._............ _...---

-- _ 0.5

.__
-
- 1 1.5

26. Macrobenlhos (note diversity and abundance) -
-
-------- --------------- .._....
015 ___.......____._..... ._......
__-
1

1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus,

--- _ -- 0,5 - - i --
--
-` 1.5
29 W and plants in streambed _
FAC 0. FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
items zu ana zi focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
- awn Shown Soj rya is ft
-_&_u ,-teen residPhCe S _ ?c?
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 .S -oz
Date: $ OCT 2001 Project: Hoheycuff 6reem latitude: 35-
Evaluator: Geralii Potterm Site: Mine Cr & 6forks Longitude: 7$. 6657
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least intermittent !J`? County: k1a e. Ida yleGf
ill 19 or perennial it t 30 g. Quad Name: -4 0 eomorp o ogy (Subtotal =_-_ J Absent Weak Moderate Str ng
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity -- 0 1 - 3
3, In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence -- _
6 1 - 2 - 3 -
4. it texture or stream substrate sorting
-? - p
- 1 2 3
S. Active/relic floodplain__-
6. Depositional bars or benches
- -
0
0 1 - - 2
2 _ 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits

9 Natural levees 0
.......... __-.___-._
0 1
-------..---_.._.__--._._
1 2

2 3

3
10. Headcuts 0 -? 1 -2 3°°--
-11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 -
Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 .5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0 -
Yes
......,-.,,W..., --. ma „vc ,a?uu. nVV UISGUSDIVnS 111 Ina11Ua1
B_ Hvrlrnlnnv tSuhtntal = 9
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water In channel and > 48 Itrs since rain, or
0
1 - "-
_ Water in channel -- dry or_growin season - -
16. Leaflitter
1
5 2
- 3D
-

17. Sediment on plants or debris
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
.
0
0
1
0,5
0
5 0.5

1 0

1 5

19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?
No .
0
Yes 1.5
=1.5
C. Rinlnnv tS(ihfnfnl = I x.51
2O F. Fibrous roots in channel
216, Rooted plants in channel
22. Crayfish - ----
23. Bivalves 3
3
0 2
2
0.5 1 0
1 0
1 1.5
3
24. Fish --- 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
-__- 0
---...__.-_......... 0.5
.___..._
. 1 1 5

28. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0 -
-._..._..___._.-__
0.5
1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; perlphyton 0 1 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.
-
-? 0.5 1.5
2
9Weiland plants In streambed FAC 0. FACW = 0.75; OB L = 1
5 V'= 2
0; Other
.
.
?•• ?••v . • ,??u? ?„ „ p ???,w? ur uplullu piarns, earn zu wcuses on me presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
PERE91._3.hown oh *po + soil nobs
Mine Cr wesi* of Sx Paths
K
5.2 Nearby
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 $- '
Date: Q` ()(r 2_007 Project: NOl1PyCUt CSYPPNWQ Latitude:
Evaluator: 6eraW PWerw Site: Miwe Cr LQ tjFtj?* KdLongitude:
7 8'. (,q30
Total Points: Other Q
Stream is at least intermittent S? County: / Ry lea f
if z 19 or perennial if z 30 r ?' ?' e.g. Quad/Name:

A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
-- Absent: Weak
?- Moderate.^` Strong
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
3
5, Active/relic floodplain _ 0 2
6. Depositional bars or benches --?-_-- 0 3
7. Braided channel -
- 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits -? --
9° Natural levees 0
0 1
1 2
2 3
- 3
10, Headcuts
-? 0 1
11. Grade controls 0 - -
0.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway
------ -- ------ 0
__
-- ..................._ 0.5 1 1.5

13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. .
-
No = 0

Yes 3
rvaan-inane uROneS are not mien; see oiscussionS In manual
R Hvrirnlnnv (Ri ihilntal = 9• J 1
14. Groun_dwaterftowldischarge -, __---_ -- -_._ p--
-- _ 1 v' _._._._.. 2 - ' 3 -
15. Water in channel and > 481irs since rain, or 0 - 1 2.._-' - - 3
- Water in channel ---orrowin?soason
16. Leaflitter
0
5
- -- 0
?- -? .
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines} 0 0.5 1,5
19, Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = I I 1
20k'. Fibrous roots in channel 31, 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves no 1 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0, 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
- 0 0.5 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
? 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.
- 0.5 1 _
1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed - _
FAC 0.5 FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
.•?...? w a. iv r w?uv vn u,u p? oavnw V1 upaarna prams, tern m focuses on me presence or aquatic or welland plants.
Noles: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
mine, ( n er?fi of Al p,w7?oH k?cd.
_ _-----
S-3
Newfoh

North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 S-4
Date: O CT' 2.009 Project: Honeycuft 6 eenW Latitude: 3 g_, g g p 7
Evaluator: 6,e -414 po' tem Site: Neahn qa AptS Longitude: 7$ , d L??+
Total Points: p
Other
Stream is at least l Ifermittent -7c
Name: Day
if z 19 or perennial If 2 30 7 Wake- e.g. Quad
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_Jt .... - Absent
_ `:..Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture or stream substrate so_rt_i_n_g_

0
1
1 2
2 3
3
3
5. Activelrelic floodplain 0 _ 1 2 3-
6. Depositional bars or benches_
-- 0 1 -2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 - _
2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9° Natural levees
"---------- 0
0
._.. 1
1
- 2
2 3
3
10. Headcuts 0 __ 1 ---- 2 -- 3_-._..
11. Grade controls 00 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 _
- 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. -
No 0 - --- -
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B_ Hvdroloav 1Subtotal = 01 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dry orgrowing season /?1 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0. 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features} present? 0
No 0 1 1.5
Yes = 1.5
C. Binloov (Suhtntal = l 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel

21r'. Rooted plants in channel IerA?
22. Crayfish - 3

_ - 3
0 - 2
- - --------------- -
2
0.5 1

- 1 --
1 0

0 _
- 1.5 -
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos (rote diversity and abundance) -
no 0.5
0.5 1 -- ----1.5
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus.
- - -0.5 _
1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed _
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other
- Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or welland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
LFPtH?rl?l?l??? Showy on Soil rya
rl +p-rat ditch urban _S*rmt?a l'
??tl
Net?'+
Sw4 Apts
/J
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 S-55,.1.6
Date: $ OCT 2009 Project: HO;JlCuff GreenWq Latitude: ,3g, 88 5'
Evaluator: 6eralil P6o tem site.. ) ev*AI ? y Ap fs Longitude: .T. l? )
Total Points: ?,I Other
Stream is at feast intermittent 7 County: i?/ a? e.g.
ifaf8or perennial ifk30 g. Quad Name:

A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_G_S_? ??-
1°. Continuous bed and bank Absent
0- _Weak_ Moderate: Strong ^'
--
2. Sinuosity _ _ 0 1 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
-- 0
- 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 _
- 2 - 3 -
5. Active/relic floodpiain ---- ----- 0 - - 1- -
- --T^ 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel __ 0 1 2 - - 3 -
8. Recent alluvial deposits
98 Natural levees 0
0 1
2
3
10. Headcuts 0 2 3
11. Grade controls
12. Natural valley or drainageway_ M 0
-
0 0.5
0.5 1
1 1.5
1.5 -
13. Second or greater order channel on existino
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. -
- -
-
No = 0 -
- --
Yes 19
rvian-mauu uttcnes are not rateo; see oiscussIons in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = y; 1
--- ?__ - -_ _...._._.._..-- ...... 14. Groundwater flow/discharge _ 0
-V 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water In channel -- dr
or
rowin
season --- _
-- 1 -
-
2 ,•°'
L f
-
y
g
g
-
16. Leaflitter -_ 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris - 0 0 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? - No 0 - -- Yes = 1,5
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = 1s 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
21 .Rooted plants in channel 3
3 2
2 1
1 0
0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3

24. Fish -- - -?

0
.
--...........
0.5

1

1.5
25. Amphibians
_26. Macrobenlhos (note diversity and abundance} 0
_ 0 0.5
0.5 1
1 1.5
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 --- 3

28. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus.
0
- 0.5
1 _
1.5
_
29 Wetiand plants in streambed -- FAC 0. FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
S^5 '
nuns cu anu e i rocus on the presence or upiana piants, nom zu tocuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
_ e eq1n raQ, shown Oh o t soi/ - - - S- 6 l.at???-pN9
- --- --- - .? _ 73. 33• S8 20
- - 4q?_0
4
1
S' S
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 S-7
Date: g OCT 2W? Project: Honeycuff &sf eeflWa Latitude: $'Y,2 0
Evaluator: 6eraW PAterh Site: k/e k/Q 4pfs Longitude: 79. 019
Total Points: 1,1 Other r
Stream is at least intermittent to County: Vl/ a ?? 8a leaf
if 2 19 or erennlal if 2 30 e.g. Quad Name:

A. GeomorphOlogy_(subtotal Absent Weak Moderate: Strong'
V. Continuous bed and bank
- 0 1 2 - 3
2. Sinuosity 0 -- 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 -2 3 -
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Activelrelic floodplain 0 _
_
2 - 3
6, Depositional bars or benches 0 - -1 2 - 3 -
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
6. Recent alluvial deposits
98 Natural levees - - -
- 0
0 - 1
1 2
2 3
3
10. Headcuts 0 1 -- _
_
?2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway- - -
- - 0 5 1 _
- 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or MRCS map or other documented
evidence,
No '-
Yes = 3
man-maca wines are not ralea; see oiscussions in manual
B. Hwirnloav (Subtotal = 2.5 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 1 -- -2 3
15. Wafer in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2

Water In channel -dry or growing
- 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0-

17. Sediment on plants or_debris _ _
0
-?
0.6
-
1 __
- 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) _
0 0.5 _
1
1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? _- - - No 0 - -_-- _
-- -+ Yes = 1.5 _
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = v? 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3
3 2
2 1
1 0
0
22. Crayfish. 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 ._ 2 -• ----- 3----
_24. Fish
- 0.5_•-_ ------1 -
1.5
25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
-VV 0 _ 0.5 -
0.5 1
1 _
1.5
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
- 0 1 _
- - 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus. 0.5 1 1.5
29 Wetland plants in streambed - - -- _
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBI = 1.5 SAV = 2.0: Other 0
items zu ano c i rocus on me presence or upiana pianrs, item zv rocuses on me presence or aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch;
t
6fmO od ch mid a f east edo? e- of
_ f /ooda/a« beAi; grits. - .? S-7
a/
EPHVI E P4 , No-t mappty orl soil or topa .
i

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 S' g
Date: 0 C T 2007 Project: H0;1 eyCUff CS roef/WQ Latitude:
Evaluator: GeraW Po-Rerm site: 0 of Penny hill 411 Longitude: '$ ? ON
+
Total Points: rI Other R4
Stream Is at least intermittent County: Ice, e.g. Quad Name: 9 lcQf
if a 19 or perennial If?: 30
A. Geomor hology L btotal Absent_ - :Weak Moderate Strong
1°. Continuous bed and bank
--? - 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0
0
1 2
2 3
3 -
5. Active/relic floodplain - 0
- -
1 - 2 - 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 3
7. Braided channel -- --
---- - 0
- -1 - 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9° Natural levees 0
0 - 1
1 2
2 3
3
10. Headcuts 0 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway_ 0 .5 _ 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on exi
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. sting
No0
Yes = 3
- Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R_ Hvrirninnv IStthtntal = 7 1
14, groundwater flow/discharge 0
- - 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- diyor growing season
- --- 0 - -? 1 - O2 - 3
16. Leaflilter 1.5 - 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1,5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)

19, Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? 0 0.5

No = 0 1 1.5
._ .... _______
Yes 1.5
C. Siologv {Subtotal = ._.._..6.9 }
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
--
-21 . Rooted plants in channel 3

3 2

2 1

1 0

0

22. Crayfish
0
0.5
1 - _
_
l 1.5 -
23. Bivalves 0 -
1 2 3
24. Fish
25. Amphibians
_.__._..._.._._....---------..

26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) _
_ 0
0

0 0.5
0.5 1
1 1.5
1.5
_....._.....
__..._..
_27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 _ _
1 - 1.5
29 Wetland plants in streambed? -- FAC ;Q55 CW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
- Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants,
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes,)
r ?l%
r`
rt,?? off=!?Qlaha<s Cxi-? 1ter
_ shown ah ,fail maw.
GA
N
S-8

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 S-17
Date: 9 OCR 200? Project: HOHey/CUtf &SYePHwa Latitude: 3s. 913 S
Evaluator: 6eraJ4 "b to kt SRO: PJ of Penn N;(( pool Longitude: 79. 6 y 13
Total Points:
Streem is at least intermittent 1la. s County: ke, Other
1SQy?e '
if 2 19 or erennial if;! 30 ?t e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =____ . ?
1°. Continuous bed and bank
- 4Absent
0 Weak`
1 Moderate:
2 Strong '; .
3
2. Sinuosity
- - -- 0 - 1 -- -- 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
?- 0
0 1 2
2 3
3
5. Active/relic floodplain _- 0 1- -'- 2 3 - "-
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 _
2 3-?
7. Bralded channel
-EE
S
8. Recent alluvial deposits
Natural levees 1 2 3
3
10. Headcuts 2 3
11. Grade controls -_-_ --, 0 .6 1.5
12. Natural vatley or d_ramageway 0
- 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existin4
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. _
- -
No:0 - --"
Yes = 3
rv 011-11 uu u4wnna UIU nut IataU. satl Ulbuu5wuns in manual
B. Hvriroloov ISuhtntnl = 2.5 1
_14, Groundwater flow/discharge e-_-- 2 --3 -
15. Water In channel and > 48 firs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dry or growing season_ _ 0 - 1 2----- - 3 -
16. Leaflitter
_-_ _-...-. 1.5 1 O.v p

17. Sediment on plants or debris ...._.._._
0
0.5 ---.__.__---
1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
_..__.__._.._..-..._._.__.-__
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? 0 0.
......._-._-..__.... .___..___ _..__._...
No = 0 1 1.5

Yes 1.5
C. Bioloov fSubtotal = 4/ 1
---
20U. Fibrous roots in channel
21 . Rooted plants In channel - -------
3
3 -- -- -
2
2 - --
1 -
_ 1
0 -
-- 0 -
--
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1,5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians-
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
- 0
__ 0 -
0.5
0.5 1
1 1.5
1.5

27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
0
1 _
2 _
_
3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. _
0 0.5 1 _
- 1.5
29s.-Wetland plants in streambed - -
-IC-- ---- - - FAC 0. FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1,5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
-
nnn- - anu c, tutus un [nti presence of upland Plants, Kern Z`J TOCUSeS On Ine presence or aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
G-vhew .. JoMs wet a'I*ti Gc -
? culvert ;M &-t ; CUAze -f dL hagpes
- arc reek-?i? w an s-o.A-ni-
IDPO mans. -- _
-ro r
MIne . reek
%P ? be,
?>z?
,Neat
s-9
l lW?, ? l
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 9-10
Date: 9 OG'r" o?009 Project: H0npycuff &sr,4PVtwaty Latitude: 35, g863
Evaluator: Gerald PAtet 14 site: SW of Old leer Tr-1, Longitude: TX-63w?
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least intermittent 11-5 County: k/01 ke- ga leQf
if z 19 or perennial If Z 30 &,g, Quad Name: ??
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =___(g _}- `Absent "'.Weak ^- Moderate. Strong'.::'
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 -2 V- 3
2. Sinuosity 0 2 3
3. In-channel structure; riffle-pool sequence-
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0
0
-1 ` 2
2 3
3
5. Active/relic floodplain An q 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8._ Recent alluvial deposits _..___...__...._.___..__._..__
9B Natural levees _-_._............_.0._-_
0 1
1 2
2 3
3
10. Headcuts
11. Grade controls 0
0 1 2
1 3
1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0, 1 1,5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing

USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.

No
-- - --`-
Yes = 3
,vian-maue unites are nut raleu; see uis;ussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov 1Subtotal = 9 1
14, Groundwater flow/discharge 0
-_ _...- 1 - ~2 3

15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or _

_ Water in channels- dr r?or growing season O 1 2 3
___..___
16. Leafiitter
1.5 --
1
0.5
0
17. Sediment on plants or debris no 0.5 1 1.5
1 B. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines} 0.5 1 1.5

19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?-

No 0 ---------- ...... .......
_
Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloqy (Subtotal= __ _3.5 )
20". Fibrous roots In channel 3 2
_.._ - - 0 '-

21 , Rooted plants in channel-
3
2 ..... ..-.....--
1
0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
-- _. _... -- - - -....,._..__..... _ --------- IMF 0.5 1 1.5

26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
0.5
1 -----
1.5
_27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus 0 _
- 0.5 - 1-- _
1
5
29_Wetland plants in streambed .
FAC 0. -FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
items zu ano z i rocus on me presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants,
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
-- - e+ msioitAl -
- '' -,9'? AW7
?. .,...--
mappe -
evt u SGS Or so MA --
- '041
--
lP-'---
__-___ ?, s-10
North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 s-r'
Date: g Oct 2009 Project: Hoh cuff Csreenwa Latitude: 3S• 8'870
Evaluator: Gerajd Poftervt Site: $W of old jbeer 7'rarl Longitude: 7g. 6 3g$
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least intermittent County: +1,?1 ? e6t f
if 2 19 or perennial if z 30 (O r" e g Quad Name: l7Ll
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal W= fc Absent
_ :Weak
V Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 -
J - ? 2 3
2. Sinuosity -- _ 0 1 2 3
3. in-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0
- 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain -- -
0 -
1 _
-- 2 3

6. Depositional bars or benches
0 _
1
-2 _
- 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9° Natural levees 0
0 1
1 _
2
2 3
3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0. 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway
_-- _ _ 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. No Yes = 3
man•maue MUMS are noc raiea; see uiscussions in manual
B. Hvdrninav lSuhtntal = 2 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dry or growing season
- 0 O 2 3
_
_
16. Leaflitter
1,5
1 --
0.5
0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 -
1 1,5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) .._. 0,5
_ 1 1.5
19, Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? --- - No 0 -- -- Yes = 1.5
C- Bioloov lSuhtntal = 2 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
_..
21 . Rooted _plants In channel 3
..... _ ..............----..._._.__.
3 2
____._._.___._..__......_..__
2 1
._..._._... --.---.._....
1 - 0 -- ^
.., -_ _____..._
0
22. Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians -
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
0 0.5
0.5 1
1 1.5
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton _ 0 _ 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.
- 0.5 _
1 _
- 1.5
29 . Welland plants in streambed _
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
items zu ano zi roeus on me presence or upiana plants, item xv tocuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch
Notes: (use back side of this term for additional notes.) :
V
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 S-12
Date: q 0C ?r 2009 Project: Howycuft &re0jjWVt Latitude: 3 883
evaluator: Gerald PAterK site: NE of Ofd Deer Trj. Longitude: 7t 377
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least intermittent y $ County: ?? I k? ga u j?
if z 19 or erennial if;! 30 r ?' e.g. Quad !Name: J
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal Absent Weak' Moderate Strong `.
18. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2- _
2. Sinuosity
- 0
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4, Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0
_0 1-
1 -2
2 - 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 3
6. Depositional bars or benches _ 0 1 2 -- 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 - 2 3-
6. Recent alluvial deposits-_-
9° Natural levees 0
0 1
1 2
2 3
3
10. Headcuts 0 2 3
11. Grade controls
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0
0 0.5
0.5 1
1 1.5
1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes
A. jj
- Man-made ditcnes are not rated; see discussions In manual
B. Hvdrolonv Muhlolal = q 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2
Water in channel -- dry or growing season
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
1 B. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 015 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? _ No Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = t 2- )
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish-
- 0.5
1
i.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
._ .............._...--------_._._ 0
.-____.._...._...__...--- 0.5
.-----..
_
. 1 1.5

26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0 .
_
•--__.__.._--
0.5
1 ........ -----..-_..
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphylon 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. - -__
? T _
-- 0,5 -W 1 --- - - - 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed __
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBI = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other
items -o anu a focus on me presence or upiano piants, item zs focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
Pc°?rPnlzife.P, .M on Sod ac 7-opo ^v s
extensive bedrVCk- riAf1e,

109(,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 5-13 R
Date: 21 Zrime, 2010 Project: HoOeycuft &rpejrwa Latitude: 3r-. ?gg(.
Evaluator: GeraW Merv site: 25.0" N of 014 Iker Tr. Longitude: 7g b3'15
Total Points: Other p r
Stream is at least intermittent County:
if219or perennial ifa30 1q. 57 Wake- e.g. Quad Name: 94ti1eJ
A. Geornorpholo Subtotal __? _
9Y i. _ _- ------ = Absent
- Weak_ Moderate

- _ Strong-?_
-
1°. Continuous bed and bank
- - - - - - 0
--.-.........
- 2 3
-
2. Sinuosity 0 2 3

3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
0

._..

....... __._.. .
. _
3
.

4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
1 _ --
---.------
3
5. Active/relic floodplain U 2 3--
6. Depositional bars or benches 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 - 2 3
9" Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 .5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existin _
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No Yes = 3
evidence.
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal= -Vi 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
d
i 0 O 2 3
ry or grow
ng season__
Water in channel --
16. Leaflitter
1.5 1
.5
0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0. 1 1.5
Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
18 0 0.5 1 1.5--
- -
.
19 Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal,-_ 2.5 J -------- ---..
._.__..
__._
_
.
_..__ ._
.
._.-
. -_----_-
-
--------
206. Fibrous roots in channel -
3 .
.
_
.
.
.
2 .
.
-
1 -
--_
0
....

21'. Rooted plants in channel
_ -._._.._...
...........
3
.__........,__..._.__............._..
2
..._.__.._._ _
1
_ _
0
22. Crayfish --- 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) CO) 0.5 1 1.5
-
27, Filamentous algae; periphyton 1 _ 2 -- _ 3
- -
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fun us.
-
- 0.5 1 1.5
-
- -
29 . Wetland plants in streambed __ FAC 0.5 FACW 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on Ilse presence of aquatic or wetland plants
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
or -._ $13A 138
o?
1
J//
a 617-
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 5=1?? B
Date: ! OJ 2409 Project: Hon! yCUft &reenWw Latitude: 35-W971
Evaluator: Ceral4 P0'ttYyl Site: k)esf of Ctea6ttWk Dr. Longitude: +7g. 6 370
Total Points: Other p
Stream is at least intermittent County: ke- v/M f
if Z19 or perennial if z 30 e.g. Quad Name: OQJr +
A. Geomo polo Subtotal Absent. `.,Weak Moderate.',, ..Strong
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
- no 2
5. Active/relic floo_dplain_
_
6. Depositional bars or benches
-_-.___ -_- 0
..__.
- 1 -2 - 3
7. Braided channel 0
__ .. ? --•-- 2 - - 3----
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9° Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainagoway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existin
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No --00 Yes = 3
evidence.
Man-made ancnes are not rated; see discussions in manuat
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = Jr- 5 1
14 Groundwater flow/discharge 0 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Wat
r in channel
- dr
or
rowi 0 1 O2 3
--
e
-
y!
g
ng season
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1
1.5
19. Hy dric soils (rdoximorphic textures) present? No 0 - ??
Yes - 1.5
G. Biology (Subtotal= __A

20 . Fibrous roots in channel
. Rooted plants in channel - -
3
3
2
2
- __ --
1

_ -
0
_...-
_0
--
-
22. Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
- ----------- 0.5
. 1 1.5

26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)

0
....._..-_-
-......
0.5

1

1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteriatfungus.
1
0 0. 1 1.5
- ---- -
29 s. Wetland plants in streambed
-
FAC 0.5 FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
- tewte a.P, n O AlMA!c(m Soi? 4- _*o.
13A
5-13?
5-)4

O
,q
v
v
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 5
Date: pGt 2009 Project: MOV1PyCUf7' &rePNWa Latitude:
Evaluator: GerQIR PAterkl Site: W fSf &I- 61ejrbioak Longitude: 71T. 6360
Total Points: 1'
Stream is at least intermittent County Other y7a „j
if z 19 or perennial if e 30 3f : Ke. e.g. Quad Name: L7y/eKI

A. Geo_orphology__ ubtotai --
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strang
V. Continuous bed and bank 0
-? 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 -- 3 -
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence -- 0 - 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0
- 3
5. Active/relic floodplain_
- - 0 1 2
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Braided channel 0
0 1 -
1 -- 2)
2 -- 3
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9 8 Natural levees 0
p 1
1
2 3
3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0
- 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No _
_
- -'
Yes = 3
Man-mace anwes are not ratea; see coiscussions in manual
B. Hvdminnv (Suhtntai = 7 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0
- 3
..._..
-- -
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 3
_ Water In channel -- dry or g-rowiN sea_so_n__- -

16. Leaflitter _ -
1.5 -1- _- _ w -
0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris fines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes 1.5
C. Bioloov (Suhtntal = IU 1
R. Fibrous roots in channel
21 . Rooted plants in channel
22. Crayfish ----------

- 3
3
0 2
2
0.5 1
1

--1- - - - 0
0

- 1.5 --
23, Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish --
-- -?-- 0
- 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) p
0

_._
--_........ 0.5 _
0.5
1 1:5
1,5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton _
_ 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 _
- 0.5 - _
1 5
29 . WYetiand plants in streambed ___
FAC 0.5' FACW = 0.75; OBI = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
items zu ane Z7 rocus on the presence or upiana plants, item zu tocuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
pereHaio? {? wide . N1uptwd Oil_
Soil N'?aD ,

D
ti
J

North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 s- ?5
Date: 9 Oct 2009 Project: H,0?1PyCUff 6reenWV Latitude: 35, g7/0
Evaluator: Gerald PO-RerK Site. Mille (r 0 ljoi4rsiny P/VoLongttude: 79', 636 f
Total Points: Other Q_ r
Stream is at least intermittent 27 County: Wake, e. g. Quad Name: RaLyle
if 2:19 or erennial if a 30
A. Geofnor holo Subtotal Absent: _
_ Weak Moderate. ':Strong
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 i 2 3
2. Sinuosity _
0 ? 2 - 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
- 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floo_dplain
--- -? 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 _ 2- - _
3
7. Braided channel -- 0 1 - 2 3 --
8. Recent alluvial deposits _
9° Natural levees 0
0 1 2
2 3
3
10.lieadcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 .5
12. Natural valley or drainageway- --
- - - 0 0.5
-- -
- - - 1.5
----
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. No
90 Yes = 3
Man-made ancnes are not rates; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdminav tSuhfnfal = ?f' • ra 1
C. Biolaav tsubtnfal = ' 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 his since rain, or 0 1 3
Water in channel :- dfy or growing season
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17, Sediment on plants or debris _0 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines __
0 0.5 5
19. jydric sails (redoximorphic features) present? No 0 Yes 1.5
20 , Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0

21 . Rooted plants in channel

3 -----____-.._.......
_.
2

1

0
22. Crayfish 0.._..-._. ._ 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
----._..._._..... _.......... _.....-.__._........... _._.....__.....---_------- .----------_._.. .. 0
.-._...__._._._____.___..... _ 0.5
._..._..-- 1 1.5^

26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
---- - -
0 ---
0.5 ..__...__......__.._._.._..__
1 __.___
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0
- 1 TM- - 2 -- -----3 -
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus 0 0
.5
1
1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed _
FAC_ 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
jhTZ°lr"r o l'el?i*I ?._ S-S WIG?E
uerns zu ano e i rocus on ine presence or upiano prams, item zy focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 SS20
Date: ( OC? _ X007 Project; HOneyCUft &reehWa Latitude: $'. 8985
Evaluator: Gerajii PW'?erm Site: Iv Chaf ft&-M 'Dr. Longitude: 7 ( 3)2
Total Points:
Stream is at feast intermittent -?6/. ? la' County: ?? k? Other L
if z f 9 or erennlal If z 30 e. g. Quad Name: nQ y l ells l
A. Geomor holo y (Subtotal =17 Absent ".:Weak Moderate Strong ':'
18. Continuous bed and bank -
----- 0
-- 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity p 1 -- ----2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 _C3?
5. Active/relic floodplain 0
-
6. Depositional bars or benches _ 0 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3 -
8. Recent
alluvial deposits
0
1 --
3
6 Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 - 1? _
- 1.5
12. Natural valley or dra_inagew_ay _ 0 0.5
-?- 1 1.5
-- -'-
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No 90 Y
= 3
evidence. es
man-mane oncnes are not rates; see aiscussions in manual
B_ Hvdrninnv tSuhtntal = C 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain. or - 0
-
-
- 3
-
_ Water In channel
__drY
- 0

-
- 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 i --- 0.5 -- _ --T' 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris
----
_ 0 0.5 1 1.5
B. O
1 rganic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5

19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? -----
---.----No = 0 --
Yes - 1.5,
C. BEoloav (Subtotal = ( ( 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 -1.5-,-
23. Bivalves U 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0._._. 0
:5 1 1.5
_26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 .
..___.----_
0.5 --- 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton _ 0 1 2 3? T-

28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.
0 --
0.5
1.5

29 Wetland plants in streambed _
FAC = 0.5`FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
nems zv ano z i Locus on ine presence of upiana plants, item z5 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants,
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
bier d -1-6b, Y-6 -ff V1740,
p Pr-m o id uo s t am o-nd.
1 _
$CNT F° o l
TREE
?r1
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1" v2
Date: I q Z01 Project: f .Onetfcuft &I-eehwa Latitude: 3g. 9000
Evaluator: 6el-a1rQ ro t rN Site: ' ? Tr?'e fitf4 ouflet Longitude: 79. 6 306
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least intermittent ?? County: ?a '? e.g. Quad Name: 134yl?a{
if z 9 or perennial if s 30

A. Geomorphology Subtotal Absent Weak ` .Moderate ` _Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank_ _ 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 _
2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3

4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting -
0
- 1- _
-? -
?- 3
_
5. Active/relic floodplaln - 0 1
- 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0_ 1 2
--- 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 - 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9a Natural levees 0
0 1
1
-- 2
2
---
-- 3
3
----
10, Headcuts
- - 0
- 1 2 3 ---
11. Grade controls - 0 0.5 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0.5 - 1 --
- -1_5 -
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. ?1
No 6J Yes = 3
"Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
R. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 6S ?
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0_
_ - 1 X 2 - - -- 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 3
Water In channel_- dryorbrowing season - -
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0
0.5 1 1.5
-
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? -
_
_
- -No 0 -- Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = co )
20 . Fibrous roots In channel
21 . Rooted plants in channel -- _ 3
3 2
2 1 _
1 - 0 _ _-
0
22. Crayfish
23. Bivalves 0
0 0.5
1 1
2 1.5
3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1.5
25. Amphibians
26. Maerobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
0 0.5
0.5 1
1 1.5
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton _ 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus. 0 0.5 _
1 - 1.5 -
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other
" Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
.3-5' rock creed below
CY Ct?? t?ri
4z:
r f IM [oPd _?0[1 0_ nbut o rt
is ni&1J10 0_?, &?A gia/1s, 5-a1 ; r
;t
Pw 1 i l`Pe
pond
North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 s - goZ
Date: r? Off-- "ZOW Project: HoneyCUff &reeyiWa Latitude: '35. 6100,5
Evaluator: Gei-aliI PWerK Site: N of b'&jqjTree Popld Longitude: ,?- 6307
Total Points: Other
Stream is at feast intermittent 0 County: W a ke- e.g. Quad (Name: 1J a???vt f
if z 9 or perennial if a 30
I /r --
A. Geomorphology subtotal = I ' ' -) Absent Weak . Moderate: '. Strong
18. Continuous bed and bank 0 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
_
3. In-channel structure: riffle pool sequence 0 -
_ _- 1 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 - -
1 2
- _
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or bunches
- - - 0
--- 1
--- 2 3

7. Braided channel -
1 - ---
2
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
_9B Natural levees 0
0 - 1
- --1 2
2 3
3
10. Headcuts
11. Grade controls 0
0 _
1 _
0,5 -- 2 -
1 - 3
1.5
12, Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 175`
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No
Yes = 3
"Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R. Hvdrntnnv (Suhtntal = I s i 1
_14. Groundwater flow/discharge _T_ 0 -
_ -1-_-
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 _ 2
J
Water in channel or growing season
16. Leaflitter 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? --- No = 0 -_ Yes 1.5
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = I '?' )
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
_ -?- _--
22. Crayfish -
0 0.5 1.5
23. Bivalves _Eea ct(Lk i5 0 ? ----2 3
24. Fish
__•-----
---- 0 0.5 1 1.5
---
25
. A
mphlbla
ns
- -
.- -_.__._._.__.
-
-
.
p5 _._..
_._....
._.
.----._._?
1.5
_
_ _ ._....-_..-
-26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
---
-- _
0 _
0.5
? .
.
1 _
.5

27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
0
1
2 -
3
_
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.
-- 0 0.5 1 1.5
_
29 . Wetland plants in streambed _
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0_
- Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item Z8 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
erer!?r?Ld q-6 -fit sa d/ ?a c??Gl _-
?',??__ s?z2
1
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1-?
Date: 00, )'00 Project: HOneyCvff &r,*etjW Latitude: 35. 9003'
Evaluator: 6eralc[ Pp Qrm site: _, yo cut V in Longitude: 7&', 6310
Total Points: -? ?-- Other ]?
Stream is at least intermittent 9 County: k/Ja ke, e.g. Quad Name: E> gy(ee,
if a 9 or erennial if z 30
A. Geomor hoiogy (Subtotal-=_c Absent,: Weak" Moderate. Strong
1". Continuous bed and bank 0 1
- 2
- 3
--
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0
0 1
1 2
2 3
3 _
-
__
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 _ 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9" Natural levees 0
0
0 1 -
1
1 -- 2
2
2 _ 3
3
3
10. Headcuts 3
controls
11. Grade 0
- 015 1 1. -
_
_
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 - 0.5 1 - 1.6 _-
_
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes =3
"Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
10,15
R Nvriminnv fSuhfnfnl = 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2 3
k2j
Water In channels- clLLq growing season --__-__-
16. Leaflilfer 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) _ 0 0.5 1.5
19. Hydrlc soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
r` Rintnnv fSuhinfRI = 15 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21". Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
-
23. Bivalves _ 2 _ 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 -
_
0.5 1 _
26. Maerobenthos (note diversity and abundance)- 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
-
29b. Wetland plants in streambed - FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL 1, SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
" Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or Welland plants.
? Q_-_ +
Holes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch: 5-10 (Avert
_.._S &dn4 074 sar f 144 L
S -g,3
n),
i'
?1
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1

Date: 17 Oct oa o0 9 Project: NONPycUff `SreenWr7 latitude: 35-,1016
Evaluator. Gel-alai Po-em . Site: WesF of Pump longitude: 78', 63a0
Total Points: ?,/ Other ?ay lei
Stream is at least intermittent ??. County: VV a ke- e.g. Quad Name:
if 2 9 or erennial if z 30
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal Absent : Weak' Moderate Strong 9':-
,a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity - 0 1 - - 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0
? 1 3-
6. Depositional bars or benches
--- _
0 3
7. Braided channel 0 1- 2 u 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9" Natural levees 0
0 1
1 -
2 3
3
10. Headcuts_
-
11. Grade controls_
_ 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0
- 0.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. No = 0 Yes 90
Man-made ditcnes are not rated; see discussions In manual
B. l-fvdmloav (Suhtntal = /I 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge - 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2 3
Water in channel -- dry or growing season
-- -_

16. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5 _-
0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes - 1.5
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = r' ?? 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
i15. Rooted plants in channel 3
3 2
2 1 0
0
_
22. Crayfish _.__..-.-..-- -
_23. Bivalves Pea. clam-5 _ ---?? __
-- 0
- 0- ---
0.5
- -?-

2 _
1.5 --
3
24. Fish 0 _
- _0.5
-- 1.5

25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
0 _
0.5
0.5
1
1 _
1.5
1.5

27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
- mm
0
1 _
3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1
_
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
Items zu and zt focus on the presence of upland plants, item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) --~-•----------•--._..._.
ytLr & - lD t wski U wcnr?
A-n it avid
0 Maas
C
,\
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 5-,-25
Date: ,27 Project: Ho)leycuff &rP0hWt7y Latitude:
Evaluator: (???a(? ?0 2k f?i Stte: ( 510 --romel Longitude: 179- 6 31 ?Z
Iota! Points; 7 ? Other
Stream is at feast intermittent rx County: W,, e.g. quad Name: J_?1qy1P..j( (
if z 19 or perennial if s 30
A. Geo orph0logy (Subtotal Absent.' Weak Moderate. Strong
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity
- 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 _ 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 2 - 3 - -
dplain
5. Active/rellc floo 0 1 -
2 3
_
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 I 2 _ 3
7. Braided channel (6) 1 -
- _ -_ 2 - - - 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1' 2 3
9° Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts_ 0_-- 1 2 3

11. Grade controls
-- -?
0
0.5
-
1
-- _ _
_
1.5 -
12. Natural valley or drainageway __ 0
-
T 0.5 1 1.5

13. Second or greater order channel on existing -
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
?
-
No _ _

Yes = 3
- Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = (n. 5 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2 3 "
_ _Water In channel -- orgrowin? season _ _ _ _ ___
16. Le
aflitter
- 1.5 1 0.5
_
_
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5
- 1 - 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) -
0
0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? - - _
No 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = ?() 1
20r'. Fibrous roots in channel
210. Rooted plants in channel 3
3 2
2 1_
1 0
0
22. Crayfish
23. Bivalves_ 0
--_.501-_ 0.5 ?
1 1
2 1.5
-- 3_--- -
?
24. Fish _
-~ _ ----- 0
- 0.5
- 1 1.5
25. Amphibians

26. Macro_benthos (note diversity and abundance_)_ 0

0 0

0.5 1 -
__............_.....---------.-.
1
- -T - 1.5
-_-
1.5
27, Filamentous algae; periphyton
_-? - 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing_bacteria/fungus.
_ 0 - 0.5_ 1 1.5
i6 l. Wetland plants in streambed _
FAC 0.5• FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2,0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Skotch-
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
0 014, !tl tell ?
5-25A
stt a
Gi?ee??trSA?
North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 067 2007 Project: HoneyCUl f &reetjWq Latitude:
Evaluator: Get--aW PWet-i1 . Site: fjpne (Uift & o 5'10 ogjje.t Longitude: Gj f
7K-
Total Points: if Z9 or rennia! if Z 30 Other p
Stream Is at feast intermittent ??. 'C- County: Wake- e.g. Quad Name• ??a
'
- ,--
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =_ Absent' Weak Moderate', : Strong
1°. Continuous bed and bank _ 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3 --
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequen_c_e_ 0 1 T 2 3

4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
- _
1
2 _
-
3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 _
2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches _
- - 0
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 - - 3 -
8. Recent alluvial deposits ?_
9" Natural levees
10. Headcuts 0
_ 0 1
1
_2 3

3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway
- 0
?
13. Second or greater order channel on exjstinq
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. .
No = 0 _
Yes
- man•maae clacnes are not ratoa; see aiscusstons in manual
J R_ Hvrlrninnv tSuhtntal = 11-5-
1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 2
15. Water In channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2 3
Water In channel -- cly or yrovring-season _
16. Leaflitter .5 1 0.5 0
_
17. Sediment on plants or debris __
_ _
0 _
1.5?
18, Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0.5
19. Hydric soils (rodoximorphic features) present? No = 0 - _ _ Yes = 1.5
C_ Rinlnov fSuhtntat = / "l' 1
20 .Fibrous roots In channel

21 . Rooted plants in channel 3

3 - 2

2 . 1
-
1 0
-------_-
0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish ?- 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
26. Macrobentho_s (note diversity and abundance) 0
_ 0 0.5
0.5 1 1.5
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton _ 0 1 2 3
28, Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. _ 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed _
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL 1,5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
- Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) g?
?()(f and 1.70 Mw.5
t
.r_ spa
-zq
S-23
r?
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 S-(.26
Date: c?R 0 (;4er 200 Project: Ho)1eycUff &J-eeHW4 Latitude:
Evaluator: Gter M J>af to K Site: '1/V of fir)jI' ejW ff P01,1( Longitude:
Total Points: Other I
Stream Is at least Intermittent County: wake- e.g. Quad Name?yr
if t 9 or perennial if a 30 cz? A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
=^ Absent:' Weak _ ,Moderate ' Stro_rig
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 _ 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence_ _
substrate sorting
4. Soil texture or stream _ - 0 --
0
_ 1

- _ 2
2 - 3_
-3
_
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 -- 2_
V 3 _
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 2 3
B. Recent alluvial deposits _ -
9 B Natural levees 0
0 1
1 2
2
_._____ 3
3
-
10. Headcuts 2 9
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainagew_ay 0 - - 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. n?
NoJ
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R. Hvdmionv (Suhtntal = 11.5- S
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, gr
Water in channels or growing season_ 0 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 0.5 0
Sediment on plants or debris
17. 0 0.5 1 1.5
.-
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?- 0 0.5
No 0 1 1.5
Yes 1.5
C V
V
Z
2
0 1
1.S
D I
3
C. Rioloov (Subtotal = .57^ 5- 1
20?F€brous roots in channel
0. k?ooted plants to channel 3
3 2 1
1 U
0
22. Cra?Fish - 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 6uryceei, X,aWk.
-----
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) - 0
------ .._......_.. _ -----
0 0.5

0.5 1
_
_ 1 1.5
_......
1.5 -
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
_ 0 1 2 _ 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteriatfungus.
_ 1 1.5

29 . Wetland plants in streambed _
FAC FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other= 0
h5
7
2
0.1
0
0
r
1
1 _
0.?
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
p yeVl Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
"At
L 5-,26 N,
totsI on ilk s iii blle:flaod 67W 0owerliffe- J__
,Jl In
.. .... ... ....... %_V@
Neflalrt 6 c? Swale _
? v, a}x,u? wet &K
C-?1?1ond indlStipcc ' /701 r??e Pawedime X' imy oil
2-7 xwie 2010
sc:.t?fe = 35.5, P?rel,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 -ag
Date: ?/ Ci c,t0 t`_'f' -7067 Project: HoneyCUH (si'eenWa Latitude: a _ `JD? 5
Evaluator: 6el-414 P'5'tterm site:' k1o f &ieycu/f//_OwkPf Longitude: 7g ? &RIO
Total Points:
Stream is at feast intermittent a??e County: W, Other
Wa ?'es
e.g. Quad Name:
fz 9 or erennial f a 30
. H
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal Absent Weak' :Moderate . `: Strong '..
18. Continuous bed and bank
-- 0
--
- 1
- 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 -- ? ----- -__ 2 --- 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 T 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting__ _ 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain
?- - - 0 2 3

6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2 _
3

7. Braided channel
8. Recent alluvial deposits
98 Natural levees
0
0
0 ------
1
1
1 -
2
2
2 - ----
3
3
3
10. Headcuts 0 1 3
11. Grade controls _
W 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway
_ 0
---- _
0.5 _
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. -^-
No o ---- - -
Yes = 3
"Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
6_ Hvdrnlnnv (Suhtntal = 3. G 1
14. Groundwater Flowidischarge? u_----
- 0 1 2 3
-
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dry or grow! season 0 /

lJ 2--- 2- ?

- -- 3 --
16. Leaflitter 1.5 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0. 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? 0 0.5
No 0 -' 1 " - 1.5
Yes 1.6
C_ Rioloav (Subtotal = 1?, 7 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel

21 . Rooted plants in channel 3

3 2
- --
2 1

1 0

0
22, Crayfis_h_
23. Bivalves ----- ----? 0
"`..- --`-
- -- 0.5
1____.._-
-
-- 1
2
- 1.5
3
-24. Fish 0 0.5 - 1 1.5 -
25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0. - --1 - _ .__...._...._ 1.5 -
27, Filamentous algae;periphyton
_
- - 1 _ _2 3
_
28, Iron oxidizing bacterla/funqus._
_ 0.5 - 1 1.5 -
i9 l'. Wetland plants in streambed FAC 0.5 FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
" Items 20 and 21 focus on tite presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plan)
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes-) Sketch:
---- \
Vd. stioum 01 Sol aped T?w j "w'
r
S.
ovtl???
- - - ---------

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 S -C;7,7
Date: oN Oc ,20© /
Evaluator: Gergl4 PWerm
Stream is at least Intermittent qo, o
ff z 19 or perennial if a 30 11
Project: HOI111cuff & eel9Wa
Site: ?l(1'tll7??
County: Ke.
/
Latitude: - U7
Longitude:
Other
e.g. Quad Name: (/?/? (CQ TQ
A. G_eomorpholo? (Subtotal =-__rtL ___) Absent ' Weak`, ` Moderate `
? Strong
1'. Continuous bed and bank
--- 0
--
^ 1
---
- 2
-- 3
2. Sinuosity - 0 1 2 _ 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 _
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
__ - --
_5. Active/relic floodplain -
M _
- 1 - _
2 3 _
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
-7. Braided channel -_--------- 0 1 2 -_-3
_._. ?.- ---
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9 Q Natural levees -- --
0
0 --?
i 1
1 _
2
2
3-
3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1
12, Natural valley or drainageway_ _
? 0
- -- 0.5 1 1.5
_
13. Second or greater order channel on
existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
- -
No
00
-M - - - - -
Yes = 3
- Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R Hvrirnlnnv lSuhtntal = '?? 1? 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge
- 0
^
?
" 1 3
> 48 hrs since rain, or
15. Water In channel and -
0
--- __
-- 1 2 -- - 3
Water In channel -- dry or growing season --.._...__.......__ ___-.
-
^

Leaflilter
16.

1.5

0U
"-

.5
--------
-

0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or plies (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19, Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes 1,5
C. Bloloav (Subtotal = 11,511
206. Fibrous roots In channel 3 2 1 0
21?Rooted plants in channel 3 ? 1 0
___- -_
22. Crayfish 0 -
____....__
0,5 ...__._._.._
1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 - 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 05 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus 0 0.5 1.5
-Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 05
- Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
'
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch: AI
71
_ VuVLAWT
h
111
North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 30
Date: 0 (,Job el 6? 007 Project: HoneyCll f t&t-eej W& Latitude: S _ 913 3
Evaluator: ,er,aJ4 P6" tej-K site:' p? j idkl ? 5-001 Longitude:
Total Points: Other },? {
Stream is at least Intermittent j 7.5 County: ke_. e.g. quad Name: W t?rt°st
if a 9 or perennial it a 30

A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =- I_5 Absent:. Weak ; Moderate ' Strong,
1e. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity
- 0 1 _
2 3
3. In-channel structure; riffle-pool sequence
- 0
- 1
_ 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 _
1 _
- 2 3 _
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
- 0
- 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 - y- - -- - 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits

9 a Natural levees 0

0-

1 2
__.._...._...__..__..__.......
2 3
.._......._.
3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1
12. Natural valley or drainageway -
-
- 0 -- 0.5
13, Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. No Yes = 3
'"Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
R Hvrirninnv lriihfnfal = g.0 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge
----?
0
1
2
3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 2 3
Water In channel _- dry or growing season _
-
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1(-- 1.5
19. Hydrlc soils (redoximorphic features) present? _No 0 Yes = 1.5
C. B€oloav (Subtotal= 3- 0 )
204. Fibrous roots in channel
21s- Rooted
. Roooted plants in channel
-- - 3

3 _
- 2

2 -
-

- 1 0

_ 0 -
22. Crayfish
-
-----
--
---- 0
-- 0.5 1 1.5
-----
-
-
23. Bivalves - 0 - --?--- -- 2 ------3
24. Fish 0 _ 0.5 1 1.5

25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
_ --?

0
0.5
0.5 _
-
--
1
1 _
1.5
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton _ 1
_ 2
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Welland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
- Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
_ n
F?
L,
7_

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 13 :rk1 y 2-010 Project: Hoheywff &Sf-eeptwu Latitude:
Evaluator: Gerald I>Ateli- I site: 1G0b'N 9 Grant ed Longitude: 7g._ 61 7,.z
Total Points: (9 Other /?,
Stream is at least intermittent + yt ' County: klm ke, e.g. Quad Name: 04+a?t fres?i
L
if Z 9 or perennial if a 30 1
A. Geomorphology Subtotal Absent:. ; Weak' .Moderate ' Strong ;
-
1e. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 - 3
_? -
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting _ 0
0 1
1 _
_2 _
3 '
5.-Active/relic floodplain 0 2 3
-
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9 B Natural levees
0
1
2 3
3
10. Headcuts 0 1 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5
? 1
_
12. Natural valley or drainageway _ _T0 --- 0.5 - - _1 .5
Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No
Yes
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
R t-Ivriminnv M11hintal = r 5 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 ?2 -- _ 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 3
Water in channel --dry or growing_season
16
Leaflitter
1
5
0
5 ?-
0
.
17. Sediment on plants or debris .
0 0.5 .
1 1.5
16, Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features present? Yes = 1.5
C Rinlnnv fSuhtntal = M. 0 1
20'. Fibrous roots In channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
-T_
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0. 1 1.5 _
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton - 0 1 2 ?- 3
-----,
26. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 _1.5
_
-i9 l'. Wetland plants In streambed ?- - FAC 0.5 FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
" Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence or aquatic or wetland plants,
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
I'C'??YI a l? tot l oil 'S' 07
?e
;,N' U
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 S-3a+33
Date: ? oZ Oc?ri.2er C2()Oy Project: Honeycuf 6reeilwa Latitude: 35. 9188 S:32
Evaluator: 6eraJ4 PofterK Site: f-foh Cgy6- ,5 6{fCE Longitude: 7K, 6177
Total Points: f Other 1
Stream is at least intermittent County: kb k'e - e.g. Quad Name,
if z 9 or arennial if 2:30

A. Geomorphology Subtotal
_ Absent:.,' Weak ' Moderate:.` Strong `
18. Continuous bed and bank
- 0 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence -
- ---- 0 1 -- 2? - _ 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 -`
- - 1
- _- 2 3-
5. Active/relicfloodplain _ 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 3
7. Braided channel ---_---- - -- _- 1 -- --2----.- 3 _
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9e Natural levees 0
0
1 2
2 3
3
-- --- ---
--- -
10. Headcuts -?
-
- --- -
0 -----
2 -
--
3
11. Grade controls
- 0_
-u 0.5 _ 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway
-? 0
- 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existin
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. --
No = 0 - --?' -
Yes ?J
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
R_ Hvdrnlnav (Suhtatal = 10 S
14. Groundwater flow/discharge _
- -
^ 0 1 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2- - 3
Water in channel -- dry or growing season
16. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5
0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 - 0.5 1.5

18. Organic debris lines or plies (Wrack lines)
0 0.5 -
1 5
19, Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? - No 0 Yes = 1.5_
C_ Bioloov (Subtotal = I )
I

_
265. Fibrous roots in channel _
t
d
i
l
21
R
l
t
h --
3

3 --- -- -
2

2 --- -- -
1

1 -
0

..._._...--.___--
0
oo
e
p
anne
.
an
s
n c
22. Crayfish _ _ 0 - -- 0.5T _ _
1 _
23. Bivalves cpr CU?Q 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobe
ntho
s (note diversity and abundance) _ 0 _0.5
-- 1 1.5
_
_
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton - 0 1 -- 2 3
_
28. Iron oxidizing_bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 land plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL =(1,5) $AV = 2.0; Other = 0
"Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquaff-or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
/,3 -l? wry' ?q
--r -
Cobble, Showtl oil
(+'f glYl ?liiri l-f???fsrt; u?? CY?N,?
Lori z 78% 6 /53
v
33
J i? r?rn?osed ???i
f
f

North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 S - ? q
Date: a6 o cj- 2 o o ` Project: HOneycuH 6reenWa Latitude: `721
Evaluator: Geralli PAter t . Site: Longitude: 7 g . 6
Total Points: 'J Other J
Stream is at feast intermittent County: Wei. Re- e.g. Quad Name: ?U ?j f? E'S
if z 19 or perennial if Z 30 32. 57 1
A. Geomorphology {Subtotal Absent Weak`.; ' Moderate. >.Stroh'
1d. Continuous bed and bank 0
--- 1
-
-? 2
----???- 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 _
i
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0
0 1
1 2
2" _ 3
3
-
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches _ 0 _ 2 3
7. Braided channel 2_
8. Recent alluvial deposits-
-- ----
9 e Natural l levees

0 1
.._..__._._._._
1 2
...._._.....___-2
2 3

3
10. Headcuts 1 2 3
11. Grade controls
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0
0 0.5
0.5 1
1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on exi_ sting
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No 41"0)
Yes = 3
"Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
R Hvrirnlnnv /Suhfnfat = 'i?? 0 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge... _ _0 1 2 3
_
--
15. Water in channel and > 46 hrs since rain, or ,
i 0 1 2
j; S
lJ
ng season
Water in channel -- d orb row
16. Leaflitter
1.5
- 1 M
0.5 0
_
17. Sediment on plants or debris - 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? 0
No 0.5
= 0 1 1.5
Yes 1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = io'o )
2 Fibrous roots in channel - 3 - -- -T2-)- 1 - 0

21 . Rooted plants in channel .
3 ...
2
1
0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23, Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
- 0 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
26, Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 7 v )
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
kntnh• .Af
RI
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
_ elq iq 'd 'Show? on mav
35
yj ? ??GtVIG{'
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Cam.'- 3F
Date: t-Z6 oG t, z 0Ur
Evaluator: 6Or-a J4 pO?berl/?
Total Points:
Stream Is at least intermittent 9-0
if z 9 or perennial If Z 30
Project: floneycuff &I-eenwa
Site: r3pO?6 a Fay???t fi't?y
County: k/oi ke-
Latitude:
Longitude: f79- 6133
Other
e, g. Quad Name: l/ tom('
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal Absent . Weals '.Moderate:` Strong
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 - 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 _
- 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 - 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting __ _ 0
- -
- 2
- 3
_5. Activelrelic floodpiain 6101 1 2 - 3
6, Depositional bars or benches 0 _
1 _
2 3 -
7. Braided channel 0 2 _ 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9" Natural levees 0
0 1
1 2 -
2 3
3
-10. Headcuts
11. Grade controls 0
0.5
- - 3
1.5
12. Natural valley or dr_ainageway
-- 0.5 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. --
No0 - -
Yes = 3
Haan-made aacnes are not rated; see discussions in manual
g_ Hvdrnlnov fSuhtntal = /X 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge -"
- ?
- - -- 0 - - --'- 1--- 2 3 .?_
_
_
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
W
t
i
h
l
d 1 2 u - 3
_
a
er
n c
anne
--
ry or growing season
- ---
?
16. Leaflitter
-
- - -__ 1.5 1 - 0.5 -

17. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5 -
1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) - - - 0 - 0,5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloav !Subtotal = 2.0 1
201). Fibrous roots In channel
_.._..-._.- ---.-.-...--------._........._._-----_..

21 , Rooted plants in c_hannel---_---_-- 3
_._.._.....
__._...----.--.__
3 2

2
? 1

1 0

0

22. Crayfish
23, Bivalves
no
0.5
1
1
2 _ --
1.5
3

24. Fish
__. -.-•--------------

--
0.5
1 _
1.5 -
25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) _
-?-- - 0
0
- 0.5
0.5 1
1
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 1 2 3
_28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.
-
' 0 0.5 _
1 1.5
57. Wetland plants in streambed
i9 _
FAG = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other W 0
- Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this f- for additional notes.) Sketch: X
)m 60 Soo/ M

j4 ",

North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 CJ^._ ??
Date: ?6 Oct '20t o
Evaluator: 6el-6114 "POKerlil
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if 2 1.9 or perennial If Z 30 r
Project: NOl?Pycuf &feenwag
site: a $00 ? S i4 /C Ven RW qe
County: k h, ke?
Latitude: 5 q.2 3,3
Longitude: 7g,.
Other r
e.g. Quad Name: 1"0
A. Geomor hofoogy (Subtotal= _ rJ__•Q __) _ ° Absent
- Weak'' Moderate: Strong _
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 ? 2 3
2. Sinuosity 1
- 2 - 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0
- _ 2 3
5. Activelrelic floodplain _ b 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 2_ - 3
7. Braided channel 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9a Natural levees 0
0 1
1 2
2 3
3
10. Headcuts
11. Grade controls 0
0 1
- 0.5 --- 2
- 3
1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 a 1 1.5

13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.

No 0 -
-
Yes = 3
Manmade ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = 1.0 )
14. Groundwater flowldischarge _ 1 2 3 -
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or !,^1 1 2 3
Water in channel - dry or cZrowin season V_
16. Leaflitter 1.5 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 N --0,5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? - No 0 Yes = 1.5
0. Bioloov (Subtotal = .?• 0 )
20'. Fibrous roots in channel
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3
3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0.5-
-..
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians

26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0

_
- - ----------
-- 0.5

0.5_
--
- 1 1.5

1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphylon 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. CO 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5_ FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other
- Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
r or
me? _
/l f

North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 S ?37
Date: 26 D t,} Zo p Project: NonPyCUff Creep Wa Latitude: 3,5-, 723 7
Evaluator: GeraW P6+t.erm site: 6UhnP(cl a Longitude: 79 ? 6 CM
??/
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least Intermittent O County; YV ot k e. if ;t 9 or perennial if a 30 e.g. Quad Name:{ ' 7?i CaS
A. Geomorpholq Subtotals `Absent
_ - Weak'', Moderate.' strong
18. Continuous bed and bank 0 2 3
2. Sinuosity
- 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence- 0 C l)'
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 _
2 - 3
_5. Active/relic flo_odplain - ^ - -- _---_- - no 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 _ 3 -
7. Braided channel _ -- _-__- 0 - 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 - -
1 2 3
9 ° Natural levees 2 3

10, Headcuts
0
1
2 _
3
11. Grade controls
-...w-__..-.__ _-.-.__._
' 0
_._ 1 1.5
12Natural valley or drainageway
Ti, 0 0.5 1
-- -
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS reap or other documented
evidence. No Yes = 3
man-maue uncnes are not raiea; see aiscussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = V O O 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge -----__
? - 0
- --- ?"-`-- -- 2
_
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2 -

Water In channel _? or growing season 3
-16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 -0.5 p-
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?- _ No 0 Yes =1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal= .2.0 )
F_ibrous roots in channel
21 .Rooted plants in channel -- - -- y 3
- 3 2
2 - ,-
0
22, Crayfish
----
---
_ - ?-
--- 1.5
23. Bivalves
es.-.-.-- 0 ;-- -2 _ 3 _
24. Fish 0
- 0.5 --- - 1 1.
5
25. Amphibians

26. Ma_erobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0

0
- - 0.5

0.5
- - 1
_____--------
1 _
1.5
----_....__.._._..__..-
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; eriphyton 0
T 1 - - - -
2 3 -
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 _
_
1 1.5
_
i96. -Welland plants in streambed _
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
items zu ana zi focus on the presence of upland plants, item z9 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Rkatnh
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
'eoh0I . Lot "al/ on uswys or
K

u

North Carolina Division of Water Quality-- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 S S
Date: cZ r6 Oct 2007 Project: Ho)leycur &Je&14W& Latitude:
Evaluator: 6eraJ4 Poft ell-K Site: 000 ?Q Veil 04C Longitude: 794095-
Total Points: Other (? }
Stream is at least intermittent 16.0 county: klm ke. e.g. 0,,d N,.,: r v 4 )",e f; t-
if a 9 or perennial if 2 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal l'Absent; : Weak'' ; Moderate' :Strgng
la. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 _
2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 2 3
_
5. Active/relic floodplain _0
-- 2-- 3
_
_
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1
_ _
_ -2
? 3

7. Braided channel
0
2 _
_
3
_
8. Recent alluvial deposits
_
.
.
. _ 3
.-.___
.._
__
98 Natural levees .-?_____....-_._.._....
Natural l .._.
0 1 .-._.._.._z _...-.3._.._-
10. H
s
---- 0
- '-_--_. 2 3 _--
11.
Grade controls ?_ - --
--- 0 0.5 -
-- ---1- 1
_
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0_ 0,5 1- 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No
Yes = 3
"Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
B. Hvdroloav {Subtotal = t. C) 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 -2 3
-__
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or - CO)
2
-? 3
Water in channel -- dror growing season
'-.._._ ?. -- lJ__
-
---
16. Leaflitter 1.5
1
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
-19_Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?- No 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Bloloav (Subtotal = a. 0 1
20 . Fibrous roots In channel
____', _.-..__._._-. _._...---.

21 . Rooted pl..ants .-in channel 3
..__ -_..... -_. ._..__.._._.

3 2
.._..-__..--•_--__.

2 1

.
----- _.-__
1 0

.--.__.
0
22. Crayfish_
?.
------ -? 0
----- 0.5 1 1.5
T
-
23. Bivalves 0 1 --_3
24. Fish _
- - ?
--
----- 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
-
26. Macro_benthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 _
0.5
0.6 ---1'----
1 ---1.5 --?-
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
-?
-
- 1 2-
- - 3
-
28. iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29?. Wetland plants in streambed _
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
. (use ac s e s orm a i ona n os.)
Items zu ano z't locus on me presence of upiand plants, item zu tocuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
i ,?1,p,ND GM
Mm. s b k l 'd of thi f tor 11,43; I' 1 o t Sketch: L
(?Qhe>m chain o4 upshr Gpi ol,
i?tl10 t I a t? (s', M ,not_ onli
is to WeVarid)

North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1'-?
Date: 076 Uc? 2-
Evaluator: Get-aW !pot ervt
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 911-Q
it z 19 or perennial if a 30 OM V
Project: f oneyCtlff 6reenWa
Site: j 9(Jd S G?Ravem aQt?
County: Wa ke-
Latitude: 3,5_. 9 o?3 7
Longitude: 7g. 0
Other I wa(- or6t
e.g. Quad Name: I?Q ?tl t

A. Geomorphology (Subtotal Absent ' . Weak" `. ` Moderatt3 ' Strong
18. Continuous bed and bank 0 _ 1 3 `-
2. Sinuosity 0 1 T 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3

4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
- -- -
0
-- _
- _
3 -
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches- ---- 0
7. Braided channel 0
_ - 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
.__.__....---.__.._----
98 Natural levees 0
-----._
0 - 1

1 _
_
2
2 3
-.--.__--
3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1
4 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 _
- 0.5 1 1,5
13 Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. _
-
No _
_
- -
Yes = 3
man-rnaue uncnes are not rateu; see aiscuss ions in manual
R- Hvrlrninnv fgiihtntal = R.0 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 2
- 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water In_channel _-- dry or growing season

- 1 2

--
-

_ 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 V 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = _? -0 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
21 . Rooted plants in channel - - 3
3 2
2
1 0
0

22. Crayfish
0.5
1 -
1.5
23. Bivalves
- 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
--___ 0
0
_ 0.5
0.5 1
1 1.5
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria(fungus. 0.5 -
1 ?- 1.5
29 . and plants in streambed _ _
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0 _
items zu ana L7 rocus on ate presence of upiand plants, item zu tocuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes,) Sketch;

0

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 !?"-If 0
Date: 0(f 2007 Project: H0neyCUft &r,-eMW Latitude: 5"S 9 3r?
?j
Evaluator: Geral! PO+t'erM Site; 1,y00 ''61AOMA'0? Longitude: 18. 60SI
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least Intermittent ;? 8157 County: k1a , J14? Rest
if z 9 or erennial if 2 30 e' e.g. Quad Name: v

A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=---Lj•G_ Aiasent. Weak.'! ' Moderate: Strong
1'. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 _
1 - 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 - -- 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 2
5. Active/relic floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches 0
0
1R
2 3
---3 -
7. Braided channel

8. Recent alluvial deposits
9° Natural levees --

_-,-
10
0
0

1
1
1

2
2
2

3
3
3

10. Headcuts
0
1
2 -.-
3
11. Grade controls 0 0. 1 1,5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0- 005 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. - --
-
No OD ?
_
Yes = 3
man-moue oncnes are not ratea; see oiscusstons in manual
• R. Hvriminnv tRtthfnfnl = 9.0 1
I
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or p 1 2 3?
Water In channel -- dryor growing season
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines} 0 0.5 1 1.5

19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? .._............
No = 0
Yes 1.5
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = 6.5 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3
3 2
2 1
1 0
p
22, Crayfish - 0.5 1 - 1.5
23. Bivalves _ -- _.__---_ __--•- - 0 _._ _ 3-
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
0 0.5
0.5 1 _ 1.5
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 -- 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus_ 0 -
0.5 1 1
5
29 Wetland plants In streambed .
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBi_ = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
items zu and z1 tocus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
hano,od an SOW silrv-
s F
-
-
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 S-11.1
Date: o26 0 C T -?0 07 Project: Honeycuff &f E'Ph'nW4 Latitude: jS9? 6 6
Evaluator: 60_6M BW-erm . Site: 700'S' of k,ttfCVif?l* Longitude: M 6071
Total Points: 'J Other r j r' f-
Stneam is at least intermittent j.Q County: ?? ll e. e.g. Quad Name: aK? [fit
if z 9 or erennial if z 30

A. Geomorphology Subtotal Absent _._Weak'?
- Moderate Strong
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 - 2 3
_ _-
2. Sinuosity - 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 2
- _3 _
-
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain --_ _ _ - - 1 - 2_ 3
6. Depositional bars or benches - 1 _ -_2 _ 3_
?
7. Braided channel 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits - -- _ - -
98 Natural levees , -_ 0 1--
1
.-._.._ _
-_.-....?
2 3 .
3
10. Hea
dcuts 0 1 2 _ 3
-
_
11, Grade controls -- 0 0.5 1.5

12. Natural valley or drainageway
0
0.5
1 _
-
13. Secand or greater order channel on existing
USGS or MRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No 4o
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R Wvrlrnlnnv 1Ci ihtntal = 1.0 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge ?- _- 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 his. since rain, or 0 1 2 3
Water in channel -- d or growing season__.
flitt
16
L
1
5
1 ._....__.._.-
0
5
--- 0-
er
.
ea
17. Sediment on plants or debris . 0.5 _ .
1 - 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
_ _
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? _ _
- - No 0 Yes = 1.5
r` Rininnv /Ci ihtntal = T o 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
21 , Rooted plants in channel 3
3
- 2

- 1 0
0
22. Cra ish
_- _y _-.-
u

- 0.5
- ---
T'- 1

- 1.5
- --
23, Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0.5
0.5 1
1_- 1.5
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0
- 3 _
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus, _ 0 0.5 1 1.5
29b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
" Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, item zu tocuses on me presence of aquatic or weuanu prams.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
•?i?e1-a.Q c ??? c1?- ???t'? tai -----...
?,(SgS or?_ Sot' ur
A -
5

J