NC 109 (11)

t t
i~®~i
IUS Army Corps r UBLIC NOTICE ~~~~S~Nj
Of Engineers ~
Wilmington District /U ~
N1, D
~N ?~»
t~F7~p R ~ W
Issue Date: ~4Y4csrw~tdiyrl
Comment Deadline: July 1 l; ~y
Corps Action ID: SAW=2008-02845
The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received information from the North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), regarding a potential future requirement for
Department of the .Army permit authorization to impact streams and wetlands adjacent to Sotith
Muddy Creek, Brushy Fork, and Abbotts Creek, tributaries of the Yadkin River, associated with
the proposed improvement of the NC. l U9 corridor between Old Greensboro Road (SR 1798) in
northeastern Davidson County and southeastern Forsyth County up to but not including
interchanges with I-40. The project is referred to as Transportation Improvement Project (TIP R-
2568C).
Specific alternative alignments and location information are described below and shown on the
attached plans and charts. This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the
Wilmington District Web Site at wwwsaw.usace.army.mil/wetlands
Applicant: North Carolina Department of Transportation
Attn: Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
.1548 Mail Sewice Center
- Raleigh, i\iC 27699-1548
Authority
The Corps will evaluate this application to compare alternatives that have been carried forward
for study, pursuani to applicable procedures of Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.
1344).
Background
A NCDO"f/federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) was completed for the NC 109 corridor improvement (TIP R-2568C) on September, 2010.
The social,'economic, and environmental'inipacts associated with the reasonable and feasible
build alternatives for this project have been evaluated and are described within the Draft EIS.
Existing NC 109 within the project area is a two-lane undivided rural highway with no control of
access. This existing cross-section of NC 109 consists primarily of two ten-foot lanes with
unpaved shoulders varying from three to six feet in width. NC 109 in the vicinity of the

interchange of I-40/US 311 has been widened to a five lane, sixty-four-foot curb and gutter cross
section. Speed limits on NC 109 are 45 mph except within the Town of Wallburg, where the
speed limit is 35 mph. Five Build Alternatives are evaluated in detail in the Drafr EIS..
Alternative 1 would upgrade existing NC 109, mainly on existing alignment, and the other four
would be mainly on new location. All five alternatives would begin at Old Greensboro Road.
Three altematives~(Alternatives I, 3, and 6) would terminate just south of I-40/US 311; the other
two alternatives (Alternatives 4 and 5) would terninate at US 52. Figure 1 is a project vicinity
map and Figure 2 illustrates the Build Alternatives. The figures are attached to this Public
Notice.
Location
The proposed project is located from the intersection NC 109 and Old Greensboro Road (SR
] 789) in northeastern Davidson County north into southeastern Forsyth County up to but not
including interchanges with I-40, in Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina (center of
study at ~ 36.0266° Nand -80.1622° W)
I/xisting Site Conditions
Rural residential and agricultural uses are found throughetit the portion of the study area in
Davidson County. There are a few residential subdivisions in the area, with most of these
subdivisions including fewer than 20 lots. The only major residential subdivision is the
Meadowlands development, agolf-course oriented subdivision near central Walburg.
Commercial development is concentrated in a few areas: the intersection of Gum Tree Road and
NC 109 contains rivo retail shopping centers, fast food restaurants, and service stations; central
Wallburg contains a small number of retail stores, offices, restaurants and other commercial
establishments; and the Midway area, just east of the US 52.interchange at Hickory Tree Road,
contains two retail shopping centers along with service stations.
A similar pattern of land uses to that found in Davidson County, characterized by rural
residential uses and agricultural uses is also found in southern and southeastern Forsyth County.
At the northwestern corner of the study area, residential development becomes somewhat more
urban, with smaller lots and a mix ofsingle-family and multi-Family housing. Apartment
comp]exes are found on NC 109 and'Teagrie Road.' Commercial uses, including~service'stations;
restaurants, bars, and small offices, and light industrial uses, including building contracting
businesses and auto-related business, are located near I-40 on NC 109, Olct Lexington Road, and
Clemmonsville Road. Two large industrial parks are located along US 52: the Salem Business
Park, on Old Lexingtion Road, and the Piedmont Triad Industrial Center, located near the
interchange at South Main Street. Industrial parks are also located in southeastern Forsyth, near
US 311. The Centre 322 Industrial Park and Ridgewood Industrial Park are located along
Ridgewood Road to the south and north of US 311, respectively. The Union Cross Business
Park is a very large industrial park located on Wallburg Road south of US 311. While much of
the residential development in southeastern Forsyth is rural, large-lot residential, there ace some
small residential subdivisions in this area.

There are one hundred and twenty-four (124)jurisdictional streams or stream segments located
within the project study area. The proposed project study area also has twenty-nine (29)
jurisdictional wetlands. Wetland and streams have been delineated in the field and were verified
by the Corps of Engineers. These jurisdictional areas have been documented and rated as
recorded in the project's referenced draft EIS and are available for review in the provided
`'Section 404 - NEPA Merger Process Application" package that is available on the Wilmington
District Web Site at vwvw.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands
Applicant's Stated Purpose
The project purpose as stated by the applicant is:
^ Existing and Projected Unacceptable Levels of Service
Existing levels of service (LOS) on some two-lane segments along NC 109 were an
unacceptable LOS E or F in 2008. From 2008 to 2035, traffic volumes along NC 109 are
expected to increase by approximately 90 percent. In 2035, under no-build conditions, all
segments ofNC 109 are predicted to operate over capacity at unacceptable LOS E or F.
By 2035, all four of the signalized intersections along NC 109 within the project area and
all but three of the forty-one unsignalized intersections are projected to be over capacity.
^ Above-Average Crash Rates
Between February 2006 and January 2009, a total of 219 crashes were recorded along
Chis section of roadway. Of this total, 110 crashes caused injuries. The total crash rate
for NC C09 within the project area for the three-year period from Febniary 2006 through
January 2009 (228.69 crashes per 100 million vehicle miles traveled [MVM]), is
approximately 36 percent higher than similar routes in North Carolina (167.65
crashes/MVM), and exceeds the statewide critical crash rate (189.94 crashes/MVM) by
approximately 20 percent.
The primary purpose of the proposed action is to improve traffic flow and levels of service along
the NC 109 corridor in the project study area. The secondary purpose is to improve safety along
the NC •109-corridor in the project study area. By meeting these, the: project.will address existing , ,
and projected deficiencies in levels of service and above average crash rates along the NC 109
corridor.
Project Description
Maps showing the location of the project study area and the five build alternatives are included
with this public notice. These maps facilitate the above written background description of the
proposed improvements of the NC 109 corridor. The project alternatives are:

No-Build Alternative
The No-Biiild Alternative would not make any substantial improvements to the NC 109 corridor
through the year 2035, with the exception of regular maintenance such as patching and
resurfacing, regarding shoulders, and maintaining ditches. It would include all other NCDOT
programmed roadway improvements and other roadway projects in the area that are included in
the adopted YVinston-Stdem/Forsyth Counry 203 Long-Range Transportation Plan and High
Point Urban Area Thoroughfare Plan. Currently there are two capacity projects proposed in the
project area. The first includes upgrading US 52 from I-85 in Davidson County to I-40 in Forsyth
County to interstate standards. The second includes widening Union Cross Road (SR 2643) from
Wallburg Road (SR 2691) to Sedge Garden Road (SR 2632) in Forsyth County.
New Location Build Alternatives
To maintain at least a LOS D with 2035 design year traffic forecasts, the proposed facility' "`'
requires at least four Havel lanes (two in each direction). There are three distinct typical sections
proposed for different portions of the Build Alternatives. The New Location Alternatives would
include full control of access, a 46-foot median, a design speed of 60 mph, and a posted speed of
55 mph. Portions of Build Alternatives on existing NC 109 would include partial control of
access. South of Teague Road along the Upgrade Existing Alternative, the typical section would
include a 46-foot median, a design speed of 60 mph, and a posted speed of 55 mph. North of
Teague Road as the area becomes more urban, the Upgrade Existing Alternative and portions of
the New Location Alternatives tying into existing NC 109 would transition to an urban typical
section with a 23-foot raised median, curb and gutter, a design speed of 50 mph, and a posted
speed of 45 mph.
Upgrade P'xistingAlternalive (Alternative 1)
The Upgrade Existing Alternative (Alternative 1) includes making roadway improvements along
NC 109 that would better serve traffic in the design year 2035. Existing NC 109 within the
project study area is a two-lane undivided rural highway with no control of access. The existing
cross section of NC 109 consists primarily of two ten-foot lanes with unpaved shoulders varying
from three to six feet in width. In the vicinity of the I-40/US 311 interchange, NC 109 has a five
lane, 64-foot curb and gutter cross section. Speed limits on NC 109 range from 45 to 55 mph
except within Wallburg, where the speed limit is 35 mph. "Phis alternative follows NC 109 from
Old Greensboro Road (SR 1798) for three miles where it turns to the northwest to'bypass the
Town of Wallburg, crossing Motsinger Road (SR 1723) 0.4 miles southwest of its existing
intersection with NC 109. Corridor 1 ties back to NC 109 0.4 miles west of the existing
intersection of NC 109 and Motsinger Road and follows NC 109 to the existing interchange at I-
40. Alternative 1 is 9.5 miles long with 1.6 miles on new location. Alternative 1 includes thirteen
directional crossover intersections, including four with traffic signals: at Jesse Green Road (SR
1753), Motsinger Road (SR 1723), Gumtree Road (SR 1711) and Rex Road (SR 1709)/Devoe
Road (SR 2839). At all other intersecting roads, only right turns would be permitted. Drivers will
be forced to turn right onto NC 109 and then make a u-turn at median openings to travel in the
opposite direction.

Alternative 3
Alternative 3 follows NC 109 from Old Greensboro Road (SR 1798) one mile and then turns
northwest, crossing John Green Road (SR 172), Shady Grove Church Road (SR 17~ 1),
Motsinger Road (SR 1723), Gumtree Road (SR 1711), Mount Vernon Church Road (SR 1708),
Fox Meadow Lane (SR 1921), and Teague Road (SR 1705). Alternative 3 parallels Friendship-
Ledford Road (SR 1700) north to Fox Meadow Road, then continues north into Forsyth County,
connecting back to NC 109 0.75 miles south of the interchange with I-40. Alternative 3 then
follows NC 109 and connects to the existing interchange at I-40. This alternative is 9.5 miles
long with 7.75 miles on new location. Alternative 3 includes six directional crossover
intersections: at NC 109, Jesse Green Road (SR 1753), Shady Grove Church Road (SR 1751),
Motsinger Road (SR 1723), Gumtree Road (SR 1711), Fox Meadow Lane (SR 1921), and
Teague Road (SR 2705). Alternative 3 connects to the existing interchange at NC 109 and I-40.
Alternative 4 . ,... - .. > .t .... .... -
Alternative 4 follows NC 109 from Old Greensboro Road (SR 1798) approximately 0.55 miles
and then turns northeast crossing Jesse Green Road (SR 1753), Johnson Road (SR 1755), Jerry
Clodfelter Road (SR 1747), and Stony Ridge Drive (SR 1749) east of existing NC 109.
Alternative 4 then turns west and crosses NC 109, Motsinger Road (SR 1723), and Friendship-
Ledford Road (SR 1700) and then turns northwest crossing Gumtree Road (SR 1711), Old
Lexington Road (SR 1706), Beckerdite Road (SR 2759), and the Winston-Salem Southbound
Railway railroad tracks. Alternative 4 connects with the existing interchange of US 52 and South
Main Street (SR 4205). This alternative is 9.3 miles long with 8.5 miles on new location.
Alternative 4 includes seven directional crossover intersections: at Jerry Clodfelter Road (SR
1747), NC 109, Jesse Green
Road (SR 1753), Motsinger Road (SR 1723), Friendship-Ledford Road (SR 1700), Gumtree
Road (SR 1711), Old Lexington Road (SR 1706), and Beckerdite-Stewart Road (SR 2759).
Alternative 5
Alternative 5 follows Alternative 3 over existing NC 109 from Old Greensboro Road (SR 1798)
1 mile and then turns west at Jesse Green Road (SR 1753). It crosses John Green Road (SR
1752) and then Shady Grove Church Road (SR 1751) approximately 0.2 miles east ofthe
intersection with Friendship-Ledford Road (SR 1700). Alternative 5 continues northwest
paralleling Friendship-Ledford Road (SR 1700) and passing southwest of Meadowlands
Residential and Golf Community: Alternative~5 than follows Alternative 4 for the remaining 3.6~ ~`
mites to connect with the existing interchange of US 52 and South Main Street (SR 4205). This
alternative is 8.6 miles long with 7.4 miles on new location. Alternative 5 includes seven
directional crossover intersections: at NC 109, Jesse Green Road (SR 1753), Shady Grove
Church Road (SR ] 751), Motsinger Road (SR 1723), Friendship-Ledford Road (SR 1700),
Gumtree Road (SR 1711), Old Lexington Road (SR 1706), and Beckerdite-Stewart Road (SR
2759).

Alternr~tii~e 6
Alternative 6 follows Alternative 4 for 4.5 miles before splitting off to the northwest to follow
Alternative 3 for 4.4 miles all the way to the existing interchange of I-40 and NC 109. This
altemative is 10.1 miles long with 8.7 miles on new location. Alternative 6 includes five
directional crossover intersections: at Jerry Clodfelter Road (SR 1747), NC 109, Jesse Green
Road (SR 173), Motsinger Road (SR 1723), Gumtree Road (SR 1711), and Teague Road (SR
2700.
Each of the Build Alternatives under consideration would tie into an existing interchange at its
northern terminus: Alternatives 1, 3 and 6 terminate at the [-40/NC 109 interchange, and
Alternatives 4 and 5 tie into the US 52/South Main Street (SR 4205) interchange. The I-40/NC
109 interchange, along with the I-40/Clemmonsville Road interchange, makes up a spread
diamond interchange. Ramps on this interchange serve as acollector-distributor system to move
traffic between I-40' arid the two diamond interchanges. The'interchahge at'US`52/South Nlaiii '
Street is a diamond interchange.
Along the alternatives, the use of directional crossovers with offset left turns is proposed for
major intersections. Directional crossovers are generally used in the following situations, all of
which can be applied to the project area:
^ High speed rural median divided facilities
^ Corridors with partial or limited control of access
^ Intersections with a documented crash history
^ In congested areas where it is desirable to minimize the use of traffic signals.
The directional crossover eliminates full movement median openings. Traffic on the primary
highway is not affected as all movements are still permitted; however, traffic on the secondary
highway must turn right onto the primary highway. Through and left turn movements from the
secondary highway are then directed to a median a-turn crossover approximately 800 to 1,300
feet downstream of the intersection. Because these turning movements are separated, the need
for signalization at intersections is reduced. Other intersections and driveways will have right-in,
right-out capability only.
t.
. ~; - ..
The impacts of the alternatives that are being reviewed are described in the attached table (Table
I ).
In order to more fully integrate Section 404 permit requirements with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and to give careful consideration to our required public
interest review and 404(b)(1) compliance determination, the Corps of Engineers is soliciting
public comment on the merits of the proposal, and on the five build improvement alternatives
discussed above. At the close of this comment period,'the District Commander will evaluate and
consider the comments received as well as the expected adverse and beneficial impacts of the
proposed roadway improvements to select the least environmentally damaging, practicable
altemative (LEDPA). The District Commander is not authorizing construction of the NC 109

Corridor Improvement Project at this time. A final Department of the Army permit could be
issued, if at all, only after our review process is complete, impacts to the aquatic environment
have been minimized to the maximum extent practicable, and a compensatory mitigation plan
has been approved.
Other Required Authorizations
This notice and all applicable application materials are being forwarded to the appropriate State
agencies for review. The Corps will generally not make a final permit decision until the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or waives State
certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500). Additional
information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at the NCDWQ
Central Office, 401 Ove;sight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Boulevard,•Raleigh,•
North Carolina 27604-2260. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application
for certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act should do so in writing delivered to
the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27699-1650 Attention: Mr. Brian Wrenn by July O1, 2011.
Essential Fish Habitat
This notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The Corps' initial determination
is that the proposed project will not adversely impact EFH or associated fisheries managed by
the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marine
Fisheries Service.
Cultural Resources
The Corps has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places
and is not aware that any registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion
therein are located within the project area or will be affected by the proposed work. Presently,
unknown archeological, scientific, prehistoric, or historical data may be located within the
project area and/or could be affected by the proposed work.
1/ndangered Species
The Corps has reviewed the project area, examined all information provided by the applicant and
consulted the latest North Carolina Natural Heritage Database. Based on available information,
the Corps is not aware of the presence of species listed as threatened or endangered or their
critical habitat formally designated pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 within the
project area. A final determination on the effects of the proposed project will be made upon
additional review of the project and completion of any necessary biological assessment and/or
consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or National Marine Fisheries Service.

ATTACHMENT (2 of 8
i
i
i
i
i ~
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
"i
i ~
-1
_ :r.I
._~

Forsyth
~
~ ~ County
t, ?

~ ` \
~
~ 1

Davidson - - s;,,
" \
County _'':.~:;- _
'
~~-..'"
\
\
~~~ti~, ~ g
_ \

\
y
\
\
I
\
,_ \
~~ tiw 'I :i£`-~ . =tee; ~u-` ~ { r5 nP ae ~ `Y~E /~.s°/~ ~~ .'~, ~ ~~.
` / \ =~ }
_~ , JIY 0 r n .~ keln ~ R ~ \ oTesoiemlld ~ ``.
U~ ~ l
IF~ - 6] I` ~ r - vf1l ~_ 52,~ r ~51 - ~ ~H19n Pd ~~`
r ~ t~i e Py+l,. ~ L.i o~ ~ len T-"
I ~ ~ 5~ 1 dl i-' ` 11~ ~ ~ ]tl '~ ~ nt, tp//Or
(( ~ F r, T II ~ t~~-ti
^ ~ / ~ Ce 'fl `// ~ ~ UFipn Upts~ :~ f d
l ~' . / I - - d ~b oyuor d
7E~ p ,09 ~ w Ik~
`` o tl
_~
i~LP iso 1 ~ / ,~. // rr ~e'4'~, ' r ~ ~ 1
v- ^ ~ Rd t~~. ~ cn . n d -R', ~,~t cnYd;e n
LLLLLL 4 r(~~.~I p~
°Wkkad \ e ` p ~ ~ ~ 11.I~~P~J Of _ zl'" yr 11 l~}qt(~(~ ~~
~`n IgelFtl •`~.. ~ £' I ~ ~rv'~ town0.d `rY '~y~"
1
L ~• y/OIIbYIg- ~yhQ
I. ~°' /PP Rtl Q ~~ TI • ¢ p0[nP Or ~ °n/ WeX°ver Or
J'~.]IVVTJ ]/'Jjl' CY / ~ up y ` I ~ ~~a C'7 ~ ~ °
~o~
-c-en-rTmi~ F
` ~ o C "~1 N
'~ ^~ on RO 52 ~ F
e yeo~°
a, 'a n v. a Pd ^p . 20 pue
e° ~R J ~ ESPY ~> a p ° ,
rise Rd ¢° - ": W -~
Enrer 4
- CAL P Fb a e o 01 109 N/BUron Fd d
0ur1°°0.
p ~ ~ Ad o M1 ,~
Fi~F' L Z;mm d = a. 4i U r~ ~~.
Oala Sources: NCDOT,NC'One Map!, DaviGSOn County: City of Winston: SaleMForspM1 County, ESRI © t~ Uh°A~ J "s
u
Legend E
~di Project Study Area \
~~~~~ Mules
0 0.5 1 2
North Carolina
Department of Transportation
NC 109 Improvements Project
Forsyth and Davidson Counties
State Project No. 8.1172401
T1P. No. R-2558C
Figure 1 Project Vicinity

w~rTacrt~rrLtvT (3 or£

.
~ _ P
'
~
I
( . '.__ r - (fir I
/ ~
1
_
.' i
~I3~.~~IJ~~~~~II~ i V ; i j~ -
~' 1 I ~ 1 ~~ 't F/~~ i ~^
~
I .~-
~~4-+~" I ~ ~ ~ ~
i
~ ~ 1 I I
-'T1 / l Sy
~j~
a:.
J i~ ~~\" L-
Il r
~'
.
_
~y r
777
~
{

_ I
~ S\ ~ \a-` /~ A
~- I ~

~r t J Pry '}J C~ I \~~^ P I I ~ ~ l:1 1
j
nv
/
l
~ ,,@
(
4 I
~
~

~ r
~ c r t ..
P ,u
~ I
~
~ L-/ i t 11 ~ I i J F f ~ ~ i
i

t--- i f. '~ 1 j 1 s1 V 1 n~ 1 J '.-~1 ~i G
:
~

F {
I I
a rr ~~ f '~'3 i yl "" ° '~ I~ n 1 r. J r ~` v d'i 1
f' y
.
~~~
r
x
~
~~

.
-
I
.
'
-r
~
rk ri i~c
u ~
. r
L~ri
{
~
{
~y
i
T
3 ~ 11 fry ~i tl
S 3 \ \ ~ n ~f*j~i t4-4'~i33 S` k,v
"
~
{
\

a
j// ly'fl ut e
d o'°
L* ~ NIF t a a•'
r
rA - f 1 IL x F N
s
Y 4 (
{ {
r C G
w F
4
m
~
y
(
.
y r
l ll'~1 51
" 2r
~
s `•.1 t
is
(r ~`
~, ~f711DTG1 ~ ~~ i ~ ~r
I~ ' i ~
~1
'
$ ! 1: r~T £~
,
~
6 .
.
L
f
(
l
L~
n p
s
'
~
x
o
a
3 ~
A
p~,
1 l L ~,, (
.
M
i~P
t
o
~~1 r{
l
jj ~
l\~ l
~ L )

~
' y
*ilEf N ~' 1 ~ ~.
i
r Y ) ~
~
'
> ~
\
~
1
11' lip
t
~ ~
\
ti l
~
ne
I ''
L ) Ir1 y S S 1. { 1 l
r11 ~ GwY' p'e Y pL ){ '.
_;
t
l
~'2`
u
T
~
I~t
I
l
Y R
~
3 i
ti,i
4 4
ni
..a
.
,. ~
Y
1
~
I .
~
u
I
iY( r I ~ 5 ~ t Yyn
{F¢° ~ 1 - ) l t v
al ~ t ~ ~
I i ~ 1 " a
'P~)
^
~
~ 6 ~4 ~ 4 t ~ `
s
; a
51 i~ i4r
~
\
r
r
nh 4'~ 1tJ
cl t '71 tlt
}t ~
~ ~ ~
i
n ~
)
r
;
1
4'
a).
fl
x
F
i
~
~
I
I .. ]y )
l
il~~ (~ r ~ 'vi t`,
ylt+
,
~ ...( `~' I aw
I
s l >• n t "~" Ji i
- 'v ~~~ ~ ~§ { h "^"~. a ~ .r w 4,, ~ k t o , ly)y_
a '~ I 1 '
`4
'~i ~ ~
,
e
11J5
~ ~
11
~ tF
~ n "~
li
t 4
hi
rk/yy r
f~ll
_a
r ~
u ~
1
.
r.
^
f
l
r,
yr
:
"~
p
1
l
s
8 \
.
l ~, 4
~
r
~rl
~ k 7 '
fl~ F yr i
y
e !
?
1
t
'X ~ i
q
L
`
`
~
F ;
t
Try a. '~
r l
x
d5z
pe p
A 41
}~
r
I !z
+vP (
e t f. ! t zt;L c^^L^ ev i 15~f~ ~e<
'k r It I w
,~
I
g
c
i ~a ff 7a)J >,
u .. I I~,+ye
it -} r h 1~4i '_•
t .
J\
t
~
'
5z ~
$
I
~ 4V.
=9 (I!E I
& ~ ~ h 1~f
Fi
'+ 4 'F Z 3~
~
`v C
r t
P 4:
I
r
4 \ c~
a
d A
~'d r ~
r
'
q
q p
,
d
r
i
.
~
6
. .
o\
i 1
e (eP i .~ lrl )^4 } Fk)">~ a yr 3 ~x_
'.
t
A
C
5
5
^
8 ~
pl
< p '. ~ 1 i k I
21 '' ~
r
'~ ~ e ~ i'IJ
u~
a
a,
{
z
~
e
~~~
~
..,.,,a '
x r R
1~ 4 p
e e Wii
F N x
Se-n
f
e
h
T
I j y~. fx ~ n S C 1~ r x
"r5 l
L
~^` j'~'
I
r
~
~
~
V
~,
& u~~ „C s
r ¢drue 'Far j G
(
~ ~ "~ ~~ ~ It ~J'
,
l i
~
nt,.-
1
~-:
i1 .~~~}
l v
}
Z
F i t i.~ J
.i'~
t ~
r
-
~
p t
~ ,
7_
l
f
C
e
i
~
z
.
~
E
x ~
-~
~..~.
.
1-' ..x F(
r
$.
i>
_/ 11.,~. ~ ~
i t rl ~ r
pt
-~ e° r T
h^
1 $ L4
~
~ ~ T
~ '
l
! { ;v
yf 1 a
_
t.
t
I P V } } ~ V 1 ~ 1
~
Ii~F JF
14
~ )
..e~p r1 ~ P 4 ~~ P 1 ~ p _~ 109 ~:
S
~.
L 4~ yl I
•1.
aM { 4.-
€N ff 14
- ..
a ! ~
P
4 1
ds
,
ro
"Lb
S
1
t
e g < l
v.~h dx+n vnSab,vtm(. ronry 5

North Carolina

Legend ~ N Department of Transportation

e atemare t ~ .
,>/ e
NC 109 Improvements Project
- Plm na:=J
m N
!
a Forsyth and Davidson Counties
lerna
e Stale Project No. 8.117X01
Pllerna;e 5 S T.I.P. No. R-2568C
® P!:
z:
6
err
a I I I ~ Miles Build Alternates
® s;utyPree aooceart 0 0.5 1 2 Figure 2
for Detailed Study

A~rTacx,~iwT ~a oe s
_ ~~
\ NN~~9RR y~
sz ~~'1VJ~`~I.
I
a ~ o* ~ ~~_
10!
rl
Jtl=
m rmd
~~ .,c -, ~T:!
52
Legend
Q ~eoa
® comca,o
Q was«.
Q m,u~,s
O Cm JO~6
m sur a.a aa.n:rr

. ~e
um ~,

I
N_!e ComGCrs hexn am 1 L-0n f el w Ge.
Ktual n9MCf wal wiEO geneallY would Cem re ltvn JOO lest.
~o~uico re.er: e'n .:.ra+r+~~~r:[sn
~,',
North Carolina
Department of Transportation
NC 1a91mpmvements Pmjep
Forsym aM Dandmn oo~n4es
SUC Rgec No. B 1 f]taot
T 1 P tan 3XS
'e 3 Wetlands antl Streams Index

A1'TACHD~IENT (~ of S)
UT
109 1
t
BD 2cF
t
1
t
1
I
I
W
I
_I_ _I_
UT
I I UT Brushy Forkf
UT Spurgeon
^Wetland BDBD
Wetlantl HR L ; ~\
~ 4
UT Reedy Run
'..
'(
N 1 ~' f ;,
s W '~ ii
;~ t ?, UT Reedy Rur
~' r
~ n~-3 3 ~,
Abbott's
Mumn/n wy 4 P
~

o
c`°"

o ..
p
d C,
8
°- r
°I
_
~
r
' ~ Pond DJA - - e;
;
~
- . 1 l
Wetland BDi ;:e i v p
s

Legend

~~
' .

d W
~
~ ~"
O co,m UT Abbott
s Creek
... .. Wellan
A
_F P
Stream SA ~ 109
_
i
wmc,rs -

ssmay Nor so~oenn - , . UU~UUUoI,~:J~71])~ ~i
~- r.r~o, a s.eamr - '~
`8 ~; ~ North Carolina
-^'-- n ~r..:.m see,,,,, _ ~ ® Deparment of Transportation
o,e~,:a":rye, E• ~
~
i yc NC 1091 p o ¢ eniz ProjeC.
- j ForsH~~ d0 G nCaun'i_s
~~a SUIeP '~ H 1 .0.11]N01
//VVII„ Nose: Conidc ssh In arel0nn (e I .de. ]1P1 R 05o3C
0.dual rSht of ay 'dIM1 gere ally wo Id Ce no e N 3001e L
ors 1 rso
: Figure 3-A Wetlands and Streams
_
d
y

ATTACHDYENT (7 of 8'

r~TTr~ClINIENT (8 of R;
~~~ ;, ~./ UT Soakal
r ~ UT Soakas Creek

~ r -
I
I

-
~ FI I I
" UT Soakas Creek ~S
Netiand
HR K

~ I
,` Wetland HR J
... I

UT Soakas Creek
s
:.
..n W I ! .G
~
I
I ~
r ~ UT Soakas Creek

h

it ri
I
~
UT Soakas Creek
I
I
1
I
m

UT Soakas Creek = ~