20110844 Ver 1_Application_20110901

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
ATTN: Mr. Monte Matthews
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
August 24, 2011
S,cp
?D
?o? os ?0 //
EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
SECRETARY
11 0844
Subject: Application for an Individual Section 404 and Section 401 Water Quality
Certification for SR 1001 (Connelly Springs Road) from US 321A (Norwood
Street) to SR 1712 (Starcross Road) in Caldwell County. Federal Aid Project
No. MA-STP-7533(2), Division 11, TIP No. U-221 1B. Debit $570 from WBS
34783.1.1.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to extend SR 1001
(Connelly Springs Road) on new location with the realignment of SR 1178 (Hibriten Drive) in
Lenoir, Caldwell County. The project begins west of US 321A (Norwood Street) and ends
approximately 650 feet east of SR 1712 (Starcross Road). The project also includes the
construction of a half-clover interchange at US 321. The project will eliminate a portion of
SR 1178 (Hibriten Drive) including the existing bridge over US 321. The proposed facility is
a four-lane, curb & gutter, median-divided roadway and will provide two 12-foot lanes in each
direction, a 17.5-foot median and 10-foot berms.
U-221 1B is one part of the two-part TIP project U-2211. U-2211A was completed in 2003
and was the widening and new location portion of SR 1001 (Connelly Springs Road) from SR
1933 (Southwest Boulevard "loop") to US 321A in Lenoir, Caldwell County.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone]
PROTECT DEVELOPMENTAND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSTS 1020 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
1598 MAIL SERVICECENTER WEBSITE: WWH(DON.DOLSTATE.NC.US RALEIGH NC, 27610-4328
RALEIGHNC 27699-1598

Please see the enclosed ENG 4345, Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) mitigation
acceptance letter, permit drawing review minutes (Concurrence Points 413 and 4C), Rapanos
jurisdictional determination form, State Stormwater Management Plan (SMP), permit
drawings and design plans for the above referenced project.
Purpose and Need:
Existing Connelly Springs Road is characterized by a substandard roadway width and poor
sight distance. Congestion occurs along Connelly Springs Road and along US 321A
(Norwood Street). The accident rate for the existing facility is over two times the statewide
average for similar roadways.
The proposed improvements for U-2211 will alleviate congestion by widening the roadway
and extending Connelly Springs Road to connect with US 321 (Hickory Boulevard) and SR
1178 (Hibriten Drive). The project will improve the traffic flow and safety along the facility.
In addition, it will help relieve some congestion on US 321A in the downtown area going
toward NC 18 by connecting with Hibriten Drive as an additional route to NC 18. The project
implements a portion of the Lenoir Thoroughfare Plan and will function as an urban connector
improving access between Lenoir and the Cajah Mountain area.
Summary of Jurisdictional Impacts:
The project will permanently impact 0.24 acre of wetlands, 1,252 linear feet of streams, and
temporarily impact 0.01 acre (73 linear feet) of streams.
Summary of Utility Impacts:
There will be no temporary or permanent impacts to jurisdictional resources due to utility
relocations on U-2211B.
Summary of Mitigation:
The project has been designed to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional areas
throughout the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and design processes. However,
project impacts will necessitate compensatory mitigation for the unavoidable impacts.
Detailed descriptions of these actions are presented in the mitigation portion of this
application. The EEP will provide compensatory mitigation for 1,252 linear feet of stream
impacts. Compensatory mitigation for 0.24 acre of wetland impacts will be provided by
debiting the Long Creek Mitigation Site in Mecklenburg County.
NEPA DOCUMENT STATUS
An Environmental Assessment (EA) was prepared for U-2211 in February 1995. A Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI) was prepared in November 1995. A Reevaluation of the
EA/FONSI for U-2211B was completed in 2007 (after U-2211A was completed in 2003).
Additional copies will be provided upon request.
In compliance with the NEPA/404 Merger Process, Concurrence Points 413 and 4C were
reached for U-221113 on January 23, 2008 and May 13, 2009, respectively (meeting minutes
attached).
U-2211 B Individual Permit Application Page 2 of 10

INDEPENDENT UTILITY
The subject project is in compliance with 23 CFR Part 771.111(f) which lists the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) characteristics of independent utility of a project:
(1) The project connects logical termini and is of sufficient length to address environmental
matters on a broad scope,
(2) The project is usable and a reasonable expenditure, even if no additional transportation
improvements are made in the area;
(3) The project does not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably foreseeable
transportation improvements.
RESOURCE STATUS
Waters within the project area are located in the Upper Catawba Drainage Basin (HUC
03050101 of the Catawba River Basin within subbasin 03-08-32). No designated Outstanding
Resource Waters (ORW), High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supply (WS-1 or WS-II)
waters or 303(d) impaired waters occur within 1.0 mile of the project area.
Wetland and stream determinations within U-2211B were conducted using the field
delineation method outlined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual.
Mr. John Thomas of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) field verified the wetland
and surface waters and issued a signed jurisdictional determination (JD) on May 5, 2006.
This verification was verbally confirmed by Monte Matthews of the USACE on March 1,
2008. As this verification expires before the current let date for this project, a Rapanos
jurisdictional determination form has been included with this application for the relevant
water resources impacted by U-221 1B. The NCDOT requests an updated final JD for this
project.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE U.S.
Tables IA and 113 summarize the impacts to jurisdictional water resources. Site numbers
correspond with the permit (hydraulic) drawings included in this application. The stream
names correspond to the 2007 NEPA document. A brief description of each impact site will
follow the tables.
Tahln 1 A _ I1-2211 R Wetland Imnaety.

Site

2 Wetlands

Number
W l Wetland Size

(ac)
0.24 *Permanent F Min,
-
Wetlands(ac)
0.24 FVMechantzed
??m x
Cleazmgi(ac),,
0 Tem rarytF I

> (ac)s
0 tMttigation ,
._
¢Requlredi(ac).
0.24
Total Impacts 0.24 0 0 0.24*
• Wetland impacted is riparian
U-2211B 1ndividual Permit Application Page 3 of 10
_I

1 - All streams are Class C waters with a DWQ Index Number of 11-55-(0.5)
2 - Mitigation for bank stabilization impacts required by DWQ- not required by USACE
3 - UT2 was determined by the USACE in March 2008 to be an intermittent, unimportant stream (not requiring mitigation
from USACE). Since that time, DWQ has changed its policy regarding mitigating for intermittent streams, therefore it
now requires mitigation from DWQ at a 1:1 ratio.
4 - Values are based on rounding, due to some of the individual impacts being <0.01 acre
5 - Mitigation proposed by NCDOT (based on mitigation required by the USACE exceeding the amount required by DWQ)
StremName &

ermient o e'

:: a
_
IN.
Iinpact Type

?p act

Te p a y'

acts

?
tN-RKfftir#9',o'
equ
mbert ? a
ei
re} feet) n(acres) hne
rf
UTl to Perm. fill 922 USACE & DWQ
1 Gunpowder UTl Bank Stabilization 78 DWQ'
Creek (P) Temp. fill -- <0.01
N/A (wetland
2
only) - --
UTl to Perm. fill --
3 Gunpowder UTl Bank Stabilization 16 DWQ'
Creek (P) Temp. fill --
UTl to Perm. fill 42 USACE & DWQ
4 Gunpowder UTl Bank Stabilization 41 DWQ'
Creek (P) Temp. fill -- <0.01
UT2 LM Perm. fill 153 DWQ'

5 Gunpowder UT2 Bank Stabilization -- --
Creek (I)3 Temp. fill <0.01
-
„ .. ? ?"??= ??,, ??« 7,? Total Tem ora , rlm acts: ri'Wa 0:01° Km
''70-0.
Permanent Imp acts Perm . Fill + Bank Stabilization : 1,252
--
-
Permanent Impacts Requiring DW Miti ation 1:1): . 1,252
-
--
Permanent Impacts Requiring USACE Mitigation 2:1 : 964 - --
Total Impacts Requiring Mitigation (2:1): [ 964 - 1,928
Table 1B - U-2211B Stream m pacts.
Permit Site 1: The reach of UTl that extends under the proposed interchange footprint will
be culverted. A 7' x 7' reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) will be used on the inlet side
of US 321, and will be 646 feet in length. This new 7' x 7' RCBC will connect to the existing
7' x 7' RCBC under US 321. The existing culvert is 212 feet in length. The outlet side of the
existing culvert will be extended with a 7' x 8' RCBC 214 feet in length. The total culvert
length (including the existing section) will be 1,072 feet. This culvert extension on both sides
of US 321 will result in 922 linear feet of permanent impacts to UTl . Additionally, there will
be <0.01 acre (34 linear feet) of temporary impacts associated with culvert installation and 78
total linear feet of bank stabilization impacts at the inlet and outlet ends of the extension.
Permit Site 2: Wetland W l is located entirely within the footprint of the new interchange and
all 0.24 acre of W1 will be permanently impacted from the new roadway.
Permit Site 3: The existing 12" reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) will be replaced with a new
24" RCP. The rip rap at the outlet end of the new RCP will result in 16 linear feet of bank
stabilization to UTI.
U-2211 B Individual Permit Application Page 4 of 10
Permit Site 4: The existing 72" corrugated metal pipe (CMP), approximately 40' in length,
that carries UTl under Starcross Road (SR 1712) will be replaced with an 8 x 8 RCBC. This
RCBC will be slightly longer (64'3") to accommodate the widened portion of Starcross Road,
but will be on a better alignment for the stream than the existing CMP. The pipe replacement
will result in 42 linear feet of permanent impacts to UTI. Additionally, there will be <0.01
acre (29 linear feet) of temporary impacts associated with culvert installation and 41 linear
feet of bank stabilization impacts at the inlet and outlet ends of the new culvert.
Permit Site 5: The existing 24" CMP, approximately 36' in length, that carries UT2 under
Hibriten Drive will be removed and replaced with a 54" RCP to accommodate the widened
roadway in this location. A portion of the channel on the inlet side of the new pipe will be
lined with rip rap for stabilization purposes. This pipe replacement and upstream rip rap will
result in 153 linear feet of permanent impacts to UT2. There will also be <0.01 acre (10 linear
feet) of temporary stream impacts associated with pipe installation.
MORATORIUM
No moratoria are required by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or were proposed
in a letter from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) dated March
9, 2004.
FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with Federal classification of Endangered (E) or Threatened (T) are
protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973,
as amended. As of September 22, 2010, the USFWS lists six federally protected species for
Caldwell County (Table 2).
Table 2 _ Federally protected species listed for Caldwell Countv.
t
cientifWNimeF

A "
C oName
aw
M vFederal'3 Habitat

v ea sr
3? gical

? :
'
? - Present usio
Clemm s muhlenber ii Bo turtle T S/A No uired
Glaucomys sabrinus Carolina northern flying E No ffect
T
coloratus s uirrel
Corynorhinus Virginia big-eared bat E No ffect
No
townsendii vii inianus
Microhexura montiva a Spruce-fir moss spider E No No Effect
Hexas lis nani ora Dwarf-flowered heartleaf T Yes No Effect
Liatris helleri Heller's blazing star T No No Effect
T(S/A) - Threatened due to similarity of appearance
E - Endangered
T - Threatened
The only species with habitat present within the project area is the dwarf-flowered heartleaf.
The entire project area was surveyed for suitable dwarf-flowered heartleaf habitat. All
potential habitat was surveyed in April 2008 by walking visual plant-by-plant surveys. No
dwarf-flowered heartleaf plants were found, therefore this project will have "No Effect" on
U-111 1B Individual Permit Application Page 5 of 10
this species. The bog turtle is listed due to similarity of appearance and does not require a
biological conclusion. However, per communication with Dennis Herman (NCDOT
Biological Surveys Group) the wetland located within the project area is not considered a bog
and likely would not provide suitable habitat for bog turtles.
INDIRECT CUMULATIVE IMPACT ANALYSIS
Existing rules for the 401 Water Quality Certification Program (15A NCAC 2H.0506(b)(4)
require that the DWQ determine that a project "does not result in cumulative impacts, based
on past or reasonably anticipated future impacts, that cause or will cause a violation of
downstream water quality standards."
An Indirect and Cumulative Effects Assessment (ICE) was completed for this project in 2005.
Copies of this report are available upon request. This report concluded the following:
Indirect and Cumulative Effects to the Human Environment
The project is not expected to result in major induced growthiland changes or substantially
contribute to cumulative impacts in the area. The proposed project is located in a mature and
stable area of the City south of the downtown urban core. Contingent upon access, the
likelihood of development is contained to the few available parcels in the immediate vicinity
of the proposed project.
Given that the project will result in new access, commercial infill development is most likely
to occur, particularly in the vacant parcels that were converted from residential to commercial
uses within the last five years. This project could influence the timing or status of the
development likely to occur on these parcels, but only if access is allowed. The type of
commercial development likely to occur is small businesses, fast food, or other small-scale
commercial uses.
With regard to transitioning existing residential land uses to higher intensity uses, there is the
potential for U-2211B to induce land use changes along the US 321 corridor. This is probable
because of the corridor's connection with other urban/commercial strips and because it is
located close to downtown Lenoir.
The project has the potential for limited cumulative effect resulting from the incremental
effects of the proposed interchange with other past project and current and future development
activities in the project region. Non-transportation development projects in the area are few,
and are limited to infill development of parcels along the US 321 corridor. There is the
potential for existing residential parcels to convert to commercial uses, particularly those
fronting US 321 north and south of the project. However, this is not necessarily a result of
this project, but rather because of the nature of US 321 as a major commercial corridor within
the City of Lenoir and through the region.
The project will directly alter the street network by upgrading a portion of Hibriten Drive as
part of interchange construction. Although this upgrade will not significantly alter the street
U-2211 B Individual Permit Application Page 6 of 10
network, volumes will increase on this local street as a result of this project. There is the
potential for some homes in the Whitnel neighborhood to convert to home-based businesses.
According to the City, the project will not likely alter the stable and cohesive nature of this
neighborhood.
Indirect and Cumulative Effects to the Natural Environment
Habitat fragmentation already exists in the study area as the project is located in a suburban
area in Lenoir. The project will result in the direct removal of upland habitat. However, it is
not anticipated that the project will produce substantial changes in the ecological makeup of
the study area.
The interchange will impact two unnamed tributaries to Gunpowder Creek and a small
wetland. In combination with TIP Project U-2211A, there is the potential for cumulative
effect to the creek system. It is anticipated that the project will not indirectly induce new
development that will promote negative cumulative effects in the study area. Potential
adverse effect to surface waters will be minimized through implementation of NCDOT's Best
Management Practices for Protection of Surface Waters, as applicable, during the
construction phase of the project to avoid construction impacts to aquatic communities where
construction activity occurs as well as to downstream communities.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Historical Structures:
The State Historic Preservation Office (HPO) requested surveys for historic structures in their
memos to NCDOT dated August 17, 2004 and September 2, 2004. A field survey of the Area
of Potential Effects (APE) was conducted in January 2005 and July 2006 by an NCDOT
architectural historian and eighty structures over fifty years of age within the APE were
recorded. The photographs of these properties along with their evaluations were shown to the
HPO in three separate meetings: February 22, 2005, May 31, 2005 and August 16, 2006. At
those meetings, HPO staff concurred that all eighty properties were not eligible for the
National Register and forms were signed that reflect these findings (and were included in the
2007 EA/FONSI Reevaluation). Therefore, there are no National Register-listed or National
Register-eligible properties within the APE for this project.
On June 28, 2007, NCDOT met with the property owner of 1318 Hibriten Drive about a
tunnel on their property. NCDOT researched the tunnel to see if it was part of an important
event and discussed with the state agency (HPO). On August 1, 2007 the HPO agreed that the
tunnel was probably not eligible, but they recommended documentation during utility
relocation or construction and NCDOT agreed.
Archaeoloav:
The NCDOT conducted an archaeological survey of the project area. The majority of the
project area was determined to be disturbed from previous residential and commercial
development. No archaeological sites were recorded, and no evidence of cultural use or
occupation of the project area was encountered during the survey. This work was done in
U-221IB Individual Permit Application Page 7 of 10
compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the guidelines
issued by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. No further compliance is required.
SECTION 4(f)
There are no section 4(1) properties affected by this project.
FEMA COMPLIANCE
The project has been coordinated with appropriate state and local officials and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to assure compliance with FEMA, state, and local
floodway regulations.
WILD AND SCENIC RIVER SYSTEM
The project will not impact any designated Wild and Scenic Rivers or any rivers included in
the list of study rivers (Public Law 90-542, as amended).
MITIGATION OPTIONS
The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to
avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts, and to provide full compensatory mitigation of all
remaining, unavoidable jurisdictional impacts. Avoidance measures were taken during the
planning and NEPA compliance stages; minimization measures were incorporated as part of
the project design.
Avoidance and Minimization:
NCDOT has avoided impacting wetlands and streams and reduced impacts to wetlands and
streams to the greatest extent practicable. Specific examples of avoidance and minimization
measures include:
• Multiple baffles will be utilized within the downstream portion of the culvert
extension at Site 1 to provide energy dissipation within the culvert.
• A 60" floodplain pipe along the culvert extension under US 321 at Site 1 will be
required to meet FEMA requirements.
• At Site 1, a benched channel at the inlet and outlet will be utilized to maintain low
flow.
• The interior of Loop C of the new interchange will be utilized as a dry-extended
detention pond to provide treatment of stormwater runoff prior to discharging into the
proposed box culvert extension at Site 1.
• Rip rap pads and preformed scour holes will be used in order to dissipate energy and
reduce velocities at stormwater pipe outlets near Site 3.
• Riprap used for outlet protection will be placed on banks only and will not be placed
in the streambed.
U-21118 Individual Permit Application Page 8 of 10
• Though the majority of roadside ditches were unable to obtain a 3:1 slope or flatter
due to the physical constraints of the mountainous topography, most ditches on the
project will be lined with rip rap in order to control erosion.
Compensation:
The NCDOT has avoided and minimized impacts to jurisdictional resources to the greatest
extent practicable as described above. This project will permanently impact 0.24 acre of
wetlands, 1,252 linear feet of streams, and temporarily impact 0.01 acre (73 linear feet) of
streams.
Of the 1,252 linear feet of permanent stream impacts, 964 linear feet are permanent impacts to
a perennial stream, 135 linear feet are bank stabilization impacts to this same perennial stream
and 153 linear feet are permanent impacts to an intermittent, unimportant stream.
Therefore, all 1,252 linear feet of permanent stream impacts require mitigation by DWQ at a
ratio of 1:1. A total of 964 linear feet of permanent stream impacts require mitigation by
USACE at a ratio of 2:1.
Mitigation for the 0.24 acre of wetland impacts will be provided by debiting the Long Creek
Mitigation Site at a ratio of 1:1. Located in Mecklenburg County, the Long Creek Mitigation
Site encompasses approximately 156 acres. It is situated off of Beatties Ford Road (SR 2074)
and was bisected by I-485. This site provided compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts
associated with sections of the Charlotte Outer Loop.
The Long Creek Site is designed to restore a bottomland hardwood forest wetland. It was
originally constructed in December of 1996, with 37 acres of the planting occurring in 1997.
A 5 acre portion, consisting of the former haul roads, was planted in early 1998. Groundwater,
surface water, and rain gauges were installed in early 1998. 2001 is the fourth year of
hydrologic monitoring and the fifth year of vegetation monitoring for the site.
To offset 0.24 acres of unavoidable wetland impacts, associated with T.I.P U-2211B, the Long
Creek Mitigation Site will be debited 0.24 acre. Table 3 shows the mitigation that has been
debited from the Long Creek Site to date.
Table 3 - Lane Creek Mitigation Site Debits.
i
i
1 Mitig hon TYRE??
* .
Riverine Wetland Restoration DEBI?
xAMOUNT. ac
7.2 TIP Projects
ti
R-21 1,R-2123, R-2248
2 Riverine Wetland Restoration 15 R-2123 AB/BA/BB/CB
3 Riverine Wetland Restoration 9.8 U-2506
4 Riverine Wetland Restoration 2.54 R-2248 AB/BA
5 Riverine Wetland Restoration 1.6 R-2123
6 Riverine Wetland Restoration 5.12 R-2248AC/ADBA
7 Riverine Wetland Restoration 0.24 U-2211B
U-1211 B Individual Permit Application Page 9 of 10
The USACE stream mitigation requirement is 1,928 ft (964 ft @ 2:1). The DWQ stream
mitigation requirement is 1,252 ft (1,252 ft @ 1:1). Please reference Table 1B in this
application for further breakdown of impacts and mitigation requirements. Therefore, the
NCDOT proposes to mitigate for the larger of these mitigation requirements, 1,928 ft, by
utilizing the EEP (see attached acceptance letter).
PROJECT SCHEDULE
U-2211B calls for a May 15, 2012 let date, and a review date of March 27, 2012. This
application provides final design and impacts for the project.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Section 404: Application is hereby made for a USACE Individual 404 Permit as required for
the above-described activities..
Section 401: We are hereby requesting a 401 Water Quality Certification from the N. C.
Division of Water Quality. In compliance with Section 143 215.3D(e) of the NCAC, we will
provide $570.00 to act as payment for processing the Section 401 permit application
previously noted in this application (see Subject line). We are providing five (5) copies of this
application to the NCDWQ for their review and approval.
This project is located in a trout county, therefore comments from the NCWRC will be
required prior to authorization by the Corps of Engineers. By copy of this letter and
attachment, NCDOT hereby requests NCWRC Review. NCDOT requests that NCWRC
forward their comments to the Corps of Engineers and the NCDOT within 30 calendar days of
receipt of this application.
Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please contact Erin Cheely at [e-mail] or [phone].
A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT
website at http://www.ncdot.org/doh/preconstruct/pe/neu/permit.html
Sincerely
orY X.Thorpe, Ph.D., Branch Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc:
NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List.
U-2211 B Individual Permit Application Page 10 of 10
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003
(33 CFR 325) EXPIRES: 31 August 2012
Public ropor" burden fix this wr adio n of udomlabrin is estimated to average 11 hours per response, including the time Tor reviewing instructions, searching
ennsta ng data sources, gathering and maudaaung the data needed. and completing and MVONffg the collection of bdornabon. Sod cormnens regarding the
burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of bdartretion, including suggestions for reducing this burden. to Deparbnerd of Defense, Washington
Headquarters, Executive Services and Cannwil®lors Directorate, Information Management DNsaon and to the Office of Manager nend and Budget,
Papervpk Reduction Propd (0710-0003). Resporldens should be avrare that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shag be subject lo any
penalty for fal6g to cornpy with a collection of udormatian if it does not display a crTently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to
either of those addresses- Canrpleted applications Trust be subaneted tu the Distinct Engineer having jursdiction over the location of the proposed autrvfy.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Ad, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clem Water Act, Section 404,33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries
Ad, Section 103,33 USC 1413, Regulatory Prograrus of the Corps of Engineers, Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332. Principal Purpose: hdamalon provided on this
farm will be used in evahnaing the application (or a pemdL Routine Uses: This Irdamatim may be stored with the Deparlinerd of Justice and other federal,
state, and local govenmrert agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal lax. Submission of
rested information is voluntary, however, f adomal in is not provided the pernit application cannot be evaluated nor can a pemtit be saved. One sat of
original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be aftached to this application (see sample
drawings and instructions) and be sbrattad la the Dsbrd Egrneer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity- An application dud is not
corrploted in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(HEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANTS NAME: 6. AUTHORED AGENTS NAME AND TITLE (alt agent is rot required)
First- WMme- last- First- Mxldle- Last -
Cerpay- Haut.cr.,.oy.odTwwarm,-wgec n.*w.r a e. m.Mrw,*y Conpany-
E-mal Address- E4nad Address-
6. APPLICANTS ADDRESS. 9. AGENTS ADDRESS
Address - 1548 Mee Servka Cerra Address -
City- wary, State- wen Cwa Zap- 21OW154 COuntry- city- State- zip - Country-
7- APPLICANTS PHONE NOS WIAREA CODE 10- AGENTS PHONE NOS. WIAREA CODE
a. Residence b. Business c Fax a. Residence b. Bustriess, c. I=
919-707-6100 919-212-6785
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11.1 hereby authorize, to act in ay behalf as nny aged in the prooesirhg of this application and to kxroh, upon requesk
yupgnnertal mfwnotion in support of this pemd application.
APPLICANTS SIGNATURE DATE
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12 PROJECT NAME OR TITLE pee irsinddbw
U-221IB
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN or accurate) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (twpeobia)
IJTs to Gunpowder Creek
Address
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Lahlade-'N waxiiis City _ State- Zp-
Lerxjbde: 'W a,emr
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (se, bennxaxn)
Slade Tax Parcel ID Maricipahty
section- Town"- Reroe-
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Please see attached vicinity map and cover letter.
ENG FORM 4345, SEPT 2009 EDITION OF OCT 2004 IS OBSOLETE Proponent CECW-OR
19. Nature of Adiviy (0oalpem a prided Maude a hseees)
The project will extend SR 1001 (Connelly Springs Road) on new location and realign SR 1178 (Hibrlten Drive) in Lenoir. The project also
Indudes constn)cbon of a hat-dower Intercharge st US 321. I twill eltminate a portion of SR 1178, including the existing bridge over US 321.
19. Project Paposc Blmeaeettw remm apeposeatm ROp0. am Fabucdots)
The propose of dots poiea Is to eBetiae onpmrin by%4dwft me roods" SW ertl etderWg Candy Sprkge Rnedtommna wah US 321. The papa wall tr"a traffic flow
ad eatery done ft Ially and reBae same mgesBOn an LIS 321A In the dwrarom acne gohg tow®d NC 1B by oomteahg wah Hbr ten Odve m m eddNaral rood m NC 1B. The
props hrgkrrewds a paten of are Lame Thaaghta, Plan snows kmcUar m an abet oameaa hnpa+hrg eu>ma betwmmi Lenoir and am Ceish Maodeh rm.
USE BLOCKS 20-231F DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Disdtage
Impacts will result from widening the roadway and shoulders, constructing a new half-clover
interchange and lengthening/replacing hydraulic structures within the project area.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Do dharged and the Amamt of Eadr Type in 0 1bic Yards:
Type Type Type
Ann unt in Cubic Yards Amood on Cubic Yards Amount in C bhc Yards
See attached cover titer
22 Swfa Amain Acres d Wetlands o Othw Wafers Figed pm M nxth m)
Acres See attached cover facer
or
Urer Feet
23. Dewipbm of Avoidartce, M aanama iat, and Cmgernabon lees amudbe)
See attached cover letter
24. Is Any Poison of the Work Already Complete? Yes 0 No IZI IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK(
No work associated with U-2211 B has been completed. The A section (U-2211A) was completed in 2003 and was the widening and
now bcadon portion of SR 1001 from SR 1933 (Southwest Badevard'loop') to US 321A in Lenoir.
25. Addresses of Adpitl g Properly Dieters, Lessees, Etc, Whose PmpertyA*=Cie Waterbody N none mat rn be adored hose. pies emdta empbnr+a M
Address- Please see adjacent properly landowners page in the permit drawing package
city- state- Sp-
26. Lai of Other Certifications a ApproralstDerstls Received from other Federal, Sate, or Local Agencies for Work Described "m Ties Appfiwsort.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATEAPPUED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
' Wald htrlude buts not rest&.ted m marg. Witting. and rood plain pernuts
27. Application is hereby made for a ponmt or permits to authorize to work described in Uts apptcalim- I certify that the irdommLon in this application is
complete and amtate. 1 it~ taffy that I possess the authority to Undertake to work described heron or am acting as the dtdy authorized agent of the
applicant-
USIGIIIATUPE OF APPLICANT r v pA r E413NATURE PAGFW ec) I I DATE
The application mat be signed by the person who desires to Undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly, aauthorized agent if the
statement in block 11 has been flied out and sighed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that Whoever, in any manner within to Orisddbn of any department or agency dthe United States knowingly and willfully
falsifies, toroeels, or covers up any trick, sdeme, or disguises a material fad or makes any false, fictilims or fraudulent statements or representations or
makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fiditola or fmUdulont statements or entry, stall be feed not mere than
$10,000 or krprismed not more than five yews or both.
ENG FORM 4345, SEPT 2009
rI'*--
July 19, 2011
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Manager, Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter.
U-221 1B, SR 1001 (Hibriten Drive) from US 321A (Norwood Street) to SR 1712 (Oak
Hill School Road), Caldwell County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will provide the
compensatory stream mitigation for the subject project Based on the information supplied by you on July 14, 2011,
the impacts are located in CU 03050101 of the Catawba River Basin in the Northern Mountains (NM) Eco-Region,
and are as follows:
Catawba Stream Wetlands Buffer (Sq. Ft.)

03050101

Cold

Cool

Warm

Riparian Nn-

o Coastal

h
M Zone 1
Zone 2
NM Rim ars
Impacts 0 0 1,252
1
0

0

0

0

0
(feet/acres
EEP commits to implementing sufficient compensatory stream mitigation credits to offset the impacts
associated with this project in accordance with the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources'
Ecosystem Enhancement Program In-Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact
amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance
letter will be required from EEP.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Hannon at 919-715-
1929.
Sincerely,
(
EEP Deputy Director
cc: Mr. Monte Matthews, USACE - Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Mr. Brian Wrenn, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
File: U-221 iB
Protectzit? Ow Stag
-Aa
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 /www.neeep.net
Minutes for Hydraulic Design Review Meeting
U-2211B
State Project 34783.1.1
SR 101 (Connelly Springs Road) From US 321A (Norwood Street) to
SR 11783 (Starcross Road)
Caldwell County, Division 11
A Hydraulic Design Review Meeting was held on Wednesday, January
23, 2008 in the Hydraulics Conference Room at the NCDOT Century
Center Complex, Raleigh.
Team Members: Andrew Nottingham-Hydraulics (Present)
Monte Matthews-USACE (Present)
Marella Buncick-USFWS (Present)
Marla Chambers-NCWRC (Present)
Amy Euliss-NCDWQ (Absent)
Brian Wrenn-NCDWQ (Absent)
Chris Militscher-EPA (Absent)
Kathy Matthews-EPA (Absent)
Donnie Brew- FHWA (Present)
Davis Harris-REU (Absent)
Gary Lovering-Roadway Design (Present)
Betsy Cox-Structures (Absent)
Charles Cox: PDEA (Absent)
Carla Dagnino: NEU (Present)
Trent Beaver: Division 11 (Present)
Participants: Doug Petrey-Structures
Michele James-PDEA
Erin Cheely-NEU
Jennifer Harrod-NEU
David Wainwright-NCDWQ
Troy Wilson-USFWS
David Bocker-Mulkey, Inc.
Joe Dudeck-Mulkey, Inc.
The meeting began at 11:00 a.m. with introductions initiated by Andrew Notthingham
(NCDOT Hydraulics). David Bocker (Mulkey, Inc.) proceeded with the review of the
project as follows:

General Items
• All waters within the project are Class `C' (suitable for aquatic life propagation and
survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture).
• Project falls within the Catawba River Basin; but since the project is not on the main
stem of the Catawba River riparian buffer rules are not applicable.
• Grass Swale treatment will occur throughout the project in the median and in areas
where flat slopes can be maintained.
• Pre-formed scour holes will also be utilized as treatment measures where feasible.
• Proposed culverts will be buried 1 ft to provide for fish passage.
Cross pipes in jurisdictional intermittent streams will be buried lft culverts greater
than 48 inches and 20% of the pipe diameter for culvert less than 48 inches in
diameter.
Sheet 4
No jurisdictional streams or wetlands; therefore, no impacts
Sheet 5
• Proposed design will tie into existing 42" Storm Drainage system that directly
discharges into Gunpowder Creek @ the 12'x8' RCBC under Norwood St. At that
point, most of this drainage basin is impervious, therefore widening of the existing
roads should not adversely impact the jurisdictional waters at the outlet of this
system.
Sheet 6
• Wetland impacts; total take is unavoidable due to roadway
alignment/intersection/interchange.
• Stream impacts - Upstream/Downstream of Culvert Extension @ -Y5- U.S. 321
through -Y4- Berkley St. as well as under Loop C & Ramp C.
There will be several direct discharges points into the proposed culvert extension in
the interchange area.
• Several concerns from NCWRC about the added storm water from the interchange
added to culvert. Currently, the area is heavily wooded; the proposed interchange
will change to pavement & grass surfaces resulting in changes to the water quality of
the creek.
• The use of multiple baffles within the culvert and up-sizing culvert (7'x8') to
accommodate was discussed to provide energy dissipation within the culvert.
• Having one long culvert from loop "C" to "Y4" was agreed to be a viable option and
will be pursued during the design phase.
• Mulkey will investigate use of stormwater detention in loops prior to discharge into
the proposed culvert (Gunpowder Creek).
Sheet 7
• Stream impacts - Upstream and Downstream of existing culvert under -Y9- Starcross
Rd. culvert replacement necessary due to intersection improvements.
• Intermittent Stream Impacts - Upstream of existing 24" CMP, due to roadway
widening.
• Concern of stability at the outlet of the proposed 54" RCP was expressed, it was
explained that the pipe outlet will be located at the stream bed elevation. The current
24" CMP outlet is 3-4 feet above the creek bank. It was also explained that a head
ditch would be required on the upstream end of the proposed 54" RCP due to the
cross pipe layout and grade of the roadway in this location.
• NEU mentioned that they would further investigate whether or not this is a
jurisdictional stream.
Sheets 8, 9, & 10
• No jurisdictional streams or wetlands, therefore, no impacts.
Sheet 11
• Stream Impacts -Downstream of Culvert Extension @ -Y5- U.S. 321 and -Y4-
(Berkley St.) due to roadway realignment.
• No jurisdictional stream or wetlands; therefore, no impacts.

Minutes for Permit Drawing Review Meeting
U-2211B
State Project 34783.1.1
SR 1001 (Connelly Springs Road) From US 321A (Norwood Street) to
SR 1783 (Starcross Road)
Caldwell County, Division 11
A 4C Permit Drawing Review Meeting was held on Wednesday, May
13, 2009 in the Hydraulics Conference Room at the NCDOT Century
Center Complex, Raleigh.
Team Members: Andrew Nottingham - Hydraulics (Present)
Monte Matthews - USACE (Present)
Marella Buncick - USFWS (Conference Call)
Marla Chambers - NCWRC (Conference Call)
Amy Euliss - NCDWQ (Present)
Kathy Matthews -EPA (Absent)
Jake Riggsbee - FHWA (Absent)
David Hams - REU (Absent)
Gary Lovering - Roadway (Absent)
Betsy Cox - Structures (Present)
Charles Cox - PDEA (Absent)
Carla Dagnino - NEU (Absent)
Trent Beaver - Division 11 (Present)
Participants: Chris Militscher - EPA
Donnie Brew - FHWA
Ron McCollum - Roadway
Tina Snell - Roadway
Christy Alford - Structures
Erin Cheely - NEU
Michael Turchy - NEU
Mark Staley - REU
David Bocker - Mulkey, Inc.
The meeting began at 11:00 a.m. with introductions initiated by Andrew Nottingham
(NCDOT Hydraulics). David Bocker (Mulkey, Inc.) proceeded with the review of the
project as follows:

General Items
• All waters within the project are Class `C' (suitable for aquatic life propagation and
survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture).
• Project falls within the Catawba River Basin; but since the project is not on the main
stem of the Catawba River riparian buffer rules are not applicable.
Sheet 6
• Wetland impacts; total take is unavoidable due to proposed roadway
alignment/intersection/interchange.
• Stream impacts - Upstream/Downstream of Culvert Extension @ -YS- U.S. 321
through -Y4- Berkley St. as well as under Loop C & Ramp C.
• In addition to the culvert extension, a 60" floodplain pipe is required to meet FEMA
requirements. The 60" pipe inlet is located within the channel on a proposed bench to
the left of the box culvert inlet (looking downstream).
• A dry-detention pond has been provided within Loop C to provide treatment of
stormwater runoff prior to discharge into the proposed culvert extension.
• It was found that the gore area and loop on the west side of US 321 are not conducive
to detention ponds due to the steep grades.
Sheet 7
• Stream impacts - Upstream and Downstream of existing culvert under -Y9- Starcross
Rd. culvert replacement necessary due to intersection improvements.
• The proposed culvert under Starcross Rd. was aligned to minimize the bend in UTI to
Gunpowder Creek which will improve bank stability.
• Intermittent Stream Impacts - Upstream of existing 24" CMP (UT2 to Gunpowder
Creek), due to roadway widening.
• Pre-formed scour holes have been utilized at the outlet of several storm drainage
systems to provide treatment prior to discharge into UTI to Gunpowder Creek.
• Concern was expressed regarding the proposed head ditch upstream (within the
intermittent stream - UT2 to Gunpowder Creek) of the proposed 54" RCP and
placement of Class `B' riprap in the bed of the channel. It was explained that the
riprap was utilized due to the steep slope of the head ditch (4.8%) and to prevent
possible "head-cutting" and long-term erosion that would require future stabilization
by DOT maintenance staff. It was agreed to retain the proposed design utilizing
Class `B' riprap.
Sheet 11
Stream Impacts - Downstream of Culvert Extension @ -YS- U.S. 321 and -Y4-
(Berkley St.) due to roadway realignment.
The downstream extension of the existing 7'x7' box culvert under US 321 consists of
a 7'x8' box culvert utilizing 1 ft high sills spaced @ 20' intervals to provide energy
dissipation within the proposed culvert extension thus reducing the velocity and
subsequently reducing potential erosion at the culvert outlet. It was requested that
"alternating" baffles be utilized to promote fish passage. Alternating sills would
consist of a V high sill for half the width of the culvert and 0.5' high sill for the other
half of the width of the culvert. These different heights will be alternated at each sill.
The design of the box culvert extension will be modified to reflect these alternating
sills as requested.
The 60" floodplain pipe outlet is located within the channel on a proposed bench to
the left of the box culvert inlet (looking downstream).
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Caldwell City: Lenoir
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.89068° ff Long. -81.519780 jR,.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Gunpowder Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water G NW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Catawba River/Lake Hickory
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03050101
Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Q Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Q Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
Therer °`a" "navigable waters of the US." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There rr "waters ofthe US" within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply):'
ct TNWs, including territorial seas
u Wetlands adjacent toTNWs
Relatively permanent waters= (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
rP Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
t: Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
ae Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 3,350 linear feet: 2-10 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0.24 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: jEsta IishedW0
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
Q Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing ihe appropriate sections in Section III below.
' For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 montts).
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.
SECTION 111: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.I. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section HIM below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapenos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section IH.B.I for
the tributary, Section IH.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section IILC below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Is
Drainage area:
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
? Tributary flows directly into TNW.
? Tributary flows through ,iekISi tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pi)cklc;„. river miles from TNW.
Project waters are river miles from RPW.
Project waters are ®R' aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNWs:
Tributary stream order, if known:
' Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the avid
West.
I Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into trbutary b, which then flows into TNW.
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that aoolv):
Tributary is: ? Natural
? Artificial (man-made). Explain:
? Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Piek:Lis
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
? Silts ? Sands ? Concrete
? Cobbles ? Gravel ? Muck
? Bedrock ? Vegetation. Type/0/6 cover:
? Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/ op of complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: ek+IIi
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: -tek
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/yew:
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: iekt =is . Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: c i t. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
? Bed and banks
? OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
? clear, natural line impressed on the bank ?
? changes in the character of soil ?
? shelving ?
? vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ?
? leaf litter disturbed or washed away ?
? sediment deposition ?
? water staining ?
? other (list):
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
? Discontinuous OHWM.r Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to der=
El High Tide Line indicated by:
? oil or scum line along shore objects
? fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
? physical markings/characteristics
? tidal gauges
? other (list):
ne lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
? survey to available datum;
? physical markings;
? vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
"A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily severjurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flaws underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agriculLral practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock otacrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
7Ibid.
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
? Wetland fringe. Characteristics: .
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is. lRNW. Explain:
Surface flow is: EON
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: . ffi. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adiacencv Determination with Non-TNW:
? Directly abutting
? Not directly abutting
? Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
? Ecological connection. Explain:
? Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are , river miles from TNW.
Project waters are aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from:
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the MEM floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
? Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatidwildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if an
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis:
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW).,Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if arty), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section IB.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section ID.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
[oil TNWs: li near feet width (ft), Or, acres.
ft Wetlands adjacent toTNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: UTI scored >30 on NCDWQ Stream ID form.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: UT2 scored >19 and <30 on NCDWQ Stream ID form..
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 3,350 linear feet 2-10 width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWs° that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
El Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has asignificant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Q Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
0 Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
ta Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: Located along the floodplain of UTI.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.24 acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
QQ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisddcctional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters!
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "Seaters of the U.S.," or
o Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
A Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
sa from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
R which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
c Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
'See Footnote N 3.
To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based witty on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet widt It (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands: acres.
NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
(] Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
? Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
R Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Q Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
'udgment (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): li near feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
to Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): li near feet, width (ft).
Lakestponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
? Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
? USGS NHD data
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
2E U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
sy 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
s Photographs: ? Aerial (Name & Date):
or ? Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
® Applicabletsupporting case law:
??' Applicabletsupporting scientific literature:
Q Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
WBS No. (State Project No.): 34783.1
TIP Project: U-2211B
Caldwell County, North Carolina
Hydraulics Project Engineer: David P.
NCDOT Hydraulics Project Engineer:
Project Description:
August 21, 2009
Bocker, PE
Andrew T. Nottingham, PE
This proposed project includes widening the existing two lane shoulder section to four
lane divided curb & gutter section on SR 1001 (Connelly Springs Road) from US 321A
(Norwood Street) to SRI 712 (Starcross Road) east of US 321A. The project is a
proposed upgrade of theiexisting two lane road, an addition of an interchange on US 321,
and a replacement of the SR 1001 bridge over US 321. The overall project is 0.9 mile in
length. There are 2 existing crossings of UTl to Gunpowder Creek and 1 existing
crossing of UT2 to Gunpowder Creek, all of which will be upgraded and extended.
Environmental Description
This project is located in the Catawba Basin, but since the project is not on the main stem
of the Catawba River, riparian buffer rules are not applicable. UT 1 and UT2 to
Gunpowder Creek are classified as class C streams and are not on the 303(d) list for
impaired streams. There are a total of 5 permitted sites on the project, with permanent
impacts totaling 1252 feet of stream and 0.24 acres of wetlands.
Roadway Description:
The proposed roadway cross section is a 4-lane facility with divided median or concrete
island, consisting of 12 foot travel lanes. Several areas along the mainline at intersections
also consist of additional turn lanes required for traffic circulation. The project drainage
system will consist mainly of storm drainage systems, ditches and cross pipes.
Berm drainage outlets will be used in order to pick up off site drainage at the top of the
high cut slopes. The berm drainage outlets will discharge into a 2GI along the bottom of
the cut slope. The 2GI will connect into a storm system and outlet into a ditch.
Shoulder berm gutter will be utilized in areas of high fill and/or excessive runoff. In
these instances, the runoff will be collected in a 2GI and discharged into a preformed
scour hole, ditch or stream.
Page 1 of 2
U-2211B Stormwater Management Plan 8/20/2009
Best Management Practices and Major Structures:
The primary goal of Best Management Practices (BMPs) is to prevent degradation of the
states surface waters by the location, construction and operation of the highway system.
The BMPs are activities, practices, and procedures taken to prevent or reduce stormwater
pollution. The BMP measures to be used on this project to reduce stormwater impacts
are:
• Major Structures
Station -Y5- 31+08 Existing 7'x7' reinforced concrete box culvert under
US 321 will be retained and extended downstream for approximately 214'
and upstream for approximately 646'. Multiple baffles will be utilized
within the downstream portion of the culvert extension to provide energy
dissipation within the culvert. A 60" floodplain pipe under US 321 will be
required to meet FEMA requirements. A benched channel at the inlet and
outlet will be utilized to maintain low flow.
Station -Y9- 10+94 Existing 72" Corrugated Metal Pipe will be replaced
with an 8'x8' reinforced concrete box culvert under Starcross Road. The
culvert will be buried one foot to promote fish passage.
Extended Dry Detention Pond
The interior of Loop C will be utilized as a dry-extended detention pond to
provide treatment of stormwater runoff prior to discharging into the
proposed box culvert extension. The interior of Loop B was not
conducive to provide stormwater detention due to its small area and
extreme slopes.
• Roadside Ditches
The majority of roadside ditches on this project were unable to obtain a
3:1 slope or flatter due to the physical constraints of the mountainous
topography. Most ditches on this project were lined with rip rap in order
to control erosion.
• Rip Rap Pads & Preformed Scour Holes
Rip Rap pads and Preformed Scour Holes were used in order to dissipate
energy and reduce velocities at pipe outlets. These structures are located
throughout the project.
• Cross Pipes
in order to allow for fish passage, cross pipes will be buried a minimum of
20% of the diameter of the proposed pipe size, up to and including 48"
diameter. Pipes greater than 48" will be buried 1 foot.
Page 2 of 2

PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
NAMES ADDRESSES
16 THOMAS SHUFORD & 1229 CAMELOT CT
SYBIL BUFF LENOIR, NC 28645
22 NELLIE JACKSON BLAIR 3144 STONEY BROOK DR
LENOIR, NC 28645
30 LILLIAN WALDROP LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT
4-2-04
BRUNSWICK, OH 44212
31 ELIZABETH C CRAVEN 2785 SMOKEY CREEK RD
LENOIR, NC 28645
34 RENEE TRIPLETT 1508 STARCROSS RD
LENOIR, NC 28645
35 CAROLE K. SWEAT ET AL 1305 HIBRITEN DR SE
LENOIR, NC 28645
36 JOSEPH A GOMEZ A/W 527 N BOUNDARY ST
RALEIGH, NC 27604
38 EDWIN DUARD PRICE PRICE JOHN ALLEN &
MARK TODD
DENVER, NC 28037
60 CALDWELL GARDENS P.O.BOX 1526
HOUSING INC. LENOIR, NC 28645
61 WILLIAM HARTLEY & 1514 WINDSOR ST.
STEPHEN ICENHOUR LENOIR, NC 28645
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CALDWELL COUNTY
PROJECT: 34783.1.1 (U-2211B)
SR 1001 (CONNELLY SPRINGS RD) FROM
US 321A (NORWOOD STS TO SR 1712
Permit Drawing (STARCROSS RDA EAST OF US $21
Sheet 2 p{ I
SHEET OF 08/13/2008
N

C

W
' O

2 N
N
O
d
j y
N
D m N
m
Z N m n

W u U%
W m<
N d 6 EE
d N r C O
'i
t
E~ 4
u
t
i 0
a o
? ^
C
m Z
C C Zj C
m C
H
N Ol
O
?
O
<? N
? y O ? A
1? C

< L d

u?UE v
W ? N
K G a
<o
a ? m
o
m
L
0
0 z
z
E
d
m W E d c
o 0 0 c
0
H
w
w
C T- ?
-- b

€
- -

to c'mcmd
m
._
m
V ?
U
Q
CL
a m
F q q « d
m
? 5?3
W ~ ?
C a o
a

5 c

m
3
W
3 m
a
E-
10 m
? lL d
3
C m
C ? C
<
?
N
m_ N N
€LL N °
3
a

BD
X
F.
0
m m
0 0
0
0
d 2 =
m N N d ? m N d
Ti ? m
m y m ;; , g K q K
2 d
? : 3
v m co p
o fp m
K 0
N
W U Y Y Y
I Y
m m
m c m
m m N
m Cd
m
m
F-
x
"r
lC
K
H
H
7
F-1-
: Q
J J
v
W
?
' O
C N
? J K
N (7 O
N + 1-
W R f
? K 4
N
O Q N t0
+ + O < h
W N
W
O
F N i
l
g N O N i pa
P
Permit Drawing
+
c=v I +m » N < i i Sheet 3 of I
=c.
i N
? U
a
J
J
LL F
O ?
2 N f70 a ?n
C Z O

0

SSSSS
89/88/99
SSSSUSERNAMESSSS
rCO11lTRACT: TIP PROJECT: U-2211B

u T ? N ?r ? f O ? O
O a u
"OD mZ y ?? b

m m
!(p?j M

M Z
a
-

y
_
° O
N
N
N -
y
N _
N
m?
{.
y
>C
R

u >

?
V
E
H
= m
Z ;O

(?

?i

cD D
? l A
o O
• c d
n N n i

ntl
tl II
tl tl
tl tl
O
imno
OC C
?m p A p O A P
o v„1
? as
X
R Z 0
p
M 1~?.
17

•
u
A :k
3:
•I i o Ir
V t
?
?

' O
m O
r ?
_ _
\ pp
C 3
y,,
D', r
Z
1 Z
Gl m
Z
A
y S
a ? ? te' J_
-
?
?
.
M'
Z
ti
w =
'?

I g? 8
'm am
w
I.
0 ? lV
,'r
a m
N
y
y „
Q7 8 r 3 ~ (
?

y
M

m
O
m y

t?
°y m
g
g

Q

`^" yV
?
'1y?d
!9
c
I
a C
O
m
tl A
m N
m L
C)
tl tl ? ?,
. ? x l ? z
M m N 8 6 y O 0 P?0

E
H ? ? we SP ? b y x " C
?

m
a b 03
m
n
N
?'C
b N
f z m z
: •
Q
/
?y

0
o
?
? M
=x
?g u8

m
?
?
x
z
b u
m t" Goi

1
70

• g

4
G) 4

`

? J~

<

,'
n

--?
Vi
N

O o

y
o j
? y (A y 2=5v S
9 -? 8 a CA o o 72 m
M

y
/
!q
G
C Y/? < h
J

a y
e. sa3 tv
'? b my
! na
?
C y
N
a? 8 to 8 x /_ ? `77, ` y m t ? C

N
c
\ I NAD 8395 C a
p
@ &'?
P
? Cr > @

CI
y
m aa
3
F
F ?
B/V/991?i
:z[YSTIYFf fff{ ....
+00.00
ST A.
SHE ° ET 5
M.,TCHUNE SEE \ \ \\\ \\\ \\\\\\ ° °
i P e „IN F?
as -og
sue,[ ?!? ? '[ ?IIII
T3 J` I,
/ I $ -5Nn ?\ ?o ovt ?-
1
.;a P9
S I IIOiY / ^ ? ? ? ? \ _
o \ \ p? ?;
i ens o I - Q h
2 -- v?
2 ue mz of m t m i.
r? o r
^ a? _ 15B 1oN .QC
? a
IJl / 4S pp - - n N
te \ I °° I I.
a a
n
5
a
F-ri
x? ms a * ' / 4jy F
sot/
i; lad
\ v /? R A
Zs - / / o OF
I ?-E i7
I
S
1,1,40
p N?
UNF / _a
sFF s F / ? s? ? ° ?ra ?zo
J ?? s m y m p of i'..4???A0 / 4
ll2?iSSl?1,^F:.::r}cu????ss?>taa?s?? eivisa
r? oA

3
/ n}
?? $ EVa
Ln
m
i
I
A
I
I
WV
?o
s, ?3
- v
n _
z t
ass
4 ? I ,t KE
I ? I ?€
PN. y/ or ? n
u \ C _ _ 'rte,,
- - c
o m
m
_ o
n
y
A .

0
s n? WAIT

t
Y
ns ?`

8
I

M1

\ f

7
\
1
C
40
f
d
B?
g'Z
?? ci ?

M fl
o
SFE SH ?
?
FE „€ r
? ??
rr
?? ?
T
_?` /
^ H ?
AC O19
a 42?1L.M ? i o

zr CD
W 3 I
U
YV
vjI
5
S
1 4
O
S
m
W
0

n
N
O

i.
j..
?kVL901d
f
F
'???NE SEE SyEET
6 -L- STq 42`00
np?
10
3 3 e ? O? ? ? m u ??11IIph$`?? ? ? ? "? ? teI Or / =?TJ 9A
Ia*:
I ? p R ?
m ?
- - all
o
° - 0 45
?I• N 4? 9 ? n• ? y ? Y S
m
A
I Q o p ca v 0
10 I ; n; -Im O
I $I\ ? $ ?o F ,r
I o?
a 1 , _?\
\?_ ? \ I o „ ? ?, ? s ? o ? ? X02 ?6, \
Az
A
1 N
m
A/\• ?,?? ?? I P p NN
c ? ? _? 00
o '
\ y a
\ z3€
` 4 Mr4 m ?y5 ? ?a F." ?r??? s?s? fob '£?Qm?
T--j O AO x?) i? : Vlr?m P ?? z
' 1 I I m o
m?mm =b ??
• lz ?o
n?i?N4 y m np va
I
I !
I
i
I
I I c?
;NflSSffil SfSSfSJf
8/V/9
t
a
d
1
3
V
MgTCHL/NE SE-
E SHEET _ 6
ST
_? A 4
\ 2f0 .00
-
I r ? r '?i E t't
I r - r,
f -
(-Aj 4S

a

? 3 I
?v
I?

9
/ 11 i p if
? a
of if m a s? ez
IRA w
i?N? m y w
{v
1 I f
t
MAY 7.MO - R/W R£VISA'.W'S - PARCEL PP.COMR/NED PARCEL 55 WITH PALM PP WD CRAK.ED THE OWNER NAYErPAWEL %CHANGED OWNER MWE AWES W
55 99TT [[ RECD EXISTING R/W 5 FEET AND MADE THE EXISTING R/W COMTAMLED ACCESS.
tfff i3if t{DGNSHttitf iit{ii{{ B/17/°.
I
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 6 -Y5- STA3I+OOAO
/ sT?2
00
0?
FSY„p /f? of 'r ? / A / •'
o . It'. ,' ? ? I ? I ? of ? •?
S: It
o I
I I ?:
ln?
1 F /. I I:o' / ? '
a
/ N F a
I ?e ?. II ,? Q S5 / ? ff =.
I I I I ? ?
r = v
N y I I ?.
e I I If
p, .. ee ? ? ? e 1 ? t1
!??o?// ? III o?
/ a
II ,
II I? it i? as /
' -.b II II s.
I I I °
6-P
a
r 1 ?? 11 ? ?, /,/?• Q I?'
Nrro St, ? II o€ I ??/?? ? m? u
? 13 91 II Gal l I ? Q
m
o I ?
I Gil
\ 7 / p
oI ° IY - - I
N
- to 71111 II u r o
List
----, II I II 11 ?. / a
I - I-' III 1 ., ,
I I
uvarora pl
YAM T.AOA) RM REV/S5 -PARCEL DE THE INE I PARCEL 55 WITH PPARCEL PP AND CNMK£D THE OWNER NAYFrPMCFL 54CNM'CED OWNER NAYE?PARCE[S 62 & 63.
REp/CEO EXISTING R/W 5 FEET AND YAL1 THE EX/5T/NC RiW CONTROLLED ACCESS.
t
t
MATCHUNE SEE SHEET 6 -Y5- STA3/i00.00
6

4Pj ? x \
I
Q
4tm,\
L?
N m
i
3
3
4
?r
lil
'i?g I I s S
?p A
I
' ? 1 11
e
1 4 ,
I
I ? I ?I
!1 ? - r
n I -'
IK I
? 'JI
I
ua
.>/' -T ; l
1
0
i

1
{r

I
III
?I
0
I yy
L \ ?? ?u
I ?
1
I I ? ?a
1 I 1
o -
i I I ? .p y /
I I I IAM1 \ /
u
1 ? I C /
11 "?
I 'p \ \ S p7 i
G ? F
C O?
r ax
gA

tsttsf$15 ilMppEif
f i
$
11E
SEEMAM ttt
f fLLNttYSitisistitsst 8/231
I
E
1
I I I I
O
O
I
I
I
I

_
O
?i I I

O
O ?
I I
f I
° ? °
I a I I
I

o °
I I

I

i '

I I

I ?. f

II I
I
I
i ; ? ? ? o o
l
I , I ?
? I
I

I I
T N '
N
I
N
P I m
O m ° r p
N V
I O
0
I I
' ?

I
I I I
I N N I O ?'
° '

L
I I I I
I I i.
I
I I
'
I
I
I !
I I 7 I
I ti

N _ T
I ik
m* I
I

m 1„
?
I N ? I z
+ o
° c o

° -S m
I s
I I I I ? I
o I °
z
I I ? e

Z

°
O I ? I
r
co
x
i
o I 1 ?
1 ?
I o
'I
Sssss{$S{YpS TIMES Sttt
S58fIl5E8NAMEf Ef fL
L
rttsiHesste Hii6 8/23/9°
I
O
°
I O
?
I N ? 1
O
O
_
I
? '
I O
O °
I:
I
I ?
?

o I ?

I I
'III I 1 87.29 I 1289.6 '

'
I I °
I
II ?
° 4 I 8
I

it ? ?

J I'l i i
i
W
? /
,
1lJ
?
I + /
N .. P O P O
I V
O N O
N N
I II
II I /
O
I ° O

I I I 1
11 N TI N

I I

Ili I

? I .ti I
i I
I

0

N

m I,
o =
I
c ? °
?I I a Q:
II ? I z

o ff9
>:

I
z °
z
I I I a
o
Z
o
i I I ?
I

1
I ? I o
'I ri
I
I
I
I
I
t
Ell
it
FA
?w v

5/23/2811
N
m
J
m
'g
Oil
H
r
e
0
OR

r
?
i
,I
t
)
,
ffigg

E ; f
;
_
{$
(i
I
N
O
O I
i
__a I
N
N
:q
m
-A
cn
C?

2A-MAY-201110:19 1
r:\roadwayy\proII\u2211b-rdy-tsh.dgn 89108/99
$$SEIbERNAME$$ VI
11CONTWACT- TIP PROJECT: U-2211B

J O
? O Mn
_2 rr
N A N ?
r N ?
N V

n_
m
"'A.DDD T
C
_
n n

e
i 22
O Q
O H 4j
O u

s W
M
r
r
I (n 4
z
N ?. i

i r

°
Elm
]
T
z

n I

gg R mow

3
§
b
~ n

< O o 0

ti C
Z
N O< p

n p II
OC M x
II III II II II
A p O A P a
C
2
rm
4t 3 I? P V "1
R iR OO A a ya
`

QZ x A
_
w . R
N

Q

?

? I
m m

Z Z r
m
2
Q
y
I
z
x
O
„
ti
v
9
Q
n
c
N
r
o
0
0
0
m
H
J? ?I
pG] m
N _"1 p
x
9n
m
1
i
n?
2 I
M
O
0
m y
N
N
P
Q
O
m
w
e
=S
W x
O y
y FE
'G ~
z

li7
c
C) ki
g O k A
k4 I
r
w
ti
b n
b yz
b
ti
N
C n ?
yy
yyy 17
ID
v
a
n
O'
?C
u
n
E
a
m
y
?l
c

f9,

® M

> ?
cn 0-4

9 I
0 (7 '?
i .
a
s
C 5
N
a
5 W
a 1
..

s
f
1
`1I
t I
II
i I
? II
G ? II
aT l
II m
? Z
.y
,: o II
i _ II
' DTI
II
II
II
II
I
I Y
! -N
5
T Ic
N
N
O MM
Q
s o
N Z
ti
t Z
N 0
O
? J I
O
m O v o 0 o A A A 0 C, n n o n
M m m N j N A W N O m v W N A W N
ut A W

1 "m O<a
° y
D y
a% S? t? Ty SY? 1 my9 r
>ya 1a mya ?1? Y?
wya >19 Y
» Y9 ya < <a Oa p m
1 l V A i
V m
% i
>% O 1 ?
n
TO ? _» O mV >v Tt? ?'? >% = t > ta t
? = ? i Z yt w ?
? r [
F ? [
fi>< m>) >) A>< ?» 1>
>< ?>) >><
r » )1 9 ?< e s<>
a 9 '-a
C i>t f> » 9 m9 m1 TYa mi mi
oma AL iO T? mi m9 YO-°? T YO?T ? OA9 Aa m1 oA
y y O-
A
%
O% s
O%
mi

! TN .
%
LO%
rmn
y %% TT
%
l
P
9Z
ey
-??
>Y
"
"?
>
O
y

m

'

i
Z
y
°`

?
S9
_
< 90 i9
_
Y t _
0 > r <qi .
> m,•s• <yz +
m >S n y x
m n <P m m 7-5
Y
Z
>
w
z
Y>
_
s
=
>
'
y
s
m
m m
m
m
m s mTS m s m
° o
>1 °>m >V >? 9 a O? .%
m e a em 9 Oa T ss
O
09 '1 Ti T9 Te >O
w< <Z %
wGZ <? < pZ> 7
> m'> T a 9 T>
y1 z
> y y r Y
r

?

01

f

>?
0

Z

»
y
Z
>?

OY
S
Or

YOy

01
°

O?
m

"mn

O"

°f
m

Y»"

a m?

a
'?
O
M>
° 0?

0

.
G `
m
Po
Y
p Q
O
Y
O
O
Y
0 0

? ° Y
p " » °
i n ai ? se az
s mz me _? am
OOmo °mo mmi mmmo °mo amen is s ?o ?? io ?a
g ma m%
? T ma Mme i
.
? Z ? ° N ? . A ? P ?
v A Om !?T ? T IOT
- TN yTA O O pm ? 9, a.. im m
i ym y a
S (e
» y w W
w n 0C

r 02
T
m
0
0?
N
O
mmC
0
oD
0»
O
T
V
0> O? 0 Om. om m
0 P1 P
Y 09 °i °0 09 °a C 9 C
> O m° ' L
<° m as '? ?? <v? ? ?a^ a? a> Aa^ a? a>> a^ a^ <;
? D
as °° as
°
c as
- - °mo p mo °m p m s . % -
n '
i %
c »• i v i P ° o ivy ws c ..s

Z
A A'm
n
m
P ?> ee en » w
9 a
9
L ia zc
9
O
G
i y- Y9w T
a ?D 9P 9 Z9? O m9 i C 0 (
1
y
9 y
> y y y
s 0
0 O
wm 00 »
m t [>f? r ?» A r L
"»
?
Q
( < O a< < < .
wpC °C °C p; °» Z - pY Z pY ZY
_ m
: °m : » o pY
P< Y
< m< r? T? e
» » yam a° e a^ oA m w
? » ? =T ; =
» A ? _ ?

D
o-m - ° ?a pa o
° •° a c? ° O° . ` m
?
a
?
> >
p P
O 1

? z
n Z
r

m
'E < C 1 9
A W N co N
y co

.. s % % a m ? ? ? O n
u a i '

" ? ? °
°
Y p _ .
a .
a o s

m
a
m
w
p
a o.
o
a
n m
.Y
r m P o
» » a
i " O m 0 O > > v
0 > O y C 0 °
n my ai m

»
y c »
> s m ? ° ie » m °
.
m
a M 0
0
e
<_ <_ M .
m
i
O
jr,
O N
f

a `F
> ? I a• a.
d

m
00 m a I
d ? o
<I ?

+ T S

°o n • I i 3

I
?
D I g

0
N
O
7
m
O
0
CL.
m
d
m
m
A °
A
:
< m
A
o mI m
TI
0

Y_
i
s
y
y
s

? m
» w

{A
S
O
7m
m
S
R_
w
m
d
m
m
v
0
o'
N
7
O
7m
O
7-
O
d
a
m
d
m
{
1 P`Naae.oy 0:20 i
I
I ?
1
I ?I
1
1 I
I
' III
I
I
I I 1

Z•
<
C
ti
'
?
N
S
x ?
O c
p ? m
q m
' m
N m
N m o
q e
? o
O o
N O °
O n
P °
Y °
O °
q °
? ?+
° ?
p _°
?

m
.°.
Z
O
^
.r..
.t
° m
H
H
-

9

m
m m
>
i

a

> X

m
G
?

>

°
v M

n

m

O

!

° r

m

Cl

!

° Y O

y m y
O O
O ° +O

>
m
O O

m
[l O
>
b
(1 '

9
O
p

m m

mN
U
-

° '

9
O
N

m a

p
U

P a

o
G

O 1

9
^
r
m i

^
°

O I

9
M

r
m
m a

?
°

O F?
N

^

r
m
m !

9
O

T
O
s a

T
°

1 ?

T

°
1 9

O

U
° q

o
P

° ?
+
N
O

P
° 9

O

P
m i

e
P

m Y
N
m
°

q
P ?ICII

'? -=1
?O

Z
?a
c
m
i
1'.
?w
7
N C
o m
+ J
w d7
u e
~ ?r
lO m
5 0
y Z
N 0
4
+ Y
N >
N
C
O
1
I

f
i
t

I i
I
G
r N
N
O

p
f ?
O
N
G
0
0
Z

Z
i w O
' u u
+ P
I N
? U
O
I
I
i
i
t I
W
4
Y
mm
9
0
Z
Z
9
ca
a
i?
t t ?C
V O
N O ((?
°o f
0 y V
00 ?
} C
7
u ? C
Y V A
+ +
V N
u G
SO
ss
C
V O n
V O ?
u o ?_
g
0 H
1O lO g
5 1 ?
Z
TT ?
u u ?
a
N q
O O
1
I:

S
tt

}? 41 N
? u
T T C Y U P

u u m
m p

N ?
NI
A ZO O
Y
00 ? F
00
C7

ll
7 i
O m
u
Z
N r.
Z
Z m Z
0

E

?
d
a

i
I
I
I
?I
i
I
o ?
°o
o i- O
O N ?
T
F I
? Z u°II
N o '{ I
+ D
it
l
I
II
it
II
? I

¦
G
O
Y
'
fail
N
+
? c
W c
N ? m
P
r
W m
N m a
P v
r o
W v
N v n
O v
0 v
V v
0 o
U v
? v
W v
N v

+
;
S
m
v
?

L

m w
?

L

O x.T

0
Y

y
>
S
m

m
s
z
Y >
a
Y
2

i
sm

a

>
r

a
m
P

;
(

m
Y
Tm 0
a
S
O N

?

O

P

v +
-
?

O

0

o y 0
a
O a
Y Y
m m

O O +
o

>
m

O

>
m
O 0

>
0
O >
a

N

W

O
v m

0
N
P

O
O S
>
a

N

P

O
m W
a
0
p
W

O
m p

0
N
P

O
0 >
a

w

O
-
O
v a

w
r
O

O
O >
a
-

w_

0

O
m >
a
w

m

O
m N
S
a

w_

O

O
m G
>
a

m
T
O
-
U
> P
a
T

O

P
>
aY

m
T
O

P
> >
a

m
O

YI
O P

o

--
P
O rY

0

O

0
O >
a

m
O

W
m d

0
O

P
m

0

O

P
0 icm
m

ay

?0
O_
E
a

m

fig
1_
nm
I1
t
t
$5

z
T r u
P
+ +
m
W ?
O
u
rF
5s
r r m
+ +
O O
O ?
O
S O
00
z
1 S O
K
T
o
b U,
o m
O?1
G IZ
+"
P
a
y
HO-a"
4
N
z
z
0
A
r?
t 7
z is m I

V
V „
L?
N
P U
P n
> a
F

r r z

T t p
w w
t

N O
W o
o $
W Z
cCV m
G
S
II
t,
Piss , ¦

P
?
_
~
r
4
N
+
? c
q ?
N ? m
P m
? m
P m
N _ m
P o
? o
m P
N o o
m m
m D
Y ?
P ?
q ?
? ?
q ?
N D
?
?m
m
o
-j
D w
?
Z
D x
m
y
;
m 7
y
S
y
a x
'z
m

a
ti °
s
D o

m
D w

m
D a °
o o r
y? --)
w q
n n ..
>
q
n m
>
m
,9 m
>
P
D -

p
q
cOi m
m
N
q
S -

N
w
m a
m
N
Q
m m
N
P
m

?
m
S ?

m
n
H

N
m ?

w
m
M
?
o
m

m
m
> a
r
O
s

T
o
>

P
u
n a
o
P
'?

O
a
n

O
w
m o

P
q

m
u
w ? y

ym
Fi
?C
m

x?
L?
0
z
r o
m
O F
Z =
Z ?
O
a0
i
i 1
i
?o
o m ??
N _
O
w
^q
--1
i O
z
t 0
+
N
G ?
O

s
r
m
Q
O
Z
Z
O
co
s
N
Z
O
t V
s
C
m
Z
O
P
t
• • s
ft"? tf tY?3? ? ?
rr?? m Nttt??t m t ? m
t
+ ++ + + + + T T + o o
N G N O (y? V P S C N j 2 ++
O >' S O F S S O O yq'j O O ? S S G
00oo°u m 0 00 °o g 0 -,
iiOO O '?' i t ?0,?, 0 0 0
Z rp S Zro
ffl I Z fffY 1 II
z `a p o S' q' o s
tT?2?2 ° t? t>> P r
N ?YN11 yN11 m N J I I N T r ????yy
++ y --1 +?+ O H+ N V 4
V O T T N G m N t t G ?+
G _ P O _ V _ G ppp
S O N J S+ Y + N P O
GO ? S O
lu O J 9
O O 0 0 3#;
H
! I
0
O
T
N
n
H
Z
Z
O ?
A I
It
3 3
1 1
T t
A p T
u m
53 i
i ?
T T
N ? A
u }
u u
O 0
O O
nbT
F
N
A
O
Z
Z
O
ca

¦
i
C
ti
'
V
H
a
if
O c
N ?
.? m
P
r m
P m
N _m o
P 0
1 0
tl 0
N _o n
O m
m n
V m
m ?
P m
? m
m n
N n
;

o°

-t

m

.rr.

Z

O %

m
y

;

m >

y
S

a

m

?

`
m P

c
Cl N

°

m

P
m +

°

n

P
m V m

o a r
H H
m m

O fi +O

>
m

O m

>
P
O O

>
O
n >
a

m

U
n m

m
N
P <
(s
-

m

P
m a

m
N
P

0 i

m
N
P

m >
a

w

O
n i

..
+
O >
a

w_

O
m a

.?
r
O

m N
.Y

i
?"?

O
m ;
a

m

T
O
i P

m
T
O

>
I?

m

O
>
?

m

O
P
o tl

o

-
P
A
15

m

O
P
a <
a

m

O
P
m i

o

-
P
m
S

m

O
P
m fT
m
? -si

m
A'S
?mo
c
y r m
m
K
F
N
n
w 1
O
Z
Z
O
N
ny?_
F
m
wy 1
R Z
O
(DM
r
n
IN
w ?
p IZ
Z
O
0

P
A 1 I

I
1 Q a

P
r
m
T
m NN
r
m
mm
N
O y
9 V
O +
P y
y
^9
F M
OO

-1
O
m
?

?
m
a
?
O
m
a y
V
T
3

T O
Z
z
o
Y ?n
,?

T O
z
z

N '
3
p
T O
z
z
O ,'??

T
N O
z
z

O
O N O +
V O O ?
N V ?
O
O ?J
O
N
8
g?
9
8
w
I ?
! < c y a
A a
O a
N _a % c
O L
N L mw Pm m
d Mm m o
u m
A o
d O
N o_ m
0 O
O n
Y fa
0 l'a
u m
A o
d n
N o

+
;
G
T T x w N + m
i + m m m w ; G ; G A N < d < d '
T
m .. % > a - a o > a > a D S D a a a s a i
m y $ ° ' ' m .. s ?+ ' m a - m a - u a
o
y
i
w z
ll ° ° o
a r
y y
D >
m >
O • m
N •
N m
N
+
+
T

0
0 ^ 2
y
2 2 0 m m m Cl [f O m 0 w w N 0 1+ 0 M m 0 O 0 0 0 °

m
0
m
n
O [a
CI
N
N
+
+
+
T
T
O
w
O
0
w
0 S 0
> i P u n m m m ° n ° m ° An
y < u
< . m o n m A m ° j > m m m m IM
u m O

r T
y y

n o
y ?1
D S I D
F ? r
to ? m
S _

w -1

i II I ! $ ?
§
Z f z

O O

1
ny?
F
N
0
Z
Z
O
P

N I
O c I
Z
b
OZ
=
?f
b Jbp' b
y?1?
p3
1
?
3 3
? .
1 1 a 1 1
N
TT> 1
?
T Yi > ao
? N h ? ? N
m
0 0 0 m o?o m w m u v
+
0 00
£ pov
N
N
N
£
? ou
O
l?
p O O t
11 O $
? T 000
p O
10 a 0

1
Iq Z
0 m m
ptt z
0
y Z
0 y
i t z
t j m ?i? V N P N ? w

+ + + +++
0 P m
+ +
+ A
m '.??
u mao a o 0
'o1
u
o,
a?
?C
y
3
r
a
x
ii
d.wA..d,n
4
? 6 ?a r
r
yz ?
a
as
n
S

r
- p SY
Y ? -4

a?
i
F
a
T ? ????pppp++++
S Ir s
t a
a
0 L?
S

9 I:?

,
I
i
n

S

F
s
?e n

3'
Cab
LLGx
b0

°

/ g

I ?

I
I ?
?

i
a ra

oy

p R 44Xnnnnnn
ggg

E
Y
irrr
EWU
5!39
»»rTT
xy -°ci 4F
1
:Y
7
ad aV
xg ?f
ii ss
as
a p
°L.
8x8
aaa
C75
Ott

%
4
i
3R Y a°°
t
? i
F ?a
»sb
6 ^
4
?p4
»st
If
tit + °
tit
e pyJ!``
++ $ 44La
+iig
x88°8

are
pr. p
a a
=sx ¢ [g ?
} 4 ,
III I In
pvvl
?0
a4?S
x x?
a ?
r
4 y
z s4 ?
»6 rq
ga s
p ?m
Q s
i
If
:,
++
as pf aF°
SF<
P7 of ss
xa ,4 I 4

t=T
q
i f
e
?
I88
$aa c
f S

a
'_
°
a
r' [

o
.. l
K
s
4
_
:xa »ss
4m
;
s
8
a s?4
+ »s
f
fE g l

s° 3
3R
s+
a
x
s ?
a
++ ° I
ss a
.,
xx .
e
:»ss

TTtl 0.
.ss g a
a8a Q c
. 66
v
M
D
N

1
i
I.
?-2011\_ 20 I I
I1
I
1
Mlb-.d,
a
BL 9
x ?-a a
I xQ
41, 1 xl I I., J a
Q ° w I I a ?: a
0 Ft
a r-x ? a ? o I ?I ? I i? Q
' x? a tll I?It l n? i o -
a s ??
u ? I
or31BE
I
oaZa s I? h i ??? I °
1 . I I dlx_ Im I?1 vo
f• f_ hj' 1
Q ?Qa °-x- I I I a z' 1,15
I I I I ; II ? - ---
a I I I I; '-,I ? a -
,a I II 1 ? 1; I?? M __ P c
1, elll- I ? II l i; I'? 'l a
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 5 -L- STA/6+00,00
III
?s
H
mrn
VV
iN
i
?I
I.
A
I
,I
IY
Q??
I ?
MAY I? 2W - R/W REVISION - PARCEL SADDEO A.76•Q4NEWAY
1
MAT-CHLINE?SEE?
I I '
x?.x'TPwF? ' IaY '
IaO If
x
f 60 BLR LLl
f, FR
?j 41Ap c .
b \ Z \
\ z I
11 dw
I?

ga
3 g
u °
S

a Ae SYa 16+44/5
1 I I
\ I I I
I I
I
r \
?? 1 I B 1
1
caw \ I
I
7 ? 1 I
i I
I ?
4 I I ? / f
?5 O? ? % as tcs'
(Alt
T 4 -L- STA16+00.00
I 1? 1 ? a
!?- ,--
Ilo
II °
? a 41 ?
M, 1 ??
41 0 Re•c
Ir
1
I I
I 4 I
I I I

h I

$_P
nl
m I I
x
l I I
n , A Q?
1 ?
I ?
°
°
lil
I
t
7
+a
•
J
,
J
ik _ Ii'...._
R

P
5n\,?
V-k X 4 C
I I l
Q p
c? a {E ?V? II V O ?? \ ?a
n 4L
? x
x
rr Ae o
1 _ 141 ? I
?L ? «a \I ?I II II I
• I o I I II 1 ? ?_?
7
I i I 1 .Y %% ?L'S1 ?I 1
S ?I 2 f? ' I 1 1 1
1 1 8 - L5
o ? 1 \ c ? / k?' ? P
1 1 i N
o\ ?\\ 1\ \\ n a ,.p o c ' I ?Y
"Y
it _mua ?%•?G3 __? ?JIf

?\.?" 1 a mmmmm
e \\ \\>? 8 : w A p5
\ .. _Q\\ \\ I` m l I i G
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 6 -L- STA28+00.00 ryl r: F;
?mmm o
e;
1aaN m
a c
i
V OI
m `
;
NNE &8(ND - RIW REVISM - ADDED AN EMERGENCY ACCESS DONE TO PARCEL B
yy
Y- oo11 1 -1
Md.ell\P?o \d211b_rdy_peh 6.dgn
0 100
X 5 -L- ? \ \\ as
9` /oQj 'jam SEE SNEET s \ \\N \\\ ?_
/ ./.
AATcH
pO ice- ° b ?? i\\^i3ry t l
J)I mss
_.--
ns` \
z
O S ,p \ $ C
O . \ p & ry 0 00
rra?I xis ?? $ e •I h- c'.---- a
I I
{{
un,
12 g 69 12 93 4r 1#41
s 09-T F -L
m
mm= ?o , ?a p
rr _ - - - -- - - ----
rn T
Y?law '?.2 ` 1 r .i 1
a Ln
o p cn m -
O?" r o I. ?? N g
? .R 1
aE IQ _
Mrs
N rt\
oti p ? : 11 ? ? ? ? \
1
s *?
a
S 1 L?> I 7
w 8
z
o
it E . I I 1
F
? , o o ' STA ,/ 8 ? o
l

MAY 7,200 - RAY REVISIONS - PARCEL MCNAMGED OWNER NAME,PARCEL 27.CNANGED OWNER NAME AND DEED BOOK IMFORMATKMSAND EXTENDED PAVED ORAEWAY TO
PROPOSED R/W,PARCEL 31 CNAWED OWNER NAME, PARCEL 33 CHANGED OWNER NAVE AND DEED BDOC INFORMATION, PARCEL 3&Shg4TENED GVARORAL ON RIBR?EN TO KEEP
ENTIRE EXISTING DIWEWAT ENTRANCE.
N a
O $?
I ?? I
RJR a
7 ?y
a a'
I I pJS,,J' ? I
I -8001 b
?i
a a
i 1 0
S CF • II•
A 8r ? , s
\pY? I
'?, Ial
I
F ?
sw , _
8?o III ' ?
a ? a X?.Y'? ? ? < A
at
V S a
snyy ?I I? ?e W °•/
a
Rws
al}?a F ICI', '? , f?
?aa * ?
©I?
II?
g L? \
I?
m
o
a
GQ -
o?
c>•
e
O A
q? a
o? G
L T
5
•
i
? r II
aye !:?i
- ,J• In

45 _
A E
?a m •
a?
n• ? 3
y
1
50
1 ? ? I
.w
.l

P?
ZZZZZZ I
I I •
J \1 °
\ ?
(y 1

? 1
a
?
`R R4i
g ap
N ..
yp

i
w
A
'
, I
d m
dU
w Ola
A

N

IU
w O
0

w
A I

,<' 4\
Mii
NimN4
A
i
I
DECEIIDER I,EOKI - RAY REVISiow - REVISI£D EXIS MG RAY DY PARCELS J9 & q. REVISED PROPOSED RAY OR PARCEL JA
REVISED PAOP£RIX DYWER M WE.PROPOSED RAY & PROPOSED ME OR PARCEL In
r
MATCHL/NE SEE SHEET 7 -L-
n ?N
\ a ij \ ? Iry I I 4 ^@@'Q N
3 0 ? \\ '? ? s ? I I Z1
rQ Fla .I
??}}55-- ?. tQ?
f}xT.pa? ? \ r+1
????? \x\ Q III I '
c6 \ p1 1 ?. II
© / l
?C) I li 7 5603/M Y
I C
t T/ Q f? G} it y O
.o E3 ? it a o Q b O
Q?? w 9 .o
d ET o? x'? x x'?pq h
Q I [T ?? l
i?-=?20 b
1 1
1 I
I I
II
I?
II
II
I N
I
I
f
ii
r'

c
m
Mi
?EAA
a
m?mm
N 'L N
a z
0
? I
GIECEMBER LEWO - RM REVISM - REAMED P"ER" LINES QV PARCELS 4.47 b M
201110,21 ,

A

,o
0 N
{°a

?
0
22
zn
O?i {tlZ
Oa"L'

$? 1
uu
u 00
Y / a
bmT ?? V I ?? 7/ /
o ml (? e? & / i O If
VII Zdrsra 10#0awy
d
n
aP?l I I ?-
_x?x xts• wx??l I ?/ ? /? \\z?
_--'----III I /r}i
I I ?'1. 1 m
Q It. ie• cw I^ I h / fi. BAiUpO
z II ? ?lx ?
III/ atle?fi \
'j rC L? CM01
II , , _. V
? ? i I Q ® •,
1 1
co
I b
Z-O
_ __
I e? 1 \\ 1Q © I ? ?? ? ? I r
1 lit
e 1• A ?? "y 1 Q 1, \ ? ?\\
o?e11 I 1 - ? en ?? I, 11 0 0 f/? J
L stars
I ,
• Ir ? •
I ?
It \
•+s
I
I
5 °
t I
MATT
I I?
Sy
® 3 I I I ila ?? ? ? ?
p v e -
' I
r? . ao"c
1? ? ? II*
.em?: e o 8 ? I ?
?'' gas I ?I
o I I a I i
\? c. ester ? I ?
?`?.JJ I g p
fi 1 \ : d
0
s I !
?3 we`e'
SN*
M
?15kp0A0 m w N
N?i'?

x?
III ?0
11;.II???y
H Ml
i!x
REVIMOM
MAY 7,2010 - RiW REVISIONS - PARCEL 20.CNANGED OWNER NANErPARCEL SKSUBON/LIED INTO PARCELS 54.54AAND 5IB.AND CHANGED OWNER NAVE AND DEED BOOK
INPO4VATKMLPARCEL 54ACHANGED OWNER NAME AND DEED BOOK INFOWATION
ja I ; ; gs
l i I,lll /` ?M
°°' l ti % 11 // / l0

f
C
11
0 ¢M ?_ as. l lI l P _ _
aP C y ? \
1 i Q s aE(yp Q-4Y i
I I/ ,
? ¢I I s// ( I ' III ? ? I / , l
Il l II It
u la°??
I 1 / Il , :. a R?_
p111 1 / l1 Ill ` /?/ '.
? O 19? f
Ln I lI 1 /l'.? It
O \ / l I • 1 / rk 5
.. ` I I I I - ? iLZ l
IIIT ,II ? , , ??
1, II It I /IS
I
o//0
1
/ 11
?' aE° I I
s°a' / ? ' 1 f
Q

? I I!
F
a N
7. FI
- v
II // ?,
^, ?'?Isl I/I
g

I x II ? ? ?? I ,?
I l '
U

sl
, c
Y4'
g
I I ?c \ ?
j
96'&ItN ;
I I I I Ln I ..

If I I
.. ..
II -` I 20
1 `_
F '
II Q

1.
It Qoo

AAA
yy
N I
I I
I I I
/ I ?p9 gm $?
S g r

•
r I
R III r°_y
x ''.. ...4
R o
m?=
6x 'I '?21n
I/ ? ?

?
I? Z

EE SHEET 6
-Y5- STA22t00.00
?io, Q
i
z

II
I

O

? I
NN 7.200 - RAY REVISIONS - PARCEL MC M&N£D PARCEL 55 WITH PARCEL £P AND CHANGED THE OWNER NAVEIPARC£L SGCNMGED OWNER NAVE?PARCELS 62 & 63.
RELT.CED EXISTING RAY 5 FEET AND MAX THE EXISTING RAY CONTROLLED ACCESS
MATCHUNE SEE SHEET 5 -Y5- STA3/+00.00
cl\
06 I a? ? , Q
9
°

m I
w
.
a A/ II
0? ° I I
may I? I
? oa?$j \I Ilp
,III
Q A. COW 1 I lj
d?
ICI III
A ?? 1 I
O N /
'2 I
6 Q ?o I I I
O 1 I
a
G3dEl
I $ I '
1
I ? t 4
° Y I --
I
11 >^ L
L -111,
C6 / o

---

i
1 /
ly \n /
I N
I Q ?' O
35
I ?
I
I'
I
I '
I' I
I:
I. C
I'
1
I'
IJ1^
(GIN
V / P
z
$, 40
11. - I p z!w,od
I
7
I I
I I ?? I
I
? I I g ?
I I I
I
I mr I
I I g I
1 1 ? I
? ,I Y
f
I
O e ? 1?ppIy1Y1??QQGG
O
I
0

zl I°
?1aSu??l ? 4I I I?

a
i?
S
i

`f
0
J
N

A
N
P
B
?g3
7
i

N
N
O
m
O
O
m i
k ?Igihl ;
A
A
N
i
i
i
8
9
6
F
it l
? 1. .Y

5
..
I ?.
d4
P
N
V
N
m
n
2
i
i
? O
8
L
O
N
A
N
P
V
O
O
N
O
O
N
O
A
N
P
V
m
`O
N
O
N
N
N
3g?
pyi
9

Z$

9 4

I

1
I ?
Ill. I
r
i
0

N
W
A
W
P
V
CD
?O
N
O
t?
2 2
i
i
? O
8
egg
7
d
0
N
W
A
N
P
V
P
1O
e
i
a

s

m m T M

N

W
-
- -
---------------
--------

A

N

P

V

P

10

N
O

Q TT
V

p
I n
2
N -- -
- n
2
------- - - --------------
-
----- -- --- -

N
N
i

J
N
N
N
W
N
A
N
N
N
0.
N
V
N
m
N
'O
W
O
W
Q
? O
i
0
K
I

N
m
u
ca
A
ca
N
P
W
V
W
co
m
`O
A
O
a
N
A
N
A
A
m M
?S€s34"'E?TR? m
o??o?aoio
n

Q ?

T
O
6
5

i a
t

n

O
N
to Ih A FT
N
9 ? y
g p
y y

A
? R
y
A

n?
n
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

$?N $?
?g
? 0
L S n
ti
n

0
N
O
? i
?:
18
I?? 11,11 -
O FRiff
? r Fi?Fi-FF+
10
I?
IN
N
N
N
W
N
A
N
N
N
P
N
v
N
m
N
`O
W
O
O

N
W

I

' o
I I
I

ro
I?
Ip
p?_

? o

- a '
ro
2 w A? ?: 5