20110848 Ver 1_401 Application_20110911

1
1
I Transmittal
Attention:
' To: Division of Water Quality Date: 09/12/2011 Project No: 50038629
401/Wetlands Unit Project: Greenway Bridges Replacement and
1650 Mail Service Center Removal Project
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Reference:
cc:
1
1
1

0
t

1
1
1
We Transmit: the following:
? as per your request ? prints
? under separate cover ® copies
® by mail ? reports
? by messenger ? studies
? by pick up ? reproducibles
? by overnight carrier ? product literature
? by overnight carrier, early delivery

fl-11 Dewberry'
2301 Rexwoods Drive, Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27607
919.881.9939
919.881.9923 fax
for:
® your approval ? as requested by
? your review and comment
? your file/use ? as approved by
? revision and submission
? distribution ? as submitted for approval by
Copies Date Number Description
5 09/12/2011 1 (2) Pre-Construction Notification Bound Documents for Lions Park
Bridge and Lake Johnsons Bridge.
5 09/12/2011 2 Permit Plan Set to Facilitate Review
1 09/12/2011 3 2 $240.0 review fee check

Comments:
This is the PCN application submittal for Greenway Bridges Replacement and Removal Project
in the City of Raleigh, NC. Please let me know if there are any questions with this submittal. Signed:
Shweta Chervu, PE
Project Engineer
Dewberry
If enclosures are not as noted, please notify us at once S D
EP 1 3 2011
a
°s?WATER
1
u
1

1

1
r-,
?I

Chervu, Shweta
From: Shern, James F SAW [[e-mail]. mi1]
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 1:32 PM
To: Chervu, Shweta
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: PCN Application Submission for Greenway Bridges Replacement at Lake Johnsons Park
and Lions Park (UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
This is covered by NWP 18 and does not require a PCN. I have not yet digitized it into our database but will forward a
job number once a file has been created.
Jamie Shern
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Wilmington District
US Army Corps of Engineers
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure
we continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at
htt):Hper2.«wWp.usace.army.iniUstarvev.htnil .
' From: Chervu, Shweta [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 201110:05 AM
' To: Shern, James F SAW
Cc: Long, Cameron; Kistner, Pam
Subject: PCN Application Submission for Greenway Bridges Replacement at Lake Johnsons Park and Lions Park
I
Mr. Shern,

1

1
Pursuant to our discussion over the phone on August 15, 2011, we are submitting digital PCN applications for Lake
Johnsons Park and Lions Park Greenway Bridges Replacement Projects, located in City of Raleigh.
List of items included in this PCN package are:
• Transmittal
• Consultant Authorization Form
• PCN Application-Lake Johnsons Park Bridge # 74
• PCN Application- Lions Park Bridge # 391
0 Exhibit A- PCN Application- Buffer Impacts-Lake Johnsons Park Bridge
• Location Maps
• Exhibit B-- PCN Application Buffer Impacts- Lions Park Bridge
1
• Record of Communication with USACE.
1 • Plan Set (Zipped file)
Please let us know if you have any questions.
Best Regards,
' Shweta
Shweta Chervu, P.E.. CFM
Project Engineer
Dewberry
2301 Rexwoods Drive, Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27607-3366
Tel: [phone]
Direct: 919-424-3706
Fax: [phone]
www.dewberry.com
1
I
Visit Dewberry's website at www.dewberry.com
This email transmission may contain confidential or privileged information. If you receive this email message in error,
notify the sender by email and delete the email without reading, copying or disclosing the email contents. The
unauthorized use or dissemination of any confidential or privileged information contained in this email is prohibited. If you
' are not the intended recipient and intentionally intercept or forward this message to someone else, you may be subject to
criminal and/or civil penalties. See 18 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.
' Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

1

1
1

1 2

1
1

1
1

1
n

August 17, 2011
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality Wetland / 401 Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd Ste 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Authorized Agent for PCN Application
To Whom It May Concern,
This letter authorizes Dewberry & Davis, Inc. (consultant) to act as authorized agents of
The City of Raleigh in submitting a PCN application for the Greenway Bridges
Replacement and Removal Project - Lake Johnson Bridge #74 and Lions Park Bridge
#391 in Wake County, NC. This letter authorizes the Consultant to sign and submit a
PCN for the proposed project with the intent of securing Clean Water Act Section
404/401 and Riparian Buffer Authorization from the US Army Corp of Engineers and NC
Division of Water Quality.
Should you have questions, please contact me at 919-996-4785 or via email at
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
Lisa Potts
Park and Greenway Planner
City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation Department
Cc: Pam Kistner, Dewberry
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
OF wA
r 1 O`er pG
O T
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information T1
1. Processing ?jµ.
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 18 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
If. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Greenway Bridges Replacement and Removal Project
2b. County: Wake County
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Raleigh
2d. Subdivision name: n/a
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: n/a 1
3 ?? j?
3. Owner Information NR . ny,?
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Carl R. Dawson, Jr., PE - City of Raleigh star
3b. Deed Book and Page No. n/a-Municipal Project
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): n/a
3d. Street address: P.O. Box 590
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27602-0590
3f. Telephone no.: 919-996-3030
3g. Fax no.: 919-996-7638
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page I of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1
1
1
1
1

1
1
1

1
1
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify:
4b. Name: Ms. Lisa Potts
4c. Business name
(if applicable): City of Raleigh
4d. Street address: PO Box 590
4e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27602
4f. Telephone no.: 919-996-4785
4g. Fax no.: 919-807-5125
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Pamela A. Kistner, PE
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Dewberry & Davis, Inc
5c. Street address: 2301 Rexwoods Drive
5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27607
5e. Telephone no.: 919-424-3726
5f. Fax no.: 919-881-9923
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1

1
1

1
1

1
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Lions Park Bridge # 391
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.7950 Longitude: - 78.6140
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: 0.12 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Bridges Branch
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C;NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse River Basin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Lions Park greenway bridge is deteriorating , and was not considered safe for the public use.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0-ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
56-If
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
It is Greenway bridge maintenance project. Lions Park greenway bridge is deteriorating , and was not considered safe for
the public use. Approximately 16-ft of culvert replacement and approximately 40-ft of stream bank regrading for a total of
approximately 55-ft in length.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will consist of a greenway bridge replacement with metal arch culverts. The proposed metal arch culverts will
be buried 1-ft below the existing channel invert. Equipment will likely include trucks, trailers, backhoes, cranes, concrete
trucks, dozers, pavers and pump systems.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
? Yes No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No
? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
1
1
S. Future Project Plans
3a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
3b. If yes, explain.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
1
1

1
1

1
I
L
r_

1

11

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? POT ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts O.Oac
2h. Comments: n/a
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ®P ? T Bridge Replacement Bridges Branch ® PER
? INT ® Corps
® DWQ 14 16
S2 ? P ®T Banks Grading Bridges Branch ® PER
? INT ® Corps
® DWQ 14 40
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 56-LF
3i. Comments: Total Stream and tributary impacts are expressed in linear feet of stream impact. Temporary impacts may
include pump around, rip rap and re-grading.
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1

A

1
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
- Permanent
(P) or
Temporary T 4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable) 4c.

Type of impact 4d.

Waterbody type 4e.

Area of impact (acres)
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4L Total open water impacts 0-ac
4g. Comments: n/a
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then com lete the chart below.
5a.

Pond ID
numb
r 5b.

Proposed use or purpose of 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
e pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
517. Total
5g. Comments: n/a
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1

1

1

1

F

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason for Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
or Temporary required?
T
B1 ? P ®T Project
Construction Bridges Branch ® Nos 386 0
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ? PEI T ? Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: Buffer impacts cannot be avoided due to the replacement of the bridge. It requires a re-grading of the area and
will be revegetated after the completion of the grading.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The project was designed to replace the bridge with the smallest culverts possible while not adversely affecting water surface
elevations for various recurrence interval storms and that care will be taken to minimize impacts to buffer areas during
construction. In order to do that the staging areas have been minimized to the extent practical.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Due to the deterioration of the existing bridge structure, a replacement of the bridge is deemed necessary due to the public
safety.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ? Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ? Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: n/a
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

u

1

?I
3c. Comments: n/a
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete If Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
n/a
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
n/a
6h. Comments: This project is exempt from buffer mitigation.
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1

1

I?
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Existing stormwater discharges are exempt under 15A NCAC 02B ? Yes ® No
.0233. The greenway bridge were in place before July 22, 1997 so they are exempt
from this requirement.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 22%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The overall site plan contain less than 24% impervious surface area considering both current and future greenway trail.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWO Stormwater Program
? DWO 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties

4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HQW
? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1
C!
1

1

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWO Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes ? No
letter.)
Comments: n/a
2. Violations (DWO Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): n/a
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
n/a
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
n/a
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

7

1
1

u

1

l
11
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
E] Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
www. saw. usace. army.mil?W ETLANDS/esa
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
hftp://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh-coral/ims/viewer.htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
www.hpo.dcr.state.nc.us
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: n/a
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA-FIRM
Pamela A. Kistner, PE 08/17/2011
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

O

d C d ..
0? C f' R M

T

- o Y J

Q Li O
N
d
m
No 6 -('j
'

>> „ a a
co

? ?
r°irn
o

3 „> ° d

:3 CO Q` mo
m

o
Q ? N (001

° 0 N W
3 0
O.
R O L
a
N E o N N
U
a) CU
C N c
c
N ?
Z m ao
m
A
' L
?
V f1? C 'p
p m
m o Co
m
MCL NNU) ?IL mm L
U
C L m
a mm?
30?
J I I I 5Y,- °Nd' d?
r Q
E.
410,
x9 f.'

f.
l ,
. ?E
Canadefo -11b,
Lambstwe Fairfax „
Dawns.,' Woods $
,hem 8 R ?b Quail ? a a
to Pf ?} 70 ® gr 3rwund a Meadows
ate Park n ty d Cardinal
O ?? {p Grove
La,uei Brook CO gWWA SRW» 38 Slowecrc
Vp*4 Rd
Trrrty Farm arkwim,
Grey
Park ?
q
3 Carl A?6vm Marsh
Schenck G Belden Creek Park
Memorial Forest
Ernest Acres $,
a '?1gd
Bolton 4'
Cameron
View Ti%vn,-f;
r
ITr h'astcr„9
'? _ 401 Raleigh r C P
Ir Cox" Wheezer Lands En
Place c) v Eaykdu
sryO„ Re Tryon Pees 401 1 ?OnF h
Swartz ° 9a ?a
Ternroon Gpson Pond
SwAt Ridge aaa?TT
02111 Google - Map data C
Lions Park Bridge - Represented as (A) on the map
1
l

1
II
F
LJ
1

1

Phone Conversation with Jamie Shern on August 15 2011
A call was made by the engineer (Dewberry-Shweta Chervu) to talk to the project
manager at USACE Jamie Shern). Here is the summary of item discussed during
conversation:
1. The engineer asked question on the NWP permits determination for their project
areas at two sites- Lions Park Bridge and Lake Johnsons Park Bridge. To confirm
the NWP for the site, the manger asked a set of plans to look at the existing vs.
proposed conditions. After looking at the plans the manager determined that the
NWP 18 is most suitable for the project areas since the impact was less than 1/10
of an acre.
2. The engineer inquired regarding the number of application for the two project
sites. The manager mentioned that for USACE it should be two separate PCNs -
one for Lions Park bridge and one for Lake Johnson bridge.
3. The manager asked question on how the project area is generally referred. The
engineer responded as Lions Park Greenway Trail and Lake Johnsons Park
Greenway Trail.
4. The manager mentioned, per guidelines, PCN is not required for the NWP 18, but
to meet the DWQ requirements the manager suggested that the PCNs should be
submitted digitally.
5. The manager provided contact of DWQ's, Ms. Lauren Witherspoon (791-4251)
and will copy her on the permit approval (determination) email.
6. The engineer also inquired whether the Unnamed Trib to Lake Johnsons be
referred as stream vs. open waters. The manager suggested that the area be
represented as a stream.

FLOW v~
SIDE SLOPES SHALL BE LESS THAN 3:1
TYP. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON 2" SF9.5A LAYOUT PLANS. CUT AND FILL SLOPES SURFACE COURSE- 90% COMPACTION I .eel
SHALL TIE INTO EXISTING SLOPES TO
CREATE AN EVEN TRANSITION. CLASS B EROSION STONE
6" AGGERGATE BASE COURSE (TYP)
Dewberry & Davis, Inc. 2301 REXWOODS DRIVE
SUITE 200
" " NCDOT #5 OR ' ®R ® ~ ~ D HONEH91N9.889939
2 -0 10°-O" 2 -0 57 WASHED STONE LED STONE FAx:s~s.e31.~23 NCBELS # F-0679
SHOULDER SHOULDER J~ DIAMETER OF PIPE OR 12" WHICHEVER
SHOULDER IS IS GREATER
REQUIRED ON ALL
2x TRAIL PROJECTS CLASS B EROSION STO 2% 2X MAX. CROSS SLOPE ~ EROSION STONE 25'
TYP.
® D ® D D 0 D
1 ° GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ILTER CLOTH COMPACTED SUBGRADE CLEAN BACKFILL
ABC EXTENSION SEED AS SPECIFIED ~ C
D D d
GAPACITY OF PIPE = BANKFULL FLOW _OW NCDOT #5 OR #57 WASHED STONE
NOTES:
1. CROSS SLOPE DIRECTION VARIES. SEE LAYOUT PLANS FOR DIRECTION OF SLOPE. STREAM
CHANNEL PLL~I z
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-ESTABLISHING ALL SLOPES DISTURBED BY °
CONSTRUCTION. C~ ~ ~ N
I -
t NTS OC w
o~ Q
NTS ~U~=
„ W~~ 36 Q ~ = 0
°m o HENT T W =
~-I ~Q 3 ~
H ° Z POST SIZE AND DRILLED HOLE SIZE rrooD PosT wioTN Lus zL~ ~ ~ ~ ° DH~p ~ NGC~c.~ Y N J
r p °n ~ to A ~8" DIR. HEx HEAD ~ ~ O ° Tn Z = ~-1 A B HOLE EMBEDMENT (Q. _ r,~" DiA - - - ~ Z = OC ~
a-i -I D SIZE NYLON WASHER v v OC N iv ~ NOLES ~ ~ 36"
~ p ~ ~ Pfl 4. D" 4. D" N!A 9.5 FT. W Q ~ u" g ~ ~
Y = ~ ® O B 4.D 8.0 1.5 4.5 FT. ~ '11 ~=~Z~ r n
Z p r SIGN FACE ~ H gL ~ -O MAX. C7 2 ~ Z ~ ALUMINUM SHIMS t' ' ~ MAX.
FOR TYPE D E AND F SIGNS ~ ~ " NOTES: SEAL
~ ~ ~B" DIR. HEX HEAD "U" CHANNEL CROSS-BRACING ~ > 45°
Z NYLON WASHER DIR. LOCKWASHER ' 1. STOP SIGN SHALL BE RED .WITH WHITE LETTERING.
HEX HEAD NUT ~ , ~ , r,' NCDOT TYPE III LI I AMY

ALUMINUM SHIMS ~ SIGN FACE (FOR TYPE "D', "E" BARRICADE 2. LETTERING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3" IN HEIGHT AND 2" IN WIDTH. D~ NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
~ AND "F" SIGNS) ® ~ DIA B T WASHER ~ ~ OL
~ ~ ~ WASHER ~
~ , A Z C ~ C3
Z ' ~ ~ ~ QRE WAY CLOSED -I m ~ ~ ~ cn CLOSE 48"
H Z ~ ~ LOCKWASHER ~ ~ ~ ~ ® r FOR IVTRUTIO Z ~ ~ OD SUPPORT ~ V- 'RUTIO KEY PLAN
~ r NUT ~ H ® ~ C7
O ® N ~ ~ Z
~ 3 ~ 30" `f L DRUM (TYP.) FOR CONSTRUCTION
-I ~ LOCKWASHER ~ ~ ~ jyI ~ D BACKING p
WOOD SUPPORT NUT ~ PLATE m ~ ® ~ STABILIZER BAF 31LIZER BAR
® H D "U" CHANNEL ~ ~ NOTES:
O ~ ~ CROSS-BRACING Q - NOTES: „ ®
'0 z ~ ROREFLECTIVE OREFLECTIVE SHEETING ON BOTH SIDES OF BARRICADE RAILS. 1. SIGN SHALL BE YELLOW WITH
m ® ~8" DIR. BOLT ~ ' ~ ~ 1. USE TYPE VII, VIII OR IX RET . Q z ~ a}- BLACK LETTERING.
y WasHER ~ ~ ~ 2. STRIPES ON BARRICADE RAILS SHALL BE AL SHALL BE ALTERNATING ORANGE AND WHITE.
Z ~ H ® `-NUT = O RI,1 Z BACKING PLATE ~ e°,,• ~ 2. LETTERING SHALL BE 3°° IN HEIGHT SCALE NTS/AS SHOWN
~j LOCKW HER J C'3 ~ AND 2" IN WIDTH. p
'PI ' ~ C7 Z p Z t-a
UJ ~ ~ IaI I- ~ LOCKWASHER NOTES Z M ~ I I ~
~ ~ , 'a \ NTS 2~~~
z NuT f~ ~ ~ ~ 1.4 X 4 WOOD POSTS ARE ACCEPTABLE UNDRILLED, AND CAN BE USED AT ANY LOCATION WITHOUT GUARDRAIL PROTECTION. ®k~f~• ~ ~ ; ~s~vsr 4u~~
"U" CHANNEL CROSS-BRACING ~ 2.4" X 6" WOOD POSTS MUST BE USED WITH GUARDRAIL PROTECTI OR DRILLED . ~I H
\ TO MAKE THEM BREAKAWAY.(DRYLLED WITH 1~" HOLES, PERPEN ICULAR TO ~,e
THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL, LOCATED 4" AND 18" ABOVE THE G OUND} ~
SHEET 2 Of 2 3. USE "U" CHANNEL POSTS FOR CROSS-BRACING SIGNS SUPPORTED BY DUAL WOOD SHEET 2 OF 2
POSTS. 903.20
~ + FOR REPAIR AF SILT FENCE FAILURES, USE
o TREE PROTECTION AREA FOR ANCHOR WHEN SILT
T No. 5T WASHED STONE. FENCE IS PROTECTING
DO NOT ENTER I CATCH BASIN.
~ _L.
APPROVDED DEWATERING DEVICE. PROVIDE POSITIVE WARNING SIGN DETAIL e' MAX.
DRAINAGE TO STREAM STREAM DNERSION VARIABLE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGNEER
PUMPS STEEL F STEEL POST
D15CHARGE H05E5 NDVE1d aaRN - WOVEN WIRE FABRK: WARIONC SIGN
SILT FEI~E GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TREE PROTECTION AREA No. DATE BY Description
P INTAKE HOSE = MIN. IO GA. DO NOT ENTER MIN. 12-1/2 GA. REVISIONS
TO CHECK DAM ~ s o P DEWATERING PUMP ~ a $ d c_ flLL SLOPE LINE WIRES NRERMEDIATE $ WIRES
• s ~ SN.T FENCE FABPoC DRAWN BY J K D
' A A .nm' ,y!°°~~:~~ INSTALLED TO SECOND aNi ~ ~ ' GRADE WIRE FROM TOP PAK
f FLOW DESIGNED BY
FLOW s -.r NTAKE HOSE s' MM. covER ~II~In~I~~IU~II~~III~~~IVF I~III J
4 OVER SKCiT + CHECKED BY
CLEAN WATER DIKE U11UTY INSTALLAl10NS AND OTHER PUBUC FAgUTIES, N EXTEND WIRE 6° MIN. INro TRENCH MARCH 2011
SEDIMENT DIKE INCLUDING SIDEWALKS AND HANDICAP RAMPS ARE TO BE ~ SUMP-HOLE OR POOL CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS AS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY . , , . . • ~ (12" to 18" DEEP 2' DIR.) CODE. THESE FACILITIES HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE ~ AND ANCHOR SKIRT AS DATE DIRECTED 8Y ENpNEER +
WORK AREA CITY ~ RALEIGH AND SHALL BE 50 INSTALLED UNLESS A SIDE VIEW VIEW _ FRONT VIEW rITLE
PUMPS SHOULD DISCHARGE LENGTH NOT TO EXCEED A CHANGE IS AUTHORIZED BY WRITTEN APPROVAL PUBUC ONTO A STABLE VELOCITY THAT WHICH CAN BE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS ARE TO BE RECORDED PRIOR NOTESe
DISSIPATOR MADE OF RIP RAP COMPLETED IN ONE DAY TO FlNAL ACCEPTANCE. OR .SANDBAGS ~ m I. WARNNG SIGNS TO BE MADE OF DURABLE, WEATHERPR~F MATERIAL L
SIGNATURES: ~ 5 m 2. LETTERS TO BE 3' HIGH MNMUM, CLEARLY LEGIBLE AND SPACED A5 OETAK.EDo 3. SIGNS SHAH BE PLACED AT 50' MAXIMUM NTERYALS.
PLAN VIEW ~ o ~ p 4. PLACE A SK~i AT EACH END OF LINEAR TREE PROTECTHN AND 50' ON CENTER THEREAFTER.
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ti c ~ y C 5. FOR TREE PROTECTION AREAS LESS THAN 200' KV PERAIETER PROVNE NO LESS THAN ONE SIGN PER PROTECTION AREA.
o ~n c ~ ~ 6. ATTACH SIGNS SECIN~LY TO FENCE POSTS AND FABRIC. ~ y n y T. MAINTAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE THROUGHOUT DURATION OF PROJECT.
PUBUC Ui1LITiES ~ y ~ ~ ~ L~ ~ ~ ~ ~ B. ADDITIONAL SIGNS MAY BE REOU1iE6 8Y CITY OF RALEIGH INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT BASED ON ACTUAL FIELD CONDRKlNS. r ~ 9. PLACE A SK;*1 AT EACH END OF LINEAR TREE PROTECTION AND 50' ON CENTER THEREAFTER
D r O IMPERVIOUS SHEETING STORMWATER ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ 10. FOR CON~TIONS WHERE PRACTICE APRIESf PLANMNG CONSIDERATIONS f HOWEVER FLOW SHALL NOT RUN PARALLEL
-I m~a $ 0 8 0 ~ wITH THE FENCD AND OESICId CRITERIA. PROJECT NO. 50038629
BASE FLOW + 1 FOOT PLANNING ® v °m n WORK AREA (2 FOOT MIN.) ~ o ~ ~ a 7 Ifl n I I. EIS OF ALT FENCE NEEDS TO BE TUIOJED UPH9.L.
a ~ 12. SEE N,C. STATE DENR PRACTICE & SPEgFK:ATKXJ SEDIMENTS FENCE SECTION.
z~~ n m 11 FOR CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIESI PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS.
m= ® An = 13. SEE N.C. STATE DENt PRACTICE & SPECIFICATION SEDIMENTS FENCE SECTION.
zm~ SECTION A-A n (HOWEVER FLOW SHALL NOT RUN PARALLEL WITH THE FENCE) 0
m >Zc
cross SECTION of SANDBAG nlxE NOTE: ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS C~l 1
< STANDARD TEMPORARY SILT / TREE PROTECTION FENCE
TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF RALEIGH DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
N.T.S. SHEET N0, 11 of 17

4' 8' MAX
MAX
WOOD FENCE DETAIL
PIAPn CANOPY, ORIPIJNE 4 X 4° HOOD POHIS
1` X 4' t RABS Ef~tING PLktF Dewberry 8E Dais, Inc.
LBlR OF CAM'A+Y, ~iIPIB~ ' MAX 2301 REXWOODS DRNE SUITE 200
9 RALEIGH, NC 2717 5~ PHONE: 919.861,9939
6' MAX. ' „ FAX: 919.881,9823
VARIABLE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER NCBELS # F-0679 1 -0 DEEP BED OF CLASS A RIP-RAP
..,i i; ' I II ~--5' MI SPLASH PAD CONSTRUCTED ON
i~ ~ I DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF SILT FENCE
MIN. 12-i/2 GA.
PLAN VIEW OF PROTECTVE FENCING ~ ~ ii ~ INTERMEDIATE AROUND 51NGLE TREE- EXPAND A5 NECESSARY MIN, 1o Ga. ; wIREs MAINTENANCE
LINE WIRES 1.INSPECT STABILIZED OUTLET ONCE PER
SI FE E f RIC , ~ t2' IN A TO ECO D 1NHH PRDi6lT10N ANBA MN1~, WEEK AND AFTER EVERY RAINFALL EVENT
12° m Im'r ewreR it 1 /2" OR GREATER.
12° li GRADE 2. REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM OUTLET AND
2° X 4° HORQ. IA~OD RWIS I . ta• ~i, I~i REPLACE STONE AS NECESSARY.
I' I: 40° 3'-0"
I d0. i d' . i'''. MN a ` i~. L ILT C
~T TREE PROTECTION AREA ,I, a' 1 B" s I N.T.S.
PERFORATED P ETAIL ra DO NOT ENTER ~-__t.~
_ ~
WARNING SIGN DETAIL ~-STEEL PosT SEEDBED PREPARATIONS
ill1; WOVEN WIRE FABRIC W
IIII! SILT FENCE GEDTEXIILE FABRIC ~;;1, 1. CHISEL COMPACTED AREAS AND SPREAD TOPSOIL MINIMUM 4INCHES DEEP OVER ADVERSE SOIL _ ® o
NOTE: j'i PtMn CANOPY, OAI~,INE I' ~ ~ CONDITIONS. _ ~
-USE SILT FENCE ONLY WHEN DRAINAGE AREA ° ill ~ FlLL SLOPE * DOES NOT EXCEED 1/4 ACRE AND NEVER IN ~ I FOR REPAIR OF SILT 2. RIP THE ENTIRE AREA TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. ~ ~ ~ Q W
~ AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOW ~ ~I~~ z ° FENCE FAILURES, USE i ~ No. 57 WASHED STONE. 3. REMOVE ALL LOOSE ROCK, ROOTS, AND OTHER DEBRIS LEAVING SURFACE REASONABLY SMOOTH AND ~ W ~ J
-END OF SILT FENCE NEEDS TO BE TURNED UPHILL. I ~I' 8' MAX. .i iv •v.°•9i FOR ANCHOR NMEN SILT I;~' M GRADE FENCE IS PROTECTING UNIFORM. M ~ c~ ~
VARIABLE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER i~ CATCH BASIN, ORANGE, UV RESISTANT, 4 BELOW*)GRICULTURE UME, FERTILIZER, AND SUPERPHOSPHATE UNIFORMLY AND MIX WITH SOIL. (SEE ~ ~ W
IGH -TENSILE STRENGTH, `si POLY BARRICADE FABRIC (TYPICAL) 6" MIN. COVER
i .i EMSIR~ RAN! ~ OVER SKIRT * IJMR OF CANOPY, BRHAJNE iv 5. CONTINUE TILLAGE UNTIL AWELL-PULVERIZED, FIRM, REASONABLY UNIFORM SEEDBED IS PREPARED 4 ~ ~ ~
jt IN 12-i/2 GA. I IL L L L L L L L L L L L L+ WIRES ~I~ ANCHOR SKIRT AS TO 6 INCHES DEEP. w~p
MIN, 10 GA, DIRECTED BY ENGINEER LINE WIRES I' L L L L L ~ "RH" L L L W W =
I LLLLL ~ ~ eN~R L C92pNGE W RESISTANT 'gyp 6. SEED ON A FRESHLY PREPARED SEEDBED AND COVER SEED LIGHTLY WITH SEEDING EQUIPMENT OR ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CULTIPACK AFTER SEEDING.
- T NSILE STRENGTH ~ " ~L L L L L L`. L L L L ~ppLY BARRICADE FABRIC (TYPICAL)
GRADE I E 3: n~'' Ij N ~ 7. MULCH IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING. ANCHOR MULCH AGAINST WIND. ~ W
WARNING SIGN 8. INSPECT ALL SEEDED AREAS AND MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS OR RESEEDINGS DURING PLANTING SEASON
'I jj PLAN VIEW OF PROTECTIVE FENCING IF POSSIBLE. IF STAND SHOULD BE OVER 60~ DAMAGED, RE-ESTABLISH FOLOWING ORIGINAL UME,
AROUND SINGLE TREE- EXPAND A5 NECESSARY NOTES FERTILIZER, AND SEEDING RATES.
i. ALL PLANTS TO BE SAVED SHALL BE 9. CONSULT CONSERVATION INSPECTOR ON MAINTENENCE TREATMENT AND FERTILIZER AFTER PERMANENT
PROTECTED BY FENCING AS SHOWN IN IN THIS DETAIL COVER IS ESTABLISHED. SEAL
2, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL FENCING ¢ APPLY: AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE - 2 TONS/ACRE (3 TONS/ACRE IN CLAY S~LS)
PRIDR TD BEGINNING ANY CONSTRUCTION CITY OF RALEIGH CITY OF RALEIGH FERTILIZER - 1,000 LBS./ACRE OF 10-10-10 SUPERPHOSPHATE - 500 LBS./ACRE AT 20~ ANALYSIS
OR GRADING ACTIVITY, CENTRAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CENTRAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MULCH - 2 TONS/ACRE OF SMALL (MAIN STRAW AA v
3, CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL FDR INSPECTIDN AND APPROVAL OF PROTECTIVE FENCING REVISIONS DATE: 7/3/00 DRAWN BY. JTB REVISIONS Darr: 7/3/00 DRAWN BY: J1H ANCHOR -ASPHALT EMULSION AT 300 GALS./ACRE RELI ' /y I
PRIDR TD BEGINNING ANY CDNSTRUCTDIN DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRQCTION
DR GRADING, PLANT TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE SILT FENCE ~E ~ o r
4, PROTECTIVE FENCING SHALL BE LOCATED AT DR FENCING OUTSIDE DRIPLINE OF TREES AND 1' MINIMUM I,E 1: TE ® RY SEED T TABLE 2: PERMANENT SEED
OUTSIDE SHRUBS DR OTHER PLANTS,
STD. # 50.02 STD. 40.04 ._,~n.,..~,
Wirrter and Earl wirer and Early Sing ?
Seeding Mixhn aed111g PC11;'tUCB KEY PLAN Seeding Mixture ~ { Spr Rata il~tacr~)
S cie! Species Rate lblacre Tallt~b r tin
Rye (gr. Rye (grain) 3D - 40 5erlc 1~ ~ °~edeza ~7+; l
Kr:taa i~sped~za 1 G
GUY+ NOTES; Seeding dates
ROOT BALL 9, INSTALL ~ ITEMS ONLY IF REQUIRED Seeding dates 50' MIN. ~gTES; * 2. REMOVE ALL TAGS, LABELS, RIBBONS January 1 -May January 1-May 1 ~e~ding Ils3te~
CIENT TO KEEP t. PUT SILT FENCE OR TREE PROTECTION FENCE UP STAKE AND ROPES FROM TREE BUT SUFFl ' ' 3. WATER THOROUGHLY TWICE WITHIN THE 1. In Eastarrl PiBs'-r•ni~t a ~ ~ IC>'~a~•n Pensacola S~hiagrass cr 1 ~ ib~acru commE~n Bermur. ~gr~ss U ~ ~fr:mon Bormudagrass only vthor~ it :sun-
SEDIMENT ON SITE TO ENSURE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IS USED. A'?`' : FIRST 48 HOURS Soil Arr~ndanerrts iiksly to become a E}est. I
. 4. PLANTS TO BE PLANTED 4° ABOVE SoilAtnendanen Y';~,;;,:,,ti,;ar + r~.:;+;'b;,,..*I,~r,,. : 2. IF CONSTRUCTION ON THE SITES ARE SUCH THAT :x'. ;y„ ,,;i.t:t, fa,;,: ADJACENT GRADE TO ALLOW FOR ~ Follow recommendations of soil tests, Attar A~~q. g 6 use uns r'`i senr,~A Seor?,
•I : ~ VEHICLE TRAVEL- Follow recomme. ..,•;y;;1~, ,.r!,',,s.~"'," •,~..~;,y;,; THE MUD IS NOT REMOVED 8Y THE ',+•r;•. ,,;t;,:: CENTER DRAINAGE ~ SETTLING ING OVER THE STONE THEN THE TIRES OF THE ' ~ OF TREE 5. NO SOIL SHALL BE PLACED ABOVE G.'!Nhare ~ neat appears Me .desired, rrmit s~ricea and subaiitute G Ibla=rty P,t~iagrasa or 1S i-~!r ; Bermuda0rass, ~ SCALE NTS/AS SHOWN
25 OR WIDTH OF EXISTING ~'°`'t"~~'+~CLASS A STONE TO BE USED`, VEHICLES MUST BE WASHED BEFORE ENTERING THE R00T COLLAR + .ti PROPOSED STREET, PUBLIC ROAD. PLANTING PIT MUlch Mulch To a~l~nd spring goading lotus Into ~lunso add 15 lla,~acre h~rllr ' ~
ROADWAY .;^.!'~~I' i1~a:,:~`"l';'a•i~+xy', WHICHEVER IS . . ; Y' • h ,i 4R~'' , . APpIY 4, OOO lb/a Apply 4 000 lb/acre straw. Anchor straw by tacking withh polymer or a udagrass~ Howevor, it Is preferable to ss~ed temporary rover ae,~ ~ q
i„r,;•a`°~~'~'.: . "y; •r ~E°'~R' 3, IF A PROJECT CONTINUES TO PULL MUD AND DEBRIS PREVAILJNG WIND 7• •rr.r.:.r+,+"+•°'. .,+,r`r•r'k'' .'°~•^,.r~;•a. mulchanchorin ~ ' feseueinSept. ~ mulch anchoring tool A disk with blades set nearly straight can be used
^r''~, + n"• ON TO THE PUBLIC ROAD, THE GOVERNING AUTHORITY .:a~~w WILL CLEAN THE AREA AND INVOICE THE FINANCIALLY PLAN VIEW ~ s,~,;.(,,,n;.,;,:,,.•~,°;,;r,,. +v _ IPER A asamulch as a mulch anchoring tool $+Il1t'",,a£! larttS ~ ~ ~ ~
',.i;~~~r+'• • r AS INDICATED ON THE FINANCIAL NTS EASTERN RED CEDAR JUN USYIRGINIAN anoho RESPON`~BLE PERSON ( ) RESPONSIBILITY FORM. 2° CALIPER SPECIMEN TREE, SEE PLANTING SPECS, Between Mai 9 and Aug.1'' ~Q I>aracre Germ~a~n millot or i~ I" ,rr~ I ~
SudanGr~ss, Prior to May . ' ~ ~ - A~~q.15n add 10 #t~Cacra rk / OEM .
U CH 2" TO 4" DEPTH, Maintenance BARK M L , Maintenance ~ ~ ~ / t~ ,~DSp,Np~W
DO NOT MULCH W/IN G° OF TRUNK Refettilize ifgraY~ Refertilize if growth is not fully adequate. Reseed, refertilrze acrd mulch im- ~dlr1~ d,St~g [ r t,
mediate ~ follawn 3° HIGH SAUCER mediately following erosron or other damage. R~ ~ I~osslbla ~ y~ , Fall: AEf{~, ~ r • ' ; ` .°c ~ t~U~, ~0 - ~f;1, ? s
GUY° Tabie 6.IOa Tempo Table 6.IOaTemporarySeedingRecommsndationsforLate K~:titer and Lats~~nter. Fnb 1~ - fk'i.~r, 1 I°~b, $ ° ~^T. 1~
Early Spring -NCi 35' MIN. 15' MIN. NEW CONSTRUC110N EarfySpring -NCDivtsion of Land Resources Land Quality Section ~ I'~li IS tSt for t~ii t8 rd l~tE' wlnterfor i. ~varsaaE~lrlq Kobe losp~ade~aov d~,~Jtallfiescuesve ~~~etfu~,Useunirut~ad
Erosion and Sedim EXISTING ROADWAY FlNISHED GRADE Erosion and Sediment Con7roiPlanningandDesignManual. B~rtrt~{i~,~rs1"sCz~4~'4; ~ ~ .
.•t PLACED ABOVE THE GCtlf pi11G1't5~'t~tE'r1$;~y
' ; , ; ROOT COLLAR. 12° MIN. ApP~ line and v ~i ~i,*~r a~rr~ing to arff 1~~s'= r- 'pRly ~,;n;a~
6° MIN. ;,5: r STAK x,;'.,, ,~~;r;. rJroundagricukui,Ill~~~nrt,~noand 1.40ty14~1;,~,i ~Ita-lQfnrtll
PLANTING SOIL `
SEE SPECS. PLACE IN 12° LAYERS. ':;4s;:, i fidulCh
FABRIC UNDER STONE LIGHTLY TAMP & WATER I REMOVE ALL WIRE, EACH LAYER, TWINE, AND BUR- APp~' 4,COG-S,OtiO Italacru grain strew, of ep~aivalarlt c~t+er of :I,.:,, suifable mulching malerlal. Anc(~or mulch ~ tacltin~ w~h aspl-~~`t, i~~,~l,
LAP FROM UPPER or netting. NelttnrJ is the preferred anchorinC nretfrod can stnop slol ~ .
CROSS SECTION 1/2 of RooT 5,~,~r Sinnnre r
PLANTING HOLE BALL MIN. 3 TIMES DIAMETER SeedUTg 1Vi'xhU Seeding 1Viixture l,haintpnanc~ No. DATE BY Description
OF ROOT BALL Specie; Species Rate blacre Rofnrt?iaa in 1hEr seoand year unless Sravtth is fully adcquE~te. May be mawod r~nce rart3wice a year, but mowisrg Is nit na~ssary. Pleased, fern- REVISIONS
CTerman Orman Meet 40 i7a, and mulch damaged areas ntmsdiatAiy.
1FtetartnAppendix8.tl~torbt~:anicalnarnas. DRAWN BY JKD
~ NTS ~ ~ ~ ~ Seedi dates Seeding dates DESIGNED BY PAK
NTS May 1-August May 1-August 15 JLL
CHECKED BY
Soil A?nendaren ~ UTILITY INSTALLAl10NS AND OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES, DATE MARCH 2011
PRUNE CROSSED, CROWDED Follow recomme Follow recommendations of soil tests. INCLUDING SIDEWALKS AND HANDICAP RAMPS ARE TO BE
BROKEN OR LOW BRANCHES; NOTES: CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS AS SPECIFlED BY THE CITY CODE. THESE FACILITIES HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE TITLE
STREAM WIDTH CUT FLUSH 1. REMOVE ALL TAGS, LABELS, Mulch CITY OF RALEIGH AND SHALL BE SO INSTALLED UNLESS A I
VARIES) LEAVE CAMBIUM EDGE CLEAN RIBBONS & ROPES FROM PLANT Mulch ( 2. WATER THOROUGHLY TWICE W/IN Apply 4,000 lb/sore straw. Anchor straw by tacking with polymer or a A CHANGE IS AUTHORIZED BY WRITTEN APPROVAL. PUBLIC
THE FRST 48 HOURS Apply4,0001b/a BARK MULCH 3. PLANTS TO BE PLANTED 3° mulch anchoring mulch anchorin tool A disk with blades set near stra t can be used SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS ARE TO BE RECORDED PRIOR g ~ ~ TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
2 - 4 DEPTH ABOVE ADJ GRADE TO ALLOW as a mulch anchoring tool
FOR DRAINAGE & SETTLING as a mulch ancho RIP RAP ENTIRE BANK INCLUDING 3° EARTH SAUCER 4, NO SOIL SHALL BE PLACED SIGNATURES:
TOE OF SLOPE AND TOP OF BANK ABOVE ROOT COLLAR Maintenance TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
FlNISHED ADE Maintenance Refertilize if groU Refertilize if growth is not fully adequate. Reseed, refertil¢e and mulch im-
mediate followi ` 13` mediately following erosron or other damage. PUBLIC UTILITIES

DO NOT PLACE RIP PLANTING SOIL, / 'N!a' r • Table 5.I Qb Tem c STORMWATER
GEOTEXIILE FABRIC P RAP IN STREAM ~ SPECS.° Table 6.IQbTemporarySeedingRecommendationsforLateWinter and PROJECT N0. 50038629
RFO EXCEPT AT PLACE IN 6 LAYERS. ~ EarlySprdng-NC, EartySpring -NCDtvlsion ofLandResourcesLand Quality Section PLANNING
24" TOE « LIGHTLY TAMP & WATER 12 Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual.
EACH LAYER. Erosion and Sedim MIN.
NOTE: ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS C~l 2
TVTIC""AL RUP RAP DETAIL TYPICAL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH CITY F
NTS NTS
RALEIGH DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHEET NO. 12 of 17

UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AND OTHER PUBLIC FACILmES y'®~ .i. INCLUDING SIDEWALKS AND HANDK;AP RAMPS ARE TO BE
CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS AS SPECIFlED BY THE CRY
CODE. THESE FACHJTIES HAVE BEEN APPROVED 8Y THE
NEW WORK LEGEND Ctil' OF RALEIGH AND SHALL ~ SO INSTALLED UNLESS A
A CHANGE IS AUTHORIZED BY WRITTEN APPROVAL PuBUC Dewberry & Davis, InC. SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS ARE TO BE RECORDED PRIOR 2301 REXWOODS DRNE
ASPHALT TO FlNAI ACCEPTANCE. SUITE 200
RALEIGH, NC 27607
SIGNATURES: PHONE: [phone] FAX: 919,861.9923
0 0 0 CLASS 1 RIP RAP ll~ TRANSPORTATION SERVICES NCBELS # F-0679
L', ~t
E, ~1~ ~ PUBLIC UTILITIES
a ~ ~ ; CONCRETE k~s a, STORMWATER
4 ~ I: . a: ~'`5~
CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE BARRICADE ONCE APPROVAL PLANNING
HAS BEEN RECENED FROM THE CITY OF RALEIGH PARKS & TP
RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND RETURN-1`HEM TO A LOCATION TREE PROTECTION
SPECIFIED BY PARKS & RECREATION: (TYP OF 2)
NOTE: ALL MATER LS AND CONS UCTION METHODS SHALL S I ICT
I~ E i' ~ C DANCE WITH CITY F EIGH DESIGN STANDARDS AND
COIR MATING 0 a ~ o EIFITIONS. a U
SAWCUT & MATCH EXISTING GRADE U z 2
PA PUMP AROUND
V
CORRUGATED METAL HEADWALL PA-D PUMP AROUND DISCHARGE
W/WINGWALLS (TYP) NOTES: rWR z o
1. PROTECT EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN AND OTHER i? Q ~
/ I ~ .a UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. IF TERRA ~ a
, , ~ / \ METAL ARCH PIPE W HEADWALL COTTA (VITRIFIED CLAY) SANITARY SEWER PIPE IS 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATION - ~ ~ Q w z
EXPOSED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE TERRA COTTA OF EXISTING UTILITIES IF REQUIRED DURING INSTALLATION OF ~ ~ J PIPE SHALL BE REPLACED WITH DUCTILE IRON PIPE NEW WORK. ~ ~ ~ 0
/ \ ~ . FROM NEAREST UPSTREAM MANHOLE TO NEAREST 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL PERMITS AND APPROVALS PRIOR Q
DOWNSTREAM MANHOLE (WITH SAME LINE AND GRADE). TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. ~ ~ C) ~ ~
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ALL GREENWAY TRAILS 11. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY BY DEWBERRY do DAVIS, INC. AND ~ ~
` \ LIMITS OF RIP RAP. HATCHING JOINT AND MATCH EX. CONCRETE ~ • NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY TYP DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO ADDITIONAL WAKE COUNTY GIS. ~ ~
d ~ COST TO OWNER. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN CONTINUOUS SEWER SERVICE TO ~ ~ z
~ L4 PROTECT EX. MANHOLE 3. EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT FORD THE STREAM. PROVIDE EXISTING RESIDENCES AND BUSINESSES THROUGHOUT LU = TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING. CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT. z ~ c~
4q,,~ AND SANITARY SEWER E 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR, GRUB, AND PRUNE 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE GREENWAY CLOSURE AND ~
~ X42 f VEGETATION TO THE MINIMUM EXTENT NECESSARY TO SIGNING WITH CITY OF RALEIGH PARKS AND RECREATION. ~ Q w ~
2 SHOULDER (TYP) 1 CONSTRUCT THE WORK. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE IMPACT TO STREAM DURING W
~ ~ 1 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT FROM CITY PRIOR TO GAINING CONSTRUCTION. ~ ~ ~
, ACCESS TO THE SITE. THE PLAN SHALL BE CERTIFIED 15. IF NECESSARY,. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
- _ BY AN ARBORIST. TRAFFIC CONTROL ON LEHMAN. 5. DISTURBED AREA = 0.12 AC
~ .....y PA 6. ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED AND WORK PERFORMED SEAL ®Nenw®®®t
SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY OF RALEIGH ~ A R~
' fNVERT 237.75 ~ STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, .SEE CORPUD ®®®®.'~t~~,o~~SS~O~ ~~~ee`®®
~ ~ • LIMITS OF RIP -RAP. HATCHING- HANDBOOK, CURRENT EDITION.
;°2~4~~,5. _ _ . NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY(TYP) i,~ '124E7 ' 7. EXCAVATION AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED
1 \ _ • c~~ „ ~F , ACCORDING TO THE LATEST OSHA REGULATIONS. 8. UTILITY LOCATIONS: aorrarus '~brrsTTucT®N
INVERT , , . 3\. . f NOT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN ON THE ®®®®'®.q~1/'~~p•:.N:p'"'~~,•'®~
\ , 236.1 a ~ \ . ..o.... . PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ®yyl~®A ®®Kn~~•'
A- \ \ , LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.
' CALL CAROLINA ONE CALL (1-800-632-4949} 48
\ ~ 2~ HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. KEY PLAN
` ~ ~ "STABILIZE EMBANKMENT WITH 2 \ COORDINATE WITH UTILITY AGENCIES FOR LOCATION
CLASS I RIP RAP W ' \ GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYP OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND WORK/COORDINATE WITH
( ) THIC E - \ KN SS - 24" EACH ENTITY TO REMOVE/RELOCATE CONFLICTS.
1 ' \ VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING
\ \ . \ \ UTILITIES BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS AND
\ . COORDINATE WITH THE ENGINEER FOR CHANGES TO
~ THE SANITARY SEWER LINE LOCATION AND/OR UTILITIES. IF CHANGES ARE NEEDED, PLANS MUST
~ \ ~ \ SAFTEY RAIL (TYP) BE APPROVED BY CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES
\ \ SEE DETAIL SHEET C'-13 ' DEPARTMENT. SCALE
\
LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS
. \ SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE SHOWN IN APPROXIMATE
\ ATCH EXISTING GRADE \ SAWCUT & MANNER ONLY. ~ ~

~~~sr
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB \
EX. SANITARY SEWER MAIN.
\ /
\ ~
\ ~ s \ , '
~ . \ .:i/~
~I \ ..,,a
- i
: ~ \
i,
- \ \ /
\
' v
PROPOSED GRADE No. DATE BY Description
REVISIONS
9° 18' g'
DRAWN BY JKD
DESIGNED BY PAK
2,~' ~Q~~~,,~ CHECKED BY JLL
~ i
~ FO~,Sf e u 5~~~ DATE MARCH 2011
~FFpFR 6 -3 ~~OQE
TITLE
GRADE: 236.16 ;
9 INVERT: 235.16 1 SITE OUT
STREAM BED IG EROSION
15'-6°= C OL -.LIONS PARK.
GRAPHIC SCALE RI #391
10 0 b 10 20 40
Lam'':'" PRO~ECr No. 50038629
IFd FEET j
I inch = 10 ft
DOWNSTREAM METAL ARC I
Am% /H ALL CROSS-SECTION
SHEET NO. 8 OF 17

s ®e®
UT1LffY INSTALLATIONS AND OTHER PUBUC FACILmES,
/ 1 ~ / t 't INCLUDING SIDEWALKS AND HANDICAP RAMPS ARE TO BE
1 ~ CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS AS SPECIFlED BY THE Ctfl(
t ~ ~ DE~}OLITION LEGEND ~ 1 ~ ~ CODE. THESE FACILITIES HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE
t r G? 1 ~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ 1 f ` ~ H i ~ / D`EMOLIS 1' CITY OF RALEIGH AND SHALL BE SO INSTAU.ED UNLESS A A CHANGE IS AUTHORIZED BY wRffTEN AP~iOVAL PUBUC Dewberry & Davis, InC.
t \ ' 3~ ~ 1 f Ii ~ SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS ARE TO BE RECORDED PRIOR 2301 REXWOODS DRIUE ~i~, TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. SUITE 200
~ ~ - i f i ~ , `1
~ ~ 1 , ~ ' ,t DEMOLISH CONCRETE - i ~ RALEIGH, NC 27607
1 ~ ~ r'` ~ ~ 1 I t ~ SIGNATURES: FAX: 8E9.669.8923 939 NCBELS # F-0679
~ ~ r~ TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
r i 1 ~ ~
,i t f ~ r,% 1 J PUBUC UTIUTIES
r' r r ~ STORMWATER

r ~ i ~ ~ / ,r V ~ r f` t x d PLANNING
~ / ,r' % i ~ , a a
f V ' ( v r ,i ~ i 1 v
t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ f ~ i ~ f N®TE L MATERI S D CONSTRUCTION METHODS SHALL SE I STRICT
r x~ / ~ ! ~ , f ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF EIH DESIGN STAND DS D
t I ~/j,I f` / 1 1 ~ 7 t ~ ~ ~ ' SPECIFICATIONS.
i ~ ~ t J J ~ ~ 1 I I r
~ ~
t i ~ r # i y ~ ~ a I r i r
I ,,..r J / f ~ ~ 1 i
+ - ~ t i / ~ ; i LIMITS,~F DISTURBANCE ~ t ~ ~
~ I I 1 SAWCUT ~ ~ E f % NOTES:
3Q ~'IhJ~ ! 1` j( N
l ~ ,awl ~ ~ ~ J -ar-`" ~ I ~ / i f i f'' ~7 ~c. I t J I 1 1. PROTECT EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN FROM ALL P~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o
r ~ ~ ( r i 1 i i ~ r CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. V ~ ® ~ i 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH PROGRESS ENERGY TO ® ® N
1 ~ o, j ( ~ ~ r j ~ ~ fr f ,1 TEMPORARILY RAISE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINES FOR SITE - ~ ~ ~ z
f ~ f'' i ( f r ~ ACCESS, AS NEEDED. ~ F- J
r
ti / i J T~ 1 J( ` , 3 DAMAGEDTDURINGLCONSTRUCTIONLANDPSHALL RES ORE AR TEAS ~
-~.~/~v rr_ ~ ~ ~ ~,~1,45 / ~ j WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS ALONG THE SITE ACCESS ~ _
x t ~ ~ ~ 1 f ~ r r ~ J J. ! ~f CORRIDOR COMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY BACK TO W ~ F- " PRECONSTRUCTION GRADES AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ~ = p
~5 f 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR, GRUB, AND PRUNE VEGETATION TO ~ z
~A~~_a ~ ~ j " ~ ~ THE MINIMUM EXTENT NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT THE WORK. w =
.Jt f~ ' 1 ~ _ ~ r ' CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT FROM (n ~ ~
~ ~ t~' ~i CITY PRIOR TO GAINING ACCESS TO THE SITE. THE PLAN ~ N Q
/ f DEM~iCISH BRIDGE ~ ABUTMENTS / ~ r SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY AN ARBORIST. Q ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ,l i i f ,r r i%` / 5. THE ACCESS POINT SHALL BE LOCATED IN DONS PARK OFF r PARKING AREA TO WEST. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE ~ ~
f ? ' ~ . ~ ~ i ~ f i f~i' i " TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS LOCATION WITH THE CITY
i ~ OF RALEIGH PROJECT MANAGER.
' , - ; PROTECT-MANHOLE--AN©--_ ~ / .C v~- i / ~ 6. WAKE COUNTY GIS AND AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WERE USED IN
?~5 ~>a~ - / SANITARY SEWER , _ f~ ~ i ADDITION TO THE SURVEY. TOPOGRAPHY, STREAMS, PROPERTY //AO®,®®
~ LINES, SANITARY SEWER, RIGHT-OF-WAY AND OTHER ITEMS ARE Ste' ®®e'~'`~ 'o®
/ r ref /f / SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE MANNER ONLY UNLESS OTHERWISE ®e®•~~~~: E S R~l~••,• ~ SPECIFIED. ;,~r'~o~ O~~s~'
~ ~ ? / t f ~ r'` f~ 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE IMPACT TO STREAM DURING
ii r ~ 251, ~ 7 `l CONSTRUCTION.
.,r 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE GREENWAY CLOSURE AND N6TUSLL~bNST~ C ~N
. ~ r ~ ~ i' ~ ~ _ ~ r'"~ , / 2 --r~ / , SIGNING WITH CITY OF RALEIGH PARKS & RECREATION. sAS a~e®
_ - i 9. ALL DATA SHOWN IN THE SITE ACCESS MAP TAKEN FROM WAKE ®®09~1~f~~loe®~~`~`'® COUNTY GIS AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE. ®®®•,~,~q®A, V~1S~'~
~ _ f / 10. HORIZONTAL CONTROL (HAD 83) AND VERTICAL CONTROL (NAND rno
88) ESTABLISHED BY GPS OBSERVATIONS AND DERIVED BY
/{'.~,-v., ~ f ~ USING NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY ONLINE POSITIONING USER KEY PLAN
SERVICE (OPUS) YIELDING VALUES OF:
t ~ ~ ~'~~'~~,1~' 9 g. J 1 ~ ~ / ~ i
/ r' . -'-'i' #14 N=744690.85 #15 N=744576.59
f i ~ _ l 1 ~ r/ i' I ~ ~ ,/'l/ / E=2114532.11 E=x:114581.29.
f f f ELEV=249.02 ELEV=249.31
1 rl r / l ,f ~ ~
/ 1 / ~ J ~ ~ i .r ~ ~ i I / #14 & #15 ARE IRON RODS W/CAP SET IN GRASS
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u7r ~'_50,C9 ~ ~ ~ ~ C~AiE_) '
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rl / i ~5[~,3 i~ t'` / ~ NOW OR ORMERLY,~ ~ ,t I ~ ~ I ~ _
i~ t f ~ ~ ~
C~IARLES G. S LER ~ i c~ ' / ~ ~ j ~ t ~ ~ SCALE
1 jDB 07- ~ PG 245 f , ,t 1 ~ I f
r`` PIN: 1 1444 594 ~ i f ~r~ ~ ~ ti' _ ~ U
~ t 1 ~ i ~ 1 i' ~ Sip 3 201
. f / ~ < I ~ i
/ ~ EX ~ ~ 'DGE 39`1 ! .WOAD BR ~ l t ) r t ~ ~ r ! ~ ~ ~~°~r~~t~~~ Acj~~~
I I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ l ~ , r,. ~ a
~ I ~ t ; j ; ~ t ~ , ; + i ~ ~ V / ~ ~ ~I
~ f ~ ff ~ I I r.-- . r
i ~ 1 i ~ ! r ~ 1 ~ i f 1 r-'' i ~ ~ i c ,
t ~ ~ ! ( ~ I
~ f f i , t ~ ; /
i j ~ I r
I ~ ~ ~ E r ~ ~ , '
r ~ j ! i ~ t I ( % ~J ~ #
/ ~ r ; I / brow o~ ~oR~ ~~LY ! ~ r ~ 1 I ; I ~r p.--- _~_.r_..~..__... _ w_.-
~ R' LEIGH NOR ,K INVES OR LLC ~ ~f r , \ j . ~ ~ l~ ~ ~ ~ < ~d~v'~
~ ~ ,f ' , % r/ ; ~ V ~ ~ DB: 114 9 PG 1 51 ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ r P~'RO~(~tMA~E-~TE ORARY - ~ r 1 i , ~
+ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ,i ~ IN: 71444538 it=__._ ,y ~ J~,' i ~ CO STRU~`TION ACC~"SS ~ ~ ~
c r r ~ ~ /
/ 1 7 / A 1/ r•• / i ~ / ~ / t, ~ ~ ' i ~ ~ W" 'fEMPQ ~ RYIGN ~ ` ~ I f~ i No, DATE BY Description
f ~ ~ / / ~ ~ r ~ f % -~~'~~~`~!~---m-~.~~_{ i ~ ' ~ / ~ ~"G~ ~A'i~ IS CLO ~ FOR REVISIONS 3 J`
1' / ~ E l ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~`~CO'I~ T 1CTION",,;~~~ AIL
t I ~ ! % r ~ f / ~ f ~ j ~ ~ `~rNS~ C ION ~C' EIS W/~~ ~r~ ~ ` r~ ~ ~ DRAWN BY JKD
~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ i' ~ / ( f CONSTR~C I ~N ~N~~A cE; I I Iw f.. ! ; ? ~ , ~f r. ~ ~ "`~l ' ~
f/~ SEED H ~El`~`~ 10 ~ ` ~ --__1~E~ ~ ~ E'~~ / x~ 1) ~i DESIGNED BY
i / ~ / I ~ ( ,r ~ ~V ; ~ I ~ i / ~ /r~_-~, / CHECKED BY JLL
t ~ ' i f 1 / ~ ~ i ~ W~ ~ _ d 4 `Z ,"„i I 1 m',
f t 1 f~ % ~ f ,r ~ ~ ~ !f ~ / / ~ f f 1 ` MARCH 2011 -`f ! ~ ROJ E T I L A ~ : 1 ~ I ~ ~ ; ~ DATE
! ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 'y ~ rte-,.. ~ i~. r~ I ~ I J ~ ~ ~
~4
( ~ I ~---...,-~_ss *'~,,.b ~ `~I I P ~ ~ .r~~ 1~ f ) m--~..=~ ~ ~ TITLE
~a~ ~--~__~~_M~a"~ i ~ , ~ ~ r I,' ~ '1 EX. C4NDITI®NS
~ ~ ; I'_ ~ ? I ~ ~I ; ~ ~ ~ , i j D LITTON _ _ i I 4 !
j~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~..~!`j__.~.-._., , ~ ~~~~~j.~ ~ P N - LI SPARK
. ~ m I , I ~---1 r ~ BRIDGE #391
GRAPHIC SCALE r , : F ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ I it ~ ~ ~i}
~o o s 'o ao ~o _.l ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ , ~ i
~i. t 1 s ~ r d ' (l ~ l x ~ ~ ~ 4 I ~,,~...~...__~____MJ ; i J ~ PROJECT NO. Q(~ Q
I ~1 r,';.lat~, -'''1 GLASCOCK STREET `~~:~-`1~~--_
flN FEET I
~ . 9n
i
NOTE: ALL DATA SHOWN IN THE SITE
ACCESS MAP TAKEN FROM SITE ACCESS MAP
WAKE COUNTY GIS C,,04
AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED 1:200'
APPROXIMATE.
SHEET NO. 4 of 17