Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20011729 Ver 1_More Info Received_20020813Q?c.Erv?D $-i3-o2 DR. J.H. CARTER III & ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Consultants P.O. Box 891 • Southern Pines, N.C. 28388 (910) 695-1043 • Fax (910) 695-3317 Letter of Transmittal To Ms. Elizabeth Kountis NCDENR Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 WE ARE SENDING YOU Date: 08-07-02 Job # 9847 Attn: Ms. Elizabeth Kountis Re: Surface water reclassification application package Attached Reports Copy of letter Plans Prints Photos _ Maps _ Data X Application COPIES DATE # P s DESCRIPTION 1 08-08-03 Application to Request Reclassification of North Carolina Surface Waters 1 2 USGS topographic ma of project site 1 07-31-02 1 Letter from Mr. Joel Brower, Town of Siler City Town Manager 1 08-05-02 1 Letter from Mr. Gary Phillips, Chairman Chatham County Board of Commissioners THESE ARE TRANSMITTED X For approval Approved as noted For your use Approved as submitted As requested Returned for corrections For review and comment For your information REMARKS: Please call with any questions. COPY TO: Mr. Joel Brower, Town of Siler City SIGNED: Mr. John Thomas, USACOE Endangered Species Surveys • Environmental Assessments • Land Managemen • Wetlands Upping and Permitting 1 RECLASSIFICATION OF SURFACE WATERS IN NORTH CAROLINA How to Request a Reclassification Any person may request the reclassification of North Carolina's surface waters. The enclosed application entitled "Application to Request Reclassification for NC Surface Water" may be used for this purpose. In addition, a request to reclassify a surface water of the State as an ORW (Outstanding Resource Water) must follow the petition process as described in- 15A NCAC 2B .0225(d). Local governments which are requesting a water supply reclassification should also have dialogue with all local governments having land use jurisdiction within the boundaries of a proposed water supply watershed; . if the request is for a more protective water supply classification, a written resolution from all affected local governments is required by 15A NCAC 2B .0104. -Once the completed petition/application is received, the Division of Water Quality may be required to conduct studies to determine whether or not the waters meet the criteria associated with the requested classification. For more details on the reclassification process, see the attached flowchart entitled "Reclassification Process Process for Reclassification If the waters meet the criteria for reclassification outlined in the North Carolina Administrative Code (15A NCAC 2B .0100 and .0200), permission is sought from the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission (EMC) to proceed with the reclassification request through "rule-making"; rule-making is the required legal process to make official amendment to a waterbody classification. The rule-making process can typically be, at a minimum, a two year process. Public comments are considered as part of this process, and verbal comments are heard at public hearings. A written record of . the rule-making process including all comments received is. prepared, and a recommendation regarding the reclassification is presented to the EMC. Final Adoption of a Reclassification If the EMC adopts a rule, the rule is then submitted to the Rules Review Commission (RRC), a ten member panel appointed by elected officials. If the rule is approved by the RRC, the reclassification then goes to the next legislative session. If no bill is introduced by the General Assembly that disapproves the reclassification, or if such an introduced bill is defeated, then the reclassification will become effective pending EPA approval of the change. Application Instruction.doc Last revised 11101/01 BKountis 2 RECLASSIFICATION PROCESS Receive re for rec quest lassifiicatton 1 Conduct water quality study 1 If waters meet criteria, then initiate Dept review (101 process) Proceed to WOC for permission to proceed to EMC Proceed to EMC'for permission to conduct rule making . Publish Intent to reclass In NCR followed by 60-day comment period Publish proposed reclass notice in NCI? and send out public announcements Conduct public hearing about 30 days after notice. 30--tc-60°day-comFnerrt-nercod EMC adopts, modifies or rejects reclass If adopted, reclass goes to ARC If ARC approves, the reclass c to next legislative session If bill Is Introduced to stop reclass en reclass is stalled until legislators vote the bill up or down if bill passes, then reclass dies H waters do not meet reclass criteria, then notify petitioner that waters do not qualify If agency can not overcome RRC bjection, then reclass chance die On 31st day, If no bill has been introduced to stop reclass then it. goes into effect an date oraodsed if bill is defeated, then rule goes Into effect The above outline Is the general process for reclassifications. Process takes about 2 years for completion. ENR - Department of Environment and Natural Resources EMC - Environmental Management Commission NCR - North Carolina Register RRC - Rules Review Commission WQC - Water Quality Committee 1 If the waters are already classified as WS (water supply) then a water quality study may not be necessary. A reclassification may still be necessary to include a Critical Area, revise the Protected Area boundary, or change the WS classification of the waterbody. Please see Rules 1 SA NCAC 28.0100,.020Q and.0300 for descriptions of the different classifications and their water quality standards. These rules, and other information can be found on the Division's website at: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us APPLICATION TO REQUEST RECLASSIFICATION OF NC SURFACE WATER 1. Date of Request: 2_ Reuested by (inrinde fiill rnntact information): tz 0 3. River Basin: -A ? County(ies): C dl&1 V 1 4. List Waterbody(ies) requested for Reclassification: (*see reverse) Waterbod Name Waterbod Index # Current Class Request Class t S - w,,> ^-= pct l ?,h?c 1-1 - -7,5 WS - 11E GAS = 5. Attachments: Is a USGS 7.5 minute topographic map outlining the subject waters/land area attached? Q I?aehrcQ Is this a request for a more protective water supply reclassification? Q If so; . is a resolution from all local governments with land use jurisdiction within the boundaries of a proposed water supply watershed attached? 6. Reason for Request attach additional sheet if necessary): 5ce, a ch--- Additional information on the reverse side of this application. Application Form.doc Last revised 11/01/01 BKountis 4 ItR- h2-23`L3 ?ftc?-ci s-t? *Guidance for completing #4 on the first page of this application form: The information being requested can be found in a "Schedule of Classifications" for the subject river basin (also known as North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A Subchapter 2B, Section .0300). A hard copy can be requested from staff at the Division of Water Quality at the number below. The "Schedule of Classifications" containing classifications of surface waters is also available online at: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/rgports.html The North Carolina Administrative Code Rules pertinent to Water Quality Classifications (15A NCAC 2B .0100 and.0200) may be found on the internet at hgp:Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/ruies/ The homepage for the NC Division of Water Quality is: http://h2o.enr. state.nc.us/wqs/ IT IS EXTREMELY BENEFICIAL TO ATTACH A USGS 1:24,000 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP WITH AN OUTLINE OR HIGHLIGHT OF WATERS and WATERSHEDS BEING REQUESTED FOR RECLASSIFICATION If you need additional information or would like to request an electronic or paper copy of this application form, please submit such a request to the Division of Water Quality to: Betsy.Kountis @ncmail.net or by calling Betsy Kountis at (919) 733-5083, EXT. 369 or, a letter may be submitted to the address below. Send this completed application form and attachments to: Tom Reeder, Supervisor, Classification and Standards Unit North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality-Planning Branch 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Application Form.doc Last revised 11/01/01 BKountis 5 .`i t??650 /%%:\• `? _-.' i; i ?,C\._;". /nom ail ?'?`\•\ rti,/ ?u.`. F?-•?11?? ij?l1 -.l, , ,ill \lr. \._.? • I\?`?i ?_..,.``\,` 1. /,?-%i?'r \,?• `./1 ?.?\?`i 650 _ _\? -? ?? l .s O O a . 66-0 \ o? X649"f" !'' ?,7,'. i ?? /, r /??\ U I 100 !' J i.,?, 650 1.7 ? (l/? 62 600 1 ;. p u o ? ? ? o0 -' J o o G-- on y0 f II 0 SILER CITY 2.1 Ml. 1 638 1 860 000 FEET 639 27'30" 1540 641 (BILE CITY) SANFORD 25 Ml. 5155 //l NW 3eological Survey 1 SCALE 1:24000 1 2_ 0 MN 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Trial photographs GN 1 .5 o - h Carolina coordinate CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET 71 MILS 0.55' TIC VERTICAL DATUM Ql' 192 -'' 16 MILS NATIONAL GEODE se- grid ticks, ??Atw ican datum e and field lines where r 4af?'g5 R?', 11-5ja GRI 1974 6 MAG uOECL NOATION.AT CEN ERN FCSHEET NORTH i ' s information is unchecked O 4nit+)ef Now oil ta. o ., 1 r ? 600 COUNTY OF CHATHAM COMMISSIONERS GARY PHILLIPS Chairman MARGARET BRYANT POLLARD Vice Chair BOB ATWATER RICK GIVENS CARL OUTZ August 5, 2002 P. O. BOX 87 PITTSBORO, N. C. 27312-0087 ORGANIZED 1770 707 SQUARE MILES Mr. Tom Reeder Supervisor, Classification and Standards Unit North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality - Planning Branch 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Dear Mr. Reeder: CHARLIE HORNE County Manager ROBERT L.GUNN County Attorney Phone (919) 542-8200 Fax (919) 542-8272 The Town of Siler City, Chatham County, North Carolina is proposing to expand the Rocky River Lower Reservoir in order to increase its water supply.. The surface waters associated with the existing Rocky River Lower Reservoir are currently classified as WS-III BW and WS-111 CA waters. As a result of the proposed reservoir expansion project, additional areas adjacent to the existing Lower Reservoir will be impounded and will require reclassification. In addition, the critical areas and the balance of the watershed associated with the proposed reservoir expansion will require recalculation. Currently, the majority of land adjacent to the Rocky River Lower Reservoir is within Chatham County's planning jurisdiction and only a small portion of the adjacent land is within the Town of Siler City's jurisdiction. The Chatham County Watershed Protection Ordinance is applicable in all of the county area (outside towns' jurisdictions) and in many aspects is more stringent than the state's minimum requirements. In general the stream buffers are greater and the densities allowed are lower. This letter is to notify the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality that Chatham County supports the request for reclassification of the surface waters associated with the proposed Rocky River Lower Reservoir expansion project. The county is willing to work with the town and state to provide the town and county citizens a more reliable water supply. If you have any questions give me or our county staff a call. Yours trulgntyBoa PhilliChatham Commissioner s 8. JOEL J. BROWER TOWN MANAGER WILLIAM C. MORGAN, JR. TOWN ATTORNEY Tafan of $T-fer Ci#g POST OFFICE BOX 769 311 NORTH SECOND AVENUE SILER CITY, NORTH CAROLINA 27344-0769 PHONE: (919) 742-2323 FAX: (919) 663-3874 July 31, 2002 Mr. Tom Reeder Supervisor, Classification and Standards Unit North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality-Planning Branch 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Dear Mr. Reeder: CHARLES L. TURNER MAYOR HELEN M. BUCKNER PROTEM COMMISSIONERS SAM ADAMS ALEXANDER GRAVES; JR. JOHN GRIMES PATRICIA PERRY ROBERT SILER GUY D. SMITH The Town of Siler City, Chatham County, North Carolina is proposing to expand the Rocky River Lower Reservoir in order to increase its water supply. The surface waters associated with the existing Rocky River Lower Reservoir are currently classified as WS-III and WS-III CA waters. As a result of the proposed reservoir expansion project, additional areas adjacent to the existing reservoir will be impounded and will require reclassification. In addition, the critical areas and the balance of the watershed associated with the proposed reservoir expansion will require recalculation. The Town of Siler City hereby requests reclassification of the surface waters associated with the proposed Rocky River Lower Reservoir. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, TOWN OF SILER CITY oel J. Brower Town Manager JJB:ka 9 :..9 APPLICATION TO REQUEST RECLASIFICATION OF NORTH CAROLINA SURFACE WATER 6. REASON FOR REQUEST The Town of Siler City (Town) proposes to expand the Rocky River Lower Reservoir by constructing a new dam structure immediately below the existing Rocky River Lower Reservoir dam. The proposed dam and expansion of the Rocky River Lower Reservoir are located entirely in western Chatham County northeast of the Town of Siler City, North Carolina (Figure 1). The project would result in'the establishment of a 162.5-acre reservoir (including 24.1 acres of existing reservoir) and the preservation of a 117.3-acre buffer zone consisting of a strip approximately 100 feet wide around the proposed reservoir (Figure 2). The Town's purpose and need is to develop a safe and dependable water supply to provide an additional 2.0 million gallons per day (MGD) to meet its projected long-term needs past the current 20-year planning window through at least 2030. The assurance of an adequate water supply is essential to serve the existing population and industries and for continued economic growth. The watershed above the existing Rocky River Lower Reservoir consists of agricultural land, forest and rural development. Lacys Creek and Mud Lick Creek drain into the Rocky River within the project area. Several unnamed intermittent drainages located on the east and west side slopes provide direct discharge of surface runoff. Several of these drainages have ponds in their upper reaches. All named and unnamed discharges to a point 0.3 miles downstream of Lacys Creek are classified as WS-III-CA waters (NC DENR 1999). All waters from the headwaters of the Rocky River to a point 0.3 mile downstream of Lacy Creek are classified as WS-III waters (NC DENR 1999). As a result of the proposed Rocky River Lower Reservoir expansion, approximately 138.4 acres of additional land adjacent to the existing reservoir will be impounded and/or inundated and will require reclassification. In addition, the existing critical areas and the balance of the watershed associated with the proposed Rocky River Lower Reservoir expansion will require recalculation (Figure 3). 10 ALA NCE C UNTY CH TH MU TY Z O V a r a r 64 LOWERR VOVOIR TOWN OF Date: October 15, 2001 ROCky River Lower Reservoir Expansion Study for the Town of Slier City, Chatham County FIGURE 1 Prepared By: Resevoir Expansion Project Hobbs, Upchurch and Associates, P.A. 1 0 1 Miles Vicir+ity Map JEWELL Engineering Consultants, P.C. v t ROCKY RIVER UPPER RESERVOIR 1 Y . l l ?D (sR135 .?.?_ , 4.ft'? PROPOSED ROCKY RIVER LOWER RESERVOIR LEGEND r-j Parcels 09 Existing Hydrography Proposed Lower Reservoir Flood Elev. 540.30 Property Affected 100' Buffer )ate: October 15, 2001 FIGURE 2 Proposed Rocky River Lower Reservoir Expansi0 Clapp Lake j /J 1 5: t } LacYs C sek f ) ?`? ....M _? gRd Emsnw; DAM ,. PROPOSED DAM : r % X 1 Rocky River Lower Reservoir Expansion Study for the Town of Slier City, Chatham County Prepared By: Hobbs, Upchurch and Associates, P.A. 100D 0 1000 Feet 1217EWELL Engineering Consultants, P.C. Currently, the Upper and Lower Reservoirs on the Rocky River in northwest Chatham County serve as the primary raw water source for the Town. The Upper Reservoir Dam is located approximately 9,000 feet upstream of the North Carolina State Road (SR) 1312 bridge (Figure 4). The existing Rocky River Lower Reservoir Dam is located approximately 7,500 feet downstream of the same bridge. The existing intake pump house for the Town's water treatment plant (WTP) is located immediately upstream of the Lower Reservoir Dam (Figure 5). The existing reservoir system can provide a maximum of 4.0 MGD of raw water for treatment. Currently, the capacity of the Town's WTP is rated at 4.0 MGD. The plant currently treats approximately 2.75 MGD on average; however, during peak periods demand has reached 3.5 MGD (approximately 88 percent of the plant's capacity). The majority of land adjacent to the existing Rocky River Lower Reservoir is within Chatham County's planning and zoning jurisdiction and only a small portion of the adjacent land is within the Town of Siler City's jurisdiction. However, the Town is currently in discussion with Chatham County regarding the expansion of the Town's extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) (Figure 3). This expansion would give the Town control of both sides of the Rocky River for a distance totaling approximately 18.26 miles both upstream and downstream of the reservoir, which would allow the Town to better protect natural vegetative buffers and wildlife habitats along the Rocky River corridor. Expansion of the ETJ would allow the Town to utilize and expand existing ordinances, such as the Town of Siler City Watershed Protection Ordinance and Unified Development Ordinances, to manage and direct growth within the Town and its ETJ in order to protect resources. A roller compacted concrete dam would be constructed approximately 105 feet downstream the existing Lower Reservoir dam. A single release outlet structure capable of releasing a range of flows equivalent to the minimum release requirements will be utilized. The drainage area above the proposed dam site, including the Upper Reservoir. drainage area, is approximately 53.8 square miles (sq. mi.). In order to increase the draft rate of the Lower Reservoir to 6.0 MGD (an increase of 2.0 MGD), the normal water level would need to be raised 12.3 feet above the spillway crest of the existing dam. The 13 0 ? g c3g??A Cf m ? s ? ? w nl t $ m a °• g z O m CL 0 Date: October 15, 2001 Rocky River Lower Reservoir Expansion Study for the Town of Siler City, Chatham County FIGURE 3. Map showing the Prepared By. current and proposed extraterritorial Hobbs, Upchurch and Associates, P.A. jurisdiction and watershed classifications. JEWELL Engineering Consultants, P.C. Sfy f 7100 _ Liberty Rd (SR1346) ROCKY RIVER UPPER RESERVOIR It t K _a CI Lae Ed 0 ROCKY RIVER LOWER RESERVt Clapp Lake Fox Lake Date: October 15, 2001 Rocky River Lower Reservoir Expansion Study ' - for the Town of Siler City, Chatham County FIGURE 4 Prepared By: Existing Rocky River Hobbs, Upchurch and Associates, P.A. 1500 0 1500 Feet Upper and Lower Reservoirs JEWELL Engineering Consultants, P.C. I 4 r/ 0 do 0 e ' i i ' F ; i 0 0 '' . ... : .. :.. AS r Figure 5. Map showing existing and proposed raw water intake structures. Rocky River Lower Resevoir. Chatham County. North Carolina 16 0 Hobb>R Upphumh , rxlates, ra I "%J SOVnIaeJ PINES NC - Irr--- MlfIGN.- DFACE4 14W5 HEAD. NC - CNANtORE NC NC 3W A W S t S.0- Frr?...(91xon?C 78767 pW. (94 elevation of the impounded pool would be 540.3 feet above MSL and would impound approximately 1,102 acre-feet of water. The expanded Lower Reservoir would continue to be used in conjunction with the Upper Reservoir. The Lower Reservoir would remain the terminal reservoir from which raw water is pumped to the Siler City WTP. Currently, the WTP raw water intake and pumps are located immediately above the existing Lower Reservoir dam. The existing WTP raw water intake and pumps would be demolished and upgraded to meet the proposed increased pool level and draft rate. New intake structures would be located immediately above the proposed Lower Reservoir dam and designed and constructed as an integral part of the new dam structure. No changes in treatment requirements are anticipated for the proposed Lower Reservoir Expansion. Thirteen landowners would be affected by the proposed reservoir and the inundation of 85.3 acres of forestland, 38.5 acres of pasture and 10.7 acres of cropland. All landowners affected by the proposed project have been notified of the proposed project. Each landowner has been contacted by periodic mailings updating and informing them of the project status. A Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared in accordance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NCEPA), N.C. General Statute Section 113A-1. et seq., N.C. General Statute 143-215.1 (b)(2) and other applicable laws, for the purpose of evaluating the environmental consequences of the expansion of Siler City's Lower Reservoir on the Rocky River, Chatham County, North Carolina. The EA will be submitted for a second North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) internal review on or before 30 September 2002. A Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is expected. A NCDENR Department of Public Water Supply (PWS) intake permit application was submitted in spring 2002. PWS has reviewed and commented on the proposed intake plans. Issuance of the intake permit is pending approval of the EA and a FONSI. A Dam Safety permit was submitted on 03 May 2002. Approval to construct is expected by the end of 2002. 17 ANNOUNCEMENT PROPOSED RECLASSIFICATION OF ROCKY RIVER: PUBLIC HEARING SET FOR NOVEMBER The N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources on behalf of the Environmental Management Commission (EMC) will conduct a public hearing in order to receive public comments on the proposed reclassification of two segments of the Rocky River in Chatham County (Cape Fear River Basin) to the Class Water Supply - III Critical Area (WS-III CA) classification. In addition, the hearing is being held in order to receive public comments on the proposed 401 water quality certification ("certification') required for this water supply project. PUBLIC HEARING Location: Jordan Matthews High School Auditorium 910 East Cardinal Street Siler City, NC Date: November 6, 2003 Time: 6:00 p.m. GENERAL DEFINITION OF PROPOSED RECLASSIFICATION A WS-III water is protected as a water supply for drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes and for those users where a more protective WS-I or WS-II classification is not feasible. WS-III waters are generally located in low to moderately developed watersheds. A CA is an area in close proximity to a water intake or reservoir, and the remainder of the area affected by the WS-III designation consists of the rest of the watershed draining to the intake or reservoir. BACKGROUND OF RECLASSIFICATION REQUEST A request for reclassification of Rocky River was submitted by Dr. J.H. Carter III and Associates and the Town of Siler City. The reason for the proposed reclassification is to allow a new dam structure to be placed below the existing dam. The existing dam does not impound enough water to result in a true reservoir according to DWQ and DEH staff. However, the new dam will cause the nature of this water supply source to change from run-of-river to an approximately 160-acre reservoir. The new dam will raise the normal water level above the spillway of the existing dam, and as a result, approximately 140 acres of land will be impounded in the new CA. The Town wishes to have the new dam constructed and the resulting reservoir created in order to meet water demands through 2030. WATERS TO BE AFFECTED BY PROPOSED RECLASSIFICATION The proposed CA would extend along the current river from the proposed dam, which is to be placed approximately 65 feet downstream of the existing dam, to a point approximately 3.6 miles upstream of the proposed dam. This proposed reclassification also includes several tributaries to the above-mentioned main stem portion of Rocky River; portions of these tributaries, which are presently classified WS-III, are proposed to be reclassified to WS-III CA. The new WS-III CA will be the area measured 0.5 miles from the proposed reservoir normal pool elevation of approximately 540 feet. The proposed CA, which is approximately 2,207 acres, includes all of the current CA, which is approximately 168 acres. The remainder of the balance of the watershed that will not be reclassified to WS-III CA will remain intact. Nearly 4.3 miles of named surface waters are proposed to be reclassified. PROPOSED RECLASSIFICATION REGULATIONS If reclassified, development and discharge restrictions will apply. However, there are no current or planned dischargers and no planned development in the entire proposed reclassification area. Chatham County and the Town of Siler City, the only local governments with jurisdiction in the reclassification area, would need to modify their water supply watershed protection ordinances within 270 days after the reclassification effective date, and have already taken steps to do so. Chatham County has provided written support for this proposed reclassification. HOW TO SUBMIT COMMENTS The purpose of this announcement is to encourage those interested in the proposed reclassification and certification to provide comments. You may attend the public hearing and make relevant verbal comments, and/or submit written comments, data or other relevant information by December 1, 2003. The Hearing Officer may limit the length of time that you may speak at the public hearing, if necessary, so that all those who wish to speak may have an opportunity to do so. 18 The EMC is very interested in all comments pertaining to the proposed reclassification and certification. All persons interested and potentially affected by the proposals are strongly encouraged to read this entire announcement and make comments. The EMC may not adopt a rule regarding the reclassification that differs substantially from the text of the proposed rule published in the North Carolina Re gister unless the EMC publishes the text of the proposed different rule and accepts comments on the new text (see General Statute 150B 21.2 (g)). The estimated proposed effective date for the final rule regarding the reclassification and pursuant to this hearing process is April 1, 2004 provided no review by the legislature is required. Written comments may be submitted to the N.C. Division of Water Ouality Wetlands/401 Unit 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650, Attn: Mr. Bob Zarzecki (Phone: 919-733-9726, FAX: 919-733- 6893). The physical address of the Wetlands/401 Unit is 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Existing Division of Water Quality rules are located on the internet at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/Rules/ruleindex.html. In addition, this announcement is located at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/pubinfo/pubinfo.html (look under "Calendar" section), and the public notice for the proposed certification is located at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/pubnot.html. Further details regarding certifications and reclassifications may be obtained from Mr. Bob Zarzecki (contact information provided above) and Ms. Elizabeth Kountis (contact information provided below), respectively. Ms. Elizabeth Kountis DENR - Division of Water Quality, Planning Branch 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 (919) 733-5083, extension 369 Elizabeth.Kountis@ncmail.net In the case of inclement weather on the day of the scheduled public hearing, please contact the above telephone number for a recorded message regarding any changes to the location, day or time of the hearing. MAP OF WATERS PROPOSED TO BE RECLASSIFIED SCALE LMJI00 0 5000 10000 FEET Proposed beereoir PNpR1?,,,Crdlcd Ara A IYY [ ??'°'! a/11001r eNA1YAY Dam i? Pr,VDsed ?aler Supply lalershed data compiled by SCALE 8151000 t 9ndeipaNll NED?Q/NCCC II, and automated by NCCCIA. AUAuai lake/p,ye cir/Urcom 1991. N00t current revision: 9avember 2002 6 2 Nunieipality data (collected for the Powell Bill) Yap Prod.eed by the N.C. Caatarstor ® Correct critied JEER comp[ lad by NCD 7. July 2000. Cealraphie Information and laatfils Balanaeof latershed