20060645 Ver 2_More Info Received_20110825

Strickland, Bev
From: Homewood, Sue
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 9:32 AM
To: Mcmillan, Ian; Dennison, Laurie; Strickland, Bev
Subject: FW: Duke Energy Belews Creek Craig Rd Landfill Project - NCDWQ Public Notice Letter
Response
Fyi - electronic copy
Project 06-0645 v2
Ian, let's talk when we've both had a chance to review the response. Thanks.
Sue Homewood
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Darrin Peine rmailto:DPeine(-asmeinc.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 20119:26 AM
To: Homewood, Sue
Cc: Kenneth Daly; Thomas, John T JR SAW; Leap, Tom Y Jr; [e-mail]
Subject: Duke Energy Belews Creek Craig Rd Landfill Project - NCDWQ Public Notice Letter Response
Hello Sue,
On behalf of Duke Energy, S&ME has provided a response to the NCDWQ's July 26, 2011 additional information request
letter, pertaining to the Belews Creek Craig Road Landfill Expansion project. A paper copy of the S&ME response was
mailed on August 24, 2011 to your attention and Mr. Ian McMillan.
An electronic copy of the response may be accessed via the hyperlink below - S&ME's Sharefile website. The article is a
.pdf document with attachments, approximately 14 MB in size. Please let me know if you have any trouble accessing the
electronic copy or do not receive the mailed paper copy within a week.
https://sme.sharefile.com/d/s27dc74bd5el45388
If after your review of our response letter and attachments, you have any questions or require additional information,
please contact me at your convenience.
Regards,
Darrin
Darrin M. Peine, QEP
Natural Resources Project Professional
*"ME
ENGINEERING INTEGRITY.
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte NC 28273
Ph: 704-523-4726
Fax: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
doeine(cDsmeinc.com
www.smeinc.com
This electronic message is subject to the terms of use set forth at www.smeinc.com/email. If you received this message
in error please advise the sender by reply and delete this electronic message and any attachments. Please
consider the environment before printing this email.
S&ME
August 24, 2011
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown St.
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Attention: Ms. Sue Homewood
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
-23-2-f- Crabtree Boulevard,-Strite- 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260
Attention: Mr. Ian McMillan
Regarding: Response to July 26, 2011 NCDWQ Letter
Section 401 Water Quality Certification Application
Duke Energy - Belews Creek Steam Station
Proposed Craig Road Landfill Expansion, Stokes County, North. Carolina
S&ME. Project No. 1356-10-041
DWQ No. 06-0645 v2
USACE Action ID No. 2011-00972
Dear Ms. Homewood and Mr. McMillan:
S&ME, Inc., (S&ME) on behalf of Duke Energy is providing herein responses to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality's (NCDWQ) July 26, 2011 additional
information request letter and a subsequent August 4, 2011 conference call between Sue
Homewood (NCDWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office), Duke Energy project
representatives and S&ME's project representatives. The purpose of the conference call
on August 4 was to obtain clarification from the NCDWQ on the specific additional
information requested, in order to properly respond. Summarized below are the six
requested additional information items from the NCDWQ and S&ME's response to each.
The response to comments herein references the proposed landfill expansion design in the
context of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(NCDENR) Solid Waste Section permitting process. The current Craig Road Landfill
Phase 1 is operating under Permit No. 8504 issued by the NCDENR Solid Waste Section.
Consistent with NCDENR Solid Waste Section rules, the proposed landfill expansion
S&ME, INC. / 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard / Charlotte, NC 28273-5560 / p 704.523.4726 f 704.525.3953 / www.smeinc.com
Response to July 26, 2011 NCDWQ Letter SWE Project Number 1356-10-041
Proposed Craig Road Landfill Expansion August 24, 2011
will be permitted in steps including Site Suitability and the Construction Plan
Application. S&ME prepared a Site Suitability Study (June 24, 2011) for the proposed
landfill expansion that was submitted to the NCDENR Solid Waste Section for review.
The Site Suitability Study evaluates various siting restrictions, characterizes site geologic
and hydrogeologic conditions, and communicates the proposed expansion facility plan.
Once the Site Suitability Study is approved, a Construction Plan Application providing
the detailed design for the next five-year phase of landfill development can be submitted
for review and approval. S&ME is currently preparing the detailed design, concurrent
with Agency review of the Site Suitability Study.
Comment 1: "If the US Army Corps of Engineers requests a response to any comments
received as a result of the Public Notice, please provide the Division with a copy of your
response to the USACE. "
Response 1: S&ME provided a response to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) Raleigh Field Office's Mr. John Thomas regarding the June 27, 2011 Public
Notice Comments from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. S&ME's_response was
provided to the USACE on August 12, 2011 and a copy furnished to Mr. an McMillan
and Ms. Sue Homewood of the NCDWQ. The USACE also provided S&ME Public
Notice comments on August 3, 2011 from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission and Mr. James Martin of Walnut Cove, North Carolina. However, a
response to those comments was not requested from the USACE. To date, no additional
comments have been received.
Comment 2: "Please submit full plan sheets at a scale of no smaller than 1 "=50' with
topographic contours shown and all jurisdictional features overlaid in order for our
office to adequately comment on the proposed avoidance and minimization for the
project. "
Response 2: S&ME prepared various plan sheets illustrating the location of the proposed
landfill expansion in the context of site features of interest for the Site Suitability Study
submittal (June 24, 2011) to the NCDENR Solid Waste Section. The Quarter Mile
Radius Map, Drawing 5 from the Site Suitability Study Submittal (attached), shows
surveyed streams in the vicinity of the proposed landfill expansion. Since the time we
submitted the June 9, 2011 Application for Section 404 Individual Permit, S&ME has
advanced the proposed landfill expansion design and prepared a preliminary design. The
preliminary design is a thirty-percent level design intended to communicate fundamental
landfill design elements including proposed subgrade grading plans, five-year
development phases, select stormwater management features, and proposed final grading
plans. The following drawings from the preliminary design are provided to communicate
the proposed development including existing and proposed contours relative to
jurisdictional features:
Drawing C1 - Aerial Photograph;
Drawing C2 - Existing Conditions;
Drawing C 10 - Future Phases Subgrade;
Response to July 26, 2011 NCDWQ Letter SAME Project Number 1356-10-041
Proposed Craig Road Landfill Expansion August 24, 2011
• Drawing C 11 -Future Phases Cover System; and
• Drawing C13 -Future Phases Stormwater Management.
Comment 3: "Although the Division cannot fully review the avoidance and minimization
for this project as noted, we request that the applicant consider an alternative that
completely avoids or reduce impacts to Stream SC5 only. "
Response 3: S&ME identified and evaluated several alternatives for landfill expansion as
summarized in the June 9, 2011 Application for Section 404 Individual Permit, Section 5,
Alternatives Analysis. As NCDWQ personnel requested during our August 4, 2011
conference call, we have developed another alternative (Alternative G) that avoids
impacts to stream SC5 and SC6 only. Consistent with the prior alternatives analyses,
S&ME prepared a conceptual landfill expansion boundary (footprint) considering the
topography of the area and delineated stream and wetland limits. A limit of waste
footprint was developed by assuming a 50-foot stream buffer offset and an additional
100-foot offset to allow for grading and installation of perimeter roads, stormwater
management facilities._and leachate management facilities.
The resulting footprint is illustrated in the attached Figure 1 and consists of 2 separate
landfill footprints within the proposed expansion area: one continuous with the existing
Phase 1 landfill; and the other discontinuous from the initial phases and separated by the
subject streams. Based on the footprint, S&ME developed a conceptual grading plan to
estimate the possible gross landfill volume. Estimates indicate that Alternative G can
provide approximately 14,500,000 cubic yards of gross capacity. Based on anticipated
generation rates of 900,000 cubic yards per year, Alternative G could provide up to 16.1
years of disposal capacity. This is less than the disposal capacity for the life of the
Belews Creek Steam Station and less than the anticipated disposal capacity of Alternative
C (21,230,000 cubic yards and up to 23.6 years).
An alternatives analyses comparison and comparative cost estimates were provided in
Tables 2 and 3 from the June 9, 2011 Application for Section 404 Individual Permit.
Revised Tables 2 and 3 including the additional Alternative G are provided with this
letter for comparison purposes.
Comment 4: "Please provide detailed engineering drawings that include all fill slopes,
energy dissipaters, bank stabilization, etc. at all impact areas. The plans should include
cross section details for all impact areas, temporary impacts for construction/delVatering,
restoration of all temporary impacts, and a hydrological analysis indicating that streams
below the proposed impacts will continue to function/flow. "
Response 4: We understand that the NCDWQ intent in comment 4 is to understand the
nature and extent of proposed temporary and permanent impacts from the proposed
development. The footprint of the proposed landfill expansion, perimeter roadway,
perimeter stormwater channel, and grading to reach existing grades (including cut and fill
slopes) have been developed with the preliminary design. Various preliminary design
drawings illustrating the proposed expansion are attached with this response.
Response to July 26, 2011 NCDWQ Letter SWE Project Number 1356-10-041
Proposed Craig Road Landfill Expansion August 24, 2011
Detailed design is currently in progress and will culminate in a final design submitted as
the Construction Plan Application to the NCDENR Solid Waste Section for review. The
preliminary design was, and the future detailed design will be, developed consistent with
civil engineering hydraulics and hydrology standards of practice. In addition, the design
will specifically meet design criteria established by the NCDENR Solid Waste Section
for landfill development, satisfy design criteria of the North Carolina Erosion and
Sediment Control Manual, and satisfy design criteria to obtain a NPDES General Permit
NCGO10000 for construction activities.
One component of the proposed landfill expansion design is an under-drain system. The
under-drain system will be designed and constructed where the proposed landfill
expansion will be located over existing streams with the intent of intercepting water flow
beneath the landfill and conveying it to the stream down gradient of the expansion. The
under drains will be composed of perforated pipes surrounded by a drainage aggregate
and wrapped in a non-woven geotextile filter. The under drains will be designed to
convey the quantity of flow and for structural stability considering the overlying loading.
Near the landfill grading limits, each under-drain will terminate at an appropriate
structure (i.e. rip-rap apron) to convey flow into the existing stream.
The detailed design will not include a hydrologic evaluation of post-development stream
function or flow. The proposed landfill development is expected to alter the stream
watersheds and the effect on stream function and flow is beyond the scope of this project.
The detailed design will include hydrologic evaluations of stormwater management
features including (and not limited to) channels, culverts, retention/detention basins,
erosion and sediment control measures, and conveyance to natural features. The
hydrologic evaluation will be developed for various stages through the project life-cycle
including construction, interim, and final conditions.
Comment 5: "Please provide documentation of contingency plans in the event of landfill
liner failure and groundwater exposure. "
Response 5: Contingency plans are addressed through the routine groundwater
monitoring program that is required by the NCDENR Solid Waste Section. Groundwater
quality surrounding the landfill will be monitored consistent with a site-specific
Monitoring Plan that is reviewed and approved by the NCDENR Solid Waste Section.
Consistent with NCDENR Solid Waste Section rules, groundwater and surface water
quality around the landfill will be monitored under an assessment monitoring program.
Should results indicate an effect on water quality, a detection monitoring program will be
implemented to characterize the nature and extent of the groundwater conditions. Should
conditions warrant, corrective measures would be implemented to address the
groundwater conditions.
Comment 6: "Please provide plan sheets that indicate any new impervious surfaces such
as roads, storage buildings, processing areas, etc that are part of this landfill expansion
Response to July 26, 2011 NCDWQ Letter S&ME Project Number 1356-10-041
Proposed Craig Road Landfill Expansion August 24, 2011
project. For all new impervious surfaces the Division requires details on stormwater
management and collection. "
Response 6: New impervious surfaces will include perimeter access roads and the
landfill liner system within the proposed limits of waste as indicated in the attached
preliminary design drawings. We note that the future detailed design will be developed
consistent with civil engineering hydraulics and hydrology standards of practice and will
specifically meet established design criteria. The detailed design will be subject to
review and approval of the NCDENR Solid Waste Section and approval of and Erosion
and Sediment Control Plan.
In closing, we believe that these responses clarify the nature and extent of the proposed
landfill expansion and its effect on the subject streams and wetlands. Furthermore we
believe our responses address the NCDWQ comments. Please let us know if you would
like additional or supplemental information. Upon your request, we are willing to
provide detailed design documents as they become available.
Thank you for your assistance with this project. Please notify us if there may be
additional information we can provide at this time to address the additional information
request.
Sincerely,
S&ME
Kenneth Daly, P.E.
Senior Project Engineer
D&A^^., M. PCZ
Darrin M. Peine, QEP
Natural Resources Project Scientist
Senior Review by: Dane Horna, V.P., P.E.
CC: Tom Leap, Duke Energy
Attachments:
Drawing 5, Quarter Mile Radius Map (June 24, 2011 Site Study)
Drawing C1, Aerial Photograph (August 10, 2011 Preliminary Design)
Drawing C2, Existing Conditions (August 10, 2011 Preliminary Design)
Drawing C10, Future Phases Subgrade (August 10, 2011 Preliminary Design)
Drawing C11, Future Phases Cover System (August 10, 2011 Preliminary Design)
Drawing C 13, Future Phases Stormwater Management (August 10, 2011 Preliminary
Design)
Figure 1, Expansion Area
Table 2, Alternatives Analyses Comparison (Revised August 23, 2011)
Table 3, Alternatives Analyses - Comparative Cost Estimate (Revised August 23, 2011)
Y tlNIlOYtlO XlYON'M88L0 IIM8l8i
ayAQ ? ? W)RS* - - NOLLtl14 Wtl11II MiiLO 4M81ii loriNB 3M00 , ? g ' y
-Afijou3
NOI$NYYX31111GNtll Gtl OY 0"3 6 N
W YtlW IIOIOW 3lIW Y3LIV 00
17
s ^'C \
\ d c
?\???\,. '? \\\\\ q fi'r'>,? ?S': t ? ? s ? ?" i? ic'?a? :.r. \` fit.,' ?
' 11 S ? Si
7D ' 4
\\
kip\?\\\\?\
\
\ \??t'\\ , ? ? r r;1A Thy T ?>?.A j
L a
i? JAVA Yd r
I. a w • '
{? \?y- 1 Fr e F o
y, itt?y g g 8 ° a ? ? g -
:j, '. '4444 Idldld .. Y o 'n a o o ? ? 4 ? o ? i ? e
,? _ ?? '? ; ? ?? ` ` ' ? a?:? ? o o _ • ? ? sees 10 ? e 3 ?,
rrv,ob., ?.borv >,33b, s?,?
WO.'-13W5'ALNM
AJ rGU3? uo snvex3,vb31vl»eOrvr, OrOtl ?vb?
rvo.r„dd.rvr,drvo. b.suo,.3sv e --, a yv
n
3
3W'8S?
ey
/
a
- - -
HdtlH?OlONd ltl b3v
s

• ()
-
s

A
Vol,
'? kf f
•
V ,
C

t
t
,.
?

I T t'!• ?
"FL
x
ue
'
"Kt
'
•41 t \ 1
1 y
'

k
1
-•
??
t
p
w
?
y
? .
?
??t ? ? .
w
}
?
1'
[?
'1?
V
"°?
? ? t ` tl?C ? .? • ???' ;
Y 5
1
" A;q k
Y
?,, tY`?f f'? a T i4 i V t
y
3 R*{ 4"
- ? d!M ? t
?
t
..
?l
T O'iY
C `
x l 1
1t
q
Y -.(a
?
§ h
t
,
?
^rSy`
• tk t?
t
e
yl
i , _ i 1.
R
's'R:-.? +? ?
\t '
+$t
1
a ?' .i,
- e
t. )
N 'F' I
t+ '. W1mr+Y1-tit?? L ?. 4?'S??• ?
I
f
l
? ..
'a?? ??J'
T f
r i +?•
?yi 1".

l
T{.;?.
i7 t
:. ?j lVil? _
. ?. li 4
i
,

•? ? t g$ 1 ???? 4 +? 'E ? _ ?` ?O i }r.J"t ? ? ? .ads ?

r `
®
i-.:. ^">. ,•• .It..:?•G std5y ??D?, fY, f I ?'? _ - ? ? 'ya _. _ ?i•-- ?
1 O 1n ? ' ,
Y 1
-?
I ` $ .G
,
,•;
d: r x dkx
l?
t`.. } .7

I t?
1
.. ;
,,
mo
_?dy,? NayC-i,`' a lS ??? '.1.•345 ,,,'r
tl'
?
1
Yeti
•
y' Ila?if'D '-
- ?kJ
4f ?Sw 11 , v ?x
O w ?
.'
6 E ` ? 4 ? 1'*, ?_[
yy
?1
?
- r
• a
? n
• i
y
, y,.? . t ..
o 1
!.'4s.t •. ' ..+#fk K a ??.1
G ° i ? '` +'t; ya• ?7y?2 ?. V` V _?. ??
t ? tl.
i
'i V t
µ r tl fl a y _4 a t? `,y1lr}? t {?.:
Hi ,y?. ? C1 1s4=-J? x ' r Y p YQ.??`?y'
y ?
c ? ? ? ??'. I 5 _t ? !? ` l _?A a s 'r ? ? } is,.r '+ys'? z* ? V?. V v li '? ? 7C't ? '<?y:

q w 'i ...o fi" t slif +- of
,?_ c 1. -i ¢ z t 7S? O "O: Q, Q ? ? .w: ? ? y _ 4?+?a} '?.t ? •ti I r? , I
a ? s s
I

( d'

?
.• d-S { 9 Sl•1 i . -•-p 4??,?•?. ,. ro

i y+ e z , 1 4?6i ? ,. ?

q "x*
.1 161?a
6 w e

' r>'

?-a f
i ? e t , A

w L>
a

µ

r
' ,

M
T
GC
'. jXZR• i
t J t ,
,
.," ?

52
a.

i y

? I o 1 O
00®
+'
.•
? r

WOO DN13W5'MMM b3.v»i0xr??v0
e3 _ _ N
j
aJJnp SNOI110N03 ONI151%3 N
;V
.isnone ans otoq€-Am -- GG9>I6 4
??' --?----- g wmw
\, I ow<
10
14- -
I ? ? ? Q p w O I \ aossla v
\ W < '
I g i a? ? 5 g 000'316 Y
W
\`I i ?? w pwV ? ? O I
O-C o Q 1
_._._.-1- - - -Q - - - - - ?
I ? WSW Q Q
Q ? yO W R' OOS91fi V
6 1aa
I \ aa oz.
e \ o f o' /
' ol \\ O 0 /
31 \ 1 O O I O
' 955 O \ I
I
I
06 \ . '
(q(qf w
W l
J 3E L\`? - I ? ? OOS't 16 V
o
9 ?? nab 0 O g \ y J \
000'816 4
s zWm ?? a 1
009916 N
I ,_ ' }Q 0006 t6 N -
1
7 ?a?m ? 11 \
I
COS 816
a
\ ] p a
i I- m w - \ ? , g/ ? L a A
W
w ' OOG'G. v 4 I //??
FF?^

?
3 M
WOO ONI3W6'N1MM `Q ? v?lddv rvv?a rv
0 ]?n15rv0?L $ i e N
* ©
?
u?'
?
3W" nC
a9 - o
3Otltl0606636tlHd 3tl0101 V

wo33NI3W5'MMM
M,a„ __ Srv _ -
e
rvo
.,se.rv.
O - M
' 3? - R
3W
8S* aitnp? -- W315A5tl3 0?53StlNd3tl l l V
3
WOO ON13WS-MMM O `? rvo ivy a er viv?evoo i?n?e?srvc? ?
sr?+d + M
N
3WVS* au?'
A
T
M $
s Nl
1x3W39tlNbW tl3ltlwntl015535tlHd 3tl111?d _ - V
o• s I V
=775_=' .0. F_
AW7
? 765 _ 765 + s i?'F
51
1 rti? +, s I wL t
t7- 7
fy y
np 1 .?
'' 7Z I r r? 6 t 1 , } # i
'.
y?Y L 'Y 1 ? ? A p0 4 i ? tryy?S.
SS,:
84, IF,-
sx-
07
1 is + -:' '? h v '
?4; 714 1
k 5
IAL
r., (zy y s l r 0 ¢T K '
ZY.. " 0 - ? .tom+fy, '1T a ?F
750, p lL l ,
p?. y f,
'
Alternative G Limit of Waste
?? tk x r? i, { CRLF Phase 1
Alternative C Limit of Waste
r
Alternative C Grading Limits
r i'3: 7 t}w.?: - rr t} t*.f f l a !., q?v y `.
R Zj b +? .L ! yr' ??' l M1ti F
5-ft Contours
a
r: g a j Wetlands
REFERENCE: Streams
THE ABOVE WATERBODY DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM THE NATIONAL HYDROGRAPHY DATA SET STREET GIS a
._ F ?ki ; p ?FJd,E
DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM ESRI. HYDROLOGY AND WETLANDS JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES WERE
DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME PERSONNEL ON 11-11-2010 DISTURBED AREA INFORMATION WAS -
OBTAINED FROM S&ME. INC AND MP SELLS, INC. PLEASE NOTE THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL d 600h,` ,f + 1, 200 ,
PURPOSES ONLY IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES THERE ARE NO
GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY S&ME,INC.ASSUMES NORESPONSIBILITY FORANYDECISION
Feet
.
MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE ABOVE DATA
SCALE: 1° = 600' EXPANSION AREA FIGURE
NO
Duke Energy Belews Creek Steam Station
DATE: 8-23-2011 ` S&ME
DRAWN BY CHR = - Landfill Expansions
WWW.SAy ;(_4i' -G0M Stokes Count North Carolina
PECKED BY: KRD PROJECT NO: 1356-10-041
0 E C O
C m .2 N
CL
Eon
U?w moo
M:O 1=1?_?(n ? N
b Cy YyN ri
Na A `?" N
a`gJ? I
0 0 a - 3
t v a: CI d Q
? y cm
Q m
wV Twm
Q c'a O1S1
N G p N
W
C
m 0 0
Y
F 0,
Q
c
a
E
as
v
- mE
-
-
_- _
°a
a - _ Ea -
a n L 'Z' N '?' N ac ?' y m o
`
m m m 3 ° E° o m E° N m E° m
y d m
n A
N C
j m _ n p
L (?
r LL
N C
a? ? c °a? E c c m E a o? ? 3 c
m 1 o
2 K u li 6 m
m m m
2
m m
U
0: v
? C
- O v
m u a
r = o

¢
Z

N

r'r

°

d

?°

N
¢ W

a

a N
im! -
?mE N
m
N Z a a a
m r« '- y m r r

` r
- S r
m
E-

oa
,2 a o o
E m a v
v a o g _
= o
N E
`-° c°
o - c ?.?
a a? a
w - o o
E v a

_
> N
o a v S
E
> m ° m o d a -
° E ? ° `
0
x S`m -:°-. a u,Eoam mE° ?°'O
mm bum -
co
E v 30; o
u aTNyc ?G
° g.13 mm
Na

m y
rxa

m m

m

Wy
Z
Na. '°>

.N
a x.m
E

-.
°
o
mW n

r
N-vm d

Nmd
?y °u `oc ind a°?a va ? o
a Eam c a
Et Ut
a
m o E m
n? -
?
O .. c d
° c a
o £
?' ? E c
o o
?
N E m r o y
c c ??c
` mv-
mo `?c n mo ?ym E `->E

>
m E W
m° GN °''Dm
m a
? y Y
p' x°
o f me
? N a
E `av
°c o?? c
.. o c cs c
n
°>° i

$T'
a Ti a
`r'
m E d
as o
`
:2 cm
; a
aF?i
Z E Z° d _
D o O Uc
a U c 3 z ¢> E

v `m
,r, y" m

o

°o
o
°o
14

0
0
0

°o
.6
E a U°i IQ uNi
ENO
W ? M ? ? ? d
p
U
w
w

m?
.m.
a E w

¢

° 10

o
u
_ t = Z ° N n d N C
r
C J
6
a
j?
.R m ¢
Z o_ O o O o
° n u w m of m °m °m m
y N ...
C ?
a
`o
vm e

Q I

?O

<

N

?°

N

'« o
?
Z V.
w
l
°
w
w
w
O
i
w
$
?
W U Q
U w
d
r
E u
¢
z °
o
a
o
m p O
C
d- O
C ?

?n
W p
Vi K W ? M

m -
v E a

c

o

0

0 So ol
E i" z o 0
w o g i r e v
v N N m
8 N ¢
'p 'E
z Z ? .- ? o N N
='
a

W q
LL
o E -
m
2
N J A
W
> o o O Z i a

y
E ac c
c
3 0 v s
o° O O
°
m V m
E `w
r y
a z m a°
d
o o m
> i o m m$
m o a
d P m m q
m°
p o
p n3a> aU oa`dd o¢`LL`? pm a` m¢>
c 0
z ¢ m U ? ? w w ?
° o
a
v `m y
c nL
N a g
v ra
°r' = a
°o m
O O m
O
. O
E 'o
?. o w
m d
o rn?
«°oo h E
E E E
¢¢w
-NM
N
m
E
a
W
E o 0
U a ? `9
(n
a
A j W y o 0
6 C w ? ? N
O a R N
U a J V ?
a c A g Z a
Y
Qy
a w U ` W m
T c m Y
m O O W N
V m
Q CLs
.Q ?

A N o
° o N o 0 0

U
¢ e
n o n
M m
M o
o 0
°
Cj
q
p
? Z m
r
w m
r
w m
ai
w o
ui
w
m
? N
L6
? m
N
w
a
O
U o
O o
N po
O o
O 0
O 0
O

j ¢ N o o O o ¢ o
A
G
C Z O
Q N N
r N
O N
m Z N
m
U U w w w
a n
0
U 0?
<
¢ 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 $
0
¢
z o0
o
]
o a Z ?
«n n
w ?
w n
w r
w ?
w
U
d
LL
C
d

Z

Z

Z

Z

Z

z °o
o

^c

z
A
0 n m
U
C
A
m
c ~ 'z 'z z z 'z z z

a
v a v
?
S ?
] o
o

n
a 2
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
g
¢
¢
Q A
U z z z z z o Z z
? o

N
O N
N o
N
r 0
N
M
N
r 0
O 0

? ,Q,

N
U ¢_ O
N ai m
o O N of
]
= Z W
w omD
w C'1
w c
? ? N
? ?
U m

C
E ccV N N N N
N N
N N
N
N

C 7 c °,q w o w w °» w w

A
x p
=

man
7 c
¢

z 0 0 0

m
? 0 °o
o

N o °o

A C
f

N N
_
r N

Y

N

W V

?
Y
A
•

Z

O
S A
E ? ? N N
o

O

2 c
•c ?,
Y N
Y
c v

¢

z °o
0
O

o °o
0
N

N °o
0
O

o °o
0
O

° °o
0
O

o

¢

z °o
0
o

°

W
.
»
« o
w y
A v
w
v
ro .

c
c
a"
0
0
0
°
0
0
o Q z $ ° ° o
o o z o
c

w
U . « w
u
w
w

T
p o

c
0 V

0. Z z z z z

w z z
'a
]
o
Q p O Q Z Z Z Z Z yj z Z
ti
Y i U
a T
N ?j ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ m ¢ ¢
z
p Q Y
a` A z z z z z z
A
O Q b

•
Z
°
m
N
o o
c0
O
Z ?cpp
O
J3?

o
c
o O
d d
? N
`m o
? N
N
V Y
m
A a
E c
t Y
v c
N 0
n c U
n c O
a J
Y A
E o
z'"
Q a Z A_cm
° a
? yO
d 20 Y
A -y Y j m¢'
N
o
o m
n3¢' ° o
a c> m
.
o
¢ a m °
aP
o¢` .
ao a
E2 ¢ m o d w c?
Q
H e ? r .
E E
=a ao,
A u m ; ? m
E E
e V E ? u
o 2 o i a
$ . ? m 3
E
? o o ? E
A U