20061042 Ver 3_401 Application_20110811

WITHERS &- RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
1410 COMMONWEALTH DRIVE, SUITE ioi
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA, 28403
[phone]
FAX [phone]
TO: NC Division of Water Quality - 401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
WE ARE SENDING YOU
? Shop Drawings
? Copy of Letter
oV - o l? a. v3
DATE 8/ /11 106 No.
ozo9o5o0.00
ATTENTION Mr. Ian McMillan
PHONE # [phone]
RE: Ashton Hall Phases & NWP 2 PCN Submittal

2011
KEN ?lNR- WATERQUAIlTv
?? !;RANCH
® Attached ? Under separate cover via
? Prints ? Plans ? Samples
? Change order ? Diskette ?
the following items:
? Specifications
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
5 8/9/11 02090500.00 Ashton Hall Phases & 4 NWP 2 PCN Submittal
1 8/8/11 02090500.00 $24o Application Fee
1 8/9/11 02090500.00 CD of Submittal

F'
r7 AL

THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:

® For approval ? Approved as submitted ? Resubmit copies for approval
? For your use ? Approved as noted ? Submit copies for distribution
? As requested ? Returned for corrections ? Return corrected prints
? For review and comment ?
? FOR BIDS DUE 20 ? PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS:
r
Signature:
Date:
COPY TO: File SIGNED: Troy Beasley
if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
WITHERS ?, RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
August 9, 2011
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
NC-Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
Attn: Mr. Ian McMillan
1650 Mail Service Center.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Re: Ashton Hall Subdivision - Phases 3 & 4 - NWP 29 PCN Submittal
ACOE Previous AID #2005-20047
NC DWQ Previous Project # - o6-o142, Ver. 2
W&R Project #02090500.00
Dear Mr.Alsmeyer and Mr. McMillan,
On behalf of Hearthstone Multi-Asset Entity B, LP, we are requesting authorization from the USACE to
use NWP 29 for 0.21 acres of permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and 104 if of permanent
impacts to streams for the construction of the proposed project. We are also requesting 401-
Certification and Buffer Compliance from NC-DWQ for impacts to jurisdictional wetlands, stream and
11,430 sq of impacts to riparian buffers.
The project consists of the construction of Phases 3 & 4 of the previously permitted ±134 acre Ashton
Hall subdivision, located at the intersection of Sherron Road and Karen Drive, in Durham, Durham
County. Phases 3 & 4 consist of ±45 acres and are located west of Ashton Glenn Drive within the
Ashton Hall Subdivision (Latitude: 35.9583171N; Longitude: 78.830178°W). The project is located in
the Neuse River basin and onsite waters drain to Little Lick Creek. The Water Quality Classification
for Little Lick Creek is WS-IV; NSW and the Stream Index Number is: 27-940.5). The cataloging unit
for the site is 03020201.
Project History
The Ashton Hall Subdivision was previously permitted as a single and complete project. The Corps
issued a NWP 29 (AID #2005-20047) for impacts associated with the Ashton Hall Subdivision on
May 9, 2oo8. NC DWQ issued a Water Quality Certification and Buffer Authorization Certificate (DWQ
Project #o6-o142, Ver.2) for the Ashton Hall Subdivision on June 6, 2008. Copies of these permits
have been provided as Appendices to this application.
As a result of the downturn of the economy, construction of Ashton Hall was halted. Authorized
impacts associated with Phases 3 & 4 were not completed prior to expiration of the NWP 29 and 401
WQC. The applicant wishes to proceed with construction of Phases 3 & 4 and is requesting re-
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
www.withersravene[.com I License No. C-0832
WITHERS I RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
authorization ofthe previously permitted impacts associated with Phases 3 & 4 in orderto complete
construction of the Ashton Hall Subdivision.
A Buffer Determination was issued for the Ashton Hall Subdivision site by NC DWQ (NBRR# 04-0337)
on June 1, 2oo6. As a result of the Permit Extension Act, the Buffer Determination is still valid. A
copy of the Buffer Determination Letter has been provided as an Appendix to this application.
The Corps issued a Jurisdictional Determination for the Ashton Hall Subdivision Site (AID# 2005-
20047) on October 25, 2004. The original JD expired in 2010. W&R has field reviewed the wetlands
within the proposed impact areas, and the original delineation is still correct. Per a conversation
with Eric Alsmeyer with the Corps of Engineers, we are providing Rapanos Forms for verification the
wetlands within the proposed impact areas.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of 0.21 acres of permanent wetland impacts, 104 if of permanent
stream impacts and 11,430 sq ft of permanent buffer impacts. The proposed impacts will occur from
construction of road crossings to provide access to onsite uplands.
Please not that the proposed impact locations and road crossing alignments are the same as was
previously permitted. However, it should be noted that the total impacts from the crossings has
increased slightly (0.07 acres) at Wetland Impact #4 as a result of an error in the design by the
previous engineer. The impact plans approved under the previous permits did not address impacts
from installation of culverts beneath the road and rip-rap at the ends of the culverts to prevent
erosion as required by Durham County Erosion Control. The enclosed impact plans have addressed
these additional impacts.
Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed impacts will occur from the construction of road crossings to access developable
uplands within Phases 3 & 4 of the Ashton Hall Subdivision.
Also, since the proposed impact locations for Phases 3 & 4 have not changed, the previous issuance
of the NWP 29 and 401 Water Quality Certification documents that avoidance and minimization of
impacts was exhibited by the site plan.
Mitigation
Through the previous permitting of the Ashton Hall Subdivision, o.66 acres of riparian wetland
mitigation was required to mitigate for impacts for the entire subdivision. The o.66 acres of riparian
wetland mitigation was purchased from EEP on January 17, 2008, satisfying the mitigation
requirements of the previous permit. A copy of the EEP Mitigation Receipt has been provided as an
WITHERS RAVENEL Page 2 of 3
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
WITHERS I RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
Appendix. Since the proposed impacts for Phases 3 & 4 have increased by 0.007 acres, it is not
anticipated that additional mitigation will be required.
Since the buffer impacts for the road crossing (Buffer Impacts 1 & 2) are less than 1/3 acre, not
buffer mitigation is required perthe Neuse River Buffer Rules Table of Uses.
Stormwater Management
The proposed Stormwater Management Plan is currently being reviewed by the City of Durham.
Upon issuance of the City of Durham Stormwater Management Approval, a copy will be provided to
NC-DWQ. We are requesting conditional approval of the proposed project pending the issuance of
the Stormwater Management Approval by the City of Durham. A copy of the proposed Stormwater
Management Plan submitted to the City of Durham has been provided with this application.
The current request is for 0.21 acres of permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetlands, 104 if of
permanent impacts to jurisdictional streams and 11,430 sq ft of permanent impacts to riparian
buffers (see the attached maps and PCN for details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Troy Beasley
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• Aerial Photograph
• USGS Quad Map
• Durham County Soil Survey
• Previous NWP 29
• Previous 401 WQC and Buffer Authorization
• Buffer Determination Letter
• EEP Mitigation Receipt
• Rapanos Forms
• Wetland Impact Plans
• StormwaterManagement Plans
WITHERS RAVENEL Page 3 of 3
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
10? ,yWNATFRQG
Olqii? -c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ® Yes ? No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Ashton Hall Subdivision
2b. County: Durham County
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Durham
2d. Subdivision name: Ashton Hall
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Hearthstone Multi-Asset Entity B, LP
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 005370
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): 000631
3d. Street address: 781 Lincoln Avenue, Suite 300
3e. City, state, zip: San Rafael, CA 94901
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page I of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Local Office for Hearthstone Multi-Asset Entity B, LP
4b. Name: K. Scott Phillips
4c. Business name
(if applicable): Hearthstone Multi-Asset Entity B, LP
4d. Street address: 4509 Creedmoor Road, Suite 200
4e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27612
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Troy Beasley
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Withers and Ravenel
5c. Street address: 1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101
5d. City, state, zip: Wilmington, NC 28403
5e. Telephone no.: 910-256-9277
5f. Fax no.: 910-256-2584
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): PIN - 0840-03-93-8708
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.958317°N Longitude: - 78.830178W
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: Ashton Hall Subdivision - ±134 acres
Phases 3 & 4 - ±45 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to Little Lick Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV; NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse River (HUC Code 03020201)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The existing conditions of Phases 3 & 4 of the Ashton Hall subdivision consist of undeveloped woodlands. The general
land use in the vicinity of the proposed project consists of a residential subdivision.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Phases 3 & 4 - ±2.26 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Phases 3 & 4 - ±470 If-20047
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to complete the construction of the previously approved Ashton Hall subdivision.
The proposed project was previously issued a NWP 14 (AID #200520047) and a 401 WQC (DWQ Project #06-1042, Ver.
2). The permitted impacts associated with construction of Phases 1, 2, 4 & 5 of the Ashton Hall subdivision were
completed. However, due to the downturn in the economy, construction was halted and authorized impacts associated
with Phase 3 & 4 were not completed prior to expiration of the permits. The applicant wishes to construct the additional
phases of the Ashton Hall Subdivision and requests re-authorization of previously permitted impacts to complete
construction.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project will consist of the construction of the Phases 3 & 4 of the Ashton Hall Subdivision. The proposed
impacts were previously approved, but were never constructed prior to expiration of the 404/401 permits. Equipment
used for construction of the project will consist of standard commercial construction equipment.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes ? No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Land Management Group
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
The Corps issued a Final JD for the project site on October 25, 2004 (AID# 2005-20047).
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ® Yes ? No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
A Buffer Determination was issued for the Ashton Hall Subdivision project site on June June 1, 2006 (DWQ Proj NBRR
#04-0337), see attached.
A NWP 29 was issued for the Ashton Hall Subdivision on May 9, 2008 (AID #2005-20047), see attached.
A 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Authorization Certificate was issued for the Ashton Hall Subdivision project
site on June 6, 2008 (DWQ Proj # 06-0142, Ver.2), see attached.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ®Yes ? No
6b. If yes, explain.
The Ashton Hall Subdivision was previously permitted as a single and complete project, but was constructed in Phases.
Due to the downturn of the economy, construction was halted prior to completion of the authorized wetland and stream
impacts for Phases 3 & 4. The applicant wishes to proceed with construction of Phases 3 & 4 and is requesting re-
authorization of the previously approved impacts for these phases.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary (T)

W1 ®P ? T Fill - Road
Crossing
Headwater Forest ® Yes
? No ® Corps
® DWQ
0.05 ac

W2 ®P ? T Fill - Road
Crossing
Headwater Forest ® Yes
? No ® Corps
® DWQ
0.02 ac

W4 ®P ? T Fill - Road
Crossing
Headwater Forest ® Yes
? No ® Corps
® DWQ
0.14 ac
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.21 ac
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)

S1 ®P ? T Fill - Road UT to Little Lick ? PER ® Corps
5'
49 If
Crossing Creek ® INT ® DWQ

S2 ®P ? T Fill - Road UT to Little Lick ? PER ® Corps
5'
55 If
Crossing Creek ® INT ® DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 104 If
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason for Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary (T) required?

B1 ®P ? T Fill - Road
Crossing
UT to Little Lick Creek ? Yes
® No
3,228 sq ft
2,081 sq ft

B2 ®P ? T Fill - Road

Crossing
UT to Little Lick Creek ? Yes

® No
3,786 sq ft
2,335 sq ft
6h. Total buffer impacts 7,014 sq ft 4,416 sq ft
6i. Comments: Buffer mitigation is not required because the total buffer impacts at this road crossing are less than 1 /3 acre.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed impacts have been minimized to those necessary for road crossings to access onsite uplands. The proposed
design for Phases 3 & 4 is the same as was previously permitted under AID #2005-20047, which documents that avoidance
and minimization was achieved.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Silt fencing will be installed around all disturbed areas to prevent sediment from escaping the construction area and entering
onsite wetlands and streams.
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ® Yes ? No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ® Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this

project? ? Mitigation bank

®Payment to in-lieu fee program

? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.66 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments: The mitigation impacts associated with the entire Ashton Hall Subdivision was purchased under the previous
permits. A copy of the EEP Mitigation Receipt has been provided as an Appendix to this application.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8of11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a . Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b . If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
® Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a . What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 28.9%
2b . Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d . If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Wet detention ponds are proposed throughout the project, such that all impervious areas are directed through the wet
ponds for both water quality and peak attenuation control. The Stormwater Management Plan is currently being reviewed
by the City of Durham. Upon issuance of approval of the Stormwater Management Pl an, a copy of the approval will be
provided to NC DWQ.
® Certified Local Government
2e . Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? City of Durham
® Phase II
3b . Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HQW
4a . Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b . Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a . Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b . Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes ? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project consists of the construction of Phases 3 & 4 of the existing Ashton Hall Subdivision. The Ashton
Hall Subdivision is located within a developed residential area of Durham County. Therefore, the construction of the
proposed project is not anticipated to be a catalyst for additional development that could impact nearby downstream
water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
E] Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
W&R reviewed the NC OneMap Viewer GIS website, located at http://www.nconemap.net/Default.aspx?tabid=286, to
identify if any potential occurrence of endangered species on or near the proposed project. The review of the GIS
database did not identify any recent occurrences of endangered species or critical habitat on the subject property or
within 1.0 miles of the project. Furthermore, the proposed project is located within an existing residential development
which was permitted in 2008.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no waters designated as EFH in Durham County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The Ashton Hall Subdivision was previously permitted in 2008, which documents that the project will not impact historic or
archeological resources.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfloodmaps.com

Troy Beasley - Authorized Agent
Withers and Ravenel 8/9/11

Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature
' Date
(Agent
s signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
WITHE ? ?VENEL
,00,IP-t#It S RI:.JA4FN ;L4 aPY%IFf!?
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned purchaser(s)fowner(s) Hearthstone Multi-Asset Entity 8, LP do(es) hereby
appoint Troy Beasley Y Withers & Ravenel, Inc. as has, her, or it's agent for the purpose of
patitioning the appropriate local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army
Corps of Engineers. NC Division of Water Quality, NC Division of !Coastal Management, etc.) for:
a) review and approval of the jurisdictiorral bounda0es of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands,
surface waters, etc,) andior; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate environmental permit
applications?requests for the Ashton Hall Subdivision (Durham, NCJ.
The owner does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts on
behalf of the owner
( 1) To submit appropriate requestsfapplications and the required supplemental
Materials;
{2) 7o attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the CIient_
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of environrneotaI
review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This auttrorization shall continue In effect until compl an of the Contracted task or termination by
the property owner.
Elate:
Agent's Name, Address & Telephoner Signature of Owner(s):
Troy Beasley( Withers & Havenel. Inc. K1. +TL-: t1 Ys / [ ?l k"-rtzj cA 'i? pr t4j-4 e,
(Name - Print) (T01e)
1410 Commonwealth Crive, Suite 101
Wilmington, NC 28403
Tel. X0255.•9277
(Signature)
4509 reedmoor Rd.. Suite 200
Mailing Address
Raleigh, NC 27612
City State Zip
i11 M,acKenan Drive Cary, NC 27511 tel. [phone] fax: 919,467.6408 wwwmfther caveneLcam I License No, C•4632
1410 Commonwcat[h Drive I Sufm 101 1 ilmil;gton, NC 2484091 td: 910.256.9271 fax: [phone]
416 D (5 aflinlore Di) iry R4nd Gre,2 ii ti,Im1- . N{. 274091 tet_ 336.9,93-5504 fax= 91Y.467-60023
EXHIBITS

L
= •' "'

i x GR PHI
A C SCALE
1
fY{ •?1}q
v : ?i ?Cr
. tj ,? y. ? if , ?.yk }i SpT al k '1 i #J Q AM 400
Y
•}F? •'.? y RIi T ]???+r'1 J?} iy,,,, °y ?, ?P 'iC rP 'L;?-. .T.'. ? C?. .
' 1 ?1•??7
?: '
r.`
k
L5'
iC.'?M r '?

s
+ :?
?
?
i
Tillie
-
1. 1 inch 400 fl-
? 1
t
? '?
~ I
' ?4"
'
'? AI
?
.
S ?
1 'C• ; i, r
Y
f
r.4 '
,
A '} '4K
,? ?
?" v_1'?? ?

I
.
! 4
y
1?RR y
?yyt
?-! t } }1 T?'
-
-
i:i •
y
?
lj
L
1?
` i ! ? ? ??r '.? P
?, RSS,
r .r?ri 1•(":4 i?? ';*Y4A _
`
;
.
???+++ ? ssreel ??r y; 5• .
??`aYf?r:vy?if
tv"

42
?
#
?
l

[ . ,? Ili. ? ? t4'

,. y , ]IillA .. `'( +`'
$}
' k. F •
_ ti„k„? k?4?,,,' ? 5. ?,w?{ ? i! {? ?
V ..."vi i 4 y 1 1 M 17 1 1FR T
'?
f. 1
+ -
e
'
'?
L
d ' #` s
y 1*4 r ? •Si
7
?1r ?. ± e, Iy '
1 !
p
M1 y..
!

e
e 1 1 PY
71 i.
1
#
Pd xF
Sti E ,S
.T6411
i 1 A r1?i?
r a
„'ti
''
-
?
b
ir?+ ? '? ?'"
tL
?
l r
,
fi
k M1h
r.
.
'
? S? I
r
?
p f
y1.
'A t' ? ?
. :.
...
w ?
y
r.
,
yy
1 t
,}?•? • .<
• '' }' 'k 'L,?1.: ; • k ;n yY Ir' 1 •Ir q '? 1
i 1 a>? ., i r I
4 ?75
• ?`
.. yy.
¢ )•,} 1ti r
lS:
r
. FA, 'r'{ .+.
,''
l
l
'

r
? 14. y
L iR,R +
l
?'? 1 \r \ °i i y
.F
.3 1 F `i 7p+ r ?•'
•wf '.
4`ti
n
y t I
r,
Y f+
1
y y-1 ?
•.
j Jy'?,
?'? xk y
+, ^ ? A
..
+j it 1,' 'fl ...? ''1 1k t+ ?',. "'f T i1 y ?
?
?' li ?^3 e { n L, s , ? n
? r,?11a 7
A
' I
y
'5? I'CI'' 1IL Sj
*?•, ?`
y
?
y
r t,
•
lT
r:yr
?f4} y'SI ? 4j 5. }`' y??.. y ll?- l +ti ,}" ?..• ?
?7?
•
il.i ?rI -4 •}yn 'r it
z
•
` +

? V 1? ! I 1

?•• -? JJ 1, 1
?, t ?r!`3? ??„?
,?_4'f , ?•??' a ,
-• 1- ??Ll ?'?tti I.y?+ r ?.
f •'? 1 I L?''I 11 ~Y ?1/iSVr Yy
,?'•(?

-
• ,
:???, 1? T'??x +.!''?'
.. a r
? • •' A li x{1',
';}
.. 1 ? q-Ir{.L ?+La' 1 rr N

1
+
"T F
YY t' ,
rr
?
r R
.7 4 a , .
+ L ? ?????? 1 A'
+A
,` '!`.71 / a
,+{??,?Iy " ?J4 Ip
? {.,?p}4 $FC `'y?Y' r? y. •
^`" ?I r i¢f ??I 4? ?k?c? 4k ?•' s- j A ?. 3 ? '?'? .r ?l'?gV]?i;'?: ul, f
}
}
?
p{
?TJy?
Ari
? ?•??'IrYI. ,.f.''• ?!• f kGI f! ? i
d .-} 1'x(isf{i?•?? l??'? 't'fa R ?{ ?,j.s-' xl( ISry'./'r

*
y•
? i •
q
? ?;d' T'J?
b 7Ryy „r'
"?
1?
'?? • ?' p w
I, F
y
+
;
_1 ?
3
? t^. '?I?a.. ..
i
r o"
.,y •A
U lf 0
r..•,V 1 ?'' 1 ?C
, t

,? ..4 ¢ i ..?-. °?' i ? ?. 7 a
•/ ?
{ ? ?"?
,
k
ll i
-
1.
1
I ??
S"T°,'
???}
?? +r:
?J

'
1i Td p

1 1 r
s
?' , ?? ±?'?. •`
m? . ? ? ? ? _ rip ? -
??'{ ??
y ?t i s? 3„ ? ' .. 5. • _ _ ? -' yam, .. . ?`
1r?1•' •. .
,
t
7
,
..
y?
?
t. %4
?
•
?
'
?
??
1'?'
? ? c-?.
ti?i,y
?r
y?41
.\'? •y. !?? 'a
"L'?4???1 '
? *.
eta +?1 •ti
1 .
. g
1 ?_ r r e ?. pas try ? `r`'+,r` f;+ ?
IA
?1
?
I
4'6?
'] "?.
. ,! 15.
?
Y
?.
f
;?'% ??
r?
! ?
1
r
?,? r
. y.;
?.
1_
??? y`?F
Y•
T
.
. -
'?
? +
?•,.P
?
.
,{+,1+
?
?
+? 4,
?°\? ?{ ? }?
Y
, ? c ?
t '
? q
l
?
s '
' ?
,
?? • i, ?,:
?r
_ ?
??' ? t ? • ,
r
?
l
L
? ,
`
I
14
S ! .
1 ,
,
,
_
'-
?
4
?k
1ay + T
`,
li tJ' .?' r?y 1 .. n1 f., +
L ,

FASHTON HALL - PHASES 3 & 4 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH - 2010 WITHERS RAVENEL
¦NGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
11'.'- :1.NI': NORTH CAROLINA
.•*N�r
0
4
i#
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 150 300
1 inch = 300 ft.
lk It
I f IL s - I.
AIPF
ASHTON HALL - PHASES 3 & 4 USGS QUAD MAP - SE DURHAM QUAD WITHERS &' RAVEN EL
IRSIRRRR■ I �LRRiIRR■ 1 ;Il i1 YRTQRi
111;R10h5 I)tlki iAM{MNAY -N ORIF P CAR7WA

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400
AA/01 1 inch = 400 ft.
PREVIOUS NWP 29
? 5 -41040
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 6`kw
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 200520047 County: Durham USGS Quad: Southeast Durham
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: Marc Lesman
Address: McCar Homes
4125 Old Milton Parkway
Alpharetta, GA 30005
Telephone No.: 770-206-9100
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): The project site is a 134 acre subdivision
named Asliton Hall and is located east f Mineral Springs Rd. and north A Sharron Rd. sotitheast Durhain
Durham County, North Carolina,
Description of projects area and activity: This iernrit verification allows for 90 linear feet of erinanent stream
channel impacts from the instillation of calverts in a LIT tr) 1 jttln l.,icli (=rcclc and 0.141 nea_'"_ot` lu_:1_avincilt
r¢L9_9 '
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
? Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 29
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the'
perinittee. to a stop work order, a restoratiott order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide pcrniit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requircmerits of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit mahoi-1zation e%pir, s or is. s ist?andt cl revoked, or k inud f nd, ow-h that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have coinincsiced (i.o., are
under cotlstructiorl) or are tinder contract to eominence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also rcquirc an individual Section 401 Water Quality Ct'llification. You
should contact the NC Nvision of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Sdction 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C, Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory.
program, please contact Eric Alsmeyer.
Corps Regulatory Official -James Lastinger - rtAO {mot Date: May 9, 2008
Expiration Date of Verification: May 9, 2010
Page 1 of 2
The Wilmington District is committ ed to providing the highest level of suPPO"t to tile. public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
Please complete the Customer satisfaction Survey located at our websitc at lt[tnalre lafor .usrscesurve .coml to complete the survey
online.
Page 2 of 2
Determination of Jurisdiction: described ? Based nrr preliminary information,e appear t action under the Regulatory wetlandsAdministratwithin the eove Appeal Process,ect area.
This preliminary detei?aninataon is not an appealable a
( Reference 33 CFR Part 331). ibed
subj
the ? There are Navigable Waters of the Act ad Section 404 of the ClleanrWa er Act. Unless here is a changerin the law ortourf
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors rs
published regulations, this determination may be retied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date oft is
notification.
regulations, Section
? There are waters of•the US andlnr wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requ
444 of the glean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344)• Unless there is a change in the law or our published determination may be relied upon fbr a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
® The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued October 25, 2004. Action ID 200520047
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination: Established by an OHWM.
Appeals Information (This information apples only to approved jurisdictional determinations.) agreoment Attached this verification is an approVedE ?e appeal runder 33 CI-R 331. Enclosed you w ill find a Nowith that approved
ficati n of Appeal Process
(NAP) determination, you can make an a appeal (NAP) fact sheet and request for apl>peal (RFA) form, if you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RF
form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attar: Jean Manuole, Field Office Chief,
ItaleighReguIatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Dr., Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 77587
---.,1,
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps mtisi uc -?sU-?--'-,nc that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 GFR part 331.5, and that it has been reec vedby the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP, Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at flhc above address b July 9, 2008.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the D' rict Office if you do n7 hject'to the determination in this correspondence."
Corps Regulatory Official; -James Lastinger _
Expirutio ate October 25 2009
Bate Mav g ?.nnx
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
Copy Furnished:
Chas. H. Sells, Inc.
ATTN: Budd Titlow
15401 Weston Parkway, suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
Page 3 of 2
Action ID Number: SAW-2005-20047 County: Durham
Permmittee: Marc Lesman
Date Verification Issued: May 9, 2008
Project Manager: Eric Alsmeyer
upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
3331 HERITAGE TRADE DR., SUITE 105
WAKE FOREST, NORTH CAROLINA 27587
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension,
modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized-by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee Date
Applicant: Marc Lesman File Number: SAW-2005- Date: May 9, 2008
20047
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of A
ermission)
_ PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or obj ect to the permit,
final
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you nlay sign the permit document and return it to the district cngunaer for
authorisation. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP); you may accept the LOP and your work is authorizoo. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated wlth the perinit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly, You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district eitginees•. Your
objections must be received by the district engiticer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will for Ceit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district cnguneer will evaluate your objeotions and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to tithes some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written, After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below,
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you tiny sign the permit document and return it to tho district engineer Cur final
authorisation. If you receive[! H Letter of Permission (1,OP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Pernnit or acceptance of the LOP meuns that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
pormit, inch=ding its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
+ APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit -tinder the Corps ofEngineet:4 Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division enginoer. This forfn must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice,
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer, This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice,
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: ff you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the'form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record. ?`_ ...
If you have questions regarding this decision If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact: may also contact:
Eric Alsmeyer, Project Manager Ms. Jean Manuele, Field Office Chief
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Dr., suite 105 3331 Heritage Trade Dr., suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587 Wake Forest, NC 27587 _
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process, You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
rntirr•.rtirratinna
Telephone number:
re of appellant or
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Jean Manuele, Field Office Chief, Raleigh
Regulatory Field Office, 3331 Heritage Trade Dr., suite 105, Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
For Permit denials and Proffered Permits send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Mike Bell,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-ET-CO-R, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9Mi5, Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8801
CHAS. H. SELLS, INC.
011
15401 Weston Porkwoy
Suite 100
Cory, NC 27513
Tel: [phone]
Fox: 919-678-0206
www choshsells.com
Ashton Hall
Subdivision
Durham, NC
Mccar Homes
15401 WeslonParkway, Suile 175
Cary, NC 27513
PROJECTM 00000 DATE: 06-02-06
DRAWN BY: C'CM CHECKED BY: TD
TITLE SCALE V=100'
Stream & Wetland Impacts
SHEET
C3.5.1
D
CHAS. H. SELLS, INC,
.ttt .
15401 Weston Porkvray
Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
Tel: [phone]
Fox: 919-678-0206
www.choshsells.com
Ashton Hall
Subdivision
Durham, NC
McCar Homes
15401 Weston Parkway, Suite 175
Cary, NC 27513
PRO]ECTO: 05-4040 DATE: 06/02M
DRAWN BY: 1VF CHECKED BY: DF
TITLE SCALE P'=100'
Stream & Wetland Impacts
SHEET
C3.5.2
t f 1 i f ry
+ff ?._,1 4 J ??
? T
i' " SrfACUAF 2
52 53 54
55 56 57 58 s
r'= 3 t etIcnd
pact y, f
8 SF
66
7 , a 0 Q ?w
Op,, r?--w-25-03055 64 63 b? YA' r z
Q
62 61 W
TOP OF ? ,.
CREEK VAN"
Buffer Impact #3
Zone 1: 869SF fr ?, 4
Zone 2:3,062 SF _
T 11-1
BPS JJ} GRAPHIC SCALE
- ' , ? ??? ? rR•-,f ?i' I 0 50 100 200
?16 "04, CL=-350 0
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 ft.
1,1j CHAS H. SELIS, INC. ALL RIGHTS ARE EFSERVED. ANY POSSBSION, RMODUCHON OR OfH M
CHAS. H. SELLS, INC.
15401 Weston Porkwoy
Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
Tel: [phone]
Fox: 919-678-0206
www.chashsells.com
USE OF T105 DOCUMHNf WrrHOUT PRIOR PffiMMISSION FROM CHAS tt SEU
Ashton Hall
Subdivision
Durham, NC
McCar Homes
15401 Weston Pedcway, Suit* 175
Cary, NC 27513
INC., IS HURBSSLY PROHIBI M.
PROTECT #: OS-40A0 DATE: 06/02/16
DRAWN BY: WF CHECKED BY: DF
TITLE SCALE V=100'
Stream & Wetland Impacts
SHLE7•
C3.5.4
PREVIOUS 401 WQC AND BUFFER AUTHORIZATION
Michael F. Easley, Governor
AT ?9 p William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
June 6, 2008
DWQ Project # 06-1042, Ver. 2
Durham County
Mr. Mark Lesman
McCar Homes
15401 Weston Parkway, Suite 175
Cary, NC 27513
Subject Property: Ashton Hall Subdivision
Ut to Little Lick Creek [030401, 27-9-(2), WSIV, NSW, CA]
ditic Se per the Neuse River
tiato Certif
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and' Authoriz
Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233)
Dear Mr. Lesman:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 0.141 acres of 404/wetlan ar a0 blinear uffers and 7intermittent stream and 9,330
square feet of Zone 2 Neuse
square feet of Zone 1 Neuse River basin protected r p application dated April 28, 2008, and received
River basin protected riparian buffers, as described in your app
by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on April 28, 2008, to construct a residential development at the
site. After reviewing your application, we have decided
Certification(s) allows you to use Nat onwideter
Quality Certification Number(s) 3705 (GC3705Cor s of Engineers (USAGE). In addition, you should
Permit(s) NW29 when issued by the US Army p
obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, diment Control, beforeNon-you ahead
with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Se
regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with uu expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
waters as depicted in your application shall Pon your
application. If you change your
This approval is for the purpose and design required to sendeusia new application. If t e property is sold,
project, you must notify us and you may be q
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification nnowprom the future) exceed one responsible for acre of
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project
wetland-or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory o t mitigation follow the cond bons 1 sted in theeattached--
NCAC 2H.0506 (h). This approval requires y
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
*approvee d includin inciden tal im acts: plan Location or Reference
Im act Amount A roved Units pCN a e 8 of 12
tland 0.141 (acres) pCN a e 8 of 12
-intermittent 90 (linear feet)
-----------------
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: htt://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
?__? -1 A f-tiVP Action Emalover - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

McCar Homes
Page 2 of 5
June 6, 2008
Buffers Zone 1 9,330 (s ware ft.) PCN page 11 of 12
Buffers Zone 2 7,245 (square ft. PCN age 11 of 12
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
3. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in
order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures and
stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
4. Sediment and Erosion Control Measures
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that
the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
5. Culvert Installation
All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted in a dry work area. Approved BMP
measures from the most current version of NCDOT Construction and Maintenance Activities manual
(Ilttp://www.ncdot.org/doh/operations/BMP manual/download/BMP Manual ndf)
T such as sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams and other diversion structures shall be used to prevent
excavation in flowing water:
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream
profiles are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions,
pattern, and longitudinal profile) must be maintained above and below locations of each culvert.
Culverts shall be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent
head cutting of the streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate
stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall
be removed and re-installed correctly.
Culvert(s) shall not be installed in such a manner that will cause aggradation or erosion of the
stream up or down stream of the culvert(s). Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section
McCar Homes
Page 3 of 5
June 6, 2008
dimensions, pattern and longitudinal profile) shall be maintained above and below locations of each
culvert.
Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed below
the elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches,
and 20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow
low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures
including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result
in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream
of the above structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall be
maintained if requested in writing by DWQ.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques
must be used where practicable instead of rip rap or other bank hardening methods. If rip-rap is
necessary, it shall not be placed in the stream bed, unless specifically approved by the Division of
Water Quality.
Installation of culverts in wetlands must ensure continuity of water movement and be designed to
adequately accommodate high water or flood conditions.
Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate
of Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has
been completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the
401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project. Please
send photographs upstream and downstream of each culvert site to document correct installation
along with the Certificate of Completion form.
6. Diffuse Flow (DWQ Reviewed Plans)
All stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected
stream buffers and will not re-concentrate before discharging into the stream as identified within
15A NCAC 2B .0233 (5)
In an effort to comply with.the diffuse flow provision of the Buffer Rule (15A NCAC 02B
.0233(5)), you have provided the DWQ with level spreader designs received by the DWQ on
April 28, 2008. The DWQ believes that if implemented, as per these plans, diffuse flow will be
achieved. However, if diffuse flow as per 15A NCAC 02B .0233(5) is not achieved, then the
DWQ shall be notified and corrective actions to restore diffuse flow shall be taken if necessary to
impede the formation of erosion gullies. At no time shall stormwater from the proposed
development be piped directly through the buffer without prior DWQ written authorization.
The structural stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well°as drainage patterns must
be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made
without written authorization from the Division of Water Quality. Stormwater easements shall be
recorded for a distance of at least 10 feet on each side of all stormwater conveyances on all lots
containing these structures including future access for maintenance. The stormwater easements
shall allow for the ability to maintain the structures, perform corrective actions as described
above and shall provide protection of the structures from potential alternations by future property
owners.
McCar Homes
Page 4 of 5
June 6, 2008
7. Written Stormwater Management Plan (Final Approval Needed)
The final, written stormwater management plan approval on letterhead from the reviewing local
government and one copy of the approved stormwater management plan, including plan details,
calculations and other supporting information, must be received by this Office before the impacts
specified in this Certification occur per Condition No. 12 in GC No. 3705. Also, before any
permanent building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities (as approved by this Office) shall
be constructed and operational, and the stormwater management plan (as approved by this Office)
shall be implemented. The approved structural stormwater practices as well as drainage patterns
must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made
without written authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
8. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning fencing
(or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the
buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities;
9. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act and the Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. I you have
any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or Ian McMillan at 919-733-1786. /?
McCar Homes
Page 5 of 5
June 6, 2008
CHS/ijm
Enclosures: GC 3705
Certificate of Completion
NCDWQ 401 WQC Summary of Permanent Impacts and Mitigation Requirements
cc: USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Lauren Witherspoon, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Bud Titlow, Chas. H. Sells, 15401 Weston Parkway, Suite 100, Cary, NC 27513
Filename: 061042 Ver2Ashton Hal IS D(Durham)401 _NB R
BUFFER DETERMINATION LETTER
%
F W A r? Michael F. Easley, Governor
Willi
G
t
R
J
S
?
9
Q? QG am
.
ary
oss
r.,
ecre
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
\
y
CO
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Colleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
-1 Division of Water Quality
June 1, 2006
(Revision of December 31®`, 2004 letter)
NBRRO#04-0337
County: Durham
Land Management Group
Mr. Rob Moul
PO Box 2522
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: Mr. Moul
BASIN:
Neuse River X Tar-Pamlico
(15A NCAC 2B .0233) (15A NCAC 2B .0259)
Complaint NOV Buffer Determination X
Incident # Appeal Call
Project Name: Mineral Springs Rd /Sherron Rd Future Site of Quail Creek
Location/Directions: Off Mineral Springs Road / Sherron Road near Delmar Road and Bonnie Rd
Subject Stream:
UT to Little Lick Creek
Date of Determination: 10/8/04
Feature Start Buffer
GPS Points (if
provided) End Buffer Stream
Form Appeal
Call Located
on Soil
Survey Located on
USGS
Topographic
A Subject X X
B Subject X
C Subject X X
D Subject X
E Not Subject X
G Not on property X
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties
that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that a surface water exists and that
it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing do Cyndi Saroly, DWQ Wetlan&1401 Unit, 2321 Crabtree
Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or Delegated Local
Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an ad judicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory
appeal time does not start until the affected party ('including downstream and adjacent landowners) is nottf ed of
this decision. DWQ recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third
party appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center WDEP
Water Quality Section Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
phone [phone] Customer Service
facsimile [phone] 1-877-623-6748
Land Management Group
Mineral Springs Rd/Sherron Rd Future Site of Quail Creek
611/2006
Page 2 of 2
Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing
within 60 days.
The - (owner/future owners) should notify the Division of Water Quality (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated
above). This project may require a Section 4041401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the Division of Water Quality (Central Office) at (919)-733-1786, and the US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-876-8441.
Respectfully,
Michael Horan
Environmental Spec. I
CC: Joe Pearce, Durham County Engineering, P 120 East Parrish St., Durham, NC 27701
Todd Tugwell, US Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Office
Wetlands/ Stormwater Branch, 2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250, Raleigh, NC 27604
File Copy
Central Files

IA - SHEET NUMBER 27
rC Joins she 27
W
NxE. WsC C of 22 s CB
WsC O
Sc W\ 0 Wn; ?'? I se k
w5c l 1?' crB w56 Gr6 cra SF cn N
i
WsC Ch CrC? Ws8 j Wn WsC
GAG /WsE ( Cep I ` C? a A16
...CrB - .r.staf •x>gis WsC.. ?.?; ,
.. r - \ ..
s' Cr8h
'AlT
t
V r WsB y r s a:" CrB a°
k AIA R ^?, etr 7 y f G o
!! + -eu,? '? t xtc, , e { ie Z 1 't =k"' n73 3 ?-s' r ?- L y - it
s. Gr8 q can
F;s+ a I `. f i? = WsC. s? r W"s? r Gi
CrB AIB
?s r ? '.T 4 -s k? ?e11 .,:a' ? ? • ?# 4:? ,? 4V ;a6 s a6 98
-• 5? a .? ? ? a ?$'',?` ',? Lr±? s-? ?J?"ir"* ? ? "? CrC,y l?iJ??
? ?: ?? ? ?d-'? ,tfN Jr ? ? 7,f ^?,SC ?t 4' ?k v? fir; 15C ?r? ????)??.`?rr + ? ,?a ?L??;``?-•
1?- ?K ?-.K- cr{` R? 3 k-?S, 't`•I.yT {? ?47 5?+f. i ?? ?ISE' T
her r 7 a { y
r' i1 i r /'y ?S.4? e 7 a•,s, u -9. ,?2:." l Y1 T '?'?' YS??, W
;a? ? ?+ ? a'?,xis d '?5,'? l,`h 'S .}??? 2 ;i gy , * ? ,?`?8 •' s n } .nx • a• 3#
i .a. ,.% t'?a ? .. ..'R•r€"f"'?xa.'- s. +.'; ..?.: ?? . -?. ?e ... _ ,c?:. , , t.:: ..X'°?:.. 3 te•_':=. x,?•'a.:. ¢„ :.?k!: m
a{
? F ", s s cf ?
v 't•? -5i? W§B ,+E°?''i .L k` ?; t _
.? L i
r4- 4 O .-i
r E ,gyp eau ;n. i 4p ?• rkr. ' a '?" S-, ° ? Ch ?`+ : ?? Utz .*'?? - > y r?'? t ? 't`ry"-?-.d u :i
,? .?, e_ ?,y-C ? -•y Y _ t` ?k[^»?,? ?y „vx?s_. ,a to H 1s.-.??.*'S" ,f #? lefs - ?,.., ?
.cs ? ? r e ";4 t? • ?5? ? ? ,+?.t,.tif??'i? '?? ?? I? q ? ?` ?4e? '-- S ?'„'. V)
WsC
r ?+ gyp;: .,? t - 'k',:Vr -`•^ ` - a ,
^ i mt; :4Y $ a a `` ?b: i WsC ?. o
.s°?. ? .fix'. '^s i.- ? '4 rr ?? ,?? ?i r rY °,? ?.- ?' :! ? a v •--'
P'i
S w, z 3s z
S ,e .^r ? ?? e w s ?? ^G-•,?
r
':pr i l ss ir. .., ^ ,,,, 'Y°"t s*a g-p• X" ?: g o
.,, #¢ 5 h-, r cs .;rih _3 r ?+ ,t - '• N
Y + . !r c - y d - ra 9[ `9s! e^' ? ,?'v`'6 t ii. a y- ?? 1 ri,' ?' ''^t t-
52.
fr
}. N fhy 1 `',? .,.1 R '4 ..C"^Tt E. y' F ?y'4 ^ { 'i.L?.' W$GA`- !F 4
th _ R W$B .: ?
ut; $ {4 t t. ,i'xd 'r-, "'s 1 -+Xc Cr6 00
? ?, y+?"y? ??.? r 1"t? ? gxV?l tF?• -? ?'?tk'T ''. ? ?;r..ac,, X} •-ae ?"`:" s _ m
sr ?r r?,?hT'e w . ? .+., ??? ?, * t,,t.?w-r;'YV?E'r'??? `?? I •?` - '?..:?''l? } s? '?; -
Fes;. Ws ''.a'Y .-y5a ?# -? '? - ?s.+' •'''Sy \\ cx'*+ ?- y` \'?, , t G
? - ? A ? ?:d`? Z`r? *; .Y;, '? •CrB , ?? ? ? x`?*h ?'1 ?`? CrQ ' ?' a
r Jn v _ . ?? `T•??'?" r'??eyT?? ??`? .? 4?'?? : - ? ? 'v?„a?` ?WsB' I11 x3x? :? r& ,? ' • YI[`sC .
.•"! ?. , ,. ?? ? ? t ?- ? x 1Tl . - ? +i •, ?+ f 3 Z, ? 9 v H ? r f? {9. 'ic++ CfrC Cr? ?a -l` O
it 0
--m 40
LO
WsC
sB ,y r .r /? Y,.(_ an t. '? WsC t WsE 'z ?s
?/ WsB Ws? t
(Join s ee? 32) WsE z oss o0o FEFi g
A _.. ,1 M
f? ! t -' y. a`'f ?••btt lei ?? r' , l?f J .:J ? , 7 0. ? f,.- r?1 l ?/r,i Ji ..
5{{ ,{ / \ ,ti tY d J F `Kj
1..'y.,......?''
=•
A,liraY .?als4
1t?L?+ ,,? . 'l' ? :f / ? ; , + ? . c ''? „' {?1? ` '.; ? ti f Y? . ?; ? 1,,?? ?? ,•`? ? r
?,,,ti? v • ;? J, s y}?\
a { ?{j; '. r? S? ??.? .,?„ ? i l'?`•. 1 ?.._._ ?? ?i ? ??\
IN, 7
4 t sa '•ac. - ,+r,.?. - ?`-?'"`i.... rykFyf,??1b'g??.J:??` {. p'ij72 ?«t-4- :? Gr2$k .. \ \1
17
?• r°a? >:./ _t 1 '? S, 7..+ rv ! i ??..t ..vv' 1 `?.? {l 1 7 , ! .'. 1 ?• qty a? ti:..._
z rti }. }r. li (1i rF{?? C>? lr.-.? , i ft {.t?zT?1v1 1?i e r i?r t j X, .r
\? ?_ ?.'' c ?.=?-1• ..i ? ?.r'?.,..:.f , ,Y.?..?:?^.^,.-. i t!s:r E ?.::i}, ^It t._; ,?t '+•?, ? iti - G? ,:..:.t,.:•
'A^-?;?'J14? ? :, ?a t? ,..?'?? '? 'u J`.? y??\` `?':7t? 1 r„ ?(??'' t,?..? •?--. ?1 J. ? '`? ? ?`
FA{L$
IN k 1? / ?J
ti {
Au.
Uj?
1??' ?•`F /rr1?'y s? {j????V?t r,' ?7(?1 I`?
V"N
?f:7;
_NJ
,.. c r =., I ? {,•,.....,, ? ? r is -? ?,? I?.
1Sr /euew?Za? "r. •.?C,1. ?.l
,1 _ys \? " I •.•* ?`?.J „y. - - , ,r `r'?.? 7? ttt
40
?1•f' Y i ?
?' Ty J t,r.?? }} 1't ?t?'?,. ? !c'' .~ 'f11i?.A /4 _- ?r??- r_' I? h.!/'i""ti? W?' r > -? ....??..
1 ?

I • 1?,
17j
3
9* w
Coovdaht (C) 1E

r

Y1.7„1 1.1r-7i I r

S 82:Y08-
E
1,795.
KATHERINE P. MCLAMB
PIN 0650-01-05-6804
PB 25 PG 26
I NpuSE
DE"MING A. PEACE, SR. &
DORA J. PEACE
P/N 0650-01-05-6336
DB 195 PG 261
PB 85 PG 76
r 100YR FLOWUNE
A A/AP/ 3ML=179 0
VARY A. 1996
OLD TIMBER LOGGED AREA "
?a
TIMBER RECENTLY LOGGED
N 1f7'W
DE "OR£ST 4'ny0N I
76 PG 7 82 *8 32' W i 99.90' - -?_- n
i
14} ?B 83 PG 301 j 8285 G9' f 749:1i7TAL) -?'-- w'
?"f 113iJ t 12) ? 11 f r j ?r ;' weN? --=iia?
Joe
'MAP PB 76 po
H-34 61
27798• -- Pe a3 ?GPC30i94 ?11 1
S 9285?9- £ 20a98'
82'5531- £
'Qo
THOMAS W. & ELDORA KING
PIN 0850-03-04-7601
D8 182 PG 483
PS 26 PG 116
_?--_
a
?ES !
1 f
THOMAS W. & ELDORA
PIN 0850-01-15-4014
DB 107 PG 103
THOMAS W. & ELDORA KING %,
PIN 000-03-04-9766
?i DB 182 PG 483
PS 110 PG 97
WATERS OF WE U.S
83'1 T m2 E
1898.83'-"--
`?C-` uvv?-.uae
HP Z ELN
/?" a-mad
INl
INV
00PEN NEIL
OJ IG "r^
C4
a
2
a
?o
v
W
Co
v
i
#ga
O
a
m
N
£
4107

z,
1'

NCY/SE-
Pe
V
y ?N
4?
0

y a
" V O

4
?• q
A?

1
I S' .
a
50 -
C
r-q
a?
w?
we
an
a
14
?z
i
y
a
P•.
?O
Cb O
~ O
Ii
p
b ?
V
N
N ?
W ?
U
vp
y
? N
CI i
V
46$24• w
A?
, f
1 j
i l

0
Q
o b?
m
a

Away
.
Aso

Awl /ft AeZ
PC ja
lV 0&2oor £
1 21Qog•
jl?„ VI
1
21K69'
? ; b 4t
0
b
N?
?
p

!R4 PN ??
&A
0
P
cc o
o? ? I

! Lan
ARC
CT
i
60

1

!
N
? v

i,
j
1
l:'I
o?
a O ?'
N
w I
w?
?y
b
?0 ? O 2
A
#p
wH a
w
r?n
Wt
a?
?o g
x 2
r?

b? Pa
u

` ? ?? m 2 F
A y

m ?"
t vN
u
ti ?Q
Z rPb
?a'y

v_
a, ?' o o
? w$

?°D S ??128rW'B-
?TR?pA T.
ai
V) Pig 2.9
o n+4AIQ

ip
h ? G
Pkg
aB Z
a
`•_ mw a
•? b
it t4
y
4
?
Pa
a
•? m
?

?e Q
PO •R
A
w •
y

Pn ?
I
b;a (

w I

R/IY

b
y x ?
a

0 -C), m
sN
?m?
?I ? h1 ? H U
4
? ,NQ
b'C oo?o
• Oo V jy
N p 00, E n
11825 N
P+
V N
N
4 ?.

G I
? O
? I P
r? Pa

O
+ r ?!
4 •
4 ?? I

At.
kpp_ 2
co gw
bQ0 ?
u? g
a. t4
4
•ti .
KATHERINE P. McLAMB
PIN 0850-01-05-6804
DB 168 PG 353 APPROXMIATE fOOW FLOODUINE
PB 10 PG 181 DATED FEBRUARY Z f996
A.B. NAPIER FAMILY TRUST-
P/N 0840-02-95-5540
i
/
/
RALPH aONTZ N ;
PIN 0840-02-95-4278 /
SPRINGS RDA
I
PUBLIC R/,W -_
INWJ21.2
r ` 179.54' // ' ?/•?/
a-41.3"
029• OAK /
,V a Z2
CREEK BANK
• ?O'iHLLOW OAK
a T4aJ
41,
2o'IR6TE
N 82 25'41'1 / •. f // /
THOMAS W. KING
ail P/N 0840-02-95-4047

Q. cc

- - - - --------
lK 7H W. HINTON 0P8B4 -0 ?9 -2694
581
38
v- 4
ji
?IED ...rrpy BY O26•
GRA
'F
FE
A
Llw
NOUg 5 1 " A ANEL 179 O Jl%/
Bf 3953' " ? ? l /?
E TGUM `
ra.J49.6
127K14' SHED ENCRQICWfI?T EL-JS? 1
a
t8 SHAGBARK HICKORY
16'HH/7E OAK a-JSB.O
19 SHAGBARK HICKORY a- f 1.7 .
EL.Va9
0 021 SWEETGUM
EL-JB?.J
P927GUM
;Jaa.a
-' ----te?xHITE OAK 2J'N1uoW OAK
21'SMX7WM ,7p•IN OW OAK
f n/ EL-JBf.60 EL 1.6
EL-311 0 K
'WLLOW
! 016 NEETGUM
i ?? JSMEEIGUMO a J73 6
I ?
i
•
22'SNEFTCUM 0
37-11
2 SNEMUM
FUTURE QUAIL CRt
AREA=134.3141 At
EEP MITIGATION RECEIPT
Is-
jem'?
PROGRAM
RECEIPT
January 17, 200$
McCar Homes, Inc/Hearthstone III
4125 Old Milton Parkway
Alpharetta, GA 30005
Project: Ashton Hall Subdivision
County: ,'Durham
DWQ 06-1042
USACE Action ID.- 2005-20-047
EEP No.: ICLF-2006-4644
Amount Paid: 22,013 2S „
Check Number: 229013.25
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) has received a check as indicated above as payment for the
compensatory mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification/Section 404/CAMA Permit(s) issued for the
above referenced project. This receipt serves as notification that your compensatory mitigation requirements associated with
the authorized activity as specified below have been satisfied. You must also comply with all other conditions of this
certification and any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with this activity.
The NCEEP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that theNCEEP is `responsible for the compensatory mitigation
requirements associated with the project permit and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified in the permit.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the`NC Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the US Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998, as indicated below.
River Basin Stream Credits Wetland Credits Buffer I & 11
CU (linear feet) (acres) (Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
Neuse 0 0- 0 0.66 0 0 0
03020201
Please note that a payment made to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program is not reimbursable unless a request for
reimbursement is received within 12 months of the date of the receipt. Any such request must also be accompanied by letters
from the permitting agencies stating that the permit and/or authorization have been rescinded. If you have any questions or
need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Eric Alsmeyer, USACE-Raleigh; Thelma Hemmingway, USAGE Wilmington
Debbi Fertn, agent
File
1?P,S DY «.. Ehk"... Prot"' CJLLY .f G ?A
t" NCDENR
4orth Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / wvvw.nceep.net
RAPANOS FORMS
IMPACT AREAS 1 & 2
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION L• BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: NC County/parish/borough: Durham City: Durham
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.958317° N, Long. -78.830178° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: UT to Little Lick Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Little Lick Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Neuse River - 03020201
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
? Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc... ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
? Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
? Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION H: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
? Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
? Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): i
? TNWs, including territorial seas
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
? Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 1041f linear feet: 14' width (ft) and/or 0.04 acres.
Wetlands: 0.07 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Established by OHWM.
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable) :3
? Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
s Supporting documentation is presented in Section III. F.
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section HIA.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections IILA.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section IH.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section IH.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section HIBA for
the tributary, Section HIB.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section HIB.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section IH.C below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: ±40 acres
Average annual rainfall: 41.7 inches
Average annual snowfall: 7.5 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
® Tributary flows directly into TNW.
? Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight)
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Project waters are 2-5 river miles from TNW
Project waters RPW.
are 1 (or less) river miles from
Project waters are 1-2 aerial (straight) miles f
Pro miles from RPW.
a Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
Identify flow route to TNWs: RPW within the Impact Area 1, 2 &3 consists of intermittent stream that changes to a
perennial stream approximately 1000' downstream of the review area. The UT flows generally from southwest to
southeast and directly into Little Lick Creek.
Tributary stream order, if known:
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apps
Tributary is: ® Natural
? Artificial (man-made). Explain:
? Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 14 feet
Average depth: 5 feet
Average side slopes: 3:1 .
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands ? Concrete
® Cobbles ® Gravel ? Muck
? Bedrock ? Vegetation. Type/% cover:
? Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: Stream banks appear to be stable as no
major bank failures were observed.
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: Riffle pools were observed within stream channel.
Tributary geometry: Meandering
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): >5 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Intermittent but not seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 11-20
Describe flow regime: Intermittent.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is:
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
® changes in the character of soil ?
? shelving ?
? vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
? leaf litter disturbed or washed away ?
® sediment deposition
? water staining ?
? other (list):
? Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
? High Tide Line indicated by: ?
? oil or scum line along shore objects
? fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
? physical markings/characteristics
? tidal gauges
? other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
ne lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
? survey to available datum,
? physical markings,
? vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.
'A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: Water color is stained.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: Sediment.
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
? Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
® Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: Evidence of usage by various species of wildlife were observed.
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size:0.07 acres
Wetland type. Explain: Headwater forest.
Wetland quality. Explain: moderate due to small size.
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Ephemeral flow. Explain:
Surface flow is: Di
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
® Directly abutting
? Not directly abutting
? Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
? Ecological connection. Explain:
? Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 2-5 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1-2 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Wetland to navigable waters.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 50 - 100-year floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: No standing water within wetlands at time of site visit.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: Sediment.
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
? Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: 1
Approximately ( 0.07 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Wetland Impact Area 1 and 2 (Yes) 0.07 acres
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: Wetlands provide for the transfer of
organic carbon and nutrients to downstream food webs and storage of sotrage and filtration of stormwater.
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section IILD:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section 111.1):
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section 111.1): It was determined that a significant nexus exists between the wetlands within Wetland Impact Areas 1 &2 and
downstream TNW.
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
? TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
® Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section 111.13. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: The RPW was classified as an intermittent stream by the JD issued by the Corps in October of 2004 (AID#2005-
20047).
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 104 linear feet 14 width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section 111. C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
? Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: Drainage patterns within wetlands flow directly to RPW.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
? Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
? Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
? Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):"
? which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
? from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
'See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section IILD.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapauos
? which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
? Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
? Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
? Wetlands: acres.
NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
? If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
? Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
? Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
? Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
? Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
? Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
? Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Withers & Ravenel.
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
? Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
? Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
? Corps navigable waters' study:
? U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
? USGS NHD data.
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U. S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: SE Durham Quad - 1:20,000.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:Durham County Soil Survey.
H National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
? State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
? FEMA/FIRM maps:
? 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):Durham County Aerial Photographs - 2010.
or ? Other (Name & Date):
® Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: AID 2005-20047.
? Applicable/supporting case law:
? Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
? Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:
IMPACT AREA 4
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION L• BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: NC County/parish/borough: Durham City: Durham
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.958317° N, Long. -78.830178° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: UT to Little Lick Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Little Lick Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03020201
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
? Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc... ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
? Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
? Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION H: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
? Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
? Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): i
? TNWs, including territorial seas
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
? Relatively permanent waters (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
? Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0.14 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable) :3
? Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
z For purposes ofthis form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
s Supporting documentation is presented in Section III. F.
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section HIA.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections IILA.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section IH.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section IH.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section HIBA for
the tributary, Section HIB.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section HIB.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section IH.C below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
? Tributary flows directly into TNW.
? Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNWs:
Tributary stream order, if known:
a Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apps
Tributary is: ? Natural
? Artificial (man-made). Explain:
? Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
? Silts ? Sands
? Cobbles ? Gravel
? Bedrock ? Vegetation. Type/% cover:
? Other. Explain:
? Concrete
? Muck
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
? Bed and banks
? OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
? clear, natural line impressed on the bank ?
? changes in the character of soil ?
? shelving ?
? vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ?
? leaf litter disturbed or washed away ?
? sediment deposition ?
? water staining ?
? other (list):
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
? Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
? High Tide Line indicated by: ?
? oil or scum line along shore objects
? fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
? physical markings/characteristics
? tidal gauges
? other (list):
ne lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
? survey to available datum,
? physical markings,
? vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
'A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
? Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
? Directly abutting
? Not directly abutting
? Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
? Ecological connection. Explain:
? Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
? Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section IILD:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section II1.1):
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section II1.1):
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
? TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
? Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section II1.13. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section 111.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: The wetland within Wetland Impact Area 4 is adjacent to a stream that was classified as
perennial during the previous JD that was issued by the Corps of Engineers in October of 2004. Drainage
patterns within this wetland flow directly to perennial stream which documents that the wetland is adjacent
? Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section 11I.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
? Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
? Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
? Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):"
? which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
? from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
? which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
? Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
? Other factors. Explain:
'See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section IILD.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapauos.
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
? Wetlands: acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
? If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
? Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
? Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in ` SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
? Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
? Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
? Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
? Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultantWithers & Ravenel.
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
? Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
? Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
? Corps navigable waters' study:
? U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
? USGS NHD data.
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U. S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: SE Durham Quad - 1:20,000.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:Durham County Soil Survey.
? National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
? State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
? FEMA/FIRM maps:
? 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):Durham County Aerial Photograph - 2010.
or ? Other (Name & Date):
® Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: AID #2005-20047.
? Applicable/supporting case law:
? Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
? Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:
TOTAL IMPACTS SUMMARY:
EXISTING (SF) PROPOSED (SF)
BUFFER 1 - 3,228
IMPACT
AREA #
2
_
3,786
ZONE 1 3 2,442 -
NRB 4 1,954 -
TOTAL 4,396 7,014
EXISTING (SF) PROPOSED (SF) TOTAL (SF)
BUFFER 1 - 2,081 2,081
IMPACT
AREA #
2
_
2,335
2,335
ZONE 2 3 1,310 - 1,310
NRB 4 1,202 - 1,202
TOTAL 2,512 4,416 6,928 SF
TOTAL (SF)
3,228
3.786
1,954
11,410 SF (0.26
EXISTING (SF) PROPOSED (SF) TOTAL (SF)
1 748 1,451 2,199
WETLAND 2 - 972 972
IMPACT 3 3,169 - 3,169
AREA # 4
-
5,965
5,965
5 5,210 - 5,210
6 - - 0
TOTAL 9,127 8,388 17,515 SF
EXISTING (LF) PROPOSED (LF) TOTAL (LF)
STREAM 1 - 49 49
IMPACT 2 - 55 55
AREA K 3
33 - 33
TOTAL 33 104 137 LF (1.9
16 AC.
?r f=7 / \\ BUFFER IMPACT #4 F-
r rr? i \ (AERIAL SEWER CROSSING) p
(COMPLETED)
ZONE 1IMPACT: 1,954SF 0 250' 500' 1000'
1 ZONE 2 IMPACT: 1,202 SF
rr, rr r?
It rr r!
1 t1 r, ti
4
' rr ter SCALEz 1' = 500'
' rr'J rir 1
Ir r.rr r
NOT NEEDED
"'LAND IMPACT #6
zz"
•? --- F it !7J' r '` (SEW LINE IMPA `
p' ,'?- 48 SF (0. C.1 RMITTED
r ?i 1111 i i / L 1 L_j ?ll
tit l1 I I ?B7(I$TI?16rT???°? r?-1-Tr -'? !-L4 A (THIS IMPA OT NEEDED),
r rIa ?I II ?' PkAS 61 I I I I I I I ?` r iCONST CTIO OMPI_ETE
fl, rr? rm I 1 IEXI TI 0 1? ,r
_L A - N.- L-I-
fr :ii 11 ?EV?t? MEIbI
rr01- TiTT7T
t L_ _ / I I I T (1 t ,'t` , PFfA E?5 v W/ WETLAND
s, .; , I I I ??' 4?-4lEVE MENT
B -FER IMPACTS.
r? tb?„ar, 1
r
'I
I
WETLAND IMPACT # 4
(ROAD IMPACT)
(TO BE COMPLETED)
WETLAND IMPACT: 5,965 SF 0.14 AC.)
t
a
BUFFER IMPACTS # 1 &2
WETLAND IMPACTS # 1 & 2
STREAM IMPACTS # 1 & 2
(ROAD IMPACT)
(TO BE COMPLETED)
ZONE 1 IMPACT: 7,014 SF
ZONE 2 IMPACT: 4,416 SF
WETLAND IMPACT: 3,171 SF (0.07 AC,)
STREAM IMPACT: 104 LF (1,542 SF)
Designer Scale
W&R 1'=500'
Drawn By ate
BDH 07/27/11
Checked By Io Na.
BDH 02090500.0
ASHTON HALL
DURHAM, NC
JL J
' I
_ it , .f tDE1(ELME
--D MA7t-QD"
U 'U 'E 'QL_
,'tip tiit P p TINS
? rr 11 I ? I I_
11 1`` y- -?
L 00 -4
iANDALE LN, rl ,1j t? i LI dCISTuyG .. I.
3 /I it 11 'ti.? ? r -?Hg5E i
r -?r14,1? 1y??y?y 1 DEVELOPiM.ENT
?i'YM1 f PS?? 1 L y + r-
¦
-4 --T-? r`F_ r
q?1 1i y?? ? T? • Y,'` 1 1 I I r-
11?W 11 rlr ? _
--I ?- I Jir\ F, J 1 _J
_ -t--i=i -? -
- " --4
r. -? I I Ja
11t 11 1
P ED rr' 0 ' 44SE 4>r
rr
?,H Nrr hQEV?L?M(r1V}?
rrr` ? 1
E?ISTING`, io r
a rr /r
it
rJ ?/
4
ENT,, rr ' `7
? a rjr r 1.,?

f?tar

OVERALL SITE PLAN &
IMPACT LOCATION MAP
BUFFER IMPACT #3
STREAM IMPACT #3
(SEWER LINE IMPACT)
(COMPLETED)
ZONE 1 IMPACT: 2,442 SF
ZONE 2 IMPACT: 1,310 SF
STREAM IMPACT: 33 LF (396 SF)
WETLAND IMPACT #5
(ROAD IMPACT)
(COMPLETED)
5,210 SF (0.12 AC.)
WETLAND IMPACT #3
(SEWER LINE IMPACT)
(COMPLETED)
/ 3,169 SF (0.07 AC.)
. l
r ?
'rr
NOTES:
1. EXISTING WETLANDS IMPACTS SHOWN ARE BASED ON
PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED IMPACT MAPS FOR THIS PROJECT
(USACE ACTION ID #200520047; & DWO PROJECT #
06-1042, VER.2).
2. IMPACTS SHOWN FOR THE REMAINING TWO (2) ROADWAY
IMPACTS BASED ON SITE PLANS BY WITHERS & RAVENEL, INC.
THE PROPOSED IMPACT SOUARE FOOTAGES HAVE BEEN REVISED
SINCE THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL. THE LOCATIONS OF THESE
IMPACTS ARE THE SAME AS ORIGINALLY PERMITTED.
WITHERS & RAVENEL Sheet No.
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tic No CA72
te1:919469-3340 www.withersravenel.com fax: [phone]

PRC
EL.-353.50
TWIN 42'
318
P
Q
STREAM IMPACT #2
55 LF (660 SF)
212
BUFFER IMPACT #2
ZONE 1: 31786 SF
40NE 2: 2,335 SFj
211
WINDRU
i
i
BUFFER IMPACT #1
ZONE 1: 31228 SF
ZONE 2: 21081 SF
STREAM IMPACT #1
49 LF (882 SF)
LANE
D) -

WETLAND IMPACT #1
WETLAND IMPACT: 2,199 SF
(0.05 AC.)
(748 SF EXIST. IMPACT & 1,451 SF PROPOSED)
EXISTING BADE EL-352.2

PROPSED INVERT DOWNSTREAM SECTION
EL.-351.20
NOTES:
0 25' 50' 100'
mm
mmm

AQUATIC PASSAGE
DETAIL 1. EXISTING WETLANDS LIMITS SHOWN ARE BASED ON
IMPACT MAPS FOR THIS PROJECT (USACE ACTION ID PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED l
?
l
#200520047; & DWO
NOT TO SCALE PROJECT #06-1042, VER.2). SCALE: I' = 50'
No. Revision Dare By Designer Scale
W&R
,•=SD'
WITHERS
& RAVENEL
She.( No.
Drawn y
By ate ASHTON HALL WINDRUSH LANE I
BDH 07/27/11
DURHAM NC ROAD CROSSING IMPACTS ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS 1-2
Cher ke( By Job No. / North Carolina 27511
111 MacKenan Drive Cary

H ,
tic. No. C-832
BD 02090500.0 te1:919-469-3340 www.withersravenel.com fax: [phone]
r r
r ?? r
rr°o?wrr
Aj?
1 f
rr .'.
F 11
R o
r ??
WETLAND IMPACT #2
WETLAND: 972 SF
ti /? rr ' (0.02 AC.)
END OF EXISTING PAVED STREET
PER PREVIOUS PHASE 1 CONSTRUCTION.
I k
r / WINDRUSH LANE
r / I'x' • `+ (EXISTING)
748 SF OF WETLAND IMPACT PR VIOUSLY
J COMPLETED IN CONJUNCTION WI PH. 1
?r I ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION.
41 L? EX1S ING 30" RCP CULVERT
321
+ + 319 320
I I !
UPSTREAM SECTION
w w w ?'
w y w
w y w
i y W
W y W
Y y w
y w
r "I Y w Y ?
i W EXISTY w Y y y y Y
' w WE*f LAND, Y
w Y Y
Y w Y Y Y Y
Y y Y y Y
Y Y
w Y Y Y
w w
Y y i
w
i •
w y w
WETLAND IMPACT #4
WETLAND IMPACT: 5,965 SF
(0.14 AC.)
l: 7

O ? / / ?M4+i TES
•?
•
1
cn m I 1
m r I I
t ?
Z
r
i m

I i •......,.,:,
..... • uu
ILT.p •• •1••
? ?
N
O
l
1

lop
r ?
r1
f
w/
r rry?o /
r ?
/ r
• .'EXI5f.
• WETL1lly?5. •' ,
r1j • • ? 0
rl -
1
r /
/
NOTES:
1. EXISTING WETLANDS LIMITS SHOWN ARE BASED ON PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED
IMPACT MAPS FOR THIS PROJECT (USACE ACTION ID #200520047: & DWO
PROJECT #06-1042, VER.2).
0 25° 50, (00'
SCALE: V = 50'
o WAR 1-50 Sheet No.
Drawn By Date
ASHTON HALL CALLANDALE LANE WITHERS & RAVENEL
BDH 07/27/11 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
Checked By job No. DURHAM,NC ROAD CROSSING IMPACTS 111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 I_3
"
Lic. No C-832 BDH 02090500.0 tel: [phone] www.withersravenel.com fax: [phone]
TOTAL IMPACTS SUMMARY:
EXISTING (SF) PROPOSED (SF)
BUFFER 1 - 3,228
IMPACT
AREA #
2
_
3,786
ZONE 1 3 2,442 -
NRB 4 1,954 -
TOTAL 4,396 7,014
EXISTING (SF) PROPOSED (SF) TOTAL (SF)
BUFFER 1 - 2,081 2,081
IMPACT
AREA #
2
_
2,335
2,335
ZONE 2 3 1,310 - 1,310
NRB 4 1,202 - 1,202
TOTAL 2,512 4,416 6,928 SF
TOTAL (SF)
3,228
3.786
1,954
11,410 SF (0.26
EXISTING (SF) PROPOSED (SF) TOTAL (SF)
1 748 1,451 2,199
WETLAND 2 - 972 972
IMPACT 3 3,169 - 3,169
AREA # 4
-
5,965
5,965
5 5,210 - 5,210
6 - - 0
TOTAL 9,127 8,388 17,515 SF
EXISTING (LF) PROPOSED (LF) TOTAL (LF)
STREAM 1 - 49 49
IMPACT 2 - 55 55
AREA K 3
33 - 33
TOTAL 33 104 137 LF (1.9
16 AC.
?r f=7 / \\ BUFFER IMPACT #4 F-
r rr? i \ (AERIAL SEWER CROSSING) p
(COMPLETED)
ZONE 1IMPACT: 1,954SF 0 250' 500' 1000'
1 ZONE 2 IMPACT: 1,202 SF
rr, rr r?
It rr r!
1 t1 r, ti
4
' rr ter SCALEz 1' = 500'
' rr'J rir 1
Ir r.rr r
NOT NEEDED
"'LAND IMPACT #6
zz"
•? --- F it !7J' r '` (SEW LINE IMPA `
p' ,'?- 48 SF (0. C.1 RMITTED
r ?i 1111 i i / L 1 L_j ?ll
tit l1 I I ?B7(I$TI?16rT???°? r?-1-Tr -'? !-L4 A (THIS IMPA OT NEEDED),
r rIa ?I II ?' PkAS 61 I I I I I I I ?` r iCONST CTIO OMPI_ETE
fl, rr? rm I 1 IEXI TI 0 1? ,r
_L A - N.- L-I-
fr :ii 11 ?EV?t? MEIbI
rr01- TiTT7T
t L_ _ / I I I T (1 t ,'t` , PFfA E?5 v W/ WETLAND
s, .; , I I I ??' 4?-4lEVE MENT
B -FER IMPACTS.
r? tb?„ar, 1
r
'I
I
WETLAND IMPACT # 4
(ROAD IMPACT)
(TO BE COMPLETED)
WETLAND IMPACT: 5,965 SF 0.14 AC.)
t
a
BUFFER IMPACTS # 1 &2
WETLAND IMPACTS # 1 & 2
STREAM IMPACTS # 1 & 2
(ROAD IMPACT)
(TO BE COMPLETED)
ZONE 1 IMPACT: 7,014 SF
ZONE 2 IMPACT: 4,416 SF
WETLAND IMPACT: 3,171 SF (0.07 AC,)
STREAM IMPACT: 104 LF (1,542 SF)
Designer Scale
W&R 1'=500'
Drawn By ate
BDH 07/27/11
Checked By Io Na.
BDH 02090500.0
ASHTON HALL
DURHAM, NC
JL J
' I
_ it , .f tDE1(ELME
--D MA7t-QD"
U 'U 'E 'QL_
,'tip tiit P p TINS
? rr 11 I ? I I_
11 1`` y- -?
L 00 -4
iANDALE LN, rl ,1j t? i LI dCISTuyG .. I.
3 /I it 11 'ti.? ? r -?Hg5E i
r -?r14,1? 1y??y?y 1 DEVELOPiM.ENT
?i'YM1 f PS?? 1 L y + r-
¦
-4 --T-? r`F_ r
q?1 1i y?? ? T? • Y,'` 1 1 I I r-
11?W 11 rlr ? _
--I ?- I Jir\ F, J 1 _J
_ -t--i=i -? -
- " --4
r. -? I I Ja
11t 11 1
P ED rr' 0 ' 44SE 4>r
rr
?,H Nrr hQEV?L?M(r1V}?
rrr` ? 1
E?ISTING`, io r
a rr /r
it
rJ ?/
4
ENT,, rr ' `7
? a rjr r 1.,?

f?tar

OVERALL SITE PLAN &
IMPACT LOCATION MAP
BUFFER IMPACT #3
STREAM IMPACT #3
(SEWER LINE IMPACT)
(COMPLETED)
ZONE 1 IMPACT: 2,442 SF
ZONE 2 IMPACT: 1,310 SF
STREAM IMPACT: 33 LF (396 SF)
WETLAND IMPACT #5
(ROAD IMPACT)
(COMPLETED)
5,210 SF (0.12 AC.)
WETLAND IMPACT #3
(SEWER LINE IMPACT)
(COMPLETED)
/ 3,169 SF (0.07 AC.)
. l
r ?
'rr
NOTES:
1. EXISTING WETLANDS IMPACTS SHOWN ARE BASED ON
PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED IMPACT MAPS FOR THIS PROJECT
(USACE ACTION ID #200520047; & DWO PROJECT #
06-1042, VER.2).
2. IMPACTS SHOWN FOR THE REMAINING TWO (2) ROADWAY
IMPACTS BASED ON SITE PLANS BY WITHERS & RAVENEL, INC.
THE PROPOSED IMPACT SOUARE FOOTAGES HAVE BEEN REVISED
SINCE THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL. THE LOCATIONS OF THESE
IMPACTS ARE THE SAME AS ORIGINALLY PERMITTED.
WITHERS & RAVENEL Sheet No.
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tic No CA72
te1:919469-3340 www.withersravenel.com fax: [phone]

PRC
EL.-353.50
TWIN 42'
318
P
Q
STREAM IMPACT #2
55 LF (660 SF)
212
BUFFER IMPACT #2
ZONE 1: 31786 SF
40NE 2: 2,335 SFj
211
WINDRU
i
i
BUFFER IMPACT #1
ZONE 1: 31228 SF
ZONE 2: 21081 SF
STREAM IMPACT #1
49 LF (882 SF)
LANE
D) -

WETLAND IMPACT #1
WETLAND IMPACT: 2,199 SF
(0.05 AC.)
(748 SF EXIST. IMPACT & 1,451 SF PROPOSED)
EXISTING BADE EL-352.2

PROPSED INVERT DOWNSTREAM SECTION
EL.-351.20
NOTES:
0 25' 50' 100'
mm
mmm

AQUATIC PASSAGE
DETAIL 1. EXISTING WETLANDS LIMITS SHOWN ARE BASED ON
IMPACT MAPS FOR THIS PROJECT (USACE ACTION ID PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED l
?
l
#200520047; & DWO
NOT TO SCALE PROJECT #06-1042, VER.2). SCALE: I' = 50'
No. Revision Dare By Designer Scale
W&R
,•=SD'
WITHERS
& RAVENEL
She.( No.
Drawn y
By ate ASHTON HALL WINDRUSH LANE I
BDH 07/27/11
DURHAM NC ROAD CROSSING IMPACTS ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS 1-2
Cher ke( By Job No. / North Carolina 27511
111 MacKenan Drive Cary

H ,
tic. No. C-832
BD 02090500.0 te1:919-469-3340 www.withersravenel.com fax: [phone]
r r
r ?? r
rr°o?wrr
Aj?
1 f
rr .'.
F 11
R o
r ??
WETLAND IMPACT #2
WETLAND: 972 SF
ti /? rr ' (0.02 AC.)
END OF EXISTING PAVED STREET
PER PREVIOUS PHASE 1 CONSTRUCTION.
I k
r / WINDRUSH LANE
r / I'x' • `+ (EXISTING)
748 SF OF WETLAND IMPACT PR VIOUSLY
J COMPLETED IN CONJUNCTION WI PH. 1
?r I ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION.
41 L? EX1S ING 30" RCP CULVERT
321
+ + 319 320
I I !
UPSTREAM SECTION
w w w ?'
w y w
w y w
i y W
W y W
Y y w
y w
r "I Y w Y ?
i W EXISTY w Y y y y Y
' w WE*f LAND, Y
w Y Y
Y w Y Y Y Y
Y y Y y Y
Y Y
w Y Y Y
w w
Y y i
w
i •
w y w
WETLAND IMPACT #4
WETLAND IMPACT: 5,965 SF
(0.14 AC.)
l: 7

O ? / / ?M4+i TES
•?
•
1
cn m I 1
m r I I
t ?
Z
r
i m

I i •......,.,:,
..... • uu
ILT.p •• •1••
? ?
N
O
l
1

lop
r ?
r1
f
w/
r rry?o /
r ?
/ r
• .'EXI5f.
• WETL1lly?5. •' ,
r1j • • ? 0
rl -
1
r /
/
NOTES:
1. EXISTING WETLANDS LIMITS SHOWN ARE BASED ON PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED
IMPACT MAPS FOR THIS PROJECT (USACE ACTION ID #200520047: & DWO
PROJECT #06-1042, VER.2).
0 25° 50, (00'
SCALE: V = 50'
o WAR 1-50 Sheet No.
Drawn By Date
ASHTON HALL CALLANDALE LANE WITHERS & RAVENEL
BDH 07/27/11 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
Checked By job No. DURHAM,NC ROAD CROSSING IMPACTS 111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 I_3
"
Lic. No C-832 BDH 02090500.0 tel: [phone] www.withersravenel.com fax: [phone]
r 0
I . - \ J m oEtMARURIV`-='~`=.._ ~ I, ~~.r'"~" ~ ` _ ~ I_3~,,~ Y fi":.~.:•---- „ - FH ~ ~ ! I
. : - -
_ _ - .r s . , o ~ ~ _ - ~ . _ _ _ ' -'---r-~-.,. ~ _ - ~r~ • - _ _ .
-.i._ ~ - '
- _ ---~54- _ , _ r -
: I r I ~.-r~~ I ~
~ i . L ' w f- _ _ , _ ~ ( - _ - I ! y W i
' a i. - I .w. _ a-. . Y . Jr ~ ~ .y. .y. y... r fI ~ ! I 1 I ~~~rrr~~~'''~~~''''''''' ~ rv j Y
- _ - i ~ . }a _ _ w l _ - i _ _ r .f ~ M r . ~ a. '..y.. W y..... ~y . .y. . w.. ~ . •'I• I ~ I i ~ _ ~ 7. ~'~tLj . y.. y.. .W ..W.. I W ~i.,J II I I+ I \ ! r.~fr ` ~ ~1 f
- . W -r-~-= TU A•. . • •~`U•A, ~ I_ t I ~~I ~ ~ i, -~y~ ! f x ~ ~ • ~ ; p.~1F- ,r > W . y w y..' y y W. 't ~ ~ J
- '1~ y y y~ y y, v_ _ I T ~~l _ . W J y y
I ~ ~ .W. . ~ I I I I ..y~ ~ p
~ ' ~ `.W.. . . _ ' ~ TREE PROTECTI~~ P y W ..y..'.a. . f~. t" , ~ I, EN~IN i .W .y. w. ~ ~ _ _ , w x'T
'F V I IT 1 . .
f~~ DISTURBANC ` , , ,'t, ,W„ , y ' , y / ti ,r y s 1 ~y . W..~W W •y y. . v1 , ! ~ ~ . I sq 1TUA?,
F 'r J~ I c _ J'. r w. ' . WSW I ~ I I ~ . ~ ~ _ I I ~ I W W y ~ • 6 I l ~
, : y i - . e,I. { \ ' . V`' y ~ .y. (I 4~ ~ ~ ~ I k ~1
r, - - - I , _ ~~~~F~~_www~~~,,,```~~~..```...,,, ~ W . . . y y ~ ' y y y y y W •V~ W ~ 4 ~ l( ~ ~ T~ 4 I ` T x
. ' I ~'...'D IIRBi~NC ' ' . _ _
W y y y y y t 4t I 1 E
. ~ - . , / 1 ~ _ _ i1 . , . BOLP~,,,~}'6UFFER _ , -j----~.....-- ' ' ~ . VE y f ~ , v •4 W y y ~ w
_ u + + : I , , I , ; s V W W.~ d yw. y x••`6~ LM I ~1 p \1 f+y
~ i I T r I W' w y 'y ~a' ' ~ t. 1 y NC GR10 (NA~3) f + y y I q i., .'w ~ i ` i PB t60, PG 306-326
i ' ~ ~ i TUA + , ( , , I ,n - I ~ ~ t~ - + T I ~ + w ....W y . ~ i i .r~1< \
I - 1( I. ~ ,1 - f IT F iQ 1 ~ i ah ~ i ~ o r , I ~ u1 f~ ~ • F + ~ y, W . W W ~ ~ ~ • ~ W
; , , - DISTURBANC ti c~ , + + T - _ ~ 1 . I _ _ _ . - _ _J t + ~ ~ ~ , W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PROPOSED PHASE 3 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: + + a
~ 1 i 1, Ly _ + ' a. 1F : x . TREE i`• ~ + + ~~fl ~ W ~ y W ~ • • . ! . ROADS: 138,469 5F
- t I I . - _ - ~ rRE law ~ ~ t: . I`Ifi` ~ • • . , W . ' ~ SIDEWALKS: 18,772 SF
' ~ I : • ~ ~ I; r F N I + ~ I Ii ' j ~a ~C~ ~ ` *,.W,•,:.;.•I' 1..,.1..•.'. , LOTS: 222,68© SF (24 LOTS X 3,445 SF + 50 LOiS ~ 2,$00 SF) _ ~ ~ ' w y ~ ~ WI ~ ~ I TOTAL: 379,921 SF (8.721 AC.)
+ t • • W • • W TOTAL SITE AREA: 1,313,500 SF (30.153 AC.)
- _ I + + + + 7 ~ y, f' ~ IMPERVIOUS: 28.923 f•, W •w
, ' ~ ' ~ `W j • • ~ • ~ • • • • MAXIMUM ALLOWED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: (SEE SHEET 2 OVERALL PROJECT SITE DATA)
~r r ~ - - ~ . , _ ~ x WELL HOUSE i~ i, ~ + + + ~ ~f . ~ < ~ y W + ! ~ • •w ~ • • ~ NO SPECIFlC ~ IMPERVIOUS LIMIT fOR INDNIDUAL PNAS(E; PROJECT MUST COMPLY WITH j VERALL • • • L i • • • • APPROVED IMPER410US COVERAGE UMft Of 38,91 AC. 29.0 OF ENTIRE PROJECT AREA .
- Q i E f i
- / ` t . _ rti '.,i h - - - _ 'I'mo"SP I`,~+ : . _ 1 I I W I 1
~ - gam: i day 3 + ti 5b' USE y W
- p _ 26'PROJECT _ - UNDARYBUFFER •PHAS~ ~ ~ - LIM 0 I I . o , a ~ ~ PHASE 3 T(JTAL t~ISTIJRBED AREA= 22.5 AC.
r IST RBANCE - r ~ + + \ I ; • BLrrC i y , ' + ~~-f'+.~~ ~It ~ ~ i. • a
~ I . _ , _ + _ ~ + ~ \l ' • . ~ ' • . PRIVATE STORMWATER + +
'`r U`A TUA r I i , I i I, u + . ~ . ITUA I , . ~ I + ~ + _I } : • . ~ W ~ . • MGMT. & ACCESS ESMT. W
241 iI i ~ i i 2 •,r
42 _ . . ~ • ~ W ; . ~ • SHADING LEGEND.
` + t I I I I 39 i W W + + f li` fir`' W ' W W
390.0 , i - i ' r ; I ; 3g1.5 ~ L ~ ! ~ 89.0 ; i ! i ' `i ' r k, + + - 38$.0.. i 3$7<0 I 3$5.0 i 38 ' 3/~ i y ' 1 1 + + + + + U'. i . . ~ W.
: ~ r ~ ' W y W
g.l., CB '372:•0 i L - I ~ i A~ i - ~ ~ i I ~ W f.~ FE' CING~ ~ ` y y y w WETLANDS
t I 74 ` ` ' it ~ , U ~ ~ i .,c,..;+ . ~ ~ . , ~ • ~ ! ~ ~ W y
: i i ~ .A,~ ; t, w..,z.. ' ..m_ m..
~ ; - ~ y + , + I ~ • ~ I I ~ . . ' ` '
I I ~ r ~ ~ Y .y~ . :ai A,, : a . a ~ i. 1 ~z r'
I - - r- `r.: } -d ~ ' ~ ; I I ~ ! ~ '•.'..1.. TREE SAVE . + ~ .N I f • ~ ~ ....1 . ~ AREA
. I 8 . _ - I ~ ~ r H ~ M i 'i 3 M' AINA~ ;L .i ~ I t t
: ,.h i i i I ~a _ :y o i E EME i 'i / r' I - - - ~t - i - I i i I U i - + + M . ' 1 i~~ t' • IL M1T~S ~ Of~ ~
r V1 _ +r1 i + _ . _ . I _ _ - I i - ti ~ M1 ~ ~ I; i ; ' i, i, _ ~ ~ _ , ~ w - i ( ~ i D Tu~EsANCE ~ . . r' ~ ~ k~ ~ •4 I t ~ i , I , y
I I I i b' II , I i . ; o: - _ - - . a N7 p ~ ~ ~ ~ 'i ! _ - li i , Z ~ I ~ i ai.l A~\ . I ~ o ' - ~ I ~ ` ~ y.,~ -I- PRIVATE
~ I I I I i i ; I.~~ II i ~ I ,O ~,i ~I T' i3 fi.00 i r it ~ ~ - _ F • , . STORMWATER
: ~ ° j 4. ! ' 1 ' ' j I + + + + ~ + MGMT. ESMT.
I i ~ I ~ ~ Y r 1 I is _ i 1 I .T...=. ~ ~,7J I ~ I .I { 1 I W. rR ~ f
-.-._._._._._.J ~ o . : M~ G r I 1 I ~ - - r r I i L7 \ U\• ~ I , , v 219 - ' I ~ ~ , i I,// ~
_ ( ' E ~ I Q~ i I I r I L, ~ v t3+ , i I I Irh P- ~ I W `i I I ~ ~ I I I I ( i 4 I 1 sl ~ I L. , r ~vv ~
r. ; ,i~ ~ ~ I 2: i , . , , ; i M I 11} ~ ~ ~ ! t I - . I O II
1I I a I ~ : ' ip I I ~ ~ +rii I I'~ ~ I ~ ~ I~ I Ni ~ `~~l~ + I I ~ 364 I r 01 ~ I. ~ ~ , t g ~ III i I M I _ + + + + + +
,I ~ I w~l ~I ~ t ~ t ~~v. . , W .
I - J 6~ ~ ry ~ ~~~N ~ !W m ~ ~ J
I I I ' I ~ NO , ~ I" ~ i I i I I - i _ o ' + + . s't'd + + ~ ~ r K
a~
4 r II'~ ~ rn ~ ~9~Q-,.~ , - - 1 I , _ ~ ~
LIMITS 0 ~ 'I A' i ° ~ ~ 9~ uw : : s I. ; ~ ,
: ~Y III ~ ~ I - _ I ! r I . , ~~I I ' • f w y r• y ~
/ J ~ m ~r y ' ICI ~ ' 'i . ' / \ `'r ~ I \ y S ' ~ A• k I
1 , ~ , ~ © I ( ~ \ u ~ ~ ! ~ 7 ~ S~ ~I ~ TREE ' , . + + _ + S _ - i' } W I I I I y _ ~r~j ~ u 1 ~ ~b~. I ~ ~i~: ,SAVE. ...4 W _y W I .i.~. :I d v! .r ~ J[/ .w Iw.yl
P ~ l `t ~ 'h I 'i i I ~ ~ W W W 'yl ~~OR~i'.DR' EN GE I W.: rI I ~ i I ..8. .i. 'W . Ilu11TS OF W .I. r, AS M T ~ W w.. • i, s ` I ~ W
_ 2 0 E W 1 I L I / \ r v . . f : ~ I W •I - - _ 1 A' ~ - I ! ~'i ' % 394.5 \ I,:" I l , . , . ISTURBANCEW W W + . .
r} ' I V l1 1 \ \ .I II ~ I I ~ ~ i( 1~ ~i~ ' W .y, y,..~ W .v W W W W I ~ .1.. ~A •'•5~ tV 1 ' ~ I w . ~
I r W r i w ~ ~ 1 \ : I I , ~ 1h I • W ,y. W. W. W m I I ~~t . 9 ' i
. ~ i W f' W Z~
z I~ I °jr ~ dfll , d 1 ; b'fll : ~ 1 ~ l ~V tl ~ ~1 . '',TREE' ~ ~ - ~ I i ' ; ~ ~ f111 1 d 1 Ill, d 1. ---~-r-,-:~ .,.r,-.-+<,. n b't11, •~R•f} ~1' .W .W ~ y r•. W .y • • f
y ~ i. W r I it : . U ! \ I M l L - ~ _ Y
+ I `r...; ~ ~ 1 r . . ..r ti~.r? vim. ini~ -",J~ • - : i , ~~'~89 •TR~E Pf~vO~~TION,•••••T4~ W' .
, j I I I• i ~ I • ~ ,Y Imo,,. 'r r~ •ii r• , , r i I 'PROJECT UNDARYBUFF:C . , ~ . ~ f ~ I ~ ~ ~ -.w I
d i . ~C y
i Y t ' o _ - ~ - - , _ u ` . , I ~ ` r I~' 9 I I 5~ 15.29 , , • j , • ~ ~ '
• ~ I ( i I 1 1 I , I , ; ~ ~ I 1 ~ ~ I I ~ I I I I , ~I~ttT~ ~ ~ , ,1W
, I , ' , ~~III I _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , I ~ I I aIS~UReAne~ _ ~ I q I . . I I I ~ - _ ~ , ~ ~ r
I it _ } i _ , i ~ i 1 MITS~OF7 ir' - i I •1..~ ~1STLlR$ANCE • C• • ~ •f'r
° I i 1 ~ ~ ~ PRIVATE S ORMWA ER ' I ~ - - _ t ~ _ I - ~ ' I ~ MGMT, & ACCESS ESMT, ' kI' r- ' I ~ ' 1 .y I ~ ; v . ,
I ~ - ; I ~ ~ - (TYP:) - - 3 r I i /
f v I~i~ ~ i, I ~ ~ i 1 i 1 ~ I l ~J /Jj
I s rn I _ _ I ~ 'pr
, , o I I I 1 i I ~ i ~ I ~ ' N , , I I B~ 9 ._..I { 1 ` ~ `
i ' ~ _ w , I.. ~ I I ~ o I I I I i I 0 I I I ` ~ L `s - ~ I 1 ~ I
I.i - I ~ ~ I I, ' III t I : F w i~ • ft R ~I J,• r~?
s I URBANCE' I ~ 1. I y y, . W w l l y I •
- ¢ ; ~ ,'~17~ ~ s o i r' ~ i ~ ~ ~ I. .I 1 1 4. W W. 8; . .W. r I N ! 1` 1. ~ ~ • y Y 9IF/\V17
j ~ I .A ~ A ~ t~.~...+c W 4~ 1 V i y W . W. W I i'i
' a O ~ I ' I i , I r', I ll ti ..b.I.y W ~W.. I i ~I oDp0U00D00pOppppp S t I f." ~.Sn.. rW J' y w ~ N ~ S' ~ ~1 rT apps
a i11~.~ i ~ I i ~ i ,,1 I t ! . „ W . y.. ~:W...• t.. ~ o°° O o°°0ooo°a°pa ~/,jp0o ~ f,y~. ~E~~^^C a 9 °
~ ~i ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~~•/{$E~CK•~..;:.w..~~.. ....W.. y. EXISTING 30' SAN. SEWER o a°~0 ti,~na nn
w a ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ' I ! IN ~,I R1J~.15 '1. .y .W. +N. i. .y. W k ~ Ilf d' , • • •W• I•'~ I P EASEMENT (PB 180, PG. 322) n~L}~1 ~y°~~• A ~j ~T
~ I'.~, . . c '0 ~I~ i ~ ~ M , M + I, I 'EAS•Ei~ N..'.•F,..'.'r.~•y.~ .y.. y j ..ll i ~ .C J,~li ~15~11 1 ~ ~ ~1V ~I ~ ~ ii ~ I ~ y.+.y W.W W1,WWy ~ I tJi ~~rr ° 4
NOT #PPI~VED ONS'~tUC~10N I ~ ! y. y . W . w .W. 1. I.y II ~I~ p0 ~a6a {J I~i~°a°° Q~ 0
II l v Ir ' y~~~~ ~ 1 t .W. y y W t I ~ ~ °op ,~1 aaao ' '_r•-"'"'°° 7 ~ ~INI I-Epp •1y .Y . .W 1~ j f ~ app. U e
a s 'ti f ' !i < C ~ ~ I I ~ • _ ~ SJ W W W ~ W a! ~ p OD00
~ ~ 1 ~ ;a I ~ I ~ ~'.1 ,
~ ~ I ~ + ~ ' " i ~ ~ I~ ~ I _ 1 ~i y ~ W W JJ I~ I ' Wcp ~ ~
a ~ f _ ~ I ~ I _ 1 ' ! I I ~ ' ~ ' C~ ~ i I I I ' 1~ ~WW W ,'P, ~ ~ • I~~ I ~f
i , - ~ 1, ~I ~ it ' ~;IE` T •E^kIS1~•~ W I I r W I I I ~ i. .W• yy~~~J~W ~1 W { ~ ~~Ji...
p I I ~ li i ~ ~ i, t j I ~ ~ p 1 I I ~ W 3. Y s W . I. L i I
.1 , 3 L • l : - O i [ i t a r) : I N I I ~ . I i; ! ~ r{REE .ROr.~T1f3N...y: ~..y . ° . ; I ! GRAPHIC SCALE ' I i W ~ W .y ~ + I 60 D 30 60 12D
I , I I F,fN kYV y W W W! I ,j-.
4 I ,r I I.~! ..N. n' w I.J I I I , ' ~ ..W .W. W.'. , .J.
. I { . W .W. M1W. N. p t } I (~Sn--, ~ Ii ~I I! I ~ W .p.. ~ II ~ f • • ~ ~ ~ i t.,~4. _ Gn q
' ~ II ~I It lli tUll I
a" i
No. Revision Date B Designer Scale W&R AS NOTED
i Drawn B Date W/1 RTH R R(r=`V E E L Sheet No.
o By NJA GAS 06/17/11 ASHTON HALL PHASES 3 & 4 GrRhADING & STOR'D
m Checked By Job No. 0 TORM DRAINAGE PLAN 1 CAF 2 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS 7 111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] www.withersravenel.com License No. C-0832
DURHAM DURHAM COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA o BDH 02090500.0

r k I j , ..t a I ri I I 1 y. W W a.. ~ y.
` ~ ~ ~ ` ~ I~ ,l ; ~ , I 'ti ~ I , ` ~ i.. _ i ~ ~ . b W t Iw
¢ ~ . . I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ / ! y. . ~ y y .V ,y. . ~ uwx.,.,. ~ J„..u w ~ ~ ~~'{I7 Y ~•y ~ W '~1 E
I ~ _ t ~1 ~ y MnWi y. W.
C ~ ~ I _ ~ ~ ~ u it , i I 1 L,M1 . W y y YLi
' ` ~ ~ I ~ 'r I . `I' I~ ~lll y Y W 1 51 Syr Y ~ ~ W i ~ i ~ i I ' 1 ~ ~ • ~ y y Y NC GRiD {NAD83}
. r. 1 y ' I I ~ ~1 1 W y y. ~ ~ PB 184, PG 348-326 1 ~ .y.
. - i - I ! ~ i~ I I I i I ,11 r v~~~ • Y Y .i IMIi F yp y ~ ~ . .
' ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ 1 . y. DISTURBANC p I ~ ti I I I ~ I~ .~.~5 y.. y j y
~ , L. r._. ~ iI Jl ,l I 1 .`!1-I q~l~. .W., y. . y. . y .a W y. .J
I ~ ~ . r _ 1 I ~ 1 A/~( Y W.... y Y N I 1 _ _ _ I DIST ~BA1xICEW y. y .Y. . y 1 Y' W 1•
, , I y Y / i
i - ~ I ~I I I lye, I I) 1 ( . .y.. w. . Y I• . ~ :I~ I d i ~ it I~ ~ ~i y.y.. ~•:w ...y. ....y. y.
PRIV TE STORlwl4YATER__ I 5TORMWATER_. ` ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 f , ~ ~ i i ~ i~ ' ` ; Y ~"...y W.'.:~.~
= ' ' MGM . & ACCESS ESMT. ' I +7 I ~ ~ ~ TvP c ACCESS ESMT, ~ II I ~ I I; + I QTR ~~'QOTECT19N.•y . 1 ! i i,i .y..~
/ ~ c ~ I N ~ I , ~ y. y ~y'!~„L. may. ~ y
~ i I i .y y
~ ~ I ' ;i ~ 1 / . y r . . y ' y
f _ I 1 I ~ I ~ 7~ 1 I. Y .y . .W. . w.
~ - _ , . - ; i ~ , r _ , y • y J' r ' I . ~ I ~ ~ I j` ~ w y
L _ ~ f • ` ; y ` 1. 0
- i _ I LIMITS OF ~ 3 . ' 1 ~ ~ m ~ y y , ~ _ _ , ~ ~ ~ ~,•Y
DISTCIRBAN E ~ r ! ~ ~ ; a ` • - _ _ . f , ; , ~ S 88'283 f q 1 5 ~ I I I ~ I . y .t.•. V 1 iM1T$-OF i ~ i ~ ~ I. • • A I
36, 3 _ . _ . ; gSTURBAI~ICE f rj~ I ~ i . ~ ~ ~ ~ y. . .
_ , 25' PROJECT 8 ~UNDAR`f 9UFFE - ~ i-~ - ,...~a.~-,~~--.~,.~~,.~~,- ~ , ~ ~ '--`.-~r~..n PTc~2V+ i I ~ .1` .1 1 I ~ Ir W .y . .
' r.~_~r__..r . I ' r T. I ~ r, .rh~~..JR, x-«xs-~+ea-.~ ate,- ~ 'i±i.-.-_~. -F - - _ -h--.l ,I. ~ i nay ~ oU O ~~~~'l~f~~/ ~~[(Ey~yo+ b ~ ' ~ ~ ~ 1~ ti ~ ~ y . o. ~ y ~ i 1 ~ i i
+ ' I ~ ~ INVERT, 337.2 _ 1 W Y . ~~"'..w~ is ~ ~ 1 r . .I. y~-: y r
i i ~ _ ~ _ , A + + + , 1 } H ' ~ W y W
I ' f * - - ~ I i ;I Tf1A T + I I I I ~ ' f TUA ~ n ~ ~ y.~~ y
I - I' p ~ 1 i i I i ' i r. i ~ + + . '
~ :I , . I I I Iii I ! ~ - ~ / I I I - I I j
Ij ~ j' 1 I _ I i I i ~ I I I
I I I I. i I' ~ i 1 ! I I I I- I I ~ I I / I, I I . ~ IIIJJJ 1 I / ~~i / ~ ~ Y V ~ i Ohi /r• y ~r /
r; 1 ~ j ~ ~ i ~ i ~~yy I I'~ 1, i I I ( I 1 I j - i 7 r~ i ~ i Q ~ ~ i V y '
i 03.0 I I 1 ; G' + I , ~ i n i I i i ~ I i i ~ i ~ a I ;~t ; ~ ~~t~,_.~ 'L. .399. i 39b.5~ I ~ 1 I ( ' ' I i
i i _ . ;...392,0 i i i + << ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' 7ET ~ ~ . ~ f ~ . . r 1 ~ ~ ~ ~
I J. I _ , . ~ _ 389.0 i _ i + I . - 1 - ~ 1 1 I I ~ - L._ 387.5 i + - + \ I p. ~ /1 ~i $ E y , . i I '~y I . ~ I jai ~ AREA .1~~, i i .~...I.
, . - 0 0 386 ; + + ~ + ~ _ 5 t +QO ~ ~ ~ _ ? 3)3 f; fit.. , .y y: i,
I' h _ + + _ , - , ~ i___ ~ ~ i ` ; + + + + + + ~ ~)4 ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ ~I~ .l
m ~ p , d ~ p I 0 ~ o, , 'i ; - a' I I ii ~ r o T F• t ~M S ' ~N la `L~' G i r
_ ~ _ v.. , - ' ~I _ . i + + ' ' _ - - ~ ! ~ r ~ IpIS~JdRBAN~E• ~ ~ ~ , t
_ ~ U . _ W I v , j- , ~ ~ ~ ~
1 S R t~ ' W if2 _ 1 - ~,,~y f 2 ' ~ ~ I , 0 ~~PROFECTiON ~ ` / , . ~f~ CItvG y ,
I f I' `~5"pRO~fCT-BOt1ND B I M -T ~ ~ W e~ 0 i ~ _ _ -mow ~ _ _ pry I ~ , y ~
. . . . q 2 11 i 0 W~ 8 i
~ 9 ~ ~ _ ~ 1 f, 3 t r ,r,_ ~ I ~ 88. i I ~ ~ ,~I, ' LIMI OF, II I ~ - ' - i 3 i ~ x _y ~ ( ~I, , ~ ~ ~ ~I, ~
w ~ . ~ ~ ~ DIST RBAN~E , N~": i ! ! 38,0 _ _ ~ tY~ + CCU-.1_
I ~ , ~"`4' _ I i j I 386 I I~ ~p ' "0 ~I i r- 0 ~ - L? L I t a i i • _ . ~ _ ~
~ i r 5 ~ A. I t I I I 1 ~ l ~ ' - - I " i -
' ' ~ ~ ' i i I i '~T R~N t , 0~ - - t iv ~ ~ _ .
° ,I IMI 5 OF' L m ,i - i i ' ` _ ~ ~ E I ! ~ I ~ ~ ~ OI ~ - - - ! DISTURBANC i. _ i ! _ 7 I'fi E ~ b,l ~ } v ~ I W OI~ _ l ~ +
° L~'c7 ~ ~ i I ~ ~ I I I I ~ ~ I ~ tt f ~ ~
' I ~"'3 47 L'- I 1 I I I ~ I i i ~ I 1 i I ~f~ ~ I I ti / ` . m
F ~ +..w+:. ~ ru ..w r r , ~
~ c,"!. l U I ~ ' I ~ N'892fi31 ~ 311.71 _ - , - - = ' . ' ~r ~ t r.
' i t , I ~ ~ ,~i , x`~ / i . F
i I ~ I o ~ I ~ d r • 251 PRO~C]' BO~d. ~ . 1 ^ ~ t , i • , f~ I 4 }r I. I ~ ~ I ~ S
s I I ~ i i I ~ \ ~V~ 1 I f ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ FI i ' L~vit~.~.•:OF ~ _ n 1,. ~1~'
S 1 ,i I ~ i ~ i TREE I . ! , i i I' / _ _ _ r / I E i 'S I I ~ , j 'i st.. ~ UA TUA __TUA A x. ~ i i' ~ 1~ I r ~ ~ ~r D~STU~BANC /
.i. ,IlA, I + ~ 4 i I it I i ~ r'r M 1 r ' ~ ~ t,.~ A' 1 i i~' 1 i' I , i ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .,i.' ~ ;~1' s
I I , i Li.. ~ , 1 ~ . i I ~ w LIMITS OF i~.. i~ i . ~ r / ~ i'I ~ ~ ~1 r
~ ~ ~ '.T ,R~ ~FyT10N DISTURBANGE~ i x' i i • i ~k'
1 ~ ~ I LING I ~ I i i / / ~
i / ,k ~ ~ ~ ' I ~ I ` t g.4 i 397.0 ; , 3 ~ i i 0 i l ~ .W ~ r~' J
~ a ~ 1. ~ _ - X5.5' i
• I i a ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ p,Od ~ ~ . B°-2 l• 3831 ; ~ o SAS ' ' W ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ q , y F
r@ ,~r1, i \ > J j ; V ~ R .,TREE ~ • tECT~I ~ f i
I w a,
, i i ~ r : ~ ~ tx z.
'1 ~ ~ _ ; f a ~ ~ i ~r r, - rl'~
f . ' ~ r ~ r ~ ~ ~ A ~ /
t ~ ~ ~ I i i~ ~ w x 1 ~ ! ~ ~ u-i i ~ IMITS 4F ~ 398.fl r'', V 1 ~
~ ~ i DISTURBANCE 1 ~ ' . . t ' , , i ~ ~ i 8 r . . • ^
I << ~.t~~, i ~ .l,~~, ji A (r~Cl I ~ I A;' ~ C1 ~ 0 ~ . , V.
I~ i ' ~ i ~ ~ J'~ V / m 'k ` , i - .I i , u : w i ~ ~ . r, Q J , i , i 9' ' , . , . ,~'W ~ >r , , • , ;~•,%;i!'.',;/ / PROPOSED PWASE 4 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: .
I I , ; ~ J ~ ~ ~ o < ~ r • ~ ~ • ~ r' ROADS: 39,448 SF
o ' I ~ Ir ~ gj STORM IyAGE - ~ • z ~ ~ - 1 i S ORM DRAIN ' ~ ' / ' ~ T 5 ~ p , Iv9 ' q , •6~ EASEME ` ' , a ~ 1 . , ~ ' ~ r ~ SIDEWALKS: 1,494 SF ' - TS: 11 1 F (34 ~ 3,445 SF EA.)
r s ~ ~ i ' ~ p c? ~ ~ASE~iENT h U ~ ~ U Y ~ r~~ ~ ~ ` ~ 1 I ~ ~ 0 ; ~ h ~ ~ I~ ~ g. , ' . LO 7 30 S f ' r • / ~ TOTAL: 158A72 SF 3.628 AC.)
! I I ~ r h J ~ , i ~ f 'LIMIT ~ 1 I i / i' S.• ~ i ' I 'I ~ , I r pp F ' TOTAL SITE AREA: fi45,491 SF (14,Si$ AC.)
1 , i I I t I i. , D i ~ i. .f~fSY 6ANCE , . . . 4 ~ I i ~ ~ i iq ~ q .A i y~ ! I ~ r ~ N t `'7. - i \ I I ~6ANCE1'. ~ ~ ~ IMPERVIOUS: 24.49%
. w • , Q I I ,G ~1 ~ I I ~ C7 ii ~5y'~J~ ' u t, ~ ~ i i . , ' / ~ MAXIMUM ALLOWED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: (SEE SHEET 2 OVERALL PROJECT SITE DATA)
; . y a ~ ~ . ~ ~ ' ~ NO SPECIFlC ~ IMPERVIOUS LIMIT FOR INDINDUAL PHASE; PROJECT ~1UST COFAPLY WITW OVERALL ~ APPROVED IMPERV14US COVERAGE LIMIT OF 38.91 AC. (?9.O% OF ENTIRE PROJECT AREA).
vi , i i , i ~ ~ ~ I /i ~ , ~ I , ~i / ~ i / i y
i , y y„ ~ ~ r - is
t 1 ~ l uMITS OF ~ ~ ~ .
- I - g ~ , ; ' . DISTURBANCE , f, ~ / . E~ ~ r ~ , ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ PHASE 4 TOTAL 1~ISTU RBEC~ AREA 9.7 AC~
I~ ' ' I ' A d;.. r ,
I t _ I ~ 'TREE PR 10 ~ , ~ . b,~. ~
I ' ~ SHADING LEGEND. , i' „ ~

w ~ ~ ! ~ RAVE. + ~ _ 5 ~ ~ ! , i'.f.. W y Y
i ~ ~ ~ I ~ i i .AR~. ~.~i ~ I 1 i / t p'~ + + + ~dfr,; i . z 5 f ~p ; Y PRIVATE STORMWATER Y W y EXISTING
, 1 + ~ MGMT. & ACCESS ESMT. W y Y WETLANDS ~ (TYP) W y W
_ / I EE I~ W y oAOOaoocaaoooooo0p° °
E I • I ~ ; • ' ~ _ 0 .~Yt CARp • ,o~dR °aaaaaa° l~
a ' ~ ~ ! ~r -6 ! ! o ; ~ ~ ~ + LIMIT. < ~ . . ' r 000 o00°hc~,SJ lO~ o°a "7 °°o
I i ~ ...1..... 25' RROJEOT BOUNDARY BUFFER i i ,1 r ~ , < ~ o ' i c I a ' ' ~ . , TREE SAVE e q°~ ~ p /
i . ' . I < ~ j • 89'05'41' E 383.51 ~ _ _ _ , . ~ AREA PREI~II ~RYo ALAN
i LIMITS Of ~ ~ . . ' . ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ + , . / N©T dAP OVE~"1 CON~RU~1'ION . , ~ ~ ~
I ° - i DISTURBANCE ~ ,.K + + + I ~ CJ , 4 ~ j , 0 REE PROT T' w# ~r..' -
I ~ I ~I ~ _ ~ i ~ C O i 1,.... 1 ~ °a°°°° ~ 0,~0 , + + + PRIVATE E'Y 0
k ~ / ! a ~ ~ li 393.0 ~ + 1;~ I N • ~ ~ I -tt~ v ' ~ ' ' ' ~ 31 ~ i i ~ ~ ~ oono ° ,'1 + + + STORMWATER
' / p ~ 'TEE .~~}T CTION• . I ~ / ~ ~ I I ~ 1 I •I, I ~ • • + + + MGMT. ESMT.
• ) ~ + + + ft
o , I i .I'... cr . i ~ i~ i ~ ~1 , 'dill ~ 7 ll i i.'.. fol.. .~fLll....,.,
'd ...'1.; . . , ,w U i I' / I I I a X1,1 I ~ ~,.~4 . I ~ I ~ . t.
. _ .~,,t_~ GRAPHIC SCALE
I .AR ai ---1" _ . w o - '1 ~ ~ I , i~ I I a i + ~ ' . . N ' a ~ 1`~, 6{1 D 34 60 120 I I
, - ' I ~ LIMITS OF ~ .1.. a ~ ~ ~ - I DISTURBANCE - . , . - rte' zs . ~~ru,: , f -f'"'.~I~"~0. 0 s - ~ ' - 1 inch - 64 ft.
- x - , ~.T - ° ~ ~ ~ N $x'06'39" E 929.8,7' I {
f
i
° No. Revision Date By Designer Scale i m W&R AS NOTED
~ Drawn By Date r o y AS H TO IN' HALL rPhHASES 3 & 4
NJA GAS 06 17 11 o G R"ADI NG & STOR"A P TORM OF 2 Sheet Na DRAINAGE PLAN 2 ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYORS 8
o Checked By Job No.
NORTH CAROLINA 0 8DH 02090500.0 DURHAM DURHAM COUNTY 111 MaeKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] www.withersravenef.com License No. C-0832
{ i