20110732 Ver 1_401 Application_20110811

201 10732
HCPOA -- AUG 9 201, ?
Irrigation Pond
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina
Joint Application Form and Supporting Documentation for
NATIONWIDE PERMIT #3 PCN
Prepared For
Ms. Amanda Skinner
Harris Corners Property
Owners Association
9335 Harris Corners Parkway, Suite 250
Charlotte, NC 28269
Prepared By:
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
Environmental Planning Consultant
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
[phone]

The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
6701 Carmel Road, Suite 205
Charlotte, NC 28226
704 527 0800
August 8, 2011
WA
0 r?ROG
1 I > =?
o
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
'
k Vft-
1. Processing A NP
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes N No For the record only for Corps Permit:

® Yes ? No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: HCPOA Irrigation Pond Repair and Maintenance
2b. County: Mecklenburg County
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name: Harris Corners
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
AU
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: HCH LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 25482-821; 08969-984 B?
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Mr. Tim Shaughnessy
3d. Street address: 9335 Harris Corners Parkway #250
3e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28269
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name: Mr. Amanda Skinner - President
4c. Business name
(if applicable): Harris Corners Property Owners Association (HCPOA)
4d. Street address: 9335 Harris Corners Parkway, Suite 250
4e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28269
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Leonard S. Rindner
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
5c. Street address: 3714 Spokeshave Lane
5d. City, state, zip: Matthews, NC 28105
5e. Telephone no.: 704-904-2277
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 02511101
Latitude: 35.3439 Longitude: - 80.8437
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 0.37 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT Long Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing disturbed construction site in succession to the south; existing office/transportation/industrial developments to the
north, east, and west.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 0.37 acres - existing pond area
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
An overflow channel from the existing pond has naturalized - approximately 50'
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Irrigation Pond Repair and Maintenance - reconstruct dam
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Reconstruct dam including removal of vegetation; compacted berm; O-ring RCP; Concrete Cradle; seepage diaphragm;
riser with trash rack; and other supportive design requirements. The pond is used to irrigate several properties in lieu of
using municipal water source.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes ? No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: Action Id. 201000014
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
Name (if known): Leonard S. Rindner/Patrick Kealy Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
1/21/10 by the USACE - Steve Chapin - USACE Asheville Office
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
® Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
? Yes ? Corps
W1 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W2 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No ? Corps
? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ®P ? T fill UT of Long Creek ® PER
? INT ® Corps
® DWQ 3' 40'
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 40'
3i. Comments: channel is a naturalized overflow channel from existing pond.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ? P ®T irrigation pond repair and maintain dam irrigation pond .37
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts .37
4g. Comments: Pond will remain - temporary draining will be required to repair exisiting dam. Pond will be re-established.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
6b. 6c. 6d.
Buffer impact
number - Reason
Permanent (P) or for
Temporary (T) impact
B1 ?P?T
B2 ?P?T
B3 ?P?T
6i. Comments:
? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
? Catawba ? Randleman
6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer
Stream name mitigation
required?
? Yes
? No
? Yes
? No
? Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
Zone 1 impact I Zone 2 impact
(square feet) (square feet)
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The civil engineer for the project have determined that rehabilitation of the existing pond dam is required in order to maintain
the long term viability of that resource and reduce the likelihood of failure due to large storms events. The reasons for
rehabilitation of the dam are as follows.
1) The dam does not currently have a stable, permanent outlat structure. The current outlet structure of the pond is an non-
stabilized channel that has eroded into the default spillway for the pond. The channel is relatively steep and highly susceptible
to erosion during high flow events. A permanent riser outlet structure designed to maintain the existing normal pool elevation
and bypass large flows is proposed.
2) The existing spillway is unstable and substantially under capacity for the drainage area it serves.
3) There are a substantial number of existing trees growing on the dam . these trees need to be removed to eliminate the
possibility that they can be uprooted during a high wind event, causing failure of the existing dam.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The project will be subject to an approved sedimentation and erosion control plan. The pond will be drained slowly to minimize
potential of sediment from the pond bed moving downstream.

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ? Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
? Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: NA linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes ? No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Project is an irrigation pond repair -
NWP#3 - WQC 3687
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? City of Charlotte
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HOW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
? Yes ® No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes ? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ® Yes ? No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): A Nationwide
Permit #3 was issued by the USACE SAW 2010 00537 for 40' of stream impacts to repair the dam. An application was not
submitted to NCDENR due to an inadvertent misreading reading of WQC 3687. The consultant thought that a permit
application was required for over 40' of impacts instead of 40' or greater.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project maintains an existing facility
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ® Yes ? No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
? Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
ill
? A
h
ev
e
s
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Site was evaluated during the wetland delineation process for the presence of Schweinitz's Sunflower. The site is heavily
disturbed in conjunction with previous development. Invasive grasses and grasses planted to stabize construction sites
such as Lespedeza sericea, vines, and and shrub species dominated the lower vegetative strata. Ecotonal edges along
roads and clearings were inspected to determine if Schweinitz's sunflower was present. Project site is not in a watershed
that has been identified as habitat for the Carolina heelsplitter. Based on a field evaluation Schweinitz's sunflower or it's
habitat was determined not to be present.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://www. nmfs. noaa.gov/habitat/habitatprotection/efh/G IS_inven. htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
According to the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of
registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, this site is not registered property or
property listed as being eligible for inclusion in the Register.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determi ion? a en urg County GIS; Owner/engineer provided
information
Leonard S. Rindner
J--
8-08-11
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
LEONARD S. RINDNER, PLLC
Environmental Planning Consultant 3714 Spokeshave Lane
Professional Wetland Scientist Matthews, NC 28105
Land Planning Tele: [phone]
March 30, 2010
Ms. Amanda Skinner
President - Harris Corners Property Owners Association (HCPOA)
9335 Harris Corners Parkway, Suite 250
Charlotte, NC 28269
Re: Irrigation Pond Repair and Maintenance - NWP #3
Dear Ms. Skinner:
In order to interface with the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources (if required) I will need your formal
authorization. Please sign the following statement:
This letter authorizes Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC as our firm's agent in matters related
to Waters of the U.S. and Waters of North Carolina for the referenced project site. This
includes interfacing with the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the North
rolina Department of Natural Resources.
-3o- Io
Signature Date
Please con eif you have any questions or require additional explanation. Thank
you.
;Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
Profession Wetland Scientist
THE JOHN R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
Rosearch Irian{tic Nark, NC
.'r-•;t I???„? ins i4?:':
I„ l l
. ?I
(Aariolti), W,
,_,:' I

March 24.
Mr. Len Rlndllcl'
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Malthews, North Carolina 28105
Re: I Iarris Corners Property Owners Association
Charlotte, North Carolina
130;1'-09020
Dear Mr. Rindner:
On bchal l of our client, i larris Corners Property Owners Association, wc have
evaluated the condition of the existing irrigation pond used to serve the Harris
Corners dcvclopillcnt. Our evaluation had determined that rchahilitation of' the
existing pond (1,1111 is required in order to nl,1intaill the long terill viablhty of 111,11
resource and reduce the likelihood of failure dllc to large storm events. The
reasons For rehabilitation of the dam are as fellows.
1. 'I he danl does not Curt-cntly have a Stahic, pernrulent outlet structure.
The current outlet of, the pond is an non-stabilized chmincl that has
eroded into the dcl-ault spillway fOr the pond. The channel is relatively
steep and highly susceptible to erosion dln'i11g high Ilow events. A
pernlarlent riser outlet structure designccl to maintain the existing
normal pool elevation and bypass large flows is proposed.
1. In addition to the existing spillway hein?_? 1111V'1,111110, it is subslantlally
under capacity for the drainage area it serves.
3. 'T'here arc n substantial numhcr of existing trees growillg Oil the danl.
'T'hese trees need to he removed to Chilllnalc the possibility that one
could be upruutcd during it high wind event, causing lailtil'c of' the
existing dam.
4. It is obvious there has been a lack of, maintenance on this pond Fi?r a
number of years. Without regular maintennncc, tllc likelihood of future
problem,,: is greatly increased.
11Icase Ict rile know it' you have ally (IUCSti0l1S or 11CC(I additional infornlatioll to
hCgin your review.
Sincerely,
7711; .IOIIN R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
limluloll I. Plunkett, 1'.I ;.
Director of l"'llgincering, (.Aau•lotte Region
i)ar,itln >orvicos rw used oil Clieni Sucr,F;ss
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action 11), SANV-21110400537 (vsunty? meeklenumrg In is (,)nod: Derita
GENERAL P100111- (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE,) V11 IFICATiON
Property Ovrier' .Author/ed .Ayenl: Barris Corners PON Att'n Annyda Skinner
Addre s_ 0335 Harris Owners Pktiyy.. Suite 250
Charlotte, NC 28269
Telephone Nkl.:
Stir and location of pmrierty (water hody read namr,`humhct'. ilnVn. rte )' 11(TOA Irritation Pond
project located at the Harris Corners- ti/D west of Statesville Iliad. south of Exit IN U-77); in north
Charlotte
Dcscriplron ol'pruleris area sand acti", "This permit authorizes Impacts to 40 IT Of a t" 1 11AMIg
Creek in association with the repair and "jaintenance of an irritation pone!. In addi:ioa. the 0.37
acre pond will be teMvrarily drained as part of the work.
App)ltahlr I ;tx+. ? Section 4(W (Clean Waler Act, 'tI I ?S( I l44)
[ Scelion 11) l hers and Harbor" Act.1 4 1 'S( 40;)
Authrtu/mi on: keglonal t;cucral 11clnut Numhcr.
Nalloinvldc I'c.rrnll tinnlhcr t
Volir mark iw aallhlarl: cd h4 the above reft-lellcrd permit pturided 1 is a"t-uni ltslicd Hl wlr o accoidaixt- mull the
attaihcil Conditions anal gnu SuNnowd ph" s Any %whanin (d the attached altu nu"ls m dealaurin Wut your
sAmoled plans nmy wtlhWO the pcrinowc to a stop mink (tilde. a rewtoratitln order and (it apprnl'i'mir. lettal acttol
t hew verilica!.it'll Is. %Am until the %% 11 n nwo l i, rowwd, in revoked. All of the eyiwtitlc '':ITIN ak:
wholix d in he nllldrlied, rrm"lied, of it-voceti print hi Tlanh IN. 2612. It a mrutnhcnt upon rent t(i remain
rnfornlcrcl of chanpv% to the Wily We mill wir a public mawc n1wn Q NU IN are reissued. Furihcrnlow 1f (ou
entllnlcnt v Ill ale undrl wun t n9 twinu mce the. activity heknc the date that the rcleranl uanonww ule pvrnrti h
plodiffi d of Ivi okvd, NIM m d! Itact_ wlw (12) ni nthw I= ihtt rlau- ell the nlntllfic mmi or rc(ocmms of the WP
Io + ofIIVIC1t, Iht' <Ik I14.. n1 111141cI II itr fity" al it,fnl? and ("nr11111)1ariw -d l1w, nallone,isIt' per7n11
At Im I rt- slrkgn tit. Sc?rlltirl .ftl4 tae !rain alol ahovu) "my .rho r"lime an intli"thud Sm wn 401 Win (AA R
t 111 it 0 III 'I','" m1;'tllit) € itnlat t IIIQ' %( I71('1',trril of ? ;ttC"1 Qualit" 14.1 `phsnic 1019) , 1 "'U') to kicicrillun:
in, two Of la rl131ic•Irtt'iat'
I to at in ltll in c uttl w A'rthin Mtiiavia; taxial < o111dw% tililyi i us wpulmuin urukr the ( ihoLd Awl
'elttn.,lTriww Ao It AMA i Mon to hc'pninnlx' min ym namq tt+nlo 14e N4 Lim mom of ( "awal Nlanaltenleni
h : I rr.-Il;lINIM "I of 16 -1"", t N111t'Mom thMA mo Ic`llo v Me pt:lnMluci, tit the t'C'?pii#1?Il-ylht'•: U7 t&lartl ali\ orlict
as f100?sA I?'ir;lla' of hs :tf earl#Irt6;a 1, pt'tlY311
11 fin "it ' Ar- xl'ti (lovNIP"n tf$'att1mr His- will alnuv ally 14 ;he cranrlituw't oI the ('t.'l11111, "I thcr { o1p, tit
1.ar'I m(in la vulas 4 ptrt)'taMC pho•'w i "wicl ? al E24 ?71 7usil_
tIrl l?ptilslttr;F f ?'liclal !?lr?c 4 "l)aplfl bate: April 26, 2010
' ?4 rclt lei 2ti12
I "intwilm 1)MvOil b'vOicalltll)
l 111 °d('1ll)t?Itpatrrl 11tw;tt('i rw t ttnrilllltt'tl la7 prciw ulitrft tha iugrhewt lewd a+I 5npport tai the plllaltc. 'i rt help to ensure etc
r a,ntlrills° to ,hi wrtr I?)cr,?hc• +?.aultrplc?te ihcr aliarhrrl t':I*tarrntl tiatlal;aetlon Sl1rw°c1err ti,`I},1t
Itt1f? cacw} °=,l'f t)w,tw ?t.tr?. rllll'1b'1 lI Ah)I)s iu,(t?d,.Illrld Its omph-le lilt,wnr?e?ttn)Itlc
Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ? Based on preliminary intitrnration. TOW a TWI w he "alas of ilte I!S including kVCtkIIIds %%Ithu) life above
described project area. 'I his preliminan deterfill [lilt loll is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Progranf dinnusiratisc Appeal Process ( Relcrrncc 33 (TR rail 331 )
13, ? 1here are Navigable Was ofthe United SwIcs %vithin the above described pmjrct area sulucct to lice
hermit regn1mincnls ofSection 10 of Ow Rivets ,nil harbors Art and Section 404 ofthe ( lean Water Act,
1;nlcss there is a change in the law or our puhimlied regulations, till,, detennutahon ma)' he relied tgxut fir a
Period not to exceed fire Sears from file date of this notification,
c. El There are waters ofthe I JS and ow wetlands wtthtn the ahoye desenhed project area subject to the permit
icgumcments of Sectmn 404 of the ('lean Water Act ((AVA)(t 1, I SU ? I X44 j, 1 finless there Is a chance rn the
Iau or our puhlished wgulaI I oils, tilts dCrerminatIoil may be relied upon I o r a PCrtod nut t„ ex Cecil II%(' years
from the dale of' dus notification.
1). ? -l he jruisdfctomd am= "Hhin the above descrihcd pngml area have fleet) idCIlulird MOO it previous ac(inu.
Please rct'rrenee lftns(hctttnal determutation t*:sued....._.. Action 11)
Basis of Juristlictimial Delct-mimilion: llic site Contains Juris(Itcllonal open water and a stream channel that
exhibits lunccator:s of ordlnar} high water marks, The stream channel on the property is an nnnantcd trfimitary h,
1-onl: Bieck +(hrch 114,"% mw the ('atawfla Rnvr and uhnwtcrly flow it, the Atlantic (kcan thi nigh fire I only.
(-reek--( bumlif Rnef sySwn which is a ticcmuil 10 navigable-in-tacl watcnva% at Lake Wyliv..
,lppcals Inforrtta(irrn: 1 1 his intitrrnation dues not apply u? preliminary rlefefmtnation.s as inducted by pal-aymph A
abox 9
Anaelhed If "% ,c(itkation is an approvcd Jurisdictional detcrmtnatiott If vole are not in agreement with that
aplrrnrCd jurtsdtcti+mai deR:rmrnanott. yon Call stake an adnlintsuativc appeal under 33 (I It 3_,1. l nCloscd you trill
firm a Notification of Appeal Prot-css f ^?AI'l fact sheet and re(pr ,:f for appeal IRFA) hum. It yon reguesl to appeal
lifts delcimifuitfon you roust suhnnt a ronrhleWd MIA firm to the Inlhwmg addretis_
lfistrict Fnginect. Wtlnlinplon RCpulafraru Prr? ill
4ttn . Prirlck-1 'slanagcr
151 P:+ttc+n Avenue. Rmill) ?f)x
ayltr?villc•,\?nrrl) ( ;lrtlna !Ssf)1
III o)<(cr 1131 sin RI A W f9. acccploi h; Ilk, ( r,fp?, the ( tips, nnsr determine that if 1s, conlpicfe. That it rose," 1110
a (atIm for aplwal under x I i I R glut ? If ti, and Owl a has hccn wcowd by the Division t)ffire within A(t dav" of
the rlatc tl the %AP Shnuhl wu+t decide 1,) sufunit ;n 1!1-:1 loan, it nutst he received at the abocc addle," Ailhm Of)
41JS, ftois7 dw i ?In /(rllr' h, Irrt
-It v itol ides, $I !1, t'"g: an III A WMI Us Tv lb, t urn t)t11C?' i1 )'{iii !1(r lint N" "O tilt" (It.'Wi'Ritfi:3WO in A--
OYrrd°IMMIum c -
( 1,rjr. 11v, 'otsstiw, I PlIn i;d' SwI k. I hillull
I-W fmk j rail 1(r'. 1(lilf
I xi matrnn Dare. InV year: !morn hop lul,
S1 RVI Y Iq A I . IIIH I I SKF I I 11, ANE?I I AAND DVI INFA 11ON IOR1/1S. P10 01- `I IT ANS. I 1 C..
kil `-? 1 10 AIV .N IHA IO IIII, -VH F(UPV111 IIHSIURM.IF IZI•QIjIRF.i)OR:Al'AII.AHI.I--
( r?1.i?, 1`t)rtt+?Itc°t1r"a'tt I s?(rrt,nal s+ ltlftilttct
HCPOA
Irrigation Pond
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina
Joint Application Form and Supporting Documentation for
NATIONWIDE PERMIT #3 PCN
Prepared For
Ms. Amanda Skinner
Harris Corners Property
Owners Association
9335 Harris Corners Parkway, Suite 250
Charlotte, NC 28269
Prepared By:
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
Environmental Planning Consultant
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
[phone]

The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
6701 Carmel Road, Suite 205
Charlotte, NC 28226
704 527 0800
April 3, 2010
Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info:
1. Project Name
HCPOA Irrigation Pond Repair
2. Name of Property Owner/Applicant: Harris Corners Property Owners Association
3. Name of Consultant/Agent: Leonard S. Rindner
*Agent authorization needs to be attached.
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s):
5. Site Address: See attached location map
6. Subdivision Name: Harris Corners
7. City: Charlotte
8. County: Mecklenburg
9. Lat: 35 . 3439 Long: 80 • 8437
10. Quadrangle Name: Der i t a
11. Waterway: UT Long Creek
12. Watershed: Catawba
13. Requested Action:
x Nationwide Permit # 3
General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
_ Pre-Application Request
The following information will be completed by Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
(Decimal Degrees Please)
Begin Date
Site/Waters Name:
Keywords:
LEONARD S. RI DNER. PLLC
Environmental Planning Consultant 3714 Spokeshave Lane
Professional Wetland Scientist Matthews, NC 28105
Land Planning Tele: [phone]
March 30, 2010
Ms. Amanda Skinner
President - Harris Corners Property Owners Association (HCPOA)
9335 Harris Corners Parkway, Suite 250
Charlotte, NC 28269
Re: Irrigation Pond Repair and Maintenance - NWP #3
Dear Ms. Skinner:
In order to interface with the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources (if required) I will need your formal
authorization. Please sign the following statement:
Thls letter authorizes Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC as our frrm's agent in matters related
to Waters of the U.S. and Waters of North Carolina for the referenced project site. This
includes interfacing with the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources
-=---. 3 3n - D
Signature Date
Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional explanation. Thank
you.
Sincerely,
Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
Profession Wetland Scientist
THE JOHN
March 24, 2010
Since 1979
R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
Mr. Len Rindner
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, North Carolina 28105
Re: Harris Corners Property Owners Association
Charlotte, North Carolina
RCP-09020
Dear Mr. Rindner:
On behalf of our client, Harris Corners Property Owners Association, we have
evaluated the condition of the existing irrigation pond used to serve the Harris
Comers development. Our evaluation had determined that rehabilitation of the.
existing pond dam is required in order to maintain the long term viability of that
resource and reduce the likelihood of failure due to large storm events. The
reasons for rehabilitation of the dam are as follows.
1. The dam does not currently have a stable, permanent outlet structure.
The current outlet of the pond is an non-stabilized channel that has
eroded into the default spillway for the pond. The channel is relatively
steep and highly susceptible to erosion during high flow events. A
permanent riser outlet structure designed to maintain the existing
normal pool elevation and bypass large flows is proposed.
2. In addition to the existing spillway being, innstable, it is substantially
under capacity for the drainage area it serves.
3. There are a substantial number of existing trees growing on the dani.
These trees need to be removed to eliminate the possibility that one
Research Triangle Park NC J Could be uprooted during a high wind event, causing failure of the
existing dam.
? F9(t3' 'af, f :{N
4. It is obvious there has been a lack of maintenance on this pond for a
number of years. Without regular maintenari , the likelihood of future
Sara hor i ,??.?; <; !? problems is greatly increased.
trt!". '" .i fd3a6
`"''r' Please let me know if you have any questions ol- need additional information to
begin your review.
Charlotte, NC Sincerely,
THE .JOHN R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
Brandon G. Plunkett, P.1'..
Director of ingineering, Charlotte Region
Design Services Focused On Client Success
o?"F W A r ! Ry
? . aa
Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the

Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this. notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ? No For the record only for Corps Permit:

® Yes ? No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ? No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ? No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ? No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: HCPOA Irrigation Pond Repair and Maintenance
2b. County: Mecklenburg County
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name: Harris Corners
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: HCH LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 25482-821; 08969-984
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Mr. Tim Shaughnessy
3d. Street address: 9335 Harris Corners Parkway #250
3e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28269
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name: Mr. Amanda Skinner - President
4c. Business name
(if applicable): Harris Corners Property Owners Association (HCPOA)
4d. Street address: 9335 Harris Corners Parkway, Suite 250
4e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28269
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Leonard S. Rindner
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
5c. Street address: 3714 Spokeshave Lane
5d. City, state, zip: Matthews, NC 28105
5e. Telephone no.: 704-904-2277
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 02511101
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.3439 Longitude: - 80.8437
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 0.37 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT Long Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing disturbed construction site in succession to the south; existing office/transportation/industrial developments to the
north, east, and west.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 0.37 acres - existing pond area
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
An overflow channel from the existing pond has naturalized - approximately 50'
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Irrigation Pond Repair and Maintenance - reconstruct dam
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Reconstruct dam including removal of vegetation; compacted berm; O-ring RCP; Concrete Cradle; seepage diaphragm;
riser with trash rack; and other supportive design requirements. The pond is used to irrigate several properties in lieu of
using municipal water source.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes El No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: Action Id. 201000014
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
Name (if known): Leonard S. Rindner/Patrick Kealy Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
1/21/10 by the USACE - Steve Chapin - USACE Asheville Office
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
® Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number- Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? PEI T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ®P ? T fill LIT of Long Creek ® PER
? INT ® Corps
® DWQ 3' 40'
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 40'
3i. Comments: channel is a naturalized overflow channel from existing pond.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ? P ® T irrigation pond repair and maintain dam irrigation pond .37
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts .37
4g. Comments: Pond will remain - temporary draining will be required to repair exisiting dam. Pond will be re-established.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ®No if yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
6b. 6c. 6d.
Buffer impact
number- Reason
Permanent (P) or for
Temporary (T) impact
61 ?P?T
B2 ?P?T
B3 ?P?T
6i. Comments:
? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
? Catawba ? Randleman
6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer
Stream name mitigation
required?
? Yes
? No
? Yes
? No
? Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
(square feet) (square feet)
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The civil engineer for the project have determined that rehabilitation of the existing pond dam is required in order to maintain
the long term viability of that resource and reduce the likelihood of failure due to large storms events. The reasons for
rehabilitation of the dam are as follows.
1) The dam does not currently have a stable, permanent outlat structure. The current outlet structure of the pond is an non-
stabilized channel that has eroded into the default spillway for the pond. The channel is relatively steep and highly susceptible
to erosion during high flow events. A permanent riser outlet structure designed to maintain the existing normal pool elevation
and bypass large flows is proposed.
2) The existing spillway is unstable and substantially under capacity for the drainage area it serves.
3) There are a substantial number of existing trees growing on the dam . these trees need to be removed to eliminate the
possibility that they can be uprooted during a high wind event, causing failure of the existing dam.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The project will be subject to an approved sedimentation and erosion control plan. The pond will be drained slowly to minimize
potential of sediment from the pond bed moving downstream.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ? Yes ? No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes .
4b. Stream mitigation requested: NA linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ? No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Project is an irrigation pond repair -
NWP#3 - WQC 3687
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? City of Charlotte
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
F1 Yes
? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project maintains an existing facility
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ® Yes ? No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
? Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Site was evaluated during the wetland delineation process for the presence of Schweinitz's Sunflower. The site is heavily
disturbed in conjunction with previous development. Invasive grasses and grasses planted to stabize construction sites
such as Lespedeza sericea, vines, and and shrub species dominated the lower vegetative strata. Ecotonal edges along
roads and clearings were inspected to determine if Schweinitz's sunflower was present. Project site is not in a watershed
that has been identified as habitat for the Carolina heelsplitter. Based on a field evaluation Schweinitz's sunflower or it's
habitat was determined not to be present.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/habitat/habitatprotection/efh/G IS_inven. htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
According to the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of
registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, this site is not registered property or
property listed as being eligible for inclusion in the Register.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Mec nb rg County GIS; Owner/engineer provided
information

Leonard S. Rindner 4-03-10

Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's ature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
LEONARD S. RINDNER, PLLC
Environmental Planning Consultant 3714 Spokeshave Lane
Professional Wetland Scientist Matthews, NC 28105
Land Planning Tele: [phone]
March 30, 2010
Ms. Amanda Skinner
President - Harris Corners Property Owners Association (HCPOA)
9335 Harris Corners Parkway, Suite 250
Charlotte, NC 28269
Re: Irrigation Pond Repair and Maintenance - NWP #3
Dear Ms. Skinner:
In order to interface with the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources (if required) I will need your formal
authorization. Please sign the following statement:
This letter authorizes Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC as our firm's agent in matters related
to Waters of the U.S. and Waters of North Carolina for the referenced project site. This
includes interfacing with the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the North
Z lina Department of Natural Resources
K'L '=--- 3 -.30 - ? o
Signature Date
Please contact one if you have any questions or require additional explanation. Thank
you. /?
Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
Profession Wetland Scientist

4ir

Stage Rd?,??
1

HCPOA
IRRIGATION POND REPAIR
STATESVILLE ROAD
CHARLOTTE,NC
APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION
Ste Rd 2116
06- s ? ', 45? JOpiot
tun FwH V»tacs 115
Ton t kc 5
t,
m
Z1 ?' ? R
d rti ?
V
4 F
1 ?G
Rd 2481
IRRIGATION POND SITE
W r, A.t
b
H??fiA
115 .<
r4 ;
y Lakeview Rd
?0i'
34 Wear ? ? ??? `,
b?tdQy??
115 24
r
w, Z
C?r?tYith
62009 Google - r0ap data 02009 Google -
LOCATION:
LATITUDE LONGITUDE
35.3439 N 80.8437 W
HUC :03050101
HCPOA - IRRIGATION POND REPAIR
STATESVILLE ROAD
APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION
CULVERT
t
RETLAND AREA
CULVERT _
RPW(STREAM)
RIP/RAP OVER STREAM
WETLANDAREA
GULLY/SWALE(NON-JURISDICTIONAL)
_ . _ "'5? 2fl9 .?T
r' . J i?{? $5
cp
IP
c
ull
q]
V?
r
x
v
ut f .r
p
Xr
LINEAR WETLAND
.03 -no
POND
jr'

iC
SITE
OVERFLOW CHANNEL
rt
0
m
( r O
IIG
4
N
50'
ar
G
w
I ?
i?
W
cq
C
0
94ft
i
S_o• 3,6 1
HCPOA -IRRIGATION POND REPAIR
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. STUDY
03-31-10
APPROXIMATE MAP- WATERS OF THE U.S
*FOR SURVEY AND STUDY PURPOSES ONLY
SUBJECT TO U.S.A.C.E. VERIFICATION
W
rt
r

SITE
RPR (STREAM)
RIP/RAP OVER STREAM
OVERFLOW CHANNEL
?V .Ark •''" '? ,tad ? ? ?" ?'
4
Nil if 1\f) 01 1 6 YV' fem., w y '+ § 1-m
NA -
x
41
'o -y- rif
1i.
F ., i
,A
t
HCPOA IRRIGATION POND REPAIR
AERIAL LOCATION MAP
03-31-10
APPROXIMATE MAP- WATERS OF THE U.S
*FOR SURVEY AND STUDY PURPOSES ONLY
SUBJECT TO U.S.A.C.E. VERIFICATION

S1nl Map--Meakleriburg County. North Corm
If 36*M'3B
sia ar ai ai w o ?w

- 0 , K TI-14
11 3sm'2s

If SaY 1:1mDffprnW mAgm(8S'x II'lMed.
tiers
_ N D 40 au 160 240
A Fed
0 150 300 we 9m
U
ii? SDA Mobnol Resnorcas Web Sod Survey
Ca ...A. S.. National Cooperative Sail Survey
4ltf2t110
Page 4 of 3
?i
3S 2:1.31r
36' 2D2sll
HCPOA - IRRIGATION POND REPAIR
STATESVILLE ROAD
SOILS MAP
GRAPHIC SCALE
60 0 30 60 120
1
1 inch = 60 ft.

r
r
w
BLVD-
a
F-

SIDNEY SITE
CRCLE
w
z

VICINITY MAP

HARRIS -' \
CORNERS vi
PKWY. ?
NARR15 OAKS ?
HARRIS
NSp01
R?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
FEX. CURB & GUTTER
(mss
7E X.
IRRIGATION POND i
PIN 0251-Ml
hry ??EX. ESA+(T
-P-QNt1 OVFRAI OW/. T?IF k1 7 \ rn,
CENTER
DRIVE
LEGEND:
O• EXISTING REGIAR
O EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
O IRON PIPE SET
A• WETLAND FLAG
• SURVEY POINT
EX. POND
ISL
ANDIA A CHARLOTTE, LLC
D.6.20274, PG. 424
M.B. 28, PG. 609
PIN 02511105
GRAPHIC SCALE
60 0 30 60 120
1 inch = 60 ft.
n
n
W
F-
SIDNEY
CIRCLE
L
HARRIS
CORNERS
PKWY.
VICINITY
TE
HARRIS
CENTER
DRIVE
EX. POND
ISLANDIA CHARLOTTE, LLC
D.B.20274, PG. 424
M.B. 28, PG. 609
PIN 02511105

B

LEGEND:
OO EXISTING REBAR
O EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
0 IRON PIPE SET
As WETLAND FLAG
• SURVEY POINT
c--
Jill, r
IRRIGAIION POND / -41 ?(y LINE
EX. c S R? AEAC?OB.8 A -[NP RS 8 , LLC
6
040?`°LF PIN 0251t101 '\
r?? ,ELI
FUTURE PAF KING LOT ;? i
J
ck
?fxY:
?•t
l ?
r•
1till
:
u
My I.
0 L
s4 1",
?'t z
F,. yFR
t
r 'His
w
i
ftY
1 _
M
11. ? , 1
I I
14LrL. 1 1
Alf Dl--
ON h?j 1
( k ( ''+9 a
S 9
i ? ± 1
S S
ki
a?
r.l
N
iritr
r`
T-it
F i _ ?+ur?3
s,? a y ¢ i' S •
IiF i! .li y .7`
I
J Z
?s
Z ?
W ?
w ? ¢
n 4
N
FJ
W
O
W
Y
a
N
0
Y
(J
W <
tY
O 2
W
Z O
< m
xa
og

$ U
O F
U
< I
e

I

I
W
U
? U I
I^
i
2
?? N 50 o I
? ' II
?
u 1
?
II F
L5 I lull z
I ^ I
I
I ' I I I I V '
1
It
II
2 U ?
W
ZU U
Y U N
?o
z a
<
3
W Y
N
U o ^3 8
m F c1?
o?<
m
W = U
Z
?j (Wt? U
O
tnU?l Uy?2
V In<WS
51??WJ(?Y
?F pWQO6?1?.
U jpoti
Fr-A
sa4,?o
eo < ? vi ?
0

Z Z3n
O
F
Y2
o?
r
z
yx
tlS
A
z
C
a,
z
0
H
a
x
a
w
z
x
U
3
0
a
w
O