20110670 Ver 1_401 Application_20110711

201 10670
July 12, 2011
NC DWQ, 401/Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Re: Pre-Construction Notification
5?nzt w i,% j$ot-ta
R@190 ER
JUG. 1 3 2011
Written Approval - 401 Water Quality Certification
Transco - Bank Stabilization and Maintenance of Exposed 36-inch Pipeline
in a Tributary to Abernethy Creek
Gaston County, Bessemer City, North Carolina
Submar Job #SB2999
On behalf of Transco, Submar, Inc. is submitting this request for a Section 401 Water Quality
Certification Written Approval to conduct bank stabilization activities and restore cover to
natural gas pipelines within waters of the United States. Based on a review of the Corps of
Engineers Regulatory Program, it appears that the work proposed herein could meet the criteria
established for authorization under Nationwide Permits (NWP) No. 3 - Maintenance and
No. 18 - Minor Discharges, as found in the March 12, 2007, Federal Register, Reissuance of
Nationwide Permits (72 FR 11180). Please refer to the enclosed Pre-Construction Notification
for project specific details. We will comply with the general and regional conditions of the
permits during construction.
CONTACT INFORMATION
Applicant
Transco
2800 Post Oak Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77056
Attn: Mr. Randall Flowers
PROJECT LOCATION & DESCRIPTION
Agent
Submar, Inc.
805 Dunn Street
Houma, Louisiana 70360
Attn: Brandon M. Clark
The Transco right-of-way (ROW) crosses a tributary to Abernethy Creek in Gaston County,
about 2 miles south of Bessemer City, North Carolina (Figure 1- Vicinity Map). The GPS
coordinates for the site are N35.25887° and W81.27697° (Figure 2 - Topographic Map).
The stream flows in a southeasterly direction where it crosses the ROW. The site is located in a
wooded area between Interstate 85 and US Highway 29 (Kings Mountain Highway). The banks
within the ROW are vegetated with a variety of grass and forbs. Outside of the ROW, the banks
805 Dunn Street - Houma, LA 70360 - 985-868-0001 - Fax [phone] - 800-9-SUBMAR
.J W
July 12, 2011 Page 2
are also vegetated with brush and trees of varying sizes. The soil in the area is composed of clay,
rock, and sand. The banks are 5 feet high and steep.
There are three natural gas pipelines in this section of ROW. The upstream line is the 36-inch
Line C, followed by the 30-inch Line A. The 36-inch Line B is the downstream pipeline.
Headcuts migrating upstream have exposed the top of Line B across the creek. A headcut is
currently located between Lines A and C. There is a low-water crossing for local ATV traffic on
the downstream end of the ROW. Downstream of the low-water crossing, the creekbed is
covered in rocks (Figures 4 and S - Site Photos).
Submar proposes to cut back both banks to create gentler, stable slopes and place fill around the
exposed Line B. Submar will then armor all three pipelines with a system of articulating
concrete revetment mats. The mat system will cover the pipelines in the creekbed and extend up
both banks. The tail on the downstream end of the mat system will articulate with the creekbed
to prevent the upstream migration of future headcut erosion. Submar's articulating concrete mat
system will provide and maintain cover over the pipelines in the matted area (Sheet 3 - Proposed
Design).
The Submar Revetment Mattress is an articulating concrete mat used primarily for erosion
control. The mat is 4.5-inches thick and has a low hydraulic profile when placed in a streambed.
Pipeline companies prefer our mat over their pipelines for several reasons. If the stream
undergoes significant changes, the mats can be repositioned to compensate for changing flow
patterns. The mat has open areas that allow revegetation through the mat. The design for matted
areas includes a rapid return to a natural appearance.
PURPOSE AND NEED
The pipeline is exposed, so a repair to restore cover is required. Headcuts migrating upstream
have exposed the top of Line B across the creek. A headcut is currently located between Lines A
and C. There is a low-water crossing for local ATV traffic on the downstream end of the ROW.
At some point, this Line B exposure may likely suffer structural damage. This unfortunate event
could cause environmental damage and endanger the public.
DIRECT AND INDIRECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
The proposed project involves the installation of 21 articulating concrete mats over the exposed
pipeline to restore cover. Of the 21 total mats proposed, 6 (approximately 9 cubic yards) will be
installed below the ordinary high water mark. About 4 cubic yards of clean uncontaminated fill
will also be placed below the ordinary high water mark. It appears that the project may
permanently impact about 0.02 acre of other waters of the United States. It is anticipated that no
wetlands will be impacted. We expect temporary impacts (approximately 0.07 acre) during
construction; however, anticipate no long-term adverse impacts to the project area.
805 Dunn Street • Houma, LA 70360 • 985-868-0001 • Fax [phone] - 800-9-SUBMAR
It I T
July 12, 2011
ADDITIONAL PERMITS TO BE REQUESTED
Page 3
No other state or federal environmental permits are required for the subject work. NWP-3 and
NWP-18 are certified Nationwide Permits under the North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Program; therefore, an individual
WQC will not be required. However, written approval is being requested from DWQ.
Your prompt attention and approval of this permit request will be appreciated. If you have any
questions, or if I may be of further service, please call me at [phone]. Thank you in
advance for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
SUBMAR

Brandon M. Clark
Regulatory and Compliance Manager
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Randall Flowers, Transco
2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77056
805 Dunn Street • Houma, LA 70360 • 985-868-0001 • Fax [phone] • 800-9-SUBMAR

_0O W A rF9°G
y
O Y
2 0 1 1 0 6 7 0
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the

Corps:

Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
FZ
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 and 18 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Bank Stabilization and Maintenance of Exposed 36" Pipeline in Tributary to Abernethy
Creek
2b. County: Gaston
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Bessemer City
2d. Subdivision name: Kings Mountain Highway
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: 185 Highway 29/74 LLC; Christa A. Overcash; Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Corporation as recorded in 1949
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3901 and 0491; 3901 and 0497; Right-of-Way Agreement: Book 554 and Page No. 453
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Transco, Attn: Mr. Randall Flowers
3d. Street address: 2800 Post Oak Boulevard
3e. City, state, zip: Houston, Texas 77056
3f. Telephone no.: 713-215-3427
3g. Fax no.: 713-215-5442
3h. Email address: I. Randall. [e-mail]
Page I of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
W t
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Brandon M. Clark
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Submar, Inc.
5c. Street address: 805 Dunn Street
5d. City, state, zip: Houma, Louisiana 70360
5e. Telephone no.: 1-800-978-2627
5f. Fax no.: 985-851-0108
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
I J -.t
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): PIN 3525-26-5713 and PID 205044
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.25887 Longitude: - 81.27697
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: N/A acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Tributary to Abernethy Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is currently being maintained as a right-of-way for existing natural gas pipelines. Current land cover is (311)
Managed Herbaceous Cover and (321) Managed Shrublands while land use is categorized as (1.06.02.02) Gas Storage
and Transmission.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Unknown
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Stream is approximately 150 linear feet at limits of maintained right-of-way crossing.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Project purpose is to conduct erosion control activities within a tributary to Abernethy Creek to restore protective cover to
Line B, an exposed natural gas pipeline and to protect two other lines, Line A and Line C, from future exposure.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Submar proposes to cut back the right bank to create a gentler, more stable slope (2:1) and place fill around the exposed
Line B. We will then armor all three pipelines with a system of articulating concrete revetment mats. Proposed project
involves the installation of 21 articulating concrete mats over the exposed pipeline to restore cover. Of the 21 total mats
proposed, 6 (approximately 9 cubic yards) will be installed below the ordinary high water mark. About 4 cubic yards of
clean uncontaminated fill will also be placed below the ordinary high water mark. It appears that the project may
permanently impact about 0.02 acre of other waters of the United States. The mat system will cover the pipelines in the
creekbed and extend up both banks. The tail on the downstream end of the mat system will articulate with the creekbed
to prevent the upstream migration of future headcut erosion. Submar's articulating concrete mat system will provide and
maintain cover over the pipelines in the matted area. A track excavator and track loader will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
? Yes ? No Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: Corps permit likely issued when pipeline installed
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
I t
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes ? No ® Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
T 1 If
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P M T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: No known wetlands on site
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ®P ? T Excavation Tributary to ® PER ® Corps 10 140
Abernethy Creek ? INT ® DWQ
S2 ® P ? T Fill Tributary to ® PER ® Corps 10 105
Abernethy Creek ? INT ® DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: Impacts associated with excavation of the banks to create more gentle 2:1 slopes will be approximately 140
linear feet. Approximately 105 linear feet of impacts will be a result of fill associated with the installation of the pre-formed
concrete mattresses.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
t v Y
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: N/A
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: N/A
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact required?
61 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B2 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: Although located within the Catawba River Basin, proposed project is not located within protected buffer.
Page 6of12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
+ 4 -W
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Project is designed to minimize the amount of material to be placed within the stream, but maximize the protection of the
currently exposed line and additional lines within the section of right-of-way.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Measures to control sediment and erosion will be implemented prior to any ground disturbance and will be maintained
throughout project construction. Permanent grass will be planted to help control erosion immediately following any fianl
ground disturbing activity. Native annual small grains and herbs appropriate for the season will be planted. Fescue based
mixtures will be avoided. Also, fertilizers and pesticides will not be used near streams. Additionally, construction best
management practices, using pre-formed concrete mats, working in the dry, clean uncontaminated fills, and permanent soil
stabilization measures.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ®No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
1
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: Project is located within the Catawba River Basin; however, it is located outside of the protected riaprian
buffer zones of the Catawba River mainstem.
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Total project imapcts (temporary and
permanent) are less than 1 acre.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Gaston
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
S U Or
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes ? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater is anticipated to be generated from the propsed project. Any sewage generated will be contained within a
porta-potty and hauled off site by an authorized waste disposal company at the completion of the project.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
u i
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ? No
impacts?
E:1 Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ® Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS Threatened and Endangered Species list for Gaston County and USFWS sent a letter to Submar and Asheville
Regulatory Field Office on June 29 indicating the propsed project would have "no effect" on Endangerd Species or
Designated Critical Habitat.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh_coral/ims/viewer.htm and EFH layer on Google Earth
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Electronic resources at http://www.hpo.dcr.state.nc.us and National Register of Historic Places layer on Google Earth and
concurrence letter sent to the State Historic Preservation Office on June 9, 2011.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Project packet sent to Gaston County floodplain administrator for
review and permit determination.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? The National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) for Google
Earth developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), its mapping partners, and America's
communities. Viewed data from the National Flood Hazard Layer as an overlay in Google Earth. Additionally, map was
viewed at www.gastongov.com and hftp://www.ncfloodmaps.com.
G" ry). U"lC- 1 rla/t
?m C? .,k
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
u ?
SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. A PLAN NO. N?A PARCEL ID: `a U504?
STREET ADDRESS: _NlA •- iiLynSco &A 4 - 9 - j? ( ?• ???? " el. P1 b91)
W -j
ess e r C •?, -N C (SZ A999)
Please print:
Property Owner: Tran S W - Add r+ : Mr, RQM A l l
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
random N. Cork , of ?ubr•ar}Irc.
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, Issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
a'WW b4- Oe-k ?3c:? to «r,nl r Hoc's 6n 'Ty -1-10510
Telephone: 1 13 ° a 15 - N X?
We hereby certify the above Information submitted In this application Is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
A ed SI Authorized Signature
Date: A j /2-40 11 Date:

r?N W T /VNESSEEA E TENNESEEAVE y BOSTON q CORD tnx = C'P?SOP ??? ';;,
32 = ° BESS pAVF cF2J , ' Uw2 RHYNE ST
_ R a
q cc
y E CLEVELq E T ENryESSE E lNDlANA AVE o'p
tn;
H tix NO AVE AVE 3 O0 w
?PV CAS WELL AVE N EAST GASTON RD as D lZ?~ O
1 a P
H V i
w S
w ?
O 1?
3
ti n
p m
J PQ ''
3 13
?4)
P may:
0
A (35.25887,-81.27697) m
N m
X w'
2 ?? Gt m -?• t
p ?C?`?y m z m 1341 29 VICTOaY lN-
'!b 250' `-" p ° Z Q?
g
t yly? 29 " ?r9
108
A I
MOUNTAIN VILLAGE CIR C q-
108
?A( ?OJ ap0.
0Z419 Q? c ;r0
i % 3 r? z9 N
'P° o <? 0
'a 'R' r y
Alm 2 IINWOOD RE) F Q2 On 3
J'
Mountain View `? O z j
O
ARCH! O o S
ti E WHITES 0
IDES R
w
ft z
0 800 600 Zoom 400 1 3200 4000
Data eRENnt poo c! S
805 Dunn Street PROJECT TITLE:
Houma, LA 70360 36-inch Line B Exposure Repair in
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] _ Tributary to Abernethy Creek Willia Gas Pipelines
Email. submar@submarcom Gaston County i6Z? Transco
Website. www.submar.com
,>..A Bessemer City, North Carolina
SOURCE: DeLorme Street Atlas USA 2009 DRAWING NO.: SB2999 DATE: 06/09/2011 SHEET TITLE., Vicinity Map SHEET: Figure 1
?OGp? `ry$ tix N 9r2?
Bessemer City
W PENNSYLVANIA AVE ?x ay
42 _ 2 ate, 2 ?P? 9L<1
SR 1307 27? E VIRGINIA AVE
?? o y y PENNSyLV ]\
.
- j x ANlA
N :, ^ SR 13A 0 VE .'
uO
x n
P k HARTFORD AVE W BpST0N AVE h 9Jy?
n W !Np OSA E h 2 Z
I ,_y
w n ?
r,
f4

Z ?.U-,(--

IN k
'", o
t ti _f 2 r
u.
-74
„ E
S
•sr
06
1 ?
805 Dunn Street PROJECT TITLE:
Houma, LA 70360 36-inch Line B Exposure Repair in .?
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Tributary to Abernethy Creek W illiams Gas Pipelines
Email: submar@submarcom Gaston County
Website: www.submar.com Transco
5L7-.,j..r>:Bessemer City, North Carolina
SOURCE: USGS 7.5 Minute Topo, "Bessemer City, NC". DRAWING NO.: SB2999 DATE: 06/09/2011 SHEET TITLE: Too Ma SHEET: Fi ure 2
Map dated 2003. P P 9
•
I 1P

¦

1=
805 Dunn Street
Houma, LA 70360
Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: submar@submarcom
Website: www.submar.com
rrl..yt..aC lt.G..-
SOURCE: Google Earth, 2011 Imagery
M
PROJECT TITLE:
36-inch Line B Exposure Repair in
Tributary to Abernethy Creek
Gaston County
Bessemer City, North Carolina
DRAWING NO.: SB2999 DATE: 06/09/2011
V a Gas Pipelines
46 Transco
SHEET TITLE: Aerial Map I SHEET: Figure 3

V
a
Looking Upstream
4
?u
arA? y
?x+ r
? writ
C`
3' k

G r

''x:41 w? w

805 Dunn Street
Houma, LA 70360
Phone: [phone]
Fax [phone]` _
Email: submar@submar com
Website: www.submar.com
SOURCE: Site Visit March 31. 2009
Looking Upstream
PROJECT TITLE:
36-inch Line B Exposure Repair in
Tributary to Abernethy Creek
Gaston County
Bessemer City, North Carolina
DRAWING NO.: SB2999 DATE: 06/09/2011
Willi" Gas Pipelines
? Transco
SHEET TITLE: Site Photos SHEET: Figure 4

Looking Downstream

Looking Downstream
805 Dunn Street PROJECT TITLE-
Houma ' LA 70360 36-inch Line B Exposure Repair
in Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Tributary to Abernethy Creek te.ams Gas Pipelines
Email. submar@submarcom Gaston County Transco
Website: www.submar.com
i-? Bessemer City, North Carolina
SOURCE: Site Visit March 31, 2009 DRAWING NO.: SB2999 DATE: 06/09/2011 SHEET TITLE: Site Photos SHEET., Figure 5
A" N N 1,
w ? W
Qc p 3
Z3 ?i c
v
V ? ? 11
II
II
11
11
II
11
ri
l
ULQ
V N
Ca p Q W
o ?
0
Wiz
h
\ \??` WOW
.? `?? mal,? ?
m
Q:) L
N V
WWI
o
.- •
to
I?
(? ? 1 I
II
II
II
II
II
II
i
N
Cl-
Q j
1E
0
\ Q ? N
??JJ U
.•• C3Lj
••• co
m
m Z
_ J
N U1
h $t4
o
R• .&
s: "K V
t
R W
On

? 1 $
X 3 ! ? ? ( ! E N

i r

t
p/ \
?? ; ? CE Q

t
s? ?

M
,

. . t z

i a1Lu
??
i
€ ?
?
' ~c ti
Qom

? q
? i
i

5

WWI

i
i f

? k
!
a 4
E
?
p
bl