20110647 Ver 1_401 Application_20110711

Southern environmental croup, Inc.
5515 South College Road, Suite F_ - Wilmington, North Carolina 2841 2
910.452.2711 • Fax: [phone]
www.segi.us
[e-mail]
201 10647
5 July 2011
Hand Delivery
Ms. Crystal Amschler
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Ms. Joanne Steenhuis
NC Division of Water Quality - WiRO
401 Wetlands Unit
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
[SEGi Project #: 11-010.011
ALI
A1ID
Re: Pre-Construction Notification Application for Equine Acres Equestrian Center
Lots 13 & 14 of Equine Acres Subdivision
Pender County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Amschler and Ms. Steenhuis:
Southern Environmental Group, Inc. (SEGi) is working on behalf of Mr. Jakob Bojarski ("Applicant") to
pursue a Nationwide Permit on his property, being all of lots 13 and 14 of the Equine Acres Subdivision,
within the Topsail Township, in Pender County, North Carolina. The parcel identification numbers
associated with this project are 3264-82-6687-0000 and 3264-82-7203-0000.
With the submittal of the attached Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), the Applicant is hoping to obtain
the Department of the Army's approval to utilize Nationwide Permit 39 and the Division of Water
Quality's concurrence to utilize the corresponding General Certification #3821, which will authorize the
fill of approximately 0.458 acre of non-riparian wetlands located within the property boundaries. The
purpose of fill is to facilitate the construction of roadways and buildings, which will support an
equestrian center that will cater to persons with special needs. While the NCEEP has wetland restoration
credits available in this HUC, the Applicant is proposing to compensate, for the unavoidable impacts to
wetlands, by performing permittee responsible wetland creation on land within the Equine Acres
common area. The mitigation is proposed at a 3:1 mitigation-to-impact ratio (1.5 acres of creation for
0.458 acres of impact). The Applicant also proposes to place the created wetland area and remaining
wetlands, within the project boundaries, into strict preservation. The PCN provides greater detail about
the proposed compensatory mitigation component.
Also within the PCN, you will find Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Forms and a Wetland
Boundary Survey. SEGi is requesting a site visit with the Corps to have SEGi's wetland line verified. In
Sr-Gi
the next few days, I will email you both to begin the process of scheduling a site visit to obtain the Corps'
verification of SEGi's wetland delineation. It is SEGi's hope that, during that site meeting, we can also
take a look at the proposed mitigation area and discuss any questions or concerns the agencies may have
with the proposed project.
As always, thank you both for your time and assistance with this project. I look forward to hearing from
you.
Sincerely,
Dana A. Lutheran
Project Manager
Enclosures: Pre-Construction Notification and Accompanying Attachments.
Cc: Mr. Ian McMillan - DWQ 401 Certification and Oversight (4)
201 10647
S?G?
Southern Environmental Group, Inc.
5315 South College Road, Suite E
Wilmington, North Carolina 28412
910.452.2711 (office) • 910.452.2899 (fax)
Date: 7 July 2011
To: Mr. Ian McMillan
Of: DWQ 401 WiRO
Attached you will find:*
SEGi Project #:11-010-.01
Client Name: North Marine Town Center
DWQ Project * NA
Transmittal Letter D /;::N? M
l1 L? D
JUL. 0 8 2011 I
? Proposal ? Sketch(es) ?x PCN ? Signed Wetland Map ? Photo(s)
? JD Package ? Report(s) ? Plans ? Information Request ? Other

Copies Dated Description
4 7/5/11 PCN for Equine Acres Equestrian Center (Lots 13 & 14)

These are being delivered:
*If noted items are NOT attached, please contact our office.
?x For your Review/Comment ? For your Records ? Returned for Correction(s)
? Corrected and Returned ? For your Signature ? Asa Courtesy Copy
? Other:
By: ? Hand Delivery ?x Fed-Ex ? UPS ? Regular Mail ? Other
Notes:
Ian, please note that 1 copy has been hand delivered to Joanne Steenhuis. 4 Copies and the filing fee are included with this
submittal.
Signature and (Typed) Name: Dana Lutheran
715111
20? WATX,?
0
o f
o ?
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1 Processing t
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the

Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
_
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number: NA
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ® Yes ? No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ® Yes ? No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Equine Acres - Equestrian Training Center
2b. County: Pender
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Hampstead 201,
2d. Subdivision name: Equine Acres ?NR`: °?----:_. ,.

2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: -;M"ft St QUALITY,
NA nn?
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Bojarski, Jacob (see Attachment 1 - Pender County GIS Information)
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 47/145
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): NA
3d. Street address: 307 Tallstone Drive
3e. City, state, zip: Fayettville, NC 28311
3f. Telephone no.: 315-415-1741
3g. Fax no.: NA
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no..,
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Ms. Dana Lutheran
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Southern Environmental Group, Inc. (see Attachment 2 - Agent Authorization)
5c. Street address: 5315 South College Road, Suite E
5d. City, state, zip: Wilmington, NC 28412
5e. Telephone no.: 910.452.2711 (o) 910.228.1841 (m)
5f. Fax no.: 910.452.2899
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
3264-82-6687-0000 and 3264-82-7203-0000 (see
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Attachment 1)
Latitude: 34.4111 Longitude: - 77.7761
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): (see Attachment 11 - Vicinity Map)
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: 23.71 (10.23 and 13.48 respectively) acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Harrisons Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C;Sw (see Attachment 3)
2c. River basin: North East Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site has been cleared of woody vegetation. The general land use in the area is urban/agriculture
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
5.8 AC (see Attachment 4 - 404 Wetland Survey)
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
There are no streams within the property boundaries (see Attachment 5 - USDA Soil Map).
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct an equestrian training center and associated features for special needs
persons.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed work consists of constructing 3 barns, along with associated parking areas, stormwater treatment ponds,
pastures and training arenas. Driveways will need to be able to provide semi-trucks and trucks with horse traitors
sufficient room to manuver around the buildings. Heavy equiptment such as backhoes and graders will be utilized during
the contruction. Work will be performed in the dry. Sediment and erosion control measures will be utilized to ensure
additional wetland impacts do not take place (see Attachment 6 - Wetland Impact Map).
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the

/
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: Portions of the property were delineated to ? Yes ®No ? Unknown
ensure that wetlands were not impacted with the installation
of the main soil road, within the SD. The two parcels for
which this PCN has been prepared have not been field
verified.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ? preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: SEGi
Name (if known): Mr. David Scibetta Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
The Applicant is requesting a field verification of SEGi's delineated line, with the submittal of this PCN (see Attachment 12
- JD Form and Data Sheets).
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
NA
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
Fill for road ? Yes ® Corps (P) 0.485
W1 ®P ®T crossing and headwater forest ® No ? DWQ (T) 0.03
building footprint
? Yes ? Corps
W2 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W3 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W4 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W5 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W6 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.485
2h. Comments: A 5' construction buffer has been provided around the permanent impact area. This will ensure that
unauthorized impacts do not take place during the construction process. Once construction has been completed, the
temporary impact area(s) will be returned to their original grade and contour and allowed to revegetate naturally (see
Attachment 6).

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g•
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
? PER ? Corps
S1 ? PMT NA NA ? INT ? DWQ
? PER ? Corps
S2 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
? PER ? Corps
S3 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
? PER ? Corps
S4 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
? PER ? Corps
S5 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
? PER ? Corps
S6 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts NA
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water
impact number - Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T

01 ?P?T NA
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts NA

4g. Comments:

5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1 NA
P2
5f. Total NA
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individuall y list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse
?Tar-Pamlico
? Other: NA
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T im act required?
?Yes
61 ?P?T ? No
?
Yes
62 ?P?T ?No
?Yes
B3 ?P?T ? No
6h. Total buffer impacts NA
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
To offset impacts to 404 jurisdictional wetlands, the Applicant proposes to perform permittee responsible mitigation, in the
form of creation and at a 3:1 mitigation-to-impact ratio. The proposed mitigation-to-impact ratio is based upon the
guidelines provided in the Department of Defence, Corps of Engineers, Code of Federal Registry, under Title 33, Parts
325 and 332. In addition, the work does not fall within 150 linear feet of any stream, which would create the need for the
Applicant to adhere to the NC Division of Water Quality mitigation requirements.
The work is proposed to take place within the common area of Equine Acres, which will be dedicated to the home owners
association in the future (see Attachment 13 - Proposed Wetland Creation Area Map). The selected location is conclusive
for wetland creation, as it is situated in a low topographic area; is adjacent to existing wetlands; soils in the area are
mostly mapped as Muckalee loam (see Attachment 14 - Soils Map for Creation Area); little effort is necessary to convert
the land and lastly the Applicant is unable to make the lump sum payment, of at least $23,115.00 (1:1 mitigation-to-impact
ratio), to the NCEEP or private mitigation bank.
In order to maintain a uniform hydrologic regime, the proposed area will be scraped down to the depth at which the
seasonal high water table is located, but excavation will not encroach upon the confinement layer or hard pan, and then
backfilled with hydric soils removed from impact area. The area will then be seeded with a wetland seed mix and allowed
to revegetate naturally.
Upon approval of this mitigation plan, the Applicant will provide the Corps and DWQ with a formal mitigation plan that will
include: wetland delineation and data sheets for the mitigation area; plan and profile view plans that will depict the
existing and proposed elevations of the mitigation site; monitoring requirements and contingency plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: NA
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
NA
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan

1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments: NA
2. Stormwater Management Plan

2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 19.6%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: NA
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, na rrative description of the plan:
Runoff will be directed to catch basins and piped to the proposed Wet Detention Facil ities designed to meet NCDENR
Stormwater rules for high density. Overflow from Wet Detention Basins will be discharged to existing wetland areas.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ® DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review

3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? NA
? Phase II
? NSW
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs El USMP
apply (check all that appIy) ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
® Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
? Yes ® No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ® Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ® Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes ? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): NA
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project will not open access to adjacent properties for development, as those properties area accessible
via an existing soil road. In addition, the project will be required to adhere to strict stormwater and erosion control best
management practices, which are shown to reduce potential impacts to downstream receiving waters.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated from the project will be treated by a septic system.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ? No
impacts?
Raleigh
El
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? A
h
ill
s
ev
e
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
US Fish and Wildlife data base, knowledge of the area, as well as the existing conditions within the project limits and the
surrounding area (see Attachment 8 - USFWS Data Base).
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The project is not located on a waterbody that would promote essential fish habitat and is not listed as one of the Division
of Marine Fisheries (DMF) inland or estuarine waterbodies (see Attachment 9 - DMF Primary Nursery Map).
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The area is extensively managed. There are no structures on the parcel.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program (see
Attachment 10 )
Dana A. Lutheran
4 5 July 2011
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applican Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
i
, ?1?d" C" . G ! s?cc Ts
BORJARSKI JACOB
PIN 3264-82-6687-0000 "?
?l f?c?m?nf ?
NAME BORJARSKI JACOB
ADDRESS 307 TALLSTONE DR
CITY FAYETTEVILLE
STATE NC
ZIP 28311
PROPERTY ADDRESS HWY 210 OFF
PROPERTY DESCRIPTO N L14 PB 47/145 EQUINE ACRES SURVEY
DEED DATE 12/17/2010
SALE PRICE
DEED
PLAT
TOWNSHIP
ACRES
LAND VALUE
BUILDING VALUE
DEFERRED VALUE
TOTAL VALUE
SUBDIVISION
ZONE
TAX CODES
Null
3866/047
00470145
PIN
NAME
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
PROPERTY ADDRESS
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION
DEED DATE
SALE PRICE
DEED
PLAT
TOWNSHIP
ACRES
LAND VALUE
BUILDING VALUE
DEFERRED VALUE
TOTAL VALUE
SUBDIVISION
ZONE
TAX CODES
TOPSAIL
10.23
$91,213.00
$0.00
$0.00
$91,213.00
EQUINE ACRES
SEEMAP
G01 F29 R40
3264-82-7203-0000
BORJARSKI JACOB
307 TALLSTONE DR
FAYETTEVILLE
NC
28311
HWY 210 OFF
L13 PB 47/145 EQUINE ACRES
SURVEY
12/17/2010
Null
3866/047
00470145
TOPSAIL
13.48
$92,906.00
$0.00
$0.00
$92,906.00
EQUINE ACRES
SEEMAP
G01 F29 R40
,4410,chn,e04 Z
SF.G
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 14 and 15 Equine Acres
LOT NO. 13 & 14 PLAN NO. 00470145 PARCEL I.D. 3264-82-6687-0000 and 3264-82-7203-0000
STREET ADDRESS: Off Hwy 210
Property Owner (please print): Js w 4
The undersigned, registered property owner of the above noted property, does hereby authorize
Southern Environmental Group, Inc. (SEGi) to act on my behalf in matters regarding areas of
environmental concern.
ti
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
308 Tallstone Drive
Fayetteville. NC 28311
Telephone:
Jennifer Witkowski - 847-204-9458
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of
our o ed
Vq?U?j Udl4l,Jl??;
SEGi Authorized Signature roperty OW:n? Authorized Signature
Date Date

NC DL-NR - DTVISON OF WATER (QUALITY
.0311 CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN

2B .0300
Classification.
Name of Stream Description Class Date Index No.
Hawkins Creek From source to Northeast C;Sw 04/01/59 18-74-47
tape Fear River
Northeast Cape Fear River From N.C. Hwy. 210 to Prince B;Sw 08/01/87 18-74-(47.5)
George Creek
Honey Creek From source to Northeast ;Sw 04/01/59 18-74-48
Cape Fear River
?Harrisons Creek From source to Northeast C;Sw 07/01/73 18-74-49
Cape Fear River
Godfrey Creek. From source to Harrisons C;Sw 09/01/74 18-74-49-1
Cree k.
Merricks Creek From source to Harrisons C;Sw 07/01/73 18-74-49-2
Cree k
^_atskin Creek From source to Merricks C;Sw 09/01/74 18-74-49-2-1
Cree k
Trumpeters Swamp From soruce to Catskin Creek. C;Sw 09/01/74 18-74-49-2-1-1
Blossom Swamp From source to Trumpeters C;Sw 09/01/74 18-74-49-2-1-1-1
Swamp
Players Creek. From source to Merricks C;Sw 09101/74 18-74-49-2-2
Creek
Island Creek From source to Northeast C;Sw 07/01/73 18-74-50
Cape Fear R iver
Old Creek. From source to Northeast C;Sw 04/01/59 18-74-51
Cape Fear River
Sturgeon Creek From source to Northeast C;Sw 09/01/74 18-74-52
Cape Fear River
Northeast Cape Fear River From Prince George Creek C;Sw 09/01/74 18-74-(52.5)
to mouth of Ness Creek
Prince George Creek From source to Northeast C;Sw 07/01/73 18-74-53
Cape Fear River
Turkey Creek, From source to Northeast C;Sw 04/01/59 18-74-54
Cape Fear River
Long Creek. From source to Northeast C;Sw 07/01/73 18-74-55
Cape Fear River
Horse Branch From source to Long Creek 1-;SW 09/01/74 18-74-55-1
Pole Branch (Penderlea Lake) From source to Horse Branch C;Sw 09/01/74 18-74-55-1-1
Keith Branch From source to Long Creek C;Sw 09/01/74 18-74-55-1-2
Cypress Creek From source to Long Creek. C;Sw 04/01/59 18-74-55-2
Bee Branch From source to Cypress Creek. C;Sw 04/01/59 18-74-55-2-1
Mill Branch From source to Long Creek C;Sw 04/01/59 18-74-55-3
Biq Branch From source to Long Creek C;Sw 04/01/59 18-74-55-4
Jumping Run Branch From source to Long Creek C;Sw 04/01/59 18-74-55-5
Mill Branch From source to Long Creek C;Sw 04/01/59 18-74-55-5
Mulherry Branch From source to Long Creek C;Sw 04/01/59 18-74-55-7
Mill Run From source to Long Creek C;Sw 04%01/59 18-74-55-8
Rileys Creek From. source to Long Creek C;Sw 07/01/73 18-74-55-9
59

LLZ -H
rn
i
w
,h
O
iry
r°
92.19
(Tie)
O
I,
y ti
?i
?I
I
I
I
wl
?I
°I
ti I 0
w0
?I
?I
0
V) q, 1) 11 41 a)
?z ?d Wr?? qq a as as
00 rn LO
??W? W ?. W N ?O MN W
U) CN
z tz!qW
U , o`o J --1L t~oCWiW??
> ?w??? WC9 oo?? 4-4 t,-q
E? ,Eg4 ?WV ?a a JJ oo ?C°a q??OWWti
whWW :3zw? 0 33W? W?V??
r. W W oW? V
?rg 4 ct ? oN wW 25.77° E ? cz,
S 2.54 (Total) Wro?tti?v? tiW 71.37' ?NEE-4
405-0 A 210 -- - vQW?? vWOC?7
-?- - _ q
C, rN
(so'PUBtt
_ o) W WOE ?0.'?W
L1 196.56'r °o w 1 Sizs37? QN°gW
(Tie) ooI S 1oeS 30.17 E I w I W w? w IS on
!? yy V ^N,q '97.29 I ? W W??04, q 14 0? ,
O
`o IW I I ZQ [E,
v y V I I ?' ` J W
e? ?; ??? J I I ?g4QZi to Q ?CI4 ?
> 9 v Q? h j V I I
iJ I
o ~ y ? I -\ ti I O I
ti
-CQ
o? Q I?
a9>' 7 0 v Io ?ti??
, O
t0 y G ?I ? ?? I W ? ?q
o oI Iti I ?gaoW?c°?
y yJ
00 `n rXi
y? W I W??WWw4t?V ?
W ? j W
S
y ? ? N
Ooh I J
?? S,

rr '
0
(9rs)p0. p,1.69 IV
00101' «u=---
I
l
9ti3
n
h
e
PL94, Lq6
y
L32
y L39,4
Al 8e
w ?I
n ?y
y
?qpU-? g gONo
Z -4
0
?WV?C?Oti?W? ?
E-4
o
Wq°WWWE4
?q?W
w?Ww
13 4
I
g
y
W
rQ4
6
0
?D
0
0
rt
Q
q o
(Zi cu
'Zi
??ww
Q
?tiq? o
w
U-
0
0
N
x
u
Z
w
O ?
"`

b
eH

?v °tio4

u q)

z
w ?

O q
co s..

? ?
a Why

o

O ',?• ?I
c 3 k

d" ??®y?6.'' -CrR
? ??96Y b:, :', +aq ,

Cy ?,? tt C4 .. a
tai
a`s
0
.
, ?,
?d

Soil Map-Pender County, North Carolina
(Lots 13 & 14 Equine Acres)
d
34° 24' 49"
a
c
; I

Iz
34° 24'20"
Map Scale: 1:4,190 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet,
° N Meters
A 0 40 80 160 240
,t\v Feet
0 150 300 600 900
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
34° 24'49"

34° 24'21"
N
iD
v
n
5/11/2011
Page 1 of 3
Mop
Page I of 1
(\
0
N

?c
I 11?a-. -
'At
Scale: 1:602

htti)://gis.i)endercountync.gov/newgis/site/PrintTemplates/PrintOut.aspx 5/11/2011

U
h
F ?. 3
O
U I
S
?suao!1
Z990-d :jguinf4
woo•Suu?u!8aalgseooega}?o!!nyU :!!awg
L95f'604'016 :ouogd
60C8Z auH-3 gmoN •aol8u!uq!M
peoy lu!od aeo!lod 16
D'TId `JNM99NIJN9
IVISVODW.LNI
Dx `jmoa AxDox
SaUDV aNifloa
IIOA
dv l .L? Y 41' 1LL cimv 1.Lam

F 0
? 3 $ 1
V
??za

Pender County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and Candid... Page 1 of 3
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern,
and Candidate Species,
Pender County, North Carolina
Updated: 09-22-2010
Critical Habitat Designations:
Piping plover - Charadrius melodus - See the Federal Register for a description of the primary constituent
elements essential for the conservation of wintering piping plovers within the designated units. This document
also contains a map and a description of each designated unit.
Federal Register Reference: July10, 2001, Federal Register, 66:36038?36136.
Common Name Scientific name Federal Record Status
Status
Vertebrate:
American alligator Alligator mississippiensis T (S/A) Current
American eel Anguilla rostrata FSC Current
Bachman's sparrow Aimophila aestivalis FSC Current
Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus BGPA Current
Carolina crawfish frog Rana capito capito FSC Current
Eastern Henslow's sparrow Ammodramus henslowii susurrans FSC Current
Eastern painted bunting Passerina ciris ciris FSC Current
Green sea turtle Chelonia mydas T Current
Loggerhead sea turtle Caretta caretta T Current
Piping plover Charadrius melodus T Current
Rafinesque's big-eared bat Corynorhinus rafinesquii FSC Current
Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis E Current
Shortnose sturgeon Acipenser brevirostrum E Current
Southeastern myotis Myotis austroriparius FSC Current
Southern hognose snake Heterodon simus FSC Current
West Indian manatee Trichechus manatus E Current
Invertebrate:
41
http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/cntylist/Pender.html 5/11/2011
Powder County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and Candid... Page 2 of 3
Atlantic pigtoe
Buchholz's dart moth
Carter's noctuid moth
Venus flytrap cutworm
Yellow lampmussel
Vascular Plant:
American chaffseed
Carolina bishopweed
Carolina bogmint
Carolina grass-of-parnassus
Carolina trillium
Coastal goldenrod
Cooley's meadowrue
Georgia lead-plant

Golden sedge
Grassleaf arrowhead
Pickering's dawnflower
Pineland plantain
Rough-leaved loosestrife
Sandhills milk-vetch
Savanna onion
Seabeach amaranth
Small-leaved meadow-rue
Smooth-seeded hairy nutrush
Spring-flowering goldenrod
Thorne's beakrush
Venus' fly-trap
Nonvascular Plant:
Lichen:
Fusconaia masoni
Agrotis buchholzi
Spartiniphaga carterae
Hemipachnobia subporphyrea
Lampsilis cariosa
Schwalbea americana
Ptilimnium ahlesii
Macbridea caroliniana
Parnassia caroliniana
Trillium pusillum var. pusillum
Solidago villosicarpa
Thalictrum cooleyi
Amorpha georgiana var.
georgiana
Carex lutea
Sagittaria weatherbiana
Stylisma pickeringii var.
pickeringii
Plantago sparsiflora
Lysimachia asperulaefolia
Astragalus michauxii
Allium sp. 1
Amaranthus pumilus
Thalictrum macrostylum
Scleria sp. I
Solidago verna
Rhynchospora thornei
Dionaea muscipula
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
E
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
E
FSC
E
FSC
FSC
FSC
E
FSC
FSC
T
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Historic
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Historic
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range."
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to
support listing. (Formerly "C 1 " candidate species.)
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.
FSC = federal species of concern. A species under consideration for listing, for which there is insufficient
information to support listing at this time. These species may or may not be listed in the future, and many of
these species were formerly recognized as "C2" candidate species.
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance
with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S/A) are not biologically endangered
or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential). Experimental,
nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened species on public land,
httn•//Axnxnu fivc onv/nr_PC/ec/rntvlict/nPnr?Pr html 5/11/2011
d tor map
® Military Danger
Zones and
Restricted Areas
Inland waters MRC jurisdiction) Map 26
Map Datum NAD83
Map Projection: NC State Plane
Map Date: March 2011
1000 0 1000 2000 Yards
0.7 0 0.7 1.4 Miles
Background imagery are U.S. Geological Fishery Nursery Areas Fishery Nursery Areas
Survey 1:100,000-scale planimetric maps. Primary Permanent Secondary
Special Secondary
fe, v,

i'

I 3 _
?
«
a
-

s '

A IFS ? ? f

N z

C
O G;

C
N
Y

? G
-
- T
t
C t
3 3 - `
R} Y
G r - ?u^?W?MII a
i
« J r ?
Y ,v
i ; ID
a ? v ^
G ¢ ? E
f C', a f`s
` i2 1
v
ems" - ?
1
b
??-??h min f I z
ATTACHMENT
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Mr. Jacob Bojarski and Ms. Jennifer Witkowski
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State:NC County/parish/borough: Pender City: Hampstead
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 33.4099°
N, Long. 77.7773°W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Harrisons Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin Class:
Stream Flow:
Wetlands: 5.17 acres.
Cowardin Class: PSS3/4B
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non-Tidal:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APnY):
? Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
,4?,,? l z 2-of 9
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
M-f-ch eZ -sGpq
11
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: Field Sketch of Wetlands.
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
? Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
? Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
? Corps navigable waters' study:
? U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
? USGS NHD data.
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
? U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Soil
Survey of Pender County.
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
? State/Local wetiand inventory map(s):
? FEMA/FIRM maps:
? 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum
of 1929)
® Photographs: Z Aerial (Name & Date): Bing Maps 2011.
or ? Other (Name & Date):
? Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
? Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Signature a ate of
Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
??W M r' Sampling Dale' J_ ?r
Projecl/Site: I{ f f Y-1 t?) (e j/T . Wel, CitylCounty: -
Applicant/Owner: Sa rt I -F,- u wS . 11 StaleIV-? Sampling Point: -C
Investigator(s): d 1 c Section, Township, Range: ^ / ", f^
Landfonn (hillslope, terrace, etc.):/ n rid L Local relief (concave, convex, none): t!oIIVG? Slope (%)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): (L T- Lalt 3 4073 Lcngg 7941s, Datum: AkE
Soil Map Unit Name: ?1Yr4 e 4 r NWI classification: A114
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (It no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No _X within a Wetland? Yes No_Z_
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes No _2L
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one Is required check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhlzospheres along Living Rools (C3) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tlled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss (DB) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Y
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Atf?? ?z s?Fq
VEGETATION l Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicalpr Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size ) °A, Cover Species? Status_ Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
1
2. Total Number of Dominant ?
ss Ali Strata: (B)
i
A
S
3 cro
pec
es
4. Percent of Dominant Species
5 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/8)

6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7. Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
OBI species x 1 =
= Total Cover FACW species x2=
50% of total cover. 20°,6 01 total cover.
FAC species x 3 =
3??
/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
lin
S )
g
ap
/:1
' 26rptiT/Nq
L1 i
LAC
FACU species x 4 =
1.
t
r.
i
G C UPL species x 5 =
.
e
merrw, H
2.
?
+-r i s

? F t
5
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3. i ril Dom.
- ,
4, Prevalence Index = B/A =
5. Hydrophylic Vegetation Indicators:
6. _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7. _ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8. 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Total Cover _
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50°x6 of total cover: 20°A of total cover: __-'-L _
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
unless disturbed or problematic.
be present
1 ,
2 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4 more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
5
6. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants. excluding vines, less
then 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.2811(1 m) tall.
7
8. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
of size
9 ,
10. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11 height.
12.

= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.

5. Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
Present? Yes No
50°r6 of total cover: 20°h of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Areo, beo1 - i,., hre-,J.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
,414M ) z_ &oic 9
SOIL
Sampling Point. V -14t-)
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color moist % Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type Loc'
Texture Remarks
0-)p 4/1
I?yRS/3 1? s.l•
'Type! C=Concentration, D=De etion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Send Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Melrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosd (Al) _ Pdyvelue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic E..pipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Slretified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 7 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P. T) _ Merl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (A12) _ Iron-Manganese Messes (1`12) (LRR O, P, T) `Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F2D) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0
A? IZ II&P q

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: ? AC [ ?1l «4rt4n (c ,4*1' / J R o r 1ptSk1 7P?Jfrli?ll' City/County: ?1r r ?J/ W lr [ Sampling Date
State. /VC-. Sampling Point: WL
Applicant/Owner: LTA& 4- W/,WSk r
Investigator(s): -Pq lz. Q 5"bD 4i 5" Section, Township, Range: /V/f
Landlorm (hillslope, terrace, etc ): "f /V? 14 ^ / Local relief (concave, convex, none): r Q Slope (%)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L- 9p i:: Lai: Long: w 79-jl:?7Z Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: 01a d A- NWI classification:
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil OF Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (it needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum or two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_
_
,_ High Water Table (A2) _ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Moss Trim Lines (BIG)
_ Water Marks (B7) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) - Thin Muck Surface (C7) fb Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain In Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (97) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
X
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): `rcG Wetland No
Hydrology Present? Yes
includes ca illa fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, serial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VCCCTerrntJ Mniir strntat - I IsP sripntific names of plants
Sampling Point: Wt, R1Vtz/
-
) Absolute Dominant Indicator
°A over sg)ecles? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
t S
i
i
Tree Stratum (Plot (fsize:
1 {?Le/ f Kpr u r?
C es
pec
nan
Number of Dom
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC IA)
2 Ljr;o d"ron ?eCA -f? Total Number of Dominant
r
3.uK t`aj[Y??la ? STz1r1ZC i H O? ??
,- FA
41 Species Across All Strata: f' IB)
4. Percent of Dominant Species
I
g N (?)
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC.

6
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7. Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
B.
Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =

20-A of total cover: FACW species x 2 =
50% of total cover: -
FAC species x 3 =
Saplino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3
FACU species x 4 =
1. ia+Ir 4 (uciaq
UPL species X5=
2, t o -?L?-
2
Column Totals: (A) (8)
3. Mr r-flA Cer'i et(? ?
4. Qt.erwS ??
/
FACH_ Prevalence Index =B1A=
5. Hydrophylic Vegetallon Indicators:
6. _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophylic Vegetation
7. _ 2 - Dominance Test Is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover. 2 5 20% of total cover: J 1 _
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 'indicators of hydric soli and wetland hydrology must
unless disturbed or problematic.
be present
1 ,
2 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4 more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
5
6. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.213 ft (1 m) tell.
7
B. Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
9 of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 fl tall
10. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 R in
11 height.
12.

= Total Cover
500% of total cover: 20% of total cover:

Woody Vine Stratum (Plotsii'ze: )
s
G
'
?
? '
is. !AX l4Nt
ta
1.
I L?
"
2.
3.
4
5.

= Total Cover
A Hydrophytic

Vegetation
X
50% of lotel cover: Jc 20% of total cover: - No
Present? Yes
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point. ((?7
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
Color moist
(inches) Color (mast) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
J
9-2 z I J tut s.I,
a_J-Z? 411 y/ 0 G _LVL s, 1,_
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Sall Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Salls°:
_ Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Solls (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
.X 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Marl (1`10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (A12) _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present.
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Della Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
4
Depth (inches)- Hydric Soil Present? Yes No -
Remarks:
I
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
0
r s
h .
110
IP
ot
-` r
I
1

Map Page 1 of 1
PaA
PPP' Y V.-; j'_

Mu
nA I

Scale: 1:575

http://P,is.pendercountync.gov/newgis/site/Printl'emplates/PrintOut.aspx 7/5/2011