20110626 Ver 1_Application_20110705

•~..~
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "9'~ReR,t,~,
Mr. Brian Wrenn
Division of Water Quality
401/Transportation Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
June 30, 2011
~~~~~nn,~,
/U~ , 5 1,~~
~<ANp~ OS ~~~ ~~~
H
EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
SECRETARY
110626
SUBJECT: Pipe Replacement on SR-1307 (All Healing Springs Road), Alexander County
Dear Mr. Wrenn:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation requests authorization to replace an existing
pipe on SR-1307 (All Healing Springs Road), Alexander County. NCDOT proposes to replace a
deteriorating perched 37-foot long, 60" CMP with headwalls, with a 50-foot long, 60" CMP with
headwalls at both ends. There is a sharp meander bend at the existing pipe outlet; therefore, the
new pipe will be longer and positioned to better align the pipe to the downstream section. The
new pipe alignment will result in the loss of 24 feet of stream channel; however, 12 feet of
stream channel will be reconstructed to connect the pipe outlet to the existing downstream
section. Therefore, the new pipe alignment will result in a total permanent loss of 12 feet of
stream channel. Five feet of riprap will be utilized at the pipe inlet and outlet. The existing pipe
is perched approximately three feet and there is a cast iron pipe utility located perpendicular to
the stream channel at the existing pipe outlet. To connect the pipe outlet invert to the
downstream bed elevation would result in a ^5% pipe slope. Therefore, in an effort [o avoid
downstream destabilization and to avoid impacting the unknown utility, the new pipe will remain
perched and a rock ladder will be constructed at the new pipe outlet. The impact area for the rock
ladder is contained within the same area as the outlet riprap stabilization. Due to this
condition, NCDOT requests a waiver from the Regional Conditions 2(b) (e) permit depth
specifications. A temporary cofferdam pumping system will be used to divert the stream around
the construction site as needed. Area affected by temporary cofferdam system will be graded and
restored back to pre-project conditions.
The scope of the work will permanently impact 22 linear feet of an unnamed tributary to Beaver
Branch, which is classified as Class C Waters by the Division of Water Quality.
This office has conducted a GIS and field survey for the project for historical sites and threatened
endangered species. No sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places are located in the
vicinity of the project nor did there appear to be any eligible structures. The federally listed
species for Alexander County (USFWS list dated 9/22/10) include the dwarf-flowered heartleaf
(Hexastylis naniflora) -Threatened and bog turtle (Glyptemys muh/enbergii)- T/SA (Threatened
due to similarity of appearance). National Heritage Program records document the nearest
Post Office Box 47 Shelby, North Carolina 2 8 1 5 1-0047

SR 1307, All Healing Springs Road
Page 2
June 30, 201 1
Dwarf-flowered heartleaf location approximately 10.2 miles south of the proposed project area.
The heartleaf is usually found on dry to moist ravine slopes (usually north facing and of the oak-
hickory-pine forest type) and in boggy areas near springheads. There is no suitable habitat
within the proposed project area and no species were observed. The Natural Heritage Program
records document the bog turtle location approximately 6.7 miles north of the proposed project.
Bog turtles are typically found in bogs, marshes, and wet pastures. There is no suitable habitat
located within [he project area. T/SA species are not subject to Section 7 consultation; however,
there is no suitable habitat located within the project area and no impact on this species is
anticipated. NCDOT is recommending a finding of "no effect" for T&E species.
The project area is not located within '/, mile of any critical watershed area. SR-1307 is not a
rural or urban arterial; therefore, hazardous spill basins are not required. Enclosed is the
hazardous spill basin checklist.
T have enclosed apre-construction notification for a NW#3, sketches of planned activities and
location maps relative to the project.
Project information for the 401 Automated Payment Procedure is as follows:
• Work order number: 150465-55120005-12B.200211-3302
• TIP#: NA
• Project Category: $240.00 Fee
If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me at [phone]. Thank you for
your time and consideration on this matter.
Respectfully yours,
M.L. Holder, P.E.
Division Engineer
Twelfrh Division
BY: ~~~
Trish Simon
Division 12 Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures
cc:
Polly Lespinasse, Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office

Q2oFrywjarF~goc
> ~V.I.w~/~ ti
O T
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWO project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form
A. A licant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ^ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the N WP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ^Yes ®No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWO (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certifcation -Regular ^ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
^ 401 Water Quality Certification -Express ^ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
^ Yes ®No For the record only for Corps Permit:

®Yes ^ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ^Yes ®No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ^Yes ®No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ^Yes ®No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: SR 1307 (All Healing Springs Road)
2b. County: Alexander
2c. Nearest municipality /town: Taylorsville
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: 12b.2002211
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NC DOT Right of Way
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC i f
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ^ Agent ^ Other, specify:
4b. Name: Mike Holder
4c. Busines s name
(if applicable): N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12
4d. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street
4e. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151
4f. Telephone no.: 704-480-9020
4g. Fax no.: 704-480-5401
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. AgentiConsultantlnformation (if applicable)
5a. Name: Trish Simon
5b. Business name
(if applicable): N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12
Sc. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street
Sd. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151
Se. Telephone no.: 704-480-9044
5f. Fax no.: 704-480-5401
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.9341 Longitude: - 81.2665
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: <.10 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to Beaver Branch
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing perched 37-foot long, 60" CMP with headwalls, landuse is mostly cropland/pasture land with some forested
areas. Pipe is on paved secondary road.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
100 feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed work is to replace deteriorating pipes for the safety of the travelling public.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
NCDOT proposes to replace a deteriorating perched 37-foot long, 60" CMP with headwalls, with a 50-foot long, 60" CMP
with headwalls at both ends. There is a sharp meander bend at the existing pipe outlet; therefore, the new pipe will be
longer and positioned to better align the pipe to the downstream section. The new pipe alignment will result in the loss of
-24 feet of stream channel. Twelve feet of stream channel will be reconstructed to connect the pipe outlet to the existing
downstream section. Five feet of riprap will be utilized at the pipe inlet and outlet. The existing pipe is perched
approximately three feet and there is a cast iron pipe utility located perpendicular to the stream channel at the existing
pipe outlet. To connect the pipe outlet invert to the downstream bed elevation would result in a -5% pipe slope.
Therefore, in an effort to avoid downstream destabilization and to avoid impacting the unknown utility, the new pipe will
remain perched and a rock ladder will be constructed at the new pipe outlet.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ^ Yes ®No ^ Unknown
Comments: Jurisdictional stream determination made by
Division 12 DEO.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ^ preliminary ^ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ^ Yes ®No ^ Unknown
Sb. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ^ Yes ®No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Imp
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
^ Wetlands ®Streams -tributaries ^ Buffers
^ Open Waters ^ Pond Construction
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number- Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ -non-404, other) (acres)
Tem ora
W1 ^ P ^ T ^ Yes ^ Corps
^ No ^DWQ
W2 ^ P ^ T ^ Yes ^ Corps
^ No ^DWQ
W3 ^ P ^ T ^ Yes ^ Corps
^ No ^DWQ
W4 ^ P ^ T ^ Yes ^ Corps
^ No ^DWQ
W5 ^ P ^ T ^ Yes ^ Corps
^ No ^DWQ
W6 ^ P ^ T ^ Yes ^ Corps
^ No ^DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3 b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ -non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
Total stream

S1 ®P ^ T channel loss due
to change in pipe UT to Beaver ®PER ^ Corps
5 '12
alignment Branch ^INT ®DWQ

S2 ®P ^ T Rip rap
stabilization & UT to Beaver ®PER ^ Corps
5
10
rock ladder Branch ^INT ®DWQ
S3 ^ P ®T Cofferdam bypass UT to Beaver ®PER ^ Corps 5 30
pumping Branch ^INT ®DWQ
S4 ^ P ^ T ^PER ^ Corps
^ INT ^DWQ
SS ^ P ^ T ^PER ^ Corps
^ INT ^DWQ
S6 ^ P ^ T ^PER ^ Corps
^ INT ^DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts '" 22
3i. Comments: 'Stream channel loss due to change in pipe alignment = 24 ft with 12 feet reconstructed; therefore total
permanent stream loss = 12 feet; "Permanent Impacts
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number- (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora
01 ^P^T
02 ^P^T
03 ^P^T
04 ^P^T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
Sa. 5b. Sc. Sd. Se.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
SL Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
^ Yes ^ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
Sk. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST f II out Section D of this form.
6a.
^ Neuse ^Tor-Pamlico ^ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ^ Catawba ^ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora T im act re wired?
B1 ^P^T ^Yes
^ No
B2 ^P^T ^Yes
^ No
63 ^P^T ^Yes
^ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
There is a sharp meander bend at the existing pipe outlet which is causing stream/bank erosion; therefore, the new pipe will
be longer and positioned to minimize downstream erosion. The existing pipe is perched approximately three feet and there is
a cast iron pipe utility located perpendicular to the stream channel at the existing pipe outlet. To connect the pipe outlet invert
to the downstream bed elevation would result in a -5% pipe slope. Therefore, in an effort to avoid downstream
destabilization, the new pipe will remain perched and a rock ladder will be constructed at the new pipe outlet.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Minimization of impacts by installing appropriate erosion control measures.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ^ Yes ®No
26. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ^ DWQ ^ Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigat ion option will be used far this
project? ^ Mitigation bank

^ Payment to in-lieu fee program
^ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ^ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ^ warm ^ cool ^cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) -required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ^ Yes ®No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ^Yes ®No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
^Yes ^ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ^Yes ®No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Com plies with NCDOT's individual
NPDES permit NCS000250. (Implementation, management, and inspection of erosion control devices and control of
discharge sources (ie. constmction equipment).
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, na rrative description of the plan:
^ Certified Local Govemment
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ^ DWO Stormwater Program
^ DWO 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? NA
^ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ^ NSW
^ USMP
apply (check all that apply): ^ Water Supply Watershed
^ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ^Yes ^ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
^ Coastal counties
^ HOW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ^ ORW
(check all that apply):
^ Session Law 2006-246
^ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
^Yes ^ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ®Yes ^ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ®Yes ^ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ®Yes ^ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ^Yes ®No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA f nal approval
letter.) ^Yes ^ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ^Yes ®No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ^Yes ®No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ^Yes ®No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is a minimum criteria project which has low potential for cumulative/indirect impacts and wil l not result in
additional development which could impact water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page I 1 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ~ yes ®No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ^ Yes ®No
impacts?
^ Raleigh
5c. If y es, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
^ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program database.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ^ Yes ®No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No salt marshes, oyster reefs, or seagrass beds in the vicinity of the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ^ Yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The State Historic Preservation office resources and the National Register of Historic Places were reviewed for historic
sites in the vicinity of the project; however, the pipe replacement project occurs within a previously impacted area
(NCDOT Right of Way).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in aFEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ^ Yes ®No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM papal number: 3710382000)
/~. L. /~/~/e~ ~~ ~~~ Q ~ ~o-ll
ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name ApplicanUAgent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only rf an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

12th Div NCDOT
Bridge Maintenace
Pipe Replacement
All Healing Springs Road
SR 1307
Alexander County
(Site Approx. 0.15 miles North of SR 1318)
Revised FB: B-3 P 47 DRS

L
1) Pumping rystem to be used to
~/, divert the stream around the
construction site as needed.
~
Unnamed Tributary to
2) Arry contaminated water within
Beaver Branch ~ the construction site is to be
Q pumped into a silt bag
= 3) Silt fence is to be placed around
stockpile wd project as it allows.
~ 4) Upon tompition of the pro,"Iect all
il
b
l
d
s
t fences are to
e p
ace
as
needed. Also seeding and mulching
of disturbed oreas.
5) Divert runoff into storage basins or
into TRSL-A's before leaving the pro,I'ect.
Place contamiwted devices at the end of
silt fence
CL
~ RD Existing 60" CMP 37' Long with
9~
Headwolls on both ends to be
~ Removed

I
\
~I
~
~
m
~,
I ~ ~ Existing stream Channel
'
/ ~ Lass of 24
Proposed 60" CMP 50' Long with 1~/
P
d
ll
b
h
d
roposed Hea
s on
at
en
s
wa

~ Proposed Channel
.-. Reconstruction
ar of 12'

5'
5 ike set in
PP assume Elev.
100
0
.

mQ
gPa n.o iaa

P
P n gPm n
PP P .o ~nc~..
PPPP O
PPP P ~
!e6 m
a d c
~aG h
o
u
d
~ C
'!66 m c
Ql t
m ~ d ~ ^ O Z
o a
~ ov _
- V)
N ~L E
d n
~
d ~ ~
~ ~ ~ o n
~
•!s6 d a ~ d Q
~ 0 x v
n L d =
m d ° m
!~O m N
N ~ ¢ « (~
B'

S6 O~ =' .p ti Q N D)
~W
~ d m u v
Q ii o 'e~
~ N ~ in u

"' 6s6 ~a
~ ~
~ N
1 6
~ ~ ~
~ N
^ N
tt
m ~ ~
P
`a '9r
~^ N N ~
m p= Y •6S
did 6 P
to y~ w
m

5 ai
P
~ ~~
^
~ m
~
~
_
O . ~ ~ 9S,
S w N ~K
aJS
96 P W ~~.'v N P W
Eso !
_ ~
o
HYy
t,, w •O
m
F~86 ~
u
!-. m o s ~-
m v`
a
v
c
,8.
S6 ~
N ~ ~
v o a
v

•fB
N' o S
S
C
6 °a
OlP
~+ V
Q

« a
d
c
G
w M
~ Y
~
O
l7
°
~ N
~

JD. ___ __
VC
_

~ d
6
a
f `~
\

Q
JCI, ___ _
Vat
__
~ 0 IO
d

P
q
~
~ s
C U

N N aJ
o P
°
x
W c
6
•be6
m :. 1
O
P ~
V y~ < N
Y Al
N a NI
N
n n
O\
N T
N
Q a~
V
m Q
m Q 0 Q
Y p C
u P Ov ~
u
v
~ o
o ?' ~ 0 0
P E

3 i~ P E i. - w
~ C
N
(T
~ l
N a\
~ O a~
i °

rB6 o _
ai
Ifl of
g+
0 .a
a~
~
•sB6 o
~ "
m g'
1[I ~
N _
O d
P
~ o
-.w. ~
d VI u
vI CL
O % 3 «
W W ~ {nl Oho
`
3 ~, v
.n
u O
•!P
e N •!P
s N
n Y
d a
n o
a
L
•Q.
~ N
ari •Q~
~ N
ari OU~aO~
ainvm N ~L
c«
n n oPP P
QPPP ~ y
Y
v
P(O n~
gQPPPPP
P pP(O n
OPP PppPP

a ~ . r fin. rX -
~,~, qd ~ o
c a .- is
- ~ _ ,.~ ~,.ol ~ t _ _ ..
! o, rte'
r ~ .~, ~wj n~ ~
z - ~ ~- _ .
t- i+ ~ J ~ _~ (~N~~j~. -
x ~,: ' ~ `ti I, k , ~ d; ~ m
x
a It ~ ~ ~^e+~rlyn '~ 'V
,f~~ as r `'f ,.. N
I ~i!~1(S/Ii qR0 ". , t t Im V ~l .
z z,m' ~ r ,. 1 1~~ t'w o n 18 a
... O ~', r t r ~' ~• li.. YdO ~ __. 1 ~J+,i's~ ~~~ laf { ~~i"
¢ -.may, ~ ~ x ~:- F/ !g~ -}, , .
s
- ~j £~'~~& sa+.^ ~ ~~ - ,.:may.. ./ ~ ~'D°-a•E
gas i :. ~~7''~`~ ~0 t~ ~; - _ . ,,_m ti
P y
} ,.
-_~ ,; ~
- ~
>~` w 3
'~ 5 OEN ,L7E;y
'..pie^00~~ 4 ~ _I ~ ~ ~ T.i7.'16..." d'3 I ~I s j~ ~ ~~:
mm~• g
~R"Qm ° ~'
ga~g~ ° ® ° ®®® BA BB® Be ~ ~
p3.•ye g fA
ym~oo _ _... __ -_-._ ___ _-__• _ ~ D
~s~T3
Rp<33 ~~ m T 3p~~ ~m D ~ ~ T m
~~sog m ,..a.. 3 ~ ~€d ~ >R ~ A O ~ I ~ ~
~m 5 A m II Z
qq H ! a ~ ~, o
Xo~;S ~a ~m ~g! ~ °v ~ 2 o p G r'11
aSBa '~~ v~s a ~ m ~ s~ ~ ~
u. ~ ~y
m ~ _ cz ~ 9:7 x ~ m .~
~~aam ~" oz a $ A
3$gi3 ~.'o n~g N
• msm ~ O
3;~~~ T°o O
m
40° m
H

NCDOT
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST
Division: 1 ~ County: A1Pxantler Project ID: 12B.200211
River Basin: Catawba Bridge No: NA
Route: SR 1307, All Healing Sprin sg Road Stream: UT to Beaver
Branch
Water Quality Criteria:
Yes No
Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS r ~
ORW r r
WSI >- r
WS II,III OR IV, Crossing Within O.Smi of W.S. Critical Area r r
Roadway Criteria:
Route Designation-
Arterial Urban
Arterial Rural
Additional Site Information:
Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required?
Yes No
c
r
Yes No
r_
Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the
Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997).

~~
. ~ . ,~ ~~
~~ ~ ~d';
,: ~ .~.~ '~.s~'
l A ~S'~ ~
~ ' ~
^I ~ ~ ,
. J ti. ~~ y .D}~I ,•~.
Pipe Replacement
SR 1307, All Healing
Springs Road
Alexander County
r :._.r~ ~ _ -.a.~ - --
~. ,~ y*~ .. -, v fa
Downstream
a~a
•AK ~ L ~!
.~ ~'~-
j ' i• TS~
f .. h~!

~ o`t\
`
~~ ~
``
/q ~' 1~..
ll1
.. '
V
"i
~ f~
~Y
~ ~ ~,4P
•~
r
~1

;~ - ~
~~ ~ -_~~ .
.,f,
!• ,
~- ~ '
Inlet
cutlet
U pstrea m