20110611 Ver 1_Application_20110629

c - t
~,.~o ~
-0a.:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
~~~~o
~w°f'~N2'~?p>>~~
~S~pSq~ROU
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~'NWq Rry Er
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE EUGENE A. CorT~l, JR.
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
June 24, 2011
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue 11 0 611
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
ATTENTION: Mr. Brad Shaver
NCDOT Coordinator
SUBJECT: Nationwide 14 Permit Application for Secondary Road Improvement on SR 1375
(Stanley Trail), Brunswick County. WBS#: 010062 (DWQ Permit Fee: $240)
Dear Mr. Shaver:
Please find enclosed a PCN application from the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
for a Nationwide 14 permit for the secondary road improvement project on SR 1375 (Stanley Trail) in
Brunswick County.
The scope of the project will be to widen, grade, drain, base and pave the 0.37 mile of existing unpaved
road to current NCDOT secondary road standards to improve the roadway safety and stability. These
standards include 20 feet of travel lanes and 6 feet of grassed shoulders on both sides within 50 feet of
right of way. Also enclosed are wetland data forms and maps for the issuance of a jurisdictional
determination based on your field review on March 3, 2011. The jurisdictional form will be supplied to you
electronically.
By copy of this letter and enclosures, NCDOT is also requesting issuance of 401 Water Ouality
Certification (WQC) #3820 from the Division of Water Quality (DWQ). A method of debiting $240 to
process the WQC permit request has been provided as noted in the subject line of this application.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Anneliese Westphal
Division 3 Environmental Specialist
Enclosures
cc: (without wetland forms)
Mr. Mason Herndon, DWQ, Fayetteville (1 copy)
Mr. Brian Wrenn, DWQ, Raleigh (5 copies)
SSOI BARBADOS BLVD. CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
PtiONE:[phone] FAx:(9l0)675-0143

O~ ~ W AT Fq~G
>~~
o ~ ~
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWO project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PC Form
A. A licant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ^ Section 10 Permit
tb. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ®Yes ^ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWO (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification -Regular ^ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
^ 401 Water Quality Certification -Express ^ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? Far the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
^ Yes ®No For the record only for Corps Permit:

^Yes ®No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ^Yes ®No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ®Yes ^ No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ^Yes ®No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: SR 1375 Stanley Trail
2b. County: Brunswick
2c. Nearest municipality /town: Calabash, NC
2d. Subdivision name: NIA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: 3C.010062
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): N/A
3d. Street address: N/A
3e. City, state, zip: N/A
3f. Telephone no.: N/A
3g. Fax no.: N/A
3h. Email address: N/A
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ^ Agent ®Other, specify: NCDOT Division 3 Engineer
4b. Name: H. Allen Pope
4c. Business name
(if applicable): North Carolina Department of Transportation
4d. Street address: 5501 Barbados Boulevard
4e. City, state, zip: Castle Hayne, NC 28429
4f. Telephone na.: 910.341.2000
4g. Fax no.: 910.675.0143
4h. Email address: N/A
5. AgenUConsultant Information (if applicable)
Sa. Name: Anneliese Westphal
5b. Business name
(if applicable): North Carolina Department of Transportation
Sc. Street address: 5501 Barbados Boulevard
Sd. City, state, zip: Castle Hayne, NC 28429
5e. Telephone no.: 910.341.2000
5f. Fax no.: 910.675.0143
Sg. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A
Latitude: 33.91815 Longitude: - 78.59146
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: N/A acres
2. Surtace Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Shingletree Swamp
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C Sw
2c. River basin: Lumber
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is currently an unpaved secondary road. General land use is residential.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
N/A
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
N/A
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To improve the existing roadway by bringing it up to NCDOT standards to inlcude paving to provide a better and safer
roadway for residents and school buses that utilize this facility.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project will widen, grade, drain, add base, pave and stabilize the existing road to NCDOT secondary road standards
to 20 feet of travel lanes and 6 feet of grassed shoulders using standard road construction equipment.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ®Yes ^ No ^ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
^ Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Anneliese Westphal Other: NCDOT
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Field verification: 3/3/2011
5. Project History
Sa. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ^ yes ^ No ®Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ^ Yes ®No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ^ Streams -tributaries ^ Buffers
^ Open Waters ^ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWO -non-404, other) (acres)
Tem ora T
W1 ®P ^ T Road and
shoulder fill headwater forest ®Yes
^ No ®Corps
^ DWO Wetland A: 0.06
W2 ^ P ^ T ^Yes , ^Corps
^ No ^ DWO
W3 ^ P ^ T ^Yes ^Corps
^ No ^ DWO
W4 ^ P ^ T ^Yes- ^Corps
^ No ^ DWO
WS ^ P ^ T ^Yes ^Corps
^ No ^ DWO
W6 ^ P ^ T ^Yes ^Corps
^ No ^ DWO
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.06 acre
2h. Comments: This wetland is located from Sta. 3+50 R to Sta. 5+14 R.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWO -non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ^ P ^ T ^ PER ^Corps
^ INT ^ DWO
S2 ^ P ^ T ^ PER ^Corps
^ INT ^ DWO
S3 ^ P ^ T ^ PER ^Corps
^ INT ^ DWO
S4 ^ P ^ T ^ PER ^Corps
^ INT ^ DWO
S5 ^ P ^ T ^ PER ^ Carps
^ INT ^ DWO
S6 ^ P ^ T ^ PER ^Corps
^ INT ^ DWO
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. ~ 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
01 ^P®T
02 ^P^T
03 ^P^T
04 ^P^T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
Sa. Sb. 5c. Sd. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
SL Total '
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
^ Yes ^ No If yes, permit ID no:
Si. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
Sk. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti anon, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
^ Neuse ^Tor-Pamlico ^ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ^ Catawba ^ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora T im act re wired?
^Yes
B1 ^P^T ^ No
^Yes
62 ^P^T ^ No
83 ^P^T ^Yes
^ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The road will be built using the existing ditches and no new ditches will be required. Impacts are the minumum amount
needed to accomodate the road design in a 50-foot R/W.
1b. Specifcally describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Strict implementation of sediment and erosion control BMPs will be utilized to protect waters of the US.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ^ Yes ®No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all [hat apply): ^ DWQ ^ Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ^ Mitigation bank

^ Payment to in-lieu fee program
^ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ^ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ^ warm ^ cool ^cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) -required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ^ Yes ®No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required. ~

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ^Yes ®No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
^ Yes ^ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ®Yes ^ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
NCDOT's BMPs for Construction and Maintenance Activities will be utilized to manage Stormwater runoff during
construction. Grassed swales will be used to the maximum extent possible in compliance with NCDOT's NPDES Permit
No. NCS000250 Post Construction Stormwater Program. In areas where there are no existing ditches, no new ditches
will be constructed. From Sta. 0+00 R to Sta. 5+14 R, there will be no direct conveya nce of Stormwater; it will be allowed
to sheet flow. (The jurisdictional wetland is located from Sta. 3+50 R to Sta. 5+14 R).
^ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ^DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? N/A
^ Phase II
^ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented Stormwater management programs ^ USMP
apply (check all that apply): ^ Water Supply Watershed
^ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ^Yes ^ No
attached?
4. DWt] Stormwater Pro ram Review
® Coastal counties
^ HOW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented Stormwater management programs apply ^ ORW
(check all that apply): ^ Session Law 2006-246
^ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
^Yes ®No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
Sa. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ^ yes ^ No
Sb. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ^Yes ^ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or.the ®yes ^ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ^ Yes ®No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
^ Yes ^ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surtace Water or Wetland Standards, ^ Yes ®No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 28 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ^ Yes ®No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ^ Yes ®No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project is one which qualifies as a minimum criteria (category 12i) under 19A NCAC 2F .0102. As such, the project
is in a category of projects that add either no or a minor amount of new impervious surface directly, indirectly, or
cumulatively. Consequently, the project will not result in cumulative impacts that cause or will cause a violation of
downstream water quality standards.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ^ Yes ®No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ^ Yes ®No
impacts?
^ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
^ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Natural Heritage GIS Database
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ^ Yes ®No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NC GIS data
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ^ Yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b . What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Project has been reivewed and cleared by NCDOT Human Environment Unit in coordination with the State Hisotric
Preservation Office (see attached forms).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a . Will this project occur in aFEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ^ Yes ®No
8b . If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA GIS data
Anneliese Westphal ~ ~ ~
~l~ct~-?~ /y1yfZ~ 6/24/2011
ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name ~ App Icanl t/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from [he applicant
is rovided.
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F-- ~ 6
(-
~

a
. r
_s
S ~ ~
(~
v ~ M o

~- `~ ~ ~
~ V' M
S N
s M ~ N
~% y c~~3
°
~ ~' ~,
-.
~~\
,/
~I
\\
\~ \~
i
NI 1
o ~
~~
~ ~
~ ~
i
i ~ a
~ ~~
es
~~
p9
`\\
a ~
\92 .o
~~ ~I
- sJ/
98/ Sl.
,~/
F
/ _. h ~
~r ~
~~~

Brunswick County
To o Ma 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet
P P l i i i l i i i l
Name: Calabash

Brunswick County
SR 1375 Stanley Trail Secondary Rd Project
Soils Map 0 125 250 500 Feet

' Brunswick County
SR 1375 Stanley Trail Secondary Rd Project
Lidar Map 0 250 500 1,000 Feet

Project Tracking No. /lNernnl UseJ
~._
I II-04-001
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
County. Brunswick
WBS No: 3C.010062 Document:
F.A. No: Funding: ®State ^ Federal
Fedora( (USAGE) Permit Required? ®Yes ^ No Permit Type: NWP14 and WQC
Project Description.' Grade and pave SR 1375 (Stanley Trail).
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, HPO GIS information, historic designations roster, and indexes was
undertaken on 21 April 2011. Based on this review, there are no existing NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS
properties in the Area of Potential Effects. Brunswick County GIS/Tax information indicates that there
are several structures within [he APE; two structures are over fifty years of age. Based on photographs
provided with tax information, these properties do not meet [he criteria for National Register listing: No
historic properties are present.
Brief Explanation of why the available inforrnntion provides a reliable bnsis for reasonably predicting
tha( there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
HPO quad maps recording NR, SL, LD, DE, and SS properties for the Brunswick County survey, and
Brunswick County GIS and tax information are considered valid for the purposes of determining the
likelihood of historic resources being present. There are no historic resources present and no survey is
required.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: Maps, tax cards.
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCIr S PROFESSIONAL NO SURVEY REQUIRED
ARCHAEOLOGY ISTORIC ARCHITECTURE (CIRCLE ONE)
Cultural Resources
Date
"Nu Snrvey 2uquirtnl"~nnn Jor N/innr Tranapunolinn Yr jrcu nv Quul jed in tAe 1007 Prngrnmmuric Agreernenl.
NCDOTArchacnlnpy .p nivmricArclrileclure Grnup.r

Project Tracking Na. (/nfernn( Use)
11-04-0018
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No.
SR 1375
County: Brunswick
WBS No:
F.A. No:
3C.010062
Document.'
Funding.' ®State ^ Federal
® Yes ^ No Permit Type: NW l4 and WQC
Federa! (USAGE) Permit Required?
Project Description: Grade, drain, base and pave existing soil road (SR 1375, Stanley Trail) to current
NCDOT standards., Shifts in the centerline are expected, up to 10-I S feet. Generally, where ditches exist
they will remain in place though some new ditching is proposed. The project is 1944 feet long, all within
NCDOT Right of Way (ROW).
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description oJreview activities, resu/ts ojreview, and conclusions:
Records at the Office of State Archaeology were reviewed. USGS quadrangle mapping there indicates
that the location has not been previously reviewed for archaeology. No previously recorded
archaeological sites were identified in the vicinity of the proposed project. Aerial and topographic maps
were studied, and no visit was merited. Expectations that an intact or otherwise significant azchaeological
resource would be adversely affected is low on this project, which improves an existing facility.
Brief Explanation ojwhy the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
The undertaking is limited to improving an existing road with paving and drainage to typical NCDOT
standards. The existing facility has already disturbed a large portion of [he APE with grading and
ditching; though some minor new ditchwork is expected. Some areas maybe considered wetland. When
considering the combined results of this review, these factors suggest [ha[ undocumented, significant
archaeological sites are unlikely to be located within the APE.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: USGS quadrangle (Richfield),
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL
RC A O OGY HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE (CIRCLE ONE)
6/23/2011
NCDOT Cultural Resources Specialist
Dale
"Np Snn er RrynireJ':%orm for Minor Trnnspuraviou Pr jeers m QvJifieJ in roe 'lllll p. ogrn unnric Agr eemrni.
NCDOT Archrteplog~ & Ninpric drelrirccnve Groups

. .,

~'
i
~
5+14.0
1 ~
1
'
~
~
au~l
~o~~~W

q+95.~5
4+95.67 ~
~ '
~

~
~
I
' ..
1
1
' ~
'
~
~ ~
~
1
1 ~
~ ~F
Q
~

b '
' H
' ~ _
O
U

~` '
1 F
~
; ~
r- ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ i 1
b I ~
~u

~ ^O

C
1
'

1
~
®
~
IVI

.ta b
^
d 1
1
, ~ U

O
M ~ ~ a
~\

°"~
1 ~
1 ~O
Q

( 1
VV
a' '
1 '
1 O

b
~ '
' ~ ~~

°°
~ 1
1
~
~ •~
1 ~
m
y
.-I 1
1 '
1
~ p
---i1/
~
w ~
~ 1
~ a
~
:u
.. '~ 1
~q
~i E
~ ~
1 1
°
1 J
J a
q
Cf 11 1
oq ~ LL
1
1 QE 1
ai p 1
~ [
Q
11 rva ~ \ ~
~ 1 ~1 ~ ~
11 1
1
z
z
~ ~ ' ~
1
1
X
X
W 1
~ ~ Lil

1 1
1 1

~~~,^
J N N ~ O
~ ~ ~ v
Z ~
(n rn N yl N

U C
.in ~ m ax
o
d W U E
E
i
a
~ ~

~ rn ~ ~ ~
=% c ~
° ~
F c c
_
N N~~~ O tq
Y>° Q
Q .
XL °-E"
w U E QZ°~
~ ~
~ a = ~
O r
U F~?UO~
Q ~
m v D
E~
U ~ ~ o ~U_F-Q
U
O: ~ Z
~ W ~
Z

tq OZw~

>
N fn ~ J ~
~ N
O > m w ~
E U ~ m ~
N a
a E
m ~
v ~ c ,-.
~ ~ c ~ ~
- o
_ ~
~ ~.
U
~ N 01 -
C C
C
G
to O U
L N .'C• ~
v p
.
7 ~ a~iU~
~ Q ~
a+
V
~
~ .~ ~o
LC o . ~ u
O
~ EIL .. N
Z ~ _ >N ~ .
~ O
>

a
d C ~ ~ O pp
~ .... 1~
Ul
~ ~
F N
C to
~
~
C
C C
t0 _ lU ~ ~
O (p
O
E LL
~ o 0
3
a~
a
~ ~
J T
U
~ ~
N
O
~ ~
J
O f
~ I
O O
O ~ ~
~ O
(~ +
C7
O
Z
U) N
~ ~

COII11tTY: BRU11lSWICK WBS ELEME11lT: 3C.OI0062
`~o
~~~
w~~
^o
~~~
A A
A,
~~
A
~+J ni
N ~..
N
0
a
0
a.
0
~~
it
~y
H
I 'I~~O
N.

h ,`~ .
a
,~ ~
~~ o o~ s
°z ~~~
~a $ ~a ~
~~ z ~~ ~
~~
~~ n
b
0
~c "
¢~0 '~
• ~,aw ~/
N `e~y
t3_e ~ ~
L~ ~
~~
~_
N
m
a~9
bti
~~
~,~°°
~ C
g N. ~
~m N.
p ~
'~ ~ A
9v 2 ZOEI
a s o
~a
s'
v °~`^
e
~,~
Pleasant
Grove
ChurM
00
z b v
b
F
z ~''~ A
"ba
o H
z ~
~~
ey
W
~..
i
I
vJ ~~
A ~ H
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ eo eo
a' t0 y
y O~
~ ~
~~• O
A. R, ~
~ O
~ ti
0
~ ~
R p+ n•
~ ~• y
d9 A
~ ~ ~
~ A ~
~y~ ~ Q
r.... ~ t0
O
{n ~ O c'f ' Cn
C(p~0(n~
~~030n'1
n~~v~b
~•~~rt~~
r*~~o~G~
O'-"~ ~ rt~
~~~~lD
o ~' 10
rtCOjOC
~°'~~N~
~~ n~
c oar
~ ~~ ~~•
~~~ ~ ~` ti
O o n~O,~ ~'
~<~~S
~ ~.
n'
,(~nO~N
7
r
to
o~ ~~
o r~ ro
c ~-°_~
C1 ~ d
~ ~ Ol
't CD Q
~ Q SI1
N
0
Q
~ '~ ~ '`1
b
~ ~ b ~
b b z o '~
as ~ b
x ''C h y I~^~
y• ~ ~? •J
~. ~ b .. y
~ a a
c ~ ~ ,°o ~
~ ~ ~
m Z
R!
h ~
~ b o
ti ~
h
...
0
0
'~~l y
b ~~
b z~
y
~ Z
o A
N N
~~~
~ ~ ~
A _
d
... a
~ a
W
n§
0
o a
O
r

top\D DRIVE\RDY\20102011 Designs\Brunswick\Stanley Trail\SR 1375 Stanley 7r ail_pIn210110308.tlgn
(COU11tTY: BRU11tSWICK WBS ELEME11tT.• 3C.010062

sa r~ss ~avuw.wx nuro ---
I~"
VER< q<RL Ow
to. •zzsoooes ~m
m
2 ~
,o'
SF IJ56 xbNAV~pvx i.OM

oI
,,,444 e>
/ x~
/ 90
AC
~A
S
fx
y
C
-i -
o N
Y m
n g>
R
ti~
l
0
O
'>
C
m
3
m
z
-~
a
X
.m
N O
$ ~
~roD~
iu~~uu~ m
u,~Wo
~o~ ow
~y0 ~~

L
a
R
u a
o~
mg F
4`~
i
~Q io ~

pc ~
o
~
~ ~
4 V1
p U~ ~ ,O`
W ~N • r

§ ~
~ $ °

In I ~ ~ b
~

aso a~ !CS
o1 y~
g 2~
"p~

z A ~,
a
o ~~
~ ~ t 0
~w
@
zXZ ~"~ ~ ~ ybR
_` y t (n

y

w
~~ r~ a
o
o ~ I
~ ! •''•'
~ r'

a
°o

/
$'~ ^ 1fµ
~t
a~ " ;,~
/ ;~
r ~ A
S^
,/
~tti rDD~
vNm~
1 ~~b~QI~m
NbN
~~ ~~~§
6 y 5 5~
A

~' Y i Y i
E- 4 Y~
, ,
i i i r~ j~ ~ O
s _ a~~a z
~
_ I ~ A ~ e
P,
(~
C r x ! g g n~ j O
w ! ° : n n i Z
L ~ C f ~ '~ ~I
y A
j i 4 ~4 H O
'~ y S 1~ Yf~ i C.'
~
' 1 ..> >
r
V - m
C ®~ " ®A ~ z
v
~~~'~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~\1I' \`J
~~ I ~ m ~ 1
,; ~ ~ m ~
;;
~~~1
~t
/ o s
N
~ m
}
m /
+`'
` \
T\~
~ /
o I
ti
o, I
e
4 r u u"u urn
\ `,~ o
~N~y~o°~
~~~wLnO .
°o s
Rb y o N a
\` ~
O \ \\
o ~ \ \{{
/ o m \ G
P \
/ `, \9
\`` \ "M
\~,
,
o~ 4yy
~259~
\ 9
\ ~sq °H~
`ar f
a E
~~
m
m '~
~ 2
/~~~ ~~.77
~ ~e i~d
7-a `~
~~z

:m '/\\
o m / \
/ \ z,
^~@ y, \ ~ y
V~ y
,\ ~ w
°. °^ ~k a
. \ e~ `a
` ~ W 9
~ \ oS
. 0 a
~~~ J
t \ ~ t
~i c~ 7`
c~
\ o+ (q~,
e'~~9~0 4\\ ` \\~~S~~aJ~ ~J
J ~

SYSSSSS7S TIME44 Ss
sss4USERN MES5S8
covr
it
C
^~
`/
dN
7~ ~
~°+ 2
~~ O
~£ 2
~~ n
~~ b
Q o
r ~
E~ ~
rtl~i
a
z
"" Z
as ~
~n t~
4444444444
BR U11lSWICK
ti ~ \ g~
G ~1 \
n /
y \
a~ `
,/~Y~a F~
/~~'~ aye
~° ^`' /
/~
F6 /
io /
Xp /
A /
O / /
-~ /l//\/
~ C
m
~' 3
~5 ~ \
`O
0
`b
b
b S G
A (n
a 0 $
E '7. d
A 3 w $
L y b Q
z Y 1"(~j~
o CJ
'`l
w
WBS ELEME11tT: 3C.010062
~~
~°

1'
\ ~1
~~
e~
~~
~~\ ~ ~ ~
J ~ _~
~l /
t ~~~-y
~~ ~ ~i
~ / ~' ® '~
ZYy+~ /
n
OS
l~ /
s" ~
of
° ~ ~ ~r-~
P
\¢ ~ `~ ~ a
~¢ a
i
F

E ~ ~~ F
o

y E E y 3a ;1
j - ~ i i j
z

E _ °:~- ~
~ ~ i m_"w 6 O
~ `~ i n n z

O
i ~ ~i >~ 4
~ : '' g>> r

r

C ®O ~ ®® + t Z
I c
N q
w~
n
oa
O
c
N
W
W