20060645 Ver 2_Public Notice_20110623

13 0u -Ol.c45 V
US Army Corps PUBLIC NOTICE
Of Engineers
Wilmington District
Issue Date: June 23, 2011
Comment Deadline: July 22, 2011
Corps Action ID #: SAW-201100972
The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received an application from Mr. Tom
Leap of Duke Energy Corporation (Duke Energy), seeking a Department of the Army permit
authorization for permanent impacts to 4,592 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channels and
0.27 acre of jurisdictional forested wetlands adjacent to West Belews Creek (Belews Lake),
associated with the proposed expansion of the existing Craig Road Landfill that services the
Belews Creek Steam Station (BCSS) located off of the abandoned Craig Road on BCSS property
south of Pine Hall, in Stokes County, North Carolina.
Specific plans, alternatives, and locations are described below and shown on the attached plans.
This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington District Web Site
at www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands
Applicant: Duke Energy Belews Creek Steam Station
Attn: Mr. Tom Leap
3195 Pine Hall Road
Belews Creek, NC 27009-9157
Authority
The Corps will evaluate this application and decide whether to issue, conditionally issue, or deny
the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act
(33U.S.C. 1344).
Background
Duke Energy owns and operates BCSS that is located in North Carolina, in the southeastern
portion of Stokes County, adjacent to Belews Lake. The plant address is 3195 Pine Hall Road,
Belews Creek, North Carolina 27042. The proposed Craig Road Landfill expansion is located on
the BCSS property south of the steam station adjacent to abandoned Craig Road. The existing
Craig Road Landfill (Phase 1) was constructed in 2007. The construction included impacts to 70
linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel that was authorized by Nationwide Permit 39
verification (Action ID 200421105). The proposed Craig Road Landfill expansion project
involves construction of additional landfill areas in future phases for coal combustion products
generated by the coal burning process. The Phase I portion of the Craig Road Landfill, including
associated perimeter berms, ditches, stormwater management systems, operation facilities, and
roads is operated under a current North Carolina landfill permit, Permit No. 8504,
issued by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Waste Management, Solid Waste Section (state solid waste section). Based on
current disposal rates, the Phase I landfill area will reach capacity in the second quarter of 2013.
Proposed future landfill areas will be designed and permitted by the state solid waste section in
approximate five-year operational phases consistent with current North Carolina Solid Waste
Section permitting requirements. The proposed Craig Road landfill expansion is to secure coal
combustion product disposal capacity for future BCSS power generation. Duke Energy expects
to produce electricity at this facility at least until the year 2045. Based on current projections
BCSS needs waste disposal capacity for the next 32 years to accommodate station operations.
Location
The general project area is a portion of Duke Energy Corporation's BCSS property,
located on Tax Parcel No. 6982-00-64-2715, south of Pine Hall, in Stokes County, North
Carolina (36.266160°N, -80.071100°W). The location of the subject property is depicted by the
Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1), the appropriate portion of the 2003 Belews Lake, N.C. USGS
Topographic Map (Figure 2), a 2010 Aerial Photograph (Figure 3), a USDA
Stokes County Soil Survey Map (Figure 4), an Approximate Waters of the U.S. Map
(Figure S), and a Project Impacts Map (Figure 6).
Existing Site Conditions
The Craig Road Landfill Phase 1 is located on the southwestern portion of the BCSS property
and is approximately one mile south of the BCSS plant facility. The site is characterized by
rolling topography consisting of ridges and valleys typical of the North Carolina Piedmont. The
Craig Road Landfill Phase 1 is approximately 31 acres in area and was designed to provide an
estimated three years of operating capacity. Construction of the Craig Road Landfill Phase 1 was
completed in late 2007 and operations began in 2008. The Phase 1 landfill area is surrounded by
a landfill access road, two leachate ponds, and a stormwater management basin. The proposed
landfill expansion area is located south of the existing Craig Road Landfill Phase 1. The
proposed landfill expansion area consists mainly of wooded ridges and valley areas and is
bounded on the north and west by Belews Creek. The proposed future landfill area is bounded by
Craig Road to the east and the Duke property line to the south. The landfill expansion area
generally slopes from east to west towards Belews Lake. During Phase 1 construction, soil was
excavated from the ridge areas and stockpiled at two locations within the proposed landfill
expansion area. Landfill operations facilities including a field office, vehicle maintenance
facility, and a lay-down yard are located within the proposed landfill expansion area. Site
drainage for the existing and proposed future landfill areas is generally bounded by the Craig
Road alignment on the east with surface water runoff directed to stormwater management
features west of the landfill and ultimately into Belews Lake. Ground surface elevations range
from approximately 830 feet near Craig Road to 750 feet near drainage features located on the
north and west sides of the site.
2
Groundwater recharge in this area originates from the local ridges and discharges to areas of
lower topography as valley creeks and streams. Land use in the area around the Duke Energy
BCSS property is mostly forested with a few rural residential properties throughout this area in
Stokes County.
S&ME, consultants for Duke Energy, conducted a jurisdictional delineation of the proposed
landfill expansion areas on November 11, 2010. Stream and wetland boundaries within the
landfill expansion area were located with a Trimble0 GeoXH GPS unit capable of sub-meter
accuracy, and mapped on Figure S -Approximate Waters of the U.S. Map. The jurisdictional
boundaries were subsequently surveyed and mapped by a registered land surveyor. A request for
jurisdictional determination was submitted to the USACE and North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (NCDWQ) on January 21, 2011 and approved/confirmed on May 25, 2011 (USACE ID
No. 201100972).
Applicant's Stated Purpose
The proposed Craig Road landfill expansion is to secure coal combustion product disposal
capacity for future BCSS power generation. Duke Energy expects to produce electricity at this
facility at least until the year 2045. Based on current projections BCSS needs waste disposal
capacity for the next 32 years to accommodate station operations.
Project Description
The proposed landfill expansion project entails extending the existing Phase 1 Craig
Road Landfill to the south. The proposed landfill expansion will be organized and
developed in approximate five-year operational phases consistent with NCDENR Soiid
Waste Section regulations and permitting requirements. Based on anticipated waste
generation rates, the proposed landfill expansion is estimated to provide about 25 years of
disposal capacity. The Craig Road Landfill areas were evaluated for available waste
management capacity, access, operation, groundwater and surface water monitoring systems, and
operational flexibility. In general, anticipated landfill construction will require installation of
erosion and sediment control measures, clearing, mass grading of existing ridges and valleys to
establish landfill base grades, constructing a stormwater management system, and constructing
the landfill liner system. Consistent with the existing Phase 1 landfill, the proposed landfill
expansion will be constructed with a composite liner system. From the top down the liner system
will consist of a leachate collection system, a 60-mil thick high density polyethylene (HDPE)
geomembrane, a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) with a permeability no greater than 5x10-9
centimeters per second (cm/s), and prepared subgrade. A stormwater management system will
be developed to control and manage stormwater within the landfill area and around the landfill
perimeter. Perimeter berms and diversion ditches will divert overland flow from entering the
proposed landfill area. Stormwater adjacent to the landfill will be controlled by diverting run-on
away from disturbed areas of the site and collecting runoff from disturbed areas in ditches that
lead to sediment traps and basins. Stormwater will be managed and controlled within the landfill
by operational, intermediate and final covers.
3
Stormwater contacting the waste material will be diverted to the leachate collection system.
Stormwater infiltrating the waste material will be collected in the underlying leachate collection
system of the landfill liner. Contact water and leachate will be conveyed to leachate storage
basins and transferred to the BCSS active ash basin.
The proposed landfill development is organized in approximate five-year operational
capacity increments, referenced as phases. The five-year operational capacity is based on
current estimated coal combustion product generation rates. The landfill development
approach is to provide the most volumetric capacity over as small an area as possible.
The optimal landfill layout that satisfies the development approach consists of side-byside,
contiguous phases developed in sequence. That is, with each new phase developed next to and
connected to the prior phase. Waste placement in each new phase will lie over or "piggy back"
on the prior phase, thus providing more volumetric capacity for the given area. This development
approach decreases the overall land area required to meet the project need because it maximizes
the volumetric capacity for a given area.
In summary, this development approach provides for economically and environmentally
responsible waste management because it decreases the resources needed (land, soil,
jurisdictional impacts) for the waste management capacity gained. Consistent with the North
Carolina Piedmont Region, the BCSS site and the current landfill areas, the proposed landfill
expansion area is characterized by rolling topography consisting of ridges and valleys. Surface
water and groundwater from the local ridges discharge to lower topography areas as valley
creeks and streams. In turn, the proposed landfill expansion area contains various streams and
wetland areas.
Proposed impacts resulting from the Craig Road Landfill expansion project are
summarized in Table I which denotes the total jurisdictional features to
be impacted as "grading/fill placement impacts". Project grading design plans will not
extend the full length of the project area streams because site topographic constraints
restrict grading in the vicinity of the downstream terminus (Figure 6). As currently
designed, the proposed project would permanently impact 0.27 acres of forested wetland
and 4,592 linear feet of stream. In addition to the proposed stream impacts, the existing
Craig Road Landfill previously impacted 701f of stream.
An alternatives analysis and the proposed selection of Alternative C, proposed landfill
expansion configuration were developed with consideration of environmental impacts,
cost, solid waste regulations, and whether or not the alternative meets the project purpose
and need. The following alternatives were analyzed:
• Alternative A can be characterized as the "do nothing" approach. In this
approach, the landfill expansion would not be constructed; therefore, the existing
stream and wetland areas would not be disturbed. This alternative was not
selected because it does not meet the need to provide for continued and future
coal combustion product disposal capacity.
4
• Alternative B (proposed location with stream/wetland avoidance) avoids impacts
to streams and wetlands within the proposed Craig Road Landfill expansion area;
however this alternative falls short of the project need lifetime and would require
future landfill expansion or development on Greenfield sites. Considering the
regional geology and topography, it is likely that streams and wetlands would be
impacted during future landfill expansions at other locations. For these reasons,
landfill expansion with stream / wetland avoidance was considered the second
most desirable option.
• Alternative C (proposed location) unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional features
are proposed within the Craig Road Landfill expansion area; however, this alternative will
provide airspace for approximately 24 years of facility operations and it is the most cost-effective
option in terms of anticipated cost per cubic yard of airspace. This alternative comes closest to
meeting the project need lifetime. Additionally, the impacted streams and wetlands are not
currently identified as navigable waterways, high quality trout streams, or contain habitat
suitable for listed endangered / threatened species. The impacted streams and waterways flow
directly to Belews Lake, which is owned and operated by Duke Energy. For these
reasons, the proposed landfill expansion configuration was considered the most
desirable option.
• Alternative D (other sites on Duke property) falls short of the project need
lifetime and would require future landfill expansion or development on greenfield
sites. Considering the regional geology and topography, it is unlikely to avoid
impacts to unknown jurisdictional features. This alternative is less cost-effective
than Alternative C. For these reasons, developing another on-site location
(locations 4 or 5) was considered the third most desirable option.
• Alternative E (developing off-site property) may minimize impacts to unknown
jurisdictional features, however based on the general topography of the region and
considering estimates indicate that more than 300 acres of property would be
needed, similar quantities of jurisdictional impacts are possible. Whether or not
this alternative could provide for the project need lifetime is uncertain. This
alternative likely requires developing a previously undeveloped, greenfield
property. Additionally, since the landfill is unlikely to be contiguous to existing
Duke property, landfill construction and operations are likely to be more
obtrusive. Also, this alternative is less cost-effective than Alternative C. For
these reasons, developing an off-site location was considered the fourth most
desirable option.
• Alternative F (disposal at a regional landfill) may avoid impacts to on-site streams
and wetlands, however it does not meet the project need timeframe and regional
MSW solid waste disposal capacity would be reduced substantially. Additionally,
disposal at an existing regional landfill would require an increase in haul distance,
cost of waste transport and tipping fees, and increase in truck traffic. For these
reasons, disposal at an existing regional landfill was considered the fifth most
desirable option.
Alternative C, the proposed landfill expansion configuration, was selected as the best
alternative based on the factors of environmental impacts, cost, solid waste regulations,
and whether or not the alternative meets the project purpose and need. Although
jurisdictional features will be impacted, review of the alternatives indicates that some
stream and wetland impacts are likely unavoidable to meet the project need on the order
of 32 years for the life of BCSS. For example, while developing Alternatives B, D-A, and D-B
combined will avoid impacts it would require developing an estimated 240 acres to provide a
capacity on the order of 19 years. In comparison to Alternative C, these alternatives combined
require about two times as much land area to provide about 75 percent of the estimated
Alternative C Capacity (18 years/24 years).
Alternative C provides the most efficient land use in terms of the volumetric capacity
generated for the land area developed and as a result, provides the most cost-effective
alternative. With respect to solid waste regulations, Alternative C is very likely to satisfy
siting and design criteria and gain Solid Waste Section permit approval on the basis that
it is an expansion of an existing approved and permitted landfill, much of the
design/permitting basis information has already been developed, and it can likely be
developed prior to the existing Craig Road and FGD landfills reaching capacity. In
addition, Alternative C was evaluated as the best alternative because it comes the closest
to meeting the project need, providing an estimated capacity on the order of 24 years.
To mitigate for the anticipated impacts, the applicant has proposed a payment into the North
Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). The appropriate number and resource
type credits were not available from any private mitigation banks within the 8-Digit Cataloging
Unit 03010103, at the time the application was submitted.
Other Required Authorizations
This notice and all applicable application materials are being forwarded to the appropriate State
agencies for review. The Corps will generally not make a final permit decision until the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or waives State
certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500). The receipt of the
application and this public notice combined with appropriate application fee at the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality central office in Raleigh will constitute initial receipt of an
application for a 401 Water Quality Certification. A waiver will be deemed to occur if the
NCDWQ fails to act on this request for certification within sixty days of the date of the receipt of
this notice in the NCDWQ Central Office. Additional information regarding the Clean Water
Act certification may be reviewed at the NCDWQ Central Office, 401 Oversight and Express
Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260. All persons
desiring to make comments regarding the application for certification under Section 401 of the
Clean Water Act should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (NCDWQ), 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 Attention:
Mr. Ian McMillan by July 13, 2011.
Essential Fish Habitat
This notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The Corps' initial determination
is that the proposed project will not adversely impact EFH or associated fisheries managed by
the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marine
Fisheries Service.
Cultural Resources
The Corps has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places
and is not aware that any registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion
therein are located within the project area or will be affected by the proposed work. Presently,
unknown archeological, scientific, prehistoric, or historical data may be located within the
project area and/or could be affected by the proposed work.
Endangered Species
The Corps has reviewed the project area, examined all information provided by the applicant and
consulted the latest North Carolina Natural Heritage Database. Based on available information,
the Corps is not aware of the presence of species listed as threatened or endangered or their
critical habitat formally designated pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 within the
project area. A final determination on the effects of the proposed project will be made upon
additional review of the project and completion of any necessary biological assessment and/or
consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or National Marine Fisheries Service.
Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts,
including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will
reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The
benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against
its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be
considered including the cumulative effects thereof, among those are conservation, economics,
aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife
values, flood hazards, flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use,
navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water
quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of
property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving
the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of the
impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the Environmental
Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines.
7
Commenting Information
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies
and officials, including any consolidate State Viewpoint or written position of the Governor;
Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this
proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to
determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this
decision., comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water
quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above.
Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine
the overall public interest of the proposed activity.
Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a
public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a public hearing shall be
granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues raised are insubstantial or there is
otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received
by the Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, until 5pm, July 22, 2011. Comments should be
submitted to John Thomas, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office, 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite
105, Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587.
N
A
ek
TO Wn Fork Gee
Stokes
County
Stokes
County
14/,
5'u n
65 ) ?9(5?

Guilford
County
ckingham
County

m
V

Belews Creek
Selew t
, Creek
Rd
Forsyth

County
Guilford
0 County
5 Rd 158 r,
e\e? dSJ`\\e 'mss
Re c''ee,
Project Area
e
REFERENCE:
THE ABOVE INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED ESRI STREETMAP DATASET. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE 0 0.5 1 1.5
NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. SWE, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE
OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. Mlles
;ALE: AS SHOWN SITE VICINITY FIGURE
N°.
\TE: 4-1-2011 Duke Energy Belews Creek Station
iAwN BY: DDH S&ME Landfill Expansions
WWW.SMEINC.COM Stokes County, North Carolina
iECKEDBY: DP PROJECT NO:
1356-10-041
I
a
S?
Q
Q
(93
I Forsyth
County
Belews Creek Steam
Station Entrance
7
k FpC2
FpD2 n lillh.I ' FpB2 FpD2
!`may s ? .,
7pB2 FpC2 k FpD2 ` w
*
FpD2`
FpC2
FpD2
W Ud
FpD2 `. FpD2
F
FpC2
k
T
FpD2 ? i
FpC2 `
M
°? FsD2
SfD SfC
?F,pD2
FpC2
r FsC2 SfD
RPE a. FpC2
FpD2
s F'V
FpB2 RPE
RPE SfG
SfC FpD2
RPE JC.A?
FpC2
SfD
FpB2.
FpC2 SIC ?.. FpB2
CsA: Codorus loam, 0-2% slopes, occasionally flooded Q Project Area
FpB2: Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 2-8% slopes, moderately eroded - Perennial RPW
FpC2: Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 8-15% slopes, moderately eroded --R- Seasonal RPW
FpD2: Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 15-25% slopes, moderately eroded Culvert / Pipe ` ,
FsD2: Fairview-Siloam complex, 15-25% slopes, moderately eroded ® Wetlands
® SfC: Siloam fine sandy loam, 8-15% slopes
I- 1 SfD: Siloam fine sandy loam, 15-25% slopes °
- W: Water
REFERENCE: SOIL SURVEY GEOGRAPHIC (SSURGO) DATASET FOR STOKES COUNTY
THE ABOVE GIS INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM USDA GEOSPATIAL DATA GATEWAY WEB SITE. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THEREARE NO 0 400 800
GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S&ME,INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS
TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. Feet
SCALE: AS SHOWN FIGURE
USDA SOIL SURVEY MAP NO.
DATE: 4-1-2011 ` S&ME
Duke Energy Belews Creek Station
DRAWN BY: DD H == Landfill Expansions
WWW.SMEINC.COM Stokes County, North Carolina
NECKED BY: DP PROJECT NO: 1356-10-041
NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES WERE DELINEATED IN THE
FIELD BYSBME PERSONNEL ON 11-11-2010. BOUNDARIES HAVE
a` BEEN SURVEYED BY WSP SELLS, A NC REGISTERED LAND
SURVEYOR. JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES WERE VERIFIED IN
THE FIELD BYTHE USACEAND NCDWO ON 3-1-2011.
ki
� 4 t
t,
MAP 5D
_u
U ,
MAP 5C
MAP 5B`
, Aa
Perennial RPW
Seasonal RPW
®wetlands �
aProject Area `� 4 fie
REFERENCE: T
THEABOVE GIS DATA WERE OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAPAND NCDOTGIS WEBSITE. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES, THERE ARE NO 0 500 000500
GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. SSME, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY
ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION.
Feet
SCALE AS SHOWN APPROXIMATE WATERS FIGURE
DATE: 6-6-2011 Duke S&ME Duke
THE U.S. MAP - INDEX No
Energy Belews Creek Station
DRAWN BY: DDH Landfill Expansions
WWII
.SMEINC.COM Stokes County, North Carolina
CHECKED BY: DP PROJECT N0:
\ 1356-10-041

;f
r
p p ? ? ? ?.lG f µ? /1LL "y9 t 'F {'- ..ifr•-:
m Ct , . ?-"j!) 1 r.•tY.r- -R+m R.y M?4= °'°°,.r?l.
Z m X d _? ? +J? ? 0." S'tf? J?_? ?V?•?.Ya. -.. ?-} .-?CtZ??,,? ` J)?p ? ? ?.
,iF-_.
/W"W
+ o'S
z' 1,
a`a4.'+
y n o r .j'ys ..aa t"as..._f ?, '$##tra -. ; «er v ?ss.;y O' \ r..
z ° o ,! x? /:.i"' :?,, o T'a'm y'?,a. d'lvta a'S `,?r•`? Y^'?? a o1e' ,
o
"a
z o .s '' L + P , v". -Y 'I°` $?_`".?}.1 , 'k .'-•r :_ `4..,? 1 s;$?'!?b• " I9:
c l?,-j
N
:ft "V
,,es-+a'?
m z al" ?gyy
o `'56` r s. f:. 3?` ?N } r< ?1 `-=? i 3
,, ,acs . ;- j? 'i
w. 1-
z o 'Y 'cyr? Y yy1,: cn _: F tF a? ?4 tom. ?•'f: ?.+?'? '?j t. Y E 1
?? '17 "T ! m N C;1 S y ?Y i °"? ' it yr .af { 5
S n o r i r iyC 44 sF + r. 7 t . -w*.rl?f ?,.: ^•s A'?,?`'wy
d ?'x ? a f aw ? ,? ,a?y`t" ',l"`,Jx _ ,r' 3 ?" hl e a •,t ,.
?z zn =?¢r 3 ', (s i'Si7"?fa3_sPS} v° 1r?
n oA
°°O>z °tG?3e
M.P
+f 4d „
C + A r.c . Myyyyt 1y ?N ' ,'
-? 4!
m°n r t pr '' p, . w Mi! tst`yi7 sc,E t»g 5.??, /' At
?' 1 t,? & r.. ?r.'k v r'P,• y ?'y rye ? ' t ,? j. 4 K'?.t?
OJr% t .r'ya i* 5 " s` s°? s ?7 a.°??? ?•?. 'i$ + 1r ?\ ?.:_?`r ? 'A
+' w r n ,f.:r q ?? t >?7 ti??? N.
( sa } 4
,? t (? 3 a? t? ^t / x #tt 'rx s ? e' 1 c Y-a ! -
o;rl t11 r ?o1» 3 I *. et t ?• ??rs .p
D O
. Y r,l }J;
1J
-?`yR 't" 'al, / tlr,r} N` ?q
` } %{ s
v f ar R ?, o-kt ?t as a oar 1Yt a a
r X"?r+1 +,
r rry-k?i'C ,tr* #f'v is ?.v ?'r
IT,
.?,jj?, 's 3 r
S' v t 3S ?6 ty,, ?' e. 3 D D a @ ? C
Tk a f e . $r ` K? 5 • c H t] y ?i ' ?1?.,: 16r ? r3 y dw.» '? 3°h ?, ert, 47XR ;`r
t z +'- L -j 1 h? r `??? y A? ; o Jy? " lc Zs? 7n? zr„at
>r j;{ Sr.e? '? r' ? ,,r1 f Y -' i ?',? ?• ? ? t ?''ti ?? ?''` -?? ?'S ?iy ?,,? Py ?.?.t sh CMS'',:
t
4ep
jl ?il l„k.1' / H,' s'J.? ,?ps'.p i? ,r?.'fYrb`r 3..;.?ylyr t'"?,.i.,:„C$ Yk. '•(
?F('Y"r'F -. , i
/+ r `- J Y.4 b 1 YV ' T *' } }, itl I "4r, .
CC,
® II In r,J N t b ' } r? ?? ,. 1 y
?7Ht. r asa R"'2 ¢ }h t `:v°'#a
'' N m t''`?O tX'e: a m m fr r As
3". V ?'-
o c m m o 3
61,
5`°p. ,'?j t^ Z y m o?i 4?A?1. • _ f 1}::r F,'•?r'r .c, ?r `' '?` c"` i?yN
D 6 g °i °-' v ,•, 'R r" ?? v r -
6 Si .5 X ;U ?a F'$tdl! I r -.1 - .. 'r
7Jt'?kk _
S'f
C CC „.?{ r f?
APPROXIMATE WATERS SCA1E ?„ - 150, DATE
*S&ME 06 D6.2°"
OF THE U.S. MAP PROJECT NO DRAWN BY
m Duke Energy Belews Creek Station 1356-10-041 DDH
° Landfill Expansions CHECKED BY
WWW.SMEINC.COM DMP
Stokes County, North Carolina
?s t ! f '.v ,a 'rte - ;s. '¢ 1, F ig r?,LL-F
s
47
? o o ? ?1. r 1 rj/j??J`?,?*,f?? < r ? .rF . ?. a ?r ° .,? ?t "?w 1 r ?? 4 i, ? t ?: Y a i'?, ?> (: .:v i c, y ?t
y?,ltll tt F -y `,r k.. {-{,?•t+Y " -u" c }_ ?.•? r29,r'? s
4 1 ? sr
m n ? 9a y A a ? , t:: a .? ,a _.? 1 9 ?rF
z 22, NIA N
°z i• '?t . . f 4 ,. !k g +..G, n ,~ .} r L r / '1 f Dii?T - ` ,..:
z o ,'L?A j/? rah u? r r A.ai a, r- s t.. t u m
'vf . A'li t
?cn
u o r x fr o- Ny r R ;. ,v ; 5; -? m q ?a-? > ??
s z.nytr}5 r : 3 at p's
m #
in o P t •. t Z +,> '? Y s ' o*?,.o F `.,,
m
xh 1 I L v?
p o a t L t k d`' ° ]fib ?' .? a x# e 3 of
St
IV 3
A 1 y ,s P } ?i, ?y w 1 ?Y3 + a s
Sgt m n a r r s e ?" rr ';
m i >°>u tUl § %v!f;rP a` ?, td r +'." t q >.s.•• r? ?r ?A
y 1 SIt s r? f. a- I?x ,„+. , s .v 'lu' i ;
1? V.
oA o d?- Nil E',
o 1 F r e> 1 4 76
'0 z?
mm.
y eS _ y x s e
h 0
p C'? T ,T ' • 1 ? 3Y "'f' Y S?fS - ? b ?° 4 3;+r'?'.
' r? e s
?
(r aq?lL qq \ d tqa?`. j.r c ; fit. FT ?'^a.?, rr,?°i°•t
N o c ep V 41 *
Ce qr, f".'y'i., f F> n I - t tr-a Ht o
?lp .:g#?tt1 ?.?z`x` r? r } ? •-? + :1 4< ?N? 3 ?? `t - 3.'i r '::
ca .Y +r;' # ys a e : a. r r .y k
p - 3n *? k S • '? r ^ "" F'.r N y .,? arc
CD a 4? Y a st 20 'rn rJi'µ t,/
< ,:iil
T s#
yq
(. ' ffi?. afar p3," s rriw r 5 n r. +w :: ?
s u 1 # 3,? yr j., rf! 5 ?, cn
-•t ,. ' ? ? ate.. ??o;; { { t?,?e lr:-? +{ j,?l+ a _. - -
Y
4r .1
a iii
o z 0
D m
m ? O -0
?A ? ? V `• z®+u? t ?1? ` ? r
APPROXIMATE WATERS SCALE: 1" = DATE
150' 06. 06.2011
PROJECT NO'. DRAWN BY'.
cn o OF THE U.S. MAP *S&ME
m Duke Energy Belews Creek Station 1356-10-041 DDH
° Landfill Expansions
WWW.5(t1t1N(. d.: ,j N! CHECKEUBY: DMF'
Stokes County, North Carolina
n h ; ? F dfF'C" rat, ? 2??'.Y )+ ,.
m O t ,^. ? ??:`y V 1
zo -w
<m i g' ., 1 mac " I n.,
> cy
o s* ?y.+ ?
o m'
?! r 7 rM1;' ? r ? ?• ?
O
°
- °
tl Al
r is .Zip", : J r.-° r'if. ? •Tx,? ` r ?x --,t?
?; ?q'.
%
Z? ? '.{ ?? ?? ?! J = ?r V tI tip 1 ? Q r)
o s l '? I r" 'P /_ 'lfsY
4 :T rIr
p ? .. 4 'Y?'? 777$
a;` y '`?' tl .. h * i r r ?kr r{ rIS .. "-a
A s O }}rd iJry.+. i "+f- J ?j =? f'I ry
4 it 0 t t N +°,-' @,B r r i `r v d,'kr{? +^ r !?I
o A o p a , 44,
IV,
'41, V
?? ?? FJ s #r W 9 ?? I r
O - = i N i 0'Q: a y `: y
Oz m O n qc., "tr r?r¢ [ten ¢ d °y F s' l.`` °i D'o. m g?
4. 77 moAZ _'"m°? ,.???y_ D ? ? _I-?', ' ? ??:?r ' "t m N n t `' F? ? # r• i /
o r y? q' i'l
',p(1? t 4 ?t ° I w!'?f r
4' J O t
r v ?Y aY
'IF
W ^YM'?_, ?{ TTT x fF t0
`I r y J ? N T r? i`3 s?}
O - ?` `I vyr , Diu
g r/ 3 3 1
-n C) d e V
J 'ar=f \\
`?? ??m'm sue'
-. 5 .....fir' m 3 aI
. c, . + a ?Xa ?_,ry m n
' YY xbcc?5 ? C? °o
N C) N -p
..
,
l0 Q 'x » C N (1)
Z 0
?
r^1 C) ON N ? is /
Cad -,_ Y
4 lY3tn'
APPROXIMATE WATERS SCALE, V -150' °ATE
cn OF THE U.S. MAP *S&ME os. os.2o11
A PROJECT NO. DRAWN BV'
v 1356-10-041 DDH
o Duke Energy Belews Creek Station
Landfill Expansions WWW,yMEINC.CoM CHIC KID BY '. DMP
Stokes Countv. North Carolina
NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES WERE DELINEATED IN THE 4r N
FIELD BY S&ME PERSONNEL ON 11-11-2010. BOUNDARIES HAVE
BEEN SURVEYED BY WSP SELLS, A NC REGISTERED LAND '
SURVEYOR. JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES WERE VERIFIED IN `r`.%t?? • zat ' p
x ?.a
£ e
THE FIELD BY THE USACE AND NCDWQ ON 3-1-2011,
x
a t
?'? F .. r .v -. eA. cr ,? # e ? ;"?'r- ? *?t>eta!. ?z R•t
? ,LAS;. ?1 ++?.
P"i, 7N,
;K MAP 6D
t '• Y Ff.''fi t' 1 '`?11 t '.L '6 y,? yu
rr 4r
i.
'<< r ? r sty ?s
< Sri ? {
x_b ? rI? 4 t q 7 {? "sx Ar1` L
MAP 6C , :A?i1' ,z
a ?? e:_ x an &? tra"? ?° t':3? - r ? ?rr?'?sGi?.'?•JW h1
;?` ?" ? ?`g t ? '? ? rs ? ? " ?iri ? e??a•? zM
t 7 '8 'A t .' t 3:. t ,y-i ct t Aye. t? "
r t ( 5 ern r ? ??
?'r ? eE' ?, r U, i§' ? u5 a u '?' t}r r !
t ?: } J Y11 w tbQ '' ?+ K
d ''t t 4 I "ttx!` n, i .y??c+ I ON._? r 1t, .` t? . ;? y
Lti'r?s
MAP 6?B
t .t,r X? MaC
r,G ?? "''«- F_: ; ?j ,.. •, a `? a
ks g: F t3 ' n t j s?? F f° S? '"
ti t rf? a, t Fri:
r ? _ 4?t
411
':Limits of Grading / Impact} Y yy y r . fig;
Perennial RPW OR. .,f
A I t, -om
q
Seasonal RPWx n x ; >; ,.ti "` r? ?,t•
® Wetlands ?? # 4 4 S
ED Project Area
REFERENCE:' aY"
THE ABOVE GIS DATA WERE OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP AND NCDOTGIS WEBSITE. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR -?°Cyl t? i 4 -
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO 1-,-000 1;50
GUARANTEES ABOUT ITSACCURACY. S&ME, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY
ACTIONSTAKEN BYTHE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. 'Feet
KALE: AS SHOWN FIGURE
PROJECT IMPACTS MAP No.
)ATE. 6-6-2011 S&ME
Duke Energy Belews Creek Station
)RAwN BY: DDH Landfill Expansions
WWW.SMEINC,COM Stokes County, North Carolina
;HECKEDBY: DP PROJECTNO: 1356-10-041
'Y y .r ? k? ?v x w 3 t
m ; 04
ell
gz,
a?f < 3 ga. °a c+yrtt r A s ?r; g s
ta' ^!.?,J F`d '. } e rr;4' +c?k' 'tn w. ,at4 s„ ;??;
I I rllk?4?41
_wl
n a of t : 4 { i?• 4p'f-¢ a .1?' -
27? T_ o r a; ?cy W ?'a' F >f ` . ! '.,?'?'?`.?""!i.?4'F?.'s4
z m v T f ^-??'t-"?
m o? i*'" Si`,d 3 „y 'e°
op0 X?'
m a s isy'1•.? ?x ?y ^# tP AM_f"'"{` Si'?'f
< o< o 0 3" d +Y ?VWa ':'{kk q „, ' I e S, ti: o v v; X; s! f r r
} 1 ° „u
jf,
4 rf` W F .! L' ? PAL v1^E c
Z . III IC + F'? ! S r'x
1n s o ?'J p •aJ d ?, f ?i b1.+ 'a ?i?,3^' t`°.
a ?y .j' s3o Cr r ,
o x-0
o n z J ? 7 q y a .? r O V, ,
'( ' ?i ?y ?r I g r?ykk y' ..
tJ
j c i s P' ;mlh Nvj Y y `
?v y ?fgJ
O ' y1}?s.'??5, * $ "IC ?+ {gl'c!? Sw
fff44t '? ' .±:f} raw ' , ,,94 11'!,tS?
C fa .f'- a s !'s i.?R1R?2 1
y C "fir'?, 't% ? ? ??.w? 'hea `:t`.
NN_
en 4? f r t sw' >9la e?y
'AM
li
1
JU q4-
IFU
71
0 c ? yy !rx? jar f
FIT
?' yy,?' yy,, 2 eetg: t r ?
Ll? II I ue ft s* r ?h ^,z? F9i' k
3ssf" ?"` . 's* ;?,? *'V?°F q 4 ., €F'r Si
cn -a
m £y ti w b., Y tr: Y "CN
° o m c m
w m N
D a o 'J` " sX hy'r + of
7s?r
`?^ m m v n 1?$.,,+ 3r6a" 1??;. #r ?'Z`H a _ .rf r n `?,yc ° r? ?`.
3 i&y r:Pr ?4 a?.' 1'?dr "?l' !? tea;:
SCALE DATE.
PROJECT IMPACTS MAP 06.06.2011
*S&ME 1 - 150
PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY.
1356-10-041 DDH
o Duke Energy Belews Creek Station
Landfill Expansions WWW.SMEINC.COM CHECKED BY
Stokes County, North Carolina DMP
7 1
4i ?y,JS H 1 : +l_ F +j.5 ?I
XN'
?mi q, M1l?v'?1
] ?? a
44
Nit,
y > 1.:... ?'?• ,$ ,tea A,n?,,??? M,? s yy *.. 6 .,
1 ? ./( .t .. 'rL•M.rll'a? T?y, Y a ?. y?,+i 7y?L; ?1f ?x?? ?4
z m t >. ns w, k r,"'Px m 4K`' i s M°?Y0.9??•/ .¢1?
e td . 3 t r ?x _ + r''. ':ar '?
t •? ?S 'ik ,p , ' C ;' t ti' r Ra a+'p{0 4,
ILI'
Pt
VIA
a ?' , ?,, Ij? `?, -' /.p ? ?q?k ,E '*?' '?`?''??w^•'?;''A'+„' «d .?g ?
?y n k ?t t` r x
xy ?+= y e d7 o +R `
\y!`v? f+ 2`'S '} 'qp?9 q?,.,'Yf ?+???L?.7 ?'GR? V yyt]1 .?S 11 SS'ky°t " t.\ .{?,:
Trl
a m, t Yi S 4'S YA.'G.IFf SA[.-j y`M?-" {.'? ;C '? L 4 Yn{i 9 •'
m y\ / 9r Y C i i ?m ?. ?, y? ?1?•? y lr b Y3. ^ °I? 4 ( e a ,_
n ? ?'\ 1F'4$ ? d ,? ?* ?' '? ?:vi?Y? ±?3,"r,,F
i ?\ r'm, gl.jr3: '1 f'JY+? j'?'
®? ?\\yy?? s? Y+, J .r! 5. s•"`aw5% e s e? R ,r `i 1 ?,?' Q w?pp yC a
.Am
'R a>.t ?r;yR 4i ?, 3. n 4. ,k y `? ?6(fu,p,r `
I F ^r T L 't "r s rY'i ."C' '? x.:. r y F?r,
0 6 tP? I?i? i •?? t r -' ''r "' rYx 4, *+d? a w .? y?ya1`"'4' d '?d! .t
ox
7
?a b 4? ?, +fa t £? ' t •:? ,s"+' _2 S } n ?e *?`1 r+ ? y8t..:.?V:
t1 ?I??j?! ? .. ? ? ??? t??r ?? ?' 1? }rt ,? '?yy? -`ry ? y ? R -) ?rt ,? F? u?_`
o ° '?h Fly t?1 x '?+1i4???4 ? f? ??9???5? ?t r " M1d ? c y +. Mfr t ?? S¢? ?, ??n i•nwc? }'?i+\ , ^ ? - YF ,?j ?6? a
? ??! , j y' ? - n w ? `5. J .?rt a 1 r Z' >',.r6' r iYa
z m 1 7 i .pb ?X + ? - M1 Y t yf ' .. .r+ ,a ^' mkj'ty'? .J'w?,'? V xe r , ; Yt ? t : .
m `o 1: ?Z ^w'r
? cn q F ? Vtr.+.r y fs' '`?'.>'^'i'1?t.r.,{ > 2y ?° ?§i? t•wpr :,'q+ 0?..6,.
p? 3,?4„ ' ?t L Ey. `4^,?rt ? yr G -5'?' 4 •;'!d ? ?'?•
co ? ? ?? ?, ????; /?vt?y,t,?• t
y > n p , 111 F w. ?j y` r ?! t.z s>',ffr 7aa...Y t t > n r .r ..,r rd
m m f9I I4_n t, x ?.? 1 ST: Jly"z: 1 SY a?F M ?k. L `
0, t
z?`T?r 1t t ltX ? t' 'S' Ffy,ifi` {J?}
r ?A? -? + a ??P v R bra. m ,???•"Sr, y t .e'er. {{y~?? ?''? ? s i? ?' ? ? ? w ?5
r a??he?rr#l?' \t'r Y
`?TP< k w "9'?. e4t:+ it ay y °
?;?4 .t a s t ,?
•}? ?? ??.? Air, ApN? C ;ff ? r s t Y Ae t't ? ~!
I'????r b?' #t # w ct3i txs x ly
%
cad+???txa4? ' Ma?i1l' s r ° m r>
D?k '?? ? 2$e W4:4?a
Y4`Ghl? ril?+y b F `, jth ? '+6 p r,h?h y? / '
17,
IVA
?A' ?? tP t a Maya : \ M1 j
fi k'? r Ott 341, 1, 0, [ I.?` pps;. f F +ti ` A ?'? ??w S?{y4' *C, b<?n
s'°',/. !v Jt?reyl rJ' a n s rr`.r + t r r r -A+ ?' _ ??
ler. Ctiin ? y. ? ce ' , s ?
?,?"' r/ f is ??7,t i i?t i "W+
9 Y:y v h;y,i?'4?"' iU-'t•aFsyi,?C L4r,L•n.? (M1 t 11 w fs' 3 \
I I 3° 4c ' P °yw^rd xf4 y,?q a$sN'tA??? rw.,xyaxe rc2ys' :?c,c,T? "?" •w'Fr ?Y < "w l1 P + 1 fTM1.a
8, -0 n v v 00 II ?,rrn<r a , ?.? t
t F, n;F R J ?c ` ccf ttidJ 44 qr?r r ?r eyt t 1
-25 cD i%.
1, 11 1* 1 w,
, 4
n o S m oS eH1tiJ M??bi A??! sss's €'
t y'
^,e7p.,,,;?>ti
°e a obi -o p A sa„ef,?®? .t, g°{wT•b4t A\
rn ?' m m U a _ ?' 3.?IaS] a s . Nk+?iY°E't 3??- r _ ,;y
yy i! }l
D Z
PROJECT IMPACTS MAP *S&ME 1" = 150' 06. 06.2011
PROJECT NO DRAWN BV:
m Duke Energy Bele Creek Station 1356-10-041 DDH
Landfill Expansions
WW W.SMEIN i:.C OM CHECKED BV: DMP
? Stokes Countv. North Carolina
. a 5
730 " r' =770 �r ,M,,a ' ` '1`" ''; - 755
750' -"- r
775
i.•`J �� ,.dei .'ICAO "-.-",�"__ _ - _ - `" ' r,`pS
• ^ 10 +,r'«.�r-10 r 51,.44-- `1 •`
� �, __ '�' �'•"� � wl' � I` yl I ' ti 1�- . 1` X50 a
«'� � ••`V .` SAO.• � f � ''I�i�✓.j , r 3 � r 1 j; ry ,,t�, '/ 5�1g0
r.y •770 - c .• 80T
,S Shy SSO
L
_..845
855
.750
REFERENCE:
THE ABOVE WATERBODY DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM THE NATIONAL HYDROGRAPHY DATA SET. STREET GIS
DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM ESRI. HYDROLOGY AND WETLANDS JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES WERE
DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME PERSONNEL ON 11-11-2010. DISTURBED AREA INFORMATION WAS
OBTAINED FROM S&ME, INC. AND WSP SELLS, INC. PLEASE NOTE THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL
PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES, THERE ARE NO
GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S&ME, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION
MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE ABOVE DATA
OUt`iL=. 1" = 600'
DATE: 5-31-2011
DRAWN BY: CHR
NECKED BY: KRD
S&ME
WWW.SMEINC.Ctrivd
c, CRLF Phase 1
Alternative B Limit of Waste
Alternative C Limit of Waste
Alternative C Grading Limits
----- 5 -ft Contours
Wetlands
—" — Streams
EXPANSION AREA FIGURE
NO.
Duke Energy Belews Creek Station
Landfill Expansions17
PROJECT NO: 1356-10-041
Y
t�
-
� r
REFERENCE:
THE ABOVE WATERBODY DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM THE NATIONAL HYDROGRAPHY DATA SET. STREET GIS
DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM ESRI. HYDROLOGY AND WETLANDS JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES WERE
DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME PERSONNEL ON 11-11-2010. DISTURBED AREA INFORMATION WAS
OBTAINED FROM S&ME, INC. AND WSP SELLS, INC. PLEASE NOTE THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL
PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES, THERE ARE NO
GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S&ME, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION
MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE ABOVE DATA
OUt`iL=. 1" = 600'
DATE: 5-31-2011
DRAWN BY: CHR
NECKED BY: KRD
S&ME
WWW.SMEINC.Ctrivd
c, CRLF Phase 1
Alternative B Limit of Waste
Alternative C Limit of Waste
Alternative C Grading Limits
----- 5 -ft Contours
Wetlands
—" — Streams
EXPANSION AREA FIGURE
NO.
Duke Energy Belews Creek Station
Landfill Expansions17
PROJECT NO: 1356-10-041

If r j
f .? 5?' ? J I? y'f I
t ' s d C.. 4. r C r 4, a k
^^?? ?•? y ? ?, i 4 F. r x ?T Y r
Alternative On-Site Locations
® CRLF Phase 1
Z CRLF Expansion
Duke Property
r ?R
Waterbody
4
REFERENCE: Q County Boundary
THE ABOVE WATERBODY DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM THE NATIONAL HYDROGRAPHY DATA SET. STREET GIS DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM ESRI. HYDROLOGY AND WETLANDS JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES WERE - n• -f - --7`t' 1
DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME PERSONNEL ON 11-11-2010. DISTURBED AREA INFORMATION WAS i° •1 --
OBTAINED FROM S&ME, INC. AND WSP SELLS, INC. PLEASE NOTE THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL . 0 • 7,000:-- - _.14, 000 r.'
PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO
GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S&ME, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION Feet
MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE ABOVE DATA. ar. t
SCALE: 1" _ 7,000' DUKE PROPERTY FIGURE
NO.
Duke Energy Belews Creek Station
DATE: 5-31-2011 S&ME
DRAWN BY: CHR Landfill Expansions Q
WWW.SMEINC.COM Stokes Count North Carolina v
3HECKED BY: KRD PROJECT NO: 1356-10-041
rk 21 , 220'
T
?ti fJ
J-f ?
ir I
t? ,+ r
? J
?

?
.I r
-5 - s`• • -v-? ?
- 50
Danville

?y J b ' F t._ROCKINGHAM COUNTY rCASWEL'L?G
29
11
f 20
i !
- 44
I i
YADKIN CO_ UNTYI -'
K {_ rJ ,-
01
DAVIE CDUNTY1 ~ 1 4` E p?,;,t T4
158 4 f `
- -f I +rl i; Craig Rd. Landfill ti? t
- " JDAVIDSON COUNTY + Hanes Mill Rd. Landfill
REFERENCE: A Q County Boundary
THE ABOVE WATERBODY DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM THE NATIONAL HYDROGRAPHY DATA SET. STREET GIS CHATHAM COUNT)
DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM ESRL HYDROLOGY AND WETLANDS JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES WERE i.j .I , -
DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY SBME PERSONNEL ON 11-11-2010. DISTURBED AREA INFORMATION WAS 20`Y
OBTAINED FROM SBME, INC. AND WSP SELLS, INC. PLEASE NOTE THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL 0 50,000 100,000
PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO - L-_-+
GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY SBME, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION ? r Feet
MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE ABOVE DATA.
J y' i
SCALE: 1" = 50,000' FIGURE
REGIONAL AREA NO.
Duke Energy Belews Creek Station
DATE. 5-31-2011 - S&ME
DRAWN BY: CHR Landfill Expansions
HECKED BY: WWW.SMEINC.COM Stokes Count North Carolina
KRD PROJECT NO: 1356-10-041
Table 1 - Proposed Impacts
Application for Section 404 Individual Permit
Proposed Craig Road Landfill Expansion
Duke Energy - Belews Creek Steam Station
SWE Project No. 1356-10-041
Wetland ID Classification Grading/Fill Placement Impact ac
WC1 Forested 0.02
WC2 Forested 0.14
WC3 Forested 0.05
WC4 Forested 0.06
Stream ID Classification Grading/Fill Placement Impact (M
SC1 Perennial / Seasonal 699
SC2 Perennial / Seasonal 0
SC3 Seasonal 0
SC4 Perennial 0
SC5 Perennial 1894
SC6 Seasonal 29
SC7 Perennial 864
SC8 Perennial 768
SC9 Perennial 243
SC10 Perennial 95