Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20090769_Report_20070801 dt.,. STATEy, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ?FTC9N?s ?,R ? ? DEPARTIVffiNT OF TRANSPORTATION STS l e MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPP GOVERNOR SECRETARY August 1, 2007 Mr. John Hennessy NCDENR - DWQ / WETLANDS 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 SUBJECT: Bridge Group No. 59 Dear Mr. Hennessy, The Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch is completing the project development, environmental and engineering studies for the following projects: B-4456, B-4468, B-4517, B-4519, B-4553, and B-4632. These projects are included in the 2006-2012 North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program. The alternatives under consideration at this time for each of these bridge replacement projects are as follows: B-4456 Replace in place with offsite detour. B-4468 Replace in place with offsite. detour. B-4517 Replace in place with offsite detour. B-4519. • Replace in place with offsite detour. B-4553 Replace in place with offsite detour. B-4632 •. Replace in place with offsite detour. MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 919-715-1500 LOCATION: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: 919-715-1522 PARKER LINCOLN BLDG PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 2728 CAPITOL BLVD- SUITE 168 BRIDGE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT UNIT WEBSITE. WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC 27604 1551 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 y I have provided a copy of the Executive Summary of the Natural Resources Technical Report (NRTR) for each project for your use. I would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful in evaluating potential environmental impacts of these projects. Your comments will be considered in the completion of each federally funded Categorical Exclusion. These documents will be prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. It is desirable that your agency respond by September 24, 2007 so that your comments can be used in the preparation of these documents. If you have any questions concerning either of these projects, please contact me directly at (919) 715-5513. Please include the TIP Project Number in all correspondence and comments. Thank you for your consideration. Fank , wab Bri dge Project Planning Engineer Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT Replacement of Bridge No. 144 SR 1327 (Mooresboro Road) over Sandy Run Creek Cleveland County, North Carolina TIP No. B-4468 State Project No. 8.2802001 Federal Aid No. BRSTP-1327(2) Prepared for: The North Carolina Department of Transportation Raleigh, North Carolina June 2007 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B-4468 Cleveland County The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No. 144 located on North Carolina State Road 1327 (SR 1327, Mooresboro Road) over Sandy Run Creek in Cleveland County, North Carolina (Figure 1). INTRODUCTION The project study area is located at the crossing of SR 1327 over Sandy Run Creek, approximately 3 miles north of the community of Mooresboro, NC (Figure 1). The project study area has been determined to be approximately 300 feet wide (100 feet west and 200 feet east of SR 1327) and approximately 1000 feet long (centered along Bridge No. 144). The project study area encompasses approximately 8.3 acres. Two alternatives have been proposed for this project. Alternate A calls for the bridge to be replaced in place with a bridge 160 feet in length and 28 feet in width. During construction, traffic will be maintained using an off-site detour. Alternate B calls for the replacement of Bridge No. 144 in place with a temporary bridge approximately 25 feet east of the existing bridge. The new bridge will be approximately 160 feet in length and 28 feet in width. During construction, traffic will be maintained by utilizing the temporary bridge as an on-site detour. It has been determined that, due to the timber structure of Bridge No. 144, there will be no potential temporary fill associated with bridge demolition. NCDOT will coordinate with resource agencies during project planning to ensure that all concerns regarding bridge demolition are resolved. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Physiography and Soils Included within the project study area is a section of Sandy Run Creek, an unnamed tributary of Sandy Run Creek (UT1), and adjacent uplands. Elevations within the project study area range from a high of approximately 920 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) to a low of approximately 820 feet NGVD (Boiling Springs North, NC 7.5-minute quadrangle [1982]) within the stream channel. The project study area contains slopes up to 25 percent. Land use within and adjacent to the project study area consists of disturbed/maintained forest, pasture, residential lots, and roadside shoulders. The project study area is underlain by six soil units: Appling sandy loam (Typic Kanhapludults), Cecil sandy clay loam (Typic Kanhapludults), Chewacla loam (Fluvaquentic Dystrochrepts), Pacolet sandy clay loam (Typic Kanhapludults), Pacolet-Bethlehem complex (Typic Kanhapludults), and Pacolet-Shaw complex (Typic Kanhapludults). The Chewacla series is considered a non-hydric soil with hydric inclusions in Cleveland County (Gregory 2002). There are no other hydric soils within the project study area. Water Resources The project study area is located within sub-basin 03-08-04 of the Broad River Basin (NCDWQ 2003a). This area is part of USGS Hydrologic Unit 03050105 of the South Atlantic/Gulf Region. TIP No. B-4468 Page 1 Cleveland County The structure targeted for replacement spans Sandy Run Creek. The portion of Sandy Run Creek that lies within the project study area has been assigned Stream Index Number 9-46 by North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) (NCDWQ 2003a). Sandy Run Creek flows east through the project study area (Figure 2). Sandy Run Creek enters the project study area as a well-defined, third-order, perennial stream with high flow over a sand, gravel, cobble, and bedrock substrate. UT1 is an intermittent stream that flows south from a seep located in the northern portion of the project study area to a confluence with Sandy Run Creek just upstream of the bridge crossing. UT1 is approximately 1 to 6 feet wide. The banks are approximately 1 to 3 feet in height and moderately sloping. UT1 is entrenched, a likely result of stormwater runoff from adjacent pasture land. Adjacent banks consist primarily of mesic mixed forest vegetation. A Best Usage Classification of C has been assigned to Sandy Run Creek (NCDWQ 2006a) and UT1. Class C waters are suitable for aquatic life propagation and protection, agriculture, and secondary recreation. Secondary recreation includes wading, boating, and other uses not involving human body contact with waters on an organized or frequent basis. No Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), Water Supply I (WS-11), Water Supply II (WS-11) waters, or watershed Critical Areas (CA) occur within 1.0 mile of the project study area (NCDWQ 2003a). Sandy Run Creek is currently listed by NCDWQ as Fully Supporting for its designated uses. With respect to temperature regimes, Sandy Run Creek is designated as a cool water stream (USACE et al. 2003). Biotic Resources Two distinct plant communities were identified within the project study area: (1) disturbed/ maintained land and (2) mesic mixed forest. Plant communities were delineated to determine the approximate area and location of each (Figure 2). These communities are described below in order of dominance within the project study area. Table 1. Plant Communitv Coveraae Within the Proiect Studv Area Plant Community Coverage (Acres) Coverage (Percent) Disturbed/Maintained Land 5.8 70 Mesic Mixed Forest 2.5 30 Total 8.3 100 Projected permanent impacts to natural plant communities resulting from bridge replacement will occur along roadside shoulders within disturbed/maintained land and in mesic mixed forest. Both alternatives call for impacts to mesic mixed forest. Both alternatives propose permanent impacts of 0.3 acre to mesic mixed forest. Alternate B proposes additional, temporary impacts to mesic mixed forest of 0.2 acre. TIP No. B-4468 Page 2 Cleveland County Table 2. Plant Community Impacts Within Proposed Cut-Fill Limits, Including a 25-foot Rbiffar Plant Community Alternate A (acres) Alternate B (acres) Permanent Permanent Temporary Disturbed/Maintained Land 0.7 0.7 1..4 Mesic Mixed Forest 0.3 0.3 0.2 Total 1.0 1.0 1.6 It has been determined that, due to the timber structure of Bridge No. 144, there will be no potential temporary fill associated with bridge demolition. NCDOT will coordinate with resource agencies during project planning to ensure that all concerns regarding bridge demolition are resolved. JURISDICTIONAL TOPICS Surface Waters and Wetlands Sandy Run Creek exhibits characteristics of a well-defined, third-order, perennial stream with high flow over a sand, gravel, cobble, and bedrock substrate. The stream contains well-defined riffle/pool sequences within the project study area. Sandy Run Creek can be classified as riverine, upper perennial, with an unconsolidated bottom composed primarily of cobble and gravel (R3UB1) (Cowardin et al. 1979). UT1 exhibits characteristics of a second-order, intermittent stream with low flow over a gravel, cobble, boulder substrate. The stream contains well-defined riffle/pool sequences within the project study area. UT1 can be classified as riverine, intermittent stream, with a streambed composed primarily of cobble and gravel (R4SB3) (Cowardin et al. 1979). UT1 runs parallel to the road with approximately 400 feet in the project study area. No jurisdictional wetlands are located within the project study area, so the proposed project will not impact wetlands. A Section 404 verification request was made to Mr. Steve Lund of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) on March 13, 2006. On June 26, 2007, Mr. Lund indicated that a site visit had been made and that a jurisdictionai determination was forthcoming. Two alternatives have been proposed for this project. Alternate A calls for the bridge to be replaced in place with a bridge 160 feet in length and 28 feet in width. During construction, traffic will be maintained using an off-site detour. Alternate B calls for the replacement of Bridge No. 144 in place with a temporary bridge approximately 25 feet east of the existing bridge. The new bridge will be approximately 160 feet in length and 28 feet in width. During construction, traffic will be maintained by utilizing the temporary bridge as an on-site detour. Alternate A and Alternate B will generate 114 linear feet of culvert impact to UT1 (Table 3) due to approach road shoulder widening during bridge replacement. TIP No. B-4468 Page 3 Cleveland County 7?kle Q lisAcAir+innni Araac Within Alternative Cut-Fill Limits. Includina a25-foot Buffer Alternate A Alternate B Jurisdictional Area Permanent Permanent Temporary Length' Area' Length' Areal Length' Areal Sandy Run Creek - - - - 18 < 0.1 UT to Sandy Run Creek (UT1) 114 < 0.1 114 < 0.1 - - Total 114 < 0.1 114 < 0.1 18 < 0.1 ream eng s given in linear ee 2Areas are given in acres. It has been determined that due to the timber structure of Bridge No. 144, there will be no potential temporary fill associated with bridge demolition. Permits This project may be processed as a Categorical Exclusion (CE) under Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidelines. USACE has made available Nationwide Permit (NWP) 23 (67 FR 2020, 2082; January 15, 2002) for CEs due to minimal impacts to waters of the United States expected with bridge construction. The NCDWQ has made available a General 401 Water Quality Certification for NWP 23 (GC 3403). If temporary structures are necessary for construction activities, access fills, or dewatering of the site, then a NWP 33 (67 FR 2020, 2087; January 15, 2002) permit and the associated General 401 Water Quality Certification (GC 3366) will be required. In the event that NWPs 23 and 33 will not suffice, impacts attributed to bridge replacement and associated approach improvements may qualify under General Bridge Permit (GP) 031 issued by the Wilmington USACE District. NCDWQ has made available a General 401 Water Quality Certification for GP 031 (GC 3404). Notification to the Wilmington USACE District office is required if this general permit is utilized. Appropriate and practicable compensatory mitigation is required for unavoidable adverse impacts which remain after all appropriate and practicable avoidance and minimization opportunities have been implemented. In accordance with the "Memorandum of Agreement Among the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina Department of Transportation, and the United States Army Crops of Engineers, Wilmington District" (MOA), July 22, 2003, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), will be requested to,provide off-site mitigation to satisfy the federal Clean Water Act compensatory mitigation requirements for this project. Utilization of BMPs is recommended in an effort to minimize potential indirect impacts. A final determination regarding mitigation rests with the USACE and the NCDWQ. Federally Protected Species Species with the federal classification of Endangered, Threatened, or officially Proposed for such listing are protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The term "Endangered Species" is defined as "any species which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range," and the term "Threatened Species" is defined as "any species which is likely to become an Endangered TIP No. B-4468 Page 4 Cleveland County species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range" (16 U.S.C. 1532). The USFWS currently (as of June 21, 2007) lists one federally protected species with a range that extends into Cleveland County: dwarf-flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora). Dwarf- flowered heartleaf is considered a Threatened species in Cleveland County. Hexastylis naniflora (Dwarf-flowered heartleaf) BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT The NCNHP has no documentation for dwarf-flowered heartleaf within 1.0 mile of the project study area, and no dwarf-flowered heartleaf specimens were observed during the field visit. The project study area contains suitable habitat for dwarf-flowered heartleaf: bluffs and nearby slopes along Sandy Run Creek overlain by mesic mixed forest. A systematic survey for Hexastylis was conducted within the project study area on October 30, 2006 by EcoScience staff member, Mr. Dave O'Loughlin. No specimens of Hexastylis species were observed. Therefore it can be determined that dwarf-flowered heartleaf does not occur in the project study area and that this project will have No Effect on this species. CONCLUSIONS Two alternatives have been proposed for this project. Alternate A calls for the bridge to be replaced in place with a bridge 160 feet in length and 28 feet in width. During construction, traffic will be maintained using an off-site detour. Alternate B calls for the replacement of Bridge No. 144 in place with a temporary bridge approximately 25 feet east of the existing bridge. The new bridge will be approximately 160 feet in length and 28 feet in width. During construction, traffic will be maintained by utilizing the temporary bridge as an on-site detour. It has been determined that due to the timber structure of Bridge No. 144, there will be no potential temporary fill associated with bridge demolition. Alternate. A and Alternate B will generate 114 linear feet of culvert impact to UT1 (Table 3) due to approach road shoulder widening during bridge replacement. Included within the project study area is a section of Sandy Run Creek, a section of UT1, and adjacent uplands. No jurisdictional wetlands are located within the project study area, so the proposed project will not impact wetlands. A Best Usage Classification of C has been assigned to Sandy Run Creek (NCDWQ 2003a) and UT1. Class C waters are suitable for aquatic life propagation and protection, agriculture, and secondary recreation. Secondary recreation includes wading, boating, and other uses not involving human body contact with waters on an organized or frequent basis. No Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), Water Supply I (WS-1), Water Supply II (WS-II) waters, or watershed Critical Areas (CA) occur within 1.0 mile of the project study area (NCDWQ 2003a). Sandy Run Creek is currently listed by NCDWQ as Fully Supporting for its designated uses. With respect to temperature regimes, Sandy Run Creek is designated as a cool water stream (USACE et al. 2003). The USFWS currently (as of June 21, 2007) lists one federally protected species with a range that extends into Cleveland County (Table 3): dwarf-flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora). TIP No. B-4468 Page 5 Cleveland County Dwarf-flowered heartleaf is considered a Threatened species in Cleveland County. A systematic survey for Hexastylis was conducted within the project study area on October 30, 2006 by EcoScience staff member, Mr. Dave O'Loughlin. No specimens of Hexastylis species were observed. Therefore it can be determined that dwarf-flowered heartleaf does not occur in the project study area and that this project will have No Effect on this species. TIP No. B-4468 Page 6 Cleveland County % r 4 ? 1 ? . 1 -I i ? II Cem 1331 113. Trailer Park f- ..,._-? Bobbins _fxm \? / t / 11333 ' S \ % i ?c l % 0 2000 4000 6000 SCALE IN FEET est tyJ Cliffs ' de D, - ql rig Client: Project: Dwn By' Ch° By: JDG MDT FIGURE LOCATION MAP D°r<- FEB 2006 Replacement of Bridge No. 144 (B-4468) NC 1327 Over Sandy Run Creek r'-2000' ESC G.°jec: N°.: CLEVELAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 05-262 J- UT to Sandy Run Creek i LSanc ?`. 7 'Ern 4 '-t. ` 4 r Y ? rt c 4 ? ?? ? i?1 ? ?. q R J yK TTT 1 I, V, 200 0 200 400 Feet; LEGEND Project Study Area ESC Delineation N Stream Disturbed/Maintained Mesic-Mixed Forest - Dwn By. Ckd By. ae MDT APS FIGURE 7 PLANT COMMUNITIES AND LAND USE Date: Replacement of Bridge No. 144(B-4468) Scale: OCT 2006 NC 1327 Over Sandy Run Creek AS SHOW N ESCProje O rQ CLEVELAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 05-2 05-262.02