20041109 Ver 1_Memorandum of Understanding_20040701

...a~
d~~o
~ ~s
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPAR'I~-~NT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
August 2, 2004
Division of Coastal Management
Hestron Plaza II
151-B NC Highway 24
Morehead City, NC 28557
ATTENTION:
Dear Mr. Arrington:
Cc:
W/ attatchement
Ms. Cathy Brittingham, NCDCM
Mr. David Timpy; USACE, Wilmington
Mr. John Hennessy, DWQ, Raleigh
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Mike Street, NCDMF
Mr. Mason Herndon, DEO
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
p 41 /09
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
~IETLANDS / 401 GRQUF
AUG 1 3 2004
~vAT~H QUALITY Sl~Crit~N
SUBJECT: Application for CAMA Major Development Permit for the
proposed replacement of Bridge No. 10 over Bradley Creek on SR
1411 in New Hanover County, Division 3. Federal Aid No. BRSTP-
1411(5), State Project No. 8.2251101; TIP No. B-3496.
Please find enclosed the requested wetland mitigation plan for B-3496. If you have any
questions please call me at 715-1488.
Sincerely,
Brett M. Feulner.
Environmental Biologist, PDEA
Mr. Bill Arrington
District Manager
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
w/o attatchment
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP
Mr:-Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. H. Allen Pope, P.E., Div. 3 Engineer
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
2728 CAPROL BOULEVARD
PARKER LINCOLN BUILDING, SUITE 168
RALEIGH NC 27699

t
Bradley Creek Mitigation Plan
Bridge No. 10 on Wrightsville Avenue (SR 1411)
New Hanover County
TIP B-3496
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-1411(5)
State Project No. 8.2251101
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Office of Natural Environment
August 2004

1.0 Introduction
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposed to replace Bridge
No. 10 over the Bradley Creek on Wrightsville Avenue (SR 1411) in New Hanover
County (Figure 1). The existing 40 foot long bridge will be replaced with a 200-foot long
bridge and will facilitate the removal 160 feet of existing causeway. The existing
causeway will be graded back to the original elevation of the adjacent wetland.
1.1 Wetland Resources
Within the project area, a coastal tidal marsh, Cowardin Classification Estuarine-
Intertidal-Emergent-Persistent, is adjacent to the causeway and Bradley Creek in all four
quadrants. Existing marsh vegetation primarily consist of salt marsh cordgrass (Spartina
alterniflora), and black needle rush (Juncus roemerianus).
1.2 Summary of Mitigation
Wetland restoration associated with B-3496 will be accomplished by removal of 0.19
acres of the existing causeway and vegetating with species matching the target wetland
community and the resulting enhancement on 0.74 acres of adjacent wetlands (Figure 2).
Proposed impacts due to the replacement of Bridge No. 10 are 0.04 acres, below the
threshold for mitigation. Therefore, the entire 0.19 acres of restoration and 0.74 acres of
enhancement will be available for future projects in the Cape Fear River Basin (HUC
03030001).
2.0 B-3496 Onsite Mitigation
The purpose of this report is to document the existing site conditions at the location of the
proposed replacement of Bridge No. 10, to describe the wetland restoration and
enhancement, and to establish the monitoring for the onsite restoration site. This plan
includes on-site wetland restoration and enhancement associated with the planned
removal of the bridge causeway.
2.1 Site Description
The total project area for the bridge replacement is approximately 1.51 acres. The
approximate elevation in the project area ranges from 5-10 feet above mean sea level.
Soils located in the project area are of the Kenansville-Craven-Lakeland and Tidal
Marsh-Newhan associations. The Kenansville-Craven-Lakeland association consists of
nearly level to gently sloping soils on uplands. Soils of the Tidal-Marsh-Newhan
association consist of nearly level soils in flat or slightly depressional areas on rims of
depressions and on broad smooth flats. Tidal-Marsh-Newhan is the dominant soil in the
study area.
2.2 Methodology
The goal of the mitigation plan is to establish a wetland community classified as Coastal
Tidal Marsh. The proposed replacement of Bridge No. 10 will provide 0.19 acres of
wetland restoration by the removal of the existing bridge causeway to the elevation of the
adjacent marsh.

Fill material will be graded down to the elevation of the adjacent jurisdictional wetlands.
Exact elevations will be determined during the construction by matching grades at cross
sections of the marsh. If the depth of excavation of the existing roadway surface layers
fall below the adjacent wetland elevation and excess waste soil is not available onsite,
clean sand will be added to bring the restored area to the correct elevation. The area will
be disked as necessary to reduce compaction. Soil amendments maybe added if needed.
Marsh vegetation (See Figure 3) consisting of saltmeadow cordgrass (Table 1) will be
planted on random spacing averaging 3 foot on center.
Table 1: Species mix for B-3496 marsh restoration
S ecies Pro ortion
Salt marsh cord ass (S artina alterniflora) 100%
The removal of the old causeway is expected to enhance the natural hydrologic cycle for
the surrounding wetlands. Water will be able to flow unimpeded beneath the new
structure, allowing natural wetland hydrology to improve.
2.3 Monitoring
NCDOT will photo monitor the site once a year for a period of three years following
completion of the project. The NCDOT will meet on site with the regulatory agencies
after the third year to closeout the project. The elevation of the mitigation site will be
verified during construction of the project to ensure that the elevation matches the
adjacent salt marsh. No hydrologic monitoring is proposed.
2.4 Mitigation Credit Ratios
The following table outlines the onsite mitigation from the proposed replacement of
Bridge No. 10. NCDOT proposes to use the surplus mitigation for the impacts from
projects in the Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 03030001). Each projects debit will be
submitted for approval from the regulatory agencies.
Table 2: B-3496 Onsite Mitigation Debit Ledger marsh restoration
Miti ation T e Acrea e
Coastal Plan Marsh Restoration 0.19
Coastal Plain March Enhancement 0.74
2.5 Final Dispensation of the Property
NCDOT will retain ownership of the restoration located within the proposed 80-foot right
of way. The NCDOT does not propose to place the areas of enhancement in a
conservation easement because New Hanover County considers the area in question as
submerged property and due to presence of such high quality coastal marsh wetlands.

€i
~ ~
m
~ai P ~ ~
~~' ~ H ~
F ~
t ~ z
e a z
e U ' Z "'
t O ~ b m 'k ~c
~ ~ V ~o
F
~~ ~ ~ a
~ ~~ ~ x
~ ~ ~ ~
d F
~ ~ ~
CS
o ~~ ~
~~ ~~
o ~
0
,~ ~~.
o~ ~~
~ a
0
A ~~ ~; ~~
•
Q ~ _°~ ~ ~
is. !4 l~tj ~~I ~~'s...
i- - ~~ ~ ~
L

wEt~f~osi401 cf7~~P
~~ ~~° ANN 0 7 2004
~ - wAtER QU
~~•Qa .:~• '~T1'SECtfON
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTZVIEENT' OF T~tANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office .
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTENTION: Mr. David Timpy
NCDOT Coordinator
Deaz Sir:
Subject: Supplement to the Nationwide 23 Permit Application for the Replacement
of Bridge No. 10 over Bradley Creek on SR 1411, New Hanover County.
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1141(5), State Project No. 8.2251101, TIP
Project No. B-3496.
On March 19, 2004 the NCDOT submitted an application for a Nationwide 23 and 33
permit for the replacement of Bridge No. 10 over Bradley Creek on SR 1411 in New
Hanover County. There were errors in that application and design changes have occurred
since the application was submitted that affects the impacts to jurisdictional resources.
Please find enclosed revised permit drawings and revised '/z size plan sheets
Impacts due to the construction of the proposed project have decreased since the permit
application was submitted. The NCDOT has eliminated the use of 0.12 acres of
mechanized clearing in wetlands and the replacement of the preformed scour holes in
wetlands with rip-rap pads at pipe outlets. Construction of the proposed project will
result in'0.04 acre of fill in wetland, and 48 feet of impacts to Bradley Creek. Bridge No.
10 will be replaced with a four span structure, using top down construction. Driven piles
will be used to support the new bridge.
BRIDGE DEMOLITION
May 21, 2004
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
The original permit application incorrectly stated that there is potential for components of
the deck and interior bents to be dropped into waters of the United States, resulting in a
temporary fill of approximately 13 cubic yards. The NCDOT has committed to removing
the existing bridge over Bradley Creek and the adjacent concrete utility structure in
accordance with NCDOT's Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and
removal. No temporary fill will be placed in Bradley Creek as a result of removing the
existing bridge and utility structure. Top down construction will be used to construct the
new bridge. According to the BMP guidelines this project is classified under the "Case 2"
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1 S48 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBS/TE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC

category., which allows no work at all in the .water between February 15 to June 30 to
protect anadromous fish spawning.
Temporary Causeways
The original permit application incorrectly stated that a temporary causeway would be
required for the construction of the new bridge. No temporary causeway will be required
for this project.
Mitigation
Project impacts will be less than the 0.1 acre threshold, therefore no mitigation is proposed.
However the removal of the old causeway will result in the restoration of 0.19 acres of
coastal plain tidal marsh wetlands. The removal of the causeway in 143 feet of tidal marsh
wetlands will result ui the enhancement of .74 acres of wetlands adjacent to the old
causeway. This enhancement area was calculated by determining the area of a '/ circle
with a radius of 143 feet, based on the length of causeway removed, on both sides of the
bridge. Sheet 5 of 7 of the permit drawings shows the enhancement area. The NCDOT
request that this mitigation be available for future NCDOT projects, with the understanding
that each future project will require agency approval for the use of this mitigation.
Regulatory Approvals
The original permit application requested a Nationwide 23 and 33 permit. A Nationwide
33 permit will not be required because no causeway will be required. This project is
being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in
accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(6). Therefore, we do not anticipate requesting an
individual permit but propose to proceed under a Nationwide 23 in accordance with 67
FR 2020, 2082, Jan 15, 2002. We anticipate a 401 General Certification number 3361
will apply to this project. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0501(a) we are providing
two copies of this application to the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, for their records.
In a separate application, NCDOT is requesting a Coastal Area Management Act Major
Development Permit for this project from the NC Division of Coastal Management.:
Copies of this. application as well as the CAMA application will be posted on our website
at the following address: (http://www.ncdot.org/planning/pe/naturalunit/Permit.html).

,~
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the DOT website at:
~://www.ncdot.org[planning/pe/naturalunit/permit.html.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Brett Feulner at
[phone].
Sincerely,
,, , t~-=-
_` Grego .Thorpe, Ph.D. Environmental Management Director,
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
w/ attachment
Mr. John Hennessy, DWQ(2 copies)
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Ms. Cathy Brittingham, NCDCM
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Omaz Sultan, Programming and TIP
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmingto
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Ms. Karen Taylor, P.E., PDEA
Mr. Bill Arrington, NCDCM
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Allen Pope, Division 3 Engineer
Mr. Mason Herndon, DEO, Division 3
Mr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
n (Cover Letter Only)

~~
y 4
;~ ~, ~
'l °s3~
~ 4 ~a ,
~ ~
~=
Q,
4 SITE ~•~°
0
Q~ '
~ ~
~~ ~
~ ~, ~ ` ow
~`:' A~ ~ o
/ ty~~ J-~~e ~ o

MA~~~
q, o
''~°
C~~
r ~
jf
~~ ~
a,. q,~ ~s U
'os ~ ,~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
--
~~~®°]~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT:82251101 <B-3~%> '
BRIDGE NO.10 OVER BRADLEY
CREES ON SR 111
IN WILMINGTON
SHEET ~ OF __~ 07,E Ol l~ O:,
.~ NORTH C4ROLINA

1'V' ~L.s~.lL.e~~~ ~~`tJi ~~~
L
E
e
a
E
„z,
oo~.
-WLB- WETLAND BOUNDARY
L
WETLAND
rl L..
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
~Ll~ DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
® FILL IN SURFACE
WATER
• _ _ DENOTES MECHANIZED
• _ _' _ _ = CLEARING
~ FLOW DIRECTION
T~_ TOP OF BANK
WE EDGE OF WATER
-- ~ - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
- --E - PROP: LIMIT OF FILL
~- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
--NG-- NATURAL GROUND.
- P~ - PROPERTY .LINE
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-PDE PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-EAB-- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL. BOUNDARY.
-EPB.- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
----•~---- WATER SURFACE
XX XXX X z LIVE STAKES
BOULDER
CORE FIBER ROLLS
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
12'-48'
PIPES
(DASHED LINES DENOTE 54' PIPES
EXISTNG STRUCTURES) & ABOVE
SINGLE TREE
- .. .. . - ~ WOODS LINE
_^~--- -
DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD

RIP RAP
ADJACENT PROPERTY
5 OWNER OR PARCEL
NUMBER (IF AVAILABLE)
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE

LEVEL SPREADER ILS)
DITCH /
GRASS SWALE
~~~®
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT:8.225ll01 (B-3~d96)
BRIDGE NO.10 OVER BRADLEY
CREEg ON SR 1~t11
IN WILMINGTON
SHEET ~, OF ~ 07 % Ol ~~ 03

~~~~1Ls~ 1L ~ ®~'~Y ~~~~
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
IDARCEL NO.
NAMES
ADDRESSES
I10 Hooker Rd.
3 Carol Ann Russell Wilmington, NC 28403
James A and 1601 Southwind Way
q Holly A Hug Wilmington, NC 28403
N~~®~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT:8.2251101 <B-3~%)
BRIDGE NO.10 OVER BRADLEY
CREEg ON SR 1~Ill
IN WILMINGTON
SKEET ~ OF , 07 / Ol ®03

i
~ ~ -
1 ~~ ro
~:
jd-o~~Lts E349F,~rn '
;, ~~ ~.,. i, i
l__----._.. _ - ___..
~i
h
r~. i
b to yJpY~
~~ 8`f'~ ~~ ~ ~~~~
~~~~Qo~~~o~~
ii o
~~~~a~~~~~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i
N ~ N 2
` ~ ~ N
yr
D
_~
Z
Q~
0
O
m
0
N
-1
D
_~
O
Z
O
m
in
O
r
(/1 N
-i -~
D D
o~
+ +
cn yr
p o
~ ~
~ O
+ cn
~,, +
~ N
Cl7
_'. ~
r.i ~
i
~r
++
,O~
~A
c~ ~'
y~
I
rn v
~ ~
~~
~_~
~~
rnN
Hm
rn
~~
;~
i
N
' x ". 1
x x !a• COac, 1
II
x I
~~
:

~~ ~ a
~~ ~x :~
~ ~ -~
~
..
X
V
x
auwn urrxxr x
x
~~ ~~ STIf7W/nD Np rp
~`
• ~~ -~ ~ f3~
pmm
n m
°zSm K z
m z z, s
Z -1 ~ H
A S O / A
c s r i
ti
,p N O
K ~ N
- ~ ~
i D
r
c z F` D
~ K
_ 4
m m
A v
r
~
m
o ? Z z /

z N ~ f
pis
ti
y
O
~ I 0
m
__ y m
I ~ m D
a , ~ r
~~

~
n
. o0
z
n s
Z A
m
~ ~
~~
~S
~

N
~
r _m
o ~~
y ~ ~ + ~
o nD
C
--+r

i~ 0
m ~ ~
oh o^ -~
~ h
7 ~-~ ~
0
u
o ing-Ti
'*I D A ~
-F m 7 ~
„' Qy~
rd ururr rayr[rr ~~ ~..y~~
x ` &1KY~
~~ ~
~~
~• \ \
\~~
~~~
~~
g Y ~ ['~, 1
Q R~ ~~
Q
. ~$~
y7 nmi
'~
4~
/ ~ '~ ~
~' ~
a~ .~ .
m" lio ~$ S
nD~
OWN
~~~ g
m
Nan cm rn ~ x
~r ~o z n O a
O D"i {6 ~
C mN lvmi m
i1i~ T r h1 ~ ,~
p~ -D-1r Or R1 ~ x ~
-i m ~ am ~
~-
rn z $..
r po g~
N~ ~
n0
~7.,.~
o Z
N cm H ~ ~ ~~~~ .
Z '~ ~
~~ ~ ~ x
r ~i ~ ~
r vmi $ .a a ~
Z ~ 'o ~ ~
-i
'
< m
v
m
o
c ~
o
i m ~
~

~I _
z p
°+ n fT'1
i~~
°mD
oar
~ m~v
n a m
~ ~
I
s m g ~'
m 30 ~" ~
Da _ ~
o ~ ~ I
~ ~r
1
~ ~
8 i
~~
~.
~~ ,- ~
~~
Y /
~$ +~.~~ 7

.~ 4
7:.2 na
~~ b~ b~
~
x. 8R ~R ~
~
x
+a
~ 'J ~
~~; ~, i as
,~ _._ P~NfB Mp ~~
~ Q 7 ~PPoVaE ~ ~
O
~,

(

O
R __ O
~ ~' = --tea
1 ~ ~ ~a ~ '"
o n
t r y
!4 ~rma<<~ ~
rA
a
1~
J

O I ~
N cb
~ rn~-I~`OD~
~ ~, ~ 1~
S
~~ ~''}
l x
Q
V n ~~~'(y~~7°
~~~jW 2S~*'
~
rl
RF ~ ~
~D ^'~ ,
~t
i ~
~
~ ~ ~
~ i
~,
~---
..,wr asr
i
a
M

~-i~ *~~
1
1 ~
I .~
~~ . ~ ~
i 1'
1
~' ~
~ Ia~
A
I n~ia~roDv
p"`""'~
~~~~~~~~
~~~
~ ti
..

y
N
O
O
. c'b
y
--i
0
"'~
0
m
Z°
v
m
Q
.f., ~~ ~
~~
N
~ wsrm~.mrnoti^°.~
' 1
° . !~~
~$
b'i
aR
:~
~~ , ~.
~o
SffiS
a, " O
w
Y
~ ~ ~~
~~
R
~~ °a
~$~~'
~t ~
Y G- A
!cam

~~
~ ~
A~~

i i ~:
~ ~ .
,~ ~~~~~~~~90~ io
,~
"'"-
~~
C
is
~ h
~ ~~~
~~B~~M ~~~.I~rng
~~~o~~o~~~~~
I'',~~~~~9f p
lfi~~go~~~o~~
O
~N~ ~~ Q~~H „ o
~~~„ ~-T ~~~ ~
~ ~~
D
--I
O
Z
61
f
0
-i
O
6~
O
r
N
--I
D
-i
O
Z
0'T
t
O
O
O
m
U,
O
r
cn cn
-i -~
D D
O ~
++
rJ. ~n
O O
--1 -I
00
~'
~ fV
I
rv r
~r
+ +
O~
z°
~~
ti ~
1
rn~
~ ~
~~
~~
rn~
nI~
N
m
~x
`^ m
~y
~~
Z
N
x
x x zr c"`°"• ~ 1
x ~I
~~', ~
$ ~8 .~.~'
~~ ~yy 4
~~ ~ ~p ~'
-~ N ~
/ ~ ~ X~
~. ..~~
x ..
aulNn cuo[vr X
x x ~ ~~
~ _.-- ~ ~- sa~nuvo wawa r5av~aB F ~ ~ ^ ~ ~
~/ U,IUIT fSYr~
a m A
~ O D m
~_
Z ~ m s
n m Z 2. y
g Z --~ .
A ~ N / S
O a O C
rO ~ o
K F N
~ v ~
~ rn
_ 9 -,~
s D
r
z i C m D
K
u 2
m A v
O 2 '~ F
N O D < ~
r
~
m
n m z
~ ;
_
N
Z

~
s4 /
o `
v
< I
~
,~ rn
=r ~ m ---I
_[ >
z ~ o : D
r

/°
n a Z ~

Z A
o a
r co
~ ~
~
/ /

~~.;V Z C"7 Q
°~m
o ~~ -1
o nD
C -
-+r

w 0
m°-n
p
O --1
~ h
h n
S
7 m^
O
..
T
o Inv
o +o
m7~
a mart f'~rExr Rs>\ `~_~, _s.
x ` ,ter
'~C ~~
~~ ~ ~ ~ '..
~-
4
~~
g Y ~ .A
4 R~
-~ ~ ~ ~
~'
w $
~I~
R
//` ~~.
1~~
moo
~D~ a
-a
O.nN
rn
cnOn tnm c N m
~D Ap Z n
i
On ~m mm W
C mv' -~vI m
+ ~ L .+ 2.m+ ~ A ~ A,f
0~ ~ .prr Or ~ O x
-I m r ~'~ y
~~
f-= Z Z ~rn ~ ~ _~
'~ Ao 8~
N~ 07 ~ pppp
n~ ~ ~ ~RQL
0
o'~ i --3
vi p m as
z a•
~O o x
r1 bm
rm y
'~ 1'1 O
Zm o n ~ ~
ti
~ m
o ~
o -p
~ o
°i ~
D
to

~~ _
~
Z Q
° n I T1
~~
n
r- o
m A
~ ~Wr
II ~ m~v
~~
D ~ ~
fTl
~ ~
= 3 n ~ >< 8
mp
~~ ~ r
a
o * ~
~ ~~
~ ~
~ ~
8 a'
~ ~ ~
a ~
0
ti~
pQ bd~ ~~
/ g~ t~p~a`{~ b.
e. s.,er, /
~~ ~~~
QQ ~ ,~ 7
~~ I ~g
„~ „~ ~ y
X4 a~
1vj ~ ~
! ~R
y0
OO ~ ~
d
'~1
x O
~a
S
~ ~.
O
\
L
f
0
dRlGt 4
.WP
~
• „b
t~a O
•V
l
~yry!
ER
rr
~~
/
W ~ MA' f PRNQE / y~
ti.1 ~y
v
`~
~
~^ -.a
Q
/ O
~

. ~a f3 /
y

r IYrpE~ $ ~_
p
~ ~ v !a~
3 Q
'
a
~
$ ,~ 2
A~
~F - $ ~
~/` 1t
$ i
~ ~1~
~ s.
~r-~ ~mz.r ~I
W,on, i.snlnrx,el,...

!~~ €~
~ q
9
~ ~
t k ..

~~~ ~~
~~ W
R~ '~ O
rr~~>
40
g W !~J
~ O IAWV"
N
~ ~~ ~
. O
. -I
~ ~ ~
Q
.:f
b
Q
i Q
i ~
I' ~ ~
I rn~~~oDv
~~~~~~
.. ~~~~g^~~ r
1
N y
v~
~~ ~_
~~~ ~d
..~ ~ o
~~~ a
~ ~t
Y~ ~_ p
2
c~.~
s
--1
Z
N
-~
0
m
Z
~1
m
v^~\
Y'
m
N
m x-+~oD ~
1 ~ ~ ~ ~
~~='vI~`'l° r
fmT1~C.ic~,l~fww r
~~ ~~w
y

m~
~~~
~ ~
A

~'~i
' r8:t6
.. .'~y_~o~~i ,,,,t3a 9c.pr1
_i.
~ .
5. ~~, a9

i~tt -i

r
_
-%
~
N ::::::::::.:::.:.: :::....:..
' .....: ... :....:.. ..........
~' ~~i~ ~
~ ~: Q ~ :::iii:::::
....
n,•m Pi
' ~'
~f€
b
:Ab
~EEi:
~'~i: E .
1
°
'i
°
~b
~
~
~~
` ~
~~E:E:
t_ _ 2~E
?EE
~iif: p
.x
2
p: 5
::
Z -0:{~ cii~ii'
...
fl1
~ ~ -' - - - C
~GS~ :
::: ,{5ii:
`
:CiiE
iE:E :..........:.
am:
'
'~
h ~
...
r~C~
~
1
.:::
1
m
..

i~ :~~~, :.:::::::::a::::::::::::~ii

~:
- C
~~
i.:
' . i
eiii;uri€iirirar~€ o
~ ~

^
~
~
~ .:::
.
u
b0
b?bi~iE~
o: y~
T ~:...

;~~
.
.......
.......
.. .
.......

...........

....

...

......

....

...

....

..... ..[ In E::
~:~
' .
x
~
'~ ~::
~`~- ~
~
_
.
..
*
'- .
cn R
'
:::
~

~} ~:::
? 'u wE:

;
r
. -
--
o~
_
~~

~.

r::
$

V

',+
T

;-;-,t ,
:art
.. ,
; .
} ..
;
:
_ ..

;t om .

~_ .~
;-~

- ~ ~::
- - ~N
~~:.:::
_ N
C ~O~e
11
1 _ - :15!1.:;;,
'
E'~ V
.. rnl;
~

~ - -_- - - - :ii:
i~
;~~ :it:::i6Ei
2iiii'
~
t _ `::::
A:~
'
.
. is
fig::::

~::::::
~::::::
b
.::::::

t'
i~iii~€i
T

1'.
r7

:1
~:. _ N
N.
'i~~~iii ~:
i~
r
ii`
i
!i` :~
i ::
iiii
-F-t .
.
l :
:~

`:: :E
1 '
::
.::::
'::
i- i.:: :: ~ ::::
_ i,i:a
ii! iii~iiii
~ :
~ i iE iiiii N
T ~ ¢ i
::
fl :p W
~ ~ ~
::z:: :i:`:
S ~ ~~ 'i
7-+ ~
.. ...
' ~ ttl:
4f :
m~i
- ~ ~ .
:E
.. :
.~
:::
~ ~ ~ :
::
~
s ~ a ~ ~ i;:

:::ni i~iii
;: ~ u :
;::~:: :x
p :::: N

%:
~. x
'~
i - ~ w
_

} r

' ~
:~.
~ ~
~
In
I. .. 7
is
;~: z z
~ „
~~
~~ ~
~ ~ N ~'
~ ~
~~:
}
- ~ ''rG
Z
+ ~ '~~.
3
t iS7
~
t
" ~ 7
{~
~14 ~ ~,'
,
~
' €
?CnE T z
0

z ~
~ ~o
m E ~
t0 .~ ~
N .;'
~

° _
~ , N
~O ~
N
v E,y
O
~
z~o ~
d-
v
„
O~ F
a .Q z "'
~3 aaa
~

.
~~ °O v dz o
~ Up
~ N m ~
m~ v fx
,~
x w
a W~ ~ ~
~~
~ ON
w o WO ~U ~
.~ ~ °

Q w
a~ Z
a
w a
~
fA ~ C U
C O
° ~ ~
l6
-°'~- Z

~ W ~ N
v O °
Z
LL ...

r
~
Q -~ =_
N ~ -
C ~~ O U
L ~ L l0 O
N U
v
F- ~
~
U
a
lA y
~_ c
O
`-°

~

rn
~ U u.
~
~ ~ ~ c.

~ p
W
a Z
g o 9

o

Z
w ~
~a~m
~.
.
°
~ ~ ~~
E- -
w
~
N
C ~ U O O
N
N "'
LL
p O
>
N
a
~ m`
a~ o_
~ ~ .n
m
U ~ ~
N
~ ~ N
O
U
0
0
N
J
O
O
O ~

N
N
~
~

.y O N
O
m
~ ~ p ¢
o
(O
LL
J
~ 0
r
Z O

. ~ •
CONTRACT: C200889 TIP PROTECT: B 3496
o o
',~ ~ o ~ ~ ~
o
°~ °
~ ~
= A
~
N ~ y
o 0

V
o g s
• v v
~ ~' b
~
v c c
~ < ~ c ~ ~ ~

n n n n u n x
~ o ~ c c~

~~ ~~~~ a
_ .
~
z i
~ ~ i
o 0
o .
o
.~
~ ~
o ~~° `O
m ~ ~ ~!
m ~ y
A
a
A
.~ a ~
a
n
000
~o~
~ W A
N ~

~~
~ r
ob
N ~ -+ pr
K

A~ 0 ~
~ ~ ~.
'°O ;,
.e~, ~
b
~
O ~
~o ~

~
> .; 8
'' O ~,
A Q ~`~
p
m °
~~
~~
~~
~a
~i
H
a-
~~
~~
~~
~~
P ~ ~ ~ //
/ i
S
y ~
W O
~ "~-~,
p
,~ O
O
o ~~
y~
~~
~~ ~~ o
1~ 0
~~ ~ O
~y O
~b ~~
.~ ~
~ y~
r~ x ~ O
~ ~ ~'
n n
r~

(~
~~
~~
Cb a
00
~~
o~
~~
~x
~'
o~
S~

b
r~
®®
~~
®~
~~
~ ~
~~
~J

~
'ta
~
i~ ~

-' ~
~
i
q
~ ~n° ~ . w
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
J ~
V ~
~ ~
P N

~ ~
~
m Fwd 'a~
~Z

~~

0'-MAY-~OQ4 r1~7~ 0 t\h3496.tsh
1~PW AT ~ 71 4~i9
N N x ~ ~I N N N ~ 'll N
v. ° ~ ~ o ~ m .° ~
~ o'~ 3
m~ C
3
~, p 'a, o
aa,
Q ~ Q
°
~ a,
~°
CC
C` O y Q M s y ~ O
~
o c
K C'

~
O
0 3 C,
`
O (~
~ Q
v rt
a
Q ~
c ~'
~ ~
I~
~ O
V
J
y
~ -'e ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~°
n 3
0 3 3 0>> o m c m m~ o
rt rt
~ ~ ~ rt ~
7 ^
O A ~ ~ ~ ~ O ? ~ ~ r ~ ~' ~J
Si ~ ~ 74 1~
m 7 ~ C~ p !!° o 0 1~
p 4 M o o; s~ s~ p~ 0
o
~ ~ 3 0 -~v ~..~o
7 ~~- '~ O O
0 0 ; ~ ~ ~
0
3
7~
O
O
n I~ I ~ I a ~ " ~ I '~
I I
D ~ I r I~
~ I ~Fi I ~ ~ ' ~ m rQi in t' ~ n ;Dp1
,--~ I I ~ ~ l y I I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I
- I i I ~ I
H c -i p~-, ~ Q c o 0 o m O~ p~ 0 0 7~ ~ ~ ~ o `~' Q' c = o m ~ ~c', ~ Q' ~ Q' St',
o ~' <, -+ ~ o~~~ o v ~ o a rt~ v o a - a o~
o~ m° .* o N Q o 0 o e~ c o Q m 9. ~ 3~ o o~~ o
N O O n D ~ O ~ o ~ ' N O O T S 3 ~ ~ ~ O .-. C S 3' W O
n r; ' ~ ~, `` O A ~ Q q p p O_ p O C S Q~ a a O O y ~o
0..7 ~ [1 C rt Q ~~ ~ p o ~ o rt fP ~ Q o O. o 0 0 70 O O
~o o. o ~ z " ~ o ~ c ° T ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ m
O D O C O s ~_ OS S W ~ O m O
Sp O K 3 a o O O
p N O
0
~p ~ ~ X
m O
~a
®O~~QOomO®oo®I~peQQ®CCappp~~~}o-•
r
o~ 3 ° o a o~ o o~ n° o c
rt
~ rt '~ ~ o
`` ~ a ~ ~
rn rn~ m 7 ~ ~ ~[ ~ 7 ~~ ~ p .0 r 7
3 3 ~` fC 3 z; n fi r; , ~ 3 0 0
0 0 ~ °. ~ ~ 3 ° -o m 'o ~ o
>> 0 3 3 3 c
o~ 3 ~- u 3° ~ o
a ~Wg ~. a b
O_
~ ~ C 3
~ 3 c a ~!
00 0 ~. ~ ~
c o ~
3 C
O_ ~
O Q_
~n W
N V
I i I gl I
I
m m t t ~ O W ~ ~~
m W ~ ~ ~ I I
I I I ~ I
I I I I ~ +
H
~ v -~ _ ;
Q
Q
e
S 3.
m
o
~ c
S
a
m
~ o
~_
<
o
~ Q.
Re

~
Q. O
~
V' N
~ O

yC
'~1
I Y if
I ~

I
0 I
~ ~
li z

I ~ ~ II
,~

rn 0
mm 70 0
qq C O

~ p 7o O

o ~ ~

o

~ ~ ~

~ m ~ N

O Q ~
fl.
3 ~ N
m ~
O M
m
O ~ ~
m n
O a
m a
~
~ ~
~ ~
O a
m n ~
O ~; a
m n
O
~. c ~
~ ~ ° a ° a O
3 °
° a
Q ~ ~ ° a~.
O ° Q_
a ° pap ~ ° ~
O ~. ~ d O Q ~ A O. O . ~ 0 ~ O. ~ 10.
O ~ ~ p
Fi O 3~ ~ O ~ O O ~ ~ ~ a ~ 7 ` O
O ~
C
~
~
~ to
~ _
o O
O ~ ~ r 3
o ° ~ ~ r
p
m
~'
~:

~
~ a
°
A m
~
~- A
3
p r
~

a >
o >
°
_ ~

N N
0 L-
3

o p
0
O [7 O D S "~ O ~ n~
c in to
C ~
o ~ H
°~ Q,
~ g
a m °
o [~ °~ ° C !" „ c C
m N ~ O. Vi ~ `-~ ~ o m

C. m ~% N v '. p

m C

O
I
I I
I
i I
~
G I
N I
I
1~1 y
~ e I
° i
O ~
O i
i ~~ i
i ~ i
-1 ~ i
I
V ~ ~n
I
to i
Iy ~
" ~ N
I N
I ~
N ~`
i
~ K ~
I I ~
~ A
I ~ I ~ I I ~ I ~n
i N
~ ~ I
N 7o f/f 4 Q `` 2 to N r -~ T n 'i1 ~ 'O G) ~ A A=
~ D p ~ ` A ~ 7 m O O C o ~ 3. C ~ C S fl
~ Vl d ~ S O m m m ~ ~ ~ ~ X ~ ~ ~ ~ a' ~ Q a
S~ O p O Q
~ a o A tP = ~ O. a. C o ~c Q- ~ i t0 N o
C ~ ~- O_ ~ S' C rt ~ O ` ~ '. C C
G~ m 2 ~ m ~ o ~ ,°-r ~ ~ ~' ~'
O ~ ~ O ~ 70 ~ O
p C S ~ N O
a o C ~ °-
~ O O C
o
o
~ ~
I ~ ~ I I I ~ ~
I I I I ~
6 p ~ I I I
Q ~ I=I ~ I II ~ o
~ n fi, I it ( I
p ~ ~ I I I I ~ I
~ III I II I
g
0
0
-o ~ -moo ~
~ ~o ~ o ~ A'o -~v -~v
N~ o 0 0 ~r
0 -o
3 'moo A
0~ ~
p
~~c o c
" c n~8°S
~ o c o f °~ Q
-r N ~ O
D
O ~ p O ~ D
' o O
~~`o ~ ~ <
O IP
~ 'fl
IC ~

C O C C ~
-
a, 71 ~~ 3
;
~
~
Q
C
p
~ V

~
s0,
o ~
~ a ~ ~
a__a_ o33s ~ ,~ ~ ~
O O

3.'
O,

b
~
'

3 ~ m' 0 4 c^ s o 0
o = er g a3 ~T- o ~ ~ ~ c
? s
o ~
m ' '
a
7
O
~
, ~

O c
~ °_
7
O ~
0

n
O
Z
m
Z
O
z
D
r
N
W
Q
r
N

0

rI rI
x Eo ~o I"I I I ~' ~ ~ ~
I~ l~
,~ ~ ~
,~ ~ ~ ~
a
N
m
~~
N
c
N
C
rn
c
z
m
m
~o
C°'~-
~~
~~
~®
®~
®~
~ ~

. i~. i
17:20
t
a
a
w
m
z
m
~ m
''~
O ~
z
+ O
p~ UN
P
v
ii
~! n _
r~$
~~~A
o~~~
r ~
Z~ ~
C~ Q
Z "'
W
o
N
z
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~~
~~

I
{

~
A

I N
N
~

c 1
O
~
Z
N O
I O.

~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
N
I
I i J
...~ W

1
i
1
1
r
i
i
~~
~ ~
~
i
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
c ~ ~
m
t
N
0
S m
O

~
i
p
O O
p
O A
r

D
rn
O
Z
Z
r~~i
I y
P
o n
+ ~
~h y
O•
O ~
z
+ Z
N O

~t
N

~
C ~ m
N m
... v
N
v
N
C'1
~
N
m o~v>~v D9 00 ~ ~•o mDv »

M~
N
y
rza
~
-ia
am~a
.ca
m~a
za Z

a D O O m~VO '00 p O
mw 1 -
i ~C)D•O D9 D-1 m•O my ~D~ Dv

xr z s z 7o < » 70 < ~> c>aD< aD
m 0 y

•i0
9 .i
m 2070
m m• m
as 10• a
x O• ~
Oa pma
a• O~
m7o
"m > a •0~ Do Dmm m0 -i> o

z r ~m= A Ar11 -D1W ~ -9i m~ ~
D ' ~'~ ~
: r zoz~ Z
y ~
~ ~D D
> c
y
~~v OD O >•o W
D•o Ov -`W ~
-i rA~ '>' ~zm
~ D
m 0DS

'9
amir-r•1
~~ 7p
i
r ~o
~ O >
r
i
r~ m
m
m O
r rD-
1 D
° .
.~
N ~
m a
oc> l
- <mo mc~ o
O a ~
1• z m s
° z c
!c w a
z a mmz
i ~m
o mz mD0 Dc0 XtllO vz m
7
o mm mm • ~s
-i am o z m
m
m -i as o ~ ~ mv-i m Z
wpm ~~ -ism m v
m pm
W ~ y
m .,. m m ..
r ~+ W ~
m z
>
D _
~
Z
A 1 ~+
C
<4
l m +.
.I Np~ <
d/ OOm D mAm Nm a• ~ va

z -ivo v xmm mm zvm o

~. m
m
m 11
--
aoov- ~ap ao =sm m =
O -
C
Dvv ~ ~+DC pC ~ m m
Sm
~ Z• N ~
Z i1
I ~ ~ I
il<
m =n ~ O
v ~~oi m ~o o 1m m
m =O• a 1 =m C

~ zm~ C 07mo OtA ~ r
r m a m a
~ O7
_ - m

i
i
1
r
f
I
i
i
i

r
H
m
O
z
Z
N
I~l
N
tt m
0p P
++ ~
ac
a8 y
O
v~ i
P
$° + Z
w ~
N
O'~
•~O~Z~'
$p m
O ~

D
r-
N
rn
O
Z
Z
~•I
~• ~
~p m
~O ~
+ +
°o ~
o$ m
00 O
r P Z
+ + Z
00 O
S C

B

. ~ I
1 ----~
-,~-
Y4 6
_~
~ r~~ ~$~
Y~; r
~ ~a~ ~ ~~
~~ N -~
tV'
V
gytArtT [aSFI(tlx k I
~~'\.

4-MAY-2004 08.35
\p ro~ect\63496s4.psh
RWt3rennen AT
~ ~ a
~ ~_ ~~
~`^ =s
~~~
~~~o~~~~~~~~
O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ T
~~~~$~Qwi~~~
~~~g$~~~~o~~~,~
8t !~ g ro H ~ ti
O
Cn
'--~
D
O
Z
Gl
cn
0
O
m
O
r
r
N
D
O
Z
O
O
O~
O
r
~~
~~
D D
o~
++
~~
O O
O O
~'
W t
~ N
w
'j r
N ~
I
~r
~ ~.
~~
~n
R~
~~
N
~~
~~
~~
~~
s "+
~~
N
(A
~~
Z
s m m
zz° A rzn K z
n '~' -zr z
o ~ ~-1
par=
Z ; C / C
r 'a z
~ m o
K ~ er m D
m
m ~ ~
~ D
r z c~ D
z 3 m
u z
~r~im
ozA
N w
x ~-
K T
O ~
~ m r-
~ f m '~
~
2
_
o a
r -r
K ~
VI

Z >
~ ~
I O K _D
I r
z W
O-1
v a q~O K I
i
3 1
/)
. /
,o
CC
ao
N
~
s m
wti Z~v
°~m
oc"~~
D
C .
o -~ r
i~ m Q (..)
ph O ~

~
~~ 2
v
p NOT
0 ~O
~ ~~
m-~'io
nD~7
z°+~
NUin
OD
~r
o~
~C
+~
O~
In
r=
m~
m=
00
~~
O
dSf

eex8x
m g
r&N ~
r
~~~ ~ S
l~
~, ,
y
~~
'~ o
bo
b
i
O
H
-~» ~~ m
,~`~5 ~w~ininra~'.
,Se zos

~> 47
/r
~~~'
./~
I~ aIR ~~
P
yy : ~ $$
y~ ~~
AO
~$ +
~ ~~~~
~ ~~
~~~~ ~
a~yyNp
~ ~~ N {~~{
°' ~ m wo
n
r
~~
is+`-
X.-.-
O ~ N
I~
D~~^ ~~ ~ Z
FP w c# ~ F _ _ 8
~ 1
F N ~, , ~~
.z ~ ip O Z'
~.9
_._.,, mvH NSl
I b ~ +N 1 aVlB ~~
to ~~ va ~' ~o
~ ~ ~~
rLV"
~ ~~ s$~~
~~~ ,a~
~~ R>
R•lB,yy, ~ ~` 7~p
__~' F_96! >d yrr~
yR`~ cwvt,~ER wnr s~a~
~~
~K ,a
ZiJ
~~
gp`^' N56'02'!p~
~ ~~ ~ O
= ~=tom wrr agae ~R
y $ T~ N n
~c f' ~ '
/.p ~
11 y + ~ j ~~
~~~~ ~ ~

P~
:1 a y~y
D ~~~~
~~
O
N
~'
O
`< m
a
W
~
-~ N TJ
O ~
1 N
a
~

r _
zip
~Dm
~~
~
r o
m D
a o W r-
~ m~v
z
~
a
e '~
~O
8Le
!I ~~~
o EL °°`' .
any tip`
y= \
bU~~rrr
I
I
1 ~ w
i
l
~ /
/~
~/
~~
i
.t
Y
3<
~1
z
c
A
~V~i`WyWa l
2 ~~~
~I6
I
~ ~I~
~l
~ y

y
` ~ ~
_ SR 1420
HOOKER RD.

,~
~ SI~
-r2-
~ ~
I
S
~I ~
s~o
;a~
,~
~a~~oD
M ~ ` , 1 ~
,4 V ~ }~Q~T> O
~' rh~~l~~rlZ~ I
,~ -~ ~ , ~~
~f
B~ ~
1 6~ ~

_ _~-.--
S.
- . = ocM ~° :_ - . _ _ own °i°
_
Development Type FEE (143001601 435100093 1625 62531 (243001602 435100095 2341
I. Private, non-commercial __ _ ,
~
development that does not involve 8250 ~ 100% ($250) 0% (50}
the filling or excavation of any
wetlands or open water areas:

t. Public or commercial development ,_ __

_
-
,. -
_. --,j. -
~ `- -'- _ '
_~ -.
-,
--~-- - -
_.:__
that does not involve the filling or $400 100% ($400) 0% ($0)
excavation of any wetlands or open -
water areas: _ . _ - ,
_,

III. For development that involves the - - _

+- - . _
_ _ ,
-
filling and/or excavation of up to 1
acre of wetlands and/or open water
areas, determine if A, B, C, or D
below applies:
III(A). For Private, non-commercial
development, If General water Quality $250 100% ($250) 0% ($0)
Certification No.3301 (seeattached)
qn be applied: ,
III(B): For public or commercial
development, if General water Quality 5400 100% (5400) 0% (50)
Certification No.3301 (see attached)
wn be applied:
III(C). If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 (see attached)
could be applied, but DCM staff
determined that additional review and $400 60% ($240) 40% (5160)
written DWQ concurrence is needed
because of concerns related to water
quality or aquatic life:
III(D). If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 (see attached) $400 60% (5240) 40% (5160)
can not be applied:
IV. For development that involves
the filling and/or excavation of more $475 60% ($285) 40% ($190)
than one acre of wetlands and/or
open water areas:

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT - ~ 3y9
- ~=; '~~ -
-_
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department of Transportation
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Bridge No. 10, on SR-1411 (Wrightsville Ave.) over
.Bradley Creek in New Hanover County
__
._
Photo Index - 2000: 289 grid: D-5 & 6 1995: 272 grid: E-12 & 13
State Plane Coordinates: x 2349419 y: 173585 GPS: Rover File #
6. SITE DESCRIl'TION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan -New Hanover County
Land Classification from LUP -Rural & Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: CW, CS and PTA
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E} Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - SR 1411 and 40-foot long by 29-foot wide bridge
Planned - SR 1411 and 200-foot long by 33-foot wide bridge
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A Source: N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
(A) Coastal Wetlands 0.04 .acres 0.21 acres temporary
shoulder widening Disturbance for erosion
and rip rap at control
culvert outlets
ll
Sh
A
T
P
bli 0.025 acres- (Rip 160 sq. ft.
~s in 1
ow
a
rea -
rust
u
c
B
( ) Rap at bridge 1
rti na
Bottom bents) Shading 160 sq. ft.
(C) Other -High Ground 0.19 acres Approximatelyl.
(causeway 5 acres
removal) (In roadway)
(D) Total CAMA AEC Disturbed: Approximately 1.5 acres
(E) Total area disturbed by project: Approximately 2 acres
(F) Primary Nursery Area: -Yes
(G) Water Classification: SC-HQW
(H) Open for Shellfishing: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The N.C. Department of Transportation is proposing to replace the
existing 40-foot long timber and concrete bridge over Bradley Creek with a 200-foot long cored slab
concrete bridge spanning Bradley Creek and the adjacent Coastal Wetlands. Approximately 160 feet
of causeway would be excavated from the existing roadbed with 143 feet of that area restored to its
previous wetland hydrology.

- NC DOT - B-3496, Bridge No. 10 over Bradley Creek, New Hanover County
PAGE 2
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The site of this proposal is Bridge No. 10 on SR 1411, 1.6 miles west of the Intra Coastal Waterway,
. - ___ - -
at the crossing ofBradley Creek, inNew-Hanover County. -The general_p~rpase of the project is to
-- -
replace the deteriorated 40-foot long by 29-food wide_timber-:and cancrete-6~ idge with.. an 204- foot-- = _ - -
_ _ _
-long by 33-foot wide concrete cored -slab bridge.SpanningBradl~y Creek. and the adjacent Coastal
--
•~ Wetlands, -to allow safer driving conditions for--the traveling public and restore a more natural
hydrology to the Coastal Wetlands adjacent to bridge No. 10. _ - - • ~ _=--
Bridge No. 10 crosses Bradley Creek 1.6 miles west of its confluence with the Intra Coastal
Waterway, approximately 500 feet upstream of where the creek changes from a wide estuary creek,
to a 40-foot wide creek. The bridge crossing Bradley Creek is flanked with expansive Coastal
Wetlands in the northwest and northeast quadrants and residential lots in the southwest and southeast
quadrants. Creek width at the crossing is approximately 40 feet. Vertical cleazance between the water
and bridge bottom is approximately 4. S feet. An approximately 1000-foot. long by 60-foot wide
causeway was constructed through the Coastal Wetlands northward from the north bridge bent when
the bridge was constructed. The Coastal Wetland area consists of Spartina alterniflora and Juncus
roemerianus. The road shoulder is vegetated with grasses, Poison Ivey, Greenbrier, Red Cedar, Sweet
Gum, Black Willow and Myrtle. Soils on this site outside of the tidal marsh are Craven Fine Sandy
Loam as classified by the NC Soil Conservation Service. Approximate elevations on the site range
between 1 feet and 6 feet above Normal High Water (NHW). No evidence of SAV beds was noted.
The North Carolina Division of Water Quality classifies waters of Bradley Creek as SC-HQW at the
project site. Bradley Creek is Primary Nursery Area, as designated by the North Carolina Division of
Marine Fisheries, at this site. Shellfish (oysters) were observed in Bradley creek, however, the area is
closed to the harvesting of shellfish. Approximately seventy five percent of the project area is within
CAMA Areas of Environmental Concern and is designated as Conservation by the Brunswick County
Land Use Plan.
The proposal is to replace the existing 60-foot long by 29-foot wide timber and concrete bridge with
a 200-foot long by 33-foot wide cored slab concrete bridge on the existing alignment. The proposed
bridge would have a vertical clearance approximately 4 inches greater than the existing bridge
(approximately 5.1 feet). Constructing this project would include removing 160 feet ofthe previously
filled causeway (that is approximately 60 feet wide) and grading it to correspond with the surrounding
Coastal Wetlands, which are predominately vegetated with Spartina alterniflora. The bridge approach
roadway would be approximately 6 inches higher than the existing roadway. The bridge is being
widened from 29 feet to 33 feet to more closely correspond to the 12 foot paved travel lanes and 6
foot grassed shoulders of SR 1411. NC DOT Best Management Practices would be used for bridge
demolition and Design Standards for Sensitive Watersheds would be used for Erosion control. NC
DOT has committed to no in-water work from February 15 through June 30 of each year, due to
anadromous fish moratoriums.

_ __ .
_ 10. ANTICIl'ATED IlVIPACTS: - ` --~ - f
As proposed, the construction. of the bridge approaches with 3:1 slopes and two erosion control rip
rap pads at culvert outlets, would require the filling of approximately 0.04 acres of Coastal Wetlands
-- - -
-- _- - _ and: approximately ~ _5 acres= of inipac€s: to high ground. The additional width of the badge would
___-
- _ - cause approximately 160 square feet of additional hading impacts to IsubIic Tnist Waters AEC:'~~~
Removal of 1601ineal feet. of previously filled causeway (5 feet; an each ide will .later be used to
-= --- armor the end bents under the new bridge) would=result in the disturbance of approximately 0.19 _ _
._
- - acres of high ground. -Disturbance of 0.025 acci~es of the creek bottom is expecteddurmg-tFie.= -- =- -_-
installation of rip rap at the east and west corners of the south end bent to'match the rip rap installed
at the shoreline of the adjacent residential lots.
NC DOT has reduced the Coastal Wetland excavation and fill impacts associated with this proposal
by lengthening the bridge from 40 to 200 feet. NCDOT agreed to place erosion control measures at
the slope stake line and eliminate 0.12 acres of Type III mechanical clearing in coastal wetlands. The
bridge will span the waters of Bradley Creek, be constructed by top down methods, use driven piles
and be lengthened to reduce impacts to the coastal wetlands adjacent to the bridge. Lengthening the
bridge also creates a wetland buffer between the bridge approaches and the waters of Bradley Creek,
allowing some treatment of the storm water run off associated with the bridge and roadway. NC DOT
has committed to dropping no materials from the bridge demolition in the water. Due to the presence
of anadromous fish in Bradley Creek, NC DOT has committed to an in-water work moratorium from
February 15 to June 30. The NC DOT has proposed to use Design Standards for Sensitive
Watersheds BMP's to minimize the impacts of erosion.
The proposed removal of 160 feet of existing causeway should restore approximately 0.19 acres offill
causeway to its natural hydrology. NC DOT is asking for riverine restoration mitigation credit for this
area as well as enhancement mitigation credit for an area extending outward from the removed
causeway, calculated as a quarter circle, the radius (143 feet) of which is the length of the removed
causeway on the north side of the bridge, minus the rip rap area armoring the north bridge bent, (0.74
acres at 4:1 ratio = 0.19 acres credit). Due to the relatively small areas involved and the direct
connection to the tidal waters of Bradley Creek, NC DOT has asked to use. verification of elevations
in the restoration area rather than performing hydrologic monitoring. NC DOT would be impacting
approximately 0.065 acres of Coastal Wetlands and Shallow Bottom in this proposal and is proposing
no mitigation to offset these impacts.
The collective disturbance area for the project is approximately 2 acres.
Bill Arrington
June 29, 2004
Morehead City

f~d~
_.
~e r'~
u
~.~...~~.~ i
~...
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPART~ENT,~~~~~s~~RTATIO~
LYNDO Tff'PETT
SECRETARY
lvivi cucau ~.1 ~y, i v ~. ~. v.~.~ i
ATTENTION:
Dear Mr. Amngton:
Mr. Bill Arrington
District Manager
rl2c'~~ ~1~~ ~~~
fore
SUBJECT: Application for CAMA Major Development Permit for the
proposed replacement of Bridge No. 10 over Bradley Creek on SR
1411 in New Hanover County, Division 3. Federal Aid No. BRSTP-
1411(5), State Project No. 8.2251101; TIP No. B-3496.
Please find enclosed three copies of the Categorical Exclusion (CE) document; permit
drawings, and design plan sheets, MP1 and MPS forms, and a.copy of postal notifications for
Adjacent Riparian Property Owners.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No.
10 over Bradley Creek on SR 1411 in New Hanover County. The existing bridge will be
replaced with a longer bridge along the existing aligr~ent. The proposed bridge replacement
will be a spanning structure, thereby eliminating the piles in the stream channel. The
proposed bridge is approximately 200 feet in length and will facilitate the removal of a total
of 160 feet of the old causeway, resulting in the removal of fill in 0.19 acres of wetland.
During construction, traffic will be detoured along existing area roads. There will be no in
water construction between February 15°and June~30 to protect anadromous fish spawning.
PROPOSED. IMPACTS
Bradley Creek (DWQ Index No. 18-87-24-4(1)) Class SC HQW, and associated .wetlands
will be impacted by the proposed project. Construction of the proposed project will result in
0.04 acre of fill in wetland, and 48 -feet (0.025 ac) of impacts to Bradley Creek'.' Bridge No.
10 will be replaced with a four span structure, using top'down construction. Driven piles~will
be used to support the new bridge.
The 0.04 acres of fill in wetlands are due to the widening of the fill slopes resulting from
widening of the ,road and the installation of rip-rap at pipe outlets. The 0.025 ac of fill in
Bradley Creek results from the placement of rip-rap on the side of the channels adjacent to
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
15tH MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WYWY. NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC

_ - _ _ __ the budge Rip. rap_has already been placed on the sides of the channel.by the landowner and _- - - - _
-- _. __
- the additional rip rap wilhprevent erosion. - ~~ - - = - . --- --
_ . MITIGATION = - ..
This project is on the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) transition ',list for mitigation.
---- _-. ,:,,._-However,--due to-minimization._Qf impacts__during the design_phase__and_the use of onsrte , _
.___ ..
mitigation, no offsite mitigation will be needed. `Project impacts will lie less-than the O.t acre ~ ~~" ~""
threshold, therefore no mitigation is proposed. However the removal of the old causeway
- - will result in the .restoration of 0.19 acres of coastal_plain .tidal. marsh. wetlands Tine removal -
=_--
_ _ - - - - _
_ _ of the causeway m_ 143 feet of _hdal .marsh :wetlands will result in tfie enhancement o~ X74 _
- acres o~ wetlands adjacent to the old causeway. "This enhancement area' was caleulatecd Iay - - -- = -
determining the area of a / circle with aradius-~of 143 feet, based on the length of_causeway
-~- - - removed, on"both sides- of the :bridge. Sheet. 5 of 7 of the permit drawings shows ;the
_, _
_::
-- _ - - - enhanceirient -area.` 'The NCI30T request that-tlns- initigat-on be 'avairable'for hit~ire~Gl'P_ _~ __. ,__
projects, with the understanding that each future project will require agency approval for the - `=
use of this mitigation.
BRIDGE DEMOLITION
The existing deck and bridge railings are composed of concrete. The substructure is
composed of timber bents and caps. The NCDOT committed to removing the existing bridge
over Bradley Creek and the adjacent concrete utility structure in accordance with NCDOT's
Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and removal. No temporary fill will be
placed in Bradley Creek as a result of removing the existing bridge and utility structure.
UTILITIES
There is one sewer line and one water line in that will be relocated due to this project.. The
6" force sewer main is currently located north of the existing bridge on three concrete piers.
A 8" water main is currently located underground on the south side of the bridge. Both of
these pipes will be relocated under Bradley Creek and the wetlands using directional bore
methods and will not cause any additional. jurisdictional impacts. The three concrete piers
that support the existing sewer line will be removed by the contractor.
FEDERALLY-PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed
Endangered, and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of January 29, 2003, the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service lists ten federally protected species for New Hanover
County. Of these species; the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) is listed
threatened due to similarity in appearance and is not subject to Section 7 consultation. There
is potential habitat for the manatee and the shortnose sturgeon at this project location, but it is
unlikely that either will be encountered. However, NCDOT will commit to adhering to the
Fish-and Wildlife Service Guidelines for Avoiding -Impacts to the West Indian Manatee (se`e ~-.
attached Guidelines). A biological conclusion of "May Affect, but Not Likely to Adversely
Affect" has been rendered for the West Indian manatee. A copy of the concurrence request
letter dated February 4, 2004, to the Fish and Wildlife Service is attached. • NCDOT also
commits to the above mentioned construction. moratorium and adherence to best management
practices to avoid impacts to the shortnose sturgeon. The Biological Conclusion of No Effect
for the shortnose sturgeon remains valid. Biological conclusions of "No' Effect" documented
in the CE for the remaining species given based on the absence of habitat within. the project
area remain valid.

-. _ ,_
:, _- -~ -
REGULATORY tPPROVALS -
_.
NCDOT requests that the proposed work be authorized under a Coastal Area Management
- __ _
Act Major bevelopment Permit. In a separate application, we aze also requesting -issuance-of
a United States Army .Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit 23 & 33 and a 401 Water
- _ _ __.__ :Quality._Certification_fromthe North Carolina -Division of Water Quality. ==
Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional
information pleas call Mr. Brett Feulner at (919} 715-1488. ..:_
,~
Sincerely, - ~ ~ , r
Q~ .~ ,
y
- _ _ _
r~
___ __ --
• ~ ~
- _ M
-
-:.. _;_ _
_ _ .:_-
-~ - _ - - - - .~. -Grego J~'Thorpe;~h.D.
L' Environmental Management Director, PDF~~
GJT/drr
Cc:
Ms. Cathy Brittingham, NCDCM
Mr. David Timpy, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. John Hennessy, DWQ, Raleigh
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Mike Street, NCDMF
Mr. Mason Herndon, DEO
~~~~~a~ pity D~Ni
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. H: Allen Pope, P.E., Div. 3 Engineer

~' ~~ ~~. ~ ~ ~ ~ Gallewi
~° ~ ~ ~~
\ ~
~, \ e ; ~ y ~\\ --
Q~ ~~'~
~~, 4 SITE ~,
~4
m
\~ c0 S
// -~ ' ~ \
~~, _
~/ ~ `\ ~ ~~ (/ tea- \~ ~ ~~ ~'~ ,
~`L~~®~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I NEW HANOVER COUNTY
~/ PROJECT:82251101 <B-3~Q96)
BRIDGE NO.10 OVER BRADLEY
CREEE ON SR 111
~' II`' WILMINGTON
I F ~"

-~ILB- WETLAND BOUNDARY
- - _ _ _ PROPOSED BRID GE
:

_
_

L

ETLAND _. __

,_ _
..:
_.
_
_

PROPOSED BOX __
_.

CULVERT
- DENOTES FILL IN _ - -: = _ -
-
_
-• L~G'LLLELa
__ WETLAND -

-

}--_ _
- PROPOSED PIPE: CULVERT
..
.. _
- ® DENOTES FILL IN - -
- 12'<48'
PIPES
..
- SURFACE WATER
- (DASHED LINES DENOTE

' -
~ EXISTNG
STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES

~; .. ,-
- -__ .
_
DENOTES
FILL ~I+t =: _
_..
=
~ . & ABOVE

,..,
_

t .
" SURFACE WATER
GCL
!_L1L1~ (POND)

DENOTES
TEMPORARY SINGLE TREE
FILL IN WETLAND
.. .. .. .. WOODS LINE
DENOTES EXCAVATION
® IN WETLAND
DRAINAGE INLET

® DENOTES
FILL IN TEMPORARY
SURFACE
WATER -=~' ROOTWAD
i DENOT
~, ~, ~ NIZED
, CLE ARING
~ -PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
-~ FLOW DIRECTION-
- T~ TOP OF BANK
WE EDGE OF WATER
O
0
RIP RAP
ADJACENT PROPERTY
OWNER'OR PARCEL
NUMBER (IF AVAILABLE)
E
O
0
a
E
S
0
o==
~~o
., ;
--~- PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
~- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
- - NG - - NATURAL GROUND
- P~-- PROPERTY LINE
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-PDE PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB- - EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY.
- EPB.- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
-••-•U ••- - WATER SURFACE
XX xXX X X LIVE STAKES
BOULDER
--- CORE FIBER ROLLS
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE
LEVEL SPREADER (LS)
DITCH /
GRASS SWALE
=y>~~~ t~ti
ii~, ~ ~ ~' ~ f ! r ;ice
>~ ~ s.
JUN 0 4 200.4
l~l `L ~ ~~, `'r a.s~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT:82251101 <B-3d96>
BRIDGE NO.10 OVER BRADLEY
CREEg ON SR 111
IN WILMINGTON

_ ..~__ _ .
- _ _
- _ _.
_ _ __-
_ - NAMES AND._ ADDRESSES - _ ` _
1V ~~® 1l
DIVLSION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT:8.2251101 <B$.496)
BRIDGE NO.10 OVER BRADLEY
CREEg ON SR loll
IN WILMINGTON
SHEET ~ OF ~] 07 / Ol / 03

5<,
..o~ll~:~E]49F.d.n
t, l
V1lJ1~I
m-~o
~n~
--~
O d N
Z+~
N~,m
On
n
~r
On
~C
+~
~O
O ~
I ("'I
r=
m
r ~ h
1Z 1

X
i ~ i ~
T k
O N ~ ~~: Q O
O x
X
T ~ T ti
O ~
T
r V
y~
~ ~ ~ r
~~,i` o~ n~Trn
o
3~~
~~

q
Q
~
~
~~L
~53+n
~ ~ ~$
~~4
~
o~~~
q~ _ bpbp ~ ~
T
Y ,.
~ ~ H yyT S ~ T • ~i A
~
N ~
~
N
O ~
...
x
avlurr usoo~I X
-~f~
' __ ~ f SOf7WM0 Wp IPR.v,3~
f {
mpa
A m m
R ~
N m ~ i
i z m z
z z y
g~ -~
D ~ O_ / ~
~ C
ti =
~ N O
p N m0 Q
m
m ~ ~
~ A
_ ~
~` D
~ Z
L Z i
~ Z
r
r
N
O
m
i
I
m p ~
O 2 A x '-
g~Z -
r
m
fI m ?
°z ?
A N
C j f
z
//
~ 4
O
r -+ f
`
y

` D
N m
m _{
C y o < D
A I ~
/~
n~
~ C
Z A
O m x_
~ N
~
-
r ~J

nz
~o
o -r
c c
no
_
N

~'
".;~ _ m
Z n ~
O y
'
f
rl
~ r
o -r ~
onD
_
~ '~ (

Tr
O
O 0
mo
-1 ~
~ X
x
m n
0

o I
v_IO-n
O -t~
T1
;+ D () O
R+7y
t
I
i
~~
m=
m~
n0
~T
0
t/1
to
t F 1:
+ 1
~1 k k
i~ 1 ~i ~
' "'~
q'urllrr t4y~Yi '
X yP~
8
x ~`
~~
7Y' CCIy
~~
Y~
~R
A

i ~pµfi ~ -
z ~` {~ ~
~-
~i'~'uII~II tSYI\
\ `~~ ~~~ •
_ BRAt
\ ~\
~~g
~~
~g
"~ Yy~y ~
CI l'1 ~~
K
0
W
of
-mi
fr
i ~ ~
AA i
~~
~~~~
o
cn m o ~ m
~ zo z D O ~,..
cD-It^ m~ ~
mN ~~ ~ ~
ar z.. ~ ~ A'' a
yr- or v x
rn r r
z _ g °'
z ~m ~~ _,
Ao $S
~' ~ ~$$~
z 66 ~a
Oho N v ~ Q~~~
r m ~ ~ °'
In D ~ ~ {
y u
A r, oo+
Z m o n r -~ $
S ~ u ^
•y 0 v, ~ N
DID'. ~ ~
Z
Q ~ ~ ~ !
~ ~r

~' C$ ' C~
'© V ~ 1d
X aR
r a~
O
V~
'~ TG ~~
~\~ X
J~
~pRrC
~ IAVPf
~
MJ~TfR WlPRN.
°
°-~
1 ~~ vE I
,~~
!
,~ ~- Q
~1~~aa
-
a

i~~~ .,
~~ ,~~1~ ~ ~ ;~
,~ ~ ~ i,rj, .E
i~
~ .,'.~ a ,~f.
~~ i t I
~~.

_ •„ C

~Eyj
S I. PPf
~Q ! °:
1.~-~ i
j
~ ~ ,: ~'

~ ~
,
I ~~ ~~~ ` ~'~ ~'
~ ~.I L. 'A i JI'.
~,
~ ''i! j;
,
~

~ i

i~
~~
~S

~~~ - ~L
~' :,
~I ~~I
, .
`
+7 . `
i !
~
~
~ ~ ~ ~
I
1
' ~
m ~
I
~~ i
~
~ .I

~

~
V77 ~ ~
O ~,
I I ; .' ~-. ~
~ Iii ~ ! N .
! ~ I I
f'
~~
'
~. '
~ .
~
p
O i
'
~
'
'~ 1. ~ 1 ~~I ~ { ~' y
~ j , '_
~
'
a
~ ~ . ~
;
~
~ ~

~ ~ ~;
.
i;
i

' . tl..:
~
~ ~ ~ i
I
i
~~ .~.•-~~ '~ ~k• . ~i ~ ~: I''; .
Y t~ I
I ~f '
n X
~ i
~ ~g
R i - I
+ ~~~~
>~e'a ~
~ a r ~ 1 '
g$~.N~;

'fl *IWW
O
~'
I m
n
-1
O p
W
O N '~
O
~ O
~ ~
~ ~
D
rn _ ~
z Q
~ D fTl

1 ~
w
n
r o
mD
~ ~Wr
°
A
v m~~
~ ~
i ~
P.
D
'D m
~

1[

{,..o~
^'~
?.E.7
~ i I

w~ ~
_
a I
~ 1
;
•
°J
Q ~%
~
.
N
Q ~. :.

~:.•,
x-Y ~ +
~

~
~
/
~~R / ~ \

~~
b

T e~ Per `•.° /

Y
{~ C
Te; ~ N\ / 1

R
yom ~H
\.~~~
\ 7

D
/~~ ~~
.' /// ~ ~ Z
~`
P
~ y
i.
I m ~~t-OD v
~~~~'~
11 A~~~O
§~ i
N ~!
n
II

G

I
\ N'•
~.
~g8 4 ~. :~
~~~~~~~
v~~i~ r ~ ~ ~ ~~
~ QO~I~~lwif
~~
i
~ / I
~ ~I f I'
~~
dg
G~~
1
+ ~
I +
~ ~ ~~'
~ ~ ~
~ ~~ ~~_
~ ~ ~e~
'V .~~ 4 lr..~
•=~~..
+
~~~~ ~ ~ - ~a ~ $
i
'~ ~ t ~ v
u F
61 ~
oZN ' N ~
W ' ~ „
~ a ~ u O
' / 6 u J } 4
• ~ • ~ t °
O ry ~ b Q
~7 ' r n
~~~~ • ¢
o Q * ~ In
S• V - P•FP~ ~ ~
w ~ p ~ a~
~~~~ K
I ~8 0
*a 2
w ~_ * ° ~
i ~ !n
V K _C
~ e~ ~~
,~,`~~
8"a Q a
~ « W yj
a
Z ~ Y / p/
O
I 12
Qa
~ J
i O H
~ W
W =
~ z
~~
W J
F- J
O LL
Z
W LL
O O
_ '
? Z
i ..~
..1 W
'~, J O --I /--
Z ~a
Ir_Q LL2
ln~ NW
1-W WQ
O ~ 1'" t,.
Z ZQ
W ~
~ O~
$~ ~lyl

e- ~
0
ti .~,~°~
o ~~+
z ~
~--
In
~o
O~
v
~ w
=w
~N
= J
U~
F-
O~
w
~+
~~
UO
J~-
Q
O
WAN
d+Z
NQ O
~-
~a~
or-w
w~~
H
Z
W ,~
Y
OZm
¢a
m
JAN
QWo
{-- H
wao
paz
Q
d'
d
d
Q
a
J
v
N ~.
U ~
o J
rV v-
O
~n ~
w n
ti
CL~ +
~ } d ti
__O
LLOV1 ~
~

U o,
m ~
Ut-_
0 m oo I
a `~
O
J t-- !n
QV o
~ }
J '~ ~
WQo
W = ti'~.

N

1 ~
~~~ a o

~ o
x m u
~ ~~ e

a Y ° I ~ w
r-
w
D I a
a
R
,\ 1- J
J`°
a~~

f
/
/ Z _

~ N
Z O
2 ~ U
J
J - ~ Z
< O O
LL Y
y 3
a Z O
n ¢ W
a ~ ~ L~ ~ ~ ~
x ~~ ~,~~~ r ~ m m
~~
jf ' ~
W H
N O
g ~,

Y

- ~73~~ ~ O
~
ado - ~,
.
a ~ ~. ~
ll
Q ~
~

_ M~
~~M -~\ \

Xr inn '
~~
1
8y ~
YY
q
A ~ A

Sq Y
I 8~ }
.~
W
~, d ', o
u_uu_ N
3~ ~ ~ ~
6 6 .J
J
4
y3~ Z n
1 _1
R Q
J
8~~ Q s
w o ~, ~ Y
o w
p N d
Z
\ O '~ ~ ~
\ ~.., u / H 3 Z~Z
= w 5
757119 ~ ~\ ~X it Y aa°
1Sg rh~lSV ~ ~ ~ 2 O
~~-\` J ~llllnp
W W ~
a ¢ ~'
\!\ /1`lln.p~ /~
J
' ~~8~!/ 1~~,`dl 'd`OVIwI..~pS ~, ~~ ~ ~~ ~
9- . '
~~
- 7( l~Opf~7 4M1n4
x

~
.
~_
O
~
~'-
8~
~ Y~
~~ ~x
~
a. B 8 e
n
1
0
S
k
I '~p~.11 7i k
~ .. ,
~ ~ k
~ ~ W

'~ ; ~ ' a
$ ~'
A
aq
* ~ : 1~
'~ i

s
~ ~ ; =1
~ ~
~~ ~
~_
~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ O
'~ . ~ ~• ,,, ~ Y
o }~kII~~ ~~a ~~~~~~
~ ~~~~'~~a&~~~~~
O ~~~~~o YYO ~
3_~~a~~~~~~~~~
`~ ~ ~~=Q7`c a:~
wa ~~
Cy11 ~ ~
_= ~
~~~

i~ a
'
I
~,
~f
,.~. ~,.
'`
i ,i
' ~~ 1~.'i t
it ~

--- - : _. _ . __ _ __
o
a
~~~,
m ._ ~-.

_.

O

..... ,. ~- ;o
¢ ~ _ ci
„_
,u
N ~ ~
ZOO ~
~
eo
~'~Q
~~" f'"
"'
a¢ z
:. _ - _>_
~~_.:.~~

~ __~~ m
~ °° ~~ ~o
x
~
~ _ . ~
a

-- ~ -_ _ _ _ 2 ~ ~ar cL
.. z _
_ - . >
w ~ _ ~ x ~ w
_

-o
i ~
Q a
~
lQ .-.
v
i
c p q O
U
z

r V N N
O
C ~p
Z .... p
O O
ti `-'

}
0.'
a v =
N ~= '
i
C p U
w :~ ~
~
O
L N
~ U ~
~
H ~ v
Q
a ~ ~
>_~
~
O LL ~ U
v ~ ~
o
I- d °'~~ ~ ~
Q ~ ~ 1 5~
~
Z - N ~
~ J ~ 1.x~ ~V
~~rj~~l ~ TR
W2 d ~ ~
2 v O
J ~
J
JUN 0 4 2

C ~ U
`° p O fj

j ~

O
O .
~I(~
1
~.~ l
N
~ ~
~
N Q.
~ T m
~
(O
U.~ ~
~ N ~
N
~ ~ O
U
0
0
N
J
O
O
O
O C }
N

'~ ~ N
O
~ ~ O
~. O

J
~ O ~
(~ Z Q
H

0
N
n
°u
m
s
0
LL

APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
Fax {919)733-9794
b. Authorized Agent (Contact):
Name Deanna Riffey
Address same as above
City
State
Zip Day Phone [phone]
Fax{919)715-1501
c. Project name (if any) B-3496
NOTE: Permit will be isszred in name ojlandowner(s), ancUor
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County New Hanover
b. City, town, community or landmark
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Replace existing bridge. Grading paving,
drainage, and structures
b. Is the proposed] activity maintenance of an existing.
project, new work, or both? New Work
c. Will the projectjbe for public, private or commercial
use? Public transportation
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed project.
If more space ~, is needed, please attach additional
pages. Purpose of project is to provide public
transportation.) Bride No. 10 will be replaced at
the existing location with a new structure while
maintaining traffic during construction with an
off-site detour. ~
o~..:...,,~ nine

- a. Size of entire tract ROW approx 2 acres- -- - =
-- .n.
b. Size of indivdual.Iot(s) _ N/A -
c. - Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or hiWl.
.____
_ --- -
= Roadway elevation is 6 feet above NWL - - ~. -
._ - .
=- d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
._ :: =-:
- - ''Itidat Marsh-Nevvhan and Kenansville-
o
Craven-Lakeland
Describe location acid type of discharges to -wafers of
the state. :(For, example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industriaUeommercial effluent, : "wash
down".and residential discharges.)
_ ,_ _ _ ___
surface runoff from roadw av and surrQUndii~g .
_watershed - _ __ ,:- .:._
Describe existing drinking water supply source: ~- -
N/A
e. Vegetation on tract Salt Marsh is composed of Salt
Marsh Cordgrass and black needle rush
f. Man-made features now on tract existing bridge
and roadway
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land classification
of the Site? (Constelt the local land use plan.)
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
X Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
N/A
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? X Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? X Yes _ No
If yes, by whom? SHPO
k. Is the project .located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes _ No
Coastal (marsh) X Other _
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? YES
(Attach documentation, if available)
In addition to the completed application form, the.
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then forward
a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the
owner claims title, plus written permission from the
owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to Coastal
Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed
description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
regarding that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site
or location map is a part of plat requirements and it
must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel
unfamiliar with the area to the site. Include highway or
secondary road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and the like.

•A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
•A list of the names and complete. addresses of the
_ _ - _=-
- adjacent waterfront. (riparian) .:landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
._ . _ have received a copy of ti,e application and plafs-by
cerhft_~d malt .-:Such landowners must be advised. that
'~ - they have 30 days m which to submit comrrients on the
.,proposed.- project - to . the :Division -of Coastal
Management. --Upon signing this form, he applicant
-further certifies that such notice has been provided. = - "
Name see permit drawings page 3 of 5
Address
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit .numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
N!.
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEI-INR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to 10)
If the project involves the expenditure of public funds
or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting
compliance with the North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER OO NLAND --- - ---- - _ _ _ - - -
- _ ___ _. _
__ I understand that any-:permit ...issued ._ in response -to thFs
- - applncatio~ will allow~nly;the development described. in
_- _ _.
the application The ~`ajeet.will be,sub}echo coiieliiioins
_ .. _ __
=and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify -that to the laesi; -of-;zny Icr~owledge;-the-:pmpos~d
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact, grant
permission to representatives of state and federal review
agencies to enter ion the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the Z~' day of Mme- 20r_f ,
Print Name~,~ ~ ~,~, ~ . ~ ~,~, ;; ~ ~ S ~ 1 .
Signature d~---~~ ~--
Landowner r Authorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
i
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-S
/
~ L~ x 1, f
DGES AND ~~:,:--
BRI
JUN 0 4 2004
1. BRIDGES
- __ __
_ ~oreh~a~ ~~~y
Length of proposed bridge 200 ft
_ __
Width of proposed-Midge - 33 ft - -
_.. __
,-
Height ofproposed-bridge above wetlands
5 ft - _ _ - `.
Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flaw? -
_ Yes X No
If yes, explain
a. Public X Private
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
4(a~ 50' concrete -cored slab, total length of 200',
Driven Piles will be used to support spans
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge
Bradley Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL approximately 6.8 feet (NWL)
e. Will-proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge 40 ft
(2) Width of existing bridge 29 ft
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge 4.8 ft (NHV~
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) _Entire bridge to be
removed and replaced.
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert N/A
(2) Width of existing culvert N/A
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL N/A
(4) Will- all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain) N/A
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
5.1 to 8.8 ft
1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
opening? Yes X No
If yes, explain The proposed replacement
bridge will be a spanning structure, thereby
eliminating the piles in the stream channel.
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? Yes X No
If yes, explain
n. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning
their approval?
X .Yes No
1f yes, please provide record of their action.
See letter, dated 08/09/OlOwithin the appendix of
the _CE__dQCUment -stating no permits will be
required, under the Advanced Approval category
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-S
' 3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
_ _.
_ _-._
2. CULVERTS N/A a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL? _~
_.
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed - ~ -- - - _ Yes X No - --
Ifyes, ', _ _
(1) Length of area to be excavated
_.
b. .Number of culverts ro osed ' -
- - _' -_( urea to be excavated
T _ _ _ - p p _ i t o area to be excavated - -
- 3) -Depth of
,;_ c: Type of culvert (construction material, style) (4) .Amount of -material to be :excavated in cubic -
_ _ yards _
_ _. _ ,_ -
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existingbridge?_ T - .
_. _ -
- __ _-- -
__
Yes No ` b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
If yes, require any excavation within: NO
(1) Length of existing bridge _ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert
g. Width of proposed culvert
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL
Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain
Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation.
potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of'area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any higlground excavation?
X Yes ' No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated 145 ft
(2) Width of, area to be excavated- 65 ft
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 1700 cubic yards
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any
excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
To be determined by contractor.
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
To be i determined
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes X No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes X No
(5) Does th'e disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes X No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHyV or NWL? Yes X No
If yes, give dimension if .different -from No. 2
above.
Reviceri Oi/95

Form DCM-MP-S
e ~~~~'the placement of the proposed~bndge';or euly _ d.
result -it any ~; fill ;.(other than .excavated 'material
described in Item d Yabove} to be,placed~bel_ow M
,~
if yep' _ _ e.
.~~ ,-ter. ~ :.-p. - -:
Y`(i~, Length of ~~rea :to be filled i. ] 8
(2),,'Widthofareato`behlled 23 - ~ _ --
., Pu~ose>df filb`~$nd~e 'Abutment _
Will the proposed project require any work channels?
Yes X . No _-
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
How will excavated-or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? ..Design -.:.Standards :-for,
Sensitive~Vatersheds wilLbe=userk~.~

f.
.: N~
Wetlau~
:(
~~~~~~
3 - - - . ---.,~-,
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? _ Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
,-
- _ f. What type of construction equipment will be used
~= f (for example, dragline, backhoe o"r hydraulic dredge}?
Standard bridge and roadway construction
- equipment.
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail _

4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail The removal of the old
causeway and replacement with a spanning
structure will remove 0.19 acres of fill in wetlands.
Removal of the causeway will also result in-the
enhancement of ?? acres of coastal marsh
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail Sewer and water lines will
be relocated using directional boring
c. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
Applicant~or Project`Name•
~ ^ ~d--~-. t~
Signature
~~~~-~
Date
' + F y'~I
~~~
~ur~ 0 4 2004
~~~~;~~1~~~ ~i~y ®~N1

Permit Class
New
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and
Permit Number
92-04
Coastal Resources Commission
~~~~~
for
X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to Jean-Claude Corbi, 185 Sound View Drive, Wilmington, NC 28409
Authorizing development in New Hanover County at Adiacent to Masonboro Sound within the
community of Sound View , as requested in the permittee's application dated September 30, 2003,
including the attached workplan drawings (2), one dated 11/05/03 and one dated revised 04/08/04
This permit, issued on June 25. 2004 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subject to fines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
Docking Facility
1) No sewage, whether treated or untreated, shall be discharged at any time from any boats using the
docking facility. Any sewage discharge at the docking facility shall be considered a violation of this
permit for which the permittee is responsible. This prohibition shall be applied and enforced throughout
the entire existence of the permitted structure.
2) This permit authorizes only the docks, piers, and other structures and uses located in or over the water
that are expressly and specifically set forth in the permit application. No other structure, whether
floating or stationary, may become a permanent part of this docking facility without permit
modification. No non-water dependent uses of structures may be conducted on, in or over public trust
waters without permit modification.
(See attached sheets for Additional Conditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing
date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work initiation or
continuance as the case maybe.
This permit must be accessible on-site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 2007
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DENR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
i
harles S. Jones, Director
Divi ' n of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

Jean-Claude Corbi
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Permit #92-04
Page 2 of 3
3) The pier and associated structures shall have a minimum setback distance of 15 feet between any parts
of the structure and the adjacent property owner's riparian access corridor, which is determined by
drawing a line parallel to the channel, then drawing a line perpendicular to the channel line that
intersects with the shore at the point where the upland property line meets the water's edge.
4) The authorized covered gazebo shall not be enclosed. Any material (used on the sides shall not obstruct
view and must be permeable to air and water. Screen or wire on the sides along with benches and knee
walls are permitted. Lattice is specifically excluded from being used,under this authorization.
~~
5) The roof of the covered gazebo shall not be designed for second story use.
6) The authorized structure and associated activity must not cause an unacceptable interference with
navigation.
7) The permittee will maintain the authorized work in good condition and in conformance with the terms
and conditions of this permit. The permittee is not relieved of this requirement if he abandons the
permitted activity without having it transferred to a third party.
8) This permit does not authorize the interference with any existing or proposed Federal ro'ect, and the
p J
permittee will not be entitled to compensation for damage to the authorized structure or work, or injury
which may be caused from existing or future operations undertaken, by the United States in the public
interest.
This permit authorizes a maximum of four (4) boat slips
NOTE: Permanent reflectors should be attached to the structure in order to make it more visible during
hours of darkness or inclement weather.
NOTE: The permittee is cautioned that this permit does not authorize the placement of tie piles in
association with the docking facility. Furthermore, due to the proximity of the AIWW, boats
utilizing the docking facility will be subject to frequent wavewash from passing vessels. The
issuance of this permit does not relieve the permittee from taking all proper steps to ensure the
integrity of the structure and the safety of moored boats. The permittee shall not hold the State
of North Carolina or the United States liable for any damage to the structure or moored boats.
(ten era 1
The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States requires the
removal, relocation, or other alteration of the structure or work authorized by this permit, or if in the
opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause
unreasonable obstruction to free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee will be required, upon
due notice from the Corps of Engineers, to remove, relocate or alter'~i the structural work or obstructions
caused thereby, without expense to the United States or the state of North Carolina. No claim shall be
made against the United States or the state of North Carolina on account of any such removal or
alteration.

Jean-Claude Corbi Permit #92-04
Page 3 of 3
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
NOTE: This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional state, federal or local permits,
approvals or authorizations that maybe required.
NOTE: Future development of the permittee's property may require a modification of this permit.
Contact a representative of the Division at [phone] prior to the commencement of any
such activity for this determination. The permittee is further advised that many non-water
dependent activities are not authorized within 30 feet of the normal high water level.
NOTE: The permittee and/or his contractor are urged to meet with a representative of the Division prior
to project initiation.
NOTE: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers authorized the proposed project under General Permit No.
197800056 (COE Action Id. No. 200400685) that was issued on 06/01/04.

~j_ro~L~s E`149F,~.n 7
c-i r~. !.T _.. 1
i - -
~ ~ ~ _ ~
'~ ~ k
~1
`~~ :Q
4 . ~ 1_ _, S l .~ it
s
F ~ H
m ,°i ° 53 r^ $'^ r~ 0
r„
51-~
oN~so~~~~~~ ~
°~ = o
~ ~ ~~~ ~h
` ~
--i
D
--I
0
Z
6~
0
O
~,
O
r
r
-i
D
--~
O
Z
61
t
O
0
O
m
O
r
cn cn
-i -i
D D
Oa
F +
U~ ll~
O O
~~
O O
~'
~ r~
Ul
r„~ r
~r
+~
O~
~a
~r
i
y ~
I
m rv
2~
~$
~_~
m~
rn~
im
~"
m
~~
!, to
1
N
m
~~
x ~'
S~
x x s~• corr. ~ 1
'
x I
~~
`
:~

Y~ ~ ~

~2
R ~
_ a
~ RR ~
~ _£

~
.
..
%
V
:
x ~
purun usooir x
~
~
x x
~

--r-- sor7wrno wa rv w,~
E~p~
~ O"
`/ ^ ~
~^'~uhnr tsm~
z m m
N T ~ m
Z m Z Z, a
g Z ~ --~ : ,
D
S ~ / ~
p a f- O
r -+ c
~ N O
K
~~ ~ °m
m ~
s D
r-
r~ D
~ z
z z K
u z
a ~^ ~^
2 p u
F '
O
~
P -
K ~
O
gpZ -
n ^;r? C Z
i ~
N z
//
z L 4
p a r
r -+ i/
a
~
=r m
I
y
v m D
a I -s r'
~~ ~
~:
o
Z ~
m x
~ N
''
o ~ ~)

N
~
~ m
° nm
y ~ ~ rt
ony
~_
-~ r

T~ O
m~
n
', o
o ~
X
7 h
7 ~-~ ~
2
0
~~
r
p V70T
0~~
o
~ Du
~ m~+
~~ ~ h
x ~, ~ Blt~
~ ~'
~~ ~
\~
~~~
~~ ~
la
G Y~
Att ~
C
Vl
ml ~i

mN-io
C7 D ~
o.~~'
z+m
SOD cm m
'ter ~O o
H
OC mN rm
~ _ ~
Ul D f Z «~+
O~ mr or
~ AZ
~~ z
r=
i
N~
m=
m~
~o
~~,
0
N 'jOm
~n Z
~o
rm
a
Z~
H
`~
D
m
N
m
a
'h

N
~
O 'D

°i
l o ~
D

o N .-. ~
Z Q
~ D fTl
~ ~
t7
r 0
mD
~ oWr
~ m~~
D ~ ~

'17 Tl
f
-~
=m
m3
~o
r~
DD
z~
0
(~~
n I'~
/ ~ W ' ! a
b~
OOf~f W
~ /~j+J
II~~
~
~ ~
W
1
'~ ~~ ~
`
~
~F~~ x 6~ ~ a
~«~ ---L as
~ o
Q ~" ww,pa,~..vE , ~~
~ a
-- ~ °
~

14
~
~ y
_ r
E
~
~ ~ /b/~~
q y f ~
I ~ a>
I V\
~
+`~1Q{
s '~~ ~J_ 1
v ~
N
$ ~ `,
N
~~ a
$ 1 ~~,.1
$~ , ~.~~
/~ ~~ / ~ Tr ~k~
~ ~j Z 9 V ~ ~
~ ~~
~ ~ ~a A~
~ ~a
~~ g g ~,
~~~ ~ e
~~~jj
n ~ +. ~ Q In $~ 6
~ ~
M
m v x a E P
~ ~
A m T
m
v
~0 8^
~"' ~ " `` ~
~~~~
~~ ~~ ~ m
a m ~ 1<
v~ r^
~ cNi ~ ~ 00
~ I = ~
g i
P
~ ~~g
I t~
~ ~ I I ' ~
I
1'
~ ~ ~ / / t ~
S i
o
/ R
. ~ ~aP
e bay `>p
N C~ py0 S•° C
~~ ~. ~

.Y~ ~
~~~
`~i
5.--~• ~1~P~"~ . 01 ~ ~ ~ ssr-
~Ad.O s ~J
r u
~~ ~~ W~iS11 Ar17111~~~'~
F n \
o \~
~
.~ ~

~~~~
~~
_ aR O
~
~
~a
oos y
i v~

, mP
S
N
' O

s
= N
; t '1~ ~

~ Q
~

y

`A
..r...
~.~~~
~~s~
~~$O
b
i ~~~~~a
~ /~~. A
~ G
7.'.P ~=
h
rn~~+~ODv
„~,,~
NA~I`l~~` r
~~~wa
~tp Caw WW '
~ §~~
Vf y
3~~
oe ae
1
r

Y
--I
.Z
Q
D
m
Z
v
rn

T~~h~
~~~~
z
mz~ al
S~: Q I'

Lidro.;~i~ /@~j49F.~rn
[. T
T
F ~ (~
Z ~ !(LS
M
~ E a
~~~a~~o~~~~~
~~o~~~~~~~ o
°^ ~4~~+`n'3~ga
oo~$ ~
T
p h ~ t^ 2
D
--I
O
z
6~
cn
0
O
m
0
r
r
-F
-~
D
O
Z
t
O
O
-I
O
T
+
0
r
Z7
r-
~ N
-~ -.~
D D
~~
+ +
(Ji C7r
O O
O O
+ ~
~,, +
~ N
V~
rv r
~r
+ ~
O~
~~
~~
y ~
I
m~
~'
~~
~_~
~~
m „~
i~
~"
m
`^ m
~y
~n
i
N
~ ~
* ~ ~

~ :
I
~~ ~ ~
• & .
~
~:
s

X X ~l'COK. 1I
'I
x D
/ QY
~ ~$ ~ ~I
Y~ ~
~

R ~ a
~ ~
g ~
^ ~ _ p
^ T
/ V
,
~
X
V
VI
V
~
x @
.. 4
a otun usoar x o
~
'
Q
x x ~ J
~

~-~'- SQ 7W/XD WN'IPRN
~ a ( O'

- ~
~/7B ~/"+'uluti ESXf~
m ]J 'O
n m p
y~j T C ~
i ~ rzn "" i ~
~p ~ z z a
Z Z -'I _ ' -1
ZO ~ O / C
n r-
-1
~ N O
K ~ u: o 0
_ .~ m
S b
r
~` n
s ~
Z K
_ _ t, 2
r
r
N
O
m
y m m
o zp F '_
< n
p
Z A Z _ r
-
r
nm y ~ Z /
i y =
/
N
O_
O P r
r -~ ~
v
<
O
Rl
m m
~ y o m D
A I ~
/~
ne
c° c
Z~ rm" 'l
~~
''
v n
r
/
/
o
c +
c
n o
~
~
w, m
.
~ o ~ Q
~~m
p {~
I .F
o f") D
C .
-+r

T~ L)
m~
C7
oX o -a
n
~ h
7 ~-'. 2
0
p VfOT
O -+ ~
~1 DOS
~ mss
x ~ BRRX
,~C ~~
~• `
1_lrj7
`<
~~
~~
~ ~_~_ ~ N
O
pp
4
mlm
m`l'-~o
nD~J
--I
O.aN
Z+~
m
NOD C m m
-ir" ~ ° o
-~
OC mN -mim
N
'~' ~ >C .~. a'rl
cn ar z~-
p~ "tr °rr-
~ AZ Z
r=
N~
m=
m~
`~'o
~~
0
N
Vl ~ O
m
~z
r °
rm
Z~
m
H
m m
o
N ~
o ~
o
°' =
1
D
N

~~ -~
Z Q
° D fTl
'"~ -I
~
r o
r*i D
~W~
-~ mho
i

~ x
~

t3
mp
H ~
r
2D
0
~~
~~~~
~`
x r

D "
~ ~ ~ ~~
~ v x ~
~ r~
~rn ~.. _.
Ao g~
~ ~ 8$$L„
A ~ ~~
O X
am
v° + ~! 4
'~ n
g ~ r' ~
a ai
w ~ ,_
g ~ ~E
~ I
I
,~ ~
l~ /
* ;~
8 i
~~
~ ~
'~
/ R
ti~
.~~ `~ .
s. A~ `, //
~r ~ ~B `~~~~ \~c
>/
~/
10
(/ 6s I ~~

L~
a
Vk' ^^
MJ
~
z
~J x ~~
l aR
=~
a
~1
~
~
X
\
~ au ~
-
~_ ~~
~ i
~~
~ 1°
as
~
1 n ~ l:J Q ~R MN /PR,yNE /
~
~ y~
11 ~
~~
~
1
~
~
~
°P~
_
X§~• N~ H
- 7'GgWEt ,~ -
~tis g
~
1
P a a 7
p
~ ~
-
a '~
~
~
~ ~m
8 r' i
N
"' F A
2! _ o
~ .~ ,~
$ ~ o
~ ` •T ~` Z
s
1a
_.,.,~..~! ust
+y
W
,,°o
°o
1
u.iwxi+ urnnati^1°."
jf+ i
a~
', ~ * ~ ~"$
/ ~ ~ $~
1
r;
i ~
I Q
~~ ~` ~
I ~-z~~oD v
m
p~~~~~~
N~,~~~~o
~q~
° !~~
.._
t 6 ~ Y~
R~ ~~ O
~O
~ / $ S v'
iv7m ~ O 1~
w ~
a N
~ ~~
Q
..
1 ~
O
y
.3
~ ~
Q
y
-'1
Z
N
0
D
rn
Z
v
m
v~
fi~~~
~~~z
~x~~~0
~~~~~
c ~~
r ~A
~K
i _" ~
H
I
rn ~'+~oD v
~t~~~v~
u a~wyu~o i
~~w~w~ r
e~~ §~w
N y
"b
~~
~~~~~
~ ~
~~ ~
a!~

z ~
0
m~a,~
° F jo
Q'
~
~~„ d N w ~
~

~

~ C/1
~ W
~~
~ zx o~
~ ~ c m~
m m co
c °p
'~ ~C7 VO
...
.~
w v ~ ,~
w ~ W ~
g O
~.'`
' ,
O
O N
~ ~ z z zoo ~.
v
w ~ ~ ~~ w~ ~
~ Z
¢

LL ~ w
o
.
a w
~ ~ C U A ~
v> ~ ~o m U
;~ v z

~~~ o 0
=Z" ~ °
~~

r
a

r
~_
N
L ~ ~ p U
L N ~ ~ °
~
~ U ~ v I
H
~ ~ `

U
Q
a

~
~
H
~_ ~
oi~ `-°

~

~ !

`

I
!
v

~ ~ c
_
~ p
W
a Z N
=~
~

Q
g m
E
~
°
3 ~
~ ~~
- ~
~
w
~ N
C ~ U O O

N
a
~ m
d n
~ ~ ~
m
U ~ ~
~

~ ~ 'O
m
O
U
0
0
N
J
_
O O
~
N
O ~ N n
•- ~
:d O N
O
m
(n LL ° m
`-' O K
~ o
~ ~
J
~ O
r ~
Z O
H

Form DCM-MP-1
APPLICATIO
N
(To be completed by all applicants) .
Wilmington, NC
c. Street address or secondary road number
1. APPLICANT SR 1411
a. Landowner:
Name N. C. Department of Transportation
Address 1548 Mail Service Center
City Raleigh State NC
Zip 27699 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent (Contact):
Name Deanna Riffey
Address same as above
City
State
Zip Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
c. Project name (if any} B-3496
NOTE: Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s), and/or
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County New Hanover
b. City, town, community or landmark
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? X Yes No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) Bradley Creek
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Replace existing bridge. Grading. Having.
drainage, and structures
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? New Work
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? Public transportation
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed project.
If more space is needed, please attach additional
pages. Purpose of project is to provide public
transportation. Bridge No. 10 will be replaced at
the existing location with a new structure, while
maintaining traffic during construction with an
off-site detour.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract ROW approx 2 acres
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or NWL
Roadway elevation is 6 feet above NWL
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Tidal Marsh-Newhan and Kenansville-
Craven-Lakeland
e. Vegetation on tract Salt Marsh is composed of Salt
Marsh Cord~rass and black needle rush
f. Man-made features now on tract existing bridge
and roadway
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land classification
Of the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
X Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
N/A
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? X Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? X Yes _ No
If yes, by whom? SHPO
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes _ No
Coastal (marsh) X Other _
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? YES
(Attach documentation, if available)
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of
the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industriaUcommercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.)
surface runoff from roadway and surrounding
watershed
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
~ A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. ff the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then forward
a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the
owner claims title, plus written permission from the
owner to carry out the project.
~ An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to Coastal
Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed
description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
regarding that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site
or location map is a part of plat requirements and it
must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel
unfamiliar with the area to the site. Include highway or
secondary road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and the like.

Form DCM-MP-1
•A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
•A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats by
certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that
they have 30 days in which to submit comments on the
proposed project to the Division of Coastal.
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name see permit drawings page 3 of 5
Address
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
pernuttee, and issuing dates.
A
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to 10)
If the project involves the expenditure of public funds
or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting
compliance with the North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact, grant
permission to representatives of state and federal review
agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the '~~~ day of i5'1_ t~~, 20~~ j.
Print Name '~-;~ _ ~ 3 . ~w ~:. ~ ,~ °'-.
Signature ~ ~' -
Iandowner r Authorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE:. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-S
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
1. BRIDGES
a. Public X Private
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
4(a, 50' concrete -cored slab, total length of 200',
Driven Piles will be used to support spans
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge
Bradley Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL approximately 6.8 feet (NWL)
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge 40 ft
(2) Width of existing bridge 29 ft
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge 4.8 ft (NHV~
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) Entire bridge to be
removed and replaced.
g. Length of proposed bridge 200 ft
h. Width of proposed bridge 33 ft
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
Sft
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
_ Yes X No
If yes, explain
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
5.1 to 8.8 ft
1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
opening? Yes X No
If yes, explain The proposed replacement
bridge will be a spanning structure, thereby
eliminating the piles in the stream channel.
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert N/A
(2) Width of existing culvert N/A
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL N/A
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain) N/A
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? Yes X No
]f yes, explain
n. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning
their approval?
X Yes No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
See letter, dated 08/09/OlOwithin the appendix of
the ('~F document -stating no permits will be
required, under the Advanced Approval category.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-S
2. CULVERTS N/A
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
c. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If yes,
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
Length of existing bridge
Width of existing bridge
Navigation clearance
bridge
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert
g. Width of proposed culvert
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain
Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
underneath existing
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
_ Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of azea to be excavated
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within: NO
Coastal Wetlands _SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of azea to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yazds
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any highground excavation?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated 145 ft
(2) Width of azea to be excavated 65 ft
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yazds 1700 cubic yards
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any
excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
To be determined by contractor.
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
To be determined
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes X No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
(4) Will the disposal azea be available for future
maintenance? Yes X No
(5) Does the disposal azea include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes X No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal azea include any azea below
the MHW or NWL? Yes X No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-S
e. Will the placement of.fhe~pmposed bridge or culvert
result art:;any ~fill,~,(otlies =than excavated material
described"m Item d above)'t~ be~placed below MH
or,.NWL?yv X `:'>Yes r~'J~ ~~~ ~No .._ _
``~y~;
'? (1) Length of area~to be~filled 18
(2} V~idtb of area to lie filled ?3 '
~} Prizpose gffill 'Bnd4e Abut~ueni
~: n--~ ~ ~~. -.~ , rr _- ,,.~,.
f WiII the placement of the,~roposed,lndge:'ar culvert
result m'~ .fik ~~~~a ~xca~rated material
descn`6ed'm Item. d~abov h ~be pieced. within _
`:'NO GoastalWetlarids .NOi ,S~Vs ~ `NO C?t~ier
°Wetlands If yes, w
°(T) Iaengtli af~a ~ to- e;fille~- ~ ~' ~R ~ ~'
~;(2} Width of area~tgbe~[~cl_y,
~_
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? _ Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail The removal of the old
causeway and replacement with a spanning
structure will remove 0.19 acres of fill in wetlands.
Removal of the causeway will also result in the
enhancement of ?? acres of coastal marsh
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail Sewer and water lines will
be relocated using directional boring
c. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
d. Will the proposed project require any work channels?'
Yes X No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? Design Standards for
Sensitive Watersheds will be used.
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe or hydraulic dredge)?
Standard bridge and roadway construction
equipment.
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen.
environmental impacts.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail _
~~1~~ 5. ~-v.,.~ ,,._
Applicant or Project Name
Signature s
J ~~~-~
Date
Revised 03/95

c~
.wsT^n'o
~a o=~
~ ..:R~...>~
.Q~~
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
May 20, 2004
Division of Coastal Management
Hestron Plaza II
151-B NC Highway 24
Morehead City, NC 28557
ATTENTION:
Mr. Bill Arrington
District Manager
Dear Mr. Arrington:
SUBJECT:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTZVIENT OF TRANSPORTATION
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
WETLANDS 1401 GROUP
JUN 0: 22004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Application for CAMA Major Development Permit for the
proposed replacement of Bridge No. 10 over Bradley Creek on SR
1411 in New Hanover County, Division 3. Federal Aid No. BRSTP-
1411(5), State Project No. 8.2251101; TIP No. B-3496.
Please find enclosed three copies of the Categorical Exclusion (CE) document, permit
drawings, and design plan sheets, MP1 and MPS forms, and a copy of postal notifications for
Adjacent Riparian Property Owners.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The North Cazolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No.
10 over Bradley Creek on SR 1411 in New Hanover County. The existing bridge will be
replaced with a longer bridge along the existing alignment. The proposed bridge replacement
will be a spanning structure, thereby eliminating the piles in the stream channel. The
proposed bridge is approximately 200 feet in length and will facilitate the removal of a total
of 160 feet of the old causeway, resulting in the removal of fill in 0.19 acres of wetland.
During construction, traffic will be detoured along existing azea roads. There will be no in
water construction between February 15 and June 30 to protect anadromous fish spawning.
PROPOSED IMPACTS
Bradley Creek (DWQ Index No. 18-87-24-4(1)) Class SC HQW, and associated wetlands
will be impacted by the proposed project. Construction of the proposed project will result in
0.04 acre of fill in wetland, and 48 feet (0.025 ac) of impacts to Bradley Creek. Bridge No.
10 will be replaced with a four span structure, using top down construction. Driven piles will
be used to support the new bridge.
The 0.04 acres of fill in wetlands are due to the widening of the fill slopes resulting from
widening of the road and the installation of rip-rap at pipe outlets. The 0.025 ac of fill in
Bradley Creek results from the placement of rip-rap on the side of the channels adjacent to
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW. NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598

~1
the bridge. Rip rap has already been placed on the sides of the channel by the landowner and
the additional rip rap will prevent erosion.
MITIGATION
This project is on the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) transition list for mitigation.
However, due to minimization of impacts during the design phase and the use of onsite
mitigation, no offsite mitigation will be needed. Project impacts will be less than the 0.1 acre
threshold, therefore no mitigation is proposed. However the removal of the old causeway
will result in the restoration of 0.19 acres of coastal plain tidal marsh wetlands. The removal
of the causeway in 143 feet of tidal marsh wetlands will result in the enhancement of .74
acres of wetlands adjacent to the old causeway. This enhancement area was calculated by
determining the area of a '/ circle with a radius of 143 feet, based on the length of causeway
removed, on both sides of the bridge. Sheet 5 of 7 of the permit drawings shows the
enhancement area. The NCDOT request that this mitigation be available for future NCDOT
projects, with the understanding that each future project will require agency approval for the
use of this mitigation.
BRIDGE DEMOLITION
The existing .deck and bridge railings are composed of concrete. The substructure is
composed of timber bents and caps. The NCDOT committed to removing the existing bridge
over Bradley Creek and the adjacent concrete utility structure in accordance with NCDOT's
Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and removal. No temporary fill will be
placed in Bradley Creek as a result of removing the existing bridge and utility structure.
UTILITIES
There is one sewer line and one water line in that will be relocated due to this project. The
6" force sewer main is currently located north of the existing bridge on three concrete piers.
A 8" water main is currently located underground on the south side of the bridge. Both of
these pipes will be relocated under Bradley Creek and the wetlands using directional bore
methods and will not .cause any additional jurisdictional impacts. The three concrete piers
that support the existing sewer line will be removed by the contractor.
FEDERALLY-PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed
Endangered, and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of January 29, 2003, the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service lists ten federally protected species for New Hanover
County. Of these species, the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) is listed
threatened due to similarity in appearance and is not subject to Section 7 consultation. There
is potential habitat for the manatee and the shortnose sturgeon at this project location, but it is
unlikely that either will be encountered. However, NCDOT will commit to adhering to the
Fish and Wildlife Service Guidelines for Avoiding Impacts to the West Indian Manatee (see
attached Guidelines). A biological conclusion of "May Affect, but Not Likely to Adversely
Affect" has been rendered for the West Indian manatee. A copy of the concurrence request.
letter dated February 4, 2004, to the Fish and Wildlife Service is attached. NCDOT also
commits to the above mentioned construction moratorium and adherence to best management
practices to avoid impacts to the shortnose sturgeon. The Biological Conclusion of No Effect
for the shortnose sturgeon remains valid. Biological conclusions of "No Effect" documented
in the CE for the remaining species given based on the absence of habitat within the project
area remain valid.

~' 1
REGULATORY APPROVALS
NCDOT requests that the proposed work be authorized under a Coastal Area Management
Act Major Development Permit. In a separate application, we are also requesting issuance of
a United States Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit 23 & 33 and a 401 Water
Quality Certification from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality.
Thank.you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional
information please call Mr. Brett Feulner at [phone].
Sincerely,
j\ F ~
..ti Grego J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
L.% Environmental Management Director, PDEA
GJT/drr
Cc:
Ms. Cathy Brittingham, NCDCM
Mr. David Timpy, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. John Hennessy, DWQ, Raleigh
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Mike Street, NCDMF
Mr. Mason Herndon, DEO
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. H. Allen Pope, P.E., Div. 3 Engineer

r
Qom.
U /
- ~~~
'~ /
a,~ ~~,
'~ ~'
,~~ y
v 4 SITE ~~b
o~
~ Z
\ \~ / \ .Sj
B
ty~ ~ ~ '° ` ~ r/
,;b, ~°e
O
\ O'y ~ o
~ ~'r ~ ~aa,F ~ ~
/ ,. ~~ \
~~~~~~ 11
~~~~
e~
~~ ~` %
4 G %
O ~'~v ~~
~,
a
Q~

Q, o
~.,
~~
74
~,,
~~
e
~-'8 9~ O E T ~ ~p~~y
~ ~~ ~~
Wrigh6ville
41 ~~--d
q,~ ~ 76 G
\~ ~ r ~ \ / i
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT:82251101 (B-3~96>
BRIDGE NO.10 OVER BRADLEY
CREEg ON SR 111
IN WILMINGTON
~ --

Y ~~ ~. wl ~~~ ~~~~~
0
E
O
0
E
0
N.=
0
ooa
-WLB WETLAND BOUNDARY
WETLAND
L
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
® FILL IN SURFACE
WATER
• • DENOTES MECHANIZED
•• •• • • • CLEARING
-~ FLOW DIRECTION
TB
~ TOP OF BANK
WE EDGE OF WATER
- - ~ -PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
---~- PROP: LIMIT OF FILL
~- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
- - NG - • NATURAL GROUND .
- P~- - PROPERTY LINE
=TDE TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- PDE PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-EAB-- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY.
- Epg.- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
-••-•U ---- WATER SURFACE
XX zX X X LIVE STAKES
BOULDER •
--- CORE FIBER ROLLS
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
12'-48'
PIPES
(DASHED LINES DENOTE
EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES
& ABOVE
W SINGLE TREE
.. .. .. .. WOODS. LINE
DRAINAGE INLET
~- ROOTWAD
RIP RAP
ADJACENT PROPERTY
5 OWNER'OR PARCEL
NUMBER (IF AVAILABLE)
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE

LEVEL SPREADER . ILS)
DITCH /
GRASS SWALE

~~~®~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT:82251101 (B-3~%>
BRIDGE NO.10 OVER BRADLEY
CREEg ON SR 1~t11
IN WILMINGTON
SHEET ~, OF ~ 07 ®Ol ~ 03

NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL N®.
NAMES
3 Carol Ann Russell
James A and
q Holiy A Hug

ADDRESSES
I10 Hooker Rd.
Wilmington, NC 28403
1601 Southwind Way
Wilmington, NC 28403
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT:82251101 <B-3~t96)
BRIDGE NO.10 OVER BRADLEY
CREEg ON SR 1<ll
IN WILMINGTON

y
New Hanover County
Bridge No. 10 Over Bradley Creek
on SR 1411 (Wrightsville Avenue)
in Wilmington
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-1411(5}
State Project No. 8.2251101
TIP Project No. B-3496
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
APPROVED:
'7- /-02
Date Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch,
NCDOT
I-j-~2
' Date
_n
~icholas L. Graf, P. E., Division Administrator
FHWA

New Hanover County
Bridge No. 10 Over Bradley Creek
on SR 1411 (Wrightsville Avenue)
in Wilmington
Federal Aid 1?rojectNo. BRSTP-1411(5)
State Project No. 8.2251101
TIP Project No. B-3496
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
July 2002
Documentation.Prepared in the
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch by:
~~.p~~ C
y~~
`,
ti'Y'
~~,,
?~FE /O~
z ,
o
~
~I ~ ~Q~ Q
:
~ ~
~
-
SEAL
Karen Boshoff Tayl r, P. E. _ ~

Project Development Engineer ~; `
~
~•.~H
~t~+.•'4~
~~
~~
~M
``
~''%~QFN BOS~,~~~•

S. Eric Midkiff, P. E.
Project Development Unit Head
c~<.u/4~ `~ ~/
Lubin V. Prevatt, P. E.
Assistant Manager

PROJECT COMMITMENTS
New Hanover County
Bridge No. 10 Over Bradley Creek
on SR 1411 (Wrightsville Avenue)
in Wilmington
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-1411(5)
State Project No. 8.2251101
TIP Project No. B-3496
Division 3 Construction
An in-water construction moratorium is required from February 15 to June 30. Bradley
Creek is located within a Primary Fish Nursery Area and may potentially provide habitat
for anadromous fish spawning. The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and
the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries require the moratorium.
Division 3 Construction/Structure Design Unit
The existing bridge over Bradley Creek (Bridge No. 10) and the adjacent concrete utility
structure will be removed in accordance with NCDOT's Best Management Practices for
Bridge Demolition and Removal (Case 2 action). No temporary fill will be placed in
Bradley Creek as a result of removing the existing bridge and utility structure. Based on
preliminary information, top down construction will be used to construct the new bridge.
Division 3 Construction
Suitable habitat for the West Indian manatee is present in the project area. NCDOT will
implement the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) "Precautions for General
Construction in Areas Which May Be Used by West Indian Manatee" (see Appendix B).
If these precautions are considered in all aspects of project construction, this project will
not affect the West Indian manatee.
Categorical Exclusion
July ], 2002

r f
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
I. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS ..........................................................1
II. COST ESTIMATE ................................................................................................1
III. ANTICIPATED DESIGN EXCEPTIONS ...................... ...........2
..........................
IV. DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS ..................................................2
A. Structure ....................................................................................................2
B. Roadway .................................................. .................................................2
C. Functional Classification ......................... .................................................2
D. Intersections ............................................. .................................................3
E. Right of Way and Access Control ........... .................................................3
F. Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations .................................................3
G. iJtilities ..................................................... .................................................3
H. School Bus Data ....................................... .........................................:.......3
I. Traffic Volumes ....................................... .................................................3
J. Accident Record ....................................... .................................................4
V. ALTERNATIVES .................................................................................................4
A. Build Alternatives .....................................................................................4
B. Alternatives Dropped from Further Study ................................................6
1. Do Nothing Alternative .................................................................6
2. On-site Detour ...............................................................................6
VI. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS ...............................................................6
A. Structure/Roadway ..............................:.....................................................6
B. Drainage ....................................................................................................7
C. Right of Way and Access Control ............................................................7
D. Bicycle Accommodations and Sidewalks .................................................7
E. Utility Conflicts ........................................................................................7
F. Maintenance of Traffic .............................................................................7
VII. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ..........................................................................7
A. General ......................................................................................................7
B. Air and Noise ............................................................................................7
C. Community Impacts ...........................................
.......................................8
D. Farmland Effects.....------•--• ........................................................................8
E. Historical Effects and Archaeological Effects ..........................................8

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
F. Natural Resources .....................................................................................8
1. Physical Resources ...................................................................... ..8
a. Topography ..................................................................... ..8
b. Soils ................................................................................ ..9
' c. Water Resources
.............................................................
..
9
2. Biotic Resources ......................................................................... 11
a. Biotic Communities ........................................................ 11
b. .Summary of Anticipated Impacts ................................... 13
3. Jurisdictional Topics ................................................................... 16
a. Waters of the United States ............................................. 16
b. Permits ...........................................................:................ 17
c. Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation ...................... 18
4. Federally Protected Species ........................................................ 20
5. Federal Species of Concern and State Listed Species ................ 29
6. Summary ......:..................... ................
......................................... 31
G. Flood Hazard Evaluation and Stream Modification ............................... 31
VIII. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION .............................................................31
A. Agency Coordination ..............................................................................31
IX. BASIS FOR CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ................................................... .32

r
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
FIGURES
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Proposed Improvements (Aerial Photograph)
Figure 3 Proposed Off=Site Detour Route
Figure 4 Projected Traffic Forecast
Figure 5 100-year Floodplain Boundary
TABLES
Table 1 Summary of Bridge Replacement Alternatives ............................5
Table 2 Estimated Impacts to Terrestrial Communities ...........................13
Table 3 Fish Species Listed by NMFS Likely to Occur in Bradley
Creek ...................................................................................15
Table 4 Federally Protected Species for New Hanover County ..............21
Table 5 Federal Species of Concern and State Status
for New Hanover County ....................................................30
APPENDICES
Appendix A Comments Received from-Agencies
Appendix B U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (tJSFWS) Guidelines (July 2, 1996)
"Precautions for the General Construction in Areas Which May Be
Used. by the West Indian Manatee in North Carolina'.'

New Hanover County
Bridge No. 10 Over Bradley Creek
on SR 1411 (Wrightsville Avenue)
in Wilmington
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-1411(5)
State Project No. 8.2251101
TIP Project No. B-3496
The replacement of Bridge No. 10 is included in the Draft 2004-2010
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as a bridge replacement project due to the
deteriorated structural integrity. The project is part of the Federal Highway Bridge
Replacement and Rehabilitation Program (HBRRP) and has been classified as a
"Categorical Exclusion". The project's location is shown in Figure 1. No substantial
environmental impacts are anticipated. Right of way acquisition is scheduled to begin in
Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2003 and construction is scheduled to begin in FFY 2004.
I. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace
Bridge No. 10 on existing location as shown in Figure 2. The existing structure carries
Wrightsville Avenue (SR 1411) over Bradley Creek in a north-south direction. Bradley
Creek is flowing from west to east in the vicinity of the project. The existing bridge and
a portion of the existing causeway will be removed and a new bridge 200 feet (61 meters)
in length will be constructed. The clear roadway width of the new bridge is 33 feet
(10 meters).
Approximately 160 feet (48.8 meters) of the existing causeway will be removed.
The grade of the new structure will be approximately the same as the grade of the
existing bridge. Approximately 270 feet (82.3 meters) of new approach work is needed
to the south and 260 feet (79.3 meters) of new approach word is needed to the north of
the new bridge. The approach roadway will have a pavement width of 24 feet
(7.2 meters) with 8-foot (2.4-meter) shoulders, of which 4-feet (1.2 meters) will be paved.
The proposed right of way width is approximately 80 feet (24.4 meters) wide with
additional construction easements. Traffic will be detoured on existing secondary roads
during construction to allow for on-site replacement with road closure (see Figure 3).
II. COST ESTIMATE
The current estimated costs for the replacement of Bridge No. 10 are as follows:
Construction Cost $ 1,150,000
Rigth of Way Cost $ 110,500
Total Cost $ 1,260,500

The estimated total cost of the project, as shown in the Draft 2004-2010
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), is $ 1,013,000, which includes $ 28,000 for
right of way acquisition, $850,000 for construction, and $ 135,000 for prior years cost.
III. ANTICIPATED DESIGN EXCEPTIONS
NCDOT does not anticipate any design exceptions.
IV. DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
A. Structure
Bridge No. 10 is located 0.8 miles (1.3 km) west of the US 76 junction and carries
Wrightsville Avenue (SR 1411) over Bradley Creek. The bridge consists of a two-span
reinforced concrete rail and deck on timber beams supported by timber caps and timber
piles with timber bulkhead-type abutments. The existing structure is 39 feet
(11.9 meters) long and is 29.3 feet (8.9 meters) wide. The bridge has a 28-foot
(8.4-meter) clear roadway width with two 11-foot (3.4-meter) travel lanes. The vertical
clearance between the floorbeams of the bridge deck and the streambed is approximately
13 feet (4 meters).
The bridge was originally constructed in 1961. According to Bridge Maintenance
Unit records, the sufficiency rating of the existing bridge is 28.1 out of a possible 100.
The existing bridge is found to be functionally obsolete. The posted weight restrictions
for the bridge are 28 tons for single vehicles and 34 tons for truck-tractor semi-trailers.
B. Roadway
Wrightsville Avenue (SR 1411) is currently atwo-lane facility in the vicinity of
Bridge No. 10 consisting of a 24-foot (7.2-meter) wide travelway with 6-foot (1.8-meter)
wide grass shoulders.
The vertical alignment is flat in the project area. Horizontally, Bridge No. 10 is
located on a tangent section; however, there is a notable curve on SR 1411 north of the
existing bridge.
The posted speed limit on Wrightsville Avenue in the project area is 45 mph.
C. Functional Classification
According to the North Carolina Functional Classification System, Wrightsville
Avenue (SR l4l l) functions as an urban collector within the study limits of the project.
Wrightsville Avenue is designated as a major thoroughfare in the Wilmington Urban
Area Thoroughfare Plan.

D. Intersections
Hooker Road (SR 1420) intersects Wrightsville Avenue (SR 1411) approximately
125 feet (38.1 meters) south of Bridge No. 10. Rogersville Road (SR 1419) intersects
Wrightsville Avenue approximately 950 feet (289.6 meters) north of the existing bridge.
Both intersections are stop-sign controlled.
E. Risht of Wav and Access Control
The existing right of way on Wrightsville Avenue (SR 1411) in the vicinity of the
project is 60 feet (18.3 meters). No control of access currently exists in the project area.
F. Bicvcle and Pedestrian Accommodations
No exclusive bicycle lanes, other bicycle facilities, or sidewalks currently exist
along Wrightsville Avenue (SR 1411) in the vicinity ofthe-project. Bridge No. 10
currently has 2 feet (0.6 meters) of lateral clearance on each side of the bridge for passage
of pedestrians and bicyclists.
G. Utilities
A forced sewer line is located above ground on a separate concrete structure west
of the existing bridge and continues underground parallel to and west of the causeway.
An underground waterline runs parallel and east of the existing bridge and causeway and
crosses underneath Wrightsville Avenue perpendicularly just south of the bridge.
An overhead shared utility line (telephone, power, and cable) parallels the
existing bridge and causeway to the west and crosses to the east just south of the bridge.
An underground telephone line parallels the bridge and causeway to the west.
H. School Bus Data
Sixteen (16) school buses travel on Wrightville Avenue (SR 1411) for a total of
29 trips a day, year round, in the vicinity of the project. These school buses serve J.C.
Roe Pre-kindergarten School; Bradley Creek, College Park, Gregory, and Wrightsville
Beach Elementary Schools; Roland-Grise, Virgo, and Williston Middle Schools; and
Lakeside and New Hanover High Schools.
Traffic Volumes
The current traffic volume (base year 2000) on Wrightsville Avenue (SR 1411)
between Hooker Road (SR ]420) and Rogersville Road (SR 1419) is 11,800 vehicles per
day (vpd). The projected traffic volume on Wrightsville Avenue in the year 2025 is
20,700 vpd in the project area (see Figure 4).

1. Accident Record
There have been nineteen (19) accidents reported in the vicinity of Bridge No. 10
during the period between November, 1997, and October, 2000. No fatal accidents
occurred during the studied years.
V. ALTERNATIVES
A. Build Alternatives
Three "build" alternatives were studied for the proposed project. Alternative 1
proposed the replacement of Bridge No. 10 with a bridge of adequate length to satisfy
hydraulic needs of the surrounding area. Alternative 2 proposed the removal of Bridge
No. 10 and a section of the existing causeway (approximately 480 feet [146.3 meters]
west of the existing bridge) and constructing a bridge approximately 550 feet
(167.4 meters) in length. Alternative 3 proposed the removal of Bridge No. 10 and a
section of the causeway that would equal the area of wetlands to be impacted by the
proposed project. The three alternatives are summarized below:
Alternative 1
Alternative 1 considered replacement of the existing bridge with a new structure
approximately 100 feet long. Three different side slope scenarios; 2:1, 3:1, and 4:1 were
considered for the roadway approaches to the bridge. Two-to-one (2:1) side slopes will
need rip-rap for slope protection. Cross pipes will be installed under the causeway to
improve sheet flow.
Alternative 2:
Alternative 2 considered removal of a large section of the existing causeway and
constructing a bridge approximately 550 feet in length. Three different side slope
scenarios; 2:1, 3:1, and 4:1 were considered for the roadway approaches to the bridge.
Alternative 3 (Recommended):
Alternative 3 considered removal of a section of the existing causeway that will
result in restoring an area equal to the area of wetlands to be impacted by the proposed
project. Three side slope scenarios; 2:1, 3:1, and 4:1 were considered for the roadway
approaches to the bridge. The length of the new bridge would range from 138 feet to 234
feet (42.1 meters to 71.3 meters) depending on the side slopes. Alternative 3 with 3:1
side slopes is the recommended alternative. The length of the recommended structure
was increased to 200 feet (61 meters) after preliminary planning studies were completed.
Table l summarizes impacts associated with all three bridge replacement
alternatives.

Table 1: Summary of Bridge Replacement Alternatives
Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
(Recommended)
Length 100 ft 550 ft 2:1 slopes = 138 feet
3:1 slopes =188 feet*
4:1 slopes = 234 feet
Width 40 ft 32 ft 32 feet
Total $850,000 $2,625,000 138-ft bridge = $1,100,000
Construction Cost 188-ft bridge = $1,195,000
234-ft bridge = $1,375,000
Approximate 2:1 slopes = 0.109 ac 0.2 ac 138-ft bridge = 0.109 ac
Wetland Impacts 3:1 slopes = 0.191 ac 188-ft bridge = 0.191 ac
4:1 slopes = 0.264 ac 234-ft bridge = 0.264 ac
Approximate Area 0.048 ac 0.771 ac 138-ft bridge = 0.109 ac
of Causeway to be 188-ft bridge = 0.191 ac
Removed 234-ft bridge = 0.264 ac
Note: The length of the recommended structure has been increased to 200 feet (61 meters) with 3:1
side slopes after preliminary planning studies were completed.
B. - Alternatives Dropped from Further Study
Do 1'~lothing, Alternative
The "Do Nothing" alternative is not practical, since it will require the
eventual closing of the road as the existing bridge completely deteriorates.
Rehabilitation of the existing bridge is neither practical nor economical.
2. On-site Detour
An on-site detour was dropped from consideration because of the pristine
salt marsh located on both sides of the existing bridge and the impacts associated
with constructing a temporary bridge.
VI. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
A. Structure/Roadway
Alternative 3 is the recommended alternative. Bridge No. 10 will be replaced
with a new 200-foot (61-meter) long cored slab bridge on existing location (see Figure 2).
A section of the causeway, approximately 160 feet (48.8 meters) in length, will be
removed as part of the proposed improvements. The cross section of the new bridge will
include two 12-foot (3.6-meter) wide travel lanes with 4.5-foot (1.4-meter) wide offsets

(shoulders) for pedestrian and bicycle passage. Based on preliminary information, top
down construction will be used to construct the new bridge.
Approximately 270 feet (82.3 meters) of new approach work is needed to the
south and 260 feet (79.3 meters) of new approach word is needed to the north of the new
bridge. The new approaches include two 12-foot (3.6-meter) travel lanes and 8-foot
(2.4-meter) wide shoulders, of which 4-feet (1.2-meters) will be paved.
Three-to-one (3:1) side slopes will be constructed at the roadway approaches to
the- new bridge. In this area, side slopes steeper than 3:1 present maintenance and slope
stability problems. In dry conditions where it never rains, a 2:1 side slope would always
be on the verge of failure and will fail by mass erosion when it rains. The safety factor
against slope failure increases to a more acceptable level with the use of 3:1 side slopes.
A 3:1 slope will also fail in some rain events; however, it will fail less frequently than a
2:1 slope. Vegetation takes longer to establish on poor sand material found in the coastal
areas. Vegetation tends to grow better on 3:1 side slopes and erosion is less likely to
occur. Refer to Section VILA on Pages 30 and 31 and Appendix A, Page A-4 and A-5
for coordination with resource and permitting agencies regarding the side slopes.
B. Drainage
Based on preliminary information, stormwater on the new structure may need to
be drained through openings on the deck. Due to the length of the proposed bridge, deck
drains may be required to drain excess water off the bridge. If deck drains ane required,
they will not be placed over open water. Based on NCDOT's guidelines for the location
and design of hazardous spill basins, no hazardous spill basins will be required for this
project.
C. Right of Wav and Access Control
The proposed right of way width is approximately 80 feet (24.4 meters) wide with
additional construction easements. No control of access is proposed for this project.
D. Bicycle Accommodations and Sidewalks
The new bridge will have a 4.5-foot (1.4-meter) lateral clearance on both sides of
the bridge for pedestrian and bicycle passage. The approaches to the bridge will have
4-foot (1.2-meter) paved shoulders to accommodate pedestrians and bicycles.
E. Utility Conflicts
A forced sewer line is currently located above ground on a separate structure west
of the existing bridge. The sewer line will need to be relocated. A waterline is currently
located underneath the creek east of the existing bridge and will need to be moved. It is
anticipated that directional boring will be used to relocate the existing forced sewer line
and waterline undemeath the creek.
6

An overhead shared utility line (telephone, power, and cable) that currently
parallels the existing bridge and causeway to the west and crosses to the east just south of
the bridge will need to be relocated. An underground telephone line paralleling the
bridge and causeway to the west will also need to be relocated. The method of relocating
the overhead shared utility line and underground telephone line is not known at this time.
F. Maintenance of Traffic
Traffic will be detoured on existing area roads during the construction period (see
Figure ~). The detour route will follow SR 1421 (Greenville Avenue) and US 76
(Oleander Drive) for alternative routes and will increase travel by 2.47 miles (4.0 km).
VII. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A.~ General
The project is expected to have an overall positive impact. Replacement of an
inadequate bridge will result in safer traffic operations. The project is considered to be a
federal "categorical exclusion" due to its limited scope and insignificant environmental
consequences. This bridge replacement will not have a substantial effect on the quality
of the human or natural environment by implementing the environmental commitments
of this .document in addition to use of current NCDOT standards and specifications.
The project is not in conflict with any plans, existing land use, or zoning
regulation. No change in land use is expected to result from construction of this project.
No adverse effect on families or communities is anticipated. Right of way acquisition
will be limited. No adverse effect on public facilities or services is expected. The project
is not expected to adversely affect social, economic, or religious opportunities in the area.
There are no publicly owned parks, recreational facilities, or wildlife and
waterfowl refuges on national, state, or local significance in the vicinity of the project.
This project will not impact any resource protected by Section 4(f) of the DOT Act.
The proposed bridge replacement project will not raise the existing flood levels or
have any significant adverse effect on the existing floodplain.
B. Air and Noise
The project is located in New Hanover County, which has been determined to be
in compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. 40 CFR part 51 is not
applicable, because the proposed project is located in an attainment area. This project is
not anticipated to create any adverse affects on the air quality of this attainment area.
Noise transmission loss provided by the proposed structure should be sufficient to
moderate any intrusive traffic noise. Since the existing two-lane bridge will be replaced

with atwo=lane bridge, the proposed project will not increase traffic volumes; therefore,
the project's impact on noise and air quality will not be significant. If vegetation is
disposed of by burning, all burning shall be done in accordance with applicable local
laws and regulations of the North Carolina SIP for air quality in compliance with 15
NCAC 2D.0520.
This evaluation completes the assessment requirements for highway traffic noise
of Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 772,. and for air quality of the 1990
Clean Air Act Amendments and the NEPA process.
C. ~ Community Impacts
This project does not propose relocations or negatively effect property access or
access to public facilities and services; therefore, no negative community impacts are
anticipated to result~from this project.
D. Farmland Effects
This bridge replacement project will not result in the loss of any federally or state
designated prime, unique or important farmland soils, nor will this project disrupt an
active farming operatiori.
E. Historical Effects and Archaeological Effects
The proposed project will not affect any potential historic architectural or
archaeological resources within the proposed project area. The State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO) reviewed the subject project and recommended that no
further historic architectural or archaeological surveys would be required (see letter in
Appendix A, Page A-2 and A-3).
F. Natural Resources
1. Physical Resources
Topography, soil and water resources, which occur in the study area, are
discussed below. In addition, a general description of the project vicinity and
project region is also described.
a. Topography
The proposed project is located in eastern New Hanover County
near the Intercoastal Waterway. The project is located in the Coastal Plain
Physiographic Province of North Carolina. Topography in the vicinity of
the study area is characterized as nearly level to gently sloping along
streams. Project elevations range from 5 to 10 feet (1.5 to 3 meters) above
mean sea level.

b. Soils
Soils located in the project area are of the Kenansville-Craven-
Lakeland and Tidal Marsh-Newhan associations. The Kenansville-
Craven-Lakeland association consists of nearly level to gently sloping
soils on uplands. Soils of the Tidal Marsh-Newhan association consist of
nearly level soils in flat or slightly depressional areas on rims of
depressions and on broad smooth flats. Tidal marsh is the dominant soil in
the study area. Information concerning specific soil types occurring in the
study area is provided below.
Craven fine sandy loam is nearly level, moderately well drained
soil found on broad, smooth flats on uplands. Areas are generally
irregular in shape and highly variable in size. This soil has a low organic
content, low permeability, low shrink-swell potential, and medium
available water capacity. The seasonal high water table is from 2 to 3 feet
(0.6 to 0.9 meters} below the surface.
Tidal marsh is on the nearly level flats between the coastal dunes
and the interior uplands. Organic-matter content of the surface layer is
high. The water table is at or above the surface most of the time and many
areas are flooded daily.
c. Water Resources
This section contains information concerning surface water
resources likely to be impacted by the proposed project. Water resource
assessments include the physical characteristics, best usage standards, and
water quality aspects of the water resources, along with their relationship
to major regional drainage systems. Probable impacts to surface water
resources are also discussed, as are means to minimize impacts.
Best Usage Classification
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has assigned index
numbers for streams and tributaries in North Carolina. One perennial
stream in the Cape Fear River Basin, Bradley Creek [DWQ Index No.
18-87-24-4(1), (8/1/90)] is crossed by SR 1411 (Wrightsville Avenue).
This stream carries a Best Usage Classification of SC HQW. Class SC
refers to saltwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life
including propagation and survival, and wildlife. All saltwaters shall be
classified to protect these uses at a minimum. High Quality Waters
(HQW), refers to waters which are rated as excellent based on biological
and physical/chemical characteristics through Division of Water Quality
monitoring or special studies.

No waters classified as Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), or
Water Supplies (WS-I or WS-II) occur within 1.0 mile (1.6 km) of project
study area.
Physical Characteristics
The salt marsh community is bisected by a coastal plain perennial
stream. At the time of the field visit, Bradley Creek had an approximate
depth of 4.0 feet (1.2 meters). The flow was slow and the water had dark
brown color. The average channel width was approximately 25 feet
(7.6 meters). The substrate consisted primarily of silt.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Point sources refer to discharges that enter surface water through a
pipe, ditch, or other defined points of discharge. The term most
commonly refers to discharges associated with wastewater treatment
plants. Point source dischargers located throughout North Carolina are
permitted through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) program. Dischargers aze required to register for a permit.
There aze no permitted dischargers located within 1.0 mile (1.6 km)
upstream of the project study azea.
Non-point source refers to runoff that enters surface waters
through stormwater flow or no defined point of dischazge. There aze
many types of land use activities that can serve as sources of nonpoint
source pollution including land development, construction, crop
production, animal feeding lots, failing septic systems, landfills, roads, and
parking lots. Sediment and nutrients are major pollution-causing
substances associated with nonpoint source pollution. Others include fecal
coliform bacteria, heavy metals, oil and grease, and any other substance
that may be washed off the ground or removed from the atmosphere and
carried into surface waters.
Water Quality
The DWQ has initiated a whole basin approach to water quality
management for the 17 river basins within the state. To accomplish this
goal the DWQ collects biological, chemical and physical data that can be
used in basinwide assessment and planning. All basins are reassessed
every five years. Prior to the implementation of the basinwide approach to
water quality management, the Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient
Network assessed water quality by sampling for benthic macroinvertebrate
organisms at fixed monitoring sites throughout the state. There are no
biological monitoring sites located within the project vicinity.
~o

2. Biotic Resources
This section describes the ecosystems encountered and the relationships
between vegetative and faunal components within terrestrial, and aquatic
ecosystems. Descriptions of the terrestrial systems are presented where
applicable in the context of plant community classifications (Schafale and
Weakley, 1990).
Representative animal species which are likely to occur in these habitats
are cited. Animals observed during the site visit are denoted by an asterisk (*) in
the text. Sightings of spoor evidence are equated with sightings of individuals.
Scientific nomenclature and common names (when applicable) are used for plant
and animal species described. Subsequent references to the same organism will
include the common name only.
a. Biotic Communities
Three biotic communities, maintained roadside, salt marsh, and
coastal plain perennial stream exist within the project study area and will
be impacted by the subject project. Each of these communities is
described below.
Maintained Roadside
The maintained roadside community consists of the highly
maintained shoulders and some less intensively managed areas that grade
into the surrounding natural communities as well as residential
communities. Significant soil disturbance and compaction, along with
frequent mowing or herbicide application, keep this community in an early
successional state.
Dominant plants in the heavily maintained portions of the
maintained roadside community include fescue (Festuca sp.), and plantain
(Plantago sp.}. In the areas which receive lower levels of maintenance,
more diverse communities can develop. This community was populated
by bead grass (Paspalum sp.) and ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia).
This community grades into residential yards with vegetation comprised
of grasses and species such as flowering dogwood (Corpus florida) and
pecan (Carya illinoensis). Also included in this community are roadside
shoulders along the causeway with herb and vine species such as morning
glory (Ipomoea sagittata), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans),
greenbrier (Smilax bonanox), silverling (Boccharis halimifolia), trumpet
creeper (Campis radicans), foxtail grass (Setaria geniculata), peppergrass
(Lepidium campestre), soft needle rush (Juncus effusus), and giant cane
(Arundinaria gigantea). Trees and shrubs found in this area include sea
ox-eye (Barrichia fi~utescens), sweet gum saplings (Liquidambar

styraciflua), yaupon (Ilex vomitoria), black cherry (Prunis serotina), red
cedar saplings (Juniperus virginiana), black willow (Salix nigra), marsh
elder (Iva frutescens), red maple saplings (Ater rubrum), lobolly pine
saplings (Pinus taeda), water hickory (Carya aquatica), Chinese wisteria
(Wisteria sinensis), and pecan.
Salt Marsh
Dominant plants in the salt marsh community consisted of two
species which covered the entire community. Salt marsh cordgrass
(Spartina alterniflora) covered areas of elevation adjacent to Bradley
creek while black needle rush (Juncus roemerianus) was present in areas
that were slightly higher in elevation.
Coastal Plain Perennial stream
Bradley Creek is a brackish stream that bisects the salt marsh
community. This stream has a tidal influence that results in over-bank
flooding. One species, salt marsh cordgrass was the dominant vegetation
present along the banks of Bradley Creek. The ribbed mussel
(Geukensia demissa) was observed in the stream near the banks by the
bridge and the Eastern oyster (Crassitrea virginica) may also be present in
these stream. Fishes likely to be found in creeks such as Bradley Creek
may include striped bass (Roccus lineatus), striped mullet (Mugil
cephalus), golden shiner (Notemigonus crysoleucas), and mosquitofish
(Gambusia a~nis).
Wildlife
Wildlife found in these communities is limited and consists
primarily of wide-ranging, adaptable species which are well suited to
coexistence with human development. Mammals common to salt marshes
such as raccoon (Procyon lotor), river otter (Lutra canadensis), and marsh
rice rat (Oryzomys palustris) may be observed occasionally. The most
common reptiles found in such habitats are eastern box turtle (Terrapene
Carolina), predators such as black racer (Coluber constrictor), and eastern
garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis). Amphibians present in this
community may include bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana), and pickerel frog
(R. palustris). Marsh fiddler crab* (Uca pugnax) and marsh periwinkle*
(Littorina irrorata) were observed during the field visit.
Birds likely to frequent such habitats include great blue heron
(Ai°dea herodias), redwing blackbird* (Agelaius phoeniceus), kingfisher*
(Megaceryle alcyon), marsh wren (Telmatodytes palustris), clapper rail
(Rallus longirostris), black duck (Anas rubripes), and meadowlark
(Sturnella magna).
l2

b. Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Construction of the proposed project will have various impacts on
the biotic resources described. This section quantifies and qualifies
potential impacts to the natural communities within the project study area
in terms of the area impacted and the organisms affected.
Anticipated Impacts to Terrestrial Communities
Impacts to terrestrial communities will result from project
construction due to the clearing and paving of portions of the project study
area, and thus the loss of community area. Calculated quantitative impacts
to terrestrial communities reflect the relative abundance of each
community present in the study area (Table 2). Estimated impacts are
derived based on approximately 740 feet (225.6 meters) of total approach
work required on both sides of the proposed bridge. The entire right of
way [80.0 feet (24.4 meters)] was used for this calculation. The entire
right of way will probably not be impacted, therefore actual impacts to the
communities may be considerably less.
Table 2. Estimated Impacts to Terrestrial Communities.
__ _ __
Community type
Estimated impacts in
acres (hectares)
Maintained roadside 1.24 (0.51)
Salt marsh 0.20 (0.08)
Total 1.44 (0.59)
Flora and fauna occurring in these communities are generally
common throughout North Carolina because of their adaptability to wide
ranging environmental factors. Moreover, a similar roadside shoulder
community will be re-established after construction. Animals temporarily
displaced by construction activities should repopulate areas suitable for
the species following project completion. As a result, it is unlikely that
existing species will be displaced significantly from the project study area
following construction. However, to minimize the temporary effects of
project construction, all cleared areas along the roadways should be
revegetated promptly after project completion to minimize erosion and the
loss of wildlife habitat.
Anticipated Impacts to Water Resources
Estimated impacts to Bradley Creek will be minimal.
Approximately l 60 feet (48.8 meters) of the existing causeway adjacent to
Bradley Creek will be removed which should improve tidal flushing and
movement of aquatic organisms.
l3

Aquatic communities are sensitive to any changes in the
environment. Any action that affects water quality can have an adverse
impact on aquatic organisms. Although most of the disturbance caused by
project construction will be temporary, some environmental impacts
caused by the proposed project will be long term or irreversible.
Installation or modification of instream structures, such as replacement of
bridges, can permanently affect many physical stream parameters. Project
construction may result in the following impacts to surface waters:
• Increased silt loading and sedimentation from erosion of disturbed
soils.
• Changes in light incidence, water clarity and water temperature due
to increased sediment load and riparian vegetation removal.
• Alteration of stream discharge due to silt loading and changes in
surface or ground water drainage patterns.
• Increased potential for release of toxic compounds such as fuel and
oil from construction equipment and other vehicles.
Precautions will be taken to minimize these and other impacts to
water resources in the study area. NCDOT's Best Management Practices
(BMP) for the Protection of Surface Waters will be strictly enforced
throughout the construction stage of the project.
Bradley Creek is located within a Primary Fish Nursery Area, and
may potentially provide habitat for anadromous fish spawning. For this
reason, an in-water construction moratorium will be required from the
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission from February 15 to June 30. The
N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries agreed that this moratorium would be
sufficient.
Essential Fish Habitat Designations
The 1996 Congressional amendments to the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSFCMA) (PL 94-265) set
forth new requirements for the National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS), regional fishery management councils (FMC), and other Federal
agencies to identify and protect important marine and anadromous fish
habitat. These amendments established procedures for the identification
of Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) and a requirement for interagency
coordination to further the conservation of federally managed fisheries.
The replacement of Bridge No. 10 will result in impacts to salt
marsh adjacent to Bradley Creek that might provide habitat or contribute
to estuarine food chains. The proposed project involves replacing the
existing bridge which is 39.0 ft (11.9 m) in length in the same location
with a new bridge that will be 200.0 ft (61.0 m) in length. Impacts will
14

occur as a result of additional fill necessary due to the lengthening of the
bridge, while removing a portion of the existing causeway.
The replacement of Bridge No. 10 will impact approximately
0.2 acres (0.08 hectare) of salt marsh adjacent to Bradley Creek.
However, removal of the existing causeway will expose 0.2 acres
(0.08 hectare) of marsh substrate that was previously filled. Therefore, the
net effect of the new bridge construction and existing causeway removal
will result in no net loss of Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) with the 200-foot
(61.0 meter) bridge length.
Table 3 lists the fish species that may occur in the study area that
are managed under MSFCMA (species listed by NMFS for Bradley
Creek), including the life stages which are known to occur.
Table 3. Fish Species Listed by NMFS Likely to Occur in Bradley
Creek.
ecies Life`Staa
Brown shrimp P/J, S
White shrimp P/J, S
Red drum P/J, S
Spanish mackerel J
Cobia L, P/J, A
Bluefish J, A
Summer flounder L, J, A
Note: E -Eggs, P/J - Postlarvae/ Juvenile, L -Larvae, 5 - 5ubadult,
J -Juvenile,
A -Adult
Bridge Demolition and Removal
The existing deck and bridge railings are composed of concrete.
The substructure is composed of timber bents and caps. The bridge rail,
bents, and substructure will be removed without dropping components into
Waters of the United States. However, if components of the deck were
dropped into- Waters of the United States during bridge demolition, the
resulting temporary fill associated with the concrete deck would be
approximately 13 cubic yards (9.9 cubic meters). The existing bridge will
be removed according to the NCDOT's best management practices for
bridge demolition and removal guidelines. According to these guidelines,
the subject project falls under the "Case 2" category which allows no work
at all in the water during moratorium periods associated with fish
migration, spawning, and larval recruitment into nursery areas. An in-
water construction moratorium will be required for this project from the
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission from February 15 to June 34.
~s

An existing sewer line is located on a separate concrete structure
next to Bridge No. 10. The structure is composed of concrete caps on top
of concrete piers. During construction of the new bridge, the sewer line
will be moved and the concrete structure will be removed according to the
NCDOT's best management practices for bridge demolition and removal
guidelines. The structure will be removed without dropping components
into Waters of the United States.
Jurisdictional Tonics
This section provides inventories and impact analyses pertinent to two
significant regulatory issues: Waters of the United States and rare and protected
species. These issues retain particular significance because of federal and state
mandates which regulate their protection. This section deals specifically with the
impact analyses required to satisfy regulatory authority prior to project construction.
a. Waters of the United States
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) promulgated the
definition of "Waters of the United States" under 33 CFR §328.3(a).
Waters of the United States include most interstate and intrastate surface
waters, tributaries, and wetlands. Areas that are inundated or saturated by
surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support,
and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of
vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions are
considered "wetlands" under 33 CFR §328.3(b}. Wetlands generally
include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Wetlands are identified
based on the presence of hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and
saturated or flooded conditions during all or part of the growing season.
Any action that proposes to place dredged or fill materials into waters of
the United states falls under the jurisdiction of the USAGE, and must
follow the statutory provisions under Section 404.of the Clean Water Act
(CWA) (33 U.S.C. 1344).
Characteristics of Surface Waters
. One surface water, Bradley Creek, exists within the project study
area and is considered a jurisdictional surface water under Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Discussions of the biological and
water quality aspects of this water resource are presented in previous
sections of this report.
Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Estimated impacts to Bradley Creek will be minimal.
Approximately 160 feet (48.8 meters) of the existing causeway through
16

Bradley Creek will be removed. Approximately 0.2 acres (0.8 hectare) of
salt marsh may be impacted as a result of project construction. Estimated
impacts are derived based on the project length of 760 feet (225 meters).
The entire right of way width of 80 feet (24.4 meters) was used for this
calculation. The entire right of way will probably not be impacted;
therefore, actual impacts to the stream may be considerably less.
b. Permits
Clean Water Act (CWA) §401 authorizes states to determine
whether activities permitted by the federal government comply with state
water quality standards. The DWQ may require a Section 401 Water
Quality Certification if a project fills or substantially modifies waters or
wetlands. The Section 401 Water Quality Certification allows surface
waters to be temporarily impacted for the duration of the construction or
other land manipulation. North Carolina developed General Certifications
(GCs) that satisfy CWA §401 and correspond to the Corps of Engineers'
Nationwide Permits (NWPs) [NCDENR, DWQ, Water Quality Section,
Wetlands Water Quality Certification; undated Internet site]. The issuance
of a 401 permit from the DWQ is a prerequisite to issuance of a Section
404 permit. Water Quality Certification No. 3107, which corresponds to
NWP 23, will likely be required for the project.
Clean Water Act §404 establishes a permit program to regulate the
discharge of dredged or fill materials into waters of the United States. The
USACE, which administers the permit program under CWA §404,
established nationwide permits for minor activities, specialized activities,
and activities regulated by other authorities. A nationwide permit (NWP)
is a permit by rule. In other words, compliance with the NWP rules
satisfies the statutory provisions under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act. Forty NWPs referenced by a number currently exist (Strand, 1997).
Nationwide 23, entitled Approved Categorical Exclusions, covers certain
activities undertaken, assisted, authorized, regulated, funded, or financed,
in whole or in part, by another Federal agency or department. Nationwide
Permit 23 applies when another Federal agency or department determines
that their activity, work, or discharge is categorically excluded from an
environmental impact statement (EIS) under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA). The activity, work, or discharge becomes
categorically excluded when its actions neither individually nor
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. The
Office of the Chief of Engineers must receive notice of the agency's or
department's application for the categorical exclusion and concur with the
categorical exclusion determination [January 15, 2002 (Volume 67,
Number ] 0, Pages 2019-2095)].
t~

A Nationwide Permit 23 CFR 330 Appendix A (B) (23) is likely to
be applicable for the crossing of Bradley Creek. This permit authorizes
construction provided the following conditions are met:
• the width of the fill is limited to the minimum necessary for the actual
crossing;
• the fill place in Waters of the United States is limited to a filled area of
no more than 1.0 acre (0.45 hectare);
• no more than a total of 150 linear feet (45.7 meters) of the fill for the
roadway can occur in special aquatic sites, including wetlands;
• the crossing is culverted, bridged or otherwise designed to prevent the
restriction of, and to withstand, expected high flows and tidal flows and
movement of aquatic organisms, and;
• the crossing, including all attendant features, both temporary and
permanent, is part of a single and complete project for crossing of
Waters of the United States.
The subject project is located within a county that is under the
jurisdiction of the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), which is
administered by the Division of Coastal Management (DCM). DCM is the
lead permitting agency for projects located within its jurisdiction. A
CAMA Major Development Permit will likely be required for this project.
Representatives from NCDOT's Hydraulics Unit held apre-
application meeting with the DWQ Wilmington Regional Office on
November 14, 2000. At this meeting it was determined that a Stormwater
Management Permit will not be required for this project.
NCDOT coordinated with the U.S. Coast Guard to determine if a
permit is needed from that agency. At the site crossing, Bradley Creek
meets the criteria for advanced approval and an individual permit will not
be required from the Coast Guard. See letter on Page A-1 of Appendix A.
c. Avoidance. Minimization, and Miti ation
The Corps of Engineers (COE) has adopted through the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) a wetland mitigation policy which
embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and sequencing. The
purpose of this policy is to restore and maintain the chemical, biological
and physical integrity of Waters of he United States, specifically wetlands.
Mitigation of wetland impacts has been defined by the CEQ to include:
avoiding impacts (to wetlands), minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts,
reducing impacts over time and compensating for impacts (40 CFR
1508.20). Each of these three aspects (avoidance, minimization and
compensatory mitigation) must be considered sequentially.
~s

Avoidance
Avoidance mitigation examines all appropriate and practicable
possibilities of averting impacts to Waters of the United States. According
to a 1990 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and the COE, in determining "appropriate and
practicable" measures to offset unavoidable impacts, such measures
should be appropriate to the scope and degree of those impacts and
practicable in terms of cost, existing technology, and logistics in light of
overall project purposes. In order to avoid impacts to U.S. Waters, the
existing 39-foot (11.9-meter) bridge will be replaced by a 200-foot
(61 meter) bridge, thereby avoiding impacts and further opening up the
existing causeway. Removing approximately 160 feet (48.8 meters) of the
existing causeway should improve tidal flushing and movement of aquatic
organisms.
Minimization
Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and
practicable steps to reduce the adverse impacts to Waters of the United
States. Implementation of these steps will be required through project
modifications and permit conditions. Minimization typically focuses on
decreasing the footprint of the proposed project through the reduction to
median widths, right of way widths, fill slopes and/or road shoulder
widths. To minimize impacts to U.S. Waters, the existing approaches will
be widened symmetrically, thereby maximizing use of the existing facility
pavement. Additionally, the minimum standard shoulder and lane widths
for this type facility are recommended, as well as the steepest slopes
possible for this area.
Compensatory mitigation
Compensatory mitigation is not normally considered until
anticipated impacts to Waters of the United States have been avoided and
minimized to the maximum extent possible. It is recognized that "no net
loss of wetlands" functions and values may not be achieved in each and
every permit action. Appropriate and practicable compensatory mitigation
is required for unavoidable adverse impacts which remain after all
appropriate and practicable minimization has been required. Compensatory
actions often include restoration, creation and enhancement of Water of the
United States, specifically wetlands. Such actions should be undertaken in
areas adjacent to or contiguous to the discharge site.
Estimated impacts to jurisdictional wetlands total 0.2 acres
(0.08 hectare). Though compensatory mitigation is not required for impacts
for projects authorized under Nationwide Permits that result in the fill or
19

alteration of less 1.0 acre (than 0.45 hectare} of palustrine wetlands, it is
likely that mitigation will be required for impacts in estuarine wetlands (salt
marsh) associated with this project. Written approval of the final mitigation
plan is required from the DWQ prior to the issuance of a 401 Certification.
Final permit/mitigation decisions rest with the COE and DWQ.
Current designs call for the removal of approximately 160 feet
(48.8 meters) of the existing causeway. This area (0.2 acres
[0.08 hectare]) will be graded to the elevation of the adjacent salt marsh
and replanted with vegetation of the same species as that in the salt marsh;
therefore, offsetting impacts from construction of the bridge.
Minimal impacts to jurisdictional surface waters may occur as
result of the proposed project. If fill or dredging in surface waters occurs
as a result of construction activities, permits and certifications will be
required from various regulatory agencies in charge of protecting the
water quality of public waters resources.
4. Federally Protected Species
Some populations of fauna and flora have been in, or are in, the process of
decline either due'to natural forces or their inability to coexist with human
activities. Federal law (under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended) requires that any action, likely to adversely affect a species
classified as federally protected, be subject to review by the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (FWS). .
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened,
Proposed Endangered and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of
Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. An
endangered species is considered to be a~species that is in danger of becoming
extinct throughout all or a significant portion of its range. A threatened species is
considered to be a species that is likely to become an endangered species within
the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
As of March 7, 2002, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists ten
federally protected species for New Hanover County (see Table 4). A brief
description and biological conclusion is provided for each of these species below.
20

Table 4. Federally Protected Species for New Hanover County.
Comrnori'Name Scientific Name Status - =.
Shortnose sturgeon Acipenser brevirostrum Endangered
American alligator Alligator mississippiensis Threatened (S/A}
Loggerhead sea turtle Caretta caretta Threatened
Piping plover Charadrius melodus Threatened
green sea turtle Chelonia mydas Threatened
red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
west Indian manatee Trichechus manatus Endangered
Seabeach amaranth Amaranthus pumilus Threatened
rough-leaved loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
Cooley's meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi Endangered**
tote: "Endangered" a species in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range
"Threatened S/A" This listing is defined as a species which are threatened due to similarity
of appearance with other raze species and are listed to protect these species. These species
are not biologically endangered or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation.
"Threatened" a species likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future
throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
"**" obscure record, the date and/or location of the observation is uncertain.
Short-nosed sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) Endangered
Family: Acipenseridae
Date Listed: 11 March 1967
The short-nosed sturgeon is a small (3.3 feet [1 meter] in length) species
of fish which occurs in the lower sections of large rivers and in coastal marine
habitats from the St. John River, Canada to the Indian River, Florida. It can be
differentiated from the Atlantic sturgeon because of its shorter snout, wider
mouth, and the pattern of its preanal shields (the short-nose having one row and
the Atlantic having two).
The short-nosed sturgeon prefers deep channels with a salinity less than
sea water. It feeds on benthic invertebrates and plant material and is most active
at night. It is an anadromous species that spawns upstream in the spring and
spends most of its life within close proximity of the rivers mouth. At least two
entirely freshwater populations have been recorded, in South Carolina and
Massachusetts.
The short-nosed sturgeon requires large fresh water rivers that are
unobstructed by dams or pollutants to reproduce successfully.
Biological Conclusion:
No Effect
Bradley Creek may provide suitable habitat for the shortnose sturgeon. A
review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on
July 18, l 999 indicated that there is no known occurrence of the short-nosed
2]

sturgeon within. l mile (1.6 km) of the project area. Through verbal
communication on August 12, 1999 with the N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries, it
was determined that it is unlikely that the short-nosed sturgeon would be present
in this section of Bradley Creek. However, best management practices and use of
the construction moratorium will insure this project will not affect this species.
American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) Threatened
Family: Alligatoridae (Due to Similarity of Appearance)
Date Listed: June 4, 1987
The alligator is a large aquatic reptile, measuring 1.8-5.8 meters in length,
with a broadly rounded snout, heavy body, laterally compressed tail, and a dark
gray or blackish color. Young are black with conspicuous yellow crossbands; the
banding may occasionally persist on adults, although very faintly. Unlike the
American crocodile, the fourth tooth on the lower jaw of the alligator fits in a
notch in the upper jaw and is not exposed when the jaws are closed.
The alligator can be found on the east coast of the United States from
Tyrrell County, North Carolina to Corpus Christi, Texas, and north in the
Mississippi River drainage basin to Arkansas and southeastern Oklahoma. Home
ranges may vary considerably, with 3,162 acres for males and 21 acres for
females being average. Individuals can travel great distances, both overland and
in the water, but males tend to travel more than females.
The alligator is found rivers, streams, canals, lakes, swamps, bayous, and
coastal marshes. Adult animals are highly tolerant of salt water, but the young are
apparently more sensitive, with salinities greater than 5 parts per thousand
considered harmful. The diet consists of anything of suitable size, including
mammals, reptiles, amphibians, birds, fish, and crustaceans.
Nesting takes place in late spring and early summer, with the female
building a mound of grass and other vegetation that may be two feet high and six
feet across. The nest is usually constructed near the water, in a shaded location.
The clutch of 30-60 (average 35) eggs is laid in a cavity near the top of the
mound, and is incubated by the heat from the decaying vegetation. The female
usually remains near the nest until the eggs hatch. Hatching takes place in about
nine weeks, when the young begin calling to alert the female to excavate the nest.
The primary threats to the alligator in the past have been loss of habitat
and overhunting. The legal protections in recent years have allowed this species
to increase significantly, and it is now considered biologically secure. The
alligator is distinguished from the American crocodile by its broad, rounded snout
and the way its fourth tooth of its lower jaw fits into a notch in the upper jaw
when the jaws are closed, and is therefore not exposed when the jaws are closed.
Biological Conclusion
Not Required
~~

This species is listed as Threatened Due to Similarity of Appearance, and
is therefore not protected under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act.
However, in order to control the illegal trade of other protected crocodilians such
as the American crocodile, federal regulations (such as hide tagging) are
maintained on the commercial trade of alligators. The NHP database shows one
element of occurrence for this species approximately 0.8 miles (1.3 km) southeast
of the project area. No survey is required for this species.
loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) Threatened
Family: Cheloniidae
Date Listed: 28 July 1978
The loggerhead nests on suitable beaches from Ocracoke inlet, North
Carolina through Florida_and on a small scale off of the Gulf States. There are
also major nesting grounds on the eastern coast of Australia. It lives worldwide in
temperate to subtropical waters.
Adult loggerheads weigh between 170 to 500 pounds (77 and
227 kilograms) and are 2.6 to 3.9 feet (0.8 to 1.2 meters) in length. The
loggerhead can be distinguished from other sea turtles by its unique reddish-
brown color. The loggerhead is characterized by a large head and blunt jaws.
Otherwise they have 5 or more costal plates with the first touching the nuchal and
3 to 4 bridge scutes.
Loggerheads nest nocturnally between May and September on isolated
beaches that are characterized by fine grained sediments. It is mainly carnivorous
feeding on small marine animals.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat in the form of beaches was not observed during the site
visit. In addition, a review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) database on May 6, 2002 indicated that there is no known occurrence
of a loggerhead sea turtle within 1 mile (1.6 km) of the project area. Therefore,
this project will not affect this species.
piping plover (Charadrius melodus) Threatened
Family: Charadriidae
Date Listed: 11 December 1985
The piping plover is a small migratory shorebird that resembles a
sandpiper. An average bird grows to about 6.9 inches (17.5 cm) in length and has
awing span of 14.8 inches (37.5 cm). It can be identified by the orange legs and
black band around the base of its neck. During the winter the plover loses its
black band, its legs fade to pale yellow, and the bill fades to black. Breeding
23

birds -are characterized by white underparts, a single black breastband, and a black
bar across the forehead.
The piping plover breeds along the east coast from New Foundland to
North Carolina. It winters from North Carolina southward into the Florida Keys
and along the Gulf of Mexico. Plovers return to their breeding grounds in Mazch
or early April.
Piping plovers nest in flat areas with fine sand and mixtures of shells and
pebbles. They nest most commonly where there is little or no vegetation, but
some may nest in stands of beachgrass. The nest is a shallow depression in the
sand that is usually lined with shells and pebbles and food consists of
invertebrates such as insects and marine worms.
The piping plover is very sensitive to human disturbances. The presence
of people can cause the plover to abandon its nest and quit feeding.
Biological Conclusion:
No Effect
Suitable habitat for the piping plover in the form of fine sand and mixtures
of shells and pebbles was not observed during the site visit. In addition, a review
of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on May 6,
2002 indicated that there is no known occurrence of piping plover within 1 mile
(1.6 km) of the project area. Therefore, this project will not affect this species.
green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas)
Family: Cheloniidae
Date Listed: 28 July 1978
Threatened
The green sea turtle is found in temperate and tropical oceans and seas. It
ranges as far north as Massachusetts on the east coast and British Columbia in the
west. Nesting in North America is limited to small communities on the east coast
of Florida.
The distinguishing factors found in the green turtle are the single clawed
flippers and a single pair of elongated scales between the eyes. This turtle has a
small head and grows to a size of 2.5 to S feet (0.76 to 1.53 meters) and a weight
of 220.5 to 650.4 pounds (100 to 295 kilograms). It has a strongly serrate lower
jaw and only four pairs of pleural scutes.
The green sea turtle can be found in shallow waters. They aze attracted to
lagoons, reefs, bays, mangrove swamps and inlets where an abundance of marine
grasses, the principle food source for the green turtle, can be found. These turtles
require beaches with minimal disturbances and a sloping platform for nesting.
Biological Conclusion:
No Effect
24

Suitable habitat for the green sea turtle in the form of lagoons, reefs, bays,
mangrove swamps and inlets was not observed during the site visit. In addition, a
review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on
May 6, 2002 indicated that there is no known occurrence of the green sea turtle
within 1 mile (1.6 km) of the project area. Therefore, this project will not affect
this species.
red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) Endangered
Family: Picidae
Date Listed: 13 October 1970
The red-cockaded woodpecker once occurred from New Jersey to
southern Florida and west to eastern Texas. It occurred inland in Kentucky,
Tennessee, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Missouri. The red-cockaded woodpecker is
now found only in coastal states of its historic range and inland in southeastern
Oklahoma and southern Arkansas. In North Carolina moderate populations occur
in the sandhills and southern coastal plain. The few populations found in the
piedmont and northern coastal plain are believed to be relics of former
populations.
The adult red-cockaded woodpecker has a plumage that is entirely black
and white except for small red streaks on the sides of the nape in the male. The
back of the red- woodpecker is black and white with horizontal stripes. The
breast and underside of this woodpecker are white with streaked flanks. The red-
cockaded woodpecker has a large white cheek patch surrounded by the black cap,
nape, and throat.
The red-cockaded woodpecker uses open old growth stands of southern
pines, particularly longleaf pine (Pinus palusiris), for foraging and nesting
habitat. A forested stand must contain at least 50% pine, lack a thick understory,
and be contiguous with other stands to be appropriate habitat for the red-cockaded
woodpecker. These birds nest exclusively in trees that are more than 60 years old
and are contiguous with pine stands at least 30 years of age. The foraging range
of the red-cockaded woodpecker is up to 500 acres (200 hectares). This acreage
must be contiguous with suitable nesting sites.
These woodpeckers nest exclusively in living pine trees and usually in
trees that are infected with the fungus that causes red-heart disease. Cavities are
located in colonies from 12 to 100 feet (3.6 to 30.3 meters) above the ground and
average 30 to 50 feet (9.1 to 15.7 meters) high. They can be identified by a large
incrustation of running sap that surrounds the tree. The large incrustation of sap
is believed to be used as a defense by the red-cockaded woodpecker against
possible predators. A clan of woodpeckers usually consists of one breeding pair
and the offspring .from previous years. The red-cockaded woodpecker lays its
eggs in April, May, and June and hatch 38 days later. Clutch size ranges in
number from 3-5 eggs. All members of the clan share in raising the young. Red-
?~

cockaded woodpeckers feed mainly on insects but may also feed on seasonal wild
fruits.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker in the form of trees that
are more than 60 years old and are contiguous with pine stands at least 30 years of
age was not observed during the site visit. In addition, a review of the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on May 6, 2002 indicated
that there is no known occurrence ofred-cockaded woodpeckers within 1 mile
(1.6 km) of the project area. Therefore, this project will not affect this species.
West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus) Endangered
Family: Trichechidae
Date Listed: 11 March 1967
The manatee's historic range included the Gulf Coast as far west as Texas
and the Atlantic Coast as far north as New Jersey. Winter populations are now
limited to the southern half of the Florida peninsula. In summer sightings have
occurred as far north as Virginia and west as far as the Florida panhandle.
Although manatees found in North Carolina are considered to be migratory, there
is evidence of overwintering by manatees in warm-water discharges from
powerplants.
The manatee is a large, gray or brown, barrel shaped, aquatic mammal.
Adults average 9.8 to 13.1 feet (3 to 4 meters) long and weigh around
1,100 pounds (500 kilograms). The vestigual hindlimbs are not visible and the tail
is horizontally flattened. The specialized forelimbs are adapted to swimming.
The wrinkled body is nearly hairless except for stiff "whiskers" on the muzzle. In
turbid water common to North Carolina's waterways only a small part of the head
and nose are visible above the surface.
Manatees are found in freshwater and marine habitats with a depth of
4.9 feet (1.5 meters) or more. These habitats include: canals, sluggish rivers,
estuaries, salt water bays, and as far off shore as 3.7 miles (6.0 km).
Overwintering occuxs in areas with warm water, during the rest of the year
habitats with sufficient water depth, an adequate food supply, and proximity to
freshwater. It is believed that manatees require a source of freshwater to drink.
Manatees are herbivorous, feeding on aquatic vegetation and occasionally
fish. They may consume up to 11 % of their body weight and spend up to eight
hours a day feeding.
The main threats to the manatees existence are from flood control
structures, destruction of habitat, and injury by boat barge collisions.
26

Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Bradley Creek may allow access to the West Indian manatee, therefore
suitable habitat is present for this species. The North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program's database of rare species and unique habitats was checked on May 6,
2002. No populations of the West Indian Manatee have been reported from the
project vicinity. This species typically inhabits more southern areas but has been
observed on occasion in North Carolina's coastal waters. The U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service has developed a list of "Precautions for the general construction
in areas which may be used by the West Indian manatee in North Carolina,"
(July 2, 1996). If these precautions are considered in all aspects of project
construction, this project will not affect the West Indian manatee. See
Appendix B for the "Precautions for general construction in areas which may be
used by the West Indian manatee in North Carolina."
sea-beach amaranth (Amaranthus pumilus) Threatened
Family: Amaranthaceae
Federally Listed: 11 March 1992
Flowers Present: June to frost
Seabeach amaranth is endemic to the Atlantic Coastal Plain beaches. It
was historically known from Massachusetts to Florida and is presently confined to
55 populations in North Carolina, New York, and South Carolina.
Seabeach amaranth is an annual legume that grows in clumps containing
5 to 20 branches and are often over a foot across. The trailing stems are fleshy
and reddish-pink or reddish in color and 3.9 to 23.6 inches (10 to 60 centimeters)
long. The thick, fleshy leaves are small, ovate- spatulate, emarginate, rounded
and 0.4 to 0.6 inches (1 to 1.5 centimeter) long. The leaves are usually spinach
green in color, cluster towards the end of a stem, and have winged petioles.
Flowers grow in axillary fascicles and the smooth, indehsicent fruits are 0.16 to
0.2 inches (4 to 5 millimeter) long. Seeds are glossy black. Both fiuits and
flowers are relatively inconspicuous and born along the stem.
Habitat for Seabeach amaranth is found on barrier island beaches
functioning in a relatively dynamic and natural manner. It grows well in
overwash flats at the accreting ends of islands and the lower foredunes and upper
strands of noneroding beaches. Temporary populations often form in blowouts,
sound-side beaches, dredge spoil, and beach replenishment. This species is very
intolerant to competition and is not usually found in association with other
species. Threats to seabeach amaranth include beach stabilization projects, all
terrain vehicles (ATV's), herbivory by insects and animals, beach grooming, and
beach erosion.
Biological Conclusion:
No Effect
?~

Suitable habitat for seabeach amaranth in the form of barrier island
beaches was not observed during the site visit. In addition, a review of the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on May 6, 2002 indicated
that there is no known occurrence of seabeach amaranth within lmile (1.6 km) of
the project area. Therefore, this project will not affect this species.
rough-leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia) Endangered
Plant Family: Primulaceae
Federally Listed: 12 June 1987
Flowers Present: June
This plant is endemic to the coastal plain and sandhills of North and South
Carolina. It is currently found in nine locations in North Carolina and is believed
to be extirpated from South Carolina.
This perennial herb has slender stems that grow to a height of three to six
dm from a rhizome. The whorled leaves encircle the stem at intervals below the
showy yellow flowers, and usually occur in threes or fours. Flowers are borne in
terminal racemes of five-petalled flowers. Fruits are present from July through
October.
This species occurs in the ecotones or edges between longleaf pine
uplands and pond pine pocosins (areas of dense shrub and vine growth usually on
a wet, peat, poorly drained soil), on moist to seasonally saturated sands and on
shallow organic soils overlaying sand. It has also been found to occur on deep
peat in the low shrub community of large Carolina bays (shallow, elliptical,
poorly drained depressions of unknown origins). The areas it occurs in are fire
maintained. It is rarely associated with hardwood stands and prefers acidic soils.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for rough-leaved loosestrife in the form of ecotones or
edges between longleaf pine uplands and pond pine pocosins was not observed
during the site visit. In addition, a review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program (NCNHP) database on May 6, 2002 indicated that there is no known
occurrence of rough-leaved loosestrife within 1 mile (1.6 km) of the project area.
Therefore, this project will not affect this species.
Cooley's meadowrue (Thalictrum cooleyi) Endangered
Family: Ranunculaceae
Federally Listed: 7 February 1989
Flowers Present: late June-July (best mid July)
Historical records show populations of Cooley's meadowrue in the
southeastern coastal plain in North Carolina, Georgia, and Florida. Present
populations are limited to nine locations in North Carolina and one in Florida.
28

Known North Carolina populations aze found in Columbus, Pender, and Onslow
counties.
Cooley's meadowrue is a rhizomatous perennial plant with stems that
grow to one meter in length. Stems are usually erect in direct sunlight but are lax
and may lean on other plants or trail along the ground in shady azeas. Leaves aze
usually narrowly lanceolate and unlobed, some two or three lobed leaves can be
seen. The flowers lack petals, but staminate ones have yellowish to white sepals
and lavender filaments about 0.2 to 0.28 inches (5 to 7 millimeters) long.
Pistillate flowers are smaller and have greenish sepals. Fruits are narrowly
ellipsoidal achenes, 0.2 to 0.24 inches (5 to 6 millimeters) long. Fruits mature
from August to September.
This plant is found in moist to wet bogs, savannas and savanna-like
openings, sandy roadsides, rights-of--ways, and old cleazcuts. It is dependent on
some form of disturbance to maintain its habitat. All known populations are on
circumneutral, poorly drained, moderately permeable soils of the Griffon series.
It only grows well in areas with full sunlight.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for Cooley's meadowrue in the form of moist to wet bogs,
savannas and savanna-like openings, sandy roadsides, right of ways, and old
clearcuts was not observed during the site visit. In addition, a review of the
North Cazolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on May 6, 2002
indicated that there is no known occurrence of Cooley's meadowrue within 1 mile
(1.6 km) of the project area. Therefore, this project will not affect this species.
5. Federal Species of Concern and State Listed Species
There are twenty-two Federal Species of Concern (FSC) listed by the
FWS for New Hanover County (Table 5). Federal Species Of Concern are not
afforded federal protection under the Endangered Species Act and are not subject
to any of its provisions, including Section 7, until they are formally proposed or
listed as Threatened or Endangered. However, the status of these species is
subject to change, and so should be included for consideration. Federal Species
of Concern are defined as a species which is under consideration for listing for
which there is insufficient information to support listing. In addition, organisms
which are listed as Endangered, Threatened, or Special Concern by the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program list of Raze Plant and Animal Species are
afforded state protection under the NC State Endangered Species Act and the N.C.
Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979.
29

Table 5. Federal Species of Concern and State Status for New Hanover
County.
(_ommon Name Scientific Name Status Habitat
Southern hognose snake Heterodon simus SR No
Southeastern myotis Myotis austroriparius SC Yes
Mimic glass lizard Ophisaurus mimicus SC No
Eastern painted bunting Passerina ciris ciris R No
Northern pine snake Pituophis melanoleucus melanoleucus SC No
Carolina gopher frog Rana capito capito SC No
arogos skipper Atrytone arogos arogos SR No
magnificent rams-horn Planorbella magnifica E No
rare skipper Problema bulenta SR Yes
Croatan crayfish Procambarus plumimanus SR Yes
Cape Fear threetooth Triodopsis soelneri T Yes
savanna indigo-bush Amorpha geogiana var. confusa E No
sandhills milkvetch Astragalus michauxii C/PT No
Chapman's sedge Carex chapmanii W 1 No
Venus flytrap Dionaea muscipula C-SC No
bog St. John's wort Hypericum adpressum C No
Pondspice Litsea aestivalis C No
spiked medusa ~ Pteroglossaspis ecristata E No
spring-flowering Solidago verna E/PT No
goldenrod
Pickering's dawnflower Stylisma pickeringii var. pickeringii E No
Carolina asphodal Tofieldia glabra C No
Dune bluecurls Trichostima sp. 1 C No
Note:
• "C" (Candidate) a species which is very rare in North Carolina, generally with 1-20
populations in the state, generally substantially reduced in numbers by habitat destruction,
direct exploitation or disease. The species is also either rare throughout its range or disjunct in
North Carolina from,a main range in a different part of the country or the world.
• "SR" (Significantly Rare) a species which exists in small numbers in the state and has been
determined by the N.C. NHP to need monitoring.
• "SC" (Special Concern) any native or once-native species which is determined by the WRC to
require monitoring but which may be taken under regulations adopted under the provisions of
this article.
• "E" (Endangered) any native or once native species whose continued existence as a viable
component of the State's flora or fauna is determined by the WRC to be in jeopardy or any
species determined to be an endangered species pursuant to the Endangered Species Act.
• "T" (Threatened) any native or once native species which is likely to become as endangered
species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range, or one
that is designated as threatened pursuant to the Endangered Species Act.
• "P" (Proposed)a species which has been formally proposed for listing as Endangered,
Threatened; or Special Concern, but has not yet completed the legally mandated listing
process.
• "W 1" (Watch List 1) a species that is considered rare, but relatively secure.
30

Surveys for these species were not conducted during the site visit. A
review of the N.C. Natural Heritage Program database of the rare species and
unique habitats on May 6, 2002 revealed one record of North Carolina rare and/or
protected species in or near the project study area. An element of occurrence of
Venus flytrap (Dionea muscipula) exists 0.8 miles (1.3 km) northeast of the
project area. '
6. Summary
The proposed project is expected to have only minor effects on natural
resources and environmental quality in the vicinity of the project area. The
primary issue of concern is protecting water quality from excessive sedimentation
as a result of stream bank and substrate disturbance. Minimizing the impacted
area along the stream channel and protecting exposed soils from erosion will
greatly aid in reducing water quality degradation. Effects on populations of other
native plants and animals should be minor. Permits will be required from the
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, the N. C. Department of Environment and
Natural Resources -Division of Water Quality, and from the N. C. Division of
Coastal Management prior to construction initiation for impacts to surface water
resources.
G. -Flood Hazard Evaluation and Stream Modification
New Hanover County is a current participant in the National Flood Insurance
Regular Program. This particular crossing of Bradley Creek is in a designated flood
hazard zone; however, it is not included in a detailed flood study. Bradley Creek is
included in the detailed flood study for New Hanover County; however, the project site is
downstream of the detailed flood study limits. Figure 5 shows the approximate 100-year
floodplain limits in the vicinity of the project as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map.
There is one home northwest of the bridge which has a floor elevation approximately at
the same elevation as the existing bridge deck, which is below the approximate 100-year
flood level shown in the FEMA floodplain mapping. The existing floodplain is rural and
primarily comprised of marsh wetlands. The proposed bridge replacement will not. have
any significant adverse impact on the existing floodplain or on the associated flood
hazard. Existing drainage patterns will be maintained to the extent practicable, and
groundwater resources should not be affected by the project. .
VII. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION
A. A enc Coordination
An on-site meeting was held on May 5, 2000, to discuss the impacts associated
with the proposed project and to discuss possible design alternatives to minimize impacts
to the coastal wetlands next to the existing bridge. Representative from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USAGE), the N.C. Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM) and
3l

the N.C. Department of Transportation were present at this meeting. A request was made
to study an alternative that would bridge the causeway.
On December 7, 2000, an interagency meeting was held to discuss three build
alternatives (see Section V.B pages 4 and'S) for the proposed project. Representatives
from the. following agencies were present at this meeting:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE)
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
National Marine Fisheries (NMF)
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC)
N.C. Division of Coastal Management (DCM)
A representative from the N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries (NCDMF) was not
present, but meeting minutes were sent to this agency following the meeting.
Representatives from the above mentioned resource agencies requested that
NCDOT investigate the possibility of removing a large section of the existing causeway
and thereby construct a much longer bridge than what is hydraulically sufficient.
NCDOT agreed to construct a 550-foot long bridge in exchange for wetland mitigation
credits to help off-set a portion of the additional costs associated with. constructing the
longer bridge. Additional meetings were held to further discuss this possibility; however,
resource agencies were not able to commit to providing additional mitigation credits for
this project and the longer bridge concept (Alternative 2) was dropped from further
consideration.
NCDOT coordinated with the Division of Coastal Management (DCM) regarding
the construction of 3:1 side slopes instead of 2:1. DCM has agreed to the use of 3:1 side
slopes for the approaches to the new bridge, provided that NCDOT can supply adequate
documentation to demonstrate that the maintenance and construction of 2:1 side slopes is
not feasible (see Appendix A; pages A-4 and A-5). NCDOT provided DCM with the
requested information (see Section VI.A on pages 5 and 6).
IX. BASIS FOR CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
On the basis of the above discussion, it is concluded that no serious adverse
environmental .effects will result from implementation of the proposed project.
32

-- ~ ~ I
/, 1
/ - I
•~
Il
\r
~ / A ~1? LO
1 ``!
~ / ~ 1
/ /
' /
11 ~ I ~ i I
1
,' '~I Kerr 1.W
i 1
Ig I ~ ~ jje~ \
,' IN
...-.. _
...
/ I
IN _.._ .-_~~.. _ .. _. , ~1 ~
Canege ~ .30 entl ~
NC 132 z7 Fd. 13 ` b _.._'-
.32 '~
I~.3a ~ I~ I~ ~
a
I bl'
I la/
~ ,~
i
I i ~ ~ I~ 1 vl li
I ~ fn 3j ~ ~ ~ Itl
I ~ I
\ I
ti0 ~ I A ~ y
~ ~ - .Jq IZ' ,12
~ ~ \', Zl'
~, i NC 132
I. , ~ ~
10 , ~• I~ xs'
? ~.
~ _ .g -
I -I
s
_ _ : D I~ m
.,!
i_
~• • I~%
oe .01 c7 •1J s 'Ja ~ 1\'r ~ `;~~ ~ I~ •e a I~ I~ ,~, '~ ~~1~• ~
~ I~
I '~ ~ '~ b •J3 ~ ~ ./8 N
I ~.07I~~ o I~3 ~ m ~ .I3 ~+~ I~ Ie.
~ ~ ; ~, Z ~ l+ ~ .,, o
.~ ~ o - b
.lp I Qg ~ 'JP '~ ~i ~, Jm ~ ~ ry '~ I A, `~ •7`7 •~ ~ `-~~ .Jp JI N r~ m
I~ I I .~ I~ eri ~ ~ r, '` ~~ C{~ I' W
.p ~ IK' I~ $ ~ IL, ~ ~~ ~ ~r / I i • IB i' I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Vb J A nm
I~ ~ I- :.
~ ~_
I~ Ia '25 ~ ~ ~ y ~ i' I~ I! J ~ /? 1~ rZ o I1£
Iq v ~ z 0 07 t)' Q•
6 $~ I ~ • ~ qtl ~ H ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ 3
~~ ~ I~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~
~1 Z ~ $ r 81'
4 ~ I~ b .JS ~ IY~ • ~' IfO I i3 6~ I ' J 11' '$ ~`
-~ .. (n ~~ i ~ .38 I .c
.D • 5 I2 9C ` ~
Z G7 •^ ti :. a r" 1 ~ 'e ~ e~ ~
/B %'
~ .n . m I ,,;, ~ •
3 N sc 7\. I `
>I~~ ~ I~ ~. I~
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~•
o m I~ ~, - .~. ~ I~~ ~ ___.________.__
IN (~ I /~ .u ~ ~ ~, II
~ .p1 -/~~~~ / - 1 _-- - __.____' 1.83 ~
Y i
8 I / r
1\1 ~
I~ IN i i ~ / ~h. • ~~
i r b /
w ~ ~ r
, r
11 1 /
/`)' I
/ ~/ w • /
a
._ _ tt ~ _
kl ~ ~ ~, ~~~ ~ D A r ~j r// .~.. eor _~ ~_. ~~a(-~:4 if •..<- ~~n^~L
~' ` __, _` ~\` `-~--_ m I3 1^ C. ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ , ;.. 8 ° d~3 * ..~ ~ - \ /mar o o .' O kt
I )~ ~ ~ +` / fir. ~~T§ A.. a1gg `~ w'yv//T o, ••'~^ ., ..
~r t 1 :. $ fl .Z~ ~ Imo .~ D
_ ."~ ~ ~ p
m T ,~• ~~
00 ~7f ~+ ~7 O a
r~
.j z f0 ZZCZ~ ~ ~ J ~.\`~..
O O r ' ~~ \
'O p ZOO(' ~~' ,xl
O O ~ '.7 i 'r9 \\\
~-• < o DODO ~ i _
,,~ _ / A
~ ~ C] frI ~Z D ~ ~ ss~ ~'
~ j A ~• C < 2 O ~ ~~ +6< j ~ ~r
~D /0 L7 r--r ~ frl V r N ~~
CD a~ e" ~7 D -D of .~ fur- ~ rl ~
[] ~ O -C D ~ am > r
,/
o` ~ m 3 ~ r
X' Z m _ - S , ~~,
„~.
_ ,., ,n ~
- _... n _
.: _.._ ~ _
__.

~ . ~ F=
.;-.
-~,

e _ ~ ~ ~s ti~ _ . ~~
°~+~
~~>;

/' ' • .
. j `V _ I
~ ~`' 1 ~~
~~,
~, ~ ~,, „~
.~~
;` i ;' =1
~ ~
~ I~ I~ I,
~.
I3 ~ ,j .1 .$ Kvr
i
1.00
I, ,,,~ ~
1 -~
._ ,
COeege
NC 132 zl a~~ ,~ . ~ 8 ~ ... _... ~ ' "~ 1
.~
.ol •~ ~•
~ ! I~ I~ (Y
I~ <b 1
I~ ~~ ~ x >>
'a l
i` n ;
~ ' ~ ~a
,,
~ I ~
f ' .J7 .~ rc
i ~
~ ~
I1a `.~ AA''
V
I ' `' •
7@ a
~ ; z''
~' ~ ~ u ,
j , ~ qo as'
ir° i I~ a ~ NC 132
I ~ ~ -
j (p o
rD
~~ ,~
~ .,, ~ ' ~
~ .ie I~ I~ ` I~ ./0 4 ~ Il ~ ~ I
.~ .,/
~ ~ r ~~ I~
~ ~ '~, yc
~ .O7 I~ ~ °'i ~ Q ~ .7J $ lg r
.a ~?• Z ~ .,, o
.~ ~ .0
I~ ~ `, '
7
! ~ i ~
y~ B n
v ~ .. ~
,,
~' el 'A I~ JP ~ I~ ~y ~ ~~ ~ (~' ~IS~ ~ ``i I,~ _ - ~ ~Is ~ ~~ I~- > ~ I• I~ ~ V $ I~
• ~ .~ ~
~ I~ I~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .'~i I~ Ig ~ I~ ~ g % S ~ I~
~ J •r j 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~
~/~ a Y
~ Z ~ I~ '1J ~'' qr ~ ~ r ~ , ~ '~ ' I~ ~, I ,~ , ~ J a
.~
g ~ z
-~ I~ w Z D /e ` ~a I ~¢ u
~b e~ ~
~ I" I~
3
1C • / I~
~ i
r ,~` ~ ;
N-
,:, ,.
~ .. ~ ~ ~~
i111l1;; ;; m + /
R~~~, «~ /
__ _ :, ,
~- ~~I - a ~
O O ~~~~ ~ IY
r.
~ .~
-+ coil ° m nzincn= -%'~ ~ ~ ~~
' c. Z r O ~ c~ z ~ D ~ . ~ ~',~.
n y m m DODO •, i \...._ vl \;
~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~
00 omvm <= o ~.~~ b
~~
,-. ~ m
C •+ m n 3 ~ ~ ~
Z '-' m m fT7 3 ~_
~ 3 Z m ----- ~/
p m -~ z ------- ~(-.:

N
O

L
~ O
`
/~ ~ ~ /~'
N ~' . o
'
T
;
0
1~
T- ,^ ^,
V/
W
,
~
°
LL ~

0

L ~
D 0
N rn ~
~,
~
i- ~ •> o
°
N ~ ~ °n
rn
L
L O
~
~
V

0
0
c,
n
O ~
O
N J ID
DHVP ~D
/ (Dual, TT5'1~
~ \
0
o.
1
O ~ O~
N N cn
0 0
~ ~ o
~ `' ~
fY Y ~
~ O
O
0
0
N
O
O
O
J m
DHV ~D
(Dual, TTS'1~
o \
O
r
N
o°o o - o
.~ ~ .r
.. N
O p
~ ~ o
r, L C
N ~
~ O
~ O
L
L
ti ~
~'
0
O
0
N
N
0
L
~~
~~
~~
_~
0
0
N
N
Q
N
.~
..~.
s
1
r
r
v
N
Q
rn
~>
~_
C
O
t ~
C M O

m ~ C
~ ~ ~
•

'~
(/J ~
y ~
~~

th
O
•fA
'~
A

w
..r

G.
C = ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 11~
d ° c
N O S ~'? F ,s4
~ A
F
y
3 >_ ~ ,Q >In U c

~ V ~ ~ C ~
Z oOCA ~
N
'" ~
U
a
i
~
o 3
z ~
k ,
~
~ ~'' ~
H ~ "'
1 ~ ~

^
W '~ Q
Q_ .
C
•
~ G
i 3 ~
~ N
•~ O O O nj
..~ to
0 oaoz~,

.,
~ O N O O ~
~ p ~ N W
~ LZ. ^'
-~
i
C N `N-~
.N

^ ~ ~
.--, n~ N ~
N

~ •> oA O O
~ ~ N ~ ~/'~ ~
~ .M...
M ~ CC C ~ ~ C!> >~. N
m 3 @J o c~
~i
C ~
~ ~
~ ~'' Q Q • ~'• Q" i~
Q ~
Q
M Q
~
Q
II w
F
F o
[-. e
W ~
a •y
G. Q
F o
~ d
,, ~
3
~ ~ o
>
O
]Y m
o.
Z
°
O ~
Q
m
y
a
. ~
x.a~~
= °
=
zm~
a d
U Y ~
O
~
'~
aW p
>Gr,L]Q '- c
L1E=3

II II II II 11 0
11 II
y
°o ~ ~ A ~ _
°
Q ~ A
~ `, q
~
~ >>
Gx
W A
y

a r
z

«,\ .:
~;~ .
aN, swr °qb
s
~ ~,_~
_n~.
'aa,,.,.,~s•
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resou~~ ~ ~ ~ ~.
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
September 17, 1998
Nicholas L. Graf
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Department of Transportation
310 New Bern Avenue
Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442
Re: Bridge #10 on SR 141 1 over Bradley Creek,
New Hanover County, B-3496, ER 99-7303
Dear Mr. Graf:
Division of Archives
~a kffrey J. Crow, ;
s
~~ ~~,ly~~~F ~~
~~
~~;~,xA~
On September 14, 1998, Debbie Bevin of our staff met with North Carolina
Department of Transportation {NCDOT) staff for a meeting of the minds concerning
the above project. We reported our available information on historic architectural
and archaeological surveys and resources along with our recommendations.
NCDOT provided project area photographs and aerial photographs at the meeting.
Based upon our review of the photographs and the information discussed at the
meeting, we offer our preliminary comments regarding this project.
In terms of historic architectural resources, we are aware of no historic structures
located within the area of potential effect. We recommend that no historic
architectural survey be conducted for this project.
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based
on our present knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological
resources which may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places will be affected by the project construction. We, therefore, recommend that
no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection wi~ci this project.
Having provided this information, we look forward to receipt of e`~ther a Categorical
Exclusion or Environmental Assessment which indicates how NCDOT addressed our
comments.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
A-2
inn c..... t..-e.. c..--.. v..ie:,.~. ~i,...~. ~--,.r-.. ^f~fcn~ '7QM
r?~9

Nicholas L. Graf
9/17/98, Page 2
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
~~~~ ~w .
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
cc: ~. D. Gilmore
B..Church
T. Padgett
A-3

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
_:

January 3, 2001
Karen Boshoff, Project Development Engineer
NC Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
RE: Replacement of Bridge No. 10 on SR 1411 (Wrightsville Avenue) over
Bradley Creek, New Hanover County, TIP Project No. B-3496.
Dear Ms. Boshoff:
On December 7, 2000 I attended an interagency meeting about the above
referenced project. The purpose of the meeting was for the NC Department of
Transportation (DOT) to review the proposed project with environmental agencies
to address any potential problems that might be encountered in the permitting
process.
As you summarized in the meeting minutes, most of the meeting attendees agreed
that 3:1 side slopes are acceptable for approaches to the new bridge. However, I
stated that the NC Division of Coastal Management (DCM) prefers the use of 2:1
side slopes because of the reduced impact to the adjacent coastal wetlands. DOT
then explained that the construction and maintenance of 2:1 side slopes creates a
major problem in coastal areas due to the steepness of the slopes and the instability
of the sandy soils. Based on this information, I agreed to speak with Ed Brooks,
DCM Field Representative and Doug Huggett, DCM Major Permits and
Consistency Coordinator, to reconsider whether DCM would agree to the use of 3:1
side slopes for the approaches to the new bridge.
Based on information received at the meeting, and subsequent conversations with
Doug Huggett and Ed Brooks, DCM has agreed that the use of 3:1 side slopes for
the approaches to the new bridge would be acceptable, provided that DOT can
supply adequate documentation to demonstrate that the maintenance and
construction of 2:1 side slopes is not feasible. Documentation may include a
description of the type of fill material to be used, and the stability of the ground
surface where the fill material will be placed. Documentation may also include a
description of DOT's experience constructing and maintaining 2:1 side slopes
under similar circumstances.
MAILING: 1638 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1638
PHYSICAL: 2728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH NC 27604
PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SOyo RECYCLED / 10% POST-CONSUMER PAPER
A-4 DENR TOLL FREE HOTLINE: [phone]

Though DCM has agreed to the use of 3:1 side slopes for the approaches to the new bridge
provided that adequate documentation is received, we remain concerned about the additional
coastal wetland impacts that would result from the use of 3:1 side slopes. We would not agree to
the construction of 4:1 side slopes for the approaches to the new bridge. During the permit
review process for any project, DCM will require that DOT use the steepest possible slopes that
can be adequately stabilized and maintained.
'Another question that came up at the meeting was in regard to DOT's consideration under
.proposed alternatives 2 or 3 of replacing portions of the existing causeway with a bridge. The
question was whether DCM would consider the •area underneath the replacement bridge in areas
where the causeway has been removed as mitigation of coastal wetland impacts even if shading
from the replacement bridge prevented coastal wetland vegetation from recolonizing the area.
The answer to this question is yes. Even if coastal wetland vegetation does not recolonize within
the areas where the causeway has been removed due to shading from the replacement bridge,
DCM would consider removal of the causeway as marsh mitigation. At a minimum, the marsh
surrounding the causeway would qualify for enhancement credits due to benefits from improved
tidal flushing and movement of aquatic organisms.
At the 1217/00 meeting, there was also discussion about removing more of the causeway than is
needed for mitigation of wetland impacts from this project. The additional wetlands that would
be restored by removing a longer section of the causeway could potentially be used as up-front
.mitigation for future DOT projects in the area. Removing all or most of the existing causeway
would have significant benefits to the Bradley Creek ecosystem, and is strongly supported by
DCM.
Please contact me at [phone] x238 or via a-mail at [e-mail] if you
have any questions or concerns, or require additional .information.
Sincerely, ~ t a
~-y -~
~ yr ~'v
Cathy B~tingham f_,'
Transportation Project Coordinator
CC: Ed Brooks, DCM
Doug Huggett, DCM
David Cox, WRC
John Hennessy, DWQ
Tom McCartney, USFWS
Dave Tirnpy, COE
John Wadsworth, FHWA
Randy Turner, DOT
Kelly Williams, DCM
O_5

TIP Project No. B-3496
APPENDIX B
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (IJSFWS) Guidelines (July 2,1996)
"Precautions for the General Construction in Areas Which May
Be Used by the West Indian Manatee in North Carolina"

Appendix B. PRECAUTIONS FOR GENERAL CONSTRUCTION IN AREAS WHICH. MAY
BE USED BY THE WEST INDIAN MANATEE IN NORTH CAROLINA
The North Carolina Field Office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has
developed recommendations for general construction activities in aquatic azeas which may be
used by the manatee. Since the manatee is considered a seasonal inhabitant of North Cazolina
with reported occurrences being greatest during the months ~of June through October. The
Service prefers that in-water construction which can be completed in several months be
scheduled during the seven month period of November through May. However, the Service
believes that •the implementation of the following recommendations will allow major, in-water
construction projects which do not require blasting to proceed without adverse impacts to
manatees. While most conditions must be implemented throughout the year, other requirements
may be implemented only during the period when manatees aze most likely to be in North
Carolina waters, currently considered to be the months of June through October. The conditions
which should be implemented throughout the year aze:
1. The project manager and/or contractor will inform all personnel associated with the project
that manatees may be present in the project area, primarily during the months of June through
October, and the need to avoid any harm to these endangered mammals..The project manager
will ensure that all construction personnel know the general appearance of the species and their
habit of moving about completely or partially submerged in shallow water. All construction
personnel will be informed that they are responsible for observing water-related activities for the
presenceyof manatees.
2. The project manager and/or the contractor will advise all construction personnel that there are
civil and criminal penalties for harming, harassing, or killing manatees which aze protected under
the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 and the, ESA.
3. If a manatee is seen within 100 yards of the active constniction/dredging operation or vessel
movement, all appropriate precautions will be implemented to ensure protection of the manatee.
These precautions will include the immediate shutdown of moving equipment if a manatee
comes within 50 feet of the operational area of the equipment. Activities will not resume until
the manatee has departed the project area o:~~ts own volition.
4. Any collision with and/or injury to a manatee will be reported immediately. The report
must be made to the Service's manatee coordinator in Jacksonville, FL (ph. 904-232-2580), the
Raleigh Field Office (ph. 919-856-4520), and the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (ph. 919-224-1288). The project manager should coordinate with the Service
immediately prior to the start of construction for the name and current telephone number of the
individuals to be contacted.
5. A sign should be posted in all vessels associated with the project where it is clearly visible to
the vessel operator. The sign should state:

CAUTION: The endangered manatee may occur in these waters during the warmer months,
primarily from June through October. Idle speed is required if operating this vessel in shallow
water during these months. All equipment must be shut down if a manatee comes within 50 feet
of operating equipment. A collision with and or injury to the manatee will be reported
immediately the US Fish ad Wildlife Service at 919-856-4520 and the North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission at 919-224-1288.
6. The contractor will maintain a log detailing sightings, collisions, or injuries to manatees
during project construction. After construction the project manager will prepaze a report which
summarizes all information on manatees during construction. This report will be submitted to
the Service's Raleigh Field Office and NCWRC.
The following conditions will only be required for construction during the period from
June 1 through October 31, the period when manatees are most likely to be in North Cazolina:
7. All vessels associated with the construction project will operate at "no wake/idle" speeds at
all times while in water where the draft of the vessel provides less than a four foot clearance from
the bottom. All vessels will follow routes of deep water whenever possible.
8. If siltation barriers must be placed in shallow water, these barriers will be: (a) made of
material in which manatees cannot become entangled; (b) secured in a manner that they cannot
break free and entangle manatees; and (c) regularly monitored to ensure that manatees have not
become entangled. Barriers will be placed in a manner to allow manatees entry to or exit from
essential habitat.
For projects which require an Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact
Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the inclusion of these
conditions in the environmental document as part of the determination of impacts on the manatee
will expedite the Service's review of the NEPA document for the fulfillment of requirements
under Section 7 of the ESA.

td4Y
II COlYTRACT: C200889 TIP PROTECT: B-3496
0 0 0
~ ~o ~ ~ ~
o
~ o~ o o

= ~
n
~
N N ~ y
o p o o

~
o _ _
v v
"
~ ~' b

n n n n n n x

C
th
O
th ~h
O
N -'
.p O ~~
y+
W

(1J 't 1

O
r

^ ~ Q
Y.
~ O
O

r
/Q
o -~~ o
m ~ ~
~o

~o `m ~ y
O~
~
y, G7
a ~
B A h
0 0 0
~
~ o~
4A A
~ 3
~
~~ ~
~°
+ ob
N
~ - ~
N ~
0 p ~

w k

~~
~ x~
b Q $

0
~ $
A ~ ~i
~ ~
o ~
~ $
c
A 3
p ~
In° a
y
~
m -o
m `o
~ /b
~ Q
~a
~~ h
N
~~
O
y r~
'` ~ O 9
~~ ~~
V ~"I l~_
a ~ ~
S ~
N ~
rt
W
g
P
~~ ~ ~
Q
O
:: iC(n
~~ ~ o
-~; O
~~
b~ ~o
~b ~° ~
~~ ~~ o
y ~~
~ ~
C n
n

~~
~~
mn
00
o~
~x
3
~~
S~'

®~
~~
~~
~,
~~

J
J ya

W !j
N _ ^
J ~j
V
r

m
~

J
~
r
~
r
~
~ A
A
v_
P th 17~

~
~
~
m h`~ 'v~

nZ.-reav- 0 4 Iz:2o
I o~ o ro~Q~~\63496.tsh
D7 N ;~ N N N ~ ?I 7o N
~. =. v g s ~ v ~• O ~• ~ ~ -moo -tee -tee n -o ~ ao -o m -moo ~ A ~v ~v ~ -o •o v A m
°~m ~~° ~• ~,o ~~~ ~~~~'° a ~a ~~'° 4~~~Q ~aaa as ado
a° o O~ o• ~~ -v o~ 3 ~ p p 3: ~ o° 'o 'P ~ a• P P P p p p
m ~ C ~ 'O A ~ ~ ~ A o W ~0p p O ~. m C ~ m ~ ~ o ~ ~ 0 C c A ~ o SAS ~ ~=' v-' ' ~ ~
Q• ~ ~ a ~ Q ~• ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ O rt 3 O ~ ~ ~ ® •'~, N 0 ~ G C ~ C < '00 0 ~ O
c n ~ Q 3 ~ o o ~ ° u 3 ~ > ~ ~ O a a ° ~ ~ ~ ; _~ ~ ~2
°. ~ n.o 0 o n s ,
_ ~ 3~ ° ~~
yJ ; ~ ~ ~j 'Q 'p0 ~ ~ p I
~ q V
' I I I O O ~ O O M' 'O
~ °. d
'I ~ ~ i
I i i ti
g n I~ Y~ ~ ~ ~ 1 i a N~~ i~i~ll
4 Y 1 i ~, 0 0~ i~ I
IzI ~ t r ~ i ( ~ ~ ,nil ~D~ a ~ ' ' I
I ~ l i ~ y ~ I I I! ~ I i i i i ~ l
7 - O O' ~. '~ ~ O ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ S ~ m 2 ~ ~ W ~ ~ O ~ ~. '•OC ~ 'p ~ ~ 4 a ~ O Q z
C C• O N Q Q N~ ,-1 ; ~~ S. C O O ~? ~ n`~ ~ O O C• O m O ~ O ~ m O. C Re 70
h o o^~ ~- o °~ o~ ~° ~° •~ > > c o 0 0~ ~o v O o n o o m
n'' 7~~v N Q ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 0 -i o_ p ~ o ~ ~ s oov C C s S -o -o s ~ ~. ~
c•. ~ ° V C ~ ~• O ~ ~ x ~ O O O ~ O ~ p- C. ~ ~ o ~ O O ~ h ~
O a W ~ S~ j ~ O O ~ ~ ~' O ~' ~+ O O 'o 'v O O ~ D
~? ~ ~ 3 ~~ o ~' O - ~ O O A ~ C O
O
O 07 A
g~. x ~ ~ ~
30
~~ ~
n
®©0~Q0®m0®oo®I~p
r
n o.n N
a~'mo~-~~~oa~
0
o a o ~ ~
O 'n P" 7
O A 7 °- O ~ a '~ O
d d C p ~ O '
~ ~ ~ ~
3 0 ~ ~ ~
C C ~ ~
~ C
nO Q. I
.~ O ~ ,
N _
~n~~~loW~ ~~~ I i i ~,~
m ~ m m mx ~ . I I ~
I I I ~I . I I I I
I I I i i + ~ I
N 70 N !~ O .~ S N N
~, 70 0 ~ o
n y 3 O S O m m m
s~ o o° ~- o a r
0 3. a_ °- ~ s a-i
m 2 W
'O ~ ~
Q O
O ,
yl ,
I~ Q
~0 ~ ~ 1= I b
o ~ I~ I ~ p p
a
I_I p
O
~ ;
I Y if
e 00+ ®Cs a p © ~ ~ ~ ~ o- I ~ i II
II ~
I ~ r II
I ~ ,r
~~~~~ ~ s~~~ ~~~~ ~~fa ~ ~~ ~; m ~
3 n O ~ ~ m ~ ~ m S ~ m ~ 1D ~ ,y, ~
° a a ~ ~ °c. ~ ~ '~ °..
O 3 •~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ N ~ p °
m m ~' ~' ~ A m 'OO s p 3 O O O O O
~ ° ° ~ ._.. 7 O ° ~ .-. N ~ O
to C N
p- o 0 0 o n t o C m '+ p C
m ~°° m .~ os m
N C ~ C y ~ A' ...!:
~ O
~ C m ~' rt I'll ° 7
a m ~ H .!
m C
,, ~ v,
i ~ i I~ ~ ~ lj Al I ~~
o 0 7~ ~ ~ ~
0 0 7 i ~ 4 `'' ~ ~ I N w I
I I ~ I ~ I ~ I I I I I~ I
m
_
qOi
• a
'A
.O~'
~ ~
~.
p ~
~. ~
~ a
c
~

~ ~
o ~
~
O
~ ~
~"
~ m
~c.
c
~
N
C ~

' 03 O
Qp,~~ 1 Y
D'Q
I
~ s a s
a' = Q
O C N
Q~ eC
8 $
°.
1
m ,

I I i
I 11
, ,
I
I
I 1 1
I .I I
f
o
~ , 1
I
I I I ~ ~ ~ ; I
I I I
I 1 I ~ ~ ~ I
I
I I I ~ I
n
0
z
m
Z
O
z
D
r
tI~
3
O
r
t/~
~ 3
° m m Q o
3 c n=~
~ p ~ o c
3
3 -
~ - ~ 3
o ~?' o ~
°- 3' 3 e
O ~
n ~
g
~!
m o ? -° ~ s•
~ C
~ O O

O
.fit V
O ^

~ '
~ O

h

x

Eo ~o rl

I"I rl

II
~~ o
~

~ ~
~I
I~ 1~ ~
N
C
en
n
N
C
N
c
m
z
m
m
~o
~~
®`~
®~
~~
t~
h~-~
~d

~( \ e \b 3496.typ
HDrew~1AY AZ0 KL721~459
t
a
w
J~~.
C
ao m
Z
m
~ m
O O
Z
+ O
O•
r'ii
v
m
O
~.
~~
~e O~ N
A ~ m
-C
~~
©o N
© ~
r
N
;_
Z
\ 1
\ ,
\ ~
\ ~
\ ~
\ 1
1
\ ~
\y~
1
1
I n
~ I r
D
~~ ~~
t/! I
rn I
l~
--1 ~.
Z ~I a1o
~ ~I~
~-
Z I
~ I n
.p. I _'
i
~~
~~
~~
~.
C ~ ~
iI~ N
? m
0
S N
O
i
Z
g O
g ~
H
r~
m~
_~~
~~
Z ~'
N
~ ~
o~
Z
N 47
a
f~
i
r~-
o~
w
w_
N
r
-v
rn
Z
0
w
N N
p 3
~o
P
O O
z
+ Z
~ O
w
A
'c
r~

~
C ~ m
N m
-+ v
N
~
N
~
-~
w
m m'o>v >v oo
v ~v m>v »

N7>o
w
>
rza
~
~a ~
am a
•
t a
m-~a
za Z

mD
are
~ D o
-oDV o
>v m
ovo
»m•o vo
m'n p
v>v o
»

i
i
x
m<•
z•
-ix
~z.
<• D
s
it z z°~< >D 9 ~< ~> o>< a>
m -i vzoa mm -io• a v vma o~
-iv v m m m• as x o• o a a• ma
--m > po 'ur >o >aa coo r~> o

m r m -I ~
am-1
A A v»
r1 >
w r '9 i
m-• ~
w ~ w
x ~~ _
1
D
= -i >a-i
mi ~
o ...c
iD > o D
S OTf>A _
m zvmz>w zy taDmC>i TD
> -i~~ o> v >v >~ o-o ~m C
r x mm m-+<x <x zm a~
-1 rw> 9 ~zm> m> O ~ Sox
m r ~
~ -1 a r a r 1 j r > 177
v co r -1 x r > -i > -~ -•i r r
> ao m w r D o O -iro m -~

<
m o
-i
-C m o
m to
0 0
~ ~
m ~• o r m o o ro 0
e z mo saz az mmz o

m ~
~n
ap0
W>v
DCf
X40
•oz m
2 ma z 1a -131 O• a mC7
-i am o zmm mm m m as
w~ ~a o 1 -~ mv1 m Z
-pm m
m ~
°
m m
° v
m pm
N o-
1
7 -
n '
n A
m z• a m z i ~
ao m~z w mc
~ m

m -<~ Dm W+1 A-1 0a <C
i mom ~ MAC Nam a ~ OT

z 1vo v xmm mm zvm o N

n
Nmm m 9 C
} ~ r m -Ia~
•
f O +
a a x o~ a 2
m av~ - = n n im m
`~
~ m
~
9 ~ ZOO GA C m
-
i -
1 •-i
o gy=m m o•tm •<m vv ~ v
N ~°- v- -im
o i
-i-~o m
1 o ~ = C
o
a •v ~ m
z
co '
~ m- o Aa o r
m m a
~ ~ m
m
>
z
0
1
m
.y
C
m
m
z
-~
m
D
D
m
r
D
m
s
a
m
~o
b
A
s~
L
i
s
n
A
n

-~
r
N
m
0
Z
Z
0
N
~- {-
N
m
Pt
ma
++
00
P O
m~
v~ z
P
~e° + Z
w O
~~ ~
O "'
m
oZ
g~
o~
f~

-v
D
r
m
0
Z
Z
0
~~
~P H
•o ~
++
°og
og m
00 Q
o, Z
++ Z
0o O
°og
I
rr

4-VAAY-2004 OB•335
\p .oJect\634'36s4.psh
RWtlronnon AT
H
~ ~~~ ~~
_~ go
O N ~Qf ~Qj
~~8~ ~~ri Oi ~ ~i~~ 6
99 ~ s
$~~to~~~~$~~m ~
m~~~~o~~ ~~ (~~/
~~~ ~ ~Q +~ Tm ~ 7
~°~ ~ 9.y
~~~_~~~ ~~~m~ ~
~~~i ~~ ~ ~ iry ~NjO
1y. t~~55 y ~ , =~{
1t • " of .~. _ ` I~ 2 .,'
O ~ij( t^~Q ~N
(n
D
_~
O
Z
(Jl
O
0
~,
0
r
N
--I
D
O
Z
O
O
--I
O
O
r
Z7
s
~ N
~ --I
D D
o~
+ +
00
-~ -~
00
+ ~'
W +
~ N
i ~
~r
N ~
~r
-i- ~
j~
~~
~r
I
~~
,1
N
U 1
E$
~~
m m
A
O T
K
Z ~ m 2
n m ~ Z
g --
3.
A ; ~
~ > r / O
o ~ C
o
>
~ ~, m
t^
y
~~
;
=
- f
-
_ ~~
z
- W
p m m

_N +zi Z
° w
m
-~
g
~z _
m

N
~ ~ _ r
z
/
~Zs
p ~ r i
v
< ~
~, m
~ m .~
z
_ s o ~ D
~ I ~
~

cc mx
o a q
i ~
r ~ )
/
/
10
C C
ao_
N
~
• m
w' Z~'~
°~m
° ~ o~~
D
NO
-~ r

,c~ v
/O
O 0
m v n

~ h
't n
2
~ ~~
0
n
~
p tng
o +~
-n
~ vo°
~~{

`<
D
(D m

N

O
~ -
F
N
~

r O '~
~
~ ~
, :U
a
~~ ~ z~i
gal
-~.
~
r
~ °m
DWI
~ °D
~
~ ~
~
a ~ ~
m
v z
,~, ~ l'~a
_ +~'rai
it:...
~ ~ ~ -:
~.,~....
n hI~' ~ ~
t~n ~ O
I
~ ~
P~
t-~ ~
,.• ~~
~_ ~_!
~~ ~
~~ ~
~ ~ ~ $~
~ ` ~a~ ~ "~
I ~~~
I ~~ ~ ~~
~~
p'U1ILITY C~SFA[NT k
~ ~~
. ~-'SOF7w%40ZI N rPRN~-i~~~ 'U14T1
to mUtr \ ~S
I t~
2~ ~~
F
I
I ~ ~~
~$
I ~~i ~~~0
._
4
I~ g~~
~~ ~ ~~
a
~ ~
rt.se.s
I
A' ~ ~
=-
®
=_ 965
~
1? 7~
aa~
~,
Q ~3 ~w war ~ Pavare ~ ~~

-.
~`~ 'a
<tp~ 0'w ---~
. _
~r ptNEl ^ ~
prr
W
~
a
~ y
~
z

~
~ ~
i0
+ ~
y~y~p
P~ N~
~~
II
~1~~ a ~~
~zy9-oD ~
n~~~~~~
.4~~~c
~~~~8~~1
~ a~
as yy~dl.i
;~`---5 l~ln~nro
.59 LOL
~I6

~~~oD
A A ~ A ~ 1/~
11 `\`Iy~C I
~~~w$w+
~~~
~w

~ ~
a ~
~ ~
I
~ ~ ~
_ SR l420
H0t7R£R RD. ~
+
m ~ -Y2- I}
~
~ 8
~I ro
a
r

~l roroi
a
7
~1

II:51
3d96.tsh
i i
CONTRACT: TIP PRO
0 0 0
~Uo~ ~~
o T
~o~ o o~
?m =
0
tti A
a o y o `~
o
N r ~
0 c
gv
~ ~' ~' b
~ o o y
~ < -' o ~ ~ A
n n u u n n ~
tip t7~ t71 N '~
C ~ ~ ~ ~ IN
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A
wed _ ~
1 r r
61 61
O
O
~~g
~ c y
~ ~ ~
O v '° ~
.~ o
m -° 70
4~ `m n y
~ ~ =1 h
o. ~ ~~~Gf
~o a
A ,Ap ni
P
n n n
000
0
N ~ A
~ 3 ~
~ ~
E~ -'o
~~ ~o ~ °b
r r ~ o ~
N~ ~~ a~
b ~, a`
wa ~e r~
o~
A w ~0 v
;~~
b
IT O
Z ~ ~
o
q
m ° y
~~
N ~ y
I
~~
k~
~~
O~
~z
~x ~~
~~ ~
~~
CT.• B 3496
:
< ~-
P
~ ~;
~ y '~
2 ~ ~ O
'~
r ~Y ~~+-
i i~
' ~ P
i
i
i
i
s
o
O
s: ~Cy^^
1~ ~ y)
~~ ~ o
s~
-~.. O
O
~~ ~
~b
C~ ~
~~ ~~ o
n~ ~
~~ n
r~

~~
~~
~~
:
wn
o~
o~
~x
3
~~
o~
g~

~ ~
i
~ ~
~ ~
p~ a
y
m w w
~ ;
~ ~/
~ ~ _
w i.~ ~ ~

~
~ ~
~
~
~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ o•
~
w ~
o
w ~

z ~ ~"~ P
~
m i

~ ~~

04-FEB- 004 II:27
Ai : \~~o~Q~t~\63496.! sh
5/
~ ~ ~ ~ Zi N V/ N ~ T 7o trt/f -p ~ ~ ~ 'O ,~O ~
;gym O •o ao 3 ~•~ ~ mao o'o ~'o ~'. ; ~ `lj~ ~ ~o
°oo ~Q H mg a a ~°.~as~ass °.a
° n n ~ ~< Iii m A p ~ ~ 7W 3 7 ~ `C
e~ s ~ 3 3~ o `° s o~~ ~' O
O W A W
rt O O ~ ~ ~-
o ° 3 °~ a
0
I_1 I I ,I I
I
I„I ~' ~; ~ Y I I I I ,1, I
g i z l ~ t~ ~- i I ~ ~, m ~ \n~l ~ p
,~ ,~, , ~ ~ ' y _ III ; 1 I
- ~ ~ I
4~~~a~'~a~~a a a=m
m op v ~. }p P P p v p 3- n
3 ~ C1~n~ g n~ N N p /V
~"s~a.a~8~~~~~ ~O
3 g~ ~ a 3 "c ? ' ~ ~ 3
a ~~,~~~.~ ~y
~ ,o a~a~,a
s' ~ o
O
3
v
H
i
~ a ~ T~ i~l~l I
a ~ I ~ I I
~ ~ ~ ~. m' ~ S. o N ° o m o ~ o m ~ o ° o W v ~ o' ~ ~ o o ~ ~ o
a p 3 ~ Q ~ o ~ '~ ~ ° 'O ~ W fC
~~ ~ 'O O `~ o O ~ 3 a -•1 °_ G C OS 7 ~ S o "p C M O 4 -p '~
° ~° c` ~ G) ~ ~ o 0 0 o m p° °- ~~ 0 3 0 0 0
~a _a W ~ ~ P o 3 ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ° ~ w m
0
oa ° o o~ p o 3- o ° o m o
S~ --1 >< 3 ~^ W O o
m 4
W A
K
~o
O
O ~
~~
n
. ~~ ~,
®oo~Qo®mo®oo®I ~ o
m m o m $ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ '~ •° o ~ ~ o m
o. a~ 4 o a- c o o -0 3=~ '- W o o
3~~ o $ 3 3 3 0° !r o'
A ~ 3 °- O ~ O `~ 0
O. Q W ° "' O
.o ~ ~ ~ -
Q
~ 3 c ~.
c 3. ~ V~
o ~
O C
°. ~
e°e °
fJ~ ?• i
i
I
I I I ^x 1
~III~' ~ ~I!I,!~
v n ! ~ »e l O W ~ ~~ 1 I I I ~ 1
m m ~ ~ wX I I 1 ~ 1
I I I :I I I I I
I I I I~ ~ I ~

'O

~
v

s v

'.
~°
o

g°
T
°.
oa
m
o
'O
•$
c

o
a, x

~
Re

m
a ~

z
~O

m °

I Y 1f
I ~ II g
e O O ®Cs a O D ~- +~ 4+ o- I~' II ~
I ~ ~ II
1 ^ ~~
~ g: ° m o ~° ; ° '~° o ~i° ° ~i°~ ° ~ ° b o ° 'o°
b bb o
o ~. g a Q~ ° o. ~ °o. a o ~ Q o a~ ~~
fi W T W 4 fC ~ O A O ~ W' '~ Qi ~ 7 p ~~
[f oo rt
s N~~ 'Q c ~, •~' ~ o ~ s~ A a ~~ O 1 o A
O r e- ~
~° m ~~° c in _. o ° n o o in ~ o o W
S a- m ° n y C '' N
O O m -~ O n m
o to O ~. N ._*. n o ..
N C Q_ C
C 11f ~ rt C o
171 • ~ C rn ~ ~ ° ~'
~ vw v N v 7
C N
m ~ ~ ~ ~ m
I ( I I I I II I I
o ~ ~ ~ i i ~ I ~ ~ I ~ d ~ ~ i I
~ 5 e° I I I I ~ I I i I i
a -~ r ,y •, .. -~
I I I I i l i I I~ ~ I l~ I
s
N~ N ~~` p Vf V1 IC ~ ° C o O ~ ~ C m C S G N
v- ~ o s o m m m rt a' ~ m ~ x m o° 3 a" S a o 3•
a- a- ~- r N -i C O ~ _ ~ Q,~`w o C C ~
C m ~ ~ m ~ O ~ ~ + ~< ~ ~ ~ ~
~v s o
'p0 m s O N p ~ O
~ `3~ ~
~ O 3 O y
t~ p ~ ~ ,
~~ ~
O~,
y p
~ ~ r r i ~ ~ Y ~ " i i
I~ I 1 1 ~ I
I II ~ I
I i ~ ~( I I I ' 1 I
~'Q~ ' I 1 I o .Z7 I
~~ ~° I> I cal ° ~ ~ i ~ I I ~ '~ ; 1
~ 0 I~ I b ~ c i I 1 1 I ; I
~ Q ; ; I I I I I
E
3 p m o~ ~^ s~
o_ 0 3 3 ~- c~~
W ~ S C
<P
A ? 'O
O
a
C C
~ ° ~ a
~ m
~ ~ w
i
I
I
n
O
z
m
Z
O
z
D
r
t/1
W
r
to
VJ
O
. ~ ~ ~ ~ C
h
rl rl
x Eo No I'I I I ~' ~ ° ~. ~~~ ~ ~
I~ l~ J
N
m
II
N
c
m
z
rn
m
~v
~~
~_
~ ~
® ~
~ ~
r•--ate-
CJ~ ~

0;1-F~EB-2004 11:43
R \ reJec t\63495s4.psh
JM~rex AT
N
orn ~ ~~x go
~as~~ ~~~~~~
~~~o~fi~~~~~m
~~ p'~~p~~o~~~
H ~ ~ ti
~ ~"
(n
-I
D
_~
O
Z
O
O
~,
O
r
r
(n
D
'"4
O
Z
O
O
-~
0
~,
0
r
1
~~
D D
o~
++
(.,i
00
~~
00
+ cn
W +
~ N
Ut
i I
-<
^~ r
i
~r
~ +
' 4
~~
--
p4' COrK
j
W~ $~
~~~ ~~r
I ~~ N
~yurn~r* usc+cxr k-~
_~-~ ~~°
..~ -~ sow-~v-~ ~, ~ ~
m m
.zr ~ m / _
> K /~
~ m z
m z z a
y "'r _'~~ to ~
"~ / o c'
a T ~ C
O
n iJN
v ~
n
~`D
=z K
m_ m
Z ~A1 W
T Z ~ T
°p = `
m /
~ 2
m ~ ; ~ /
s~
0
~ ~ ~
I ~ m
o° ~
< I-
~~ d ~ D
ap W
~ ><
~ ~~
N

ti m
Zc~~
°~m
~ `- a ~ v
~ -c+ r=

-~~~
po
0 0
m ~
("")
x
~ tp ~
S
7 ~\

u
f
o rnv~
-„ v°o~
~ ~~+
~I~

~ ~
a }y~
1K
A ~ ~
~ N IA
~, ~ SR 1420
HOOKER RD. Q.' ~"Wo

~I ~
a

~ r
1

` wI
$ N
a
f
I

'II Vii:
~.~I~.ii
~1'!

~ ~~i'
_

~
~ss
~ C
~ ~ o

wir _
~~" a5T\ 'ur4nr c
I ~ ~4ENr _ ..~ RS1 t
1
. ~t~
,~ ,
rI
r~~
aar
~~
BRT,71

~~ ~~~ s~~
CS ~
R:gg 9y ~~ ~$
A.~g~~ ~ ~~ ~ O
~« aa~ $
R/G!?ER MAY ! PgA.,aE / 4
M
^_ ~
"~ o ~'
a t~
i
r~ ~ $y
• GpM'El ~. - W r r .~
w~ ~~ N~
~c ~ ~' ~"
~~ >~~ a~
• tt~~~
~ - . '~
I ~~ RSSSi'24~
~'
~~ ~
~F
'J„~I ~ n I__ 1
---
as/
.P
c Nw
~ ~l
is
~ D~ ~
~ • ~ ~ oR
¢ ~o
~ ~ ~~
./ ~~ ~ ~-
i' ~y0 ~ ~
~~'~
,~ ~ ~
p ~
R~~~
~~
~~z~ w ~ ~
. 1 ~~
-IC r ai; '~ a a ~ O
N I a{ S ¢~ '~ .~
y rt ° ~ a ~ iii
y ` 3' ~ ~ z
cn ~o ~ v
u s' O ~
N
;•
3 .'fi a °o
0

rt
r
*I
~g
~~
p
b
O~

~~
~~!
a
$~
aye
3~
2
Nr W
I
' N
1 1 erg P
?. ~O .0
O
4 • W '4
~ ~ :; $
*/~ ~/ ~°~
/ / ~ ~o
e' 4
• ~ ~ ~~
'~ s . .
asss~ ~ ~ ~ sir O D ~
~~y.~J. ~ / / \ ~ II g II g 4 II
N ~V~~O
~ ~ / \ ~Qw~~~~i
Rf
~6' / // 'S B~ ~B ^ ~W
~~ 'AFC ~ / / ~ . ti SJ../.
17 / ~ / ~ '9!. J ..
rt(~°i
s
Z
N
Y
3
v
m
~`I~oD
I M g R ~ }~
II ~~`y~~ I
~t~p~W~W* r
~~ ~ ~~~
~w
h ti
v rr'
~ i
~ N ~
o ~
~
m o
m A
D
n 2~~
°am
.a• ~ ---~

~ 0
~D
~
W
v ~ o
~z v
~ ~ ~
Z
b
j ~
~~
~x ~ Z
Z O
~ ~ A~
O

II.51
34 6.tsh
II CONTRACT:
0 0 0
~~o ~ ~~
~ T
O' O ~ O O
_ ~ ~ ~
o ~
~ ~ H y
N
n ° z ° ~
~ ~ ~
c o° o°
v v
~ ~ -, -~ b
~ v c c
it II II II II II `.2',
th th N N ~
D p p~ p N
~ ~aQae~~A y
s~ m m
r~.1 1
r = _
m
O O
_ ~ O
D
~ ~ v
.~-o C D
rt~°i '~
O -~-o ~ ~
O
m ~ ~
4~ `m n y
~ ~ -1
a~~
A ~p
~o o.
o.
II II II
O O O
~o~
N ~ A
~ 3

s ~
~ ~' ~
~
~o ob
N" ~~ ~ ~S
N ~ N ~ a,
~1
~8
a~~

O
~ Z
° ;. ~ ~
~ > ~
O
o N ~.
rn
y
e
a
a ~~ ~
b
F
1
~
i
I ~
~ ~ ~ y
~~
'~O

~o
K~ x
x
~~
a ~'~'
~,
~~ ~~

~~
r
~~
~~
~~
i
. ,.
TIP PROJECT: B 3496
~ ~
<~
P ~ ~ ~
~ /.
~ i
_ N ~
n ~
Z ~ W ~.
r ~~'' ~-
a
,~ O
y
~ x
O O
zy~
b ~ ~~
~~
ti 0
c~~ ~o
~~O ~ O ~
~b
~~
~~ ~~
C~ y~
y O
ti~ ~
~n ~
r~

I~
0
~~
of
z
~~
~~
~~
~~
wn
o~
o~
~~
~x
j~
o~
gy

I~
'~~
~' .~~-
~ ~
~ ~
~~
~®
~~

~

W

~
a
~
~ a
n
~ ~ ~
41 IJ
a

ao
~°ii m
~°n
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
r ~
r .Ar ~ O~
N

Z ~ ~ P~
~ m
~ ~
~~
~~

04-FER-
96.tsh
~ ~ ~ Q S N 'O p 'n 7o N -p 'O ~ ~ ~ ~ -p
° °' ~p ~ •°O w ~ G = fl• ° m ~ O O O ~ O ~ f7 O p ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~'o -~v ~ ~ A m
O A ~ O A 3 ~ •O ~ '' ° 'D ~ ~ ~i 'p ~ ° N In ~ W D 'a ~ '•°O r O O O O O O O ~ m
fli C C U O~ A~ ~ ~ fl 3 ~ O W D O C A ~ 3 p Lam. ~ 7 O~ A C1 ~~ f7 Oo A N N O ^~
Q 3 Q '~ G. ~ Q ~. 0 3 0~ ~ 3 3 o rt ,Or, A 7- ~- S 7' Z°. A ~ N O- Q' G G~~ Q p O O O p~
°- c 3A ~ Q a S ~ ~ C 0 v .O '~ p O O ~ ~. ~O,ti -O.. S ° W ~ O A C' a" ~ n C~. 7 ~ W ~ <
X A ~ !~. ~° Cam' Sy:~ n ~ C 'o ~ r O O ~YJ Q p O p A '•n
C. C n D_ ~ V rn rn 0 '" ~ `~ A 3 O ~ ~ ~. ^I s v ~p7f s ~ T C
W ~ v '~ A A lif O 3 ~ ~.. ~ ~. y A W A L"
~j a Q ° 3 3 ° -o ~ ~ ~- ~ ° -Zi
= A 'fl v o ~ y
a a ~ b
y
~ n I I I i~ I. ~ ,I ~ ~ I I i I y
~ I , I I
~ I~I T ~ ~ Y I i I ~ 1 I 0 a ~ ~ ~ I„ ,,, I
F ICI t~ ~ ~! I a m m -~ID~I ~ ~• ®~ I I I I
'-` I I ~; ~~ y ~ I I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I I
I
3 C A ~ ° ~ ° ° ° ~ ~ a a O_ O 1 m ` A O A X, ° ~ p O ~ ~C ~ X ~ X X ~ ~ p ~ _ ~_
° .~ < ~ ~? A 7C' =" A -p A m ~ rt W •O ~ A ~ ~ n' a' A ~ ,rF ~ •~« '°p ~ .•~i. ~ ~°a. A• D Z
O ~• '~ N p ~ N~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rt r A ° ~. ~ ~ n ~ A rt ~ O O °. A ~ p O O lC° d C_ ~ 70
A~ n IQ 7 .t A N ° A ~ p = Q ~ ° A O A '+' 3 7 O O A ~ ~ A v A (°
N A ° 7 ~ A ~ A 7 A ~ 3 7 O A 0 A "' ~` 'ti7 •C A A ~ A ~ m
~ ~ N~ ~ A ~ ~, ~ p ...1 O s N S 7 ~ rn ~ C C S S A -~ W A
C r ~ 'O ~ ~ O O ° O_ ° O ~ T Q. m a w O O y .o S° ~' Q
~~ ° n C _- O 3 1 ~ ~ A ~ A A ~. A O° A Q A A A W °_ O ~ A
° o o ° ~ ~ o_ s ~° A '° °- °
0 3 ~ K 3 ~ A ° A A
A m A o
~y m x y
mo
9
rt ~
rn
~ ~ Y ~~ ~ -~
W t l o
® ~ ^`^ ~ O D ~ m 0 ®O o® I t~ Q B Q Q ® CS b ^~ ~ ~' ~' ~ ~ O- r • I ~ ~ ~ ~ i
I ~ ~i
-o •n -o v -o -o -v '0 70 -~ N m
'+ A ° ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ , e n O n -« O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ C v ~ v A v 70 { v ~ v ~ N v 70
y q• O y,• ~ ~ O O O O O b O ° A 3 A O A A
n ~ •O 'C •O ~ ~ •O A ~ ~ C ~ O- ~ n _, fn n m n y, n o in n h n ~ ~ ~
3 7 a 3 A A A A O z I- m O A O G. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ° ~ ° ~ ~ ~ m ~ '~ (G ~
m m m Q ~ S~ I'~ ~+ ° m~ ,~ 3 Q 7 O_ ° 7 Q 7 a. 3 ~ 7 O_ 7 °. ° 7 °.
`` r Z ~[ ~ ~t p ~ ~ _ A 3 4~ ° ~. A 1P ~ ° A ° A ° A ° tD ° A ~ ° A
3 3 c m O Z ~ A 3 ~• r 0 •Q W 1.. ,0.~, A •~ ~ A °. a °. 3 ~ °. A °. O °. AN A °_ m Q N A+ Q
`A-r S O O ° ~ 3 3 7 r A W O °- _ •~ °. 11 Q ~„~ C °. °. ~ Q~~ °' O °' N p °-
0 C ~ ° A 3 3 ~ 3 A A r 3 0 ~ D o ~ ?! O' ~ A = c (~ -i A '9 ° A ° N ° ~ `
m m O 3 ~ ~ O A N 3 A ° n !e Q. A A /C - S A A O ~ ~ 'n to ° 7 p ~ O
A A 7 °- A ~ '~ K A ~ ~: O W A 1 O a• ~ 47 ~ A ~~ 0 e°n C~ O •'Q" ~_
C. W N rt C b 3~ C~ O •p o; O y --1 A S O ~ r r 3A ~ `Z ~ r
O _~ 7 ~ A O r O 3 ~ ',
-p ~ O ~ ~ t0 m ~ ~i O C A S 3 3 A A n ~ A
Q. 171 ~ O A n A N A
~ o. -« `•' ~' A [l ~ yr, S ~ (1 ° H A p
m ° ~ A y ° S S 1P A n Q- A ~ O C
C N ~ •' ~ S tP O A C 171 ~ ~
c ~ m A~ m -= O n m r~7
H O V C H
I I ~ ~I - I I ~ I I ( I y I I I I I I I I ~ I
~ ~ H -1 d
v n ~ ~ ~ O N c- b~ ~ I I I ~ 1 ~ ~" cc~ e ~ I I I I ~~Iy I I I I I I II
C9 W W W m X O I I I I I F A I ,~ i y G ! I -1 9 V N Cf ~ N N
I I I ~ I I I 1 O O < < n I I I ~ U U
I I I I I I ( I
I I I ~ + I I I
N .'o N ~ O ~ 2 N N r ~ C n 4 N 07 'O O 70 (7 n 2 ~ N N~ N ~ (1 'O N A .l7 ~~ T W
p d Q Q r A O O °' ~ _ ~' A N C 3. ~ N ~ S C O D m W
A C S ~• ~ ~ N O n A O A A• ~
O A C ~ °' °
~ 7 aT N 0 °
3A O ~
~ o ~
~ ~ ~ -~
~ ~ ° ~
p
~ ~
C
y ~/
I~ ~ I I I , I r
I I ~ , I I I ~ I ~''I
p ~O < ~ Qp(j~~ ' ~ I I I I ~ I ' I ~ o ~ /~~ I
40 ~ Im I a O (~ W l ; I ( I ~ O ~ I k £~ N~ I-hl I I IUIT ~~
b ~ I I I ~
- I ~ I 1- l i I
C
T
II
N
C
N
c
m
C
z
c~
rn
rn
~o
~~
~~
_~~
~i
V
i~
99

~ i
04-FEB-?R004 Io2e \b3496.typ
4Drew AT•F7~7~~~i4 9
F/7 /99
t
P
N
m m
~ m
~ ~
Z
+ O
O~
a
T
v
W
a

I~
D~
r ~
m~
n y
O S
Z
0

N
3
z

~ ~
~ ~

~ ~

~ ~
~~
~,
~~

I

I
n
-v -~ N
n I

~ ~~
f
I ~ N
-~
o
~
~
Z
I N ~
T I P
~ I ~

Z u I
c ~ a o
~~ ~~ ~
o i-
g
Z f

o i
~ „ ~,
~ I

i
1

i

i

i

~~
~~
~ `
~ ~
} ~ ~
N N
m
T
N
V
V
O
O
Z

Q ,
O ~

-v
r
N
rn
~_
Z
0
W
N I~
m
P ~
J ~
O i
+ F
P
O O
Z
+ Q
N
m
A
i
z
0
m
m
m
z
m
O
m
ai
r
0
m
m
D
a
m
C
z
r
m
O
O
x
2
O
x
m
m
m

~
C ~ m
N m
~ v
N
v
N
j
H

m m mvD~v D'n oo-1v -~v aoDv Dv

NA
~ D rza
~D O -ia
O am•ca
' <a m~a za
Z
roD 1 ~ -OD'O Dv m
DyO
D-imv ~O
m~ O
vDV O
Dv
D

xr z s z a< DD a< D nD< ~D
mm
m o D MDD <~ -ImD m ~o m<D Dv r-

1°
•O -~
m °zpa
m m• m~
as -lo• a
x O• v
Oa Oma
a• wv
ma
`•'m D a yr DO Dmao mO -+D O
• ~
'~ < ,-, iDav ox zm- v x z47G aK
m y x•<Dm
m-Iv m• m mm D•
~
r ?vD~ D r v 1 p
D Bpi ~~ 'yi= -iw <D= m~
t
n 1 m ~
~ z•nD m = zmzD zD 7
omD ~ D
D -°i~v OD p° m
<s W
<s m O D
a~
~
1 ~ mO
~ mf+ z~='

~ rAD
m r
or-i
rnx
D ~zmD
-~ ar
xrD-i mD
ar
D~ O D
1yr
-~ Oox
D
rr
m
m a'm 411 <rn ° 0~1 m~
c1 o mc~ o ~
i• z mO a
° O m° c
2m
O 02 az
41D0 Z
a
DC1 m
z
Xfd c1 ~2 m
Z
1 O
7 n m mm m• m
am
m -i
v a z
m
O -i
-i
m v~ as
m Z
_
~+ _pm ~-mi ~~m ~ m °~m am
z• D m ~
m O m~z toz qC Gp
O Ovm pD OOp .pm N m ~D-ary C9
z v• m s ; D D
n t or r ~,<c
i
° imC ~C1 D4W1C ~p ZOm m (n
s OaN ~ z. ,.,
D ra
D 0 0
m
c ~
° aim ~ Wv
~1 v-
i '
vmc
F q - m
gym
ym
saw
9

o
m°m~
-aio
mo
a
m =
~
D
m ~ zp
° p9 m
t+ -
i-
I f
• a
p °-~
o a m v=~ vm ~ v
O ro
~ i to ao m
~. 1m
D z
° ~ m O C
m
m m
ao
~ m- ~ Aa orn r
m m
D
-~ '• _ - m
D

-v
a
'r
to
m
~_
O
Z
Z
0
N
"~
N
~-
pt m
0o a ~
f t A
mo
P O N
mO
c~ O
Z
P
~+ Z
p a• O
•^J + ~
••1 ,..~
Om
~~
'O z
g~
°o~
f~
r
I~
a
r
m
~i
O
Z
Z
0
~' ~
c
H
•O ~
00
'~'
O O T
00 ~
~ p Z
+ + Z
V O O
o g
r
5 0
i~ ~
i< W
~~~
O
~ N

4-FEB-2004 11:43
\ roject\6349Ss 4.psh
Jhl~rew AT
~ m~a ~~
C ~ ~ S = ~ O
~~$~T~~~~~~ c
~~~o~F~oo~T~~T ~
O~ ~ ~1
Qt ~ ~~ g~i ~~ ~''
~s
p~ N~ H~ H ~ 2 2
~~ ~"
H
D
~_
0
Z
m
t
U7
0
O
6~
0
i
r
r
-F
D
--I
0
Z
O
O
O
tr
O
i
r
N N
~ --I
D D
o~
0 0
-~ -~
00
+ ~
W+
~N
(P
~ I
'~ r
N~
~r
~~
I ~ 3
, ~
z(• ~o~.
~.

~~
~
I ~ r~ ~$~
I ~~~ ~ ~~~
~~ a
I N
R °'
I
q UTM1rtY USE1(NT k ~ "'
~_ 3ym
x

m m
T Z m
K
m

rn z 2 z
a
~ ~ 1 N ~
~ c
a ~ ~ ~ s
o
~ ~
z

n (!N v
~

z
2
- m
D
r
z ~~~ D
Z m
- -~
~' z
m m w
T D -mC
p m /~
m ~ ; / I~
~ 2 /l/
~~
a
I ~ m
o ~
1 ~ D
/'I K
n z z
~ a Cp
°c~c
pp
In x
~N
L -~
~~
i
N

~',~ m
z~~
°~m
° ~ o~~
D
NO
o~~
-C~ ~
p
~ N ~
n
~ h
~` ~
S
I ~ ~~
o
u
o ~nqT
o~~
~ ~~o
~~+
~~

I ~
d ~
~ g
~
N
~ ~
SR 1420
HOOKER RD. Q' ~+
-Y2- o
ro
ro ~
N

a

6 i
~
" I ~'v
r $ a
I

I
N ~r'
;,:~::
,~,_

0
~ ~
c

Nf~ ~ ~\ "UIyNr E$NI\
b'Ui(RYE \`~ ~'~
~ ~~ ~~
I
1 +
I 4' N
~$~
~^ r~~ ~
I ~ RR~O ~ I
I ~~ ~~
~ iv
~C
~~~~ ~~~~
~ ~~ ~~ 8~~
R. se. sy. as
\ _ es. a
RD 4NP!/Q//T ~ O V N ((~~~p
fR MAY tPRNATt' / Gy~C:R'40
\ p tQ ~ /di LGy~ V~~r
ep~R
.- Q
~~
ep~ N=6ror ~-~_NN
~ r ff
p 6RiYEl~„ - O+r r $ ~ w
W(n0 $7E4 d~
~ O ~Z `~ >'
Z_ ~$$ fi~
I { a _ (N A Ai
a V ++
_" 1(+-
~,a
b °~' O I R
R Or '~ ~'
A ~ H °~ I 2
~F ~N A `~
$ ~ w~ ~ 3
~~,r ^1 ~~
N
$~`~~_ ~
! ~
~ ~ ~~~ Z
h~~~
d •9
b
IV
y

,,°o
°o
~ '.
~ 6 ~
~ .;
a
I
I w 3
~~ ~
~
I F
r
W ~
~v
/V W
=
~ ~~

~
s
~ 'R
~ ~
~¢ ~ 1S _

80

~ ~~ ,~s
J /
~
J ~
/.. 7
m
~~ ~ ~
~
^
m ~
~
< ~
/l I ~ k
~
A '~•
$ I
~
$~
~$~ ~
m ~,
~ ~ ~ m
~ O R~ ~ 2
u
~ m

pCf1
N

N~
~
b
I
A O c
~ v
° ~ O /
~
"' ~ +
I . ~ ! ~ a .~
0
m
0
~~ i
~ '
~ / /
~ ~ ~ /
pp~
WA!
$~~ ~` / /
~AA / /D 7.
n .
., Ss.
r0• J
db~4 ~~. \: ~.
~'~ ~ ~s. / / ~. ,Q
~ SBA ~ ~ ` f~ a.
.~`~5 ix~in~n irimw.a
5g 20L

+ ~ ~~~ w \
i y ~1$ n
I ~a~
n ar W c~~~O
I yi N ~m {,
~~
~ ;:~ ~ ~L ~
a
vE w ~ v
4
°~ ~~° ~ y
II ' ~' O ~
N ww``
aV
m
. .&
~ ~ •~ O
. • ~ O
~~ ~ Og
~~
,~

y ~
y
Od
~A
a
m
_s
Q
Z
y
'~
D
m
m
z
-~
O
00
v
rn
7/2/99

~ti~~~ U
A ~ ~ M ~
II `~w~~o I
~~~iw$w+
~ ~ ~ 8~oi
~ §~w
`~
~
m m
y
+
~+ N ~

O

~
ZI
~
~~ ~
z p
° a fTT
n

r +~-I
o D
~ ~~r
W
~
~ O
mzv

~
~ x
~
'DO ~ Z

~ a ~ I~
O
a
~~ >.
g~ ~ ~i ~
~~ ~~~~
rn~y~oD_b ~Z ~
~ M ~ N II~
II ~~V~~p
b~N~g~c~ r
O ¢
~ ~§~ Z ~'
cn ~ ~ ~ $

~.~~v
~e ~ a ~ ,
M,
.®~~.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TR~IVSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX2S201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
GOVERNOR
E. NORRIS TOLSON
SECRETARY
September 16, 1998
MEMORANDUM TO: File
FROM: Missy Dickens, ., Project Planning Engineer
Planning and Environmental Branch
SUBJECT: Scoping Minutes for Wilmington, Bridge No. 10 on
SR 1411 (Wrightsville Avenue) over Bradley Creek, New
Hanover County, TIP Project B-3496
A Scoping meeting for the subject project was held on September 14, 1998 at
10:30 a.m. in the Roadway Design Conference Room at Century Center. The following
people attended:
Scott McLendon U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Dave Timpy U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cyndi Bell N.C. Division of Water Quality
David Cox N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
Debbie Bevin State Historic Preservation Office
Jerry Snead,. P.E. Hydraulics
Art McMillan, P.E. Roadway Design
Gary Covering Roadway Design
Ray Moore Structure Design
Tom. Tarleton Location and Surveys
Lanette Cook Program Development
Ray McIntyre, P.E. Program Development
Kimberly Hinton Statewide Planning Branch,
Lubin Prevatt, P.E. Planning and Environmental Branch
Dave Schiller Planning and Environmental Branch
Tim Savidge Planning and Environmental Branch
Missy Dickens, P.E. Planning and Environmental Branch

B-3496 Scoping Minutes
INTRODUCTORY PROJECT INFOR~I:~TION
I opened the meeting by giving the following information:
Purpose and Need: to replace an obsolete bridge.
Existing Conditions:
• Cross-section of SR 1411: 7.2-meter (24-foot) travelway with 1.8-meter
(6-foot) grassed shoulders
• Functional classification: urban collector
• Right of way: 18 meters (60 feet)
• Cross-section of bridge: 7.2-meter (24-foot) travelway; 8.4-meter (? 8-foot)
clear roadway width
• Structure length: 12 meters (39 feet)
• Bridge sufficiency rating: 47.5 out of 100
• Year bridge built: 1961
• Bridge weight postings: 28 tons (single vehicle); 34 tons (truck, tractor,
semi-trailer)
• Estimated years remaining life of bridge: 10 years
• Alignment: The vertical alignment is good; the road is flat.. Horizontally, the
bridge is on a tangent; however, there is a notable curve on SR 1411 north of
the bridge.
• Intersections: Hooker Road (SR 1420) intersects SR 1411 just south of the
bridge; this intersection is stop-sign controlled.
• Traffic data: 10,000 vehicles per day (vpd) on the bridge in 1997; 18,900 vpd
in 2020
• Utilities: Overhead utilities parallel the bridge on the west side and cross to
the east side just south of the bridge.
• Natural environment: Pristine salt marshes
• Community: residential; smaller, older-homes near bridge; new subdivision
nearby (Sounds Edge at Bradley Creek) where homes are 5500,000 or more
• Other: No railroads, airports, or apparent hazardous material sites in the area.
Other TIP projects in the project area were mentioned briefly, including TIP
projects U-2571, U-2733, and U-2734..
STATEWIDE PLANNING COMMENTS
Kimberly Hinton commented on thoroughfare planning data.. The approved
Wilmington Thoroughfare Plan recommends the three-lane widening of SR 1411,
although no such project is currently programmed in the TIP. However, this
recommendation is based on old data, and the forthcoming new data may result in a new
recommendation. She also summarized the history of the proposed Randall Creek

B-3496 Scoping Minutes
Parkway. If constructed, it would connect to Hooker Road and increase volumes on
SR 1411. However, the University of North Carolina at Wilmington is opposed to this
roadway.
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE COMMENTS
Debbie Bevin said that there are no known architectural or archaeological
resources in the project area.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY COMMENTS
Cyndi Bell stated that the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) recommends
replacing the structure at its existing location with road closure and anoff--site traffic
detour. If a temporary on-site detour were constructed, DWQ would require that the
marshlands be restored and monitored after construction is completed. She asked that the
road user cost calculations reflect the cost of doing the mitigation an on-site detour would
require.
Bradley Creek is classified as High Quality Waters, and consequently DWQ asks
that no deck drains be installed on the new structure.
WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION COMMENTS
David Cox said that, like DWQ, WRC would request that impacted marshlands be
restored and monitored if a temporary on-site detour were constructed.
Anadromous fish use Bradley Creek, so NCDOT must apply anadromous fish
guidelines. An in-water construction moratorium will be required at least from
February 15 to June 30. National Marine Fisheries may require a longer moratorium.
WRC, as well as the other agencies present, indicated that they would not oppose
raising the bridge by approximately one foot, if necessary. David Cox said that raising a
bridge's elevation generally becomes an issue when it allows for large boat traffic
underneath. The wave action interferes with the marsh, and the potential for petroleum
spills threatens the water quality.
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS COMMENTS
The Corps of Engineers said that they anticipated that this project would be
permitted by a Section 404 Nationwide 23; however, permit requirements will be
determined once impacts are. assessed. The Corps asked that Planning and
Environmental quantify the wetlands impacts based on actual anticipated fill rather than
right of way limits; this will allow fora more accurate impact assessment.

B-3496 Scoping Minutes
PROPOSED STRUCTURE
4
Jerry Snead said that Hydraulics recommends replacing the existing structure ~t•ith
a 26-meter (85-foot) long bridge. This will shorten the existing causeway by
approximately 14 meters (46 feet). Art McMillan said that Roadway Design has not yet
determined the necessary clear roadway width of the proposed structure; however, it will
be a minimum of 9.6 meters (32 feet). The lateral clearance will provide for safe passage
of pedestrians. Roadway Design is to provide the Planning and Environmental Branch
with a typical section of the approach roadway and the structure.
FUTURE WIDENING OF SR 1411
Currently, no widening of SR 1411 is programmed in the TIP. However,
widening is recommended by the Thoroughfare Plan, and design year traffic projects
(18,900 vpd in 2020) warrant widening. We discussed the need to propose a structure
that would accommodate any future widening of SR 1411. Art said that Roadway Design
does not typically design a structure to accommodate a future widening that has yet to be
programmed. However, the structure that is proposed will be capable of being widened
and lengthened. Lubin Prevatt suggested that, if the widening it is to be programmed
soon, we consider postponing the bridge replacement and handling it in conjunction with
the widening. Ray McIntyre said that he would find out if and when a widening of
SR 1411 is likely to be programmed. Ray is also to contact Jimmy Lee of Bridge
Maintenance to see if postponing of the bridge replacement is feasible based on the
bridge's sufficiency rating.
MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC
Joe Blair of Division 3, while not at the scoping meeting, did communicate prior
to the scoping meeting via e-mail the Division's recommendation of road closure with an
off-site detour. At the meeting, I stated that anoff-site detour looks to be economically
justified based on road user costs, which I calculated to be $452,100. We did not have
school bus data at the scoping meeting. We agreed that, unless school bus usage dictated
otherwise, we would propose road closure and utilize anoff--site detour.
ALTERNATIVES
We agreed that, unless information on school bus usage revealed a critical need to
keep SR 1411 open to traffic, we would look at one build alternative: replacement of the
structure at its existing location with an off-site detour. I am to get the needed
information on school bus usage.
INTERSECTION TREATMENT
We do not currently have turning movements for the Wrightsville Avenue
(SR 1411)/Hooker Road intersection. I am to request those from Kimberly. Roadway
Design will consider the need for an exclusive left-turn lane based on these movements.

B-3496 Scoping Minutes
Art said that even if a left-turn. lane is warranted, the proximity of the bridge may not
allow for the standard minimum taper length. A design excepfi6n may be required.
SCHEDULES ADD COSTS
The TIP calls for right of way to begin in December 2000 and for construction to
begin in December 2042. However, based on construction moratoriums, we decided that
this date should be adjusted. Ray Moore indicated that it will take a minimum of five to
six months to construct the project. If there are no curves and no superelevations on the
structure, then a cored slab bridge, which is quicker to construct, could be used. Ray
Moore also observed that peak summer traffic ends just as school begins (and as school
buses begin to run). Dave Timpy of the COE indicated that he believes traffic is higher
in the summer than during the school year. After discussion, we decided to adjust the let
date to provide for a September availability. Ray McIntyre will take care of this.
The TIP allocates $28,000 for right of way and $275,OOa for construction. I am to
request a right of way estimate, and Roadway Design is to provide a construction
estimate.
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Roadway Design agreed to have preliminary design to the Planning and
Environmental Branch by December 1, 1998.
MAD/plr
cc: Scoping Participants

B-3496
Scoping Agenda
Page 2
VIII. Alternatives
1. Maintenance of traffic: on-site v. off-site detour
a. Division recommendation
b. Road" user costs
2. In-place replacement v. shifted location
IX. Section 404/NEPA Merger (if individual Section 404 permit anticipated)
X. Schedules and Costs
l . Right of Way
a. TIP Schedule
b. TIP Cost
c. 'Estimates
2. Construction
a. Tl~' Schedule
b. TIP Cost
c. Estimates
XI. Concluding Comments

B-3496 Scoping Meeting
September 14,1998
Agenda
I. Staff Introductions
II. Project Introduction
A. Project Description
B. Aerial Photograph
C. Purpose and Need
D. Functional Classification
E. Project Numbers
III. Existing Conditions
A. Cross-Section
B. Bridge Data
C. Right of Way
D. Alignment
E. Intersections
F. Traffic Data
G. Utilities
H. Natural environment
I. Community
J. Other
IV. Thoroughfare planning data
V. Other TIP projects in area
VI. Environmental concerns
1. SHPO comments
2. DWQ comments
3. WRC comments
4. COE comments
VII. Proposed improvements
1. Hydraulic comments
2. Structure
3. Sidewalks
4. Approach work

.-
y,,. swE
g~
5 ~-`
`~Q.N,~'
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 E. NORRIS TOLSON
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
August 13, 1998 ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~"~
re, --~ (~ ~ ti.
,` ~ ~ 15 ~
,~~' 2 6
,WE ~~p TY~~P13Rf„~.y...~
W~
MEMORANDUM TO: Ms. Cyndi Bell
DWQ - DENR
c
FROM: William D. Gilmore, P. E., Manager °~'~°~ "'"
Planning and Environmental Branch
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets for the Replacement of Bridge No. 10
on SR 1411 over Bradley Creek, Wilmington, New Hanover
County, TIP Project B-3496
Attached for your review and comments is the scoping sheet for the subject project (see
attached map for project location). The purpose of these sheets and the related review procedure
is to have an early "meeting of the minds" as to the scope of work that should be performed and
thereby enable us to better implement the project. A scoping meeting for this project is
scheduled for September 14 °1998 at 10:30 a.m. in the Roadway Design Conference Room
(Century Center, Building A). You may provide us with your comments at the meeting or mail
them to us prior to that date.
Thank you for your assistance in this part of our planning process. If there are any
questions about the meeting or the scoping sheets, please call Missy Dickens, P. E., Project
Planning Engineer, at 733-7844, Ext. 223.
MAD/plr
Attachment
~~
.~

BRIDGE PROJECT SLOPING SHEET
8/13/98
TIP PROJECT: B-3496
F. A. PROJECT: funds not vet established
STATE PROJECT: funds not vet established
DIVISION:
COUNTY: New Hanover
ROUTE: SR 1411
DESCRIPTION: Replacement of Bride #10 on SR 1411 (Wrightsville Avenue)
over Bradley Creek
PROJECT PURPOSE: _ To replace obsolete bride
PROJECT U.S.G.S. QUAD SHEET(S): Wrightsville Beach
ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION: Urban Collector
TIP CONSTRUCTION COST ........................,
TIP RIGHT OF WAY COST .........................
PRIOR YEARS COST .....................................
TIP TOTAL COST ..........................................
................................................ $275,000
................................................ $ 28,000
............................................... $303,000
TRAFFIC: CURRENT 10000 VPD; DESIGN YEAR (2020) 18900 VPD
TTST 2 % DUAL 2
EXISTING ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION: 2 - 3.3m (1lft) lanes with 0.6m (2 ft) lateral
clearance each side
EXISTING STRUCTURE: LENGTH 11.9 METERS Clear Roadway WIDTH 7_8 METERS
t~ '~~~~ 39 FEET y ~ ~ (~~~`'~ i ~~7 26 FEET-
\ `,~''
~. ,Y
_ ~ r
d~~''~ '~

a
~a~
o~
o~
0
D,
\ C
~ `.
0

~ _
1
~ ~'I ~ I~
. ~; ;
i ,/ ~ ~ R~~
~ .~
1 ~ - 1
j ~ ~
Ig ~ I:. .$
~~ I ! Kerr 1 ~
r y
_. _.__. r: j it H -
. _.._. 11i. 1
{II' _ _.. _.
r Caege I I' _.. _.._I~_. 1
NC 132 27 Ra. ~ c 34 ~ .env
.~ .~ ,.._..~ l
i i .07 ~~ o
~' l
i N~
1= I~
_ ~ l~
Z,
°'
I~ i~ ti ~ ~a
I i ~ .3j . ~ ro5' ;!
I ,
~ '~
I., J6
I~ ~
b ~1 , IZ 4z
I i~ I _ .I Z~.
I ;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NC 132
.4 ! N !. ~' I~ tq'
I ~I ~ _
1_ ; D
I~ f ~ i
ILS .)p
// ~,
,.
yc
/
.. I a y 'Oi / I I I ' ^2
I qP .o>- ~ ~ m Y C7 A r as ~ y_p
_ ! 13 ~ m i ' ./3 I ~ ~ 125 ~J
~ ~+ g '% r ~i ~ .13 le
_ J .40 I 2q Z i ~ .74 0
R i L' 0 ~4y'
~~ >D I & 9 I ~ ~_ I~ E"i l~~ ~ _JA ~ ~ I v 50 ~
gJ 1 I~ ~ I``~~ $ 14 ~~ ~ JJ .32 ~ ~ ~ ~ r+ I' .10
I~ I~ ~ ~ i~ ~~ I- I$ N Ig ~ r r r ~ ~ ~ ~~
,rI
s I. ~ ~
Im `' ~ I! rr ~ ~ ~ ; o Cz
*~ ~ !$ ~ 0 0 1~ ~ ~r .~ ,B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ICY I~ ,~ ZD
I ° it _ .~
qti ~~ g ~ ~ ~i li ~ I' I ~ I~ 6: .~ r ~ I~ i° ~N ~ .{~ ~ ,I° ~ I~
Y '
~+ ~ V i ~ ~J2 O I
a ~ 8 I~ ~ i ~` Is c ~ 0~ ;~~ ~Nti ` wl~ S2 ,o ,C
to \ I qP' .nj l F
~lgJe I ~ '° ~ • ~f ~, a0 S~ a 'g
tip! ~ ~Y ~ 'JS i IS ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ o _ & $
~J ~ C ITI I J >o ~ '~ 1 I „ JB ~ ~' l ~ a~ '~ et ~ e5 $
3B w
D I~ .IS ~~ 9C N . ~'~ I~ I I~
~ I~ w Z D Js ~ ~q ~ s 4B `o e: .~
N u' ~ ~ (~ I~
N `~ ~ _`
~' ec 73 \ • dr ~`
I r~~ ~ _ ii I~ ~ I~
~ ap' ~ ~. ~,, h
I~ - ~ ~ ~
~ ~ s . ~ I
--- -.
I~ _. ___ ----_ _ .___ _ _ _ _
o, U ~s~ h~ m ~~
IN I~ I~ ~ ~~ I
_ ~ I
~~ G- / ~ ~ 1.63
~ I I" r
.~
J.
_ ,;;iii
~/ ~
\tk; ~~ ` _ ~`J ~
,~ ~, m '~ r ~ --o /~
~„
~ _ _ ~ ~.
\ 4 ~l
-:\ ~ ~p .r
S _,~. ,.r,~ I°
~ /o
~ x m S ~ ~ ~~
3 n
-~ x ~ zz~z-~
'' ,fir i
\` 1`"p' ~ ~ ~ DODO ~ ~J\'~ \~~ r, 1
x W W ~.. Y SOZ ~ II
z c~
A O-[ D ~ ym ,
°' ~ f~r'I 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~/
x' Z m ~~ x I /
D -I ~~
a4 f O ~~~_ ~ ~~= ~
_ ,
~ ~ ,,
_.
-- / ~~
,.
\ /' - -

.. ~ '•
L s ~~
s`' ' ~ "^~ '
~~ f .
~.:r _`~J~3 d,J
l M~yN
~
'OrQ ~_I'
fy]
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF Z~tANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT jF.. P.O. BOX 25201, Rf+LEIGH..N.C. 27611-5201
GOVERNOR

Nolu~s Tol.soN
SECRETARY
October 1, 1998
MEMORANDUM TO: Scoping Participants ~~(~ _
FROM: Missy Dickens, P.E.;1'roject Planning Engineer
Planning and Environmental Branch
SUBJECT: Scoping Minutes Addendum for Wilmington, Bridge
No. 10 on SR 1411 (Wrightsville Avenue) over Bradley
Creek, New Hanover County, TIP Project B-3496
The scoping meeting minutes dated September 16, 1998, contained an error. The
TIP calls for right of way acquisition to begin in December 2001, not December 2000 as
the minutes record. Please note this correction on your copy of the minutes.
Also, since the scoping meeting, I have contacted the Transportation Director for
New Hanover County Schools to inquire about school buses. There are 16 buses that use
Bridge No. 10 for a total of 39 trips per day, year-round. This is much higher number
than I expected, although the off-site detour route is relatively short: 1.5 miles. I
welcome your comments on whether or not you think this information should change our
recommendation to close the road and route traffic off-site. I may be reached at
[phone]x223, or you may email me at [e-mail].

~~i
.~