20050603 Ver 1_Complete File_20050414

0-5- 649 03
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE
tf ij a
TO:
I-a REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG.
ee i
FROM:
w
c6 REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG.
Loo
l,Mu«f!:?f P?? 5
ACTION
"? NOTE AND FILE ? PER OUR CONVERSATION
? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? PER YOUR. REQUEST
? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL.
? NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS ? FOR YOUR INFORMATION
? 'PLEASE ANSWER ? FOR YOUR COMMENTS
? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE - ? SIGNATURE
? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT
s
COMMENTS:

j 7
I
` Q
. W Ln
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
April 6, 2005 WBS Element 513.209211
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office STAT IO# 9800374
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27609 WBS Eleinent:.5B.209211
STAT 10'# 9800375
Attention: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: Proposed maintenance improvements to structures at two sites conveying
unnamed tributaries to Black Creek on SR 2754 (Kennebec Road) in
Wake County. DWQ # 050603
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace pipes at n
two sites conveying unnamed tributaries to Black Creek on SR 2754 (Kennebec Road) in rn
Wake County (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Information concerning this activity is provided rn M
below: p ---A
Impacts to Waters of the United States
Maintenance activities at these sites will impact unnamed tributaries to Black Creek
[NCDENR-DWQ Index No. 27-45-(1), Best Usage Classification B NSW; HUC
03020201] (Figure 3 and Figure 4) in the Neuse River Basin. The existing structures at
each site are undersized and have resulted in a blowhole at each outlet. The outlet of the
proposed structures will be located inside the limits of these blowholes, making is
impractical to bury the pipes one foot in the stream bed. Additionally, both sites have
noticeable amounts of bedrock within the channels which may also hinder proper pipe
burial. NCDOT hydraulics unit has indicated that the increase in diameter of the proposed
structures will reduce the water velocity and cause sediment to accumulate in the
blowholes and eventually fill up over time to match the surrounding stream beds.
Site 1 - Waters of the U.S.
The existing structure conveying this perennial stream is a 36-inch corrugated metal pipe
that is 32 feet long (Photographs 1 and 2). The NCDOT proposes to replace the existing
structure with a 16'6" x 6'8" corrugated aluminum arch box culvert with headwalls that
is 45 foot long. The NCDOT proposes to temporarily dewater the work zone during the
construction of the project. This will involve the temporary placement of sandbags in the
creek 120 feet upstream and 27 feet downstream of the existing structure. Please note that
the extra distance on the upstream side is proposed in order to use an existing weir
a
Division 5, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

location for positioning the sandbags (See Photograph 1). The placement of the sands
will not result in impacts to the riparian buffers surrounding the mapped Partins Pond.
Once the stream has been dewatered, the pipe will be replaced. Permanent impacts at the
site associated with the replacement of the structure involve a total of 13 feet of surface
water fill and 20 feet of rip rap placed along the streambank to protect the structure. The
work zone will be dewatered for approximately 3 weeks. Temporary concurrent impacts
to the stream from this activity will result in the dewatering of 147 linear feet of stream (33
feet plus an extra 114 linear feet for placement of the sandbags upstream at the weir). The
sandbags will be removed after construction.
Site 2 - Waters of the U.S.
The existing structure conveying this perennial stream is a 48-inch corrugated metal pipe
that is 37 feet long (Photographs 3 and 4). The NCDOT proposes to replace the existing
structure with a double line of 66" x 51" corrugated metal pipe arches that are 60 foot
long. The NCDOT proposes to temporarily dewater the work zone during the activity at
this site. This will involve the temporary placement of sandbags in the creek 10 feet
upstream and 10 feet downstream of the existing piped section. Once the stream has been
dewatered, the pipe will be replaced. Permanent impacts at the site associated with the
replacement of the structure involve a total of 23 feet of surface water fill and 16 feet of
rip rap placed along the streambank to protect the structure. The work zone will be
dewateredrfor approximately 5 days. Temporary concurrent impacts to the stream from
this activity will result in the dewatering of 39 linear feet of stream. The sandbags will be
removed after construction.
Riparian Buffer
Site 1 - Buffer
Construction at this site involves a road crossing of a stream that is not subject to the
Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules. The stream at this crossing is an unmapped overflow
channel for Partins Pond. Please note that the weir is at the northern edge of the pond dam
and the placement of sandbags at this location will not result in any impacts to the riparian
buffers. Therefore no impacts to protected riparian buffers are proposed at this site.
Site 2 - Buffer
Construction at this site involves a road crossing of a stream that is subject to the
Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules. The unnamed perennial tributary to Black Creek at
Site 2 is depicted on the most recent version of the Angier (USGS 1964/1981) topographic
quadrangle (Figure 1) as well as the Soil Survey of Wake County (USDA-SCS 1970) (Figure
2). Construction impacts at this site total 2,593 ft2 in Zone 1 and zero ft-' in Zone 2 (totaling
39 linear feet of riparian buffer impacts). Based on the impacts to the riparian buffer at this
site, this crossing is EXEMPT.
Waters of the U.S. Mitigation
Avoidance: All wetlands and surface waters not affected by the project will be protected
from unnecessary encroachment. No staging of construction equipment or storage of
construction supplies will be allowed in wetlands or near surface waters.
V
1 3
Minimization: The side slopes have been steepened to the extent possible at jurisdictional
sites. Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control Best Management Practices
for the protection of wetlands and surface waters will be enforced during project
construction. Continued coordination will occur with maintenance forces and the
Environmental Officer during construction to minimize impacts to these sites. '
Compensatory Mitigation: Unavoidable impacts to 36 linear feet of stream associated
with this project will be mitigated (at a 2:1 ratio) by providing 72 linear feet of warm
water stream restoration equivalent in the Neuse River Basin (Hydrologic Cataloging
Unit 03020201). All compensatory mitigation requirements will be assimilated on a
quarterly basis and provided to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) for their
acceptance with a copy provided to the USACE for verification and accounting purposes.
Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed
Endangered, and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the ESA. As of January 29, 2003, there are four federally protected species
listed for Wake County. They include bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus),
red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta
heterdon), and Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii). Partins Pond is adjacent to Kennebec
Road but does not provide foraging habitat for the bald eagle. The open area surrounding
these sites ;do not offer suitable forging or nesting habitat for red-cockaded woodpecker.
These UTs to Black Creek are heavily silted and do not provide suitable habitat for mussel
fauna. Additionally, the roadway shoulders along Kennebec Road are heavily maintained,
eliminating the possibility for Michaux's sumac to exist in this area. Therefore, based on lack
of suitable habitat observed during the 03/03/05 site visit, biological conclusions of No Effect
have been rendered for each species.
Summary
The NCDOT proposes to replace the existing structures at Site 1 and Site 2. Both sites
will be dewatered temporarily during construction. This will involve the temporary
placement of sandbags in the creek upstream and downstream of construction. Once the
streams have been dewatered, the pipes will be replaced. Permanent impacts at the Site 1
associated with the replacement of the structure total of 13 feet with 20 feet of rip rap
placed along the streambank to protect the structure. Permanent impacts at the Site 2
associated with the replacement of the structure total of 23 feet with 16 feet of rip rap
placed along the streambank to protect the structure.
Construction at Site 1 site involves a road crossing of a stream that is not subject to the
Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules. The stream at this crossing is an unmapped overflow
channel for Partin Pond. .Please note that the weir is at the northern edge of the pond dam
and the placement of sandbags at this location will not result in any impacts to the riparian
buffers; 4ierefore no impacts to protected riparian buffers are proposed at this site.
Construction at Site 2 involves a road crossing of a stream that is subject to the Neuse River
Riparian Buffer Rules. Construction impacts total 2,593 ft' in Zone 1 and zero ft' in Zone 2
(totaling 39 linear feet of riparian buffer impacts). Based on the impacts to the riparian buffer
at Site 2, this crossing is EXEMPT.
4
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Section 404 Nationwide
Permit (NWP) 3 and NWP 33. Additionally, this application provides notification to the
NCDWQ as Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) No. 3494 and No. 3366
will be utilized for construction of this project. The NCDOT will comply with all
applicable NWP and WQC conditions. A pre-construction notification is attached with
this request. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
Ms. Heather Montague at [phone].
Sincerely,
on G. Nance, P.E.
Division Engineer
cc: Nicole Thomson, NCDWQ
Dallie Bagwell, NCDOT
C. K. Woodby, NCDOT
Katie Simmons, NCDOT
I

WEIR s ,
-•."'Yt ?. 4 r ? rr _ a?.-nt, .? ? _ .'^-ter- _i
it _.i ?-? v ? „? ?_? •7 P r??r ? ?` Y ? ?3. } t
17,
_,??t ?;° a 'try '.? }: '.: LSD`' ia?l {?:V- 11 ;3fe• ".: "-j?
k ^ ,4. ?• y ,J .s
Photograph 1. View upstream from inlet, Site 1.
N^ ;.? Y !, ,: •.?+.'1'? _ .'•` M.: ??l?y 3iy??R^? ?? yet t '??, Res 8, ;,, '? _ sti'n.?'%r.?..m?T' 1??
y <q??, r f c 2(?-f 7 d "' fir' a 1<a ?s ?.c ?a e?'.
?J&+ ri ? ?>?T -..4? 1.s?v'"? ? '? r •. ?"*, .+. ?" '?!? ''7r",bl.?i?+,. •-?`ri?•,??!.aVy,+'?
r+ !F /• a ?,t a? ? / f .-.a?~-'lam" ?d?7'S ? s - ?! 1 r t - ? ? ? } t ??it' ?.s 'l.
:--•: _ ?' Jr • .y `??J,••%r > ? ?z ?. ? T i?7 ..c ? ;'r ?? ?! ?? s\t ?'S'-t?!?
> w
Photograph 2. View downstream from outlet, Site 1.
SR 2754 (Kennebec Road at Dam) - Wake County

itz

'[ k
^ 1y
f

x
w
z%`
y. ,+G • ?.r rYi'?7 e ? ??? .x ? >t ''? k ,? in'R ? .i 2`Yl- ?
,
a.
Photograph 3. View upstream from inlet, Site 2.

L -'Y s t3 - w I
Photograph 4. View downstream from outlet, Site 2.
SR 2754 (Kennebec Road at junction with SR 2765) - Wake County

E
y • ) ? ? ??/• ? R 1^T
i yy /s
M \r ? •„ 1
Kv?l,-R i r ? '
}
:.
r - l?
Points Will --
1 t? ? 7Y 1,/ L-
. 1 ,
ate' ` -' ?? ? ,? ? :. , ? •,? ?. ? ? }} t '`..
1 4
L
309
7 \ ,
Pa
rw,- ?'1 .I ?.? j}J) .:J 1t r' }I ?'3 -? 1? .A 1j „ ,,` ?..... f//? ? - 1 .? { `
,\ t i? •t f t?- ?3?!' a ? I -, p. ? p ? ? l .,s ? ?j? ? i T r-' \ 1 t?'.
,
y .0t . u I \ ??1159 N
SI iI
it 'Ji
_. ,
l `
4-1
•.ti
SITE 1 ty;? ?', .---??,.ti ?.. • ? ?' ? ?" ,.
{
>?' l 1 ?V `L ?.fJ9 $
-rte .
• ?? \ q
• ?t
P, k -?t ! '111 j04
_ rb? P ( x ;t o? a
? r2767? . •?._. ,? ? ' • 1I,y' !. Pvl
a . J A a
4/""` } t I N? .Ce rt ` a
•
,
358
J XF'
?. ; J • C --?+?? 1 \ ,' "'? ? ? ? ., -mil ?
72,1 F811owshlp t'
r
k r` Project Study Area
?. a TT Y ?????` \\\ ` SR 2754 Kennebec Road
Wake County
1
-? f
H' ti??> Angier
`t?"`' f ?? N USGS Topo Map (1964/1981) B-K
Figure 1 1:24,000
We ..' Z ? - ?j Q o
Ma WaA 0ti +ur,
No s AO 'q "Fab WaA WgA
oy WaB wa6 Wil `f 5 r 1 *?hVrch NoB
.p Wd - r- .g a6
Fab ? ,Ra?P ? WaB
Ra . x Nob WgA WP,A °? ` aC WaA WaB wo a• s f Wo Ra
O Was e
WaC L w' aA
NoC2 aB WaB
s
W Q? °p NQic re ;Spring
v
°. f FaC2 N ~ was t r m No6
Ma x 3; $ No62
d 4 i+ 3 N .- a\.
j 11 FaB Me
Naq m as .!` Il - wa6, -.s 2 r t" O.
NoC fa62 / Me NoA NoC oB °
1. !k' Was
WaB Ra No6 No6: _ ... :?_ . z ` -yyap 42 WaA
r WgA
\ f ? Wa6 p.
?. i • o
. WaB VYaB- WaA r y r
"°a Q h'e ° ,f \- No ns NoA • » WgA '-
a•: s,4p 1. Syr f ' OrB2
F ,
s WaA r -,_Wo
WaB, Nob
( T., 4 is Wa6
r- WaA 2
No62 Wa6
)aG d o1
CfVo - / p x WaB `' No
v } ? ?4 ? ?' I ? No8 NoC
`/ _. 4 m _, WaA Z
?'4 •?' + .?? K ? Mob -'"' "'' ';?VaB
r ?a0 Ra s t N° NoA v
?0 Z ?' ,< r raB WaB o eC2 os?
?• ?,? ? H v ? WaC ;:
..e N WaB NoB ., Z° p14? Ps-= • WaB NoA
WgA ?. O No6 a a .? : ?' A
z W WgA f : PB .
b C r n I.c.A: '
bVo No6 °, was WaA e
i
VVac NoA ~? v Or62 f 20 y?°!
e „? rCr2 Go w I j ?n
`'.? 0r62 ? a '' ? e OrB No6
Wa6 2 p SITE 2 OrB OrB2 t } m ?`
OrC2 N06 . WaB ' :x }? .. .. • 2 y Nos
OrB 11
Wo.,? NoB HrOp 9.. c? ti
0
?, Ra was H`?2 ?.:. 1306 WaB '(r. ?Ma
Nob APC2 ?,T • NoA OrB2
4 Orb pj a-?. ?? `'.
WgA F. `
aG q y,C? l HrC2 No6 API ep`?
?O? NoG m O M8 a?
ApB L Ra Ra WaA4?
/Wo m . Me Y \ y NoB LY yQ': lWa6
F
3m NOB WaB ~ \ .Wo Wo NoA \ WaC Q
55 WaC ,?' _ ' wd OrW
u
N°B 3m WaB 9?? R ` y'i'° NoA q \ No62 HrD2 ml V
WaB a OrB2 WgA WaC 0 9 20 0? 3°7
WgA.' WaC Me G"
WaB Me .., \ W
.. NOS.. WgA WaC - ?` ti
?' 0ti WaB WaC <. yyO o
WaB O ?G ?• WaBCLL, $T C? cc er Fa' 2 s W
a<?,¢? o? way
49A.?? WgA` IT-
?
D5
£: WaC Ra?HrC AC?} o. NoB
Wa ? ,,` \ - /`' Go ? NoB •. s ? r?2;.' '- .?r P t?
WaC WaG'• ?- - ° HrC2
NoC2
v/ /W? y waC WaC Wa6 s' i 3 WaB ` Wo
HIV°,pY J l ¢ I LY - aj ;70! YVa?" ?M< <3. , Wr'E
WgA 1N°C
Wa8.' NoB2 t' r ; No6: S. ?l
I Wa6 ?T. • _ , ?9 ! No6 WaB No6 Wa6 qo? o U
LY C a L s'
F
LY No6 s YJt
Wa6 r ? ?-
jj
w G ,,lac Project Study Area
No6 No6 N a c SR 2754 Kennebec Road
VV€16d No8 R
- orb Wake County
-?- • WgA Noe ?a6'' _ USDA-SCS (1970)
`Goof, w ? ??? die?. Wa6 { NoC2"WaB t :. N
t g 1 Figure 2 1:15,840
: H . WaC
?_ g / o . ' Wa6 NoC R i' o WaC o d :j

I
T
•U i
° °o
LL ; C
?- CO +
c 4-
(D O x 0
L a?
N °
Q + L
v a
° ° o I I
OL I ?v I
N c 1 >; I
a
.- a
U °
I v
L I °o I
3 -'I
j I 4-o I
C cn c I - O I
0 4-
CL U
C N L L

O X
- w I I
I I
L
d W
L? X

'
I I

N
LL I I
1 I

O W

Z ..
I I I

I I
? i I I
I I

N
rn I I
I v I
I rno
L v
ao
sv
a
I Cn t
?C aviE ;+L I y+ I
O p L
+
W o L .E
0 '4-
ip CL I x 4- I
cli
N
p . I mM
I
L E o 3
m
- ;,?,•
p m 1
+ 04-0
p L C _ i
394- m L
myEO
?am4-

` ' I I
J o ? I L O
CL
a? > v
I
w
3-1 +-
4-? v=p
1 OUm
F
N
h
O
1
O
N
O
O
0
c ?
Ln -
w
N m F
N C
C
N
Y
tin 3m
t0 N
CL r
o+
L4-t
au, 4-
? 3
H
w
F
n?
c.
4-
0

a o c
a

O ? O ~
O
?U
?
a x M
,
U
3
?
l? bA
r+ N iz
?a

y
v
p E
? v v
C m
p L.}
`-p3
O ; O
m ?
t
- m L4-
Eo
o q- o
U N
0
Cl.
T
U
v c 3
?L c o
C - y
+
V1 O x 4-
L
+ m 10
v ;
v 3 0 i + {
w CO i v 1 ;
a m c i 1 >; I ;
d U p I p I
1 a v
~ s hE + ;-mot
m 7 i 1 4- I
C N C ; 10 I
d fA C i- ? I L I w
0 (!) w
L W = x ; I 1
LL W ! I I
LL I I
}- H Zdne 21 I 1
0 W I I one '
Z - i i I I
? I I
? ? I I
I I
y Zone I I I
ID Zone ;I
I I
a a
o a ; I o' I
c +o I } a I +L
O L 4- ' I N 4- I CO
_a
(0 0 00 a' I X N 1 i L
+ 1 m M 1
4- O '
O ; 1 I
m I *0*0 i rrr??
0) L
E O I I '=
0 4-
U +'i 1 y
O _
IL N3 CD a I +
0 0
N 1 Oa + 1 = N
L p I
r -i I a ? I One 11
N Zbne I; 1 I
; i I I
? ? I I
O I I
o
? N Zone 2 I I ZOn9 - ?
t? U
2
C N m w I I
O N I I
N C ; I I
O I 1
N Y ? I I ,
M
kn
0

O ? NT
M
w o
a
0 o
o
0. U ?
D M
?
D O
O
V
W

N N
?a

N
O?
D c
? C
C
O L
co 0
4- O
0 3
M
c
m L
E O
0 4
U
0
a
t
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 0-5 06 0_3
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC 3494 and WQC 3366 do not require written
concurrence).
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 3 and NWP 33
3. If this notification is solely ourtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: 71
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
i
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NCDOT Division 5 Jon G. Nance
Mailing Address: 2612 N. Duke St. Durham NC 27704
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: JNance(a dot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:_
Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 1 of 8
III. Project Information
Attach,,a vicihity'niap clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 1l by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Proposed replacement of structures, at two sites, conveying unnamed
tributaries to Black Creek on SR 2754 (Kennebec Rdl in Wake County.
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): Non-TIP and Non-Work
Order Number
i
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Fuquay Varina
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Fuquay Varina, take
Hwy 42 east past Five Points and on to Willow Wirings. Make a right onto SR 2754
(Kennebec Road) and travel south to Site 1 and Site 2.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): Site 1: 35.5709°N, 78.7355°W
Site 2: 35.5787°N 78.7353°W (Note - If
project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the coordinates for each
crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 0.06
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UTs to Black Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/mgps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Site is surrounded by wooded areas and agricultural land.
Page 2 of 8
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B.0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
There is 0.014 acre of existing impervious surface and 0.014 acre of proposed impervious
surface (no increase) within the 0.06 acre total project size. Erosion and sediment control devices
along the project are comprised of temporary silt fence.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project will not generate wastewater.
XIII. Violations(required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
.? G 1 os
Ap@icant/Agent's`tignature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8

X.
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Site I
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 Not Subject 3 N/A
2 Not Subject 1.5 N/A
Total I Not Subject I I N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Site 2
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitigation
1 2,593 3 N/A
2 0 1.5 N/A
Total I 2,593 I I N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 8
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed. 72 ft of stream restoration by payment in the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
Page 6 of 8
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 13 feet existing channel
fill at Site 1 and 23 feet of existing channel fill at Site 2, along with rip rap armoring of
16 feet at Site 1 and 20 fill at Site 2. Concurrent temporary dewatering impacts will be
33 linear feet (plus an additional 114 lft for placement of sandbags by hand 120 ft upstream
at weir) at Site 1 and 39 linear feet of concurrent impacts at Site 2.
3. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbod
y Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on ma) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
All wetlands and surface waters not affected by construction will be protected from
unnecessary encroachment during, construction Strict enforcement of Best Management
Practices for the protection of wetlands and surface waters will be enforced during construction.
Only the smallest amount of fill necessary to complete the project will be placed in waters of the
United States.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 5 of 8
1. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
(indicate on map) (acres) (yes/no) (linear feet)
N/A
N/A
* List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USAGE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.0
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.0
2. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on ma) (linear feet) Before Impact (please secif )

}
Fill in SW
13 ft
Rip rap along
1 streambank for 20 ft UT Black Creek 13.5 ft Perennial
stabilization only
Temporary 147 ft
Dewatering (33 concurrent,
plus 114 ft)
Fill in SW 23 ft
Rip rap along
2 streambank for 16 ft UT Black Creek 6 ft Perennial
stabilization only
Temporary 39 ft
Dewatering (concurrent)
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.us2s.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.coni,
www.mapgucst.com, eta).
Page 4 of 8
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
NCDOT will replace the existing structures at Site 1 and Site 2. The NCDOT will also
dewater the work zones during construction. Equipment may include excavator, backhoe,
bulldozer, grader, and crane.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The existing structures are undersized and have
blow holes at the outlet ends.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
None that are known for NCDOT activities.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
12. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The NCDOT will replace the existing
structures at Site 1 and Site 2 The NCDOT will also dewater the work zones during
construction.
Page 3 of 8
r
O?O? \N AT ?RQG
? --t
o -c
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 22, 2005
Wake County
DWQ Project No. 050603
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER AUTHORIZATION
Mr. Jon G. Nance, P.E. Division Engineer
NCDOT, Division 5
2612 N. Duke Street
Durham, NC 27704
Dear Mr. Nance:
You have our approval, in accordance with the conditions listed below, for the following impacts for the purpose of
proposed pipe maintenance and improvement to two structures conveying unnamed tributaries to Black Creek on SR
2754 (Kennebec Road) in Wake County.
Impact Stream Impacts - Concurrent Stream Imp' cts - Riparian Buffer Impacts (Square Feet)
Locations Permanent Fill Temporary Dewatering-
(Linear Feet) (Linear Feet)
Site 1. 33 147 N/A
Site 2 39 39 2,593 (2,593 Zone 1 + 0 Zone 2)
The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated received April 14, 2005. After reviewing
your application, we have decided that the stream impacts and riparian buffer impacts described are covered by
General Water Quality Certification Numbers 3494 and 3366. This certification corresponds to the Nationwide
Permit 3 and the Nationwide Permit 33 issued by the Corps of Engineers. This approval is also valid for the Neuse
River Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233). In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits
before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge
and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying 404 permit, unless
otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below).
Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying
with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total
impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the
conditions listed in the attached certification.
1.) Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of
Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification has been completed. The
responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the Division of
Water Quality upon completion of the project.
2.) During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in waters of the U.S., or
riparian buffers.
One
Carohna
Transportation Permitting Unit QtllralllJ
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: hfp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
. e....,.? n-..-..a..-:?.ie u:...--c.- e-a:-- e..--?-..-.. enoi n........i...?u not n....? n......?....... o.......
N
3.) Riparian vegetation must be reestablished within the construction limits of the project by the end of the growing
season following completion of construction.
4.) The dimension, pattern and profile of the stream above and below the crossing should not be modified by
widening the stream channel or reducing the depth of the stream. Disturbed floodplains and streams should be
restored to natural geomorphic conditions.
5.) Any riprap used must not interfere with thalweg performance and aquatic life passage during low flow
conditions.
6.) All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent
contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
7.) Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment in or adjacent to surface
waters is prohibited.
8.) The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary located within the construction corridor approved by this
authorization shall be clearly marked by highly visible fencing prior to any land disturbing activities. Impacts
to areas within the fencing are prohibited unless otherwise authorized by this certification.
9.) There shall be no excavation from or waste disposal into jurisdictional wetlands or waters associated with this
permit without appropriate modification of this permit. Should waste or borrow sites be located in wetlands or
stream, compensatory mitigation will be required since it is a direct'impact from road construction activities.
10.) Heavy equipment must be operated from the banks rather than in the stream channel in order to minimize
sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into the stream.
11.) Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed below the elevation
of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and 20 percent of the
culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow low flow passage of water and
aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures including temporary erosion control
measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or stream beds or
banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the above structures. The applicant is required to provide
evidence that the equilibrium shall be maintained if requested in writing by DWQ.
12.) If the above condition (#11) is unable to be met, due to bedrock or other limiting features, encountered during
construction, please discontinue activities and contact the NCDWQ for directions on how to proceed.
13.) No live or fresh concrete shall come into contact with waters of the state until the concrete has hardened
14.) The presence of equipment in the channels must be minimized. Under no circumstances must rock, sand or
other materials be dredged from the wetted stream channel under authorization of this permit, except in the
immediate vicinity of the culverts.
15.) All work shall be performed during low or normal flow conditions.
16.) All fill slopes located in jurisdictional wetlands shall be placed at slopes no flatter than 3:1.
17.) A copy of this Water Quality Certification shall be posted on the construction site at all times. In addition, the
Water Quality Certification and all subsequent modifications, if any, shall be maintained with the Division
Engineer and the on-site project manager.
18.) For 147 linear feet of stream at Site 1, and 39 feet of stream at Site 2, being impacted due to site dewatering
activties, the site shall be graded to its preconstruction contours and revegetated with native vegetation.
r
19.) All riparian buffers impacted by the placement of temporary fill or clearing activities shall be restored to the
preconstruction contours and revegetated with native woody species upon completion of the project
construction. A post-construction as-built with the restoration activities included shall be submitted to the
DWQ no later than 60 days after the project is closed out by the Department of Transportation.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms
to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please contact Christina Breen at [phone].
JEH/cmb
Attachment
Sincerely,
an Zllirrie.k, P.E.
cc: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, US Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Field Office
Mr. Chris Murray, Division 5 Environmental Officer, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
NC DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Central Files
File Copy
cACoirespondence\2005 SR Projects\DWQ050604\042205wgc.doc
A

W EriA D4& r vub
S wpT
?NQSr MWA
DWQ Project No.: 0506 0 3 ?h
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Envlronment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E, Director
Division of Waler Quality
County: lak-e_
Applicant: AlOD07- D/(15. ? A anc-e
Project Name: SR 2751f &162e4ec &,W),. Z-' Sr?
Y
Date of LqSuanee of 401 Water Quality Certification: 14 r2- oS
Certitlrare of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and
any subsequent mudifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to theQYWedands Unit, North
Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699,1621. This form may be
returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the prc?ject engineer. It is not necessary to
send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's CcWlcation
I, iv G• /1/ 16e.- , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence
was used in the observation of the construction suet Oat the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of Water Quality Ccrtirication and Buffer Rules, the appravcd plans and
specifications, and oth supporti materials.
Signature: cl?l
Date: /
Agent's Certification
1, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities. due care and diligence
was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Ruless, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature: Date.
Engineer's Certification
Partial Final
T„ , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North
Carolina, havit,g been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project. for the
Pennittce hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the
construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401
Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature
Date
Registration No.
,-fC hCarolina
Transponaflon Permitting Unk NaftraffiJ
1654 Moll SeMoe Center, Raleigh, North Caroline 27699-1650
2321 Crebtmo Sculmrd. Suite 2m, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone]! FAX [phone] Internet httm/th2o.enr.state.no.us/ncwetlands
c)
Y99 STATE of NORTH CAROLINA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
October 27, 2005
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Offfce
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27609
Attention: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
NCDOT Coordinator
References: 1) NCDENR-DWQ Project No. 050603. r'
2) USACE review expired May 25tn
In an application letter, dated April 6, 2005 - the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) provided information on the proposal to replace pipes
conveying unnamed tributaries to Black Creek on SR 2754 (Kennebec Road) in Wake
County. On 04/22/05 the NCDENR-DWQ approved a referenced 401 Water Quality
Certification (WQC) 3494 and 3366 to correspond with a Nationwide Permit 3 and 33.
REVISION
Site 1 of this project is currently under construction. The 04/06/05 application proposed
10 linear feet of rip rap armoring along the streambanks at both the inlet and outlet of the
new pipe. However, Maintenance supervisors have advised that site conditions
necessitate additional rip rap bank stabilization along the inlet of the new pipe. Two trees
(one on either side of the stream) within the footprint of excavation must be removed and
therefore we propose to stabilize these affected areas with the additional rip rap. Total rip
rap now proposed includes 35 feet along the banks of the new pipe inlet. This additional
rip rap does not increase surface water impacts as previously permitted (as all activity
falls within the construction limits as described in the 04/06/05 application). By copy of
this letter we are not requesting a modification but would like to provide a revised permit
drawing for your files. If you have any questions or need additional information, please
contact Mr. Chris Murray at [phone].
Division 5, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Sincerely,
Jon G. Nance, P.E.
Division Engineer, DIV 5
cc: Ms. Nicole Thomson, NCDWQ
Mr. Jon Nance, NCDOT
Mr. Joey Hopkins, NCDOT
Mr. Dallie Bagwell, NCDOT
Mr. Robert Liverman, NCDOT
Mr. Clyde Woodby, NCDOT
Ms. Katie Simmons, NCDOT
A-.-
T
U
v
LL.
C
N O
L
N
4-- L
CL a 3 O
C). o v
L
L F-
? L
O C N C
b i-
a U) C
O -2
L X - X
a 1i1 LL w
N LL
0
O W
Z I
N
L O n
" D O Y O
m? v
4-3 CC UE
O 0L LC
N+ N N D_
L E C
m O m
+ m }.p
34- m L
0NEO
CL m4
O U
O
CL
w
3
v
v
v
Q ?
U') -
r U w
N m ?
D
? m to
N C
C
m
Y
p,3
o '
c?
+ '
x
m0 ?
i
i
I C I
I m? I
I >; I
I v I
Q T ?
I p I ,
4-?p
I mp I
w I -O I LL
F I I f-
w 1 I w
I 1 I i
a
v
+ L
4-
M a
I I
1 I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I m I
I p, a I
1 Cn I
t
I N} I
I x 4- I
I mM I
1 1
+ IT
4-
O Q
I I
' I }N I
I LO 1
3 ? ? I gym;
} ?- I N 7 p 1 4- 4-
Lo I avr
.3 I O} I tD0
?cn I L4-.c
I
i I O'tn
T,;
i
tn
O
110
N
O O
Cf? M?
o t~ ?' II W
?' o >~
? y V)
~
? W

Cd
., N

Qf)
rp
N
O'
o E
D rnv
C C m
OLD
N m N
4-03
-? O3U
m-0
_ C
O L+
4-
EO
U N
v
a
Re: Maintenance activities on SR 2754 (Kennebec Road) in Wake Co.
Subject: Re: Maintenance activities on SR 2754 (Kennebec Road) in Wake Co.
From: Christina Breen <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:03:32 -0400
To: Chris Murray <[e-mail]>
I am fine with these changes provided that no new additional impact occurs, that
downstream water quality is not impaired by the activities. If you could please
provide me with a revised plan for the files, it can just be hand drawn if that would
be easier. Also, keep this email as proof of our discussion and DWQ's concurrence
with your assessment.
Chris Murray wrote:
Reference: DWQ Project No. 050603
Eric and Christina,
The NCDOT submitted a permit application for this project on
April 6, 2005. Construction at Site 2 involves the replacement
of a 48 inch CMP that is 37 feet long. The NCDOT proposed to
replace the pipe with two lines of 66 inch x 51 inch CMPs that
are 60 foot ling. The DWQ issued a 401 WQC and riparian buffer
rule authorization on April 22, 2005. The USACE has not issued a
Section 404 NWP at this time.
The NCDOT Division 5 Bridge Unit has informed me that they have
revised the sizing of the replacement structure. We now propose
to replace the existing pipe with one line of 95 inch x 67 inch
CMP that is 60 feet long. This revision does not appear to
warrant a permit modification. The fill in surface water or
riparian buffer impact will be revised based on the revised pipe
size. The only issue that changes is the decision to go with one
line of pipe that is 95 inch x 67 inch.
Please let me know if you agree with my assessment of the issue.
Chris Murray
Christina Breen
Environmental Specialist II
NC Division of Water Quality
Transportation Permitting Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
1 of 1 7/14/2005 9:03 AM
Re: Maintenance activities on SR 2754 (Kennebec Road) in Wake Co.
Subject: Re: Maintenance activities on SR 2754 (Kennebec Road) in Wake Co.
From: Chris Murray <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 11:31:33 -0400
To: Christina Breen <[e-mail]>
Christina,
Thank you for the response. As noted in the email, the structure
originally proposed in the permit application was two lines of 66" x 51"
corrugated metal pipe arches that are 60 feet long. The Department has
decided that a more appropriate structure is one line of 95" x 67"
corrugated metal pipe arch that is also 60 feet long. This revision will
reduce impacts to the channel by not changing the pattern, dimension or
profile of the stream above and below the structure. So, there is no new
revised permit drawing for submittal as the fill in surface waters remains
the same. However, I have attached the permit drawing with a note in the
corner stating the revised pipe size.
This should close our discussion concerning this site. Again, the
Department is grateful for your continued help in discussing this and
similar issues.
Chris Murray
Christina Breen wrote:
I am fine with these changes provided that no new additional impact
occurs, that downstream water quality is not impaired by the
activities. If you could please provide me with a revised plan for the
files, it can just be hand drawn if that would be easier. Also, keep
this email as proof of our discussion and DWQ's concurrence with your
assessment.
Chris Murray wrote:
Reference: DWQ Project No. 050603
Eric and Christina,
The NCDOT submitted a permit application for this project on
April 6, 2005. Construction at Site 2 involves the replacement
of a 48 inch CMP that is 37 feet long. The NCDOT proposed to
replace the pipe with two lines of 66 inch x 51 inch CMPs that
are 60 foot ling. The DWQ issued a 401 WQC and riparian buffer
rule authorization on April 22, 2005. The USACE has not issued a
Section 404 NWP at this time.
The NCDOT Division 5 Bridge Unit has informed me that they have
revised the sizing of the replacement structure. We now propose
to replace the existing pipe with one line of 95 inch x 67 inch
CMP that is 60 feet long. This revision does not appear to
warrant a permit modification. The fill in surface water or
riparian buffer impact will be revised based on the revised pipe
size. The only issue that changes is the decision to go with one
line of pipe that is 95 inch x 67 inch.
Please let me know if you agree with my assessment of the issue.
Chris Murray
Christina Breen
Environmental Specialist II
NC Division of Water Quality
Transportation Permitting Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
1 of 2 8/15/2005 2:45 PM
Re: Maintenance activities on SR 2754 (Kennebec Road) in Wake Co.
USN 14 Ak SR 2145
$R 2754
Xannoboc Rood
5
u?+trraa ckanw v }.q?, /
Notrxe .. Y, tt a a t
rr 1 n ?y y
Proposed' Rto Rap. i?ggF .x.:s
dd:°cPryj}
Pigcement of 6andboos-- ExlstInQ Rip Roo;
for doeotorina Ftitln Sttt'foco Waters
ETF Ext'ating Trnnsporotlon Facility
p?

,.-- ___- - '1.51r
5W
_., _.-
orb?oood
601 t;ptara
------------- -- ----
?
a'
.._......
, ... SW trf , .
_.....
N. ?
ati
rl?. rtq?..,........ w _...-...,
o 'a
axtating - - "' - _ _ _ _ existing
Oft Oavad. soft Row
37tt. p}pa rgAdrny vlµtt!
0 0
q ?
.............
r pt roa
Ofoaemonf of aondbaga
for aniratering
Content-Type: image/jpeg,.
Image-40.JPG
Content-Encoding: base64
site 2 - Construction Plan
SR 271,4 Kennebec `Road
Wake County
Figure 4 INGO,
pl n 1-rl5
2 of 2 8/15/2005 2:45 PM
'out 'yoaldSjN '8661 (0)1y6uAdoo
0001, 'Z= i
?sAZI
(186131961) dulk odoL SqSfI fee?
.aaiDud
A4uno3 ajuAA,
:
uo as auua
p N a ?I VSLZ NS
ua.iV XpniS iaafoid G f,d °
§ 3 ,
v
r ? /•'' :; L• \ ? jE??j'/////may/? ,
'•JSt i,_,-6? ?-F' / ?? ? }'? j'f? ! vii ?'l !
lam, '
,
a
r / i }
j!/ ?t C f
i
.
f
' " ..-."' j'am' ...,...._ i ? a • ? ?J
ar*
J
r
w
I ails
I
.. _
Z I.LIS ,
:-?? 4? ?''\? ?.;#' , ,- §?/• (.-«'•^'? Via' '\?:_\ 'q ° ^--'' f
,-
., f
(i 1
4V7 p
it
6A£ '1 S
o6ec
fi
.o- . ?• f
k
r
-Julo
.'r ??. ? : \ / 4[ it •1 ?t 1..,.4•, ¢ .. ` /..
t } \
O
\ a
? t

OEM ° 1 3ON _ _?.._. 8eM 4i\ ° o
i y? w eM u o / V2M \\ • Z l
0?8 SI I Z aan?i3 z? ' \ °°
?T GUM ON ? 8eM a9 -?' ?L r J
(OL60 S3S-VQSi1 Bed ?' goN \,'
r - -_-
"4unOD aluM ?? f e'° = aQM
pnog aagauuax tISLZ US B°N ;' s?: J ??•.
Oe OBM 9e P m;! 8°N ? 8°N
na.rd SpnjS pafoad 5 or f- °?
8 eM ?I w•
BEM ? 9 N E? ? ,??,•'!,
e `? ,(l t t
` j?? ? ? a "?8+ ^ a?;V JP?N 8eM * 8oN'1 ? ri' 8eM ??/
8eM 'i 4 cc oN 2Jo? ea? oM \ iI ?o k `?'
OdV: 1 y 8eM e
Ody ZBON 9
Y SON _ I 3 t($M t/,2 M ` \oM
8e41 OEM IoM =\ 8EM i 1 } \( GeM JLM
m 1; '
ZJoN n ZPH oM- ?- OEM OEM
ZO H Z? H \ a ZO H 3W goN og j' ; \ 8Eh1
S, 0
\ SON oM \ Eb OEM \ VIM
O H yl -77
? t -
SON ?,V$M o e --- - VIM
BeM???p ?O1H /?,' a oM :OQN gEM 8eM'
20ag AH ao p s C.. ._ °N OM - OEM 8eM ti? oN 80
Nt ti j rAJL,,, OEM°. >f2M
aw t 9EM OpM eo
3 oM aw \ o ° VBM Z8?0 e ?° 8eM
69oN Z 80 °ti OEM /e 8eM M o
`-a f - ZO?H ?? 2WH ,?' I ti ? •'\ •. b'ON .y ? 21 y? ? ' eoN /
Z8?0 beM \ OEM oo b?M 55 n
BON
BEM J°b\ \ aeM ` SON g°N c enn `? li °nn
a yEM _?
SdV
eH 0-1
?0?0 Ody Q SON Z? H 2?'a b O ?? Vs
8 o
p\ o ' Ze'0 VON b now
_
j Z N F ew EM I
m Z8?0 ?, ?? a OaO? _ 8eM SON ZOiy 1 ea
Z BON oM
ov ! 9a0 SJ?yb Opp e Z?jO' ?, \ 0 BON zolo
BeM M
S N / 8 O.`/ • 1i7¦ i?C
SON Z9a0
p
OCr o? / / Z8l0 VON VIM
8eM
t/eM ' sd' OoN` O?
VIM BON >°M'. {
M s "
91 v ^o a??v 8oN 8eM m0 '.: n. VIM
VON BeM
Al _ oc0 OeM 1`3O c 2 `'J'y
8ON 2 °: O IV0N gd 8 M f +'=.BON # 9eM ea ?¢`1. ?. l?O?
?ge?? `o mB?M ?i 8oN /. G OeM / Gem ( i.
oN a
?, S M - a? O°N y?M
° a 8°N ..jw VEM 8ON 9
9ON GEM 'S8 j ' ;• oM
8eM 2 r / yem / ..
e 1 aM yeM A 8 M BON x s Y Gem Sd =`:? Z8j0
VON •\ ° PM
O t VEM BEM 8 eM
`J 'g•' 8eM
E8
? _ y?M 8oN e
C . - I SON b 8eM,
VeM ?JZb b?M f { ," -'?. '? rl
aEM f I -e o
1
.r. -? "•:.? y., - ' SON JON VoN c /"' 8EM aW fI ZBEj DON
eed
O oW., BEM b'eAA:.
ti -
aW eW
N n GEM \ZO.
rJ \ GEM O. O VeM NBM 8oN \ e8I
:. M GEM d?M
`?aE M BEM »n =t , ids.i '.e8 .. Bed
SON \ ?? a nna? o? ¢tr yg VeM BEM gej ??°oe Z oN
0 M
VeM _ e w
91,
K 1 / \1
a?
i f ?.. Will
firings . /ru
g / l! "?, . • • - t `t 37 55{? t..- ?t? .... - . J_
..,.Yi.e.-_;..._ _>*.? • 3.?I1GW Sp[SniP+.
?1 ?l .1, Ti ?. f i??# ), 7g,?•?'?-""k.a"?.- ?---,-`--.- .?. . ?=•'it? ? , j i 1, `?-'.
J 1 9 111 .`\ ?t -, -. f II l.aM<
4 - t •,•/ ? ' ? -1 ` jd `-._ ..., rat ?. , i./.
t J fJ ) t
v ...• 1' ? '. /` '"' ^^"`?'? ll ?( 414 /" ° ?,s.il. + ( f,.}; ?/? ?`.? ? ? \`#?'?.•
6d 1 ?a
SITE 2
J. 0
_ x 1 g+
,' • ? -? ? Mac
1P
\
i
•
,..-- P r - ?. .,y,;l ? v ?. ???.' ? 't ? ?f? Lit
SITE 1 ! l?; - ?? `tee r 7
i w ?.\\? ??1 t1l ' <:Fjf •ia.tJt?. ll.`s
l ..
t (' :C
\ ti
-
?,. ?- ` .. :. ( ? ? ?i ? - PSpr•+ ? ?? Frllnw>ttUP ?„?? ?_„?,.-.-?'?"°?"e?"
i ? ` I ,I fit, i t? L
1
I ` ?J
. e. r f ' / ?-1 ti-_...?.^•-.? ? ? lit ..
F-
A
Copyright (C) 1998, Maptech, Inc.
Project Study Area
SR 2754 Kennebec Road
Wake County
Angier
USGS Topo Map (1964/1981)
Figure 1 1:24,000
U 11'
6
No 2 Ma eoR9o? WFa6 WaB WaA WgA ??°ya ?o?/ i; i' ew a ;{L `' ro NoB
a
FaB Ra WeB j Wil Spr *Church aB<
??R t Wa- !r
WaB
WgA ?- aC ?' Ya6 WOE
yyo ?.
Ra \... Nob WgA WaA WaB /p
~ { 'WaC T / LY °G ? waA ' NoC2 WaB / WPA ?. !' o \\ ?` °..
o No.C Springs \
o FaC`? ;' WaB m Nob } $ No62.
Ma : C Me 3 N ,. \
f Fab WaA. o i WaB tiWO o
WaB :•? 2 NoA Nod I
1 NoC FaB2 Me NoC o < f waB
??- tp r WarA 42./ WaA _
a6 Ra NoB No6 `• - 0
i. WgA Ra{.,F:...
Q . f WaB _
Go
WaB was WaA ??S .•
?a O NoA y? t aY Wg:. `
Q \ No
Hr
OrB2
/ WaB NoB It. WaA. Wo
.^ _ WaA Wa6
No62 •` ?aG ? ?'` ? ?`. o? +^.?_?
? , /' Ps rT. WaB
W ' No6 a ao a?
3 NoB ' WaB '° ` ` m No6 Q Nor
Wa6 /. WaG ? ' rkr w No .. B o )IV
t..:
WB NoA !J ? ?'NoB
.. WaB rs a P? GeC2
-?
NoB... o ?ypP Ps WaB NoA
WgA u? _ Wa6 WgA NoB a ?R I: Wot, r APB
VJo NoB NoC
S LY 1?0 Wa8
C NoA OrB2 YVaA
_. rCZe2 ; Go OrB2 ® OrB /
WaB .: ?. \ SITE 2 !%O B OrB2 < ' m N°B
WaB ;, ay r j ; = NOB
1 Or C2 No6 o \ OrC2 e { y'? OrB
?Wo No6 \ • t? f hrpp y . ? L
?, Ra I WaB h??2 ?;. NoB WaB ,. s .._., Ma. _\ge? ?tq.??a Or62 ? \ obi
N 12
No6 ApC2 Or62 O
qq NoA OrB ss.
WgA G q y?? \ HrC2 No6 i ADC
oB
Yea Wo hips ?< Q I 3,o p' Hi ?? o. v
` ?.-•-.?. ?. APB. NoC Ra GY
?. Ra WaA \ ate.
LY NOB- Ly I ?, yq' WaB I
TWO j 3m X NoB WaBWaC \. No NOA WaC. C'
.01 3 wg4?a RaC? WaC oboe NoA ` aq \ NoB2 WE HrD2.. \ l ro
o No65
WaB 2 a' 3
as Wa Or62 s WS' o o• ti A
1? W A. WaC i Wa8 T P' Me Me i ?\ __ c_
OB No }^?..I WgA w a C SITE 1 o? M o .ii f tir W j6eC2,
WaB WaC ? Wo o n / ee f
WaB _ WaB ?: oC 1 wo N p?? g 7
w FA WgA , NoB HrD2?' Wa \ t c?'
.?
?19 Wgq' i +G WaC
? WaC Ra HrC wo NoB
e1:p : I \' i poi '. Parts po? ?, ??
WaB Wo\ Go NoB mE HrD2 y HrC P? HrC2 HtD2'
WaC WaC :? • 7_ _, -` ' gA HrC2 Q NoC2 _
Go ?Wga 'Wac ? wac waB j \ - ?? waB ?' bbo ?l
WaB
??•' Oo ? ? ? '. f ; ? o HcB2 ?? x
WOf `? Wok WgA NoB ?\NS
aB WaB ?? /_ NoB2 ?' , ADC
ADC .
a0 Y1 ?? 6 ` i O Ra \ °C? No WaB Ap`` gym; ^
f '9 1` NoB -? waB yf/O p, ? .!? ;,A.,,. ?_ ?:
Ly- , C a ( \ .-
/^LY Wa6 No3 I WaC;
oG ?o• Project Study Area
NOB NoB aG W-- aCa a ?, .
f. SR 2754 Kennebec Road
Ps' No6
waB Orb Ra Wake County
_ USD
aB ?? A-SCS (1970)
WgA O?e2. WaB WaB 1 1
?Go \ ? ?, ? NoC2
\\ I;. wgA _ o ? ,, wac Figure 2 1:15,840
NoC a r of
:f 10 \tl kY.' boo WaC WaB
1jha Sr 1}r x /? t \\ \
" I r"Z?'
17
? A4'
z,
Wilt pnrlp
flUm
\ "ti 5
\
.... ???. ? •2
a t • 089 ?'? ._^•"""'. ..-..r?s, {
,
3" f
C.?
?.
•
t. / •?, ' r? ! J ° 1t t? it P 'rr
! \ 1 _ y Pty
s : • `fit/\3 J 1 } - \tlx
N
_ r
SITE 2
\ 1 A
3 } ?.
?v t !i
36 ?
i
,- SITE 1
r ?.._ , ,, , f ,rte _ ,,' ?`•?-;? ? .__
\
» 'Par64 Jar f; ' `, ` y
/
r
- .ter,.. ..•.,/ r^,..1... ., li r \p°'.?' ??.r
3
.w.
f
Gl? c •...; V7 nml r S f / / ° 1
lDrr} r x > c,d. P°r`c - \ J ..r?•;, "< i +-,,v \ F:t
x'50
Project Study Area
Ht? SR 2754 Kennebec Road
t ' J Wake County
jr.' Angier
USGS Topo Map (1964/1981)
.,. r r 1
Figure 1 1:24,000
('.nnvrinht fC.) 1 QQR h ntarh Inn
b WaG ?.o \ / as 2 rvoa \\\ '0"
No 2 Ma eo,S,A WFa6 WaB WaA Wg,A ??a ?°0.? _. z___,;. • x P -".. ew • m e . ,o Nob
ocY WaB /r*Chyrch \,
Fa6 Wil Spr • ;',,,: Wa6 aB< W Wo) •-..
P,A aC f wa6
?Ra. NoB \, r WaA' U ..,; WaB
G f WaC WP?A Vol o aq ?. \W;-
NoC2 Wa6
NqC l Springs\
Via; ? n
'ii. FeC\? WaB m NOB s
o . C 3 NoB2
f Me f.
,i Ma ? Fab c Wa6 ,,;yyp ':? o
NoC' Fa62 Me Wa6 2 NoA NoC Nob k'
wap
r
?x ?• WaA 42y/ \W?AJ
\ •1 WaB Ra NoB Nob I gA _ Ra
\ .i q WaB ,^ Go -
` WaB WaA
` WaB NoA y+Ig c
OrB2
F Nob WaA. Wo
'` < WaB ' Wa6
:' '' / aG 1 WaA WaB
NoB2 1 `
a /' .S? Ps Was £ Wa6 o Nob 7KO f° r , m No6 L/ NOC
NoB '..'
N e
..,.. Wg,A oC
.. , WaB WaC NoB ?I a ASg? n '? q . 1NaB
G.? ( aG Ra g No, g NoAjj T f ,, c NoB
?a LI WaB' ., WaB P / e02 `
'°B f / ?° Gam: .
ism -Al ? c °? WaC Go
? ¢ N ??? Wa6 N NoB =o ??avP Ps :: WaB NoA
WgA u. co WgA N.B y R I,. •? yyo, APB
Wo No6 p Nec ,per - WaA k
A WaC LY NoA r.z WaB OrB2 s?°./
r
?r`re2 Go OrB2 k
Wa6 \ \ SITE 2 /?r6 OrB2 ¢ ! " Nob
Wa6 ?` r A _ No6
1 OrC2 NoB . O QrC2 Orb ,
?wo No6 \ a , Nr0? 9 2 ti
No6 Wa8 APO t, .F? ? OrB2 m oti
WaB Ma 9 2
No6 APC2 \ i.
N Or62
qA oA Orb / ??
(l ti \
WgA HrC2 ' No6 II APC ?p ..
aG A C2 ?: ? 6 \
DB
Wo Hrp2 NoC Ra m °° a
?' .. APB LYi ' Ra ' 0
?. WaA ., a .
Ly ,.
/W m WaC \. NoB Wa6
LYi NoA WaC \ \ t?
9A
No6 WaB /y ??\ Wo W\' Or62
u+, 55 WaC. , 1ya II \
'o NoB WaB g4?a Ra / WaC \ ti° oe NoA q \ NoB2 HrD2 HrD2 m
Wa8 .? Wa OrB2 WgA \ °o o` ti Me W.
AC 3
W A ac i WaB ?i v Q Me i
? ? ee
IoB No ?? W gA WaC " WaC Wo No` SITE 1 qr o? -M o Hr Gee?
W Wa6 !L -__ -=__? WgA WaB o,C. Wo 13 Hr0 pcG?waB ',? 7,
gA No6
/l^ 55 Go ?' WaC \\I
WgA
/_WaC Ra \ Wo i i? NoB
WaB'.. \ Wo / Go NOB r?F h HrD2 HrG Q \ . HrC2 HTD
WaC W IC HrC2 Q NoC2 °
` ?
Go / ?. W o
WaC WaB ,? WaB <
WgA Ly WaC \ ??i °? WaB :.
GP -? I on HrB2 ??? Zi
k a f i 2, !
Wo Wg
A ? I
1 WgA NoB-r
a6
ll. 2 f ?:.. ? ? APo P
Wo. y d
?E z fRa \. °C<, No o Wa6 A t/ o e i
Y Wa6 Nos WaB IVaC !'' p+ Z A ° 1 ?E 3?,1
i, LY };? Wad
I Gv
boo J-N. 1?? a6 NoB
G Wac aG? T Project Study Area
No6 No6 N a a (,:'
/ SR 2754 Kennebec Road
\ was , ore / RsN°s R? Wake Count
No6 y
l . M1 j T
W?'i, a6 USDA-SCS (1970)
c ` ?T
WaB NoC2 WaB l?l
Fi ure 2 1:15
\ .II WgA °? $A g ,840
\ t wac(
WaB NoC LY' toB w3c \° ? \° \fF -.<

000`t7Z: I I a tnti3
(1861/17961) dujV odo,L SgSIl
aaltud
/junoD a3iuA1
peog 3agauuaN bSLZ HS
ea.td.fpnjS pafo id
1 tai j ? 1J \_
k .z i?° ??d » ? r w c'"
or If E 7- ?e
V1, Sq 3= '
,d a .-a ._ :. -?,.,?- ?,???MKmniia?. :»•? os °._ r?`.t'`i "? 1 i .. _Z\ V?'.C7,
b
ti
°
s .. err '? t...??.:'- ' t j \+'ti,--.,?, ?t r / K Q
' _ II
\\ i
9ce
r, r t y 5t ?( ??; - ..
., J
r' ?M is r, ;/ ! ? . Vjr •?°" \?l `r.: `? i\
/ Z 3.LIS?
Ji ,
,
r
+ t i/
f _.
it
if l, 0
?, ? ? > ?' ?.,,. ' - ? a•: ; »• B v tom' -•i?. ? t `•
•
-uvds -ow
14 N-1?
? lei S.?' ULit1 O i
-julo'l 9,i
v 1
i INS,
r
71
eor
M
wa?^Q. 2 / woo i ?°
Ma WaA
tjO66 0.. ,__ = P .
e ? WaA W6A a o :/ ew e
q 2 °q Fab / !%? tG
N 9°? Wa8 was i ??f*Church ?? NeE
y 4q \ V1ic_. FaB Ra / Wil Spr ,W
_. was
WgA Wok. T'=
aC / Wo ?.
Ra No6 WgA VvaB
W C•. WaA' U(( / Was\ / N
1
a\ \?a
W2` WaB LYWgA '. Zol o No
C Spring ?
742
11 0. / .EeC2 WaB No6 1 ?,. S NoBZ
Ma was W
f i! FaB WaA., o w o
NoC FaB2 Me WaB z NoA NoC NB
t 1 o r T' f / WaB
42 , WaA
?k
Wa6 Ra NoB ?. I --- G lip,-
No6 i WgA Ra
t i. a WaB a G c
1= WaB WaB WaA , f
No Nc Wg..
Q V
/ 340 j I -O162 NoB? . ?` Ps W?
r" r WaB \ ° WaB ,, i , Wo
+. '.? /•G, l WaA 1- WaB f
NoB2 1 r ''
W\ /' Lea Ps Wa6 No6 ' °
Wd8 .. p rey t :. <i 1 NoC.
5 No6 WaA = No6 t
' ro
I ? WgA
N
WaB WaC `? ?? NoB Ii o e qgg 9 WaB
G aG Ra c No6. NoA j .' Nos
WaB F% ?/ ?° GeC2
-was
+0
B2
u 2:. N ??? WaB NoB No6 -14 Ps? ' WaB NoA
WgA Q7 WgA ,B? I . yyp APB _.
Wo No6 ?o N°C #'s WaA
Was a. ! Q7 ?oi<
WaC LY , NoA OrB2 s ?°
?' / OrB
?, ? Or82 ;''? % y Nos
WaB .? "-- SITE 2 !0r6 OB2 ¢ I m
was t•- • j _ Nos
OrC2 NoB p \ OrC2 a., w y'P Orb
NoB " a w. NrDp S 2 Lo;
?eO } ,•"???.' Or62 m 4i
- Ra y'?2 No6 was
a
Ma 9 Z
a c<?I
WaB APC2 ? ?.: ? - ? ? '? f1
\. No6 qp NoA Or-2 OrB
e
oB ` WgA iI \ aC q yrc? \ HrC2 NoB Ra I' APC Cpl ?-
Nou
APB ?. ?• Ra 4 " LYRa 3 WaA
/Wo Q7 I WaC LY No6 LYi ?. \qA Wa6
i 110 Nob WaB !y ?'r WO WaC O
95, \\f., I NoA
u'. OI Wac \ a Or82 \
ro WgA a ; ` ti do NoA q \ No62 HrD2 HrD2 m .
Wa6 No6 (? Wa w0 B2 WgA Ra WaC T7 A Ma _ ?. Me
B. _ Q1 W WaC i WaB Il V
No WgA WaC ?N SITE I o .
^
11 ?ti WaB WaC \Wo Hir . GeC2
/D
W? WaB WgA was oC NoB Wo P• ti HrDZ? O?c2Wa? \ ?;!
Wes:: i WaC -
WaC Ra ?.?HrC ?. Wo_?NoB
"-'•. d? ; ?; ? ,?> o? :• runs .?o?a? ?. .,. ?r
W2 '... \ / -? Go NoBy? Hr02 HrC
WaC WaC L Wo J€A H C2 HrC2 HrD2
NoC2
r Go WaC . WaC WaB Was ho
L)' o' WaB
HrB2.'
1 Wo:\ } I WgA WgA ,. /? I ? 2
?;tt ?n ? No6
38 Wa6 4 , i? wO 1 ..-B2
?` APC
G ?/ ? °c •? ? W Ra'\ ?OC No m ?!: A C
0?-1 m l cB. 2 ! Wa6 4, o
Nab _I' D y r' 9 r WaB ?? p ? 2 q° f / 3?? v'
lv` it C a C„
?ty I? NoB WaC
'N WaB' ` ?-
oG Project Study Area
N°B No6 ??, '.? ?` aG WaC aC
?? SR 2754 Kennebec Road
_ Ps \ Nos
___ •B °, oa US Wake County
Wgalt ae A SCS (1970)
e u >, e2. Was 1?T
? 1 r
•\ ? ? ?`.' '`; ? No C2 was
Y G° I' WgA ?? U 4
Figure 2 1:15,840
Wa(c?A ;.t
o o \\ i Wa6 _;:.. s NoC Ly og WaC ° ' Co \ ! J ?. _
,
?' r? ? -.. k ; ? r....,.r ' '!.' a,`\ \._? t •; J ? \ rvj ffr ? ? fr' ?"': \??1,,? ? "?-, ?-s?- ' ` ?.
6?F Y' , f I:Y:0. ?.e is 1 ? t-^ ' '/v i (' ?j„ •?! ?a't, / \ °?'L .(? i ?4'?C- -q '"
r
//?
`Yil?o ynngs l
vv ` f' J ?i e ?? l^ A? A
• 9 ' ;?s+r _ ,
,116w SprfniCa
C; ?\
? ??? '?` / ?`? d 389 H •-?..."' li
v -
t _ l 1
b, ? \
(' f - a ; •? ?' n it t
it 111 .
5 jt',' t f t v (r
v7it ", SITE 2
n,
' '?•??. ` \? \ t?ti` fir, sit?ti} ? u
t:?` - r 1
-"T - 336 \ \ , r r,.
SITE 1
It-
?1?
1 I
77
°J
1 1
tBrV/
,
..,?, v'- ... .. h`\ .' ''. ('? )? ! ? t ...-.. ?SO?+??_ . ; w.. . Fellnwnhlp ?'
Project Study Area
T `i h ? t \? J 1 f f r' ?} f ,?
?n x ?' r SR 2754 Kennebec Road
f Wake County
i • ?', t Angier
USGS Topo Map (1964/1981)
t rt•an
w i t
r
g re
Fi u 1 1:24,000
? Ma WaA W W ?o??
B°9QO? Fa B: WaB WaA gA T1a°. Wa6 r N
4CnOWCh?
? OB
499 Wo_-.? Fab r, ?.Ra r) " Spr 1 .? r Wa B
WgA Wa Wo?' -
eC / WO --
W Pa
IRa NoB \,. / WaB
-? . WaA U 4y
' WaC L WgA ?° / o aq\ tvdaB
NoC2 Wa6 / 1 n No.C' Springs A\-??
o FaC\ Wa6 Nob 1 NoB2 ?.
d !! FaB WaA: :?< o WaB,W° ; o
NoC FaB2 / Me Wa6 <. - 2 NoA NoC { c .NB I k W B
?-?? WaA 42 / WaA
\ ,Wa6 Ra NoB Nob I
WgA - Ra anti a? r y
e
` i. . 4 Wa8 Go,
` WaB nWaB WaA r L Wcf
NoA {
OrB2
1 r NoB - Wa6 WaA; Wo
?: ;• G ' WaA ?. Na'...• WaB
! NoB2
No6 Rs WaB
-wa¢ .° No6 r m NoB NoC
m ? t? r
( Y l .,
. \, WgA NoC 3 WaC s 'r,= ) ? ' W ? ?,?ri ti. No -
7
waB NoB Wa88/
aG f aG Ra NoB r s • N.A s . t' NoB
y1 i ; I ? Wa6 '? WaB (?•? ?? G ? yG2 '
\ bz oB2 cti c ?,I WaC r.?<'? Go Ly., ti
2. c w NOB. - =o a?P Ps- WaB NoA
APB
WgA• u. N W Wa6 WgA No6 a 'li?Ra? . ' WO
NoC'
Wo aA
iA No6 ?o s Wa8: OrB2 W K o o
WaC ?Y NoA / Z ?•
• rg ??
rCZ ? r Go ??, ?a:`
?, Or82 ? Or6
0 Nob • ?WaB SITE OrB OrB2
Wa6 ? .- ? ti 'NOS
OrC2 No6 . o X2 ` e Sc Or8 r
?Wo.. ? NoB \ rec.~`?a? ? Hrp2 1 y ?? ?o ?1
?. Ra yrC2 ?: NoB WaB r GeC .t': 'F `? Or62 m 9:
Ma 9
WaB ro ? 2 `
{ \ No6 APC2 1',. t. Orel s. eft " O o
qp NoA OrB ?'. 6
WgA ' y? HrC2 V NoB ?i (1 APC app . 2
D ' ?aG 4 ?C2 e Ra \ 6
•
` _. Wo Hrp2 ' sNoC
?.- { APB, \ ?. Ra + Ra WaA ate
LY '
LY11 No, WaC \ 90 O W
/yyo { m j ! WaC \ NoB
55 w a6
/. 3 Nob WaB ? ?? Wo '? W a .?I ? / .•
? l OrB2 1
W1 C HrD2
to _ \ l
NOB 3 WaB gA?O \ Ra! o?°e NoA ` aA ` No82 m? HrD2
3
Wa6 Wa OrB WaC
2 ! WgA 1 ? o toy Me Me° C
06 W A ac i WaB Q" >/
---
? No { a . Qa, NI O . '??'Hr _ '?GeCZ ,
NO ?• .r W ?, WgA ` WaC SITE 1
WaB WaCWo N ?? 2
WaB' -- --=o Was oCr Wo HrOz ` O?G Wa8 ?1
?? :-- -- P o WgA ' . NoB
WgA
G!/ WaC Ra FirC ?. Part' °nd : Wo ? ? ` NoB
• WaB \ / GO No6 m Hrd2 V. 4rC Q HrC2
WaC WaC Wo HrC2 NoC2 HrD2,
Go sIQ
?. WO
WaC i WaC WaB WaB ?7
ly, \ 0 waB `
Go / l j w o? HrB2 Od
`Wok \ WgA
JgA NoB. l?
aB ? ?Wa6 t • ?? j ? No62 ?' . ? APC ??
Ra"\ °C2 No o
I WaB q e
Wa8 ' Dt a9 1 hc5 WaB 4
Li { ?+ C
Nob Wac;
N 1` WaB
°G Project Study Area
N°B No6 ac wac ac SR 2754 Kennebec Road
B Orb N°s Ra Wake County
N°B\ USDA-SCS
WgA {;? tae o .- (1970)
oC, wa6 WaB 1
o wgA N°c2 Figure 2 1:15,840
\\ Wa c ?
z {t?
,>.1 ? o :?{ Wa6 NoC LY '2'0 _ WaC ° lu \a\il? A.
Ncl[ce c> - /lLefle,6<c A-
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE
L(al

TO' / ,. -
REF. NO. OR ROOM BLDG.
AJJ

FRO REF. NO. OR OR. ROOM,
DG
.
n
p((/ ?
ION
? NOTE AND FILE ? PER OUR CONVERSATION
? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? YOUR REQU
? RETURN WITH MORE DE9'AILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL
? NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS ? FOR YOUR INFORMATION.
? PLEASE ANSWER ? FOR YOUR COMMENTS
? PREPARE REPLY FOR. MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE
? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION - ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT
COMMENTS:

p

(CU'
56

APR

WEnAt S AND StOWNEMISIV&
Christina Breen
imap://nicole.thomson%40dwq.denr.ncmail.net @ cros.ncmail.net:143/f...
Subject: Re: NCDOT projects in Wake County
From: Christina Breen <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:50:35 -0400
To: Chris Murray <[e-mail]>
CC: Nicole Thomson <[e-mail]>, [e-mail], "Heather W. Montague"
<hwmontague @dot. state.nc.us>, Dallie Bagwell <[e-mail]>, "Ricky E. Greene"
<rgreene @ dot.state.nc.us>
The 3 Wake County Pipe replacements SR 2754, SR 2329, SR 1160 as currently proposed will require
written concurrence from our office because they do not meet Condition 10 of NW 3/WQC #3376.
Division of Water Quality requires that pipes of this size be buried one foot below stream bed and the
text of the transmittal letter states "the outlet of the proposed structure will be located inside the limits of
this blowhole, making it impractical to bury the pipe one foot in the stream bed." Unless the project
plans change 7 copies of the PCN will have to be submitted with the appropriate fees. Should you have
any questions please feel free to contact myself at the number below or my supervisor John Hennessy at
733-5694.
Chris Murray wrote:
Christina,
Heather Montague has just let me know that you had called her
concerning some permit applications that were supplied to your
office in the last week. These are pipe replacement projects to
be done in Wake County by the Bridge Maintenance Unit. The issue
had to do with bedrock in the stream. I did the field work for
these pipe replacement projects and wanted to provide you with
some additional information. During the site visits, it was
apparent that surficial bedrock was noted immediately upstream
and downstream of the existing pipes. The existing pipes are
small in size, extensively deteriorated (i.e. rusted out), and
have to be lengthened to comply with our current construction
regulations. The information concerning bedrock was supplied in
the permit applications to make your office aware of the existing
stream conditions. There is never any geotechnical assessment
done in the streambed prior to any of this work. It is simply a
field assessment that is passed on as information in the permit
application. However, this does raise the potential issue
concerning burial of pipes in the streambed. If bedrock or hard
rock is encountered during installation of the pipe, we notify
the agencies (i.e. DWQ, USACE and NCWRC) immediately, as there is
always the issue concerning proper pipe burial in the stream.
The Department can never be truly sure what will be encountered
within the footprint of the pipe project until we dewater the
site and begin excation.
We have previously been advised from DWQ that they do not want us
to blast using dynamite to bury the pipes in the bedrock. We
typically try to chip away at the bedrock with on-site equipment
that allows some burial in the stream bed/bedrock. We then
follow up with the agencies concerning what was encountered
during construction. If you have any additional questions,
please contact me by email or at 560-6851.
Sincerely,
Chris Murray
Division 5 Environmental Supervisor
1 of 2 4/13/2005 3:21 PM
Christina Breen imap://[e-mail]:143/f...
Christina Breen
Environmental Specialist 11
NC Division of Water Quality
Transportation Permitting Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Telephone: [phone]
Pax: [phone]
2 of 2 4/13/2005 3:21 PM
NCDOT projects in Wake County
Subject: NCDOT projects in Wake County
From: Chris Murray <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:18:11 -0400
To: Nicole Thomson <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
CC: "Heather W. Montague" <hwmontague @dot. state.nc.us>, Dallie Bagwell
<dlbagwell @dot. state.nc.us>, "Ricky E. Greene" <rgreene @dot. state.nc.us>
Christina,
Heather Montague has just let me know that you had called her
concerning some permit applications that were supplied to your
office in the last week. These are pipe replacement projects to
be done in Wake County by the Bridge Maintenance Unit. The issue
had to do with bedrock in the stream. I did the field work for
these pipe replacement projects and wanted to provide you with
some additional information. During the site visits, it was
apparent that surficial bedrock was noted immediately upstream
and downstream of the existing pipes. The existing pipes are
small in size, extensively deteriorated (i.e. rusted out), and
have to be lengthened to comply with our current construction
regulations. The information concerning bedrock was supplied in
the permit applications to make your office aware of the existing
stream conditions. There is never any geotechnical assessment
done in the streambed prior to any of this work. It is simply a
field assessment that is passed on as information in the permit
application. However, this does raise the potential issue
concerning burial of pipes in the streambed. If bedrock or hard
rock is encountered during installation of the pipe, we notify
the agencies (i.e. DWQ, USACE and NCWRC) immediately, as there is
always the issue concerning proper pipe burial in the stream.
The Department can never be truly sure what will be encountered
within the footprint of the pipe project until we dewater the
site and begin excation.
We have previously been advised from DWQ that they do not want us
to blast using dynamite to bury the pipes in the bedrock. We
typically try to chip away at the bedrock with on-site equipment
that allows some burial in the stream bed/bedrock. We then
follow up with the agencies concerning what was encountered
during construction. If you have any additional questions,
please contact me by email or at 560-6851.
Sincerely,
Chris Murray
Division 5 Environmental Supervisor
1 of 1 4/13/2005 11:19 AM
. , ,, ' ,
d,.a SfATf o
?06oV
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
April 6, 2005
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27609
Attention: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, NCDOT Coordinator
A.14
9A? ?O
°%p .! 6
cNv
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
WBS Element: 5B.2092 ^ S ?'
STAT IO# 9800374
WBS Element: 513.2092 -__S?-4e 2
STAT IO# 9800375
Subject: Proposed maintenance improvements to structures at two sites conveying
unnamed tributaries to Black. Creek on SR 2754 (Kennebec Road) in
Wake County.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace pipes at
two sites conveying unnamed tributaries to Black Creek on SR 2754 (Kennebec Road) in
Wake County (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Information concerning this activity is provided
below:
Impacts to Waters of the United States
Maintenance activities at these sites will impact unnamed tributaries to Black Creek
[NCDENR-DWQ Index No. 27-45-(1), Best Usage Classification B NSW; HUC
03020201] (Figure 3 and Figure 4) in the Neuse River Basin. The existing structures at
each site are undersized and have resulted in a blowhole at each outlet. The outlet of the
proposed structures will be located inside the limits of these blowholes, rrhking is
impractical to bury the pipes one foot in the stream bed. Additionally, both sites have
noticeable amounts of bedrock within the channels which may also hinder proper pipe
burial. NCDOT hydraulics unit has indicated that the increase in diameter of the proposed
structures will reduce the water velocity and cause sediment to accumulate in the
blowholes and eventually fill up over time to match the surrounding stream beds.
Site 1 - Waters of the U.S.
The existing structure conveying this perennial stream is a 36-inch corrugated metal pipe
that is 32 feet long (Photographs 1 and 2). The NCDOT proposes to replace the existing
structure with a 16'6" x 6'8" corrugated aluminum arch box culvert with headwalls that
is 45 foot long. The NCDOT proposes to temporarily dewater the work zone during the
construction of the project. This will involve the temporary placement of sandbags in the
creek 120 feet upstream and 27 feet downstream of the existing structure. Please note that
the extra distance on the upstream side is proposed in order to use an existing weir
Division 5, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
2
location for positioning the sandbags (See Photograph 1). The placement of the sandbags
will not result in impacts to the riparian buffers surrounding the mapped Partins Pond.
Once the. stream has been dewatered, the pipe will be replaced. Permanertiinpacts at the
site associated with the replacement of the structure involve a total of 13 feet of surface
water fill and 20 feet of rip rap placed along the streambank to protect the structure. The
work zone will be dewatered for approximately 3 weeks. Temporary concurrent impacts
to the stream from this activity will result in the dewatering of 147 linear feet of stream (33
feet plus an extra 114 linear feet for placement of the sandbags upstream at the weir). The
sandbags will be removed after construction.
Site 2 - Waters of the U.S.
The existing structure conveying this perennial stream is a 48-inch corrugated metal pipe
that is 37 feet long (Photographs 3 and 4). The NCDOT proposes to replace the existing
structure with a double line of 66 x 51" corrugated metal pipe arches that are 60 foot
long. The NCDOT proposes to temporarily dewater the work zone during the activity at
this site. This will involve the temporary placement of sandbags in the creek 10 feet
upstream and 10 feet downstream of the existing piped section. Once the stream has been
dewatered, the pipe will be replaced. Permanent impacts at the site associated with the
replacement of the structure involve a total of 23 feet of surface water fill and 16 feet of
rip rap placed along the streambank to protect the structure. The work zone will be
dewatered for approximately 5 days. Temporary concurrent impacts to the stream from
this activity will result in the dewatering of 39 linear feet of stream. The sandbags will be
removed after construction.
Riparian Buffer
Site 1 -Buffer
Construction at this site involves a road crossing of a stream that is not subject to the
Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules. The stream at this crossing is an unmapped overflow
channel for Partins Pond. Please note that the weir is at the northern edge of the pond dam
and the placement of sandbags at this location will not result in any impacts to the riparian
buffers. Therefore no impacts to protected riparian buffers are proposed at this site.
Site 2 - Buffer
Construction at this site involves a road crossing of a stream that is subject to the
Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules. The unnamed perennial tributary to Black Creek at
Site 2 is depicted on the most recent version of the Angier (USGS 1964/1981) topographic
quadrangle (Figure 1) as well as the Soil Survey of Wake County (USDA-SCS 1970) (Figure
2). Construction impacts at this site total 2,593 ft'` in Zone 1 and zero ft'- in Zone 2 (totaling
39 linear feet of riparian buffer impacts). Based on the impacts to the riparian buffer at this
site, this crossing is EXEMPT.
Waters of the U.S. Mitigation

Avoidance: All wetlands and surface waters not affected by the project will be protected
from unnecessary encroachment. No staging of construction equipment or storage of
construction supplies will be allowed in wetlands or near surface waters.
3
Minimization: The side slopes have been steepened to the extent possible at jurisdictional
sites. Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control Best Management Practices
for the protection of wetlands and surface waters will be enforced during project
construction. Continued coordination will occur with maintenance forces and the
Environmental Officer during construction to minimize impacts to these sites.
Compensatory Mitigation: Unavoidable impacts to 36 linear feet of stream associated
with this project will be mitigated (at a 2:1 ratio) by providing 72 linear feet of warm
water stream restoration equivalent in the Neuse River Basin (Hydrologic Cataloging
Unit 03020201). All compensatory mitigation requirements will be assimilated on a
quarterly basis and provided to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) for their
acceptance with a copy provided to the USACE for verification and accounting purposes.
Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed
Endangered, and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the ESA. As of January 29, 2003, there are four federally protected species
listed for Wake County. They include bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus),
red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta
heterdon), and Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii). Partins Pond is adjacent to Kennebec
Road but does not provide foraging habitat for the bald eagle. The open area surrounding
these sites do not offer suitable forging or nesting habitat for red-cockaded woodpecker..
These UTs to Black Creek are heavily silted and do not provide suitable habitat for mussel'
fauna. Additionally, the roadway shoulders along Kennebec Road are heavily maintained,
eliminating the possibility for Michaux's sumac to exist in this area. Therefore, based on lack
of suitable habitat observed during the 03/03/05 site visit, biological conclusions of No Effect
have been rendered for each species.
Summary
The NCDOT proposes to replace the existing structures at Site 1 and Site 2. Both sites
will be dewatered temporarily during construction. This will involve the temporary
placement of sandbags in the creek upstream and downstream of construction. Once the
streams have been dewatered, the pipes will be replaced. Permanent impacts at the Site 1
associated with the replacement of the structure total of 13 feet with 20 feet of rip rap
placed along the streambank to protect the structure. Permanent impacts at the Site 2
associated with the replacement of the structure total of 23 feet with 16 feet of rip rap
placed along the streambank to protect the structure.
Construction at Site 1 site involves a road crossing of a stream that is not subject to the
Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules. The stream at this crossing is an unmapped overflow
channel for Partins Pond. Please note that the weir is at the northern edge of the pond dam
and the placement of sandbags at this location will not result in any impacts to the riparian
buffers -therefore no impacts to protected riparian buffers are proposed at this site.
Construction at Site 2 involves a road crossing of a stream that is subject to the Neuse River
Riparian Buffer Rules. Construction impacts total 2,593ft2 in Zone 1 and zero ft- in Zone 2
(totaling 39 linear feet of riparian buffer impacts). Based on the impacts to the riparian buffer
at Site 2, this crossing is EXEMPT.

4
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Section 404 Nationwide
Permit (NWP) 3 and NWP 33. Additionally, this application provides notification to the
NCDWQ as Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) No. 3494 and No. 3366
will be utilized for construction of this project. The NCDOT will comply with all
applicable NWP and WQC conditions. A pre-construction notification is attached with
this request. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
Ms. Heather Montague at [phone].
Sincerely,
on G. Nance, P.E.
Division Engineer
cc: Nicole Thomson, NCDWQ
Dallie Bagwell, NCDOT
C. K. Woodby, NCDOT
Katie Simmons, NCDOT
r
Office Use Only: ((?? Fonn Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ NM 0603
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC 3494 and WQC 3366 do not require written
concurrence).
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 3 and NWP 3
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NCDOT Division 5 Jon G. Nance
Mailing Address: 2612 N. Duke St., Durham, NC 27704
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: JNance(i0ot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 1 of 8

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly' showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Proposed replacement of structures, at two sites, cone jnng unnamed
tributaries to Black Creek on SR 2754 (Kennebec Rd) in Wake County.
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): Non-TIP and Non-W
Order Number
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Fuquav Varina
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Fuquav Varina, take
Hwy 42 east past Five Points and on to Willow Springs. Make a right onto SR 2754
(Kennebec Road) and travel south to Site 1 and Site 2.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): Site 1: 35.5709°N, 78.7355°W
Site 2: 35.5787°N, 78.7353°W (Note - If
project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the coordinates for each
crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 0.06 acre
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UTs to Black Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Site is surrounded by wooded areas and agricultural land.
Page 2 of 8
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
NCDOT will replace the existing. structures at Site 1 and Site 2. The NCDOT, will also
dewater the work zones during construction. Equipment may include excavator,, backhoe,
bulldozer, grader, and crane.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The existing structures are undersized and have
blow holes at the outlet ends.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
None that are known for NCDOT activities.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
12. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The NCDOT will rpplace the existing
structures at Site 1 and Site 2 The NCDOT will also dewater the work zones during
construction.
Page 3 of 8
1. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
(indicate on map) (acres) (yes/no) (linear feet)
N/A
N/A
List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.0
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.0
2. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on ma) (linear feet) Before Im act ( lease specify)

Fill in SW 13 ft
Rip rap along
1 streambank for 20 ft UT Black Creek 13.5 ft Perennial
stabilization only
Temporary 147 ft
Dewatering (33 concurrent,
plus 114 ft)
Fill in SW 23 ft
Rip rap along
2 streambank for 16 ft UT Black Creek 6 ft Perennial
stabilization only
Temporary 39 ft
Dewatering (concurrent)
* List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.us%zs.sov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Page 4 of 8
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 13 feet existing channel
fill at Site 1 and 23 feet of existing channel fill at Site 2, along with rip rap armoring of
16 feet at Site 1 and 20 fill at Site 2. Concurrent temporary dewatering impacts will be
33 linear feet (plus an additional 114 lft for placement of sandbags by hand 120 ft upstream
at weir) at Site 1 and 39 linear feet of concurrent impacts at Site 2.
3. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody

Site Number ,?
Type of Impact*
Impact
(if applicable)
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on map) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A
• List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
All wetlands and surface waters not affected by construction will be protected from
unnecessary encroachment during, construction. Strict enforcement of Best Management
Practices for the protection of wetlands and surface waters will be enforced during construction.
Only the smallest amount of fill necessary to complete the project will be placed in waters of the
United States.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 5 of 8
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed. 72 ft of stream restoration by payment in the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
Page 6 of 8
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
X.
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify, )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Site 1
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitigation
1 Not Subject 3 N/A
2 Not Subject 1.5 N/A
Total I Not Subject I I N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Site 2
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 2,593 3 N/A
2 0 1.5 N/A
Total 2,593 N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 8
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
There is 0.014 acre of existing impervious surface and 0.014 acre of proposed impervious
surface (no increase) within the 0.06 acre total project size. Erosion and sediment control devices
along the project are comprised of temporary silt fence.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project will not generate wastewater.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may ;impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
44 Jos
App)icant/Agent'Aignature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8

` S. ^ N

l

Photograph 1. View upstream from inlet, Site 1.
Photograph 2. View downstream from outlet, Site 1.
SR 2754 (Kennebec Road at Dam) - Wake County
fir!
.. s+.a ? d .. k

. y.?,,?.,.,..,?;, ..* ?" ,#-k`l•.'' a F ?.s? °'f? -r DPW"
i +?a?"n* 4? 1y#?.-q yy?yyE'"" ry,ri? r? w r.
lee,
Photograph 3. View upstream from inlet, Site 2.

Photograph 4. View downstream from outlet, Site 2.
SR 2754 (Kennebec Road at junction with SR 2765) - Wake County.

a
J-
40
rw r; A
-- ' P a
N'R
. 1, ti,. ,' ?A° 7 • i ?? ?, °? ? -- ?`? I'?? .`a? ,-'-i ? ?-
to
PolnLs`v ( 1
%ZZ
;t R n .
1 ? 44115
a
1 / dsj rt
? l? " a -? ) J J f1 p \ i s i? thaw Sn{pA
?7 7.
r
r ° ,S` Pc si ?5 ? ... ?_ ?_`?..??..??iiy ,•?:Jr? ? } `fin 7 '3?} ? ?
i lt)
3
:
rc f jI a f}? ?'? ??? !•? ?\
i at aI? .? ? .?„/j 0.1 ? ( ?`--.•? >/ tt =??` 't9:4';
t
?Cu •. v? - ,..., i ?? '? `? r 7S4v i { f. 36c i r r? ? t
IJ
"Al
?> h 1't l
H ? \
?,..
l k ` SITE 1.:
?? acv
r a .x a
l
t 7
J C
t
9 t
l/ s
{ t C' ?"? t ! DSO • 7 . FaiiGhsStlpa
3
t
Project Study Area
SR 2754 Kennebec Road
Wake County
ngier
N, yt tea i j A
au`'' - 1 % '{ f /` $ ' USGS To o Ma 1964/1981
Figure 1 4,00
r,,...,.;,.hrfc??aaa AA?n}cch Inc
oB
WgA ° WaC WO `` '0 N 0J WaB
=r t
No Ma eo?R WFa6 WaA WgA Nfa ?o? F? ew . e °°
NOB
Wa6 Fab Ra Wa6 Wil Spr 4 i!"?hurch as
y
Wo .
WgA Was
IRa . NoB
F ` ' t ` 7 L ..;r , WaA ~ t QU . WaB Wa Ra
?.
NoC2 WaB,
Q-a? n NoC" Spring
o fyLZ WaB 3 Nos
`?? 4 S No
' II FaB WaA __. ?= o WaB}gQ ?? o a
IOC, FaB2 II / Me WaB 2 NoA NoC „< No6 u
wa B
W? waA
Wa6, Ra No6 U2 Nob •. ? ? o
WgA Q Ra`" ^
r
WaB VyaB WaA
NoA
?a ° J .\ c No r a z? WgA
?_. WaB' raa NoB WaB W?cWo
WaA ,? '' s ` o ° a: • .WaB -
No62 , / -•aG r PSy 3 Web ?i? No6
3 NGB y ?x , t.' r? WaA No6 4 NoC
? Wg'?' NoC? ? ?m • W ?'ari > ? W '?'?*; ?' NO
1 WaB s x K48 . r Q\
t aG i Re s No NoA kVa6
. y
oB"
W A? >, ?„ O WaB No6•. NOS v' Zo `NPs '? WaB NoA
g RB
R m WgA
N/aA Z'a`V[[[ Zo ?0/
ay, WaC LYBr NoA C Y was M2
rC r 2 Go ra ' r OrB
M2 r y. o/ 4 NOS
WaB 0r62 ¢-?., ro
WaB SITE 2 orb Nosi
OrC2 No6 . ?+ o ~ rC? W . b, OrB
Wo.. NoB Nrpp " y, o? rY
?' \ o l
> Ra WaB Hfp2 NoB WaBaGep t9 "t? Or62 q
APC2
NoB qA NoA Or62 Orb. C?2
WgA `?'; ?aG q ?rC2 ? ` HrC2 NoB An(. FOR,
OB r 4Vo H ?c r 0 R? m v °` O? v
?p2 N oC 44 o e a
?. qpg ?r Ra ; F Lys Ra WaA a?'
.? Ly N,B LY Wa6 '
\ o
%Wo m WaC y
N.OB Wa8 \ YR \ W? / NoA .,... ` WaC O
55 d? \ Iy Or62
u;
RaC rY NoA `• eq?? NoB2 HrD2
j No' 3?0 Wa6 WaC Oe
WaB !y Wa M2 WgA o c?` r Me o qpC ..
B .. Q9 WgA / WaC WaB Q? Me
u t
llu ?B Wa6 W WgA WaC z r< M o ?GeC2 r
a• 0? WaB WaC ?s < a VJo No _ waA ' i._ n e :Hr _ -
nC' WaB 4 t oC T ?B N a_€,? ;: ' 0?2W n`
WgA:a = _ -__. ?io o WgA L SITE 1 r H a '
` ?' a, a? aP acr WaC
}., WaC Ra -01' HrC ??r F o. ?? r ? NoB
Wa \ W / Go NoB m' a?wu HrQ2'lY w Hr Q ° HrC2 HrD2
WaC VGaC -] i I gA 3
?r r rGo , ? H?7t ? ? NoC2 , _
WaC Wa8s WaB S WO-
„? ,..? WaC
W / Coo ... ,?, WgA ? t ; •1 of Wad ? oM Hr82' ??B ? «?
`IW?. •` _ ? ' ?, ? WgA ? r,. •? ? ? ? 2.? ?_?
1. y m r? WaB q r a Q
Wa6 v 1 H y r ?., No8 was
1Ys No6 ` 9nn_ n ? 3?0 U
W -
LY Wa6 NOB X ?" y C i-
G-,pn ...asp x
?. Noe` NOB N `'• c w?ac `' Project Study Area
e a s .x a?
w .a 'fir SR 2754 Kennebec Road
WEB -? r ?? a No6 a
Wake County
WgA
USDA-SCS (1970)
?oC `u' i y O?e? WaB WaB N
it
r w?? Noce Figure 2 1:15,840
y WaC u:
«"cam - r
NoC; y WaC ° 1 ,
A
Wa

U
v
LL
C
to O
L
N ?
CL } L
O a
v O
a?
o L
? L
~
L

O .I-
a uj C +
O O
L
d X
W X
L? LI
il
o
O ". W
z
O O '
I 4-
t av I
(D
3
W
W
y
O
L p a
O D° Y p p
3?L ?E L
p L y
ILI+ N O C i0 Q
4- °
L E o'D
}m}.v
oL c
3} 0L
EO
VnO+ { i
7 U
0
a ?
W
at J z
N 3
p
0
v ?
Ln
~ U W
N m ?
4
? O N
N C
C
O
Y '
I a ?' I
I ? v I
i - o I
I L I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I
I I
I t
I O I
I p' a I
I C n I
I y+ I
i X? I
I OM I
I n I
W
O
}.
4-
? ;v
I L ',

I Lp I
I ?°O3
?y I }
=p 4-
O
I a o
I }
r
I
I u->
o}
I L+r
1 ?Ln
aL, t
v '-
i 3
i
kf)
0
N

0. O M
C)
a

O
? V

M
V?3
'-+ N GSA

(0
D'
p E
C O
v L .i
) (D
_4- C
` V 3:
O ); O
O -V
+p
C
E o
v4-0
V N
v
n.
T

U
V O, 3

U- C O

(0
}
to O
L x
m 1
o

o
a L
O
r
Q I v I
CL OL
O C
3
1
w O
?- I a Q
D L. te a- 39
m
C 7
C 1 Y-
Ch 1
!A 0 i p I
O
a }-
co
c +- W
1- I L 1

X
= W I
I I W
I
L W _
X
LL ui
I
I

+ LL
F-
Zd
21 I
1 1
1

W ne one
Z _ €
? I
I I
I

m

Zone I I
1
1 I
1
I Zone ;1
?
o

a

v? I

1 m
a
a I
n
I ? ?L
?
C
v -
L ; 1 + + I 4-
a
U)

4- m a'
+ L
O\\
' 1
I X
m ti
M 1 ' L
1

I
O ? 1 Nb
?
; ?
}
c
m ?

L - ffffl

- - f 1 ?
\,
l '

E
m
U
?
O
4- r

-

I

1

v

m
rrr,
I

-
I
a Ln 3
=N I m
y
O _o
o +
} 4
_?3
I

I C
} N
I
I L p I

Zone i I

I
I O' ? I
Zone ;I
i
I
? I I
? I I

LO O ;

Zone 2'
I
1
i
1 ?one 2
~ O

N W
m I I
? ~ I I
c I I
c i 1
Y ? I I I ,
0
N
4 0
? °
o

O ? O
O
? ~
U
y
ox ?
?

N N

to
c -
c
C
O L
(t) m
}
4- v
O 3
m
+ -p
c
m L
E o
m 4-
0
v
O.