20050132 Ver 1_Complete File_20050221

;OF WA
OTFR
pG
tom_
February 21, 2005
Transylvania County
DWQ Project No. 050132
Bridge No. 195 NCSR 1504 (NCMA 14001B)
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions 0 ^ ONO
Mr. J. B. Setzer, P.E.
Division Engineer FEB 2 4 2005
N C Department of Transportation
253 Webster Road ??WATER QUALITY
Sylva, North Carolina 28779 ORMWATERBRAto
Dear Mr. Setzer:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact 80 linear feet of
Lyday Creek (installation of 80 linear feet of rip rap for stream bank stabilization under bridge and temporary impacts of
70 linear feet for removal of the existing bridge end bents) in order to construct a new bridge on NCSR 1504 in
Transylvania County. The project must be constructed in accordance with the application dated January 20, 2005
(received January 25, 2005), including the environmental commitments made in the application letter. After reviewing
your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Nos. 3399 and 3366,
corresponding to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit Numbers 13 and 31. In addition, you must
acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to)
Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with
the accompanying 404 Permit unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below). Should
your project change, you must notify the DWQ in writing and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the new
owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying with all the
conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or if total impacts to streams (now
or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any
additional conditions listed below.
1. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing the proper design,
installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface waters
standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated, and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures must be
such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow
sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the
project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed, operated
and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
NPe
o Carolina
Ntura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
y ?
Mr. J. B. Setzer, P.E.
February 21, 2005
Page Two
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in accordance with the
requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
2. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the footprint of the
impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notice Application. All construction activities, including the design,
installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be
performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
3. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent practicable.
If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed
and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land Quality has released the project.
4. Adequate sedimentation and erosion control measures must be maintained on the project site to minimize sediment
transport to downstream aquatic resources. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all
bare soil within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control. Erosion control matting
should be used in conjunction with appropriate seeding on disturbed soils in steep slope and riparian areas. Matting
should be secured in place with staples, stakes or, wherever possible, live stakes and native trees. Riparian vegetation
must be reestablished within the construction limits of the project by the end of the growing season following
completion of construction.
5. In-stream construction work and land disturbance within the 25-foot wide buffer zone are prohibited during the trout-
spawning season of October 15 through April 15, to avoid adverse effects of sedimentation on sensitive egg and fry
stages of trout in downstream waters.
6. Stormwater shall be directed to vegetated buffer areas, grass lined ditches or other means appropriate to the site for
the purpose of pre-treating stormwater runoff, and must not be routed directly into streams. Mowing of existing
vegetated buffers is strongly discouraged, so that they may be utilized for stormwater diffuse flow.
7. Removal of vegetation at the stream crossing and adjacent to streams should be minimized. Native trees and shrubs
(e.g. Rhododendron, dog hobble, willows, alders, sycamores, dogwoods, black walnut and red maple) should be
planted along the streambank to reestablish the riparian zone and to provide long-term erosion control in the vicinity
of the new bridge.
8. This certification does not allow causeways or temporary work structures to be placed in the stream.
9. Rock should not be placed in the stream channel in a manner that constricts stream flow or that will impede aquatic
life movement during low flow conditions. Riprap placed for bank stabilization or inlet or outlet should be limited to
the streambank below the high water mark, and vegetation should be used for stabilization above the high water
elevation.
10. The dimension, pattern and profile of the stream, above and below the bridge, should not be modified by widening the
stream channel or reducing the stream depth. Any over widened areas at the bridge site should be restored and the
width/depth ratio typical of reaches upstream and downstream of the site should be maintained through the bridge
project.
11. Heavy equipment must be operated from the banks rather than in the stream channel in order to minimize
sedimentation and to reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into the stream.
12. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent
contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
13. Excavation in the stream associated with the new bridge construction and old bridge removal should be conducted in
the dry, if possible. Sandbags, cofferdams, flexible pipe or other diversion structures should be used to minimize
excavation in flowing water.
14. If concrete is used during bridge installation (e.g., headwalls), a dry work area should be maintained to prevent direct
contact between curing concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete should not be
discharged to surface waters due to the potential for elevated pH and possible aquatic life and fish kills.
15. Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment in or adjacent to surface waters is
strictly prohibited.
16. The presence of equipment in the channels must be minimized. Under no circumstances must rock, sand or other
materials be dredged from the wetted stream channel under authorization of this permit, except in the immediate
vicinity of the bridge construction. Instream dredging has catastrophic effects on aquatic life, and disturbance of the
natural form of the stream channel will likely cause downstream erosion problems, possibly affecting other
landowners.
17. This certification does not authorize the discharge of waste rock and dirt into the stream or riparian zone except for
permitted areas associated with the bridge construction-
Mr. J. J. Setzer, P.E
February 21, 2005
Page Three
18. Grading and backfilling should be minimized and tree and shrub growth should be retained where possible to ensure
long-term availability of riparian cover for fish and wildlife. Backfill materials should be obtained from upland sites.
19. Discharge of materials into surface waters from demolition of the old bridge should be avoided as much as possible.
Any material that reaches surface waters should be removed.
20. All work shall be performed during low flow conditions (below bankfull).
21. Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of Completion" form
to notify the NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been completed. The responsible party
shall complete the attached form and return it to the Transportation Permitting Unit of the NC Division of Water
Quality upon completion of the project. The NCDOT is strongly advised to send in photographs upstream and
downstream of each structure to document correct installation.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act
within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have
any questions, please telephone or Mr. Mike Parker of the Asheville Regional Office at 828.296.4500.
Sincerely,
/-- kZZ____
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District, US Army Corps of Engineers
Mark Davis, Division 14, DEO
Ed Ingle, Roadside Environmental
Angie Pennock, USACE Asheville Field Office
L'ransportation Permitting Unit
Mike Parker, Asheville Regional Office
'p-

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY - LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
January 20, 2005
Ms. Angie Pennock, NCDOT Regulatory Project Manager p ('?,7 ;, ?
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Lg D
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-2714 JAN 2 5 7005
DENR - WATER QUAL,TY
Subject: General Permit No. 31 and Nationwide Permit 13 Application VYEILIWD.SANDmitkyygTERBRgNM
Bridge Replacement - MA 14001B
Bridge No. 195 on SR 1504 over Lyday Creek
Transylvania County PAY M E 'N T
State Project No. WBS Element 37633 (DWQ Minor Permit Fee $200)
RECEIVED
Dear Ms. Pennock:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the subject
bridge under the North Carolina Moving Ahead Program. The bridge was built in 1920 and is
rated structurally obsolete. NCDOT would like to let a contract in early Spring 2005 for this
bridge replacement project.
NCDOT proposes to replace the structure on the same location. The new bridge will be designed
to minimize impacts by implementing a longer single span to increase flood plain width under
the bridge. The removal of the existing structure shall be performed by sawing and/or non-
shattering methods such that debris will not fall into the water.
I am attaching a PCN application, site plans with the proposed erosion control and construction
limits, photos, as well as, a marked county map and USGS quad map. The Section 106
concurrence letter is also attached due to the age of the existing bridge structure. Bridge No. 195
spans Lyday Creek, which is a tributary to the French Broad River at river mile 187.6.
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Database was checked for records of threatened and
endangered species. There are no records listed for the Lyday Creek watershed. The Little
River, a tributary to the French Broad River 1.3 miles below the project site, supports the
federally endangered Appalachian elktoe (Alasmidonta raveneliana). Additionally, the Natural
Heritage Database includes a record for the Appalachian elktoe on the main stem French Broad
River approximately 2000 feet below the confluence with the Little River. However, this is an
Fourteenth Division.Office, 253 Webster Road, Sylva, North Carolina 28779
Telephone. [phone] . wrWv doh.dot state.nc us Fax - 828 586-4043
Bridge 195 on SR 1504 Page 2 January 20, 2005
error within the Natural Heritage Database and does not represent an actual occurrence of the
Appalachian elktoe. Lyday Creek is a relatively small stream and does not provide the
appropriate habitat to support the Appalachian elktoe. The bridge will be replaced with another
spanning structure and disturbance will be limited to removal of the existing end bents from the
streambanks. The new end bents will be constructed further up the streambanks than the existing
bents. Sedimentation resulting from the work will be minimal. Non-shattering demolition
methods will be used to minimize debris being discharged into Lyday Creek. For these reasons,
adverse impacts from this project will be minimal. Therefore, there will be "no effect" to
threatened and endangered species.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
Lyday Creek is considered a perennial stream with a well-defined channel and is shown on the
USGS topographic map as a blue line stream. Therefore, we believe that Lyday Creek is under
the jurisdictional authority of the US Army Corps of Engineers. In order to construct the project
it may be necessary to impact waters of the United States in the French Broad River Basin.
Specifically, NCDOT is requesting to place construction machinery adjacent to Lyday Creek
(DWQ Class C Tr) in order to remove the old end bents. Listed below is a summary of the
proposed impacts.
Site No.
Station Existing Condition Proposed Condition Net Impacts
Site 1 West -Existing End Bent Structure Removal 35 L.F. (350 sq. ft.)
Site 2 East - Existing End Bent Structure Removal 35 L.F. (100 sq. ft.)
Site 3 N/A West Bank Stabilization 40 L.F.
Site 4 N/A East Bank Stabilization 40 L.F.

Total 70 linear feet (Temp)
80 linear feet (Perm)
Erosion and sedimentation control measures that are sufficient to protect surface waters will be
used on this project to minimize impacts to downstream aquatic resources. The construction
foreman will review all erosion control measures daily to ensure sedimentation and erosion is
being effectively controlled.
Permits Requested
NCDOT is hereby requesting authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act to proceed
with the construction project outlined above. By copy of this letter, I am asking Mr. David
McHenry, Mountain Region Coordinator, of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
(NCWRC) to comment directly to you concerning the 404 Nationwide Permit request.
Also, by copy of this letter, I am requesting authorization under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act from the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR),
Bridge 195 on SR 1504 Page 3 January 20, 2005
Division of Water Quality (DWQ). In addition, I am asking Mr. McHenry and Mr. Ed Ingle,
(NCDOT) to comment directly to me concerning this permit request.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at [phone].
Your early review and consideration will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,,
K'24-j' xa" ?
Mark S. Davis
Division Environmental Officer
Enclosures
cc: Mr. John Hennessy, DWQ, DENR, Raleigh (seven copies)
Mr. Mike Parker, DWQ, DENR, Asheville
Mr. Dave McHenry, Mountain Region Coordinator, NCWRC, Waynesville
Ms. Marella Buncick, NCDOT Coordinator, USF&WS, Asheville
Mr. Mike Goodson, Acting Regional Engineer, LQS, DENR, Asheville
Mr. Joel Setzer, P.E., Division Engineer, NCDOT, Sylva
Mr. Jamie Wilson, P.E., Division Construction Engineer, NCDOT, Sylva
Mr. Ben Williams, P.E., Division Bridge Maintenance Engineer, NCDOT, Whittier
Mr. E. L. Ingle, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer, NCDOT, Mills River
Mr. Ray D. Elliott, P.E., TGS Engineers, Inc., Shelby
Office Use Only: 050132 Form Version October 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: GP 31 and NWP 13
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here:
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: North Carolina Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: 253 Webster Road
Sylva, NC 28779
Attn: Mark S. Davis, Division Environmental Officer
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation: N/A
Mailing Address: N/A
Telephone Number: N/A
E-mail Address: N/A
Fax Number: N/A
Pagel of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 195 on SR 1504 over Lyday Creek
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): WBS Element 37633
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Transylvania Nearest Town: Brevard
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Hendersonville, take US
Hwy 64 West approximately 13.5 miles. Turn left onto SR 1528 (Crab Creek Road), then
right onto SR 1504 (Old Hendersonville Road or Old Hwy 64). Continue on SR 1504
approximately one (1) mile to bridge over Lyday Creek. This is the project.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 035 16' 16.89" N 082 39' 25.26" W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Rural residential with surrounding forest and agricultural land
7. Property size (acres): N/
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Lyday Creek (DWQ Class C Tr)
9. River Basin: French Broad
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 2 of 9
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: To replace an obsolete bridge structure. Bridge
No 195 is to be replaced with a 30' x 60' cored slab bridge structure on existing alignment.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Mechanical construction
equipment such as excavators drills cranes. and dump trucks.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Rural residential, agriculture, and forest
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application:
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 9
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.feina.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please seci )
Site 1 & 2 Temp. Structure Removal
(End Bents - 35 if per bent) 70 LF Lyday Creek 10' P
Site 3 & 4 Bank Stabilization under
New Bridge - 40 if per bank 80 LF Lyday Creek 10' P

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usts.gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site:
Temporary: 70 linear feet - Removal of existing end bents. New structure will completely
span the stream. Permanent: 80 LF of rip rap for bank stabilization under bridge.
Page 4 of 9
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation,
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The existing structure will be removed by sawing and/or non-shattering methods such that debris
will not fall into the stream.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
? wetlands
installation of
Page 5 of 9
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stn-ngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP) with the NCEEP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that you
would like to pay into the NCEEP. Please note that payment into the NCEEP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCEEP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/=/index.htm. If
use of the NCEEP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 80 linear feet for bank stabilization
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 6 of 9
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Gone 1 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 9
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
There are no bridge deck drains to discharge over surface waters. All bridge and roadway
drainage must pass through a vegetative buffer before entering the river.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
? ,/moo / -'O 'D,
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 9
a i s STA7F
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDo TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
DATE: June 21, 2004
TO: Mike Summers
Bridge Maintenance Project Manager
FROM: Jennifer Cathey
NCDOT/OHE Historic Architecture Section
SUBJECT: Division 14 Moving Ahead Bridge Replacement Projects
cc: Bill Rosser, PE, NCDOT Director of Field Operations
Ralph Cannady, Division 14 Moving Ahead Coordinator
Mark Davis, Division 14 Environmental Officer
Owen Anderson, Division 14 Environmental Specialist
Mary Pope Furr, OHE, Historic Architecture Section -
Renee Gledhill-Earley, North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
DIVISION 14 Moving Ahead Projects Bridge Replacement Projects
Division personnel identified the following projects as requiring federal (US Army Corps
of Engineers) permits. Jennifer Cathey made site visits to the project areas on June 17
and 18, 2004. These projects have been reviewed for compliance with Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act within the permit areas.
MA 14007B Bridge No. 194 on SR 1504 over Glade Creek
MA14001B Bridge No. 195 on SR 1504 over Lydia Creek, Transylvania County
These bridges are located within two miles of each other on SR 1504, Old
Hendersonville Road. This two-lane county road runs along the edge of the wide
French Broad River plain, and was once the main road linking Hendersonville and
Brevard. Numerous houses that were recorded during Deborah Thompson's 1991
architectural survey of Transylvania County line this stretch of road. The bridges
were documented, though not Study Listed for the National Register at that time.
Both bridges are reinforced concrete slabs with concrete flat panel parapets built in
1920 and 1921. Bridge 195 was the earlier built of the two, and Lichtenstein
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] PARKER LINCOLN BUILDING
OFFICE OF HUMAN ENVIRONMENT 2728 CAPITAL BOULEVARD, SUITE 168
1583 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH, NC 27604
RALEIGH NC 27699-1583
June 21, 2001
Page 2
Consulting Engineers noted during their 2003 survey that it is one of the earliest
bridges of its type. However, the concrete slab and parapet are badly deteriorated
and the plaque is missing, rendering it ineligible for the National Register.
(Lichtenstein has documented other early and more intact examples of this bridge
type.) Bridge 194, a later example of the same bridge type, is not eligible for the
National Register.
There are no structures eligible for the National Register in the Bridge 194 APE, and
it is approximately one-quarter mile distant from the closest property surveyed by
Deborah Thompson. Bridge 195 is located approximately one-quarter mile west of
the Blythe-Whitmire Farm, which is Study Listed for the National Register. The
farm sits atop a ridge on the north side of SR 1504, and is buffered from the project
location by the rise in elevation and a post-1950 house lot. Surveyed structures to the
west of this bridge are outside of the project's APE. Compliance Agreement: N/A.
MA14006B Bridge No. 173 on SR 1556 over Martin Creek, Cherokee County
Bridge No. 173, a cored slab bridge on concrete abutments, was built in 1922. It will
be replaced with a wider cored slab bridge. This bridge is the same type and
approximate age as Bridge No. 172, also on SR 1556. Bridge No. 172 was evaluated
by Lichtenstein Consulting Engineers and classified as ineligible for the National
Register. Due to its similarity in age, form, and materials to Bridge 172, Bridge No.
173 is here determined as ineligible for the National Register. There are no
structures eligible for the National Register in the project APE. Compliance
Agreement: N/A.
Li
IA's f

3

r?

v

?VLT7 N
.117

S- ? - U

i
I
f

Cr) t A,?

? 17r n
- iu ?; r- I
l

"Ag -n
e?
C .-

\1

f ; .`' :cl -
C -?
CV.
.
N
"It LO 7
,t N

W

.
r' .
-r v 'W 3?
%
??A° ?. ?; ? ? __? -,tip r ,• fi e ? ? ,?vt;•, ..."'
y if J J
I ?• ` r ` ' ? - ,? ??q1 Cam' ? ?" ? ?'• ? •+ JJ ?"'?,h`
_o 7,
s
Cl?
..r-•+" ~" 1 4 ; ter". ?- r,j i ¦ `4?;•Y 5' ..?}.?5 .?`
ce)
k
a ' ? i ?. Y c
04
00
f? ?a ,wT .f
,?- t ,? Z J c
` F
?m 0 - Co '6 C\J CO 'E
' z ' 1y >
t ,f 4 ;
TT ?)1'"? {
Ilk
5
.
.1 Y
? ? ":'k f' ,3` •wr ? ' '° i '"` {„`'?'1 * 'ri`d ,r' .•',"?
710
Ioi I- o
s `s
LLJ
LO CT
co cu 0
NCMA Bridge Replacement Project
Bridge 195 on SR 1504 over Lyday Creek
Transylvania County

n
y

Y
4 V 3?

x w
e
1
_J
0
MM
M
h
U
W
0
1533
I VICNITY MAP
l OFFSrrE DETOUR
r0
BREV
HYDR4UMCS ENGINEER
THIS PROJECT CONTAINS EROSION CONTROL PLANS
FOR CLEARING AND GRUBBING PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION.
Ran RAn raoraer ""ononca Pak Mental
.C. MA14001 B EC-1
RATE taetnn aala"Na amOVlten
f
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES
Drce4tha Ego"
Reforstation ----------------,
1630A Temporary Silt Ditch. - - - - ... ,-
I61M Temporary Diversion -- - - - - - . - - - TE
IGUA1 Temporary Silt Fence .. - . - - - - }-
1606A1 Special Sediment Control Fence ...
1622AI Temporary Beroso and Slope Drains- ...... ??' t'a'
1td0AI Riser Basin - . - - - - - - - - .
1H0.02 Silt Basin Type B- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I , T?
161L01 Temporary Rock Silt Ckeek Type-A- . -.
16UM Temporary Reck Silt Check Type-B- - - . ?
1KdA1 Temporary Rock Sediment Dam Type-A-
16un Temporary Rock Sediment Dam Type-B. .
IGUAI Reck Pipe Inlet Sediment Trap Type-A- - - - -
16UA2 Rock Pipe Inlet Sediment Trap Typa-B.. (j 141SUI Rack Silt Screen-------------------
163M Stilling Bain----------------
Rock Inlet Sediment Trap
16=1 Type A--------- .. A13-OR- A'
MUM Type B-----.---.. B13-011- B1
IGUAi Type C ----------- C13-OR- C)
TO PENROSE
-10
EROSION CONTROL SCHEDULE
1. Install ervean C011trd measures axording to plans In all &4&5 aM of dyer discharge Adds
after deoring bud before grubbhg,
P- Clear and clean a dfdl ditches leovlrg shdestopes at an angle that can be retained Ar
vegefn 7lese dads will sequin s?apy seeding an0 mtdddn?
3. atla
Begin ar T hIl of r7da=,,?, dite PhaGe orasim caHrd measures akrg roadway ditches as
4 Seed OW OAnoreos as soar os any Alnsa of grodfrq is ao afed. (Note there
ore 15 work1W dogWlendor days IwNfdeHerand 5 Cn dui W1 rewocry I Oslo' codrd rainfall
(ar os otise . These measures shloutd bs morntained untlr o permanent
ve0othe carer Is established.
PIPE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE
1, 1AV011 erosion cWrd devices
P- Rem materlaland existing Ape whIle Ilmltlrv? as much as mssibleimateridand sediment
from entering the stream and/or escaArg from lie project.
3. Prepare Ape foundation wMe taking care to 11mih material and sediment from entering the
stream and/or e=Pltg from the projed. Permit cordnlons win normally require that new
Sssp r9will In bow and tiing st? ?. N needed, bedding material will be demo stone
4. Plane new Ape and Compact fill.
5, hnStdl slope protection an outlef and Inlet ends or Ape. Also complete Installation of
erasion control measures and perform maintenance as needed on existing measures.
6. Establish Aermonent tvegetation as soon as passible.
GRAPHIC SCALE
t 02?0
i6 PLANS
1, 0 0 20
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
1.0 0 2P
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
`to
FLAN FAR PROPOSED 1
HIGHWAY EROSION CONTROL o?
TRANSYLVA NIA COUNTY
LOCATION. BRIDGE NO. 195 ON SR 1504 (OLD US 64) OVER LYDIA CREEK
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, & STRUCTURE
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
THS MEDIA SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED
CERTFED DOCUMENT.
SIGNATURE
PE.
PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
Plans Prepared Bar Plans Prepared fort
cc TGs ENGr"ms NCDOT DIVISION 14
N IN R SUITE 141 NCDOT Contact.
915 WALNUT STREET RALPH CANNADY
1
GARY, NC 21511 DIVISION PROJECT MANAGER
PH [phone]
2002 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
CHARLES L. FLOWEr PE
LETTING DATE. PROJECT ENGINEER

W. CRAIG PARKER, PE
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
Roadway Stand" Drawings _
The following roadway a fish standerde a appear in "Roadway Standard Drervinge"- Roadway Deeigu
Unit- N. G Department o remportaton - Raleigh, N. G, dated January, 220. 2002 and the latest
revieon thereto ere applicable to this project and by reference hereby are comidered a part of
these pleas
1605.01 Temporary Silt Fence
1630.03 Temporary Silt Ditch
1630.05 Temporary Diversion
1632.03 Rock Wet Sediment Trap Type C
1633.01 Temporary Rock Silt Cheek Type A
1633.02 Temporary Rock Silt Check Type B
1634.02 Temporary Rode Sediment Dam Type B
I

10+00
EXISTING NCDOT R/W (MAINTAINED)
DETAIL PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
LATERAL BAS??TgI
1Re, to scowl
Fill EROSION CONTROL PLAN CLEARING AND GRUBBING '
EROSION CONTROL FOR RAY SHEET N0.
CON T
D Pv R.
it. Iin.D • .LFt.
'_2_fl. 141
'w-a w(6.c 8
b•_SFt. p
Type Of Uw • tt_B.BE_668__...__ CL B MP RAP
SEE DETAIL •R• 1', F
4- STA. 11+70 TO 12 +30, LT
CL R RIP RAP: EST. 77 TONS
FILTER FAMC: 76 SY
0 DDE EST. 16 CY
THOMAS P. SWEET POPLAR
NANCY L. SWEET
0.8. 179 F0.17
r,,- -- I
18" POPLA?..++T
GRAU 350
F
S RUCTION SHEET 4 ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
INCOMPLETE PLANS
ROLAND LL ENLOE and e4,
Wuu P. EAIOE RO NOT 110.6 FOR R/W ACOUW"M
OIL 106 PG. 232 %0 PRELIMINARY PLANS
24L Ro NOT UM FOR COWFRUCTM

THIS NEDtA SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED A
CERTFEO OOCBYENT,
1.17' 15+00
N09' E
F20" MAPL&_F
GRAU 350 ,
TYPE-III HEADWALL EXI
al
plI S 65713'09]f ,
)OT R/W (MAINTAINED)
1 I I
1 I I
1 I 1
I I 1
I I I
I I I
1 1 1
I I 1
I I I
I I I
I I I
1 1 I
I 1 1
I I 1
I I 1
1 1 1
1 1 I
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 I I
1 1 1
1 I I
I I I
1 I I
1 I I
I r 1
I 1 I
I I I
I I 1
i
i
I
I
t
1
I
N 1
z I
0 l
N I.
i
? i
1
1
i
i
I
i
i
I
1
1
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
CONC
PAD
-- 0
WELL
KN00
SPLIT RAIL
-X-X-
EXISTING NC
ROCK WALL
R/W (MAINTAINED)
HOUSE
DETAIL AA O DETAIL PROTECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
LATERB?DIITCH o RP RAP AT EI$APMENT DATUM DESCRIPTION
r .? t Not to Scald LR RAy SHEET NO.
Fr .0 TE MKIZED 070+01WE SWEF mELOPED FOR THIS PRMICY
D rv 1. Slope ppth ?--- IS DASED OFF TIE STATE ftW OMIAATES ESTA3ISIEO Sr ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAUUCS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
rata A4n.D • _),Fl.
Gage OrERS FOR NN" 11-l'
rm k Mae, d • -I Ft.
4 ' 2' O WITH TAD ES RATE PIArt GRID LtiO b11ATE5 Of
• w- e N <e a B • _2 FL Ee4 -5-T- ROLMA H. ENLOE and .rife, eF) AORTMIX94DS 4Wfi EASTIAG E082K67SRT0 INCOMPLETE PLANS
h • _S FL WIIMA P dT TIE ANER1'E' OOIIDIED GRID FACTOR USED DN THIS FIBEET Do mar Ilm FOR R/• Aamm otr ,.
Type of Liner • CL_B_BIPCL B RIP RAP T, of Lk- - _CL.B_BE_B60____ P. ENLOE
SEE DETAIL 'B' m 4-STA. 12+30+F, LT D.B. 106 PG. 232 AY" TO GRID ISO. MV PRELIMINARY fnuPLANS c
-L- STA. II+70 TO 12+70, LT +27.00 +10.00 01 TIE A-G UMWK GRID REARING AD ll0 NOT Om raR aNRcTwN
CL B RIP RAP: EST. 27 TONS k STA 12+60+f, AT
+49.00 ls.a0 N +10.00 50.00 N +47.00 lCAlllEOIARIEDRTA! =11110 DISTANCE FAN
FILTER FABRIC: 76 SY
DDE EST. 16 CY 46.000 +02.00 50.00 If /i $-1• TO * STATIGI IMW IS THS NEDU SHALL NOT RE CONSIDERED A
+72.00 45.00 N 34.00 N 34.00 N
O S6f•3F4S03•E 48LTDFT. CERTIFIED DOCUMENT.
4110 N END BRIDGE
ILL LINEAR DIERSIDK ARE LW&IEED i0lZoiTAI DISTAICES
THOMAS P. SWEET PSH
NANCY L. SWEET 4" POPLAR y BASE DITCH ti? - SEE DETAII'C' YODICL DATUI USED !S an 99 +29.00
D.B. 179 79 PG. 17 SEE DETAIL W AB '• r0 37.00 N
+ ????? ` d•d 37.00 W +
75.00 N 1.17'
„ .p TB DI +00.00 +50.00 _X L / 181, POPL N09 41'47"E "^U A0" _ -, L POT 15.11.86 (12.14'
X X-.--X?-X__ F - 24" SY AMORE //• F20" MAP F IF Swr BAi cu7r L-2 00 N -- __L-2a! ------ F - -BL- •4 PWC 13.04.82
R R . .P-a 50• \ TYPEAIt y HE W ?0w ? GRAU 350 I EXI ING NCDOT R/W fMP1NTAINEC'
gas "
64
GRAU 750
EXIS ING NCDOT R/W (MAINTAINED) m BEGIN PAOJECT YAI40018
-L- PUT f 0Z --•-? L
-- _ C
?- +49.00 CL 8 RIP RAP: EST.8 TONS
N. 47.00 If +00.00 FILTER FABRIC 24 SY
R,W
-/- p/1T r1i/YIM 48.008 +79_00
I TYPE-Ill MEMO I
u?
TYPE411 TYK411
BRIDGE/ROADWAY RELATIONSHIP SKETCH
811-I ELEV.= 2072
N 574043 E 908139
BL STATION 4'F49.46, 7071 RT
RAILROAD SPIKE IN TREE
10 11
-L-
I
??-_ F ----- CL II RIP
+00.00 EXISTING SWALE
36.00 N CL 8 RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL '13'
BEGIN BRIDGE +s0.oo
+94.00 _ _ 50.00 It
50.00 N 36.00 N
SCUIHERN RAILROAD
O •8L• •3 PINC 10.1`-0•J8
L• POT 12.94,96 C
SEE SHEETS S-- THRU S- NOTE
FOR STRUCTURES PLANS All PIPES CLASS III RCP
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS.
12
t ..
? TB D
t 1RruAAOx
`t SLOT FLAT
+77.00 LI 1t
1+27.00
50.00 R t F 36.00 N
56.00 If
1 L
J,
4
¢ ? L L
RT) $ 1 1
? •F ? t
?\ F
Lu
13
PLUG
1 A
I
+I
X m S 69'13'09TE 8

A A -
RWOVE

AD 750 T
.L GR

i?ON ,r EXISTING NCDOT R/ (MANTAIU :.

- gT? Ir1 cinrrr?i?
'RY GUTTER LT Ar RT +00.00

34.00 A

L

-

POT /
S +6200
EXIST. RA9
? _ END PROJECT MA14001B
- + N N
gpN
-L-13+28+/-, LT -?- Al +1
PSRA4 EST. 34 SY RAILROAD ..
+54.00 CL 8 RIP RAP: EST. 10 TONS c SIGNAL 0
49.00 N FILTER FABRIC: EST. 26 SY p
DETAIL_?
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE WITH
LEVEL SPREADER APRON
CPSH)
PLm VIE
NYVPVVV V 'N rOk/d r41A
try
PIPR al-!,
A A
iierlA`dR? 9I?+i
Oro
aeillyl A

d
Ytid A•A
PP a> qiN
PSRU
Dtrrml d ._Ngtvr(Ll_
Ground
.finer: CWn 8 r8p Aap I•?g-.{ 1' tuck
T Wck with Filer Fphrk
IOrO/W
iii
14
EXISTING RAILROAD R;":-
I
90
S TGS ENGINEERS
SUITE 1411
975 WALNUT STREET
GARY, NC 275 I l
PH 19 19) 319-5660
15 I
NOTES :
TEMPORARY BENCH MARK
BM-1s RAILROAD SPIKE IN TREE
N 574043 E 908139
BL STATION 4+49.46, 70.71 RT
ELEVATION = 2.111.72
EXISTING BRIDGE INFORMATION
EXISTING BRIDGE 6195 ONE SPAN BRIDGE
1 0 21'-B; CONSISTING OF CONCRETE DECK
ON REINFORCED CONCRETE VERTICAL
ABUTMENTS WITH 16'ROAOWAY. SHALL BE
REMOVED.
`TO SR tlil
1. THE OUANTITY OF RIP RAP TO BE PAID FOR WILL BE THE ACTUAL
NUMBER OF TONS OF EACH CLASS OF RIP RAP WHICH HAS BEEN
INCORPORATED INTO THE COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED WORK, THE RIP
RAP WILL BE MEASURED BY BEING WEIGHED IN TRUCKS ON CERTIFIED
PLATFORM SCALES OR OTHER CERTIFIED WEIGHING DEVICES. THE
OUANITY OF RIP RAP WILL BE PAID FOR AT THE CONTRACT UNIT
PRICE PER TON.
1 PLAIN RIP RAP CLASS II (2'-O'THICK) WITH FILTER FABRIC.

0c 0
6 3
4

END BENT 1 180 TONS

END BENT 2 190 TONS
TOTAL 370 TONS
2. ADT 1600 FOR YEAR 2001.
6 GEO TECH BORE HOLES LOCATION.
JEY -L-
3. PILES TO BE DRIVEN TO A MINIMUM BEARING CAPACITY
OF 45 TONS EACH.

TO SR
152
5 4• PILING SHALL BE DRIVEN CONTINUSOUSLY IN ACORDANCE WITH THE
-
- STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 450-8 UNTIL THE LOAD IS
OBTAINED AT OR PAST THE MINIMUM TIP TO THE ESTIMATED LENGTH
SHOWN ON THE PLANS. IF LOAD IS STILL NOT OBTAINED AT THIS
POINT,THE CONTRACTOR MAY SUSPEND DRIVING AND ALLOW THE
PILE TO SET BEFORE RESUMING PILE DRIVING. WHEN DRIVING IS
RESUMED, THE HAMMER SHALL BE WARM AND OPERATED A
SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF BLOWS TO OVERCOME THE FRICTION FORCE
(MIN. 10 BLOWS) BEFORE FINAL BEARING IS CHECKED.
5, THE EXISTING BRIDGE SHALL BE REMOVED BY SAWING AND/OR
NON-SHATTERING METHODS SUCH THAT DEBRIS WILL NOT FALL
INTO THE WATER.
6. THE STRUCTURE HAS BEEN DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FHWA'S
TECHNICAL ADVISORY T5140.20 (SCOUR AT BRIDGES).
PLAN
SCALE: 1'= 20'
2110
2100
DRAWN BY, NNW DATE 6/04
CnECRED BY, NTJ DATHr 8104
V BRIDGE
?STA.12+61.50
i EL. 2098.980
STA. 12+32.891 I STA. 12+90.109
WP 1 A FILL FACE WP 2 A FILL FACE
EL.2099,692 EL. 2098.268
STA. 12+21.956 i EXIST. STA. 13+01.045
BEGIN APPR.SLAB I BRIDGE END APPR.SLAB
EL. 2099.964 j TO BE EL. 2097.996
REMOVED
--- - -- --- --- - FIX -2.4880% EXP. -- - -- EXISTING ROAD PROFILE
EXCAVATE TO - -
NATURAL GROUND
AND TOP OF BANK J APPROACH SLAB
(TYP.) (TYP.)
CLASS II RIP-RAP CLASS II RIP RAP
25 YR
2095.5' W.S. ELEV. 2088.4'+/-
ON 4/22/04
11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00
PROFILE ALONG C SURVEY
SCALE: 1'= 20'
PROJECT NO. MA 140016
COUNTY: TRANSYLVANIA
STATION: 12+61.50 -L-
REPLACES BRIDGE NO. 195
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRAN3PORTATOOK
RALEIGH
BRIDGE '195 ON SR-1504
(OLD US 64)
OVER LYDIA CREEK
30'CLEAR ROADWAY W 70' SKEW
I I INCOMPLETE PLANS
p NoT m R RPW AGN6R1f0X PREPAAEO BY
i6S ENGINEERS
I PRELIMINARY PLANS NS WEST PARKER ROAD
p lpi A p a NORG.TON, MC 26655
REVNIONE 6T6Te p•
NO. ET DATE RO. EY DATE S'1
+ a mu RWnr;