20050786 Ver 1_Complete File_20060124

dy r
~. __ ~~~
•~-°' ~S
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTI~'~NT OF T~ZANSFORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY DMSION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR
January 24, 2006
WBS Element: 33321.3.1 (B-3877)
Contract No.: C201364
F. A. No.: BRZ-1101 (7)
County: Nash
Description: Bridge over Turkey Creek and Approaches on SR 1101
I.JV ~~ V
,:~ ~ s
~~~ s:~
~,~ ;z N 2
^'~~ _ W,qT~ ~ ZQQh~
°STaR;~q~C~~y
LYNDO TIP,,.
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AND PERMIT MEETING
Mr. Erick Frazier
S. T. Wooten Corporation
P. O. Box 2408
Wilson, North Cazolina 27894-2408
Dear Mr. Frazier:
Per our conversation, the Preconstruction Conference and Permit Meeting for this project is being
scheduled for Thursday, April 20, 2006 at 3:00 p.m. The conference will be held in the Conference
Room of the Wilson Division Office. Our office is located at 509 Wazd Boulevazd in Wilson, N. C.
Please be prepared to present the following documents at this conference: progress schedule, letter
naming persons authorized to sign Supplemental Agreements, and letter naming your Company EEO
Officer and Muiority Liaison Officer.
We look forward to meeting with you at the above time.
Cordially yours,
~~
Wendi O. Johnson, PE
Division Construction Engineer
WOJ/cbl
Post Office Box 3165, Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3165
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]

Mr. Erick Frazier
January 24, 2006
L Page 2
c: Ron Lucas (FHWA)
Gary Jordan (US Fish & Wildlife)
Bill Biddlecome (US Army Corps of Engineers)
Nicole Thomson (NCDENR, Division of Water Quality)
John Holley (NCDENR, Land Quality Section)
David Cox (NCWRC)
Travis Wilson (NCWRC)
Ron Sechler (National Marine Fisheries)
Jess Byrd (Sprint).
Robert Babb (Progress Energy)
ec: Cecil L. Jones, PE
Donald Pearson, EI, CPESC
Robert Simpson
Andy Brown, PE
Andy Pridgen
Shannon Sweitzer, PE
Albert Joyner
Lloyd Johnston, Jr.
Eddie Bunn, PE
Kevin Lacy, PE
Victor Barbour, PE
Ellis Powell, PE
Don G. Lee
N. W. Wainaina, PE
Jamie Guerrero
Mike Robinson, PE
Warren Walker, PE
Haywood Daughtry, PE
John Williamson
Ed Reams
David R. Henderson, PE
Jermery Armstrong
Ronnie Moore
Bobby Lewis, PE
Gerald McCauley
Charles W. Brown, PE, PLS
Keith Honeycutt, PE

Re: B-3877 Turkey Creek, Nash County
Subject: Re: B-3877 Turkey Creek, Nash County
From: Christina Breen <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 09:25:24 -0400
To: Chris Rivenbark <[e-mail]>
CC: Bill Biddlecome <[e-mail]>, Nicole Thomson
<nicole.thomson @ ncmail.net>
I am fine with these changes provided that no new additional impact occurs, that downstream water
quality is not impaired by the activities and that the Corps also agrees with the changes. Please be sure
to show these changes on the final "as builts" and supply DWQ with 2 copies for our files. Also, keep
this email as proof of our discussion and DWQ's concurrence with your assessment.
Chris Rivenbark wrote:
TIP B-3877
Nash County
Action ID 200511113, 200511121
DWQ Project No. 050786
I wanted to check with both of you to see if a modification is
necessary or if this notification is sufficient. Impacts to Waters
of the U.S. and Riparian Buffers will not change from those
permitted. The attached email describes the correction.
Please let me know how you would like for us to proceed.
Thank you.
"John (Jay) W. Twisdale, Jr., PE" wrote:
Chris, we have discovered an error in the quantity of Class II
Rip Rap for the proposed temporary work pad. Permit Drawing
Sheet 5 of 7 reflects 222 tons of Class II Rip Rap when it
actually should be 45 tons. This change in the quantity of Class
II Rip Rap does not change the temporary fill in surface water
impact of 0.009 acres. If any other information is needed other
than this email, please let me know.
Thanks
Jay
Chris Rivenbark
Eastern Regional Manager
Project Management Group
PDEA Natural Environment Unit
N.C. Department of Transportation
[phone]
1 of 2 10/6/2005 9:25 AM

Re: B-3877 Turkey Creek, Nash County
Subject:
B-3877 Nash Permit
From: "John (Jay) W. Twisdale, Jr., PE" <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:31:31 -0400
To: Chris Rivenbark <[e-mail]>
To: Chris Rivenbark <[e-mail]>
CC: Bruce Klappenbach PE <[e-mail]>
Chris, we have discovered an error in the quantity of Class II
Rip Rap for the proposed temporary work pad. Permit Drawing
Sheet 5 of 7 reflects 222 tons of Class II Rip Rap when it
actually should be 45 tons. This change in the quantity of Class
II Rip Rap does not change the temporary fill in surface water
impact of 0.009 acres. If any other information is needed other
than this email, please let me know.
Thanks
Jay
Christina Breen
Environmental Specialist II
NC Division of Water Quality
Transportation Permitting Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
2 of 2 10/6/2005 9:25 AM

RE: B-3877 Turkey Creek, Nash County
Subject: RE: B-3877 Turkey Creek, Nash County
From: "Biddlecome, William J SAW" <William.J.BiddlecomeC~saw02.usace.army.mil>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:36:10 -0400
To: "Chris Rivenbark" <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
Chris,
Since the impact area is the same no formal modification is necessary. This
e-mail notification is sufficient. Thanks!
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Rivenbark [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 11:05 AM
To: Biddlecome, William J SAW; [e-mail]
Subject: B-3877 Turkey Creek, Nash County
TIP B-3877
Nash County
Action ID 200511113, 200511121
DWQ Project No. 050786
I wanted to check with both of you to see if a modification is
necessary or if this notification is sufficient. Impacts to Waters
of the U.S. and Riparian Buffers will not change from those
permitted. The attached email describes the correction.
Please let me know how you would like for us to proceed.
Thank you.
"John (Jay) W. Twisdale, Jr., PE" wrote:
Chris, we have discovered an error in the quantity of Class II
Rip Rap for the proposed temporary work pad. Permit Drawing
Sheet 5 of 7 reflects 222 tons of Class II Rip Rap when it
actually should be 45 tons. This change in the quantity of Class
II Rip Rap does not change the temporary fill in surface water
impact of 0.009 acres. If any other information is needed other
than this email, please let me know.
Thanks
Jay
Chris Rivenbark
Eastern Regional Manager
Project Management Group
PDEA Natural Environment Unit
N.C. Department of Transportation
[phone]
1 of 1 10/6/2005 9:26 AM

~,
O~O~ W AT ~RQG
~ rp'
~_ ~
O ~ ~, `C
~~r
June 15, 2005
Nash County
DWQ Project No. 050786
Tip No. B-3877
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER AUTHORIZATION
Dr. Gregory J. Thorpe, PhD, Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
You have our approval, in accordance with the conditions listed below, for the following impacts for the purpose of
replacement of Bridge No.52 on SR 1101 (Claude Lewis Road) over Turkey Creek.
Impact Locations Buffer Impacts Buffer Impacts Buffer Replacement Buffer Replacement
Zone 1 (s . ft.) Zone 2 (s . ft.) Zone 1 (s . ft.) Zone 2 (s . ft.)
Station 24+41 to
25+12 3406 1792 583 0
Station 26+07 to
26+93 3750 3218 2391 358
The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated received June 1, 2005. After reviewing
your application, we have decided that the stream impacts and riparian buffer impacts described are covered by
General Water Quality Certification Numbers 3403 and 3366. This certification corresponds to the Nationwide
Permit 23 and the Nationwide Permit 33 issued by the Corps of Engineers. This approval is also valid for the Neuse
River Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233). In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits
before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge
and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying 404 permit, unless
otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below).
Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying
with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total
impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 1501inear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the
conditions listed in the attached certification.
1.) Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of
Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification has been completed. The
responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the Division of
Water Quality upon completion of the project.
2.) All stormwater runoff shall be directed to sheetflow through stream buffers at nonerosive velocities, unless
approved otherwise by this certification.
No°rthCarolina
Transportation Permitting Unit ~QtllCll~~l,J
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] /Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Gluality
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

3.) During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in waters of the U.S., or
protected riparian buffers.
4.) Riparian vegetation must be reestablished within the construction limits of the project by the end of the growing
season following completion of construction.
5.) The dimension, pattern and profile of the stream above and below the crossing should not be modified by
widening the stream channel or reducing the depth of the stream. Disturbed floodplains and streams should be
restored to natural geomorphic conditions.
6.) Any riprap used must not interfere with thalweg performance and aquatic life passage during low flow
conditions.
7.) All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent
contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
8.) Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment in or adjacent to surface
waters is prohibited.
9.) The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary located' within-;the construction corridor approved by this
authorization shall be clearly marked by highly visible fencing prior to any land disturbing activities. Impacts
to areas within the fencing are prohibited unless otherwise authorized by this certification.
10.) There shall be no excavation from or waste disposal into jurisdictional wetlands or waters associated with this
permit without appropriate modification of this permit. Should waste or borrow sites be located in wetlands or
stream, compensatory mitigation will be required since it is a direct impact from road construction activities.
11.) Pursuant to NCACISA 2B.0233(6), sediment and erosion control devices shall not be placed in Zone 1 of any
Neuse River Buffer without prior approval by the NCDWQ. At this time, the NCDWQ has approved no
sediment and erosion control devices in Zone 1, outside of the approved project impacts, anywhere on this
project. Moreover, sediment and erosion control devices shall be allowed in Zone 2 of the buffers provided that
Zone 1 is not compromised and that discharge is released as diffuse flow.
12.) Heavy equipment must be operated from the banks rather than in the stream channel in order to minimize
sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into the stream.
13.) Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed below the elevation
of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and 20 percent of the
culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow low flow passage of water and
aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures including temporary erosion control
measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or stream beds or
banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the above structures. The applicant is required to provide
evidence that the equilibrium shall be maintained if requested in writing by DWQ.
14.) If the above condition (#13) is unable to be met, due to bedrock or other limiting features, encountered during
construction, please discontinue activities and contact the NCDWQ for directions on how to proceed.
15.) No live or fresh concrete shall come into contact with waters of the state until the concrete has hardened
16.) The presence of equipment in the channels must be minimized. Under no circumstances must rock, sand or
other materials be dredged from the wetted stream channel under authorization of this permit, except in the
immediate vicinity of the culverts.

17.) All work shall be performed during low crr normal flow conditions.
18.) All fill slopes located in jurisdictional wetlands shall be placed at slopes no flatter than 3:1.
19.) A copy of this Water Quality Certification shall be posted on the construction site at all times. In addition, the
Water Quality Certification and all subsequent modifications, if any, shall be maintained with the~Division
Engineer and the on-site project manager.
20.) All protected riparian buffers impacted by the placement of temporary fill or clearing activities shall be restored
to the preconstruction contours and revegetated with native woody species upon completion of the project
construction. Apost-construction as-built with the restoration activities included shall be submitted to the
DWQ no later than 60 days after the project is closed out by the Department of Transportation.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms
to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please contact Christina Breen at [phone]\
me rely,
~`
Alan W. Klimek, P. .
JEH/cmb
Attachment
cc: Bill Biddlecome, US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington Field Office
Jamie Shern, Division 4 Environmental Officer, 509 Ward Blvd. Wilson, NC 27895
NC DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Central Files
File Copy
c:\Correspondence\2005 Bridge Projects\DWQ050786\061505wgc.doc

t :> i ~ ~O ~~~ O /~~\
y ~ ~/ \~\/
~,@ .ate ~ tiFT~~°FN ~/.//~~r /q~
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA °R~ 9~~~ry
DEPAR7~N'I' OF TRANSPORTATION Ae,~NCy
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
May 23, 2005
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
Attn: Mr. Bill Biddlecome
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
Subject: Revised Nationwide 23 & 33 Permit Application and Neuse Buffer
Certification. Replacement of Bridge No. 52 on SR 1101 (Claude Lewis
Road) over Turkey Creek, Nash County. Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-
1101(7), State Project No. 8.2322201, TIP Project No. B-3877.
The Division Construction Unit has requested revisions necessary for the construction of the new
bridge. The width of temporary work bridge was originally shown as 20 ft., however a width of
30 ft. is needed. A platform (finger) from the proposed work bridge and a temporary workpad
approximately 12 ft. from the existing bridge abutment has also been added. Hand clearing
beneath the proposed bridge has been included. At end bents 1 & 2, an adjacent 10 ft. area
(Method III) in the Neuse Riparian buffer will need to be cleared. Please reference the original
application for the subject project dated May 2, 2005. Please replace the wetland permit
drawings, the Neuse Riparian buffer drawings, and the Pre-Construction Notification provided in
the original application with those included with this revised application. The Categorical
Exclusion (CE) and roadway plans submitted with the previous application were not revised.
BRIDGE DEMOLITION
Bridge No. 52 is currently a 121-foot structure that consists of a superstructure composed of a
timber floor on I-beams, timber piles with concrete caps, and a steel crutch. Bridge No. 52 will
be removed without dropping any of the components into Waters of the United States.
Approximately 0.001 acres of temporary impacts are anticipated due to temporary fill in Turkey
Creek and adjacent wetlands for the bents supporting the temporary work bridge.
The NCDOT will adhere to appropriate guidelines for bridge demolition and removal including
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
NCDEPARTMEN7OFTRANSPORTATION ~ 1 SOUTHWILHBNGTONSTREET
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONA~NTAL ANALYSIS WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US RALEIGH NC
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548

those presented in "Pre-Construction Guidelines for Bridge Demolition and Removal", "Policy:
Bridge Demolition and Removal in Waters of the United States", "Best Management Practices
for Bridge Demotion and Removal", and "Best Management Practices for the Protection of
Surface Waters".
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
Bridge No. 52, a 121-foot long structure, will be replaced with a new structure approximately
180 feet in length consisting of a 36-inch prestressed concrete girder superstructure with two 65-
foot spans and one 50-foot span. The substructure will consist of end bents on piles with the
interior portion on drill piers. The Let Date is November 15, 2005 with a review date of
September 27, 2005. The project involves replacing Bridge No. 52 approximately on the existing
alignment. Traffic, during construction, will be maintained with an offsite detour using existing
roads.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
Permanent Impacts: Permanent fill impacts are not anticipated to occur in Turkey Creek, or
jurisdictional waters, due to bridge demolition and construction activities. As part of the
construction process, a directional bore will be made underneath Turkey Creek for placement of
a utility line.
Temporary Impacts: 0.001 acres of temporary impacts are anticipated to due to temporary fill in
Turkey Creek and adjacent wetland for the bents supporting the temporary work bridge.
Temporary fill impacts are not anticipated to occur in Turkey Creek due to bridge demolition.
Hand clearing of 0.007 ac is proposed beneath the proposed bridge. A proposed temporary
workpad will impact 0.009 ac of surface water. The temporary work bridge and temporary
workpad will be constructed prior to demolition of the existing bridge and removed when
construction of the new bridge is completed.
TEMPORARY WORK BRIDGE
A temporary work bridge will be constructed to the south of the existing Bridge No. 52. This
bridge will be required to minimize impacts to jurisdictional waters during bridge construction.
Temporary work bridge pile types and driving methods will be determined during construction
by the contractor. The work bridge will be constructed at the elevation and location as shown on
the permit drawings. Non-mechanized clearing will occur prior to temporary work bridge
construction. It is assumed that the contractor will begin construction of the proposed work
bridge shortly after the date of availability for the project.
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER RULES
This project is located in the Neuse River Basin (subbasin 03-04-07, NEU7 03020203), therefore
the Neuse River Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) apply. Buffer impacts associated with this
project total 7,156 sq. ft (0.16 acre) for Zone 1 and 5,010 sq. ft (0.12 acre) for Zone 2. All
practicable measures to minimize impacts within buffer zones were followed in the bridge
design. Measures used to minimize impacts to the buffer zone include using the current
alignment. In addition, NCDOT proposes to remove the existing bridge abutment that was part of
a previous bridge, .along with existing fill, and plant native riparian vegetation. Buffer
replacement associated with this project totals 2,971 sq. ft (0.068 acre) for Zone 1 and 358 sq. ft
B-3877

(0.008 acre) for Zone 2. According to the buffer rules, bridges are ALLOWABLE. Uses
designated as allowable may proceed within the riparian buffer provided that there are no
practical alternatives to the requested use pursuant to Item (8) of this Rule. These uses require
written authorization from the Division of Water Quality, or the delegated local authority.
Therefore, NCDOT requests written authorization for a Buffer Certification from the Division of
Water Quality.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Section 404 Permit: It is anticipated that the temporary work bridge and temporary work pad will
be authorized under Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33 (Temporary Construction Access and
Dewatering). We are, therefore, requesting the issuance of a Nationwide Permit 33 authorizing a
temporary work bridge and temporary work pad. All other aspects of this project are being
processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance
with 23 CFR § 771.115(b). The NCDOT requests that these activities be authorized by a
Nationwide Permit 23 6( 7FR, pages 2020-2095; January 15, 2002).
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certifications numbers 3403 and 3366 will apply
to this project. In accordance with 15A NCAC 02H .0501(a) we are providing two copies of this
application to the North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources, Division
of Water Quality, for their records.
Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules: In accordance with 1 SA NCAC 02H .0501(a), NCDOT is
providing copies of this application to the NC Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR), Division of Water Quality (DWQ) for review and issuance of a Neuse
Buffer Certification for impacts to Neuse Buffers in compliance with the Neuse Buffer Rules.
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the DOT website at:
http://www.ncdot.org/planning/pe/naturalunit/Permit.html. If you have ariy questions or need
additional information, please contact Chris Rivenbark at [e-mail] or (919)
715-1460.
Sincerely;
1~~
~ Gregory Thorpe, Ph.D. Environmental Management Director,
Project D velopment and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ (7 copies)
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg.Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Jim Trogdon, PE, Division 4 Engineer
Mr. Jamie Shern, DEO, Division 4
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
w/o attachment
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIl'
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Bill Goodwin, P.E., PDEA
B-3877

Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 23 and 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN}, complete
section VIII and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: North Carolina Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: 1548 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699
Telephone Number: 919-523-7844 Fax Number: 919-715-1501
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 5 of 12

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Replacement of Bride No. 52 on SR 1101 (Claude Lewis Road over
Turkey Creek- Nash County
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-3877
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Nash Nearest Town: Bailey
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Located on SR 1101
approximately 'h mile north of Nash/Wilson County line, southwest of Bailey over Turkey
Creek
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or LatlLong): N35° 45.10' . W78° 09.59'
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres):
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Turkey Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse River
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/rnaps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application SR 1101 is classified as a Rural Local Route, with
agricultural land dominant and scattered low density residential development.
Page 6 of 12

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Three ~an 180-foot long bride replacement using mechanical hi hway construction
equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Investigations by the Bridge Maintenance Unit
indicate that rehabilitation of the existing structures is not feasible due to current
deterioration and costs. Bridge No. 52 carries a sufficiency rating of 38.7 out of a possible
100 The bridge deck is only 19.1 feet wide. Replacement of the bride will result in safer
and more efficient traffic operations.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
A Nationwide Permit 23 33 and Neuse Riparian Buffer Authorization was applied for on May
2 2005. This Pre-Construction Notification has been edited to included revisions needed for the
construction of the proposed~roject.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (internuttent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12

Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: 0 001 acres of temporary impacts are anticipated
to occur due to temporary fill in wetlands for the bends supporting the temporary work brid>=e with this
pro,Lct Hand clearing of 0 007 ac is proposed beneath the proposed bnd>;e. A proposed temporary
workpad will impact 0.009 ac of surface water.
1. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number yp
a
t*
I Area of
Impact Located within
100-year Floodplain** Distance to
Nearest Stream
Type of Wetland***
(indicate on ma) c
mp (acres) (yes/no) (linear feet)
1 (24+84.38 to Temporary 001
0 Yes 65 Coastal Plain Bottomland
25+00) Fill . Hardwood
1 (25+12 to 25+22-
Hand clearing
0.007
Yes
65 Coastal Plain Bottomland
Hardwood
L- LT&RT
-~__-__ ~~___ r„
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. tmpacts mcmae, nut are not umtteu io: ~nccua~uzw ~~~, «<~> ~~QU~«~, ~__.,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htt~-//www.fema.QOV.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0 008 acres (temporary)
2. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on ma) (linear feet) Before Im act (pleases ecify)
N/A
-~---~ _~ ..a
* List each impact separately and identity temporary Impacts. impacts mctuae, ouL are INL uuu~w w. wtvc~w ai~u a~aw.a~an+ •ay-=c.r,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usQS.¢ov. Several Internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site. 0
Page 8 of 12

3. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
C+pen Water Impact

Site Number

Type of Impact* Area of

Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on map) (acres) (if applicable) bay, ocean, etc.)
1 (26+04 to 26+20 Temp. fill 0.009 Turkey Creek stream
-L- RT

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: nu, excavation, areaging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): Q uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. ~ Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be implemented. Bride
No 52 will be removed without dropping any components into Waters of the United States.
_Durira removal old fill and abutment will be removed and the area will be replanted with native
vegetation
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that maybe appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http •//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm~ide.htrnl.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The temporary work bridge and temporary work pad will be removed when construction of
the new bridge is completed. The existing bridge abutment and existing fill will be removed
and native riparian vegetation will be planted to serve as buffer replacement.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 10 of 12

Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ^
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ^
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ® No ^
IX. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. AlI buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ^ If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* (s uarpe feet) Multiplier Mitig t on
1 7,156
2 5,010
Total 12,166
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12

If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
N/A
X. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
N/A
XI. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ^ No
XIII. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
S
~ Applicant/Agent's Signature late I
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12

NORTH CARD~INA
• tj: e~
erg, ; 5B1 .,rri`" ....:-,~ti i ~aslalia J ;Wt~ takers "~'
jam` [ ~ ~3. ~, ,~ 6aIJ Ro~k< ` ~~ ;~
• ~ ~~ ~ l F
I ~.J;3ClF't~ le.::~ J:;cii~'c' I . •<.• e C~ r 4 ~ f ;,`' r~"~~
~~ 58i t ,f•n ~ Red 03k'[gO~~l, ~~ ~ s 3~ F' ~~ras~~
p ~~: 1; P'3~ ~ ~ ~ Cticr~tta Qp {l y~yr~~]{i' _
' Suns 'S{trin~i~'1i~A ~ ; .,NCYP ~'~_ Y~
r-
oads ,.~ ~~ ~~ Ho~ l~asksviife~ r 5 _ °' a„
a ~'~
Y
I~ Pa3rvBS ~~€ ,~ ,,, ..' I t~ f~r'~• ~ ~~riSP.aSf?
d'Q ~ i 7
~ ~~k.~; ? 'V 4: ~ ~~ 3~ hoc ° ~•
.1 ~Cf
'+ :)~ T31 ~ Stantio~E a,~` ur ~ ,,, .. Shay ru It
~ G t ~ ~~,~f- ~~ ~ ~•~ ~~ %° '~ .,,~~ r °' ~, ~ 111
95 , . JE ~nu~rolry ,a. ~ . !
°, ~ ~ f nhusc~~rt4 .Y' "Tov.» , F` ne-pPc
'~ ~ ~~ s~ ~ f T ~~~ .~~
~~td dr~aSe,~ " .~_' tI2
~ ~ ~ ~ NS ~~e~~`'~.264A ~ .~ y a 1~ 2,~ 4/c-rte.
E ~ • ~ ~ ,~dRCC~ 5-m~ _ ~ ~-• ~ - ~' ,~ ~P:Jsr.~ r,•~iield
Y ~~ ~7
.aMRC ~. aels ,
NCD®~
DIVLSION OF ffiGHWAYS
~~ ~ NASH COUNTY
PROJF,CT:8.Z5~'l01 (B-387T
~~ ~ REPLACE BRID(lE N0.52
OVER TURKEY CREB,g
ALONG 3R 1101
(CLAUDE LEWIS RDJ
SHEET ~ OF ~ 11/18/

,f '
,.i,_ . r'
~:'# f•
~ i
rf ~ ~~.' .' i 1''.
`i
r' _....
. >_'t
'-
;_ ~.-. %~
t i
,~•
. r
~, ` ~
l('f~y~:.f.~
1 _y
t '1 .
A -
i ~; ~'u
.. . ~:,
'~- _-
~' .... _,
',_.e~~
,.
SITE
r, ,;
• r:u'
~`''•.
"'^I," -.
~ ', -rat ±:'~ ~ ~
NCD®T
~~1~~G1~APHIC
1~~1.~~
DIVISION OF ffiQHWAY3
NASH COUNTY
PROJE(,`T:8.Z322201 (8-387n
REPLACE BRID(1B NO.64
OVER TURSBY CREBg
ALONG SR 1101
(CLAUDE LEWIS RDa
' ~ OF ~ 11/18/O~1

.~.
®~1.~~ 11 ~~~
~A~~
1V ~~©~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NASH COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2322201 (B-387n
REPLACE BRIDGE N0.52
OVER TURgEY CREES
ALOND SR 11901
(CLAUDE LEWIS RD.)
SHFFT 3 AF 1 ~~ / ~ n / nt

0

~+ ago ~ pd ~
~' M
a~.~ O ~
za
o A
a
~H o
"~~ W U
~~. ~
a
~
~ ~,v~ aaa ~ ~'a

~ o ~
E aarz
~ o w
~ w
O
~ f, ~~ U ~

I
1 ~ o a ao ..

{ h
~
ac

w I
I
~
J
i ~
O I N

~9
m I
I
~ I
~
z I ~

a ~

~ I I

~ X I
I I
w
t~ I j
I ~
I
I ~
I
~
~w
I
b wzo
~
- _I I ~ N
I ® w
w
f ~ ~ cnw
I ~ w~
I
w I
~ zm
m N
l
O
I
L1
._
I
M
W
I
O
31
I
I
z
~ ~
c~ ~

0
~, ~ \
~+ ~ b o
~ p~ .~
~ M C W G
~ ~, e~, ~zw.~a
qq ~ ~ v C
h~l ~ ~ Z C ~" ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ w ®~U ~a~~a ~
a F
c ~~°d~
U
~® F~ va ~ ~z o.~aa4a L~
~ ~ --+ q ~ a w v
~ ~ ~ A a a' p
~1z ~ ~ ~ w
N~ z ~a
w wv e
z b
~ ~
~a
®r~~ ~
~ ~®w ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ® ~
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
~~
~ ~
~ i ~ ~ ~ ~' w
~ ~~ ~~~
o ~ ~,
z o0 0 ~ ~ ~
w ~ °° of ~~~
~ ~ o 0 0;0 ~
o ~ ~ ® z
j'S'l pio p ~ ~ ~ ..
1 w
l ~
3 ,I~i. ~ ~
i ~ W
~ F
1 ~

~• ;~
:°'
~• '`~:,
- SI
1\`~~
1
;, 3
t ''ryii
h ''
r.
~°
M1 Fs
~'
f :j
•t
~i
6
h
`1
a
~cV
k
,~~ U
~~ ~
t. ~
~~ O
-•A
~~.
yy ~
~~
,,c;;
O
l
1
f
i
1~
h
' ~~',
~~
ti
V
N
`u
b
V
3
i
V
b
v `~
i
b~
d
V
Q
V
y
I
~ O '
0.
I
f
a4i
~o
1 ti
C
I
V
`a
•~
N
tl
3
V
I
h
ZS
i
~ e it
? ~ il'
a
y ti
h
'J d
~ ` H
a`~
N y
C J
O
a
N N
O O
0
~i
N U
~ ~.
L N
C
~ ~ O
~ _
~ W
~ Y
N
N N
N ~
i~( ~ •.!
N Q~
d O Q N_
N N N •3
D m ~ J
n ~
N N
Z Z
~ c
0
N ~
3 a
d
N
~.
~,
>C ~ >
? ~ U`
O O ~
~~ O"~lO
U
l0
~ ~
~ L
(d
C N
O
O J
11f 'am^^j\J\

U °i
rn~ c
c ~~cv
.ate ~ ~
4; ~ O N -
~ L
7 ~ O
O
. ~ ~ N
f6 ~
°ma~E
' ~ C9 ~ O N

a~
C
0 ~
J
a
N
O N
O
,~--
0 0
N ~
~
N
O U
L
0 ~ C
O
d 2
F: W
~ Y
~
_
t0
M
M
N
N

C O p
C ~ N
-°~ U

n ~
N N
Z
Z
axi
~
~
N O
N
v
v

o
m m
a a
C
.j
a~ o
~ T
T
L CO
Of
~ L7.
O
T
n ~n
>'.
r r3
0
..t
h

~~ O
~~ a
_J
Ol
O
C
N
d

0 o v
0
t` ~ c
rn
d .N ~

O

O

O E'" c°v

~
o
z~ov ~
~
O~ M
a
~3 ~
m~ ~
° zx ~~
~~
N
~ N~a~ o o ~ ~
Q wv ~ ~ OU
w~
N (`
,
c
O
~ m O x N

~
=
a~
o
o
~ F a0 w
wo zH o
Q ~
~" ° °
~
~
~ ~ _ ~ o
a w r
H
'
w ~
~ ~
~ ~
A
a
~

'~
~ r.
a w
w a
y Com o c ° 2 A
.a F z

W

~ ~
~
c
v o 0 0 ~
Z R'
ii ~-
atS
~ J
a .0 =
N ~_
J
G C V
~ O ° O
~ v ~ ~
U? N
N
~"" ~ +

a
~„
s ~ N
o
~ U m d R o ° ° N
d X ~ +
~
~ ~ W c ~
N
~
a g -~
~
Z ~-
W a =~ ci
~ y t6 o 0 0 !A
g ~ ~~

_~
m Z
_
~ o 0 0
LL~ ~
J
U
D
Z
w n.
m a
~~
~ 0
~
m Q
a ~
s 2
~
O
~ Y ~

~' n Y
~
~
Q
o
U O
O
O
W
m

G
O
J
~
~ J
J o
1
O ` ~ J ~ J ~ e~
W ~

~/I 01

~ N

~ O

t+p O

+ (1J ~
m
~ -'
v
N
N
N
N o
W z

LL

J
~
to z p
H

I ~~j ~ I
/ i ~'
hydraulics\perm~t\63877_hyd:wetperm.dgn
O-In ~ Z I N
I :`
\
C :
~~
~
I CnD \ I
--~
ZC7p _"_
~-- I
~ L. ~ ~ 129
~
~_ ;
~
D I
D _ ~~ ~ ~ ~° I ~~
I~IZ
- 'T1 ~ ...
D
II x ~ ~ ~
I ^ ,~ O
Q~ F #
'O ~
~ _ v
N
m
-- j ~ ~
S~ ~ /
i8-. ~ ~ /
ss~~o . /
o ~~
r
2p~
+ B2
.~
\WD
1 (ll~ , ~

~
1 .I I ~ m
~.
I .~-
! t ~ rrn ~~
'

~
~
I _
~.
_ m ~
~
~
_ ~

s.an ~
p
G5 -* a

-'II' ~
1 m
~
i . ~
~ .
m
e
~.
~ , •
' m

N
8 ~'
• •~ ~
n ~xer arex
L~
" ~.
~
_ `
I rn

r
I ..
Z
p ~~ ..
•
~

~ y ~
~ - ..
~
~ ~m ~ ~ q
Oy
_
rn ~
yy y <
`nS <~ CSC ~
r
N
' ~ I
I
~
~ I
~ ,

_ y
O .
~ '
(~ ~'
v
~~ b
te.25
~, ~,,ar
ssrssroe+
\'~
~ ~ ~
~~
~ ~
~ 1
t r
~, ~
0 g
~"'
N
CNO ~~
m
~~s Pl
=
~~~ ~
o
..s N \
~
g =i
vmo

~
'N "
boG ~

V
1
~,
0

I ~
g~ 9

~ i ~
T

I~ ~ 0
~
v
s

0
~ ~
c

.;
~ x
0
m

o tom
~IS~ s
~
~$
~~
i
~ I
I I
/ = cn cn
/~~ AA
~ ', n_n O O
~~ ~
~ I ~~
s. ~ L r
~ ~ ~~ m Q
I ~ y Dp Z-I ~ 2 2
ZZ ~ .O ~ ~~
I ~ ,p ~ ~ ~ b n
N ~~
~~~~' ~ ~ m° o~
I~ ~ ~ ~D
,- ro D y t
' ~ z ~ oo n
~ DTI 'U ~
N
I ~ ~ O ~
.. .~ .. .. 25~Wi0
~ m
m ~

~'Z UOi~O
DO ~Z~
rn
-~
~"' e
o
DX N '~
rn
OD
O
~
C- ~~rOp~
4ypp,~
OZ ~Q~~t'!~N
~
~
~
~~
~~~

~~~oD~
auNa~~
~~ y~w~
~4~~
~~~
v
I ~r
~ O ~ I II
I ~ 1
n~.Tr n
•Sq~O'E ` ~ A0
C./ W 6 yY
~ ~ gyp"
{~~''''""~ s a goy `I~ 'I`
I ~''^~ '9 ~r p
N 93.TY ~ ~ ~i °S,`S,
I - s r M17'19'06'E R7 ''
I„ _ +$ o O N~S~d~ ~
I ~ ~ ,' ~~
I ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
. 1 ` y .~,A
~ O rn ~ ,~ ;
Tw (~,~ ~ Q rn ~sb3o s~
n~
' ~n ~ ~L
.. ~ ~ ~ I
~ ~~
~ C
~ a ~ oaf
H
1
r
I
'~.~ ~v g
~ '~. lbw 8~ ~K w
~~
~ ~~
~ ~a~_~-
i i'
i i
' / ,
` / i
I /~
~r ~"
~~ ~~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
ro ~
~ ~
A

,. ., ..
•
..
/ ,
~ ~' r5l f ';' ; rr''
,,
,,
~...
.,
~. •.
,.
.,
.. •.
,~
,.
,,
., ...
...
. _.....
....
.. ..
..
.. -
." .. ~."
...,
., .
..
." ., .. .,
,, " t ... 4
..
:;:
.. .. ..
. ..
-. ."
..."
.....
_ , ~ ,i% ,
,
-i- ,;ri; %,;,
.. ...
...
., .,
'~4++.
~..
•..
+....
..
:,
-MAY-20p5 11:04 ~~ ~~ ~~.~~' 4".-
''l.'/./''~ /'1' ' " 8/l7/9
\hydraulics\ ermit\63877_hyd_wetperm.dgn ~~:, "'"~, ~"••., - ... '~!~~, I''~%lij'I
.,
•. j r
, r
'.
•. ,.
•. ,' -
_ .,
•..
...
.:
_...
. + xa... a ,...
-...
..
-.....
_ _ ...--
I '~~...,
-...
"
...
n ..
......-:
j ....
.."
i /
-•..
..1
..
~...
~.-. " F
...
.....~
~,.....-
-
..
....- +/
f
I .., i I
, 1
..
•.
./
-.....
~-
,,
• -.....
...
..
~•...
-..,
... 8
! ~ ... ~
•• - - •
,,. ,
,~
.. -• .
. .. ,
.. ..
•..
- - ~ '`
' ~:~;~
•,. I
iB -•...
,. ~'
.,..
'f
._„ , ,
,"
..I.l, .. .. .
-.."
.,
.,,
->' ....
... -..
;. , , .._
..,,,
...
__
_....
..:
......
.~.. ;;
_ ;j~,`,.
(/~ a .:. I Imo! iFilf;:a - J+i l •.~'I . ...
^il
r-
...-
~; i
,• +`''
..
..
D ._
'~
.. .. ~ ~ ?
...
•.. c~ ..~_..... ~ '
O ^s0y°.
~ _ ~ _...... r.. ' ~ ,
-.......
..,_,
~. ~ ....
4 I i
~~~ ~~ ~
~~ ~~~ ~ ~o
;~ '~ ~ ~
v
fi m
0
I4 ~
a ~ ~ ~
y
> n
c
z
0
0
r
,r m
s~ i
~ F^r~r ~~
.."..
m .. ..-
-
..
~ _ .... j
". _
..
-~ I
TT ..
, .. „,F - - .....
1
4;..-
,.....
,
,•
.. .N t'
f
..: .. _..
, ,,
,.
.... o: a.: _ /l~
1
-rv~ r~~~
t'
1
._. _ -. :~
r .
f
._. ......._ ~ i Q ~'~.
,
_-..
.~
,
-. ... .~ ~ ~ i N V3
t , :~
_.. ..
'~, ,
.. - •...
.
., , j
~_ .: ~ _ ~
....
•"^ym,~
~of~ I , , ,
•.
~'
.. '' '~ :,..`"~ ' ~'~..'.`.. ~~~°'-''-!ern„~ li j•• _ ~~
°"t
`
t:~',!F~ .~ T .. ..... 'i..-! - _ fit. ! I 1 !~r~ I .
:~: .....
':.
. ZI .
.......
.....
,:
~-
" ,,.
,., er ~ ,,..._ _ ~ ~ r o
! _, ~ .
! rQn~VZ,,~~O~ M ~
+ '. ! ~. ~.e1.... ~ .. ~ 141! ~+ I !!ii ,'!•• tJ~ .._ ZZ V i S ~ (n ~~ ~~
! 1 ~-~'Z _
, , , , ,; -,
,,
-...~_..._.. ITl
,. ~
ZC•)Q '! 111 + : :' ':, !!I! ,', I!! I 1'! ~' j ~ ! j I.,r,,....! N~
l I, ~ .m ~41~ i I ~ O D
!,, ..> I r lii r r aD y rn n
i ~ Dp ~ OD
~ i j t ~ u, ~ :~7C
m~ ~ -~ ~ _ ; I e r D ~ ~ ~I O ~ti~oD
m I (~ " i ~ N ~ N C~ N M ~ N~
--,._~~~--~ ' it .. ~` ~„":--k_~A r ~ ~ OZ ~ ~~fv
1 -?t ;, d 418
r
1 , I 'i ~ ..
~ ~ • ' - ~ ~tirop I
m ~ ! _.
~..
:,
..
~ ~ ,i ,,;,
..._
.~(7 :~ _
• • )e
N i' ~ :j iii _ !
' ,• , ,' '
y (~
: •,. ...
-..
•
o ... _
.,.
_,
•.
"~~'
~ ~ 6n ~ ~~ ~~ ~ i~ •
< ~ ~ C~ a .... 8
~J ~ i•,,,,, 1
1
V r 1
,.
_ ~:~._,.., I,
I
~1 ,% r
....... _
...~ "~ ,;VI ..... i I 1111'!......-. . -•'~
~~rt.
YYY r .-...~.. ~..m
r3y ....., .....
......... ~ ..i ~ .. ... ..-.
~' ,,
~:
e
~...._
~' ~
;~s~+ ~'~ ~..
` .-
53756.067 = _~ _---__ ~~- .._. ' ~.. ,~
~_ --a..._ ~ rn
~~, rya .-- -__-__.~-__- _ _ ___ _ i'~ ~ N~14'O6•E ~~JI.
:: ;-~.
.. ~~`
. ` 4
... R
.. ...
.. •,
,. tir-> _
..
...._
::
_.
:t:...
u ~_._....._ ... ..~
,... .,
~m _.~ ~ ,..._._. ' ' y ~'
..._.
ae ,r .._.. ~._
-f---- _ _....
,.
,
•:.~a
..
g m s :....~..._.._.... .
....
_,..
.
- .......
"
....
..._ /~ nl
•.
'.
S' '~~'ti
c ..-_.._ __.. ,. - -
.,
Q N ._..... __.-.~........_. ........__.. -...,
,,,
^...
-......
' {
`... • .
^_.
~ ....._.r._ .................... .. yj,
.. _....... ~ '. ~. 1 ... .... ~, , .,
.;
_- ....
.:. .
-.
~...• ~~
-.
r _....-._- .. .._ .. .............. - -
}-:
~ OOtn gy ......... ........ ........ .... _
b _...._... `
J ._= .........._._. ".. _ _
li•
-' .........-. ~ ....... , ~ ~~'r
"... , ~
;..-.
..
..
,
,
~..
~'y` I ...._ _' Q GI
.1 , ~
....
....... ". ~......... n . ..,
~... ~ ~ O
,. _
_ .
-- .....
~...
_1
..
,:
-.-
_.::~~
. .:
~.. ~
.~
-...
...
...:
....
~ _...
;. ...
.~
....: ~
. ....
o _ ,. _._...... ~ ~~
. , yb ~ ~
:: .~v ~~~.; •
:•
~ ...: . n.. ,,', ~~ s~
s :~ .,..
....
,...
.....-
...
.:
..~
'. i
.~.
'~
:..
i
~K :' : ... _ _ _:_~ ~ ~
.:.
..
•....
;~,
. _
.. .
~'
. .
~~'~
.:.. •.
,
.- -...
i'
......
...,~, _
~... '...... .. ~~'~.i
, ~~
., 1
`.+I
~:.....
~. ~: ~
I
't ~•
',~ ,
.a, ~
d . qy,
• •,
..
!~
,. •. .,

w r
-~
1 Naa2
~~C~N~~~
1`~11~~~
NELJS~ 1$IV]Ela
~UF~~~$ Z~N]E
NCB®~
DIVISION OF HI(3HWAY3
NASH COUNTY
PROJECT:8252t201 (8-387
REPLACE BRIDGE NO. b2
OVER TURgEY CREEg
ALONG 3R 1101
(CLAUDB LEWI3 RDJ
~3HEET ( OF ~ 11/18/O~/~
NORTH CAROLINA

t1.
`,

SITE
.- r:-w
~~,` +r.

DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~~~ NASH COUNTY
PROJECT:8.2b22t01 (B-3B7~
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ REPLACE BRIDGE N0.62
U' OVER TURgEY CREEg
ALONG 3R 1101
®~ ~ (CLAUDE LEWIS RDJ
3HBET 1 OF Z 11/18/01
_: f ,
~'~~
r
_; `__
~• `
}
;-
.~
''
:` ~ .
~ ~

'
J
,
- •ti
- t
` -
..
~ •,
? t _
' 1
:~ { J
i'.
i ..
i.. ~' ,'~~Y ~,' •t.
'-- r ..~~='.

,s.
.;

LL~ ~ :~
d"_. .
1V ~~~~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NASH COUNTY
PROJECT:8.2322201 (B-387n
REPLACE BRIDGE N0.52
OVER TURKEY CREEK
ALOND SR 11901
(CL~UDE LE;NIS P,1~
SHFFT 3 nF ~ > > / ~ n / nt

z
~~
~~
~~
~~
~~
~®
~~

z
W

z

® ~ ~
~
w
i
i ® w
U
w
0
00 0
0 0 0~
0 0;0
°~odo
r.•~ °oi o 0
O ~
O
` w
~ ,' I' I
3 ~ 1 ~
I
i ~ W
I ~

U
o
~Q ~ ,,
~ ~' ~ „
w a ~, mxm,~ a
~ ~ ® ~ ~ n~ a

w
W
~
~
~ ~.a
~ a ~ ~'
.Wa r
~ °
Z~.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~UE~„O ~
E~ ~ ° ~ z oaa~ .~a ~,
~ ~+ ca aaO
~ E
~
~

U v
W e
~~
~~
~~
~~
~ ~
® ~
~ ~
~ ~' w
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~
~ ~
~
a
~ ~
~ ~ ~ N
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ® z
v

T
~

».
~
~ ~
rnV c
C ~ p Y ~
Q ~ N
1 o)
\~/
,a`
I ~ II
V I 7f C t
~ N y 0
J~ ~
O ~ ._
. ma~ E
1 V` ~ O N

~

~
~ ~ ~
a

~

o
V a~
`
~,
a~
~ m

~

x
+.
3 ~
r J C
L J
~ n. n.

F. ,.~
~' I b ti i NO NO .. N
O N
O
-' I~ o A

~~
; v ~~
~ o ~ o 0
(y#
itC !i
~ ~~ Vj
~ ? i
O Vl
N ~
7

¢ I
II ~ L
O~ Q,
O N
Q '~ ~
O
~
s•
I b
w
~ d =
a _
)
~+ ;i II V
I ~ Y ~ Y
'i~ i II

~ rn
fD r ~ , O
V
k` I I
Q1 ~.. I N N ~

t£
;i
I
^ ~ I
,O _
O
I N
p ~
7
(~7
N
e ' 0.
'~i N O '~ '
N
~ Y
i' i,~ ~I
I I
I ~
v ~
`' I~ .e
,~
a

~ ~ V h
d p
In
fn ~
to
In
~ ~ C
V d

''~ ~ I
I
a+i I c
N O t
Q. N ~
N
O O
I I
*~ ~ ;. I Dm ~
I ~J ~ U~
`' ~ I; ,~ I ~
U °' ~ n
~ rn .
,+.._q 7 I~ ~ w
N N N N
7 I
~1 ~ i 01 ~~I
O h ( ~
N
~
I
nn`` N
W
_
0~

O I
C
~

~ ~
C
O
:1 "al I- ~ ~ N 7
a .a v,
~ `
V II
iI ~
~ i ~ N 'a
ee
Gy

l

~ t
L-:i ~
cc
i~ i
I

I I
~

-p
F<< ~
} i I I ~ y
r
`4v ~ ~ I ~
C G) O
> QI O
y I (p
_J ~
I. ~
~ ~
° ~
m
° m
O m
O
c
~
m I _ .

~~
fi
~
C~ ~
~ I

i N
,
-_
~
~

O
II ~ II c L
c;~ ~ !
, O~ i~ o N ~ ~
,
M ~L 'I ? ~

~a

/ 1 r1--1 ~\ ` `~ /
;i
~i
0
.~
y
r
f7
tx
a ~
~
ii N

a N
O
~

~` 0
1

v
~.
0

z
O
a cn o
0 3 0° ~
o
rr
L
2 Q 7 N ~ p O
~
=
O M ~ N
FQ VN ooF-
t~. Z ~ ao W ~ W
Op Zf" ~~2
~
f-. y U
aj w
~~ O
d a
Z

w
p
J ~^
? Z W
Q
W
Z
~ ~ m
f) ~ W
g w ...
a ~ -~
J_
~ Z LL
w

~
lL ~
N
m Q
X W
lL W w W
O C7 ~- _
yp0 ~
Q w
W
-~
m O
¢
ZQ O
ui i= Q a

zwt~i vi

O o0 ~
I-'

Z N

w~
M
W Z ~-
W W N v

~ U ~,
~ ~
m a W N N
W 0
a' N
0 0 0
Q
F
O --

W
J
m
Q
N ~ C p
Ur W
Z ~
~ N ._.

_ o 0 0
W ,~
~
'" O
N

Q J _
H m (O ~
~ ~~
O v ~ ~ N
C V W
C Q m
a N
- ~
1~ ~
N ~
a 6yJ •
•
~ p
5
O Z ~
O ... in
(~ J
J
'...
Q .- m o co
W ~ M ~
~/
Q O ~ fh ~
a "
~ W
~
J U
~a x x
W ag
~ W
a

z
m °m
(~ X X
~ ~

U
OC ~ _' ~

+ N
+ r
° r~
~ ~ N N N N
W
N

~ a °'
p~ v
j~ m

H

O
Z ...1

~
~ a
~
o

i ~
w
REVISIONS
~erm3t\buf fperm_ep\63877
m '
o ~ r
++~
.~s ' S
~~~
'C' 81
I
~~
D
!rlf'TI A 1
~ ~
r
~e I
m
u
0
:~~~~ ~
~ ~~~~
~\
\ ~
\
V

I 7r`?sr
'
~T I
-11/!'~

~ ~
~ `~
~
m~
~m r ~, ~
1
O
~ ~
'
ts+ao
~ O
G5
rn
~-~---'!'°
I
r '
I _
~~"
$ a
n -~. ~~
m
N
..._ ~~
771M'EY ~~~ ~ ., A
w
I ~
~~.. • I
r ~ \~,:_
~ ~°`~~~
m ~ p
~_ ~ y~l
ll~V`iiJJ7 0~
m
1
y< ~~ ~ ~
~4 rx sa ~~ m~ ~ '
~ >, 1 ~.
91~ ~ tlf O y$ T' •.
A~ ~
~~ Ng
t>s~5
lq.2Y 5250'
139J0' 5N17'S8'M ~ \
537'56'08'11
r ~.
s ~
\.
orn
r ~ Isil
~' ~ N Q
m ~~srm
~ma
;, H~ ;
o ~m \
s N I
~pI •-1
+ ~ y S
g Q m 0 p ps
'N ~Qj Y
-~i bolril ~ ~
±* ,
o ~
r O ~, I
a
o ~~
,,
/~
'~
~I
..•
:1 `~

~_
I
r
~ ~
• •~' 25'fQ0
~~
i
I
m~m~
]]~~~~ X
'IG~EfR ~ ~i°O
~~"
~•~, ~t,l
~4
\ • • >g
I
~~
o>
RIN

~~f..
~~ ~+~ ~~

~~ y~
~ A
~
P9
~ m
O

~i ~ m
v
s
~ o
C
A
a

4 O
r
m
~~ s 3
~~
i
orss a ((aaa
~I~~1~ 9
~
iF
:3

~
1 I
I
~ ~
N
0 N
0 ~S'''32'

m
a
~
~I

~. -~
O ~~
~
y
n
rn
~
o

y
~ \~~~
\ ~\\\
rn ~\~

^I y
(~ \~~
~~~ alti~oDa
R 4 R M R~
~
~
~ ~w
vvc~.,
~~
0 0 ~i ~
-+
Wvmi -~
oovrni
~-I~opv r
~
Ct1D
f~9r ~D
~o RRRURti
N
~~~#
$~
~r-{r~~ r}~
~
~
Zr
mm ZW
m ~
-~ N
'0
n

N
<A R ~ I 1
I ~$ ~w ~ r r
A ~ >< ~ I
$8
~~ ~ y
e7 iz r ~ n0 /~
y 5790'E ~ (~ 69y~'49
` ` `$~
~ ~~~ ~ O O
I ~ °"
ss~ s3.ir ~'b'ks
i=~ N9779'O6'E ~ A~
I ~_ z
0 O .yjs,~ ~~
.. , 11 b~
Rl ~@g ja>
$ ~~ O Q ~
.' \c' I T ~~ y 0
Ate. y
r ' V
v 1 O
N I 9 ` } ~ `'
~.. I $ Lbw
8~
~ ~a
~r
~~
y
z
<~C
o
U'1p~1
\~ .~
-JDN<
o~~
cn
~~ (/~
'~ ~

i
NEVKIONS
perm.dgn
D
Y~ ~ r
I
>F
..
...,_...., I .
•. (
•_..... 0
_ I .-
~~, '
.... •... ., f
:'~ li
__
fl
.. .
-.. Y
...` F ~,
~...... _: ' . I
..... `^ _ , •f III ' ' f' ~ I If 1
...,, : ~ ~.t ~ 1
A^ ..
.._iai+,:i •.. it i ;'11 Imo... I 1 ~ ~'•,.
..
'^ .
1 1 .:' I .~ .
~._ Y .............
f ._. ,~ •
..
> >.
1 1 ~rf I
.±
\ .. ~ air I
..
i I
.;
,
.. .... `
~~
.~
.,, :F.
~,
,
4,
~ ~f ' ~~•~
"•.
'..
,
....
w~~
7 }
.. •,
..J
~.... _~ .~ I q
_ _ ~.
., ~'
„~'
--....
.. .. .. ~''--.. __ I~--.
•.
..~ _,
,.
/ ...
..
i >
~~
•,
• ,,' ~I'~ I .... c s
-..
...,. ~
.., _ .III ~ '.~~...~ - ~'
,Bw . .• „ ~
.....
..-
_....... I f r;
..
... _.
;tf,
.. ..
_... ..
~.~ 1 .. ~ _
I~ ,~ t
~I ~ fr . ' ~ S C)
.__ ..1 I • •.... .....
.• ._. I
..._.,.........._ ~ f ... _ __...
rs ~w 4 . ~1 I I~It _ _ 1 ~ {~

.- y
~~~~ \
~\ \ ~ c \
\ \
I ' ~I
~~
~ ~~ ~ r~ l
m~ m I
~_ ,
~~ ~ ',...ar-
~ + ,,tea
~~ m m~ ~~ ~
(fi P~.J;
m ~~~ ~
N i'f ffff ~~t ... m
~~,~'~
I'
,1,
,,~; r ~ : ....~ ,..
•i. ~` ~'
I I ' '~ / ~ I _..
.:.; ;}:i
:., I. , } ~ .
fall f , +i , i '..:
.;1
,:
~ ,jfi ~ II ~ .1 i
i ~'
!ly' I ! ~ II f ,~
.`N
•1 I I ./ y. ............
'li ~ 1 ~ I D
~.li~; !-...~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
2
1 m
y
s -~ ~
~(" ` r.
Oy II
~ f
m yy~~~ ~omifm :~ f
yy11<~
i r y~ 'LIJ1~:~ '~ ~ ~•~ I fl~
l7 ~
Qom"`!
_ ~ %~ 111
N ~~ _. _. .. r ~ - t ~ ,.
..
_. _ ;. _.
y~...^_ ..:- .
... ~ } ~
...-... ~~ n '. ,
' ~ rA l'--'' :x'65"Jl"" - ``1 I
_...__
,f
1„ f
.....~ ~
'. .~.
...
rs ~... ''
...~..~ ... y,
.u- =-I--= _ - ~ ~ .
....
G ~ ~ •~~ _.._.__....__ .... ,..
_.. ,
•-, ,_~a
__.. ._.
r c m o _:..:. ~ .__......
1 .. .. .. ~ _ .......
_ -_.....
5~ _~ ~ __ .~... "-..
y ~OOrr _ _ .^' _ '
•' ...
3 ~ 1
....^~ .,
y , ._-~ •-- ~ ..
r yyy' ........._
in. .........
..
_:= ~~;~
__
__
$ ~ ..: _..
..
~.....
,: i
• ,.... ~.
r ~ ,~,~ ..
O _
~~ - ":
,-
` ~ I / ..~
.:
~....,, ~
,.......
;''/ , ;,:
. /
'',n. 25,rQp
'I rn
~~U
I
N
„«.
f l 1,
~'I t , ...__I
1.
~{, I~1 ...... /
34
~$
~~
T
O
mm~
v
~ n
O
A
S
0
m
~ ~
A A "~
~

o
~ s
:3
~ ~
~ ~
c~
~7
,~ 2
O ~
`

~ ~ 1~1
Y
~ rn
0
n
y ~
~ ~\\\
\ \\\
n \\\
~
~ ~I \~\ ~o~~oD
p
~
N ~ \~~ p
p 4
A:Z+1~
v v ~~

0
0 Y
-~ -~
m
Wcn m
avocn
~ti~op
'llD aMpg~
'*ir- ~ y
ND ND
o
~
+-
oo~
mm 00
mr j

-~ N
n
-1
N
O
-`.._L ~ ry~98

~._..
~
~g
~
4
'
_~_
y
_~ `
.
S
~
,
'•'~`•,
~" ~~ ~.. 1,4~•} h

n
„
_ , ,-
fit
~ .• ..
.
I
.... •- ~
` ~
~. I
. ~ ~.
i if
'~~t.
v ~~
1 ..
•.
f
~
••~
'•.•Y... ~•~ i
'~•' ~ ...._..
t
`'.fit _ 5 ~ v:~ _
_ ..........
..~......

.; ,~. .1~.,
• .I ; '~' ..

t`~~
(~ ~
[Xn,
V
$g
~ ~
O
n
A~.
V
\_ `~.
0 W
V
~v
~ B/17
~i
~~
$~~~~ ~~
~ I
I
~~Z
<~C
O~TIT~'lTm
~NN
~DN<
~~
Ulm
N
$~ ~~
~r ~~~
9 ~ n
Ag Z
~~ o
A~
~~
o.o~
~~~~

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
TIP Project No. B-3877
WBS No. 33321.1.1
State Project No. 8.2322201
Federal Project No. BRZ-1101 (7)
A. Project Description:
NCDOT will replace Bridge No. 52 on SR 1101 (Claude Lewis Road) over
Turkey Creek in Nash County. The bridge will be replaced with a new bridge
approximately 130 feet in length. The bridge will be 28 feet wide. This width
will provide fora 22-foot travelway and 3 foot offsets on each side of the bridge.
The new approach roadway will have a 22-foot travelway with 4-foot shoulders
on each side of the roadway. Shoulder width will be increased at least 3 feet
where guardrail is warranted. Traffic will be detoured along surrounding roads
during construction. Total project length is approximately 2200 feet.
B. Purpose and Need:
Bridge No. 52 has a sufficiency rating of 38.7 out of 100. The deck is only 19.1
feet wide and the bridge is composed mainly of timber. For these reasons, Bridge
No. 52 needs to be replaced.
C. Proposed Improvements:
The following Type II .improvements which apply to the project are circled:
Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation,
reconstruction, adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., pazking,
weaving, turning, climbing).
a. Restoring, Resurfacing, Rehabilitating, and Reconstructing pavement (3R
and 4R improvements)
b. Widening roadway and shoulders without adding through lanes
c. Modernizing gore treatments
d. Constructing lane improvements (merges, auxiliary, and turn lanes)
e. Adding shoulder drains
f. Replacing and rehabilitating culverts, inlets, and drainage pipes, including
safety treatments
g. Providing. driveway pipes
h. Performing minor bridge widening (less than one through lane)
i. Slide Stabilization
j. Structural BMP's for water quality improvement
2. Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects including the
installation of ramp metering control devices and lighting.
a. Installing ramp metering devices
b. Installing lights
c. Adding or upgrading guazdrail

d. Installing safety barriers including Jersey type barriers and pier protection
e. Installing or replacing impact attenuators
f. Upgrading medians including adding or upgrading median barriers
g. Improving intersections including relocation and/or realignment
h. Making minor roadway realignment
i. Channelizing traffic
j . Performing cleaz zone safety improvements including removing hazazds
and flattening slopes
k. Implementing traffic aid systems, signals, and motorist aid
1. Installing bridge safety hazdwaze including bridge rail retrofit
3. Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of grade
separation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings.
a. Rehabilitating, reconstructing, or replacing bridge approach slabs
b. Rehabilitating or replacing bridge decks
c. Rehabilitating bridges including painting (no red lead paint) scour repair,
fender systems, and minor structural improvements
O Replacing a bridge (structure and/or fill)
4. Transportation corridor fringe pazking facilities.
5. Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest azeas.
6. Approvals for disposal of excess right-of--way or for joint or limited use of right-
of-way, where the proposed use does not have significant adverse impacts.
7. Approvals for changes in access control.
8. Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in azeas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such construction is
not inconsistent with existing zoning and located on or neaz a street with adequate
capacity to handle anticipated bus and support vehicle traffic.
9. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and ancillary
facilities where only minor amounts of additional land are required and there is
not a substantial increase in the number of users.
10. :Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open area consisting of passenger
shelters, boazding azeas, kiosks, and related street improvements) when located in
a commercial area or other high activity center in which there is adequate street
capacity for projected bus traffic.
11. Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such construction is
not inconsistent with existing zoning and where there is no significant noise
impact on the surrounding community.
12. Acquisition of land for hazdship or protective purposes, advance land acquisition
loans under section 3(b) of the UMT Act. Hardship and protective buying will be
permitted only for a particulaz pazcel or a limited number of pazcels. These types
of land acquisition qualify for a CE only where the acquisition will not limit the
evaluation of alternatives, including shifts in alignment for planned construction •

w
projects, which may be required in the NEPA process. No project development
on such land may proceed until the NEPA process has been completed.
13. Acquisition and construction of wetland, stream and endangered species
mitigation sites.
14. Remedial activities involving the removal, treatment or monitoring of soil or
groundwater contamination pursuant to state or federal remediation guidelines.
D. Special Project Information:
Estimated Costs:
Total Construction $ 975,000
Right of Way $ 30,000
Total $1,005,000
Estimated Traffic:
Current - 300 vpd
Year 2025 - 700 vpd
TTST - 1%
Dual - 2%
Proposed Typical Cross Section:
The new approach roadway will have a 22-foot travelway with 4-foot shoulders on each
side of the roadway. Shoulder width will be increased at least 3 feet where guardrail is
warranted.
Design Speed:
60 mph
Design Exceptions:
None
Functional Classification:
SR 1101 is classified as a Rural Local Route in the Statewide Functional Classification
system.
Division Office Comments:
The Division 4 Construction Engineer supports the chosen alternate and proposed method
for detouring traffic during construction.
Bridge Demolition:
Bridge No. 52 is located on SR 1101 over Turkey Creek in Nash County. The Bridge
deck is composed of a timber floor on ~-beams, timber piles with concrete caps, aad a
3

steel crutch. Therefore, Bridge No. 52 will be removed without dropping any - -
components into Waters of the United States. -
Alternatives Discussion: (including Studied Offsite Detour Evaluation)
According to the Nash-Rocky Mount School System, this road has 5 school bus trips per
day.
According to Nash County 911 Supervisor, a volunteer fire department in Middlesex and
an ambulance from Bailey aze the responders in this area.
The detour route will utilize SR 1111, SR 1113, SR 1131, and SR 1100. There will be 2.3
miles of additional travel.
One other alternative was studied. It included an onsite detour to the south. The onsite
detour was eliminated from further study due to .their increased costs and increased
impacts on the surrounding environment.
"Do-nothing" is not practical; requiring the eventual closing of the road as the existing
bridge completely deteriorates. Rehabilitation of the existing deteriorating bridge is
neither practical nor economical.
4

E. Threshold Criteria
The following evaluation of threshold criteria must be completed for Type II actions
ECOLOGICAL YES
(1) Will the project have a substantial impact on any unique or
important natural resource?
(2) Does the project involve habitat where federally listed
endangered or threatened species may occur?
(3) Will the project affect anadromous fish? • ^
(4) If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of
permanent and/or temporary wetland taking less than
one-tenth (1/10) of an acre and have all practicable
measures to avoid and minimize wetland takings been
evaluated? X
(5) Will the project require the use of U. S. Forest Service lands?
(6) Will the quality of adjacent water resources be adversely

impacted by proposed construction activities? a
(7) Does the project involve waters classified as Outstanding
Water Resources (OWR) and/or High Quality Waters (HQW)? ^
(8) Will the project require fill in waters of the United States ^
in any of the designated mountain trout counties?
(9) Does the project involve any known underground storage a
tanks (UST's) or hazardous material sites?
PERMITS AND COORDINATION
(10) If the project is located within a CAMA county, will the
project significantly affect the coastal zone and/or any
"Area of Environmental Concern" (AEC)?
(11) Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act
resources?
(12) Will a U. S. Coast Guard permit be required?
YES

NO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
NO
X
X
X
5

(13) Will the project result in the modification of any existing
regulatory floodway? X
(14) Will the project require any stream relocations or channel
changes? ~ X

(17) Will the project have a disproportionately high and
adverse human health and environmental effect on any minority
or low-income population? X
(18) If the project involves the acquisition of right of way, is the ^
amount of right of way acquisition considered minor? X
(19) Will the project involve any changes in access control? ^
X

SOCIAL, ECONOMIC. AND CULTURAL RESOURCES YES NO
(15) Will the project induce substantial impacts to planned
growth or land use for the azea? X
(16) Will the project require the relocation of any family or
business? X
(20) Will the project substantially alter the usefulness and/or land
use of adjacent property? X
(21) Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent local
traffic patterns or community cohesiveness? X
(22) Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan
and/or Transportation Improvement Program (and is,
therefore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of 1990}? ^
X
(23) . Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in traffic
volumes? X
(24) Will traffic be maintained during construction using existing
roads, staged construction, or on-site detours? X
(25) If the project is a bridge replacement project, will the bridge be
replaced at its existing location (along the
existing facility) and will all construction proposed in
association with the bridge replacement project be contained on ^
the existing facility? X
(26) Is there substantial controversy on social, economic, or
environmental grounds concernmg the project? X

6

(27) Is the project consistent with all Federal, State, and local laws - ^
relating to the environmental aspects of the project? X
(28) Will the project have an "effect" on structures/properties -
eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic Places? ^
X
(29) Will the project affect any archaeological remains, which aze

important to history or pre-history? ^
X
(30) Will the project require the use of Section 4(f) resources
(public parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges,
historic sites, or historic bridges, as defined in
Section 4(f) of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act of
1966)? ^
X
(31) Will the project result in any conversion of assisted public
recreation sites or facilities to non-recreation uses, as
defined by Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation

Act of 1965, as amended? ^
X
(32) Will the project involve construction in, across, or
adjacent to a river designated as a component of or
proposed. for inclusion in the Natural System of Wild and ^
Scenic Rivers? X
F. Additional Documentation Required for Unfavorable Responses in Part E
(Discussion regarding all unfavorable responses in Part E should be provided bell
Additional supporting documentation may be attached, as necessary.)
7

G. CE Approval
TIP Project No. B-3877
WBS No. 33321.1.1
State Project No. 8.2322201
Federal Project No. BRZ-1101(7)
Proiect Description:
NCDOT will replace Bridge No. 52 on SR 1101 (Claude Lewis Road) over Turkey Creek
in Nash County. The bridge will be replaced with a new bridge approximately .130 feet .
in length. The bridge will be 28 feet wide. This width .will pmvide fora 22-foot
travelway and 3 foot offsets on each side of the bridge. The new approach roadway will
have a 22-foot travelway with 4foot shoulders on each side of the roadway. Shoulder
width will be increased at least 3 feet where guardrail is warranted. Traffic will be
detoured along surrounding roads during construction. Total project length is
approximately 2200 feet.
Categorical Exclusion Action Classification:
X TYPE II(A)
TYPE II(B)
Approved•
,1 J j j;
Date
~,
~ V ~~ ~ f. .
\.' ..
Date
Project Development &
Analysis Branch
Date Robin Y. Han ck, roject Development Engineer,
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
For Type II(B) projects only:
Not Required
Date John F. Sullivan, III, Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
8
,~
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch

~ N
11 N p;r .5 ~ .s „ - `"' '1169 ~; _~ ; •- ,
.9 __~~' 1961 19
11 y ~ 109 ;' a 1106 •----... ~ ..:
`~~; .Stony Hill BAILEY
~ 'i `- Ch. ~i 1108 _. _.. 74 ~•
1128 ~ POP. 553
I L_ .~ 6 .._ _ 2.2 '• 1175 ~ . ~`°
~~ .: ;
i 6 ~ ~ ~ I C N .9 'i~ 10 ,
~"^ ~ q rlr. POP. 969 ~i m ~• -~--~
~;.; • . .,i ,~3 ~ m•, a3 ;110 1 ~ "-_,..
`~ zl:`, °o '~\ 1108 ~~ 1106 ~-r- L. _
~ '. , .-. I
~'t-a ~
111 i"tO 1118 w4 110 ,~~ -----s=--`--_ ~~ 'RAI~A ~ ~ }~•~ °.,~ 9 •-~ I
_~ 'h;
f.., t 1101 ~~L/rit;~'STERN~ - v'~ 1.0 ` -;,` _ _ : ~ -~ '• ,,,
~•,
r
1116"`•._..t::.. mo' ~ i ~' • ~ ~ ~ ~ `~~~ \i`Q
~m ~ ~ ~ 1108 1.2 i~ •~• 1972 •
,. 1104 7
m~ 3 `1111 ~•': ~ BSA •~~• ~ ~%;;' .5 "•x'
1115 ',~ •'•.\ 110 CAMQ. ,%`%-; ~GS~ " ~ ~-F-f~ i.+ / 9969
1112 CHARL~~-~- ;,+s.•, ~ i ~--+~ e'
,~,r 1100 ~ '•• .~'~
1116 1.3 _ _ _ 1.4 Br. •. ~?: -1102 ', '"~~
\ ~ .~''
w "' 115 1112'i t '~ 't l ; °' ~.~'' 8 '•.
.~ ~ '\ ,' • ~? (y': ry ~~.~' .., °~ Math
~~ ,
a;' ~ ~ 1100 ~,.~''~~~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~,.- `1i~ ,
\~' ~ .~ 1141 ~ _ -i ~ ~~
~ -, .-- .
t t 1~ ^ 1. 0 • ~ 113 ~ Co r Bridge No. 52 ~ ~ _
' 1221 '~ o i
\ \ •.
~,.. ---"~ 1131 ~co, ti., ~ - -' a ,~
i '9si'~ i : ~ -: '~ ''.
c~~ ~~~ ;
s ' i ~ ~ i
~w i' I ,
1 ~J .` .•`
_ .~ 1 i ,,
~~~~~
..~~~,~~~~~ ~+~. i e.\\581 ,
RESERVOIR ~~`~~ c~ V -- • •~J
• \~ t 4
` I , NMp1
~~
Detour Route
North Carolina Department of
Transportation
Division of Highways
,~ Project Development f~'
Environmental Analysis
a
Nash County
Replace Bridge No. 52 on SR 1101
Over Turkey Creek
B-3877
SCAi.E: 1 m = 1 mi Figtue 1

~'~o
yd r "•
~+u.
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administtatar
Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Archives and History
January 16, 2001 Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
MEMORANDUM
To: William D. Gilmore, PE, Manager
Project Development and Environ1mental Analysis Branch
From: David Brook ~, c-,1 l~~-1.~~
De u State Hist tlic Preservation Officer
P tY
Re: Replacement of Bridge No. 52 on SR 1101 over Turkey Creek,
TIP No. B-3877, Nash County, ER 01-7929
On December 5, 2000, April Montgomery of our staff met with the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) staff for a meeting of the minds concerning the above project. She reported
our available information on historic architectural and archaeological surveys and resources along with our
recommendations. NCDOT provided project area photographs and aerial photographs at the meeting.
Based upon our revie~v of the photographs and the information discussed at the meeting, we offer our
preliminary comments regarding this project..
In terms. of historic architectural resources we are aware of no historic structures located within the area of
potential effect. We recommend that no historic architectural survey be conducted for this project.
There are no known archaeological sites within the project area. Based on our present knowledge of the
area, it is unlikely that any archaeological resources which may be eligible for inclusion in the National
Register of Historic Places, will be affected by the project construction. We, therefore, recommend that
no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project.
Having provided this information, we look forward to the receipt of either a Categorical Exclusion or
Environmental Assessment, which indicates how NCDOT addressed our comments.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have any questions concerning the above
comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, Environmental Review Coordinator,
at 919 733-4763.
Location Mailing Address TelephonelFax
Administration 507 N. Blount St. Raleigh 4617 Mail Service Center. Raleigh 27699-4617 [phone].715-8653 .
Restoration 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh 4613 Mail Service Center. Raleigh 27699~d613 [phone].715-1801
Survey ~ Planning 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh 461 R Mail Scrvix Crntcr. Raleigh 27699-4618 (919) 733763.715-1801

___ _ __ _ ~`~ North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Charles F. Fu~hvood, Feeru:ive Director
1~iE 1C :Ai~'DUM
TO: Robin Y. Hancock
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
FROM: Travis Wilson, Highway Project Coordinator _~
Habitat Conservation Program ~~-= ~ i~
DATE: September 15, 2003 ,
,~ --~
SUBJI~CT: NCDOT Bridge Replacements in Warren, Nash, and Johnston counties. TIP Nos.
B-3863, B-3876, B-3877, B-3921, and B-4312.
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)} and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.9~:C. 661-667d).
Our standard recommendations for Bridge repiacemeni projee;t5 cf this scope are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.

Bridge Memo
2 September I5, 2003
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
~be planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x10'. If possible, when using temporary
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project. require an individual `404' penmit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist Mr. Hal
Bain should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be
required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
10. In areas with significant fisheries for sunfish, seasonal exclusions may also be
recommended.
~1
11. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
12. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 1 S days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
13. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used
- where possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
14. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
15. Only clean, sediment-free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance. of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
16. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal.pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used: ~ ~ '

' Bridge Memo 3 September I5, 2003
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for aquatic life and fish passage. Generally, the
culvert or pipe invert should be buried at least 1 foot below the natural streambed
'.(measured from the natural thalweg depth). If multiple barrels are required, barrels
other than the base flow barrel(s) should be placed on or near stream bankfull or
floodplain bench elevation (similar to Lyonsfield design). These should be
reconnected to floodplain benches as appropriate. This may be accomplished by
utilizing sills on the upstream and downstream ends to restrict or divert flow to the
base flow barrel(s). Silled barrels should be filled with sediment so as not to cause
noxious or mosquito breeding conditions. Sufficient water depth should be provided
in the base flow barrel(s) during low flows to accommodate fish movement. If
culverts are longer than 40-50 linear feet, alternating or notched baffles should be
installed in a manner that mimics existing stream pattern. This should enhance
aquatic life passage: 1) by depositing pediments in the barrel, 2) by maintaining
channel depth and flow regimes, and 3) by providing resting places for fish and other
aquatic organisms. In essence, base flow barrel(s) should provide a continuum of
water depth and channel width without substantial modifications of velocity.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated along the existing channel alignment whenever
possible to avoid channel realignment. Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases
~ ~yater velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and
;~ disrupts aquatic life passage.
4. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed
in a manner that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures
should be professionally designed, sized, and installed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore the
area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be utilized as mitigation for the subject project or
other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
B-3863, Johnston County, Bridge No. 151 over Little River on SR 1722. We recommend
replacing this bridge with a bridge. Our records indicate a known population of Dwarf
wedge mussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) and Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni) in close
proximity to the project. NCDOT should conduct a mussel survey to determine the
presence or absence of these species. Anadromous species are found in this portion of
the Little River. NCDOT should follow all stream crossing guidelines for anadromous
fish passage, including an in-water work moratorium from February 15 to June 15.
Standard recommendations apply.

Bridge Memo 4 September 15, 2003 - .:
2. B-3876, Nash County, Bridge No: 34 over Pig Basket Creek on SR 1004. We
recommend replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
3. B-3877, Nash County, Bridge No. 52 over Turkey Creek on SR 1101. We recommend
replacing this bridge with a bridge. Our records indicate a known population of Dwarf
wedge mussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) and Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni) in close
proximity to the project. NCDOT should conduct a mussel survey to determine the
presence or absence of these species. Standard recommendations apply.
4. B-3921, Warren County, Bridge No. 45 over Fishing Creek on SR 1600. We recommend
replacing this bridge with a bridge. Our records indicate a known population of Yellow
Lance (Elliptio lanceolata) in close proximity to the project. NCDOT should conduct a
mussel survey to determine the presence or absence of this species. Standard
recommendations apply.
5. B-4312, Warren County, Bridge No. 42 over Shocco Creek on SR 1613. We recommend
replacing this bridge with a bridge: Our records indicate a known population of Dwarf
wedge mussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) ~in close proximity to the project. NCDOT
should conduct a mussel survey to determine the presence or absence of this species.
Standard recommendations apply.
NCDOT should routinely minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources in the
vicinity of bridge replacements. Restoring previously disturbed floodplain benches should
narrow and deepen streams previously widened and shallowed during initial bridge installation.
NCDOT should install and maintain sedimentation control measures throughout the life of the
proje t and prevent wet concrete from contacting water in or. entering into these streams.
Repl eitt~t-t of bridges with spanning structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box
culve' s, is recommended in most cases. Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along
streambanks and reduce habitat fragmentation.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on these projects.
,,
Cc: -;Gary Jordan, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh

PROJECT COMMITMENTS
Nast County
Bridge No. 52 on SR 1101
Over Turkey Creek
Federal Project BRZ-1101(7)
WBS 33321.1.1
State Project 8.2322201
TIP No. B-3877
Commitments Developed_Throu~h Proiect Development and Desi
Roadside Environmental Unit, Division 4 Construction, Structure Design Unit
Bridge Demolition: Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition & Removal will be
implemented. The bridge deck is composed of a timber floor on I-beams, timber piles with
concrete caps, and a steel crutch. Therefore, Bridge No. 52 will be removed without dropping
any components into Waters of the United States.
Division 4 Construction, Roadside Environmental Unit, Hydraulics Unit
Due to the potential sedimentation concerns resulting from demolition of the bridges, where it
is possible to do so, turbidity curtains will be used to minimize sedimentation in the stream.
Division 4 Construction
In order to allow Emergency Management Services (EMS) time to prepare for road closure,
the NCDOT Resident Engineer will notify the Coordinator of Nash County EMS at (252)
459-9805 of the bridge remova130 days prior to road closure.
Program Development, Design Services Contracting, Division 4 Construction
Construction of B-4327. in Wilson County must be completed before starting B-3877 because
it will serve part of the offsite detour for B-3877.
Green Sheet
Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Page 1 of 1
December 2003

NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
for the
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.52 ON SR 1101
OVER TURKEY CREEK
NA5H COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TIP No. B-3877
State Project No. 8.2322201
NCDOT Consulting Project No. 00-LM-07
LandMazk Design Group Number 1960024-307.00
Prepazed for the
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Natural Resources, Permits and Mitigation Unit
One South Wilmington Street, Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Cazolina 27611
Attn: Elizabeth Lusk
Issued: June 2001
LANDMARK
Environmental Consultants & Planners
6512 Six Forks Road, Suite 200, Raleigh, NC 27615, [phone] FAX [phone] [e-mail]

Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................................ 1
1.2 PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.3 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.4 QUALIFICATIONS OF INVESTIGATORS ......................................................................................................................... 2
1.5 DEFIIVrTION$ ................................................................................................................................................................. 2
2.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................................................. 3
2.1 SOns ............................................................................................................................................................................. 3
2.2 WATER RESOURCES ..................................................................................................................................................... 3
2.2.1 Waters Impacted and Characteristics .................................................................................................................... 3
2.2.2 Best Usage Classification ...................................................................................................................................... 4
'2.2.3 Water Quality ........................................................................................................................................................ 4
2.2.4 Ecological Impacts ................................................................................................................................................ 4
3.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES .................................................................................................................................................... 5
3.1 TERRESTRIAL COMMUNTI'IES ...................................................................................................................................... 5
3.1.1 Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods (Brownwater Subtype) ............................................................................. 6
3.1.2 Slope Successional Community ............................................................................................................................ 6
3.1.3 Riparian Community ............................................................................................................................................. 6
3.1.4 Maintained/Disturbed Roadside ............................................................................................................................ 6
3.1.5 Fresh Water Marsh ............................................................................................................................................... . 7
3.2 AQUATIC COMMUNI'TIES .........................................................:................................................................................... . 7
3.3 SUMMARY OF ANTICIPATED IMPACTS ....................................................................................................................... . 7
4.0 JURISDICTIONAL TOPICS ......................................................................................................................................... y
4.1 WATERS OF THE UNTIED STATES ................................................................................................................................ 9
4.1.1 Impacts to Wetlands and Surface Waters ............................................................................................................. . 9
4.1.2 Permits ................................................................................................................................................................. 10
4.1.3 Bridge Demolition ............................................................................................................................................... l l
4.1.4 Mitigation ............................................................................................................................................................ 11
4.1.4.1 Avoidance ........................................................................................................................................................................ 11
4.1.4.2 Minimization ..................................................................................:.................................................................:.............. 11
4.1.4.3 Compensatory Mitigation ................................................................................................................................................ l l
4.2 RARE AND PROTECTED SPECIES .................:..............................................:............................................................... 12
4.2.1 Federally Protected Species .............................. .............................................................................................. 12
4.2.2 Federal Species of Concern and State Listed Species ......................................................................................... 14
5.0 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................................................16
6.0 APPENDICES
6.1 FIGURES
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Alternate 1 and 2 Permanent Impacts To Bridge No. 52
Figure 3. Potential Temporary Impacts to Bridge No. 52
Figure 4. Site Photographs
6.2 RESOURCE AGENCY LETTERS/MEMORANDUMS
6.3 WETLAND DATA SHEETS
North Carolina Department of Transportation TIP B-3877 June 2001
The LandMark Design Group, Inc. Project No. 1960024-307.00 Page ii

LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1. ANTICIPATED IMPAC'T'S FOR ALTERNATE 1 ........................................................................................................... 8
TABLE 2. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS FOR ALTERNATE 2 ........................................................................................................... 8
TABLE 3. FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES FOR NASH COUNTY ....................................................................................... 12
TABLE 4. FEDERAL SPECIES OF CONCERN FOR NASH COUNTY ......................................................................................... 15
North Carolina Department ofTransportation TIP B-3877 June 2001
The LarulMark Design Group, Inc. Project No. 1960024-307.00 Page iii

1.0 INTRODUCTION
The following Natural Resources Technical Report is submitted to assist in prepazation of a Categorical
Exclusion (CE) for the proposed project. The project is situated in the southern portion of Nash
County.
1.1 Project Description
The proposed project calls for the replacement of Bridge No. 52 on State Road 1101 over Turkey
Creek . The existing right-of--way (ROW) width is assumed from ditch line to ditch line. The proposed
ROW width is 80.00 ft (24.38 m) for alternate 1 and 2. The assumed ROW for the on-site detour
bridge for alternate 2 is 60.00 ft (18.29 m). A ROW width was not given for the temporary on-site
detour bridge in the project description, therefore, the assumed width was based on past project
descriptions. The existing bridge is 121.00 ft (36.88 m) long. The proposed project length is
approximately 1,200.00 ft (365.76 m).
Alternative 1 -Replace the existing bridge with a new 130.00 ft (39.62 m) long bridge at
approximately the same location and roadway elevation as the existing bridge. Traffic will be
maintained off-site.
Alternative 2 -Replace the existing bridge with a new 130.00 ft (39.62 m) long bridge at
approximately the same location and roadway elevation as the existing bridge. Traffic will be
maintained using a temporary on-site detour bridge, approximately 100.00 ft (30.48 m) in
length, located to the south of the existing bridge during construction.
1.2 Purpose
The purpose of this technical report is to inventory, catalog, and describe the various natural resources
likely to be impacted by the proposed action. This report also attempts to identify and estimate the
probable consequences of the anticipated impacts to these resources. Recommendations aze made for
measures that will minimize resource impacts. These descriptions and estimates are relevant only
in the content of existing preliminary design concepts. If design parameters and criteria change,
additional field investigations may need to be conducted.
1.3 Methodology
Research was conducted prior to field investigations. Information sources used in this pre-field
investigation of the study area include: Middlesex (1978) U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle
map, Middlesex (1994) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) National Wetland Inventory Map,
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) Soil Survey of Nash County, North Carolina
(1989), and NCDOT aerial photographs of the project area (1:100 ft). Water resource information was
obtained from publications of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), Water Quality
Section Tar-Pamlico Basimvide Management Plan (DENR, 1999). Information concerning the
occurrence of federal and state protected species in the study area was gathered from the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (FWS) list of protected species and species of concern, and the N.C. Natural Heritage
Program (NHP) database of rare species and unique habitats.
North Carolina Department of Transportation TIP B-3877 June 2001
The LandMark Design Group, Inc. Project No. 1960024-307.00 Page 1

LandMazk Design Group environmental scientists Ryan Smith, Wendee Smith, and Corn Wolfe
conducted field surveys along the proposed alignment on 19 Apri12001. Plant communities and their
associated wildlife were identified and recorded. Wildlife identification involved using one or more of
the following observation techniques: active search and capture, visual observations, and identification
of characteristic signs of wildlife (sounds, scat, tracks, and burrows). Jurisdictional wetland
determinations were performed utilizing delineation criteria prescribed in the Corps of Engineers
Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987). Jurisdictional surface water
determinations were performed using guidance provided by N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
Field Location of Streams, Ditches, and Ponding (Environmental Laboratory, 1997).
1.4 Qualifications of Investigators
1) Investigator: Ryan Smith, Environmental Scientist,
LandMazk Design Group Inc., September 1999 to Present
Education: B.S. Natural Resources: Ecosystem Assessment,
Minor in Environmental Science, North Cazolina State University, 1999
Experience: Project Coordinator, Environmental Impact, Inc. Aberdeen, NC, May 1999 to
August 1999
Forestry Technician, N.C. Forest Service, Summer 1998
2) Investigator: Wendee B. Smith, Environmental Scientist,
LandMazk Design Group Inc., September 1999 to Present
Education: B.S. Natural Resources: Ecosystem Assessment,
Minor in Environmental Science, North Cazolina State University, 1999
Experience: Natural Systems Specialist,
N.C. Department of Transportation/Project Development and
Environmental Analysis Branch, May 1999 to August 1999
Forestry Technician, N.C. Forest Service, Summer 1998
3) Investigator: Corri Wolfe, Environmental Scientist,
LandMazk Design Group Inc., Apri12001 to Present
Education: B.S. Natural Resources: Ecosystem Assessment,
Minor in Environmental Science, North Carolina State University, 2000
B.S. Biological Science, North Cazolina State University, 2001
Experience: Associate Scientist, Biolex, Inc.. Pittsboro, NC, Januazy 2000 to March 2001
Laboratory Technician, Department of Forestry, North Cazolina State
University, January 1999 to May 2000
1.5 Definitions
Definitions for azea descriptions used in this report aze as follows: Project Study Area denotes the
azea bounded by proposed construction limits; Project Vicinity describes an area extending 0.50 mi
(0.80 km) on all sides of the project study azea; and Project Region is equivalent to an azea represented
by a 7.5 minute USGS quadrangle map with the project occupying the central position.
North Carolina Department of Transportation TIP B-3877 June 2001
The LandMark Design Group, Inc. Project No. 1960024-307.00 Page 2

2.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES
Soil and water resources that occur in the study area are discussed below. Soils and availability of
water directly influence composition and distribution of flora and fauna in any biotic community.
The project study azea lies within the eastern Piedmont Physiographic Province. The topography in
this section of Nash County is broad and flat with long slopes and is drained directly by Turkey Creek.
Project elevation is approximately 160.00 ft (48.77 m) above mean sea level (msl).
2.1 Soils
Three soil phases occur within the study azea: Wehadkee loam, Wedowee coarse sandy loam, and
Wickham fine sandy loam. Soil description information was obtained from the Soil Survey of Nash
County, North Carolina, 1989. They are as follows:
• Wehadkee loam is a frequently flooded, poorly drained, neazly level soil that occurs on low flood
plains along most of the streams in Nash County. Permeability is moderate and the seasonal high
water table is located at or near the surface during all but the driest months. Frequent flooding for a
brief duration is a chazacteristic of this soil type.
• Wedowee coarse sandy loam with 6 to 10 percent slopes, is awell-drained, moderately sloping soil
that occurs on side slopes draining towazd streams. Permeability is moderate, surface runoff is
rapid, and erosion is rapid in unprotected azeas of this soil. Moderate permeability and moderate
shrink-swell potential aze the main limitations of this soil type.
• Wickham fine sandy loam with 0 to 3 percent slopes, is a infrequently flooded, well drained, neazly
level to gently sloping soil that occurs on high stream terraces. Permeability is moderate, surface
runoff is moderate, and the soil is susceptible to infrequent flooding. .
2.2 Water Resources
This section contains information concerning those water resources likely to be impacted by the
project. Water resource information encompasses physical aspects of the resource, its relationship to
major water systems, Best Usage Standazds, and water quality of the resources. Probable impacts to
surface water resources and minimization methods aze also discussed.
2.2.1 Waters Impacted and Characteristics
Turkey Creek will be the only surface water resource directly impacted by the proposed project.
Turkey. Creek is located in subbasin 03-03-02 of the Taz-Pamlico River Basin. The average baseflow
width is approximately 110.00 (33.53 m). The average depth is approximately 6.00 ft (1.83 m).
Turkey Creek is a brownwater creek with low turbidity. Turkey Creek has a loamy sand substrate and
flows northeast to southwest.
North Carolina Department of Transportation TIP B-3877 June 2001
The LandMark Design Group, Inc. Project No. 1960024-307.00 Page 3

2.2.2 Best Usage Classification
Streams have been assigned a best usage classification by the NC Division of Water Quality. The
classification of Turkey Creek (DEM Index No. 28-33) is C NSW (NCDWQ, 1999). Class C refers to
waters suitable for aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation, and
agriculture. The supplemental classification of NSW denotes Nutrient Sensitive Waters that require
limitations on nutrient inputs.
Neither High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-I: undeveloped watersheds or WS-II:
predominately undeveloped watersheds), nor Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within
1.00 mile (1.61 km) of the project study area.
2.2.3 Water Quality
The DWQ has initiated abasin-wide approach to water quality management for each of the 17 river
basins within the state. To accomplish this goal, the DWQ collects biological, chemical, and physical
data that can be used in basinwide assessment and planning. All basins are reassessed every five yeazs.
Prior to the implementation of the basinwide approach to water quality management, the Benthic
Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network (BMAl~ assessed water quality by sampling for benthic
macroinvertebrate organisms at fixed monitoring sites throughout the state. There is not a BMAN
station located on Turkey Creek within 1.00 mi (1.61 km) of the project study area.
Many benthic macroinvertebrates have stages in their life cycle that can last from six months to one
year, therefore, the adverse effects of a toxic spill will not be overcome until the next generation.
Different taxa of macroinvertebrates have different tolerances to pollution, thereby, long-term changes
in water quality conditions can be identified by population shifts from pollution sensitive to pollution
tolerant organisms (and vice versa). Overall, the species present, the population diversity, and the
biomass aze reflections of long-term water quality conditions.
Point source dischargers located throughout North Carolina are permitted through the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program. Any discharger is required to register for
a permit. No point source dischargers are located on Turkey Creek within 1.00 mi (1.61 km) of
the project study area.
2.2.4 EcologicalImpacts
Replacing an existing structure in the same location with a road closure during construction is almost
always preferred. It poses the least risk to aquatic organisms and other natural resources. Bridge
replacement on a new location usually results in more impacts. Usually, project construction does not
require the entire ROW, therefore, actual impacts may be considerably less.
Project construction may result in the following impacts to surface waters:
1. Increased sedimentation and siltation from demolition and/or erosion resulting from vegetation
and land disturbance during construction,
North Carolina Department of Transportation TIP B-3877 June 2001
The LandMark Design Group, Inc. Project No. 1960024-307.00 Page 4

2. Changes in light incidence and water clarity due to increased sedimentation and
vegetation removal,
3. Alteration of water levels and flows due to interruptions and/or additions to surface
and ground water flow from construction,
4. Changes in water temperature due to the increase of sun and wind exposure resulting from
streamside vegetation removal,
5. Increased nutrient loading during construction via runoff from exposed azeas, and/or
6. Increased input of toxic compounds from demolition, construction, toxic spills, and highway
runoff.
Precautions must be taken to minimize impacts to water resources in the study area. NCDOT's
Best Management Practices (BMP) for the Protection of Sensitive Waters must be strictly
enforced during the construction stage of the project. Guidelines for these BMPs include, but are
not limited to minimizing built upon area and diverting stormwater away from surface waters as
much as possible. Provisions to preclude contamination by tonic substances during the
construction interval must also be strictly enforced.
3.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES
Biotic resources include aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. This section describes those ecosystems
encountered in the study azea as well as the relationships between flora and fauna within these
ecosystems. Composition and distribution of biotic communities throughout the project azea are
reflective of topography, hydrologic influences, and past and present land uses in the study area.
Descriptions of the terrestrial systems are presented in the context of plant community classifications
and follow descriptions presented by Schafale and Weakley (1990) in Classification of Natural
Communities of North Carolina where possible. Dominant flora and fauna observed, or likely to occur,
in each community aze described and discussed.
Scientific nomenclature and common names (when applicable) aze provided for each plant and animal
species described. Plant taxonomy generally follows Radford et al. (1968). Animal taxonomy follows
Martof et al. (1980), Potter et al. (1980), and Webster et al. (1985). Subsequent references to the same
organism will include the common name only. Fauna observed during the site visits aze denoted with
an asterisk (*). Published range distributions and habitat analysis are used in estimating fauna expected
to be present within the project area.
3.1 Terrestrial Communities
Five distinct terrestrial communities aze identified in the project study area: Coastal Plain Bottomland
Hardwoods, slope successional, riparian, mamtained/disturbed roadside, and Fresh Water Marsh.
Community boundaries within the study azea are well defined without a significant transition zone
North Carolina Department of Transportation TIP B-3877 June 2001
The LandMark Design Group, Inc. Project No. 1960024-307.00 Page S

between them. Faunal species likely to occur within the study azea will exploit all communities for
shelter, foraging opportunities, and/or as movement corridors.
3.1.1 Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods (Brownwater Subtype)
The Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods aze present southwest of State Road 1101 northwest of
Turkey Creek.
The canopy is composed of red maple (Ater rubrum), sweet-gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), hickory
(Carya sp.), river birch (Betula nigra), white oak (Quercus alba), tulip poplar (Liriodendron
tulipifera), and chinkapin oak (Quercus muehlenbergii). The understory consists of America holly (Ilex
opaca), dogwood (Corpus jlorida), ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), blueberry (Vaccinium sp.),
muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), and red chokeberry (Aronia arbutifolia).
Wildlife associated with the Coastal Plain Bottomland Hazdwoods include: white-tailed deer*
(Odocoileus virginianus), eastern chipmunk (Tamias striatus), opossum (Didelphis virginiana), deer
mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus), gray squirrel* (Sciurus carolinensis), striped skunk (Mephitis
mephitis), and raccoon (Procyon lotor).
Avian species utilizing the Coastal Plain Bottomland Hazdwoods likely include: blue jay* (Cyanocitta
cristata), American robin (Turdus migratorius), red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), and mallard
(Anas platyrhynchos).
3.1.2 Slope Successional Community
The slope successional community is present on both sides of State Road 1101 northwest of Turkey
Creek and north of State Road 1101 southeast of Turkey Creek. This azea is composed of poison ivy
(Toxicodendron radicans), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), blackberry (Rubus argutus),
Indian strawberry (Duchesnea indica), American holly, and Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense).
Faunal species frequenting the slope successional community will be lazgely those species inhabiting
the Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods.
3.1.3 Riparian Community
The riparian community is present on both sides of State Road 1101 southeast of Turkey Creek and on
the southwest side of State Road 1101 northwest of Turkey Creek. This area is composed of river
birch, saw greenbrier (Smilax bona-pox), red maple, sweet-gum, white oak, willow oak (Q. phellos),
black willow (Salix nigra), and lizazd's tail (Saururus cernuus). Faunal species frequenting the riparian
community will be lazgely those species inhabiting the Coastal Plain Bottomland Hazdwoods.
3.1.4 Maintained/Disturbed Roadside
The maintained/disturbed roadside community includes road shoulders along State Road 1101 that aze
present along the majority of the length of the project. This is vegetated by Indian strawberry, plantain
(Plantago sp.), Japanese honeysuckle, red maple, ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), sweet-gum,
greenbrier (S. rotundifolia), dog-fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), and daylily (Hemerocallis fulva).
North Carolina Department of Transportation TIP 8-3877 June 2001
The LandMark Design Group, lnc. Project No. 1960024-307.00 Page 6

Faunal species frequenting the maintained community will be largely those species inhabiting the
Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods.
3.1.5 Fresh Water Marsh
The Fresh Water Marsh is an island located within Turkey Creek. This area is vegetated by river birch,
ash, red maple, lizard's tail, black willow, chain-fern (Woodwardia sp.), and microstegium
(Microstegium vimineum). Faunal species likely to frequent the Fresh Water Mazsh include snakes
(Squamata), turtles (Chelonia), frogs (Salientia), and salamanders (Caudata).
3.2 Aquatic Communities
One aquatic community, Turkey Creek, will be impacted by the proposed project. Physical
characteristics of a water body and the condition of the water resource influence faunal composition of
aquatic communities. Terrestrial communities adjacent to a water resource also greatly influence
aquatic communities. No submersed or emergent aquatic vegetation was observed within this section
of Turkey Creek. Vegetation along the bank of Turkey Creek includes river birch, saw greenbrier, red
maple, sweet-gum, white oak, willow oak, black willow, and lizazd's tail.
Fauna associated with these aquatic communities includes various invertebrate and vertebrate species.
Vertebrate species likely to occur near Turkey Creek would include great blue heron* (Ardea herodias)
and beavers* (Castor canadensis). Invertebrates likely to be present include various species of
caddisflies (Trichoptera), mayflies (Ephemeroptera), dragonflies (Odonata), damselflies (Odonata),
amphipods* (Amphipoda), and bivalves* (Bivalva).
3.3 Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Construction of the proposed project will have various impacts on the biotic resources described. Any
construction related activities in or near these resources have the potential to impact biological
functions. This section quantifies and qualifies impacts to the natural resources in terms of area
impacted and ecosystems affected. Temporary and permanent impacts aze considered here as well.
Calculated impacts to natural resources reflect the relative abundance of each community present
within the study area. Project construction will result in clearing and degradation of portions of these
communities. Tables 1 and 2 summarize potential quantitative losses to these communities resulting
from project construction for alternatives 1 and 2. Estimated impacts are derived using the entire
proposed ROW width of 80.00 ft (24.38 m) and an assumed ROW width of 60.00 ft (18.29 m) for the
on-site detour bridge. Usually, project construction does not require the entire ROW, therefore, actual
impacts may be considerably less.
North Carolina Department of Transportation TIP B-3877 June 2001
The LandMark Design Group, Inc. Project No. 1960024-307.00 Page 7

Table 1. Antics ated ~m acts for Alternate 1.
. ri: ,, .~rt~ ~ ~~r~ , ~ , . ~-;:, '' `~ , ~ ~~~ .~P;ernaanent Impacts for Alternate l 't_
~` ~~" ~ ~''~ To Is
"f ~iriitii~n~tv~~~~~ ' ~ .. ~WetlandS _ Upla~`dS
Coastal Plain Bottomland -- -- --
Hardwoods
Slope Successional
-- 0.20 (0.08)
0.20 (0.08)
Riparian __ 0.01 (0.00) 0.01 (0.00)
Maintained/Disturbed Roadside -- 1.30 (0.53) 1.29 (0.52)
Fresh Water Marsh 0.08 (0.03) 0.08 (0.03)
Turkey Creek -- -- 0.12 (0.05)
Total 0.08 (0.03) 1.51(0.61) 1.70 (0.68)
Note: Values cited are in acres (hectares).
Table 2 Antics ated un acts for Alternate 2
emporary mpacts ~o~4 Iterna e, 2 P manent In%pact5 for;ternate~2
-
~

~:~~Y~
i ,
x
~F ~, 4 ~ 'i(on-site detour}
~ . : ~- ..
~
~s ., ~ K
`'
~ U Ia€~ds
" ~
-~ 4=~ etlanils
~ p -Tot is WetE'~ands ','Uplands ~ Totals
3C~~~~.~1~~ .
, ..
~,~,~~
Coastal Plain -- 0.27 (0.11) 0.27 (0.11) -- -- --
Bottomland
Hazdwoods
Slope Successional
-- 0.15 (0.06)
0.15 (0.06)
-- 0.20 (0.08)
0.20 (0.08)
~p~an -- 0.01 (0.00) 0.01 (0.00) -- 0.01 (0.00) 0.01 (0.00)
Maintained/ -- 0.82 (0.33) 0.82 (0.33) -- 1.30 (0.53) 1.30 (0.53)
Disturbed Roadside
Fresh Water Marsh
0.06 (0.02) --
0.06 (0.02)
0.08 (0.03)
0.08 (0.03)
Turkey Creek -- -- 0.10 (0.04) -- -- 0.12 (0.05)
Total 0.06 (0.02) 1.25 (0.50) 1.41(0.56) 0.08 (0.03) 1.51(0.61) 1.71(0.69)
Note: Values cited are in acres (hectazes).
Plant communities found within the proposed project area serve as nesting and sheltering habitat for
various wildlife species. Replacing Bridge No. 52 and its associated improvements may reduce habitat
for some faunal species. However, due to the size and scope of this project, it is anticipated that
impacts to fauna will be minimal.
Areas cleared by construction (but not paved) will become road shoulders and early succession habitat.
Reduced habitat will displace some wildlife further from the roadway while attracting other wildlife by
the creation of an early succession habitat. Animals temporarily displaced by construction activities
may repopulate areas suitable for the species.
Aquatic communities are sensitive to even small changes in their environment. Stream charmelization,
scouring, siltation, sedimentation, and erosion from project-related work would affect water quality and
North Carolina Department ojTransportation TIP B-3877 June 2001
The LandMark Design Group, Inc. Project No. 1960014-307.00 Page 8

biological constituents. Although direct impacts may be temporary, environmental impacts from these
construction processes may result in long term or irreversible effects.
Impacts often associated with in-stream construction include increased channelization and scouring of
the streambed. In-stream construction alters the stream substrate and may remove streamside
vegetation at the site. Disturbances to the substrate will produce siltation, which in excessive amounts
can clog the gills and/or feeding mechanisms of benthic organisms (sessile filter-feeders and deposit-
feeders), fish, and amphibian species. Benthic organisms could also be covered by excessive amounts
of sediment. These organisms are slow to recover or repopulate a stream. Due to the negative effects
of siltation, it is recommended that silt curtains be used during construction.
The removal of streamside vegetation and placement of fill material at the construction site alters the
terrain. Alterations of the streambank can enhance the likelihood of erosion and sedimentation.
Revegetation stabilizes and holds the soil thus mitigating these processes. Erosion and sedimentation
carry soils, toxic compounds, and other materials into aquatic communities at the construction site.
These processes increase turbidity and can cause the formation of sandbars at the site and downstream,
thereby altering water flow and the growth of vegetation. Streamside clearing also leads to more direct
sunlight penetration and to elevations of water temperatures that may impact some species. Based on
the potential for increased sedimentation, it is recommended that silt curtains be used during
construction.
4.0 JURISDICTIONAL TOPICS
This section provides descriptions, inventories, and impact analysis pertinent to two important issues;
"Waters of the United States" and rare and protected species.
4.1 Waters of the United States
Surface waters and jurisdictional wetlands fall under the broader category of "Waters of the United
States as defined in 22 CFR Part 328.3. Any action that proposes to dredge or place fill material into
surface waters or adjacent wetlands falls under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(COE) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Surface waters include all standing
or flowing waters that have commercial or recreational value to the public. Wetlands are identified
based on the presence of hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and saturated or flooded conditions
during all or part of the growing season.
4.1.1 Impacts to Wetlands and Surface Waters
Potential wetland communities were investigated pursuant to the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual. The three-parameter approach is used where hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation,
and prescribed hydrologic characteristics must all be present for an area to be considered a wetland.
There are Fresh Water Marsh wetlands in the project area located on an island within Turkey Creek.
The total area of wetlands permanently impacted is 0.08 ac (0.03 ha) for alternate 1 and 2. Temporary
wetland impacts occur only in alternate 2. These temporary impacts tota10.06 ac (0.02 ha).
North Carolina Department of Transportation TIP B-3877 June 2001
Tire LcrndMark Design Group, Inc. Project No. 1960024-307.00 Page 9

Turkey Creek is a jurisdictional surface water under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC
1344). Discussion of the biological, physical, and water quality aspects of all surface waters in the
project azea aze presented in previous sections of this report. The total area of surface water impacts to
Turkey Creek from alternates 1 and 2 aze 0.12 ac (0.05 ha). Temporary azea impacts to Turkey Creek
from the on-site detour of alternate 2 aze 0.10 ac (0.04 ha). Additionally, 80.00 lineaz ft (24.391ineaz
m) of Turkey Creek will be impacted in alternates 1 and 2.
Usually, project construction does not require the entire ROW, therefore actual surface water
impacts may be considerably less.
4.1.2 Permits
As described above, impacts to jurisdictional surface waters aze anticipated from the proposed project.
As a result, construction activities will require permits and certifications from various regulatory
agencies charged with protecting the water quality of public water resources.
Nationwide Permit 23 (33 CFR 330.5(a) (23)) is likely to be applicable for all impacts to "Waters of
the United States" resulting from the proposed project. This permit authorizes activities undertaken,
assisted, authorized, regulated, funded, or financed in whole or part by another federal agency or
department where that agency or department has determined that pursuant to the Council on
Environmental Quality regulation for implementing the procedural provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act,
• the activity, work, or dischazge is categorically excluded from environmental documentation
because it is included within a category of actions which neither individually nor cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment, and
• the office of the Chief of Engineers has been furnished notice of the agency's or department's
application for the categorical exclusion and concurs with that determination.
A Nationwide Permit 33 may be required if the construction plans require a temporary causeway.
This project will also require a 401 Water Quality Certification from the DWQ prior to the issuance of
the Nationwide Permit. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act requires that the state issue or deny water
certification for any federally permitted or licensed activity that may result in a dischazge to "Waters of
the United States." Section 401 Certification allows surface waters to be temporarily impacted for the
duration of the construction or other land manipulation. The issuance of a 401 permit from the DWQ
is a prerequisite to issuance of a Section 404 permit.
Projects located within the Taz-Pamlico River Basin aze subject to the Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules,
administered by the DWQ. These rules address loss of stream channel buffers for field verified streams
appearing on the USGS Topographic Quad and/or the NRCS Soil Survey. Bridge construction is
allowable provided that there are "no practical alternatives." As this bridge replacement project is
currently proposed, it is allowable under the Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules. However, a written
authorization is required from the DWQ. A request to the DWQ for the authorization should be
included in the cover letter of the permit application package.
North Carolina Department of Transportation TIP B-3877 June 2001
The LandMark Design Group, Inc. Project No. 1960024-307.00 Page 10

4.1.3 Bridge Demolition
Bridge No. 52 is located on State Road 1101 over Turkey Creek in Nash County. The superstructure is
composed of a timber floor on I-beams, timber piles with concrete caps, and a steel crutch. The bridge
is proposed to be removed without dropping any of the components into "Waters of the United States:'
As demolition and construction activities may temporarily raise turbidity levels, a silt curtain is
recommended during the associated periods of disturbance within or adjacent to Turkey Creek.
4.1.4 Mitigation
The COE has adopted, through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), a wetland mitigation
policy which embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and sequencing. The purpose of this
policy is to restore and maintain the chemical, biological, and physical integrity of "Waters of the
United States," specifically wetlands. Mitigation of wetland impacts has been defined by the CEQ to
include avoiding impacts (to wetlands), minimising impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over
time, and compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20). Each of these three aspects (avoidance,
minimization, and compensatory mitigation) must be considered sequentially.
4.1.4.1 Avoidance
Avoidance mitigation examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting impacts to
"Waters of the United States: ' According to a 1990 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the COE, in determining "appropriate and practicable"
measures to offset unavoidable impacts, such measures should be appropriate to the scope and degree
of those impacts and practicable in terms of cost, existing technology, and logistics in light of overall
project purposes.
4.1.4.2 Minimization
Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and practicable steps to reduce the adverse
impacts to "Waters of the United States: ' Implementation of these steps will be required through
project modifications and permit conditions. Minimization typically focuses on decreasing the
footprint of the proposed project through the reduction of median widths, ROW widths, fill slopes,
and/or road shoulder widths. Other practical mechanisms to minimize impacts to "Waters of the
United States" crossed by the proposed project include: strict enforcement of sedimentation control
BMP's for the protection of surface waters during the entire life of the project; reduction of clearing
and grubbing activity; reduction/elimination of direct discharge into streams; reduction of runoff
velocity; re-establishment of vegetation on exposed azeas; judicious pesticide and herbicide usage;
minimization of "in-stream" activity; and litter/debris control.
4.1.4.3 Compensatory Mitigation
Compensatory mitigation is not normally considered until anticipated impacts to "Waters of the United
States" have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. It is recognized that "no
net loss of wetlands" functions and values may not be achieved in each and every permit action.
North Carolina Department of Transportation TIP B-3877 June 2001
The LandMark Design Group. Inc. Project No. 1960024-307.00 Page 11

Appropriate and practicable compensatory mitigation is required for unavoidable adverse impacts that
remain after all appropriate and practicable minimization has been performed. Compensatory actions
often include restoration, creation, and enhancement of "Waters of the United States." Such actions
should be undertaken in areas adjacent to or contiguous to the discharge site whenever possible.
Compensatory mitigation is required for those projects authorized under Nationwide Permits that result
in the fill or alteration of:
• More than 1.00 ac (0.40 ha) of wetlands;
• And/or more than 150.00 linear ft (45.72 m) of streams.
The impacts from this project do not meet the minimum mitigation thresholds. Therefore, no
mitigation requirement is anticipated. However, fmal pernut/mitigation decisions rest with the COE.
4.2 Rare and Protected Species
Some populations of flora and fauna have been in, or aze in, the process of decline either due to natural
forces or their inability to coexist with human activities. Federal law (under the provisions of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended) requires that any action, likely to adversely affect a
species classified as federally protected, be subject to review by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS). Other species may receive additional protection under sepazate state laws.
4.2.1 Federally Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed
Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) aze protected under the provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of 12 Apri12001, the FWS lists the
following federally protected species for Nash County. A brief description of the characteristics and
habitat requirements for these species along with a conclusion regarding potential project impacts
follows Table 3.
Table 3. Federall Protected S ecies for Nash Coun
Scie' c N~me~ ~~ ~'` '~' Common Name _.~ Fe _eral Status
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded woodpecker Endangered
Alasmidonta heterodon Dwarf wedge mussel Endangered
Elliptio steinsta»sana Tar River spinymussel Endangered
Endangered is defined as a species that is threatened with extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
Picoides borealis (red-cockaded woodpecker) Endangered
Animal Family: Picidae
Date Listed: 13 October 1970
The red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) once occurred from New Jersey to southern Florida and west to
eastern Texas. It occurred inland in Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Missouri. The
RCW is now found only in coastal states of its historic range and inland in southeastern Oklahoma and
southern Arkansas. In North Carolina moderate populations occur in the sandhills and southern coastal
June 2001
North Carolina Department of Transportation TIP B-3877 Page 12
The LandMark Design Group, Inc. Project No. 1960024-307.00

plain. The few populations found in the Piedmont and northern coastal plain aze believed to be relics
of former populations.
The adult RCW has a plumage that is entirely black and white except for small red streaks on the sides
of the nape in the male. The back of the RCW is black and white with horizontal stripes. The breast
and underside of this woodpecker aze white with streaked flanks. The RCW has a lazge, white cheek
patch surrounded by the black cap, nape, and throat.
The RCW uses open, old growth stands of southern pines, particularly longleaf pine (Pinus palustris),
for foraging and nesting habitat. A forested stand must contain at least 50% pine, lack a thick
understory, and be contiguous with other stands to be appropriate habitat for the RCW. These birds
nest exclusively in trees that are greater than 60 yeazs old and are contiguous with pine stands at least
30 yeazs of age. The foraging range of the'RCW is up to 500.00 ac (202.34 ha). This acreage must be
contiguous with suitable nesting sites.
These woodpeckers nest exclusively in living pine trees and usually in trees that aze infected with the
fungus that causes red-heart disease. Cavities are located in colonies from 12.00 to 100.00 ft (3.66 to
30.48 m) above the ground and average 30.00 to 50.00 ft (9.14 to 15.24 m) high. .They can be
identified by a large incrustation of running sap that surrounds the tree. The incrustation of sap is
believed to be used as a defense by the RCW against possible predators. A colony of woodpeckers
usually consists of one breeding pair and the offspring from previous yeazs. The RCW lays its eggs in
April, May, and June; the eggs hatch approximately 38 days later. Clutch size ranges in number from
three to five eggs. All members of the colony share the raising of the young. Red-cockaded
woodpeckers feed mainly on insects but may feed on seasonal wild fruits.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Open pine stands do not exist within the project azea, therefore, the habitat requirements for RCWs are
not met. The North Cazolina Natural Heritage Program database was reviewed on 29 Mazch 2001 and
there were no records of existing populations of RCW in the project azea. No habitat for RCWs exists
in the project area. Thus, no impacts to RCWs will occur from project construction.
Alasmidonta heterodon (Dwarf wedge mussel) Endangered
Animal Family: Unionidae
Date Listed: 14 March 1990
The dwarf wedge mussel is a small mussel having a distinguishable shell noted by two lateral teeth on
the right half and one on the left half. The periostracum (outer shell) is olive green to dazk brown in
color and the nacre (inner shell) is bluish to silvery white.
Known populations of the dwarf wedge mussel in North Carolina aze found in Middle Creek and the
Little River of the Neuse River Basin and in the upper Tar River and Cedar, Crooked, and Stoney
Creeks of the Taz River system. The dwarf wedge mussel inhabits creek and river areas with a slow to
moderate current and a sand, gravel, or muddy bottom. This mussel is sensitive to agricultural,
domestic, and industrial pollutants and requires a stable silt free stream bed with well oxygenated water
to survive.
North Carolina Department ojTransportation TIP B-3877 June 2001
The LandMark Design Group, Inc. Project No. 1960024-307.00 Page 13

BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION:
UNRESOLVED
The North Cazolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database reviewed on 29 March 2001 contains
records of existing populations of the Dwarf wedge mussel in the vicinity of the project area. Surveys
for mussels will be conducted by the North Carolina Department of Transportation.
Elliptio steinstansana (Tar River spinymussel) Endangered
Animal Family: Unionidae
Date Listed: 29 July 1985
The Tar River spinymussel is endemic to the Tar River drainage basin, from Falkland in Pitt
County to Spring Hope in Nash County. Populations of the Tar River spinymussel can be
found in streams of the Tar River Drainage Basin and of the Swift Creek Drainage Sub-Basin.
This mussel requires a stream with fast flowing, well oxygenated, relatively silt free,
circumneutral pH water, and a stream bottom composed of uncompacted gravel and coazse
sand. This mussel is known to rely on some species of freshwater fish as a intermediate hosts
for its larvae.
The Taz River spinymussel is a very small mussel named for spines which project
perpendiculazly from its surface and curve slightly ventrally. As many as 12 spines can be
found on the shell which is generally smooth in texture. The nacre is pinkish (anterior) and
bluish-white (posterior).
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION:
UNRESOLVED
The North Cazolina National Heritage Program (NHP) database on 29 March 2001 contains no
records of existing populations of the Tar River spinymussel in the project area. Surveys for
mussel populations will be conducted by the North Cazolina Department of Transportation.
4.2.2 Federal Species of Concern and State Listed Species
There are eight Federal Species of Concern listed by the FWS for Nash County. Federal Species of
Concern aze not afforded federal protection under the Endangered Species Act and are not subject to
any. of its provisions, including Section 7, until they are formally proposed or listed as Threatened or
Endangered. However, the status of these species is subject to change, and so should be included for
consideration. Federal Species of Concern (FSC) are defined as a species that is under consideration
for listing but for which there is insufficient information to support listing. In addition, organisms,
which are listed as Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or Special Concern (SC) by the North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program list of Rare Plant and Animal Species, aze afforded state protection under the
NC State Endangered Species Act and the NC Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979.
Table 4 lists federal species of concern, the state status of these species (if afforded state protection),
and the potential for suitable habitat in the project area for each species. This species list is provided
for information purposes as the protection status of these species may be upgraded in the future.
North Carolina Department of Transportation TIP B-3877 June 2001
The LandMark Design Group, Inc. Project No. 1960024-307.00 Page 14

Surveys for these species were not conducted during the site visit, nor were any of these species
observed. A review of the NCNHP database on 29 March 2001 of raze species and unique habitats
revealed records of Cazolina least trillium (Trillium Pusillium var. pusillium), a federal species of
concern, and Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni), a federal species of concern, within 1.00 mi (1.61
lan) of the project study azea.
Table 4. Federal Species of Concern for Nash Coun
~
~ ~, ,~ _ Com~an~lau~e r ~ -
`.~:
~
a " _ gate _
J
. tiatlitvat
~.~~r ,n -
;~
~ ~ ~tatus Preseat
f~~.
Lythrurus matutinus ~
Pinewoods shiner SR* * Yes
Elliptio lanceolata Yellow lance T Yes
Fusconaia masoni Atlantic pigtoe T Yes
Lampsilis cariosa Yellow lampmussel T Yes
Lasmigona subviridis Green floater E Yes
Speyeria diana Diana fritillary butterfly SR* * Yes
Lilium iridollae Sandhills bog lily T* No
Trillium pusillum var. pusillum Carolina least trillium E Yes
"E"-An Endangered species is one- whose continued existence as a viable component of the State's flora and fauna is
determined to be in jeopardy.
"T"-A Threatened species is one which is likely to become endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all
or a significant portion of its range.
"SR"--A Significantly Rare species is one which is very rare in North Carolina, generally with 1-20 populations in the state,
generally substantially reduced in numbers by habitat destruction, direct exploitation or disease. The species is
generally more common elsewhere in its range, occurring peripherally in North Carolina.
* -Historic record -the species was last observed in the county more than 20 years ago.
**-Obscure record -the date the species was last observed is uncertain.
North Carolina Department of Transportation TIP B-3877 June 2001
The LcrndMark Design Group, Inc. Project No. 1960024-307.00. Page 1 S

5.0 REFERENCES
American Ornithologists' Union. 1983. Check-List of North American Birds (6th ed.). Lawrence,
Kansas, Allen Press, Inc.
Amoroso, J.L. and A.S. Weakley. 1999. Natural Heritage Program List of the Raze Plant Species of
North Cazolina. North Cazolina Natural Heritage Program. Raleigh, N.C.
Cowazdin, Lewis M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classifications of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. U.S. Government
Printing Office, Washington D.C.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report
Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
Foote, L.E., S.B. Jones, Jr. 1989. Native Shrubs and Woody Vines of the Southeast. Portland,
Oregon, Timber Press.
LeGrand, Jr., H.E. and S.P. Hall. 1999. Natural Heritage Program List of the Raze Animal Species of
North Cazolina. North Cazolina Natural Heritage Program. Raleigh, N.C.
Martof, B.S., W.M. Palmer, J.R. Bailey and J.R. Harrison III. 1980. Amphibians and Reptiles of the
Cazolinas and Virginia. Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina Press.
NCDENR. 1999. Tar-Pamlico River Basinwide Water Quality Management Plan. Department of
Environment, and Natural Resources. Raleigh, N.C.
NCDEM. September 1999 Division of Pazks and Recreation. North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program Biological Conservation Database.
Palmer, Willliam M. and Alvin L. Braswell, 1995. Reptiles of North Carolina. Chapel Hill, The
University of North Carolina Press.
Pennak, R.W. 1989. Fresh-water Invertebrate of the United States, 3`d. John Wiley. and Sons, Inc.
Potter, E.F., J.F. Parnell and R.P. Teulings. 1980. Birds of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, The University
of North Cazolina Press.
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles and G.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vasculaz Flora of the Carolinas.
Chapel Hill, The University of North Cazolina Press.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Cazolina.
Third Approximation. North Cazolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, NCDEHNR. Raleigh, N.C.
North Carolina Department of Transportation TlP B-3877 June 2001
The LandMark Design Group, Inc. Project No. 1960024-307.00 Page 16

USDA. 1989. Soil Survey of Nash County, North Cazolina, NRCS. US Department of Agriculture,
Soil Conservation Service.
Webster, W.D., J.F. Parnell and W.C. Biggs. 1985. Mammals of the Carolinas, Virginia and
Maryland. Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina Press.
North Carolina Department of Transportation TIP B-3877 June 2001
The LandMark Design Group, Inc. Project No. 1960024-307.00 Page 17

BUCKHORN ~"
RESERVO%R '~'
North Carolina Department of
Transportation
Division of Highways
~ Project Development f~'
.~ Environmental Analysis
Nash County
Replace Bridge No. 52 on SR ll01
Over Turkey Creek
B-3877
SCALE: 1 in = 1 mi Figure 1

a
a
D
~_
it

.,. e.. ... _ ~. ~_
~~
c'
__ .. e"` ~
/G'l
is~'\
M
~~~
~~~
Q
¢ ~ ~~~ ~ ;,
CD ~~ ~i
-{' ~7 ~ t ?~ f!) 'O
~ ~ X ~W Cf3 ~_ 'L3 4'
LU ~ N ~ 4v cD ~. (~}
tD n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CQ
3 ~.Y.~ tU ~ ~ vy a 4~f
`.- ~ ~ ~ ~,
a, ~ ~ ,{ ~
N ~
a
W ~
t:7
v
~~;:.:

J,'
rr•

~
_
~~^
~ V

.
. ~ ~,,,
to ~ ~° Q7

~

^ ~
C~'1 "~
N
_
__
___.

k .. ,.
-., ..
_. _ ~ ,. .
~_ ~,~~
~' ~;,
~,£
~
.

~ .
~
~`
~, ;~

.. .
r,
~-

:

-
~
~
~
., ~~ ~.
~, ~ ,.
e

'
,~.,~
~~ ~
a
..

..
__

~~
,~_
~-

._v_
~~~`
'`
-
., ~.. ;_
~,~
<'
,,

~
~ ~ 1
,~
6 „
~ ~ ~_ _ r z _ ,~
~
~~ _
,~

v ; „ ~~ ~~
,.. ~ e .. r., ~" d f~ ~
$R~,9
&~
~~
6 E
a
3
~~
~~
~,.
Q
y
~_ ~
~. f
.~. a
E~
{{E
l~
t
TF N
!'~
I
~~
~_
~_
ry~
4./
O
N
~.
~_
Q.
4J
0
Cl
S
{~
{
Q
V/
,~~Sy.
0
.~.
o ~
M
Q.

~•
~" ~Y
•
~, ~ -~
t~..a '~7
t~D ~ CQ
W
tJ1 ```~
h?

r~~,
j.

~.~~~ tact xs ~ zs ~K~ -t~ ~~t~~t
~~ ,
~~ _ ~x_. ~ ~ ~, ~ .~:

December 4, 2000
MEMORANDUM
TO: Robin Young
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, DOT
FROM: Stephen Hall
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets -Replace Bridge No. 52 over Turkey Creek
REFERENCE: B-3877
The Natural Heritage Program database contains records for the following species from the
reach of Turkey Creek in the vicinity of the proposed bridge replacement:
• ~ Dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon), federally and state listed as Endangered
• /Atlantic,, pigtoe (Fusconaia masont~, state listed as Threatened (proposed as
Endangered) and a federal Species of Concern
• tate listed as Threatened
• ,state listed as Threatened
• ,state listed as Special Concern (proposed as
Threatened)
• ,state listed as Special Concern
• ,proposed for state listing as Special Concern
• No c es ca 's), proposed for state listing as
Special Concern and a federal Species of Concern
During the construction phase of this project, these species may be adversely affected by both
siltation and toxicity resulting from wet. concrete coming into contact with the water.
Following completion of the project, they will remain vulnerable to spills of hazardous
materials and to pollutant laden runoff for the lifetime of the crossing.
Due to the potential for unpacts to a federally listed species, the US Fish and Wildlife Service
should be consulted. We also recommend that the NC Nongame and Endangered Wildlife
Program be consulted about the possibilities for avoidance or minimization of impacts to the state
listed species.

~.

e.s SWEv
r w
aiw+
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Archives and History
January 16, 2001 Jeffrey J. Crow, Direexor
MEMORANDUM
To: William D. Gilmore, PE, Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
From: David Brook ~\ .1.~ +'~~ ~ -
De u State Hist~reservation Officer
p ty -
Re: Replacement of Bridge No. 52 on SR 1101 over Turkey Creek,
TIP No. B-3877, Nash County, ER 01-7929
On December 5, 2000, April Montgomery of our staff met with the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) staff for a meeting of the minds concerning the above project.. She reported
our available information on historic architectural and archaeological surveys and resources along with our
recommendations. NCDOT provided project area photographs and aerial photographs at the meeting.
Based upon our review of the photographs and the information discussed at the meeting, we offer our
preliminary comments regarding this project.
In terms of historic architectural resources we are aware of no historic structures located within the area of
potential effect. We recommend that no historic architectural survey be conducted for this project.
There are no known archaeological sites within the project area. Based on our present knowledge of the
area, it is unlikely that any archaeological resources which may be eligible for inclusion in the National
Register of Historic Places, will be affected by the project construction. We, therefore, recommend that
no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project.
Having provided this information, we look forward to the receipt of either a Categorical Exclusion or
Environmental Assessment, which indicates how NCDOT addressed our comments.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have any questions concerning the above
comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, Environmental Review. Coordinator,
at 919 733-4763.
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
Administration 507 N. Blount St, Raleigh 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4617 (919) 733x1763.715-8653
Restoration 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh 4613 Mail Scrvice Center, Raleigh 27699-4613 [phone].715-4801
Survcy Ft Planning 515 N. Blount St, Ralcigh 461 R Mail Scrvicc Ccntcr, Ralcigh 27699-4618 [phone].715-4801

`~'er'~ts
N r ~ ~,
~• 1~
`ilw.vs~
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPART~~NT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
MEMORANDUM TO: Project File
January 16, 2001
FROM: Robin C. Young
Project Planning Engineer
DAVID McCoY
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: B-3877, Nash County, Replacement ~of Bridge No. 52 on SR 1101 over
Turkey Creek, State Project 8.2322201, FA Project BRZ-1101 (7)
A scoping meeting for the subject bridge was held in the Roadway Design Unit Conference
Room in the Century Center on December 5, 2000. The following people were in attendance:
Ben Brown
Jerome Nix
D. Andre Davenport
Mack Bailey
Jason Moore
Raymond Goodman, III
Jessica Kuse
Derek Bradner
Hydraulics
Hydraulics
Structure Design
Structure Design
Roadway Design
Right of Way
Traffic Control
Location & Surveys
April Montgomery State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
Elizabeth Lusk Project Development & Environmental Analysis-Natural Systems
Robin Young Project Development & Environmental Analysis
The following comments were either given at the meeting or received:
Hydraulics recommended the existing bridge be replaced with a new 130 foot (39.6
meter) long bridge at approximately the same location and elevation as the existing bridge. To
facilitate deck drainage, at least a 0.3% roadway gradient should be used on the new bridge. If
an on-site detour is considered, it would require a 100 foot (30 meter) bridge located downstream
(south) of the existing bridge. The elevation of the temporary detour bridge can be
approximately 3 feet (1 meter) lower than the existing bridge.
State Historic Preservation Office, April Montgomery, commented there is no need for
either an Architectural or Archaeology survey.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION• ~,
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH VNLMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWIN.DOFI.DOT.STA7P.NC.US RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548

Location & Surveys commented there is an overhead utility line along the south side of
SR 1101. There is an underground telephone line along the north side of SR 1101 which goes
aerial to cross the creek. The horizontal alignment and vertical alignments are good. It is
recommended to place a new structure on the existing location and utilize anoff--site detour.
Division 4 Construction Engineer, Wendy Oglesby, recommends anoff-site detour based
on the low traffic volume and good condition of the proposed detour route. The proposed detour
route utilizes SR 1100, SR 1131, SR 1113, and SR 1111. SR 1131 has one structure that is
posted 17 tons for single vehicles and 24 tons for truck-tractor semi-trailers. The existing
alignment has a sharp curve and grade drop in the alignment on the east approach. It is
recommended this be modified in the new design, if possible.
The Natural Systems Specialist of PDEA stated there are wetlands on each side of the
bridge. This project is located in the Neuse River Basin and the Buffer Rules will apply. An off-
site detour is recommended.
Comments from the Wildlife Resource Commission will be available in the near future.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Existing Bridge
Bridge No. 52, built in 1950 is 121 feet (36.8 meters) long with a clear deck width of 19.1
feet (5.8 meters). According to Bridge Maintenance Unit records, the sufficiency rating of the
bridge is 38.7 out of a possible 100 with an estimated 5 years of useful remaining life. Presently
the bridge is posted with weight restrictions of 16 tons for single vehicles and 20 tons for truck-
tractor semi-trailers.
Traffic Information
SR 1101 is a Rural Local Route with a speed limit of 55 mph (90 kmh) in the vicinity of
the bridge. The current ADT is 230 vph (vehicles per day) and the projected 2025 ADT is 700
vph. Approximately 2% of the traffic are dual trucks and 1 % of the traffic are truck-tractor semi-
trailers.
The Traffic Engineering Branch indicates that no accidents have been reported during a
recent 3-year period in the vicinity of the project.
This section of SR 1101 is not a designated bicycle route nor is it listed in the TIP as
needing incidental bicycle accommodations.
Bus Information
According to the Nash-Rocky Mount School System, this road has 5 school bus trips per
day.
B-3877 Page 2 of 3

Emergency Management Services (EMSI
According to Nash County 911 Supervisor, a volunteer fire department in Middlesex and
an ambulance from Bailey aze the responders in this azea.
New Cross Section
Due to some inconsistencies between the 1994 Green Book and the Roadway Design
Unit Design Manual, Roadway Design will be responsible for choosing the appropriate reference
and indicating their choice in their cost estimate.
Proiect Information
Categorical Exclusion document is due January 2002.
Right of Way is scheduled for January 2003.
Construction Let Date is scheduled for Januazy 2004.
DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATES
We anticipate the completion of the preliminary design and cost estimates by June 2001.
Alternate 1: Replace Bridge No. 52 with a new 130 foot (39.6 meter) long bridge at
approximately the same location and roadway elevation as the existing bridge.
Traffic. will be maintained off-site, along surrounding roads during construction
Alternate 2: Replace Bridge No. 52 with a new 130 foot (39.6 meter) long bridge at
approximately the same location and roadway elevation as the existing bridge.
Traffic will be maintained using a temporary on-site detour located to the south of
the existing bridge during construction. The temporary detour bridge will be
approximately 100 feet (30 meters) in length.
B-3877 Page 3 of 3 ~

;-, t ~
..,=..,
~~.~ c. ~... ~C
•
' ^"n ~5 Es.ET (c t h ZrERS iON
4 JF
~
..
~
• -~laSln •
,'3511
• County
iri 0 1
'
project Name:.
. sR~tvt
,leanest Road: O.p ate.- r
Date:
i~-15 f-+
Wetland Width (ft),:
i e
diet land Area (ac ~ ~ v~cl~~ -
ljY1l'~" .~c~la--!/1 ~~E~~. Cn~Y 1 Wo
of Evaluator(s)=---
Name Adjacent Land Use:
SVet~ a Location:
ary
t (Within 1/2 mi upstream,
dius)
u
on sound or es
r Iake
g ~,
uoslope, or ra
/ f crested/natural veo, 1U .o
pan
o
aI stream
on perenni ~
-~"
agriculture/urbanized "its
~
_
intermittent stream -~' impervious surface _1.j__
_ on,
~rithin interstream divide Adjacent •5~ecial Na,ural Areas
other ~•
Q •"b~ Ci an
.Ce
~w~-~ ') ~ Dacn-•---i n~,
u
~~ti,ad kCC ~
•
v
~w
`
F" ..
~~
v
~
'
'
~
Soil Series y~~
predocniaanciY C.'~=.._-- •
:
(~)
(3) -~(Y10.U1
- muck or peace)
(humus,
ureccminantly mineral (rc

n-sandy ~~oodins and ~Vetness
predomi::ant ly sa;,dr ~ ipermanent ly to
°
_
¢ermanently Lloonea
~,, -rant is Fac_ to=s_ inundated

h=°":cis._ seasonally iloaded or
ter
-
Z
.--
f_os
y:a
f ste°-? tapoora=`ny
r chaiineli_e=
'
d r inundated
/ ~ 'v f loodee or
intermitte._t~.
tc e
d~ o
> 10
total wetland width - _
0 Beet.
temporary surface water
no evidence of flooding ar
Wei ~ ~r_-:ne (se! ec: aaP}= sur:aca w~;.ter '
i~reJ1.
Gvaf
r
~nlana ~'~-rQi
_ Ectto. paa/: en
S:sa:ac Forest ~ea:~t;;ate: zcr°st
_
Carolina Day
- z ---est
„c_ -~~
_ =ocosin
Savannah - -phameral Yet land .
Fite
_
:eshc~ater Marsh Other: or
liec. tc saLt cr prac?sish ma=sties
~ t, .- v C3ni C
h~ rat lnS SfSt _.,t
~*^ b~ app.
,
s trea:a charnels - DE:d RATING
'1

~rlATER STORAGE
~ - 4 _ . C? d -
OO - ~-
~
.: . .
x .
... _ .. .
~ILS~ATTON 5
;•;:{% ShOP.EL II~iE STt.E - ~,~. (~ O
9A
,
rOLLL'TA,`iT gF;.(OVAL ~ . - - .. , t70
•:
~ X 2.00 -
'tJLIFE gA3iTr1T
WIL t70
~
- •
~ x 4.00 =
tQi]P_TIC LIFE VALUE : t7

ECREATION/EDUCATION
F rjIQ,UC7
, 'YET L A,YD S CO ItE _ _-----
•
' (TOTAL
>i0 d nanpoint 6ist~_'hanc`
d
' e ~:
• L point if in s-n~•
l
Add ~•v: watershed an
~+ radius. _
slope, or
`
=
'
i
_ , i-s mi to u~scre- ?
.
•,
~

OATH fORH
aaurlNE uETCAxD oETEa„TNATTON .
(1987 CCE wetlands Delineation Marxist)
?ro;ect~Site- 13-3$~'i -- Date: y liq 1 o t
Applicant/Owner- 1 [~ ~ A~ [~ County: NQ-~~
Investigator: U)~.~ti~~ C.~Vhll~, ~TI r~V! JYl/lE'i~~ ~.t~~c Y[ yVa~{~. State: N~.•
Do Normal Circcrostances exist as the site? "~ No Comacatiicy ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes ~ Trarssect ID: ~-~'
Is the area a potrntia[ Problaa Area? Yes ~ Plot I0:
(If needed, explain on reverse.3
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratus Indicator Dominant Plant Species '.Stratum Indicator
~_ ~~~~ Y'Y~ctDl ter ~ ~g~ 9_ 'black 1nau1 Snob ~~U

3. 1Q1~G11/le~rC ~noVltV~t~i~lnwlu~~_ ~~. ~ .
-r
4. ~I~Lkhe-~ru ~
C=
~
,2.
t
n
S.~~IV1~~ 1>VIV~'~ C,~~~. t'C~~, 13. .

z. C~SI,'1 ~ C,1N ,s. - .
8. 1i2a'; ~ ~ -kit i 1. ht I~ _lZg~ ~6.

Percent of Dominant Species that are 08t, FACSJ and/or FAC: ~1~t Q
(excluding FAC-): I I C7 °
Remarks: ~ .
N1'OROIQGT
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs •
_ Other
No Recorded Data Available ,~
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Vater: (in.)
Depth to Free water in Pit: (in.•)
Depth to Saturated Soil: _ ~ ~~ tin.)
Remarks: ~~a-IOW y~ti~~1S
wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ dater ?larks
/ Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterrss in lJetlarxis
Secorxiary Indicators (2 or more required):
• _ Oxidized Root Charnels in Upper 12 Inches
~/Nater-SCained Leavcs
_ Local Soit Survcy Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Eicplain in Remarks)

SOILS
Nap Uni t Name ~ ` A ,
Q
~~ p
~ I
~
~
1
~
(Series and Phase): VV
. ('0.
(
(1 Drainage Class:
Gl
,~~
" ~ field Observations .
)
7~ L ~IUVQ (
]
(
~
S
b
C
fi
T
d
u
group
: ~T
axonomy ( ,
,
.
on
rm Nappe
1 ;-
Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth ttatriz Color. Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Hansel[ Moist) S
~ Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc:
p-3
~oy.~ 513 -" ~ ~ ~ •Sav~d~ 5~1+ Ioa1M
~.5 5
3--] - or~.Yvti :c~a~
_
-t- - ~~`~~ X14 ~oy~51a ~ ~ - ~oa~mu t~aU
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosot Concretions
_
_ Histic Epipedon _
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in_Sandy Soils
'Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
• Atluic Moisture Regime _
listed on iota[ Hydric Soils List
_~ Reducing Conditions • _ listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or tau-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain. in R'einarks)
Remarks: .
r ~; ...
VETlAHD DETERHIHAT[ON
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Tes Ho (Circle)
Vetland Hydrology Present? Ye Ho
Hydric Soils Present? ' Yes Ho
Remarks:
• ~ •. <Circle)
`•~ ..
7s this Sa.~ling~Poini within a ttetland? Te Ho
'. ~Appraved b}' HOUSACE 3l92

L~Id 8T~OI SOOZ/Zi/S
£689-££L (6T6) =X~3
i~096-E£L (6Z6) =auoudaZay
09ZZ-~09LZ CIS 'LTb?atp2i
05Z a~rng ' •pnTg aa.z~cta.z~ ZZ£Z
Arun bur~~ruizaa uo?~~~zodsu2zy
~~rT~n~} za~~M ~o uorsrn?Q ~N
II ~sr-t~roadg Z~•~uaunzoz?nug
uaa.zg ~u?~s?zu~
• aui ~o~~uoo o~ aaz~ jaa~ suo?~sanb Iu2 an~eLt no1C pZnoLtg • nom
xu~uy •pToLt uo uo?~~orTdd~ ~?uizad s?Ltd end o~ an2r~ TT?~n I 'xaa~n P LI?Lt~TM uo?~~tu.zo~u?
s?u~ an?aoaz you op I ~I •uzatt~ uo 9gL050 # ~SMQ aLt~ Lt~rnn s~aaus pas?naz auk
~o sardoo 5 puas as~atd •uor~~iuzo~u? pas?naz s?tt~ anraoaz I s~ uoos s~ uor~ao?~?~zao
aLt~ ur ~r end osj~ jjTM I ~nct 'srr~~ bu?pz~baz suo?~sanb ~Cu~ an~Lt noA ~? Assauuag
ugor r~~?n~ x~ads as~a-tg •~oaCozd zar?~ou~ uo asn o~ ~oaCozd s?tt~ zoo ~rpazo uo?~2br~?iu
anraaaz u~o no~C ~~tT~ az~~n~ aq as~ajd 'osT~ •spzooaz zno zoo uot~~uizo~ur aLt~ paau a~n
~nct 'as~o s?Ltd u? 3o azau~ xo~T .zo 'uor~~br~?ui ~oa33~ you Tjrn~ ~I •su~Td auk s2 TTa~n
s2 ~aaus ~o~dui? ar?~ uo ~uau~urzad uioz~ pa~~z~das act ptnous s~o~dui? eCz~zoduiay • ~aar~s
I.z~umms ~o~dui? .za~~nct auk uo 'za~~nq auk o~ abp?zct ~t.zoM tC.z~zoduia~ auk uioz~ s~a~dui?
apnTou? as~aTd '~aaCozd anoct~ arty zog •suor~~arTdd~ ~?uizad n~a?naz zatt bu?dTau ui~ I
buraq aui?~ att~ zo,3 •an~aT R~ruza~~iu uo sr arts aT?Ltn~ suorsrn?p zar~ nano bu?~{~~ act ZZ?[~n
I pug 'ZSMQ ~~ uostuoLty ?xx?N u~?M bu?xzoM tug I pug 'uaazct ~ur~s?zuo s? aun?u ~~u '?g
' s r.zq~
sn•au•a~~~s•~op~xrequanua :oZ
000- 8S~Li~Oi SOOZ ~~I~ ZI `nu.L :a~~Q
«au•It~uzau~uaa.~q•~ui~suua> uaaag ~ut~stau~ :u~o.~,~
LL8£_g dI.L 'off us~N xaaz~ ~iax.~nZ nano i0i i 2IS uo ZS •oN a~pug ~o~ ££ 28 £Z t1A1~I :Iaafgns
i 3o i
••• qs~N xaal~ ,Cax.~nZ .nano TOi i 2iS uo ZS •oN a$PE.~g -TO3 ££ ~ £Z MrI

eaSfATpo
A ~~~
'~ ~"°
~~
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTT~NT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
May 2, 2005
Attn: Mr. Bill Biddlecome
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
C~ ~ -''
-:
o :~- ~ ~.
o F, ~.:. 9
y~'P ~" ~'
~o ~~ s
N~9~^
~9~'~. ~
~~
~~
LYNDO TIPP~TT
SECRETARY
,~ ....
P,~ ~'i'.'~~NT
:~; ,
~~~ ~~cE~v~®
~~.
N'
~ ... _. ,;
4 8 f .. _ ._-- -__ .~x~.r..
Q5
Subject:. Nationwide 23 & 33 Permit Application and Neuse Buffer
Certification. Replacement of Bridge No. 52 on SR 1101 (Claude
Lewis Road) over Turkey Creek, Nash County. Federal Aid Project No.~2~
BRZ-1101(7), State Project No. 8.2322201; TIl' Project No. B-3877.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace existing Bridge
No. 52 on SR 1101 (Claude Lewis Road) over Turkey Creek (DWQ Index # 27-86-3-(1), Class
"C; NSW ') in Nash County. The project involves replacing Bridge No. 52 approximately on the
existing alignment. Traffic, during construction, will be maintained with an offsite detour using
existing roads.
BRIDGE DEMOLITION
Bridge No. 52 is currently a 121-foot structure that consists of a superstructure composed of a
timber floor on I-beams, timber piles with concrete caps, and a steel crutch. Bridge No. 52 will
be removed without dropping any of the components into Waters of the United States.
Approximately 0.001 acres of temporary impacts are anticipated due to temporary fill in
wetlands for the bents supporting the temporary work bridge. No permanent fill impacts are
anticipated to occur in jurisdictional waters due to bridge demolition and construction activities.
The NCDOT will adhere to appropriate guidelines for bridge demolition and removal including
those presented in "Pre-Construction Guidelines for Bridge Demolition and Removal", "Policy:
Bridge Demolition and Removal in Waters of the United States", "Best Management Practices
for Bridge Demotion and Removal", and "Best Management Practices for the Protection of
Surface Waters".
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WW{N.DOH.DOT.STATENC.US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC

BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
Bridge No. 52, a 121-foot long structure, will be replaced with a new structure approximately
180 feet in length consisting of a 36-inch prestressed concrete girder superstructure with two 65-
foot spans and one 50-foot span. The substructure will consist of end bents on piles with the
interior portion on drill piers. The Let Date is November 15, 2005 with a review date of
September 27, 2005.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
Permanent Impacts: Permanent fill impacts are not anticipated to occur in Turkey Creek, or
jurisdictional waters, due to bridge demolition and construction activities. As part of the
construction process, a directional bore will be made underneath Turkey Creek for placement of
a utility line.
Temporary Impacts: 0.001 acres of temporary impacts are anticipated to due to temporary fill in
wetlands for the bents supporting the temporary work bridge. Temporary fill impacts aze not
anticipated to occur in Turkey Creek due to bridge demolition and construction activities. A
temporary work bridge will be constructed prior to demolition of the existing bridge and removed
when construction of the new bridge is completed.
TEMPORARY WORK BRIDGE
A temporary work bridge will be constructed to the south of the existing Bridge No. 52. This
bridge will be required to min;mi~e impacts to jurisdictional waters during bridge construction.
Temporary work bridge pile types and driving methods will be determined during construction
by the contractor. The work bridge will be constructed at the elevation and location as shown on
the permit drawings. Non-mechanized clearing will occur prior to temporary work bridge
construction. It is assumed that the contractor will begin construction of the proposed work
bridge shortly after the date of availability for the project.
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER RULES
This project is located in the Neuse River Basin (subbasin 03-04-07, NEU7 03020203), therefore
the Neuse River Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) apply. Buffer impacts associated with this
project total 1,678 sq. ft (0.039 acre) for Zone 1 and 1,927 sq. ft (0.044 acre) for Zone 2. All
practicable measures to m;n;m;~e impacts within buffer zones were followed in the bridge
design. Measures used to minimise impacts to the buffer zone include using the current
alignment. In addition, NCDOT proposes to remove the existing bridge abutment that was part of
a previous bridge, along with existing fill, and plant native riparian vegetation. Buffer
replacement associated with this project totals 2,974 sq. ft (0.068 acre) for Zone 1 and 358 sq. ft
(0.008 acre) for Zone 2. According to the buffer rules, bridges are ALLOWABLE. Uses
designated as allowable may proceed within the riparian buffer provided that there are no
practical alternatives to the requested use pursuant to Item (8) of this Rule. These uses require
written authorization from the Division of Water Quality, or the delegated local authority.
Therefore, NCDOT requests written authorization for a Buffer Certification from the Division of
Water Quality.
FEDERALLY-PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and .animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed
Endangered, and Proposed Threatened aze protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9
of the Endangered Species Act of 1952, as amended. As of February 25, 2003, the U.S. Fish and
B-3877 Page 2

Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists three federally protected species for Nash County (Table 1).
Biological Conclusions of "No Effect" were previously rendered for the red-cockaded
woodpecker, dwarf wedgemussel and Tar River spinymussel. These biological conclusions
remain valid.
Table 1. Federally-protected species of Nash County.
~ologi
Y':"
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded wood ecker Endan eyed No Effect
Alasmidonta heterodon Dwarf wed emussel Endan eyed No Effect
Elli do steinstansana Tar River in ussel Endan eyed No Effect
Endangered - is defined as a taxon that is threatened with extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Section 404 Permit: It is anticipated that the temporary work bridge extending across a small
portion of Turkey Creek will be authorized under Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33 (Temporary
Construction Access and Dewatering). We aze, therefore, requesting the issuance of a
Nationwide Permit 33 authorizing a temporary work bridge extending across a small portion of
Turkey Creek. All other aspects of this project are being processed by the Federal Highway
Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR § 771.115(b). The
NCDOT requests that these activities be authorized by a Nationwide Permit 23 (67FR pages
2020-2095; January 15, 2002).
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certifications numbers 3403 and 3366 will apply
to this project. In accordance with 15A NCAC 02H .0501(a) we are providing two copies of this
application to the North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources, Division
of Water Quality, for their records.
Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules: In accordance with 15A NCAC 02H .0501(a), NCDOT is
providing two copies of this application to the NC Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR), Division of Water Quality (DWQ) for review and issuance of a Neuse
Buffer Certification for impacts to Neuse Buffers in compliance with the Neuse Buffer Rules.
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the DOT website at:
http://www.ncdot.org/planning/pe/naturalunitlPermit.html. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact Chris Rivenbazk at [e-mail] or (919)
715-1460.
Sincerely,
I~~
ego J. Thorpe, Ph.D. Environmental Management Director,
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ (7 copies)
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Jim Trogdon, PE, Division 4 Engineer
Mr. Jamie Shern, DEO, Division 4
w/o attachment
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. Mazk Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Bill Goodwin, P.E., PDEA
B-3877 Page 3

Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
Q~~~~~
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 23 and 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: North Carolina Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699
Telephone Number: 919-523-7844 Fax Number: 919-715-1501
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 5 of 12

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps maybe included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 52 on SR 1101 (Claude Lewis Road over
Turkey Creek, Nash County
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-3877
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Nash Neazest Town: Bailey
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Located on SR 1101
approximately 'h mile north of Nash/Wilson County line, southwest of Bailey over Turkey
Creek
5. Site coordinates, if available (LJTM or Lat/Long): N35° 45.10' , W78° 09.59'
(Note = If project is lineaz, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that sepazately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): N/A
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Turkey Creek
8. River Basin: Neese River
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application SR 1101 is classified as a Rural Local Route, with
agricultural land dominant and scattered low density residential development.
Page 6 of 12

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Three span, 180-foot long bridge replacement using mechanical hi hway construction
equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Investigations by the Bridge Maintenance Unit
indicate that rehabilitation of the existing structures is not feasible due to current
deterioration and costs. Bride No. 52 carries a sufficienc~ating of 38.7 out of a possible
100. The bride deck is only 19.1 feet wide. Replacement of the bridge will result in safer
and more efficient traffic operations.
lV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12

Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: 0.001 acres of temporal impacts are anticipated
to occur due to temporary fill in wetlands for the bends supporting the temporary work bridge with this
project. Permanent fill impacts are not anticipated to occur in Turkey Creek, or jurisdictional waters,
due to brids;e demolition and construction activities.
1. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Type ° Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number *
Impact Impact 100-yeaz Floodplam** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
indicate on ma) acres (es/no) (lineaz feet)
1 (24+84.38 to Temporary 0.001 Yes 65 Coastal Plain Bottomland
25+00) Fill Hazdwood

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplam maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at httn://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.001 acres (temporary)
2. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
ineaz feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Im act Perennial or
Intermittent?
lease ec'
N/A

* List each unpact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, cnb wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be inchided.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tnbutary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usSS.eov. Several Internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com.
www.magquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site. 0
Page 8 of 12

3. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact
(~ applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on map) (acres ba oce )
an, etc.
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Best Management. Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be implemented. Bride
No. 52 will be removed without dropping any components into Waters of the United States.
During removal, old fill and abutment will be removed and the area will be replanted with native
vegetation.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that maybe appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm~ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The temporarv work bridge will be removed when construction of the new bridge is
completed. The existing bride abutment and existing fill will be removed and native
riparian vegetation will be planted to serve as buffer replacement.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wro/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 10 of 12

Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate) funds or the use of public
(federaUstate) land?
Yes ® No ^
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ^
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ® No ^
IX. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ^ If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
*
Zone Impact
care feet
Multiplier Required
Miti anon
1 2,046
2 1,927
Total 3,973
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12

If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
N/A
X. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
N/A
XI. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application?
Yes ^ No
XIII. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
~(pplicant/Agent's Signature bate
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12

9 _~
e taupe
~ICINI~~
~~~~
NCD®~
DIVISION OF HIQHWAYS
NASH COUNTY
PROJF.C't:825~1 ~387"n
REPLACE BRIDQE NO. bZ
OVER TURSEY CRESg
ALONG 3R 1101
(CLAUDE LEWIS RDJ
NORTH CAROLINA

~~ ~
~` .
1E ', ~',.
f 7 `. k
,~
.r
~i \S '~5
.r
~~.. J.. .
SITE
7C~P~GRAPI~IC
~~~
NCD~T
DIVISION OF ffiQHWAYS
NASH COUNTY
PROJBC~:B.l32~01 (8-3877)
RBPLACB BRIDQB NO. b4
OVER TURYEY CRBBg
ALONG SR 1101
(CLAUDB LEWIS RDJ
u/18/a

.~ .

~A~~
1V ~~®~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NASH COUNTY
PROJECT:8.2322~01 (B-387n
REPLACE BRIDGE N0.52
OVER TURgEY CREEg
ALOND SR 11901
(CLAUDE LEWIS RDJ
SHEET OF t~ / t st / n~

w
o
~
~
~ m
+ ~
H
N --
Q ~
~ w

z
I
I
I
i 1
I
I 1
I i
I ~
I ~
I ~
i ~
I ~
I !
I ~
I
w~
~I
~I
~ ~I
N m I
~I
~I
O
3~
I
I
I
z
0

ao
..~

~+ ~ ~ ~ .r
M
3~.~? Q
z ~
a Iii
a
~ ~z~ W ~ o
~~
®

(~ ~U~ ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ p a u
E-' U

~ c ~ o
a
F
w

~ ~w
~ ~o

~ ~ r--~N
~--~ ~

WW
~ ~w
I~ w~

zm

N

c
_c
O
10
:~
p {{i9~
~1 N
a ~?
4p F,
~ ~S
ti
~/ ~ U
~ s
c
(O
~ Q
M`: m
7
~ ~
~ ~
O O
~ ...
O t0
a
n
U/ ~
O N
7 N
X
Z Z
C'1 n .
a v
~~ L
O
7
7
-Oi~
(D (D
~~
r ~
~ o
y
yj O
~ i
1
~ 1
S ~
I
N
y

n
p<n p~
7c- ~ ~

m 3
a ~
m
N
(D
Q
~
O

n n
N N
V
~
r~ Wp
0
N ~
' N

D
~ O_ (D

~

~ ~
N
N
N
W

W
W
~ ~
Rl ""~
S
~ ~
~~
~
~ ~
~
C ~
N
2 N
O
g~ O
rn
A N
N N
'0
r
m °
~
m ~

m
N O ~ ~ +' _
O ~

N
O N -.
? D_ G
. ~o~~
~ a~
7 d
d 7C d 7
nO
(a
.
~
(D N
N
~: m
O tN0
A
j N
_ N
- A ~
~ .Z'1
ITl "'~

= 'D
o
~
m
•< ~
f7
C N
N
p~
_ O
rn
O N
O
N O
N
.D
r
~
~
m m
r
m
~~O
~ ~ ~
y ~ h
~'; H
1
A
a
Cam,
y
n
O
ti
~o
N
O
'n
+~
~n
R
~ A
a'
bo
O v
~ ~
O
w
Q
n
~~`.
~~
b°
A :~
~ A
O
0
ti
A
n
0
I, ~.
~ •`~O
V
m
v ~ ;?
• ~ Y:
kz
n.
~ H. ~~
~ ~-.
i
~"
O
H. .
t
z
ti
t+
r
F
3
ii 'I
~ ~_ ~~
~S'• ~ ~~
',.:
t

O

D ~ o
~
r

o
~ N
~p
+

A _

~ ~

i O
O
p+p
~ v

r O
-I
~ 7
s
~
O

Q N ~
a7 ~ C
' G C
D
D ~
~ m
v
~

0
o ~
~
~v=
v > >
o.
Vi C

3~

m

~ m

--i
D

0 o m~v
... m Z
~ ~ Z 'O
°' = m
v ~
X
~ ~
O O n ~ ~ C7
O
._. fl ~ D
.
N 3
~

O
O n
_ (~
~ ~ N ~ C
v O. ~ N
O
~
d
"~

_ 'A
Z

O
O _
N
~ ~ 7
~ C~C
~: G
~r ~
^
~..~
~.y

O

O _
~
01 O 3
~
C
~ ~ ~Vy O. s~
` ~
~

y O d~ m
-~ ~
H Z ~ ~ O ° n ~ ~.° -DI
o ~~ zz ~„ ~
x a
0

ND xO ~ ~X n
OZ ~~ O o ~~~~, can
~-.. `C ~ ~ fl. m ~
b
w

N ~ ~ O O ~`~ ~ C
m
°o ~ ~ 3
A O

. ~
I ~ ~ ,sue T
/ /
77_hyd:Netperm.dgn
. t X71 1

~ / a ~ ~ o
/ / 3 ~ I~ ~
/a. .. .. .. ~ _ o
/ ~
r
w~a ~ ~ ~ ass ~.. / ~ ~ ~ o
~,~ ~ ~ tl ~ ~ xJ~ / / 4 3~ ~ m
e
~ ~ / ~ s ~
4F aK Sgt y p0?' ~
' ~ 'll ~ ~ ~ • ~~W '~ D f v to
~ 0~x. cno ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~'
~ Y/ s.
~ ~
_ /
91M ~ N 0 1 '~ ' ~ ' ~ '
~ / ~ NN
//~ ~~
m N / N N ~S'''Jr
~1 'r ~~
1 ~~ ~ / ~
f ~ - '~
~ ~~ ~ ~ za
a ~ 1 ~ 1 .~ ~~ '~ n
N I 1 i O
~~ ~ ~ ~~
N O
yry'~ N
i I o;+~ c l 1 ~~ y 'O
++> 1
1 y 1
m~ ~m I G7 • _ ,~' ~I ~ ~ II b 4 II , O
~ o ~~~
1 O
In ~ x~ - s ~ o b tril # i-
m '~ 1 r ~ C `~`:~~ .
~'i W
~O D
N n e.a~ac y •e ruarer~~ ~sFJ~+ ~~m° --~ •~'r$
yy \` 1 ~ ~ ~sr Z ~~~
S ~~.. 1 h ~~~ ~4 A v
V~ , rn "~ - ~, , t ~ $
rp ,,,~.. ~. g
« O ~ O N
I ~m ~ ~t ~ ~ .. ~ ~ 1 ~~ ~~ ~
'i~ ± rt ± '.
G ~ A ~ ~
rn ~ ,~ ~~ ~
„V 1 ~ n ~ ~ ~ I r
.~Q ` o ~ .~' I V ~I O ~T ~ N NSP595
Q ~~ as ~ ~ I ~a ~ ~ ~
y~ 1 ' 9T 72' w0 k
'Sg40'E ~ (~ F+~y9'~
r ~ \
T ~ ' t ~ I -~i y~ ~9 (j Ul
JO' y~Y6 ~ 1 7 1 I v" ~g
•56.0!•11 ~ 1 ' OH
~ ~ ~ ~~ 9.7.TY ~!~.y.
~ N4T14'O6'E , • 1 ~ 6
r• ~ \ I - s t
~r~. ~ \ I r" ~ ~ ~'Se2'
F ' y 1
~ 1 = I ~ ~ (~ MSSbj H~..
~~~ ~ ~ ~ x+00 O ~ rp ~ °'F °:
~ 1
~.i ~ ~ yo
vmo g \ o '• ~ ~ ~
„~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~
' Ow
n
1 1" Ib gK~ I
' ~ ~ yb ~ r ant ~ ~
s ~ •'. ~
r .r, ~~ I 1 ~ ~ y ~ ~
I O ~ ~ 1 ~ Z'V
i i
~ \\~.
,.
,~
~.~

,, :.
I r ' ~~' , SX_V
•.
'•,
~. •,
.~
.~
~~. •.
.,
,, ti
..
•. ~.
..,
.,, ~.
'':
., .,
.,
.,
.,
•.
•~
''
......~
..., .,.
..................
,. •. •.
~•..
.. .,
:•
.. .. ~ •. /
''...
_hyd_wetperm.dgn ~ --~-~--_ ~--4---------~_--°~_----s.°°

I ~ I I 553
_.
-~,. - -- --
--~:- ._.
,
,
.._.
wee
r z
~ -.
~ ~-....._('~.. Ss
. ~ .........._....._._
D ..... ,
_~

--
~
91M . x
•__. -._ _
CT1"....:.~_._........

(A ~1.
N

~
)C I
~
9oe--I---

N ( f
, '
i 1~
m i ~~
Wn 1~ i~
+~> ', i ~
1 y ~~
s T
----------- I 8/1799
•t

.....,y.
.:r... y~i ,,,
..,.~..~
....; ..-
i /
~ 1 ~ , ~',~~ r .W
~ i'~i1 , , ,'
...............
•;'
.
..
r ~,`
.. _

g

~

D
+

IS~
r!
Qa

•
~
.......
,
I ~ .......
.....
.....- .
II
,
,:,,I
.rti~

. S
, -.,~.
,~ff. ~' ~ le ....., SOS S)
~~I ~ ., - - ..
;
, :
/
t
~ .
,
r
..
-. i ,; .
••
,+ i ~
~; ,~I
;~ I

._
i ,~~i

-_..._
;, , :~ ~
Y ~ ~ 1 . ~' ............._.-.
,

N
y

~

y

~

res'<B,.
~ ._.
,i -,..
i °,

O
1 ' •i, y (Jl
'~ .
~~
l~ ~!~~ ;'

tPt 1 ~
'''
'
.
9~ n
E
_
~'> 1 i II 8
I 1 ~ ~_~_
•
r
O
I Clr
~ H
WW~~1
rs . I i ~
F
{
O
.
~ +
n I ' I ! y=
~ 71+''
1
1
I • 1
I ~I c (~
m m I C7j ~~',, ~ _ 'iiF • ~ ^l ~ " b b N N N
srm ~ ,-.. i , .I ~,... ~. 100
p•
~ ~I ~'~ 01_`_ ~ ~ S+ ~ fr1 ~~IrOD~
-
~ I ~ ~ ~ 1 R ~v9 X uu~~uNy
m ~. I ...... , 1 ._: I r C7 7! O
• .
~ ~ ,
,,
.... w`
I`~~-.', TYlR~ETt9~• ~ ~TUR@r'CN•lrK,' r '-I t,,
.•
• __.__ _.
.. ' - :-
~.•v
{ ,~
+:
..~•.
, _a
..'
._. ~ .. .. A..., . I •~~ ~ •
...•~!
... •' f.
n.:..
' ~ GI•
I O ~~ • • _
M~ f• ~ t
-i • vmo N
yeCF1G`(n ~ ~ 4t ~f ~i y ~ '''11
1 = \ y~ 111 '+I 11, ' •Y •* ~~ 3 ~
rn m :, ~ „
< ~ :~ + '~ ~
- ,
y ,fin
li ~
$iK -v,__~ _-y" '.~ +.. ~,. _ ',''111""' ~ S41~I,~ O I N O O N '
~~i"' _ p_.. ~.._...:' t ~ I I I 111 ~ y ~ ~` N I p,
._..._' _ ..- i• .111',...
+~ 11
4
~ .~-- ~ - ~
{I -' '11,11
.~
' ,...
. ~......
.. ..
II
fT k-
.... _..... , •, . 1740 ~ ~ ~ y0
... „_ .....: .:1 _
.._. ~O
T56'0!7 = _ _ --_ ~__ .111
---_ -_-_ ~ 9 -__`-- ^ '•~ '11 •'~'.~ __~ ~r!-~- -4 N4)14'06'E 1 11 ASS.
..;. ..
- '-
__ :_
~.
-_..__-
` - .••',
• _ -.,::,
..'
_ ~:
~"....
-__. -..
--
_ _., _ . ..
_ _. :. ;
.. -„ 1 .
... '' '~:
..~ ';:-._. "'-- __..__ _._.."._._......_... ":~ -.. Mss • K ,,_
-.. .. ,.
k
~ __...~ ,
r- _-r-- -
.. ~,~" y O
:. ~..
1 ,. ~.
,.
_-_.__
•. •. .., k
•.
.......
" .. ..
• _- ••..
,
..._.
..
,,.
-+_....
•. !~
..,, -
..
;;
..,.....
• ,
. _ _.._..
-"" _..
,.
I
...
._-- .......... I ..
•...
.,,. ,
_~ ..... -
.. •
...
..
:, _
•..
,
,',
,
,..
,~
...
~_.,., _.:... o ..
,~
~ i
....
,,. v• ,...-....... ..
~~1~
r ....... ., . ~ ~ _
V I ...... _.. ..
~...... ':.. w. .
1
...
:.
_.
~ ~ ~~
. .
... --
.. _..
....
.~.:.
-
,, -
_.._:
. _..-
~-
`...
..
.....-
. . ,.~~}_
' .....:..... ,,~,F, ~~
~~
:
-.-_.
-..
• ..._
_:
. •:.
....:..
....
......
__
,,.~:
O K :~
i ...
. ! ~..
i ,. 1 '
....
- _.. _
,,. .....
_ ~~yy
.. ..::
~ ~ .. __ ..
' j ~.
' J.
..,~
i '~ '
'•~ "' '• J ~~~',,1~1
I i`
.. ; i -...
,.
,:
;;
•.. .
.•. ,:
,,1
,..
-:
. • ,: ,• ,•
,' y
;: .. ,..
,..
,: i i......, 1 .. ~ ,j;
...y.... .. ... .
i
.-
rl
I

i

~~C~l~Ti~~
lr~~~~
N]EUSE I$IV~I~
BUFFER ZONE
~~~~ro~
-®-~ --
~...
NC~~T
DIVISION OF HIt3HWAY3
NASH COUNTY
PROJECT:82~01 ~3B7n
RBPLACE BRIDGE NO b2
OVER TURYEY CREEg
ALONQ SR 1101
(CLAUDE LEWIS RDa
NORTH CAROLINA

~ _ , ~ ,~ ~
` ` "': ~.," _ ' 1108 ~ ' i f~ ~ ly..
l: \
ti
~~ ._ '
..
r
~1 b 4+ ~.;t 1, ~ '~ ~~ r !~ ' .
\\ t .^4.._. i2 ~ \ ~. f ..
1.1'. I'~ ~ j ` /~ ,;.~( [ ~y~l -h~ ~.._ }i ` t, ,.,...; / ilia 1 /~ ~ '
~ SITE
NCD®T
°~®~®~I~AA][~~3[IC
DIVISION OF HIOHWAY3
NA3H COUNTY
~~~ PROJBC'rs 801 8-3877)
N ~,~ 4 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~/I RBPLACE BRIDQB N0.62
OVER TURSBY CREBg
ALONQ 3R 1101
~U~~ ~~ ~®N ~ cCLAUDE LEWIS RDa
u/1s/a

d
.;
~~~~~~~~
~~.
1~1 ~1.. ~® JL
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NASH COUNTY
PROJECT:8.2322201 8-387n
REPLACE BRIDGE N0.52
OVER TURgEY CREEK
ALOND SR 11901
(CL?~UDE LF.~NIS RDJ
RHFFT nF t t / t R / nt

0

ao

..
y A
D+ ano
~
y Dd .~
.r
M Q w

® C~7~c
~ WU
~
Al
(
F ~ ~
V w ~ ~
A
~ O
' N
x°° ~ a
WF
Z
Q
O
(~ z`
fl~F+ (~ O
a~
~
I
I ~
~ ~ c
ca a ~~
x c
~
I w
w
I

~
W I
I.
~
J ~
~--~ I N

~
m I
I
~ I

N ~ ~ ~
- -~
~

Q
~ I I
i-
~ X I I
I
W I
~--~ i j
I t9
~ ~ ~ ~z
I ~ ,~ ~o
- -I ~ ~9
.---. b ~N
~ ®

W !
~ WW
CnLL
Q ~ ~ W~

zm
~ ~ I t9
N m I N
~i
~I
of
3
1
I
I
c~
z
~ ~ ~
~0 ~ d-

i
j ''; ~: \
1~ :~11
~yyy
h
~~
i`
~ s
r;3
~ ii
~4
•f
T ~A
C-?
~~'.
a`~
d
a~
y
C
O
L
n. ...i
N
O
r- N ..
~
O
0
~
N
L

x ~ 3

N
c
o
o
a
~: =
w
~ •
~
N v
N
O
N N
O
~
N
tC)
N ~ •%

O
O
V
N
u
V
3
V
b
vA
~~
N
v
ti
V
i
i ~ 0.
~~
i' ~. Q
~
~
j O
yy
it
~
~ ~ C
V v
i. ~+
~ ~ i
,
`~~

~ ~ I m
o
~ ~
~ I V
a 7
~9
C

~

F. ~ .,
N ~
~~ ~ I
~
I I
i
S? v
C'.• ~l
'
I
I ~ ' I
;yy
~
h
4~ ~ ~ ' ~
'is ~+

II
~ ~• ~ ~
~ i ~
O
~ ,
M I' `~' i
b
~

~,
: ~
:~
~ ~
O ` ~ •y
~
0
~ ~

N O
N N D. N
N 3 .
~ C~ -7J
O
a
O
N N

Z Z
C
O C
~
•
>N 7
O
N
N
N
E _~
~
N
C ~
~ O
3~
O O Y
c9
r ~ T ~ ..
U
`:
C L
l4 a
N
i °
~
m J

_T
U °~
C r Y V
. D ~ ~ ~
Q O O N
rn~ t
~'°oo
y
~°aa~E
J C7 ~ O N
d
m
a~ y
C ...t
O
L
Q.
O O
N ~
0 0
N ~
~ ~
N U
t N
c
o -i o
a =
~ w
~ Y

O
M
N
N
N
~ ~
C O p
C ~+ V)
U
N N
Z Z
X
N =
N O
61 N
U
rn O
CO m
0 ~
n: n:
O
.>
J O
N +~'+
c U
0
/~` J
C
ti
,.1 0
C~
:t q
y3 ~.
l ~
vH H
iV C
z
~.
d

~_
~~~i

r ~
~ s 1.6y
ro
ig ~ gue
__ m
' a
I
• s
m
.
'~M cn -~
0
I
~ m

! N I '~•

~
m~

r
\~
`~~~
A I I
~ ~
1
1
-9 A =
~Nb
l
~~ ~
„' ,• .~

N

1
<
v
m
"~
~O
~"
•~

°~
r
O ~
r~

/~
/'
l~
/~
/ ~/
' ,.
:~
~-~
N!!..~~
m
N
-~ ~ ~
~ ~ 9
-.~..
u r~fY CRffK r'~+ua
I
~ a ~ rM
~ ~ ~~
AT 7
• N 99'~
I
I
~ ~~
~ ~p~ - . ~
i
i i ~
i i

~~
I
i.~~Y~~
TLlMEY C1ffR
~1
N
~~ .~'
N 8p
O2i~p ~ c
~p
y
~°
r ~~i
~ ~ "
ry"^
N
4
~+ ~
_
g~r
o g
N
.i
~ ~
o
i am
r ~~ ~

y rr
~ ~
N
y
* M b

~~
~~/1w
r
R
i
~S,~
~, s
~~ ~~' ~~ s
~ y.
~ ~~ ~~ ~
~, o
i~ ~ ~ o
~ _ ~ o
~ • C
n =
0
~= m
~~ ~~
a Ie__ o m 9¢J$
1 IT ~ P~
j 1-; 1
N
r i
y y
A5S)ogd
~~
Z Z
O
~ ~ n
~rn
0
\~~~
~~~~
3
n \
y ~~~ ~~rC
!V~ \~~ iinnn
~~~
8
Z Z
25100 c ~ N o
~ ~N ~N ~~IrO
8C c r~`w
f~"~
T ~ ~ ~7 ~ '~~ ~~~~
i
~ ~~~ ~~ ~W
~ ry a;>_ zr Zr
o i~'' +. mm mm
g
~` g ~ D D
~ n
~ ~' ^' ~ N N
obG Y o
1 M ~ w
O
S
' ~ r
r
~ ~ ~ ~oN
~ ~
A~~
A ~
Cal CN ~~'ry
.'I
_°s T ae ryl °~
~~ y
y ~~
J y ~ rn N6'6 ~~~9• ^'- u~
~, ~ n O
~` i ~ rn
~ ~y
r ~ ~~``i
~ 0 \ ~ [A)\
O ~ M
4 ~ w~
ro
yb g~
~~
~~
,~
' ~~
rl
~~
~ ~
A
~j ~

, .~ +, •., • r,.
~,
,; ,, ,, {:
'..h ,
', ~. ~y '~,t~ i
~' '', k i r
.,
"o.
u .,h .~ .,~ ,//
.,
t\6uffperm_ep\63877
'm*t"
.~~~~
~~~~
~.~~

•LB ~ 1
~ s L65• -`=~
. u'w
- m ,_ n
1 ~
1 m

01M .
•,"-^~

~~ r
'"•
~ ~ _--- ,
r , . O ' ""~,,,,,,,

~8 M W ~ ~~~
~ cn -',1

. ~. \\\ -
~_
p ~ TI ....
A A B
~~
i
~ ~
g~ m ~•~
N
y
m
m
'~
r
O
C
r
T y
~ ~~~
s ~~
0
4 ^~
~ ~i
C
~ c m v
n u n
~~G
y ~
U'1
O
r
I
o

~.
,~./s~
s
~~~ ~~ g$
~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
~r
~~
• ~ IF m
I~ ~ ~ o
N
r ~ O
~ C
n =
0
~= m
~~ ~d
s ~~
n a v m
~~Is~ ~~
N
_.._„ ._ ~
}
.~
''~ ~ ~'`•4 ' ~ .~~ r ~ ' '`'ham'. ~ E y y
N N ~k5~9 ag
- uw~n -' 9
' + 1' ~' p"''+ '~ y 4
'~ ,~ ,~,
P ...~ ...._ ~
X50 ,~ ~~~' i { ~ ~ ° ,:,,~''~ O ~ b n
r ~ \\~
"I ~ ~ \
~r _ ~ ~ ~ rn
IV ~~\ uu~~u~cn
P ~ "''~~n' ~ '~2C.i~~4r
8 ..
.. ~'',,~'~ o m m
.,.. ~. ~
'" 8 WN cN A~~OD
,- r
,•• ~„_
~~ r a D
r ~ c m o ro (") (")
g ~~ ~~
-i --~
~ o _
f
',~-r`" 8
,~_,
N~9~33
~BT,
L~L~
P~ N
~~
n
S ~
O
• sa ajF'
W ~ 0 hry

9m
r

~
~
7
~
:; ~ ~
~•;~ ~
;~~:
3a'oo
`'
~

y
O

~ n
y

rn
i

,
'~•'~ m
~
O
••• 4
r
'~
~
~
k,
-~i~'' ~ ~-V
4 ~'••
-~ p `
O ~
V
v.
1~5.'ti~~ ii

~ ~ ., 4 t f~..-
~' ~ it ~ ;.,. W~~;'"'.,~~,,,. ~ { ~ ~ .i'• ~
4. 11'h
/ 1 t..,. .4, ,..~ .r ,,....
boss
~,
.~~pg ~? u
b ~~Y'
~~
yb~
~r
~ ~"
~~
~ry
y
I I
r
I
w
~~
•p

i i

~i
g
^.
~~
t
C) C
~~
~~
~®
b
~~
~~
O
U

,- , ~
~+
o~
h
O
9~
~ w
O
~~
~~
U ~'
~o
ti
~y
0
t~
_ .~~
,~ ,- --~^
J ~ ~ ~~
~,
~ d7
/I W
~< ~ ~ ~
!/ .. N~-
r~
/.
.
~
\
e
1
~ H
~ ,~9
,~~~
~
-f i
3 ~
~
, ~
ova ^ ~. ~ ~

€g ` ~
! Fi
i `'
'1 W
j r
~ ~ ~ ~
1 ~
'
i ~

O

~ _
~~/
~ W
__ _ l O
~ ~~O
a h ~~
~~
~ ~
~~
z~
~ ~
~~ ~x ~~
s
a ~~
~~
~~~
~e
~ tl ~
N

~o

~
~ ~ g
O
H
a

°j
~•
A ~

v
W
~

~~~
~o
.^-, p N
__ ~ o
Q 1 p N
~ s r
~ ~~~
o ~ ~~~
_ ~ °~~~
~ a° } ~
W ~ 3 ~ o
W ~ ~ ~ Z
~ ~ ~
°z ~ ~
o~ ~~~
mo
~~
~o
V~
Z s = N
. ~~ ~ ~aRa~~~o
ti
~~ ~ ~8o°•o~w°° p
m x u u u u a u `v~
ZJ h ~onoo~->~u
_" A 1- H ~ Z
~~ °~ ~ ~
Z -~
~~N--
IV
O F
d Q
_N
~~
H
ZV
0
~ r h
y
~
y
V
~

d
O o

O
....
~

h
~ _
~ Uf 0
O

LL8£-S ~dLL L9£IOZ~ ~.L~b'?LL1110~1
~.

N
J
<m
h

~~
~~- ~
~~
®®
®®
~~
~J
W
,~ a
~~
sy
~~
O
*~
W
W
N
Z
g
d
J
Q
Z
0
F
Z
W
Z
0
V

~
~ ~--~
~
I II
I I
o ~
~
o
^ II
II
~
1

1
°
3 ~
1

; 1 ~ ~
; 1 i

1 I
I
I I ; ~
1

1 ~
;

1
I

1
i
1

'I 1
1y~~ 1

~ ~
C
W

-o 1
1
1
;

1 i i 1
1 I 1
I I
' i °°

~ 1 i
1
I
i

1 ~
I
I
'

1
1 1
1
1
;

I
I
1 c
° I
1 `
1 . o
1 1
1 1

1
1

Q
3 ;

1

1
1 1 0
1 1
~ z
1 ;

1

I
1
1 ;

1
;
1
.° 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 I
Fi ~

y O

O 1 s
'~
1 1 r' ~
m
~ o
c
~

1
1
3
W 1 1 V
1
g
~ ~
F
y ~ a ~
a 0 ~
•o ? ~
V .c 5 p
~
€

I
I'
-.-0~-~o®m®I o
1 1 1 ~
~ ~ ; 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 1
1 1 1 i 1 ; 1 I 1 1
1 1 1 I ;
1 1 1 1 ; 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I I 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 ; 1
~ I 1 1 ~ I 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 ;
I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 ~
I I 1 ; 1 ; ; 1 1 1
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 I W
1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 I I 1 1 i ~ 1 1
1 1 1 I ; 1 1 1 y
I i i i 1 ~ i ° i
~ I 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 ; o
1 ; 1 1 I 1 x ; C
1 ; 1 I 1 •
1 1 1 I 1 1 1 C
1 , ° I 1 1 ~ 1
~ °' l x ~ o
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 d
y ~~~~o~~stl~~
c o s ~'" `~ o
-,
e o
'o
d c c $ .. ~ o- ~ "~ o
o~ Q~~ ~ ~ ~~~ao
} ~ ' II
W d
~~ I' I `~/ I I I I
1 1 ; 1 ;
1 1 ; 1 1 I ; i ; ; I I 1 1
~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 1 I 1 C 1 ~ 1
1 1 I 1 1 ; 1 ~ 1 ; ; i ; ° 1
~ ~ ~ ;
1 1 1 ; 1 1 1 ; ; 1 1 ; I 1 ~ O ~ I
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ; 1 E
i i i i ~ i ~ i ~ i i i i ~ W o p
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M aN
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 1 1 ; C p
i i i i i i i i i t S i i 1 O W W
~ i i ~ i i 1 1 ~ ~` i i i O O
I 1 1 1 ~ •~ ` ~~ i ~ : 2 a O W
o o °_
1 1 1 ; 1 ; C C C C
/3~ g ~ aa
~ ~ ~ 1 ; ~ ~ ~ 'J S 'J QQ G
1 1 1 1 1
~~, e~ ~ s~ s C ~ U a G
1 1 1 1 I Q,
1 , 1 1 1 _ ~ O ~ ~ 3 ~~ 3 ;?
I ; 1
1
C~ 1 C o ~ ~~~ a ao a0 ~ O ~ O O
,0 t9 ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ a a oZ aZ a oZ ~ o V a H F- d o.
0 C O a a .p e. ~ V W .°
ear a .C -~'= C C C w C M O C~ C °
'V '~ vi ~ C ~ oa ~ ~ aV oa a
I I ) ~ l ll l
I I o~ ~
D9 ®" 3 ~ Q 3 s
I ~ ( I I I I I
1
1

1
1 I
1
1
I
I
1 1
1
1
;

1 1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
I
1
1 1
1
~

; I

1
1
1 1
1
~

i 1 1
1 I

1
~ ~ 1
1 I 1
1 ; 1 1
1
1

1 I
I

I
1
I
1
1 1
I
~

1
I I
I

1
1
I
I ;

;
1
I 1
1
;

I
I
I
I
I

1
1
~ ~
1
~ ~
1
~ ~
1
~ ~
1
~ ~
1
~ ~
1
~ ~
I
~ ~
1
1 1
~ ~ 1 1
1
~ 1
1
~ ;
I
~ 1
1
~

I Z
° 1
1

p 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

I 1

1 1

1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1

1
~ 1

1
~ I

1
~ 1
~
1
~ 1

i C 0
o'~ ~
m ;
r

0.
I
I
1
1
1
1

1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1 ~
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
~
~ m
~ c

Sp

1
1
~
1
1
1
~
1
;
. 1
;
1
;
~
1 1 1
~ ~ ~

~
C
~

o
~
C
uo.
~

o
~

~
~
~ o
3 £
~ f
Y
a
~
1 1 1 1 1
1 ;
1 1
1 ~
c Z `
~ _
~
.
o
1 1 ~ 1
~ ~ c ~

E c
E$~
c o a o

3 ~ ~ m p
o d S
C
s o
C
a

o
o
C
f c
O
~
~ c
~
p
V
~~ IL U ~ ~
~ 3 c
x W c
W
c
7
0 ~
~' a
~
~
~
~
c
£
~ ~ c
ca
~
c e°
e
~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~$ d ~ ~ 33 ~ ~
I ~
I e
I'I~~
t¢®ae~® `
i i i
~ ~
' I f
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
~ 1 ; 1 ; i 1 1 1 1 ~ ; T
1 1 ; 1 1 1
1 I 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 41 1 u1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 W I ' ;
1 1 ; ; 1 1 1 i
1 1 1 I 1 ~ 1 1 y
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i ~ 1
i i i i i i ~ i ~ :C ~
~ O
_ ° V ~ V o V
'° V U V g
s
0 0 ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ ° S. O
d °' ~° s o= o~ B
c .C s s ~ F 1~ 1~ IL
ao~~~~s~~~~~~
W r~ o 0 0 o Q
Z e epp epp pcp o -~ ~ -$ ~ -g ~
C~~ n a a 1•- 'g a~ O~ O
~~d~~~~~~o~o~~
~ ~ ° (1
t I
of LLj 'I d ~ Q© g l s i
I I ~ I
y ~ ~ I I ° LI
I ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~
1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 ; 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 ; ; ; 1 I 1 1 ; ; I 1
~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1
1 ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1
1 I ; ' Q. ; 1 ; 1 I 1 ; ; 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1
1 I I I 1 I: 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I i
1 I I ; ; ~ 1 1 ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1
1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1
1 I 1 L 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I
1 I I 1 1 . 1 1 ; 1 1 1 1 I 1 1
i i i 1 i O i i i i i i i i i i i
1 1 1 1 j 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
a V ~
' ~ E I I 1 .= 1 1 ; 1 i ~ ' ~
O I I I I I I
Vag ~ ~° 0 1 i ~ ~ i i i i 1 i i i
1 Y ~ `p~ •O _ •v o ; ; i 1 i i i i
1 ~ 1 ° ~ I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I
i O D .C ~ • .~ 1 I I i i i i i
~- 1 y y V ' O ~ ~ ~ Q yl I 1 I I
.G ~ ^t I I I I I
1 1 1 1 1 1
p : 7 ~ ~ o O O 1 1 1 1 1 1
o ~ ~ ~ o ~ .g QE hi I 1 ~ I I
-~ ~ N N ~ .~ ~ C9 O V ~ OC ~h ~ ' I I I
W V ~ ,, V ~ N ~ `\ t I ; 1 1
~` O ~~~ 1- N I '~
a s ~ V a a O O
c c c c - E o o a •>~ ~ g
8.a-e ~~~~ ~~3 ~4
~~~~ d~ v~~~~ W d ~ y H x 3 o y
1 i 1 ; 1 I 1 ; 1 1 1
1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1
1 I I 1 1 ; I ; I
1 1 1 1 ; ; I I
1 I 1 1 ; ; ;
1 1 1
~ 1 ~ , ~
r' 1 I 1 1 1 ; 1 ; 1
y 1 ~ ; I I I 1 ~ 1
I I 1 1 1 I 1 1
~ ~ 1 1 I 1 1 ; 1 1 I
1 1 ; 1 1 1 1 I 1 I
1 I 1 1 ; 1 ; ; I
a 1 1 I I 1 1
1 1 I I; i 1 I ; 1
1 I I i I ;
1 1 1
1 ; I 1 1 1 1 1 1
' 1 ; 1 1 1 1 1 1
O ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 ;
c
1 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 i I 1 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 ; 1 1 ; 1 1 ;
I 1 1 i 1 1 ;
I 1 I 1 1 ; 1 1 1
I 1 I I i 1 1 ;
1 1 1 1 1 ;
1 1 1 1 ; ; 1 1
1 I 1 1 1 1
O 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I
1 1 ; I j I 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 I I ; 1 1
1 1 I 1 1 1 1
rw , 1 I ; 1 1 ; 1
e
d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 = ~ ~
.a O c ~
f%1 ~ H Y°~. ~ ~ N V 0
Ij
j ~
~~
~~iA
1 1
1 1
1 1 1
1 1 ;
1 1
1 1 1 1
; 1
1
1 1
1 I
1 1 1 1
1 1
1 ;
1
1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1
1 1
1 ;
1
1 ;
1 1 ;
1 1
1 1 I
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 I
I 1 1
1 1 1
1 1
1 1 I 1
; 1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 I
1 1
1 ;
1
1 1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1

~ 1
1
1
1
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
1
1 1 1
` 1 ;
1
~~
O 1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1

1 t
1 1
1 1
1 1
;
; ~ 1
I
O I
0 1
_;
~ 1
1
I
1
ar ~ I
1 E
1
1 ~
1
1
1 y 1
1 1
I 1
1
1
1 1
1 I
0 I
~ I
_ 1
1
1
1
`
o m
`
c
d ° p, ~
^1
E 1
1 O
C
'c
~ ; C
, 3C
1

~
' a ~
1
1
a
E
O
~ o-
~ ~ .~ c E
~'
3 ~
d ~
~ O 0
, I
I ~' ~ ~ ~
~ t ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ o
e I i I i I i ` I u I i I a
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t
i 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 I i 1 1 ; 1 I i i i i i i i i ~ i i i i i i i i i i
1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1
; I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ ; 1 ; 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 W 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1
1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1
I 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 -N- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 W 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 • 1 1 I ~ 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 i 1 ' 1 1 1 1 I 1 ° .,~ 1 1 I W 1 I 1 1 1 I O 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1
1 1 I ~ 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Q 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 C ; 1 ; 1 i i i i ~ i
I 1 1 1 1 V 1 I I 1 1 I ~~ V i i i ~ i ~ ~ 1 0 ~~ i i i i i i i i i
1 1 1 1 I 1 I ~ ; I ; y ~O^ 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 • ~ 1 ; 1 ~ 1 V V 1 1 1 y ; i 1 ; ~ ~ C 1 1 1 1 1 ~ I
1 1 1 1 C o i 1 i m 1 o V ~ i i i o ~ y C ~ i i i i g O O 1 0 1
i ~ i i C~ C i i i o O S d ~ 1 ' C C d~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ K7 ~'j" ~ 1
1 I 1 1 1
I ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v v° o ~ ~ ~ ~ J 3 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ W _~
1 1 1 1 1
i i i ` ~ ~ i i i C ~ ~ ~ N ~ tMpTj C ~ ° ~Cg ~ ~ 1 S O ~ ~ Gp C
I 1 1 3 3 p 1 1 1 = It. 1 1 ~ v ~ ~ V ~ `~~ O W' Vl i ..C O a o ~' ~ o
i i 1 ~ t i ~ ~ W ' I H
1
M 1 i i 'O ~ ~ '6 W V! ~ N ~ O
~ ~ ~ '06 'g .R d E- 5 C ~ ~ x x ~ gg

~i
0
m
~a
~ ~ b

~ J
O LLF p ~ H
W ~ m W ~
S Ip qS
IL 66 R m6t O
W S ~C W
~ dp0
~' O
~~ a i o
a
OM RW
~ 0 Odd" ~pj
W O
W Q
~~ C d
~Tp `
o
-~ LLs s
aYw c

0
j
LLO•_
W z
W~p w
O
W m m ~m1. t m <mc W
.~ W ip r m m O W

(~ 6 W
6W ~d Wd< H
po
~ 0
W 00
Z 00~ W
Z tl
J 2m
OJ m
J OJW W

d
~p SLLZ ~LL SY.2 ~

O 4p
~ y0
~ 60
W
~
=
. F
C
N F<W
6` 1~
•f~ l
-
i~c
6
~ F
6 ~iC 7 S
Q
x Q
O G < QQ
O`N M ~ ~ Wp
0 `
6' <M 6' W y p
~ W q
<~W a
~
> S

< <
O
> ~L i
<O. i Z J2
~ Z p
~ ~
d
C F 61~.
CFW 6~
6 F 6.
G.
lHW~ C
W YWa
W W
~
S
6L C<m CL d<mF O
N
V (
j W W F• ~ 3
W
W
3
Q
W
O
aD
J
2
T
r
W
W
d
O
W
Z
W
d
W
F

~g
8~
++
~~
r~
~~
00
80
ao
~~
++
00
n~
~~
h
I 1
O
Z
W
_Z Z
~ 0
O N
h
~V
'ago ~ .Ww
W N
~ J
~V
.,
0
y
J
V

~ /
/ /
p / / ~
~ ~ ~ _ ~
V' - . .. ~ + ~ ..
5~~i i z ~ ~
~i S `~ I NSW „`~... '* ~ J
~ ~ ~~ ~ °j4 ~ ~ I
s+ 8 O
O ,~ ; \~
~. ~ Q I ..
m' 1
N
v~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,., ......:
W ...
,.. : .
~ O O pp+~ ~ \ ~ 4
{~ ~~ar
J I .
H
4 j ~ ~
Z 1 ~_ ~ ~ I ~+.,,
yy°,~ a9o, -N H ~~ ~ ~ j ,A
seem ~ ~ at76 « ( .\ H'
y m~ C I 11.60.95 CS
~~W M.95.LL-fS
'(~~ ~TCdai'!~4' , S
'M' 9tlw'' M M J ~y ! Lp N
d ~ ~ s I s~ O
4N 1 4 ~~
j,L9,BSItN ~ ~ ~ p, ~ ~ ~ O~
LL 4 LL ~ ~ 1 LL
N r
9 ~ N ~ ~ J ~ O ~,~ ~ i ~~ ~ ~~ ag
~a+ ~ ~ ~ W
. b~ fl W C~
W ~O /"VC _
a a~0~ ~(p1 ~ A ~ ~~h d ~
~~$ N • ~ Q6__~ \ F
YYJJ ,t O '
6 . ~ ~ • .. _~• 2 J
J ''
ss ~. ~ ~ \ W
LL ~ 4 ' ~ ' ~_`_\~i
~ ~~ ~ _ ~
G ~ ~~ Ya3a .~aren~ ~~. rasa AaMMtt
LL LL LL ' ~~~•~~ N
~ k
~ a~
~ 8 ~
W
'
N
N
O1 f ~ W <_~ N ~ ~_ ° , ~ -60

E
ll
p
~
~ I
~t ~
~W
~
~
~
u
p
t
n V
' ~
~ ~ ~ ~ w
4Q0~1~C ~ • m ~ 1'- i ~
~i
.
~ ' ~;
~ a
7
OU
~ W
~ ~ I„
~
a

~ .1
~
J ~ +
Q Q 3 U
Q • ~ Q I ~ Z
Z .O ~ , s a<
Z Z ~ ~~ m ~
m ~ g
~$ ~.~
~~ g~ III
-~
' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
3.bye`r N N ~ ~ O
Li ~'' Fd. Id+ w
,n /I~A. yip J
` v / ~ (.l0 2
./ ~
~~
1
,~
66YLI/B
O •
' N `
~ /' O
~ ` ~ ~ f ~~
O !Y3
t ~
a
~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
.~=oo~ 9S ~~ ~ tg~ ~~
~ ~~ r~~ ~~
~„
s
u6P'60I1u~p-pfiy-
~'`Si

~~
~~
a ~
s
~ ~
~ ~ °~ °~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
o .8 .~ .~ .~ A ~
U, ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O
o ~ ~~
a
~ a .~ F
~~jj ° ~ H q
1~ F o°~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ z
O ~ ~ a
~° ~ ~ ~ ~ O
.~ ~ a ~ ~ w
H
~ ~
~ ~ ~
z ~ ~
o ~ ~ ~, ~ Z
H ~ o ~ ~ ~
~~ H~ ~~~
~~ ~ ~~~~
p~ ~ ~ N N N N
F+ d,' "~`
~~
o ~ ~ ~~~ ~~
~ ~
~~ ~ ~
~ .. ~~
~ a ~ ~ ~~ z ~ ~~ ~.~ ~ B s ~
W :~ . ~ a ~
Q o =___~.-- ~ ~~.
1 ~~~ ~ ~~~
c~
~~~~.
~ ~~~ ~
~ ~ ~~ s ~ ~
~~~ ~
r3 y ~ ~ ~
^^,
a ~ ~ ~ a ~a
.,
y
• i