20051431 Ver 1_Complete File_20050912

.y
A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Michael F. Easley, Governor
September 15, 2005
DWQ Project No. 051431
DOT Project # 6C.024024
Columbus County
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Mr. Terry R. Gibson, P.E., Division Engineer
NCDOT/Division 6
P.O. Box 1150
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28302
Dear Mr. Gibson:
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Q
SE? 2 0 2005
DEDS AND ST EORWuA? 1BRA H
v?nA?+
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
material in a total of 140 linear feet of stream (an UT to Cowpen Branch) for the purpose of replacing
two pipe culverts and installation of rip-rap outlet protection immediately downstream of each pipe.
You also have approval for the repair and stabilization of approximately 1,395 linear feet of stream
bank on the same tributary. This work is critical to the resolution of an increasingly unsafe condition
along the shoulder of Hallsboro Road, SR 1001, in Columbus County.
The approved pipe work is described as follows:
Crossing Roadway Existing Proposed Culvert
Station culvert
Crossing 1 Sta 18+95 201.f. 48" 60 l.f. 60" CMP w/20 ft. rip-rap outlet
Driveway CMP protection. Total new impact 60 U
Crossing 2 Sta 26+95 201.£ CMP 80 l.f. 60" CMPw/20 ft. rip-rap outlet
Driveway rotection. Total new impact 80 U
The stream restoration/stabilization will involve restoration of the stream banks to approximate
dimensions that existed prior to a hurricane related weather event in September of 2004. Serious bank
failures have resulted in loss of private property as well as road shoulder. Present conditions in the
stream path include unstable and eroding banks and an over-widened stream floor. The repair effort is
to include rebuilding of stream banks at a 2:1 slope and result in a stream floor approximately four feet
wide. Rip-rap underlain by geotextile fabric will be used to stabilize the banks, with rip-rap keyed into
the stream floor elevation.
225 Green Street - Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: ww.enr.state.nc.us/ENR/
An Equal Opportunity/ Affirmative Action Employer -50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper
Natural Resources
NorthCarolina
Naturally
Mr. Terry Gibson
September 15, 2005
Page 2
This project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated July 27, 2005 (received
August 2, 2005), and additional information dated September 2, 2005 from Mr. Jim Rerko, Division 6
Environmental Officer, received September 15, 2005.
After reviewing your application, we have decided that the proposed work is covered by two General
Water Quality Certifications, GC #3404 and GC #3495. General Certification #3404 corresponds to
the Nationwide Permit 14 issued by the Corps of Engineers, and GC #3495 corresponds to USACE
Nationwide Permit 13. In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits before
you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-
Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the
accompanying 404 permit, unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified
below). Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is
thereby responsible for complying with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or
in the future) exceed one acre, or of total impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear
feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7).
For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the following conditions, as well as those listed
in the attached certification. Please note condition #4.
1) Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed
"Certification of Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401
Certification has been completed. We also ask that you notify Ken Averitte in the Fayetteville
Regional Office when this work is completed.
2) NCDOT shall conduct its activities in a manner consistent with State water quality standards
(including any requirements resulting from compliance with section 303(d) of the Clean Water
Act) and any other appropriate requirements of State law and federal law. If DWQ determines
that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or
achieved use) or that State or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are
necessary to assure compliance, DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification to include
conditions appropriate to assure compliance with such standards and requirements in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before modifying the certification, DWQ shall
notify NCDOT and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public notice in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H.0503 and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to NCDOT in writing, shall
be provided to the US Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any permit issued pursuant to
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit for the
proj ect.
3) Aside from installation of the culvert and outlet protection, and placement of rip-rap at the toe
of slope, no grading or excavation is to take place in the active stream floor.
Mr. Terry Gibson
September 15, 2005
Page 3
4) In order to reduce the potential for development of a stream head-cut, each culvert shall be
equipped with a one foot sill on the upstream end of the pipe. Both culverts shall be buried one
foot on the upstream end (the top of sill at grade with existing stream floor). The pipe outlet
elevation shall be set such that the top of the rip-rap used for outlet protection is approximately
six inches above the pipe invert. (This should result in an outlet invert elevation at or near the
existing stream floor elevation at a location twenty feet downstream.)
5) If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a
hearing, send a written petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C.
27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please contact Ken Averitte 910-486-1541, ext. 722.

Attachments
Sincerely,
C?
J "ye-nae-yi)
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
FRO
Rob Ridings, Wetlands Unit
Central Files
Land Quality Section, WiRO
Col.sr1001.hallsboroRd.doc2
! ,
3
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
September 2, 2005
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resourses
Division of Water Quality
Attn: Ken Averitte
225 Green Street
Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
40
C?
W. LYNDO TIPPET
SECRETARY
?, 5 ?y 31
ATTN: Mr. Ken Averitte
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
Subject: Revisions to Nationwide Permit #13 & #14 / SR 1001 / Hallsboro Road
r
NCDENR 401 WQC 3404 $200.00
Culvert Replacement / Stream Stabilization-Columbus County
State Project Number: 6C.024024
WBS Element No. 37975
In response to the field meeting held between Richard Spencer (COE) and yourself, there were a
couple of revisions to the original permit plans that will be addressed with this correspondence.
As discussed in the field meeting, the two driveway pipes are designed at 60 LF (Crossing #1) and
80 LF (Crossing #2) in order to overcome elevation differences between the upstream and
downstream culvert ends. As noted in the field, the upstream culvert ends are relatively stabile,
but, in the downstream condition, headcutting and plunge pools were observed. By lengthening
these culverts, there is a reduction of pipe slope which in turn will reduce outlet velocties.
Addtionally, the culverts will be buried one foot at the upstream end and outlet on the existing
grade. A one- foot sill will also be added to the upstream end of the culvert to reduce the
potential of a headcut. The potential of utilizing elliptical pipe was discussed. A supplier was
contacted and it was indicated that the use of elliptical pipe would change the construction start-
up date by at least a month to a month and a half.
A minor revision to the permit letter concerned Culvert #1. The pipe will be upgraded to a 60LF
60" CMP. The original letter stated 80LF 60" CMP.
P. O. Box 1150, Fayetteville, NC 28302-1150 - Telephone [phone]- Fax [phone]
I appreciated your time in this matter and should you have any questions, or, need additional
information please contact James J. Rerko, PWS at [phone].
incerely,
fail S
J. erko, PWS
)ames
ivision 6 Environmental Officer
ATTACHIvIENTS
Cc: Richard Spencer (COE)
John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality (7 copies)
Terry Gibson, P.E., Division Engineer
Ken Murphy, P.E., Division Maintenance Engineer
? w C
H ?
? A
C7 ? ?
0
rA A
a c.
va ?'
I
a

16+00 END RIP, RA,P?
I I
I I
?` I I
8 ?I
I
'VID I
I
8 I
J? ? I
y
O °
N
0 ?9m
•? I
Ww"
w" 0
to r I i
O? ? I II
I
.. O So I
0 ? ,1
02?, I I
i I
I
i
I i
Q I I
Jo / I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
?? I I
1? I I
I I
I I.
I I
i i
gG
i
T
r
N
7
00
)
U-1

-16+18,29
PI NO CURVE-
98
C?.
Typic.
201 L P , /
ve/ocity o j p Rss/ -p?7
60„ CM
SO
06
/ C?-
r
b
N

A lJ?
'O
X
D ?
o
- D
C_
Fri
?. -i C7
D 70 0
r
m o z
m # m n
A s
T N
l 1
I b in
Ti A
'O
o
D
z °
b
N
T ?
a
N ?
v b
x

O
f-r
W D
r
x
D
z
? A
> cZi ?
o m
n m
c o

D
0 o
z
m m ?
r
b
-I N
O
z
p+S
10
? I
+
0
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I?
I
I
I
I
06 e?S
d??„bZ
Ons.
/ 00
,?0 cad # l
VE)/o C . l S Rip
? s i)c)
6 011 CMp
F
?s° C
0
N
r
s
D ?
O O D -
C r-
I- Cn Orlin
cn --i n
D o ,
r- °z
m #
/mom A s
/ N
O
D
r
b
N

Z

T lA
A
? a
a C
?
lJ ? X

O
W D
r
m
D
L A
n L r
o m W _
U-1
-o
--?
Z
00 C)
D
o
z
m m #
s

s
v
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
July 25, 2005
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
o?
?U Ol/
219
r/lOy
q?sl'
F
W. LYNDO TEPPOkwC/r
SECRETARY
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890 -+"
05 143 j,
ATTN: Mr. Richard Spencer
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
Subject: Notification for Nationwide Permit #13 & #14 / SR 1001 / Hallsboro Road
NCDENR 401 WQC 3404 $200.00
Culvert Replacement / Stream Stabilization-Columbus County
State Project Number: 6C.024024
IV As 3 7 975'
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to repair a 1395 foot
section of an UT to Cowpen Branch (C SW) along SR 1001 (Hallsboro Road) in Columbus
County. The necessity of the project is due to storm damage from Tropical Hurricane Frances on
September 5, 2004. While the majority of Division 6 was spared the wrath of Hurricane Frances,
a very short duration, high intensity storm event did impact the area along the SR 1001 corridor.
The final result left SR 1001 in critically dangerous condition. The UT to Cowpen Branch was
scoured and eroded along its' entire length along SR 1001. The pre-storm dimensions were
approximately four (4) foot wide with 2:1 side slopes. Post-storm dimensions are six (6) to ten
(10) feet in width, with severely eroded side slopes (see pictures).
The extreme flows experienced during the storm caused outlet velocities from the two driveway
pipes to exceed typical velocities.
Crossing Roadway Station Existing Culvert Proposed Culvert
Crossing #1 Sta 18+95 20LF 48" CMP 60LF 60" CMP w/20'Rip-rap
(Driveway) Outlet Protection
Crossing #2 Sta 26+95 20LF 48" CMP 80LF 60" CMP w/20' Rip-rap
(Driveway) Outlet Protection
New stream impacts = 140 linear feet
F,

t
a
P. O. Box 1150, Fayerieville, NC 28302-1150 - Telephone [phone]- Fax [phone]
The UT to Cowpen Branch has a drainage basin of approximately 222 acres / 0.347 sq mi. The
majority of the UT consists of agricultural drainage ditches. The reach of the agricultural ditches
was expanded over the years, thus the channel is perennial with flow occurring throughout the
majority of the seasons. In calculating the Ordinary High Water line, the Q2yr of 35 cfs was used,
resulting in an existing channel OHW depth of 0.52 feet. Approximately 0.23 cu yd of rip-rap
stone per running foot will be placed below the OHW in the Typical Section #2. And, 0.45 cu yd
of rip-rap stone per running foot will be placed below the OHW in Typical Section #1. The total
quantity of Rip-rap stone placed below the OHW line is:
Section #1 (Rip-rap Outlet protection) 27.2 cu yd
Section #2(Rin-ra-rap Bank protection) 320.8 cu yd
Total Rip-rap below OHW 348.1 cu yd
Construction of this project will require impacts to waters of the United States in the Lumber
River Basin. The UT to Cowpen Branch is listed as a Class C Sw.
Culvert #1 is basically a 20 linear foot residential driveway pipe. The pipe will be upgraded in size
(80LF 60"CMP) and length to improve the hydraulic conveyance and stabilize the stream /
roadside ditch across the length of the residential property. A rip-rap apron has been designed to
reduce the outfall velocities (see Typical Section #1). The apron will extend 20 feet downstream
of the culvert.
Culvert #2 is also a driveway pipe that will be extended from a 20LF 48" CMP to a 80LF 60"
CMP. As with Culvert #2, a 20 foot rip-rap apron will be installed to reduce potential velocities.
As quantified earlier, approximately 1395 linear feet of stream / roadside ditch must be repaired to
its' previous dimensions. In order to complete the above mentioned repairs, Class I rip-rap stone
will be placed along the repaired side slopes to reduce the potential for erosion along the length of
the channel. Geotextile fabric will underlay the rip-rap. The rip-rap will be keyed into the invert
of the channel to reduce scour at the toe of slope.
RESOURCE STATUS
In general, there will be minor impacts proposed as the result of the culvert replacements along
SR 1001 in Columbus County.
Endangered Species: Plants and animals with Federal classification of Endangered (E) or
Threatened (T) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of January 29, 2005, the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service fists
five federally protected species for Columbus County.
Federally Protected Species for Columbus County
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS
Acipenser brevirostrum Shortnose Sturgeon E
Menidia extensa Waccamaw silverside T
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded woodpecker E
Thalictrum cooleyi Cooley's meadowrue E
Lysimachia asperulaefolia Rough-leaved
loosestrife E
"E" denotes Endangered (a species that is in danger of extinction throughout
all or a significant portion of its range).
T(S/A)- Threatened due to similarity of appearance, a species that is threatened
Due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for its
Protection. These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and
Are not subject to Section 7 consultation.
A biological conclusion of "No Effect" was reached for all species during the May 26, 2005
survey for protected species. Protected species were not identified, nor, was the general habitat
for each species identified.
Alternatives Analysis
In reviewing the alternatives for this project, there are two alternatives that will be discussed: 1.)
repair the channel so that it can convey the less frequent storm events while minimizing the
erosive forces. 2.) Do nothing.
The first alternative requires the replacement of the two culverts while mitigating the failed slopes
along the channel. The repairs will allow for the efficient conveyance of runoff within the channel
while maintaining a safe highway section.
The second alternative involves the "do nothing" scenario. The "do nothing" scenario will result
in the failure of the two residential driveway pipes and their sole access to SR 1001. In addition
to the residential access loss, the property owners will also lose a good portion of their front
yards. These property owners have endured a year of this condition and they are not very happy
with the aesthetic appearance of their property. The NCDOT recognizes their loss, and the
potential loss of SR 1001 due to this situation. Which is why the NCDOT has actively sought a
solution that will return the aesthetic appeal to the property owners while preserving the integrity
of SR 1001.
SR 1001 is a vital link in the transportation infrastructure of Columbus County. At the present
time, the shoulders along SR 1001 in this area are less than four (4) feet, which is critically
substandard as far as safety is concerned. An eight (8) foot grass shoulder is necessary for safety
reasons. In addition, the slopes of the channel currently are either at a 1:1 slope, or, they are
vertical. This very condition will allow for a major failure during the next storm event.
Alternative #1 was chosen to protect the integrity of SR 1001 and the adjoining private property.
Alternative #I also will vastly improve the safety standards currently identified along SR 1001.
The "fix" has taken into account proven hydraulic design standards and has been reviewed and
designed by NCDOT's Hydraulic Section.
MITIGATION
This project was reviewed twice in the field with Richard Spencer of the Corps of Engineers and
Ken Averitte (DWQ) had reviewed the site July 7, 2005. It was determined in the field that the
repair to the UT to Cowpen Branch will not require mitigation and that the repair itself was a
form of mitigation in itself.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Nationwide Permits # 13 and # 14 as
required by the above-described activities.
The National Register was reviewed in addition to conducting a field view of the project for
significant historic features. There will be no additional paving placed as a result of this project,
and, no additional fill material beyond the "pre-storm" dimensions.
The project impacts are minor in nature and should not remove or degrade existing water quality
uses. Pipe sizes proposed are the minimum necessary to create a safe highway while
accommodating the 25-year design storm. By utilizing the erosion control measures, downstream
water quality standards will be protected. All appropriate BMP's will be utilized during
construction.
Attached is a Preconstruction Notification Form, plan sheets, marked county road map, quad
location map and photographs.
If you should have any questions, or, need additional information please contact James J. Rerko,
PWS at [phone].
incerely
James .Rerko, PWS
Division 6 Environmental Officer
A7TACI IMENTS
Cc: John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality (7 copies)
Terry Gibson, P.E., Division Engineer
Ken Murphy, P.E., Division Maintenance Engineer
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 20 05 1 4 3 1
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP#13 & #14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
11. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Terry R. Gibson. P.E./NCDOT/Div 6/Division Engineer
Mailing Address: P.O. Boa 1150
Fayetteville. NC 28302
Telephone Number: 910-486-1493 Fax Number: 910-486-1959
E-mail Address: tgi son@ ot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:__ _ James J. Rerko. PWS
Company Affiliation: NCDOT/DIV 6/Division Environmental Officer
Mailing Address: Some
Telephone Number: 910-437-0208 Fax Number: 910-486-1959
E-mail Address: i_irerkoQ,)dot.state.nc.us
C=OdC p
D
Page 1 of 8
JUL 2 9 2005
M&W . WA=o M W ITV
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: SR-1001 (Hallsboro Rd.)
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): 6C.024024
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Columbus Nearest Town: Hallsboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): I-95 South to Hwy 74 East.
Travel 38+/- miles., turn left on to SR-1001 (Hallsboro rd.) travel 1 mile to beginning of
rp oiect.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): Crossing #1 (78°36'12"W 340211021,N).
Crossing #2 (78°36'20"W 34021'17"N)
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 3.02 ac. +/-
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to Cowpen Branch (C., Sw)
8. River Basin: Lumber River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at am://li2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing secondary road with a roadside channel.
Erosion has occurred in several areas along the specified project location. Surrounding
land use is rural/agricultural.
Page 2 of 8
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: SR-1001
has erosion occurring consistently along the roadway. The erosion is in response to
strom dama ge inflicted by Hurricane Frances. In order to brin g this area un to cyrrent
safety stand ards, i.e. 8 foot stabilized should ers and 2.1 side slopes within a 60-foot
right-of-way , two driveway culverts, which are undersized and perched, must be
replaced and a 1395LF section of channel must be stabilized With rip-ran stone along its
side slopes, The existing culverts (along the p roposed areal a re severely deteriorated
with corrosi on and must be re laced. Impacts will be minimiz ed as much as possible
The culverts will be re laced utilizing a track hoe excavator. While front end loaders
will place fill material. Along with culvert re placement, the a diacent channel will be
stabilized using riprap and filter fabric.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Storm damage from Hurricane Frances
eroded the VT to CowPen Branch along SR-1001 and adjoining properties. In order to
provide a safe roadway, NCDOT must replace the current driveway culverts and
stabilize the existine channel banks,
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Richard Spencer (USACE) has reviewed the project on a couple of dates, while Ken
Averitte of DWO had reviewed the site 07/07/05.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
Page 3 of 8
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Remove and replace existing
culverts along SR-1001, which will include the placement rip-rap outlet protection
following each culvert.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
Area of
Located within
Distance to
(indicate on Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
ma (acres) (yes/no) (linear feet)
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
*• 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at httn://w%vw.fema.gov.
*•* List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.0 ac
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.0 ac
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on
ma

Type of Impact* Length of

Impact

(linear feet)

Stream Name** Average Width

of Stream

Before Impact Pcrcnnial or

Intermittent?

(please specify)
Crossing #1 Culvert 60 LF UT to Cowpen Br. 4 ft. Perennial
Crossing #2 Culvert 80 LF UT to Cowpen Br. 4 ft. Perennial

Last each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Page 4 of 8
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.aov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., \vw?v.topozole.com,
\\,\\'W.mapquest.conl, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 140 LF.
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean etc.
N/A N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):_N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The eaisting_culverts are severelv_deteriorated. Thev must be replaced. The proposed
culverts have been lengthened to improve the property owners frontage along SR 1001 and
balance the perched culvert situation at the driveways. The rip-rap slope protection will
stabilize the side slopes while vrotectine the limited shoulder along SR 1001.
Page 5 of 8
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm-gide.htmi.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Mitigation is not required for this project.
Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htni. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0 LF.
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0 LF.
Page 6 of 8
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0 LF.
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0 LF.
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0 LF.
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 8
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan shall be incorporated into the Construction Plans
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
X1H. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
None

Applicant/Agent's Signature 'Date'
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
N ?
O
O ?
O
.A O
D • o "?
O. O. O
.1t p, 1L? ,
o£L?as o2 <<?
s
O os ^,??? Q
o? s
0 0 r0
A O
to
N
ti
r
.Q
N
0'ti ? o
SR172 N 5?1?Z ?•Q ?
•o ?
0'L h .O
^? o
5? •0
< o 'qA 0.
s
X719 0
0
O ?L6ag 0
SR17 .ta
D
.e
le
40
•0
00
O
0

O
0
0
v
0
v
oC
0
0
ea
0
0
TOM
z -??
0
0
0
N
r
T-
O
Z ?
Q z
a,,, . O

v N I-
J
# L W

0 z O
- Q
\ O f
r U
V)
-77
m m
L
O
w
N H Q
W
J CO
I
\ Q n
< O
z
tz
`
n
c
? a -
N
Q
U
a z
O
CL I

N
-1
U I
LL
0:
W _ U

4 #
O
W
z

U ?-
w w o
En --i

~
• Q O O
\i U
? CL

CL I- Cr
a ?
L CL
Ln
4 rr
9. U
S?
dW ,3
1-09
01
?? , 86 08? -
3nan3
6Z°81 +9
ON lcd
I °D1

I
I
?I
I I ,
I

I
I
I
= I I
- I I
? ? I I
I I
I I
? I I
I I
< I I
I
00
- I I
I I
I I
I I
N I I
I
# I I
o
? I I 6 G
I I
I I
I I.
I
I I ig?o
I /' 0
_ O
+
O
I I ?J S
C\j
I I
I I
I I 1
I
I •?

m
V
w
a
a
a
i
I
I?
I
g6 0
I
-o
I
I?
I I ? ? ? o
? I g
I
??J d12d ON] 00+9
e
¦ 1
a
a
z
N N I-
U
# w w
d O rlr u
_
W ?
m co
s z 4 U
w
U?

z
O
V1 - W
w ?
a Q
m
?-
?
U
< o
z
CL r?l
a a
?--
n
a
im rr,
V)
a
a z
O
a ?
co
U
J
U d'
IW- w
O w

n

I- U

?
U I-
w w O
V) J

a O

w w
? a
x
a
C
in ?
N
N
U
? GV
- 33
dW0
„09
?aa,ss
O/a
+ d? ?
0e
1

W
Ln
1 !
Ln
z
N
d-1
l1
Soo
2
RCp l
S3p9p, c , L
I J
1
52
I o 2 ?/
I.
_ L
Q 0

? D
C)
Q o
p- cn
o-

#

0 U U
o O
I -}- T O ?
I- N

I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I V V
I
I I ?
I I
I I
I I C
I I N 000
I I
I I `
I I N 'o
p? v
W MONK
I I •? o „?
I I
I I V ?C
I I
I
.I 4
0
' 93
14g
I Q
I ? o V
I ,
I ?? I 4
I ,
II I
I I C
+
6S
LC
C\
I ' ,= S
ta0
it
I,
I,
+ trz
o? ? o
0
E
O
Aim,

#4@4n?Vw
JQ4
? 2y
~°-.? Zoos
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 'Bqy
MICHAEL F. EASLEY. LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
JULY 27, 2005
NCDENR Division of Water Quality 2 0 0 5 1 4 31
John Hennessy
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
RE: Minor Road Crossings / SR 1001 / Columbus County
WBS Element # 37975
USACOE NWP#13 & 14 / NCDENR WQC 3495 & 3404
Dear Mr. Hennessy:
Enclosed, please find seven (7) copies of a PCN and related documentation for a Bank
Stabilization and Minor Road Crossing (Culvert Replacement) along SR 1001 in Columbus
County. NCDOT proposes to repair and stabilize a 1575 linear foot section of the UT to Cowpen
Branch which was eroded during the Hurricane Frances storm in 2004. The project will be
completed in compliance with NCDENR Division of Water Quality General Certifications 3495
and 3404, and, USACE Nationwide Permit #13 and #14.
This project is being submitted under the 401 Automated Payment Procedure. The State
Project Number is WBS Element 37975 and, the permit fee is 200.00.
A separate copy of this submission has been forwarded to Ken Averitte of the Fayetteville
Regional Office.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding this notification, please feel free to
contact me.
Q?iro
James J.
Division
P. O. Box 1150, Fayetteville, NC 28302-1150 -
PWS
Dntal Officer