20210100 Ver 1_B-4648_JD_051515 Final_20210114

kV)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PATRICK L.MCCRORY ANTHONY J.TATA
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
May 15, 2015
Ms. Tracey Wheeler
Washington Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West 5th Street
Washington,North Carolina 27899-1000
RE: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
TIP Number B-4648 - Replace Bridge No. 17 on SR-1105 over Riders Creek
Tyrrell County,North Carolina
Dear Ms. Wheeler;
KCI Associates of North Carolina, P.A. (KCI) has completed a jurisdictional stream and wetland
delineation on the above referenced project for the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT). The attached information is submitted for your review and determination of
jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act.
Enclosed please find the following information:
➢ Jurisdictional Determination (JD)Request Form
➢ Preliminary JD Form
➢ Stream and Wetland Summary Tables
➢ Vicinity Map
➢ USGS Map
➢ Jurisdictional Features Map
➢ Wetland Data Forms
Project Description & Methodology
As shown in Figure 1, B-4648 project is located in Tyrrell County, NC. The study area lies
within the Pasquotank River Basin (USGS Hydrologic Unit 03010205), and comprises
approximately 7.6 acres. The field work for the delineation was performed on March 4, 2015 in
compliance with methodology set forth in the USACE Wetland Delineation Manual (USACE
1987) and subsequent guidance. This included the use of the four stratum Wetland
Determination Form for the Atlantic Gulf and Coastal Plain (Version 2.0). Streams were

Ms. Tracey Wheeler Page 2 of 2
May 12, 2015
assessed for jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act using field indications of ordinary high water
mark and the NC Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Stream Identification Form Version
4.11. Wetland Determination Forms and NCDWQ Wetland Rating Worksheets were completed
for each type of wetland community encountered.
Delineation Results
Figures 2 and 3 present the results of the delineation, including streams and wetlands. Figure 2
is presented using the Columbia East (2013), US Geological Survey 1:24,000 Quadrangle Map.
Figure 3 is presented using 2012 NC statewide aerial photography.
Table 1 presents detailed information on each jurisdictional stream within the study area,
including status, bankfull measurements, length within the study area, NCDWQ and USACE
data form scores, and latitude/longitude. One jurisdictional stream measuring approximately 477
linear feet is present within the study area.
Table 2 presents detailed information on each wetland feature NC Wetland Assessment Method
type, Hydrologic Class, Cowardin Classification, isolated status, size, representative wetland
delineation form identification, NCDWQ wetland rating score, and latitude/longitude. A total of
5.20 acres of wetlands are present within the study area.
We request your review of the attached documentation and mapping, and issuance of a
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination for this project. A copy of this information is also
being provided to the NC Division of Water Resources.
If you have any questions, need additional information, or would like to schedule a site visit,
please contact me at your earliest convenience at(919) 707-6107 or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
AG& all______‘-
Gordon Cashin
Environmental Program Consultant
Cc: David Wainwright,NCDWR
Adam Spiller, KCI Technologies Inc.

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Multiple parcels
City, State: Columbia,NC
County: Tyrrell
Directions: From Washington.take US-264 east.Turn left onto NC-32 north.Drive about 27 miles and turn fight onto NC-45.Turn right onto US-64
east Continue about 28 miles to Columbia and turn right onto NC-94 Turn right onto Bodwell street and continue 0.5 mile to project
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Various
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Gordon Cashin,NCDOT
Mailing Address: 1598 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,NC 27699
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address I: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant2
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other,please explain.
NCDOT project. Right-of-way to be acquired, where needed.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: N/A
Mailing Address: N/A
N/A
Telephone Number: N/A
Electronic Mail Address3: N/A
❑Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
1 If available
2 Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version:December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INI II, .L II I
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION4
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Property Owner(please print) Date
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
nI am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
nI am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
l 1 I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
IIII am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
❑ I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols,skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
n Map of Property or Project Area(attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
n Size of Property or Project Area 7.6 acres
I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑✓ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
❑� Project Coordinates: 35.8983 Latitude -76.2464 Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17)with Project Boundary Overlay:
n Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections,towns
n Aerial Photography of the project area
❑✓ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g.National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan,previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No.08-02,dated June 26,2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands: Tributaries:
Wetland Data Sheets8 ❑ USACE Assessment Forms
Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
nLandscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates: Latitude Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11 x 17)with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small s'cale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections,towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
n Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g.National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/red supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupld=38364 and,
http://www.saw.usace.armv.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/publicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pdf
8 Delineation information must include,at minimum,one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands: Tributaries:
piWetlandData Sheets9 n USACE Assessment Forms
nU• pland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
nL• andscape Photos, if taken
n F• ield Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
nApproved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as"Rapanos
Form(s)")
nMap(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential)hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include,at minimum,one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat,the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard-
copy submittals include at least one original Plat(to scale)that is no larger than 11"x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11"x 17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format(PDF) file. Upon verification,the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
nMust be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
Must be legible
nMust include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
❑ Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes
and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
0 Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
iliMust clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage(or square footage)of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM)of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area(using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary(based on the most recent USGS topographic
map)or,when no USGS name exists, identify as"unnamed tributary"
❑ all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie-to
surveyed project/property boundaries
❑ Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
❑ Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non-
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
nMust include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.)that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
❑ When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five(5)years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
InWhen uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS),the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
nbe at sub-meter accuracy at each survey point.
111 include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
ninclude a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Gordon Cashin,Environmental Program Consultant,NC Department of Transportation
1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1598
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Replace Bridge No.17 on SR-1105 over Riders Creek
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Tyrrell City: Columbia
Center coordinates of site (lat/Iong in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.8983 °N; Long. -76.2464 °w.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Riders Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non-wetland waters:
477 linear feet: 90 width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin Class: Riverine
Stream Flow: Perennial
Wetlands: 5.20 acres.
Cowardin Class: Forested
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non-Tidal:
1

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
❑ M• aps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:Vicinity Map
❑✓ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ D• ata sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ U• SGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑ U• .S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:124K Columbia East&West(2013)
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
111 Photographs: El Aerial (Name & Date): 2012 Statewide Aerial Photographs or
n Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
4

B-4648 Delineation May 2015
Stream and Wetland Tables
Table 1.
Bankfull Bankfull Length Scores
Stream Status Height Width
Stream Name (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) DWQ USACE Lat Long
Riders Creek(S1) Perennial 7 est. 90 477 - - 35.8983 -76.2462
Table 2.
Wetland Class Isolated Size USACE Forms NCDWQ
ID NCWAM Hydrologic Cowardin Yes/No (Acres) WET UP Score Lat Long
W1 Riverine Swamp Forest Riparian PFO No 1.48 W5 W3 88 35.8994 -76.2468
W2 Riverine Swamp Forest Riparian PFO No 0.54 W5 W3 88 35.8988 -76.2463
W3 Bottomland Hardwood Forest Riparian PFO No 0.63 X X 47 35.9002 -76.2465
W4 Riverine Swamp Forest Riparian PFO No 1.29 W5 W3 88 35.8971 -76.2470
W5 Riverine Swamp Forest Riparian PFO No 1.26 X W3 88 35.8981 -76.2462
- = No Score
PFO = Palustrine Forested
X = Data form completed
Page 1 of 1

� �6A
)2j!
Rdp�,,.....>________________________,4
Se
eiApeF eipipe,. albk
Rivem'ck
hoh
0
) , ..... .
la= _
c, 64
'Y� a`EnPo R. ',, sir :.:lumbi a
3 ' to �� d op'
UEj���
c 1 lta�
.1. do
Za�Aost 8t1'ce 1C 94 , 400/ ci
lel
r
�� Old Columbia Rd f
� dr
t 3 :iv
o A 4i1P
�d
Chapel Hil Rd o- $r
Po re4 �e�eN$
ga
eruonS River 4
Cupp P Je
ti
S .vvo cc Pittymyshoe R' ��osr.
O
�c
e�
Ilri - .
econ.„_.), o
ueek
Bodwe ''.
Lat 35.8983/Long-76.2464 z
!''��1M�11� 0All�� a
1041s.21141111111 0 i 0
ihi►ei airHai t it A
t3 FProject Location.Tyrrell County,NC —I
of"°RT" Figure 1: Vicinity Map
P� ��i N
y\ 1 0.5 0 1 Study Area B-4648
Tm o �� Miles W E Replace Bridge No. 17 on SR-1105
9�� oQ�P �/ USGS Named Streams over Riders Creek
"roFTRaNS? April 2015 s T rrell County

LW
li \
W3
C
0 W1
li
�Yeek(S1)
-WS
fig..a""eizii:=11:4
/
-14111Nsiik_111441444444114444.
W4
(
W5
/ /
�NORTy N
.se° °''ok 0 100 200 Study Area Figure 2: USGS Map
I.
w E
-` B-4648
Feet op Wetlands
I. o s Replace Bridge No. 17 on SR-1105
Q
-� �P �� over Riders Creek
�,NTOF 7RPN�'eOQ Columbia East(2013)USGS 1:24000 Quadrangle Maps Perennial Stream
April 2015 Tyrrell County

•
,...�eE' ,4 , , .!"`a '� f ,fin`.' ter'. .". 1!r` A,,r-' "x = 1'' 'ir"`' ' .•s
- r ; rF
v t' p 5
�� •�+c+a -t.. 't � �:'Bi��k �'r+< 'tom ".� s"� '��� 1��
P� -= s. . `' .4- 'yF: =4"C k�wk '{ ,t 'r i�`
''r .-k-•' .19-4,- 7,1°"'"1. .V;L, '''. _.(, ' ---e:ti'Lly5w.:*0;.:-jf-74i'':::
r k+&,
4,
+ a ¢: g 4'' 'fi t f S� r s- y* -i
-....,, - .,.„..„_.
_ , .. ,,,,,,....,- lit r . ,,., .: ‘ .+-
..., ,,,,.-
ptg,--f--$4.4r.40.,-,• -,"- --•sztVey. ',,,.. •..-- IL-, ,4t..,,,„:m . , . , . . , .
yea. i kr " A
n
F N
P{ ,f'4, 7�s as mot +
vim' r ,Y3.x d y' j ' „f ' ems.$'' '+ra 3'" "t ^•' #S. "'K,'." s'«" ° i •�'�`. ')
IIl v' 7 ! t i 1 ,- Y
.".-.-"i l.-te..-ft.,;,-,,'.-',w' -.;."-;.,)-,-.:.
6 vW 'W k 0 r4 ' �d9. Wq'-, ;Y " % "'R' CYe r`` 4 4,. f. 4...`*.,ti. .r ‘A a <
•
44
Aire,
s. �i.. ,,: r . •dG•
^ � +s, ' ` > 'y„ : ,� L P
. ,, ..
'
FrZic
�" S1fM :;, r' x tF a , £j �$. �� 4 1 ' Ta a �' d.B .:'y. q 'y ; . ''' ,f r
4.
�y,_ r,!* c - it 'k" 4ybF .`•. - P" M y` ki
r' �4 v..r { „K .s4yi°r S e f. - �. , - � Y ..1,
� � c yT _� R ' .Ft
t., \W�3%1.�1 ate,
w*.. tt � Y; �r 11 c•� rk �' t� - � t'�.' �,
,y'1F r a I tM r' - ..
X - r E !! .� M141O 'L
a
[ •�
ilikiiii
»i,.. rry, X.,A.i *`h' �,fw'.4#� -1,: "I
_ .. ,, , - ..die .� T+ "� ..„4`� *Y2'k6.4:'�";� Y. _ .. }, 3
., .At, . .. a ',::i �D ` '�v "~ F e�
�NOTy 04
oe �,, N Figure 3: Jurisdictional Features
�� 90� 0 100 200 Study Area g Map
~ - B-4648
"� Feet41110 w e Wetlands
m o s Replace Bridge No. 17 on SR-1105
9�� oQ`P ��2012 NC Statewide Aerial Imagery over Riders Creek
Perennial Stream
"roFlRP April 2015 Tyrrell County

\J3
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
/
Project/Site: (j-LK City/County: Cohen bia Tarr€f(/ Sampling Date: 5—L.)S
Applicant/Owner: tit De T State: A/C Sampling Point: J
Investigator(s): f. 5tOlic4 Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hilislope,terrace,etc.):/� AP 5'0A Local relief(concave,convex,none): Goal GGAe Slope(%). a.-1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): L a k Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: TO i`"Alle NWI classification:
Are climatic!hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes _/ No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed.explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY -
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required,check all that apply) ,. Surface Soil Cracks(B8)
_ Surface Water(A1) _ Aquatic Fauna(813) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
A High Water Table(A2) _ Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns(810)
X Saturation(A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_ Water Marks(81) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Drift Deposits(B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) Geomorphic Position(02)-
Iron Deposits(B5) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
_ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches): 'a.'
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Version 2.0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
rr Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 36 T R-- ) %Cover So7s? Status Number of Dominant Species 9,
1. RAM, Meda , -. 5 0 v FA& That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)
2. I., d0.4r 19 rPIU, a 0 r4c Total Number of Dominant
3. SG/Ix iv a d�L Species Across All Strata: (B)
4. AC-tth rtkP f l DO F AL U2t11
Percent of Dominant Species
5. /VU 4 Sa b:f larc. 5 Dh R- That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (NB)
v
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
=Total Cover OBL species ,Q x 1 = Id
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: FACW species 56 x 2= 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3n ft . ) FAC species PKQ x 3= 1/2d
1. Walt mul.!`tIP. -"ordIA Gh,r"FCfa a0 FAt FACUspecies x4=
2. #fnus SBfI1J 10 FRG v..I UPLspecies x5=
3. Ara' rJf >A,_16 Column Totals: 90 1/7 (A) 5 36 (B)
4. Li ,,,J 4r Stu-ruofi 1 O FAG Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.0
5. Pin..S tacoln Lb FAt Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators:
6. TA i -1-Ai -- G 3 ri/Icy rate P+i Fl0(A 140 f AC J 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7. J 2-Dominance Test is>50%
8. �3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
=Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. ppn be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
2. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
4. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
5 height.
6. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
7. than 3 in.DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
8. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
9. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10. Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11. height.
12.
=Total Cover
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 0 _ )
1. rv0/ye.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation •
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed,list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
-� IOYR3/)- -g'sL
-5 r 0 YA 311- 10 YA 3/3 a.0 ( P 4's L
S- 9 _ 1t9 YAM 7 5 YR 3/24 15 G p4A sL �P- (1
.. 8 10 yR b�a 7,5 yR 3/1 r0 c PL L-Ps
5 rR i-I/(o
iv YR 5/3 a-0 G PL
(;=a-D /0115/6 ioyR C M sL
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils?:
Histosol(Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S,T,U) _ 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T,U) _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,S,T)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) A Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
_ Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P,T,U) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Red Parent Material(TF2)
_ Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) _ Marl(F10)(LRR U) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0,P,T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T,U) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0,S) _ Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,150B)
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A,153C,153D)
_ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T,U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
- �
S-
5 - �
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

pp WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
6 Project/Site: - 1-16 yS City/County: CO/AMht f/f9'rrd/ Sampling Date: 3/11/15
Applicant/Owner: f"'G D ( State: NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): ] , Oahe6f I-, SC.e!it/V./AtSection,Township,Range
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): F/body.) i\ Local relief(concave,convex,none): rnn Ca•fC Slope(%).
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): 1-/fin 1' Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Dn 1O*A NWI classification:
Are climatic!hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes J No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes V No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site/map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes s No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes�— No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required,check all that aoolv) — Surface Soil Cracks(138)
_ Surface Water(Al) _ Aquatic Fauna(613) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
High Water Table(A2) _ Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns(B10)
Z Saturation(A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) — Moss Trim Lines(B18)
— Water Marks(B1) — Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
— Sediment Deposits(B2) — Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) — Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Drift Deposits(B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_ Iron Deposits(B5) — Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
. Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth(inches): ,
/f
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 3 /
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes xi No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
b gfre451i, /(41 ivvIusiJ
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Spa ies? Status
�t
Number of Dominant Species
1 y '�JJt ^ a SLe�toe' ) yo 061- That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)
2. n h5 F4i Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species /�
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A/B) DP2
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total%Cover of:' Multiply by:
/T
8.
OBL species 5 x 1 = 115
=Total Cover 40 x 2= d n
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: FACW species
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) FAC species 3 a x 3= CD
1. \-Zi �l Ctl�//ti tA4em pInra L4A FAGS✓ FACUspecies x 4=
2 UPL species x 5=
3.
/Column Totals: 15 (A) a/5 (B)
4. Prevalence Index =B/A= !0 0$7
5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6. • _ 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7. J 2-Dominance Test is>50%
8. 3-Prevalence Index is 53.01
=Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1._ ic1 re C 4rra44 - Lee I sic, 0 L be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
2 or3 e O i olds Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
4. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
5 height.
6. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
7. than 3 in.DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
8. Herb-All herbaceous(non-wo
ody)ody)plants,regardless
g, of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10. Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in
11. height.
12.
=Total Cover
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: A
1. 5,„,'LLlc i0)bvJ,7ol a FAC
2. �a i i P ui I - 4.4 rail (4 I FA-c
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed,list morphological adaptations below).
crj .e, axi fs4:13 bv�
l 0�5 of 6^4°>5 c,
- 5f ov,i5 tA035/
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Pant:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 a. I YR )/0--
4G yd'
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils?:
Histosol(A1) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S,T,U) _ 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T,U) _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,S,T)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) y Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P,T,U) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Red Parent Material(TF2)
_ Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) _ Marl(F10)(LRR U) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0,P,T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T,U) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0,S) _ Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,150B)
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A,153C,153D)
_ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T,U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: FP' h/(Dtg City/County: CoL,.J y of Tn IIUI Sampling Date: 3 -Li IS
Applicant/Owner: NGOi 1 State: lV L Sampling Point: D19 14°3 yowl
Investigator(s): S , 6�k14) '�, 5Cb1 IZ14 Section,Township,Range: �i U
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): NYf.1,�,e Local relief(concave,convex,none): CO'CO Slope(%): (j—%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): Ir R R IT Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: T 0,4\5ti NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions drf/the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no,explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required,check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(86)
_ Surface Water(Al) _ Aquatic Fauna(613) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(BS)
_ High Water Table(A2) Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns(810)
_ Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
Water Marks(81) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Drift Deposits(63) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Geomorphic Position(02)
_ Iron Deposits(B5) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
_ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth(inches):T
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): I 1
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. sampling Point:
30-Ft Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Prot size: ) ° ,�gecies? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. 4 ('J)rarr M 0 J FAG That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)
2. Liq.q,d - 51,yI,L,'.4.K an() F G Total Number of Dominant
3. P'Ir AS t OAa 'I7 e �- FA' Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species y
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: I I .ilp
(NB) i 3
6. II.'
Prevalence Index worksheet: C`�g
7.
Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
=Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: FACW species x 2= d
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ,U Ci ) FAC species 9() x 3= No
1. 04�x M (Q - pordia r a:FGirtn :6O J F�.G FACU species ! a x 4= 40
2. Are"- fo. tn/w 0 F4.6, UPL species x 5=
3. age) 34d - P.P.riee, 1-Aort)n.4 6. ID FA/tJ Column Totals: 216 (A) bole (B)
4. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3'��
5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7. 2-Dominance Test is>50%
8. 4 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
=Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: i )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
2. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
4. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
5 height.
6. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
7. than 3 in.DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
8. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
9. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10. Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11. height.
12.
=Total Cover
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 'C - )1 L ,)
. on+" U cc,ro. air" tale
2. Crossw'� - [5k9-�nla Guif!'eol.J4-• I/ PA(
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed,list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features Ott
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
o-� (t)YR 5/2 f51- 4P
. -ID 10YR ii/a 45 L-
10-11.1 IQ`f R c/►i- 10 YR ch- 5 D m 5L
laYRS/'� InYR 5/D S n t4
�.5YR y/b a, G /''l S L
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S,T,U) _ 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T,U) _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,S,T)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
_ Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P,T,U) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Red Parent Material(TF2)
_ Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) Redox Depressions(F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) _ Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0,P,T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T,U) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0,S) _ Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,150B)
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A,153C,153D)
_ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T, U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No �C
Remarks:
- a
ID ' ZU
ektAtaf‘ .6.o/iI4-, r
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Atlantic and Gulf Coastal/� / Plain Region
Project/Site: 3-uh6 yt City/County: (1J/4 iAf 1tt-fig( Sampling Date: -3/505
Applicant/Owner: /VC DQ T State: /de., Sampling Point: 3
Investigator(s): S , 51-044 j. T. 5ed i'lcr Section Township,Range:
Landform(hilislope,terrace,etc.): Cl{ c54roA Local relief(concave,convex,none): C OA►Gov't Slope(%): !-- 1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): 1,RA1 Let: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name. To, Ottewt NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes •V No (If no,explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes `/ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes----7- No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required,check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(86)
_ Surface Water(Al) _ Aquatic Fauna(813) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88)
JX High Water Table(A2) _ Marl Deposits(815)(LRR U) Drainage Patterns(810)
. Saturation(A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Moss Trim Lines(B18)
_ Water Marks(81) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Sediment Deposits(B2) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _X Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Drift Deposits(63) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Geomorphic Position(02)
Iron Deposits(B5) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
_ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches): .?/i
Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 3 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes -)\ No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Version 2.0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30-Ft ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. A c r rkhr.l' `it) v r-/A t That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC:
2. Pi,w -Got)4 10 -P-AG
Total Number of Dominant
3. L i 1 /l SyJ.ui Fii�.t a0 FAG Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
4. V„}. /Q -P'bfd& Grri Fe rift. FA-c Percent of Dominant Species n V
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: /v (A/B) 116
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
=Total Cover OBL species .2./1x 1 = .7-0
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: FACW species x 2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 2/) �t ) FAC species gd x 3= clip1. u6-X el j,�t 1e -`MO ril f i- t P,i-iY..rAt 6 rite FACU species �Q x 4= M�
2. P:„wh T.c)a t o rAt UPL species x 5=3.
Column Totals: 9-/t? (A) 40 J (B)
4 Prevalence Index =B/A= a• f6
5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6. _/1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 V 2-Dominance Test is>50%
8. 4f 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
=Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: IA ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. 3Uwchti dcbtSuS 34 J be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
2. . Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
4. __. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
5 height.
6. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
7. than 3 in.DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
8 Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
8. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10. Woody vine-Al woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11. height.
12.
=Total Cover
50%of tot cover: 20%of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: w )
1. ,S.i I S fO/ , . 20
2. +-vrVCt t ni1w 10 Ric
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
Present? Yes � No
Remarks: (If observed,list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
O—3 !d YR 3/. L rs
3 It w YR 9/ 7.5M 30 c M s�
(�-0 to YR 60- rR s 6 O C /ti Ls DP
. . yb
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soli Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils?:
_ Histosol(Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S,T,U) _ 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T,U) _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,S,T)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
_ Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P,T,U) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Red Parent Material(TF2)
_ Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) _ Marl(F10)(LRR U) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0,P,T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T,U) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0,S) _ Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,150B)
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A,153C,153D)
_ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T,U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ' No
Remarks:
0 pv, (A) -
o- )
3- II
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
Project Name 8--t-(b 1-1$ Nearest Road _ fvelydi i A
County --in rc II Wetland area `-t 57 acres Wetland width WO feet
Name of evaluatpr 5, P-a/i&5, T, 5ee)' yei Date Wi5
Wetland location Adjacent land use
on pond or lake (within %2 mile upstream,upslope, or radius)
,X,on perennial stream forested/natural vegetation %
on intermittent stream agriculture, urban/suburban 2-0 %
_within interstream divide _ impervious surface %
other:
Soil series: Dominant vegetation
x predominantly organic-humus, muck, or (1) -rax,odi,ti, ascandtAS
peat
predominantly mineral- non-sandy (2) etice9e axciJlon 4
predominantly sandy (3) Cx.r Jf a id.ceMi Fiore,
Hydraulic factors Flooding and wetness
steep topography 1 semipermanently to permanently flooded or
ditched or channelized inundated
X total wetland width> 100 feet _seasonally flooded or inundated
intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland type(select one)*
_Bottomland hardwood forest _Pine savanna
_Headwater forest _Freshwater marsh
y. Swamp forest Bog/fen
_Wet flat _Ephemeral wetland
_Pocosin _Carolina bay
Bog forest _Other:
'The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
_
R Water storage 5 x 4.00= 20
A Bank/Shoreline stabilization 3 x 4.00= 1 Wetland
T Pollutant removal 5 ratin
,.x5.00= �5 e..:1 4 :.
I Wildlife habitat 5 x 2.00= ib '" . JF
N Aquatic life value = I f.- ''
G Recreation/Education 5 x 1.00 5
**Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and>10%nonpoint source disturbance within '/2 mile upstream,upslope,or radius

WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
Project Name 6- 416 09> Nearest Road
County Wetland area 0 .4 acres Wetland width Lid D feet
Name of evaluator 5_ 5toJ € (, 50m,yereAr Date 3J 1/15
Wetland location Adjacent land use
on pond or lake (within V2 mile upstream,upslope, or radius)
on perennial stream forested/natural vegetation O %
on intermittent stream agriculture, urban/suburban 26
within interstream divide _ impervious surface %
x other: d ller't h,(of\
Soil series: Dominant vegetation
predominantly organic-humus, muck, or (1) Pi n N s tnd
peat
predominantly mineral-non-sandy (2) l is cry i�GJa
predominantly sandy (3) A/A,A5 4 mule.'&.,
Hydraulic factors Flooding and wetness
steep topography _semipermanently to permanently flooded or
_ ditched or channelized inundated
total wetland width> 100 feet / seasonally flooded or inundated
intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland type(select one)*
Bottomland hardwood forest _Pine savanna
_Headwater forest _Freshwater marsh
Swamp forest _Bog/fen
_Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
_Pocosin _Carolina bay
Bog forest _Other:
•The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
R Water storage 2 x 4.00= —
A Bank/Shoreline stabilization 0 x 4.00= ' !) Wetland
„ rating
T Pollutant removal x 5.00= 1 b asT
_ =-N .
I Wildlife habitat r7 x 2.00= 10 3 r .s
N Aquatic life value ` x 4.00= f b ?,, y
vazg
G Recreation/Education x 1.00= 3
**Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and>10%nonpoint source disturbance within '/2 mile upstream,upslope,or radius