20110462 Ver 1_Application_20110516

' f_1.
a
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
MqY V?
+ c,,??nsv.114 G ?4/1
STgpRWq(?,
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION `"'"'?ReH
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
Mr. Bill Biddlecome
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
Dear Sirs:
EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
SECRETARY
May 12, 2011
Mr. Stephen Lane
Division of Coastal Management
N. C. Dept, of Env. & Natural Resources
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
1104.62
Subject: Application for Section 404 General Permit 31, Section 401 Water Quality
Certification, and CAMA Major Development Permit for the replacement of,
Bridge #3 over Tulls Creek on SR 1232 in Currituck County. State Project No.
8.2040501. Federal Aid Project Number BRZ-1232(4). Debit $400 from WBS
33730.1.1.TIP No. B-4494.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), Division of Highways, in
consultation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), proposes to replace Bridge
No. 3 in Currituck County. The proposed let date for the project is January 17, 2012;
however, the let date may advance as additional funds become available.
Please find enclosed a Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) form, permit.drawings, utility
drawings/narrative, roadway plans, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Major
Permit Forms 1, 2, and 5, stormwater management plan, EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter,
and adjacent riparian landowner certified mail receipts. A Categorical Exclusion (CE) was
completed for this project on November 15, 2007, and distributed shortly thereafter.
Additional copies are available upon request. .
Regulatory Approvals
CAMA: NCDOT requests that the proposed work be authorized under a Coastal Area
Management Act Major Development Permit. Adjacent riparian landowner return receipts
will be forwarded once they become available. Authorization to debit the $400 Permit
Application Fee from WBS Element 33730.1.1 is hereby given.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE. WWW.NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
1020 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
RALEIGH NC 27610-4328
Section 404 Permit: All aspects of this project are being processed by the Federal Highway
Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). The
NCDOT requests that a General Permit 198200031 authorize these activities.
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certification number 3820 will apply to this
project. NCDOT is providing three copies of this application to the North Carolina
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, for their
approval.
A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT
website at: http://www.ncdot.org/doh/preconstruct/pe/neu/permit.html
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Mr. Chris Manley, at
919-707-6135.
Sincerely,
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Branch Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc:
NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List

2
t ??F W ATf9o
r ' • r r 01? C
I
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.?
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
I a. Type(s) of approval sought from the

Corps:
®section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number: 198200031
1c. Has the N WP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification -'Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
I a. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
If. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ® Yes ? No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ® Yes ? No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ® Yes ? No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge 3 over Tulls Creek on SR 1232
2b. County: Currituck
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Moyock
2d. Subdivision name: not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: 8-4494
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC i f
applicable):
not applicable
3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
3f. Telephone no.: (919)707-6 135
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
31h. Email address: [e-mail]
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name: not applicable
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
2

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.466900 Longitude: - 76.076000
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: 1 acre
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Tulls creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C NSW
2c.. River basin: Pasquotank
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Currently there is an existing roadway and bridge on site, and the surrounding area is marsh, forested and
residential.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.5
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
100
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
NCDOT Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate Bridge No. 3 has a sufficiency rating of 29.1 out of a possible
100 for a new structure, with a substructure rating of 4 out of 9. Therefore, NCDOT proposes to replace Bridge No.
3 with a new bridge.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves replacing a 90-foot bridge with a 120-foot, triple-span bridge on the existing alignment with an
off-site detour. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ® Yes ? No ? Unknown
Comments: Requested July 2005, but never received
the written JD.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
and Marco J.
Name (if known): Daniel P. Ingram Agency/Consultant Company: W. K. Dickson, Inc.
Hilhorst, PWS Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ® Yes ? No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
State Stormwater Permit has been requested but not received.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
4
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary
Site 1 ® P ? T Fill Coastal ? Yes
® No ? Corps
? DWQ 0.06
Site 1 ® P ? T Fill riparian . ® Yes
? No ® Corps
? DWQ 0.02
Site 2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
Site 3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
Site 4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
Site 5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
0.08
2g. Total wetland impacts Permanent
2h. Comments: There will be 0.10 acre of hand clearing for construction equipment clearances.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length
number- (PER) or jurisdiction stream (acre)
Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 width
Temporary (T) (INT)? DWQ - non-404, (feet)
other)
Site l ®P ? T Fill Tulls Creek ® PER
? INT ® Corps
? DWQ 90 0.22
Site 2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
Site 3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
Site 4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
Site 5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
Site 6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 0.22 Perm
0 Temp
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.
4a. 41b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number - waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or (if applicable)
Temporary
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts 0 Permanent
0 Temporary
4g. Comments: N/A
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond Excavat
Flooded Filled ed Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually l ist all buffer
impacts below. If an impacts require mitig ation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse
?Tar-Pamlico
? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora 'required?
B1 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts 0 0
6i. Comments: N/A
7
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed bridge is 30 feet longer than the existing bridge; the bridge will be constructed with cored slab units;
1.5:1 fill slopes on fill in canals to minimize impacts to surface waters.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Top down construction will be implemented, and there will be no workpads or causeways. An off-site detour will be
used. There will be an in-water work moratorium from February 15 to June 15 to minimize impacts to anadromous
fish.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ® Yes ? No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ® Corps

2c.
If yes, which mitigat ion option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank
® Payment to in-lieu fee program

? Pennittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0.12 acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) -required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ®No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No "
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See permit drawings
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
® Coastal counties
? HOW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ® Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a . Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No N/A
5b . Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No N/A
10
V
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ® Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
® Yes
? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a . Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b . If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a . Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
not applicable
II
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ® Yes ? No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ? No
impacts?
® Raleigh
5c. If yes, ind irate the USFWS.Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NHP, Field Surveys, and USFWS
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NMFS County Index
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ®No'
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)? .
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NEPA Documentation
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
81b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Hydraulics coordination with FEMA
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps

Di. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph D s , 2
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name pplican Agent's signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
12

a
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
October 10, 2008
MEMORANDUM TO
FROM:
SUBJECT:
The following items were incorporated into the Hydraulic design of this project for
stormwater quality considerations:
• No deck drains on the bridge
• 1.5:1 Sideslopes on fill in canals to minimize impacts to Surface Waters
• Hold existing Roadway grade to minimize project footprint.
File
Paul F. Fisher, P.E.
Hydraulics Unit
Stormwater Management Plan
B-4494, Currituck County
LYNDO TTPETr
SECRETARY
PFF
i
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HYDRAULICS UNIT
1590 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1590
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: MVN.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
CENTURY CENTER COMPLEX
BUILDING B
1020 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
RALEIGH NC
CC,
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
October 4, 2007
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
RECEIVED
q cR
OCT 1 2007
DIYW OF HCHWAYS
PDR-OKE OF NATURAL ENVY
This letter is in response to your letter of September 26, 2007 which provided the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) with the biological determination of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) that the replacement of Bridge No. 3 on SR 1232 (Poyner Road) over
Tulls Creek in Currituck County (TIP No. B-4494) may affect, but is not likely to adversely
affect the federally endangered West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus). In addition,
NCDOT has determined that the project will have no effect on all other listed species. These
comments are provided in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
NCDOT has agreed to implement the Service's GUIDELINES FOR AVOIDING IMPACTS
TO THE WEST INDIAN MANATEE: Precautionary Measures for Construction
Activities in North Carolina Waters. Based on this commitment and on available information,
the Service concurs with your determination that the proposed bridge replacement may affect,
but is not likely to adversely affect the West Indian manatee. Also, we concur that the project
will have no effect on all other listed species. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2)
of the ESA have been satisfied. We remind you that obligations under section 7 consultation
muss be recons,.,o.eu .?. (1) new .mon:,atiou reveals impacts oft'nis identified action that may
affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered in this review; (2)
this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or (3) a
new species is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by this identified action.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to review this project.. If you have any questions
regarding our response; please contact Mr. Gary Jordan at [phone] (Ext. 32).
Sincerely,
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor

cc: Bill Biddlecome, USACE, Washington, NC
David Wainwright, NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC
Travis Wilson, NCWRC, Creedmoor, NC
Chris Militscher, USEPA, Raleigh, NC
John Sullivan, FHWA, Raleigh, NC
David Harris, NCDOT, Raleigh, NC
rb?_N_
PROGRAM
May 12, 2011
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Manager, Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
B-4494, Replace Bridge Number 3 on SR 1232 over Tulls Creek Currituck County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will provide the
compensatory coastal marsh mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by you on May
11, 2011, the impacts are located in CU 03010205 of the Pasquotank River Basin in the Northern Outer Coastal
Plain (NOCP) Eco-Region, and are as follows:
Pasquotank Stream Wetlands Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
03010205 Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non- Coastal
Zone 1
Zone 2
NOCP Riparian Marsh
Impacts 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0
feettacres
Mitigation Units 0 0 0 0 0 0.12 0 0
(Credits-up to 2:1)
This mitigation acceptance letter replaces the mitigation acceptance letter issued on May 3, 2011.
EEP commits to implementing sufficient compensatory riparian wetland mitigation credits to offset the impacts
associated with this project in accordance with the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources'
Ecosystem Enhancement Program In-Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact
amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance
letter will be required from EEP.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Harmon at 919-715-
1929.
Sincerely, N
V
Willi . Gilmore, P.E.
EEP Director
cc: Mr. Bill Biddlecome, USACE - Washington Regulatory Field Office
Mr. Brian Wrenn, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
File: B-4494 Revised
Resto?ut?... ?... Pro" OW Statt
&AMitA
M
R5
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 1919-715-G476 / www.nceep.net