20110391 Ver 1_Application_20110427

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
April 1, 2011
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
iP.O. Box 1890
!Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
ATTN
Dear Sir:
Subject:
Mr. Ronnie Smith
NCDOT Coordinator
-4,
7 D
4*0ST?7'ylY-
A
Eugene A. Conti,
SECRETARY
110 3 9 1
Notification for Nationwide Permit 14 (Minor Road Crossing)
NCDENR 401 WQC 3820
Culvert Replacement SR-2170 (Peacock Rd) Hamett County
State Project Number: 6C.043087
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) has scheduled to clear, grade, drain,
base and pave SR-2170, Harnett County. Total project length is 0.27 miles. The roadway will be
widened from 30 feet maintenance limits to 60 foot Right of Way with a paved roadway section
of 20 feet with stabilized grass shoulders of 6 foot will be provided. This project will require the
replacement of one (1) wet cross line as shown below:
crossing Roadway Station Existing Culvert Proposed Culvert
Permit site #1 Sta. 4+ 30 48 LF 12" RCP 72 LF 24" RCP
New Stream Impacts = 24 linear feet
Construction of this project will require impacts to the waters of the United States in the Cape
Fear River Basin. Permit site 41 conveys drainage to Buffalo Lakes (Class Q. The project is
located within the 03030004 Hydrologic Unit, sub basin 03-06-14.
1
SR-2170 serves as a private road for mainly retired persons that border Carolina Lakes Golf
Course. The current road way width is 15 feet within 30 foot maintenance limits. NCDOT
proposes to expand SR-2170 out to a 20 foot paved roadway with 6 foot grassed shoulders in a
60 foot Right of Way, which is the typical section for NCDOT secondary roads.
SR-2170 Peacock Rd is being paved in conjunction with an adjoining road, Mallard Rd. Mallard
Rd is situated entirely in uplands and no permits are required for its construction. These two
roads combined bring the total project length to 0.65 miles.
P. O. Box 1150, Fayetteville, NC 28302-1150 -Tel ep hone [phone]- Fax [phone]
Permit Site #1 is located at (Sta. 4+30). The current culvert is 48 LF 12" RCP, NCDOT
proposes to increase to a 72 LF 24" RCP. This stream starts as an underground spring, which is
encircled by a concrete culvert placed vertically in the ground. The origin is roughly 30 feet from
the edge of the existing road bed. Upstream stream width is approximately 1 foot wide.
i Downstream the stream flattens and widens out to 2.5 feet, with adjacent floodplain banks of up
to 6 feet in width. Vegetation in this area is Tulip tree, Wax myrtle, Giant cane and Chinese
Privet.
RESOURCESTATUS
In general, there will be minor impacts proposed as a result of the replacement of the culvert
along SR-2170 (Peacock Rd.) in Harnett County. This culvert site has undergone human
(manipulation. A Nationwide Permit #14 / NCDENR 401 WQC 3820 is required for the project.
Endangered Species: Plants and animals with Federal classification of Endangered (E) or
Threatened (T) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered
(Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of September 22, 2010; the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
'lists four federally protected species for Harnett County.
Federally Protected Species for Harnett County
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS
Haliaeetus leucocepholus Bald Eagle 130PA
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded woodpecker E
Notropis mekistrocholas Cape Fear Shiner E
Lysimachia asperulaefolio Rough-leaved loosestrife E
"E" denotes Endangered (a species that is in danger of extinction throughout
all or a significant portion of its range).
T(S/A)- Threatened due to similarity of appearance, a species that is threatened
Due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for its
Protection. These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and
Are not subject to Section 7 consultation.
A biological conclusion of "No Effect" was reached for all species during the February 14, 2011
survey for protected species. Protected species were not identified, nor, was the general habitat
for each species identified.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Nationwide Permit 14 / NCDENR 401
WQC 3820 as required by the above-described activities.
I
The National Register was reviewed in addition to conducting a field view of the project for
significant historic features.
The project impacts are minor in nature and should not remove or degrade existing water quality
uses. Pipe sizes proposed are the minimum necessary to create a safe highway while
accommodating the 25-year design storm. There is no record within the NCDOT District 2
Office (Harnett County) that the road experiences flood overtopping. By utilizing the erosion
control measures, downstream water quality standards will be protected. All appropriate BMP's
will be utilized during construction.
Attached is a Preconstruction Notification Form, plan sheets, marked county road map, quad
location map and photographs.
If you should have any questions, or need additional information please contact James J. Rerko,
PWS at [phone].
J ' cerely, ?
? es J! Rerko, PWS
ision 6 Environmental Officer
ATTACHMENTS
Cc: Brain Wren, Division of Water Quality (7 copies)
Mason Herndon, Division of Water Quality (1 copy)
Greg Bums, P.E., Division 6 Engineer
o?oF W ArFg

O Ne5? T
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PC Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:

l Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
I
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 3820
1 c. Has the N WP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes N No For the record only for Corps Permit:

® Yes ? No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: SR 2170- Peacock Rd
2b. County: Harnett County
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Spout Springs
2d. Subdivision name: NA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: 6C.043087
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NA
3b. Deed Book and Page No. NA
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC i f
applicable): NA
3d. Street address: NA
3e. City, state, zip: NA
3f. Telephone no., NA
3g. Fax no.: NA
3h. Email address: NA
Page I of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ® Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name: Greg Burns, P.E./ NCDOT/Division 6 Engineer
4c. Busines s name
(if applicable): NCDOT
4d. Street address: PO Box 1150
4e. City, state, zip: Fayetteville, NC 28302
4f. Telephone no.: [phone]
4g. Fax no.: [phone]
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: James J. Rerko, PWS
Sb. Business name
(if applicable):
NCDOT/ Division 6 Environmental Officer
5c. Street address: PO Box 1150
5d. City, state, zip: Fayetteville, NC 28302
5e. Telephone no.: [phone]x 26
5f. Fax no., [phone]
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA
Latitude: 35.2955N
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Longitude: - 79.0515W
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: 1.96 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Buffalo Lakes
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing 15 foot dirt road with maintenance limits 30 feet wide. Area is heavily wooded with homes buffering Buffalo
Lakes. Toward the end of the project SR 2170 is in between homesites and Carolina Lakes Golf Course.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
24 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
By Statute, NCDOT is required to pave all unpaved secondary roads. To ensure that the roadway meets current safety
standards, the road will be paved to a width of 20 feet. 6 foot grass shoulders will be installed on each side and 3:1 side
slopes will be provided within the 60 foot right of way.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Bring SR 2170 up to current safety standards, ie. 20 foot paving with 6 foot stabilized shoulders and 3:1 side slopes within
a 60 foot right of way. Impacts will be minimized as much as possible. Front end loaders will place fill material.
Eventually a motor grader will finish grade the project prior to paving.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ? Yes ®No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past.
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: NA
Name (if known): Other: NA
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ®No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
51b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
61b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 21b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number- Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ? T NA ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2°e. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: NA
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ®P ? T Culvert UT of Buffalo ® PER El Corps 2
5 ft 24 LF
Lakes ? INT ® DWQ .
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 24 LF
3i. Comments: NA
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T NA
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts 0
4g. Comments: NA
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1 NA
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
61b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact required?
B1 ?P?T NA ?Yes
? No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
SR 2170 is a secondary road going through uplands. The pipe has been sized and widened in order to provide safe passage
for the traveling public. NCDOT proposes to bring this secondary road up to current safety standards.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
SR 2170 does not currently meet the current safety standards, ie. 20 foot paved roadway with 6 foot stabilized grass
shoulders. NCDOT proposes to improve SR 2170 to the minimum safe standard.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigat ion option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet .
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a . Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b . If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a . What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? NA %
2b . Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: In ad greement with NCDQW and
NCDLR, NCDOT has it's own individual NPDES Permit. SR 2170 is not located within a HWQ or OWR.
2d . If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, na rrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e . Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? NA
? Phase II
? NSW
3b . Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs El USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HOW
4a . Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes
? No
letter.)
Comments: NC Minimum Criteria Checklist
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Portable toilets will be located on site for construction members to utilize.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a . Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ®No
habitat?
5b . Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
Sc . If yes, ind icate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d . What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS Endangered Species website (list by county), Preliminary Ground Survey
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a . Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b . What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
USFWS website- http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/fish/fiish.html
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a . Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b . What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
National Register of Historic Places website
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a . Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The addition of materials needed to bring SR 2170 up to standard
will not degrade or alter existing drainage patterns or obstruct flood flows.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping website

Greg Burris, P.E. March 14, 2011
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name ApplicanUAg s Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Permit Site Impacts
Stream Impact = 24 LF
Wetland Impact = None in R/W
Brian H. \ Buffalo
\ Willson \ - Springs
R LLC
\ \ 1
Lester G. R
\ Simmons \ 48 LF of
\ Existing 12° RCP
Flowline
of Ditdi- SR217
Edge of
Pavement
Shoulder -
Point N
r y
'O w
^N
j
O
1 I ? • ? ST
N?A
•JT
Buffalo 2a6?
Springs ia
LLC 0
72LF of Proposed
24" RCP
Plan View of
Existing Pipe / Proposed Construction
Harnett County, NC
SR 2170 - Peacock/Mallard Road - Permit Site #1

03/03/2011
Scale - 1 " = 60'
sheet 1 of 2

C/)
T
N
?X
O _.
e r-r Cil
CDD(p 0
0

WO -U
0 --1
W.
(D
1 =0
=
O
Q
XCD
0

Q
WO
yu n°
O
QO
1
-U co)

3 ?- O
;:i:Q
Ind
r+
(D

0
.
OD G)Z
iom
ioc
Q 21
0?
om
SOON
CJl
g(D
Q
3 ?
m000
=-5 UI
<N?
m Q
m
OW
ci
m `O-
C31
A
W
r
-n m
o X.
i
N?
0
u
OD
_ CJe
7 :thl
CD th?
Em
m to
? j
(t]
11 0
W (D
CD G)Z
?4C C
Q -
O
CYI
IV).
O SO
6
(D
O
6',
C) C
tU m N
CD Q d
m OM3-
?p
o (D
SR 2170- Peacock Rd- Harnett County

r J ??
if r ?,_ ,? • ? r I ? "- ?•`? : i? ' ?•
-At
\; 'matt- I i?l? •i`?1...I,? '? ?? >? 11?1?'
I-V
Imo` 1 rl '? ?r
I _ i i• I .!- tJ
0-4)
r % Permit Site #1 > ° 4
?i? +,r?• ?.,??(?Cj,,~? `''. ,"o` ?_ ?, ire
4
A"r
0 1,200 2,400 4,800 Feet
1 inch equals 2,000 feet