20071996 Ver 2_401 Application_20110611

n IGmley-Hom
and Associates, Inc.
1
June 1, 2011
Mr. James Shern
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Mr. Ian McMillan
NC Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
of-Iggc0 U4
Re: Nationwide Permit 3 Application
Townridge Shopping Center Basin Repairs Project
Raleigh, NC
Dear Mr. Shern and Mr. McMillan:
¦
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636-3068
CC?L?ObC? p
JUN i 2011
On behalf of Zeisler Morgan Properties, Ltd., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
(KHA) is submitting the enclosed Preconstruction Notification Application for
authorization to repair the outlets of two dry detention basins (built in the late
1970's/early 1980's) at the Townridge Shopping Center under Nationwide Permit
Number 3.
Originally, it was intended that the PCN for these repairs would be submitted as part
of the proposed Wal-Mart expansion at the subject shopping center. That project is
still proceeding, but a separate PCN will be submitted at a later date (likely this Spring
or Summer) for minor impacts anticipated with the Wal-Mart expansion. The reason
for the separate applications is that the two projects, the repairs and the expansion and
repairs were originally going to be completed concurrently. Now, the City of Raleigh
has required, as part of the City approval process, that the basins outlets be repaired
prior to expansion of the Wal-Mart. The repairs to the basins will likely include the
removal and replacement of the pipe through the dam that connects the two basins and
the removal and replacement of the riser-barrel outlet system associated with the
second dam (See Figure 3). These systems will be replaced with similar systems that
will be set with the same invert elevations and will function hydraulically the same as
the existing system. Concrete pipes and risers may be substituted the corrugated metal
pipes.
¦
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
??? Kirnley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
All of the impacts will be temporary and disturbed areas will be re-vegetated. The
disturbed stream channels will be returned to their current dimensions. Also, impacts
within the buffers are for dam maintenance activities and should be considered
exempt. Only the smaller of the two streams within the basins that flows from south to
north is buffered based on mapping and the stream determination made by Martin
Richmond of DWQ on 12/01/2010. The larger east to west flowing stream is
essentially created, but has naturalized.
The following information is included as part of the application submittal:
• Preconstruction Notification Form
• Agent Authorization Form
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (Submitted for Wal-Mart
Expansion)
• Impact Figures
• Photo Pages
If there is any additional information you need, or if you have any questions, please do
not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Peter Bishop, P.E.
Enclosures
Cc: Mr. Shannon P. Blackwell, President and CEO, Zeisler Morgan Properties, Ltd.
o?oF war?9oG
o <
or) - 1 Rot lP v 2Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Q Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NW-3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes X? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
?X 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express X? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
X? Yes ? No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ?X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in-lieu fee program.
? Yes Q No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below. ? Yes ?X No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ?X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Townridge Dry Detention Basin Rehabilitation
2b. County: Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Raleigh
2d. Subdivision name: Townridge
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Zeisler Morgan Properties, Ltd.
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Shannon Blackwell, President and CEO
3d. Street address: 30000 Chagrin Blvd., Suite 100
3e. City, state, zip: Cleveland, OH 44124-5721
3f. Telephone no.: 216-464-5256
3g. Fax no.: 216-464-8052
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ?X Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Peter Bishop
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
5c. Street address: 3001 Weston Parkway
5d. City, state, zip: Cary, NC 27511
5e. Telephone no.: 919-677-2164
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 10
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 1 0786791240;0786697296
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.863 Longitude: -78.705
1 c. Property size: 22 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Hare Snipe Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site consists of two dry detention basins constructed in the late 1970's to early 1980's. The basins serve an existing shopping center.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.015
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 788
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project will be to repair the corroded outlet structures and dams of the two basins. (3e. A track-hoe or similar equipment will be used.)
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Two outlet pipes/structures need to be removed or repaired in place and replaced with pipes of the same or approximately the same dimensions.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /

project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes ? No X? Unknown

Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ? Preliminary ? Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Todd St. John Agency/Consultant Company:
Other: Kimley-Horn
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Martin Richmond made a stream original call on December 1, 2010.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes ? No 0 Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes Q No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands Q Streams - tributaries ?X Buffers ? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T 2b.
Type of impact 2c.
Type of wetland 2d.
Forested 2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other) 2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W2 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W3 Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W4 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W5 Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W6 Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
There are no wetland impacts proposed.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T) 3b.
Type of impact 3c.
Stream name 3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)? 3e.
Type of
jurisdiction 3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet) 3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 T Outlet repair UT to Hare Snipe INT Corps 5 22
S2 T Outlet Repair UT to Hare Snipe INT Corps 3 49
S3 T Outlet Repair UT to Hare Snipe PER Corps 8 15
S4 Choose one
S5 - Choose one
S6 - Choose one -
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 86
3i. Comments:
All impacts will be temporary in nature. Stream will be returned to their approximate original condition. No hard stabilization will be added.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T 4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable) 4c.

Type of impact 4d.

Waterbody
type 4e.

Area of impact (acres)
01 - Choose one Choose
02 Choose one Choose
03 Choose one Choose
04 - Choose one Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: There will be no open water impacts.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number 5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
There will be no new pond construction
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? E] Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require miti ation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? Q Neuse [:] Tar-Pamlico ? Catawba ? Randleman ? Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Stream name 6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required? 6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet 6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 T Dam maintenance UT to Hare Snipe No 5,120 5,241
B2 T Access UT to Hare Snipe No 470
B3 - Yes/No
B4 - Yes/No
B5 - Yes/No
B6 - Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
61. Comments: The access at B2 will be through an existing, maintained sanitary sewer easement. No trees or woody vegetation will be impacted at
B2. B1 is exempt as dam maintenance activities. As such the buffer impacts are assumed to be exempt.
Page 5 of 10
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The repair areas will be accessed by an existing sewer easement and from the dam to avoid unnecessary impacts. Much of the vegetation in the
buffer is Japanese honeysuckle.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The impact footprint will be minimized by only accessing repair areas at single locations.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes X? No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

? Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:

3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Makin a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires Yes X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified Eg Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Existing drainage patterns and capacities will be maintained. No new stormwater runoff will be generated.
? Yes Q No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 10%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes X? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The impervious area within the two parcels is existing. There will be no new impervious are added as part of the repairs. The project only involves
repairs to existing infrastructure. Both parcels are mostly vegetated and will continue to be so. Post constr uction stormwater is regulated by the City of
Raleigh's nutrient reduction and Phase II NPDES programs. No new concentrated runoff will be established. Existing conveyances will be maintained.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? N/A
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's murisdiction is this project? Raleigh
?x Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs 0 NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ?Yes ?X No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
?Coastal counties
?HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ?ORW
(check all that apply): ?Session Law 2006-246
?Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes Q No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ?X Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ?X Yes ? No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes Q No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ?Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ?Yes ?X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ?Yes ?X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ?X Yes ? No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The City of Raleigh is requiring the repair of these basins prior to allowing an expansion of an existing Wal-Mart to proceed. The expansion is a
separate project that will be submitted under a separate cover by a different applicant (likely Wal-Mart East, LLC). This expansion is being reviewed by
the City and will result in less than one acre of new impervious cover. This additional area will be treated using a sand filter design to the NCDWQ
Stormwater BMP Manual requirements. This expansion should result in no appreciable impacts to water quality. There are some small amount of
stream impacts expected associated with the Wal-Mart expansion (possibly less than 40 feet of un-buffered, intermittent stream). A separate PCN
application will be provided for those impacts. The stormwater plan for the expansion will be submitted as part of that application.

4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This project will result in no wastewater generation.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ?X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ?X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. -
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The USFWS web site.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ?X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There is no essential fish habitat in the area.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ?X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The SHPO database and maps at DCR were reviewed for know historic and archeological resources. None were noted. The basins are borrow areas
generated as part of the construction of the shopping center in the late 1970's or 1980's. As such, there should be no such resources.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes Q No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
This project will no occur in a FEMA regulated area.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Floodmaps
t? `
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name A plicant/Age ' Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
Letter of Authorization
Zeisler Morgan Properties, Ltd. authorizes Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to
act as our limited agent to coordinate with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and
North Carolina Division Water Quality for the preparation and submittal of
jurisdictional determinations and 404/401 permit applications associated with the
Townridge Wal-Mart Expansion, Wake County, North Carolina. Authorization
will terminate on either final agency action or upon written notification from
either parties involved.
Company Name: Zeisler Morgan Properties, Ltd.
Contact Name: Shannon P. Blackwell, President & Chief Operating Officer
Client Address: Zeisler Morgan Properties, Ltd.
30000 Chagrin Blvd., Suite 100
Cleveland, Oll 44124-5721
Client Phone #: [phone]
Client Pax #: 216-464-8052
Zeisle Morgan 7::?s, Ltd.
(Signature of dent
Shannon P. B ckwel l , Authorized Agent
/2.22 to
Date
4
ATTACHMENT
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): December 17, 2010
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Shannon P. Blackwell
Zeisler Morgan Properties, Ltd.
30000 Chagrin Blvd., Suite 100
Cleveland, OH 44124-5721
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State:NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.863° N,
Long. -78.707° E.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Hare Snipe Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 788 linear feet: 5 width (ft) and/or 0.7 acres.
Cowardin Class: Riverine
Stream Flow: Intermittent and Perennial Both
Wetlands: 0.015 acres.
Cowardin Class: Forested
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non-Tidal:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
? Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
? Field Determination. Date(s):
1
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
2
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
? Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
? Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
? Corps navigable waters' study:
? U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Aflas:
? USGS NHD data.
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Raleigh West.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation:Wake County, 1970.
? National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
? State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
? FEMA/FIRM maps:
? 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum
of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):2009.
or ? Other (Name & Date):
? Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
? Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
?
and dat of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
3
SAMPLE
Estimated
Site Cowardin amount of Class of
number Latitude Longitude Class aquatic aquatic
resource in resource
review area
1 35.863 -78.707 388 linear feet Perennial
stream
2 35.863 -78.707 400 linear feet Intermittent
stream
3 35.863 -78.707 0.015 acre non-section 10
- wetland
4

t
11 'It

„ M t
Photograph 1. View of wetland area facing stream channel. Floodplain system dominated by Salix nigra. Area is located behind
Wal-Mart shopping center and has been previously disturbed.
f
7-
X
01i S
Photograph 2. View of upland area adjacent to the west of the wetland
Title Site Photographs
Project Wal-Mart Expansion - Townridge Shopping Center
Prepared For: Wake County, North Carolina
Wal-Mart Date Project Number Photo Page
12/21/10 015476118 1
Prepared by: Anna Reusche Con =A=.ft.
Prepared by: Anna Reusche [=n =A ,.
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: WaAm&i+ 1tKQ6ASiAA - towy-,A = City/County: ?4,wcao,
v ' W ampling Date: ,6
ApplicantlOwner:,A1a? - Mo t?4 J J I State: 04 ampling Point: UJA - l `mN6?
Investigator(s): ?a ` •. inv.. wY*, ?Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):.Aenal d Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope /a
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L-9-9- V) 1 tat: Cal (.I Long: -r-48.103: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: _WCdO0E. saa^4!4 tio41N-.. NWI classification: 06VOL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ?/ No
Is the Sampled Area - /'
Hydric Soil Present? Yes %/ No within a wetland? Yesv No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes J No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) - Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves (Bg) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2) ___. Aquatic Fauna (1313) AL Drainage Patterns (1370)
- Saturation (A3) _ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (137) `. Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
- Sediment Deposits (B2) ? Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
- Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (132)
Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) _ FAC-Neutrai Test (05)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ? Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No ? Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ? No Depth (inches): & Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V/ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: *S CIO Ya& % Cover Species? Status
r? Number of Dominant Species
1. tea. % X rk, 0.C 0.. ?L
-1Z That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. 4CAX y'0\.Qf-Q y-, 3 ? A L t
i
l N
b
f D
T
om
nan
ota
um
er o
3, Species Across All Strata: (B}
4.
Percent of Dominant Species +
?S l
5. (A/B)
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
6
.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
{^^ = Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) OBL species x 1 =
1, c&, d- ? ilk C` FACW species x2=
2. SOU i x VN?,atri. ._ ./ C%BL FAC species x3=
3 FACU species x4=
4 UPL species x 5 =
5 Column Totals: (A) (B)

6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =

7.
?u =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) Dominance Testis >50%
1 " t,Xoq Vy t ?/ ;7ArL _ Prevalence index is 3.0'
S
`
i
2
A g? .
? O Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
e?
ar
1w
.
s _
3.
4 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.

6. Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

7• vines
ood
t
l
di
T
W
d
l
,
y
s, exc
u
ng w
ree-
oo
y p
an
ly = Total Cover approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: } J (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
. crt?5sww? V a...tAZ v-,
'l`(?
1
.
. 5 J Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3. j than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.

4. excluding woody vines
Shrub - Woody plants

5. ,
,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.

6• includin
lants
-
ood
)
b
H
b
All h
g
,
aceous (non
w
y
p
er
er
-
7, herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
$ plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
10 Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
i1.

12.
1% = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
V
(. ??V??G1N? ?0.a4?N?G? T•AC.-
??
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
C6_ = Total Cover Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Sik tg f 5(1L hcLS Ifee?.. V_ 6,3% lJt z3? -
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
b01L '
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe oc Texture Remarks
b=to 10W, U 1 10 YR .. / 6 3u k6'a..16to
(e' 14 to Y Ll?
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al) Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) - 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) - Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1536)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral {A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (1713) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A,1505)
Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils_(F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Solis (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version

' REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No 0704-0188
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining
the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for
reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arington,
VA 222024302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not
d" la a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS.
1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To)
October 2008 Final report
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER
Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual:
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region 5b. GRANT NUMBER
Sc. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
5e. TASK NUMBER
5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT
U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center NUMBER
Environmental Laboratory
3909 Halls Ferry Road ERDC/EL TR-08-30
Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199
9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S)
Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
DC 20314-1000
Washington
, 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT
NUMBER(S)
12. DISTRIBUTION ! AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Approve for public release; distribution is unlimited,
13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
14. ABSTRACT
This document is one of a series of Regional Supplements to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, which provides technical
guidance and procedures for identifying and delineating wetlands that may be subject to regulatory jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. The development of Regional Supplements is part of a nationwide effort to address
regional wetland characteristics and improve the accuracy and efficiency of wetland-delineation procedures. This supplement is applicable to
the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region, which consists of all or portions of the District of Columbia and 19 states: Alabama, Arkansas,
Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania,
South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia
15. SUBJECT TERMS
Delineation Plant Communities Vegetation
Hydrology Soil Wetlands
16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION 18. NUMBER 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE
OF ABSTRACT OF PAGES PERSON
a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (include
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
152
area code)
stanaara I-orm zvo IlKev. is-vu)
Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239,18
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -- Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: J\ eA - maA- -?C?A?nSI sJ? - 1 i%?k City/County:
Applicant(Owner: yu\ "
Investigator(s): 7? I&• Jdnv+. t}+..v?b. QSt Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): rM\\s\c-- Local relief concave, cone;
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 1?R. Q Lat: '3S - ?io^h Long:
Soil Map Unit Name: "&1-.%t.es ^?a ti \0CXW111
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes t/ No
Sampling Date: L \Vt --tb Xta
State: JC- Sampling Point:W - V
c, none): Slope (%): I .
--?$-Datum;
NWI classification: Nd,,JL
(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes --,L/- No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
vJe.-41av? ? Is (o csrk?l A % nc0Fu-rr-\ dmt4 --t ,^ - Ax c4c? r &-. L ¢S
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauiredtcheck all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water (Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves (69) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Nigh Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (813) Drainage Patterns (810)
Saturation (A3) _
- Marl Deposits (615) (I-RR U) _ Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (B1) - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) -
- Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (65) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) FAC-Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Y
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available.
Remarks:
00 V ?kA-D`?
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
I
1. yj (A)
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2. Total Number of Dominant
3, Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5 D '/
5. . (AIB)
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
6
.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) OBL species x 1 =
1 FACW species x 2 =
2 FAC species x 3 =
3 FACU species x4=
4 UPL species x 5
5 Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =

7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:

Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) = Total Cover
Dominance Testis X50%
1 k % Prevalence Index is 3.0'
2 _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)

3.
4 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
.
6. Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

7. vi
di
d
t
l
W
d
l
T
u
ng woo
y
nes,
s, exc
ree --
oo
y p
an
= Total Cover approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1.
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2. approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3 than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5. approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6. includin
us (non-wood
)
lants
b
H
b
All h
g
y
p
,
er
aceo
er
-
7. herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
8 plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
10 Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.

12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )

1.SnQa1i? tC-
2. Lore a-k ck c,-. SD Jed
3.

Hydrophytic
5
Ve
etation
=Total Cover g
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Alre4k:as

US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
i
SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist % Tyne Loc Texture w Remarks
O - lr3 10 Y R 514 Ct? w-&IA I [awA
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Sol( Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
r _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) - 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (LRR O) - Reduced Vertc (1718) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
- Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) - Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1536)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _„ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) - Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84) w Reduced Vertic (1718) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:

US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
Form Approved
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188
Public repo" burden for this collection of Information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, inrJuding the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining
the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for
reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington,
VA 222024302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not
display a current vatd OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS.
1. REPORT DATE (00-MM-YYY1) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To)
October 2008 Final report
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER
Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual:
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region 5b. GRANT NUMBER
5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER
U
Arm
Cor
s of Engineers
S
.
y
p
. 5e. TASK NUMBER
5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT
U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center NUMBER
Environmental Laboratory
3909 Halls Ferry Road ERDC/EL TR-08-30
Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199
9. SPONSORING 1 MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S)
Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington, DC 20314-1000
11. SPONSORIMONITOR'S REPORT
NUMBER(S)
12. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Approve for public release: distribution is unlimited.
13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
14. ABSTRACT
This document is one of a series of Regional Supplements to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, which provides technical
guidance and procedures for identifying and delineating wetlands that may be subject to regulatory jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. The development of Regional Supplements is part of a nationwide effort to address
regional wetland characteristics and improve the accuracy and efficiency of wetland-delineation procedures. This supplement is applicable to
the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region, which consists of all or portions of the District of Columbia and 19 states: Alabama, Arkansas,
Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania,
South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia
15. SUBJECT TERMS
Delineation Plant Communities Vegetation
Hydrology Soil Wetlands
16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION 18. NUMBER 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE
OF ABSTRACT OF PAGES PERSON
a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT C. THIS PAGE 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (include
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 152 area code)
5tandard Form 298 (Rev. 6-98)
Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239.18
USACE AID# w DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment.
1. Applicant's name:
3. Date of evaluation: 17, / 1 1 ZDld
5. Name of stream: u 541?G C/GG?
7. Approximate drainage area: '* Yo acNGS
9. Length of reach evaluated: "L Y5-,o 4
2. Evaluator's name: 7;41J 157• 11hri,
4. Time of evaluation: Ok&WWS 0of 30yott oceA Z II/&/*J
6. River basin: 8. Stream order: :1..
10. County: wR
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 36-, g 7 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): -71,740
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS er GI Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO f yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE O N 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YEC7
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential /GAO % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
% Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width:.4u 3 " 574 41- 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3
24. Channel slope down center of stream: kFlat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight 9)C Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Com
ISM
Evaluator's Signature Date I (_O
This channel evaluation orm is int ed to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and n ronmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET A46P
16. Site conditions at time of visit: _4? A W
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

#
CHAR
CTERISTICS ECOREGION POIN T RANGE
A SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
no flow or saturation = 0• strong flow = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5
2 Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5 O
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max oints
3 Riparian zone
' 0-6 0-4 0-5
2
no buffer= 0• contiguous, -wide
buffer = max points) •
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges

extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-4

5 Groundwater discharge
=
0-3
0-4
0 - 4
U no discharge
0• s rin s sees wetlands etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
'
0-4
0-4
0-2
no flood
lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)

p" Entrenchment/ floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
(deeply entrenched= 0• frequent flooding = max points)

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
no wetlands = 0;large adjacent wetlands = max points) 0-6 0-4 0-2
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3
1
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4
3
extensive deposition-- 0• little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5
2

fine homogenous = 0; large, a diverse sizes = max points) .

12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0
5
2
(deeply incised ,= 0; stable bed & banks = max oints -
13 Presence of major.bank failures

severe erosion = 0• no erosion, stable banks = max points) 0-5 0-5 0-5
6
14 Root depth and density on banks 0
3
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max oints - 0-4 0-5
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber` production
15 substantial impact =0• no evidence = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
no riffles/riles or pools = 0• well-developed = max points) 0-3 0-5 0-6

17 Habitat complexity 0-6 0-6 0-6
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points

18 Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0
5 0
5
3
x no shading vegetation = 0• continuous canopy = max points) - -
19 Substrate embeddedness *

(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max) NA 0-4 0-4
21
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 1
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points) 0-4 0-5 0-5
21 Presence of amphibians 0
4 0
4 0
4
O no evidence = 0• common numerous es = max points) - - -
O 22 Presence of fish
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points) 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4

23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5
L

no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points) ,
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
ncsc cnaraciensucs are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
M
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: l 1I2vJ O 4. Time of evaluation`/ k*"41N9o? $"A/ mQ11'L?'?.ti'iS 6i!l401
5. Name of stream: LA NwC w Creek 6. River basin: /???.?
7. Approximate drainage area:_--- 10 at re S 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 10. County: Gpw- J
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): `may, r??1
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3$1 8 R Longitude (ex. -77.556611): +l d? 7
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Cher Other
13. L cation of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attac ma identifyen stream(s) location):
cU ? k& %*i 6we-; &w _ or, no pik e"A 5-11 C L#/42 44120 ?
14. Proposed channel work (if any
15. Recent weather conditions: LIPStO CA" Or% f/tY/?/'OLGS ©0005,5 W.S
16. Site conditions at time of visit: `r4 k
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evalu?atiionn;point? YES?If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES/NO/ 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey ES
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential 16W % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
%%? Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: $?Twor, 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 0'6 0. Jam!
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total §yre (ffjom reverse): ? y Comments:
Evaluator's Signature tW- Date /??/ t7
This channel evaluation form is intended be used only as a guide to assist landowners and en it mental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

# ECOREGION POIN T RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5
f
no flow or saturation = 0• strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human `alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 0
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max oints
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5
no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive dischar es - 0 no dischar es = max oints
5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4
no discharge = 0• springs, sees wetlands etc. = max points)
U 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0- 4 0- 4 0- 2
no flood lain = 0• extensive flood lain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
a" (deeply entrenched = 0• frequent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0-6 0-4 0-2 O
no wetlands = 0•,large ad
acent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4
extensive deposition= 0• little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5
fine homogenous = 0° large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 2

y+
(deeply incised = 0• stable bed & banks = max points) ,,,
13 Presence of major bank failures 0-5 0-5 0-5
severe erosion = 0• no erosion stable_banks = max points)
14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5
2
no visible roots = 0• dense roots throughout = max points)
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber' production
15 substantial impact =0• no evidence = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5

16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes i
no riffles/ripples les or pools = 0• well-developed = max points) 0-3 0-5 0-6
I

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
little or no habitat = 0• frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed

no shading vegetation = 0• continuous canopy = max points) 0-5 0-5 0-5

19 Substrate embeddedness *
NA
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)

no evidence= 0• common numerous types = max points) 0-4 0-5 0-5
GJ 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4
O no evidence= 0• common numerous es = max ints
0 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 O
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5
Z
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
i nese cnaractensttcs are not assessed in coastal streams.
^..
VIA LI. aoi
g 5m
i
t
1 .
M? FRA LI11-
98 Sp' 9839
s
86?b4j_ -147 ? ? ?_
LAMA CI 1
t kl S
/r
0 50 100 64 ° 0 10 20
nnilac ' 'S Miles

' fp 5
5/' r' .3 1 ?
I(N
4e Mk,
JIN
s -
iv,
All' I
A
y f ?_ . 4 - _ - `dal
k r k DWQ Stream Origin
12/01/2010
v.
tnAL
wro
Title JD - Buffer Aerial
Project Wal-Mart Expansion - Townridge Shopping Center
Prepared For: Wake Count North Carolina
Wal-Mart Date Figure
12/17/2010 3
??
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Todd St. John, P.E.
Kimlev-Horn and Associates, Inc.
3001 Weston Parkway
Cary, NC 27513
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
December 23, 2010
Natural Resources
Dee Freeman
Secretary
NBRR0# 10-210
Wake County
BASIN:
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233) ? Tar-Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B.0259)
® Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial Determination ? Isolated Wetland Determination
Project Name: Townridge Shopping Center
Location/Directions: Subject property is an existing commercial shopping center located at
6600 Glenwood Ave in Raleigh
Subject Stream: UT to Hare Snipe Creek
Date of Determination: December 1, 2010
Feature E/1/P* Not
Subject Subject Start(a stop@ Stream
Form Pts. Soil
Survey USGS
To o
A I X DWQ Flag
(repaired
pipe) X
61rir = cpnemeratitnr'ermrttent?'Perennrat
Explanation; The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Quality.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Ian McMillan, DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd.,
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260.
I?1??hCarolina
,Natura!!r?
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www,ncwa*Muality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Project Name
Wake County
December 23, 2010
Page 2 of 2
If you dispute the Director's determination you may file a petition for an administrative hearing. You must file the
petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of the receipt of this notice of decision. A
petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours.
The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 am and 5:00
pm, except for official state holidays. To request a hearing, send the original and one (1) copy of the petition to the
Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. The petition may also be
faxed to the attention of the Office of Administrative Hearings at [phone], provided the original and one (1)
copy of the document is received by the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5) days following the date of
the fax transmission. A copy of the petition must also be served to the Department of Natural Resources, c/o Mary
Penny Thompson, General Counsel, 1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sixty (60)
days.
The owner/future owners should notify the Division of Water Quality (including any other Local, State, and Federal
Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated above). This
project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be directed to the
Division of Water Quality (Central Office) at (919)-733-1786, and the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh
Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-876-8441.
Respectfully,
r'
Martin Ri mond
Environm ntal Specialist
cc: Wetlands, Stormwater Branch, 2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250, Raleigh, NC 27604
RRO/SW'P File Copy
400 800 1600 Feet
iOF
Q C,WAKE
COUNTY
WMW
Olz

I /.". : . „n, WAKE Ct
Title I JD-Buffer Aerial
Project Basin Repair - Townridge Shopping Center
Prepared For: Wake County, North Carolina
Zeisler Morgan
Properties Date Project Number
5/5/11 012969001
Figure
cis Fac L„-- L?p?pmUC96-I T..r,,,,dg?wO I:SVnce Prepared by Josh Allen [OF1 "r'N
Word File Loam- K.IRAL Gwoo.nemWU?15<]??I IP TowariJge WAA?SIA\maps "bso KYe
'i -• • ` "rr.'. T . rrr• r}i' 1 1 ,'!'r','-' . r?: 1 . .f ¦ 'i's?.i ? rF? • r''? ?' r ••¦
`rh•¦r'?•Y y•'r+l+••r}, , y 1 , •¦ari fl a'L?'+r+•¦_¦ L ?¦`r?±•:rl `I+'`ri¦ r, f i T Lr ± ¦r¦ r 1 f'r r
1• !'!'+•¦' •"?!' r -?? 1a¦1y •? i a f rr•' •!FI' T!• { + ¦ •'?• `' ?'I+ ,' ?iti • .''•'r+• ' ir'
yL +??•?•' •_ , + ? 1+ y?a' + - - -'• ! ¦ rra?•?+•ai 7r ?'a ¦ • ¦ • -+i r`r" r 1 h?', h
¦ r+'•, r ','. .,Fr,,"!r r- • rr¦ • 1-•rr• - ;r I'}?•• , • rh+ ?•} •r???r?¦' ?r???!`r a - ,++'r?¦ ?r •T,¦•r?
?i?{h+?rr r• .•{r `."a L I ¦ If •'r'¦?• rrr', r a 1 ? •1 J1 ` fF++•a?.•? rf •'r { Ir ••? la¦ i ?i ,' • ' r ••'a? r - i'i
a' ( ' •`!i!". atl++• jly = rr•? "f.-1- `I'1':'.??+:???:f? +'h'f`{•? r?+.r'rl'a+,'+- +r 1 r •--OF
ha.•
?' •,i• ?1 r I I _ .-r'. _ •ra are ¦ , .
?r? r?+'i?:?'1??•a',r??..lfr ¦'r'lr'.rr'r-.?-'' I a'I ..rrr, f#? ? ¦_. •¦'r??•rfr++_r ,' '''+ra.'.-r'r'?rr. I+•r,'?'?{?• r •?
7 i'•? ¦+•'¦'r'¦r.',' 'ri¦'La r+•1+ ¦+ 'a '. ,¦ 1 , r •+I ¦ ¦¦+ ¦ Y I' , ,' i I,
a +
. 1 1 • ' I '
• I a l ¦ rr 7 r
, r
61 _ I #
+ ¦ ?. •• ¦a'a?}'"1 r ¦ !rt i' ! • • •+` 1' •?rra ' 1 r a -
1
Ibp?
f r s
• r , i+: r ; - r.r'•r L• ?A ?? .(.( .. ^1 '?••( -{.,. .Z . 1 '.... .,"_r• ri??! l^' + ?i?+ 11? ? ¦¦,?r•-*•.i+i ,
Li•J:¦. ¦ '. •. s .r",• r ' F • a I r.¦ it ',?¦`,•¦r Lr+'¦'4 "?' •¦_ '?fr{
r??• 1.1 •r• ? i ¦ i ? i i ?' +
a'r'?i i¦h r ?- • • r'- ' ¦ r \. - a y + f1+?F - I r ,?¦ ¦1'¦
¦•?_ ?•?¦r? t~ .r,_ ?: i a•'?`. rrr' • ' 1' F r
1 •.r ..r ' ' •rl_ .. • . a'ar. . r L. DWQ Stream Origin
r;¦ _ ?'?.:? • 1 r 12/01/2010
_¦`a + +a' r. 1 err '¦ 'r'.r +. ¦'?r? 1 'r •`f-I d ¦'¦' .w-'r ,r
li¦!¦,, 1 , ?, r'' ,'r' ?'1.'•,.-rrf. T'¦rr'?' '+ }? ti . -?'•',+ 'ir r+ y ¦
. 1 +rrr r r'
--. r 1 r ¦ 1 + ?' •Fr ,f ?q¦••Lr f?, r .1 r f ¦ 1¦
+ . `¦ r r+-r: '1'++a ,+ r l 1 a-+r• •!1 •+ ¦? ?{ r ???L r ii?7,'
+ ••I y? ??;{f- .a 'i }'¦yf?+ti al''?•1???'41 ?? ,??t •+ ?.1 ?,?' Y?, r i*II+ ? lr, }`it,
, .I L '+?Ta 1 + r 1
%
_ ? a 1
_ y _ L
yl?+ti •'??• • ''ti
1
~ . ' • • 1P 1 '
'ate 1 1 {: IJ
1 r ` Iy '?,r art •+,•'1
y
~ ' ti'. dry.'. L
1,1"? •••4? L'? 1 L kl ?'
0 i40
1
'`L 4 I,-
Feet Title JD-Buffer USDA Soil Survey Map (1970 Wake County Survey)
Project Basin Repairs - Townridge Shopping Center
Prepared For: Wake County, North Carolina
Zeisler Morgan
Properties Date Project Number Figure
515111 012969001 2
GISHlLnw- 1,lpjVP1,012969(XJITnnl`mld.-IIWORKSPA(r Prepared by Josh Allen
r, z1 \ yq,?,py,yq y,.
?kN

f w

i, - Existing Pipes. r. f tm

g ii Y

NO
w 0
( 10 40
1
A Feet
I
Title Stream Buffer Temporary Impacts
Project Basin Repairs - Townridge Shopping Center
Prepared Moor: Wake County, North Carolina
Zeisler Moorgan
Properties Date Project Number Figure
515111 012969001 3
cis F1eL -tmn:1: `.pq,MIO i 296YW i T..,dg,,WOMSPACF Prepared h Josh Allen G?? ==.M.
W.,d Flel.rca-. K:,R L_fnIl .e.iil'Ol54)6]]HT.wvdge WMYSNViwp, Y
f AV
cv f
d.? ,t x °ay? $ t3? ?'0, 'n" 0 a '? ,}^! 9 ?` 7 F" •ya
d z r"S,,i-'' 5, ?Sf"..?`a*'a t"?':g x> $rP rb? {"? f F Y, +? A {v r A4
-46
I-NA
R"?r A.? arov Lam'"" rb'. "'? a??4 a' j?q tla,? ? ?:p" ? `m,,
a '" w e it i' a , °' v l s ?S+ a ¢?_ ,;
i
?a: e t SY a m' qir.
a
s
Photograph 1. View of downstream of dam at S2.
% #tw ?,d? RY v =
' t a) ,
10''i 4i
v a 2+ _p
x4,L?}. a,#.
t t^^w` . Asa . • ^. 4#;'``^+ v` r „«i?':
A.
Photograph 2. View of upstream of dam at S1.
Title Site Photographs
Basin Repairs - Townridge Shopping Center
Prepared For: Project Wake County, North Carolina
Zeisler Morgan
Properties Date Project Number Photo Page
515111 012969001 1
Prepared by: Anna Reusche [0/I =?1,
Photograph 5. View downstream of dam at S3
Photograph 6. View of riser barrel outlet repair area at S2
Title Site Photographs
Project Basin Repairs - Townridge Shopping Center
Prepared For: Wake County, North Carolina
Zeisler Morgan
Properties Date Project Number Photo Page
6/2/11 012969001 2
Prepared by: Anna Reusche r-CF1
Photograph 5. View downstream of dam at S3
Photograph 6. View of riser barrel outlet repair area at S2
Title Site Photographs
Basin Repairs - Townridge Shopping Center
Prepared For: Project Wake County, North Carolina
Zeisler Morgan
Properties Date Project Number Photo Page
5/5/11 012969001 3
Prepared by: Anna Reusche rImn =A cI.