20061292 Ver 2_401 Application_20110611

~~ -~a~~,v2-
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
June 3, 2011
S&EC Project #11258.P1
To: NC Division of Water Quality
WebSCaPe Unit D ~~~Q~~ -
Attn: Karen Higgins/Lia Gilleski ~ (j ~`~ D
512 N. Salisbury Street (9th floor) '~~""--~~ ---
Raleigh, NC 27603 SUN ~ 201
From: Bob Zarzecki '
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A. Wedar,dE ~ - ,.., ~twa U
11010 Raven Ridge Road ~andt
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Fairfield Farms Subdivision-Sections 4, 5 8~ 6-EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
Fayetteville, Cumberland County, NC
On behalf of the applicant, Brolanco Corporation, please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the N.C. Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ) that the activities proposed below may proceed under General Water Quality
Certification 3821.
It is important to note that this application is a re-submittal of a previous application that was
submitted by a different consultant back on July 27, 2006 (DWQ Project # 06-1292). The
previous application received a Request for More Information letter from the NCDWQ on August
16, 2006 and then a Notice of Return on August 23, 2007. The attached Pre-Construction
Notification Application will address all information items requested on the Request for More
Information letter. Specifically, this application includes a copy of the Stormwater Management
Plan that will be submitted to the City of Fayetteville for review and approval, including but not
limited to the locations of planned BMPs and details and the percent imperviousness for the
project. This application also includes the planned sanitary sewer lines, the correct calculation of
wetland impacts and a copy of the jurisdictional determination verifying that there is not a stream
within the property boundaries. And finally, we have included a copy of the Nationwide Permit 29
that was approved on September 25, 2008. Please contact me at [phone] if you have any
questions or require additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Fairfield Farms Subdivision-Sections 4, 5 & 6
Project T e Residential Subdivision
Owner / A licant Brolanco Cor oration
Count Cumberland
Nearest Town Fa etteville
Waterbod Name UT to Greens Creek Holmes Pond
Basin /Sub-basin 18-24-3-3
Index Number 03-06-15
Class WS-IV, B
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]

IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.439 (permanent)
0.049 tem ora
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.488
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification Application Form
Agent Authorization Form
NRCS Soil Survey Map & USGS Topographic Map
DWO Request for More Information letter -08/16/06
DWO Notice of Return letter-06-23-07
Jurisdictional Determination-AID SW-2003-01163
Wetlands Impact Map (Overall Site Plan)
Impact Exhibits
Individual Plot Plans for 59, 64, 65, 109 &129
Wet Detention Basin Supplemental Forms
Signed & Notarized O&M Agreements
Signed & Notarized Deed Res. & Prot. Cov
Narrative of Design & Soils Report
Summary of Piezometer Readings Report
Copy of Deed & NC Business Corp. Info.
$1,000.00 DWQ Express Application Fee
PCN Checklist
Data CD

Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
401 Oversight/Express Permitting PCN Submittal Checklist
® The application fee (Checks may be made out to "N.C. Division of Water Quality"
- $240.00 for 401 Water Quality Certification with minor impacts
- $570.00 for 401 Water Quality Certification with major impacts
- Express Review Fee (Amount requested on Acceptance Letter)
® Five (5) complete and collated copies of the PCN Application and supporting
documentation (instead of providing 5 copies of the full size plans you may provide two
copies of full size plans along with three copies of 11 X 17 plans)
® stormwater Management Plan (if applicable -see PCN Form Help File Section E)
1) Please provide three,F3~copies of the stormwater management plans along with all
supporting information pertaining to this project including the following:
a. Entire site development/layout plans delineating all drainage areas;
b. Design calculation sheets for all proposed BMPs) sized for both on-site and
C~i"~ ~-~'~~"~ off-site drainage;
'~1,~, c. BMP supplements for each proposed BMP and Required Items Check List
~~':~d1t.~-~~ ~~" (http://h2o.enrstate.nc.us/su/bmp forms.htm) along with all required
~~,,- y~X~,y~ items;
d. A Notarized Operation & Maintenance Agreement for each stormwater
V3-~.~~~~~~,v`~ management facility;
~^ e. Detailed construction drawing sheets shall include
l;~ ~v' ~ (i) Erosion and sediment control plans;
(ii) Installation and planting schedules for the proposed BMPs;
(iii) Appropriately scaled plan views and cross sectional details of all
BMPs and associated components -inlet and outlet structures,
forebay, respective zones and pertinent elevations.
^ If your project is located within a State implemented Riparian Buffer Rule Area, submit the
following along with site plans and PCN form:
1) Three (3) copies of the details for on-site diffuse flow provisions, (refer to
http://h2o.enr. state. nc. us/su/bm p_forms. htm ).
^ DWQ Stream Determination Forms for streams on property and DWQ determination
letter for wetlands or streams (if applicable).
The following is the most critical of all the information that you must provide. The quality and
detail of the information will often determine the expeditiousness of the review. The following is
a checklist of the types of pertinent information required at a minimum:
Maps and Plans:
® The most recent version of the 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map -Please cleanly draw or
delineate the site boundaries on the topographic map.
® The most recent version of the bound and published County NRCS Soil Survey Map -
(required for projects within the Neuse River Basin, Tar-Pamlico River Basin, Randleman
Lake Watershed and the Catawba River Basin, also recommended for all projects) -
Please clearly delineate the site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures
any of the features, it is recommended that a clean copy be provided. Copies of the

Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
current soil survey and/or soil survey map sheets can be obtained from the local NRCS
County Office (http://www.nc.nres.usda.gov/). GIS soil layers are not acceptable.
® Vicinity map -Please clearly mark the location and approximate boundaries of the property
and project on the map. Please indicate north arrow and scale. Please include applicable
road names or State Road numbers.
® The Site Plan -The most critical map to be provided is the site plan. You must provide full
sized plans. The following is the minimum list of plans that are typically needed.
® Pre-construction/Pre-existing conditions -This sheet (or sheets) must include:
• All jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, State regulated
buffers (delineated into Zones 1 and 2)
• Topographic contours with elevations
• Any existing structures and impervious areas
• Existing utility lines and easements
• Existing roads, culverts, and other pertinent features
• North arrow and the scale (1":50' scale is recommended).
® Proposed conditions -This sheet (or sheets) must include:
• All jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, State regulated
buffers (delineated into Zones 1 and 2)
• Lot layout (if a subdivision or commercial development is proposed) -lots must be
developable without further impacts to jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetlands,
streams, water features, and State regulated buffers. Building envelopes must be
provided when streams, wetlands, riparian buffers, or water features exist on a lot
• All built-out structures and impervious cover
• Final grading contours with elevations
• All utilities and easements (including septic fields on all lots within 100 feet of stream,
wetland, or water features - if applicable)
• Impacted areas -these should correspond with the Impact numbers listed on your PCN
form.
® Drainage Plans -Final drainage plans must include the following:
• Locations and pertinent elevations and sizes of the stormwater collection system and
drainage ways
• All inlets and outlets must also be shown with pertinent elevations (All outlets to
wetlands must be at anon-erosive velocity aenerally less than 2 ft/sec during the peak
flow from the 10-yr storm)
• Scaled stormwater BMPs must also be indicated as required by DWQ rules and policies
• In certain cases (see Section E of PCN form), final stormwater management plans must
also be provided (see stormwater Management Plan Checklist)
® Proposed Impacts -All impacts to jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream,
water features, and State regulated buffers must be shown and labeled on the site plans at
a scale no smaller than 1" = 50'. All excavation, fill, flooding, stabilization, and other impacts
that will be conducted in or near jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water
features, and State regulated buffers must be indicated. Please provide cross sectional
details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage (burial of culvert 20% for culverts <_ 48
inches, and 1-foot for culverts > 48 inches).

Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
Wetland Impacts:
^ Precise grading and final elevation contours must be provided. Existing
vegetation and any clearing must be specified.
^ All subsurface utility lines must indicate the location of anti-seep collars.
Construction detail for anti-seep collars must be provided.
^ Roadway or other crossings of riparian wetlands may require floodway culverts to
maintain existing hydrological conditions.
^ Plans should show that the hydrology of remaining wetlands on the site will be
maintained.
Stream Impacts:
^ Stream impacts must be clearly shown on the plans. The centerline as well as
the banks of the stream must be surveyed or located by GPS for the portion of
the stream to be impacted.
^ The inlet and the outlet of all culverts should be aligned with the stream as
much as possible. Inlet and outlet elevations and streambed elevations should
be indicated. Any inlet or outlet protection must be shown and enumerated on
the impact map(s).
^ For bottomless culverts or other spans, a vertical cross section should be
provided that shows the minimum distance from each span to each stream bank,
the stream cross section, the height of the span above the stream and the
minimum distance from the edge of each footer to each stream bank.
Additionally, please provide a signed and sealed geotechnical report of
subsurface soils at the proposed bottomless culvert location. The report must
comply with the Division of Highways -Guidelines for Drainage Studies and
Hydraulic Design, prepared by A.L. Hankins, Jr., State Hydraulics Engineer -
1999.
^ Multiple culverts or sectioned box culverts typically require the use of sills, off-
setting or other means to match the cross section of the existing stream (in order
to maintain stream stability and provide aquatic life passage). A vertical cross
section of the culverts should be shown overlain with the up and downstream
stream cross section including the stream flood-prone area.
^ Impacts associated with dam construction must indicate and enumerate all fill
associated with the dam footprint, spillway and any bank stream bank
stabilization. The length of stream impounded must also be indicated and
enumerated.

OJ~~~Fry~W AT~r~9QG
1 IV_w`7~~-~
O ~ T
o~- ~a..qa u~
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
^ Section 404 Permit ^ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number: N/A
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ®Yes ^ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
^ 401 Water Quality Certification -Regular ^ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification -Express ^ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
^ Yes ®No For the record onl

^Yes y for Corps Permit:

^ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ^Yes ®No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ^Yes ®No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ^Yes ®No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Fairfield Farms Subdivision (Sections 4, 5 & 6)
2b. County: Cumberland
2c. Nearest municipality /town: Fayetteville
2d. Subdivision name: Fairfield Farms
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: N/A (~ ~ (~ (~
L'~ LS U

3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Dohn Broadwell, Sr. JUN 3 2 ~ ~ ~
3b. Deed Book and Page No. D.B. 5977, Pg. 497
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Bro/anco Corporation ~ t3~anc1-
3d. Street address: 903 Hay Street
3e. City, state, zip: Fayetteville, NC 28305
3f. Telephone no.: 910-484-5193
3g. Fax no.: 910-391-1104
3h. Email address: N/A
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ^ Agent ®Other, specify: Owner-please send correspondence to Agent and
copy both owner and applicant
4b. Name: Dohn Broadwell, Sr.
4c. Business name
(if applicable): Bro/anco Corporation
4d. Street address: 903 Hay Street
4e. City, state, zip: Fayetteville, NC 28305
4f. Telephone no.: 910-484-5193
4g. Fax no.: 910-391-1104
4h. Email address: N/A
5. AgentlConsultantlnformation (if applicable)
5a. Name: Bob Zarzecki
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
5c. Street address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27614
5e. Telephone no.: 919-846-5900
5f. Fax no.: 919-846-9467
5g. Email address: BZarzecki(cilSandEC.com
Page 2 of 13

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Parcel ID: 0531-66-5019
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.1671 Longitude: - 78.8778
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: ± 54.66 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to Greens Creek (Holmes Pond); 18-24-3-3
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV, 8
2c. River basin: Cape Fear 03-06-15; Hydrologic Unit Code 03030004
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: The existing conditions on site consist of a forested tract with existing dirt roads. The general land use in the
vicinity of the project is a mix of rural and forested land, with some new residential including the previous phases/sections
of this subdivision.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 7.27 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Approximately 0 linear feet of stream
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential subdivision, including but not limited to roads and
utlitities.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of the construction of Sections 4, 5 & 6 of the Fairfield Farms Subdivision to include up
to 110 single family lots and associated road and utility infrastructure. Equipment to be used will include
excavators, bull dozers and other typical equipment used for land clearing, road construction and excavation.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes ^ No ^ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ^ Preliminary ®Final
Comments: Action ID#2003-01163
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Needham Environmental,
Name (if known): Inc. Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE Notification of Jurisdictional Determination by Ronnie Smith, AID#2003-01163 dated 09/25/08
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ®Yes ^ No ^ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
In August of 2006, a PCN Application was submitted by another consulting firm for Fairfield Farms-Section 4. The
NCDWQ issued a Request for More Information letter on August 16, 2006 and then issued a Return of Application letter
on August 23, 2007 (DWQ# 06-1292). The USACE issued a 404 Nationwide Permit 29 on September 25, 2008 (SAW-
2003-01163).
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ^ Yes ®No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A -Previous Sections of the development (Section 1, 2, 3 & 4) are completed and did not impact jurisdictional waters
or require a permit. The proposed plans requested in the permit application represent the total build out of this
subdivision.
Page 4 of 13

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ^ Streams -tributaries ^ Buffers
^ Open Waters ^ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number -Permanent Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
P or Tem orar T if known DWQ -non-404, other acres
W 1 (A1) ®P ^ T Lot Fill Bottomland ®Yes ®Corps 028
0
Hardwood ^ No ^DWQ .
W2 (A2) ®P ^ T Lot Fill Bottomland ®Yes ®Corps 0
000
Hardwood ^ No ^ DWO .
W3 (A3) ®P ^ T Road Fill Bottomland ®Yes ®Corps 0
371
Hardwood ^ No ^DWQ .
W4 (A4) ®P ^ T Road Fill Bottomland ®Yes ®Corps 019
0
Hardwood ^ No ^DWQ .
W5 (A5) ®P ^ T Lot Fill Bottomland ®Yes ®Corps 021
0
Hardwood ^ No ^DWQ .
W6 (A6) ^ P ®T Open-Cut Bottomland ®Yes ®Corps 049
0
Sanitary Sewer Hardwood ^ No ^ DWO .
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.488
2h. Comments: ''Total Permanent Impact = 0.439 acres, Total Temporary Impacts = 0.049 acres
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number -Permanent (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
(P) or Temporary (T) intermittent DWQ -non-404, width (linear
(INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ^ P ^ T ^ PER ^Corps
^ INT ^DWQ
S2 ^ P ^ T ^ PER ^Corps
^ INT ^ DWO
S3 ^ P ^ T ^ PER ^Corps
^ INT ^DWQ
S4 ^ P ^ T ^ PER ^Corps
^ INT ^ DWO
S5 ^ P ^ T ^ PER ^Corps
^ INT ^DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all o en water im acts below.
4a.
Open water impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Tem orar T 4b.
Name of
waterbody
(if applicable) 4c.

Type of impact 4d.

Waterbody type 4e.

Area of impact (acres)
01 ^P^T
02 ^P^T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction ro osed, then complete the chart below.
5a.

Pond ID 5b.

Proposed use or purpose of 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
number pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
^ Yes ^ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 13

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
^ Neuse ^Tar-Pamlico ^ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ^ Catawba ^ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem orar T re uired?
B1 ^P^T ^Yes
^ No
62 ^P^T ^Yes
^ No
B3 ^P^T ^Yes
^ No
64 ^P^T ^Yes
^ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 7 of 13

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant had a wetland delineation performed on the entire property in order to identify natural resources so
that impacts could be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Impact Areas A3 & A4 is proposed
permanent wetland fill for the road. This road will be constructed with a 50' right-of-way, this ROW width will include
site utilities and a 3:1 slope. Impact Areas A 1, A2 & A5 is proposed permanent wetland fill for lots 34, 35, 36 and
129 to create buildable lots. Lots 34-36 will be set aside for a stormwater BMP. Impact Area A6 is a proposed
temporary open-cut excavation for a utility connection. This is the only impact necessary for utilities; all other
utilities will be constructed within the road ROW
Additionally, as stated in the previous PCN dated 07/27/06; "Initial plans for this section of Fairfield Farms
subdivision proposed 1.05 acres of fill in 404 wetlands. Further review of these plans had reduced impacts to 0.548
acres of fill after four plans were evaluated for the project. The current plan has done well to account for avoidance
and minimization of 404 wetlands fill as well as complying with other state and local agency requirements as noted
above. 6.732 acres of the tract total of 7.28 acres of 404 wetlands will remain undisturbed as part of this plan.
Remaining 404 wetlands onsife to be but under a conservation easement or restrictive covenants if the 404
wetlands are located within lot boundaries. " The applicant worked with the USACE to further reduce the impacts fo
the current 0.488 acres which were approved by the USACE on September 25, 2008.
The applicant is aware of the regional conditions associated with the Nationwide Permit 29. With respect to
residential development conditions (NWP 29-Regional Conditions section 4.0) the applicant does not anticipate any
impacts to streams or wetlands associated with stormwater facilities, there are no impacts associated with single-
familyrecreation facilities, there are no permanent wetland or stream fills proposed within the floodway/floodplain
and the stream classification for this project is WS-IV, 8 (i.e. not Outstanding Resource Waters, High Quality
Waters, Coastal Wetlands or wetland adjacent to these waters).
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Erosion & Sediment Control plan will require measures to protect water quality during construction activities.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ®Yes ^ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ^ DWQ ®Corps
^ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
^ Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
® Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ^ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ^ warm ^ cool ^cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
The permittee previously proposed 6.78 acres of wetlands to be placed in a conservation easement and protected by a
restrictive covenant. This previously proposed compensatory mitigation plan was a Special Condition of the Nationwide
Permit Verification issued on September 25, 2008 (AID#2003-01163).
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) -required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ^ Yes ®No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 13

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ^Yes ®No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
^Yes ^ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 29.43
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ®Yes ^ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The Stormwater Management Plan will be submitted to the City of Fayetteville for review and approval. The SMP includes
2 Wet Detention Ponds and have been designed to treat 90% TSS.
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ^ DWO Stormwater Program
^ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? City of Fayetteville
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ^ NSW
^ USMP
apply (check all that apply): ® Water Supply Watershed
^ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ^Yes ®No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
^ Coastal counties

4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ^ HQW
^ ORW
(check all that apply):
^ Session Law 2006-246
^ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ^Yes ^ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ^Yes ^ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ^Yes ^ No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ^ Yes ®No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ^ Yes ^ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
^ Yes ^ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ^ Yes ®No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ^ Yes ®No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ^ Yes ®No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated
Wetlands Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft
states that many private developments are unlikely to cause cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in-fill,
most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and si/vicultural operations. The
Fairfield Farms Subdivision-Sections 4-6 project is a small scale residential development. Additionally, the project is
located within the City of Fayetteville ETJ, therefore the adjacent properties that have potential for development will
have the following regulations to protect downstream waters: the Phase 11 NPDES Stormwater Permit Program
which includes permitting requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) in addition to post-
construction stormwater management requirements. We anticipate that the DWQ will advise us if any additional
information is needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This project will connect to the City of Fayetteville Sanitary Sewer System. The City of Fayetteville's Public Works
Commission will ensure that capacity of their treatment facility will not be exceeded.
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ®Yes ^ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ^Yes ®No
impacts?
^ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
^ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? The NC-Natural Heritage Programs Virtual Workroom was used to search for elemental occurrences of state and
federally protected species in the vicinity of the project. It was determined based on the search that there are forty elemental
occurrences that were found within two miles of the project boundaries. Nine of the elemental occurrences of the forty are listed
as Federally Endangered. Additionally, twelve of the forty are listed as Endangered by the State. See table below.
~~ ~ i~~;
Eriocaulon texense Texas Hatpins 1999-07-13 Medium E
Lilium pyrophilum Sandhills Lily 2003-07-26 C Medium E FSC
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded 1990 H High E E
Woodpecker
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded 1990-Pre H High E E
Woodpecker
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded 2009 E High E E
Woodpecker
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded 1990 X Medium E E
Woodpecker
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded 1990 H High E E
.Woodpecker
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded 2009 E High E E
Woodpecker
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded 1990 X Medium E E
'Woodpecker
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded 1990-03 H High E E
Woodpecker
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded 2009 E High E E
Woodpecker
Spiranthes eatonii Eaton's Ladies'- 1957-06-27 H Very Low E
tresses
References: (NHP] North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2011. Internet-based search: Natural Heritage Program Virtual
Workroom http://nhpweb.enr.stafe.nc.us/public/virtual workroom.phtml Accessed 12 May 2011.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ^Yes ®No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? !,
References: (NOAAj National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2011. Internet-based search: NOAH Fisheries Essential
Fish Habitat Mapper http://sharpfin.nmfs.noaa.gov/website/EFH Mapper/map.aspx Accessed 12 May 2011.
Page 12 of 13

7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ^ Yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Records checks at the State Historic Preservation Office or the Office of State Archeology were not performed. Please
note however that no structures were observed on the property during the wetland boundary evaluation.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in aFEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ^ Yes ®No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: N/A
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping Program
http://floodmaps. nc. gov/fmis/Ma,v. aspx?PIPS=103
Bob Zarzecki June 3, 2011
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name ~ Agent's Sig ture
' Date
(Agent
s signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is
provided.
Page 13 of 13

Environine~tal Consultants, PA
~ Baaa • galelati. xoctb Cl^oiir r~14 • >!boe~x (919 s46,~+00 • l~ 119) 8~6-~A~67
~u Alanka To He Fled In By The Currr~ Ii.andown~rs or Municipat Official
Name: gr0~4/~CO QHh: t7sn $. Cire~w~we.~t
Address: Pb Soyc 535$x.
~~ y,t irlev ~ tlt t1. C . Z@ 305
Phone: C9to~ Kay -SIy3
Project NaaieJDeaeripttan: F~i~~ietd F4~„ns
Date: ~ 3 - y - 20 -1
The Deparomeat of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Faginaas, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmit~on, NC 28402
Attn: Cr !~+-1 ~+N~e~~e~
Field Office: :1wa:.-~,~ off„
Re: Wexlanda Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May troncern:
Sd'tEC Project # i tZSB.Pt
I, the current landowner or municipal official, hereby designate and authorize Soil ~ Em-ironmeatal Camultants,
PA to act in my behalf as nxy agent in the pmcs3ssiag of permit applications,.to fiurnish upon negtu~ s+~
information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The ~_ day of I~a-rch ,toll
This nati$cation supersedes any previous corresporxlence mining the agent for this project.
NOTICE: Thls anthorizatlast, for Ha6iiity and pro[ealoaal courtesy reassas, b vagd ady far =nverameat omdals to
enter the property wkeu acoumpaaled bi' SdsEC stafL Yeaa shesJd call SdcEC m arrange a sibs aseetleg prlar bs
vldting the site.
DON B. BROAD~TELL
Print Property Owner's or Municipal Official's Name
cc: Ms. Cyndi ICat+oly
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Q .
Prapaty Owner's or Municipal 's Signature
cc: Mr. Bob Zercecld
Soil & Envico~ental Consultants, PA
~; th+neraboro OOiioe:
2361.ePhillip Cant, Suite C 3817-E Lemdale Diiv~e
ConooRd, NC 28025 Greaoabav, NC 27455
Pha~a (704) 720A405 1'hoaa [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM