20110393 Ver 1_401 Application_20110525

~xQ tl - o~q3
LITTLE & LITTLE
25 May 2011 '~
~~ , ~• Received by:
' i Date:
TRANSMITTAL '
TO: Ms. Lia Myott Gileski
NC DENR DWQ Wetlands and Stormwater Branch,
401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street (The Archdale Building)
Raleigh, NC 27604
FROM: Amy Mackintosh
~ ~~~a~~
l! (~
MAY 2 ~ 2011
~ • MATER 4U/W7Y
~~ sTOrun~~ a~aMCH
SUBJECT: PCN for Stream Crossing- - 401 & Neuse Riparian Buffer Authorization
3200 Waterfield Drive, Greenfield South, Garner NC
We are sending to you via: courier
uanti Date
5 4/10/2011
5 5/25/2011
2 5/23/2011
3 5/23/2011
5
5
5
5 12/5/2001
5
1 5/11/2011
For review and permitting
Remarks:
Amy Mackintosh (amy.m(a~lal-la.com)
Description
Agent Authorization Letter
PCN for Driveway stream crossing
Plans - 7 sheets -full size
Plans - 11x17
Vicinity Map
USGS Quad map topo
NRCS Soils map
Stream determination letter
Storm water calculations - W&R
$2000 check for express review fee
Copy: Sharron Scroggins, Hager Smith
Doug Watson
L&L Project Number (sbhav.03)
Landscape Architecture /Planning PO Box 1448 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 919/821-5645 Fax [phone]

~~c.p i t - 0393
O~O~ W AT~c9OG ~ ~~ ~ ~~ y:
Use Onl
Co action ID no.
° MAY `~ 5 2 l~wQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
t~.1AMTER
Pre-Construction orm
A. A licant Information µ
1. Processing ~~,
~:~:~~ ~:,
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ^ Section 10 Permit ~' "~""""°-"
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ®Yes ^ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
^ 401 Water Quality Certification -Regular ^ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification -Express ®Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
^ Yes ®No For the record only for Corps Permit:

^Yes ®No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ^Yes ®No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ^Yes ®No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ^Yes ®No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Strategic Behavior
2b. County: Wake
2c. Nearest municipality /town: Garner
2d. Subdivision name: Greenfield South
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Greenfield 40 Assoc LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. DB 12054 PG 742
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Douglas G. Watson
3d. Street address: 901 Old Kight Road
3e. City, state, zip: Knightdale, NC 27545
3f. Telephone no.: 919-266-5992
3g. Fax no.: 919-266-6511
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

,•
.. •• ~
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ®Agent ^ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultantlnformation (if applicable)
5a. Name: J Mack Little
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Little & Little Landscape Architects PLLC
5c. Street address: PO Box 1448
5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27602
5e. Telephone no.: 919-821-5645
5f. Fax no.: 919-831-2329
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 1730--02-3191
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.6800 Longitude: - 78.5600
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 13.768 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to White Oak Creek- #27-43-11
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C, NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Undeveloped wooded site within industrial subdivision.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
2.53 Ac.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
2013 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Construction of a driveway to access a proposed group care facility.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Site and building construction, including mass grading using typical construction equipment.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes ^ No ^ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
^ Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Soil & Environmental

Name (if known): Consultants
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
SAW 2009-02023 (11-03-2009), DWQ NBRRO-01-300 (12-05-2001).
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ^Yes ®No ^ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ^Yes ®No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
^ Wetlands ®Streams -tributaries ®Buffers
^ Open Waters ^ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ -non-404, other) (acres)
Tem ora (T)
W1 ^ P ^ T ^ Yes ^Corps
^ No ^DWQ
W2 ^ P ^ T ^ Yes ^Corps
^ No ^DWQ
W3 ^ P ^ T ^ Yes ^Corps
^ No ^DWQ
W4 ^ P ^ T ^ Yes ^Corps
^ No ^DWQ
W5 ^ P ^ T ^ Yes ^Corps
^ No ^DWQ
W6 ^ P ^ T ^ Yes ^Corps
^ No ^DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ -non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)

S1 ®P ^ T
Driveway crossing Unnamed
tributary of White ®PER
^INT ®Corps
®DWQ
3'
136'
Oak Creek
S2 ^ P ^ T ^PER ^Corps
^ INT ^DWQ
S3 ^ P ^ T ^PER ^Corps
^ INT ^DWQ
S4 ^ P ^ T ^PER ^Corps
^ INT ^ DWO
S5 ^ P ^ T ^PER ^Corps
^ INT ^DWQ
S6 ^ P ^ T ^PER ^Corps
^ INT ^DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 136'
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
- Permanent (P)
or Temporary
T 4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable) 4c.

Type of impact 4d.

Waterbody type 4e.

Area of impact (acres)
01 ^P^T
02 ^P^T
03 ^P^T
04 ^P^T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a.

Pond ID
b 5b.

Proposed use or purpose of 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
num
er pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
Sf. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
^ Yes ^ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ^Tar-Pamlico ^ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ^ Catawba ^ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) for impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
or Temporary required?
T

B1 ®P ^ T Driveway Unnamed tributary to White ^ Yes
6483
4282
crossing Oak Creek ®No
B2 ^ P ®T Erosion Unnamed tributary to White ^ Yes 0 1697
control Oak Creek ®No
B3 ^ P ®T connection White Oak Creek ®Nos 0 782
6h. Total buffer impacts 6483 6761
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Headwalls are used to retain the road fill, to minimize the length of stream impact. There will be only one access point to the
site. A segment of the smaller tributary stream without adjacent wetlands was selected for the crossing point. It is not
possible to access the property without crossing a stream.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sediment and erosion control measures will be used to avoid or minimize impacts to the stream during construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ^ Yes ®No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ^DWQ ^ Corps
^ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ^ Payment to in-lieu fee program
^ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ^ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ^ warm ^ cool ^cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) -required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ^ Yes ®No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ®Yes ^ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
® Yes ^ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 25.3
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ®Yes ^ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Stormwater runoff from the site will be treated using a constructed wetland designed per the current DWQ BMP Manual.
Outflow from the basin will be conveyed via a concrete riser structure and outlet barrel, which discharge onto a riprap
dissipater, and then flow through a natural vegetated area prior to reaching the existing wetlands at a non erosive velocity.
Stormwater management plans are currently being reviewed by the Town of Garner."
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ^DWQ Stormwater Program
^ DWO 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Town of Garner
^ Phase II
®NSW
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented Stormwater management programs ^ USMP
apply (check all that apply): ^ Water Supply Watershed
^ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ^Yes ®No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
^ Coastal counties
^ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented Stormwater management programs apply ^ ORW
(check all that apply): ^ Session Law 2006-246
^ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
^Yes ^ No
attached?
5. DW4 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ^Yes ^ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ^Yes ^ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ^ Yes ®No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ^ Yes ®No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ^ Yes ®No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ SurFace Water or Wetland Standards, ^ Yes ®No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ^ Yes ®No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ^ Yes ®No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or dischar
e) of wastewater
ene
t
d f
g
g
ra
e
rom
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater from project will be discharged to public sewer system. Town of Garner wastewater plant has available
capacity for this project, per Town Engineer.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ^ Yes ®No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ^ Yes ®No
impacts?
^ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
^ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program Topographic Map Record Search and Virtual Workroom
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ^ Yes ®No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NC Essential Fish Habitat is coastal
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ^ Yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCSHPO - HPOWeb - GIS mapping
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in aFEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ^ Yes ®No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FIRM Panel 3720172000) & 3720173000)

~'. M~~k i. ~ Trt,~ ~ ~s~l
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Appli ant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's ature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

,:J.i _iJ
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Secretary
1 •'°~
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
December 5, 2001
Jennifer Burdette
Soil and Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Subject: Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Rules
NBRRO 01-300
Greenfield SE
S&EC Project #: 01-6151
Wake County
Dear Ms. Burdette:
,~ On October 9, 2001, I conducted a site visit of the features involved in the above
referenced project. It was determined,that channels present on the property and shown on either
the Wake County Soil Survey and/or the USGS Garner, NC Quad map are subject to protection
under the Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy; Protection and
Maintenance of Existing Riparian Areas, Administrative Code T15A:02B.0233 (NCAC 0233).
The specific portions of the channels subject to the buffer rules include Feature D (below flag
#755), Feature E, Feature G (below flag #1001), Feature J (below flag #958), Feature K (below
flag #T107), Feature M, and White Oak Creek with its associated open water from former beaver
impoundments, which are shown on the attached USGS Garner, NC Quad map (Figure 1) and/or
Wake County Soil Survey Map (Figure 2). Features marked A, B, C, F, G (between flag #1027
and 1027A), H, I, and L are not subject to the Neuse Riparian Rule.
This office has assigned the reference number of NBRRO-01-300 to this project. Thank
you for your attention to this matter and if this Office can be of any assistance or if you have any
additional questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at 571-4700 ext.
237.
Sincerely,
1
2~ ~
Charles Brown
Environmental Specialist
cc: John Dorney - DWQ
~neusbuf. let/nbr013 OO.let
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone (919}571-4700 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%post-consumer paper

1 .~
~q 400 A \ 1
V ~}~ ~~_ c
• // 111 ~~

-, So,~ , f... - ~ ~~
3 O _
~___ ___
_ ==0
~3. O 3~ ~,
o _ _ 'o=:
~: °' .v
~~ ~~
.~
__ ~ ~' ~
.;_, .
~ Q. 'o
~~-a`: - -_ - 3
_a
Y \ i
5 ~u
n
•~ u .I
S ~ ~ •il~ ~ D '•3

~,/~
' lit l l
t
~~~~ ~'•
ProJed is Sale:
018151 1' =2000'
Fi
1
Project
Mgr.: JB Date:
N3/Ot gure
- USGS Quad
Greenfield Southeast

Bank of America
Garner, Wake County, NC
C3ARNER, N. C.
NE/4 GARNER I5' QUADRANGLE
35078-F5-TF-024
7964
PHO70REVISED '1987
DMA 5255 11 NE-SERIES V842
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.~ Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
r
~~' \~
ce•
•ter
~~~~~.:

ProJed t~: Scale:
01-6151 1" =1320'
Mgr.: JB ~ 413101
Figure 2 -Soil Survey
Greer~ield Southeast
Bank of America
Gamer, Wake County, NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • (919} 846-9467
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
NdRko oI-3oo

y _..
'~`•~ I ~)- ,": ,`''~.~;,`.~ ~"'~~ ~" ~ Boil 8z Environmental Caasaitants PA • •~~
1 ' 1 ~ _ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • J 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 1
;~\; ~ ..t~ r ~ ~! ~'~~ ~ , ' -. ``~~, Phone: (919) 84b-5900 - Fax• (9I9) 846.9467 _,
f
`` 1~.;,.~ ~ ~ 1
-- ., ~k~~~~.. ~. ~~a~~~J ~,~ ~ i ~ _ Project: Greenfield SE/Proiect #• 01-6151
:• ~
%. Date: ]
~' `~ ~~' • '~` ~ . ,~~. r `"'~- r^-i ' ~ = ' 10 O 1 RGY i Su( i t~,2$lp
. ~ ~ i s~ l .~ / . .
~~~ t`~' ~'` : ~ z ,'~ r r ` j Preliminary Buffer Approximation _
~• ~ ~ ~ -q"'j' ~ Z'+. ~ ~- -` 1i ~\' ~ 1 ~ -- Suitable for Preliminary Plarmiag Only -
~~~~\~` :: , / ' `. ~'°c,y `~ ;.~~~ • 1 / ,1 ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ShFx reserves the right to modify thin map hued orr mote fieldvroric, .
""-1 , ~ ~ : ~ r` ~:; ti _ ~ ~ li ~~y, . .. ,,' survryed delineations and any other additional information.
"~ ~ `~~ `/ f ~ . ~ . -~~~o a * - <' - / --. ., Approximations wee mapped using topogntphie maps and ground truthing
1! c I ~ '`^ If these aras are to be used, th ~ ••: -
~ `~~\ 'l ~~ ~ .. -: `fit . ry must be app,oved and ~'`" J
~` ~~-C ` ~~ ~~..ay+'r'" - rt.~ ~:_ l _ - permitted by the NC Division orp+ater Quality. .._ ,~,~!~
_ ' .~ _ ,fit., .; j;..:' .t : _ 1:?'~ -
`.`/~! ~~ ~~ '1 ., ~'-_.~.' '^_: it Ii 1. !r•~t_~ ~rl. ~ (t r ` :i'F:,
•1. 4 ~~ ~ ~. t rF ` ~ l
I ~-, t~~ .; ~: ~`':`, yr`
~. t..._I"?`.., LEGEND N S -' NOT S III f e C7 "~"b ~II Gf/JG F.jf/f~G~' ~V~C,f .~ ~_'~• L~ ~"
'~-~'~ _
' `'tom^+ J ~ ~ ~~ ~i `~ ~~ "_ _
• - . ~.• , • ~ WATERS OF THE US SUBJECT TO THE REUSE BUFFER RULES : ~~ - •'' '
This determination most be confirmed b the IYCDWQ] ' ,~`•
~.•' MARGINAL WATERS OF THE U9 -MAY BE SUBJECT TO HEU$E BUFFER RULES •','`. ~ ' ''
;~';;~:
r •' (SbEC does not believe these channels are snb ect to the Nenae Buffer Rnies; however, -
. this determination mnst be"confirmed by the NCDWQ.] - i
Maps and databases ore public information supplied
by various goverrunent agencies. The author and/or Ma pVl1 E
seller of the software program are in no way
responsible or liabie for the information depicted
herein. Inquiries concerning the dots should be 0 625 1250 1875 2500 8:2:
directed to the appropriate government agency. APR 3, 200
Scale in Feet

~'3'~,.
Auburn ~$~~~$
~q
4
~~d _~
~.
S
Salt Hill Rc~, .:,~
~~v
e~
'~.
"s
O
fix'
p4
Rd -~
Nn
/V
of
~~
4
~_,
~:1i1t

_ ~_
~70 ~ m
v~,~ `H .
f ' \i°o,~ ~~l 8r[cksteeE Ln
,.4~
a~ ~~ e
~ _ y~j ,`
~,~ ~~~ EF
~~' fern aaia Ur
~~`~
c
.a ;
~ ~ ,i
~~ ~~ 7wam Qr ti._.~
Cabin Vigo Ln
~~ra><egic aenavior vlClnlty map
0 800 1600 3200 Feet
~~~7e~ ~
pF
4 ~ ~~O
Z
~~~ G~~~;" WAKE
COUNTY
~::,~r~, ~.~~~~„~~ N,

`
`
`~ ~'
~
ER
~ ~ CF+
== Ih[F
,~
,, <_'~~
,:; ~~`..

i ~' _ __~' ? ,
(,..

~~ ~ f
?1~., ~ .
.;
,,
~~ ~
~~/.
1;~~.~,
?rr `i _
{, \\
~%1 ~.-._
,~ v
~\~~ \;.
~_~(: e, .
~ ~ ~,
~i ~ ~ ~- ~
~~ ~ ~~
~~ ~~~

,~. t
as ~' ~ ~- ~ ~~ ~ ,~
( ~. ~~
1` l" .-,1 r ~ Cc~ ~--,
11'x.!"
~~ ,~ 1 ~~
', _ )`~
~.r~=,~
/~~~ ~~r ~ ~ Yi l ~~ ..
' ! ( ~~ ~~ lr ~ . ~ '~ \~ Scale: 1:24,000
~~-'~'~ ~ ~ '~` Dated 1993
r ~~,- ;i ~ ~~` ~~
~,, ~~ 1.. ~ ~ ~~
~~ ~~' ~~-~ ~ 1` ' ~~~~ Strategic Behavior
~- Wit, ~~ - ~ S f 14 ;' ' , Greenfield South
,, '~`~ ~-'~° - ~` \::,_ 3200 Waterfield Drive, Garner, NC
,~- ~ ,_

WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA - SHEET NUMBED

Greenfield 40 Associates, LLC
901 Old Knight Road
Knightdale, NC 27545
[phone]
10 April 2011
Mr. Jamie Shern
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Dear Mr. Shern:
The undersigned,, registered property owners ofi Lot 1 at Greenfield South Business
Park, (per legal description provided below), do hereby au#horize J. Mack Little, of
Little & Little Landscape Architects PLLC, to act on our behalf and take all actions
necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this permit or certification
and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
We hereby certify the information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
Sincerely,
Douglas G. Watson
pc: Mack Little, Little & Little
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL DESIGNATION: Lot 1 Greenfield South BM2009-00132
PARCEL ID: 1730023191
STREET ADDRESS: 3200 Waterfield Drive, Garner, NC
Property Owner(s): Greenfield 40 Assoc LLC ,Attention: Doug Watson
Property Owner Address: 901 Old Knight Road, Knightdale, NC 27545-9065
Property Owner Telephone #;919-266-5992

"WITHERS c~~~: RAVEIVEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lia Gilleski, NCDWQ
FROM: Hunter Freeman
CC: Amy Mackintosh
DATE: May 11, 2011
SUBJECT: Strategic Behavior, Garner, NC - Stormwater Calculations
,~
r
-~ - .-
_ti ~ SEAI- =_
r_ 028342 ""
a ~~
~i~~'•~ ~~G.1 N;~ti4` ~~ti
Strategic Behavior is a proposed commercial development project within the Neuse River Basin in Garner, NC.
There is one driveway crossing of a stream buffer proposed for the site. Additionally, there in one constructed
wetland BMP, currently under review by the Town.
Calculations are provided herein to justify the culvert sizing for the driveway cross pipe, and velocity calculations
for the wetland outlet are provided to justify "non-erosive" velocity at the edge of the wetlands downstream of the
outlet.
In summary, there is one 48" RCP culvert proposed. The inverts of the culvert are buried for aquatic passage per
current NCDWQ and US ACOE recommendations. Details are provided on the plan sheets accompanying this
submittal. The culvert was modeled as a 42" RCP to represent the effects of lost cross sectional area due to the
Inver burial. Additionally, inverts were adjusted to reflect final stream bed elevations rather than culvert installation
elevations. The calculations, therefore, reflect the actual anticipated water surface elevations for each storm event.
Table 1 Inc{udes a summary of design information for the driveway culvert, Tabe 2 includes a summary of the
velocity calculations at the end of the dissipater pad downstream of the constructed wetland..
TABLE 1 -DRIVEWAY CULVERT DESIGN SUMMARY
• 48" Diameter RCP Q 0.5% slope • DA = 37 acres
• Inverts buried for aquatic passage • Composite C = 0.50
• Roadway Elev. (overtopping) _ +/-278.00 • Tc = 30 min
• Stream Bed Elev. _ +J- 265.10 (upstream)
Peak Flow Peak Water Freeboard
Storm Event (cfs) Surface Elevation (ft) HW/D
(ft)
10-Year 69.18 269.55 8.45 1.27
25-Year 80.56 270.23 7.77 1.46
100-Year 98.46 271.60 6.40 1.86
111 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511 ~ tel.: [phone] I fax: [phone] ~ www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
1410 Commonwealth Drive ~ Suite 101 ~ Wilmington, NC 28403 ~ tel: [phone] ~ fax: [phone]
416 D Gallimore Dairy Road ~ Greensboro, NC 27409 ~ tel: [phone] (fax: [phone]

TABLE 2 -WETLAND OUTLET SUMMARY
• Outlet Pisa - 24° RCP
Peak Inflow to peak Outflow Stope Velocity
Storm Event BMP (cfs) (ft/ft) (ft/sec)
(cfs)
10-Year 29.48 3.93 0.04 1.78
Detailed calculations are attached.
ili MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 te1:919.469.334o fax:9i9.467.6008 www.withersravenel.com

DRIVEWAY CULVERT CALCULATIONS

D RAI NAG E AREA MAP

3.~.,- ~
,~ fem.
'}
r- ~ ~\_~
l%~~'
~.
t.
J~ ~ ~~,~ J..l-
,` 1 tt ,~: f--..
--
~ .~\
°y'i ~~i~ ~ ~ ~. ~
y ; t
_ 1 ~ ~~, ' .
,i,
-;:-°
<< _
~'~ ~~~ '~ti\ t
~7~~;;~ 'i, __ ~~, .;tti' ~
'~ ~~a
~~~~ ~ ~
~-

~- `' ,` `` ~ J-___ -' ~~~` , Silt`
1 ~ ~ t ~ i itl~p`
.rt j ~~rlf' i 1 's ly
/1 ~~^~r ~L` `1 _~ ~ht
-~' y
~~s ~ ~~~~i~~~~~ 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~
~ 1~
,.
1 /'4
t ~ •~
~~
44, + 2.6~t .-~, ~ I 1

'%~1J ~ ,1: r ,rr
~ ~ ~ ~f ~~ ~ l~ ~If rl~f~ ~
~ '~~,~r~ ~ ,F--: r.
,~ ,` _ _
~. - r/c~ ~-_ - -~``
~~~ - " , ~ t~o~--~ S I ~~
~ ~ li
~~
~~~~ - ~-- yj.
;.
~l ~~~~'~
~~ ~ ~ ,~ ~
,, `~~`~
~~~
{ ~ ~ ~ ,~~.
,;~ 1~ ,`~ ~ ,; ~'~ ~i~~a ~ ,,p f
~,~
'~~
~k
STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR DA MAP
0 200 400 800 Feet
-i ~~ ~ e'L~ j `+'~: ~'~`i ~f~J~ ~ ~~
# C_ ~
~ ~~~k, ~~; ~ 1 ~~ _ ~~.
Lr t ~ ~ i J ~((( /!~ / ~ ~
~ ~ ~~ li ~' ~~ ~~ ~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~~
trlti:~?~~` ~h5 1 ri . `'-'1N~teftleld~Uf iM1 ='' ..~80.
~y CF
r
fU~ ~~~~~ COUNTY
N(1R1 ii i r n~~i ~ Na

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Driveway Buffer ~~~~
Anatysls Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 69.18 cfs
Peak Discharge Method: Rational
Design Return Period 10 year Check Retum Period 25 year
D i n Peak Discha
a Check Peak Discharge 80.56 cfs
w1~
ota rea 37.00 acres Time of Concentration 30.00 min
Rational Coefficient 0.50 Intensity 4.32 in/hr

Area
Subwatershed(acres) C
1 37.00 0.50

Tailwater Conditions: Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation N/A ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 1-42 inch Circular 69,1'8 cfs 269.55 ft 9.00 ft/s
Weir Not Considered N/A N/A N/A
Title: Strategic Behavior Driveway Culvert Project Engineer: hfreeman
k:l.,\h-h\strategic.cvm Withers 8 Ravenel Engineering CulvertMaster v3.1 [03.01.010.00]
05/11/11 07:27:23a~@ntley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 2

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Driveway Buffer
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev~
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Depth/Height 269.55 ft
269.50 ft
269.55 ft
1.27 Discharge
Tailwater Elevation
Control Type 69.18 cfs
N/A ft
Outlet Control

Grades
Upstream Invert
Length 265.10 ft
60.00 ft Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope 264.80 ft
0.005000 ft/ft

Hydraulic Profile
Profile
Slope Type
Flow Regime
Velocity Downstream M2
Mild
Subcritical
9,00 ft!s Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope 2.61 ft
2.79 ft
2.61 ft
0.005780 fflft

Section
Section Shape
Section Material
Section Size
Number Sections Circular
Concrete
42 inch
1 Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise 0.013
3.50 ft
3.50 ft

Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke 269.55 ft
0.50 Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss 1.13 ft
0.56 ft

Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 269.50 ft
Inlet Type Square edgewlheadwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
y 0.67000 Flow Control
Area Full
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form Transition
9.6 ft2
1
1
1
Title: Strategic Behavior Driveway Culvert Project Engineer: hfreeman
k:\...\h-h\strategic.cvm Withers 8 Ravenel Engineering CulvertMaster v3.1 [03.01.010.00]
05/11 /11 07:27:23r1~ntley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 2

Culvert DesignerlAnalyzer Report
Driveway Buffer ~,~t
Analysis Component
Storm Event Check Discharge 80.56 cfs

Peak Discharge Method: Rational _

Design Return Period . _.
10 year Check Return Period
25 year
Design Peak Discharge 69.18 cfs Check P 80.56 cfs
Total Area 37.00 acres ime of Concentration 30.0 min
Rational Coefficient 0.50 Intensity 4.32 in/hr
Area
Subwatershed(acres) C
1 37.00 0.50
Tailwater Conditions: Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation N/A ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 1-42 inch Circular 80.56 cfs 270.23 ft 9.,75 ft/s
Weir Not Considered N/A N/A N/A
Title: Strategic Behavior Driveway Culvert Project Engineer: hfreeman
k:\...\h-h\strategic.cvm Withers 8 Ravenel Engineering CulvertMaster v3.1 [03.01.010.00]
05/17/11 07:27:45G$Antley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 2

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Driveway Buffer
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elev~ 270.23 ft Discharge 80.56 cfs
Inlet Control HW Elev. 270.23 ft Tailwater Elevation NJA ft
Outlet Control HW Elev. 270.06 ft Control Type Inlet Control
Headwater Depth/Height 1.46
Grades
Upstream Invert 265.10 ft Downstream Invert 264,80 ft
Length 60.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.005000 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
Profile M2 Depth, Downstream 2.80 ft
51ope Type Mild Normal Depth N!A ft
Flow Regime Subcritical Critical Depth 2.80 ft
Velocity Downstream 9.75 ft/s Critical Slope 0.006695 ft/ft
Section
Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.013
Section Material Concrete Span 3.50 ft
Section Size 42 inch Rise 3.50 ft
Number Sections 1
Outlet Control Properties '
Outlet Control HW Elev. 270.06 ft Upstream Velocity Head 1.24 ft
Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.62 ft
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 270.23 ft Flow Control Submerged
Inlet Type Square edge w/headwall Area Full 9.6 ft2
K 0.00980 HDS 5 Chart 1
M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1
C 0.03980 Equation Form 1
y 0.67000
Project Engineer: hfreeman
Title: Strategic Behavior Driveway Culvert CulvertMaster v3.1 [03.01.010.00]
k:\...1h-h\strategic.cvm Withers & Ravenel Engineering
05!11/11 07:27:45ri~@ntley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 2

Culvert DesignerlAnalyzer Report
Driveway Buffer ~,~~ :~-
Analysis Component
Storm Event Check Discharge 98.46 cfs

Peak Discharge Method: Rational _ ,
Design Return Period 10 year Check Return Period 100 year
Design Peak Discharge 69.18 cfs Ch e_----_.____8.9.5:.-CIS:
,
~--s
Total Area 37.00 acres ime of Concentration ..
.
30.00 min
Rational Coefficient 0.50 Intensity 5,28 inlhr
Area
Subwatershed(acres} C
1 37.00 0.50
Tailwater Conditions: Constant Tailwater
Tailwater Elevation N/A ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev, Velocity
Culvert-1 1-42 inch Circular 98.46 cfs 271.60 ft 11.06 ft/s
Weir Not Considered N/A N/A N/A
Title: Strategic Behavior Driveway Culvert Project Engineer: hfreeman
k:\...\h-h\strategic.cvm Withers & Ravenel Engineering CuivertMaster v3.1 [03.01.010.00)
05/11/11 07:28:08cEa3@ntley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 1 of 2

Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
Driveway Buffer
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elevt
Inlet Control HW Elev.
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Headwater Dep#h/Height 271.60 ft
271.60 ft
271.09 ft
1.86 Discharge
Tailwater Elevation
Control Type 98.46 cfs
NIA ft
Inlet Control

Grades
Upstream Invert
Length 265.10 ft
60.00 ft Downstream Invert
Constructed Slope 264.80 ft
0.005000 ft/ft

Hydraulic Profile
Profile CompositeM2PressureProfile
Slope Type Mild
Flow Regime Subcritical
Velocity Downstream 11.06 ft/s Depth, Downstream
Normal Depth
Critical Depth
Critical Slope 3.05 ft
N/A ft
3.05 ft
0.008715 ft/ft

Section
Section Shape
Section Material
Section Size
Number Sections Circular
Concrete
42 inch
1 Mannings Coefficient
Span
Rise 0.013
3.50 ft
3.50 ft

Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
Ke 271.09 ft
0.50 Upstream Velocity Head
Entrance Loss 1.63 ft
0.81 ft

Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev. 271.60 ft
Inlet Type Square edge w/headwall
K 0.00980
M 2.00000
C 0.03980
Y 0.67000 Flow Control
Area Futl
HDS 5 Chart
HDS 5 Scale
Equation Form Submerged
9,6 ft2
1
1
1
Title: Strategic Behavior Driveway Culvert Project Engineer: hfreeman
k:\...\h-h\strategic.cvm Withers & Ravenel Engineering CulvertMaster v3.1 [03.01.010.00]
05!11/11 07:28:08cf~Antley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA [phone] Page 2 of 2

'WETLAND OUTLET VELOCITY
CALCULATIONS

IA~effand nuftef Velocify Calcs

Project Description
Friction Methad Manning Formula
Salve For NormaE Depth
Input Data
Roughness Coefficient 0.035
Channel Slope 0.03500 ft/ft
Left Side Slope 3.00 ftlft (H:V)
Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V)
Bgttom Width 20.00 ft
Discharge 3.93 ft'Ts
Results
Normal Depth 0.11 ft
Flow Area 2.20 ft=
Wetted Perimeter 20.69 ft
Top Width 20.65 ft
Critical Depth 0.11 ft
Critical Slope 0.03806 tt/ft
Velocity i .78 ftts
Velocity Head 0.05 ft
Specific Energy 0.16 ft
Froude Number 0:96
Flow'fype Subcritical
GVF Input Data
pawnstream Depth 0.00 ft
Lengkh O.OD ft
Number Of Steps 0
GVF Output Data
Upstream Depth O.DO ft
Profrle Desadption
Profile Headloss 0.00 ft
Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s
Upstream Velocity Infinity ftls
Normal i3epth 0.11 ft
Critical Depth 0.11 ft
Channel Slope 0.03500 {t/ft
Critical Slope 0.03806 fttft
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haesfad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [0@.01.071.00]
5t11l20115:30:04 PM 27 Slemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 08795 USA [phone]bfi5 Page 1 of 1

l
Type.... i•?aster Network S~a.~nn:ary Page 1.01
Name.... TridtersheC!
File.... FC:\L1\I1-C130\1X13'1-Strategic Bel~aSrcral Elealth\Si-E1\Strategic Prelim.ppw
M?~STEn. DF.STG~, S'i'OPi~Y SlJMM.4RY
Network Storm Collection: E;FrU PiQ~X1 Z9 Dc-si
Total
De p t'r.
P.eturn Event iP
1n ~.nE3~e
25 5.9600
LG3 7.37~;~G
1 3.Q00^
E~ainfall
IrA°
Tlm~-J?LJt1! CUr=JE'
Time-Deotn Curve
Time-Cept^. ~UrL'2
Syn.ck:e-ic :;urva
RNF TG
~tDJ NUp~ X yr
F<?~U NaAA 25yr
RDU PiOFA 1COyc
Typ~II [4hr
ttr"iS'i ti? e~"ETvi0~~ S'J~~i~tA:~Y
tiCJ v ~ ~ H,y3:p~>_'3_.?Il L1~tlO:.t
(~NaJe-O~~t aL! ; c-time=Di~rers ion: l
i`[.°.:!'i= E:'~'G ;zurt=~atior: Bln:tk=V;ir!e: L=LnL"t: E?=Rte I_s,~,=LefC.uRCI
?£ax
c~_turn E?Y`G ^?ol speak Qpe2k filar: G+;SEL Pond Sto;ag2
Made IL''• :Ype Event 3c-ft firer: nrs ofs ft ac-s`.
CSC. i?Tt_+lii:llCi ~OPiD lv Z.?~3 42.I1)7J 29.99
C:~. r,aiL.P.N7I`d FO~iG ?,5 l.~~i 1[.L~O~ 3v,~35 ~
~
~
v7 ~.s•1 rLANC1Pl
C ~r1 .L~`;~I~+ PCSPdD
3QiiL1 L~~G
L 2.'~3
.6'"1 2 L00!?
? 9~0~ '
'
9.1.72
12~i2 ~~~"~
~5 I`:.. rN~.i.:'~~~L7~1'.i-: :O~i :i L{) 1. °~~ :t l2. a ~.~'d 3. G3 ~?i.!. /E .8 V2
,...,'i~. nul_ _:.J ~t .C~i~? 7= i.1d9 L2.~L~J~J .7~ L !.~, .~ll
.,c=':?. ;dam=`i,F:`f~~ac'7 ?J~`~ GO ?.50; P X.35J,? L2.2v 2~1.._ 1.?. C'
~STt+. T'~ Ti.A~iCCO_iT ='O'~i+a i . oil R ic.9C~:i .2~ 2?~:.."~4 . a~2
*~''1'I F£}ST :;CT L0 2.3_9 r< L7.?'Xu 13.'?;

~;:i;;. F^S'T J~"I 100 X4,521 R 12.203^ 3?_.33
*~7i;T POD?" :7-,T 1 .5'3(. R 12.'~3~1) L.75
SI@i: Ben.Ley Systems, ino.
Fie: rley Pondwack (10.CC.C27.Cni~ 9:U2 F.i4S 5/212GLL

Type.... ~daster N~t~.rork Su~r~tary Pale 1.(72
Marne.... 'rister~;:eti
Fite.... lt:\il\1i-0130\i?0131-Strategic eehavoral Health\H-H\Strategic Prelim.ppw
NI.AST~'R [v'1'PiJRiC SUMMAR4'
SC5l~C;n1t Hy~rograotT: Methoca
t^~PJ~CfB-Qutfall; Ti1J'dp=171V?r5t0^; I
{ i r+ln= Hiv Truncation: 81 ank=Clone; L=Lei t; R=R*_; LR=Left&Rt )
Keturn {iYG Vel
Node iG Type Sent ac-:t ?'ru::
~~'~7~ 6R~ ~~..i 1{~ 1.39°
'"C3tii PR JC[' 25 1.993
:,1r_ ?RE JC7 1G0 3.io2
~~u~ ?e:E JC'T 1 .3`a3
PGA? TR~AT~u L~.~c, 1!.'+ ..5~3
:~'.~~ : 1?=.f~i E,7 EiREL t 7 _ . 9~ i
:'OAT 'T?.EA.;'"ti P.-2~A 1G 2.7+:13
i'OST' T'?r,7-c [? P.R~A 1 .'obi
"'i7J! CiN~:K:,n:~~ ?'i.R~`A 1G .BOr
_'CST UNTREI•.TEL fin:.A 27 _.lBi
1~O7T JN IRc".A?'Gl AR5'i'+. 1C~) 1.8~b
'r'Cr : '~i'CR~F.TE~% P.RSz 1 . 1 ? 1
PRc:Oc.VF.L~?.I-C,'i' P.RE:~ 70 1.399
"~L~'.~_.~LrSL~?~!~;IiS n~~'.Lrt !i 1.993

;R_uF~;~l.~,,"diP P.RLA 1 .303
S/P;:
BFr.tley PJndr~c.: {i0.c3G.62J.G4)
t,~x
speak Qpeak h!ax 6SSL'i Fc:?:1 5tarag?
z:rj C`5 ft ac-ft
12.2000 1E.05
12.150E 2&.2:~
11.150E u3.ti~
12.05:74 2.38
12.10:10 2?.;'E?
1I_.1000 39.F?5
1%.166v 9i. ~[
':!.9500 %2.12
12.2060 1G.9~
~ 2. IY~G 1~.7G
i7.iJ^4 23.Ov
1Z.0~00 1.70
1~.7.OOG ~~.©6
1t.i~00 tc.7.
!7.1500 .i~.93
'. t.GS'a'.? 2.38
Bc~+_ley Systern~, Inc.
9:02 Fl^. 5I2/2G11
i