NC0089443_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (2)

PAT MCCROR "
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
S. JAB' ZIMMERMAN
t 2a
? "C
July 8, 2016
Mr. Douglas Pierotti e,..
City of Charlotte
600 E Fourth St
Charlotte, Nc 28202
Subject. Rescission of NPDES Permit NCO089443
Myrtle / Morehead storm drainage
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Pierotti:
The Division received the ity's request to rescind the subject
permit, and we do not object. NPDES permit NCO089443 is hereby rescinded,
effective immediately. This letter is to close the permit file for the
Division, and for your department..
If in the future your municipality wishes to discharge wastewater to the
State',s surface waters, it mint first apply for and receive a new NPDES
permit.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Charles. H.
Deaver at (919) 8 "7-6391 or via. e-mail [charle [e-mail]]
nc rely,
S. Jay Zimmerman, Cl.
Director
Division of Water Resources
cc: #jal F#i,,00=="
Teresa Revis I Budget
State ofNortli Carolina Environmental Quality 1 Water Resources
617 Mail Service Center I Raleiglx, NC" .7699-1617
919 87 6300 919-807-63 9 FAX
bttps://deg.nc.gov/aboutl ivisions/water-resources/water-resources-permits/wastewater-branch/npdes-waste ater-permits

PAT MCCRORY
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
t-t,ctal
WaterResources S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
k,
. � June 24, 2016
Michelle Haas
City of Charlotte
600 E 4th S
Charlotte, NC 28202
Subject: NPDES Electronic Reporting Requirements
Myrtle % Morehead Storm Grain project
NPDES Permit number: NCO08 443
Dear NPDES Permittee;
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently published the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Electronic Reporting Rule, The rule requires NPDES regulated facilities to
report information electronically, instead of filing written paper reports. The rule does not change what
information is required from facilities. It only changes the method by which information is provided (i.e.,
electronic rather than paper -based).
EPA is phasing in the requirements of the rule over a 5-year period. The two phases of the rule, and their
key milestones, are:
• Phase 1 --Starting on December 21, 2016, regulated entities that are required to submit Discharge
Monitoring Reports (DMRs) will begin submitting these reports electronically. If you are currently
reporting your D R data electronically using eDMR then you simply need to continue reporting
in the same way as you are now. The key change is that, starting on December 21, 201,
electronicreporting of DMRs will be required, instead of voluntary.
• Phase 2 —Starting on December 21, 2020, regulated entities that are required to submit certain
other NPDES reports will begin submitting these reports electronically. Reports covered in the
second phase include Notices of Intent to discharge in compliance with an NPDES general permit,
Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports, and a number of other NPDES program reports.
Incorporating Electronic Reporting Requirements into NPDES Permits
The NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule requires authorized NPDES programs to incorporate electronic
reporting requirements Into NPDES permits beginning December 21, 2015. Under the new rule, the
electronic reporting process supersedes the paper reporting process, According to our files, your NPDES
permit became effective after November 2013, and should contain the requirement to electronically
report your Discharge Monitoring Reports using NC DWR`s eDMR system.
In addition to requiring p rmittees to report information electronically, the rule also requires permittees
to identify the initial recipient for the NPDES electronic reporting data [see 40 CER 122.41(l)( ) , Initial
State rd'North C'armina I Environmental Quality j Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Crater I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
. _._ 919 907 6300

recipient of electronic NPDES information from WDES-regulatedfacilities (initial recipient) means the
entity (EPA or the state authorized by EPA to implement the NPDES program) that is the designated entity
for receiving electronic NPDES Data [see 40 CFR 127,2(b)], Permittees are required to electronically
submit the required NPDES information to the appropriate initial recipient, as determined by EPA. By July
18, 2016, EPA must identify and publish on its web site and in the Federal Register a listing of initial
recipients by state and by NPDES data group. Once available, you can use EPA's web site to find out or
determine the initial recipient of your electronic submission,
NC DWR has submitted a request to EPA to be the initial recipient for the following NPDES data groups:
1. Discharge Monitoring Reports;
2. General Permit Reports [Notices of Intent to discharge (NOls),- Notices of Termination (NOTs)];
3. Pretreatment Program Reports; and
4. Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports
EPA°s web site will also link to the appropriate electronic reporting tool for each type of electronic
submission for each state. Instructions on how to access and use the appropriate electronic reporting
tool will be available as well.
For more information on EPA's NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule, visit
des -
electronic -re ort n -LgLe . For more information on selectronic reporting to NC DWR, visit
or contact Vanessa
Manuel at 919-807-6392 or via email at Vanessa.Manue1j2ncdenrgov,
Sincerely,
Jeff'-e4j 0.
far. Jay Zimmerman, P.G.
Cc: NPDES File
Central Files

kk
x
PAT >MCCRORY
C"ic+uerntrr
TONAL R. VAN TIER VAAR'T`
Secretary
WaterResources
NWRONMENTAL QUALMY S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Direcrar
March 4, 2016
Mr. David Wolfe
Environmental Services
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage
N I. E Permit NCO08944
Mecklenburg County, NC
Clear Mr. Wolfe -
On March 1, 2016, Roberto Sch ller, Edward Watson, and Maria`Schutte of this Office
conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was conducted as a
Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) to insure compliance with permit requirements
and conditions. At the time of inspection the facility appeared to be well maintained and
operated. We wish to thank you and operating staff for your assistance; regarding the
inspection. A copy of this inspection will be forwarded to the facility's Operator -in -
Responsible -Charge (ORC).
The enclosed report; should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact myself of Roberto Sheller at (70 ) 2 -
2204 or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, N DEQ
Enclosure: Inspection Report
cc: Joseph P. Nestor, Nesco Environmental, PO Box 78222, Charlotte, NC 28271
Wastewater Branch
MSC 1617 - Central files basement
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Waterltescurees I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional office) 610 East Center .Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704 6651699

United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved,
EPA
Washington, D.C. 20460 OMB No. 2 i40-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8�31-98
Secti0n A. National Data System Coding (Le., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yrlmotday inspection Type Inspector FacType
t
N # 15 t 3 NC0089443 111 121 16/03/01 117 18 � 1 1SI 20
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA
671
70 � 71 � 7 [ N 1 73 74 75 �80
._... Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective [late
POTW name and NPOES permit Number} 10:44AM 1610 f01 14/11/01
Myrtle t Morehead Storm Efrain project
900 S McDowell St Baxter St Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
Charlotte NC 28202 11:35AM 16/03/01 16/06/30
Names) of Onsite Representattve(s)fritle(s)tPhone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data
!Il
Joseph Petrick NestcrfORCI704-442-1365f
Name, Address of Responsible Official/TittefPhone and Fax Number
Contacted
David Wolfe,600 E Fourth St Charlotte NC 8202 844lf?04-3 6- 6021%043364554
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement in Operations & Maintenance IV Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Facility Site Review
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s)" Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Roberto Scheller MRO WGi11252-946-64811
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/O celPhone and Fax Numbers Date
W. Corey Basinger MR } WQ1f704-2 5-2194f
EPA. Fo 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Paged 1

lay Inspection Type

P^ermW NCO089443 Owner - Facility. Myrtle t Morehead Storm Drain project
Inspection Date: 03/01/2016 inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new ❑ [�
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit? 0 0 11 El
# Are there any special conditions for the permit? Q ❑ N Q
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? N Q
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? 11 d D El
Comment Facilitv is a mobile aroundwater remediation s stem and the permit expires June 30. 2016.
ORC indicated that oroiect should be com seated before Dermit ex ices.
Qorations & Maintenance Yes No NA N
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
Does the facility analyze process control parameters„ for ex: MLSS, MCR7, Settleable ❑ © 0 El
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: ORC loo and calibration logs were reviewed during ins ection. 11MR"s Lab sheets and COC
an file at office. Facility aggeared to be well maintained and o crated.
Page# 3

Scheller, Roberto
From: Joseph P. Nestor <nescoenvCca`rolina.rr.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 410 PM
To: Scheller, Roberto
Cc: Schulte, Maria; Watson, Edward M; 'Eric Donnelly'; 'Pierotti, Doug'
Subject:
and Charlotte Light rail Dewateri g ((NPt "erm"togW"
Roberto:
It was nice to meet you today.
Per your request, my firm's field laboratory certification number is 5562. A copy of an excerpt from a database
maintained by NCDEQ lab certification is attached. The database may be found at
htt p:ortal.ncdenr.r # webw lab cert{certlablists.
Other items which you requested:
Manifests for disposal of spent GAC (I believe Eric Connelly of Harvest will provide you with this
documentation).
Calibration records for flaw meters (I believe Eric Connelly of Harvest will provide you with this documentation).
other items to be addressed:
Former sump which is currently not being used at Sanders dewatring site has an open pipe extending above
grade. I understand that NCDEC► is concerned that this pipe may act as a conduit to underlying groundwater. I
understand that the construction contractor may desire to dewater in this area again in the future and may wish'
to use this sump as a dewatering point. I understand that the City of Charlotte has or will request that this pipe
be covered when it is not in use for dewatering.
Sand bags at Sanders deatering site which were used to channelize flow to drop basin have burst open and
sand has collected in sediment trap. I'understand that the City of Charlotte has or will arrange for the sand to be
removed from the sediment trip and the sand bags will be repaired or replaced.
I have copied Eric Donnelly of Harvest and Doug Pierotti of the City on this email.
If you need additional information for your records, please let me know.
Thanks.
Joseph P. Nestor, P.G. P.E.
Nesco Environmental, P.L.L..
PO Box 7622
Charlotte, North Carolina 2627
704 442 1(Office)
704 737 4046 (Mobile)
nesco mvi5carolina.rr.corn
t

,PAT MCCRORY
Groveor
DONALD R. VAN DER V AR '
Secretary
WaterResources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY . JAY ZIMM RMAN
Director
February 26, 201
Mr. Michelle Haas
City of Charlotte
600 E 4th St
Charlotte, NC 28202
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION & INTENT TO ASSESS CIVIL PENALTY
Tracking Number: NOV-2016- -002i
Permit No. NCO089443
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drain project
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Haas:
The Mooresville ;Regional Office staff have further reviewed the Notice of Violation and Notice of Intent
to Assess Civil Penalty, Wracking No. Nc V-2016-MV-0027, dated February 11, 2016. Based upon review
of permit violations and your writtenresponse, dated February 22, 2016, this Office will not pursue
additional enforcement' actions against Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drain Project (City of Charlotte) for
permit monitoring violation noted on the October 2015 Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR). Please be
advised that should noncompliance continue enforcement action, including the assessment of civil
penalties, could be taken by the Division of Water Resources in accordance with G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2).
Thank you for your continued cooperation with the Division of Water Resources. Should you have any
questions regarding the decision by this Office in regards to this matter please contact Roberto Scheller
or myself at (704) 66 -1699.
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional; Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: Wastewater Branch
MSC 1617 — Central Files
File .
State of North CarolCarolm I avironmental Quality I Water Resourees i Water QualityR.egional Operations
Mooresville Regional Q eej 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704 6631699

ITT OF CHARLOTTE
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
CHARLOrI,„
February 22, 201E ' �' ,?
i
Mr. Roberto Scheller I F, a , O F r IC
NCDEQ, Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional (Office
E10 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, North Carolina 2 115
Re: Notice of Violation & Intent to Assess Civil Penalty
Tracking Number: NOV-201E-MV-0027 Issued. February 11, 2016
N DES Kermit No. NC008944
Myrtle/Morehead Storm ]Drain project
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Scheller.
The City of Charlotte (City) is submitting the attached response prepared by the Operator in
Responsible Charge (ORC) for the above mentioned "Notice", NOV-201E-MV-0027. See
response prepared by the ORC where the October 2015 laboratory sampling was inadvertently
missed, however sampling prior to and subsequent has routinely been in compliance. The
City requests that the Division of Water Quality consider the actions taken by the City1QRC
and remove civil penalties in this matter.
If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (704) 42-512 or
dperotti("u�,cl�rlottenc, 7o�v.
Dogla4ject
erotti, L.G.
Senior Manager
City of Charlotte Engineering & Property Management
1 . 1
www.charmeck.org J 600 East Fourth Street I Charlotte, NC 28202 1 PR. 704,336,4554 1 FAX: 704,336,6586

Mr. Roberto Scheller
North Caroline Department of Environment Quality
Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street
Mooresville, North Carolina 28271
Re: Notice of Violation & Intent to Assess Civil Penalty
Tracking Number. NOV- 01-MV-0027
Issued February 11, 2016
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage
NPDES Permit No, NCO089443
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Scheller:
Neco Environmental prepared this correspondence on behalf of the City of
Charlotte (the "City"). The City has received and reviewed the document referenced
above (the "Notice"), The City does not take the indicated violation lightly and has
taken certain mitigative steps which are documented in this correspondence. The
specific violations indicated in the Notice are shown on the following page:
Environmental and Geologic Services
PO Boat 78222 Charlotte, NC 28271 + 7108 Wrentree Drive Charlotte, NC 28210
Phone 70 -4 -1 8 + Email [e-mail]

Mr. Roberto Scheller
NCDEQ-DR
February 1, 201
Page
DATE OUTFALL PARAMETER Type of Violation
10/31/2015 001 Chloroform Frequency Violation
(22106)
10/31/015 001 Total Suspended Solids - Concentration Frequency Violation
(CO530)
10/31/2015 001 Tetrachloroethylene Frequency Violation
(34475)
10/3112015 001 Trichloroethylene Frequency Violation
(0180)
10/31/2015 003 Chloroform Frequency Violation
(2210)
10/1/201 00 Total Suspended Solids- Concentration Frequency Violation
(CO530)
10/112015 00 Tetrachloroethylene Frequency Violation
(;3447)
10/ 1/2015 003 Trichloroethylene Frequency Violation
(39180)
As reported in correspondence dated November 24, 2015 which I prepared
and which included discharge monitoring reports, effluent samples for analyses in a
commercial laboratory were not collected in October 2015. 1 am the designated
operator of responsible charge for the two treatment systems associated with the
referenced permit. I noted in the November 24, 2015 correspondence that the
treatments systems operated normally during the reporting period and I have no
reason to suspect that the concentrations of target analytes specified by the permit
were exceeded. In support of this position, I made the statement which appears on
the following page:

Mr. Roberto Schuller
N DE -D R
February 19, 2016
Page
r r . r _ ..• • • - i i • • r
• _ - .-r. - • r- sr - r w - s
• r -• � 1 • M1 r •. ..r
e •s • r r -s r-
r r r rr -r sa
.r -r 'ter r .. � r � � • - • .®• • _ r
� 'rr- � ' - - r - - r •. - r r • r
r • r r .rr •
.r •-• a r
As indicated by this response, the violations occurred due to human error,
Furthermore, it is unlikely that the concentrations of target analytes specified by the
permit exceeded limits in October 2015 based upon the analytical results of samples
collectedearly-Novembers the nature of project
location. have taken -r to prevent this oversight s reoccurring in the future,
Nesco Environmental,on behalf of r
Divisionof . Resources considers
r of r. • . • the likely
absence of rnificant environmental impactsoccurred as a result of
violations in itdetermination • not assess civil penalties

Mr. Roberto Scheller
NCDEQ- ?WR
February 19, 201
Page 4
We appreciate your attention to this matter. If you have questions or
comments, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely;
NESCG ENVIRONMENTAL, P.L.L.C.
Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P.E.
President
cc: Eric Donnelly - Harvest Environmental Services, Inc. (via e-mail)
Connell harvestenvironnental.com i
Joseph Nestor-- Nes o Environmental, P.L.L C. (via e-mail)
(ne coenv carolina rr.com)
JPN11pn\20160219

PPPPV
Permit Enforcement History by Permit
Permit: 1,100089443 Facility, Myri e, f Morehead storm Chain project Owner City of Charlotte
:Region.Mooresville: Countir Mecklenburg
Penalty Remission. Enforcement EMC Collection :Was
Assessment Penalty Enforcement Request Conference Nearing Memo said Payment Case
Case Approved Amount Costs Damages Received. Void Hold To AGO Total Paid Balance Clue ' Plan Closed
09l10/15 $700 00 $146.97 $846,97 $0.00 No 10/05115
09t16/15 $260.00 $146.97 :. $396.97 $0,00 No 10105tis
09118f15 50.00 : $146 97 $696 97 $0.00 No 10123/15
MONW111-121115 $260,00 - $ 43.85 $393,85 $0,00 No 10123115
Total Cases: 4 $1,760,00 $604.76 $2,33416 $0,0
Total Penalties;... $2,834.76 Total Penalties after $2,334,76
ol—
C�LX- OJ\-
y ,

RW
PAC41TY
MGM
O REPOF MOMTOAMREPOROMMIM
C{1GAMN
PARAWTER
MOLA"MCKTE FfMOMNCY
MT to MCASLM UNT
M LATEOVAttf,% OWR...
'Am.A'nOMTYPE MATMACMN VOATONCOMMENWTVMkItDOYO
'.
0*940
CMd
vile
2
2016003
eftr
cH
tl2t1CWIS v:
xu
6{ p
1210Ef
34 tk4+ : a+E
cNkruU
43
cwdctmddb-M",oee M
2
2,19001
Efts
.Ta k
R2tiorMs
moo
43
9&
115 rertm 9— WE Caw
at kroM
S
OMat -MvN b..
M vaX*+NA
2
201900t
E9& d
oI1
UIOQ045 v..
eu
90wo
lom
20 DW.M"—Exawc Pr mEMamenwn#
aHro
3
GYId
Cava1C o -MHO m
Me4:
2
3
21516001
Z"S W1
"1
TOW W...*
qN
tl 1&
MI Xt I
4
a1+
SD
olom
,86
103M
222 Vkn*&A §tE
1S Ab#f1WM bNm
W-4
w. W
CAUM .Moro a.
Akwtirsewlle
4
2015 W3
EOki�1t
W4
"7MOI V.W4
w
&
Raw
7owm A— %NOD
mi Wvli
Gta.10cmk _Mwfl bam
- vWa.
6
2016 3
E
'[akac
fkOk-t alaol v
uM1
31M
#E
461 Ai>kMVA Exec 1a Ca
was vaIX
M09443
Clrvd •i , :bract
—W%
t1
2014001..
"W.,
'M
1t.:. 14
w
8
SAWD
1 E mE
"A
a#brwe
liWO ` Zo
CowM " -Mwd b
M.I wta
11
11
2014 Op3
2014 0..
Eft.,":6dWe
:a k%Tat» l
T118 "
Ilro80t4
"Q&2014 v
.9
—4
3010 0
43#YWD
i8.1r
1836aw
5tO -#as Exact Nana
307 CMovbteA—boeat N•WM
ti—.drnkt.
bimsa.O,-
9
i#.d .owed
11
2014 W#..
-
E
Tab!
t i4 ti
-4
&T.i
P loao .
$10 .WA.— Norw
rod.cmn
0089443
£,w0 .M"M
MN.oeWda
i1
2014 004
E
S.M Tarot Su
11 4 Maw -
-4
4&
ISSMm
302 mw-.
td .cress
0089443
G#rO .. -MUM bam
ft
1i
2014"
' t
SWWn. Tarat S.—&
til"14 M.MW
-4
3000W
62
1M Mo-MkMA Epees F"/ mE
txkauvN
CM+ed*. Z a
: "
11
20M 0"
.A
SIXA1a Tt t
#1rnwl4
-4
45ow
62 sw
39 pa#r msm ME mrtM
Ott
C.NO -t,
11
2014 [d13
S T M1Sa
11 14
m59
i.
t83
wo Exaae 4 E : 1'.Ww
ww
0009443
UNd ZMaaklardsma
M—
11
2014 M
Ef14
SdW. TdN &+
11P26^.014 Mw4
maR
48.0W0
183
301 delft Abrdm+m Em»mx ih b
eatAwM
0009443
Gdva4C! . Mwd : m
t^.Iivaf .Mvitl. v
Mos{aevdm
11
12
2014 p}i.
ZM4 p01
t.
SaH4a Td $.
.Taos
IZIAI YU14 v
1.., 14 R NM
aaM..
mv.R :.
30000D
4Owo
52.DM
SZOWD
73 V.e"A Ex P—W. EMataMnwnt Gass
i6 M0i11a4VM ME
m#Wvb
diode

CITY OF CHARLOTTE
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
F ebruary 22, 2016
r. Roberto Scheller
NCDEQ, Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, North Carolina 211
Civil Penalty
Ci
Re: Niew
�fVioln Tntet to.�ssess Issued February 11, 2016
Dear Mr. Scheler.
The City of Charlotte (City) is submitting the attached response prepared by the Operator in
Responsible Charge (ORC) for the above mentioned `Notice", NOV-2016-MV-0027. See
response prepared by the ORC where the October 2015 laboratory sampling was inadvertently
missed, however sampling prior to and subsequent has routinely been in compliance. The
City requests that the Division of Water Quality consider the actions taken by the City1ORC
d remove civil penalties is this matter.
If you have any questions, please contact me directly at 704) 432-5212 or
d ierotti charlotten. ov"
Since It
iougla irotti,l .Cl.
Senior jest M agar
City of Charlotte Engineering. & Property Management
Attachments: Nesco Environmental NOV- 0 6-M V-00 7 — NOVResponse Letter
www.charmeck.org 1 600 East Fourth Strut j Charlotte, NG 28202 1 PH, 704,336A554 1 FAX: 704.3 6,6586

Aff
A Pro W UmW UsWRy p"y
February 19, 2016
Mr, Roberto Scheller
North Carolina [department of Environment Quality
Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street
Moores ille, North 28271
r
Re: Notice of Violation & Intent to Assess Civil Penalty
Tracking Number. NOV-2016-MV-0027
Issued February 11, 2016
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage
4
NPDES Permit No. NCO089448
Mecklenburg County
Gear Mr. Sch ller:
Nesco Environmental prepared this correspondence on behalf of the City of
Charlotte (the "City"). The City has received and reviewed the document referenced
above (the "Notice"). The City does not take the indicated violation lightly and has
taken certain mitigative steps which are documented in this correspondence. The
specific violations indicated in the Notice are shown on the following page:
Environmental and Geologic Services
PCB Box 78222 Charlotte, NC 2827 + 7108 Wrentree Drive Charlotte, NC 28210
Phone [phone] - Email [e-mail]

Mr. Roberto Schaller
CDEQ-DWR
February 19, 201
Page 2
DATE OUTFALL PARAMETER Type of Violation
10/31/2015 001 Chloroform Frequency Violation
(2106)
10/31/2015 001 Total Suspended Solids - Concentration Frequency Violation
( O530)
10/31/2015 001 Tetrachloroethylene Frequency Violation
(3447"5)
10/31/2016 001 Trichloroethylene Frequency Violation
(9180)
10/31/2015 003 Chloroform Frequency Violation
(22106)
1 C 13112015 00 Total Suspended Solids Concentration Frequency Violation
(C0530)
10/31/2015 003etrecloroethylene Frequency Violation
(3445)
10/31/2015 003 Trichloroethylene Frequency Violation
(39180)
As reported in correspondence dated November 24, 205 which I prepared
and which included discharge monitoring reports, effluent samples for `analyses in
commercial laboratory were not collected in October 2015. 1 am the designated
operator of responsible charge for the two treatment systems associated with the
referenced permit. I noted in the November 24 2015 correspondence that the
treatments systems operated normally during the reporting period and I have no
reason to suspect that the concentrations of target analytes specified by the permit
i
were exceeded. In support of this position, I made the statement which appears on
the following page:
C

PV
Mr, Roberto Scheller
D -DWG
February 19, 2016
Page
.Analytical results for samples collected on November 10, 2015 did not
intimate exceedances of permit limits. Copies of analytical results for
sample` collected at Outfalls 001 and 053 on this date are attached;
Since no modification to the treatment systems occurred between the
time samples were collected in September 2015 and November 2015 1
the analytical results for the November 10, 2015 suggest that no I
exceedances of permit limits occurred in October 2015, Carbon
adsorption is the treatment method used at both systems. The fact that
no VOCs or TSS were detected in the November 1, 2315 samples is
indicative that carbon breakthrough has not occurred."
I had scheduled collection of effluent samples for laboratory analyses for
October 7, 2015, At the time of the site visit on that date,; no water was flowing into
the treatment system which discharges to Outfall 003. After collecting samples for pH
measurement, I noted that there was insufficient water remaining in system to collect
samples for analyses by a commercial laboratory. The water level in the transfer tank
had fallen to the invert of the inlet line for the discharge primps. I intended to collect
effluent samples at the treatment systems later in October 2015, but for some reason
I did not remember to do so. I have set up reminders on my office computer which
automatically open up on the 1501 of each month for me to verify that effluent samples
have already been taken for that month.
As indicated by this response, the violations occurred due to human error,
Furthermore, it is unlikely that the concentrations of target analytes specified by the �
permit exceeded limits in October 2015 based upon the analytical results of samples
collected in early -November 2015 and the nature of the treatment units at this project
location. I have taken steps to prevent this oversight from reoccurring in the future.
Nesco Environmental, on, behalf of the City, respectfully requests that the
Division of Water Resources considers the nature of the violations and the likely
absence of significant environmental impacts which occurred as a result of these
violations in its determination to not assess civil penalties in this matter.
i'

FPV
Mr Roberto Scheller
NCD Q-DWR
February 19, 2016
Page 4 Y
We appreciate your attention to this matter, if you have questions or
comments, please contact me at (04) 442-13 5,
Sincerely,
NESCO ENVIRONMENTAL, P.L.L.C:
k
Joseph P. Nestor, P,G., P.E.
President
cc. Eric Donnelly -- Harvest Environmental Services, Inc. (via e-mail)
(donnell harvestenvironmentalcom
Joseph Nestor— Ne co Environmental, P.L.L.C. (via e-mail)
(nescoenv carolina mcon
J\;pn\01601

FiLE
T
00
W- 4wor"
Certified Mail # 7015 <1520 0002 $376173
eturn Recqipt Reguested
February 11, 2016
Michelle Haas
City of Charlotte
600 E 4th St
Charlotte, NC 28202
SUB,)ECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION T T TO ASSESS CIVIL PENALTY
Tracking Number:NOV-2016-MV-0027
Permit No. NCO089443
Myrtle / Morehead; Storm Drain project
Mecklenburg County
Dear Permittee:
review of the October 2015 Discharge Monitoring Report (D ) for the subject facility revealed the violation(s)
indicated below. ,
Monitoring Violat onfsl«
Sample
Monitoring
Location Parameter Date
Frequency
Type of Violation
001 Effluent Chloroform (32106) 10/31/2015
Monthly
Frequency Violation
001 Effluent Solids, Total Suspended - 110/31/2015
Monthly
Frequency Violation
Concentration (C0530)
001 Effluent Tetrahloroethylene (34475) 10/1/201
Monthly
Frequency Violation
001 Effluent Trichl r th lene (391 0) 10/31/2015
Monthly
Frequency Violation
003 Effluent Chloroform (32106) 10/31/2015
Monthly
Frequency Violation
003 Effluent Solids, Total Suspended - 10/31/2015
Monthly
Frequency Violation
Concentration (CO530)
003 Effluent Tetrahloroeylen (34) 10/1/2015
Monthly
Frequency Violation
003 Effluent Trichloroethylene (3 180) 10/31/2015
Monthly
Frequency Violation
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality Water Resources
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 2 115
^744-60-1 A0 0

A
#
•
. . .•. . . . . . .
Additionally and if you have not already done so, you may wish to consider registering to use the Division's new
e-DMR system for the completion and electronic submittal of monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs).
For more information, please visit the eDMR Website at the following address:
http:llpoftal.ncdenr.ora/web /wa/admin/boci/iDu/edmr.
If you have any questions concerning this matter or to apply for an SC, please contact Roberto Scheller of
the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699.
Sincerely,
JC447"-
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Cc: WQS Mooresville Regional Office - Enforcement File
NPDES Compliance/Enforcement Unit - Enforcement File
rN
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
704-663.1699

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vart
Governor Secretary
RECSIVEDNODENRIDWR
October 26, 2015
NOV 2015
Mr. David Wolfe, Euvironniental Program Manager WOROS
City of Charlotte MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
600 East 41 Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
SUBJECT- Payment Acknowledgment
Civil Penalty Assessment
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drain
Permit Number: NCO089443
Case Number: LV-2015-0205
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Wolfe:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of check number 00475331 in the amount of $696.97 received from you on October
23, 2015. This payment satisfies in full the above civil assessment levied against the subject facility, and this case has
been closed. Payment of this penalty in no way precludes future action by this Division for additional violations of the
n--.I-
If you have any questions, please contact Wren Thedl
cc: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone- 919-807-6300 \ FAX: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwater.org
An Equal;Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
rd at 919-807-6304.
Sincerely,
Wren Thedford

FILE
NCDAID IIM�I EbNXIIAIMMMw.
NR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resource
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaart
Goyemor Secretary
September 21, 2015
CERTIFIED IL 7015 0640 0002 9299 3571
RETURNCEIP'i REQUESTED
Mr. David Wolfe, Envirmunental Program Manager
City of Charlotte
600 East 4"' Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violations of .C. General Statute
143.215. 1 (a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NCO089443
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drain
Mecklenburg County
Case No. LV-2015-0205
Dear Mr. Wolfe:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount of
696.97 ( 550 civil penalty + $146.97 enforcement casts) against the City of Charlotte.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: A review has been conducted of the self
-
monitoring data reported for February 2015. This review has shown the subject facility to be in
violation of the discharge limitations found in NPDES Permit No. NCO089443 The violations are
summarized in Attachment to this letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that the City of Charlotte violated the
terms, conditions, or requirements ofNPDES Permit No. NCO089443 and North Carolina General
Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1(a)6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment A. A civil penalty may
be assessed in accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 14 - 15.6A(a)(2),
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance th authority
provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director
of the Division of Waster Resources, 1, Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor for the Mooresville
Region, hereby make the following civil penalty assessment against the City of Charlotte:
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 2611
Phone: [phone] Pax: [phone]! Customer Servicc1-8 7- 23- 74
Internet: http',HpodaIecdes rorg1web1wq

0 S , 1000() For 1 of the one (1) violation of G S 143-215 l6q)(61 an
NPDES Permit No. NCO089443, by discharging waste into the
waters of the State in violation of the permit daily maximum
effluent limit for total suspended solids.
21} 00 For 2 of the two (2) violations of G.S. 143-20.1(a)(6) and
PITS No. NCO089443, by discharging waste into the
waters of the State in violation of the permit daily maximum
effluent limit for PH,
$ 250.00 For I of the one (1) violation of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(6) and
NPDES Permit No. No. NCO089443, by discharging waste into
the waters of the State in violation of the permit monthly average
effluent limit for total suspended solids.
$ 550.00 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
$ 146.97 Enforcement costs
$ 696.97 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken into account the
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-282. 1 (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health., or to
private property resulting from the violations;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violations;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which
the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
L Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (do not include waiver form). Paymenfof the penalty will not foreclose her
enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Wastewater Branch
Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

CDR
2. Submit a written request for remission including a detailed ,justification for such request.
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors listed
below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the penalty assessed. Requesting
remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy
of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Because a
remission request forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be
accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation that no factual or
legal issues are in dispute. Please prepare a detailed statement that establishes why you believe the
civil penalty should be remitted, and submit it to the Division of Water Resources at the address listed
below. In determining whether a remission request will be approved, the following factors shall b
considered.
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 14B-22.1(b) were
wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
() whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from
the violation;
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
() whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations; or
() whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Please note that all information presented in support of your request for remission must be
submitted in writing. ;The Director of the Division of Water Resources will review your evidence and
inform you of his decision in the matter of your remission request. The response will provide details
regarding case status, directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions (Committee).
Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider information that was not part of the original
remission request considered by the Director. "Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a
complete and thorough statement in support of your request for remission.
In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed. "Waiver of Right to
an Administrative Hearing d Stipulation of Facts" form within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
notice. The Division of Water Resources also requests that you complete and submit the enclosed
"Justification for Remission Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following address:
Wastewater Branch
Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27 - t 6 t 7
OR
3. File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of Administrative Hearings.
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you must file a
petition for an administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the (Mice of

'
~�~~~'~~
ninistrative
ed when it is received in
rice of Administrative
ax) or electronic mail by an
and a filing fee (if a filing
trative Hearings within
in should contact the
,e and/or the deWls of the
Office of Administrative
Hearings are as follows:
Office of AdministrativeHearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Fax: [phone]
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Mr. Sam M. Hayes, General Counsel
DENR
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Please indicate the case number (as found on page one of this letter) on the petition.
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice, as
evidenced by an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter being
referred to the Attorney General's Offic6 for collection of the penalty through a civil action.
Wininistrative Hearings. You must file the
0 a 1
N NW,
The petition tw
contact staff in the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
(Date) Fcp-Michael L. Parker, Region� Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
ATTACHMENTS
'Raleigh Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments

ATTACHMENT
CASE NO. LV-2015-0205
Outfall slate Parameter Re orted Value Permit Limit
01 2/10/2015 TSS 96.6 mg/l* 45 mg/L (Daily Maximum)
001 2/10/2015 ` PH 10.8 SU* 9 SU (Daily Maximum)
003 2/10/2015 PH12.1 SU* 9 SU (]wily Maximum)
001 2/28/2015 TSS 96.6 g/l* 30 g/L (Monthly Average)
Denotes civil penalty assessment
the City of Charlotte did not provide a response to NO-2Q15-LV-0432. Comments
written in the February;2015 I MR received on April 7, 2015 were reviewed by DWR
staff. Mitigating i factors were not found to result in a reduced civil penalty amount.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
D NATURAL SOURCES
COUNTY OF MECKLENIURG
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT } WAIVER. OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
CITY OF CHARLOTTE ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
PERMIT NUMBER NC008 443 }
FILE NO. LV-2015-0205
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $696.97 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Resources dated .duly 6, 2015, the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties,' does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged: in the assessment
document. The undersigned ifurther understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of
this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Reso ces'within 30 days
of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission request will be
allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment:;
This the day of 2015
BY
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

JUSTIN,
°mission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
ht to an Administrative Hearin -a. and Stinulation of Facts "
I -
•
factor applies (attach additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 14313-
wrongfully =lied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment fa
in the civil penalty assessment document);
N the violator Dromntiv abated cominuina environmental damaae resultina J
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and
future occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain wh,
was unavoidable or something you could rani prevent orpreparefor),-
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violati(
(e) Dayment of the Civil Denalty will prevent p qyment for the remaining nece
_
actions (i, e., explain her payment of the civil penalty will prevent you
the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION: (use additionalpages as necessary)
t
n1atinn

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
ASSESSMENT FACTOR
Violator: City of Charlotte
Facility: Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drain
County: Me klenbu
Case Number: LV-2015- 20
Permit Number: NCO0 443
1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violation,
o harm has been documented;
2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
The TSS daily maximum effluent limit was exceeded the permit limit by 114.' %. The PH Daily
maximum effluent limit was exceeded the permit limit by 20%`cr, and 34.4%. The TSS monthly average
permit it limits was exceeded by 222% during the month of February 014. .
The effect on ground or surface rater quantity or quality or on air quality,
The effect on the receiving stream is unknown. Increased suspended. solids (turbidity) increase the
-water temperature, thus reducing the amount of oxygen in water harming aquatic life. They also
reduce the amount of natural sunlight that penetrates through the water, further decreasing oxygen
production and photosynthesis. In addition, high levels of solids can kill fish by clogging their gills,
lowering their resistance to disease, and smothering their eggs.
The cost of rectifying the damage;
The cost is unknown.
5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
The amount of money saved by noncompliance is unknown.
F) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
The Division of Water Resources has no evidence that the violations were committed willfully or
intentionally.
7) The prior` record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs` over which the
Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority,
There have been 2 previous CPAs for the Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drain. The previous CPA was issued
on September 15, 2015 for TSS and fecal coliform violations` that occurred in December 2014.

can of Water Resources is $146.9°
q,,It. G A&kL�i
Cate f6 Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NC©ENR

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Pat McCrory Donald R, van der Vart
Governor Secretary
PSCEIVEDINCDENRIDWR
October 26, 2015
NOV Z01,5
Mr. David Wolfe, Environmental Program Manager
City of Charlotte WOROS
600 East 4 1h Street MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICS
Charlotte, NC 28202
SUBJECT: Payment Acknowledgment
Civil Penalty, Assessment
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drain
Permit Number: NCO089443
Case Number: LV-2015-0213
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Wolfe:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of check number 00475331 in the amount of $393.85 received from you on October
23, 2015. This payment satisfies in full the above civil assessment levied against the subject facility, and this case has
been closed. Payment of this penalty in no way precludes fitture action by this Division for additional violations of the
applicable Statutes, Regulations, or Permits.
If you have any questions, please contact Wren Tbedford at 919-807-6304.
Sincerely,
Vwo
Wren Tbedford
cc: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] k FAX: 9I9-807-6492
Internet: www,ncwater.org
An Equal Opportunity i Affirmatfive Action Employer

North Carolina Department of Environmental ualtt
at>McCrory o i r�x Vaart
Governor ' Secretary
September 22, 2015
CERTIFIED MAIL 7015 0640 0002 9295 6361
RETURN+ EM ESTE
Mr. David Wolfe, Environmental Program Manager
City of Charlotte
600 East 4"' Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
SUBJECT Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violations of N.C. General Statute
143-215. 1 (a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NCO089443
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage
Mecklenburg County
Case No. LV-2015-0213
Dear Mr. Wolfe.
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount of
$393.85 250 civil penalty + $14.85 enforcement casts) against the City of Charlotte.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: A review has been conducted of the self -
monitoring data reported for May 2015. This review has shown the subject facility to be in violation
of the discharge; limitations found in NPDES Permit No. NCO089443. The violations are summarized
in Attachment A to this letter.
Based upon the above facts, l conclude as a :matter of law that the City of Charlotte violated the
terms, conditions, or requirements of NPDES Permit No. NCO089443 and North Carolina General
Statute (G.S.) 3-215.1(a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment A. A civil penalty may
be assessed in accordance with the maximums;established by C,S. 143-215.6A(a)(2).
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with authority
provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environmental Quality and the Director of the
Division of Water Resources, 1, Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor for the Mooresville Region.,
hereby mare the following civil penalty assessment against the City of Charlotte.
Mooresville Regional ice
Location: 610 East Center Ave,, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28116
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] i Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
lnlemet: http://p €talacde r.or lweb&Yq

2%00 For I of the one (1) violation of G. S. 143 -215 � I (a)(6) and
NPDES Permit No. No. NCO089443, by discharging waste into
the waters of the State in violation of the permit monthly average
effluent limit for tetrachloroethylene.
$ 250.00 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
$ 143.85 Enforcement costs
$ 323.85 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-282, I (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of hann to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violations;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violations;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which
the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environmental Quality (do
not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for any
continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of -
Wastewater Branch
Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
2. Submit a written request for remission including a detailed justification for such request:
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors listed
below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the penalty assessed. Requesting
remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy
of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document, Because a
remission request forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be
accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation that no factual or

legal issues are in dispute. Please prepare a detailed statement that establishes why you believe the
civil penalty should be remitted, and submit it to the Division of Water Resources at the address listed
below. In determining whether a remission request will be approved, the following :factors shall be
considered:
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.I(b) were
wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from
the violation;
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(4) whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations; or
() whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Please note that all information presented in support of your request for remission must be
submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Resources will review your evidence and
inform you of his decision in the matter of yourremission request. The response will provide details
regarding case status, directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions (Committee).
Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider information that was not part of the original
remission request considered by the Director. Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a
complete d thorough statement in support of yourrequest for remission.
In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed "Waiver of Right to
an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts" form within thirty (30) days of receipt ofthis
notice. The Division of Water Resources also requests that you complete- and submit the enclosed
"Justification for Remission Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following address::
Wastewater Branch
Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, .North Carolina 27699-1 17
OR
. File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of Administrative Hearings:
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you must file a
petition for an administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the Office of
Administrative Hearings. You must file the petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings
within thirty (3 ) days of receipt of this :notice. A petition is considered: filed when it is received in
the Office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative
Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 00 a.m. and :00 p.m.,
except for official state holidays. The petition may be filed by facsimile (fax) or electronic mail by an
attached file (with restrictions) - provided the signed original, one (1) copy and a filing fee (if a filing
fee is required: by NCGS § 1 4B-23.2) is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings within
seven () business days following the famed or electronic transmission. You should contact the
(Mice of Administrative Hearings with all questions regarding the filing feeand/or the details of the

i
s
T(
R
he mailing address and telephone and fax numbers for the Office of Administrative
'allows:
lice of Administrative Hearings
14 Mail Service Center
Jeigh, NC` 7699-6714
1: (919) 431-300
x: [phone]
the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:
Sara M. Hayes, General Counsel
I
01 Mail Service Center
Jeig , NC 7699-1601
the case number (as found on page one of this letter) on the petition.
IVIVUcu yv use t1VLLV111VV tiaQ11VIa.a b v111%wc ava
Please be advised that additional per
review period of this assessment. If you ha
comai staff. in the Mooresville Regional uirice ac l r v,+) oo - i o .
f
8
(Date) Fa- Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Water (duality :Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDFC
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Mooresville Regional Office Compliance File w/ attachments
Raleigh Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files / attachments

ATTACHMENT A
CASE NO. LV-2015-0t
hll Date Parameter 12eyarted Value Permit Limit
3 5/31/15 Tetrachloroethylene 18.5 g/l* 3.3 g/L (Monthly Average)
Denotes civil penalty assessment
The City of Charlotte response to NOV- 1-LV-0504 received on .August 26, 2015 was
reviewed by DWR staff. Mitigating factors were not found to result in a reduced civil
penalty amount.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
(QUALITY
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER. OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
CITY OF CHARLOTTE STIPULATION OF FACTS
PERMIT NUMBER NCO089443 )
FILE NO. LV-2015-0213
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $393.85 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Resources dated August 11, 2015, the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated `matter `and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment
document. The dersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of
this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water resources within. 30 days
of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission request will be
allowed. after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.'
This the day of 2015
BY
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DVM Case Number: LV-2015-0213
Assessed Party: City of Charlotte
County: Mecklenburg
Permit Number: NCO089443
Amount Assessed: $393.85
Please use this for when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Ro"Ilact Pnr pamievirl" W"I'vor of picrilt fil rill 7=TD"V;14" "14"1 ni* P_tv"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -------
1110,
was unavoidable or something you could notprevent orprepare fo,
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for gny previous v:
L
actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent youom
the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION: (use additional page; as necessary)

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
ASSESSMENT FACTORS
Violator: City of Charlotte
Facility. Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage
County. Mecklenburg
Case Number: L-2015-0213
Permit Number: NC089443
1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or t
private property resulting from the violation; No harm has been documented;
2) The duration and gravity of the violation, The tetrachloroethylee monthly average effluent limit
exceeded the permit limit by 460.6% .
3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality, The effect on the
receiving stream is unknown.
4) The cost of rectifying the damage; The cost is unknown.
5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance; The amount of money saved by noncompliance is
unknown.
6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally; The Division of Water Resources
has no evidence that the violations were committed willfully or intentionally.
7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which the
EnvironmentalManagement Commission has regulatory authority,
There have been 3 previous CPAs for the Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage ;Discharge. The last CPA was
issued on September 18, 2015 for TS and pH violations that occurred in February 2015.
8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
The cost to the Division of Water Resources is $143.85.
Date Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ

p CUAIWII(M
�y
July 27, 2015
Ms. Marcia Allocco
NCDENR, Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional (ice
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, North Carolina 2115
RE. NOV1N — Effluent Limitations Response
Tracking Numbers: NOV- 015-LV-0432 Issued July 6, 201
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Discharge
NPDES Permit No. NCO0 9443
Mecklenburg County
Lear Ms. Allocco:
JUL 20
ono
The City of Charlotte (City) is submitting the attached response prepa
mentionedResponsible Charge (ORC) for the above "Notice", NOV-2015-LV-0432. Due to
nonstop construction activities of tunneling and installing storm drain elevated sediment and
pH entered into the treatment systems from concrete slurry used to hold open the excavations.
workedThe City with the contractor to stop exceedances and has implemented corrective
actions including carbon dioxide gas adjustment
requests that the Division of Water Quality consider the actions taken by •
civil penalties in this matter.
If you have any questions, please contact me directly at [phone] or
dvierott c charlottenc. ov.
Senior
City of
rotti, L.C.
ct Manager
lotte Engineering & Property Management
Attachments- Nesco EnviromnentaINOV-2015-LV-0432—NOV/NRE Response
cc: Michael Parker, NCDENR (via email)
Rusty Rozzelle MCWQP (via email)
www,,charmeck.org 1 600 Fer;t Fourth Street i Charlotte, NC 28202 1 PI-1; 704,336,4554 1 FAX.- 704.336,6586

A Pro*Wwaf Ufnfted i e "rity Company
July 27, 201
M. Marcia Allocco
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources
13 East Center Street
Mooresville, North Carolina 28271
Re- Notice of Violation and Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement
Tracking Number; NOV-201-LV-0432
Issued July 6, 2015
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage
NPDES Permit No. NCO089443
Mecklenburg County
Dear Ms. Allocco:
The City of Charlotte (the "City") has received and reviewed the document referenced
above (the "Notice"). The City does not take the indicated violation lightly and has taken
certain mitigative steps which are documented in this correspondence. The specific violations
indicated in the Notice are shown on the fallowing page:
Environmental and Geologic Services
PCB Box 78222 Charlotte, NC`28271 + 2416 River Oaks Drive Waxhaw, NC 28173
Phone [phone] + Fax [phone]
Email [e-mail]

M. >Marcia Allocco
NCCENR
July 27,2015
Page
GATE OUTFALL PARAMETER REPORTED
PERMIT
VALUE
LIMIT
02/10/2015 001 pH
10.8 Standard Units
9.0 SU
(SU)
(Daily
maximum
02/10/2015 001 Total suspended solids
96.6 milligrams per liter
45,0 mg/I
(TSS)
(mg/1)
(Daily
maximum
02/2 /2015 001 Total suspended solids
96.6 milligrams per liter
30.0 mg/l
(TSS)
(mg/1)
(Monthly
avers e
02/10/2015 003 pH
12.1 Standard Units
9.0 SU
(SU)
(Gaily
maximum
TSS Resl2onse
Fallowing receipt of the analytical results for the February 10, 2015 samples, the City
took steps to reduce the concentration of TSS in the effluent. In particular, the two granular
activated carbon (GAC) vessels were bcwrshed on February 18, 2015
and again on
February 26, 2015 at both the treatment systems at Qutfall Nos. 001 and 003.
Effluent monitoring performed on March 10, 201`5 indicate that the concentration of
TSS in the effluent at Outfall 001 was 16.9 mg/I and was below both the daily
maximum and
monthly average limits.
,pN Resgonse
Fallowing receipt of the analytical results for the February 10, 2015 samples, the City
began evaluating means to bring the pH of water discharged with the permitted range. On
April 16, 2015, the City installed an automated pH monitoring system and a carbon dioxide
gas dosing system to regulate pH at Outfall 001. Monitoring data collected in April 2015
indicates that the pH adjustment system is successfully regulating pH levels within the permit
range at Outfall 001.

Ms. Marcia Allocco
NCDENR
July 27,201
Page 3
In March 2015, the City monitored the process water at the treatment system at Outfall
003 and noted that the pH in process water was within the permitted range. Monitoring of the
pH at Outfall 003 on March 17, 2015 indicated a pH value of 8.85 SU which is within the
permitted range. On May 1, 2015 the City installed on automated pH monitoring system
and a carbon dioxide gas dosing system to regulate pH at Outfall 003:
Conclusions
As indicated by this response, the City has taken prompt actions to mitigate both the
TSS and pH issues. The City respectfully requests that the Division of Water resources
considers the actions taken by the City to mitigate these issues in its determination to not
assess civil penalties in this matter.
We appreciate your attention to this matter. If you have questions or comments,
please contact me at (704) 44-1385:
Sincerely,
NESCO ENVIRONMENTAL, P.L.L.G.
Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P.E.
President
cc: Eric Donnelly — Harvest Environmental Services, Inc. (via e-mail)
(4onnelAl@ harvestenvironmental. com)t
Doug Pierotti -City of Charlotte (via e-mail)
(d ierotti ci.charlotte.nc.us)
JPNypnl20150727

CITY OF CHARLOTTE
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
CHAfUf)IW,-
July 27, 2015
EEEI ED/NC tENR/
Mr. Ori Tuvia A U G 2 6 2015
NCDENR, Division.. of Water Resources
WoOs
Mooresville Regional Office MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
10 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
RE: NOV/NRE -- Effluent Limitations Response
Tracking Numbers: NOV-2015-LV-0 04 issued August 11, 201
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Discharge
PDES Permit No. NCO089443
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Tuvia:
The City of Charlotte (City) is submitting the attached response prepared by the Operator in
Responsible Charge (ORC) for the above mentioned `Notice", NOV- 01-LV-0504. See
response prepared by the (SRC where each granular activated carbon (GAC) units were
replaced and subsequently hydrated to remove the chlorinated solvents. The City requests
that the Division of Water Quality consider the actions taken by the City to not assess civil
penalties in this matter.
If you have any questions, please contact me directly at [phone] or
d ierotti eharlottenc. ov.
Si ref
Doug ie tti, L.G.
Senior r ject Manager
City of harlotte Engineering & Property Management
Attachments: Nesco Environmental NOV-2015-LV-0432 — NOV/NRE Response
www.charmeck.org1 600 !art Fourth Street ? Charlotte, NC 28202 1 Pt-f: 704, 336, 554 1 FAY: 7043 3&6586

CEI INC ENRI R
WOROS
August 21, 2015 ORESVI LE REGIONAL¢OFFICE
Mr. Ori Tuvia
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street
Mooresville, North Carolina 28271
Re: Notice of Violation and Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement
Tacking Number: NOV-2015-LV-0504
Issued August 11, 2015
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage
NPDES Permit No, NC0080443
Mecklenburg County
Dear M.'Tuvia:
The City of Charlotte (the "City") has received and reviewed the document referenced
above (the "Notice"). The City does not take the indicated violation lightly and has taken
certain mitigative steps which are documented in this correspondence. The specific violations
indicated in the Notice are shown below:
DATE OUTPALL PARAMETER REPORTED PERMIT
VALUE LIMIT
05/31/2 115 001 Tetrachloroethylene 18.5 micrograms per 3.3 µg/I
liter
(Monthly
W/1) Average)
Environmental and Geologic Services
PO Box 78222 Charlotte, NC 28271 + 2416 River teaks Drive Waxhaw, NC 28173
Phone [phone] + Fax [phone]'
Email [e-mail]

r. Cori Tuvia
NCDENR
August 21 2015
Page 2
Response
Following receipt of the analytical results effluent samples collected on March 10,
2015, the 'City noted that tetrachloroethylene (synonymous with perch loroethylene or PE)
was present in low concentrations and may have broken through the two granular activated
carbon (GAC) units. Each GAC unit contains approximately 1,000 pounds of carbon, The
City took steps to further evaluate the issue including the collection and analyses of influent
samples to each of the GAC units on March 25, 2015, The results indicate that the influent to
the first GAC unit contained low levels of PCE (.O µgll) and the influent to the second GAC
contained PCE at concentrations 11 pg11 which is below the monthly average limit for this
parameter (3.3 p11). Copies of these results are attached. Based upon review of this data,
the City believed there was capacity in the 2,000 pounds of carbon to continue to adsorb PCE
and prevent exceedanes of the permit limit, Upon receipt of the May 7, 2015 analytical
results which indicated that the PCE limit was exceeded, the ;City took immediate steps to
rectify the issue. These results were received on May 1, 205 and on May 22, 2015 one
GAC unit was taken offline and the carbon was replaced and hydrated. On May 27, 2015, the
second GAC vessel was taken offlne and the carbon was replaced and hydrated. The
carbon replacement was done in two steps in order for the treatment system remain
operational. PCE has not been detected in effluent samples collected since the carbon was
replaced in May 2015.
Conclusions
As indicated by this response, the City has taken prompt actions to mitigate PCE
issue. The City respectfully requests that the Division of Water Resources considers the
actions taken by the City to mitigate the PCE in its determination to not assess civil penalties
in this matter.

Mr. Ori Tuvia
NCDENi
August 21 201 ►
Page 3
We appreciate your attention to this matter. If you have questions or comments,
please contact me at (704) 44 -1366.
Sincerely,
NESCO ENVIRONMENTAL, P.L.L.C.
Joseph P. Nestor, P.G.; P.E.
President
cc: Eric Donnelly -- Harvest Environmental Services, Inc. (via e-mail)
(donnelly [e-mail])
Doug Pierotti -- City of Charlotte (via e-mail)
(d 'ierotti ci.charlotte.nc.us)
JPN1jpn\201 0422

rvo
APR
r
wz
uWay compww MOORESVILLE3
April23, 2015
Ms. Marcia Allocco
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street
Mooresville, North Carolina 26271
Re: Notice of Violation and Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement
Tracking; Number: NOV-2015-LV-9259
Issued April 16, 2915
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage
DES PermitNo. NCO089443
Mecklenburg County
Dear Ms. Allocco:
The City of Charlotte (the "City") has received and reviewed the document ref
above (the "Notice"). , The City does not take the indicated' violation lightly and hay
certain mitigative steps which are documented in this correspondence. The specific vir
indicated in the Notice are shown on the following page:
Environmental and Geologic Services
PO Box 78222 Charlot#e, NC 28271 •I 2416 River Oaks Drive Waxhai
Phone 7 -4 2-1 6+ Fax [phone]
Email [e-mail]

PV
Is. Marcia Allo co
OV NCDENF
April 2:, 2015
Page
DATE CUTFALL PARAMETER REPORTED
VALUE
12 09/2014 001 Total suspended solids 52.0 milligrams per lib
(TSS) (mg/1)
1209/2014 001 Total suspended solids 52.0 milligramsper liti
(TSS) (mg/1)
TSS Res' once'
Following receipt of the analytical results for the December g, 201
took steps to reduce the concentration of TSS in the effluent. In Decem
was placed around the sumps from which water is extracted and gravel
sumps to minimize the quantity of solids' entering the system. In additio
activated carbon (CAC) vessels were backwashed on December 1,
December 19, 2014,
Effluent monitoring performed on January 5, 2015 indicate that tt
TSS in the effluent at Outfall 001 was below the laboratory detection limit o
Conclusions
As indicated by this response, the City has taken prompt actions t
TSS issue. The City respectfully requests that the Division of Water Resol
actions taken by the City to mitigate TSS issue in its determination
penalties in this matter.

PrwM(s'-Mr_ arcia Allocco
DN
April 23, 201
Page 3
e appreciate your attention to this matter. If you have
please contact me at (704) 442-13 5.
Sincerely,
NESCO ENVIRONMENTAL, P.L.L.C.
Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P,E.
President
cc: Eric Donnelly — Harvest Environmental Services, Inc. (via e-
donnell " harvestenironmental.cdm i
Doug Pierotti —City of Charlotte (via e-mail)
( ierotti �ci.charlott nc.us)
JPNkjpn\20150423

CITY OF CHARLOTTE
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
CHAMPTTE
March 31, 2015
RECEIVEDINCDENR/DWR
APR 1 2 Gu
Ms. Marcia Allocco
NCDENR, Division of Water Resources wos
Mooresville Regional Office MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, North Carolina 2 115
RE: NOV/NRE -- Effluent Limitations Response
Tracking Numbers: NOV-2015-LV-0117
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Discharge
NPDES Permit No. NC009443
Mecklenburg County
Dear Ms. Allocco:
The City of Charlotte (City) is submitting the attached response prepared by the Operator in
Responsible Charge (ORC) for the above mentioned `Notice", NOV-2015-LV-0117. The
construction activities have introduced elevated sediment and pH into the treatment systems.
The City is working with the contractors and ORC to control the exceedances and has
implemented numerous corrective actions. As can be seen from the detailed response,
numerous preventive measures have been put forth to control the eceedances. The City
requests that the Division of Water Quality consider the actions taken by the City to not assess
civil penalties in this matter.
If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (704) 42-51 or
dpi erotti {a,charl ottenc. gov.
Sine rel
P
Do gla ierotti, L.G.
Sens r oject Manager
City of harlotte Engineering 8c Property Management
Attachments: Nesco Environmental NV-2015-LV-0117 - NOV/NRE Response
cc: Michael Parker, NCDENR (via email)
Rusty Rozzelle MCWQP (via email)
600 East FOUrth Street 1 Charlotte, NC 28202 1 PK 704.3436.3391 I FAX: [phone]

March 31, 201
Ms. Marcia Allocco
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street
Mooresville, North Carolina 28271
Re. Notice of Violation and Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement
Tracking Number: NOV-2015-L.V-0117
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage
NP©ES Permit No. NCO089443
Mecklenburg County
Deer Ms. Allocco:
The City of Charlotte (the "City") has received and reviewed the document referenced
above (the "Notice"), The City does not take the indicated violation lightly and has taken
certain mitigative steps which are documented in this correspondence. The specific violations
indicated in the Notice are shown on the following page:
EnvironmentalandGeologic Services
PG Box 78222 Charlofte, NC 28271 + 2416 River Oaks Drive Waxhaw, NC 28173
Phone 04-4 - 65 + Fax 7 -243 02
Email nescoenv@car©lina.rr.com .

Ms. Marcie Allocco
N DENR
March 31, 2015
Page
DATE OUTI=ALL. PARAMETER REPORTED PERMIT
VALUE LIMIT
11/26/2014 001 pH 01 Standard units 0.0 SU
( U)(Daily
maximum)
11/26/2014 001 _ Total suspended solids 62.5 milligrams per liter 45.0 mg/I
(TSS) (mg/1) (Gaily
maximum)
11/31/2014 001 Total suspended solids 62.5 milligrams per liter 30.0 mg/l
(TSS) (mg/1) (Monthly
average)
11/26/2014 003 Total suspended solids 183.0 milligrams per 45.0 mg/I
(TSS) liter (Daily
(mg/1) maximum)
11/31/2014 003 Total suspended solids 183.0 milligrams per 30.0 m/I
(TSS) liter (Monthly
(mg/1) average)
pH 'Re sonse
The City first became aware: of the pH issue on November 26, 2014 when pH was
measured in the field. The City arranged to have an effluent sample collected on November
, 2014 analyzed in a commercial laboratory to confirm/refute the field pH results. The
commercial laboratory results indicated a pH value of 8.; however, the sample was
measured outside of established holding times and is not a technically valid result.
Subsequent effluent monitoring in December 2014 and January 2015 did net indicate
non -compliant conditions with respect to pH at Outfalls 001 or 003. Given the December
2014 and January 2015 results, the (amity believed the pH measurements from November 2014
may have been an anomaly,

Ms. Marcia Allocco
NCDENR
March 31, 201
Page
T S Res noon e
Following receipt of the analytical results for the December g, '2014 samples, the City
tools steps to reduce the concentration of TSS in the effluent. In December 2014, concrete
was placed around the sumps from which water is extracted and gravel was placed in the
sumps to minimize the quantity of solids entering the system: In addition, the two granular
activated carbon (CAC) vessels were bakwashed on December 16, 214 and again on
December 19, 2014:
Effluent monitoring performed on December 9, 2014 indicated that the concentration
of TSS in the effluent at Outfall 001 had been reduced to 52.0 mgll but was still above the
daily maximum limit of 45.0 mgll Effluent monitoring performed on December 9, 2014
indicated that the concentration of TS in the effluent at Cutfall 003 was within permit limits.
Effluent monitoring performed in January 2015 indicated TSS concentrations were within
permit limits at bath Outfall 001 and C utfall 003
Conclusions
As indicated by this response, the City has taken prompt actions to mitigate both the
pH and TS issues. The City respectfully requests that the Division of Water Resources
considers the actions taken by the City to mitigate pH and TSS issues in its determination to
not assess civil penalties in this matter:

Ms. Marcia Allocco
NCDEN2
March 31, 201
Page 4
e appreciate your attention to this matter. If you have questions or comments,
please contact me at (704) 44 -130 :
Sincerely,
NESC4 ENVIRONMENTAL, P.L.L.C.
Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P.E.
President
cc: Eric Donnelly — Harvest Environmental Services, Inc. (via e-mail)
(donnell harvestenvironmental.c rr !
Doing Pierotti — City of Charlotte (via e-mail)
(d lerotti ci.chsrlotte.nc.us
JPNl pnt20150331

NCDENR L
E
y
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
8/11 /2015
CERTIFIED MAIL #7015 0640 0002 9295 6156'
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
r. David Wolfe
Myrtle/ Morehead Storm Drain Project
600 E Fourth St
Charlotte, NC 28202
Subject; Notice of Violation and Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement
Tracking Number NOV-2015-LV-0504
Myrtle/ Morehead Storm Drainage
NPDESPermit NCO089443
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Wolfe:
A review of the May 2015 self -monitoring report for the subject facility revealed violations of the
following parameters at Outf ll 001:
Date Parameter.. Reported Value Permit Limit
5/31/2015 Tetrachloroethylene 18.5 ug/I 3.3 ug/I (Monthly Average)
A Notice of Violation and Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement (N /NICE) is being issued
for the noted violations of North Carolina general Statute (C.S.) 3-215.1 and NPDS Permit No.
NCO089443. Pursuant to G.S. 1-215.6A, a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand
dollars ($5,000.00) may be assessed against any person who violates or fails to act in accordance
with the terms, conditions, or requirements of any permit issued pursuant to G.S. 14-215.1.
If you wish to provide additional information regarding the noted violations,. request technical
assistance, or discuss overall compliance please respond in writing within 10 clays of receipt of this
Notice. A review of your response will be considered along with any information provided on the
May 2015 Discharge Monitoring Report. You will then be notified of any civil penalties that may b
assessed regarding these violations. If no response is received in this Office within the 10-day
period, a civil penalty assessment may be prepared.
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] t Fax: (744) 3-60tt F Customer Service.1- 77- 3 ,7
Internet: h#p://portal.nodenr.org/web/wq
An Equal Oprrortunity', Affirrnafve Action Employer- 0% Recycled/ 10°A Past Consumer paper

Asian
I 1 IQ YG %4u ;Fa7"v1117 LIwt 1%0G1 I It' IV" 1117 i i'clk"wi } V"/ iQ-J%w 4-tw I Moo a fiurt5,7itGd 41✓ V:✓ Owt f%GW% :W . I I k vfY v
663-1699.
Sincerely,
r
Michael 1_. Parker, Regional upervisar
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, N DENR
Wastewater Branch
MSC 161 — Central Files Basement

i#Nt
.IIM�WM�IWNIIYIMffd
FILE
North Carolina Department Of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
8/1012015
Mr. David Wolfe
Myrtle/ Morehead Storm Drain Project
600 E Fourth St
Charlotte, NC 28202
Subject: Notice of Deficiency — Effluent Limitation
Tracking Number NCB©- 015-LV-0071
Myrtle/ Morehead Storm Drainage
NPDFS Permit NCO089443.
Mecklenburg County,
Dear Mr. Wolfe:
A review of the April 2015 self -monitoring report for the subject facility revealed a violation of the
following parameter at Outfall 001
Gate Parameter Re orted Yalue Permit limit
4/17/2015 PH 9.6 SU 9 SU (Daily Maximum)
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the cause(s) of the noted
violation. Unresolved violations may lead to the issuance of a Notice of Violation and/or assessments
of civil penalties by the Division of Water Resources.
If the violations are of a continuing nature, not related to operation and/or maintenance problems, and
you anticipate remedial construction activities, then you may wish to consider applying for a Special
Order by Consent (SOC).
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have questions concerning this matter or to apply
for a SOC, please donot hesitate to contact Cori Tuvi at (704) 663-169 .
Sincerely,
Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
cc: Wastewater Branch
MSC 1617 -- Central Files Basement
T
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] i Fax. [phone] t CustomerService: 1-877-623-6 48
Internet, hftp:/1podaLnodenrorg/webAivq
An EquW Oppo tunny ? Affirmative Actirm Emtrluyer - 300% Reeyded/10% Post Cerusumer paper

,q x
�k.
MR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaad
Governor Secretary
July 22, 2016
r. David Wolfe
Environmental Program Manager
City of Charlotte
600 East 4th Strut
Charlotte, North Carolina 2820
Subject: Notice of Violation — Effluent Limitation
Trading dumber OV-2015-LV-0474
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage
NPDES Permit NC 089443
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Wolfe:
A review of the March 2015 self -monitoring report for the subject facility revealed a violation of the
following parameter at Outfall001:
Date ar" rn r R000rted Value Permit Limit
3/17/15 pH 10.36 SU 9 SCE (Daily Maximum)
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct any noted problems. The
Division of Water Resources may pursue enforcement actions for this and any additional violations. if
the violations are of a continuing nature, not related to operation and/or maintenance problems, and
you anticipate remedial construction activities, then you may wish to consider applying for a Special
Order by Consent (SQC).
If you have questions concerning this matter or to apply for a SCC, please do not hesitate to contact
r. Wes Bell or myself at [phone]'
inerel
r
Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
cc: Wastewater Branch
Central Files (MSC 1617-basement)
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 616 Fast enter Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28116
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] \ Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet: nttp://portal,ncdenr.orgiwrebfwrq

� 3
CDENR
North Carolina department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
July 6, 2015
CERTIFIED MAIL #7015 0640 0007 5707 443
RETURNRECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. David Wolfe
Environmental Program Manager
City of Charlotte
600 East 4th Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Subject. Notice of Violation and Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement
Tracking NumberNOV-2015-L" -0 32
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage
NPDES Permit NCO08944
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Wolfe:
A review of the February 2015 self -monitoring report for the subject facility revealed violations of the
following parameters at Outfalls 001 and 003;
Date Outfall Parameter Reoorted Value Permit Limit
2/10115 001 pH 10.8 SU' 9.0 SU (Daily maximum)
2/10/15 001 TSS 96.6 mg1L 45.0 mg1L (Gaily maximum)
128115 001 TSS 96.6 mg1L 30.0 mg1L (Monthly average)
2/10/15 003 pH 12.1 SU 9.0 SU (Daily maximum)
A Notice of Violation and Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement (NOV1NRE) is being issued
for the noted violations of North Carolina General Statute (.S.) 143-21.1 and NPDES Permit No.
N008443. Pursuant to G.S. 143-156A, a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand'
dollars ($25,000.00) may be assessed against any person who violates or fails to act in accordance
with the terms, conditions, or requirements of any permit issued pursuant to G.S. 14-215.1.
If you wish to provide additional information regarding the noted violations, request technical
assistance, or discuss overall compliance please respond in writing within 10 days of receipt of this
Notice. A review of your response will be considered along with any information provided can the
February 2015 Discharge Monitoring Report. You will then be notified of any civil penalties that
may be assessed regarding these violations. If no response is received in this office within the
10-day period, a civil penalty assessment may be prepared.
Mooresville regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28116
Phone. [phone] Fax: [phone] t Customer Servio ;1-877-623- 748
Internet: http.ttportal.ncde tr.orrg/web q
An Equal Oppoaunity `, Affirmative Action Employer - 30% Rocycl ll0% Past Consumer papsr

NOV-2015-L:V-04. 2, Page
e Division
If the
and you
ecial Order
11 or myself
at [phone]�
Sincerely,
C
Michael L. Parker, Regional /upervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
c; Wastewater Branch
MSC 117 — Central Files ``Basement
WB

E" R F1,
North Carolina Department Of Environment and Natural Resources ,.
Pat McCrory Donald van tier Vaart
Governor Secretary
April 16, 2015 ,
CERTIFIED MAIL #7011 0110 0000 9950 8072
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. David Wolfe
Environmental Program Manager
City of Charlotte
500 East Ott' Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 2602
Subject: Notice of Violation and Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement
Tracking Number: NOV-2015-L -0250
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage
NPDESPermit No. NCO089443
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Wolfe:
A review of the December 2014 self -monitoring report for the subject facility revealed violations of the
following parameter.
Date Outf ll Parameter Reported Value Permit Limit
1 / /14 001 Total suspended solids 52.0 m /L 45.0 mg/L (Daily maximum)
12/ 1/14 001 Total suspended solids 52.0 m /L 30.0 mg/L (Monthly average)
A Notice of Violation and Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement (NOV/N E) is being issued
for the noted violations of North Carolina General Statute ( .S,) 1 -21>.1 and NPDES Permit No.
NC 089443. Pursuant to C=, S. 14-215,6& a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand
dollars ( 5,00 .00) may be assessed against any person who violates or fails to act in accordance
with the terms, conditions, or requirements of any permit issued pursuant to G.S. 14-215.1.
If you wish to provide additional Information regarding the noted violations, request technical
assistance, or discuss overall compliance please respond in writing within 15 days of receipt of this
Notice, A review of your response will be considered along with any information provided on the
December 2014 Discharge Monitoring Report. You will then be notified of any civil penalties that
may be assessed regarding these violations. If no response is received In this Office within the
1 -day period, a civil penalty assessment may be prepared.
Mooresville Regional Office
location, 610 Past Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax. [phone] t Customer Service:1-877-623.6748
intem t: hitp://po tal.rodenr,orgiwebiwq
„.. r _n_.. _...,. _z.::. c ___,... < •_,:_.. r_.r_.._. nnni n.._...,3..a,:a nos n.,.+:r+M.. ,............::....

JOV-2015-L-0250,'-Page 2
myself at (704) 63-1 C 99�
;;incerely,
t
Michael L. Parker, Regional Sup rvisar
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
cc: R. Rolle, MCWQP
Wastewater Branch
MSC 1617 — Central Files Basement

FILE/
E R.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
March 12, 2015
CERTIFIED MAIL #7011 0110 0000 9960 779
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
r. David Wolfe
Environmental Program Manager
City of Charlotte'
600 East 4th Strut
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Subject: Notice of etiolation and Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement
Tracking Number: N}-2015-LV-0117
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage
NPDES Permit No. NCO089443
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Wolfe:
A review of the November 2014 self-monitonng;report for the subject facility revealed a violation of
the following parameters.
Date Outfall Parameter Reported Value Permit Limit
11/26/14 001 pH 91 SU 9.O S (Gaily maximum)
11/26/14 001 Total suspended solids 62.5 mg/L 45.0 mg/L (Daily maximum)
11/30/14 ` 001 Total suspended solids 62.5 mg/L 30.0 mg1L (Monthly average)
11/26/14 003 Total suspended solids 183.0 mg/L 4.0 mg/L (Gaily maximum)
11 /30/14 003 Total suspended solids 183:0 mg/L 30.0 mg/L (Monthly average)
A Notice of Violation and Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement (NOWNRE) is being issued
for the noted violations of North Carolina General Statute (t.S.) 1-215,1 and NPQES Permit No.
NCO089443. Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A, a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand
dollars (25,000.00) may be assessed against any person who violates or fails to act in accordance
with the terms, conditions, or requirements of any permit issued pursuant to G.S. 143-215,1,
If you wish to provide additional information regarding the noted violations, request technical
assistance, or discuss overall compliance please respond in writing within 10 days of receipt of this
Notice, A review of your response will be considered along with any information provided on the
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave„ Suite 361 Mooresville, NC 2 115
Phone: [phone] t Fax: [phone] t Customer Service: 1-877-623- 748
lntemet hftp:llportaLncdonr.org/web/Wq
A. C—,...rRA...w..M...n, A..FE.... Cm+vl-- '}lids: 0nmarn1-4MADI C],,,-1 r ..,..Y.r...:.«;.,.

NOV-2015-LV-0117, Page 2
November 2014 Discharge Monitoring Report. You will then be notified
_.— I -- --------i _____�,:__ ILL.___-..._E_L;�.�._
►t (704) 63-1 99.
Sincerely,
Michael L. Parker, Regional' ;
Water Quality Regional Oper
Division of Warr Resources
R. Roelle, MCWQP
Wastewater Branch
MSC 117 — Central Files Basement
t civil penalties that
:his Office within the
problems. The Division
7al violations. if the
ne problems, and you
lying for a Special Order
:t Ms. Marcia Allocco or
4a��7�
er isor
ns Section

Joseeh Pa Nestor
sum
From: Joseph P. Nestor [e-mail]>
Sena: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 11:45 Alvi
To: '[e-mail]°
Cc. 'Eric Donnelly`, 'Doug Pierotti
Subject: RE: Report of Unanticipated Bypass - NPDES Permit No, NC 0089443
Attachments. 2015-01-1 ,. Report of Unanticipated bypass.pdf
Marcia FEB — 2015
As I indicated in my voicemail, I am following up to confirm that you received this report.
Thanks.
Joseph P. Nestor, P.C., P.B.
Neco Environmental, P.L.L.,
PCB Box 78222
Charlotte, North Carolina 2827
704 442 165 (Office)
704 737 4046 (Mobile)
[e-mail]
From: Joseph P. Nestor [mailto [e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 5.11 PM
To:'marcia.allocco nc enr. ov'
Cc.'Eric Donnelly'; 'Doug Pierotti'
Subject: RE: Report of Unanticipated Bypass - NPDES Permit No. NC 0089443
Marcia
Please confirm receipt of the attached report. Do you require a hard copy as well?
Thanks.
Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P.E.
Nesco Environmental,'P.L.L.C.
P1 Box 7822
Charlotte, North Carolina 23271
704 442 1365 (Office)
704737 404 (Mobile)
nescoen carcilina,rr,com
From: Joseph P. Nestor [mailto.nescognv carolina.rr.corn]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 5:09 PM
To:' [e-mail]'
Cc:'Eric Donnelly', 'Doug Pierotti'
Subject. Report of Unanticipated Bypass - NPDES Permit No. NC 0089443
1

Marcia
Attached is the follow-up report to the unanticipated bypass notice l ernailed in previously.
Joseph P. Nestor, P.G, P.E.
Ne co Environmental, P.L.L.0 .
P© Box 76222
Charlotte, North Carolina 2871
704 442 1365 (Office)
704 737 4046 (Mobile)
nes oenv carelina.rr.com

% %_' , "'--- - A
iFEB, . 25
A Pratk"Onml Uffoad WNW Oompany
January 15, 2015 MN.,
Ms. Marcia Allocco
Environmental Chemist
NCDEN
610 EastCenter Avenue
Suite 301
Mooresville, North Carolina 2115
Re: Report of Unanticipated Bypass
City of Charlotte
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage Improvement' Project
t utfall No. 001
NPES Permit No, NC 0089443
Dear Ms. Alloc o:
l esco Environmental, P.L.L.C. (Nesco Environmental) prepared this correspondence
to document an unanticipated bypass of the treatment system for the referenced NPDE S
Permit and Qutfall referenced above. A notification of this incident was forwarded to Mr.
Michael Parker of your agency by email on December 25, 2014.
During the evening of December 22, 2014, the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) contacted Bradshaw Construction Corporation (Bradshaw)
regarding an overflow of a holding tank at the treatment plant. Bradshaw is a contractor who
is performing excavation and tunneling activities near £Jutfall No. 001. Bradshaw has been
subcontracted by the Prime/General Contractor (Sanders Utility Construction Company,
Inc.[Sanders]) to perform certain aspects of the project. Based upon review of internal email
correspondence, Nesco Environmental understands that Freddie Young of Sanders visited
the site sometime before 3:14 PM. Evidently, the generator which powers the treatment
system was not running for some reason. Electrical power was evidently being supplied to
the sump pump which was installed in the excavation shaft and water was pumped into a
2,100-gallon holding tank which eventually overflowed. Mr. Young deactivated the sump
pump during his visit so water would not continue to overflow the flank.
Environmental and Geologic Services
PO Box 78222 Charlotte, NC 28271 + 2416 River Oaks Drive Waxhaw, NC 28173
Phone 4-4 2-1 -1- Pax 704-244-6024
Ernail nescoenv( carvlina rr.c m

Ms. Marcia Allocco
NCDENR
January 15, 2015
Page 2
Personnel were,,
the site on December 22, 2014 and departed after 1 A5 PM. The
I - - - - - - _­­ __ - ­­ t- _Z___ I- _ _J - - - - I A 11--4
the system failed to operate immediately after personnel departed at 1 PM and continued
to be inoperative until 8:14 PM (time of internal email at Bradshaw indicating an overflow had
occurred), the system did not operate for a period of 389 minutes. During the period between
December 16, 2014 and December 23, 2014, water was extracted at a rate of approximately
2.61 gallons per minute (gpm). Taking the average flow rate of 2.61 gpm and multiplying it by
389 minutes, a volume of 1,015 gallons is calculated. The holding tank has approximately
840 gallons of capacity above the set point where the pumps actuate. Subtracting 1,133
gallons by 840 gallons, a volume of 175 gallons is calculated. used upon the foregoing,
Nesco Environmental concludes that no more than 175 gallons of untreated ground water
bypassed the treatment plant and was discharged without treatment.
Samples of the water being extracted from project excavation were collected on
November 26, 2014 and again on January 5, 2015. The November 26, 2014 samples were
analyzed for selected metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and semi -volatile organic
compounds (SVOCs). The January 5, 2015 samples were analyzed for VOCs and SVOCs.
With the exception of barium, metals were not detected in the November 26, 2014 samples.
Barium was detected at a concentration 49.4 micrograms per liter (tag/1) in the November 26,
2014 samples which is less than the North Carolina surface water standard of 1,000 Pg/L
With the exception of chloroform, VOCs were not detected in the samples collected on either
November 26, 2014 or January 5, 2015, Chloroform was detected at a concentration of 2.0
pg/l in the samples collected on both dates. The most restrictive (i.e., lowest) North Carolina
surface water standard for chloroform is 5.6 pg/1. SVOCs were not detected in the samples
collected on either November 26, 2014 or January 5, 2015. It should be noted that the
NPDES permit requires monitoring of the effluent for pH and total suspends solids and neither
of these parameters were monitored in the influent during the November 26, 2014 or January
5, 2015 sampling events. Copies of the laboratory reports are attached.

Ms. Marcia Allocco
NCDENR
January 15, 2015
Page 3
In conclusion, Nesoo Environmental believes the volume of water which -passed the
treatment system was less than 175 gallons and the chemical quality of this water did not
exceed North Carolina surface water standards for the parameters for which it was analyzed.
If have any questions or comments concerning this matter please contact me at (704)
44-1365.
Sincerely,
NESCO ENVIRONMENTAL, P.L.L.
e P. T*(F7-
Joseph P. Nestor, P.G. P.E.
President
JPN/jpn 20150115

t * Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Ice ,�ilCa 9800 Kinsey Ave, Suite 1(iq
Huntersville, NC 28078
a vparxrwmcom [phone]
December 13, 2014
Mr. Joe Nestor
Nesco Environmental
PO Box 78222
Charlotte, NC 28271
E: Project: Bradshaw-Dewatering
Pace Project No.: 92 2752
Dear Mr. Nestor:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on December Cif, 2014.
The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current TNI standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless
otherwise noted in the body of the report.
Analyses were performed at the Pace Analytical Services location indicated on the sample analyte
page for analysis unless otherwise footnoted.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
04*a, om.
Angela Baioni
[e-mail]
Project Manager
Enclosures
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. pane 1 of 1

4 `+
Analytical
+ CJ
wmpwelaftcom
g
Project: Bradshaw-Dewatering
Pace Project No.: 9276
Charlotte Certification IDa
North Carolina Wastewater Certification : 12
South Carolina Certification #: 99006001
Asheville Certification IDs
2225 Riverside Drive, Asheville, NC 28804
Florida3NELAP Certification * E87648
Massachusetts Certification : M-NC030
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
CERTIFICATIONS
I Florida/NELAP Certification`* E87627
X Kentucky UST Certification #: 84
West Virginia Certification #: 357
VirginiaNELAP Certification #: 460221
North Carolina Wastewater'Certification ##: 40
South Carolina Certification : 9900001
West Virginia Certification # 356
12 VirginialVELAP Certification #: 460222
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full„
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc- Page 2 of 19

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
�++ f e� a
""A mli4ica
9800 Itlncey Ave_ Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
wwwpacewsxom
[phone]
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Project:; Bradshaw-Dewaterin
Pace Project No.. 92227526
Analysts
Lab IQ sample ID
Method
Analysts
Reported Laboratory
92227626001 Pit sample 25 Feet
EPA6010
JMW
7 PASI-A
EPA7470
HVK
t PA it -A
EPA 8270
sPJ
74 PASI-C
EPA 8260
JDWI
63 PASI-C
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 3 of 1

#
Pace Analytical services, Inc. ;
Jp�+/ J
�i
V4/ : !yt% t
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersviile, NC 28078:
wwwpa0webs.com(704)875-909
t
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Protect: Bradshaw-Dewatering
Pace Protect No.: 92227526
Sample: Pit Sample 26 Feet
Lab ID: 92227526001 Collected: 11/26114 12::25
Received: 12/01114 11: 7 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results
Units Report Limit
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Chia!
6010 MET IP
Analytical Method:
EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Arsenic
ND ug/L
10 0
1
12104/14 16:10
12/05/14 01:14
7440-38-2
Barium
49.4 ug/L
5,0
1
12/04/14 16:10
12/05/14 01:14
7440-39-
Cadmium
NO ug/L
1 0
1
12/04/1416:10
12/05/14 01:14
7440-43-9
Chromium
NO ug/L
5 0
1
12/04/14 16:10
12/05/14 01:14
7440-47-
Lead
NO ug1L
&0
1
12/04/14 16:10
12/05/14 01:14
7439-92-1
Selenium
NO ug1L
10.0
1
12104/14 16,10
12/05/14 01:14
7782-49-
Silver
ND ug1L
50
1
1/04/14 1610
12/05/14 01:14
7440-2-4
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method:
EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Mercury
ND ug1L
0.20
1
12/03/14 11: 0
12/03/1415:51
7439-97-6
8270 MSSV Sernivollatile Organic
Analytical Method:
EPA 8270 Preparation Method: EPA 3510
Acenaphthene
NO ug/L
10,0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12108/14 14;02
3-32-9
Acenaphthylene
NO ug/L
10.0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
208-96-8
Aniline
ND ug/L
%0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
62-5 -
Anthrac ne
ND a 1L
10:0
1
1210311417:30
12/08/14 14:02
1 0-12-7
Benzo( )anthracene
NO ug1L
10>0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08114 14:0
56-55-3
Benzo( )pyrene`
NO ug/L
%0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
50-32.8
Benzo( )fluoranthene
ND ug/L
%0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
205-99-2
Benzo( ,h,i)perylene
NO ug1L
%0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
191-24-2
Senzo(k)fluoranthene
NO ug/L
10.0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:0
207-08-9
Benzoic Acid
NO ug/L
%0
1
12103/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
65-8 -0
Benzyl alcohol
NO ug/L
20,0
1
12103/14 17:30
12108/14 14:02
100-51-6
4-Bromophenylphenyl ether
NO ug1L
10.0
1
12103/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
101-55-3
Butylbenzylphthalate
NO ug/t:
100
1
12/0/14 17:30
12108/14 14:02
85-68-7
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
ND ug1L
20 0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08114 14:02
59-50-7
4-Chloroaniline
ND ug/L
20.0
1-
12/03114 17.3
12/08/14 14:0
106-47-8
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
NO ug/L
10.0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
111-91-1
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether "
NO ug/L
10.0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
111-44-4
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) other
ND ug/L
10:0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:0
108-60-1
-Chloronaphthelene
NO ug1L
10.0
1
12103/14 17:30
12108/14 14:02
1-58-7
2-Chlorophenol
ND ug/L
10:O
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
5-7-8
4-Chlorophenylphenyl ether
ND ug1L
%0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14;02
7005-72-3
Chrysene
NO ug/L
10:0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:0
218-01-9
Dibenz(a,h)anthra ne
NO ug/L
%0
1
12/03114 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
53-70-3_
Dibenzofuran
ND ug/L
10.0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12108/14 14:02
132-64-9
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
NO ug1L
10.0
1
12/03114 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
95-50-1
1,-Dichloroben ene
NO ug1L
10.0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
NO ug/L
10.0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12108/14 14:02
106-4 -7
3,3°-Dichloroben idine
NO ug/L
20:0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08114 14:02
91-94-1
2,4-DichlorophehoB
ND ug/L
10.0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08114 14:02
120-83-2
Diethylphthalate
ND ug/L
10.0
1
12/03114 17:30
12/08114 14:02
84-66-2
2,4-Dimethylphenol
NO ug1L
10.0
1
12/03/14 17:0
12/08/14 14:02
105-67-9
Dimethylphthalate
NO ug/L
10.0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
131-11-3
Di-n-butylphthalate
NO ug/L
10.0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
84-74-2
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND ug/L
20.0
1
1/0/14 17:0
12/08/14 14:02
34-52-1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This
report shell not be reproduced„ except in
full,
Date: 12/13/2014 02:53 PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc:.
Page 4 of 1

Pace Analytical Services, Inca
+ / e
tr lytic t
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
ww�
.pe
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project:: Bradshaw-Dewatering
Pace Project No.: 92227526
Sample: Pit Sample 26 Feet
Lab ID. 92227526001 Collected: 11126/14 12:25
Received: 12/01/14 11: 7 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results
Units Report Limit
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
$270 MSSV Semivolatile organic
Analytical Method.
EPA 8270 Preparation Method: CPA 3510
2,4-Dinitrophenot
ND ug/L
50.t1
1
12103/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
51-28-
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND ug/L
%0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:0
1 1-14-2
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND ug/L
100
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
606-20-2
Di-n-octylphthalate
ND ug/L
10,0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
117-84-0
bi (2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
ND ug/L
6:O
1
12/03/14 17:30
12108/14 14:02
117-81-7
Ftuoranthene
ND ug/L
10.0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12108/14 14:02
06-44-0
Fluorene
ND ug/L
%0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12108/14 14:0
86-73-
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
10.0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
87-68-3
Hexachlorobenzene
ND ug/L
- 10:0
1
12103/14 17:30
12108/14 14:02
118-74-1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND ug/L
10,0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08114 14:02
77-47-4
Hexachloroethane
NO ug/L
10,0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
67-72-1
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND ug/L
100
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
193- -5
isophorone
NO ug/L
10 0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
78-59-1
1-Methylnaphthalene
NO ug/L
10 0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08114 14:02
90-1 -0
2-Methylnaphthotene
ND ug/L
%0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:0
91-57-
2-Methylphenol(o-Cresol)
ND ug/L
10:0
1
12103/14 17:30
12/08114 14:02
95-48-7
3 4-Methylphenol(m&p Cresol)
ND ug/L
10,0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
Naphthalene
ND ug/L
10.0
1
12/0311417,30
12108/14 14:02
91-20-
2-Nitroanitine
ND ug/L
%0
1
12/03114 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
88-74-4
3-Nitroaniline
ND ug/L-
%0
1
12/03/1417,30
12/08/14 14:0
9-09-2
4-Nitroaniline
NO ug/L
20:0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
100-01-6
Nitrobenzene
NO ug/L
10:0
1
12103/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
98-95-
2-Nitrophenol
ND ug/L
10:0
1'
12103/14 17:30
12108/14 14:02
88-75-
4•Nitrophenol
ND ug/L
%0
1
12/03114 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
100-02-
N-Nitro odimeth famine
ND ug/L
10:0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12108/14 14:02
62-75-
N-Nitro o-di-n-propylamine
NO ug/L
10 0
1
12103/1417- 0
12/08/14 14:02
621-64-7
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ND ug/L
10,0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
86-30-6
Pentachlorophenoi
ND ug/L
25.0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
87-86-5
Phenanthrene
NO ug/L
10 0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
85-01-8
Phenol '
AID ug/L
10,0
1
12/03114 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
108-95-2
Pyrene
ND ug1L
10,0
1
12103/14 17:30
12/08/14 14,02
1 9-0 -ta
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene'
ND ug/L
10.0
1
12/03/14 17:0
12/08/14 14:02
120-82-1
2,4,5-Trichlorop enol
ND ug/L
10:0
1
12/03//14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
95-95-4
2,4,6-Trichlorophenoi
ND ug/L
%0
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:0
88-06-2
Surrogates
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
50 %
21-110
1
12103/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
4165-60-0 P2
-Ftuorobiphenyl (S)
53 %
27-110
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
321-60-8
Terphenyl-d14 (S)
98 %
31-107
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
1718- 1-0
Phenol-d6 (S)
16 %
10-110
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
13127-88-
2-Fluorophenot (S)
26 %
12-110
1
12/03/1417:30
12/08/14 14:02
367-1 -4
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)
55 %
27-110
1
12/03/14 17:30
12/08/14 14:02
118-79-6
8260 MSV Low Level
Analytical Method:
EPA 8260
Acetone
ND ug/L
25:O
1
12/07/14 01:06
67-64-1
Benzene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
12/07/14 01:06
71-43-2
Bromobenzene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
12/07/14 01:06
108-86-1
Bromochloromethane
ND ug/L
1.0
1
12107/14 01:06
74-97-5
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in
full,
Date: 12/1312014 02:53 PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical
Services, Inc..
Page 5 of 19

8CeAna1j6ca1*
wwwpemwmcom
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project., Bradshaw-Dewatering
Pace Project No,: 92227526
Pit Sample 26 Feet
LablD: 92227626001 Collected: 11126/14 12:25
Received: 12101114 11:27 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
;V LOW Level
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
chloromethane
NO ug/L
1.0
1
12/07/14 01:06
75-27-4
trm
NO ug/L
1'0
1
12107/14 01:06
75-25-2
iethane
NO ug/L
ZO
1
12107/14 01:06
74-83-9
one (MEK)
NO ug/L
5,0
1
12/07/14 01:06
78-93-3
tetrachloride
NO ug/L
1:0
1
12/07/14 01,06
56-23-5
mzene
NO ug/L
11:0
1
12/07114 01:06
108-90-7
thane
NO ug/L
1:0
1
12107/14 01:06
75-00-3
irm
2.0 ug/L
1'0
1
12/07/14 01:06
67-66-3
rethane
NO ug/L
1;0
1
12/07/14 01:06
74-87-3
)toluene
NO ug/L
1'0
1
12/07/14 01:06
95-49-8
rtoluene
NO ug/L
1:0
1
12/07/14 01 :06
106-43-4
omo-3-chloropropane
NO ug/L
ZO
1
12/07/14 01:06
96-12-8
Ichloromethane
NO ug/L
1:0
1
12/07/14 01:06
12448-1
omoethane (EDB)
NO ug/L
1.0
1
12/07/14 01,06
106-93-4
(methane
NO ug/L
10
1
12/07/14 01-06
74-95-3
iforobenzene
ND ug/L
1:0
1
12/07/14 01:06
95-50-1
iforobenzene
NO uq/L
1.0
1
12/07/14 01:06
541-73-1
itorobenzene
NO uq/L
1'0
1
12/07/14 01:06
106-46-7
difluoromethane
NO ug/L
1:0
1
12/07/14 01:06
75-71-8
iloroethane
ND ug/L
1'0
1
12/07114 01:06
75-34-3
iloroethane
NO ug/L
1.0
1
12/07/14 01:06
107-06-2
iforoethene
NO ug/L
10
1
12/07/14 01:06
75-35-4
)ichloroethene
NO ug/L
10
1
12107/14 01:06
156-59-2
2-Dichloroethene
NO ug/L
10
1
12/07114 01:06
156-60-5
iforopropane
NO ug/L
1.0
1
12107/14 01,06
78-87-5
i1oropropane
NO ug/L
1.0
1
12/07/14 01:06
142-28-9
iloropropane
NO ug/L
1.0
1
12/07/14 01:06
594-20-7
iloropropene
NO ug/L
1.0
1
12/07/14 01:06
563-58-6
)ichloropropene
NO ug/L
10
1
12/07/14 01,06
10061-01-5
!i-Dichloropropene
NO ug/L
1'0
1
12/07/14 01:06
10061-02-6
pyl ether
ND ug/L
1:0
1
12/07/14 01:06
108-20-3
izene
ND ugIL
1'0
1
12/07/14 01:06
100-41-4
taro-1,3-butadiene
NO ug/L
1:0
1
12/07114 01:06
87-68-3
tone
NO ug/L
5,0
1
12107/14 01,06
591-78-6
pyltoluene
NO ug/L
1.0
1
12/07/14 01:06
99-87-6
ne Chloride
NO ug/L
2,0
1
12/07/14 01:06
75-09-2
1-2-pentanone (MIBK)
NO ug/L
&0
1
12/07/14 01:06
108-10-1
ert-butyl ether
NO ug/L
1.0
1
12/07114 01:06
1634-04-4
Ilene
NO ug/L
1:0
1
12/07114 01:06
91-20-3
NO ug/L
1'0
1
12/07/14 01:06
100-42-5
retrachloroethane
NO ug/L
1.0
1
12/07/14 01:06
630-20-6
retrachloroethane
NO uq/L
1'0
1
12/07114 01:06
79-34-5
oroethene
NO ug/L
1'0
1
12/07/14 01:06
127-18-4
NO ug/L
1.0
1
12/07/14 01:06
108-88-3
ohlorobenzene
ND ug/L
1'0
1
12/07114 01:06
87-61-6
Ichlorobenzene
NO ug/L
1.0
1
12/07/14 01:06
120-82-1
ohloroethane
NO ug/L
1'0
1
12/07/14 01,106
71-55-6
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
02:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc- Page 6 of 19

Pace Analytical services, Inc.
1+1 / /
4rii 7ytica#
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
hs.
:
(704)875-909
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Bradshaw-Dewatering
Pace Project No,: 92227526
Sample; Pit Sample 26'Feet
Lab ID: 92227626001 Collected: 11/26/14 12:25 Received:
12/01114 11:27 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DFPrepared
Analyzed
CAS No, Cual
8260 M V Low Level
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND ugfL
1 0
1
12/07/14 01:06
79-00-5
Trichloroethene
ND ugtL
1 0
1
12107114 01:06
79-01-
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND ug1L
1.0
1
12/07/14 01:06
75-69-4
1,2,3-Tr chloropropane
Nib ug/L
1 0
1
12/07/14 01:0
96-18-4
Vinyl acetate
ND ug1L
2 0
1
12/07/14 01:06
108-0 -4
Vinyl chloride
ND ug1L
1 0
1
12/07/14 01.6E
75-01-
Xylene (Total)
ND u 1L
2.0
1
12/07/14 01:06
1 0-20-7
m p-Xylene
ND ugdL
2 0
1
12/07114 01:06
179601-2 -1
o-Xylen
ND ugdL
1:0
1
12/07/14 01:06
95-47-6
Surrogate
4-Bromofluorobenzene ()
99 °fo
70-130
1
12/07/14 01:06
460-00-4
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
105 °!,
70-130
1
12/07/14 01:06
17060-07-0
Toluene=d8 (S)
98 °!
70-130
1
12/07114 01:06
2037- 6-5
REPORT OF LABORATORY R ANALYSIS
This report shall not
be reproduced, except in full„
Gate: 12/131 014 02:53 PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical
Services, Inc:.
Page 7 of 19

ce ly ici l
wwwPacelab&CM
Project: Bradshaw-D watering
Pace Project No,, 92227526
tC Batch: MERP#7361
OC Batch Method: EPA 7470
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Associated Lab Samples: 92227526001
METHOD BLANK: 1341787 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92227526001
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Mercury ugtL ND 0.20 12/03/1415:45
LABORATORY' CONTROL SAMPLE: 1341788
Spike LCS LCS % Rao
Parameter Units Colic: Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
Mercury ug1L 2.5 2.5 98 0-120
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 1341789 1341790
MS MSD
92227526001 Spike Spike M3 MSD MS MSD % Rec
Parameter Units Result Conc, Conc. Result Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD Qual
Mercury ugtL ND 2,5 2.5 2.5 2.5 99 100 7-125 0
Results presented on this page are in the units Indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result,
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 12/13/2014'02:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc_ Page 8 of 19
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Analysis Method: EPA 7470

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
�+w j �n j
" lyt Cr t
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100:
Nuntersville, NC 28078
MN
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Protect: Bradshaw-Dewatering
Pace Protect No:: 92227526
QC Batch: MPRP/17468
Analysis Method: EPA6010
QC Batch Method: EPA 3010
Analysis Description: 6010 MET
Associated Lab Samples: 92227526001
METHOD BLANK: 1343759
Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 9227526001
Blank Reporting
Parameter
Units Result Limit
Analyzed
Qualifiers
Arsenic
ug/L
N %0
12/05/14 00:59
Barium
ug/L
ND &0
12/05/14 00:59
Cadmium
ug/L
NO 1.0
12/05/14 00:59
Chromium
ug/L
NO &0
12/05/14 00:59
Lead
ug/L
NO &0
12/05/14 00:59
Selenium
ug/L
NO 10.0
1/05/14 0:5
Silver
ug/L
NO &0
12/05/14 00:59
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 1343760
Spike LCS
LCS %
Rec
Parameter
Units Cone. Result
% Rec Limits
Qualifiers
Arsenic
ug/L
500 480
96
80-120
Barium
ug/L
500 495
99
0-120
Cadmium
ug/L
500 494
99 '
80-120
Chromium
u /L
500 494
99
80-120
Lead
ug/L
500 486
97
80-120
Selenium
ug/L
50 493
99
0-120
Silver
ug/L
20 245
98
80-120
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 1343761 1343762
MS MSD
92227965012 - Spike Spike MS
MSD MS
MSD
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result Cone. Conc. Result
Result % Rec % Rec
Limits
R D Qual
Arsenio
ug/L
NO 500 500 477
480 '
95 96
75-126
1
Barium,
ug/L
94.0 500 500 591
588
99 99
7-125
0
Cadmium
u/L
NO 500 50 490
489
95 98
75-125
0
Chromium
ug/L
NO 500 500 494
46
99 99
75-125
0
Lead
uglL
NO 500 500 478
478
95 95
7 -1 5
0
Selenium
ug/L
ND 500 500 482
481
96 95
75-15
0
Silver
ug/L
NO 250 250 244
244
97 97
75-125
0
Results presented on this page are in the unite indicated by the "Unite" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Crate: 12/13/2014'02:53 PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 9 of 1

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
C A�( I( rt1 a
mIXc v
9800 Kinney Ave. Suite 100'
Huntersville, NC 28078
.pe s.
i
(704)875-909
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Bradshaw-Dewatering
Pace Project No.: 92227526
QC Batch: MSV/29512
Analysis Method:
EPA 8260
QC Batch Method: EPA 8260
Analysis Description:
8260 MSV Low Level
Associated Lab Samples: 92227526001
METHOD BLANK: 145726
Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92227526001
Blank Reporting
Parameter
Units Result Limit
Analyzed Qualifiers
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
NO
1.0
12106/14 20.51
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ugIL
NO -
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
1,1,2,2-Tetrachlgroethane
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/1420,51
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/L
ND
1,0
12/06/14 20:51
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/1420:51
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/L
ND
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
1,1-Di hloropropene
ug/L
NO
1.0
12106/14 20:51
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
u/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
1,2,-Trichtoropropane
a /L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 0:51
1,2,4®Trichlorobenzene
u/L
NO
1.0
12106/14 20:51 ;
1,2-Dibromo-3-chioropropane
ug/L
ND
2.0
12/06/14 20:51
1,2-Dibromoethne (EDB)
u/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 0:1
1,2-Dichlorobenene
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
1,2-Dichloroethne
u/L
NO
1.0
12/06114 20:51
1,2-Dichloropro ane
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/1420:61
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
1.0
12106/14 0:51
1,3-Dichloropropane
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
1,4-Dichlorobnene
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
2,2-Dichloropro ane
u /L
NO
1.0
12/06114 20:51
2-Buta one (M K)
ug1L
NO
&0
12106/14 20:51
2-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
2-Hexanone
u/L
NO
5.0
12/06/14 20:51
4-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:51 _
4-Methyl--pentenone (MIBK)
u /L
NO
&0
12/06/14 20:51
Acetone
u/L
NO
25.0
12/06/14 20:51
Benzene
ug/L
NO ;
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
Bromobenzene
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
Bromochloromethane-
ug/L
NC
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
Bromodichloromethane
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:1 "
Bromoform
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
Bromomethane -
u/L
NO
20
12/06/14 20:51
Carbon tetrachloride
a /L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
Chlorotlenzene-
u /L
NO
1:0
12/06/14 20,51
Chloroethane
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06114 20:51
Chloroform
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
Chloromethane
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06114 20:51
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
cis•1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/1420-51
Dibromochloromethane
ug/L
NO
1.0
12106/14 20:51
Dibromomethane
u /L
NO
1.0
12/06114 20:51
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
Results presented on this page are in the Waits indicated by the "Units" column except where an adtemsto unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT 4F LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 12/13/2014 02:53 PM
without the written consent of lace Analytical
Services, Inc.,
Page 10 of 19

Face Analytical Services, Inc.
rpa
trig± yfic
9800 Kincey Ave, Suite 100
Hunter ville, PIG 28078
.P s,c
[phone]"
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Bradshaw-Dewatering
Pace Project No.: 9227526
METHOD BLANK: 1345726
Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92227526001
Blank
Reporting
Parameter
Units
Result
Limit
Analyzed
Qualifiers
Diisopropyl ether
ug/L
ND
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
thylbenene
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
Hex chloro-1,3-butadiene
ug/L
NO
1,0
12106/1420:51
m p-X lene
ug/L
NO
2,0
12/06/14 20:51
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
Methylene Chloride
ug/L
NO
2.0
12/06/14 20:51
Naphthalene
ug/L
NO
1,0
12/06/14 0:5I
o-Xylene
ug/L
ND
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
p-Isopropyltoluene
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
Styrene
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
Tetrachloroethene
u/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20.51
Toluene
ug/L
NO
1.0
12106/14 20:51
trans-12-Dichloroethene
ug/L
NO
1,0
12/06/14 20:1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
Trichlor ethene
ug/L
ND
1,0
12/06/14 20:51
Trichlorofiuoro ethane
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
Vinyl acetate
ug/L
NO
2,0
12/06/14 20:51
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
NO
1.0
12/06/14 20:51
Xylene'(Total)
u /L
NO
2.0
12/06114 20:51
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 ()
°1
105
70-1 0
12/06/14 20:51
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
%
96
70-1 0
12/06/14 20:51
Toluene-d8 (S)
°!
98
70-130
12/06/14 20:51
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
134572
Spike
LCS
L S %
Rec
Parameter
Units
Cone.
Result
% Rec Limits Qualifiers
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
50
52,5
105
70-130
1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane
ug/L
50
52,9
106
70-130
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
a /L
50
46,7
93
70-130
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/L
50
43.0
96
70-130
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/L
50
51.1
102
70-130
1,1-Dichloroethene ;
ug/L
50
52.6
105
70-13
1, 1 -Dichloropropene
ug/L
50
52.1
104
70-130
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ug/L
50
47.0
94
70-1 5
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
u/L
50
46.3
93
70-130
1,,4-Trichlorobenzene
ug/L
50
48.5
97
70-134'
1,-Dibromo-3- hloropropane
u /L
50
41A
82
70-1 0
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ug/L
50
49.9
100
70-130
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
a /L
50
50A
101
70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/L
50
4&8
98
70-130
1,-Dichloropropane
ug/L
50
4T6
95
70-130
1,-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
50
50.9
102
70-10
1,3-Dichloropropane
ug/L
50
4T9
96
70-130
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
50
51,6
103
70-130
Results presented on this page are in the
units indicated by the "Units"
column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 1 /13/2014 02:53 PM
without the written consent
of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.,
Page 11 of 1

"Ce tyt cad
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Bradshaw-Dewatering
Pace Project No.: 92227526
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 1345727
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. 'Suite 100
Huntersville„ NO 28078
[phone]
Spike
LCS
LCS
% F ec
Parameter
Units
Conc.
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Dichloropropane
ug/L
50
52.5
105
58-145
itanone (M K)
ug/L
100
85.5
86
70-14
riiorotoluene
ug/L
50
51.0
102
70-130
axanone
ug/L
100
71.8
72
0-144
tlortstoluene
ug/L
50
50,2
100
0-130
ethyl--pentanone (MIB)
u/L
100
87,9
88
70-140
tone
ug/L
100
93,3
93
50-175
zene
ug/L
50
50,3
101
70-130
,nobenzene
ug/L
50
50A
101
70-130
rtochloromethane
ug/L
50
51.3
103
70-1 0
nodichloromethane
ug/L
50
51 ,5
103
70-1 0
rloform
ug/L
50
42.9
86
70-130
rtoethane
ug/L.
50
37.9
74
4-130
)on tetrachloride
ug/L
50
53.3
107
70-132
)rot>enzene
ug/L
50
50A
101
70-130
)roethane
ugiL
50
43.2
86
4-13
)roform
ug/L
50
51,0
102
70-130
aromethane
ug/L
50
45.9
92
644-130"
1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
50
52.1
104
70-1 1
1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
50
50.0
100
70-130
,omochloro ethane
ug1L.
50
46,0
92
70-130
womethan
a /L
50
47.8
95
70-131
tlorodifluoromethane
ug1L
50
48.7
97
56-10
opropyl ether
ug/L
50
46.2
92
70-130
(Ibenzene
ug/L
50
49.9
100
70-1 0
achloro-1,3-butadlene
u /L
50
48.5
97,
70-130
)-ylene
ug/L
100
99.9
100
70-130
hyl-tert-butyl ether
ug1L
50
43,0
86
70-130
hylne Chloride
u/L
50
51,7
13
3-130
hthalene
ugiL
50
45,9
92
70-138
/lene
ug/L
50
47.6
95
70-130
opropyltoluene
ug/L
50
50.9
102
70-130
ene
u/L
50
506
101
0-10
achloroethene
u/L
50
50.6
101
70-130
ene
ug/L
50
50A
100
7 0-130
s-1-Dichloroethene
ug/L
50
51 A
103
70-130
s-1,3-10ichiaropropene
ug/L
50
50A
100
70-13
nloroethene
ug/L
50
50.7
101
70-10
ilorofluoromethane
ug/L
50
56,6
113
2-133
,I acetate
ug/L
100
93.7
94
66-157
,I chloride
ug/L
50
54.1
108
0-10
:ne (Total)
ugiL
150
147
98
70-10
Dichloroethane-d4 ()
%
100
70-130
,omofluorobenzene (S)
%
97
70-1 0
ene-d8 (S)
°Id
100
70-130
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except In full,
Date: 12113/201 02:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 12 of 1

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
�t++�i #
aVG Iyt%ca1
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, PSG 28078
Wswpac"s.com(704)875-9092
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project. Bradshaw-Dewatering
Pace Project No.. 9276
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE.
1345728
92228066010-
Spike MS
M
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result
Conc. Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
NO
20
18.7
94
70-130
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ug/L
NO
20
19.8
99
70-1 0
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroetharle
ug/L
NO
20
17A
87
70-130
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ugtL
ND
20
1&3
92
70-130
I,1-Dic loroethane
ug/L
ND
20
19.7
99
70-130
11-Dicloroethene
ug/L
NO
20
19.8
99
70-166
1,1-Dicloropropene
ug/L
NO
20
21.2
106
70-130
1,2,3-Trichlorobnzen
ug/L
NO
20
18.5
92
70-130
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
ug/L
NO
20
17.8
89
70-130
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ugtL
NO
20
18.9
94
70-130
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ug1L
NO
20
16.8
84
70-130
1,2-Dibromoethne (D)
ug/L
NO
20
19.0
95
70-130
1,-Dichlorobenene
ug/L
NO
20
19.1
96
70-130
1,-Dichloroethene
ug/L
NO
20
18.2
91
70-10
1,2-Dichloroproane
ug/L
NO
20
18.6
93
70-10
1,-Dichloroben ene
ug/L
NO
20
19.2
96
70-1 0
1,3-Dichloropropane '
ug/L
NO
20
18.2
91
70-130
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
20
19.8
99
70-10
2, -Di hloropropane
ug/L
ND
20
191
99
0-130
-Butanone (MEK)
ug/L
NO
40
33.8
85
70-130
2-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
ND
20
19.8
99
70-10
2-Hexanone
ug/L
NO
40
34,2
86
70-1 0
4-Chlorotoluene
ug/L-
NO
20
19,6
98
70-130
4-Methylµ2-pentnone (MIRK)
u/L
ND
40
35.3
88
70-130
Acetone
ug/L
NO
40
36A
91
70-130
Benzene
ug/L
ND
20
20.2
101
70-14
Bromobenzene''
ug/L
NO
20
19,3
96
70-1 0
Bromo hloromethane
u /L-
NO
20
18.9
94
70-13
Bromodichloroethane
u/L
ND
20
16.7
83
70-130
Bromoform
ug/L
NO
20
153
76
70-130
Bromo ethane
ug/L
NO
20
20.2
101
70-130
Carbon tetrachloride
ug/L
NO
20
20A
100
70-130
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
20
%6
98
70-14
Chloro thane
ug/L
NO
20
20.7
103
70-130
Chloroform
ug/L
NO
20
17A
87
70-130
Chloromethan
ug/L
NO
20
20.3
102
70-130
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
a /L
ND
20
20.4
99
70-130
cis- 1, 3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
NO
20
18.0
90
70-1 0
Dibromochloromethane
ug/L
NO
20
16:1
80
70-10
Dibromomethane
ug/L
NO
20
17.6
88
70-10
Dichlorodifluoroethane
ug/L
NO
20
2.3
117
70-130
Dilsopropyl ether
ug/L
ND
20
18.6
93
70-130
Ethylbenzene
ug/L
NO
20
19.7
98
70-130
Hexac lord-1,3-butadiene
ug/L
ND
20
26,6
133
70-1 0 MO
mp-lene
ug/L
NO
40
395
99
70-130
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ug/L
NO
20
IT3
87
70-130
Methylene Chloride
ug/L
NO
20
18A
92
70-130
Results presented on
this page are in the
units indicated by the "Units" column except where an attemate unit is presented to the right of the result
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 12/13/2014 02.53 PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,
Inc..
Page 13 of 19

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
RCeAna1j6ca1*
47cl
9800 Kincey Ave, Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
Ww1xpftce1ab$X0M
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Bradshaw-Dewatering
Pace Project No.: 92227526
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
1345728
92228066010
Spike MS
MS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result
Cone. Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Naphthalene
ug/L
ND
20 17,5
88
70-130
o-Xylene
ug/L
NO
20 18.9
94
70-130
p-tsopropyltoluene
ug/L
NO
20 202
101
70-130
Styrene
ug/L
NO
20 19,7
98
70-130
Tetrachloroethene
ug/L
NO
20 191
99
70-130
Toluene
ug/L
NO
20 19.5
97
70-155
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
NO
20 19,9
99
70-130
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
NO
20 17,9
90
70-130
Trichloroethene
ug/L
ZI
20 21A
97
69-151
Trichlorofluoromethane
ug/L
NO
20 24.0
120
70-130
Vinyl acetate
ug/L
NO
40 37,8
94
70-130
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
ND
20 23,8
119
70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
%
100
70-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
%
98
70-130
Tbluene-d8 (S)
%
98
70-130
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1345729
92228066011
Dup
Parameter
Units
Result
Result RPD
Qualifiers
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
NO
NO
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ug/L
NO
NO
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
NO
NO
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/L
NO
NO
I,I-Dichloroethane
ug/L
NO
NO
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/L
NO
NO
I,I-Dichloropropene
ug/L
NO
NO
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
NO
I 2,3-Trichloropropane
ug/L
NO
NO
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
NO
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ug/L
NO
NO
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ug/L
NO
NO
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
NO
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/L
NO
NO
1,2-Dichloropropane
ug/L
ND
ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
NO
1,3-Dichloropropane
ug/L
NO
ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
ND
2,2-Dichloropropane
ug/L
NO
NO
2-Butanone (MEK)
ug/L
NO
NO
2-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
ND
NO
2-Hexanone
ug/L
NO
NO
4-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
NO
NO
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MlBK)
ug/L
NO
NO
Acetone
ug/L
NO
NO
Benzene
ug/L
NO
NO
Results presented on this page are in the
units indicated by the "Units' column except where an alternate unit
is presented to the eight of the result
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 12/13/2014 02:53 PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 14 of 19

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
r /� a
t� eAnalyfical
9800 Klncey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersuille, NC 28078'
www.piustatis.com
[phone]'.
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Bradshaw-Dewatering
Pace Project No.: 92227526
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1345729
922280 6011 Chip,;
Parameter
Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers
Bromobenzene
ug/L
ND NO
Bromochioromethane
ug/L
ND NO
Bromodichloromethane
ug/L
ND NO
Bromoform
u iL
NO ND
Bromomethane
ug/L
ND ND
Carbon tetrachloride
ug/L
ND NO
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
ND ND
Chloroethane
ug/L
ND NO
Chloroform
ug/L
ND ND
Chloromethane
ug/L
NO NO
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
ND A5J
cis-1,3-Dlchloropropene
ug/L
NO '- ND
Dibromochloromethane
ug/L
ND ND
Dibromomethane
ug/L
NO ND
Dichlorodifluorornethane
ug/L
NO ND
Diisopropyl ether
a /L
NO NO
Bthylbenzene
ug/L
NO ND
Hexachloro-1,-butadiene
ug1L
ND ND "
m&p-Xylene
ug/L
ND NO
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ug/L
ND NO
Methylene Chloride
ug/L
ND - ND
Naphthalene
u/L
NO ND
o-Xylene
ug/L
NO ND
p-Isopropyltoluene
ug/L
ND NO
Styrene
ug/L
NO ND
Tetrachloroethene
ug1L
NO ND
Toluene
ug/L
NO NO
trans-12-Dichloroethene
ug/L
ND ND
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
ND NO
Trichloroethene
ug/L
ND NO
Trichlorofluoromethane
ug/L
NO NO
Vinyl acetate
ug/L
ND ND
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
ND NO
Xylene (Total)
ug/L
NO ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 ()
%
105 102 2
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
%
97 95 1
Toluene-d8 (S)
°la
98 98 0
Results presented on this page are in the units Indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 12/13/2014 02:53 PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 15 of 19

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
0ore 9800 Kincey Ave, Suite 100
ce ytical untersville, NC 28078
.pe (704)875-909
QUALIFIERS
Project: Bradshaw-Dewatering
Pace Project No:. 92227526
DEFINITIONS
F - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation, dilution of
the sample aliquot, or moisture content.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit:
MDL -Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit.
L - Reporting Limit.
- Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (8270listed analyte) decomposes toAzobenzene.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and F PD values.
LDS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable,
SG - Silica Gel - Glean -Up
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270, The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration:
Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether, Styrene, and Vinyl chloride.
Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes,
TNI -The NELAC'Institute:
LASORATORIES
PAI-A Pace Analytical Services - Asheville
PASI-C Pace Analytical Services - Charlotte
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS-
M0 Matrix spike recovery and/or matrix spike duplicate recovery was outside laboratory control limits.
Re -extraction or re -analysis could not be performed due to insufficient sample amount.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full„
Date: 12/13/2014 02:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc:. Page 16 of 19

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
ceJ lyfica
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersvilie> NG 28078
Pa
(704)87 --9092
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Project. Bradshaw-Dewatering
Pace Protect No.: 92227526
Analytical
Lab ID Sample ID
QC Batch Method QC Batch
Analytical Method Batch;
92227626001 ' Pit Sample 25 Feet
EPA 3010 MPRP117468
EPA 6010
ICPt15739
922276001 Pit Sample 26 Feet
EPA 7470 MERP17361
EPA 7470
MERI7072
92227626001 Pit Sample 25 Feet
EPA 3510 EIEXT1 1437
EPA 8270
MS SVf10021
2227 26001 Pit Sample 25 Feet
EPA 8260 MSVl29512
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Lute. 12/13/2014 02.53 PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 17 of 1

REGULATORY AGENCY
SITE
"LINQUISHED BY /AFFILIATION OATE I TWe JACCEPTED BY I AFFILIATION I DATE _ITIME
,ER NAME AND &CINATURE

Race Analytical services, Inc.
��++ ) j 9800 Kincey Ave. suite 100
ce tyticad Nuntersville, NC 28078
wowpacelatacom(704)875-9092
January 14, 2015
Mr. Joe Nestor
Nesco Environmental
PO Box 78222
Charlotte, NC: 28271
RE: Project: BRADSHAW - QE ATE INC
Pace Project No.. 92 32130
Dear Mr. Nestor:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on January 07, 201 5.
The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current TNI standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless
otherwise noted in the body of the report.
Analyses were'; performed at the Pace Analytical Services location indicated on the sample analyte
page for analysis unless otherwise footnoted.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact m.
Sincerely,
owc qq, 11
Angela Baioni
[e-mail]
Project Manager
Enclosure
REPORT 4F LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except In full,
without the written consent of Face Analytical services, Inc- Page 1 of 20

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
lce"Ocal* Huntersville, NO 28078
wwwPacelabs,mm [phone]
CERTIFICATIONS
Project: BRADSHAW - DEWATERING
Pace Project No.: 92232130
Charlotte Certification IDS
9800 Kin Ave. Ste 100, Huntersville, NC 28078 Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87627
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37706 Kentucky UST Certification #' 84
North Carolina Field Services Certification #: 5342 West Virginia Certification * 357
North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 12 Virginia/VELAP Certification #: 460221
South Carolina Certification #: 99006001
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 2 of 20

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
ace"IyAcal
9800 Kincey Ave, Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
www.paceMbscom
[phone]
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Project: BRADSHAW - DEWATERING
Pace Project No.: 92232130
Analytes
Lab ID Sample ID
Method
Analysts Reported Laboratory
92232130001 INFLUENT
EPA8270
RE S 74 PAST-C
EPA 8260
CAH 63 PAST-C
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.,
Page 3 of 20

laceAnalytical
wwwPacebbs'40M
gct: BRADSHAW - DEW,
ANALYTICAL RESULT
kING
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave, Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
*ample: INFLUENT
Lab ID: 92232130001
Collected: 01/05/1515:50
Received: 01/07/1512:15 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
OF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
1270 MSSV Sernivolatile Organic
Analytical Method: EPA 8270 Preparation Method:
EPA 3510
keenaphthene
NO ug/L
%0
1
01/08/1515:15
01/09/15 09:37
83-32-9
kcenaphthylene
ND ug/L
I 0:0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
208-96-8
knifine
ND ug/L
%0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
62-53-3
knthracene
NO ug/L
10,0
1
01108/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
120-12-7
3enzo()anthracene
ND ug/L
10,0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
56-55-3
3enzo(a)pyrene
ND ug/L
10.0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
50-32-8
3enzo(b)fiuoranthene
NO ug/L
10,0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
205-99-2
3enzo(g,hj)perylene
ND ug/L
10,0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09-37
191-24-2
iIenzo(k)fluoranthene
ND ugIL
10,0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
207-08-9
ilenzoic; Acid
ND ug/L
%0
1
01108/15 15:15
01109/15 09:37
65-85-0
3enzyl alcohol
NO ug/L
20;0
1
01108/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
100-51-6
1,-Bromophenylphenyl ether
ND ug/L
10:0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09115 09:37
101-55-3
3utylbenzy1phthalate
NO ug/L
10.0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
85-68-7
l-Chloro-3-methylphenot
NO ug/L
20O
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
59-50-7
I-Chloroaniline
ND ug/L
20;0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
106-47-8
)is(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
ND ug/L
10,0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
111-91-1
)is(2-Chloroethyl) ether
ND ug/L
10,0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
111-44-4
)is(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether
NO ug/L
10,0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
108-60-1
!-Chloronaphthalene
NO ug/L
10.0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09115 09:37
91-58-7
t-Chlorophenol
ND ug/L
10,0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09.37
95-57-8
I-Chlorophenylphenyl ether
ND ug/L
%0
1
01108/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
7005-72-3
'hrysene
NO ug/L
10.0
1
01/08115 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
218-01-9
)ibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND ug/L
10,0
1
01/08115 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
53-70-3
)ibenzofuran
ND ug/L
10,0
1
01/08115 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
132-64-9
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
%0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
NO ug/L
10,0
1
01/08/15 15-15
01109/15 09:37
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
NO ug/L
%0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09115 09:37
106-46-7
i,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
NO ug/L
20,0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09115 09:37
91-94-1
!,4-Dichlorophenot
NO ug/L
10,0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
120-83-2
)iethylphthalate
NO ug/L
10.0
1
01/08/15 15,15
01/09/15 09:37
84-66-2
!,4-Dimethylphen0l
ND ug/L
100
1
01/08115 15:15
01109115 09:37
105-67-9
)imethylphthatate
NO ug/L
10.0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01109115 09:37
131-11-3
)i-n-butylphthalate
ND ug/L
10.0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
84-74-2
i,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenot
ND ug/L
20.0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
534-52-1
!,4-Dinitrophenol
NO ug/L
%0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
51-28-5
!,4-Dinitrotoluene
NO ug/L
10.0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
121-14-2
!,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND ug/L
10:0
1
01/08115 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
606-20-2
X-n-octylphthalate
ND ug/L
10,0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
117-84-0
)is(2-Ethythexyl)phthalate
ND ug/L
6:0
1
01108/15 15:15
01/09/15 09*37
117-81-7
'luoranthene
ND ug/L
10,0
1
01/08/15 1515
01/09/15 09:37
206-44-0
NO ug/L
%0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
86-73-7
iexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND uq/L
10.0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
87-68-3
iexachlorobenzene
ND ug/L
10,0
1
01108/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
118-74-1
iexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND ug/L
10:0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
77-47-4
iexachloroethane
ND ug/L
%0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09115 09:37
67-72-1
ndeno(1,2,3-od)pyrene
ND ug/L
%0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
193-39-5
sophorone
ND ug/L
10,0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
78-59-1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
,ate: 01/14/2015 01:20 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 4 of 20

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
J
ce Ocal
980O Kincey Ave, Suite 100
Huntersville; PIG 28078
l°
(704)875-90 2
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: BRADSHAW - CIEWATERIN{3
Pace Project No.: 92232130
Sample: INFLUENT
Lab ID: 92232130001 Collected: 01/05/1515:50
Received: 01107/15 12:15 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
OF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
8270 MSSV Semlvolatlle Organic
Analytical Method: EPA 8270 Preparation Method: SPA 3510
1- ethylnaphthalene
NO ug/L
%0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
90-1 -0
-Meth iaphthalene
NO ug/L
10.0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01109/15 09:37
91-5 -
-Methylphenol(o-Cresol)
NU ug/L
10.0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/1 09:37
95- 8-7
3&4-Methylphenol(m&p Cresol)
NO ug/L
10.0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
Naphthalene
NO ug/L
10.0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01109/15 09:37
91-20-3
2-Nitroeniline
NO ug/L
%0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:3
88-74-4
-Nitroaniline
ND ug/L
50.0
1
01/08/15 1515
01/09/15 09:37
99-09-
4-Nitroaniline
NO ug/L
20.0
1 -
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/1509: 7
100-01-6
Nitrobenzene
NO ug/L
10.0
1
01108/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
98-9-3
2-Nitrophenol
NO ug/L
10.0
1'
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
88-7 -5
4-Nitrophenol
NO u /L
50%0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
100-0 -7
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
NO a /L
10.0
1
01/08115 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
62-75-9
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
NO ug/L
10.0
1
01/08/15 1515
01/09/15 09:37
621 -7
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
NO ug/L
10.0
1
01/08/1515-15
01109/15 09:37
86-30-6
Pentachlorophenol
NO u/L
2.0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/0/15 09:37
7.86-5
Phenanthrene
NO ug/L
10.0
1 ,
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
85-01-8
Phenol
NO u/L
1.0
1
01108/15 15:15
01/09115 0:37
108-95-2
Pyrene
NCI ug/L
10.0
1'
01/08/15 1515
01/0 115 09:37
129-00-0
1,2,4- richlorob n ene
ND ug/L
10.0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
1 0-8 -1
,4,5-Trichlorophenot
ND ug/L
10.0
1
01108/15 1515
01/09/15 09:37
95-95-4
,4,6-Trichlorophenoi
NO ug/L
10,0
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
88-06-2
Surrogates
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
35 %
1-110
1
01108/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
4165-60-0
2-Fluorobiphen l ()
44 %
27-110
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/1 09:37
321-60-8
Terphenyl-d14 (S)
48 %
1-107
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09:37
1718- 1-0
Phenol-d6 (S)
17 %
10-110
1
01/08/15 15:1
01/09/15 09:37
13127-88-3
-Fluorophenoi(S)
23 %
12-110
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/0911509:37
367-12-4
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)
53 %
27-110
1
01/08/15 15:15
01/09/15 09`37
118-79-6
$260 MSV Low Level
Analytical Method: EPA82660
Acetone
NO ug/L
25.0
1
01/10/15 0:31
67-64-1
Benzene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
71-43-2
Bromobenzene
NO ug/L
1.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
108-86-1
Bro ochloro ethane
NCI u /L
1.0
1
01/10/1502:31
74-97-5
Bromodichloromethane
NO ug1L
1.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
75-27-4
Bromoform
NO ug/L
1.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
5-25-2
Bromo ethane
NO ug/L
2.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
74-83-9
-Butanone (MEK)
NCI ug/L
5.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
78-93-3
Carbon tetrachloride
NO ug/L
1.0
1
01/10/1 02:31
56- -5
Chlorobenzene
NO ug/L
1.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
108-90-7
Chloroethane
NO ug/L
1.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
75-00-3
Chloroform
2.0 ug/L
1,0
1
01/10/15 02:31
67-66-3
Chloromethane
NCI ug/L
1,0
1
01/10/15 OZ31
74-87-3
2-Chlorotoluene
NCI ug/L
1.0
1
01110115 02:31
95-4-8
4-Chlorotoluene
NO ug/L
1.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
106-4 -4
1,2-Clibromo-3- hloropr pane
ND ug/L
2.0
1
01/10/15 02: 1
96-12-8
Dibromochloromethane
NO ug/L
1.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
1 4- 8-1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALY
This report shall not
be reproduced, except in
full,
Hate: 01 /14/2015 01:20 PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 5 of 20

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
+1 ( e
(V i�
9800 Kincey Ave. suite 100
Huntersville, NC 2807
w pecela6&WM
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: BRADSHAW - DETERIN
Pace Project No.: 92232130
Sample: INFLUENT
Lab ID: 92 2130001 Collected: 01/05/15 15:50 Received:
01/07/15 12:15 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results units
Report Limit
DF" Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No, Qual
8260 MSV Low Level
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
1,2-Dibromoethne (EDB)
ND ug/L
10
1
01/10/15 02:31
106-9-4
Dibromomethane
ND ug/L
1.0
1
01110/15 02:31
74-95-3
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
10
1
01/10/15 02:31
95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
10
1
01/10/15 02:31
541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
1 0
1
01/10/15 02:31
106-46-7
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ND ug/L
10
1
01/10/15 02:31
75-71-8
11-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
10
1
01/10/15 02:31
75-34-3
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
1'0
1
01/10/15 02:31
107-06-2
11-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1<0
1
01/10/15 02:31
75-35-4
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1:0
1
01/10/15 02:31
156-5 -2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
156-60-5
1,2-Dichloroproane
ND ug/L
10
1
01/10/15 02:31
78-87-5
1,3-Dichloropropane
ND ug/L
1:0
1
01/10/15 02:31
142-28-9
2,2-Dichloropropane
ND ug1L
10
1
01/10/15 02:31
594-20-7
1,1-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
563-5 -6
6is-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
10061-01-5
trans-1 3-Dichloropropene
ND ug/L
1 0
1
01/10/15 02:31
10061-02-6
Diisopropyl
ether
ND ug/L
1:0
1
01/10/15 02:31
108-20-3
Ethylbenzene
ND ug/L
10
1
01/10/15 02:31
100-41-4
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
10
1 '
01/10/15 02:31
87-68-3
2-Hexanone
ND ug/L
5,0
1
01/10/15 02:31
591-78-6
p-Isopropyltoluene
ND ug/L
10
1
01/10/15 02:31
99-87-
Methylene Chloride
ND ug/L
2;0
1
01/10/15 02:31
75-09-2
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK)
ND ug/L ,
50
1
01/10/15 02:31
108-1-1
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ND ug/L
1;0
1
01/10/15 02:31
1634-04-4
Naphthalene
ND ug1L
10
1
01/10/15 02:31
91-20-3
Styrene
ND ug/L'
10
1
01/10/15 02:31
100-42-5
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND ug/L
1.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
630-20-6
1,1,2,2-1etrachloroethane
ND u /L
1.0
1
01110/15 02:31
79-34-5
Tetrachloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
127-1-4
Toluene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
108-88-3
1,2,3-Tridhlorobenzene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
01110/15 02:31
87-61-6
1,,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
01110/15 02:31
120-82-1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND ug/L
1.0
1
01110/15 02:31
71-55-6
1,1,-Trichloroethane
ND ug/L
1:0
1
01/10/15 02:31
79-00-5
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
01/10/15 02:1
79-01-6
Trichlorofluoro ethane
ND ug/L
1.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
75-6 .4
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
ND ug/L
1.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
96-18-4
Vinyl acetate
ND u/L
2.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
108-05-4
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
1.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
75-01-4
Xylene (Total)
ND ug/L
2.0
1
01/10/15 02:31
1330-20-7
mp-Xylene
ND ug/L
2.0
1
01/10/15 0:31
179601-23-1
o-Xylene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
01/10/15 02:1
95-47-6
Surrogates
4-BromoBuorobenzene (5)
98 %
70-130
1
01/10/15 02:31
460-00-4
1,2-Didhloroethane-d4 ()
106 %
70-130
1
01/10/15 02:31
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
99 %
70-130
1
01/10/15 02:1
2037-26-5
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 01/14/201 01:20 PM
without the written consent
of Pace Analytical Services, Inc-
Page 6 of 20

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
! y(Q i# yt%cal
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
.pa s.s
(704)875-909
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Projects: BRADSA - DEWATERIN
Pace Project No.: 9222130
QC Batch: MSV/29955
Analysis Method:
EPA 8260
QC Batch Method: EPA 8260
Analysis Description:
8260 MSV Low Level
Associated Lab Samples: 9222130001
METHOD BLANK: 1367527
Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92232130001
Blank Reporting
(Parameter
Units
Result Limit
Analyzed Qualifiers
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
u/L
NO
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ug/L
NO
1.0
01/09/1520:17
1,1,2,2-Tetrachlroethane
u/L
ND
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
1,1,2 Trichloroethane
ug/L
ND
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
1,1-Dichloroethane
u/L
ND
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/L
ND
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
1,1-Dichloropropane
u/L
NO
1.0
01/09/15 0:1
1, , -Trichlorobenzene
u /L
ND
1,0
01/0911 0:17
1,2,-Trichooropropane
u /L
NO
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
1,,4-Trichlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
1,0
01/09/15 20:17
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ug/L
ND
2.0
01109/15 20:17
1,2-Di romoethane (EDB)
ug/L
ND
1,0
01/09/15 20:17
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
1,-Dichloroethane
ug/L
ND
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
1,2-Dichloropropane
ug/L
ND
1.0
01/09/1 20:17
1,3-Dihlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
1,3-Dichloropropane
ug/L
NO
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/G
ND
1.0
01109/15 20:17
2,2-Dichloropropane
ug/L
ND
1.0
01109/15 20:17
2-Butanone (MEK)
u /L
ND
5.0
01/09/15 20:17
2- hlorotoluene
ug/L
NO
1.0
01109/15 20:17
2-Hexanone
ug/L
NO
5.0
01/09/1520:17
4-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
ND
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK)
u /L
NO
5.0
01/09/15 20:17
Acetone
ug/L
ND
25.0
01/09/15 20:17
Benzene
ug/L
ND
1.0
1/09/15 20:17
Bromobenzene
ug/L
NO
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
Bromohloromethane
ug/L
ND
1:0
01/09/15 20:17
Bromodichloromethane
ug/L
ND
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
Bromoform
ug/L
ND
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
Bromo ethane`
ug/L
ND
2:0
01/09/15 20:17
Carbon tetrachloride
ug/L
NO
1:0
01/09/15 20:17
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
Chloroethane
ug/L
NO
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
Chloroform
ug/L
NO
1:0
01/09/15 20:17
Chloromethane
ug/L
ND
1.0
01109/15 20:17
cis-1„2-Dichloroethane
ug/L
ND
1,0
01/09/15 20:17
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
ND
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
Dibromochloromethane
ug/L
ND
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
Dibrornomethane
ug/L
ND
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ug/L
ND
1:0
01109/15 20:1
Results presented on this page are in the,
units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 01/14/2015 01:20 PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical
Services, Inc..
Page 7 of 20

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
�aoekalXicale
98I3i1 i<YrtG"e}% Ave. Suite "I O{} :
Huntersville, NC 2808
wwwoceiac&com(704)875-909
QUALITY CONTROL
DATA
Protect: BR SHAt - DEUWATERINt3
Pace Project No.: 92232130
METHOD BLANK: 1367527
Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92232130001
Blank
Reporting
Parameter
units
Result
Limit
Analyzed
Qualifiers
Dilsopropyl ether
ug/L
ND
1.0
01/09115'20:17
Ethylbenzene
ug/L
NO
' 1.0
01/09/15 20:17
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ug/L
ND
1.0
01109/1520:17
m&p- ylene
ug/L
NO
2.0
01/09/15 20:17
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ug/L
NO
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
Methylene Chloride
ug/L
NO
2.0
01/09/15;20:17
Naphthalene
ug/L
NO
1.0
01/09/1 20:17
o-Xylene
ug/L
ND
1.0
01/09/1520.17
p-tsopropyltoluene
ug/L
ND
1,0
01109/15 20:17
Styrene
ug/L ;
ND
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
Tetrac loroethene
ug/L
ND
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
Toluene
ug/L
ND
1.0
01/09/15 2017
trans-1,2-Dichloroethen
ug/L
NO
1.0
01/09/1 20:17
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
ND
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
Trichlotoethene
ug/L
ND
1.0
01/0911520:17
Trichlorofluoro thane
ug/L
ND
1.0
01/09/15 20:17
Vinyl acetate
ug/L
NO
2.0
01/09/15 20:17
Vinyl chloride '
ug/L
ND
1,0
01/09/1520:17
Xylen (Total)
ug/L
ND
2.0
01/09/15 20:17
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 ()
%
101
0-130
01/09/15 20,17
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
%
96
70-130
01/09/15 20:17
Toluene -till (S)
%
99
70-130
01109115 20:17
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
167528
Spike
LCS
LCS %
Rec
Parameter
Units
Cone.
Result
°lt Rec Limits Qualifiers
1,1,1,-Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
50
57A
114
70-130
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ug/L
50
58,5
117
70-1 0
1,1,2,2'-Tetrachioraethane
ug/L
50
559
112
70-13
1,1, -T tehloroethane '
ug/L
50
56.8
114
70-130
1,1-Di hloroethane
ug/L
50
59.0
118
70-130
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/L
50
63.8
128
70-132
1,1-Dichloropropene
ug/L
50
61:9
124
70-130
1,2,3-'richiorobenzene
ug/L
50
61.8
124
0-135
1,2,3-Trichlororopane ;
ug/L
50
54:5
109
70-130
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ug/L
50
59.8
120
70-134
1,2-Dibromo-3-hloroprdpane
ug/L
50
56.6
114
70-130
1,-Dibromoethane (E S)
ug/L
50
57.7
115
70-130
1,-Dihlorobenzene
ug/L
50
56.2
112
70-10
1,2-Dibhloroethane
ug/L
50
55.2
110
70-130
1,-Dichloropropane
ug/L
50
57A
115
70-130
1,3-Dichlorobenzene -
ug/L
50
55.8
112
70-1 0
1,3-Dichloropropane
ug/L
50
56.7
113
70-130
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
50
56.9
114
70-130
Results presented on this page are In the
units indicated by the "Units"
column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result;
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall
not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 01 /14/2015 01:20 PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc,,
Page 8 of 20

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
I t / e
lytca!
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersvilie, PSG 28078
ww wpau sbs.caorr
(704)87 -9092
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: BRADSHAW - DBWATBRIN
Pace Project No.: 92232130
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
136752
Spike
LCS LS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Cone.
Result % Pec
Limits
Qualifiers
2,2-Dichloropropane
ug/L
50
58.1
116
58-145
2-Butanone (MEK)
ug/L
100
101
101
70-145
2-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
50
56.9
114
70-130
2-Hexanone
u /L
100
105
105
70-144
4-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
50
56.4
113
70-130
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK)
ug/L
10
110
110
70-140
Acetone
ug/L
100
106
106
50-17
Benzene
ug/L
50
60.7
121
70-130
Bromobenzene
ug/L
50
57.1
114
70-130
Bromochloromethane
ug/L
50
%9
120
70-130
Bromodlchloromethane
ug/L
50
53.7
107
70-130
Bromoor
ug/L
50
49.2
98
70-130
Bromomethane
ug/L
50
60.5
12
4-130
Cartoon tetrachloride
ug/L
50
60.2
10
70-12
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
50
56.9
114
70-130
Chloroethane
ug/L
50
54.7
109
64-134
Chloroform
ug/L
50
52.1
104
70-1 0
Chloromethane
ug/L
50
%0
100
64-130
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
50
59,2
118
70-131
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
50
59,5
119
70-130
Dibromochloromethane
ug/L
50
55,0
110
70-130
Dibromomethane
ug/L
50
56Z
113
70-1 1
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ug/L
50
52.8
106
56-130
€ iisopropyl ether
ug/L
50
53,2
106
70-130
Bthylb n ene
ug1L
50
57A
114
70-130
He ac loro-1,3-butadiene
ug/L
50
61,6
123
70-130
&p-Xylene
ug/L
100
115
115
70-130
Methyl;-tert-butyl ether
ug/L
50
51.8
104
70-130
Methylene Chloride
ug/L
50
61,0
122
63-130
Naphthalene
u /L
50
58,9
118
70-138
o- yle e
ug/L
50
561
112
70-130
p-isopropyltoluene
ug/L
50
56,8
114
70-130
Styrene
ug/L
50
59.5
119
70-130
Tetrachloroeth ne
ug/L
50
5&0
110
70-130
Toluene
ug/L
50
58.9
118
70-130
trans-1',2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
50
61 A
123
70-1 0
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
50
59A
119
70-13
Trichloroethene
ug/L
50
%0
112
70-130
Trichlorofluorotmethane '
ug/L
50
53.0
106
62-133
Vinyl acetate
ug/L
100
108
108
66-157
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
50
511
102
50-150
Xylene; (Total)
ug/L
150
171
114
70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
%
96
70-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
%
99
70-130
Toluene-d8 (S)
%
102
70-130
Results presented on this pegs are in the
units indicated by the "Units" column bxcept where an alternate unit is presented to the right or the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Cate: 01/14/2015 01:20 PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 9 of 20

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
il8il0 l�inceyAve. Suite 100
t!
ena���e
Huntersvilie, NC 28078
www.pacWabs.com
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project:; BRADSHAW -
DEWATERIN
Pace Project No.: 92232130
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
1367529
92232516001
Spike MS
MS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result
Conc. Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethan
ug/L
ND
20
21.9
110
70-130
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ug1L:
ND
20
22.9
115
70-130
1,1,2,-Tetrachloroethane
u /L
NO
20
21.5
107
70-130
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/L
ND
20
21,3
107
70-130
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/L
NO
" 20
23.1
116
70-130
11-Dichloroethene
ug/L
NO
20
2:5
128
70-166
1,1-Dichloropropene
ug/L
ND
20
25.3
17
70-130
1,2,3-Trichlorob nzene
a /L
NO
20
25.1
126
70-130
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
ugdL
NO
20
203
103
70-130
1,2,4-"Trichlorobenzene
u /L
NC
20
24A
122
70-130
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloroprbpane
ug/L
NO
20
21.5
107
70-130
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ugfL
NO
20
22.4
11`2
70-130
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
20
21.5
108
70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane
ugdL
NO
20
21.1
105
70-130
1,2-Dichloropropene
u/L
NO
20
21,5
107
70-130
1,3-Dichloroben ene
ug/L
NO
20
21.6
108
70-130
1,3-Dihloropropane
u/L
NO
20
21.9
110
70-130
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
u/L
ND
20
22.3
111
70-130
2,2-Dichloropropene
ug/L
NO
20
23A
115
70-130
2-Butanone (MEK)
u /L
NO
40
39.4
98
70-13
2-Chlorotoluene
u /L
ND
20
22.0
110
70-130
2-Hexanone
ug/L
NO
40
32.8
82
70-130
4-Chlorotoluene
u/L
NO
20
22.1
111
70-130
4-Methyl-2-pentanone {MIRK}
ug/L
NO
40
42.0
105
70µ130
Acetone
u/L
ND
40
39.8
97
70-130
Benzene
u/L
ND
20
2.7
118
70-14
Bromobenzene
u/L
NO
20
21.8
109
70-130
Bromochloromthane
ug/L
NO
20
22.8
114
70-130
Bromodichloromethane
ug/L
ND
20
19.5
98
70-130
Bromoform
ug/L
NO
20
18.9
94
70-130
Bromomethane
ug/L
NO
20
29.2
146
70-130 M0
Carbon tetrachloride
ug/L
NO
20
23,7
119
70-130
Chlorobenzene
ugfL
NO
20
22.6
113
70-146
Chloroethane
ug/L
ND
20
21.6
108
70-130
Chloroform
ug/L
NO
20
20A
100
70-130
Chioromethane
ug/L
NO
20
18:2
91
70-10
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
NO
20
22.6
113
70-130
cis-1,3=Dichloropropene
ug1L
ND
20
21.5
108
70-130
Dibromochloromethane
ug/L
NO
20
19A
97
70-130
Dibromomethane
ug/L
NO
20
21.5
107
70-130
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ugfL
ND
20
17.8
89
70-130
Diisopropyl ether
ug/L
ND
20
20,3
102
70-130
Ethylbenzene
ug/L
NO
20
22.8
114
70-130
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ug/L
NO
20
26 0
130
70-130
m&p- yiene
ug/L
ND
40
44.7
112
70-130
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ug1L
NO
20
19.3
97
70-130
Methylene Chloride
ug/L
NO
20
21.2
106
70-130
Results presented on this page are in the
units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit
is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 01/14/2015 01:20 PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, inc..
Page 10 of 20

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
° t+Gi�
9800 KrnoeyAve. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
wwwpaceldbscom
W
(704)875-909
QUALITY CONTROL
DATA
Project: BRADSHAW - DEWATERINt3
Pace Project No.: 92232130
MATRIX SPIKE: SAMPLE:
1367529
92232516001
Spike MS
MS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result
Conc. Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Naphthalene
ugfL
NO
20 23.3
116
70-130
o-ylere
u1L
NO
20 221
110
70-130
p4soprcpyltoluene
ug/L
ND
20 23.2
116
70-130
Styrene
ug/L
ND
20 22.9
115
70-130
Tetrachloroethene
ug/L
ND
20 22.5
113
70-130
Toluene
ug/L
NO
20 22.4
112
70-15
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
NO
20 24.4
12
70-130
trans- 1, 3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
NO
20 21.8
109
70-130
Trichloroethene
ug/L
NCI
20 22.2
111
69-151
Trichlorofluoromethane
ug/L
NO
20 21.6
108
70-1 0
Vinyl acetate
ugfL
NO
40 39.6
99
70-130
Vinyl chloride
u/L
NO
20 19.5
97
70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
%
97
70-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
%
99
70-130
Toluene-d8 (S)
%
99
70-130
SAMPLE DUPLICATE:1367530-
92232516002
Dup
Parameter
Units
Result
Result RPD
Qualifiers
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/L
NO
NO
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ug/L
NO
NO
1,1,2,-Tetrachloroethane
u /L
NO
NO
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ucg/L
NO
NO
1,1-Dichloroethane
u/L
NO
ND
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/L
NO
NO
1,1-Dichloropropene
ug/L
NO
NO
1,2,3-Trich►orobenzene
ug/L
NO
NO
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
ucg/L
ND
NO
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
NO
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane"
ugfL
NO
NO
1,2-Diromoethane (EDB)
ug/L
ND
ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ugfL
NO
ND
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/L
NO
NO
1,2-Dichloropropane
ug/L
NO
NO
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
ND
1 „3-Dichloropropane
ug/L
NO
NO
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
ND
2,2-Dichloropropane
ug/L
NO
ND
2-Butanone (MEK)
ug/L
ND
NO
2-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
NO
NO
2-Hexanone
ug/L
NO
NO
4-Chlorotoluene
ug/L
ND
NO
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
ug/L
NO
NO
Acetone
ug/L
NO
NO
Benzene
ug/L
NO
NO
Results presented on this page are in the
units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit
is presented to the right of the result
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced„ except in full,
Date: 01 /14/2015 01:20 PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 11 of 20

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
+gyp (e
C wlytio
9800 Kincey Ave, Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
wwwpocalaimtorrit
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project. BRADSHAW - DPWATBRIN(
Pace Project No.: 92232130
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 136753
92232516002 Dup
Parameter
Units
Result Result RPD Qualifiers
Bromobenzene
ug/L
ND NO
Bromochloromethane
ug/L
NO ND
Bromodichloromethane
ug/L
ND ND
Bromoform
ug/L
NO ND
Bromomethane;
ug/L
ND NO
Carbon tetrachloride
ug/L
ND NO
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
NO NO
Chloroethane
ug/L
NO NO
Chloroform
ug/L .
NO ND
Chloromethane
ug/L
NO ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
NO ND
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
NO ND
Dibromochloromethane
ug/L
NO ND
Dibromomethane
ug/L
ND ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ug/L
ND NO
Diisopropyl ether
ug/L
NO NO
Bthylbenzene
ug/L
1.6 1.5 4
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ug/L.
NO NO
mp-ylene
ug/L
NO ND
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
ug/L
NO ND
Methylene Chloride
u /L
NO ND
Naphthalene
a/L.
2.6 2.8 10
o-ylene
ug/L
ND ND "
p-lsopropyltoluene
u/L
ND NO
Styrene
ug/L
ND ND
Tetrachloroeth ne
ug/L
ND NO
Toluene
ug/L
ND NO
transµ1,2•Dichloroethene
u /L
ND ND
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ug/L
ND ND
Trichloroethene
ug/L
ND ND
Trichlorofluoromethane
ug1L
NO NO
Vinyl acetate
ug L
NO ND
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
NO ND
Xylem (Total)
ug/L
NO N
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
%
104 105 1
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
%
95 97
Toluene-d8 (S)'1ff
98 99 1
Results presented on this page are in the
units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result..
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 01 /14/2015 01:20 PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc-
Page 12 of 20

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
pp j e
" Xytiical
9800 Kinsey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
(704)875-909
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: BRADSHAW - DEWATERIN
Pace Project No.: 9232130
QC Bach: O T/ 21 6
Analysis Method:
EPA 8270
QC Batch Method: EPA 3510
Analysis Description:
8270 Water MSSV
Associated Lab Samples: 92232130001
METHOD BLANK 1365700
Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92232130001
Blank Reporting
Parameter
Units
Result Limit
Analyzed
Qualifiers
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
u/L
ND
10.0
01/08/1513:23
1,2-Dihlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
10.0
01/08/1513:2
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
NO ;
10.0
01/08/15 13:23
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
10.0
01108/1513:23
1-Methyinaphthalene
u /L
ND
10.0
01/08/1513:23
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoi
ug/L
ND
%0
01/0811513:23
2,4,6-Trichloro henol
u /L
ND
10.0
01/08/1 13:2
2,4-Dichlorophenol
ug/L
NO
10.0
01/0811513:23
2,4-Dimethylphenol
a /L
ND
%0
01/08/1513:23
2,-Dinitrophenol
ug/L
NO
%0
01108/15 13:2
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
g/L
ND
10.0
01/0811513:2
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
u /L
ND
10.0
01/08/1513:2
2-Chloronaphthaiene
a /L
ND
%0
1/08/1513: 3
2-Chlorophenol
u/L
ND
10.0
01/08/1513:2
2-Methylnaphthalene
u /L
NC}
%0
01/08/1513:23
2-Methylphenol(o-Cresol)
u/L
ND
10.0
01/08/1513:2
2-Nitroaniline
ug/L
ND
%0
01/08/1513:23
2-Nitrophenol
ug/L
ND
%0
01/08/1513:23
34-Methylphenol(m&p Cresol)
ug1L
ND "
10.0
01108/15" 13:23
3,3°-Dichlorobenzidine =
u /L
ND
20.0
01/08/1513:2
3-Nitroaniline
u /L
NO
50.0
01/08/1 13:23
4,6-Diitro-2-methylphenol
ug/L
ND"
20.0
01108/113:2
4-Bromophenylphenyl ether
ug/L
NO
10.0
01108/15 13,23
4-Chloro-3-rnethylphenol
u/L
NO
20.0
:01/08/1513:23
4-Chloroaniline
u/L
ND
20.0
01108/1513:23
4-Chlorophenylphenyl ether
u/L
NO
10.0
01/0/15 13:23
4-Nitroeniline
u/L
NO
20.0
01108/1513:23
4-Nitrophenol
u/L
ND
50.0:01/08/1513:2
Acenaphthene
u/L
ND
10.0
01/08/1513:23
Acenahthylen
ug/L
ND
10.0
01/08/1513:23
Aniline
a /L
NO
10.0
01/08/1513:23
Anthra' ne
u/L
ND
10.0
01/0811513:23
Benzo(a)anthracene
u/L
ND
10.0
01108/1513:23
Benzo(a)pyrene
ug/L
NO
10.0
01/08/1513:23
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
ug/L
ND
%0
'01/08/1513:23
enzo(g,h,i)perylene
u/L
ND
10.0
01/0811513:23
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
u/L
ND
10.0
01/08/1513:23
Benzoic Acid
ug/L
ND
%0
-01/08/1513:23
Benzyl alcohol
/L
ND
20.0
01/08/1513:2
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)ethane
ug/L
ND
10.0
01/08/1513:2
bis(-lhloroethyl) ether
ug/L
NO
10.0
01/08/1513:23
Results presented on this page are in the
units indicated by the "Units"* column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 01/14/2015 01:20 PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical
Services, Inc...
Page 13 of 20

Face Analytical Services, Inc.
r }* j9800
I,Ci A alyt cat
Kincey Ave, Suite 100
Huntersviile, NC 8078
ww p aw cviri
(704)875-909
QUALITY CONTROL
DATA
Project: BRADSHAW -
DEWATERIN
Pace Project No.: 92232130
METHOD BLANK: 1365700
Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92232130001
Blank
Reporting
Parameter
Units Result
Limit
Analyzed
Qualifiers
bi(2-hloroisopropyl) ether
u/L
ND
10.0
01/08/15 13:23
bis(2- thylhexyl)phthalate
ug/L
ND
" 6.0
01108/1513:23
Butylb nzylpht slate
ug/L
ND
10.0
01/08/15 13:23
Chrysene
a /L
ND
10.0
01/08/15 13:23
Di-nµbutylphthalate
ugIL
ND
10.0
01/08/15 13:23
Di-n-o tylphthalate
ug/L:
NO
10.0
01/08/15 13:2
Diben (a,h)anthra ne
ug/L
ND
10,0
01/08/1513:2
Diben ofuran
ug/L
ND
10.0
01/08/15 13:23
Diethylphtha late
ug/L.
NO
10.0
01/08/15 13:23
Dimethylphthalate
ug/L
ND
10.0
01/08/15 13:23
luoranthene
ug/L
ND
10.0
01/08/15 13:23
Fluorene
ug/L
ND
10.0
01108/1513:23
Hexahloro-1,-butadiene
ug/L
NO
10.0
01/08/15 13:23
Hexachlorobenzene
ug/L
NO
10.0
01/08/15 13:23
Hexachlorocycopentadiene
ug/L
NO
10.0
01/08/15 13:23
Hexachioroethane
ug/L
ND
10.0
01/08/15 13:23
lndeno(1,2,-cd)pyrene
ug/L
ND
10.0
01/08/15 13:23
Isophorone
ug/L
ND
10.0
01/08/15 13:23
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
ug/L
NO
10.0
01/08/15 13:23
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
ug/L
ND
10.0
01/08/15 13:23
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ug/L
ND
10,0
01/08/15 13:23
Naphthalene
ug/L
ND
" %0
01/0811513:23
Nitrobenzene
ug/L
ND
10,0
01/08/15 13:23
Pentachlorophenol
ug/L
ND
25.0
01/08/15 13:23
Phennthrene
u/L
ND
10.0
01/08/15 13:23
Phenol
ug/L
NO
%0
01/08/15 13:23
Pyrene
ug/L
ND
10.0
01/08/15 13:23
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)f
75
27-110
01/08/15 13:23
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
%
83
27-110
01/08/15 13:23
2-Fluorophenol (S)
°la
44
12-110
01/08/1 13:23
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
%
86
1-110 "
01/08/15 13:23
Phenol-d6 (S)
°t
29
10-110
01/08/15 13:23
Terphenyl-04 (S)
°le
93
31-107
01108/15 13:2
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE LCSD
1365701
1365702
Spike LCS LCSD
LCS LCSD
% Rao Max
Parameter
Units Conc. Result Result
% Reo % Rec
Limits RPD RPD Qualifiers
1,2,4-Tdchlorobenzene
ug/L
50
31A 30,2
62 60
31-120 3 30
1,2-Di hlorobenzene
ug/L
50
40.2 36.9
80 74
38-120 8 30
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
50
36.7 34.0
73 68
30-122 8 30
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
50
38.3 35.9
77 72
37-120 7 30
1-Methyinaphthalen
ug/L
50
35.7 34A
71 68
4-113 5 30
,4,5-'richlorophenol
ug/L
50
47.6 46.1
95 92
3-113 3 30
2,4,6-"richlorophenol
ug/L
50
41.8 41.9
84 84
42-120 0 30
Results presented on
this page are
in the units indicated by the "Units"
column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 01 /14/2015 01:20 PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Pane 14 of 20

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
e
ac"A iytica
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersviile, NC 28078
xp aiabsWrn
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: BRADSHAW -
DEWATERINC3
Pace Project No.: 92232130
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE & LCSD:
1365701
1365702
Spike
LCS
LSD
LCS
LCCSD
% Rec,
Max
Parameter
Units Conc,
Result
Result
% Ree
% Rec
-Limits
RPD
RPD Qualifiers
,4-Dichlorophenol
ug/L
50
35.6
33,8
71
68
30-120
5
30
2,4-Dimethylphenol
ug/L
50
35,8
34.3
72
69
29-111
4
30
2,4-Dinitrophenol
ug/L
250
240
228
96
91
19-132
5
30
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ug/L
50
51 A
49,8
103
100
58-128
3
30
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
uq/L
so
53.6
52.9
107
106
54-129
1
30
2-Chloronaphthalene
ug/L
50
48.4
4T8
97
96
43-117
1
30
2-hlorophenol
ug/L
50
4.3
8.8
85
78
37-10
9
30
2-Methylnaphthalene
ug/L
6o
34.9
315
70
67
3-120"
4
30
2-Methylphenol(o-Cresol)
ug/L
50
3T5
333
75
67
31-120
11
30
2-Nitroaniline
ug/L
100
96.8
95.5
97
95
48-121
1
30
2-Nitrophenol
ug/L
50
37A
36.1
75
72
25-116
4
30
3&4-Methylphenol(m&p Cresol)
ugtL
50
34.1
30.2
68
60
2-120
12
30
,'-Dichlorobenzidine
ug/L
100
973
100
98
100
10-154
2
30
3-Nitroaniline
ug/L
100
98.6
96:6
99
97
43-115
2
30
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ug/L
10
103
100
103
100
44-124"
3
30
4-Bromophenylphenyl ether
ug/L
50
47.9
48.9
96
98
34-113
2
30
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
ug/L
100
72.5
66.6
73
67
31-110
9
30
4-Chloroaniline
ug/L
100
67A
65.5
67
66
20-120
2
30
4-Chlorophenylphenyl ether
ug/L
50
47.5
47.2
95
94
34-116
1
30
4-Nitroaniline
ug/L
100
105
100
105
100
46-128
4
30
4-Nitrophenol
ug/L
250
104
94.9
42
38
11-120
9
30
Acenaphthene
ug/L
50
47.5
47.0'
95
94
48-114
1
30
Acenaphthylene
ug/L-
50
48A
4T3
97
95
48-112
2
30
Aniline
ug/L
50
36.9
34.7
74
69
6-120'
6
30
Anthracene
ug/L
50
50.4
50.8
101
102
57-118-
1
30
Benzo(a)anthracene
ug/L
50
51.0
52.9
102
106
56-121'
4
30
Benzo(a)pyrene
ug/L
50
54A
56.3
109
113
55-127
3
30
Senzo(b)fluorarnhene
ug/L
50
64.8
54:6
110
109
53-128
0
30
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
ug/L
50
51.3
52.7
103
105
4-125
3
30
Senzo(k)fluoranthene
ug/L
50
47.7
%9
95
102
51-123
6
30
Benzoic Acid
ug/L
250
661
%1
26
24'
10-120
11
30
Benzyl;alcohol
ug/L
100
78.9
M9
79
71
27-120
11
30
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
ug/L
50
44,7
43.7
89
87
32-120
2
30
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether
ug/L
50
47A
43.8
95
88
33-111
8
30
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether
ug/L
50
44.9
41,3
90
83
15-120
8
30
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthaiate
ug/L
50
59A
58A
118
117
0-145
1
30
Butylbenzylphthalate
ug/L
50
60.3
60.1
11
120
54-138
0
30
Chrysene
ug/L
50
51.8
519
104
108
58-127
4
30
Di-n-butylphthalate
ug1L
50
55.2
544
110
109
56-125
1
30
Di-n-otylphthatate
ug/L
50
53.5
50.9
107
102
50-134
5
30
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ug/L
50
521
54:0
104
108
53-1 9
3
30 ;
Dibenzofuran
ug/L
50
47,7
471
95
94
45-10
1
30
Diethylphthalat
ug/L
50
51.9
50A
104
101
3-1 0
3
30
Dimethylphthalete
ug/L
50
49.5
48Y
99
97
55-116
2
30
Fluoranthene
ug/L
50
54A
53.5
108
107
7-125 -
1
30
Fluorene
ug/L
50
0.9
%5
102
101
53-118
1
30
Hexachloro-1,-butadiene
ug/L
50
29.7
28,9
59
58
23-120
3
30
Results presented on
this page are In the units Indicated by the "Units"
column except where an alternate unit is
presented to the right of the result,
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall
not be reproduced, except in foil,
Date: 01/14/201 01:0 PM
without the written consent
of Pace Analytical
Services,
Inc.,
Page 15 of 20

Face Analytical services, Inc.
/*� �} /a
C lytif ca/
9800 nceyAve. Suite to
Huntersville, NC 28078
www.pacehos.com(704)875-9092
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project. BRADSHAW -
DEWAT RING
Pace Project No.: 92232130
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE & LCSD: 1365701
1365702
Spike
LCS
LCSD
LCS LCSD
% Rao .
Max
Parameter
Units
Conc.
Result
Result
% Rec %i Rec
Limits
RPD
RPD Qualifiers
Hexachiorobenene
ug/L
50
46.0
47.5
92
95
9-116
3
30
Hexachiorocyclopentadiene
ug/L
50
41.8
42.1
84
84
26-158
1
30
Hexachloroethane
ug/L
50
41.7
38,9
83
78
30-114
7
30
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
ug/L
50
55.9
58.0
112
116
55-18
4
30
Isophorone
ug/L
50
37.5
35.4
75
71
31-118
6
30
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylam ne
ug/L
50
48.2
42.6
96
85
32-119
12
30
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
ugJL
50
28.7
26.8
57
54
13-120
7
30
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ug/L
50
49.2
50.6
98
101
4-120
3
30
Naphthalene
ug/L -
50
33.9
32.8
68
66
32-120
3
ail
Nitrobenzene
ug/L
50
37.0
35.6
74
71
3-110
4
30
Pentahlorophenol
ug/L
100
99.0
97.0
99
97
10-137
2
30
Phenanthrene
ug/L
50
48A
48.8
96
98
'; 57-117;
2
30
Phenol
u/L
50
17.7
16.3
35
33
10-120
8
30
Pyrene
ug/L
50
49.7
50.7
99
101
- 5-122
2
30
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)
°la
94
94
;_ 27-110
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
%
85
86
27-110
2-Fluctophenol (S)
%
49
46
12-110
Nitrobenzene-d5 ()
%
71
67
21-110
Phenol-d6 ()l0
35
30
= 10-110
Terphenyl-d14 (S)
%
94
95
1-107
Results presented on
this page are in the
units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate
unit Is
presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in Full,
Date: 01 /14/2015 01:20 PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical
Services, Inc.,
Page 16 of 20

j} Pace Analytical Services„ Inc;
. +�#✓ t"//�� #w„,'J}i+� � a 9800 Kinsey Ave, " Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
wwwpaoew&com(704)875-9092
QUALIFIERS
Project: BRADSHAW - DEWATERIN
Pace Project No.: 92232130
DEFINITIONS
CIF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation, dilution of
the sample aliquot, or moisture content,
NO - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL - Adjusted Method Detection Limit:
POL - Practical Quantitation Limit.
RL - Reporting Limit.
- Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (8270 listed analyte) decomposes to Azobenzene.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and`RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable:
SG - Silica Gel - Clean -Up
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each anlyte is a combined concentration.
Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether, Styrene, and Vinyl chloride.
Pace Analytical is TNI accredited, Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes,
TNI - The NELAC Institute.
LABORATORIES
PASI-C Pace Analytical Services - Charlotte
ANAL"YTE QUALIFIERS
Mo Matrix spike recovery and/or matrix spike duplicate recovery was outside laboratory control limits
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 01 /14/2015 01:20 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 17 of 20

Pace Analytical Services„ Inc.
''` tlCai � 98{?Q Ki�,y Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
s [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Project: BRADSHAW - DEWATERIN
Pace Project No.; 92232130
Analytical
Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method QC Batch Analytical Method Batch
92232130001
INFLUENT
EPA 3510
OEXT132126 EPA 8270 MSSV110167
92232130001
INFLUENT
EPA 8260
MSVt29955
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace analytical Services„ Inc.. Page 18 of 20

4
kMPLER NAME AND SIG-"IATJRE
S7E
REGULATORY AGENCY

n y
Allocco. Marcia
From: Parlor, Michael
Seat: ` Friday, January 02, 2015 1 .14 A
To: Allocco, Marcia
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject; FW: Report of Unanticipated -Pass - Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage Improvement
Project - NPDEDS Permit NC 0089443
Attachments: 2014-11-26 Results for Pit Sample.pdf
FYI
g nOf VAWW rc
Michael Parker — Regional Supervisor
Michael -Parker ncdenrr ov
North Carolina Dept. of Environment & Natural Resource
Division of dater Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
610 East Cuter Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Direct Line: 7 94j 235- 194 Fax: (704) 63µ6040
-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to `third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.
From: Joseph P. Nestor [Ma
ffitea s scoenv& a calina.rr&orn
Seat: Thursday, December 25, 2014 12« 3 PM
To: Parker, Michael
Cc: `Eric Donnelly", 'RickHarmon'
Subject: Report of Unanticipated By -Pass - Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage Improvement Project - NPDEDS Permit NC
0089443
r. Parker:
I am the operator of responsible charge for the two treatment systems for the referenced project. I recently became
aware of unanticipated by-pass which occurred during the evening of Monday, December 22, 2014 and/or the morning
of Tuesday, December 23, 2014. 1 am submitting this email to make NCDENR aware of this Unanticipated By -Pass as is
required by the referenced permit.
I understand that during the evening of Monday, December 22, 2014 and/or the morning of Tuesday, December 23,
2014 an overflow was noted at an equalization tank located on Morehead Street. The treatment system at this location
is utilized to treat water which is being extracted by the Bradshaw Construction Company. I understand that an
employee of Sanders Construction Company (the primary contractor who hired Bradshaw Construction Company)
subsequently deactivated an electric generator that powered sump pumps and the overflow was stopped. I understand
that it is not known why automated controls did not actuate to pump dawn equalization tank before overflow
1

occurred. I understand that during the morning of Tuesday, December 23, 2
down.
I am attempting to obtain more detailed information regarding this incident
obtained. The Christmas holii
Joseph P. Nestor, P.G. P.E.
Nes o Environmental, P.L.L.C,
PCB Box 78222
Charlotte, North Carolina 2821
704 442 1365 (Office)
744 737 4046 (Mobile)
nest V15carolina.mcom
2
014, that equalization tank was pumped

PINAA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory John E. Skvarla Ili
Governor Secretary
September 12, 2014
David E. Wolfe, P.E.
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage
600 East Fourth St., 12 pl
Charlotte, NC 28202
Subject: Acknowledgement of Permit Renewal
Permit NCO0 9443
Mecklenburg; County
Dear Mr. Wolfe:
The NPDES Unit received your permit renewal application on September 11, 2014. A member of the
NPDES Emit will review your application. They will contact you if additional information is required to
complete your permit renewal. You should expect to receive a draft permit approximately 30-45 days
before your+ existing permit expires.
If you have any additional questions concerning renewal of the subject permit, please contact Joe
Corporon (1) 807-6394.
Sincerely,
Wren. Thedford
Wastewater Branch
cc. Central Files
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 7699-1617
Location: 512 R Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27664
Phone:[phone]\ Fax: [phone]ICustorner Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet:: www.rxcater.arg
An Equal OpportunityiAffirmative Action Employer

7606 Whitehall Executive Center [fir.
Suite 80
Charlotte, NC 23273
Shaping the Future Tel: 704- 00
Fax. [phone]
www.cardno.com
E2014
September 10, 201
North Carolina Department of Enviromnent and Natural resources
Division of Water Quality
NPDES Permit Unit
1617 Mail Service CenterRECEIVED/DENROWR
Raleigh, North Carolina 27 99-1 1
SEP 11. 2014
NPDES Permit Modification Application
E Permit l' o. NCO00 9443 t Quality
1
Permitting ecrin
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage e In provearnent
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
A'TCProject :No. 89.20207.1936
Dear NPDES Permit Unit:
On behalf of the City of Charlotte, Cardno, Inc. (Cardno) is submitting copies of the
'.T—!__'._1 d.. Ill- _t i' b n .— x.v` 1+- a
Y (I
e ", fitted flow, and additional potential discharge
x,cted stonnwater construction project schedule,
iernrit operating period until June 30, 2016.
;es that have occurred on the Storm Drainage
>tions or co rents, please contact' our office a
704) 29-3200.
Sincerely,
Cardno, Inc.
Brandon Culberson, E.I.T.
Project Engineer
cc: David E. Wolfe, PE Environmental Services, City of Charlotte
11

4
t
RECEIVED/DENR
l
SP 11 2014
Water ` allty
ng ec ion
NPDES Permit Modification Application
ICES Pennit No. NCO008 443
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage Improvement
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ATC Project Number 89.2020 7.1936
September 10, 2014

F I
NPIES Permit Modification Application
NPDES Permit No. NCO00 9443
Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage Improvement
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ATC Project No 9.20207.1936
t I l
EP 11 2014
water ouality
permitting ect`io
Prepared by-
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
avid A. Hunter
NPDES Permit Unit
Principal Scientist
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
On Behalf of:
The City of Charlotte
600 Last Fourth Street
Brandon Culberson, E.I.T.
Charlotte, North Carolina 25202
Project Engineer
Phone: [phone]C12
Fax: [phone]
Submitted by:
Cardno, Inc.
7606 %itehall Executive Center Dr.
os ph G. Schol , P.E.Suite
00
NC Licensed Engineer
Charlotte, North Carolina 2 273
Phone. [phone]
a .
�
`. (7114) 529-3272
4 f¢¢
Ica d.7
11 « '.�
rg'.°
. (
�
September 10, 2014
+fir
xppVAA
kk�

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 SITE INFORMATION ..I
1.1 Site Background.. ............ ....................................................... ...... ............................. 1
1.2 Dewatering Conditions and Flow projections...... ..................................... ....... 1
2.0 PROPOSED GROUNDWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM ............................................... 2
3.0 DISCUSSION .......................................................................................................................... 3
APPENDICES
Appendix A NPDES Permit Application — Short Form C - GW

NPD S Permit Modification Application Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage Improvement
Cardno Pro ectNo. 89.20207.1936 _ — Setemher 10 2014
1.0 SITE INFORMATION
1.1 Site Background
An approved National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (N:PDES) permit number
NCO0089443 was received from North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural'
Resources NCI ENR) on October 4, 2013. The permit approved the groundwater treatment
system, the three outfall locations, and set the effluent limitations and monitoring requirements.
Figure l in Appendix A indicates the project location on part of a [United States Geological
Survey, topographic quadrangle map.
Due to site constraints additional outfall locations will be needed, and two systems will operate
simultaneously.
1.2 Dewatering Conditions and Flow Projections
The source of groundwater from dewatering in the rock tunneling part of the project near the
Oriole/Morehead/McDowell intersections will be Bedrock fractures. The volume of flow
associated with the bedrock fractures will likely be variable and will be based on fracture spacing
v'y ...wv.�aav v�..wsw.vsx..c�, vat a�.�✓xrs vs>ar.czw,a,.cv aa.a �cyv:. aaxFw v.c .�v
expected.
Cardno, Inc.

NPDES Permit Modification Application Myrtle/Morehead Stornn Drainage Improvement
Cardno Proiect No, 8920207.1936 Se t mber 10 2014
.Q PROPOSED GROUNDWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
The system will have the same design as the system previously approved; however two systems
will likely operate simultaneously instead of one. Figure 3 in Appendix A is a proposed remedial
system schematic.
Three stormwater drains have been approved as outfalllocations. Two additional outfall
locations are proposed and may he used depending the final location of the systems. The final
discharge point of all outfall locations is Little Sugar Creek and its tributaries. Figure :2 in
Appendix'A shows the approved and proposed outfall locations on a site plan.
2 Cardno, Inc.

NPDES Permit Modification Application Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage Improvement
Cardno Project No, 89.20207.193 Se xember 10, 2014
.0 DISCUSSION
Consideration should be given to the overall ; storm drainage improvement as a rationale for
requesting NPDES permitting as part of the project construction. That is, the goal of the project
is limit flooding during major storm events, which, especially in urban settings, present
significant contributions to adverse surface water quality conditions. The routing of the drain in
its large diameter, downstream segment as proposed will aid the project schedule and limit the
number of flood events affecting headwaters of the drainage during the planning and
construction phases. Please note that the project design includes methods to seal the drain against
impacted groundwater; incursion across intervals affected by groundwater impact. Other possible
project routes would also be affected by subsurface environmental impact and would also require
some degree of dewatering fluid treatment by NPDES permitting, given the urban setting of the
project. In conclusion, the proposed NPDES permit will allow construction of a drainage
improvement that will ultimately serve to increase water quality.
Because of the extensive :nature of the construction, the project schedule is anticipated to extend
beyond the current permit termination date of June 30, 2015. On behalf of the City of Charlotte,
we respectfully request that the permit period extend until June 30, 2015.
3 Cardnc, Inc.

APPENDIX A

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - GW
For discharges associated with groundwater treatment facilities.
Mail the complete application to:
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NPDES Permit Number
If you are completing this form in computer use the TAB key or the up - down arrows to move from one
field to the next. To check the boxes, click your mouse on top of the box. Otherwise, please print or type.
1. Contact Information:
Owner Name City of Charlotte, Attn. David E. Wolfe, P.E.
Facility Name Myrtle/Morehead Storm Drainage Improvement
Mailing Address 600 East Fourth St., 12t" Floor
City Charlotte
State / Zip Code North Carolina / 28202
Telephone Number [phone]
Fax Number [phone]
e-mail Address dwolfep .,charlottenc.gov
2. Location of facility producing discharge:
Check here if same as above F1
Street Address or State Road 900's South McDowell St. /Baxter St.
City Charlotte rRX1Ek^* EHVE E)@E N R4)WR-
State / Zip Code North Carolina / 28202
County Mecklenburg ')t� t i 2014
water ouality
3. Operator Information: PermitV109 SOctlOn
Name of the firm, consultant or other entity that operates the fdcility. (Note that this is not referring to the
Operator in Responsible Charge or ORC)
Name City of Charlotte, Attn.: David E. Wolfe, P.E.
Mailing Address 600 East Fourth St.. 1201 Floor
City Charlotte
State / Zip Code North Carolina / 28202
Telephone Number [phone]
Fax Number [phone]
4. Ownership Status:
Federal Q State Private El Public 2
Page I of 3 C-GW 03/05

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - GW
For discharges associated with groundwater treatment facilities.
5. Products recovered:
Gasoline D Diesel fuel E] Solvents E Other
6. Number of separate discharge points: 3
Outfall Identification number(s) # 1. #2. #3 a' roved #4. and #5 foroposed)
7. Frequency of discharge: Continuous Intermittent El
If intermittent:
Days per week discharge occurs: Duration:
S. Treatment System Design flow 0.090 MGD
9. Name of receiving stream(s) (Protfide a map shoufing the exact location of each out, all, including
latitude and longitude):
Little Sugar Creek "Class C"
10. Please list all additives to the treatment system, including chemicals or nutrients, that have
the potential to be discharged.
No Additives
11. Is this facility located on Indian country? (check one)
Yes [I No E
12. Additional Information
Ali applicants (including renewals):
A USG S topographical map (or copy of the relevant portion) which shows all outfalls
A summary of the most recent analytical results (effluent data, if available) containing the
maximum values for each chemical detected
NEW Applicants only:
Engineering Alternative Analysis
Description of remediation treatment system components, capacities, and removal efficiency
for detected compounds.
)OIf the treatment system will discharge to a storm sewer, written approval from the
municipality responsible for the sewer.
A list of any chemicals found in detectable amounts at the site, with the maximum observed,
concentration reported for each chemical (the most recent sample must be collected less
than one year prior to the date of this application)
For petroleum -contaminated sites - Analyses for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) should
be performed. Analyses for any fuel additives likely to be present at the site and for phenol
and lead should also be performed.
For sites contaminated with solvents or other contaminants - EPA Method 624/625
analysis should be performed.
Page 2 of 3 C-GW 03/05

DRT FORM C - GW
,r treatment facilities.
Lion
st of may xxiowieuge anu ouixei 5uun xxxxormaLion its LrU%:, UVILIPACW, &LUU tL%;%;UZML%;,
Lvid E. Wolfe, P.E. Program Manager
[nted name of Person Signing Title
mature of Applicant Date
rflh C.nmlinn Cw-nt-rnl qtqtotf-, 14.R-9,1.1; 6 (h)(91 nrnviri(-..q thnt- Anv nerson who knowinalv makes anv false
100 1 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $2 5, 000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both,
for a similar offense.)
Page 3 of 3 C-GW 03/05

01
tW
NOTE& 'HILE FIGURE 3
REMEDIAL SYSTEM SCHEMATIC
MYRTLE/MOREHEAD STORM DRAINGE IMPROVEMENTS (MkTc
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES -CITY OF CHARLOTTE ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte, North Carolina 28217 [phone] FAX [phone]
REV, BY SCW F DATE PROJECT NO,
CADFILE NCDENR INCIDE:
CE-MM--5-3-13 6:c CD NONE 5/3/13 059A9774A3,93

I
r a . ;
Maximum Const
Myrtle/MoreheadStogy~
Environmental Sere
Charlotte,
{
t Concentration
ui a e Improvement
City of Charlotte
Carolina

NCDENR
North Carolina Depar�ment of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory John E. Skvarla, III
Governor secretary -
May 23, 2014
CERTIFIED MAIL 7013-2630-0001-8998-0737
RETURN RECEIPT REQUE &STED
Mr. David Wolfe
City of Charlotte
600 East 4th St
Charlotte, NC 28202
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Myrtle / Morehead Stomi Drain project
NPDES Permit NCO089443
Mecklenburg County
NOD-2014-LR-003
Dear Mr. Wolfe:
This is to inform, you that the Division of Water Resources did not receive your monthly monitoring report
,(2) of the NPDES permit, as well as 15. NCAC 2B .506(a), which requires t
Monitoring Reports no later than the last calendar dew followi �a � following �reortij
rts as required will subject the violator to the assessment of a ci.vil penalty of
You will be considered noncornpliant with the self -monitoring requirement,
he reports have been submitted,
period of monitoring.
have any questions about this letter or discharge monitoring reports, please contact me at 919-807-6307 or
via e-niait at derek,[e-mail].
Sincerely,
Derek Denard
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
cc: Derek Renard; Compliance & Expedited Permitting Unit
V IMF Wes
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Phone: [phone] \ Internet: http://www.newaterquality,org/
An Equal Opportun4 l Affirmative Action Employer - Made in part by recycled paper

1-
x
HCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
Januai y 9, 2014
CERTIFIED MAIL 7002-1000-0005-2387-2621
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Kathleen S. Drake, Project Manager
City of Charlotte
600 East 4 1h St
Charlotte, NC 28202
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Late/Missing DNM
Myrtle / Morehead Storm Drain project
NPDES Permit NCO089443
Mecklenburg County
NOV-2015-LR-0002
Dear Ms. Drake:
The request should include a begin date and end date for the period of monitoring,
Additionally, this letter provides notice that this office will recommend the assessment of civil penalties if
furore reports are not received within the r reqyirqd!ime frameeluting the newt twelve { 12cxrtin rtic�nts,
The Division must take these steps because timely submittal of discharge monitoring reports is essential to
the efficient operation of our water quality progrants. We appreciate your assistance in this matter. If you
have any questions about this letter or discharge monitoring reports, please contact me at 919-807-6307 or
via e-mail at [e-mail].
ince ely,
Derek Den �arx "
Division of Water Resources, NCDE.NR
cc: Derek- Renard, Compliance & Lxpedited permitting Unit
Central Files 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, Noah Carolina 27699-1617
Phone: [phone] � Internet: hftp://Www,ncwaterquality.org/
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer- Made in part by recycled paper

x Marcia
,n:
t
ject:
lrcia-
-cia
,,he email you sent requesth
Rroject. Specifically, when we plan to start.
)ur goal is to be in bid in January and to start construction by September 2014.
"lease don't hesitate to contact me if you have any either questions related to this project.
Ite.nc.us>
arm'Drainae Project
'hank you,
'ate Labadorf
=r. Project Manager
".harlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
'04-336-3653
1