20061341 Ver 6_Email_20200108 Damaged Images

�Y will,
• .r;- .t
j
rf yy I
r, li !� ,,.,,-tat ��l-�j, ✓ t q-'�/ i .�. �, �� IJ �� ` Lf
i E1
I i
S FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ®B 'I ✓a 4(o pj
PROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED O �f ible to (ffbi�water < 3 �reater
'is W-1
Hardwick=Rd— _
Colwick Rd A Evidence that m mum depth of inundatio feet

6. Streamside Areaffnil' &#xelaumsi t�e�impetladon is less than 1 foot
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
VEUTATI(.(Four-Strata) -Use scientific, -names of, plants.
®B ®B
Tree (Pe
1. Ulmus ru ra
2. t8 Fj
3.
4. rhai
5
Moderate evidence of
Wi fns,
tion Sampling Point: UM
ng, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affec
_b@r1§kthrough streamside area
1NM64&Qito ditching])
I� . jAWrtidal zone access
zone access [example
or assessrrlent rear) is
7 Water Q&iik9 @ftfNdM@4�tccitls-a If�R(�I'i)fiyR�
6.Gheek all thbio",. id r_'r Y,r a P-e ffn ID ��r F :<< 9a.3% (A/B)
7. F-A Dise {d=et�"WWWOMggi foam)
®B Exc %ryi HE
r I I° C v Multiply by:
❑C Not--�ePrftn 9 spI jg&�&IaVI
t I# a �i i {r 5
❑D Od{(dfll Yc
SapO�ShrubC rtre ►bdi� � tjg�{��a ��jt�rgl�l[€jfJjr� ig c i��q�l�e in "N6Rs/Sketch
1. LrLu g is leterminat•on Of •Urjsd Tonal a 19atic re�Mes; (2/ (tlw8]ppIjcantVas the(3 = 90
2 gr F,,, dance tp ing the terms an �1ds�� of the perm
4 = ®o
3. ❑H Degtl i 11iOafi0v19gea8k(fbrtilTalhdD Sd aSz Wdtnavct#hWiwbmgw mMeQdwWidtipama�Iy refit 658
4. :l i4 Mdffi r�iffer rdo cgiakgondhws; (A) the 308 (B)
5. PA p I the right to request an individual permit ra her tharpj@g&&p�WethedgrrnS 2.62
86. Recent berm i��h
ig e3ri is considered <
7. drou ht. ac
rll d }�tt is Vegetation
8. ❑A Drava MI i%r{a _ cPa rf�l ONO t� � R 9ATA 4 I F §nre t4 � a s
9 r witli lP3ll9reva UMPEeKeze �Iblject
t �JDzl3rlslitu es-t a li ant' c tan e
5-- oT'Pal�ove 4 - N`D1c�r o�ogicalSARapCP#pns (Provide supporting
9. Large or Da dkWS SMelf(hthes a erml{ authorizati I C r
g ° ,�g� °° c %at� r� ar`�s r a2 arate sheet). .
❑Yes ®f Igdi ilk ° �Q � l( tf�I l�f ftrSsr j rfaceCondition).
Herb Stratum P P ti ro i tion� (Explain)
11n--�rtn-t>�ir�se�so&dDdan tttes agreement th t-al+ ar��i �u� s� ir�t �
thaWbfi,Ht�hk4W6t*t;sj i7 fi*IV fW&"$* iho dleggwa ils
2. Carex lurida L IggrteSelliftW4cand snagging
3. Ohiopogonsp,r anfnrr..m-n ar IonW -51Znr in°a ar�ln•s �P ealsk � r
4. 10b. Check ( 3 i�6 cm) or
LJA u i e a ua i acr a n a ua is mp$ s
5. aS m I r HJ a dless of
�J � � e IC)'I t e i
6. ®B arraiva�pr #imlc;it��I�ct�®rrmi�a __Diet 'ttid w r i A' r natively
7. aoWidnpursuantto 33 C.F.R. Part 331. Ill = I h7P-4
0Hits exclhudingvines, less
o�"'emars$. n b �� a �� dei at an or equal to 3.28 ft
9. jurl fikEp )rt@KAt(r�tavpsrmQ4A6cr tops In the review ro provide an official
10.NE I @tRtIOWI @11S ICtlOna aq Ic resources jn t vj 11 I �cPsw(rWLoody) plants, regardless
� 140!tF(.51 PORS
here ma e wa ac O e II t a ��� �#61ai'O
rSF-f� han 3.28 ft in
11. Bedform an Al to - sss ent r ari .mec sF`cl"'C 4 oas a a n
he n su ecter �{ I entl Ies� I a �yres In AE review
11 a. ❑Yes D�° otdal_ cov °_df tp 1 ov rr.
Wood Vine Stratar o atZi f31CS}7
1. st . Bed . or �2nClrr k-thr''a�s�sro�pox(es). Yes I lhial I
iffe-nin Qectinn 10 al"ate 110
2. WisteQl3inensiRool-glide section (evaluate 11d) 15 Yes UPL
3. Vitis difoliaNatural bedform absent (skip to MeltFic 12, Aq"Vc Life) FAC
4. IAmpelta/Af$etfW0j§WcgWgk all that occur below$he normal tatted periUWer of the assessment reach - whether or not submerged
5 UneCK at leastone l3ox In each row s Ip Tor iz7e 4 coasfal a�fre s and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP)
_ GeWffiaea-(C) =­49-499/6,,-bw„deRt( )Hydr o j I06, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for eaWasse3-irfRW90h. Vegetation
NP R 500/Pof total c®ver: R® 20% of total cover: 16 Present? Yes X No X
Remarks: UBclude p®to numl.[]e s here rc[ bn
a seta ate sheEl*lder (256 - 4096 mm)
®
❑
®
❑
❑
Cobble (64 - 256 mm)
®
❑
®
❑
❑
Gravel (2 - 64 mm)
❑
®
®
❑
❑
Sand (.062 - 2 mm)
❑
❑
®
®
❑
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑
®
❑
❑
❑
Detritus
❑
❑
®
®
❑
Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes
❑No
Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

12. PgquaftiLTfwtudS et-reasWnmbk4sAapkWlideirMxtri h Streams)
12a. CH4qLr6a bqgN'®m 95@@9§rWR1PerPJff-§@d mN@d6rtb@4(4"lt@ro@@IsA4an %lt?area landscape
SOIL f ees�I �iloK�sr►tgth $�ittdl i 4dsletioettBQe®NetlAf bTe® committee for Hydqc Soils guidance for.,,,,,,
raninnnl i.,,+ —+„ram am
Depth _' i'� 1l5 tT1 "I� r (o centratiao�$ �IepJations for rhizospheres)
(inches) of moi p &c end2 sgaprA xa" for Size 3 4aeams.
e
WUA
0_8 ❑ E i ed � t �� �M �P�, PrPR+a isKt,ppr concentrations
A u i s nc i e s, a s s
B-16 r, cateqbfq��l checWd items: M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Li LJCaddisfly larvae (T)
• A wr C MW � � reh elf .,f +ho D Irl
FeqweisteFi
❑ phii15d97craytis s�rimep
c
ck a I Mbf r discharges (Sub).
I s c R� ra��nc� �,g���r �ty�Ric un r r un s orage an a
f Su
c.
eg
mp es 1�r iyf►aaf�myn�l§FSi�lllfle r p8r�.
e o. MIT'itInnd
•
i h u
_ • � and ctraccinn but not nvarwhalming the
1
Type: C ncent d Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric S .. ndi6.., ala a rs tad o s.
o en{ia we 'Turin e treat --err��t capacity of the wetland ((water discoloration, ea vege a Ion excess)
Histosanl (A1) i64� e v �' %IIS�I UVW Surface (S8) (MLRA'147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
— tone y arvae
_ Histic ipedo Thin D rerfce S9) ( LRA 147,148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
urve o�c P, a�,hp
$ l o"Mn �la�u �dti'ifn GIs
nneddfforrthhwith field ideerrr sources
F e{�Qsl�g AF - ���+h.sbtttai Ivla� @ of i�lpse� 9)
�5 QeiT a an on igef ISA t e asses me. area 1 la pu ers
fora e c i wi. re v a IC Tiow and.0 Ian
�cqp R e d t n� or gionsq � e t wide in g��{I � I�{N �R ecoregio�i.
X L%pl-fe!! RB , ark ac ( 01). De I ted Dark Surface (F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
CB'
%nShallnxni narkSiirfnre (F77)
�B Mo (Fate<a11 Pal. a ca ikv ��j j r ty of the streamsid�a JC 1¢ier a rTe flan 4i " ��(p}'�p YL� 4jf'4i�f�14� 1's r��a'�� afR I 'arches, fill, sc
San( , CPeye �ri o aR'�IYY A 1� . rirainane riri)
>_ 20% coverage
CdtW1clW1b t Teft Banle(LftA
ICark -4gQ8 Vi) 1 ^7W ✓ERRM
Tidal
able to pond writer s to 6( eldaki:Geodetic Vertical Datum of
RenGuh%iderEV�tt 41 ($ �d llr �I i� I wmatla�luds t#��araf i�#r sld �;��art�rrt#�tR�tla�Fl
wetted perpg f�p,`Q,I �rPIgCtt}h�qe}�p�lr�e �. Ib�u�ffr�hl�a($ eegpmol vied o�rl�d(iy$t�l �{r�bpd. (�f rQ �I��� �p}}fir
LB 7b. ' f'iOW Cr1 OT'Cfl�'ftt'SL �E[ TF0171'TFI�`rJBRI . s WellPiPPDESCTrpLClf'C'S91J§ ��arl@'L2Q`rl'CIftC�,s affectively bypass the b, iffer
❑y ❑YA > Mtl�annfds present in the streamside area?
®N Ert FFl i Rrtli e���t}ion (please specify):
16. Baseflow C(�ntrilfdt&s15 tisi; iig l nt reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check aIL EA t s jg�nljtplfi��g�fc k1�i�irfl09rtP li@l)s1Y>$0�9E11a1
OB IC. r risdictional
❑C aver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam,
®D 7d. ERh�l44#f�i3�ta��gs1�)IR� �rilii�alaf/open water?
®E 9tr�l bed o�@,ank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F 7e.g@J open water sheltered or exposed?
. Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
17. §h§A@PfKAc.
Check al
nA Wet fRara� K4 ��1��4 F� ra � fMePOHO R�ll$fVlation)
❑g Che Ifs ihfld #gbd%rAh%6y* � t dam, sediment deposit)
®C and b(tg�at@ftJW�rS*lser Manual s �I oWJ1� 5� obtaining
®D WT Evi ce that the streamside area has been modified resulting in acTMrt"fdMqgrftP e�fWr reach
❑E AAsses6merit1@9dheelocated to valley edge
❑F B None bf thLFW%M to < 100 feet
C C From 50 to < 80 feet
18. Shadin%- assiffssnMVRR�y piq
jq,,,(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect Cq%MeSdIj!t*gp"fc&pdition.
®A + F-Stre am category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B ®R9r lisp Oa jFor requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
❑C ea�Es� -A@arty W *@Efflttrict may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

In d ion uratioq — assessmg�nt r cgnd ,on tric
19. uffeQr�orTdal arsh Streams)
Con�Mr "v � i�� "d�ii iori�i 9f i �c�Pr i d jeft bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to th?Nst btq%'&nce of saturation, without evidence of inundation
LB
ge�aR E qW%f long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
M l(iqsatori3RDOWtion?M@dsefieidmveaesl>sndW4mthmt*eofthe watershed
®B CE$ider �nt positiorFcWy (Y toa:hggfl)fdbtsiridedeposition).
❑C (tG SOQeE:QpositiE�09-hWds 6&O*OAUNtd%pproximately natural levels.
®D r'ED SOd kAer:Rpositi&W@Ie3c6EL-�li663,%fdQ# WN %rwhelming the wetland.
❑E (QF SORie0Fipositi6n1i@ WbVd0A.Qbd%ttRWwheIming the wetland.
20. BWen6ftMwe-s @wWOjW*@tmntr Soi>�Io1woWftbM iStreams)
Cons011i cfiox heft banhJLOOh ahrightdbwWa(6B)dfforM,ethiddl9 #WkgmtadedrHktffeUiV dibhJates three aspects of the wetland area: the
LB size Whe wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
❑A Mane See W1RdWW Mal for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
®B WT ®E*/C Npyi/ WWOpdwQqy vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C q ❑?q I terKaceaWtgWj4ion with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D (' B ❑P-- B 1#sietainqoortdTto < 500 acres
❑E (' C ❑�-- C 1.01FLor r14(Yifig5d48Qf1100 acres
21. BuffCr,RresqoPs — Gri�am469iar�.'Prr Q8"p for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Che ,lliiaFiI aeeei:�f
pri Aox��°fr1FA � fE'M and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is withinF30 s Um (<F ?e p &lik WgReen 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If noneof the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
_
Abuts h (<I30 fbef-i rrgIy_ 6ngbf i acre
LB (Rb ('LIB qd FreI3 0.14B < 0.5 acre
❑A [JIA (. nA C]A Fr ." < 0.1 R6W crops
®B CM ('MB S36 < M aoEpr assM&fflfN�@qfUifrclear-cut
St ftandftcin-w
tr —we> d co)d� We�1, 1 ��°s useb�",,,qylture
a full nt _ 0 /" o egG� cy e.
22. Stem'Nnsityw9th 46sW &MhEl r Kttg*i?f MrrTptdwl Maftgwoa rs)
ran WROWAROJ RPSABn6AWK WgRiU QRRded" Buffer Width).
L 13a. eck a�,�rro riateIf
Q es) a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
❑ 4 Iuate ' Wh � OprTZI iPARRi9nnected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
®B ric na4°af_ly vem{esd gyre a o en wa er if a ro ri to . Boundaries are f rmedfo r-lane roads, re ularl maintained utilit❑C o oodn nne~Jer or erec�orrSina�i �ieEreceous s�eFde or are roi�nci g y y
e corn ors a wi g4aa our- ane rIIa or wider, ur an an scapes, ie spas ureen and agriculture), or water > 300 feet wide.
23. Conti nui"lVe O Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider a6ther(_vebet4�6%%fWiie% continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB eB (' B From 100 to < 500 acres
®A ®?C ('f£e tofable*hcof 600eirdwealks is < 25 percent.
❑B ®ED ( Be toEablan1*hoc&-5 fmTbseaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
®C RJE ( fie totatlh6agihsof buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
g (.� P F . Wetl nd �e�as a apoor in no co P ctigip to o er n tgtreamspts
24. Ve etative om osition — s rea i e are me nc ski or i al are
Evalu1A-tFPYA8f iifalPit MrbR�thin 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessmefitt K&&Ohhi9tat. etland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
Ed fect — etland type condition m tric,(s ' for all.marshes
Q Mag Ive a'��t R��l'c�Pa�i7s#tr'r�s�r�fa&ig4qA&1tgrO%Rr9d1Adfjrsto IaftY%€fai'gd�sCO1%Rc�aO gptl?i@Iu h�cies,
non-�j ted avy�� �S 3° � i� �S�%y����ss ei s s4 i ,�aF89ds re Iarl aintained u ilit Iin orrid r nd clear -cuts.
❑B s4d Ve?elation in is s is Or anc6 in Igr o� spea6s �liverysiiy or propo ions, eu is s�ih� �arge�y composed of native
Con er the ei main s o e co ss.
e ie po is r�a� ir>tc�upc�� dcommunities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
(' A No arti i ia�edS wi in l bU'fee in a directions
a mitie hw�nith o at a in ive s ec) pre ent but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
(' B No artiGlc�i reiI
�ti i s i ,fn ive ii� L� i etes.r P1�1®C C ❑ An artiLlCegeion is seveire�y dis U e In elms o Spe I S r IVe°rS assessmentrrpis r 2 clear
canopy is absent or communities
15. Vegetative CoVVYlf1#b9REbfli}I�sj@�jg�ggpfa�pf�ggftjigj�@u��jgalir�r communities composed of planted
('A @Arat§i @@iigfW&pyWtation.
25. Conductivit�pe e�s r iFe fitr r '�s9Ei irSealTl i'a iaE3 a '�gr�
eM®RE*
n f2 f I i gr s diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
25a. If No, tRt l� Yf��_&Sn I VVaief C115��pities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also inc u es ommunities with exotics present, bu expected strata.
25b. (planted stands of non -
❑A c:h4 acteristEJ4ec4WQr--36l6ast onEUCiat W tool7r8priately�p-69dd 6f23Qngle sWEies)? Mic species are dominant in
at least one stratum.
NotesISke%Wgetative Diversity— assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
s W lind SX02.
(' B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
(+ C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (>50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment arePWP178A1 y�ftLlggiffletMting Sheet
17a. Is vegetation present? Accompanies User Manual Version 1
r+ Yes r No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
Stream Site N2rAe rc0*a§WRvegetation Date of Assessment 11/6/2020
r" B < 25% coverage of vegetation D. David Homans, S&ME
Stream Category Pb2 Assessor Name/Organization
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the mbD& for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure
in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
Notes of Field Asse&�nenttirm9�-a_no
/N) YES
a A no *�ed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated vr�irataral processes
Presence of regulagrg co l'�era y"•rersent, but opened more than natural gaps
Additional stregm i ma resupel g(Anowents included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM featuLe ty eAper vial, iense lmecpttoryfsalpTingTh Stream) lRen30ittEit
r" B r B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
a r. C r. C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent USACE/ NCDWR
. a FuffMon SM@ Nip1q,§Hmmary All Streams Intermittent
r r B (11 )(H W rol(Pfte rate density shrub layer LOW LOW
r. C r. q2) MkW&Mer sparse or absent MEDIUM MEDIUM
{: A r: 42) FFleosbFFie* layer LOW LOW
r" B r" B M"rSI*AR1't8e44 ttenuation MEDWM MEDIUM
r C f C Herb layewrloodplain access MEDWM MEDIUM
18. Snags —wetland type condition mWWooded Riparian Buffer MEDWM MEDIUM
r" A Large snags (more than onel reUc olto(ograinngh s DBH, or large relat NA stability).
{? B Not A
(3) Stream Stability • LOW LOW
19. Diameter Class Distribution —wetl d ecor iti etric MEDIUM
r" A Majority of canopy trees hav� ��ih 51ri`8iameter at breast height ( My i= �hes DBH) are
present. (4) Sediment Transport MEDWM LOW
r" B Majority of canopy trees hav ftSft "HA60es DBH, few are MWWWPBF MEDIUM
{? C Majority of canopy treMtTre<a%V�cBaHl AR9 tiMaction NA NA
20. Large Woody Debris — wetI1p�LMRQiMgg1QqkFfflqtrtfw NA NA
Include both natural debris a I ed raI de s
�� �iCarsb�irel�m lability . F NA NA
r A Large logs (more tha ne� are wsi e > inc es in diameter, or large relay :e�o-spesies cape stability).
{: B Not A (3) Tidal arsh Channel Stability NA NA
21. Vegetation) • 3) Ti I sh tream omo to NA ater
Marsh only) (1) Water Quality LOW LOW
Select the figure that b("IldesuNowthe amount of interspersion between vegetation MFiltMwab MEDIUM sason. Patterned
areas indicate vegetatio)a,�tgaAla"eght%b�Wicate open water. MEDIUM MEDIUM
r A (3) Up Bind Pollutant Filtration r C MEDW MEDIUM
~'rr1 ulation wal"IIC HIGH
(2)%fioarSt ors ` s NO
"� ,
(2) Aitlr L " ce� WI NA
a, r
(2) Intertidal 2`664 7ation NA NA
22. Hydrologic Coh'iWtiWgL assessment area condition metric (evaluate for ripaANQW nds
MEDIUM
Examples of activitiej2l *rgft§pygq@b1t@J1(er hydrologic connectivity include intgDLNM
LOW
ditching, fill, sedimentation,r�l, diversion, man-made berms, beaver s
r" A Overbank and overla low are not severely altered in the assessment aFea.
MEDIUM
r" B Overbank flow is sev9r�A00Wthe assessment area. MEDWM
LOW
r" C Overland flow is seveft3ftnrhiGbbMyessment area. MEDWM
MEDIUM
{? D Both overbank and o\ffJgWJJpafffFga y altered in the assessment are+AEDIUM
LOW
Notes (2) Stream -side Habitat MHOBUM
HIGH
Wetland was impacted primarily b ogtV&giffgbLoyq§6ft&egetation, sanitary sewer withiM bpi, an
MEDIUM trol maintained / altered
by stormwater infrastructure. Q7)h the wetla was within 50 feet of an open suffer wetland as it was
fHIGH
downslope the that it had �i�,� '^^�^to the
fkeerafeRy'Vouall"Term to the
of open water and extent
pond. (2) Tidarsh In -stream Habitat NA
nection upslope
NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat NA NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA NA
Overall LOW LOW