20052212 Ver 1_Complete File_20060111

i OF. W A TF
0
?SgrFR -
R
January 11, 2006
Jackson County
DWQ Project No. 052212
US Highway 64 (Climbing Lanes)
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Mr. J. B. Setzer, P.E.
Division Engineer
N C Department of Transportation
253 Webster Road
Sylva, North Carolina 28779
Dear Mr. Setzer:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact 20 linear feet of an
unnamed tributary to the Horsepasture River (20 linear feet of new pipe and temporary dewatering), in order to construct
new climbing lanes as part of US Highway 64 in Jackson County. The project should be constructed in accordance with
your application dated December 9, 2005 (received December 16, 2005), including the environmental comments made in
the application letter. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality
Certification Nos. 3404 and 3366, corresponding to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit Numbers 14
and 33. In addition, you must acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project
including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
This approval will expire with the accompanying 404 Permit unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below). Should
your project change, you must notify the DWQ in writing and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the new
owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying with all the
conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or if total impacts to streams (now
or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any
additional conditions listed below.
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing the proper design,
installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface waters
standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated, and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures must be
such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow
sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the
project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed, operated,
and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
One
N thCarolina
Aalmeally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.encstate. nc.us FAX [phone]
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.F. Director
Division of Water Quality
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Mr. J. B. Setzer, P.E.
January 11, 2006
Page Two
d. Any reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in accordance with the
requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
2. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the footprint of the
impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notice Application. All construction activities, including the design,
installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be
performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
3. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent practicable.
If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed
and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land Quality has released the project.
4. Adequate sediment and erosion control measures should be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities to
minimize impacts to downstream aquatic resources. All bare soil must be seeded within 15 days of ground disturbing
activities to provide long-term erosion control. Erosion control mating should be used in conjunction with appropriate
seeding on disturbed soils in steep slope and riparian areas. Matting should be secured in place with stables or
wherever possible, live stakes of native trees. Tall fescue and straw should not be used in riparian areas. Riparian
vegetation must be reestablished within the construction limits of the project by the end of the growing season
following completion of construction.
5. Culverts that are less than 48-inch in diameter should be buried to a depth equal to or greater than 20% of their size to
allow for aquatic life passage. Culverts that are 48-inch diameter or larger should be buried at least 12 inches below
the stream bottom to allow natural stream bottom material to become established in the culvert following installation
and to provide aquatic life passage during periods of low flow. This may require increasing the size of the culvert to
meet flow conveyance requirements. If any of the existing pipes are perched, they shall be removed and replaced, and
re-installed correctly, unless demonstrated that this is topographically unfeasible.
6. Rock check dams at culvert outlets should be removed at the project completion to avoid impeding the movement of
aquatic life.
7. The dimension, pattern and profile of the stream, above and below the culverts, should not be modified by widening
the stream channel or reducing the stream depth. Disturbed floodplains and streams should be restored to natural
geomorphic conditions.
8. Stormwater shall be directed to vegetated buffer areas, grass lined ditches or other means appropriate to the site for
the purpose of pre-treating stormwater runoff, and must not be routed directly into streams. Mowing of existing
vegetated buffers is strongly discouraged, so that they may be utilized for stormwater diffuse flow.
9. Removal of vegetation at stream crossings and adjacent to streams should be minimized. Native trees and shrubs (e.g.
rhododendron, dog hobble, willows, alders, sycamores, dogwoods, black walnut and red maple) should be planted
along the streambank to reestablish the riparian zone and to provide long-term erosion control in the vicinity of the
road crossing and along the streams within dedicated rights of way.
10. Any riprap placed for bank stabilization should be limited to the streambank below the high water mark, and
vegetation should be used for stabilization above the high water elevation. Riprap should not be place in stream
channels in such a manner that it impedes aquatic life passage.
11. Heavy equipment must be operated from the banks rather than in the stream channel in order to minimize
sedimentation and to reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into the stream.
12. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent
contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
13. Excavation of the stream crossings and relocations should be conducted in the dry, if possible. Sandbags, cofferdams,
flexible pipe or other diversion structures should be used to minimize excavation in flowing water.
14. If concrete is used during culvert construction (e.g., headwalls), a dry work area should be maintained to prevent
direct contact between curing concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete should
not be discharged to surface waters due to the potential for fish kills.
15. Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment in or adjacent to surface waters is
strictly prohibited.
16. The presence of equipment in the channels must be minimized. Under no circumstances must rock, sand or other
materials be dredged from the wetted stream channel under authorization of this permit, except in the immediate
vicinity of the culverts. In-stream dredging has catastrophic effects on aquatic life, and disturbance of the natural
form of the stream channel will likely cause downstream erosion problems, possibly affecting other landowners.
r?
14 Mr. J. B. Setzer, P.E.
January 11, 2006
Page Three
17. This certification does not authorize the discharge of waste rock and dirt into the stream or riparian zone except for
permitted areas associated with the culvert extensions.
18. All work shall be performed during low flow conditions (below bankfull).
19. Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of Completion " form
to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been completed. The responsible party shall
complete the attached form and return it to the Transportation Permitting Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality
upon completion of the project. The NCDOT is strongly advised to send in photographs upstream and downstream of
each structure to document correct installation.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act
within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have
any questions, please telephone Mr. Mike Parker of the Asheville Regional Office at 828.296.4500.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Attachment
cc: Mark Davis, Division 14, DEO
Ed Ingle, Roadside Environmental
Angie Pennock, USACE Asheville Field Office
Transportation Permitting Unit
Mike Parker, Asheville Regional Office

µ STAlF o
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
toe
7 ?D
6 '7 O
??cr?,q, of ???5
??.7t Ch4
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
December 9, 2005
Ms. Angie Pennock, NCDOT Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-2714
Subject: Nationwide 14 Permit Application
US 64 Climbing Lanes
Jackson County
TIP No. R-2409 State Project No. WBS Element 34428 (DWQ Minor
Permit Fee $ 200.00)
Dear Ms. Pennock:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is proposing to realign and add a
climbing lane on US 64. The project begins 1.2 miles east of Cashiers and extends east for
2500 feet. The work is necessary to improve safety and reduce congestion associated with the
current two-lane US highway east of Cashiers. This project is part of the Transportation
Improvement Program.
I am enclosing a PCN, a straight-line diagram with the proposed erosion control and
construction limits along this project. In addition, I am sending a typical section of the road,
cross sections, drawings for pipe culvert replacements, as well as a marked county and USGS -'
quad map.
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Database was checked for records of threatened and
endangered species. There are no records for threatened or endangered species within the
watershed of the unnamed tributary of the Horsepasture River. Additionally, there are no
records of threatened and endangered species between the confluence of the unnamed
tributary with Horsepasture River and Sapphire Lake. The unnamed tributary originates
within a few feet of the culvert inlet and does not have sufficient flow to support fish or
mussels. The impacts from this culvert extension will be minimal. For these reasons, there --1
will be "no effect" on threatened or endangered species.
z
U
a
Page 2
Impacts to historic or cultural resources are not anticipated. If the State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO) and the Office of State Archaeology determines that further investigations are
required, NCDOT will conduct the appropriate site investigations and obtain compliance from
SHPO prior to project construction.
The best management practices will be used to minimize and control sedimentation and
erosion on this project. The construction foreman will review all sedimentation control
measures during installation to ensure sedimentation is being effectively controlled. If the
planned devices are not functioning as intended, they will be replaced immediately with better
devices. The sedimentation control devices will be in place prior to pipe culvert removal and
will remain in place until the new pipes are in place.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
The unnamed tributary appears to be a spring seep, which originates less than 20 feet above
the culvert outlet. The stream is not shown on the USGS topographic map. Although the
flow is minimal, it appears to be perennial. The seep does not have a well-defined channel;
however, there is a channel that lacks vegetation at the culvert outlet. Substrate is cobble,
gravel and sand below the pipe. For these reasons, we believe that the stream is under the
jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In order to extend the culvert, it will be
necessary to impact waters of the United States in the Savannah River Basin. Specifically,
NCDOT is requesting to extend one metal culvert in an unnamed tributary to the Horsepasture
River. (DWQ Class: C Tr,). Riprap stabilization is shown in the attached diagram. However,
if necessary, this riprap placement will be up slope of the stream origin. Listed below is a
summary of the proposed impacts.
Site Existing Proposed Condition Net Impacts
No. Condition
Station
Site 1 92' x 24" CMP 112' x 24" (92'CMP + 20' Concrete 20'
Extension
Total Impact 20 linear feet
Permits Requested
NCDOT is hereby requesting authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act to
proceed with the construction project outlined above. By copy of this letter, I am asking Mr.
Dave McHenry, Mountain Region Coordinator, of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC), to comment directly to you concerning the 404 Nationwide Permit
request.
Also, by copy of this letter, I am requesting authorization under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act from the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(DENR), Division of Water Quality (DWQ). In addition, I am asking Mr. McHenry and Mr.
Page 2
Ed Ingle, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer (NCDOT), to comment directly
to me concerning this permit request.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Paul White or me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Mark Davis
Division Environmental Officer
Enclosures
cc: Mr. John Hennessy, DWQ, DENR, Raleigh (seven copies)
Mr. Mike Parker, DWQ, DENR, Asheville
Mr. Dave McHenry, Mountain Region Coordinator, NCWRC
Mr. J. B. Setzer, P.E., Division Engineer, NCDOT
Mr. Paul White, P. E., Division Design and Construct Engineer
File
Office Use Only 2 O o 2Fo2nnn 1ersiiioon May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Appiicawe" or ',N/A .)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCEEP prior to submittal of PCN),
complete section VIII and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: North Carolina Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: 253 Webster Road
Sylva NC 28779
Attn Mark Davis Division Environmental Officer
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: markdavisndot state nc us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation: N/A
Mailing Address: N/A
Telephone Number: N/A Fax Number: N/A
-E-mail Address: N/A
Page 1 of 8
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: US 64 Climbing Lane East of Cahsiers
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): R-2409 WBS 34428
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): n/a
4. Location
County: Jackson Nearest Town: Cashiers
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): n/a
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Cashiers proceed east on
US 64 for 1.2 miles to the beginning of the project. The project ends 2500 feet east of the
beginning of the project The site is near the end of the project
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35.1243° N 83.0758° W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres):2.26 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Horspasture River (C TO
8. River Basin: Savannah River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Woodlands with some rural residential
Page 2 of 8
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: This
project includes cutting and filling earthwork where needed replacing old drainage
structures making slight realignments and adding a lane for truck climbing. Equipment to be
used will be track hoes back hoes dump trucks bulldozers and manual labor
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To construct a climbing lane to improve the safety
and reduce congestion on US 64 just east of Cashiers.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date pen-nits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
No additional permits have been applied for p-eviously.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No additional permits are anticipated
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below.. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The 20-foot concrete pipe extension
will be added to the existing metal culvert. The origin of the spring seen is a few feet above
the existing culvert inlet The new culvert will intercept the spring seep further up slope.
The attached diagram shows riprap for stabilization. This riprap stabilization will be up
Page 3 of 8
slope of the existing stream and will be up slope of the new seep origin. The purpose of the
stabilization is to prevent headcutting from stornlwater runoff.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.eov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
indicate on ma linear feet Before Impact (please seci
Station 33+00 Culvert Extension 20 UT to Horsepasture River 6" Perennial
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but arc not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uscs.eov. Several intemct sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tonozone.com,
www.niapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 20
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name Wat
applicable) ble)
(if ap Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 4 of 8
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The culvert is being extended the minimum amount necessary to gain the necessary width to
build the climbing lane There is no way to add the necessary lane and avoid the impact.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
Page 5 of 8
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.htmi.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCEEP, check the NCEEP website at http://www.necep.net. If use of the NCEEP is
proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the following
information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 20
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No
Page 6 of 8
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify N/A )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular trom near nanx or cnannei; Gone z exicnus tui
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Stormwater will be diverted through settling basins or grass lined buffers prior to entering
streams (See erosion control plan)
Page 7 of 8
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated from the proposed project
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
,
/-;- 9-0_
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
PROJECT
TIP

NOo R-24098
JACKSON COUNTY
Pipe Extension is located at 35.1243° N 83.0758° W
Cashiers Quad
R2409B Climbing Lanes East of Cashiers Unnamed Tributary
to Horsepasture River--Jackson County
't
F v 7..
}
? H
Inlet Station 33+00

.
id m
-
J

i
r
Outlet Station 33+00 -
z tom( \ 3 ¢ \ V U,
v oLLJ
a L'j F- U.
CL = CL
a F N - O of V)
:C W t v
<
\ Lq it)
Cl)
O
Lr)
F== Lij J ?toU r
L m: LO ?aco a
V) w ci p t-, ?! Q \? ry); NC
i cn °" + F. p u. O N
`f
- J°J tai W
U UW - W T _
o cn
o +m-. N n ? Z NHS I (n II ?I II
V) ui
J W OF?`L Lq?
p W ti \ M ti
W a
puw mcWi>?u-
1?3 W 0
L Q N WW
3?? J cL W U QZ? l / u 5: In
?g95 i Nl??g \ 1
a°? o o ° ,0 U V) W
C14 LCLL, V) CL <
upw
W X U -
c7 v pr; u. LriM Qb 80 80 `p ?o
O ?- W rn N F-': i- to f
Q O Q V W N? N
LL.
ape V
so
ko
J ' EX?S so FQ "' C31 Lq
LCI
cQf c? co p + V
]0 ` ??(? a0 ZO C7 f
or) V)
>- cc ao*
\ N v) a?/5t
J I 7? ti is Z co
G1( ;: ( I o
r , . ?;:;;\ ; \ = a ?- a ao' ??. ?
o
i I ( t ?I o
Q
O u Z v
cl p?nl a° u
eo^
V v` j, It- a0 a? Opp ? 0 W p m
t d• 1 cn N ?? I D uj
W ~
.A , W ?j ao io d V a LLI
w
'? \ Z ao 0o s? f I j, W
1
0
m
O
a
O
?I
1
1•'
of
I
Q'
j
O
Ql)
? I
l
w!
cr-
_J
Q
Z Q
' U
LL,
oc Q LLJ
Ql p e
oW
W
U- ?
ti N?
U
Z
cr-
Q V
ca
C t L
- -----9?-l6?
Q
L
m
tx)
4 co
N \rn

O

\ ? I
OU
v
N
Z
W
0
0
? CV
O T
O
N
? O
U
Q O
(O
O ? v 1
?Lv
z?Q
Wow
cr-
Cl-
?
n
cl-