20110335 Ver 1_401 Application_20110411

2d110%335
WITHERS &' RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
1410 COMMONWEALTH DRIVE, SUITE ioi
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA, 28403
[phone]
FAX [phone]
T0: NC Division of Water Quality - 4o1 Wetlands Unit
165o Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
WE ARE SENDING YOU
? Shop Drawings
? Copy of Letter
® Attached
? Prints
? Change order
the following items:
? Specifications
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
1 /6/11 021o0 16.oo $240 Check for Application Fee
4/5/11 021o0 16.oo NWP 39 PCN
1 /6/11 021o0 16.oo CD of Electronic Co of PCN Submittal

THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
® For approval ? Approved as submitted
? For your use ? Approved as noted
? As requested ? Returned for corrections
? For review and comment ?
? FOR BIDS DUE 20 ? PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS:
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
COPYTO: File
? Resubmit
? Submit
? Return
copies for approval
copies for distribution
corrected prints
SIGNED: Troy Beasley
if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
LETTER OF TRANSWTTAL
DATE /6/11 JOB NO. 02100 16.00
ATTENTION Mr. Ian McMillan
PHONE # 919-8o7-6364
RE: Crabtree Village NWP 39 PCN Submittal

? Under separate cover via _
? Plans ? Samples
? Diskette ?
ua[e: 1.''? 0 7 2011
WITHERS RAVEN EL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS SURVEYORS
April 5, 2011
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Mr. Jamie Sherri
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
NC-Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
Attn: Mr. Ian McMillan
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Re: Crabtree Village Commercial Center - Request for 404/401 Authorization and Buffer Compliance
W&R Project 402100316.00
Dear Mr. Shern and Mr. McMillan,
On behalf of Redus NC Land, LLC, we are requesting authorization from the USACE to use NWP 39 for 961f of
permanent perennial stream impacts for the construction of the proposed project. We are also requesting 401-
Certification and Buffer Compliance from NC-DWQ for impacts to jurisdictional streams and riparian buffers.
The project is ±24 acres in size and is located north of the intersection of Crabtree Village Avenue and Blue
Ridge Road in Raleigh, Wake County (Latitude: 35.834925N; Longitude: -78.678692W). The project site is
bordered to the south by Blue Ridge Road, to the east by Crabtree Valley Avenue and to the north by Edwards
Mill Road. The project is located in the Neuse River basin and onsite waters drain to House Creek, which is a
tributary of Crabtree Creek. The Water Quality Classification for House Creek is C; NSW and the Stream Index
Number is: 27-33-13. The cataloging unit for the site is 03020201.
Proposed Project
The proposed project consists of a mixed use commercial and multi-family residential development. The
proposed mixed-use development will be constructed entirely in uplands. As a condition of the approval of the
project, the City of Raleigh is requiring the applicant to provide road improvements to Crabtree Valley Avenue
and Blue Ridge Road to relieve traffic congestion in this area. The proposed improvements to Crabtree Valley
Avenue consist of the construction of two additional lanes and median, as well as a greenway trail, which will
require an extension of an existing culvert. A retaining wall has been designed to support fill for the greenway
trail to minimize stream and buffer impacts. The required improvements to Blue Ridge Road consist of
widening of the roadway and construction of a greenway trail, which will also require an extension of an existing
culvert. A retaining wall has been designed to support fill for the greenway trail to minimize stream and buffer
impacts.
Project HiAM
Onsite waters were delineated by Withers and Ravenel on February 8, 2011. A Preliminary JD Form has been
provided for the project site.
111 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 275111 tel.: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
416 D Gallimore Dairy Road I Greensboro, NC 27409 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
WITHERS RAVEN EL
ENGINEERS IPLANNERS ISURVEYORS
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of 961f of permanent stream impacts, 10,062 sq ft of permanent impacts to Zone 1,
9,426 sq ft of permanent impacts to Zone 2, 2,454 sq ft of temporary impacts to Zone 1 and 1,446 sq ft of
temporary impacts to Zone 2.
Stream Impacts
The permanent stream impacts will occur as a result of the required roadway improvements to Crabtree Valley
Avenue and Blue Ridge Road. The required improvements to Crabtree Valley Avenue consist of extension of
the existing culvert, widening of the roadway and construction of a greenway trail, which will result in 60 if of
permanent stream impacts (Impact Exhibit A1).
The required improvements to Blue Ridge Road consist of the extension of the existing culvert and placement of
rip-rap below the culvert, widening of the roadway and construction of a greenway trail, will result in 36 if of
permanent stream impacts (Impact Exhibit A3).
Buffer Impacts
The widening of Crabtree Valley Avenue (Impact Exhibit A2) will result in 4,370 sq ft of permanent buffer
impacts to Zone 1 and 2,510 sq ft of permanent buffer impacts to Zone 2. The construction of the greenway trail
will result in 1,267 sq ft of permanent buffer impacts to Zone 1 and 584 sq ft of permanent buffer impacts to
Zone 2. The temporary construction access will result in 1,181 sq ft of temporary buffer impacts to Zone 1 and
306 sq ft of temporary buffer impacts to Zone 2 during construction of the retaining wall for the greenway trail.
The widening of Blue Ridge Road (Impact Exhibit A4) and construction of the greenway trail will result in 1,716
sq ft of permanent buffer impacts to Zone 1 and 1,814 sq ft of permanent buffer impacts to Zone 2. The
temporary construction access will result in 1,273 sq ft of temporary buffer impacts to Zone 1 and 1,140 sq ft of
temporary buffer impacts to Zone 2 during construction of the retaining wall for the greenway trail.
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts
to jurisdictional "waters" could be minimized. The proposed project is being constructed entirely in uplands.
The proposed stream and buffer impacts are the result of the roadway improvements required by the City of
Raleigh. Impacts to streams and buffers have been minimized through the use of a retaining wall to support fill
for the greenway, rather than back slopes to stabilize fill which would have resulted in additional stream and
buffer impacts.
Mitigation
Because the proposed permanent stream impacts are less than 1501f, there is no stream mitigation proposed.
WITHERS Lo RAVENEL Page 2 of 3
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
WITHERS RAVEN EL
ENGINEERS IPLANNERS ISURVEYORS
The proposed road crossings will impact less than 1/3 acre of buffers at each crossing, which is classified as an
"allowable" use. Greenway trails are also an "allowable use". The two temporary construction access areas will
impact a total of 3,900 sq ft of House Creek buffers and is designated as an "allowable" use. Therefore, there is
no buffer mitigation proposed.
Stormwater Management Plan
The Stormwater Management Plan consists of one underground sand filter and two wet ponds. All BMPs have
been designed to remove 85% of the total suspended solids for the first 1" of rainfall. Per current DWQ
requirements, the outlet from the sand filter does not require an engineered level spreader because the device is
capable of removing at least 3-% of the total nitrogen loading rate. Downstream of the outlet from the wet ponds,
the developer is proposing an engineered level spreader near the existing riparian buffer. The existing slope and
vegetation within the buffer is sufficient to meet the major design requirements in the current BMP manual.
The Stormwater Management Plan is currently being reviewed by the City of Raleigh. Upon final approval by
the City of Raleigh, a copy of the approved Stormwater Management Plan will be provided to DWQ.
The current request is for 96 if of permanent impacts to jurisdictional streams and 23,388 sq ft of buffer
impacts (see the attached maps and PCN for details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
d- C5
Troy Beasley
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• USGS Quad Map
• Wake County Soil Survey
• Jurisdictional Feature Exhibit
• Preliminary JD Request - Corps Application Only
• Site Plan
• Impact Plans
WITHERS Lo RAVENEL Page 3 of 3
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
o??o'Fyw?a rF9Q?
oNii? -c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ®Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Crabtree Village Commercial Center
2b. County: Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Raleigh
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Redus NC Land, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. DB: 13954; Page: 0160
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address: 3563 Phillips Hwy, Suite 601 E
3e. City, state, zip: Jacksonville, FL 32207
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page I of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: NC Office of Redus NC Land, LLC
4b. Name: Bill Honaker - Vice President
4c. Business name
(if applicable): Redus NC Land, LLC
4d. Street address: 8540 Colonnade Center Drive, Suite 111
4e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27615
4f. Telephone no.: 919-334-2643
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Troy Beasley
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Withers and Ravenel
5c. Street address: 1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101
5d. City, state, zip: Wilmington, NC 28403
5e. Telephone no.: 910-256-9277
5f. Fax no.: 910-256-2584
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 0795598141;0795594347;0795583726;0795580999;
0795580406;0795488454
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.834925N Longitude: - 78.678692
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: ±24 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to House Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; NSW -Stream Index #27-33-13
2c. River basin: Neuse - 03020201
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The existing conditions of the subject property mainly consist of undeveloped land. The site contains and existing
structure and associated parking lot which was previously utilized as a restaurant. The land use in the vicinity of the
project consists of a mixture of residential and commercial land use, including the Crabtree Valley Mail, located north of
the project site.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
None
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
±725 If of Perennial Stream (House Creek).
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a mixed use commercial center.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will consist of a mixed used commercial shopping center. As a condition of approval of the project, the City of
Raleigh is requiring that the applicant provide road improvements to Crabtree Valley Avenue and Blue Ridge Road, as
well as construct a greenway trail. The improvements to Crabtree Valley Avenue consist of the construction of a two
additional lands and median, as well as a greenway trail, which will require the extension of the existing box culvert under
Crabtree Valley Avenue. The improvements to Blue Ridge Road consist of the widening of the road and construction of a
greenway trail, which requires an extension of the culverts beneath Blue Ridge Road.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
? Yes ®No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Wither & Ravenel
Name (if known): Troy Beasley Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary (T)
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
Al ® P ? T Fill/Culvert House Creek ® PER
? INT ® Corps
® DWQ 10, 60
A3 ® P ? T Fill/Culvert House Creek ® PER
? INT ® Corps
® DWQ 10, 36
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 96
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
- Permanent
(P) or
Temporary (T)
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of (acres)
number pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason for Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
or Temporary required?
(T)
A2 - Road ? Yes

®PEl T Fill for road House Creek
®No 4,370 sq ft 2,510 sq ft
A2 - Greenway
® P ? T Fill for
reenwa House Creek ? Yes
® N 1,267 sq ft 584 sq ft
g
y o
A2 - Greenway
? P ® T Construction
Access
House Creek ? Yes
® No
1,181 sq ft
306 sq ft
A4 - Road ? Yes

®PEl T Fill for road House Creek
®No 1,716 sq ft 1,814 sq ft
A4 -Greenway
® P ? T Fill for
reenwa House Creek ? Yes
® N 2,709 sq ft 4,518 sq ft
g
y o
A4 - Greenway
? P ® T Construction
Access
House Creek ? Yes
® No
1,273 sq ft
1,140 sq ft
6h. Total buffer impacts 12,516 sq ft 10,872 sq ft
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures ta ken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Prior to site design, the applicant requeste d that a detailed wetland delineation be completed to avoid and minimized wetland
impacts. The only proposed stream impacts will occur as a result of the improvements to Crabtree Valley Avenue and Blue
Ridge Road, which are required by the City of Raleigh. Buffer impacts were minimized by designing a retaining wall to
stabilize fill for the greenway trail, rather th an using backslopes, which would have resulted in additional buffer impacts.
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The project has been designed to utilize retaining walls to support fill for the greenway trails, rather than backslopes which
would result in additional stream and buffer impacts. Also, silt fencing will be installed around all disturbed areas to prevent
escape of sediment into the onsite stream.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ? Mitigation bank
? Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8of11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
® Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 72.6%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The Stormwater Management Plan consists of one underground sand filter and two wet ponds. All BMPs have been
designed to remove 85% of the total suspended solids for the first 1 " of rainfall. Per current DWQ requirements, the outlet
from the sand filter does not require an engineered level spreader because the device is capable of removing at least 3-% of
the total nitrogen loading rate. Downstream of the outlet from the wet ponds, the developer is proposing an engineered level
spreader near the existing riparian buffer. The existing slope and vegetation within the buffer is sufficient to meet the major
design requirements in the current BMP manual.
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? City of Raleigh
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
The Stormwater Management Plan is currently being reviewed by the City of Raleigh. A
copy of the Stormwater Management Approval will be provided upon receipt.
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ® Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes
? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is located within a heavily developed area of Raleigh. It is not anticipated that the proposed project will be a
catalyst for additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
City of Raleigh Sanitary Sewer
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a . Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b . Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
E] Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d . What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
W&R reviewed the NC OneMap Viewer GIS website, located at http://www.nconemap.net/Default.aspx?tabid=286, to
identify if any potential occurrence of endangered species on or near the proposed project. The review of the GIS
database did not identify any recent occurrences of endangered species or critical habitat on the subject property or
within 1.0 miles of the project. Reviews of the site did not identify the presence of endangered species within or adjacent
to the proposed project.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b . What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no waters classified as EFH within Wake County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a . Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b . What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
There were no historic structures or potential cultural resources observed within the project site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a . Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b . If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Flood maps found at www.ncfloodmaps.com.
T
B
l /
roy
eas
ey
Withers & Ravenel 4/5/11

Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature
' Date
(Agent
s signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
WITHERS RAVENEL
ENG1NELRS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned owner(s) Redus NC Land, LLC do(es) hereby appoint Troy Beasley 1 Withers
& Ravenel, Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate local, state
and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of
Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, etc.) for: a) review and approval of the
jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands, surface waters, etc.) and/or; b)
preparation and submittal of appropriate environmental permit applications/requests for the
Crabtree Village project.
The owner does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts on
behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required supplemental
materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of environmental
review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or termination by
the property owner. . I
Date.
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone: Signature of Owner(s):
Troy Beasley /Withers & Ravenel, Inc. 'y?l WAN\ ?Oj haa, r ? ta? ? 51? ,JT
(Name - Print) (Title)
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101 --
Wilmington, NC 28403 (Signature)
Tel._ [phone] Z,??y (3 C?)LoNts k,,e CSR- A, 5Tt It
j
TT? Mailing Address
City State Zip
111 MacKenan Drive Cary, NC 275111 tel.: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersravene[.com License No. C-0832
1410 Commonwealth Drive Suite 101 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
416 D Gallimore Dairy Road I Greensboro, NC 27409 ? tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
USGS QUAD MAP
AND
WAKE COUNTY SOIL SURVEY
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 500 1000
1 inch = 1000 ft.
I/! / •
% 11 l II

SITE
F^
#J

i

•l ?
v
a
j

?? yam'''' +. • •^ a G • ',.
//

woo
NEL
CRABTREE VILLAGE USGS QUAD MAP -RALEIGH WEST WENGIITHNEEERS 1 RS PLANNERS 1 R SURVEYORS
ERA?,h Wake Coun North Carolina
GRAPHIC SCALE • 4 •
0 250 500 \ 4 1
1 inch = 500 ft. k
Mk;
?..,?
Co
r g? ` C m
W n
1NkF -
?. C2 Co
Vol. s s
I
'+ 1, r
Cep
4t
Ce `?• / '
ti I v 1 .? ?
Q F of A • ??((^/?•• ?-J//? •(+ .4
•. ? ??, 1. ?'? U?? ! `. -
C,
CRABTREE VILLAGE WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY SHEET 38 WITHERS RAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
Ralei h Wake Coun No,lh Carolina
JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE
EXHIBIT

Z-4 W
. •, - •i /.
rim,
*00
na"
* J >? MILLAIMIS
r w
t
+s
? r
,i
r y?
r
y ry n- pp
ILA
yy
/? / •'`?^ t? q'` ?r X 7?'
AQ r'•d, ? i. n i
-40
?TYp7 i . l ? ?'
}?. mid ?T?Y• dP 6 ? ?. ?t ? * ?{? *. ?. `? e
d I
41
CRABTREE VILLAGE WITHERS RAVENEL
JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE EXHIBIT ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
Ralei h Wake Coun North Carolina
PRELIMINARY JD REQUEST
ATTACHMENT
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Redus NC Land, LLC
Bill Honaker
8540 Colonnade Center Drive, Suite 111
Raleigh, NC 27615
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.834925° N, Long. -78.678692° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: House Creek - A tributary to Crabtree Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: ±725 linear feet: 10 width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin Class: Lower Perennial - Riverine
Stream Flow: Perennial
Wetlands: N/A
Cowardin Class:
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non-Tidal:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
? Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
? Field Determination. Date(s):
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
1
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "maybe" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below):
2
Z Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: Withers & Ravenel.
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
? Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
? Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
? Corps navigable waters' study:
? U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
? USGS NHD data.
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Raleigh West
Quad 7.5 minute.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
Wake County Soil Survey.
? National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
? State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
? FEMA/FIRM maps:
? 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum
of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date)-2009 Wake County Aerials.
or ? Other (Name & Date)-
F-1 Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
? Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
SAMPLE

Site
number

Latitude

Longitude
Cowardin
Class Estimated
amount of
aquatic
resource in
review area
Class of
aquatic
resource
House Creek 35.835142N -78.677158W perennial ±725 1f Non-Section 10
- Stream

IMPACT EXHIBITS
11
?- PROTECT INFORMATION PROPOSED STREAK RB IMPACTS
IRAWS DAYf011 N! DDRGMY IR1R
DB 11268 PG 390
BM 1996 PG 1283
PIN #0795496409
/

0
i'.

s
0
.3
F?. 301.99
4
5
e? v v?
m?\,1111,"
1

N
at /F ?' -
E f YAgyDy
DA 11755 PG 1395
PIN ,¢0795571949 .R-__ -
N
P? PCAIEIIAE
!
DB 11257 P
BM 1996 PG 444
PIN #0795581396
?tt cs RyglGH 1s , SO
Jgpwsfl
ACA.I51 BE FlNpyEEp AT RME
EEIms?.. N'
DES I126B PG HE IE
390
BM 1996 PG 1283
PIN #07954964D9
TI
It
- i-- Y

- T 1 (?11 TOTALPROJECT ACREAGE 2371911AC
1
ll l
REFERENCES D
013954
#34
0160
MAP
Y PIN
.
,
.
,
, of-372
PIN REFERENCES 8544340,0)95153 01411, 0I9i583]2fi
m9is8D399, 0795 4aa454, 0791510,405
1
WETINDSDELINEAT1DBY-

' ,
b .
1 1 1
? SU RVEYED 81'X8%
or

,?T `
1 ?\ 1 2WETVRND LIM ITS, STREAMS SIT OWN IN TLEATTACiED
1 R DRAWwcSARE EASED UPON 1UR4vIrnONAL
1 V DETERMINATION, ACTON ID 2 -X%X%ADAIEJ

A S 3 SIRETREAM I
111
1 \\1111 IMPACTS WERE CALCULATED USING UPDATED
t r 1 I \ `I DED SURVEY DATA BYXBX THEINEORMATONWAS
1 PRO VIDEDTOWEREYXX.ON-
2-
1
\
?. 1
,,
1 1
N
1

ti ` 1 I1 I1?11 DAY
"
TLC
DB
9,356 PC 14,31
11 I; 11 11 ' EW 994 PG 1416
;\1 PIN #07965D2569
Z
. 1 N 1 1 l
?'
1 ??. ?? 1 1 1yi14
1
\ 1
l
°1

1 1 1
y l 1 1 1
gl 1 ll?
ye 1 11 11 l\
1
1
? #
l ? 11
1 I
R 1
11

1
111
?' 11

O 1
1
1?
\ 1
1
1 1
' \ \ l 1
1 l
\ 1 1
M1

\
Q 1 1 I
1
1 ?I `I
1
1 1
_ ?
1
1 Il `lg
1 1 ?
1
O ?
1
{ 1 11
1?
AAFA 1I
IwO 11Ia w •
memm%r
11,10001 m
ww ?
1911w'M'lOR W 011
IOwM I 4AM 0101
P Ow
°mmi
w m1
101aw 611 Ow
SEMI
IwM11M. iw 1011
111010 1011 0w
0 1w M Ow
M=2
elawr w 0w
E y l 1
11w 11YC ? 1
waAL
7N`Ol W 0Y
01M' 111 m
Oww'wL W 0!
w1K1
llllalf y1 Ow
w lwl
1lllw'M 11L W 071
IOMIt 111 IIIbK
000w Us. y11 6101
1
wail
BIOlN 1.10 0w
?. / 1 111
? ? I I. ?1 1 l11 iNn1x
E uwv 11 ??
IL ?' 11 PROVOSEO IM PACT AREA
I? 1 1 I \ l l l? PROJECT PHnsEROUNOAxr --------
?
?_?? 111 NEUSE RIVER BUFFER ZONE 1 TEMPORARY IMPACTAREA
1 BUFFER 1 \
o ?? - 1 '1 `'I ` NEUSE RIVER BUFFER ZONE2 TEMPORARY IMPACTAREA
1 1 µ
\ ?v I 1 / ? 1 11 4' 111
??? I / 1 1'' 111 NEUSERVER BUFFER ZONE2 PERMANENT IMPACTAREA
(0 I Il
`10 \ l?1 AREA
N O \?
/ 11l
l
0 P°° 1 II ?/ ,
/ I 1 111
0 1
I
,II 1 &
1
6 A?P ? r% 1 I 1\
/ II? '1 1 C 1\
I
ti r 0 j ?I 7 1 111
I N/F y
/ f f I fl 1
T
I I I1 f @78-SPI) 1 Y
1 1 YARM
D86467 PG 503
PIN #9795890454
'F7.90BgMw /
o,'n 1 t
d sa !_
s -
NEUSE eivEa euETER
g/ _ _
1 I
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
?1 11? 4 1 1
T /
q xo ECREE
-??,
- _ r
7@' 1125w1'
1 PG 1018 ?GMIK O YARMI
,I?B I1755 PG 1399 ??...
BM l#07 pG 444
#0795583471 BM 1983 PG 623
PIN #0795587517 /? n r A ?? /? ??
(a
I?
C
,(a
A N?

,
"
`
'
` -
EDIVARN
8M 1982 PG 1118 _
& II A4 11 PIN #0795588896
?:.

i

1 /
I
I

Re"TI,v ?
CRABTREE VILLAGE OVERALL IMPACT MAP WITHERS &- RAVENEL
IMBRRRIR I ?LAYRRIR I IRRVRYDRR
Tm ioeN
mn? ? RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 1? 1114111141
101 010700110
VICINITY MAP

PROPOSED STREAM IMPACT
CULV
E
TENSION \ \
\
A
A EA \
\ \

LENGTH
MPACT ILOCA ON AREA
STREAM 660 60
\ \ \ \

INDEX
PROPOSED IMPACT AREA
IMPACEA " 1 /
60 L
F
M IMPACT
\
.
.
660 S.F. OF STREAM IMPACT

PROJECT BOUNDARY ? ? ? ? ?/? I , ¦'
•
.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... \ \ \
I
\
......
STREAM IMPACT AREA \
I , \
I 1 \
? 1

I \
I

PROPOSED
BOX CULVERT
??F\
STREAM IMPACT TYPICAL SECTION \
. \
EXISTING ROADWAY FINISHED GRADE
PROPOSED ROADWAY FINISHED GRADE \
I • • \
d
?- ------------------ -
- o
??
EXISTING BOX
CULVERT I"`
PROPOSED
O F
RETAINING WA L
INSTALL MAIN CHANNEL BOX
CULVERT 12' BELOW EXISTING
STREAM BED GRADE ELEVATION. \ HEADWALL 7i
11/P ?A?
GRAPHIC SCALE T
20 0 10 2 40 O

1 inch = 20 k.

No. Revision Dale B
D-9-1
ae N, m,ie

CRABTREE VILLAGE

AREA "A1.
STREAM IMPACT MAP

WITHER5 RAVENEL
- I
a:aa es ,°e"o
RALEIGH
WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA EN6INEEES I P
LANNEES I SUEYEr0E5
maeooM ,
, N"°? ,.„°,,,,e, ,,,s,, a f.z9,?s, „ „?ers,„--.

0
s
x

NEUSE RIVER BUFFER
TOTAL IMPACTS AREA "A2"
\
' \
\ \ 0 0 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 40
IMPACT AREA AREA
LOCATION (SF) (AC)
NRB ZONE 1
"
"

'

, I
` '

'
\ \ \
1 inch = 20 k.
\ \
TOTAL 5,637 0.129
PERMANENT
A4
ROADWAY 4,370 0.100
GREENWAY TRAIL 1,267 0.029

,
NRB ZONE 1
TEMPORARY 1
181 0
027 I \
,
.
NRB ZONE 2
'
PERMANENT "A4: TOTAL 3,094 0.071 I
ROADWAY 2,510 0.058
GREENWAY TRAIL 584 0.013
NRB ZONE 2
TEMPORARY 306 0.007

INDEX
PROPOSED IMPACT ARIA tow
41j#
PROJECT BOUNDARY
I
PROPOS?D
.....
1 \? \
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER ZONE 1 TEMPORARY IMPACTAREA BOX CULVERT \
AA
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER ZONE 1 PERMANENT IMPACT AREA I \

NEUSE RIVER BUT ERZONE 2 TEMPORARY IMPACT ARFA

NEUSE RIVERBUFFERZONE2PERMANENTIMPACT AREA
I ,also as
\ \
STREAM IMPACT TYPICAL SECTION '

\ s 40#
EXLSnNG ROADWAY FlNISHED GRADE
PROPOSED ROADWAY RNISHED GRADE
\ \
0, J`O (n ' \
----
-
----------
CUULVERT'wEaT PRO SED
To RETAI ING WALL rA \
INSTALL MAIN CHANNEL BOX
CULVERT 12' BELOW EXISTING
STREAM 80 GRADE ELEVATION

rD
.

No. Revision Dale B m,ie
- °ea9A,e
CRABTREE VILLAGE

:::::]

[
NRB IMPACT MAP AREA "A2,
WITHER5 RAVENEL
? 1 I
a:aa By 41.1 N.

RALEIGH
WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CARO

LINA
EN6INEEES I PLANNERS I SUEYEr0E5
maeooM ,
, _ III '_ "'a „?,,,,„ e, ,,,s,,, a faz9,94s,6? -„?ers, -l om

0
6
s
x

PROPOSED STREAM IMPACT

EXTENSION
EIRT
REA "A2"
IMPACT AREA
LOCATION SF LENGTH
STREAM 763 36
O
?I GR
OC11-

EX
INDEX
PROPOSED IMPACT AREA
C "
"
I P A
T AREA A2 /
PROJECT BOUNDARY M 36 F. OF. STREAM IMPACT
783 F. OF STREAM IMPACT
?
I

I
00 ...:.
...:::::: ... /
/
STREAM IMPACT AREA PROPOSED DOUBLE 96
CULVERT EXTENSION
°
..............

PR OSED
RETAI NG WAL

STREAM IMPACT TYPICAL SECTION // 0
EXISTING ROADWAY FINISHED GRADE

PROPOSED ROADWAY FINISHED GRADE /
--
------------- -

EXISTING STREAM
BED ELEVATION
/
INSTALL DOUBLE CUP
12" BELOW EXISTING NG
J RAPHICSCALE
STREAM BED GRADE
ELEVATION. /
/ 20 10 20 40
NTS 1 inch = 20 t.

No. Revision Dale B - m,ie
°a ae °a°'3.
'-
11
CRABTREE VILLAGE
AREA"A3,
STREAM IMPACTMAP
WITHER5 RAVENEL
4"°
4 - I
1h
es
4 me"o
RALEIGH
WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
aNNNRe ,
, C- ".lhC-1- s„ ,e,,,,,4-3340 f- 9194-6008 -lhers, -l om

0
s
x

NEUSE RIVER BUFFER
TOTAL IMPACTS AREA "A4" O O
I ?
IMPACT AREA AREA
LOCATION (SF) (AC) Q CL
O
> W
220 j
NRB ZONE 1
PERMANENT "A4" TOTAL 4,425 0.102
ROADWAY 1,716 0.039 LL_
O
uuo 0 Q0 V

230 00
GREENWAY TRAIL 2,709 0.062
N
(ON
NRB ZONE 1
TEMPORARY 1,273 0.029 240
, / . /
NRB ZONE 2 ?
PERMANENT A4: TOTAL 6,332 0.145
ROADWAY 1,814 0.042 o?,O
O
N S PROPOSED
ERVICE RETAINING WAL ?? ??/,
1
GREENWAY TRAIL 4,518 0.104 TRASH
NRB ZONE 2
TEMPORARY 1,140 0.026

INDEX
PROPOSED IMPACT AREA \
/
'
PROJECT BOUNDARY

NEUSE RIVER BUFFER ZONE I TEMPORARY IMPACTAREA p
PROPOSED DOUBLE 96",
CULVERT EXTENSION

NEUSE RIVER BUFFER ZONE 1 PERMANENT IMPACTAREA % /
/ kiziQ o
NEUSE RIVER BUFFERZONE 2 TEMPORARY IMPACTAREA

NEUSERIVER BUFFER ZONE 2PERMANENT IMPACT AREA

STREAM IMPACT TYPICAL SECTION T
EXISTING ROADWAY FINISHED GRADE
PROPOSED ROADWAY FINISHED GRADE G) /

- ---

1( GRAPHIC SCALE.
SAT
INSTALL DOUBLE 96' CUP 20 0 10 20 40
12' BELOW EXISTING
SnWM NTS ELEVATION GRADE _ VIP, 1 inch = 20 t.

No. Revision Dale B - m,ie
°,a ae °a?°'
CRABTREE VILLAGE
AREA "A4.
NRB IMPACT MAP
WITHER5 RAVENEL
-
azk l No
RALEIGH
WAKE COUNTY
NORT
H CAROLINA EN61NEEES 1 PLANNERS I SUEYEr0E5
maeooM ,
, lh_1 ,,,,e,,,,s,,,,a faz„ „?ers,„---

i!
s
x