20110160 Ver 1_Application_20110401

I I
I?®?1
oF wnrFgor 11 ®?. ?'
o r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008-
Pre-Construction Notification C Form
A. A ticant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number or General Permit (GP) number. RGP 31
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ®No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification: -
? Yes ®No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ®No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ®No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Pitt 45, SR 1753, Stokestown-St.John's Road Over Fork of Grinnel Creek Pitt County
2b. County: Pitt
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Griffon
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: 2B.207411
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. - N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): N/A
3d. Street address: 105 Pactolus Highway NC 33 P.O. Box 1587
3e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835
3f. Telephone no.: 252-830-3490
3g. Fax no.: 252-830-3341 00
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Aes
Page 1 of 11 !?l q(7y,,
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version q
r ?i f'
7.1
{
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Division 2 Environmental Officer
4b. Name: Jay B. Johnson
4c. Business name
(if applicable): North Carolina Depratment of Transportation
4d. Street address: P.O. Box 1587
4e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835
4f. Telephone no.: 252-830-3490
4g. Fax no.: 252-830-3341
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: N/A
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
} 3
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or
parcel ID): Pitt 45,SR 1753, Stokestown-St.John's Road Over Fork
. of Grinnel Creek
Latitude: N 35.370759 Longitude: - W
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 77.363030
(DD.DDDDDD) - (-DD.DDD0D0)
1c. Property size: N/A acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Fork of
proposed project: Grinnel Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water. C;Sw;NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse Contentnea 03020203
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Pitt 45 SR 1753, Stokestown-St.John's Road is a paved secondary state highway. Woodlands and Agriculture dominate
the landscape.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 Square Feet of 404 Wetland Impacts For The Bridge to Pipe Replacement.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
60' This site is part of a longer adjacent stream system
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Bridge To Pipe Replacement ; the existing bridge has deteoriated and needs replacing.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Existing 36' Long by 24' Wide Timber Bridge will be replaced with a Proposed 17'-3" x 11'-0" x 40' ASPPA.
Eccavators,Dump Trucks,and Crane Trucks will be used for the Bridge To Bridge Replacement.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
? Yes ® No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): NCDOT Other: NCDOT
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
December,2010
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version'
< t
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
r "
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWO
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0 Sq. Ft.
2h. Comments: 0 Sq. ft. 404 Welland Impacts
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ® P ? T Pipe Fork of Grinnel ® PER ? Corps 20' 44'
Creek ? INT ® DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps 0' 0
? INT ? DWQ
S3 El P F-1 T El PER El Corps 0' 0'
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps 0' 0
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 44 LF
3i. Comments: 44 Linear Feet of Stream Impacts
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
I .. 1
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts None
4g. Comments: None
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total None
5g. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No. If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other. None
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mgation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary impact
re wired?
B1 ®P ? T Fill Fork of Grinnel Creek ® Nees 775 Sq. Ft. 355 Sq. Ft.
B2 ®P ? T Fill Fork of Grinnel Creek ® Nos 745 Sq. Ft. 370 Sq. Ft.
B3 ®P ? T Fill Fork of Grinnel Creek ® Nos 865 Sq. Ft. 385 Sq. Ft.
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: See Page 6-A For Total Buffer Impacts
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version ,
..
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts None
4g. Comments: None
5. Pond or take Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, th en complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total None
5g. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other: None
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary impact required?
61 ®P ? T B4 Fill Fork of Grinnel Creek ® Nos 775 Sq. Ft. 385 Sq. Ft.
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts 3160 Sq. Ft. 1495 Sq. Ft.'
6i. Comments: Buffer Zone 1 Impacts = 0.07 Acres Buffer Zone 2 Impacts = 0.03 Acres
Pager of To
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation.
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
There are 0 Sq. Ft. of 404 Wetland Impacts for this Project; Therefore,The Wetland Impacts have been minimized to the
greatest extent feasible, with just those impacts occurring for the pipe installation for the project
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Use of existing roadway to operate construction equipment; no equipment will enter wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes N No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this

pro
project? ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in-lieu fee program

? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete If Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete If Making a Payment to Indieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete If Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) -required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes ®No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: None
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
N/A
6h. Comments:

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a . Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b . If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Sheet flow through Vegetated Uplands and Special Sediment control
Fence will be used to treat Stonmwater Runoff from the road. Roadside ditches will ® Yes ? No
have wattles installed to treat water before entering into the buffers; the roadside
ditches are vegetated and will treat stor mwater as well.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A Roadway/Bridge Project %
2b . Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater. Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Sheet flow through Vegetated Uplands and Special Sediment control Fence will be used to treat Stormwater Runoff from
the road. Roadside ditches will have wattles installed to treat water before entering into the buffers; the roadside ditches
are vegetated and will treat stormwater as well.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? N/A
? Phase II
? NSW
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs El USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other: N/A
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HOW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
® Other. NPDES Permit
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
Q Yes No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stonnwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H. 1300). DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered 'yes' to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered 'yes' to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered 'no,' provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
I
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ®No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
?
Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCWRC and On-Site Investigation
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCWRC
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCDOT Historic Architecture and Archaeology Natural Environment Unit of PD&EA
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Pipe designed to no-rise standards
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM Maps

Jay B. Johnson
?J February
3,
/
QVnr 2011
Applicant/Agents Printed Name pli nUAgen Signature
' Date
(Agent's signatu vali nty
rf an a orization letter from the applicant
is rovi ed.
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Moratorium Pitt 45.txt
From: Wilson, Travis W.
sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 12:54 PM
To: Sutton, Michael W
CC: Rogerson, Maria A; Johnson, Jay B
Subject: RE: Pitt 45
WRC does not have any specific concerns.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sutton, Michael W
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 4:30 PM
To: Wilson, Travis w.
Cc: Rogerson, Maria A; Johnson, Jay B
subject: Pitt 45
Good Afternoon,Mr. Travis.... Division 2 plans t o replace Pitt 45,an existing timber
bridge with an arch pipe. we would like to know if there is a moratorium for this
location. Thank You..... mike
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records
Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
10-12-0006
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT DWORMATION
Project No: County: Pitt
WBS No: 213.207411 Document. Minimum Criteria Sheet
F.A. No: N/A Funding: ® State ? Federal
Federal.(USACE) Permit Required? ® Yes ? No Permit Type: RGP 31
Project Description: Pitt 45 is an Existing 36' Long x 24' wide RC floor on timber joists bridge and is to
be replaced with an arch pipe.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conchastons:
Review of BPO quad maps, historic designations roster, and indexes was undertaken on 27 January
2011. Based on this review, there are no existing NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS properties in the Area of
Potential Effects (APE). Google Maps "Street View" and current Pitt County GIS Mapping and tax
information also indicate that there are no historic structures present within the APE. Several mobile
homes are located west of the bridge but are not historic structures.
BriefExplanatton ofwhy the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
HPO quad maps recording NR, SL, LD, DE, and SS properties for the Pitt County survey, Pitt County
GIS information, Pitt County Tax Information, and Google Maps "Street View" are considered valid for
the purposes of determining the likelihood of historic resources being present.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached. Maps
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL NO SURVEY REQUIRED
ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC ARCFETECIURE (CIRCLE ONE)
CY
Project Tracking No. anternal Use)
10-12-0006
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
2B.207411
County: Pitt
RBS No.
F.A. No:
Federal (USACE) Permit Required?
2B.207411
Document: MCC
Funding: ® State ? Federal
® Yes ? No Permit Type: RGP 31
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 45 on SR 1753 (Stokestown-St. John's Road) over Fork of
Grindle Creek with an Arch Pipe.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results ofreview, and conclusions:
The maps and files at the OSA were reviewed for this project on 1/27/2011. There are no previously
documented archaeological sites in the APE, based upon reviewing OSA quad mapping, no are there
previous environmental reviews or surveys. The CRS also reviewed photographs, various mapping,
including soils, and design plans submitted by the Division 2 Environmental Program Supervisor.
Additionally, Pitt County mapping from the 1938 Highway Commission maps was reviewed for any
details of particular cultural or industrial interest. No further work is recommended. Note, cemeteries in
the local vicinity should not be affected by this undertaking, as currently planned
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
It is unlikely that undocumented, significant archaeological sites are located in the limited and previously
disturbed APE.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: vicinity map
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL
NO SURVEY REQUIRED - Archaeology
1/31/2011 - -
NCDOT Cultural Resources Specialist Date
"No Survey Required"formfar.u orT n<poaamo P oirco as Qualified in the 3007 Programmatic Agreement
NCDOTArchaeology & Historic Archtrectme Gro ps
I? I. I' I " I I ? I
i I I Z .
I
L Lj-?-
I I
-
?L
V)
C
l
L
ez-6 I I I Q
ct
L
W
0
0???0
0-
I
W
i
W
°
-
-
L-Li
) o ? Lu
LLJ
Lj
N?
-
j -/

-
u
-

II p
m
mCL N tij
-----
Lt (/) Oc
?
_ u
Z? - ?

N I
I m6-
m
I Q?
C\j

N
-- - - ---? 7VN'0 SNHOP °1S

----- ' m
LL-
LLJ
Q I y 8 -LC)
O K O

r`?
-?-- Zzz ? I ? I -+- N ? II
II O
N z O z Lu lL

II
0
OZ-8 -- j ?_-Q
_
v W?
W I I
I j
me ?1

LL- Q)
?
I LtLJ

JJ
W

I I

Q

N
Q I I I

? I I I I ?
N
C) I CD I U
i
i
y
3
N
0
N
3
3
w
W Y
tr N
? e
Q
°a
w °-
ui a
w
a o
O
W X
K
O d_
I O)
X
I
Il
W L?j
N
ct: n cl:n
W
? U- ? U)
mQ m(l.
r°
pyy:-aze__-__.
?M

caa $?

U- LL.
(5
W(n W
^o n
,o IV
cr II cf? II
IW
Ll- (n
?Q.mQ?
N
I o
? Y
m
0
1

LLJ
aYO ?
O -.
u)
mwi? Cr
LL.
L
Q

F 4j O
Z
a oll1?
,
.

i LL,

`L
tl0 LPN ? y \? hl V)
?lI
=e nrv?H Q, \'

W
ene
Wo
eo`e c:aw°w zt
a >m? N 2
Q) (n
O O ~
O

ni
m ?z..Sq

°
??
- O
N
n 1 +
? v
•o
F rvou'mc v
(LL C
Q

d? .
?
W W Z? N
s LLI C)
II u
I
I I „co ? If ? N
I
II
I II I LUcn?~
I
y` Q)
II I ?
I III m ? CQ
II
I III ?
I ? N
\
W
k& _
_
a7g
_ 1 _:
: YV---- W o

IVMJ SYp•'lf Ot J/I y, Cl:
Lli
m L1
j
_

I
p
I
? ?
o

I
I
II s
cn
W
00

Q

a)
III II Fs In (Z)
ti? N -
cl?
II
? I p V??'`?
is 6 .n; m II
II
LLJ LQ (n
v U-1
j Q
Ir-
LL?
) o
II
W Z} W

Y Co Q.
O
\
c I ®000 \ N ® Q
rI 5{ri 0

U I g b Y ON
a 00 CIZ
Z
a ec ?
? ma b w

gg O
Q w
S
?
7 S ? 3 .S \
E
K
y
S
K W
O r F
s Z
2
E y k 7
LJLJ
OO
n
_

7

m
A-
-. ?
?
U Z W m n O
oo I? N
In W m j O p
\ Z Z I Z O p L LJ
Q
/VS^) , ? O ill
ID Lli
L?
O [F (U J L ~ N
v cnomQ- Z? Z2:
Ll- ? i
? z v m W
CIZ cc
I\ v) ly
a
m„ ? Y1NJ?
?JZ
1
Q
j
O
ti
8m
n`z
of
W
o -? °-°
Z!
N?P
N °?
?°
6
m ??
a
? ?F„mn wa^mu

z
'?
°m ?
w
m W
u
? ?
wz W
^_. nPi O NWF m
S?WNmP mNb
??nq
d„?r?N dNPmPN
Jpu?P ?? WF-e
2?N rJ 6?„?TW
VG `?y W ?d W
co
0
0
ioo°e
aLL«o
m
3
S
N
0

N

3
3

W Y \<j 8'

L.) 0 ? R
0

N Q .e

o
d -
?
?
w a
z a

W
OWG, g7
{

O v W

VI
O
1II
Si
N p
3
W
F

r
r?
s-
ra °
3S¦ a8 PN
mOr.Ji 9,YJJJ
m6 - aA
An
p ?JRf? 0?
JJ
z N:.°m
N°?mo
x
?e r O
I I? ? W II
?4I? III A.
SIP II l a: ??

LL, Gi2.1
U.) r j

O O
oz
?O

U V-
V) II N

QO Z
2Qp W Q Q

J Lli
W
3 V
- QQ o
o to

I
I V I z? ? ?,
I
I II I ?? ? ?
I? l } W
N i _
_ aza - e

MMJ SM4'?5 Ot N ?.
.
° - fill
3

w x 3 _•n? ---•- x ?l . -- --- O

? ? ? ? ? II I ?

`? o'

??

N? I

I?11

Q

11
-w Q
C)
Q
?
" o a oi 2
l II p $ o
rJ II m W I p
II I W yo I\ II W
II 4L j
V, Lij
u
( $
F I
9 F F
p d Q-
n

CL
a ¦ Y
€r$ C,

3? O
U
??
s
g° a
?
W ti ?
a ffi
?
g j
CL 9

Q
d _ - 5 W
Z

0
? LLJ ?
0
Q O
'•m
Wo P
C? O ??? mN
? 1 ? ? \ O ?' ?'' 2 Nam ? •
V W Q:) y
? ?ct-WM
J
L'i
? ? Z m C
Z z ? Z
?s O
L-Li
O O N U
Lr)
\ O m W
LO C? cl_-
Cl-
C W _ W
m
V 1 O
I?
V)
? 11,1 N
O
N
O 0 O WW
V ¢ O
to ? ?
Z
O I? 41
a-- <n =
L)i N
:Z)
b
Z Wti
g zE o
m a W Li
l?Wamm?
O //Zi? `S W
v U-
H
m I?ryW
?J2W
Q
Q
O
Q
O
Cl)
3
Q
W
j
O
OZz
8 8
?m
^2 0
G I N
2?-
0
0
0
0
m
0
0
0

O ylm4l-N
2Y YpY1N?
2 Hm 2
??

3 $?F„mll o??'???
_ ?ONNP
Z I
J
N H?NYPIPW

W

m
W W
Om
2 WV
_ W
pp qpmp _=
1N?IfOry yNP(yNN
pJu.m.ii ?Fm.?
¢?¢N?vy>I QONPV>
?mJ2ryW ?mJ2NW
V'? W w W
____I ___ _____ ____ - ___________________________________LJ

PITT 45
SR 1753, STOKESTOWN-ST. JOHNS ROAD
OVER FORK OF GRINNEL CREEK
36' LONG BY 24' WIDE TIMBER BRIDGE
TO BE REPLACED WITH 17'-3" x 11 '-0" x 40' ASPPA
FORT BARNWELL USGS QUAD MAP
SHEET NUMBER 79-A OF THE
SOIL SURVEY OF PITT COUNTY
MIDDLE NEUSE 03020202 GRINNEL CREEK C, Sw; NSW
DECEMBER 29, 2010 WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 2B.207411

S

7:
06
Rd

NC-'11&
^qr" w
r
1 '
y,

PITT 45
Y= 59388 7.7808
X= 2487969.501
N35 ^-22'-15"
W 77^-21'-47" =
. N 35.370759 DEGREES
4F
W 77.363030 DEGREES
FIRM PANEL 4588 K
MAP NUMBER 3 720458800 K ;, ..

1 inch = 2,000 feet
0 700 1.400 2,800 4.200 5.600
Feet
\ W E „^d7B^
?.r S
Y ,15
r.
PITT 45
SR 1753, STOKESTOWN-ST. JOHNS ROAD`- -
OVER FORK OF GRINNEL CREEK
36' LONG BY 24' WIDE TIMBER BRIDGE r,TO BE REPLACED WITH 17'-3 " x 11 '-0" _r 40' ASPPA = -
FORT BARNWELL USGS QUAD MAP y=-
SHEET NUMBER 79-A OF THE ;
SOIL SURVEYOF PITT COUNTY ,
MIDDLE NEUSE 03020202 GRINNEL CREEK C,Sw;NSW - -,T
DECEMBER 29, 2010 WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 2B.207411
?DCOM
Faso s o ., N ?o _
i
W E 9w ,
S _ O
/St Jobs __ _ - ' _ T - - - -- - s
St Johns
° 0413
?O(' 30418
r p?, 1 8.0
2;
NC-118 : O <
r' o l f J
PITT 45
Y= 593887.7808 '
X= 248 796 9.5013 - ` N35 ^-22'45"
1 W 77^-2147" 1
N35.370759 DEGREES 8.
W 77.363030 DEGREES
FIRM PANEL 4588 K 9 '
&MAP NUMBER 3720458800 K
1 _--
' 1 inch = 2,000 feet
0 700 1,400 2,800 4,200 5,600
Feet