Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20110260 Ver 1_More Info Received_20110325. T March 25, 2011 Mr. Andrew Williams Regulatory Project Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District, Raleigh Field Office 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Reference: Response to February 24, 2011 Notice of Incomplete Application SAW-2010-01840 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Orange County North Carolina Dear Mr. Williams: 11-oa--,o GC?L? MAR 2 5 2011 The following response and attached documentation are provided to address the remark contained in your February 24, 2011 Notice of Incomplete Application pertaining to the Individual Permit (IP) Application for Carolina North. The United States Army Corp of Engineers' (USACE) remark is provided in italics and The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's (UNC-CH or University) response follows: Remark Based on a review of your application, you propose impacts to 8 jurisdictional stream channels. In order to minimize degradation of water quality, flow within these channels should be diverted around the work (fill) area during construction. Please provide additional details regarding your proposed method of stream diversion. If you plan to use temporary coffer dams, vlease be aware that coffer dams are considered as temporary fill and update/adjust your application and plans accordingly Please include a restoration plan for any temporaryfills. In your February 16, 2011 response to the remark above, you state that during construction activities that impact streams, the water will be diverted around the work area. You state that you plan to use sand bags to create temporary dams upstream of the work areas. However, you do not quantify the amount of temporary impact associated with the sandbags for each stream. Please indicate the amount of stream length in each stream that will be temporarilyfilled with the sandbags. Please update any tables within the application that show total impacts for the site. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of Environment, Health & Safety 1 120 Estes Drive Ext., CB# 1650 Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-1650- The University has quantified the amount of temporary impact to streams, in linear feet, associated with the sandbags for each stream. Tables D-9, D-10 and D-11 have been updated to show these temporary impacts for the site. In the report section of the IP application, pages 51-52 of the report have been revised. The table entitled "Phase 1 Carolina North Stream and Wetland Impacts (D- 9)" has been revised to show the 10 linear feet of temporary stream impacts to stream 1. Please replace pages 51-52 with the attached replacement pages, dated March 25 2011, Revision 2. In the report section of the IP application, pages 53-54 of the report have been revised. The table entitled "Phase 2 Carolina North Stream and Wetland Impacts Table A (D-10)" has been revised to show 10 foot temporary impacts to streams 2, 8, 13, 14B, Bolin Creek, and Crow Branch, for a total of 60 linear feet of temporary stream impact. Please replace pages 53-54 with the attached replacement pages, dated March 25, 2011, Revision 2. In the report section of the IP application, pages 55-56 of the report have been revised. The table entitled "Phase 2 Carolina North Stream and Wetland Impacts Table B (D-11)" has been revised to show 10 foot temporary impacts to streams 2, 8, 13, 14B, Bolin Creek, and Crow Branch, for a total of 60 linear feet of temporary stream impact. Please replace pages 55-56 with the attached replacement pages, dated March 25, 2011, Revision 2. In Appendix D, Table D-9 entitled "Phase 1 Carolina North Stream and Wetland Impacts" has been updated to show a 10 linear foot temporary stream impact to stream 1. Please replace Table D-9 with the attached revised Table D-9, March 25, 2011, Revision 2. In Appendix D, Table D-10 entitled "Phase 2 Carolina North Stream and Wetland Impacts Table A" has been updated to show 10 foot temporary impacts to streams 2, 8, 13, 14B, Bolin Creek, and Crow Branch, totaling 60 linear feet. Please replace Table D-10 with the attached revised Table D-10, March 25, 2011, Revision 2. In Appendix D, Table D-11 entitled "Phase 2 Carolina North Stream and Wetland Impacts Table B" has been updated to show 10 foot temporary impacts to streams 2, 8, 13, 14B, Bolin Creek and Crow Branch, for a total of 60 linear feet of temporary impact. Please replace Table D-11 with the attached revised Table D-11, March 25, 2011, Revision 2. Based on a request made during a phone conversation between the USACE and UNC-CH on February 24, 2011, UNC-CH is providing a Pump-Around Detail with explanatory text to present additional information on the nature of the temporary {00027550.DOC) {00027550.DOC}Page 2 of 3 stream impacts associated with the Pump-Arounds. Please insert the Pump-Around Detail, March 25, 2011, Revision 2, behind Table D-11 in Appendix D. If you have any questions regarding this information or need additional information, please contact me at (919) 962-9752 or Ms. Jill Coleman at (919) 843-3246. Sincerely, Ck "J'? Sharon A. Myers, L. G. Environmental Compliance Officer cc: Ms. Jill Coleman Dr. Daniel Elliott Ms. Mary Beth Koza Mr. Ian McMillan Mr. Kevin Nunnery Mr. Bruce Runberg Ms. Anna Wu Attachments: Revised Pages 51-52, dated March 25, 2011, Revision 2 Revised Pages 53-54, dated March 25, 2011, Revision 2 Revised Pages 55-56, dated March 25, 2011, Revision 2 Table D-9, March 25, 2011, Revision 2 Table D-10, March 25, 2011, Revision 2 Table D-11, March 25, 2011, Revision 2 Pump Around Detail, March 25 2011, Revision 2 {00027550.DOC) {00027550.DOC}Page 3 of 3 Table D-9 Phase 1 Carolina North Stream and Wetland Impacts Wetlands W tl d Impact Miti ti R i Mitigation Cost e an (ac) ga on at o acres $62,210/acre 2 0.005 2:1 0.010 $622 SUBTOTAL 0.005 0.010 $622 rounded up to the nearest .25 acre 0.250 $15,553 S treams Temporary Permanent Impact* Impact Mitigation Cost Stream (If) Mitigation Ratio (If) Mitigation Ratio total If $338/If 1 10 none 31 2:1 62 $20,956 SUBTOTAL 10 31 $20,956 *temporary impacts are associated with pump-around devices for culvert extension installations, see pump-around detail illustration at the end of Appendix D Jordan Lake Buffer Impacts Impact Zone l (ft) Zone 2 (ft) Mitigation Cost Stream (If) 3:1 1.5:1 total ftZ $.96/sf 1* 0 0 0 0 $0 total impact 0 0 0 0 $0 * Jordan Lake buffer rules do not apply to stream 1 TOTAL WETLAND + STREAM + BUFFER = $36,509 March 25, 2011: REVISION 2 Z NOISIAM :ITOZ `SZ 4:)aeW I 806'£bZ$ H3djns + VYV3alS + d VIAM IVIO1 salna aa}}ng alel uepaor agl to uo!l3!ps!anf aql aapun I I el lou saop weaalS ** suo!lelmle:) eaae aa}}nq lenp!A!pu! aol x!pueddy ui sa.inSU of aalai aseald * 6LZ'0£$ TtbS'T£ TLT`Z 01-£'6Z pedual;au :ivio.L9nS 88Z'9E$ 008'LE OZT'ST 089'ZZ uol;eao;sa.i wea.i}s ao};lpajo L9S'99$ Tti£'69 T6Z'LT OSO'ZS uolle8lllw paainbaa le;ol L9S'99$ LL8'8Z LZS'TT OS£'LT TZt, pedualle;o; ZT8'8T$ Ztb9'Z TTZ'S ZL (b' puel}aM) q:)ueas Moab S176'9$ SON 608'T TZ laajD ulloo 0$ 0 0 OZ **Bt?T 0$ 0 0 VLT **VtT t,Tti'£T$ ST6'T OOL'£ 09 ET L170'ST$ 66L'Z SZ8'E Lb 8 6t,£'ZT$ 996'Z S08'Z LZ Z Js/96'$ zu lejol T:S'T V£ 41) weaa;S ;so:) uol4e8l;lW (zu) Z auoZ Qq) T auoZ pedwl * s;:)edwl aa }4n(l wtiej uepiol paa!nba.i uo!les!1!w ou-3Dvsn Aq lue:podw!un PUebMO JN Aq leaawagd3 se paleus!sap lauueg:)** Q x!puaddy}o pua aql le uo!mlsnll! pelap punoie-dwnd aas 'suo!lellelsu! uo!sualxa 11aAlm ao; saD!Aap puno.ie-dwnd ql!M palmosse aie spedw! Aaeaodwal* ZL6`99T$ IZtp 09 iviolans ZL9'8t$ VVT T:Z ZL auou OT (V pUel}aM) qouea8 Moab 96T't,T$ Zt, T:Z TZ auou OT laajD ullog OZS'ET$ Ot, T:Z OZ auou OT UK 0$ 0 auou VLT auou 0 **VtiT 09S'Otl$ ON T:Z 09 auou OT ET ZLL'TE$ V6 T:Z Lt, auou OT 8 ZSZ'8T$ 17S T:Z LZ auou OT Z 31/8££$ A lejol ol3ea 41) olieb ?fl) weaa;S ;so0 uo!3eSij!W uol;e8l3 !W pedual uol;e813!W *;:)edua I ;uauew iad Aaeaodwal sweaa;g 859'9b$ OSL'0 Z asegd ao} aoueleq £SS'ST$ OSZ'0 ;uawAed T asegd JOI tlpaaD OTZ'Z9$ 000'T ane SZ';xau aqt o; do papunoi 90t"09$ TL6'0 TZ8'0 1dlOlans L80'8$ 0£T'O T:Z S90'0 8T Z98'Z$ 9ti0'0 T:Z £ZO'O LT t,09'tl$ 17L0'0 T:Z LEO'0 9 Zt,L'T$ 8Z0'0 T:Z tT0'0 (S)1 69£'T$ ZZ0'0 T:Z TTO'0 £ t,8S'SE$ ZLS'O T:T ZLS'0 8b' 6ST'9$ 660'0 T:T 660'0 b' a.iae/OIZ'Z9$ st onea Pe) ;so0 uol;egil!W uol;eBl;IW pedw I pUel;aM spuel;aM v algel s;aedwi puel;aM pue weaa;S gVON eulloae0 Z asegd 01-0 algal Z NOISIA311 :TTOZ `SZ q:)aeW I TZb`8Sb$ = 2t3jjna + Wd3HiS + ONVIAM Td1Ol paa!nba.i uo!le2lllw ou-3:)vsn Aq }ue:aodw!un pue oma Aq leaawagd3 se paleu2!sap lauueqD*** wea.ils pa}elos!** suol}eln:)le:) eaae aa;}nq lenp!Alpu! ao; x!pueddy ui sain2!i o; aa}ai aseald ZLL'ZS$ TL6'17S 9£8`9 SET'St7 pedwi }au :1d1O18f1S 88Z'9£$ 008'L£ OZT'ST 089'ZZ uoljeaotsai weaJIS aol tlpaaa 090'68$ TLL'Z6 9S6'TZ ST8'OL uoile8i}iw paainba.r letol 090'68$ ZVZ'8E LE9111 S09'£Z US pedwlle;o; ZT8'8T$ Z179'Z TTZ'S ZL (v pUeltaM) g:)ueas mol:) S176'9$ SON 608'T TZ ilaaiD ullo9 0$ 0 0 OZ ***917T 0$ 0 0 17LT ***d17T 17T17'£T$ S16'T OOL'£ 09 £T Lt,O'ST$ 66L'Z SZ8'£ Lt, 8 £6t"ZZ$ OWE SSZ'9 OOT **S 6ti£'ZT$ 996'Z S08'Z LZ Z ;s/96'$ T:S'T VE (;I) ;so:) uol;e8l;!W (Z:}) QW pedwi uaeaalS Z auoZ T auoZ *sj3edwj jogng ale3 uepior paa!nbai uo!le2!3!w ou-3Jbsn Aq;uelaodw!uf1 pueOMp Aq leaawagd3 se paleu2lsap lauueqD*** weaa;s palelosl** t7 x!puaddy }o pua agl3e uoljejIsnll! I!ejap punoie-dwnd aas 'suoljelle;sul uolsuaIca :PaAlno JOI sa:)!Aap puno.ie-dwnd gjIm paleposse aae spedw! Aaeaodwal* ZLS'VEZ$ 1769 US 09 idlOlens ZL9'817$ 1717T T:Z ZL auou OT (b' puel}aM) yauea8 moiD 96T'17T$ Z17 T:Z TZ auou OT laajD u1.109 OZS'£T$ 017 T:Z OZ auou OT 917T 0$ 0 auou 17LT auou 0 ***VtT 09S'017$ OZT T:Z 09 auou OT £T ZLL'T£$ 176 T:Z L17 auou OT 8 009'L9$ OOZ T:Z OOT auou 0 **VS ZSZ'8T$ t7S T:Z LZ auou OT Z jI/8EE$ }I jejol olle21 $ (;I) ollea 8 (1I) uaeaa;S 4so0 uollesil!W l;!W Uolje edw pedwi uol;e l3!IN *;aedw I 3uauewaad Aaeaodwal sweaalS spueltaM patelosl* 8L0'TLT$ OSL'Z Z asegd ao; aaueleq ESS'ST$ OSZ'0 tuawAed T asegd JOI tlpaaa OE9'98T$ 000'E ane SZ• lxau aqt of do papunoi SSZ'ELT$ S8L'Z L0177 SIVIOl L80'8$ 0£T'0 T:Z S90'0 8T Z98'Z$ 9170'0 T:Z EZO'0 LT 1709'17$ 17LO'O T:Z L£0'0 9 Z17L'T$ 8ZO'O T:Z 17T0'0 (S)1 69£'T$ ZZO'O T:Z TTO'0 £ 178S'S£$ ZLS'0 T:T ZLS'0 9d TL8$ 17TO'O T:T 17T0'0 db' £ZS'SL$ 17TZ'T T:T VTZ'T Z L80'8$ OET'0 T:T £T'0 A 59t7'L$ OZT'0 T:Z 90'0 *9X TTT'E$ OSO'O T:Z SZO'0 *b'X Z6L'LT$ 98Z'0 T:Z E17T'0 *X 6ST'9$ 660'0 T:T 660'0 t'/ aa:)e/OTZ'Z9$ same ollea (ae) ;soO uol;e 3ljlW uol;e$lllW pedwi pUel;aM spueliaM El algel spedwl PuellaM pue WMIS 43JON eulloae0 Z asegd TT-a algel The following pump-around detail illustrates the linear extent of temporary stream channel impacts associated with clean water and sediment sandbag dikes. The pump-around technique is often used when extending culverts for road widening. These dikes are temporary, and their impacts do not require mitigation. APPROVED DEWATERING DEVICE DISCHARGE HOSES STREAM DIVERSION PUMP •-- P DEWATERING PUMP ?. ? INTAKE P HOSE swoop qmn? A A' } INTAKE FLOW HOSE I SEDIMENT SANDBAG DIKE POOL CLEAN WATER SANDBAG DIKE '12" TO 1W DEEP, 7 DIA.' 4000M r00 ammum 600owft rnowr PUMPS SHOLD DISCHARGE ONTO A STABLE VELOCITY DISSIPATOR' MADE OF SANDBAGS ??--. WORKAREA EDGE OF WATER PLAN VIEW IMPERVIOUS SHEETING f- 8 WORK AREA m FLOW m 00 Q LL N U J APPROXIMATELY 5' FOR CLEAN SEDIMENT SANDBAG DIKE E SECTION A-A' DIMENSIONS ARE SIMILAR PUMP AROUND DETAIL NOT TO SCALE Appendix D March 25, 2011 Revision 2 Carolina North Individual Permit Application - December 2010 • banks and in-lieu fee programs typically involve larger, more ecologically valuable parcels; • banks and in-lieu fee programs typically involve more rigorous scientific and technical analysis planning and implementation than permittee-responsible mitigation; • on-site mitigation failure rates are historically high; • on-site mitigation activities are particularly sensitive to land use changes, as land use changes often alter local hydrology Phase 1(2011-2016) Unavoidable impacts associated with construction of the Research Building and related infrastructure improvements (See Figure E-1 in Appendix E). The University is proposing unavoidable impacts to 0.005 acre of jurisdictional wetlands and 31 linear feet of jurisdictional stream, as shown in the attached table. The USACE requires mitigation for these impacts. There are no Jordan Lake Buffer impacts in this phase. The University will acquire a one quarter-acre credit to cover the unavoidable wetland impact to 0.01 acre (0.005 acre of impact multiplied by a 2:1 mitigation ratio = 0.01 acre) in this Phase. The credit purchased in this Phase will be applied to Phase 2 impacts. See the table below and in Appendix D, Table D-9. Phase 1 Carolina North Stream and Wetland Impacts (D-9) Wetlands W l d Impact i i i i Mitigation Cost et an (ac) M gat on Rat t o acres $62,210/acre 2 0.005 2.1 0.010 $622 SUBTOTAL 0.005 0.010 $622 rounded up to the nearest.25 acre 0.250 $15,553 Streams Temporary Permanent St Impact* Miti ti Impact Mi i i Mitigation Cost ream (If) ga on Ratio (If) gat t on Ratio total If $338/lf 1 10 none 31 2'1 62 $20,956 SUBTOTAL 10 31 $20,956 *temporary impacts are associated with pump-around devices for culvert extension installations, see pump-around detail illustration at the end of Appendix D Prepared by: Biohabitats, Inc. March 25, 2011 Revision 2 Page 51 Carolina North Individual Permit Application - December 2010 Jordan Lake Buffer Impacts Impact Zone 1 (ftZ) Zone 2 (ftZ) Mitigation Cost Stream (If) 3:1 1.5:1 total ftZ $.96/sf 1* 0 0 0 0 $0 total impact 0 0 0 0 $0 * Jordan Lake buffer rules do not apply to stream 1 I TOTAL WETLAND + STREAM + BUFFER = $36,509 Phase 2 (2016-2051) Impacts associated with the remainder of the proposed 50-year Carolina North development (See Figure E-1 in Appendix E). The USACE is currently reviewing a position paper from UNC-CH related to mitigation for wetlands that occur on the former municipal landfill. UNC-CH believes that these wetlands are part of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) program and, as such, impacts to them should not require mitigation. Until there is a determination regarding the status of these wetlands, mitigation costs for Phase 2 cannot be finalized. The attached tables summarize impacts and associated mitigation in two different ways, one with the landfill wetland impacts excluded and one with the landfill wetland impacts included. A: Landfill wetland impacts excluded (Please see Phase 2, Table A, below and in Appendix D, Table D-10.) The University is proposing unavoidable impacts to 0.821 acre of jurisdictional wetlands and 247 linear feet of jurisdictional streams. The USACE requires mitigation for these impacts. In addition, the University is proposing to impact 28,877 square feet (0.66 acre) of Jordan Lake buffers. The DWQ requires mitigation for the Jordan Lake buffer impacts. Total impacts in Phase 2A are 0.821 acre of wetlands, 247 linear feet of streams, and 28,877 square feet (0.66 acre) of Jordan Lake buffers. Prepared by: Biohabitats, Inc. March 25, 2011 Revision 2 Page 52 Carolina North Individual Permit Application - December 2010 Phase 2: Carolina North Stream and Wetland Impacts Table A (Table D-10) Wetlands Impact Mitigation Cost Wetland (ac) Mitigation Ratio acres $62,210/acre A 0.099 1.1 0.099 $6,159 AB 0.572 1.1 0.572 $35,584 3 0.011 2.1 0.022 $1,369 T (5) 0.014 2.1 0.028 $1,742 6 0.037 2.1 0.074 $4,604 17 0.023 2.1 0.046 $2,862 18 0.065 2.1 0.130 $8,087 SUBTOTAL 0.821 0.971 $60,406 rounded up to the next.25 acre 1.000 $62,210 credit for Phase 1 payment 0.250 $15,553 balance for Phase 2 0.750 $46,658 Streams Temporary Permanent St Impact* Mitigation Impact Mitigation Mitigation Cost ream (If) Ratio (If) Ratio total If $338/If 2 10 none 27 2:1 54 $18,252 8 10 none 47 2.1 94 $31,772 13 10 none 60 2.1 120 $40,560 14A** 0 none 174 none 0 $0 14B 10 none 20 2:1 40 $13,520 Bolin Creek 10 none 21 2:1 42 $14,196 Crow Branch (Wetland A) 10 none 72 2:1 144 $48,672 SUBTOTAL 60 421 $166,972 *temporary impacts are associated with pump-around devices for culvert extension installations, see pump-around detail illustration at the end of Appendix D **channel designated as Ephemeral by NC DWgand Unimportant by USACE-no mitigation required Prepared by: Biohabitats, Inc. March 25, 2011 Revision 2 Page 53 Carolina North Individual Permit Application - December 2010 Jordan Lake Buffer Impacts Impact Zone 1 (ft) Zone 2 (ft2) Mitigation Cost Stream (If) 3:1 1.5:1 total ft2 $.96/sf 2 27 2,805 2,966 $12,349 8 47 3,825 2,799 $15,047 13 60 3,700 1,915 $13,414 14A** 174 0 0 $0 14B** 20 0 0 $0 Bolin Creek 21 1,809 1205 $6,945 Crow Branch (Wetland A) 72 5,211 2,642 $18,812 total impact 421 17,350 11,527 28,877 $66,567 total required mitigation 52,050 17,291 69,341 $66,567 credit for stream restoration 22,680 15,120 37,800 $36,288 SUBTOTAL: net impact 29,370 2,171 31,541 $30,279 * please refer to figures in Appendix C for individual buffer area calculations ** Stream does not fall under the jurisdiction of the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules I TOTAL WETLAND + STREAM + BUFFER = $243,908 B: Landfill wetland impacts included (Please see Phase 2, Table B, below and in Appendix D, Table D-11.) The University is proposing to impact 2.179 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and 247 linear feet of jurisdictional streams. The USACE requires mitigation for these impacts. In addition, the University is proposing to impact 0.228 acre of isolated wetlands, 100 linear feet of isolated stream and 38,242 square feet (0.88 acre) of Jordan Lake buffers. The DWQ requires mitigation for the isolated wetland, isolated stream and Jordan Lake buffer impacts. Total impacts in Phase 26 are 2.407 acres of wetlands, 347 feet of stream and 38,242 square feet (0.88 acre) of Jordan Lake buffers. Prepared by: Biohabitats, Inc. March 25, 2011 Revision 2 Page 54 Carolina North Individual Permit Application - December 2010 Phase 2: Carolina North Stream and Wetland Impacts Table B (Table D-11) Wetlands Impact Mitigation Mitigation Cost Wetland (ac) Ratio acres $62,210/acre A 0.099 1.1 0.099 $6,159 X* 0.143 2:1 0.286 $17,792 XA* 0.025 2.1 0.050 $3,111 XB* 0.06 2:1 0.120 $7,465 Y 0.13 1.1 0.130 $8,087 Z 1.214 1.1 1.214 $75,523 AA 0.014 1'1 0.014 $871 AB 0.572 1.1 0.572 $35,584 3 0.011 2.1 0.022 $1,369 T (5) 0.014 2.1 0.028 $1,742 6 0.037 2.1 0.074 $4,604 17 0.023 2.1 0.046 $2,862 18 0.065 2.1 0.130 $8,087 TOTALS 2.407 2.785 $173,255 rounded up to the next.25 acre 3.000 $186,630 credit for Phase 1 payment 0.250 $15,553 balance for Phase 2 2.750 $171,078 *isolated wetlands Prepared by: Biohabitats, Inc. March 25, 2011 Revision 2 Page 55 Carolina North Individual Permit Application - December 2010 Streams Temporary Permanent Impact* Impact Mitigation Mitigation Cost Stream (If) Mitigation Ratio (If) Ratio total If $338/If 2 10 none 27 2:1 54 $18,252 5A** 0 none 100 2.1 200 $67,600 8 10 none 47 2:1 94 $31,772 13 10 none 60 2.1 120 $40,560 14A*** 0 none 174 none 0 $0 14B 10 none 20 2:1 40 $13,520 Bolin Creek 10 none 21 2.1 42 $14,196 Crow Branch (Wetland A) 10 none 72 2:1 144 $48,672 SUBTOTAL 60 521 694 $234,572 *temporary impacts are associated with pump-around devices for culvert extension installations, see pump-around detail illustration at the end of Appendix D **isolated stream ***Channel designated as Ephemeral by DWQ and Unimportant by USACE-no mitigation required Jordan Lake Buffer Impacts* Stream Impact Zone l (ft) Zone 2 (ft2) Mitigation Cost (If) 3:1 1.5:1 $.96/sf 2 27 2,805 2,966 $12,349 5** 100 6,255 3,110 $22,493 8 47 3,825 2,799 $15,047 13 60 3,700 1,915 $13,414 14A*** 174 0 0 $0 14B*** 20 0 0 $0 Bolin Creek 21 1,809 1205 $6,945 Crow Branch (Wetland A) 72 5,211 2,642 $18,812 total impact 521 23,605 14,637 38,242 $89,060 total required mitigation 70,815 21,956 92,771 $89,060 credit for stream restoration 22,680 15,120 37,800 $36,288 SUBTOTAL: net impact 48,135 6,836 54,971 $52,772 * please refer to figures in Appendix C for individual buffer area calculations **isolated stream ***Channel designated as Ephemeral by DWQ and Unimportant by USACE-no mitigation required I TOTAL WETLAND + STREAM + BUFFER = $458,421 Prepared by: Biohabitats, Inc. March 25, 2011 Revision 2 Page 56