820013_Inspection_20201211

1
113 1
(Type of Visit: 9Q Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit:[C' Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Region: fro
Date of Visit: 10 1 t 110,O I Arrival
Time:
Farm Name: kmarren Gain rrFy7 C KI -il RI 1rm
I )
Owner Name: warren Farming (amPQnJ
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Departure Time:
I//.76, 1
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
i
Facility Contact: C .)r-ti;c7 BQ
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
graoIon warren
Title: T QC GI eC Phone:
g Eith Ft.efLI/iaiii J Inte rator:
Certification Number: j 1 1 1 og
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Latitude:
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
X�
Wean to Finish
10 j F;
VAS
Wean to Feeder
r c1
'SO 00
x
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
I 'Other
Layer
Non -Layer
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
O Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA 0 NE
0 Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ( No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: K.-
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection: i2f II 12O
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1
Structure 2
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Lift
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? 7�
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? i] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes tZI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Pp No ❑ NA ElNE
ElExcessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ElFrozen Ground ElHeavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etC1
PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window❑ Evidence ofWindDrift y❑ �A/pplication Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):,rm u d a/over.eed f (o1 1 1 wheat e` f 9112eops
13. Soil Type(s): vj ci gt a rn� f c eV111 e, 1)nr Fol 1C
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes p0 No ❑ NA 0 NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes I:8 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ® No El NA El NE
the appropriate box. 7�
❑ WUP ['Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ] 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes lJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number:. - 13
Date of Inspection: 12-1N/ Z{)
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
❑ Yes Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE o
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ ElNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 1No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes y.
No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [ No
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the 0 Yes \No
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes q, No
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes tsiNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes tl No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
1 i_q g oo rn w 1 nq c Some bre (L;re(IC Ihrbr nee ' rn d j n rc ice
iI J i- ri0-ef ng t(DU hive over QFpI[e4 enN however i1- i egS-The/1
101 j uGf wonted -ro rnaKe note abo u, i-
G-€ in► a( dour- iK -i form9
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Kci11€ tent)t �-- Phone: //,'0---/-437
Date: 11 II 1v
2/4/2015