Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20110141 Ver 1_More Info Received_20110318Strickland, Bev From: Steenhuis, Joanne Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 4:41 PM To: Strickland, Bev Subject: FW: Moehring Group Action ID No. SAW-2011-00311 DWQ # 11 0141 Attachments: CAMA Base Sheet 6 Proposed B Rev 3-17-11.pdf Bev, Here is a revised drawing shortening the pier due to concerns from the USACE. It does not impact our certification so I am attaching it to the file version of the certification, but not rewriting it. Have a good one. Joanne From: Govoni, Daniel Sent: Friday, March 18, 20118:56 AM To: David.L.timpy@usace.army.mil; Steenhuis, Joanne Subject: FW: Moehring Group Action ID No. SAW-2011-00311 (UNCLASSIFIED) Please see below email and attachment for modifications to the Moehring Group. Thanks-Daniel From: Kathy Vinson [mailto:kbvinson@ec.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, March 17, 20114:34 PM To: Govoni, Daniel Cc: 'Timpy, David L SAW' Subject: FW: Moehring Group Action ID No. SAW-2011-00311 (UNCLASSIFIED) Daniel, Attached is a PDF of the revised sheet 6 of the project plans for the Moehring Group Holding, LP drystack storage marina application. This sheet of the project plans repositions the floating docks in accordance with the conditions specified in the forwarded correspondence from Todd Horton of the Corps. I am providing this PDF to expedite processing of the federal comments required for this application. I will provide you with a signed and sealed copy of the revised sheet as soon as I receive it from the engineer. Please let me know if you need anything else. Thanks, Kathy 252-240-9297 From: Timpy, David L SAW [mailto:David. L.Timpy@usace.army.mil] Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 1:58 PM To: Kathy Vinson Subject: FW: Moehring Group Action ID No. SAW-2011-00311 (UNCLASSIFIED) FYI. I will furnish federal comments today or Monday. Dave -----Original Message----- 1 From: Joseph.M.Edge@uscg.mil [mailto:Joseph.M.Ed eg puscg.mil] Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 1:44 PM To: Timpy, David L SAW Cc: Flynn, Thomas Subject: RE: Moehring Group Action ID No. SAW-2011-00311 (UNCLASSIFIED) Sector North Carolina Waterways Division has reviewed the revision made by Moehring Group and deems the effect to the safety of navigation on Taylors Creek to be minimal with the encroachment into the Setback. Although it is not recommended to allow any encroachment into the Setback, we do not anticipate any adverse effects to the navigable waters in the proximity of the project areas and therefore we do not object to the approval by the Department of the Army. Respectfully, BOSN3 Joseph M. Edge United States Coast Guard Sector North Carolina Waterways Management 2301 E. Fort Macon Rd Atlantic Beach, NC 28512 (252) 247-4525 (work) (252) 241-6172 (cell) (252) 247-4521 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: Flynn, Thomas Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 10:53 AM To: David.L.Timpy@usace.army.mil; Edge, Joseph BOSN3 Subject: RE: Moehring Group Action ID No. SAW-2011-00311 (UNCLASSIFIED) Dave, Joe: It looks like a good compromise. What will the new setback requirements affect this project? Tom Thomas W. Flynn LCDR, USCG (Retired) Marine Information Specialist Tel: (757) 398-6229 FAX: (757) 398-6303 -----Original Message----- From: David.L.Timpy@usace.army.mil [mailto:David.L.Timpy(a,usace.army.mil] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 10:44 AM To: Edge, Joseph BOSN3; Flynn, Thomas Subject: FW: Moehring Group Action ID No. SAW-2011-00311 (UNCLASSIFIED) Below are the comments from Todd Horton on the revision. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Horton, James T SAW Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 12:18 PM To: Kathy Vinson Cc: Timpy, David L SAW Subject: RE: Moehring Group Action ID No. SAW-2011-00311 (UNCLASSIFIED) Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Ms. Vinson, I have reviewed the secondary proposal you submitted. If the eastern floating dock with fuel facility is located outside the channel setback, then you would not be required to obtain any approval from the USACE Navigation Branch, only from CAMA and USACE Regulatory office for your permits. We would allow the western floating dock to cross into the channel setback as proposed in your modified drawing, but the pilings must remain outside the channel setback limit. The eastern end of the west floating dock should be placed outside the setback limit, as shown in the proposed drawing, but the western end of the west dock can be located within the setback, excluding the pilings. From a Navigation perspective, I would approve your modified plan, but please contact Dave Timpy to determine if any additional information is required in order to obtain a USACE Regulatory permit. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me. Todd Todd Horton Chief, Waterways Management Section U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington 910-251-4067 910-685-3269 (cell) james.t.horton@usace.army.mil -----Original Message----- From: Kathy Vinson [mailto:kbvinsonp_ec.rr.com] Sent: Friday, March 04, 20115:29 PM To: Horton, James T SAW Cc: Timpy, David L SAW Subject: Moehring Group Action ID No. SAW-2011-00311 Todd, My company is providing planning and permit assistance to the Moehring Group in conjunction with a proposed drystack storage marina to be built on Taylors Creek in Beaufort. Dave Timpy shared your review comments on the CAMA application for the proposed drystack. We understand that you have asked that the floating docks proposed for use as boat staging areas be moved landward of the channel setback line. On behalf of the Moehring Group, we are asking that you consider a compromise on the placement of the floating docks. Attached is a drawing prepared by our clients showing the eastern dock (including the fuel platform) relocated entirely out of the setback, with the extreme western end within the setback as originally proposed. The pilings of the western dock would remain out of the setback, as originally proposed. (Keep in mind the attached drawing was prepared by the owners to illustrate the proposed compromise dock placement. If acceptable, we will revise the project plans.) Normal low water depths at the relocated eastern dock appear sufficient for use as boat staging areas. However, it appears that dredging will be required to dock boats on the western end if the structure is moved out of the setback. Please keep in mind that the docks are not proposed for use as permanent boat slips, but will be used as boat staging areas. As such, boats should only be docked for brief periods as they are removed and then replaced in the drystack. Our clients are also concerned that the adjacent project (Front Street Village) was recently permitted with floating docks within the setback, and existing multiple pilings at the neighboring site are also farther into the setback than the proposed Moehring Group floating dock. As such, if the proposed (attached) compromise is not acceptable, we are requesting justification as to why placement of the Moehring Group floating docks partially within the setback would be a problem. Please let me know if you need additional information. We very much appreciate your consideration. Kathy Vinson Kathy B Vinson AICP Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0. 1204 / Virus Database: 1498/3512 - Release Date: 03/17/11 Cn (b m n (p C) -yam o ?? n m ?, co r y x ?. t?D ? , ? ? D t7?' c>- O 7 O j b )K 3 to ?v y O? CIE O? CIE {' tD O V ^? V N p to n 400' ) O - oopunoG UoljoC,,d O ° \ ?? pq DlJo0a IJ91 a )K ?r n° O N, 'a O r"? )IE R w??? jV O I O O 0 )K _ O p la s o f } O 00 A ^? V " m Oo jIE )K )K v N o o :.. Q '? 3 - _ ° s iv C,a O e 2 ' O )IE v ^ e ' O o cw F`?1r a :i Cb Qj )K CIE e 60, ?0 co ? ? i(GM un m re rq O ti p ' i V OM U Eft We RW & Welk O ?. O Oe C M Q O O ?. O oo e ee A_n rn )K X X w n?? vz',v o? 9 Qn. o Op " CN Oo W x aj c )K o Ao. ° "I I?'?? ? n ° ° ? N) a ? ? to ?° r16 43 O jIE CIE O C31 O O co \ !v ?' 'D o \ X o° I CIE CIE ? xi X ° tp 0 V N O ?v oo CN a )K 0 y o o :A °? T rF9 n __1 N CIE ? s t" to c rozr91 ?9, r? ?t7?T13 "DZdL7 D t-j O D y < M :K F_ F_ WE CA oo t7 Z p ? ? v y? < O _ )K co )K Z? O V M 71C O 0 ° N 0 / A O £ N 0 ?Z tj N - A 5 Fl Cl M o N Z A SD?tJ p 'rte ti o r O D rD )K , 09 ?n ° '001 cn _ 01 0 _ ° 0 D Proposed Conditions B Crystal Coast Engineering PA M ° m CAMA Permit Application for: ° Q W 0 s Moehring Group Holding, LP License No. C-2553 an d o w To: Redevelop Existing Warehouse Civil and Environmental Consulting Engineers o o into Dry Stack Boat Storage David K. Newsom, P.E. John R. Freshwater, P.E. o T y ° Beaufort Township-Carteret County, N.C. 3817-3 FREEDOM WAY, HUBERT, N.C. 28539 A Town of Beaufort ETJ PHONE: (910) 325-0006 - FAX: (910) 325-0060 0 R.