B-099

FW: Div 7 bridge projects Page 1 of 1
FW: Div 7 bridge projects
Euliss, Amy
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 1:54 PM
To: Carrillo, Sonia
Attachments: 646_Fig3_JDAreas_fleldupdateJpg (766 KB) ; 699_Fig3_3D_Areas_fieldupd-1Jpg (721 KB)
For the files...
From: Kate Montieth [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 1:43 PM
To: [e-mail]; Euliss, Amy; Parker, Jerry A
Cc: Tim Jordan; Michael Wood
Subject: Div 7 bridge projects
Hello all,
Sorry it has taken so long to get back to everyone after the field visit - I got really sick last week on Thursday and
today is my first day back. The following and attached should help clarify things we talked about in the field.
Bridge 203 (Guilford County) -Amy had a question about Stream S2 - whether it was on the soils map - it is
not. Therefore it will not require a buffer under Jordan Lake Rule but is still considered a stream by USACE rules.
Bridge 46 (Caswell County) - Attached is an updated figure showing the changes to S4. Changing upstream
portion to ephemeral
Bridge 99 (Rockingham County) -Attached is an update figure showing wetland W2 extending to stream 52
I think this covers everything we discussed. If any of you need anything else or if I missed something please let
me know.
Thanks, Kate
Kate Montieth
The Catena Group, Inc.
410-B Millstone Drive
Hillsborough, NC 27278
[phone] (phone)
[phone] (fax)
[phone] (mobile)
https://mall.nc.gov/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADMSzLcd9 W2TJHI4%2bm... 2/25/2011
IK?
G) n?
O cD
O
p ? a

co
0

co
C7
O
?. < a
=
d a CD
CD
0
O
A
C
C
D
CD
K
T
O (?11 O CD
3
C C
D
C7 ?
d fJ7 ? ._-.
o (D
d

fn O
n

o fD
a
o ?
C
?

v O O
T
O

C
W?

¦
N
c f ?
0
cn
(n C? !d
C
U1 _
Q
n
0 '.. rte-..
Q
0
t N
CD

3
7 N
II
lD U

2
n
I