HomeMy WebLinkAbout20181416_Meeting Minutes_20110202NC 24 - 27 WIDENING
TIP PROJECTS R-2530B, B4974 AND R-2527
STANLY AND MONTGOMERY COUNTIES
CONCURRENCE POINT 2A MEETING
FEBRUARY 2, 2011
MEETING PURPOSE
The purpose of today's meeting is to review stream and wetland crossings along the project and
discuss the appropriate hydraulic structures for stream crossings in order to obtain formal
concurrence on bridging decisions, Concurrence Point 2A. Potential alignment refinements and
alternative eliminations will be discussed as well.
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Draft State Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP) includes a highway project in Stanly County (TIP Project R-2530B)
from NC 740 in Albemarle to the west end of the Pee Dee River Bridge, the Pee Dee River Bridge
replacement project in Stanly County (TIP Project B-4974), and a highway project in Montgomery
County (TIP Project R-2527) from the east end of the Pee Dee River Bridge to the proposed Troy
Bypass (TIP Project R-623) west of the city of Troy. All three projects will be studied under one
NEPA study. A multi-lane facility is proposed in the STIP; therefore, a four-lane median divided
facility with a 23-foot raised median from NC 740 to SR 1731 (Sweet Home Church Road) and a
46-foot depressed median from SR 1731 to the proposed Troy Bypass will be studied for these
projects. The proposed projects are approximately 14.6 miles long depending on the alternative
chosen. It is anticipated that 150 - 200 feet of Fight of way will be required to accommodate the
proposed improvements. Partial control of access will be obtained. All intersecting roadways will
cross the highway at-grade; no grade separations or interchanges are proposed.
PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR THE PROJECTS
The purpose of these projects is to improve traffic flow and level of service (LOS) on the section of
NC 24-27 through the project study areas and to maintain a bridge across the Pee Dee River that
addresses the needs of highway users.
The needs to be addressed by these projects include.
• Transportation deficiencies exist along NC 24-27 in the project study areas which are
projected to increase substantially by the year 2030.
• Bridge No. 51 over the Pee Dee River is considered structurally deficient and is eligible for
the Federal-Aid Highway Bridge Program.
• Maintain and improve the mobility and connectivity functions of the NC 24-27 corridor as
part of the Strategic Highway Corridor Vision and the North Carolina Intrastate System.
PROJECT SCHEDULES / COSTS
The proposed projects are funded for right of way (R/W) acquisition and construction in the Draft
STIP. Their current schedules and estimated costs are as follows:
Number Right of Way
Acquisition
Begins
Constru
Begins Construction Right of Way
Cost (From
Draft STIP) Construction
Cost (2010
Estimates)
ject Cost
Project
R-2530B 2014 2016
- Northern Alt. $5,750,000 $29,600,000 $35,350,000
- Southern Alt. $5,750,000 $26,000,000 $31,750,000
B-4974 2014 2016
-Alt. 1 $1,800,000 $14,000,000 $15,800,000
-Alt. 2 $1,800,000 $21,200,000 $23,000,000
-Alt. 3 $1,800,000 $22,900,000 $24,700,000
-Alt. 4 $1,800,000 $11,300,000 $13,100,000
R-2527 2016 2018 $4,100,000 $34,600,000 $38,700,000
No final decisions have been made regarding ihese projects. Therefore, the costs and schedules
shown are preliminary and subject to change.
PROJECT STATUS
A CP1 and CP2 meeting was held on August 12, 2008.
The CP2 meeting was continued on December 11, 2008.
Public Involvement Occurrences and dates:
• Citizens Informational Workshops for R-2530B and R-2527 were held in 2004.
• A Citizens Informational Workshop for all 3 projects was held on November 18, 2010.
Environmental Assessment FY 2011
Design Public Hearing FY 2012
CP3 and CP4A meetings FY 2012
Finding of No Significant Impact FY 2013
? Right of Way acquisition FY 2014 and FY 2016
? Construction FY 2016 and FY 2018
2
NC 24 - 27 WIDENING
TIP PROJECTS R-25306, B-4974 AND R-2527
STANLY AND MONTGOMERY COUNTIES
CONCURRENCE POINT 2A MEETING
FEBRUARY 2, 2011
MEETING PURPOSE
The purpose of today's meeting is to review stream and wetland crossings along the project and
discuss the appropriate hydraulic structures for stream crossings in order to obtain formal
concurrence on bridging decisions, Concurrence Point 2A. Potential alignment refinements and
alternative eliminations will be discussed as well.
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Draft State Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP) includes a highway project in Stanly County (TIP Project R-2530B)
from NC 740 in Albemarle to the west end of the Pee Dee River Bridge, the Pee Dee River Bridge
replacement project in Stanly County (TIP Project B-4974), and a highway project in Montgomery
County (TIP Project R-2527) from the east end of the Pee Dee River Bridge to the proposed Troy
Bypass (TIP Project R-623) west of the city of Troy. All three projects will be studied under one
NEPA study. A multi-lane facility is proposed in the STIP; therefore, a four-lane median divided
facility with a 23-foot raised median from NC 740 to SR 1731 (Sweet Home Church Road) and a
46-foot depressed median from SR 1731 to the proposed Troy Bypass will be studied for these
projects. The proposed projects are approximately 14.6 miles long depending on the alternative
chosen. It is anticipated that 150 - 200 feet of right of way will be required to accommodate the
proposed improvements. Partial control of access will be obtained. All intersecting roadways will
cross the highway at-grade; no grade separations or interchanges are proposed.
PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR THE PROJECTS
The purpose of these projects is to improve traffic flow and level of service (LOS) on the section of
NC 24-27 through the project study areas and to maintain a bridge across the Pee Dee River that
addresses the needs of highway users.
The needs to be addressed by these projects include:
• Transportation deficiencies exist along NC 24-27 in the project study areas which are
projected to increase substantially by the year 2030.
• Bridge No. 51 over the Pee Dee River is considered structurally deficient and is eligible for
the Federal-Aid Highway Bridge Program.
• Maintain and improve the mobility and connectivity functions of the NC 24-27 corridor as
part of the Strategic Highway Corridor Vision and the North Carolina Intrastate System.
PROJECT ALTERNATIVES
The project study area is divided into seven sections. Within each section, the merger team
discussed several different widening scenarios during the CP2 meetings. In Sections 1 and 2, NC
24-27 from NC 740 to SR 1720, symmetrical widening was eliminated from further study to avoid
impacts to homes, streams and wetlands. For Sections 6 and 7, NC 73 to SR 1550, asymmetrical
widening to the south was'eliminated from further study to avoid impacts to homes, streams and
wetlands. The merger team agreed to study the following widening scenarios in further detail:
• R-253013. Section 1 - NC 740 to SR 1731
- Asymmetrical Widening to the North - 23' Raised Median
- Asymmetrical Widening to the -South - 23' Raised Median
• R-25308. Section 2 - SR 1731 to SR 1720
- Asymmetrical Widening to the North - 46' Median
- Asymmetrical Widening to the South - 46' Median
• R-2530B, Section 3-SR 1720 to SR 1818
- Asymmetrical Widening to the North - 46' Median
- Asymmetrical Widening to the South - 46' Median
• R-2530B. Section 4- SR 1818 to west of SR 1778
- Asymmetrical Widening to the North. - 46' Median
- Asymmetrical Widening to the South /Bridge Avoidance - 46' Median
• B-4974, Section 5 - west of SR 1778 to east of NC 73
- Asymmetrical Widening to the North - 46' Median
- Asymmetrical Widening to the South /Bridge Avoidance - 46' Median
• R-2527. Section 6 - east of NC 73 to SR 1134
- Asymmetrical Widening to the North - 46' Median /Best Fit
• R-2527. Section 7- SR 1134 to SR 1550
- Asymmetrical Widening to the North - 46' Median /Best Fit
The section limits for B-4974, Section 5 have been expanded to better illustrate the preliminary
designs within this section. The limits for R-25306, Section 4 and R-2527, Section 6 have been
revised accordingly. Four alternates have been designed for B-4974, Section 5:
• Alternate 1 - South side widening, replace Bridge No. 51,
• Alternate 2 - South side widening, replace Bridge No. 51 and No. 50,
• Alternate 3 - North side widening, replace Bridge No. 51 and No. 50,
• Alternate 4 - Replace in place, replace Bridge No. 51.
Alternate 4 follows the existing roadway alignment and will impact the National Register-Eligible
Bridge No. 51. Alternates 1, 2 and 3 do not directly impact Bridge No. 51 and may provide a
potential preservation opportunity for an interested individual, group or municipality.
I?
V
Z
vI
O
w
Cu
C
Q
W
U)
Of
O
Q
F = vi 00 ¢
CD Lu
E
V
?
Z
v> w 6 0 N
W W
N Z ~
Q W
Q a z Z
H- <D ? In ? m m n (D
2
? Z M t N N
r N
r n m
W W NI . W W
m
W J H
m N LO J N Z J
Q
W Q O O
j N V Q
Q ? 2 N ¢
N W Z
W
?O
?
M
N
M
m
N
N
7
O
?
M
U)
V
N
In
M
V
M
?
?? V V V'
w Z /a N fU (0 (0 t0 mo 6 m m m m m (0 l0
Q N O C C C C c -C C -C c C C 'C 'C -C c
W U) I C C C c _
c a c c c c c c c c c
d N d a) N (D
`J
d
d
N
fU
`l
`1
N
J Q
V N Q) O a) fu 0 N N (U N N N N N N
N U a s Q. Q. Q. n- n- Q. Q. Q- w w w d- Q-
c _
U N M
L O
m m L O N O J In
3
m
?
U
U o ?-o
c K m
U
m U
M
U U
CO U
m U
Co U
m U
CO
M
X m ym ?W aj c'c ? U ry U U U U U
U H ED cD t` O co M 0 y a m ^ N m
K
W
X
X
X
o y
D L_
c
o
X
o
X
X
X m
X co
X
N W co (O f
? L W m ?` c ?c x m I? I? 1? m c0
V //?
???
V X
W
u) N U
Lo Mm m W
U
a
m
M 6 f
= N G E
n
r ? N N N N ? .- M ?
Q w cu Qj ` x ° c c c c c c c
?rn? c
3? 3a
ic c
o a a a a? d a a
O X U
W X
w X
w X y
W y 3 ,?
k
? c m C
C C fU U
t
.-
c
m- ._
O
x
W
x
W
x
W
x
w
x
w
x
w
x
w
x
w
= `MO
C6 .0 oa O
C6 c
c
p c f6
0-
3 X ..
p .
3`o m E a5 a3 o as as as 0 0
c
m?< c
' ' c
0 a
' cr o ' .
Nt m
N m
N m
N o p
y
'
E oa
N ?c?
.
p'
?
a
m
N
m
m
?
?
o
a
a
w'?
W,
of
d'm O
X
m m ? D
m? U
mu
m c[n N
=
4= c 3
2 N
2 N
K 0
d' N
d' 0
R m
W' 0
0?
Q Q J J J + + + N + M + J J J J J J J J
CO
O
0 J
O
O
J
O
J
O J
I n
co 0 N (N
N
O 00
Q Q
L) + o
+ + f
+g J
+g O
+¢ O
+¢ f
+g + ? + + + + + +
M
0 f D M M N ! n m J m J f M N 00 I p V O
M N m M co (D tD m (D tD N M 7 V V It
Y
O
Y
O
Y
N Y
N
?
Y
Y N
?
N N d O Y Y Y i p O Y
QLyJ U
C U
C U
C Q' a> O fu a) N N N Y U U L
U
w N > > > > U U U p U
Z m m m (U
m
O
p Y Y C
> > >
O (U
(U F fU
O F N
O F
fu H U U Y Y O O U m
0
2 0
2 0
2
CL
?Q)
m0
oa)
ow O
a! O
W
C)
J
F-
F p
C
C
N M O) CU N M N m H
= E
7) Z) 7 7) Q.J dJ Q.J W J (n
N
O + ? N M a
U
F- o CO H > > > >
¢
?
m
o
w Q
> ¢
> m
li m
?- w
o
E
Q
U)
V
U)
In M
'n c
In c
l()
?
U)
(n
(n W m U) (1)
U) W ? M V c
(u N a) N r (D ^ 00 01 0 - N co
_
N m
/ \ s J
i ?
2 i f1t
0.
c
0
i0
c
E
L O
Q
m U ?
a 3
a m
y
N ? w U
D C 0.0
c N .0
lp 0 D N
j O y
a a E S
0 m 0 no - O
9 O C N
w m c m N
0 0
vLw
U v U - D
o m c
? o _ N c o
> ? U r OI ?
U ` ? d d Z
0 O y ?L
m ? N U N
N L ? C O
N m w
p» O m N E (U
uLm fU m? n
c N
c n °'
U ZM'mcau
.O t0 m D .? O 0
> C nc = 9
N U N N N
c rn m m
(D
a n y6 m D
U c d m
U C
Y
U x Q x
K ? w U ? E w
vi
W
0
2
STREAM IMPACTS IN THE PROJECT STUDY AREA
R-25308:
STREAM
ID
STREAM
NAME
NCDENR STATUS
CLASSIFICATION
DWQ
SCORE STREAM
LENGTH IN
STUDY
AREA
(FEET) PRELIMINARY DESIGN
STREAM IMPACTS (FEET)
ALTERNATIVES:
NORTH SOUTH
DITCH UT, Mountain Creek - 290 99 83
St-AN 01 UT, Mountain Creek Perennial 41.5 1111 0 0
St-AN 02 UT, Mountain Creek Perennial 30.5 788 212 200
St-AN 03 UT, Mountain Creek Intermittent -- 139 - -
St-AN 04 UT, Mountain Creek Perennial -- 1482 See St-AN02 See St-AN
02
St-AN 06 UT, Mountain Creek Intermittent 27.5 636 0 0
St-AN 07 UT, Mountain Creek Intermittent -- 173 0 0
St-AN 08 UT, Mountain Creek Intermittent 26 202 0 0
St-AA UT, Pee Dee River Intermittent 13 223 182 92
St-B UT, Mountain Creek Perennial 32 475 145 143
St-BB UT, Jacobs Creek Intermittent 26 161 - -
St-C UT, Mountain Creek Intermittent 26.5 255 - -
St-CC UT, Mountain Creek Perennial 33 515 239 52
St-D UT, Mountain Creek Perennial 30 454 110 427
St-DD UT, Mountain Creek Intermittent -- 151 151 0
St-E UT, Mountain Creek Perennial 32 - 396 134 141
St-EE UT, Mountain Creek Perennial 30'5 527 527 0
St-F UT, Mountain Creek Perennial - 1264 733 790
St-FF UT, Mountain Creek Intermittent 24.5 392 124 48
St-G UT, Mountain Creek Intermittent 20.5 210 33 168
St-GG UT, Mountain Creek Perennial 35.5 246 217 105
St-H UT, Mountain Creek Ephemeral -- 80 - -
St-HH UT, Mountain Creek Perennial 30.5 619 248 79
St-I UT, Mountain Creek Intermittent 28 2416 2125 1167 '
St-J UT, Mountain Creek Perennial 29.5 175 41 157
St-K UT, Mountain Creek Perennial -- 68 - -
St-L UT, Mountain Creek Intermittent 16.5 240 77 '-: 130
St-M UT, Jacobs Creek Perennial 36.5 3730 107 1180
St-N UT, Jacobs Creek Perennial 40 676 201 271
St-0 UT, Jacobs Creek Perennial 31 121 0 0
St-P UT, Jacobs Creek Intermittent 23 789 458 565
St-Q UT, Jacobs Creek Perennial 34.5 662 169 170
St-R UT, Pee Dee River Perennial 31.5 884 350 348
St-S UT, Pee Dee River Intermittent 8.5 218 0 0
? -L- Sta. 95+00 ? ? ? 27 0
? -L- Sta. 183+00 ? ? ? 280 135
? -L- Sta. 225+00 ? ? ? 215 167
? -L- Sta. 252+00 ? ? ? 347 297
NOTES:
• Impacts are based on preliminary design slope stake limits plus 25 feet.
B-4974:
STREAM
; E
STREAM NAME
I "I
NCDENR STATUS`
CLASSIFICATION
DWO
SCORE STREAM
LENGTH IN -
STUDY AREA
(FEET) PRELIMINARY DESIGN
STREAM IMPACTS (FEET) ,.
ALTERNATIVES:
1 2 3 4
St-T UT, Pee Dee River Perennial 29 821 62 230 284 158
St-U UT, Pee Dee River Perennial 33 1445 158 148 405 408
St-V UT, Pee Dee River Perennial 34.5 1255 695 930 311 382
St-V V ? ? ? 151 0 44 77 0
St-W UT, Pee Dee River Intermittent 25 116 353 175 405 491
St-X UT, Pee Dee River Ephemeral -- 150 0 94 0 0
St-Z UT, Pee Dee River Ephemeral 4 271 0 0 147 147
Pee Dee River Perennial 965 N/A N/A N/A N/A
SG UT, Pee Dee River Intermittent 26 242 129 194 0 112
SH UT, Pee Dee River Perennial * 32.5 386 149 63 303 150
SL-B UT, Rock Creek Intermittent 27 164 0 16 0 0
? -L- Sta. 103+00 ? ? ? 121 107 112 110
NOTES:
• * Information updated after 3/26/08 site visit with Polly Lespinasse of NCDWQ
• Impacts are based on preliminary design slope stake limits plus 25 feet.
R-2527:
STREAM'
ID
STREAM
NAME
NCDENR STATUS
CLASSIFICATION
DWQ
SCORE STREAM
LENGTH
INSTUDY
AREA
(FEET) PRELIMINARY DESIGN
STREAMIMPACTS
(FEET) ,.
ALTERNATIVE:
BEST FIT
SA Rock Creek Perennial 42.5 1,123 186
SB-1 Rock Creek Perennial 40 903 117
SB-2 UT, Rock Creek Perennial 32.5 643 151
SC Dumas Creek Perennial 43 521 109
SC-1 UT, Dumas Creek Intermittent/Perennial 26 1,807 1372
SD Clarks Creek Perennial 41.5 531 145
SD-1 UT, Clarks Creek Intermittent .•.
4 27.5 480 0
SE UT, Lick Fork Creek Perennial 44.5 530 127
SF-A Lick Fork Creek Perennial 40.5 524 135
SF-A1 UT, Lick Fork Creek Perennial 30 397 265
SF-B Rock Creek Perennial 48.5 517 155
SH-1 UT, Pee Dee River Intermittent ` >19 * 81 81
SJ UT, Wood Run Intermittent 20 210 109
SK UT, Cattail Creek Intermittent 28.5 673 140
SL-A UT, Cattail Creek Perennial 33.5 627 114
SM-1 UT, Rock Creek Intermittent 24 523 190
SM-2 UT, Rock Creek Perennial 35 689 180
SN UT, Dumas Creek Perennial 39.5 753 281
SQ UT, Dumas Creek Perennial 37 747 122
SP UT, Clarks Creek Perennial 40 521 108
R-2527 (CONT M:
STREAM ID
STREAM
NAME
NCDENR STATUS
CLASSIFICATION
DWQ
SCORE STREAM
LENGTH
IN STUDY
AREA
(FEET) PRELIMINARY DESIGN
STREAM IMPACTS
(FEET)
ALTERNATIVE:
BEST FIT
SO UT, Lick Fork Creek Intermittent 29 251 0
SR UT, Lick Fork Creek Intermittent 24.5 507 171
SS UT, Lick Fork Creek Intermittent 28 298 0
SU UT, Lick Fork Creek Perennial 39 343 267
SV UT, Lick Fork Creek Intermittent 29 523 0
SW-A UT, Clarks Creek Intermittent 25 782 0
SW-13 UT, Lick Fork Creek Intermittent 29 672 147
SW-C1 UT, Rock Creek Intermittent 27.5 664 202
SW-C2 UT, Rock Creek Perennial 38 581 0
SX UT, Lick Fork Creek Perennial 37.5 1,567 339
SX2 UT, Clarks Creek Intermittent 26.5 175 -
SY-A UT, Rock Creek Perennial 40.5 2,335 729
SY-B Smith Branch Creek Perennial 43 902 196
SZ UT, Smith Branch Creek Intermittent 27.75 858 119
S1 UT, Rock Creek Perennial * 29.5 * 529 0
NC73-1 UT, Pee Dee River Intermittent - 195 N/A per Richard Spencer
R1 UT, Rocky Creek Intermittent 37 551 0
R2 UT, Rocky Creek Perennial 37 442 0
R3 UT, Rocky Creek Perennial 45 383 0
R4 UT, Rocky Creek Perennial 29 574 0
R5 UT, Rocky Creek Perennial 31 253 0
WA-1 UT, Clarks Creek Perennial - 0 0
LW UT, Lick Fork Creek Perennial No Form 135 0
NWS1** UT, Rocky Creek Intermittent No Form 284 96
SES1** UT, Rocky Creek Intermittent No Form 85 85
Rocky Creek" Rocky Creek Perennial 567 0
SWS2** UT, Rocky Creek Perennial No Form 291 -
SWS3** UT, Rocky Creek Perennial No Form 183 0
BC1 UT, Lick Fork Creek Perennial No Form 835 0
BC2 UT, Lick Fork Creek Intermittent No Form 101 0
NOTES:
• Information updated after 3/26/08 site visit with Polly Lespinasse of NCDWQ.
• ** These streams were verified by the USACE and NCDWQ on 05-31-06
` Impacts are based on preliminary design slope stake limits plus 25 feet.
WETLAND IMPACTS IN THE PROJECT STUDY AREA
R-2530B:
WETLAND
ID
WETLAND
TYPE
^'WETLAND'
RATING
_ WETLAND AREA
IN STUDY AREA
(Acres) PRELIMINARY DESIGN
WETLAND IMPACTS (ACRES).,; ,
ALTERNATIVES:
NORTH SOUTH.
1 Riverine No Form 0.35 0 0
8 Riverine No Form 1.20 0.02 0.49
9 Riverine No Form 0.13 0 0.03
10 Riverine No Form 0.24 0.17 0.24
12 Riverine No Form 0.13- 0 0.06
15 Riverine No Form 0.04 0 0
19 Riverine No Form 0.09 0.03 0
21 Riverine No Form 0.05 0 0
22 Riverine No Form 0.03 0.03 0
22A Riverine No Form 0.23 <0.01 0
NOTES:
• Impacts are based on preliminary design slope stake limits plus 25 feet-
B-4974:
WETLAND AREA PRELIMINARY DESIGN
,WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND IMPACTS (ACRES)
ID
TYPE
RATING. IN STUDY AREA
.
ALTERNATIVES:
(Acres) . ,
. a
.
1 2 3 _ 4
16 Riverine No Form 0.21 0 0.18 0 0
17 Riverine No Form 0.11 0.06 0.11 0 0
WA Riverine 37 0.005 0 <0.01 0 0
WB Riverine 32 0.020 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
NOTES:
• Impacts are based on preliminary design slope stake limits plus 25 feet.
R-2527:
WETLAND
ID
-WETLAND
TYPE
WETLAND
RATING
WETLAND AREA
IN STUDY AREA.
(Acres) PRELIMINARY DESIGN
WETLANDIMPACTS(ACRES),..
ALTERNATIVE:
BEST FIT
WAA Non-Riverine 16 0.038 0
WBB Riverine 20 0.110 0.11
WC Riverine 23 0.030 0
WCC Riverine 22 0.037 0.01
WE Riverine 19 0.011 0.01
WEE Non-Riverine 18 0.308 0.04
WF Riverine 25 0.101 0.03
WFF Riverine 31 0.601 0.04
WGG Non-Riverine 22 0.251 0.05
R-2527 (cont'd):
WETLAND
ID
WETLAND
TYPE
WETLAND
RATING
WETLAND AREA
IN'STUDY AREA
(Acres) PRELIMINARY DESIGN
WETLANDIMPACTS(ACRES)
ALTERNATIVE:
BEST FIT
WH Riverine 18 0.007 0.01
WHH Riverine 31 0.019 0.02
WJ Riverine 18 0.003 <0.01
WJJ Riverine 29 0.035 0.02
WK Non-Riverine 30 0.045 0
WKK Non-Riverine 21 0.006 0
WL Riverine 30 0.008. 0
WLL Non-Riverine 21 0.061 0
WM Riverine 30 0.012 0.01
WMM Non-Riverine 21 0.038 0
WN Riverine 30 0.017 0.01
WNN Riverine 16 0.493 0.14
WQQ Riverine 31 0.028 0
WP Non-Riverine 30 0.092 0.87
WPP Non-Riverine 18 0.057 <0.01
WQQ Non-Riverine 18 0.114 0
WR Non-Riverine 30 0.099 0.03
WS Riverine 19 0.054 0.02
WSS Riverine 37 0.061 0
WT Non-Riverine 16 0.166 0.11
WU-1 Riverine 19 0.018 0.02
WU-2 Riverine 39 0.123 0.11
WV Riverine 19 0.087 0
WWW Riverine 22 0.030 0
WXX Riverine 28 0.233 0
WYY Riverine 16 0.008 0
WZ Riverine 18 0.076 0.02
WZZ Non-Riverine 19 0.037 <0.01
W1 Riverine 11 0.23 0
W2 - Riverine 14 <0.01 0
W3 Riverine 43 0.30 0
W4 Riverine 0 0.01 0
LW Riverine 32 0.05 0
BCW Riverine 9 0.03 0
NWW1* Non-riverine 24 0.04 0
NWW2* Non-riverine 20 0.05 0
NEW1* Non-riverine 30 0.15 0
SEW1* Nan-riverine 37 0.04 0
SWW1* Riverine 27 <0.01 0
SWW2* Riverine 27 0.01 0
SWW3* Riverine 27 <0.01 0
S1 Non-riverine 7 0.02 0
NOTES:
• *Wetlands verified by USACE and NCDWQ on 05-31-06.
• Impacts are based on preliminary design slope stake limits plus 25 feet.
Q
W
Q
0
H
U
W
O
x
a
w
z
N
H
Q
a
O
Q
D
N
N?-
N y
m 0 0 0 0 C) 0 C) 0 m p l? 0)
7 d
O
LL
V U
d 'o
«
N
0
0
'-
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 r
?
N
LSD
Q l+8 fq
m
m Cl) M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O
E
m
U
m
m
L
m
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
t
U
m
m
N
W m M N N In Cl) M V V V
N
m
N
d
E a In 7 r 0 N M It V In N M N
S
O O O O O O O O O O O O N rn
R Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z } }
a
h
V
C C3) N M M OD N M l0
!4 o O CO O p 9 0 O M p 0 N 7
m
el O O O O O O O O
>
N '
E M M M CO N ? 7 CO 7 M
lp
S
c
N
m N
m 00
m O
N r`
V (O
(fl O
O 7
O l0
m N
m M
O
d ? M C-i -7 N N -7 C'l M
N
d
> N M V
a d d d
E
r
Q
J E
Y c E
Y
Q
y
N
cp z m Q Q Q Q co co
am
o«
OI.-
N
N
10
co
CO
M
N
d d
N J
O
O
r U
O o O w ,Y w z U o
0 o m Lb? Z 0
OM MN N
O M l
0
LL a r
r ?? co ? 00 O
= 0
y co O-
?-- m
•--
Uoe ww 0_2 O_' a1 10 d
zU) U) (f) mrn (f) 3 F°? ° wcn U) m
C
U 0 m
0 m
O CO
O CO
O V
n
N n
N
d
O y N
N Cl) N
N m m Cl)
-IT
N m N l0 m
N l0
N
CL N cr w N
w ff m [Y K
N
2
O
LL
U)
LL
()
L
d
w
t
N
N
7
C1
n
E
a)
Y
co
N
a)
0-
0
N
C
m
N
N
21,
m
c
N
a)
a E
C
O T
te
a) 3
O
n () -
r-CM
Q)0)
a
M N
O O
U O
m d
m m
J C
a) E
`o
LL c
U) C
LL O
U) 0
? N
a) CU
w L
to
7 N
am
v; m
U d
Co
aE -o
C
NI Q J
w
H
O
2
(n
m
a
U
C
O
N
w
0
a)
U)
0)
N
m
C
O
m
Z
a)
L
? r
m ?
3 o
0 a)
C
)
L a)
O vl
E In
cl) m
O)
C -O
m ._
N co
CA
Q C
L ,N
y x
W
a) a)
O)
a
co
CO
C
a`) O
3 N
O
w m
c ?
)
? 07
N N
C E
? m
3 ?
V
a)
m LL
'0 '0
J C
U la
C V)
V cr-
m 3
a U)
N L
m
is i
O
TC.H
4 _ r
Ali-
1;7 .
ri "a Ar
J' •. ? ? t ?Y 1r i .
14
aq,
?O
.r
VI
DU) w
po
mC00v_'
z
-,=m m
C:)>MC)
rnz?
O
Z
z
N -'-
w
Las
Qom[ `
I
F r' `y*! '' 'w ITCH ? .
00
00
mi,
X --4 m;a
VD,
_
90 p
T 1 =?
_ I
od QN
I
1 1?
F
f
l I
. III I
?• - ?? (i; Imo. ? '
1 4 A
A.
;
/v
>zw
0 C:)
? T? ? W U)
??1/
Oz2rr,m
C) >
rnz?
0
z
A h
A
t
A ?
h ?
1 ?•, ? O ? ? 111 i
r?
> U)
0
Coo v)
CDZ-Tm r1
C:) > M ?v
rnz?
0
z
i "
? rl
ri Syr.
d..? Y Jf .; •
Nrn
?m
im
-c
C?D??
oz??
X C/) . O
rf
90
.'.?. n z + z
Q
P
q cl
Y
Co
JJ
• l
z
N'
w
?r AN
UT j??V
cR?? rq/N
K
w
F 114?
Zw \ V
r
0 o
CO C/)
` CA)
- ? •
o°DZ-Tmm
m(-)C,) ---.?
-T-I z=-I Y.y1 +
's v
1' I
SR 173-1
C ET HOME E
.? HURCH '
- rl
ROAD
t _
}
AM.
cr)
x`'r.
Z fr - r
rf7 ? - -
....??'ttLiw. sue.:.' .? •lid •_
9?
/v
D ^C
V
po
m c: U)
-,;u = gy
oz mm
o > m
mz?
O
z
N
X
? qoc
DX?
cr) z m K
?Q°XCO
Oz Z
Ate
w
+w r r.. _r_ Wi?w^ Cr ' ,fin
• r• K
^1 M
r-, y r• r
` X \
r 1.
_ X
,5r M
-ZE
ZSP 1-704
i
li
i1
C's
i..
Air
l'.1
{ ?P's
?tiJn .
n
I/N
z
:Ing
Y.-
14
vo
.p.
_rn-
zrnrn
."
CD >
rno : -
?z -
--? ?•`: ? ice.
j/ I ? ? ? 1 }?.'1 t. w
i.-W
?r:_:
?,?Aft I•
T
nL,, 2?S .-
W
1
D
r(JD
4
4?,
=m- C/)
oDmrn
m0
Nz
Cal
/v
m?
00 D m
?zrn
? m
.Qo
x rmi-rn
rnm?;u
m
C/ <
Xom
I
C/)
0-4rr
xlj
4
t CA)
I [
• ' 1
1 1
•
8IC L?
?. ? `YU
M°' r
Z .
10, 14
1
D QO
r?
?m- cn
i(n ?
-?zmm
CD >
m CA 0
Z
Ul
N C
m
00 D m
?zm
? m
4go0
?Xrn
m m;u
Cc z<
?m
n
ccn
Fm 1
.S
r
V
z
0
1
i? j ? 6•
i
' r
I?7",, • ? Z? X
C'N,%V
x • «i y ,
Z m m
0 >
4?6 :
.p ca
CTI
'W FF
N
n
Z Rl ZAx
O "NOW",
??
a?J D N`d2US
haw ? `?`. •;a x y
W
D4?-
r co
Cl)
=m?n ?cn?
31 D M m
C
cn
m0
-' z
x
m
C/)u
cnm
?mm
=co o
Oxm
-n ?
?G)?u
=mc
mcnm
M-,z
-SID
Z=?
G)DM
TT 3
N Wt? r
O V= m
z
G) Co
mz?
C/)o
G?
m
N
i
W
1
D?
ro
=mJ??h cn
n ?cn?
cnDnm
o?,?cn
NO
U1
W
I.G)
m
cn
0
X
? om
r m
no
=?mm
m? m
m cn °°
x"-o? -
I
E75 00 _
n
z
C) ?? I 'l
,. Axe
I
M
D '
L
;3 p
Co
t
m ,
o
nm
O -?
moor- ?
1
U) D > M
r f M`
O0 t .A
t Ii N
,ikk
I
i •?
? I
• r??+I
I ? r
-? .? f..., _.
? ",
-'?L
?? T
F
I C7
N
N
W
WIV
TT?JJ . h
. ??"55.. ff 1
,I
!^
C) C)
<' Ilk
?. it i ? ? b• ? '? ! ? ? ?•_
T p' f? :, ?„L j, II 1 ?? ? _jx, %y ' • (n ? ; Y 41 \ '.? - •1r..'r
N ill ; • 1 r ??,, ? ; d ?„ ? ? . F{ ? ;?, ? ? +? i ?
O rn O
X QOM r '
T rn T r - ?a ?'
C) z
711
r 4
O ? na I ?? ri,R t „?? ? s• J? 1 i
16
, 41,
Cil
7 ?
is
5 !
+
•?. r, L/ ? ? t lair ?, i1 Y%'_ ,f1i 1f ? Y F
;? i+ t + ?r ?-C ? ? ? I ?v? ?, f.'rr '?4.ir ? 1! • ,- ?„'??? f,?'f 7°?:I F
Iv.
x 90
T IJ?VJV JJJ
co m
N
N
cn
N
(/)
1rn
IV
O
Z
`
X
WHO
mn
C`0 Z
X90X
?mm
nX?
(Do M-1-12
I
?T
W
0
1
I
?q,?:Y'7? if :fir,- .
_ 41
- -_?er.?s??i i?::.i. •???-s.:tr?..?`?re??.ritS:?'.Arw ..
V ?
V 1
/ V ?• ?? Y? iy ",
•
me
.
M ? ? ? -
'Y
??~ m
? t •'? r.X J?y ... \ ?
•sw ?-.?- =?g?. .9.04 ?? '+.. ? N `. r.
4, err } , . ? ?
r
i ? 4",t?
i
.60
I?
N
?
/?
? Cn
? ? cn
m
rn
?
CD
C?
O
i l c
F
'
X
M C/)
C?>?-
QOzm=
00S
OT X D
C)--?Z
OornOOn
0
C)
w
O
-`-"'
O cn
>
m o
m
m = S
i O
c
m v v d
D y m
O N =
O v
O
'D v
J-
p
C) m
?
C
m 0 O m
z 0 0 S i
o
={
O
z
c 0
D
v
N
cn
N
cn -4
t.
yr
?\
S
o D m O " m d1???d N
j
N
=
m
m
r z v,
v =
m
G1 v
_
-? cn
n?
_' ?
71o m
m ?
m
0
(D O
C
D ;o C-
C
m
o 111
cn 0
f
m \ )?
co
s
co
W
m •n
J
r;
mc?
rr; Q _ >D0
?, Xz?
PEE DEE RIV ?p
w I, ER
ZC vKO
-n > (n i?
O .? _ m ss5
M >
m '' .
cnZX
D
1 gym
co
iK?
SR 9134
T
0 \
0
3
;u Z
00
O Z 'C -4
l J - O
Z
D
O Q
Z-0 p
0
r
cn 0 fn r L-
p
M Z ,_ ca Z Z Z C')
Z NG Zic0
'n o 93 m?°?M
m p
m Z
r N r = D
0
D -4 mV
?
pz DO*
D
00
Dm-<Zm
M
W n m (n m
aicc mD
90 ?z 3
O
?
<
n
?
D
?
Fn pn
Z 0 z
2 .`
.? -4 c
-Ph -< Z
C
O
U)zX
-.-I D ;o
r- m
cn
L
r ?
W
O
7
-L
ova ? Z
71
g
R
ccn0 ?