R-2822B (2)

c

T 10
*ps A
. 4
l??? RB
CONCURRENCE MEETING"
INFORMATION PACKET
FOR YOUR REVIEW
PRIOR TO MEETING ON
Thursday
December 1 6, z o 1 o
PROJECT ENGINEER
Wilson Stroud
TIP #R-z8zz B
Please bring this packet
to the meeting.
0
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
AGENDA
Western Concurrence Meeting
Thursday, December 16, 2010
Board Room, Transportation Building
Raleigh, North Carolina
EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
SECRETARY
10:30 A.M. - 12:00 PM - Wilson Stroud, Project Planning Engineer, NCDOT-PDEA Branch
STIP No. R-2822 B - NC 143, from West Buffalo Creek to NC 143 Business west of
Robbinsville, Graham County, Division 14
Team Members:
Lori Beckwith, USACE
Donnie Brew, FHWA
Chris Militscher, USEPA
Marella Buncick, USFWS
Karen Compton, USFS
Wilson Stroud, PDEA
Brian Wrenn, DWQ
Renee Gledhill-Earley, SHPO
Kenneth Parr, TVA
Tyler Howe, EBCI
Maria Chambers, WRC
Ryan Sherby, RPO (non-signatory)
NCDOT Technical Support Staff and Other Agency Staff:
Joel Setzer, Division 14
Brian Burch, Division 14
Mark Davis, Division 14
Jim Speer, Roadway Design
John Lansford, Roadway Design
Abby Vogt, Roadway Design
David Chang, Hydraulics
John Frye, Structure Design
Pam Cook, TPB
Atefe Northcutt, TPB
Jody Kuhne, GEU
Tammy Germiller, TMS
Carla Dagnino, NEU
Kris Dramby, NEU
Mary Pope Furr, HEU
Matt Wilkerson, HEU
Damon Jones, HEU
Ed Lewis, HEU
Steve Gurganus, HEU
Teresa Hart, PDEA
James Bridges, PDEA
Marshall Edwards, PDEA
Damon Lambert, Cherokee DOT
Steve Lohr, USFS
Lauren Stull, USFS
Rodney Snedeker, USFS
* The purpose of this meeting is to achieve concurrence on CP 2 (alternatives to
carry forward for detailed study) and to revisit CP 1 (project study area) due to
the revised western project terminus.
NEPA/404 Merger Team Meeting
STIP Project No. R-2822 B
Federal Aid Project No. STP-1127 (1)
State Project Number 8.2930301
WBS Element 34508.1.1
NC 143
From West Buffalo Creek to NC 143 Business
West of Robbinsville
Graham County, Division 14
December 16, 2010
Transportation Building EIC Room
Concurrence Point 2
Alternatives to Carry Forward
for Detailed Study

Table of Contents
R-2822 B CP 2 Meeting
12-16-10
1. Purpose of Today's Meeting ...................................................... .......................................3
2. Project Description ................................................................. .......................................3
3. Project Status and Schedule ....................................................... .......................................3
4. Nearby SUP Projects .............................................................. .......................................3
5. Purpose and Need and Study Area (CP 1) ...................................... .......................................3
6. Existing Conditions ................................................................. .......................................4
7. Proposed Improvements ........................................................... .......................................4
8. Alternatives to Carry forward for Detailed Study (CP 2) .............. ....................................4

9. Crash Analyses ............................................................................ .................................5
10. Traffic Volumes ........................................................................... .................................6
11. Natural Environment Resources ........................................................ ..................................6
12. Drainage Structures ........................................................................ .................................7
13. Cultural Resources ........................................................................ .................................8
14. THPO, EBCI, and BIA Coordination ................................................... ................................9
15. U. S. Forest Service Resources and Coordination .................................... ............:....................10
16. Acidic Rock ................................................................................ ...............................10
17. Special Permits and Coordination Required ........................................... ................................10
18. Tapoco Relicensing and Shoreline Management Plan ............................... ................................11
19. Public Involvement ....................................................................... ................................1 I
Appendix
Tables: Table I - Projects in the Vicinity of STIP Project R-2822 B
Table 2 - Crash Rate Comparisons
Table 3 - Streams in Project Area
Table 4 - Comparison of Alternatives
Figures: Figure I - Vicinity Map
Figure 2 - Nearby STIP Projects
Figure 3 - Crash Analysis Locations
Figure 4 - Environmental Features Map
Figure 5 - Project Study Area-Preliminary Alternatives Map
Other Items: CP I Meeting Minutes and Concurrence Forms
R-2822 B CP 2 Meeting Packet December 16, 2010
Page 2 of 12
NC 143
From West Buffalo Creek to NC 143 Business
West of Robbinsville
Graham County
STIP Project R-2822 B
1. Purpose of Today's Meeting
The purpose of this meeting is to reach concurrence on Point 2 (Alternatives to Carry Forward for Detailed
Study) for STIP Project R-2822 B. In addition, Concurrence Point 1 will be revisited to address the revised
western project terminus and the corresponding revised project study area.
2. Project Description
STIP Project R-2822 B is included in the Draft NCDOT 2012-2010 State Transportation Improvement
Program. The project proposes to. improve NC 143 from West Buffalo Creek to NC 143 Business west of
Robbinsville in Graham County. The project has a total length of approximately 4.5 miles (measured along
existing NC 143 from West Buffalo Creek to NC 143 Business) and is shown in Figure 1.
3. Project Status and Schedule
NCDOT will prepare the initial NEPA document (anticipated to be an environmental assessment) for the
project. That document is currently scheduled for completion in September 2011. The final NEPA document
(FONSI) is scheduled for completion in January 2013. Right of way acquisition and construction are scheduled
to begin in Fiscal Years 2013 and 2015, respectively.
4. Nearby STIP Projects
The Draft NCDOT 2011-2020 State Transportation Improvement Program includes seven projects in the
general project area, including the subject project. These projects are listed in Table 1 and shown in Figure 2.
5. Purpose and Need and Study Area (CP 1)
The CP 1 meeting for the project was held on January 23, 2007. During that meeting concurrence was
reached on Purpose and Need and Study Area. The agreed-upon statements are presented below, and copies of
the meeting minutes and signed concurrence forms are attached. Although USFS did not sign the CP 1
concurrence forms, that agency did provide a letter stating their concurrence (included with CP 1 minutes).
Purpose and Need
The purpose of this action is to improve safety along NC 143 using context sensitive
solutions.
No changes are proposed for the adopted purpose and need statement.
Study Area
The proposed study area is variable in width and is shown in attached Figure 3
(Dated December 2006).
During the CP 1 meeting the possibility of deleting the 2.3-mile segment of NC 143 between the Cherohala
Skyway and West Buffalo Creek was discussed. That segment was improved in 1971 and already has existing
pavement and shoulder widths of 22 feet and 6 feet, respectively. Those dimensions match the typical section
proposed for STIP Project R-2822 B. That segment was included in the project description (as shown in the
STIP) at the time of the CP 1 meeting, but was subsequently dropped when the STIP was updated. The STIP
R-2822 B CP 2 Meeting Packet December 16, 2010 Page 3 of 12
now presents West Buffalo Creek as the western project terminus. Presently-needed improvements to this
segment of NC 143, which include only resurfacing and guardrail installation, are not included in the STIP and
likely will be accomplished as a separate Division 14 project. For these reasons, it is recommended that the
Project Study Area statement adopted during the CP 1 meeting be revised as follows to take into account the
revised western project terminus. The proposed revised project study area is shown in Figures 4 and 5.
Proposed Revised CP 1 Study Area Statement
The proposed study area is variable in width and is
shown in Figures 4 and 5, dated November 2010.
6. Existing Conditions
The subject segment of NC 143 is a narrow, winding two-lane facility that passes through mountainous terrain.
It consists of a two-lane pavement 18 feet in width and grassed shoulders varying in width from 1 to 4 feet.
The posted speed limit ranges from 35 to 45 mph, but the average attainable travel speed is approximately 25
to 30 mph. Some of the unposted existing curves allow speed limits of no more than 10-15 mph. The project
area is mostly rural and wooded, with occasional residences, businesses, and churches. NC 143 passes through
the Nantahala National Forest and also lies in close proximity to Santeetlah Lake and Snowbird Creek. Tribal
lands of the Eastern Band of the Cherokee Indians adjoin the project at several locations
West of the project NC 143 consists of a two-lane, 22-foot roadway with 6-foot grassed shoulders.
East of the project (east of NC 143 Business) NC 143 consists of a two-lane, 20-foot roadway with
grassed shoulders varying in width from 2 to 4 feet.
7. Proposed Improvements
It is recommended that NC 143 be improved to provide two 1 l-foot travel lanes (for a total pavement width of
22 feet) and 4-foot (useable width) grassed shoulders. Horizontal and vertical alignment improvements are
also proposed in order to provide a minimum design speed of 30 mph. A right of way width of 60 feet is
proposed. Additional easements will also be required and will vary in width, depending upon the terrain.
8. Alternatives to Carry Forward for Detailed Study (CP 2)
(1) No Build Alternative
Only maintenance activities would be performed under the No Build Alternative. Because this alternative
would not provide substantial improvements to NC 143 within the project study area, it would not meet the
purpose and need of the project agreed to during the CP 1 meeting.
(2) Transportation System Management Alternative
The intent of Transportation System Management (TMS) improvements is to maximize the efficiency of the
existing transportation system using low-cost measures such as signal improvements, pavement striping, turn
lanes, signage, lighting, access management, and minor geometric improvements and lane and shoulder
widening. By definition, the degree of improvement that a TMS alternative would provide would be fairly
limited. Since this alternative would not provide substantial safety improvements to NC 143, it would not
meet the purpose and need of the project.
(3) Alternate Modes of Transportation
Graham County Transit presently provides transportation services Monday through Friday from 5:30 a.m. until
5:00 p.m. This operation includes five mini vans, three high-top handicap accessible vans, and one twenty-
R-2822 B CP 2 Meeting Packet December 16, 2010 Page 4 of 12
seat bus. Daily schedules include routes to Andrews, Marble, and Cherokee. Scheduled trips are available to
Asheville, Bryson City, Sylva, Waynesville, Murphy, and Hayesville. Even if these services were to be
expanded, this alternative would not result in substantial safety improvements to NC 143 and would not
eliminate the need to improve safety on that route. For these reasons, this alternative would not meet the
purpose and need of the project.
(4) Build Alternatives
Functional designs have been prepared for four preliminary "build" alternatives (see Alternatives 1, 2, 3, and 4
in Figures 4 and 5). All four alternatives are contained within the proposed revised project study area. Figure
5 includes a study corridor 1000 feet in width for each alternative. Table 4 presents a comparison of the four
alternatives based upon preliminary data. All four alternatives were presented during meetings held with
THPO in March and August 2008, the March 2008 Snowbird community meeting, the May 2008 local
officials meeting and citizens informational workshop, and the August 2008 EBCI Tribal Council presentation.
Descriptions of these four alternatives are presented below:
? Alternative 1 (yellow alternative) - Widen existing NC 143 with substantial horizontal alignment
improvements from West Buffalo Creek to just north of NC 143 Business. This alternative has a
design speed of 30 mph and includes realignment of the NC 143 intersection with NC 143 Business
near the eastern project terminus.
? Alternative 2 (blue alternative) - Widen existing NC 143 with horizontal alignment improvements
from West Buffalo Creek to Carver Cemetery; construct NC 143 along a new alignment to the north
and east of the existing road from Carver Cemetery to the waste disposal site located approximately
0.6 mile west of NC 143 Business, paralleling Buchanan Branch Road (SR 1125) on the east side and
crossing Santeetlah Lake before rejoining existing NC 143; and widen existing NC 143 with vertical
and horizontal alignment improvements from the waste disposal site to just north of NC 143 Business.
Alternative 2 has a design speed of 30 mph and includes realignment of the NC 143 intersection with
NC 143 Business near the eastern project terminus. This alternative was developed following an April
2003 meeting between USFS and NCDOT representatives as a means of reducing impacts to USFS
lands.
? Alternative 3 (green alternative) - Widen existing NC 143 with horizontal alignment improvements
from West Buffalo Creek to Carver Cemetery and construct NC 143 along a new alignment to the
north and east of the existing road (with a crossing of Santectlah Lake) from Carver Cemetery to north
of Jackson Branch Road (SR 1149). This alternative has a design speed of 30 mph and most closely
matches the NC 143 improvements proposed in the Town of Robbinsville and Graham County
Thoroughfarc Plans.
? Alternative 4 (red alternative) - Widen existing NC 143 with no vertical and horizontal alignment
improvements from West Buffalo Creek to NC 143 Business. No improvements would be made to the
NC 143 intersection with NC 143 Business near the eastern project terminus under this alternative, nor
would any improvements be made to the existing superelevation. This alternative was developed as
requested during the CP 1 meeting and, as currently designed, would have direct impacts on Snowbird
Creek and Santectlah Lake.
9. Crash Analyses
Additional crash analyses have been performed since the CP 1 meeting. The results of those analyses are
presented in Table 2. The locations of the segments analyzed are shown in Figure 3. Three of these analyses
(Analyses 2, 3, and 6) were requested during the CP 1 meeting. A summary of the findings of these analyses
is presented below. Note that each number in parenthe es indicates the number of crashes per 100 million
vehicle miles. ntap ukf 5 +{"r>L{ shpol 6k UA kcl
G 1w muY z' ??d 04-? V%\-(XlVor c A-f- , W a-ltB?t?far?5
vog < o"X LIkIN - rt
R-2822 B CP 2 Meeting Packet December 16, 2010 Page 5 of 12
• Analysis 1: This analysis was performed for the segment of NC 143 within the current R-2822 B
project limits, from West Buffalo Creek to NC 143 Business, a distance of 4.5 miles. The overall
crash rate within this segment for the 2005-2008 time period (288) exceeds the statewide rate for rural
two-lane NC routes (175).
• Analysis 2: This analysis was performed for the segment of NC 143 within the current R-2822 B
project limits, from West Buffalo Creek to NC 143 Business (4.5 miles), with motorcycle-related
crashes excluded. The overall crash rate within this segment with motorcycles excluded for the 2007-
2010 time period (209) exceeds the statewide rate for rural two-lane NC routes (174). This analysis
was requested during the CP 1 meeting.
• Analysis 3: This analysis was performed for the segment of NC 143 from the Tennessee state line to
SR 1159 (the North Carolina segment of the Cherohala Skyway), a distance of 17.8 miles. The overall
crash rate within this segment for the 2005-2008 time period (1886) exceeds the statewide rate for
rural two-lane NC routes (175). This analysis was requested during the CP 1 meeting.
• Analysis 4: This analysis was performed for the segment of NC 143 between the Cherohala Skyway
and the western project terminus of R-2822 B, a distance of 2.3 miles. The overall crash rate within
this segment for the 2005-2008 time period (231) exceeds the statewide rate for rural two-lane NC
routes (175).
• Analysis 5: This analysis was performed for the segment of NC 143 between the eastern project
terminus of R-2822 B and SR 1137 (the eastern terminus of preliminary Alternative 3), a distance of
1.1 miles. The overall crash rate within this segment for the 2005-2008 time period (167) is just below
the statewide rate for rural two-lane NC routes (175).
• Analysis 6: This analysis was performed for the segment of US 129 from the Tennessee state line in
Swain County to SR 1247 in Graham County (the North Carolina segment of the Tail of the Dragon),
a distance of 3.4 miles. The overall crash rate for this segment for the 2005-2008 time period (1542)
exceeds the statewide rate for rural two-lane US routes (159). This analysis was requested during the
CP 1 meeting.
• Analysis 7: This analysiswas performed as an update for the segment of NC 143 within the current
R-2822 B project limits, from West Buffalo Creek to NC 143 Business, a distance of 4.5 miles. The
overall crash rate within this segment for the 2007-2010 time period (577) exceeds both the statewide
rate for rural two-lane NC routes (175) and the critical rate for this particular highway segment (258).
This analysis shows that seventy-five percent of the reported crashes occurred. during dry/daylight
conditions. Only one fatal crash was reported. Nine of the crashes occurred at a point located
approximately 0.5 mile east of SR 1148; five occurred in the vicinity of SR 1125; and five occurred in
the vicinity of SR 1118. Fifty-five percent of the vehicles involved in the reported crashes were
motorcycles. Fifty-one percent of the reported crashes were of the overturn/rollover type, while thirty
percent involved vehicles striking fixed objects.
10. Traffic Volumes
Current traffic volumes on this section of NC 143 (2009 traffic counts) range from 1100 vehicles per day (vpd)
near SR 1115 to 2100 vpd near NC 143 Business. The anticipated maximum traffic demand in the year 2025
is 3300 vpd, based upon a 2.5 percent yearly increase in traffic volumes. If the proposed improvements to NC
143 are performed, traffic volumes could increase at a higher rate due to improved access and increased
tourism and thus could be higher than the projected volumes. Traffic projections for the project are being
updated, and seasonal traffic projections are being prepared as part of that update.
11. Natural Environment Resources
The project is located within the Cheoah subbasin of the Little Tennessee River basin. The following
water resources have been identified in the project study area: Santeetlah Lake, Teeoatlah Branch, Duncan
Branch, West Buffalo Creek, Long Hungry Branch, Buchanan/Barker Branch, Snowbird Creek, Hooper
Branch, Cooloska Branch, Jackson Branch, and Massey Branch. Santeetlah Lake is part of a hydroelectric
project owned and operated by Tapoco (a division of Alcoa). The linear footage of each of these streams and
their tributaries within the proposed study corridor for each of the four preliminary alternatives, based upon
R-2822 B CP 2 Meeting Packet December 16, 2010 Page 6 of 12
USGS and GIS mapping, is presented in Tables 3 and 4. The stream locations are shown in Figures 4 and 5.
Please note that additional streams will very likely be identified during the environmental analysis phase of the
project.
Santeetlah Lake, West Buffalo Creek, and Snowbird Creek are hatchery-supported trout waters, are designated
by NCDWQ as trout waters, and are stocked with rainbow, brown, and brook trout. Brook trout is the only
native trout from the southern Appalachian mountain region. A construction moratorium for all three species
will be required, the duration of which will be determined based upon further coordination with WRC. No in-
stream work or land disturbance will be allowed within a 25-foot buffer zone around either creek or their
tributaries during the moratorium.
No 303 (d) waters, water supply watersheds, high quality waters (HQW), or outstanding resource waters
(ORW) are located within the project study area. However, the upper half of the Snowbird Creek watershed
and several tributaries to nearby Long Creek are classified as HQW. Other portions of the Long Creek
watershed (the Town of Robbinsville's water supply) are classified WS-I, which are HQW by definition.
Several other streams would likely meet the criteria for reclassification to HQW or ORW. Additionally, the
Cheoah River floodplain is considered a significant natural heritage area by the State of North Carolina
because of the rare and endangered species it contains.
Five federally-protected species are listed in Graham County, including four Endangered species (E) and one
Threatened species (T):
• Carolina northern flying squirrel (E)
• Indiana bat (E)
• Appalachian elktoe (E)
• Rock gnome lichen (E)
• Virginia spiraea (T)
In addition, the bog turtle is considered to be Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance (T(S/A)).
Snowbird Creek is the only stream within the project limits with suitable habitat for the Appalachian elktoe.
No mussels were found during a survey of that stream conducted in May 2005. No other surveys of federally-
protected species have been conducted.
WRC has provided the following additional comments: (1) a number of rare salamander species are present in
Snowbird Creek and its tributaries, (2) the northern long-eared myotis has been observed in the area, and (3)
the Cheoah crayfish only occurs in tributaries to Santeetlah Lake.
12. Drainage Structures
Two bridges (see Figure 5) are located on NC 143 within the project study area.
Bridge number 131 carries NC 143 over West Buffalo Creek just east of SR 1148 (West Buffalo
Road). This bridge is 320 feet in length, has a bridge roadway width (including shoulders) of 30 feet,
was constructed in 1971, and has a sufficiency rating of 91.5 (out of a possible maximum score of
100.0). Because this bridge provides an acceptable roadway and shoulder width and has an acceptable
sufficiency rating, no improvements to the bridge are proposed as part of the project. It is
recommended that improvements begin just east of the bridge.
• Bridge number 13 (Doctors Richard and Nettie C. Parrette Memorial Bridge) carries NC 143 over
Snowbird Creek just west of SR 1118 (I.U. Gap Road). This bridge is 180 feet in length, has a bridge
roadway width (including shoulders) of 25 feet, was constructed in 1982, and has a sufficiency rating
of 79.4. This bridge is located within the proposed study corridors for two of the four preliminary
R-2822 B CP 2 Meeting Packet December 16, 2010 Page 7 of 12
alternatives (Alternatives 1 and 4); however, since it provides an acceptable roadway and shoulder
width and has an acceptable sufficiency rating, no improvements to the bridge (other than the addition
of guardrail to all four corners) are recommended as part of the project.
13. Cultural Resources
Architectural/Historic Resources
The Snowbird Mountain Lodge, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, adjoins NC 143
on the south side just east of the Cherohala Skyway/SR 1159. This property is located just outside the
proposed revised project study area and will not be affected by the proposed improvements.
The Snowbird Suspension Bridge is located on the south side of NC 143 approximately 0.1 mile east of the
NC 143 bridge over Snowbird Creek (see Figure 5). This private bridge spans Snowbird Creek and
provides pedestrian access to a residence from NC 143 (vehicular access to the residence is provided via SR
1115). This bridge will be evaluated to determine if it is eligible for listing on the National Register.
HPO noted the latest historic architecture survey of Graham County was completed in 1998 and recommended
that the NCDOT identify and evaluate any structures over fifty years of age within the project area and report
the finding to them.
Archaeoloeical Resources
There is a high probability of significant archaeological resources in the project area, given the topographic
and hydrologic setting. Thus, a comprehensive archaeological survey will be conducted for the project.
Several sites identified in previous studies within the project limits were determined to have the potential to
contain significant information. The results of the studies to be performed will be reported to the State Historic
Preservation Office and the Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO). Additional coordination with SHPO
and THPO will be performed prior to the initiation of detailed environmental studies.
NCDOT prepared an archaeological/historical background research report for the project in January 1998.
The intent of this work was to initiate the consideration of archaeological resources at an early stage of project
planning and to provide information that would be helpful in developing alternatives for the project. The
primary goal of this screening was to determine the probability of locating significant cultural resources within
the APE (area of potential effect) in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and
Section 4(f) of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act. The report noted that ten sites had been previously
identified within the project study area during three separate USFS archaeological surveys conducted in 1989,
1991, and 1992. Though the locations of these ten sites are not displayed in this packet, due to the sensitivity
of those sites, the number of sites within the 1000-foot study corridor for each of the four preliminary
alternatives is presented in Table 4. The report also notes historic period cemeteries located within the project
area.
Traditional Cultural Properties
Traditional cultural properties may exist within the project study area. Such properties are eligible for
inclusion in the National Register because of their association with cultural practices or beliefs of a
living community that are (1) rooted in that community's history and (2) important in maintaining the
continuing cultural identity of the community. Coordination with the Eastern Band of the Cherokee
Indians (EBCI) and THPO with regard to these properties will be performed during the environmental
analysis phase. As appropriate, coordination with other Native American nations will be performed, as
well.
R-2822 B CP 2 Meeting Packet December 16, 2010 Page 8 of 12
EBCI Tribal Lands
EBCI tribal lands are located at various locations in and near the project study area. These lands are
listed below and are shown in Figure 4. All four preliminary "build" alternatives would impact EBCI
tribal lands to some degree (see preliminary impacts in Table 4).
• Tract 17 (Elowah tract)
• Tract 91 (tract name unknown)
• Tract 93 (Cooloska tract)
• Tract 364 (Chesquenetah, or Youngblood, tract) (located outside the proposed revised study area)
• Tract 373 (Ootalkanah tract)
• Tract 477 (Towayallah tract)
• Tract 482 (Teeotelah tract) (located outside the proposed revised study area)
Cemeteries
Three cemeteries are located within the project study area. These cemeteries are shown in Figure 5 and are
listed below. The presence of these cemeteries with respect to the four preliminary alternatives is presented in
Table 4.
West Buffalo (Carver) Cemetery - north side of NC 143 approximately 0.7 mile east of the West
Buffalo Creek bridge
Chickalelee Cemetery - west side of NC 143 north of SR 1125
Cemetery (name unknown) - south side of NC 143 between SR 1149 and SR 1137
14. THPO, EBCI, and BIA Coordination
Meetings with representatives of the Tribal Historic Preservation Office were held on March 4, 2008 (prior to
the Snowbird Community meeting) and on 8-7-08 (prior to the presentation made to the EBCI Tribal Council).
The topics discussed are summarized below:
• Human remains will likely be encountered along NC 143 near West Buffalo Creek and along NC 143
east of SR 1115. Alternative 3 could impact several graves, as well. Additional individual burial sites
may also exist within the project limits.
• Ramp collection, a Cherokee traditional cultural practice, takes place in the project area.
• Local residents desire a quicker route to Robbinsville from the Snowbird area.
• Some residents may support improving the existing road over new location alternatives.
• Whether to prepare background archaeological studies for the CP 2 alternatives and a detailed study
only for the LEDPA (CP 3) alternative should be discussed prior to the initiation of environmental
studies.
• Motorcyclists use the subject section of NC 143 as a timed loop, with the Cherohala Skyway and "The
Tale of the Dragon" also part of that loop.
• The boundaries of the seven Cherokee tribal tracts in the project area need to be verified with the BIA
Realty Office.
• Additional coordination with THPO should be performed prior to the beginning of environmental
studies.
• Consideration should be given to contacting property owners prior to the beginning of environmental
field studies.
• Consideration should be given to identifying other properties owned by Native Americans within the
project study area, in addition to the seven tribal tracts.
R-2822 B CP 2 Meeting Packet December 16, 2010 Page 9 of 12
The project was presented to the Tribal Council of the Eastern Band of the Cherokee Indians for informational
purposes on August 7, 2008. Following NCDOT's brief presentation, a member of the Tribal Council inquired
as to the schedule for right of way acquisition and construction for the project. No other comments or
questions were received.
The Bureau of Indian Affairs has noted the Section 106 requirement that all Indian Tribes with historical ties
to the area be consulted as to whether the tribes place religious or cultural significance to any of the properties
in question.
Coordination with EBCI, THPO, and BIA will continue throughout the environmental analysis phase of the
project due to the potential for impacts to tribal lands, archaeological sites, and traditional cultural properties.
15. U. S. Forest Service Resources and Coordination
U.S. Forest Service lands (Nantahala National Forest) border the subject section of existing NC 143 for a
distance of approximately 3.4 miles (approximately 75 percent of the project length). U. S. Forest Service
facilities within the project study area include:
• Santeetlah Road Wayside Access to West Buffalo Creek - located near the NC 143 intersection with
SR 1148
• Long Hungry Road Camping - located on Santeetlah Lake north of NC 143 near West Buffalo/Carver
Cemetery
• Snowbird Picnic Area - located on the north side of NC 143 between Snowbird Creek and SR 1118
• Snowbird Loop Nature Trail - located on the south side of NC 143 across from the picnic area
USFS and NCDOT representatives met in April 2003 to discuss preliminary alternatives for which functional
designs had been developed. During that meeting USFS representatives expressed their concerns with
Alternative 3. After that meeting, at the request of USFS, NCDOT developed a functional design for
Alternative 2, which would have less impact on USFS lands than Alternative 3. In a recent telephone
conversation (October 2010) the USFS reiterated their concerns with Alternative 3.
All four preliminary "build" alternatives would impact USFS lands to some degree (see preliminary estimated
impacts in Table 4).
Coordination with USFS will continue throughout the environmental analysis phase of the project due to the
potential for impacts to USFS lands and facilities.
16. Acidic Rock
In November 2001 the NCDOT Geotechnical Engineering Unit collected 23 samples from rock cuts at 14 sites
along existing NC 143 within the current project limits and just west of the project. Those samples were tested
and were found to be non-acidic. Those results are similar to the results of NCDOT testing at a bridge
replacement project near the entrance to nearby Joyce Kilmer Forest several years ago. Based on the
results of these studies, it is unlikely that acid-producing rock is present in the project study area. However,
additional geologic surveys will be conducted during the environmental analysis phase to determine if acidic
rock is present.
17. Special Permits and Coordination Required
• Dredging or placement of fill material into any surface waters or wetlands will require permits from
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality.
• Coordination with Tapoco with regard to potential impacts to Santeetlah Lake (including FERC permit
requirments) will be performed.
R-2822 B CP 2 Meeting Packet December 16, 2010 Page 10 of 12
• Section 26a of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act requires that TVA approval be obtained before any
construction activities can be carried out that affect navigation, flood control, or public lands along the
shoreline of TVA reservoirs or in the Tennessee River or its tributaries. The need for a TVA permit
will be evaluated during the environmental analysis phase of the project.
• Coordination with EBCI will be performed due to the potential for impacts to tribal lands,
archaeological sites, and traditional cultural properties.
• Coordination with USFS will be required due to the potential for impacts to USFS lands and facilities.
18. Tapoco Reficensing and Shoreline Management Plan
During the CP 1 meeting it was suggested that NCDOT review the recently-completed shoreline management
plan (SMP) for the Tapoco hydroelectric project, since it would likely contain valuable information for the
upcoming R-2822 B environmental studies. A brief summary of the SMP is provided below.
Tapoco prepared an SMP for the Tapoco project (which includes the Santeetlah Reservoir) in conjunction with
their Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) relicensing process. The SNIP, which was approved by
FERC in May 2005, includes discussion of natural, recreational, aesthetic, and cultural resources in the
vicinity of Lake Santeetlah. In the vicinity of STIP Project R-2822 B the Tapoco project boundary generally
follows the shoreline of Santeetlah Lake, but also follows the shorelines of West Buffalo Creek and Snowbird
Creek.upstream of NC 143. Table 4 includes data pertaining to the findings of the SMP with regard to the four
preliminary alternatives for STIP Project R-2822 B.
19. Public Involvement
Snowbird Communitv Meetin
A meeting with residents of the Snowbird Community, many of whom are of Native American ancestry, was
held at the Snowbird Community Center on March 4, 2008. Four preliminary alternatives (Alternatives 1
through 4) were presented on large aerial photography during this meeting.
During the community meeting citizens noted the presence of a ridgeline trail in fairly close proximity to NC
143 near SR 1125; the Chekelelee Cemetery (containing approximately 60 graves) near SR 1125; a ford of
Snowbird Creek that once existed near the waste disposal convenience site; and Indian Springs, a natural
spring (near SR 1118) where the Cherokee have gone for cultural washing for many years. Several comments
were received asking that the project be designed so as not to disturb graves.
Those in attendance generally favored Alternative 1 or Alternative 3 over Alternatives 2 and 4. Support for
Alternative 1 was expressed in that it would minimize impacts to forested areas. Concern was expressed that
Alternative 2 would pass through the traditionally-recognized home of the Snowbird of Cherokee legend.
Concern was also expressed that Alternatives 2 and 3 would route traffic away from businesses located along
existing NC 143. Many citizens commented that Alternative 3 would have the least impact on developed
residential areas and provide the shortest route to the Cherohala Skyway for emergency vehicles. No
comments were received regarding Alternative 4.
Local Officials Meetin
A local officials meeting was held at the Graham County Public Library in Robbinsville on May 15, 2008,
prior to the citizens informational workshop. As with the Snowbird community meeting, large aerial
photographs showing Alternatives 1, 2, 3, and 4 were displayed.
During the meeting a USFS representative asked that impacts to Nantahala National Forest be minimized as
much as possible. An inquiry was made as to the proposed route for possible new I-3, and confusion was
expressed by local officials regarding the relationship between STIP Project A-9 B/C and the I-3 project. It
was noted a fairly large number of homes are situated just outside the existing right of way limits of NC 143.
R-2822 B CP 2 Meeting Packet December 16, 2010 Page 11 of 12
It was noted additional Cherokee tribal lands may be present, in addition to the ones that were shown on the
aerial photograph. Inquiries were made regarding the length of the proposed bridges over Santeetlah Lake
under Alternatives 2 and 3; the length of time required to construct the project; and what will become of the
existing NC 143 roadbed under the new location alternatives. One attendee observed that a fairly sharp curve
would be required under Alternative 2 just north of the proposed Santeetlah Lake bridge.
Support for Alternative 3 was expressed in that it is the shortest alternative and thus would seem to be the most
cost-effective and that it would result in the least impact to private priority.
Citizens Informational Workshop
A citizens informational workshop was held at Robbinsville High School on May 15, 2008 following the local
officials meeting. The same aerial photographs showing Alternatives 1, 2, 3, and 4 were displayed.
During the workshop it was noted other Cherokee cemeteries, in addition to those shown on the display maps
(including the New Hope Cemetery near SR 1149), may also exist in the project area. The presence of acidic
rock in the general project area was noted. A potential historic house (made of stone) near SR 1118 was noted,
as was the presence of an footpath and sawmill near SR 1136. The area known as "Indian Springs" (near SR
1118) was noted. An inquiry was made as to the treatment of the existing roadbed under the new location
alternatives.
The majority of the attendees favored Alternative 3, noting it is the shortest and most cost-effective alternative
and would likely result in the least impact to private property. A few citizens favored improving existing NC
143 under Alternative 1, but support for Alternative 4 was also expressed. Concern was expressed that
Alternatives 1 or 4 would have greater impacts on Snowbird Creek than Alternatives 2 or 3. One citizen
expressed concern that under Alternatives 1 and 4 motorcycle traffic would continue along areas where local
residents have to back out of their driveways. One comment was received stating that Alternative 2 would
have greater impacts to private property than Alternative 3. The owner of a business near SR 1125 expressed
concern that the new location alternatives (Alternatives 2 or 3) would result in a loss of business.
It was suggested that a more northerly alternative be investigated as a means of minimizing impacts to private
property and so as to allow the project to be constructed in less rugged terrain. This alternative was considered,
but is not recommended for further analysis due to (1) the closer proximity of this alternative to the main
sections of Santeetlah Lake (and the resulting greater potential for visual impacts) and (2) the greater potential
for roadway icing under this alternative, given its location on the north side of the nearby mountain.
JWS
R-2822 B CP 2 Meeting Packet December 16, 2010 Page 12 of 12
Table 1
Projects in the Vicinity of
STIP Project R-2822 B
CP 2 Meeting 12-16-10
STIP Project County Project Description Project Schedule
Number
NC 143, from West Buffalo Creek Right of way: FY 2013
R-2822 B Graham to NC 143 Business, upgrade Construction: FY 2015
corridor
Cherokee Corridor K, from US 19-74-129 at
Right of way: FY 2014
A-9 B&C Graham Andrews to NC 28 east of Amond, Construction: FY 2016
, four-lane divided facility, primarily
and on new location
Swain
Hunting Boy Branch Road
R-5003 Graham reconstruction on the Qualla Under construction by E13CI
Boundary
Right of way complete
B-3335 Graham SR 1134, replace bridge no. 70 over Under construction
the Cheoah River
Right of way in progress
B-4122 Graham SR 1117, replace bridge no. 81 over Construction: FY 2012
Long Creek
Right of way complete
B-4123 Graham SR 1 123, replace bridge no. 117 Under construction
over West Buffalo Creek
B-5209 Graham US 128, rehabilitate deck of bridge Under construction
no. 10 over East Buffalo Creek
N
C m O
y N e?
G N N
C-4 E
CD O O)
a U d c
m d d «'
d
L d N
U
U
° M N C f? »?:
v:'r
v .r
N M m U m 3
? ? •,;: w
i
a
E O
N N z a) _
N O f? d t`T'_-
f? U d 'N ?o t5
C C) Z >>
> ?m dU O m`

Q
N
E d
Z d
"?d .
cP ci. vfi.
LO
U O
n o n
F
C } 3'd{? c r
^ d
'
co cN N L M O +n
-0 + 3p" cVC
to
y C,
O N O C .?` O ``>•y N?- i. p
N C d 0 C
o 0 a) C O co
l)

?

M
>.
C) In f c O
F- - 'E .L.. M co C . , p: .
M
.

r_
C,
N ? U
r-
E o_
CL
0 0

^`?„ i E v ..
Q Q N
N U
m I\
LL Z .. Yr I
M U o
H co q. U Z
N O M O

r N
6
O
N N r j
U N c+ d N O I?
C)
E =
;n
E m
c C> Z .
Q N lL N v
m cn

N 0 O) O
to N
? N
?'? qtr°"
N
0 M ?
Y O d V O
N N _ C a d M O cM

>`

O

Z
CO (D
m
(n u
U

N .O

N

C
M

N

M
N i;'
V
C l n t o
Q N
O M
d a r i
t
1p.•.. ;
O
ll W
? w c
W d m O N '
,S co
1'7
y 0
0 M
qT N O

01
E

O
L c6

O

i.,rq;
O

O
T N
N (? N
d c0
C ,C r
O d O O co .

R O

Z LL
C-
N Y
d
m
L N
,• ..

i
C.
04 d
?d„ e

N O
y C
L
?
d N "
N
VJ!

N CD

M O c
N V U 59
x
O
>
m 0
d V

c(J

O

.01...r

o
T r
o U M M Z V
E (D O
A o Z ? o_ 0 'N ra
,
Q N >>
> U
Z C V O
0
d r
K'
`
E d
E r
f
o

o .r rn o E
k
'
LL d n
U
k rri g

ao O

in
U - N
? C z
;=.ys rs.
'

N

. O
p Cl)
N
d
E
0
x r'
N N -
. O oo
A

`"

U U C

E o U j 3
C
d O

in N

N f,
.
N
o
Z 0
Z
m
a N LL Q N

co U i 9,...
9
t ;r« T N C
O C
O d
O7

. w ? ? p L C ? d 0? S O N
R '•' v N y z rn d d
'? E° E p r m

>
N C
d C

A ? d

C
U

a
r
3
d d d' CL V d L
d
a c d N a a N t > u
d m rn U)i E o d> r

F d > Z ? O .r
c a d ? c
Table 2
N
O
n
d
E
O
C)
N
O
O O
O
N ?
m > aN
eo L
o N
O p m
N O U
M
O W
O d
N N
N
L O
L... c6 d
U n
L. d
O O
0 r
C N
M
y > (D
r
N 0 N O
O E N
N d
o
c o
co d O o
w
L M
3 a o v
O
d U d Z
d ? `o
-O O
N N N d
m v :? E
rn > >
c O p N
m U U
? Z Z) d
m m ?
d ` J N
d
U o o
m
C d d `p
? ? l0 w
? d
? L L (p
a?i m ? L
? V U N
O O M U
S Q 0
N d co
Y
v -o
V
N N U
M Co
d
N ?0 ?r6
z° ¢ U U F
Table 3
Streams in Project Area
STIP Project R-2822 B
CP 2 Meeting 12-16-10
Stream Stream Length (LF) within 1000-foot Study Corridor'
Number Stream Name
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
Alternative 4
1 West Buffalo Creek (WBC) 1300 1300 1300 1300
2 UT 1 (WBC) 2100 2100 2100 2300
3 Long Hungry Branch (LHB) 1600 1800 1800 1500
4 UT 2 (LHB) 1100 900 900 1100
5 UT 3 (LHB) 1000 1000 1000 1000
6 UT 4 (LHB) 1100 1400 1400 900
7 Buchanan/Barker Branch (BB) 800 3100 300 800
8 UT 5 (BB) 600 1100 1100 600
9 UT 6 (BB) 700 0 0 700
10 Snowbird Creek (SC) 10,700 3800 0 10100
11 UT 7 (SC) 500 0 0 600
12 UT 8 (SC) 250 0 0 350
13 Hooper Branch (HB) 700 0 0 700
14 UT 9 (SC) 650 0 0 700
15 UT 10 (SC) 400 0 0 400
16 UT 11 (SC) 800 0 0 800
17 UT 12 (SC) 1400 1400 0 1000
18 Cooloska Branch (CB) 650 650 0 900
19 UT 13 (CB) 0 0 0 200
20 UT 14 (BB) 0 100 0 0
21 UT 15 (SC) 0 0 1750 0
Total Stream Length by Alternative (LF) 26350 18650 11650 25950
'Based upon USGS and GIS mapping
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL, F. EASLEY
GOVI:RNOR
February 19, 2007
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
MEMORANDUM TO: Meeting Participants
FROM: Wilson Stroud, Project Planning Engine
Project Development and Environmental ysis Branch
SUBJECT: Minutes of Concurrence Point #1 Meeting for NC 143,
from the Cherohala Skyway to NC 143 Busines Graham
County, Federal Aid Project STP-1127(1); State Project
8.2930301. WBS Element 34508.1.1, TIP Project R-2822 B
The Concurrence Point #1 meeting for TIP Project R-2822 B was held in the
Transportation Building BoardRoom (Room 150) on Tuesday, January 23, 2007. The
meeting was held to discuss and achieve concurrence on the purpose and need of the
project and the project study area. The following persons attended the meeting:
David Baker
Jake Riggsbee
Chris Militscher
iMarella Buncick
Karen Compton
Harold Draper
Tyler Howe
Marla Chambers
Brian Wrenn
Sarah McBride
Amy Simes
Joel Setzer
Jim Speer
John Lansford
John Frye
Don Moore
Sarah Smith
Tammye Davis
Mark Staley
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Federal Highway Administration
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (via videoconference)
U. S. Forest Service
Tennessee Valley Authority (via videoconference)
Eastern Band of the Cherokee Indians (via teleconference)
N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission
N. C. Division of Water Quality
State Historic Preservation Office
NCDENR, Office of the Secretary, Transportation Liaison
NCDOT, Division Engineer (via teleconference)
NCDOT, Roadway Design Unit
NCDOT, Roadway Design Unit
NCDOT, Structure Design Unit
NCDOT, Geotechnical Unit
NCDOT, Transportation Planning Branch
NCDOT, Office of Environmental Quality
NCDOT, Roadside Environmental Unit
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
Carla Dagnino NCDOT, PDEA Natural Environment Unit
Kris Dramby NCDOT, PDEA Natural. Envi ronment Unit
Mary Pope Furr NCDOT, PDEA Human Environment Unit
Steve Gurganus NCDOT, PDEA Human Environment Unit
Tim Gardiner NCDOT, PDEA Human Environment Unit
Jamille Robbins NCDOT, PDEA Human Environment Unit
Teresa Hart NCDOT, PDEA Western Planning Unit:
James Bridges NCDOT, PDEA Western Planning Unit
Zahid Baloch NCDOT, PDEA Western Planning Unit
Marshall Edwards NCDOT, PDEA Western Planning Unit
April Johnson NCDOT, PDEA Western Planning Unit
Angela Sanderson NCDOT, PDEA Western Planning Unit
Michael Wray NCDOT, PDEA Western Planning Unit
Wilson Stroud NCDOT, PDEA Western Planning Unit
Wilson Stroud opened the meeting at approximately 3:00 p.m. by welcoming the
participants and noting the four participants attending via teleconference and
videoconference. He then asked each participant to introduce himself or herself.
Following the introductions, Wilson presented a Power Point presentation that included
slides showing: meeting agenda and goals,: project description, vicinity map, project
history and schedule, existing conditions, photos taken along the project, traffic
projections, crash history, environmental features, proposed purpose and need statement,
and proposed study area. During and following the Power Point presentation, the
following topics listed below were discussed:
Posted Speed Limit
The "Existing Conditions" section of the packet distributed prior to the meeting (Item #7)
indicated the speed limit along the project ranges from 45 to 55 mph and that five curves
have advisory speed limits of 20 or 30 mph. During his presentation, Wilson noted that
the speed limit along the project actually ranges from 35 to 45 mph and that three curves
have advisory speeds of 20 or 30 mph.
Existing Typical Section
The "Proposed Improvements" section of the packet (Item #3) indicated the proposed
improvements west of West Buffalo Creek-will consist of resurfacing, widening the.
pavement to 22 feet, regrading the shoulders, and replacing guardrail as needed. During
his presentation, Wilson noted the existing pavement width west of West Buffalo Creek
is actually 22 feet and that improvements within that section of the project will consist of
resurfacing, regrading the shoulders, and replacing or installing new guardrail, but no
pavement widening.
Page 2 of 10
..Cherohala Skyway Designation as a National Scenic Byway
Sarah McBride asked when the adjacent Cherohala Skyway, was designated as a National
Scenic Byway. Joel Setzer responded that it received that designation when that section
of NC 143 was dedicated and opened to traffic in 1996.
Crash Rates - NC 143, the Cherohala Skyway, and "The Tail of the Dragon"
Karen Compton asked if the crash rate along the project has been compared with the
crash rate along the adjacent section of NC 143 to the west, known as.the Cherohala
Skyway. Wilson responded that he has not compared the crash rates for those two
facilities, but that he would do so. Karen also indicated she feels the crash rates on the
project are related mainly to motorists exceeding the posted and advisory speed limits.
Marella:Buncick asked whether we have obtained crash rates along "The Tail of the
Dragon", a nearby section of US 129 that attracts motorcyclists from all, over the country.
(NCDOT has not obtained those crash rates as part of this study.) Karen noted that "The
Tail of the Dragon" follows nearby US 129 and that it does not follow any portion of NC
143 or the Cherohala Skyway. ("The Tail of the Dragon" follows US 129 in Graham and
Swain Counties, North Carolina and in Blount County, Tennessee. It begins at the
Cheoah Dam in Graham County and ends near at Tabcat Creek in Blount County; a
distance of 14 miles.)
Tribal Lands (Eastern Band of the Cherokee Indians)
Tyler Howe noted that, in addition to the tribal lands Wilson identified near the east end
of the project during his presentation, other tribal lands are located along NC 143 near the
west end and in the middle of the project. Tyler noted those lands appear in Figure 3 of
the handout, but are not identified as "tribal lands". (Those lands are identified in Figure
3 as, proceeding from west to east, parcels 482, 364, 477, 373, 17, 93, and 91.)
Joel noted the Snowbird community relies heavily upon NC 143 and encouraged Tyler
comment on the project from the standpoint of that community.
Tyler reiterated that the tribal lands shown in Figures 2.and 3 are not the only tribal lands
within the project limits. He noted NC 143 traverses through the heart of the Snowbird
community and that his main concern is with.the portions of the project that adjoin the
_,tribal -lands. _He_ noted-there-is-great potential-for-archaeological. resources on.those.lands,
and he asked that we address potential cultural resource impacts as part of our study.
Tourist Traffic
Marla Chambers noted the section of NC 143 between Robbinsville and Tellico Plains,
Tennessee, as well as other area routes (including "The Tale of the Dragon", as noted
above), are marketed nationally as challenging and scenic routes for motorcyclists. She
expressed concern that the project could cause some motorcyclists to travel elsewhere, if
the challenging and scenic qualities of NC 143 are eliminated.
Page 3 of 10
U. S. Forest Service Issues
Karen noted that approximately 70 percent of the project is bordered by U. S. Forest
Service land. She requested that visual impacts on those lands be considered during the
CSS process. Jim Speer responded that visual impacts will be. addressed.
FERC Coordination
Marella mentioned that coordination with FERC or the Alcoa Corporation may be
required. She noted that Alcoa has recently performed relicensing work in the project
vicinity and that there is a shoreline management plan for Santeetlah Lake.
Lead Federal Agencies
Tyler asked whether federal funds would be used on the project and, if so, which agency
would be the lead agency. Wilson responded that the project is federally funded and that
the USACE and the USDOT (FHWA) would be the lead agencies, which Jake Riggsbee
confirmed.
Section 1.06 Issues
Sarah McBride asked about the presence and age of any structures associated with the
fish hatchery located on the south side of NC 143 east of SR 1115. Wilson responded
that structures are present at the hatchery, but he does not know the ages of those
structures.
Steam and Water Quality Issues
Sarah McBride noted the project crosses five major streams and asked if bridge
replacement is proposed at each crossing. Wilson responded that we anticipate the two
existing bridges (at West Buffalo Creek and Snowbird Creek) will be retained and that
the existing culverts at the other crossings will be retained and extended. He noted that
additional guidance will be obtained from the Hydraulics Unit regarding those stream
crossings (the Bridge Maintenance and Structure Design Units will also be consulted, as
needed).
Purpose and Need, Proposed Typical Section, and Context Sensitive Solutions
The purpose and need statement as presented in the information packet that was sent to
the team members and NCDOT staff prior to the meeting was as follows:
The purpose of this project is to improve safety along NC 143 by
constructing wider travel lanes and shoulders and by improving the
horizontal alignment, the providing a safer facility with a design
more typical of "NC" routes.
Page 4 of 10
Wilson sent the following revised purpose and need statement viae-mail.to the team
members and NCDOT staff on January 22, 2007 (the (lay before the meeting): .
The,purpose of this project is to provide an improved facility that
meets current design standards for NC routes.
Brian Wrenn noted the differences between the original purpose and need'statement sent
out.as part of the merger packet and the revised statement. 'Wilson explained that he had
revised the statement to avoid prescribing a specific solution.
Brian asked whether NCDOT is anticipating any realignment of the existing road if the
"improve existing facility" alternative is selected.. James Bridges responded that if the
existing facility is widened', portions of it will need to be.realigned if the design speed is
to be improved. John Lansford added that approximately 50 percent of the existing road
will have to be rebuilt if the existing road is widened, and Jim Speer noted that retaining
walls may be considered in some areas to reduce impacts.
Brian questioned whether the proposed purpose and need statement would allow us to
widen the existing road for the entire length of the project. Wilson responded that it
would, reiterating that much of the existing road would need to be rebuilt to achievea
more desirable design speed.
Karen Compton asked for clarification as to the realignment of the existing road that
would be required under the "improve existing facility" alternative. John Lansford
responded that under that alternative, only about half of the existing road would remain in
its current location if a design speed of 35 mph 'is proposed. John noted that although
only three curves have advisory reduced speed postings, many more do not meet the
requirements of a reasonable design speed. (Since the meeting, John has reported that the
proposed design speed is 30 mph rather than 35 mph.)
Brian asked about the phrase "design standards for NC routes" that is included in the
revised purpose and need statement. John'Lansford responded that there are no design
standards for NC routes: instead, design standards are prescribed for arterial, collector,
and local routes. Wilson noted that NC 143 is a rural major collector. John noted the
proposed typical section was selected to match up with the design of the adjoining section
of NC 143 to the west (the Cherohala Skyway), which has a 357mph design speed and 1I-
- ?..
footlanes.
It was asked if there are design standards for scenic byways. Jim Speer noted that there
are no standards for scenic byways, but noted that context sensitive solutions (CSS) will
be considered in the planning and design of the project. Clarification of the use of CSS
was then requested. Jim explained that CSS is a FHWA guide that calls for consideration
of the environmental context of a project during design, including such design
components as lane and shoulder widths. Jim further noted that both AASTO standards
and CSS guidelines will be followed for this project. -
Page 5 of 10
Chris Militscher asked for clarification as to the design standards for shoulder width for
rural collectors. John Lansford responded that he believes those standards call for 6-foot
shoulders. (Since the meeting, John has reported that AASHTO standards call 12-foot
travel lanes and 8-foot useable shoulders, based upon the projected traffic volumes.)
Karen asked whether the proposed 22-foot pavement and 6-foot shoulders are in keeping
with the concept of CSS. Jim responded that this would need to be considered in the CSS
evaluation process.
Marella Buncick questioned whether including the phrase "meets design standards, " as
stated in the revised purpose and need statement, would lock us into a design that (1) may
be excessive for this road and (2) may later limit our options for CSS. Wilson suggested
noting in the purpose and need statement that CSS will be considered during project
design.
Chris indicated he preferred the initial purpose and need statement, noting that the
handout made a good case for the safety benefits of the project. He also noted that not all
the team members are familiar with AASHTO standards and CSS guidelines. He feels it
may be impracticable for us to meet those standards along the entire project, and he noted
he does not want us to be locked into alternatives that call for improvements that may not
be permittable.
John Lansford explained that CSS is not a separate set of standards; instead, it is a
method of using AASHTO or NCDOT "3-R" (Resurfacing, Restoration, and
Rehabilitation) design standards to provide a better fit with the environment.
Wilson re-read the initial purpose and need statement. James Bridges indicated he did
not feel that statement locks us into any specific standards, alternatives, or improvements.
Chris noted that he would have trouble with a statement that mentions design standards.
He expressed his concern that if we adopt a statement that includes "design standards",
and it later turns out we are not able to achieve those standards in sensitive areas, we
could be at a deadlock.
James asked if all would concur with the initial propose and need statement (the version
included in the original packet).
Marella suggested using the original statement, but revising it to refer to scenic byways
rather than to NC routes.
Marla explained she normally supports most horizontal alignment improvements, but
noted her concern with such improvements for this project. She feels most motorists who
travel NC 143 expect it to have curves, given the mountainous terrain. She reiterated that
many of the tourists who travel the road do so to experience the challenging alignment.
She asked that we determine what the crash rate would be if the motorcycle crashes were
taken out of the analysis. She feels if we change the alignment very much, environmental
impacts would be much greater. Marla suggested that we word the statement in such a
Page 6 of 10

waythatretaining 100 percent of the existing alignment and simply widen fill; the
pavement and shoulders could be an option.
Wilson responded that NCDOT is obligated to look at the cause of the crashes and to take
appropriate corrective measures to reduce the likelihood of those crashes, given that the
crash rates for the project exceed both the statewide and critical rates. He.agreed to
determine what the crash rate would be if the motorcycle crashes were.excluded.. .
Joel.Setzer indicated he feels most of the tourists travelling on NC 143,are doing-so to
reach the Cherohala Skyway and they are not necessarily travelling on this section of road
for its scenic value. He, does not feel improving the alignment of NC 143 would
discourage tourists from travelling that route, and he noted there are other nearby sections
of roads with challenging alignments. He noted the main points of interest to tourists
within the project limits are the Nantahala National Forest and Snowbird Creek.
John Lansford noted this section of NC 143 differs from the Cherohala Skyway in that it
serves local traffic, as well as tourist traffic. He noted this section of NC 143 serves a
mixture of traffic, including school buses, service trucks, local residents, and tourists. .
Marella explained that she is not opposed to some realignment of NC 143. She is
concerned, however, that the revised purpose and need statement, .which mentions design
standards, would bind us to improvements that may not be permittable by all of the
agencies (for example, the Eastern Band of the Cherokee Indians and the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service). She expressed her desire for us to keep our options open. Marla
concurred with Marella's observations.
Brian recognized the need to widen and realign at least some portions of NC 143 to
improve safety, but noted the potential for acidic rock in the project area and the negative
impacts acidic rock can have on aquatic communities. He emphasized that we should
accommodate the "widen existing" alternative in selecting a purpose and need statement.
Chris suggested that the purpose and need statement be revised to include improving the
horizontal alignment, if that can be done without incurring major impacts to the
environment.
James revised the statement on the Power Point slide to read more like the statement
included in the original merger package, but adding the word "possibly" before
- "improving"and changing "NC routes" to-"seenic-byways . Karen-expressed concern-that- --- --- -
the new suggesting wording could rule out certain options, and she.noted that she feels
the revised wording still tends to prescribe a solution. Wilson noted that detailed
discussion of the alternatives to be studied will be addressed at the next concurrence point
meeting (CP #2).
Teresa Hart asked Karen to clarify her concerns with the most recently suggested version
of the statement. Karen explained that she feels safety is the overall goal and that the
original statement and the most recently suggested one both go too far in offering
solutions. Sarah McBride indicated she agrees with Karen and.suggested that "by
constructing wider travel lanes and shoulders and by improving the horizontal alignment"
Page 7 of 10
be removed from the statement. Chris further suggested that the second reference to
safety be removed, noting its redundancy.
Jim reiterated that there are no set standards for scenic byways. Joel.suggested
referencing the Cherohala Skyway (which was designed using AASHTO standards) in the
statement rather than scenic byways. Karen expressed concern with NC 143 being
improved to match the typical section of the Cherohala Skyway. Joel responded that he
feels NCDors intent in placing the project in the TIP, based upon input received from
local officials and residents, was to improve NC 143 to standards similar to those used for
the Skyway. Jake indicated l 1-foot lanes, the.width provided on the Skyway, are the
absolute minimum lane widths that FHWA will allow.. Jim, agreed, noting l 1-foot lanes
are proposed, even considering CSS guidelines.
Sarah McBride suggested including "consideration of CSS" in the purpose and need
statement, and Teresa agreed. James revised the statement to read:
The purpose of this action is to improve safety along NC 143 using
context sensitive solutions.
Joel asked if this statement would restrict us from considering new location alternatives.
Everyone agreed it would not. The above purpose and need statement was adopted.
Project Study Area
Marella asked for clarification of the TIP project description; noting the references in the
TIP to Sections A and B. Wilson and Joel explained that R-2822 A called for intersection
improvements,.minor realignment, and guardrail work on NC 143 from south of SR 11 15
to north of SR 1 125 (near the Snowbird community), a distance of 0.7 mile. The project
was processed under State Miminum Criteria guidelines, and construction was completed
in November 1996.
Wilson described the proposed project study area, which was shown in Figure 3, on the
aerial photographs included in the merger packets, and on the aerial photographs
displayed at the meeting. He noted that the shown proposed study area would allow the
study of new location alternatives within the eastern portion of the project, where existing
NC 143 follows a more sinuous course.
Joel asked John Lansford to discuss the existing horizontal alignment and typical section
west of West Buffalo Creek in more detail. (Within this portion of the project, NC 143
consists of a 2-lane, 22-foot pavement with 6-foot grassed shoulders. East of the West
Buffalo Creek, NC 143 consists of a 2-lane, 18-foot pavement with 1-4 foot grassed
shoulders.) John explained that for the portion of the project west of West Buffalo Creek,
only resurfacing, guardrail replacement and installation, and shoulder grading are
proposed. He noted that design exceptions would likely be needed within this segment
due to the two horizontal curves with advisory speed limits of 30 mph. John noted that if
those curves were improved to meet a 35-mph design, impacts to adjacent properties
(including tribal properties) would likely be greater.
Page 8 of 10

Joel suggested the possibility of processing the portions of the project west and east of
West Buffalo Creek separately, given the distinction between the.existing conditions (and
therefore between-the proposed improvements) proposed for those two segments. He
feels this would reduce the amount of study needed for the segment Lo.the west, thus
savingdime and money. Joel indicated he will look into this possibility. Teresa.asked if
the project could be split during this meeting, or if it should occur during the CP #2
meeting. Joel asked if the presence of the West Buffalo Creek bridge would-impact the
possible project.split. John Lansford responded that it would not, since the bridge is
expected to be retained, Marla asked for verification of the existing typical section along
the western segment, and Wilson confirmed that it has 1 I-foot lanes and 6-foot grassed
shoulders.
James asked if anyone objected to the proposed study area, noting that it could be revised
at a future date if the project limits are changed for the possible split at West Buffalo
Creek. Chris responded that for other projects, the project study areas have been revised
later in the merger process based upon further development of the alternatives. Chris
suggested that the study area statement be revised to include the date shown on. Figure 3
(December 2006). He also requested that the date.of Figure 3 be included in the meeting
minutes.
Sarah McBride asked if the shown study area replicates the scoping done in 2001.
Wilson responded that the study area does include. the new location alternatives that have
been studied and discussed with the U. S. Forest Service.
Tyler requested that we continue to consider the impact of the project on tribal lands, and
lie'requested clarification of the proposed improvements west of West Buffalo Creek.
Wilson explained that the portion of the project west of West Buffalo Creek will involve
less work than the portion to the east and, therefore, it may be preferable to study that
segment separately. Wilson also noted that if the project is split into two separate
projects at West Buffalo Creek, Division 14 would likely perform the portion to the west.
The following study area statement was adopted:
The proposed study area is variable in width and is shown in attached
Figure 3 (dated December 2006).
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 4:45 p.m.
Adopted Purpose and Need and Project Study Area Statements:
• Purpose and Need: The purpose of this action is to
improve safety along NC 143 using context sensitive
solutions.
• Project Study Area: The proposed study area is variable in width
and is shown in attached Figure 3 (dated December 2006).
Page 9 of 10
Additional Agency Comments
Prior to the meeting, Bill Gibson, the Executive Director of the Southwestern RPO,
provided the following comments on the project:
"Nonetheless, the Southwestern RPO is, very familiar with the subject
project (R-2822 B, NC 143 Graham County).
We are very aware of the self-evident need for a safer, straighter, more
motorist-friendly connection from the Cherohala Parkway into
Robbinsville. The economies of Robbinsville, Graham County and
Southwestern NC would benefit.
I am confident that the Southwestern RPO would/will support this
initiative."
Note: Please contact Wilson Stroud at 919-733-7844, extension 310, if you have any
questions or comments regarding these minutes.
]WS
Attachments: CP#I concurrence forms (3 sheets)
Figure 3 - Project study area
Cc: Jamie Wilson, NCDOT, Division Construction Engineer
Dewayne Sykes, NCDOT, Roadway Design Unit
David Chang, NCDOT, Hydraulics Unit
Missy Dickens, NCDOT, PDEA Staff Engineer
Matt Wilkerson, NCDOT, PDEA Human Environment Unit
Topsy Skinner, PDEA Concurrence Meeting Coordinator
Page 10 of 10
SECTION 404 / NEPA MERGER INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT
C-ONGU- RRENCE-POINT 1-:-P_URP_OSE-AND-NEED
AND STUDY AREA DEFINED
Project Title: NC 143 improvements, from the Cherohala Skyway to NC .143 Business West of
Robbinsville, Graham County, Federal Aid,Project No. STP-1127(1); State Project No.
8.2930301, WBS Element 34508.1.1, TIP Project No. R-2822 B
Purpose and Need of the Proposed Action: The purpose of this action is to improve safety
along NC 143 using context sensitive solutions.
Study Area: The proposed study area is variable in width and is shown in attached Figure 3
(Dated December 2006).
The Merger Process Team met on January 23, 2007 and concurred with the Purpose and
Need and Study Area for the proposed improvements to NC 143.
USACE ?.wG l /la 3 ?O 7
David aker Date
USEPA -2-3 ?0 7
Christopher A. Militscher Date
'NCDWQ'? --0v
i Brian Wrenn Date /
sHPO 4?-, /-Z 1 23 °7
Sarah McBride Date
FHWA / wr- Vl?i (23/aap ;
Jake A/ggsbce, P.F.. "? ? / /Dale i /
USFWS
M?rella Bmicick Da
NCWRCC_ ^v7
Marla J. Ct bers Date
THPO.
Tyler Howe
USFS TVA
Karen Compton Date
NCDO 1-2 3-0 7
dson Stroud Dale
Abstaining Agencies
Date
Harold Draper Date
Name Agency Date
01[24/2007 13:48 NC DOT PDER 4 918284882462
NV. Z)CG vu.G
__-____-----SECTION- 404-I-NEPA._MERGER._INT91UCOENCY..AGREEMENT_
POINT PUTcP - - ----
CONCURRENCE 1,. OSE AND NEED
AND STUDY AREA DEFINED
Project Title: NC 143 improvements, from the Cherohala Skyway to NC 143 Business West of
Robbinsville, Graham County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-1127(1), State Project No.
8.2930301, WBS Element 34508.1.1, TIP Project No, R-2822 B
Purpose and Need of the Proposed Action: The purpose of this action is to improve safety
along NC 143 using context sensitive solutions,
Study Area: The proposed study area is variable in width and is shown in attached Figure 3
(Dated December 2006).
The Merger Process Team met on January 23, 2007 and concurred with the Purpose and
Need and. Study Area for the proposed improvements to NC 143.
USACE /A 3
David baker ate
USEPA
Christopher A. Miliucher Date
NCDWQ
Brian Wrenn Net
SI-1P0 tt;g4 #, t a3°7
orah McBride Date
USFS
.arm Compton Date
FHWA? ?/G?i?? Y Z3/??0
Jake RiWbee, PS Date
USFWS
MAMBO Huncick Date
NCWRC -/,/ 1- 'a7
Marta 1. C bero Date
.-";i-''ter /''? •
TIiPO'' = "tat a v-Td„ - o
rler Howe Date
TVA
Harold Draper
Date
NCDO'1? 1S- I-23-0 7 ---:;& Aeon Stroud Date
Abstatnine Aeenctes
Name
Aeeney
Date

01/24/2007 13:49
y 71tlbDb3?'J4Dt '""••'?'
NC llUl YlltH
N--40-47 NEPV-MERGER=INTERAG ENCY"AGREENIENT-.: --
CONCURRENCE POINTA:,PUkPOSE AND NEED.
AND STUDY AREA DEFINED
Project Title: NC 143 improvements, from the'Cherohala Skyway to NC 143 Business West of
Robbinsville, Graham County, Federal Aid Project No. STP•1127(l), State Project No.
8.2930301, WES Element 34508.1.1, TIP Project No. R-2822 B
PurQose and Need of the Proposed Action: The purpose of this action is to improve safety
along NC 143 using context sensitive solutions.
Study Area: The proposed study area is variable in width and is shown in attached Figure 3
(Dated December 2006).
The Merger Process Team met on January 23, 2007 and concurred with the Purpose and
Need and Study Area for the proposed improvements to NC 143.
USACE ,. ?,e' 1a 7 FHWA G"r %.23? s07
David Aka to ( 9 Jake Biggsbm. P.6. Date
USEPA 1' r 23 l07
Christopher A. Milimher Date
NCDWQ
Brian Wrcrm to
SHPO t a 07
rah McBride Dace
USFWS
Morelia Buncick Datc
NCWRC /1151?
Maria J. cb5fters Dole
THPO
9ylar How
Date
i
7
USFS TVA '
Karen Compton. Data Harold Drspcr Date
- - ------- ------
NCDO-? 3-p 7
Icon Stroud Date
Ahstainin Agencies
Name
A enc
Date

of Service Supervisor's Office
File Code: 2730-2
Date: May 3, 2007
Mr ?Wllso tStroud'
Project Development- Western Region
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Stroud:
This letter is in response to your request regarding our concurrence with Concurrence Point #1
(Purpose and Need and Study Area Defined) for the improvement of NC 143 located in Graham'
County, North Carolina (T.I.P. Project R-2822 B). The United States Forest Service can concur
with the purpose and need as stated: "The purpose of this action is to improve safety along NC
143 using context sensitive solutions." We also concur with the statement that "[T]he proposed
study area is variable in width and is shown on the attached Figure 3 (dated December 2006)."
We look forward to continuing to participate in the merger process for NC 143. If you have any
questions regarding this, please contact Karen Compton at [phone].
Sincerely,
"1, 4
MARISUE HILLIARD
Forest Supervisor
S
Caring for the Land and Serving People Printed on Recycled Paper

SANTEETLAH
BEGIN /
Sea® hd XT. Lodge PROJECT
Dkfl ReeEalleP L l

ROBBINSVILLE I
Cherohala Skyway
END
PROJECT
Legend
?V NC 143
^ti•-- Streams
•^• Trout Streams DWQ
Lakes
e:Cd National Register Listed
Federal Land Ownership
National Wetland Inventory
Municipal Boundaries
--` SWAIN
401, .. GRAHAM-,__'J c
I CHEROKEE MACON'

0 2,000 4,000
Feet
VICINITY MAP
143 FROM THE County: GRAHAM
o NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT NC
Div: 14 IP#R-2822B Figure
OF TRANSPORTATION CHEROHALA SKYWAY TO
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS NC 143 BUS WEST OF
_ PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ROBBINSVILLE WBS: 34508.1.1 1
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
GRAHAM COUNTY
TIP PROJECT R-28228 Date:DEC 2006 BY: JT

ezzez-a 103road du
N
V HONtlLOH SISAItlNtl ltllN3WNONIAN3 A1Nnoo WVHVHO
3llinsNreaoa
Ntl A30 1O3P08d ?o
1N91 Q °o m
SAtlMHOI ?
H JO NOISIAIO d01S3M Sne £4L ON
NOUV1HWSN"l dO Ol AVMANS VIVHOU3HO o w LL M
1N3W1tlVd30 VNIlONV0 HIHON 3Hl WONA CVL ON
dVWavno-v3avAonls s' 6! sm o
fi
N

"IT
w
n
ny3
v =1 -o
N
CD o
c 3. 7 Dpi
O O
U3
N N
O
p? N 3
? N D1
O ?
CD
N
d
a
cD
A
A?
v?C/?
J

611' f" ?j l;i Jr021d d11.

HJN"S SISAIVNV IVIN3WNOHIAN3
3111ASN1880ii
"N
c
a
ONV 1N3WdOI3A30103r'Obd
n
£ G c
SAVMHO H 10 NOISIAIO
I 30 1S3M S
a
Vl 3N
M
/ NOI1VI
NOdSNVNl JO
Ol Ab?M.INS b-1VHON3H0
o
LL
_ 1N3W1LIVd30 VNI108VD FIIHON 3Hl W021-A £176 ON
deal avno - v3av Aanls y
i
Lake
B lvd NTtr Lodge
Mairl R&@Wk®P Lbbd
BEGIN
PROJECT
e
A

END
PROJECT
Legend
,OV NC 143 _41. -
Streams SWAIN
?",-... ..
GRAHAM
• Trout Streams DWQ i
Lakes L__ - ___1.._-'JACKSON-
'_
?!a National Register Listed CHEROKEE... ...MACON r
Federal Land Ownership
0 2.000 4.000
National Welland Inventory
Munic[pal Bouncanes Feet
of Honr?i raF..
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
4gNr vs rnn"?'?
NC 143 FROM THE
CHEROHALA SKYWAY TO
NC 143 BUS WEST OF
ROBBINSVILLE
GRAHAM COUNTY
TIP PROJECT R-2822B
Counly GRAHAM
Div 14 IP# R-2622B F i g u re
WBS: 34508.1.1 1
Dale: DEC 2006 eY JT
lt?',
Snu Intdl N7. Lodge
Higg Reglaftr L6abd
l' -
EEGIN
PROJECT 4

N
ROBBINSVILLE

END
PROJEC'
Legend .

NC 143
.._
'
?
14
_^ ~ Streams
Trout Streams DW(? C'RAHAh
Lakes
f f National Register Listed CHEROKEE.
Federal Land Ownership
I. National Wetland Inventory
ED Municipal Boundaries
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND
;., ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
SWAIN ,•?;, -?
-JACKSON
AACON j
NC 143 FROM
WEST BUFFALO CREEK TO
NC 143 BUSINESS WEST OF
ROBBINSVILLE
GRAHAM COUNTY
TIP PROJECT R-28228
0 2,000 4,000
Feet
County GRAHAM
Div 14 IP#R-28228 Figure
WBS 34508.1.1 1
Dale APRIL 2008 av JT
LAKE
SANTEETLAH
STIP Project R-2822 B
Nearby STIP Projects
CP 2 Meeting 12-16-10

-
i '
- 1_ 1 1
? I..?k i•rn Ynis1,•. ?
Santeetlah LmXe
B-5209
? urea ? i •v F
R-2822 B
Project
Limits
santeetlah
B-4123 - e
fyohbi e
e
R-5003
•
e e
B-4122
6
Andrews
A-9 A (the
recommended
alternative from
the 1984 FENS is
shown)
(Figure udupted_fi-om Jaye 20X18 Draft Supplemcittul
FEIS fin. STIP Project.4-9 Bct- C)
6
Fontana Lake
.Y
I,.LLno pro
A-9 D
'p. (Complete)
Stecoah
r s'
r/ 0 ,??..
Topton

t1J-
A-9 B"C (the recommended
alternative from the 1984
I=EIS is shown)
Figure 2
STIP Project R-2822 B
Crash Analysis Locations
CP 2 Meeting 12-16-10
NC section of the Tail of the
Dragon (US 129) begins at the
Tennessee state line in Swain
County and ends at SR 1247
in Graham County
Mw

r
u,? ?r 41
a?
aG
aG
Y- w US 129
s'
1 w
r r .
fw?r
O
`C

n M f. F

OR
FS

• crEOAn Swain County
c.J?.
'
Graham County
LiE
NANTAHALA
I•r?v
? .?? .yam
'- i ? r?2tiFt1p'
NC 143
Nr? Ilr]
Cherohala Skyway
1:'"ll
!a r
I I $9
R-2822 B
r
_" _•? -n
11611 ti
v ?- L
• fir, 1 1h ?-
,y
Robbinsville
"? it .'• ,1, ?n I.N. 110!??
Crash ;Analvsis Sections
Analyses 1, 2, and 7 (NC 143 N\ithin R-2822 B project limits)
Analysis 3 (N(' 143, NC section of Cherohala Skyway)
? Analysis 4 (NC 14 3 west of R-2822 B)
? Analysis -5 (NC 143 east of R-2822 B)
Analysis 6 (US 129 from Tennessee state line through Swain County to SR
1247 in Graham County - NC section of Tail of the Dra-on)
Figure 3
ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES MAP

O
P ?`
a GS
` FOR CPZ
NC 143 FROM NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
-
b I = OF TRANSPORTATION
m oD -? D Z WEST BUFFALO CREEK TO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
cD NC 143 BUSINESS WEST OF PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND.
o f "' ROBBINSVILLE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
?o ?
J GRAHAM COUNTY
STIP PROJECT R-2822B
vzn
2! L k L>
2 ?? a w ro i3
l 1,-
CL
2
1 l.. o`
kr
0 i - m A o. I r
ti,
?.? C j
14
•? •it Z Vi ?? l?-. .a i? _ ?? ice-- r_. I _ ??
v,m mxI' - toy O
1 _
All
?` 4? - T ?•?,ry,V ` - ?! J fir- _
3 r =Jl? ( \
?r r r J jam' ?'
1 ,
/
c ?
rrl
N
-- ?..?-'f ?• -- a ?, .} .` Jul. / 4pl" rn
?•-
C?•y ' 7t
lk?A
1 _ • ?? -?? J _ i to - -- m n
z (n IV
I a / ( it L
w 19
Ul c
1 PRELIMINARY ALTERNATIVES MAP
FOR CP2
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
NC43FROM / ~' ~~
OF TRANSPORTATION /
WEST BUFFALO CREEK TO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
Z NC 143 BUSINESS WEST OF PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND
ROBBINSVILLE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
GRAHAM COUNTY
STIP PROJECT R-2822B