20110230 Ver 1_Application_20110310

1-
a
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
March 08, 2011
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Ave.
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: Mr. Ronnie Smith
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
110 2 30
EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
SECRETARY -
o 0
N (?
0
Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 3 for the replacement of Bridge
No. 150 over the South River on SR 1502 in Bladen County. State Project No.
42257.1.1; Federal Aid Project Number BRZ-1502(2); TIP No. B-5116.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), Division of Highways, in
consultation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), proposes to replace Bridge
No. 150 in Bladen County. The proposed let date for the project is December 20, 2011
with a review date of November 1, 2011; however, the let date may advance as additional
funds become available.
Please find enclosed a Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) form, permit drawings; utility
drawings, roadway plans, a copy of the State Stormwater Management Plan, and EEP
Mitigation Acceptance Letter. A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed
for this project on August 9, 2010, and distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies
are available upon request.
Regulatory Approvals
Section 404 Permit: NCDOT requests that a Nationwide Permit 3 be issued to authorize the
impacts resulting from this project in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b).
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 Certification number 3687 will apply to this project.
All general conditions of the Water Quality Certification will be met therefore, we are not
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone]
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ANO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1020 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: MW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC 27610-4328
RALEIGH NC 27599-1598
requesting written approval from NCDWQ. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H, Section
.0500(a), we are providing two copies of this application to the NCDWQ for their review.
A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT
website at http://www.ncdot.org/doh/preconstruct/pe/neu/permit.html
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call or email Dr. Lance P.
Fontaine at 919-707-6118 or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
GregoTy J. Thorpe, Ph.D. Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
x, s
t CC:
NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List
W ATE9OG
O Y
NK?
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the

Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the N WP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ? No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ® Yes ? No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 150 over South River Overflow on S R 1502
2b. County: Bladen
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Garland
2d. Subdivision name: not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: B-5116
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): not applicable
3d. -Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
3f. Telephone no.: [phone]
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h . Email address: [e-mail]
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name: not applicable
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 34.834719 Longitude: - 78.484826
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: 1.6 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to South River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; Sw; ORW
2c. River basin: Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing conditions on site include maintained/disturbed, silviculture, swamp, and woodland. General land use is
agricultural, cropland, animal operations, and pasture.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.60
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
80
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace a structurally deficient bridge.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, induding the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves replacing a 169-foot bridge with a 193-foot, 4-span bridge on the existing alignment with an off-site
detour. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. Two power poles (South
River EMC) will be relocated to the right of way line, outside of the wetland boundary. Hand clearing for overhead
powerlines will be required.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ®Yes ? No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ® Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: NCDOT
Name (if known): Fontaine Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
February 23, 2010.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. - 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary
Site 1 ® P ? T Roadway Fill Riparian ® Yes
? No ® Corps
? DWQ 0.08

Site 2 ®P ? T Mechanized
Riparian ® Yes ® Corps
12
0
Clearing ? No ? DWQ .
Site 3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
Site 4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
Site 5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
Site 6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.20 Permanent
0.00 Temporary
2h. Comments: Impacts of piers to surface waters = +/_ 35 sf. Hand clearing for overhead powedine utility = 0.16 ac.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length
number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet)
Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 width
Temporary M (INT)? DWQ - non-404, (feet)
other)
Site 1 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
Site 2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
Site 3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
Site 4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
Site 5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
Site 6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts X Perm
X Temp
3i. Comments:
4
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number - waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or (if applicable)
Temporary
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
0. Total open water impacts X Permanent
X Temporary
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond
Flooded
Filled Excavat
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
ed
P1
P2
Sf. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
impacts below. If an impacts require mitig ation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse
?Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora required?
B1 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed bridge is 24 feet longer than the existing bridge; the proposed bridge will be at approximately the same
grade as the existing structure; an off site detour will be used, 2:1 fill slopes with rock plating where practicable; number
of piers reduced from 9 to 3.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sediment and erosion control measures will be employed; Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds will be
implemented; top-down construction; no deck drains; no temporary stream access required to remove existing bridge nor
to construct the proposed bridge.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ® Yes ? No
If no, explain:
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ® Corps

2c.
If yes, which mitigat ion option will be used for this
project?

pro ? Mitigation bank

®Payment to in-lieu fee program

? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.40 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4h. Comments: NC EEP will provide riparian wetland mitigation.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
7
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) -required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments: if yes, see attached permit drawings.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached permit drawings.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stonnwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable
? Phase II
? NSW
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs E] USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HQW
(check all that apply): ® ORW
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
? Yes ® No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ® Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? 0 Yes ? No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ® Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" t o the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ® Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Welland Standards, ? Yes ®No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ®No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? ® No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby
land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will riot be necessary.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
not applicable
10
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ® Yes ? No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ? No
impacts?
® Raleigh
5c. If yes, ind icate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCNHP, USFWS, field surveys.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NMFS County Index
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NEPA Documentation
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordinatiori with FEMA
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps
3 ` I 1
Dr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph D 4
4
Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name licVAgentts Signature
p
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
11
REcEIVEL:
ATTACHMENT ?I 7 g 2010
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM REG. WILM. FLD. OFC.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): February 23, 2010
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Lance P. Fontaine, Ph.D., NCDOT - NEU, 1598 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: SAW-2010-00123
(NCDOT/ B-5116/ replace bridge no. 150 over South River on Boykin
Bridge Road (SR 1502) in Bladen County/ Div. 6)
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: B-5116
Replace Bridge No. 150 over South River Overflow on SR 1502
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Bladen City: North-west of Garland
Center coordinates of site (]at/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 34.834816 ° N, Long. -78.48473 ° W. Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South River
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 130 linear feet: 70 width (ft) and/or -acres.
Cowardin Class: Riverine
Stream Flow: Perennial
Wetlands: 2.4 acre
Cowardin Class: Forested
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal: N/A
Non-Tidal: N/A
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
? Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): January 20, 2010 {_ 1
RECEIVED
MGR i 0 2010
DIVISION OF HraMYS
PI)FEA-OFFM OF NAiMh EM
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject- site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person,who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictionai waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that r3suit, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may bF"waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: NCDOT.
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
? Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
? Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
? Corps navigable waters' study:
? U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
? USGS NHD data.
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
? U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Garland.
? USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
Bladen County.
? National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
? State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
? FEMA/FIRM maps: .
? 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of
1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): Figure 3 (Sampson County
SID-2002).
or ® Other (Name & Date): Figure 1 - Project Vicinity Map. .
? Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
? Other information (please specify):
S' natu'e Ond date `af Sig ure and date of
egulaiory Project Manage person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
3
r I**.-
J
o tem
AaWcemeht
PROGRAM
March 1, 2011
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Manager, Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
B-5116, Replace Bridge Number 150 on SR 1502 over the South River Overflow
Winton, Bladen County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will provide the
compensatory riparian wetland mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by you on
March I, 2011, the impacts are located in CU 03030006 of the Cape Fear River Basin in the Southern Inner Coastal
Plain (NOCP) Eco-Region, and are as follows: .
Fear
Cape Stream Wetlands Buffer (Sq. FL)
03030006
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian Non- Coastal
Zone 1
Zone 2
SICP ??
Rip Marsh

F
Impacts 0 0 0 0.20 0 0 0' 0
f
t/acres

ation Units
ig 0 0 0 0.40 0 0 0 0
dits-up to 2:1)
EEP commits to implementing sufficient compensatory riparian wetland mitigation credits to offset the
impacts associated with this project in accordance with the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources'
Ecosystem Enhancement Program In-Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact
amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance
letter will be required from EEP.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Harmon at 919-715-
1929.
Sinc ly, `-` `?--
Willi . Gilmore, P.E.
EEP Director
cc: Mr. Ronnie Smith, USACE - Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Mr. Brian Wrenn, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
File: B-5116
Restotri11?1... FKlia."... Prot", Oar Stag
ern
IWER
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 /919-715-0476/www.nceep.net
G1 T j m D 0 N m D a CO D p M w
z
m
o
m
o <
m m
N r?-"
s? m c x <
m m
d , .Y c ° o ? w ? f
j
°
„ '.'?'
0
m A j y 0 R
t
•x o
m O ? ' O }£ x
W d
O. c
d m? n ? O
C 3
d m O ? m b
3

= m I
d p j
3?
;z?
?
O y .
IJ'
'fi
°
^
N
y C
D
?
£ w

1
G M•
l
A m m •
: A •?
• O N 2 $
?
0 7 p m O
? O O i• $4 N O
c .0 "
3 W y C m j N 0 xy
'

3 m
=
?'
3
N
=
"'
N
m
'
F d
3
m
m

3
S
m
m
3
c
o
°''
3
N
o
.
O
.
T o
d
3
d
O N .
8 d , o y O O
c ° n ' f "
Fe c c n 7'. G .n. ?` m ?'.
? m 3 V N d r
' 3 m w d ° F o w o ^ o `
' ° n n '^ .? L

?
R O IrY A ? e ? v ? S N O W
O ?
t? 7 ° ? ? C ?'
6 m s IF d .
Q1 w m v o
n
I o
sue., m
?
v

"fl
KZ I ° m
F, m
Z
. Z o. m w. b m
m N , D D p o d ° ' W ° °- i
o
m
- , m m

V
m
G W
° m < o p m
m n
Z
"
aT m m
o
? o r
d N t w
y m °' , o n
'm y o ' o. o A r m o d
o
_
m .N
a
?
N
A -? W ik t `q G 6 ? R` Z
'o ? ?•I ? ' s ..
j
' F ?. N
O
6 ` o
d 4. 1 N
C O
?
A ., o

. ?W
m
O
r w
N
lD Y?.
1
y
m .
3
ry y i
'? :S.'
N r N O Y A! O. I,'?F N ? m ? Q I7.
o A p ?, m >' M m m Y Sao o..
t
71 o ia: n ,. ?.
c

- N 0 J
m V1 O .,
Z

o a 3 A m a o' £ m z D o a O o 3" o
Q
II a 0 d ?.

3 o.

d m.

N ??

- c. in

d "

3 y.. o

? 3

a m y
Z p m
?. d
N 6 Q
G I w 0
c 3 - ? 3
q, c d ? c d ?

? r?Ii A ,. o ( 3 m c .''
Q v c a . L. , c c n
f. - 3 1 °.
o D

d I YA d
y
°
F 7 ? y
It I
p- Z ; s.Y
n O O
O {Y C'TA
G

O O O

U

CL m :!z m

O O m N

A
c o

n
? -
Yk ?V? 4
f

i •.
M
}y,'' I
m'`Yy 0 f
?
t

m, 4 x
m ;

3 '
a
6
' a
om: ,
f
r N
?
to
N
O ,
?
N
A a
d

p z
d
o m
F

m ? N

?
0
? m d
d 3
A. t.,
m

? -
c
N ,
?
n
d m

m .
_ co
a
N ?
.

W', m;-' 31O o ?,;
n
"
O O ,
C, m1. OYr
- N - o d 3,' Aocm ?s
?
C) v ? • Si .. 2F ? ,
m

v
z a0 d
O
_ _ '= o o d 3 0

O
?
c 5
:.
yz.
o n
p? 4
z
m A'. N y O P'.

i d O m

6
N z ?

- m
Q O
0 C

J ?

r m -
d

i

? F
m

w

? f

PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO. NAMES ADDRESSES
Daniel Joseph Korman, Jr. 7002 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Permit Drawing
Sheet -?of

N
O

? ?D N
N
N
3 ro
<z
F T p
U
a w
O O Z
z z n
W O N
N w a

¢ 0
°
3
w
0
F
w
s
y

C
_
O
3
I

IL N
CL)
r
Q.

LT Z

N
In
7
+

O
d
l0
3
m
U

0
N
0
N
N
a
`p
N

N E
E

E c
?
m rn

N
Z U)
?
u
C C U U-
r
?
N m U E
U

L
x t H
E
W U
-
C
2 N
CI C U C
W
Q
E
x t
E
W0-
3 a
w
U
a y
u
o. ?
> > ?NEm

?
? c w
m
U
?
V1 C
m 3 m p
o m
E
U)
E
U a
d m
?
C
G C
C
r m d ? ? ?

W v ?
?
C N
- U
N
?O
N

Z
L W d
m

O O O O
O
O
U 0 O O
F F ?
U

0
c
?_ m
c m p
? m
m I0
Z

3
x
3
W

W a
a
O
C
.
? U
E --m

C y)
U
p
O
Q
O
m- m
- m
O O
E

?

0 O

? o ?
o
3
m
a

?? 3 3 3 3

N? O O O O

r r r r r r r F-
p ? ? J J 2 d' J J
C J J J J J J J J
'm E ? m r> c oi v N m
O N (O N t0 N I? N
m N V ?O (0 aD tp I?

-
-
-
- i?

N o

T

T

T J
H
to z O
z o
U
z
I
r

Z O
O N
N
Q
K
N

)

? u o-
}
N
z m
o
J
x
W
U
W
O O ? r
Z Z O n
O ? n
W
_
F N m

$ 3
0
U
Z F
W
x
N

c
?
?
3
R

F-
_
_
D O
C

C
C
a

CL o D

. .
In? O N M V r W I
e
`
e

a
? E c
m

Z ?
N
U m cm o E x
d
?Er
W
a
C
? N
C C U C
W ? c m m?
.
E
Q x t E
w U - a

w
U N

? ? r E

F ?3A"
U E U a m
E
Q
a ?
LL
c
C ? N
D
E c
C' m j
C r
0 c+)
O m
O ?n
O
CC)
? m m
o m 0 O O O O
W U ?

Q ? N
N
Z ? ?
L W ? m

3 r
Q c N

H ? m '- m
? Z x
W
W N
D
d. ? c

? LL d
3
G N
m D
c c
c
m =_ m ?
E
N
LL
a ?

a> n
? FT
U ?
2 N

r r r r r r r r
p
C J J J J J J J J
O ? J J J J J J J J
0 ? N N N ? ?
m n t NJ

O -
O - - L L U
J
F
(5 Z i i n r i i i i Q
i - . . . I
Permit Drawing
Sheet 2 Of?-L
t
W
a a
`y
kiL
S 2 F ?
Q:
Y
~s
Ns a:
A W
goo
W
z
0
U
w
I
O
z
J
w
z
g
Y
U
0
r Z
z0
J ~
au
w o
t7 0
z
z_
?o
d J
Yo
U
pW
W ~
V?
N
W
;L 0
+I +I S
IV ol
01 N =
+ + _
N
N
N N O
J J ~
I I V)
0o?
F F-?
Z
+I +I
LO O
N O d
++
co r-I
U
0 W
N N ?
S?z
I I F -
x
W
IE
=
?s
I
Q 6
i-
J
H
w
0
C
g
w
0
U
W
co
LL
3
z
[CONTRACT. - TIP PROJECT: B-5116 J
0 0 _
'O N p U VNi [rmn
A O Y m
? T ? 'O
m ° m ° Iwi 0 0
? p
O
m N N y z~ V•
n O rn
yr y 2 z -
roi o
0
C m /s,
D D
z 41 p^ -"i o00 < 4/
/
z w + n n n u n n x Z `l' / //
D C c m ?o N O O O if mQ 5
p n V =• m O
° C: /
z°
O m m O 2?
z z m
m to
S S rr / /
m >
G1 A O
2 C O
O C D r T
m ?
to b m rm Ae. H _Z
O Jli O n U A
y 3 +
o .5
* N "fl
r m o m ?:
U o +
° oO
O m
o l1
V W o s W
3 •? S o?11 RryER / Ui
m t r v? Z ph + Lo / .r
r (1
m (A

m
n
0<
m? m? ? b
p ? p ? p4 e
t
o
e ? x?
n
, 6
$ 1 rn

b ?? r
1 Z
'? a v
b N p e $
$
r g D ° OD -0

n r :
k'I +
Ui

5
r4
O `
m
o n
o

J
b J

a

a z
?
g
??y r

1
e a°O,°I a a

•° r
?y N
b i
x
o0 o „
c H
t? c
5s ? ? ? m
C
?T
V
l 1
N

rn
z
v
v
m

7
d \ ` f
OLS,
O
?F o
pl
J
?r t /5
?C O
O
b .b
?x
x ?O
n o
O
x
J IV
b ? I?ryl
N?
h
b
y ? O
n b?
C
?r
?o
?N
m?
ww
0
?SD

n
O
z

a t1
7 '
a?
a
Ul
5 3
1?
O?
N
W
A

P
V
QI
10
N
O
N
N
N
ff ff 4544
O IO
? I
fl a A /Y
k
as £ P
x k' / ??/9
*
m
N A
?? S
Y
3 /
y
VVV . x / /
x x ./ / / /ik:
+
y

J
A . /
x f
II. T e Y £ / /k

70 2
n *T / / £
/ /
x /
r `A g
x s
£ rx 9
I* k w O
* xQ * ?I i M?
Sh* ( /k fA
GA
y R

L n

x * ? ?m
x x
I _
k * £
?
II .o
y
* * k*' I
III

« ? *
I ^
\
`

* k \
k
2 * b

In1 Q AC?x ? ?£L
4
A * ?
k

m?? * k
]6
t` J
?'r
SyI
I I x
f?
k
\
V
I

k
N ' ? w *

S I x x

S? $

O H x
?
}1 *
x k
y
'I N
OBI ?*v
* x *
?I h ?-IroDv
6 fSl II a II u II In
° II ybI ??IIo
mg?'?+0?"ltn r;
RI IO yN
4Aa
aY?ODa
?il??ry?fo
O a I
•
t t
t TI
# O O
m m
z z
O ?o
-i m?
C'm ?m
rcn r?
m D
?m zT+
or
z= i? .
C)
z
N '
m:
0
/5

\ ?O
ON
1
L
1 *
x
1 £ x k * k
I x * y
I * * it
I x * * *
x
% k k x * *
1 £ £
x *
Ik:
7 *y k
I:
I. £
x
1 * * 8
?1 .*x x kX$
£ k t'k
?
fk?! /?
20
L_
* *
4 *
k 4_
k ?? I
\ k z
fA?
1.e
0
N

A
N
a
V
OD

N
O
N
N
N
/rL
I

I
?x-
x
L
I m
o x?xx
k x?
a
Qi > * k
* k \kl
* *
m

n
h
Y
k
x

7 m
R k
* *
k

E?? c
YS km
A, r,?ll/
* k
k
? \ k
\V A? x?x
x
)* k
x k
s?
k
?l?$ x
k
x
••-gym Q ??x T
A *
O?\ Sbk k T
o
X,I = \ \ x
I
V^1 ? ? \ Uj ,p \k \
??y \ Ill\ \ Cg
V` I
t
r )
y I
o? I
I
Z z
'ciPn?mFr
//?/??f? **, G Jam=
71
\ \ it /
15
1 1
\
^lll \ \; .. I I \ \
?Il?xk _
x * _
x ?
\ III , *J ?? \
x *

II II II I II ? I
I$ ` ? L
a-p?oDv ? \
0 p p p ISO
k *
k
\I
I

J
q4
\

t tsh.dgn
[CONTRACT: TIP PROJECT: B-5116 i

9
p
7
r

n 0
Vi

o

s
'?
Q
-
"'

=

0
z 0
N

o

O

o

z

N 0
?

O

0

i
n
r
?
F

O

x

N
0
` _

N
m
O

m

N
z
O

=
m
n Z
cz ?? b x D
n
y
p o 0
y j
m < ti 0
N
O s a <
O m

II
If II
II II II
Z C
z
z N + m

> I
p
P
W V N N N b
T
y
C O O _
0 '?, 0

m0
r
? 0
d`a°e
a ?
e
5
m
n _ o O
o
ti z
O
O m m O F
m
D Gl G1
r ? -1

m _ r
A
z A N
C
x O N
f W
0
m { N
_ b x
o O 0

O O
? y ?

v
n °• I, x
u
O
V
O W
O
3
r ?. 3
m m
N m
r
N

Oy
72
/ I
m

N Z

N ?
+

O O
r m

U,-, \
S
OW
p
o,

a (7

?
? Ctrl pp.. J

ly OO
n OIb
b I C `, n
ti o C , a
y \ ? Oa 3 G h

H
? ? ? ?
pp
C p ?
? C G
6
C
p p

z
m? 0< jr
m io b
m 2 m
oZ4
a I m \ ? ,?
\
N p o ? ? N \ \
c? m
r ry 2 K
00 _0
?n -11-01 Lrl O
p 00 ?(t
ca \XV
"I-- _ - ddb / sari " `
S 7
?' !rybn J1 J 0 ?? ys 5 \\ k' ^ \
o \
?Pa \ \
?F o
Po Z?
y >. 9
y b !,B?q I nji
a. ? O jA ? JI .
zz az
n ay
Z
m
c
?
C
Y ?
Z o

T
r
Z ?
c

? o
D
?

N rn
r
O
O
n
a
D o
-I x
O
Z
h
O
a
ti
as W
b
a?
b
Q
n o
z?
ti
H ?
?x
h '?J
O
b
h
CD C
N
00
?to

n
0
z
Un
z?
C?

3 cl•
i
a
r
_psh.PERMIT.dgn
00
O O O O O

I r

I I

x
I
I y

N I
I
BEGIN GRADE -L- STA12+3OM.EL-7225' _
t

w

A I
I
I
I vp?

S I
N _
?.L

i

1
V S
? $
S
F a
R
S
'
END GRADE -L- 5TA 17s9000.EL-7070' 0
I
I

`O

?? n
g
QQQ P
?Cn??? I

m rn n
miii
??
m I

?
o
?
30 -
a
?
?i3 _
c?S ci c?im?2mm
o I

m
0 M1 q M1 g M1 9 M1 q M1 q M1 C I
w b V ly ?paO (?
I
a
a I
I
I
1

N
N I

i

-? x
x x
k
x
fi
oh
S
k ?
4
x x
x a.
mLx:-?+
O x?
Y
xP`? x
Yh-0
4 h
k
h ;y ?
h .
x x x x.
h k h,
h x
x x h
h Nx f
x rIS ..O?Y
x
g p w0 q q 9? y0?<,ll
m A wpSpS a?p0lln
44??
Y +
N zi
ti
?woD?
g9M14?IN
x `
x xl
r
ih
x
y

7
U3
tl3
b
b
C
H
r
H
H
m
cn
W
0
m
m
cn
SSSSSSSSS3ESSSE
CONTRACT. TIP PROJECT: B-5116

0 0 0

o
O
r m

o 00
T
m u

o u ?1
'?TLI
m
2
A
(~-l

o =
O
N
0

o s

N

o (?

G1
D
y
' S S

z ~~
c
m n
y
A N N b
in <
O
G N G7
O
N
Z
+ n n n n u n x
s
s
F n P? V? U N
?m?N
a
r gs
m p 3 2e 3e 2R
a n ? v
O m m
D Ll G)
r 2 2
M
Gl O
2 C O
O c {
N -4
? -1 -O
o p
0 0
T
m U
a
n °' n
n
n
a o
J o 0
V O O
3 V
r
m
N m
rn N
N
m n
in m
m m )1
A [?
P
N ? ? a
N ? N
O p
O
b N P
m
b ?
am
r
r
m
in 7
? m
m?
x 8
a
b
O `
=tea
y ? .
o?
N
z
rn
yti
b
y
r ma e ?b
H
a
y
r 2
Z
0
O y
z
x z
vi O
O
m 2.
z
N D
x z
r j
m z
m z
m n
29
O
m m
m O
O ?
.y Z
O y
M
= N
r
N
m
N
x
v
x
O
0
m
7IZ
yv
D ?
Oo 00
O m
o n
o -?
tin
7
?z
a?
z?
Y
?y \ti
y\
/
41
/
o?
r m
0
/ N

o 0
O m

S
O RF
OWR
L
x r

r

\\ f

C G1 O°
v 1
ti
O Q 1 8
n
Cr-n

O
\ /O5
j. -
00,77,
ol It
\
cF o
a?
f
O ?
b
?C b b
p b Nil ?y
O
zy
N
h
b ?
y ?
C O
? h
O

N N '?J
N
V U,
V

U
I

m m J
p
N p
N ?
r
U ui i
N N R

N
N a
a

P

?F
1/4/2010
B-5116 Bladen County
Utility Relocation Environmental Permit
Utility Permit Drawing
Sheet-'--of-4-
South River EMC has two power poles located on the North side of the Bridge that are in
conflict with construction. The contact for South River EMC is Mr. Scott Byrd. He can
be reached at 910-892-8071 (office) or 919-820-1814 (cell). To resolve this issue, the
power poles will be relocated to the Right of Way line, outside of the Wetland Boundary,
on the North side. Hand clearing for overhead powerlines will be required.