20131200 Ver 6_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20210108

Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
r Yes r No
ID#* Version* 6
20131200
Is this project a public transportation project?* r Yes
r No
Reviewer List:* Andrew Moore:eads\awmoore3
Select Reviewing Office:* Asheville Regional Office - [phone]
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
r
Yes
r
No

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: * r
For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
r
New Project
r
Modification/New Project with Existing ID
r
More Information Response
r
Other Agency Comments
r
Pre -Application Submittal
r
Re-Issuance\Renewal Request
r
Stream or Buffer Appeal
Is this supplemental information that needs to be sent to the Corps?*
r Yes r No
Project Contact Information
Name: Alea Tuttle
who is subrritting the inforrration?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Existing ID #:
20131200
20170001(no dashes)
Existing Version:
6
1
Project Name: Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
r No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
County (ies)
Polk
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
aick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Harmon Dairy MY1 Report 1.8.2021 FULL
15.95MB
reduced.pdf
Only pdf or krre files are accepted.
Describe the attachments
or comments:
The attached Monitoring Year 1 Report and Corrective Action Plan is being submitted on behalf of Tryon
Equestrian Partners, LLC represented by Mr. Jeff Brown.
Sign and Submit

W By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
■ I, the project proponent, hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to
the best of my knowledge and belief.
■ I, the project proponent, hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
■ I agree that submission of this online form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
■ I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
■ I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a
written signature; AND
■ I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form.
Signature:
Submittal Date: Is filled in autocratically.

CLearWaLer
C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
www.cwenv.com
January 8, 2021
Mr. Steve Kichefski
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-2638
Mr. Andrew Moore
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street, 9 h Floor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: Tryon Equestrian Partners, LLC
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project (+/- 22.28 AC)
Monitoring Year 1 Report and Corrective Action Plan
Polk County, North Carolina
Mr. Kichefski and Mr. Moore,
The attached Monitoring Year 1 Report and Corrective Action Plan is being submitted on behalf
of Tryon Equestrian Partners, LLC represented by Mr. Jeff Brown. Tryon Equestrian Partners
(TEP) applied for a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 404 Permit (Action Id. No. 2013-
02262) and a N.C. Division of Water Resources (DWR) 401 Water Quality Certification (Project
No. 13-1200) to impact streams for the construction of the Tryon International Equestrian Facility
(TIEC), in Polk County, North Carolina. Compensatory mitigation for impacts to streams is
described in the mitigation plan for the Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigaton Project (Phases 1 and 2).
The attached MY annual monitoring report documents the first year of data collection for Phases
1 and 2 of the Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project (Site).
Should you have any questions regarding the Monitoring Year 1 report and Corrective Action Plan
please do not hesitate to contact me at 828-698-9800.
Respectfully,
Alea Tuttle, P.W.S.
Project Biologist
R. Clement Riddle, P.W.S
Principal
145 71 Avenue West, Suite B
Hendersonville, NC 28792
828-698-9800 Tel

Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project
Corrective Action Plan
January 8, 2021
This corrective action plan developed by Clearwater Environmental Consultants Inc. (CEC)
includes the scope and timeline for remaining work necessary to meet the construction phase
requirements for Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project (Site), and to address Areas of Concern
(AOC) identified during the Monitoring Year 1 (MY1) period which warrant maintenance. The
project area is located off of NC Highway 9 in the town of Green Creek (Figures 1 and 2). The
main components of the plan include: (1) modification of fence lines, (2) signage installed to the
Conservation Easement boundary (3) a supplemental planting plan for low stem density areas (4)
invasive plant treatment (5) revision to the Conservation Easement (CE) Boundary due to revised
placement of stream crossing on UT3 and (6) repairs to sections of stream channel which are
eroding or unstable. The Financial Assurances is pending Corps review and comments on the TIEC
proposed DRAFT Letter of Credit which as submitted to the Corps on June 17, 2020.
1.0 Modification of Fence Lines
The As -Built Report for the Site includes sealed record drawings produced by Ben Patton Land
Surveying, PLLC. The drawings indicate the locations of conservation easement boundaries and
installed fence lines. Figure 3 indicates locations where the installed fence line protrudes inside
the conservation easement boundary, thereby violating the restrictions of the conservation
easement.
Corrective action includes moving the fence line to outside the conservation easement
boundary. This will be performed by a licensed contractor and professional land surveyor.
The timeline for completion of the modification of the fence line is April 2021.
2.0 Signage installed to the conservation easement boundary
Guidance set forth by the North Carolina Interagency Review Team's (NCIRT) "Wilmington
District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update" — October 24, 2016 (USACE
2016) indicates that the final as -built survey include verification of the installation of conservation
easement boundary markers. The easement boundary markers were not installed as described in
the construction specifications.
Corrective action includes installing signage at all conservation easement corners and along
boundary lines at 100' intervals as described per the technical specifications for as -built
survey produced by Wildlands Engineering, Inc. on March 9, 2018. Modification to the
placement of wooden posts, fence lines and metal t-posts (described above in Section 1.0)
will occur prior to the placement of signage. The non -fenced areas of the easement will
require a stakeout survey, to be performed by a professional land surveyor to locate and
monument easement corners and boundaries. Signage will be placed on existing installed
wooden witness posts/fence posts and t-posts with additional posts added as necessary in

the non -fenced areas of the easement as described below. The timeline for completion of
the installation of signage is April 2021.
Technical specification for As -Built survey. Wildlands Engineering 2018:
Contractor agrees to install wooden witness posts and signage at all conservation
easement corners as follows:
• Treated wood post; 6" round, 8' long
• Treated to a minimum of 0.4 PCF
• All posts shall be installed 2 '-3 ' below ground (wider end set in the ground)
• Place post within 6" of the conservation easement corner
• Attach conservation easement signs (to be provided by Owner) with rust resistant
bolts, nails or screws, 4 per post
• Each sign shall be placed parallel to the conservation easement boundary line,
facing away from the conservation area with the corners wrapped around the post
and secured
• Upper 6" of each post shall be coated with a water based tree marking paint
(Nelson tree marking paint 6-8 year or similar) including post top; signage shall
be installed just beneath yellow paint
• Each post shall be installed plumb and set solidly in the ground to prevent future
movement
• Contractor agrees to use cement if needed to add stability as follows: 40-80 lb bag
of cement per post; use for unconsolidated and sandy soils where necessary to add
stability and prevent future movement; all posts must be stable, complete and
approved by Engineer
Contractor agrees to install metal witness posts and signage along all conservation
easement boundary lines (i.e., between corners) as follows:
• In non -wooded areas set 6-foot T-Post (tops painted yellow) at no more than 100'
intervals along boundary lines
• In wooded areas where trees on the subject property can be marked, blaze and
mark conservation easement lines. Conservation easement lines shall be marked
with conservation easementsigns (to beprovided by Owner) and blazed with yellow
paint (Nelson tree marking paint 6-8 year or similar).

3.0 Supplemental Planting Plan
Bare root planting stock was installed on site during April of 2019. The baseline vegetation
monitoring for the site was performed in July 2019. The total overall planted density representative
for the site was 563 stems/acre, which exceeds the interim measure of vegetative success of at least
320 planted stems per acre at the end of the third monitoring year. However, Permanent vegetation
monitoring plots (PVP) 1, 4, 5 and 6 do not individually meet the interim vegetative success
criteria. In addition, Temporary vegetation monitoring plot (TVP) 5 did not meet stem density
criteria. Stem density and survivability was observed low in the vicinity of these vegetation
monitoring plots. Figure 3 shows the location of vegetation monitoring plots, and recommended
areas for supplemental planting. These planting areas are approximate and may be modified
following the MY1 vegetation monitoring.
Corrective action includes installation of supplemental bare root stock in areas indicated
on CCPV Figures 4.0-4.5 shown to have low survivability of planted bare root stems. The
proposed supplemental planting areas have a combined area of 4.4 acres. In addition, areas
of bare soil totaling approximately 0.3 acres are indicated. Supplemental planting will
include re -seeding of the bare areas, and planting of bare roots. Approximately 1,430 bare
root stems will be installed to meet the MY3 density goal of 320 stems per acre. The
timeline for completion of the installation of supplemental planting is March 2021
4.0 Invasive Plant Control
Approximate invasive plant control areas are shown on CCPV Figures 4.0-4.5. Invasive plants
observed on site include kudzu, cocklebur, Chinese privet, Chinaberry and tree of heaven. Only
mechanical removal of invasive species such as kudzu and Chinese privet were completed during
the As -built.
Corrective action includes chemical treatment of invasive exotic plants with herbicide
following recommended procedures for herbicide application at aquatic sites within
conservation areas. The work will be performed by SM Soil and Water Solutions, with
oversight from CEC staff biologists. The invasive plant management activities for 2020
have been completed. Additional follow up management activities are anticipated for 2021
and 2022.

5.0 Revision to Conservation Easement Boundary
A Conservation Easement (CE) on the property is held by the Polk County Soil and Water
Conservation District (SWCD) to permanently protect the improved aquatic habitats and riparian
buffers and restrict future activities that might otherwise compromise the functions and services
of the aquatic resources. The permanent conservation easement recorded January 23, 2017 extends
at least 50 feet beyond the top of both banks on all UTs. Within the conservation easement, the
riparian buffers are planted with native trees and shrubs in order to provide post -construction bank
stability, erosion control and riparian habitat enhancement. The ford crossing on UT3 was
modified during construction to avoid unnecessary tree removal. The extended gravel road for the
UT3 crossing extending to the southwest penetrates the boundary of the conservation easement by
approximately 30 feet.
Corrective action: The crossing is to be maintained in this location, therefore a modification
to the 2017 conservation easement boundary held by SWCD is necessary. All site
protection instruments require 60-day advance notification to the US Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) and the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) prior to any action to
void, amend, or modify the document. No such action would take place unless approved
by the Corps and DWR. The revised boundary will be surveyed and marked, and a new
property boundary plate generated by a professional land surveyor. The timeline for
completion of the CE boundary revision is April 2021.
6.0 Repairs to Stream Channel
Visual assessment of the Harmon Dairy Mitigation Project performed on August 7, 2020 field
walk revealed areas of erosion and instability within the bed and banks, which warrant corrective
action. Areas of Concern (AOC) 1 through 11 are outlined in Section 8.0 of the Harmon Dairy
Mitigation Project Monitoring Year 1 (MY1) report. The stationing for each repair location is
approximate and subject to natural variation and will require adjustment in the field according to
best professional judgement of the construction engineer.
Corrective action: Repairs to Areas of Concern 1-11 will be completed using coir matting
and live stakes to stabilize eroding banks, with structure repairs performed as necessary by
and with small earthmoving equipment. The timeline for completion of the stream repairs
is estimated to be completed during the MY2 period in 2021.

Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project
2020 MY1 Documentation Report
Polk County, North Carolina
USACE # SAW-2013-02262
DWR# 20131200 v6
Data collected:
August — September 2020
Submitted on:
January 8, 2021
Prepared for:
Tryon Equestrian Partners, LLC
2659 Sandy Plains Road
Tryon, NC 28782
Prepared by:
CCe r Wa Le
Clearwater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
32 Clayton Street,
Asheville, NC 28801

Introduction
Tryon Equestrian Partners (TEP) received authorization from the a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) 404 Permit (Action Id. No. 2013-02262) dated September 14, 2017 and a N.C. Division
of Water Resources (DWR) 401 Water Quality Certification (Project No. 13-1200 V6) dated
November 16, 2018 to impact streams for the construction of the Tryon International Equestrian
Facility (TIEC). Compensatory mitigation for impacts to streams is described in the mitigation
plan for the Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigaton Project (Phases I and 2) (Wildlands Engineering Inc.
and Clearwater Environmental Consultants Inc. 2017).
This annual monitoring report documents the first year of data collection for Phases 1 and 2 of the
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project (Site). The Site is comprised of two phases totalling
7,256 linear feet of stream and will provide 5,005 credits of stream mitigation. The site is located
in Polk County. A map of the project vicinity (Figures I and 2) as well as the phases and types of
mitigation (i.e. restoration, enhancement, preservation) is included in this report (Figure 3).
The success of stream stability and woody vegetation plantings will be evaluated for 7 years per
the guidance set forth by the North Carolina Interagency Review Team's (NCIRT) "Wilmington
District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update" — October 24, 2016 (USACE
2016). The applicant will monitor the required areas for 7 years and report the results annually to
USACE and DWR. The streams and buffer will be protected in perpetuity by a Conservation
Easement that will be held and monitored by Polk County Soil and Water Board.
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page i
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

Table of Contents
Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... i
1.0 Project Background.................................................................................................................................1
1.1 Project Location, Setting, and Directions...........................................................................................1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives.............................................................................................................. 1
1.2.1 Project Objectives- Phase 1.......................................................................................................... 1
1.2.2 Project Objectives- Phase 2.......................................................................................................... 1
2.0 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach.................................................................................2
2.1 Site Protection Instrument................................................................................................................... 2
2.2 Project Structure.................................................................................................................................. 2
2.3 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data...................................................................................... 3
3.0 Performance Standards........................................................................................................................... 4
3.1 Channel Stability and Morphology..................................................................................................... 4
3.1.1 Dimension....................................................................................................................................4
3.2 Hydrology........................................................................................................................................... 4
3.2.1 Bankfull Events..................................................................................................................... 4
3.2.2 Continuous Flow..........................................................................................................................4
3.3 Vegetation........................................................................................................................................... 4
3.3.1 Woody Stem Plantings................................................................................................................. 4
3.4 Visual Assessment..............................................................................................................................4
3.4.1 Encroachment.............................................................................................................................. 4
3.5 Schedule and Reporting...................................................................................................................... 5
4.0 Methods.................................................................................................................................................. 6
4.1 Channel Stability and Morphology..................................................................................................... 6
4.1.1 Dimension.................................................................................................................................... 6
4.1.4 Photo Documentation................................................................................................................... 6
4.2 Hydrology........................................................................................................................................... 6
4.2.1 Bankfull Events............................................................................................................................ 6
4.2.2 Continuous Flow Monitoring....................................................................................................... 6
4.3 Vegetation........................................................................................................................................... 7
4.4 Visual Assessment.............................................................................................................................. 7
5.0 Adaptive Management Plan.................................................................................................................... 7
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page ii
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

6.0 Monitoring Year 1 (MY I) Data Assessment.......................................................................................... 9
6.1 Channel Stability and Morphology.....................................................................................................
9
6.1.1 Profile...........................................................................................................................................
9
6.1.2 Dimension....................................................................................................................................
9
6.1.3 Pattern ........................................................................................................................................14
6.2 Hydrology.........................................................................................................................................15
6.3 Vegetation.........................................................................................................................................15
6.4 Visual assessment.............................................................................................................................16
7.0 Corrective Action Plan ..........................................................................................................................17
8.0 Areas of Concern ..................................................................................................................................17
9.0 References.............................................................................................................................................
21
List of Figures
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 USGS Topographic Map
Figure 3 Project Components Map
Figures 4.0-4.5 Current Condition Plan View (CCPV) Maps
Attachment A: Recorded Conservation Easement
Attachment B: Cross Section Comparison Plots and Photographs
Attachment C: Vegetation Data Tables and Photographs
Attachment D: Visual Assessment Photographs
Attachment E: Areas of Concern
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page iii
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

1.0 Project Background
1.1 Project Location, Setting, and Directions
The site is located in the Piedmont physiographic province (NCGS 2004) in Polk County, North
Carolina. The site is accessed from NC Highway 9 in the town of Green Creek (Figure 1 and Figure
2). The site is bordered by Mary's Branch to the west, and streams on the site are unnamed
tributaries (UT) to Mary's Branch, which drains to the Broad River (HUC 03050105).
To access the site from Asheville, take Interstate 26 East for 36 miles to Exit 67. Follow US-74
East toward Columbus. Take Exit 167 and turn south onto NC Highway 9. After approximately 7
miles, turn right onto Harmon Dairy Lane. Harmon Dairy Lane ends at the dairy. The project
reaches are located to the west of the dairy barns.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
1.2.1 Project Objectives- Phase 1
The resource functions of the stream restoration project address needed improvements to the
watershed in several ways. The existing stream at the site was degraded due to prior channelization,
habitat alteration, excess sediment from bank erosion, limited riparian buffers, and livestock
trampling. The project addresses these impairments and improves watershed functions by restoring
approximately 1,126 linear feet of an unnamed tributary (UT) to Mary's Branch. The primary goal
of the stream restoration project is to return the project reach to a stable, well vegetated, and
naturally functioning condition. Specific stream restoration objectives include:
• improving bank stability,
• enhancing aquatic and terrestrial habitats,
• removing invasive exotic plant species, and
• establishing more robust and wider vegetative buffers, and installing livestock fencing around these
riparian buffers.
1.2.2 Project Objectives- Phase 2
The stream restoration project addresses needed improvements to the watershed in several ways.
The existing streams at the site were degraded due to prior habitat alteration, excess sediment from
bank erosion, limited riparian buffers, and livestock trampling. The proposed project addresses
these impairments and improve watershed functions by restoring, enhancing and preserving 6,039
LF of four unnamed tributaries (UTs) to Mary's Branch. The primary goal of the stream restoration
project is to return the project reaches to stable, well vegetated, and naturally functioning
conditions. Specific stream restoration objectives include:
• improving bank stability,
• enhancing aquatic and terrestrial habitats,
• removing invasive exotic plant species,
• stabilizing upland gullies
• establishing more robust and wider vegetative buffers, and installing livestock fencing around these
riparian buffers.
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 1 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

2.0 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach
2.1 Site Protection Instrument
A Conservation Easement (CE) on the property is held by the Polk County Soil and Water
Conservation District (SWCD) to permanently protect the improved aquatic habitats and riparian
buffers and restrict future activities that might otherwise compromise the functions and services
of the aquatic resources (Attachment A). The permanent conservation easement recorded January
23, 2017 extends at least 50 feet beyond the top of both banks on all UTs. Within the conservation
easement, the riparian buffers are planted with native trees and shrubs in order to provide post -
construction bank stability, erosion control and riparian habitat enhancement. All site protection
instruments require 60-day advance notification to the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and
the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) prior to any action to void, amend, or modify the
document. No such action would take place unless approved by the Corps and DWR.
2.2 Project Structure
The project is implemented according to the 2017 Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project
Mitigation Plan (Mitigation Plan). The Mitigation Plan consists of two phases proposing a
combined 7,256 linear feet of stream to provide 5,005 credits of stream mitigation. An overview
map of the phases and types of mitigation (i.e. restoration, enhancement, preservation) is included
in Figure 3. Below is a Summary Table for Projected Mitigation Credits for Phases 1 and 2 (Table
1). Phase one consists of Restoration and Enhancement II on the UT1 to Mary's Branch. Phase II
consists of Restoration, Enhancement I, Enhancement II and Preservation of UT2, UT3, UT4 and
UT5 to Mary's Branch. Both phases were constructed simultaneously and with final earthwork and
planting completed in 2019.
Table 1: Credit Summary Phase I and II
Stream
Reach
Approach
STA
Begin
STA End
Proposed
Reach
Length
As-
Built
Length
Mitigation
Credit
Ratio
Total
Potential
Credits
Phase I
UT1
1
Enhancement 1I
1 1+66
1 3+18
1 152
1,247
2.5:1
61
UT1
2
Restoration
3+18
13+83
1,065
1 1:1
1,065
Phase 11
UT2
1
Preservation
0+01
4+06
405
--
10:1
41
UT2
2
Enhancement 11
4+06
7+90
384
--
2.5:1
154
UT2
3
Enhancement 1
7+90
22+65
1,475
2,325
1.5:1
983
UT2
4
Restoration
22+90
31+28
838
1:1
838
UT3
1
Enhancement II
100+00
100+48
48
--
2.5:1
19
UT3
2
Enhancement I
100+48
112+33
1,185
--
1.5:1
773
UT3
3
Preservation
112+33
115+62
329
--
10:1
33
UT3
4
Restoration
115+62
124+82
920
1,037
1:1
920
UT4
--
Preservation
1+14
3+61
247
--
10:1
25
UT5
--
Enhancement 11
1+00
3+33
233
--
2.5:1
93
Total Stream Mitigation Credits (Phase 1)
1,126
Total Stream Mitigation Credits (Phase 11)
3,879
Overall Stream Mitigation Credits
5,005
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 2 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

2.3 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data
Table 2 Project History
Project Component
Date Completed
Final Mitigation Plan Phase I and II
August 3, 2017
404 / 401 Issued
September 14, 2017 and November 16, 2018
Final Design - Construction Plans
March 1, 2018
Construction
January 2019-May 2019
Bare Root / Live Stake Plantings
May 2019
Baseline Data Collection Activities
July -August 2019
As -Built Report and Record Drawings
June 2020
Corrective Action Plan
July 2020
MY1 Vegetation Monitoring
August 2020
MY1 Geomorphic Monitoring
September 2020
MY Invasive Plant Management
September and November 2020
Table 3 Project Contacts
Designers
Wildlands Engineering Inc.
Construction Contractors
Baker Grading and Landscaping Inc.
Planting Contractor
Baker Grading and Landscaping Inc.
Seeding Contractor
Baker Grading and Landscaping Inc.
Seed mix source
Ernst Conservation Seeds and Green Resource
Nursery Stock Supplier
Dykes & Son Nursery
Monitoring Performer
Clear Water Environental Consultants Inc.
Vegetation Management
SM Soil and Water Solutions, LLC
Surveyor
Ben Patton Land Surveying, PLLC
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 3 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

3.0 Performance Standards
In accordance with the provisions in CFR Title 33, 'performance standards that will be used to
assess whether the project is achieving its objectives... and should relate to the objectives ... so
that the project can be objectively evaluated to determine if it is developing into the desired
resource type, providing the expected functions, and attaining any other applicable metrics ".
Success criteria were defined in the 2017 Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project Mitigation Plan
(Mitigation Plan). For each defined success criteria, quantitative (e.g. bank height ratio) or
qualitative (e.g. observations of fine sediment deposition on the floodplain), data is measured
throughout the monitoring period. Year to year comparisons for the various parameters will allow
adaptive management to be implemented early on in the monitoring period if necessary, in order
to reduce the risk of widespread problems.
3.1 Channel Stability and Morphology
3.1.1 Dimension
• Riffle bank height ratios (BHR) shall not exceed 1.2. Changes in BHR shall not exceed 10%
in year to year comparisons.
Entrenchment ratio (ER) for riffles in reaches where ER is corrected through design and
construction shall be no less than 1.4. Changes in ER shall not exceed 10% in year to year
comparisons.
3.2 Hydrology
3.2.1 Bankfull Events
At least 90% of the stream bed and banks shall remain stable through four bankfull events,
occurring in separate years, during monitoring years 1 through 7.
3.2.2 Continuous Flow
Continuous surface water flow must be documented for 30 consecutive days at any point
during the monitoring year.
3.3 Vegetation
3.3.1 Woody Stem Plantings
Density of 320 live, planted stems/acre at year 3; 260 live, planted stems/acre at year 5; 210
live planted stems/acre at year 7.
Trees must average 7 feet in height at year 5 and 10 feet in height at year 7.
No more than 50% of a plot stem count shall be a single species.
3.4 Visual Assessment
3.4.1 Encroachment
100% of fencing and signage to remain intact.
No encroachments shall be made on the easement.
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 4 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

3.5 Schedule and Reporting
Monitoring reports will be submitted to USACE and DWR by December 31 of each monitoring
year. Based on the (NCIRT) "Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation
Update), the monitoring reports will include the following:
• Project background which includes project objectives, project structure, restoration type and
approach, location and setting, history and background
• Map of project approach and structure
• Map with monitoring features and any problem areas indicated
• Assessment of the stability of the stream
• Annual photographs of monitoring features
• Assessment of vegetation
• Assessment of hydrology
• Recommended maintenance or corrective actions
• Any other observations from visual assessment such as indications of encroachment or wildlife
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 5 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

4.0 Methods
The ecological criteria for monitoring are linked to project success performance standards
established in the Harmon Dairy Stream Restoration Mitigation Plan (2017) and discussed in
Section 3.0 of this document. Evaluation of project success utilizes industry standard methods
described in detail below. Project success will be evaluated annually for 7 years per the proposed
guidance set forth by the North Carolina Interagency Review Team's (NCIRT) "Wilmington
District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update" - October 24, 2016 (USACE
2016).
4.1 Channel Stability and Morphology
4.1.1 Dimension
Cross -Sectional Stream surveys follow the methodology contained in the USDA forest service
manual "Stream Channel Reference Sites (Harrelson, et al 1994). Cross-section surveys were
conducted On September 4, 2020 and September 23, 2020. All cross-section monitoring locations
were recorded with a sub -meter accuracy Trimble GeoXT GPS device and monumented with a
PVC stake and rebar set in concrete. Cross-section surveys were performed by Clearwater
Environmental Consultants (CEC) using a laser level, and laser sensor attached to stadia rod, and
measuring tape. Permanent cross sections were established at ten locations within R and EI
reaches, representing approximately 1/2 riffles, and 1/2 pools. Cross section locations were
established according to best professional judgement. Cross section data points were collected at
all major changes in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, water surface and channel thalweg
locations. Stream channel cross section dimensions and associated parameters were calculated
using "The Reference Reach Spreadsheet" version 4.3 L developed by Dan Mecklenburg. (Ohio
Department of Natural Resources).
4.1.4 Photo Documentation
Photographic reference points (photo -points) were used to visually document stream conditions
and include both a downstream facing photo and an upstream facing photo at each photo reference
point. Photo -points were established at 30 stations along the entirety of the project streams. All
photo -points were recorded with a sub -meter accuracy Trimble GeoXT GPS device and
monumented with a PVC stake The photographer will make a reasonable attempt to capture the
same perspective in each photo -point location annually.
4.2 Hydrology
4.2.1 Bankfull Events
Crest gauges were installed on riffle cross -sections XS3, XS6 and XS 10 will be visually inspected
to document the occurrence of bankfull events. Photographic documentation of recently deposited
rack lines were recorded as indicators of bankfull flow events.
4.2.2 Continuous Flow Monitoring
Streamflow stage will be monitored to document 30 days of continuous flow using a continuous
stage recorder. An automated level -logger will be set to record every 2 hours. Evidence of channel
flow will be documented with a photo and the stream level will be manually recorded at each data
download.
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 6 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

4.3 Vegetation
Vegetation monitoring was conducted during the As -Built Monitoring and will be conducted in
post -construction monitoring years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Both Permanent Vegetation Plots (PVP) and
Temporary Vegetation Plots (TVP) were established. PVPs will be monitored in utilizing methods
established by the Carolina Vegetation Survey-EEP Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al., 2008) and the
2016 USACE Stream and Wetland Mitigation Guidance. For all monitoring plots all woody stems,
including exotic and invasive species, were recorded. Exotic/invasive species will not count
toward success of performance standards.
A total of seven permanent vegetation plots (PVP) and five temporary vegetation plots (TVP) were
established within the 14.14 AC planted area. Locations of PVP amd TVP were chosen in the field
to capture the heterogeneity of the species composition and spacing within the planted area.
Permanent vegetation plots were established by choosing a random origin point, with standard 10
meter by 10 meter square with plants located on an XY axis. The vegetation plot corners have been
marked and are recoverable either through field identification or with the use of a GPS unit.
Reference photographs were taken at the origin looking diagonally across the plot to the opposite
corner and will be repeated each monitoring year. Individual PVP data recorded will include
woody stem identification, height, density, vigor, damage (if any), and percent survival. Planted
woody stems will be marked during assessment as needed based on a known origin so they can be
found in succeeding monitoring years. Mortality will be determined from the difference between
the baseline year's living planted stems and the current year's living planted stems.
Temporary vegetation plots (TVP) are, using a circular or 100 m2 plot. These temporary plots will
be reestablished in different and random locations throughout the planted conservation easement
in monitoring years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. These locations will be indicated on plan view maps for the
corresponding monitoring assessment year. Temporary vegetation plot assessments will document
the number of stems, species type, and stem height within the plot. Please refer to the Current
Condition Plan View (CCPV) Figures 4.0 through 4.5 for the permanent and temporary vegetation
monitoring locations.
4.4 Visual Assessment
Visual assessment will be performed annually to determine locations of exotic and nuisance
vegetation, and locations of any fence damage, vegetation damage, or boundary encroachments.
Any areas of concern will be mapped and included in the annual monitoring report.
5.0 Adaptive Management Plan
Maintenance of the newly constructed channels and all structures associated with the restoration
would be accomplished by Tryon Equestrian Partners (TEP) if the monitoring parameters for
restored streams exceed the range of natural variability established during the 7-year monitoring
period. Replacement planting would be performed by TEP if stem counts fall below 320 stems per
acre during the first 3 years, 260 stems per acre through year 5, or 210 stems per acre through year
7. If any portion of the mitigation project fails to meet the specified performance standards in a
monitoring year, the reason(s) for this failure would be determined and a corrective action plan
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 7 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

(which would include proposed actions, a schedule, and monitoring plan) would be prepared. TEP
will also install and maintain the livestock fence for seven years. The landowner will be responsible
for maintaining the fence thereafter if the adjacent land uses include livestock. If it is believed that
corrective action to a problem area is not warranted, the corrective action plan would state the
reasons. Continued monitoring of the problem area may be required.
Project maintenance would be performed as described above. If, during the course of annual
monitoring it is determined the site's ability to achieve site performance standards is jeopardized,
the applicant would notify the Corps and DWR of the need to develop an Adaptive Management
Plan. Once the Adaptive Management Plan is prepared and finalized the applicant would:
• Notify the Corps and DWR.
• Revise performance standards, maintenance requirements, and monitoring requirements as
necessary and/or required by the Corps and DWR.
• Obtain other permits as necessary.
• Implement the Adaptive Management Plan.
• Provide the Corps and DWR with documentation of corrective action. This report would
depict the extent and nature of the work performed.
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 8 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

6.0 Monitoring Year 1 (MY 1) Data Assessment
MYO baseline data collection was conducted in July -August 2019. The first annual monitoring
assessment (MY I) was conducted in August and September 2020. The Site will be monitored for
a total of seven years, with the final monitoring activities scheduled for 2026.
6.1 Channel Stability and Morphology
Monitoring Year 1 morphological data collection was conducted in August 2020. Please refer to
Attachment B for cross section comparison plots photographs.
6.1.1 Profile
Stream profile was assessed visually during annual monitoring. No additional longitudinal surveys
will be performed unless visual monitoring indicates a need for remedial actions. MY1 visual
monitoring indicated changes to profile which warrant maintenance activities and will involve
modifications to the profile along stations. These are modifications to grade control structures and
riffles described in the Areas of Concern (AOC) in Section 8.0.
6.1.2 Dimension
Generally, as -built cross -sectional dimensions match design parameters with minor variations.
Noted differences are still appropriate for the channel type. Table 5 indicates the as -built cross-
section dimensions. Tables 6-8 compare typical design cross section dimensions to MY1
dimensions. Aggradation was apparent in cross sections 3,4,7 and 8. Sediment mobility in the
streambed in the first year of establishment is typical, and is expected to reach equilibrium as more
mature riparian vegetation develops over the monitoring period. The right control pin for Cross -
Section 10 was unable to be recovered during the MY1 survey. A cross section survey was
performed at the approximate location of the original, however dimensions differ due to the lack
of control. The original right control pin location will be located and monumented by a surveyor
during MY2, and geomorphic monitoring efforts will resume along the the original XS 10 transect
in future monitoring years. Summary tables and comparison plots of MY1 and Baseline data are
included below in Tables 5-9:
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 9 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

Table 5: UT2 Reach 3 (EI)
WO (As Built)
MY 1
XS 1
XS2
XS 1
XS2
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Pool
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
885.69
883.93
885.69
883.93
x-section area (ft.sq.)
9
16.8
12.5
12.3
width (ft)
8.8
10.6
9.8
8.2
mean depth (ft)
1
1.6
1.3
1.5
max depth (ft)
1.6
2.2
2.3
2.3
wetted perimeter (ft)
9.6
12.4
11.4
10.0
hyd radi (ft)
0.9
1.4
1.1
1.2
width -depth ratio
8.5
6.7
7.7
5.4
W flood prone area (ft)
19.1
N/A
21.5
N/A
entrenchment ratio
2.2
N/A
2.2
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
N/A: Not Applicable
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 10 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

Table 6: UT2 Reach 4 (R)
MYO (As Built)
MY1
XS3
XS4
XS3
XS4
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Pool
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
845.81
845.74
845.81
845.74
x-section area (ft.sq.)
5.6
11.6
2.4
5.6
width (ft)
7.9
8.7
6.9
8.9
mean depth (ft)
0.7
1.3
0.3
0.6
max depth (ft)
1.2
2.3
0.8
1.1
wetted perimeter (ft)
8.3
10.2
7.1
9.2
hyd radi (ft)
0.7
1.1
0.3
0.6
width -depth ratio
11.1
6.5
20.0
14.2
W flood prone area (ft)
31.7
N/A
21.8
N/A
entrenchment ratio
4
N/A
3.2
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1.0
1
N/A: Not Applicable
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 11 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

Table 7: UT (R)
MYO (As Built)
MY1
XS5
XS6
XS5
XS6
Pool
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
831.24
831.4
831.24
831.4
x-section area (ft.sq.)
6.8
6.4
8.5
5.0
width (ft)
8.9
13.4
7.0
9.3
mean depth (ft)
0.8
0.5
1.2
0.5
max depth (ft)
2.1
1.1
2.0
1.2
wetted perimeter (ft)
10.3
13.8
8.8
9.6
hyd radi (ft)
0.7
0.5
1.0
0.5
width -depth ratio
11.8
28.3
5.7
17.2
W flood prone area (ft)
N/A
**
N/A
**
entrenchment ratio
N/A
* *
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
** Width of floodprone area exceeds survey boundary
N/A: Not Applicable
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 12 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

Table 8: UT3 Reach 2a (EI)
MYO (As Built)
MY1
XS7
XS8
XS7
XS8
Pool
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
906.9
905.1
906.9
905.1
x-section area (ft.sq.)
11.5
5.3
2.6
2.0
width (ft)
10.3
8.9
5.8
3.0
mean depth (ft)
1.1
0.6
0.5
0.7
max depth (ft)
2.1
1
0.9
0.9
wetted perimeter (ft)
11.8
9.2
6.5
3.3
hyd radi (ft)
1
0.6
0.4
0.6
width -depth ratio
9.3
14.8
12.8
4.5
W flood prone area (ft)
N/A
21.8
N/A
21.4
entrenchment ratio
N/A
2.5
N/A
7.1
Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1.0
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 13 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

Table 9: UT3 Reach 4 (R)
MYO (As Built)
MY1
XS9
XS 10
XS9
XS 10
Pool
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
848.39
846.33
848.39
846.33
x-section area (ft.sq.)
11.6
7
8.9
5.2
width (ft)
12.5
10.5
7.6
6.5
mean depth (ft)
0.9
0.7
1.2
0.8
max depth (ft)
2.6
1.2
2.1
1.5
wetted perimeter (ft)
14.3
11
8.8
7.5
hyd radi (ft)
0.8
0.6
1.0
0.7
width -depth ratio
13.5
15.7
6.5
8.2
W flood prone area (ft)
N/A
67.8
N/A
60
entrenchment ratio
N/A
6.5
N/A
9.2
Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
N/A: Not Applicable
6.1.3 Pattern
Pattern data is not applicable for high slope project streams that are either Rosgen A -type or B-
type stream (UT2 above ford crossing and UT3 Reach 1-3) For lower gradient streams with a
wider valley and floodplain were designed as Rosgen E stream type channels (UT1, UT2 below
ford crossing and UT3 Reach 4). Sinuosity for these reaches was calculated as ranging from 1.12-
1.3. No systemic adjustments to pattern was observed during the MYI period. Isolated areas of
bank scour and floodplain scour indicate minor localized adjustments to pattern that are expected
to stabilize as riparian vegetation matures. These areas are included under the Areas of Concern
(AOC) listed in Section 8.0.
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 14 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

6.2 Hydrology
Bankfull events were recorded during MY1 at all crest gauges, observed following a rain event
which occurred on August 6, 2020. Significant rack lines were observed on UT1 as well as UT2
Reach 4 and UT3 Reach 4. Photographic documentation of observations are included below:
Table 10: Crest Gauge Data
Location
Date Observed
Crest Ga ue Reading
UT1 Crest Gage
August 7, 2020
3.0 ft
UT1 Crest Gage
August 7, 2020
2.1 ft
UT2 Reach 4
August 7, 2020
0.6 ft
UT3 Reach 4
August 7, 2020
No Reading Observed
A continuous flow monitoring device will be installed in UT3 Reach 2 in MY2. A record of
continuous flow data will be included in the MY2 report. Visual monitoring of this reach confirmed
strong baseflow in this reach during the MY1 period.
6.3 Vegetation
The MY1 average planted density is 237 planted stems/acre for permanent vegetation plots (PVP)
and 230 stems/acre for temporary vegetation plots (TVP). The total overall planted density
representative for the site is 267 stems/acre. This is below the interim measure of vegetative
success of at least 320 planted stems per acre at the end of the third monitoring year. Permanent
vegetation monitoring plots 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 do not individually meet the interim vegetative success
criteria. A corrective action plan is included that describves supplemental planting in portions of
the site showing low survivability of planted woody stems. Areas of low woody stem density are
shown on CCPV Figures 4.0-4.5 as well as described in the Areas of Concern Section 8.0. Invasive
plants were observed on site including dense stands of kudzu, as well as Kudzu privet, tree of
heaven, and microstegium in lesser quantity. These areas are listed in the Areas of Concern Section
8.0, and depicted on the CCPV Figures 4.0-4.5. Management of exotic invasive plants using
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 15 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

herbicide treatment occurred in September of 2020, and will be ongoing in subsequent years as
necessary to control the spread of kudzu, tree of heaven, and Chinese privet. Vegetation data tables
and photographs of each plot can be found in Attachment C.
Table 11: Vegetation Plot Total Stem Counts
Plot MYO Stem Count MY1 Stem Count % mortality
PVP1
3
1
67%
PVP2
11
6
45%
PVP3
14
11
21%
PVP4
7
5
29%
PVPS
4
2
50%
PVP6
7
6
14%
PVP7
12
10
17%
TVP 1
24
6
N/A *
TVP2
19
4
N/A *
TVP3
16
8
N/A *
TVP4
15
5
N/A *
TVPS
3
0
N/A *
Average 9
stems
11.25
5.33
35%
Plot Area
0.02 Acres
0.02 Acres
Stems/Acre
563
267
*N/A: Individual temporary vegetation plots are not comparable between
monitoring ears because the location of each plot changes annually
6.4 Visual assessment
The MY1 visual assessment was performed in August of 2020. Visual inspection revealed
evidence of bankfull flow described in section 6.2, and several locations requiring management
consideration, which are described in Section 8.0 of this report. No obvious easement
encroachment was observed. Photographs of all permanent photo points are included in
Attachment D.
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 16 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

7.0 Corrective Action Plan
Efforts to close out the construction phase of the Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation site are ongoing,
and are described in the corrective action plan which will be submitted under separate cover. The
corrective action plan includes the scope and timeline for remaining work necessary to meet the
construction phase requirements, including: (1) modification of fencelines as installed to contain
the conservation easement, (2) modification to the conservation easement boundary plat, (3)
signage installed to the conservation easement boundary, (4) management considerations for the
Areas of Concern (AOC) outlined in Section 8.0 of this Report. The submission of a corrective
action plan will include financial assurances for the above requirements, and will be submitted to
the Corps and DWR for approval.
8.0 Areas of Concern
Sealed record drawings include annotated Areas of Concern (AOC) in Attachment E, and are
depicted on the Current Condition Plan View (CCPV) Figures 4.0-4.5. Below these AOC are
ranked as minor, moderate or severe, and will be monitored as "watch areas" or indicated for
maintaince. Specific areas of concern are detailed below:
Table 4: Monitoriniz Areas of Concern (AOC) MY1
AOC - 4
Location
Problem Description
Rank/size
Action
AOC-1
UT1 Reach 2
Streambank erosion
Moderate
Maintenance
STA 4+50
and pattern
Scheduled
adjustment in
MY2
channel, gravel bar
forming at center of
channel which is
directing flow to
flood lain pools
AOC-2
UT2 STA 7+95 -
Streambank erosion,
Severe
Maintenance
8+25
both banks
Scheduled
MY2
AOC-3
UT2 STA 12+75
Right stream bank
Moderate
Maintenance
eroding
Scheduled
MY2
AOC-4
UT2 STA 13+88
(Boulder Step 96):
Minor
Maintenance
Structure piping
Scheduled
MY2
AOC-5
(Boulder Step 910):
Minor
Maintenance
UT2 STA 17+00
Lateral scour
Scheduled
MY2
AOC-6
UT2 STA 17+50-
Right hillslope
Moderate
Maintenance
18+00:
above streambank is
Scheduled
sloughing
MY2
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 17 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

AOC - 4
Location
Problem Description
Rank/size
Action
AOC-7
UT2 STA 17+90
(Boulder Step 915)
Moderate
Maintenance
Structure failure
Scheduled
MY2
AOC-8
UT2 STA 26+63-
Log sill piping
Minor
Maintenance
26+74
Scheduled
MY2
AOC-9
UT2 STA 27+84-
Riffle and end grade
Severe
Maintenance
28+36
control washed out
Scheduled
MY2
AOC-10
UT3 STA
Boulder Structure
Moderate
Maintenance
109+15:
repair needed
Scheduled
MY2
AOC-11
UT3 STA 116+50
Left stream bank
Moderate
Maintenance
- 117+00
eroding
Scheduled
MY2
AOC-12
UT2 left
Bare, eroding soil
0.02 AC
Watch area
floodplain
patch.
AOC-13
UT2 right
Bare, eroding soil
0.01 AC
Watch area
floodplain
patch.
AOC-14
UT2 right
Bare, eroding soil
0.10 AC
Maintenance
floodplain
patch.
Scheduled
hillslo e
MY2
AOC-15
UT2 left
Bare, eroding soil
0.05 AC
Maintenance
floodplain
patch.
Scheduled
MY2
AOC-16
UT3 right
Bare, eroding soil
0.06 AC
Maintenance
floodplain
patch.
Scheduled
hillslo e
MY2
AOC-17
UT3 right
Bare, eroding soil
0.06 AC
Maintenance
floodplain
patch.
Scheduled
hillslo e
MY2
AOC-18
UT3 Reach 2
Area of low stem
0.54 AC
Supplemental
density
Planting
Scheduled
MY2
AOC-19
UT3 Reach 2
Area of low stem
0.64 AC
Supplemental
density
Planting
Scheduled
MY2
AOC-20
UT3 Reach 4
Area of low stem
0.48 AC
Supplemental
density
Planting
Scheduled
MY2
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 18 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

AOC - 9
Location
Problem Description
Rank/size
Action
AOC-21
UT2 Reach 2 and
Area of low stem
2.19 AC
Supplemental
3
density
Planting
Scheduled
MY2
AOC-22
UT1 Reach 1
Area of low stem
0.40 AC
Supplemental
density
Planting
Scheduled
MY2
AOC-23
UT1 Reach 2
Area of low stem
0.22 AC
Supplemental
density
Planting
Scheduled
MY2
AOC-24
UT2 Reach 3
Invasive Plant
0.20 AC
Herbicide
dominance — kudzu
Severe
applied
September
2020
AOC-25
UT1 Reach 4
Invasive Plant
0.58 AC
Herbicide
dominance — kudzu
Severe
applied
September
2020
AOC-26
UT1 Reach 2
Invasive Plant
1.10 AC
Herbicide
dominance — kudzu
Mild
applied
September
2020
AOC-27
UT3 Reach 4
Invasive Plant
0.49 AC
Herbicide
dominance — kudzu
Severe
applied
September
2020
AOC-28
UT3 Reach 2,3
Invasive Plant
1.04 AC
Herbicide
and 4
dominance — kudzu
Mild
applied
September
2020
AOC-29
UT3 Reach 1
Invasive Plant
0.13 AC
Herbicide
dominance — tree of
Mild
applied
heaven
September
2020
AOC-30
UT2 Reach 3
Invasive plant
0.34 AC
Herbicide
dominance- kudzu
Mild
applied
September
2020
AOC-31
UT3 Reach 2
Invasive plant
0.21 AC
Herbicide
dominance — privet
Severe
applied
November
2020
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 19 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

AOC - 9
Location
Problem Description
Rank/size
Action
AOC-32
UT2 Reach 1,2
Invasive plant
3.25 AC
Herbicide
and 3
dominance- kudzu
Moderate
applied
September
2020
AOC-33
UT2 Reach 3 and
Invasive plant
1.59 AC
Herbicide
4
dominance- kudzu
Moderate
applied
September
2020
AOC-34
UT2 Reach 4
Invasive plant
0.30 AC
Herbicide
dominance — privet
Severe
applied
November
2020
AOC-35
UT2 Reach 4
Invasive plant
0.13 AC
Herbicide
dominance — privet
Severe
applied
November
2020
AOC-36
UT3 Reach 4
Invasive plant
1.01 AC
Herbicide
dominance — kudzu
applied
Severe
September
2020
AOC-37
UT2 Reach 2
Invasive plant
0.07 AC
Herbicide
dominance — tree of
Mild
applied
heaven
September
2020
AOC-38
UT2 Reach 3
Invasive plant
1.54 AC
Herbicide
dominance — privet
Moderate
applied
November
2020
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 20 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

9.0 References
C1earWater Environmental Inc. and Wildlands Engineering Inc. (2017) Harmon Dairy Stream
Mitigation Project Mitigation Plan
C1earWater Environmental Inc. (2020) Harmon Dairy Mitigation Project As -Built Report.
Harrelson, Cheryl C; C. L Rawlins; J.P. Potyondy. 1994. Stream channel reference sites: an
illustrated guide to field technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station. 61 p.
Mecklenburg, Dan & Ohio Department of Natural Resources. Copyright 2006. "The Reference
Reach Spreadsheet'' version 4.3 L
Rosgen, David L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers, CATENA,Volume 22, Issue 3.Pages
169-199
U.S. Army Corps of Enbineers 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory
Mitigation Update" — October 24, 2016
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 21 of 21
Monitoring Year 1 Report
October 2020

Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project (+/- 22.28 AC)
Collinsville
r.
C t
N
Project Boundary
v• .
rn �
_ / 1
0
\ / v
T �'!• ryr ¢i?
Q
F
Y
r.,rf�ar� Rv
G
Green Creekreen River
K � [I R .,:I I W EI Ha
Legend Ra •
1 Conservation Easement (22.28 AC) r'Z'
y p
0 0.5 1
Drawn by: AKT Date; 6.17.2020 CEC Project #713_ [�earWaEer MIS@S
0
Polk County, Vicinity
North Carolina 32 Clayton St Figure I
Asheville, North Carolina 28801

Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project (+/- 22.28 AC)
• i 3 T •., r�3ep�" 519�
.268.97'
�
GI5
r, r /} FL
' J 1 _ • i15
Project Boundary -
T,3 0 - f
ti
I J �
RIV�R _ i .. ze3.2
Legend �� •
1 Conservation Easement (22.28 AC)
I / i r77BT �r •.a
l 0 0.5 1 96.
f
Miles
wn WAKT Pat 6.17.2 20 CEC, Project #74f `-
[LearWaEer USGS Topographic Map
Polk County, Fingerville West Quad 1:24k
North Carolina 32 Clayton St Figure 2
Asheville, North Carolina 28801

Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project (+/- 22.28 AC)
Phase I CE (3.84 AC)
i
—_A
UTi
Legend
Conservation Easement (22.28 AC)
E72 Phase I
Q Phase II
Project Streams
Approach
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
� Preservation
� Restoration
— — Crossing
Drawn by: AKT Date; 6.17.2020 CEC Project #747
Polk County,
North Carolina
r � \
`NI, ! �.�� UT3
UT4
UT5
r Or
V
[LearWaEer
•
0 500 1,000
Feet
Project Components
Figure 3
32 Clayton St
, North Carolina 28801

r
I
I '
I
I. I
/
I
� I \
- I \
I
I
I ' Sheet 3 �\
I
r � \
I
r � \
Success criteria met Photo Points (PP) pp�
/
14
r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -/ , i \ / I I - : �" _ w4,- • i--
Sheet 1 /' ' • � `
Sheet -`- - ----- --
/. T — - s — — — — — — — — — —
,' Sheet 5 I i
or
/
/
L—————————————————————————I— — — — —-
I— — — — — —I— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
�e ham,• � Y �'''� ,•; �_. arc. •�. • r; :S'•, :��� `A w���4+i��r"e'r,a�� -�"; �� I . _ ,�r �r . - '
I
Sheet 4
I •I
L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - tij{ Y
1 250 500 1,000
a E. w..�. ti .yam• .''N,+,�jMr�=t" _
i x+fit
JIJUCs; E5U1, to7y% 7777577 _77-3 jT r;]pW05'5, Ua), 17777 !7-7 77 777ro 7777 177% nn_3 7T77 7VJ '77' C JVti
•�

a
�r
1
W,N—Im
•
3
Via' +;, r,�,, ,,,, //
ALMit � �• /� //
Ilk
. Ar
/ ' •' 'fie "
• • i e - , r '� � Y - i li+
10
F Jar— r .� � .�r � �;' -r •yl.
5 Ucs Em, Nn3� nir, -G-goLys, L� ffisitzr c�s�JU wwor ,

Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project (+/- 22.28 AC)
i PP-15
AOC-30
1W
�-AOC-1 1 �
PP-25XS-9' ` t
AOC-36 AOC-20
Polk County,
North Carolina
Y�4,-
r UT2 R
4.31
s .
.� tc
— — AOC-34
-12
1
-• ' PP
AOC-13
VP3 AOC-33
AOC-35
PP-1 40 TVP3 _
AOC-25
s.
IPI - .. —
;.
Legend
.-
QConservation Easement (22.28 AC) Permanent Vegetation Plots (VP)
- MY1BareAreas
Project Streams
- Did not meet success criteria
- Invasive plant management area
'
OJT - Approach
3 ' ^
- Success criteria met
Enhancement I
Cross -Sections
•
`
Temporary Vegetation Plots (TVP)
Enhancement II
• Did not meet success criteria
Fence Line
f
\ 1"' Preservation
O Success criteria met
40 Photo Points (PP)
Restoration
® Gravel Crossing
Low Density of Planted Wood Stems
Y Y
0
50 100 200
- - Crossing
Feet
11F7.1;Es
7 Ma a , d6o0 y ', Ea'rihstar eograpWs, CNESj
it us
, jAeroUKIU, UN, anci Tne ser ommunity
[LearWaEer
Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Monitoring Year 1 Sheet 2
JL l.lA0.y Wll JLLGGI
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Figure 42

-e-
�i-
nservation Easement (22.28 AC) Crossing Gravel Crossing
iii
1
a
-- -- - i -
f T h
r
1 � J
�i .. •
1
• LS5U1, Mn3� nU, Gs�LJs, L�P7'
'�J�L%`1� �7�j,jj.}��14.1111�#IiJ'A�►`l:� :s1EI_Sd51tl1.�JF�. W4�JI �_,J'll llJJJ �_lll_

MT-1
� ////i� �//ice // // •
_ y51
1`YJLV10.L1V11 - Invasive plant management area rc r Siy'
J
m 'r
Cross
Cross-Sections }^ r f •1-•r w / 'Y7�- S}P ,f f�- - + .:` 'y 't - A �. •
Permanent Vegetation Plots (VP) s' L • '
- Did not meet success criteria Photo Points (PP)
t ;__,r '• r� �� ' t �' �i �,
i
- Success criteria met 00
Fence Line - r t . -' ,r • J,^
Low Density of Planted Woody Stems �v ' "', „{'f -+�f r + / S 50 100 200
11 4,r ",� _ r Feet
. ..t.

0
•y1
PP-21 '� r
0 _ r
/
Now
• r
.1
1 50 100 200
wwoss, CrNE)� \ mca� uu, uuur\ uuu�, r\smu�mHu, ru�ov, nwej lm-v L�r�) us-rr c =mtjnRy

Attachment A: Recorded Conservation Easement

2
SnND a RpeL'
etl wIN
.NIaMA G xart
a�lh10.�
eee• ]!p/1!T
fen AK Fr t
19
C
ra
18
fIP
3 C wen•)
w>
15
o-a
Ay ��Enln
.gig
c, D. Sv^t( baetic. Rrohes:mal LOM S.rxyu H^. L-38C1, I. D. Scalt BeeTlc, a Lofy Not lhls plot waa dra.e STATE OF NOfI TH CARMNA
/ lily
ta one w mart of Mow e (alling ea Mtl�m[ad Ihaa. aeaw my wpeMJm kam an actual eur-, mode COUNTY Of POLK
er O' u^dw my avpeM lw (a-d description rN orded in %
OVt Book AS NOTED : that tite beuhaariee not R OKCH oPNt
lase Pat ]a of a r.rx eel amtNH wlegory, of yetl tleaHY at_
9 dra.n hwn 1 elver
Me remrnb Malian f as tnq pwcNs. o rm lien laurp m Ooak h5 NOTED; (hut M< Oea^IY• c }y Mot Na mop ar pint f0
wrt-ardeed y w athH ...pb lv the raL'u 1 prtNafan [a tolcWalea la 1:I000tr tnet thh crrlik[a Im h a�i.ea m 1 ell s[atul^ry
tleMlllen a} subelHaim. Mh plat ras prepared h attord— with G.S, rtquiremants for r wding. A
4T-30 as ama^ded, Wt.— my «lginal a ature, V
U_ SCOTT BSYSTIC PROEES9Cp LAND STIR regielrtollm nurvbH 0^A ae2 [hN _2�'
a
Li[eneu
/ (hm l:cai . No-rP-1136f
MA1T OF ArOHT/( CA]IOIINA
• ���ly AMIA
gyp-„ I�aF`tly NccS uaNLwr•acrc['-�—
_3&01 - !r- _ �->='•y„aJ-J- �et�al�r .�eiu �o r�mmm�.m
y0 f dT(z 1 me ec azaol
s>`�°7s jBroA gOS�• 0
i2D
89lf �•E•�...s+w K IrW aM20a11 toMhee dP.
� 'NYi� Ieer. 0.9Gw.LLe1 99 i�y�
_ WE]•4r�Na6 6 b�
` (r.ra11 _ (rr.eerl QY-�vA��s,o/Y1Y
f%MLLn�NA1MPl
N NYeI`ryf
uee�ae �Ul
(r,••=)
PHASE T CREEK
CONSERVAp°H AREA
167.00 Sq ft
38e A",
pW(Ani niwwpr
AUA3 A1Ax wNe.IPr
I>a..y Pli4-.
pera0e�/a3t
[P—)
XI—)
b
xas �vAAOT_d.
'sNEENAN•
N, X.ae. F:106Teeeae .n
(NAD Le.T(m11). sAc N( 1ppo)
(n.a e3(]oall c.ro:..a
ral� aaaan3olT)
• FpyNO ANON PIN (E1P)
� /
D0:'=A�efnuar
SURVEY FOR
o ser AIa+ PIN (NIP)
JnM(� j.l. �AeMo-,
HARMON DAIRY
Par
nyeaw t it
PHASE 1 CREEK CONSERVATION EASEMENT
Q. NAIL OR RAILROAD SPRKE
NYGRAN7
(r \
CASEMENT AREA UES PN THE LANDS OF
OOUGLAS
Q rELEMP
Nil \
HARMOX dt JAMES ALAN HARMON
DEED BOOK Od-E PAOE Z31
LAMP
LNYiT qE CR Ale
II OR
`TL
PARCEL NIWBER P118-•
bREEN CREEK TOWN SHW, POLK COUNT)', NO
uNu TY POLE
\
E1ELD: I. CRAu DSZVs, E. LANDIS MAPS 1, GRAUDSZU5
WAl H VALIE
\
DAIS: JM 23. 201T
uAp� 23OB1 HARMON DAIRY CREEK CONSERVARCN EA5EMENT
a wA7ER METER (wm)
OAS VA W
\
GRAPHIC SCALE -
SEN£R MANHOLE
\
s00
©O CONCRETE MONVAEHr
(h"• \
® Rr!}rr of wAr M°N(YMENr
p�rao.aR,rn�-e
xa!]d1a
\
• NOTES ••
Q S70rE
(H«I 1. ]
\
K eaa R/W IMle a. app.trimate unlep
I INCH = 1C0 FEET
PraPs-fy LMe
\
Inn.iee nplW.
ar .«d
2. Pri t> N rANcl to w.•l.
AdjolnHr (Sur.wyap)
\
ut Ht1 •�.^•nry, .w0 r1p.4. of ray ma
F
undrptana uNit:.s
%
——A1Jcinen (eat aNr..y.d)
\
'- a ea•'q ph^^•. -�1� vw•• the.
•mw
PflOFESSI ONAL S
— �Righf er R'av
\
«wa^aw e..1rN w..wt
1a�naa p tar boPnAry wrwy.
�URVEYIIJG
�
— - Lines
lm x� a Tm vH hra.notM .I.ewe n..aN
\
�nN
A. Na IroWne 1acm.p e r tAa^ lhoes shown.
IFlRu X0, P-1138]
CN.
Avh
Aephol!
— — — — — L+v.rr
�TE;
•. ear 1M. 1.. 1... ehs•• wN�e
au111. wieNel bray. a•a wra.n. to r en.
arN r e r..q s •lye n•roblbne a umeactr
\
!. lni• .w.wv we pHrw.rna wRhaat the b•n.rt
el a HeN nsea.C.
6. Raprly h eub+ct to rteea;: e^d rwVktiy
bf ...nrd, n epPllcepy.
6 M
206 N. MN STREET
P 0 EO% 1181
Ru1HERPOROTON, NO .13p
PN : (8i B) 2B7-1o59

Page 1 of 1
NC65 M000ment "1}lLL"
N= 566.88.3.27
F= 1.090.9X.17
ti+� ► f 1, Cameron S. Baker State of North Carolina
�� certify that this plat State of North Carolina, County p1 Pplk
�\A CA Rp 1j was drawn under my supervision from an actual survey under County of Polk
my serpervisian, (deed descrrprion recorded in book 4 6 , i r +, filed for registration on thk day of 2012 ")
_d_� ReviewOfFicerof Palk Courrry, p'�� �u
page 580 ) that the ratio of precision as calculated by at .- 51 o'clock M and recorded in
SEAL latitudes and departures does not exceed 7:10,000 and that certify that the map or plat to which this certification is axed
L-4924 - slide L ��% in the office of the
this map was prepared in accordance with G.S. 47.30 as amended meets all statutory requirements far recording c�
Witness my hand and seal this,T day of ��, 20�. �'r Re ister pf Deeds of Potk County
r0•� 300 cam: (� � h
..........
dN 8.6A Heviewumver Date II /A
egr ero s
)Professional Land Surveyor No. L4920
By.' ,Deputy ry
o � t12"IPS
N= 543, 710.05
1, Cameron S. Baker P= 1,067,067.514 U,
Professional Land Surveyor, ceriffy that this
survey is of another category, such as
reeombinabien of existing parcels, a court r �+
ordered survey, or other exception to the g
defin' of subdivision
Prossr d urveyof L-49 0 °5 co
Prot��
5�-� 54"P 764.29'
Global Positioning System Certification (RTR) 00`-
The Positional Accurac Of The RTK Derived Positiorral AD I ' -
L21-L27 Are Tic brFeS Y / _ Ak A
Lire
BearrirLj
Distance
I_ i
5 04° 16'25" E
37,67
L2
5 2002655" W
18.2 P
L3
5 06'03'59" E
� 7. 19'
L4
5 63' 1 2'52" W
90.62'
L5
5 52°20 E 3" W
1-40.62'
L6
I N 46°03'40" W
117.5 I'
I-7
5 35'4044" W
1 2&.46'
h5
N 0600359" W
63.39'
L9
N 20°25'55" E
1 1 7.80'
L I O
N 04010251 W
54.22'
Li I
N 84°39'48" F
134.88'
LI 2
5 231211021, E
146-84'
L13
5 39°42'48" W
i 70,1 1'
L14
5 66°3120" E
130,77'
LI 5
5 24°47'4b" W
119.61'
LIG
5 G8° 1 3105" W
105.05,
L 17
5 72°3034" W
144,GO'
L 18
N 42°28'43" E
1 18 58,
L 19
N 23"2 i'02" W
47.59'
L20
5 21,38,03, E
158.75'
L21
S 00' 18'32" W
35.20'
L22
5 47°45'07" E
50.34'
L23
5 42°49' i 2" W
1 51 .70
L24
N 35°46'44" E
37.47'
L25
5 13"0330" E
25. 17'
L26
N 68°2136" E
25.01'
L27
N 72`3034" E
142,53'
lnforrrrafron is 0.03 NORZOntaf & 003 UMMW 65°AS'0�i
Horizontal Positional Are Referenced to NAD 83 (NSRS2011)
Vertical Ppsitlans Are Referenced To NAVD B& (Geoid 12)
Combined Factor 0.99904087 (Ground To- Grid)
Equipment Used., Carlson Supervisor* GP5 Tablet h' 35 ! I`26.
J / W
/
ash / AREA 2 I /
1 J 1✓ r
/ 24'GMP A FAvf
5/8" F15
Phase l Creek Flush IN/Ground? i ! L26 f
� Z3O'08
` Conservation Fasemerrt
P, 8, F, Pig, 734
5/6
r
Plush WlGround 2/
N= 542,451,54 \��� / J" Alcrxuweil
P=rate, 652. BO y 0°39' / • 11.3. TU P#. 7679
\� Fliy, Plf} 59
S 67*47'0s" e R54.30'
\ AREA 3
�^•,` fi+ � L} b ���`�o'� 1, .1
ors (Jr, stump)
IV
3a�g5a"1?�� (in 5tump)
Notes: 25 00
!. Property iv 5ub1ect to i4l easements, restrrctroris and right of ways of record. �_ sr 3k
I30'
2. The locations of underground utrhtie6 are based an above -ground structures N -`� � �{ ? � \
:,nd record drawings provided to the Surveyor, Locations of underground 33i"
vhlities/gtructures may vary from locations shoNin hereon, Additional
L
1,vned utifltre5/5,rvcture5 may be encountered.
3. 5urveyor 1a5 made rro :nveytrgatron or independent Search for easements of record, ns 2'
encumbrarrce3, restrictive covenants, owrier5hip title ewdeace. orany other facts that Tie Li5 &
an accurate title. search may disclose. 4, `W
Y Pence Post
4. The certification of survey and plat was prepared for the entity named in the title block
hereon and does not extend to any other entity, unless recert Fred by the professional land
500 veyar. 17c%3vr,
5. All mrscelianeou5 survey related materials, viccNding but,rot 8mitcd to, project plans, ` 152, l.7:k,Py. ?0.'P
deed and ROW research, maps, field notes and data, Survey reports, record title report, B.
calculatrcn5, vrorkrng drawing_, estimates, and other materials acgwred ar 4,br prepared Prn; P719 AS
by the surveyor as instruments of service shall remarry the property of the surveyor and assigns, I
6. rule draining , not valid unless the original signature and stamp are attached. Any repraductron ! t 1 Legend;
or va rar+ce to this 90ivi°y by eiectrpmc or any other means are not to be considered issued try the j R frnga \ FiP - [xistrne Iron Pipe
profe55ionai surveyor, .- Ae 3�24' P�. 567 E15 = Fyrst;ng Iron Stake
P.8, F, Pg. 76
7 Area by Coordinate Computatrnn. Pin; Pi10-74 ` 1_ 1, = i12"�lrol 7 ipet.5et
r � -
1�0 0 100 200 30C
GRAPHIC SCALE - FEET
� krdings
A.R. 394, Pq 55R 1
AA F, Pg 74
Pih: P110-76
Unmarked Point, Unless Otherwise Noted
- - - — T Centeriine of Creek
= Proposed FaSraeat bne 5
CMP = Corrugated Metal Pipe
Lfrnnee Rd
Hwy .9 J
r f
Harmony Dairy Lnf� �
.51TF
Hwv 5"
Jim Page Rd
NOT TO 5CALt
Vicinity Mop
Illlli�f�l�klii�lilkll I111iIIINlIIII IIIII III�llllill�lll Illll I�Illillll IIII IIII
Doc 10: 00468623CO01 rope: CPP
Recorded: O2/28/2018 at 08:31:00 AM
Fee Alt; $21.00 Page f of 2
Polk Nc
Sheba 'Whitmire Register of Deeds
BKF Po1020
A Poftrau Wthat Pic pertyas descril-1
in P. R. 4-F Pg. W
Ptupo5ed Easement5w-my OF
114rmon D4ity
N45e 2 Creek Coowv4tion Eqsement
- Owner -
M7dy land Company LIC
PS. 4,?6, Py, 580
Pin: P119-4
Grsen Creek Township I Polk County, NC
ASSOCIATED LAND SURVEYORS
& PLANNERS PG
P.O. BOX 578 * HORSE SHOE, NC 28742
[phone] NC BUSINESS LICENSE NO. C-2774
save i Inch = 700 Feet IDA7e (-ebrucry 27 2018
zo— 5-17-181-HOCE I - WRY, CSB ASH ce6970
Book: F Page: 1020 Page 1 of 1
Book: F Pane: 1020 Sea: 1

Attachment B: Cross Section Comparison Plots and Photographs

Harmon Dairy Stream Restoration Project
Geomorphic Monitoring
Cross Sections
891
890
889
Y 888
c
887
(U
w 886
885
884
883
0
889
888
887
886
c 885
0
884
v
w
883
882
881
880
0
Cross Section 1 - UT2 Reach 3 STA 13+26
10 20 30
Station (ft)
Cross Section 2 - UT2 Reach 3 STA 13+66
40
50
60
10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (ft)

Harmon Dairy Stream Restoration Project
Geomorphic Monitoring
Cross Sections
854
853
852
851
850
c
849
fa
wai 848
847
846
845
844
0
854
852
850
c
848
fa
v
w
846
844
842
0
10
10
Cross Section 3 - UT2 Reach 4 STA 28+73
20
30
Station (ft)
Cross Section 4 - UT2 Reach 4 STA 28+80
20 30
Station (ft)
40
40
50
50
-MYO
-MY1
BKF
60
60

Harmon Dairy Stream Restoration Project
Geomorphic Monitoring
Cross Sections
832.5
832
831.5
831
0
a> 830.5
w
830
829.5
829
0
832.5
832
831.5
c
0
wai 831
830.5
830
0
Cross Section 5 - UT1 STA 7+20
10 20 30
Station (ft)
10
Cross Section 6 - UT1 STA 7+51
20 30
Station (ft)
40
40
50
50
60
60

Harmon Dairy Stream Restoration Project
Geomorphic Monitoring
Cross Sections
912
911
910
Y 909
c
908
fa
v
w 907
906
905
904
0
911
910
909 -
w 908 -
c
907 -
fa
v
w 906
905
904
903
0
Cross Section 7 - UT3 Reach 2a STA 104+59
10 20 30
Station (ft)
10
Cross Section 8 - UT3 Reach 2a STA 104+96
20 30
Station (ft)
40
40
50
50
-MYO
- MYl
- BKF
- MYO
- MYl
- BKF
60
60

Harmon Dairy Stream Restoration Project
Geomorphic Monitoring
Cross Sections
912
911
910
Y 909
c
908
fa
v
w 907
906
905
904
0
911
910
909 -
w 908 -
c
907 -
fa
v
w 906
905
904
903
0
Cross Section 7 - UT3 Reach 2a STA 104+59
10 20 30
Station (ft)
10
Cross Section 8 - UT3 Reach 2a STA 104+96
20 30
Station (ft)
40
40
50
50
-MYO
- MYl
- BKF
- MYO
- MYl
- BKF
60
60

Harmon Dairy Stream Restoration Project
Geomorphic Monitoring
Cross Sections
852
851
850
849
0
v 848
w
847
846
845
0
853
852
851
850
c 849
0
848
v
w
847
846
845
844
0
Cross Section 9 - UT3 Reach 4 STA 121+34
10 20 30
Station (ft)
10
Cross Section 10 - UT3 Reach 4 STA 122+11
20 30
Station (ft)
40 50
40
50
-MYO
- MYl
- BKF
- MYO
- MYl
- BKF
60
60

Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 1 of 2
MY1 Cross -Section Photos (9/4/2020 and 9/23/2020)

I Cross Section 7 — MY1 I Cross Section 8 — MY1 I
Cross Section 9 — MY1 I Cross Section 10 — MY1
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 2 of 2
MY1 Cross -Section Photos (9/4/2020 and 9/23/2020)

Attachment C: Vegetation Data Tables and Photographs

Harmon Calm Stream Restoration Pmiect
Permanent Vegetation Monitoring Plots- MY3
Current Plot Data (MY3 2020)
Annual Summa ry
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
747-01-0001
747-01-0002
747-01-0003
747-01-0004
747-01-0005
747-01-0006
747-01-0007
MY1(2020)
MYO (2019)
Pnol-S
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Inus serrulata
Tag Alder, Smooth Ald
Shrub Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Buttonbush
Sh rub Tree
2
2
2
7
7
7
2 2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
15
15
15
16
16
16
Diospyros virginiana
American Persimmon,
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Hamamelis virginiana
Shrub Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
3
3
3
Liquidambar styraciflua
Sweet Gum, Red Gum
Tree
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tree
1
1
Physocarpus opulifolius
Shrub
1
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore, Plane -tree
Tree
1
1
1
3 3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
8
8
8
9
9
9
Populus deltoides
Tree
1
1
Quercus michauxii
Basket Oak, Swamp C
Tree
1 1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
Rhus glabra
Smooth Sumac
Shrub Tree
1
1
1
Salix nigra
Black Willow
Tree
3
3
12
Salix sericea
Silky Willow
Shrub Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
4
4
4
4
8
11
9
9
9
Spiraea latifolia
Broadleaf Meadowsw
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Unknown
;41
14
14
14
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
1 1
1
6
6
8
11
11
12
5 5
5
2
2
5
6
6
9
10
10
11
41
51
58
58
71
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
7
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.17
0.17
1 1
1
4 4
6
4
4
5
2 2
2
1
1
2
4
4
6
6
7
8
8
13
9
9
11
40.47
40.47
242. 242.8
323.7
445.2
445.2
485.6
202.3
202.3
4
80.94
202.3
242
242.8
364.2
404.7
404.7
445.2
237
237
294.8
335.3
335.3
410.5
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Includes "volunteer" or natural woody stems in total

� ' x
3.3
H
4
ft
R,"WI
�a
y _
2y19,1rJ
0 117 120191110
S
_ -
f
Vegetation
Monitoring
I
��� . I I I •
I
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 1 of 3
MY1 Vegetation Monitoring Plots (8/12/2020 and 8/14/2020)

Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 2 of 3
MY1 Vegetation Monitoring Plots (8/12/2020 and 8/14/2020)

Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 3 of 3
MY1 Vegetation Monitoring Plots (8/12/2020 and 8/14/2020)

Attachment D: Visual Assessment Photographs

A I"
r
r
— — !
Q111112019 -18- 20`' �'�' � 08! Ik020.1^0 18�
Photo Point 1 view upstream
st N, t�
V \ � •
10-19
. -.��� ����;e t is �:~ +�� •• _ .k 1A_ � ro
41
xrlit-
Ldy�
rq
`07J1U2Q 9.13 2( — a ". 087P2°12070 IQ 2L

J, All
0,llr�2019�1335
_

Y...
MIMIC
y r
Photo Point 5 view downstream MYO Photo Point 5 view downstream MY1 Due to tall
vegetation blocking the view of the stream
channel, PP5 was moved approximately 50 ft
downstream on the left bank outer meander bend.
I Photo Point 6 view upstream MYO I Photo Point 6 view upstream MY1 I
g
Photo Point 6 view downstream MYO
Photo Point 6 view downstream MY1
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 4 of 20
MY1 Photographic Documentation (8/12/2020 and 8/14/2020)

Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 5 of 20
MY1 Photographic Documentation (8/12/2020 and 8/14/2020)

Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 6 of 20
MY1 Photographic Documentation (8/12/2020 and 8/14/2020)

Photo Point 10 view downstream MYO
Photo Point 10 view downstream MY1 ** Due to
tall vegetation blocking the view of the stream
channel, PP 10 was moved downslope closer to the
right bank
INN -
,y
dPaei
Photo
Point 11 view upstream MYO Photo Point 11 view upstream MY1
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 7 of 20
MY1 Photographic Documentation (8/12/2020 and 8/14/2020)

Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 8 of 20
MY1 Photographic Documentation (8/12/2020 and 8/14/2020)

Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 9 of 20
MY1 Photographic Documentation (8/12/2020 and 8/14/2020)

Photo Point 14 view downstream MYO
Photo Point 15 view
i
MYO
Photo Point 14 view downstream MY1
Photo Point 15 view upstream MY1
Photo Point 15 view downstream MYO I Photo Point 15 view downstream MY1
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 10 of 20
MY1 Photographic Documentation (8/12/2020 and 8/14/2020)

Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 11 of 20
MY1 Photographic Documentation (8/12/2020 and 8/14/2020)

Photo Point 17 view downstream MYO
Photo Point 17 view downstream MY1
Photo Point 18 view upstream MYO I Photo Point 18 view upstream MY1
' ti.41� '
'.
I
A
Photo Point 18 view downstream MYO Photo Point 18 view downstream MY1
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 12 of 20
MY1 Photographic Documentation (8/12/2020 and 8/14/2020)

Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 16 of 20
MY1 Photographic Documentation (8/12/2020 and 8/14/2020)

I Photo Point 25 view upstream MYO I Photo Point 25 view upstream MY1 I
Photo Point 25 view downstream MYO
Photo Point 26 view upstream MYO
Photo Point 25 view downstream MY1
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 17 of 20
MY1 Photographic Documentation (8/12/2020 and 8/14/2020)

I Photo Point 26 view downstream MYO I Photo Point 26 view downstream MY1 I
Photo Point 27 view upstream MYO I Photo Point 27 view upstream MY1
Photo Point 27 view downstream MYO I Photo Point 27 view downstream MY1
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 18 of 20
MY1 Photographic Documentation (8/12/2020 and 8/14/2020)

Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 19 of 20
MY1 Photographic Documentation (8/12/2020 and 8/14/2020)

Photo Point 29 view downstream MYO Photo Point 29 view downstream MY1
Photo Point 30 view upstream MYO I Photo Point 30 view upstream MY1
Photo Point 30 view downstream MYO I Photo Point 30 view downstream MY1
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 20 of 20
MY1 Photographic Documentation (8/12/2020 and 8/14/2020)

Attachment E: Areas of Concern