20071050 Ver 3_401 Application_20110311

P
March 3, 2011

r
TRANSMITTAL
To: Ian McMillan Re: NCSU Greenway Phase IV
401 Certification and Walnut Creek Bridges
Oversight NCSU Project #: 201011069
512 N. Salisbury St. SCO ID#:
Raleigh, NC 27603
RJ Project No. 0901-02
0'1- loso v3
Copies Date Drawing No. Description
m..1med ¦
Under Separate Cover ? 1 02/07/11 Cover Letter
Drawings ¦ 5 02/03/11 Sheet L-101 Overall Site Plan
Specifications ?
Cost Estimates ? 5 02/03/11 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
Chance Order?
AESI? 1 02/24/11 Check
Samples ?
Submittals ?
Reports?
Catalogue Cuts ?
Proposals 13 MAR 3
Photography ?
Other? DENR_- PIVAFER4DAL
8 ftnq 1
As Requested ?
f of Your [)see
For Review ¦
rof Your intormation ? Remarks:
Please send any comments or questions to:
Justin Montgomery [e-mail]
John Tucker - [e-mail]
it enclosures are not as
noted. please notify the
author immediately
By: Justin Montgomery
Cc:
pgIof I
February 7, 201 1
Ian McMillan
401 Certification and Oversight
512 N Salisbury St
Raleigh, NC 27603
[MAR
DEfd?. .,
Re: Centennial Campus Greenway PH.IV Walnut Creek Bridges
Dear Mr. McMillan:
Thank you for your input regarding the possibility of using a pre-fabricated bridge
designed by NC State University College of Engineering students to cross Walnut
Creek on Centennial Campus when we contacted you in August 2009. If you recall
the bridge was not designed for the proposed site and there were issues with length
and height. After many discussions and studies the University decided not you use the
College of Engineering Bridge for this site. We are now moving forward using pre-
fabricated bridges designed to meet the needs of the project. A second bridge has
been added to the scope of the project extending the proposed greenway path
approximately 1,500 feet down stream to complete a loop for the NC State Cross
Country Team. Future phases will connect the greenway path to Lake Wheeler Road.
We have revised the design to minimize impacts to stream buffers and incorporate
comments from our original discussions with you. The bridges have been sited to take
best advantage of natural grade to reduce the amount of boardwalk required and
the foundations are set back a minimum of 10 feet from the top of the stream bank.
Our civil engineering consultant, John Tucker has performed a flood study of the
channel to determine the volume, velocity and level of water in the channel for a
100-year storm event. Mr. Tucker's findings indicate a no rise situation and we have
set the bridge elevations to be above the 100-year flood level. With this submittal we
have included the overall site plan that shows the bridge locations and the
connecting asphalt greenway path. An asphalt greenway path is located in the
sewer easement outside the 50 foot stream buffer, with one exception where the path
intersect with an existing stream crossing with in the sewer easement.
The university is eager to move forward with the design and construction documents
and we would appreciate your earliest attention to this submittal.
Again, thanks for all your assistance throughout this process.
With kind regards,
Justin Montgomery
ynolds 8. J we I
110107pcn_cover_leller.doc
P% I of l
f e,°F W A TF
_° v
1 > `i
o -r
y?
L
Dl-tb5c U3
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
El Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NA or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ? No For the record on

? Yes ly for Corps Permit:

? No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Centennial Walnut Creek Bridges
2b. County: Wake

2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh 'W L7
2d. Subdivision name: North Carolina State University
3
9n,.
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: iyDFjyR e
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina State University
3b. Deed Book and Page No. NA
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Charles D. Leffler, Vice Chancellor of Business & Finance
3d. Street address: Holladay Hall B, Campus Box 7201
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27695
3f. Telephone no.: 919-515-2155
3g. Fax no.: 919-515-5121
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: John A.K. Tucker
5b. Business name
(if applicable): John A.K. Tucker, P.E. - Consutling Engineer
5c. Street address: PO Box 297
5d. City, state, zip: Fuquay Varina, N.C. 27526
5e. Telephone no.: 919-597-0483
5f. Fax no.: NA
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 0793521758
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.62666 Longitude: - 78.674103
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 55 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Walnut Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C;NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
This site is a mix of developed and early successional forest. There are mature trees including Cottonwood, White Oak,
Tulip Poplar, Eastern Red Cedar, Sycamore, River Birch, as well as a shrub layer in upland areas, and tall grasses in the
lower lying areas. The land use is generally for passive recreation and institutional use for circulation.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
6.5
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
4286
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the Centennial Walnut Creek Bridges is to extend the Centennial Campus Greenway to a point 1500 feet
east of Main Campus Drive as part of the master plan. The project will provide a pedestrian connection from NC State's
Greenway to Poole Golf Course and a proposed cross country trails on the south side of Walnut Creek. The greenway
will also provide access for educational activities where students can study natural habitat on both sides of the creek.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The greenway construction will create a multipurpose path around the northern portion of Lake Raleigh and along Walnut
Creek on the Centennial Campus of NC State University. At the western terminus, the path ends at the University
property line near Trailwood Drive. The City of Raleigh plans to meet the University greenway at this location for a
continuous path to Lake Johnson. To the southeast, the path ends at the existing tunnel under Lake Wheeler Road near
the Farmers Market. From this tunnel City of Raleigh greenway path continues to Walnut Creek. The path is designed
using several of the Guiding Principles of the University Master Plan: 1) Human-Scaled Neighborhoods and Paths, 2)
Environmental Sustainability, 3) City Context, 4) Universal Design, 5) Pedestrian-Oriented Campus. It is expected that a
combination of heavy and light earth moving equipment will be used to construct the path.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
[Z Yes ? No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ® Yes ? No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
The following permits have been issued for separate projects that were constructed along the North Creek corridor. All
three projects are complete.
NC State North Creek Stormwater Wetland - DWQ # 06-1445
North Creek Constructed Wetlands - DWQ # 04-0233
Greenway Project Phase I - DWQ # 07-1050
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? N Yes ? No
6b. If yes, explain.
The greenway will extend to Lake Wheeler Road and connect to the City of Raleigh Greenway System
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number -
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
T 4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable) 4c.

Type of impact 4d.

Waterbody type 4e.

Area of impact (acres)
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.

Pond ID 5b.

Proposed use or purpose of 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
number pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) for impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
or Temporary required?
T
61 ®P ? T t
Footbrge Walnut Creek ® Yes
? No 1602 3225
B2 ®P ? T Greenway
Path Tributary to Walnut Creek ® Yes
? No 1248 861
B3 ®P ? T FootEast bridge Walnut Creek ®? Nos 1295 880
6h. Total buffer impacts 4145 4966
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Proposed buffer impact #1, West footbridge over Walnut Creek: The footbridge is located perpendicular to Walnut Creek
(angle between 70-120°) and links the greenway path to the Lonnie Poole Golf Course and proposed cross country running
trails. Supports are set back from the top of bank to avoid stream impacts.
Proposed buffer impact #2, greenway path over existing culvert: The path uses an existing culvert located in an existing
sewer easement that is generally clear of vegetation.
Proposed buffer impact #3, East footbridge over Walnut Creek: The footbridge is located perpendicular to Walnut Creek
(angle between 70-120°) and links greenway path to the Lonnie Poole Golf Course and proposed cross country running trails.
Supports are set back from the top of bank to stream impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
A sedimentation and erosion control plan will be implemented as well a use of appropriately sized machinery to minimize the
about of disturbed area.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ® Yes ? No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ® DWQ ? Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ? Payment to in-lieu fee program
® Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
Page 7of11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 9111 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Yes
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ® Yes ? No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 Footbridge & Greenway 4145 3 (2 for Catawba) 12,435
Zone 2 Footbridge & Greenway, 4966 1.5 7,449
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 19,884
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
Through the successful completion of the CVM and Lake Wheeler Stream & Buffer Restoration Project, the University
was granted permission to bank unused credits for future projects. The amount of available mitigation credits is currently:
350 linear feet of stream credit and 62,900 square feet of buffer credit. It is the University's intention to utilize these
credits for any required mitigation associated with the Greenway Project.
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: No storm water infrastructure is required for this project and project is ? Yes ® No
less than 20 percent impervious
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 9.3%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Impervious area is less than 20%
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? NA
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ® NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes ? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NA
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCSU
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Flood study indicates that impacts will not cause a rise in flood
levels upstream of impacts
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FIRM Panel 0793 and HecRAS Computer Program
Le P
A??
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's i Mature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authoriz?licant Date
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
\ 1
a z7soo--- - - - - ,
. ~ v - - - ` ~ s~,at-- ~ \ ;ice _ ,
- ~ Reynolds
i / / / / ~ / •w swFl ~ ~ ( , ~ ~ ~ e, ~ J~~vef1
~ o / - / / \.J
I a , ~ ~ a , i wv 1 ~ 1 r
PIPE , i
ACHIEVEMENT DRIVE ~ - v ICVO
~ ~ ~ , -
VAULTS %PE\ o`..~ ~ i r LILY " 0 ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ` Landscape Architecture
_i. h ~ ~ ~ , ` ~ tand P#annir>g
Sa'_ t , _ _ - _ V _ 265.00 _ _ _ _ - _ _ ~ 1 1 ~ _ _ _ ~ J siocwwnix EtE4 CON1Aln ~ - - ~ 1 ~ r - ~ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ - DWQ STREAM BUFFER IMPACT AREA #3 AREA #3 ~ ~ - ( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
_ _ _ \ r _ - - - _ - ~ _ ~ _ - _ -30 FERENCROACHMENT. 1,295S _ _ ~ 1,295 SF ~ , ~ ° ~ - ~ X18 SnavV /~V~
- ~ ~ , _ - - BUF \ - ~ 'r'~ ' / _ - I / ~ ~ - _ = 30-50 BUffER ENCROACHMENT: 880 Sf \ 71VJlSFUAMEA ;~0~ r - \\~r \ ~ /'ll1' - - BsosF -~'I~~~~`l'Ji~'~ ~ ~ t%/j ~ ~ ~ RaleighN~ 27603
/ - 7
I - 111„.r _ -1/' i,1, ELEVATED BOARDWALK; WOOD FRAME / - " LLB l .%i ~ ~ r 141x1 _ ~ / t, ~ , FRAME _ ~ ~ < t; ~ ~ iri ~j ~I~ ~ ~ ~;W
/ , ~ ~ ~ WITH TREXDECK; @ 5 amn~n IGV ) % / r~ I ~ - ~ 5;00% _ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ % ~'rW ~ T . {919) $21-5074
/ _ , , ~ - ti - r ' ~ ' 1 ; ; I I ; ~ ~ . - oo ; - CORTEN STEELBRIDGE W/CONCRETE „r . , ~ , , ~ __ifi . i -v NCRETE ^ . ~ r~~ ~ ~~u` i f _z tC1X 91 1 V ( 9) 82_ -5139
1 , , ' ' 4 ~ I . - _ DEC - K, 1 ~ - " _ " ~ - _ o SLOPE _ ~ . r N ~ ~ www,reynojdsjewell.corn
r /r4` I / 1 1 t ~ 1 ~ ° ~ ~ 1 I I I
~ , /~~g~ /,i/ I I I o I ( t. ~ - r ~ ~r,, / ~ , , , ~ I _ ~ ,I , ;1(I r l I I 60' SPAN; 10' OFFSET FROM TOP OF BANK
r a ~ ~,1 ill t 1~I1( / 1 1 - ? , v 1 ,1 ~I,I / „I,,,/ III; ~ ~T 1: " 1 I ,Y~ i< ; ~~~!^,r~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ consultants:
r l , r 1111 t r I 1 1 v r ~ / r-- ~ . / / . ~ 1 1 ~ r. ~a ~ I! r 1~1 l / , ~ 111 { t , 1 w ~~v ~ ~ il~il l t 111 g r 11(1 r / 1'C 1 t_/` v 1 I 1 v' ~`7 - ~I:'11 ~ ~ r
r, - !,II(i l1 `v ~ _ I ~ 1 vv `_~w `v I I A ' ~ i r ~ ~ / iw'11t :I r' 1 ~1, ~1 ~ / 9 ,,Ir Iir v r` I ~ ~ - ~ v v I I / 1 ~ v.` ~ - r I~~.I`I l~ ~ ~ 1E _ _
i ,Irk{ICI ~ r _ _ _v vw v I / ~i ~ I I t r;l 1 I'` r r I l l 1 ,lil I ~ _ ~ '~1 , / \ ~ ~I ~ \\~,1`y,/ ~,ry II\1,111 /
I ~rl 11 l II ~ l ~ \ \ ~ ~ 1 / - / .l ~ ,~C- ! ~t I I 111' , v 1 A v I v / ~ •.i 11 I 1 ,dill 11 1 r ,III t 1 1 A v - - A , 11 ICI A lli l~llll 1 .III, 1 i i r t 1 1 'V A , 1-. v , I. ~ `r 1.1 I, I I i
,1 ~ ~ ~ la~ol I ~ t , , v v , , , , ~ ;r ~ . ~ , 1 I r \ \ 1 i ~ / ~ ~ ~W / 5~ ~ - ~ . ~ / / ~ ~ ~ ~ v,, 1, ~~1 ~ -
v( I drl NI 1 I 1 / v 1 1 v v ~ - 1 i ~ v \ r I, i 111 I: _ I 1 I ~I 1 / v v t A / ~ :1111 / \ i , ~ ~IIiIrlnlil 1 1 / \ t \ \ ~ \
rl 1 , , . I ~ ~ ~ ~ , ; ~ ;r~'~ ELEVATED BOARDWA~.K; WOOD FRAME ~ , / ~ s~ I I ~ R , I ~ - W1THTREX DECK; 30 @ 5:001 FRAME ' t ~ > ( / ~ ire ~ ~ h° ~ ~ ~ 5:00°10 - , ~r~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~
1 ~ , II,i1, ,v v v v , ,,I~ 1 ,1111 iII r / ~ ~ `t(~. ~ 1 111 III ~ - `\v~~, I :n ~ ~iir,y', '`,I a~~ it , ~ ~ ~ \ ~ .
_ 1 1 it _.A ~ 9'Il jllI111I1V~_ ~ i I ~~II ~iIII'I /
i i, ~ ~ rlil I1~`- ~ ~ss~~,'~. v X11 r~'~, ~I 111 t~'lill ~ RGEET PLAN _
I , 111 f sir' ~ rv v v r r_ ~i 1 ~ ~I!~ii~~ / Ir ~ VIII, _ ~J vv~v v A ~v v ~l ~ ~ I fl ~ 'I,IIi' / I i ~v 1 I I r r)1 ~ ~ ~ v~ vvvv v r 1 7 , :11111, ~ ,
r y 111= ~ vv` v1 'L ~ i ~~a ~ Iol l 1 r t v_.z~- \ , ~ ~ ~ 1 . , 0 20 40 80 ~A~ ~ 20~~
v 1111b1i1 1 ~ vvv~ v ~ v ~(i III1j11 I ) 11 i, lllrv 11 ~ 1 ~ ~ \ t 1 , Il~ 11111x1
1,111111 ) A , _ - _ , ~ ~ ~ d j, Sr I II' tv`v'~ ~V, ,A~ l~,al~I Al / , _ _ - v / I 1111 1,111 ~ Vt1~~tAv\vv\ ~ ~e~lll '1 a§sna_ - ~ ~ / Ir f f1 n 1 , I I v, w v~v v
r I I - _ ~ = - ~ ~ / it ~ l i vv vv'v v v ~v'.~ v I 1 - I \ I _ _ - ~ A _ _ ~ a _ - , _ 1 \ o t _ 1 111 ) , - ~ ~ 1 >~ii1': ;,11= v v v y ~ ~ti1' III114N' I 1 _ ~ ~ `t~ ;g ..,.I,,il1 IIi1, r' v, vvVA~~~v~~V~\~ .w.,.l~~s~
i _ 1 o i oooe 1 r i i / ~ _ - - ~ t 111 i~ 111 '~'1 ~ 11 i `~~`v~ v`v.~~\ ~
~ I I 1 1 ~ _ 1 I1 1 i II ` it li 1 1 vv v vvv~_A~ w,,. 11 r~~11 / _ i, t1 ~ ~ 11 h Is1: ~Ij11 l- r vv Av v v
~oi6tt~ld# j F 1. - 1 / _ -28p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I v ,u~ I I 1 4 1 1 ~ I 1 1 I' Vv~ v v~ ~V A,-,..' " I 1111 1A I / .Op, A. . ~ _ ( I r v v ` 0 7'1~ ti~ ~ 0
` ~ 11j1'11 \ 1 ,r ~ \ ~ i I LI ~ II 1'lllflil ~ 4 b:. I, 11x111 \ r LEVATED ~ ~ ~ 111 I r 1 , 1 ~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~
\ I I r r 1 \ E BOARDWALK; WOOD FRAME - ~ ~ I , , , ~ \ i n11j11 ~ _ v 1 li i11~1~1,1 ~ vt r :~tl I , ~ WIFH TREX DECK; T-b" @ S.QQ% I \ \ ~ ~ ~ I I , ~ , ~ . , ~ Seal:
/ f1 i X1111 ~ ~ ,1~ ~ V~~ 1 , t.A _ ~ vv VGA vi 1 \ F` i % ` ~ I(i Rllli / ~ wd I / 1 Iv ~ `t 11. v1 I rr~
, , „ r \ T)1N,Q STREAM B~1FF~R IMPACT AREA ~k1 ~S ~ / r 4 , } \ , \ I ` - 11' 1l `11 ll' , 0'-~' BUFFER ENC'ROAC'HMENT: 1,6b2 SF oq ; 7 r~ ~ - ~iPenv i" 111 v1 = ' E',~t v `v~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ r ! i
u I r ~ / ~ ~ i I,I , _ 1 'v,. , v v v` ~ ~ t 111 1x1 , { ~ I I, ' A \ 30'-50' BUFFER ENCROACHMENT; 3,225 SF / ~ ~ ~ i I ~ v v ` ~ v v ~ ~ , I I 1 ' , i it
l/ ~ i _ 1 i ~ I - _ l ~ P o d i~ I, ~ \ qq
V ~ v i I i ~ 11 II I , _ ~r , I w~,,.. , _ ~ - ,r _ _ _ ' 'v ~ " , / A it 1 ~ ~~C ~ ~ ~ - ~ 111,,1 I , ,~~,'l, i vvv V ~ A~~"~ ,'I~~I,~ ~ ~ o
_ _ /111x41 i/~~ ~ i ~ r---- v 111 I - - ~r1 r/
_ _ Irl,11~411i1,1 ~ i .r-^--= r A I ~ /'l, 1 ~ I I _ ~ _ _ _ - -"~J~//r!/ I s ® ~ m
I. 1, ~ ~.,~r , ~ _ ~ _ ` ~ 1 111 ~ ~ r- ~ ter`' ~ i i ~ ~ : ~ f~ u
~y ~ --4`_'_. _ v 1 1 1, sarEZ _ ~ \ I ( ~~It ~~+~.1 /i wsnw - P \ .\J~, ~ , ! _ t,""~~` R `8,00
1 _=J n~ \JJlI;~,. _ ~ - LIMI`tS OF i I ~,~,1 ~°'~~,~n~oR,E - - WOR it ~~°z ~ P~~8d3EDtl41ti4~
' ~ ~ ` ~ ~ _~1 ~ I i EXISTING 15"CONCRETE PIPE STREAM / , _:~li ~ _ ti / l --a- - ` , 1 ~ ~ ~ _ - ~ 2 ~ ~ - ; . , ~ _ _ - ~~AaE~E~A.~~«A~ ~ I ~ ' - `CROSSING WITH IN SEWER EASEMENT i
/
- . ~ _ v~ ; CORTEN STEEL BRIDGE W/ CONCRETE ~ " ~ ~ ~l 1, ~It11 DWQ STREAM BUFFER IMPACT AREA #2 _ / ~ DECK12%CROWN ~ ~ L',_ - Project ~
l(jY;~~}' ' " 1 - ~,0'-30'BUFFER ENCROACHMENT 1248SF ' I 30'-50' BUFFER ENCROACHMENT. 861 SF ~ ~ Wc~in~# Greek Bridges at
/l////ri`,/ ~ ~ - ~'ST'SPAN;10''OFFSEfFROMTOPOFBANK ~ _ _ ~ Centennial Campus
~ r' Greenway
, w a~, d ~ ~ ~ , _ ~ Raleigh, NorHi Carolina -
"r ~ _ ' ' _ _ ~
/u i ,r ~ ~ ELEVATED BOARDWALK; WOOD FR av~~ _ i _ _ _ _ _ - - - ~ , I ' , I \ ~ _ . \ ~ ~ . \ - ~ _ 7~ _ , ~j~~/rr///~~rr, ~J W1T TRfXDECK•3S'@5:0%s /"o. \ ~
~ Cren#
r __--_~i 1_,, Ul` ~ - ~~r - _ ~ - N~ State Unvers~r
/ / v ` r ~ ~ - ~t. I , f ~r~ _ ~ /v 1 ~ p~~g1ySE ~ \._._-~.r-
~ ~ NCSU Project No.: 201011069
_ _ ~ - RJ ProjectNo. p901_02 1~~..L._( "1
,
'Ili ~ r I I I
I 1 I I I I \ PROPOSED 8' ASRAHLT GREENWAY WITH 2' STONE ` I I I I ~ ELEVATED BOARDWALK; WOOD fRAME _ I I I ~ APRON ON EACH SIDE; CONSTRUCTION IS IN AN AREA ` JNE ~ ~ ' r ' AN AREA - - _ _ ~ ~ ~ _
/ I, I I I I i i , ~ WITN TREX DECK, 7 -6 @ 5.00% ALREADY IMPACTED BY EXISTING SEWER EASEMENT RENT ~'~'1+ ~ ~ ~
/ ~ l l ~I 1 ~ ~ ~ AND ALREADY HAS BEEN CLEARED OF TREES / 1 ~I r 1
~ !1 ~ ~ ~ , , -DWQ STREAM BUFFER IMPACT AREA # 1 1 ~ ~ / ~ , , o u l ~ m U ' ~ Ffi
I I I ~ 0-30 BUFFER ENCROACHMENT: 1,602 SF o a~ ~ .th ~ ~ ~IgrP ~8kri'~re °e~+Yr~ w l ~ ~ ~ , i _ - _ r~ x n 71 f his _
r - B FFER ENCROACHMENT: 3 225 SF ~ ~~T~~ ~~~'r~~ ~ P, ~ p~ ~ , ~
(1111 v \ ~ ~ `r' r~ ~ ' r ~`~Y,~i ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ i ,4i, p ~ ~ ii
o \ 4 "_l~~,el4sa`t}, t4 .,,ir6, J DWQ STREAM BUFFER IMPACT AREA #3 i , ~ a ; ~ ~ ~ ~ 0'-30' BUFFER ENCROACHMENT: 1,295 SF
30'-50' BUFFER ENCROACHMENT: 880 SF ~ ~ ~ ii ~ ~ ~.y ~ ~ „r~';~~` ~ ` t ~
/ ~ - ELEVATED 8(JARDWALK; WOOD FRAIv1E ~ ~ n ~ w r a~~~ ;
l/loll 111 ~ ~ ~ _ ~ - WITH TREX DECK 8' ~ 5A0% ~ - ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - CORTENSTEEL BRIDGE W/CONCRETE e ~ J s "'~a. ~ / , f z
1 a II I I e r_ ,7 ll . (l1 ~ r ~ , ; _a ~ 1lh1111,_(111 1 i~ f, ~ _ ~ DECK; 1%SLOPE - ~ , ; - F~
{ 1 ~ i F Cr ~,r ~ ~ / CD 02It13/10 DWQ PCN REVIEW b0' SPAN; iD' 06FSE1 FROMTOP OFBANK ~ ~~','l~
~ r9 111 'rte ~ ~1~ ...~~1 mow- ~ ~ " ~,~~,~~'~g,~ CD 12(14/10 FLbt7DPCAINPERMfT
- ~ ~ t ~ 1 ` DD 09/2Q/TQ SITE PLAN RfVIfW
J ~ k - W S J \ _ I ~~a fib, 7.+ sl .
~ ( ~ ~ r ~ - s ~ x'11-iilf o ~ ~ iti~ ; ~~n~,~~- Issue:
_ ~~ti; ELEVATED BOARDWALK; WOOD FRAME ~ " "
WITH TREj( DECK; 30' Q 5.00% i / ' " ~ ~ ~raVJn ~By: JM
~ ~ ' ~ CORTEN STEEL BRIDGE W CONCRETE 4 ~ _ . , ~ r~{.7. ~ , , Checked By: SR , : r
'a ` ~ DECK 2 o CROWN ~ ~ °J rp. ~ - ' , - ~ ~ Scale:
/ -'r ` ® . , BRIDGE ON sr ~„',o
/i/ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ; ~ w ; ~ ~ 5T SPAN;10' OFFSET FROM TOP OF BANK ,11~';`/' LL ~ i 7 ~ A i lei I
' ' ' ' ~ ~ Drawing Titie
~ \ ~~l w '~~i , , r ~ ~ t
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ' ~ ~ Overall Site flan
i \ ~
ELEVATED BOARDWALK; WOOD FRAME - o1-s~So~~3
WITH TREX DECK; 38 @ 5.00%
' ~ _ >sa,E,,,~ ~ v ~ ~1 ii N
r ~ ,k_~. ~ , U r~1aY~ t~ - Sheet No. ~ w
Q_._-~
r--,
NOT TO SCALE 0 30 60 120 ` V
rill 0 20 40 84
all
A
MAR - 3 2011
FILE C\P~T^.
PENR• WATER QUALITY
WIMMSTOWTER BRANCH