Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20110208 Ver 1_401 Application_20110311Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. 8000 Regency Parkway Suite 200 Cary, North Carolina 27518 Phone: 919.463.5488 Fax' 919.463.5490 TO: NC Division of Water Quality 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 20110208 RE: Permit Application for a 401 permit for the White Oak Stream Restoration Project 2321 Crabtree Blvd, Ste 250 Raleigh, NC 27604 ATTENTION: Ms. Cyndi Karoly DATE: February 10, 2011 JOB NO. 117994 We are sending via: Fax 0 Regular Mail F-] Pick-up 0 Hand Delivered The following items: Correspondence Fx-] Plans F-1 Specifications F_X? Other as listed below: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 5 Design Plans 5 PCN form 5 Agent Authorization Form! 1 Fee $570.00 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: B For Approval As Requested B Approved As Submitted B Returned For Corrections For Your Use RX For Permitting Approved As Noted Forward To Subcontractor REMARKS: Please find enclosed an application for DWQ's 401 Permit along with supporting documentation for the White Oak Stream Restoration Site in Wake County. If you have any questions, please call me at (919) 459-9044. COPY TO: File SIGNED: Joshua White, PG, EI MAR s 2 2011 DENR - WATER QUALITY WETLANDS AND STORMWAATER BRANCH Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200 Cary, North Carolina 27518 Phone: 919-463-5488 Fax: 919-463-5490 February 10, 2011 Mr. Thomas Brown Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 Ms. Cyndi Karoly 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit 2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250 Raleigh, NC 27604 Re: White Oak Stream Restoration Project 401/404 Pre-Construction Notification Application Dear Mr. Brown and Ms. Karoly: Enclosed for your consideration and approval is the Pre-Construction Notification for the US Army Corps nationwide permit 27 and the Division of Water Quality's general certification 3689 for stream restoration construction for the White Oak Stream Restoration and Greenway Project. This project is located west of the Town of Cary in Wake County, NC. Also enclosed are copies of the White Oak Stream Restoration Project Design Plans for your reference in reviewing the PCN application. The project meets the DWQ definition of stream restoration and funding was provided by grant funding. A permitting fee has been included with this package. This is not a stream mitigation project. If I can be of any further assistance, please contact me at (919) 459-9044. Sincerely, Joshua White, PG, El Enclosures: PCN, Agent Authorization Forms, Figures, Wetland Forms, and Check for permitting fees AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: See attached Sheet STREET ADDRESS: See attached sheet with names and addresses Please print: Town of Cary Property Owner: Property Owner: The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize Paul Kuhn (Contractor / Agent) of Town of Cary (Name of consulting firm) to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached. Property Owner's Address (if different than property above): 316 Academy Street, Cary, NC 27513 Telephone: 919`469-4360 We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of our knowledge. f ` Aut orized Signature Date: -311111 Authorized Signature Date: Owner / PIN / DB, PG / Site Address Property (ac) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 358.78 PIN 0722090422 DB 1984, PG 321 0 WIMBERLY RD PIOTROWICZ, TOMAZ 3.96 PIN 0723324607 DB 13894, PG 784 ADJACENT 921 WIMBERLY RD LANDOWNER SMITH, MARTHA AND BACON, MARYLOU 12.71 PIN 0723336374 ADJACENT DB 13314, PG 150 LANDOWNER 809 WIMBERLY RD SMITH, MARTHA AND BACON, MARYLOU 36.45 PIN 0723430915 DB 13314, PG 150 0 WIMBERLY RD MACKIE W. LAMBERT 39.38 PIN 0723349488 DB 2483, PG 442 0 WIMBERLY RD TOLL NC 11, LP LTD PTNRP 139.05 PIN 0723664021 DB 13110, PG 2015 8113 GREEN LEVEL CHURCH RD MARKHAN, KENNETH M. 10.51 PIN 0723573132 ADJACENT DB 10193, PG 1132 LANDOWNER 4005 GREEN LEVEL WEST RD YATES, WILLIAM HEIRS 6.28 PIN 0723577272 ADJACENT DB 1462, PG 0-E LANDOWNER 0 GREEN LEVEL WEST RD TOWN OF CARY 22.91 PIN 0723569511 ADJACENT DB 2005, PG 1316 LANDOWNER 3905 GREEN LEVEL WEST RD TOWN OF CARY 11.34 PIN 0723676323 DB 11653, PG 2002 BOM 2005, PG 2128 0 GREEN LEVEL WEST RD JOCKISCH, VIRGIL E JR. 40.66 PIN 0723689317 DB 2897, PG 636 3800 GREEN LEVEL WEST RD PRINCE, MICHAEL THOMAS & REBECCA 2.5 PIN 0723786070 DB 3238, PG 362 ADJACENT BOM 1984, PG 581 LANDOWNER 3705 GREEN LEVEL WEST RD BROWN, PHILLIP JR. & LISA 15.27 PIN 0723644169 DB 08596, PG 2590 1000 WHITE OAK CREEK DRIVE COUNCIL, ALBERT MURRAY HEIRS 14.83 PIN 0723871475 ADJACENT DB 96-E, PG 725 LANDOWNER 0 GREEN LEVEL WEST RD 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 8 yc,0F WA ?c9? r Q O t Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.0 November 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 27 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit: ? Yes ® No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. ? Yes ® No 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. ? Yes ® No 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: White Oak Creek Stream Restoration Project 2b. County: Wake Q [9 HW 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Apex 2d. Subdivision name: N/A MAR - 2 2011 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: N/A OENR-WATER QUALITY 3. Owner Information 3a. Name on Recorded Deed: See Attached 3b. Deed Book and Page No. See Attached 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): N/A 3d. Street address: See Attached 3e. City, state, zip: See Attached 3f. Telephone no.: See Attached 3g. Fax no.: See Attached 3h. Email address: See Attached Page 1 of 12 PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version Section A. Applicant Information, continued 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Grant Recipient 4b. Name: Paul Kuhn, RLA, ASLA 4c. Business name (if applicable): Senior Parks Planner - Town of Cary 4d. Street address: 316 Academy Street 4e. City, state, zip: Cary, NC 27513 4f. Telephone no.: 919-469-4360 4g. Fax no.: 919-469-4344 4h. Email address: paul.kuhn@townofcary.org 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Joshua White, PG, El 5b. Business name (if applicable): Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. 5c. Street address: 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200 5d. City, state, zip: Cary, NC 27518 5e. Telephone no.: 919-463-5488 5f. Fax no.: 919-463-5490 5g. Email address: jawhite@mbakercorp.com Page 2 of 12 PCN Form - November 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): See Attached 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 35.769196°'N - 78.911468"W 1 c. Property size: See Attached acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to White Oak Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV, NSW 2c. River basin: Cape Fear 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Mixed land uses within the stream site is primarily forested with relatively few residential areas adjacent to the propsed project, an existing sewer line easement is present north of the project area. Current land uses in the vicinity include forested areas, residential, agricultural and commercial. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 101 Acres 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 17,952 LF along the White oak creek corridor. Proposed stream work- UT1: 1,260 LF; W02: 699 LF; W07: 1,212 LF; CB3: 373 LF 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To restore streams on the site which will reduce sediment entering Jordan Lake for the Towns of Cary and Apex. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Stream repairs will be conducted along with greenway construction. The greenway will run along the north side of White Oak Creek. Stream work will be conducted with heavy machinery, track hoes, trucks and other equipment typically used for stream restoration projects. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ® Yes ? No ? Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ED Preliminary ? Final of determination was made? 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Baker Engineering, Inc. Name (if known): Richard Darling Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. JD meeting has been requested. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ®No ? Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 3 of 12 PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers ? Open Waters ? Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number - Type of Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or impact (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) Temporary T W1 EDP[-] T Restrati Palustrine ® Yes ? No ® Corps 0.13 on DWQ W2 ®P ? T Restrati Palustrine ® Yes ? No ® Corps 0.61 on DWQ W3 ®P ? T Res torati Palustrine ® Yes ? No ® Corps ? DW 0.05 o Q W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps ? DWQ W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps ? DWQ W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps ? DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 0.79 2h. Comments: The are 3 large wetland cells within the project area and they start on the west side of the project near Wimberly Rd and end at Green Level Church Rd. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. Stream impact Type of Stream name Perennial (PER) or Average stream width (feet) Impact number - impact intermittent (INT)? length Permanent (P) or (linear feet) Temporary (T) S1 ®P ? T Restorati UT1 to White Oak ® PER ? INT 19 1,384 on Creek S2 ® P ? T Restorati White Oak Creek ® PER ? INT 29 604 on Reach 2 S3 ® P ? T Restorati White Oak Creek ® PER ? INT 32.7 1,347 on Reach 7 S4 ® P ? T Restorati Clark Branch ® PER ? INT 19 386 on Reach 3 S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT 3g. Total stream and tributary impacts 3,721 3h. Comments: Restoring function and habitat, stabilizing the stream banks, reducing sediment and stresses within the channels. Page 4 of 12 PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individual) list all o en water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) - Permanent (if (P) or applicable) Temporary T 01 ?P?T 02 ?P?T 03 ?P?T 04 ?P?T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: Page 5 of 12 PCN Form - November 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ? Yes ? No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. N/A Page 10 of 12 PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information, continued 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ? No impacts? Raleigh ® 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?. NCWRC Natural Heritage website (http://www.ncnhp.org/Pages/heritagedata.htmi), Natural Heritage workroom, USFWS website (http://nc-es.fws.gov/es/countyfr.html). 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? USFWS website (http://nc-es.fws.gov/es/countyfr.html). 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? North Carolina Office of Archives and History and NRIS database. Additionally, letters were sent to Office of State Archelology and the State Historic Preservation Office on 8/18/09 requesting information regarding historical site impacts and a SHPO response letter dated 08/26/09 indicated no historic resources would be affected by the project. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The project was modeled and determined to have no rise in base flow elevation. We are currently working with Wake County and Town of Cary's floodplain managers. 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Information System, Hec-Ras, Town of Cary Floodplain Manager Joshua White 2/10/11 Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's s' natur is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant Date is provided.) Page 11 of 12 PCN Form - November 2008 Version Owner / PIN / DB, PG / Site Address Property (ac) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 358.78 PIN 0722090422 DB 1984, PG 321 0 WIMBERLY RD PIOTROWICZ, TOMAZ 3.96 PIN 0723324607 DB 13894, PG 784 ADJACENT 921 WIMBERLY RD LANDOWNER SMITH, MARTHA AND BACON, MARYLOU 12.71 PIN 0723336374 ADJACENT DB 13314, PG 150 LANDOWNER 809 WIMBERLY RD SMITH, MARTHA AND BACON, MARYLOU 36.45 PIN 0723430915 DB 13314, PG 150 0 WIMBERLY RD MACKIE W. LAMBERT 39.38 PIN 0723349488 DB 2483, PG 442 0 WIMBERLY RD TOLL NC II, LP LTD PTNRP 139.05 PIN 0723664021 DB 13110, PG 2015 8113 GREEN LEVEL CHURCH RD MARKHAN, KENNETH M. 10.51 PIN 0723573132 ADJACENT DB 10193, PG 1132 LANDOWNER 4005 GREEN LEVEL WEST RD YATES, WILLIAM HEIRS 6.28 PIN 0723577272 ADJACENT DB 1462, PG 0-E LANDOWNER 0 GREEN LEVEL WEST RD TOWN OF CARY 22.91 PIN 0723569511 ADJACENT DB 2005, PG 1316 LANDOWNER 3905 GREEN LEVEL WEST RD TOWN OF CARY 11.34 PIN 0723676323 DB 11653, PG 2002 BOM 2005, PG 2128 0 GREEN LEVEL WEST RD JOCKISCH, VIRGIL E JR. 40.66 PIN 0723689317 DB 2897, PG 636 3800 GREEN LEVEL WEST RD PRINCE, MICHAEL THOMAS & REBECCA 2.5 PIN 0723786070 DB 3238, PG 362 ADJACENT BOM 1984, PG 581 LANDOWNER 3705 GREEN LEVEL WEST RD BROWN, PHILLIP JR. & LISA 15.27 PIN 0723644169 DB 08596, PG 2590 1000 WHITE OAK CREEK DRIVE COUNCIL, ALBERT MURRAY HEIRS 14.83 PIN 0723871475 ADJACENT DB 96-E, PG 725 LANDOWNER 0 GREEN LEVEL WEST RD v DURHAM COUNTY 55 \ A } e3? "Ntif 1 „- 751 _ Project Location e?e??estRa z,` 64 CHATHAM COUNTY C r 1 r P) f 0 } Figure 1. Vicinity Map White Oak Creek B.kn E,I-Ing, h. e moo a.a.Ma P.m..r S- m C , W. CxoG V516 Fu: 194635 .1m 0 1.25 2.5 5 I Miles c. x Legend Proposed Greenway Proposed Stream Restoration 7 Nv? ....,, ail ?? , ?_ ?iii? ,. °t/?.???7'??•? r. j 57. 1?l W? r- Greenway Start ? '•. ?J 0 500 1,000 2,000 I k I Figure 3. Solis Map Feet White Oak Creek Legend - - Apex Municipal Line =Watershed Boundaries Streams Q Project Boundary Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction (Apex) Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction (Cary) UT1- 1.67 sq. mi. White Oak Creek -11.93 sq. mi. Clark Branch-1.16 sq. mi. I- s .M Cary / C_d 7/011 Ph- 016 463 5M Fu' Vtff_M MOO Exhibit 2. 0 0.5 1 Watershed Map Miles White Oak Creek Cwldx?lt) DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) Project/Site: Date:[ Applicant I Owne . County: _LA„AL Investigator. - State: "'X Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes-V-/- No is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yss_A_ No?• Community ID:- Transact ??AA: Is the area a potential problem area? Ya No= Plot ID:Tr14.a- (explain on reverse If needed) VEGETATION Deninant Pla 1. nt atactas Stratum Indicator & QAG V't Dominant Ptah Swat" 9. Mtum Indicator QB - 2. Ma _ 10. L tr? ftL 12 ?.. 4. .. 13 tcl Wr _ 5. . . a 6 G - 14. 7. rrdGw• 18. S. 16. Percent of Dominant. Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC+ Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greats than SO% of the Plant a are not Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands; S=V plot was taken... HYDROLOGY _ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators _ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge _. Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators: Other _ Inundated Saturated in Upper 12" No Recorded Data Available , Water Marks -' Drift Lines Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits _ Drainage Patterns In Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators: Depth to Free Water In Pit: ) 044ted Boots Channels in Upper 12" - Watw4talned Leaves _ Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) + FAC-Neutral Test _ Other (Explain In Remarks) Remarks: w V „ r SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Drainage Class: Taxonomy (Subgroup): Conflrin Mapped Type? Yes_ No_ Proms tisi rlotbn Depth Matrix Colon Mottle Colon Mottle Tszture, Concretions, findis) Hwtzon (MunsellMolst) (Munsdi Molstl AbundancolContnst ttructun. eta. _j cib,Z Z HydrIc Soli Indicatbrs: _ Histosol -Concretions -Histic Eplpedon _Hlph'drianle Content In $uncci Layer in Sandy Solis - Sutfidie Odor -Organic Streaking In Sandy Soils _ AgWe Moisture Regime -Listed On Local Hydric Soto List -Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Solis List _ Gleyed or Low-Chrom Colors _ Other MxpUln In Remarks) Remarks: 110 1? t?ttL?t?? 0 ? ?ty?/ia l.,' r.?i•r? . WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophyde Vegetation Present? Wetland. Hydrology Present? Hydric Solis Present? Remarks: Location (describe) Army Corps of Eu&oen i Wedmuls Yes No Is the Sampling Point Yes ,_ No*- Within a Wetland? Yes_ Nom, Yes _ No _,gL_ reified as a wedand buod upon the criteria set forth in tho 1987 Manual. DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) Project I Site: A AL. dMi 40 2- Date: S od Applicant I Owner: County: VJk Investigator. . ?•^ Stats:_ *V( Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Ye, oC No . Community ID:.. me Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? rtes Transect ID: Is the area a potential problem area? Yes Ne Plot ID: f, ,! .A A._ (explain on reverse if needed) VEGETATION Dongnant Pla 1.. _ nt species stratum MIGator hr- Dominant Plant stwlas strawm, hHucator 9. Q G _ 2. • 1. -A G 10. (am - 4. rAC 12.• - - 5. I 9A i r Vk V .13. 8. 14. 7. is. 8.-, L 18. Percent of Dominant Species that are 08L, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). q3 7, _ Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Spo 'are not Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wedands. Shia-plot was taken... HYDROLOGY _ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators _ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge -. Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators: Other - Inundated _ -,Saturated In Upper 12" No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Drift Lines Field Observations: . Sediment Deposits _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary indicators: Depth to Free Water in Pit: Oatidised Roots Channels in Upper 12" Water-Stained Leaves - Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Sots: FAC-iisutral Test _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: , 46 j`1011CA4110 04 SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Drainage Class: Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No_ Profile descrlotlon: Depth Matrix Colon Mottle Colon Mottle Twdur% Concretions, eta tl (Munsell olstl Abundance/Contrest structure ) H ll M i (i h i [M zon unse o s nc es or r-1 ad _ 3/ft . . - , Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histosol _ Concretions _ Misfit Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surrate Laybr Ih Sandy Soils _ SuMdic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy'Soils _ Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed On Local Hydric Soils List _ Reducing Conditions -.Listed on National Hydrio Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain In Remarks) Remarks: .4, ;) dv s•• k j WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? Remarks: Location (describe) Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Yes j2&_ NO?_ Yes - No X Yes _ No D assifled as a wet eation Manual. Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes_ No f based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) Project i $Its: LAA 1 a4 >r calmd#a Date: S12y /," Applicant I Owner: .: County: _t bdk Investigator: State: A&- Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes o? No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No*"*- ? Transect ID: Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No Plot ID:4?.j, a ? (explain on reverse if needed) VEGETATION Dominant Plant aoecles Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Specks U[lhun indicator 2. !nil. SAG _ 10. 3. :.. ;• Cas v "r- 11. 5, .13. 8. 14. 7. 15. 8, 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). tdO% Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Gmater than 50%, of fire Plant Sperm Mars not Classified as FAGOBL in the National List of Plant Species d at Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken... HYDROLOGY _ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators - Stream, Lake, or Tide Oauge - Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators: Other - Inundated -' -.Saturated In Upper 12" No Recorded Data Available - Water Marks - - Drift Lines Field Observations: - Sedlnwnt Deposits _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: (ln•) Secondary Indicators: Depth to Free Water In Pit: ) O>tldlsed Roots Channels In Upper 120 Water-Stained Leaves Local8611-4iiMy Data Depth to Saturated $oil: FAC-Neutral Test - Other (Explain In Remarks) Remarks: 110 ssys .F lydr.i.gy nor ;Nv,C'447i yoK.t>~ SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Drainage Class: Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No_ Pis Description: Depth Matrix Colon Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Conerstlons, ffichss) H Uon (MunssN Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundancslcontrast structure eta w , . Hydric Soll Indicators: Histosol -Concretions _,Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content In Surface Layer in Sandy Sops _ Suifidic Odor Organic Streaking In Sandy Sops - Aquic Moisture Regime _Usted On Local Hydric Sops List -Reducing Conditions _Usted on National Hydrk: Solis Ust _ Oloyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: y)o indk4-+e„ 04 y,y?lr?? sr WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytlc Vegetation Present? Yes j?&. No Wetland. Hydrology Present? Yes _ No -g_ Hydric Solis Present? Yes _, No y-k- Remarks: Location (describe) I@s not Ossified as a Army Corps of Fngineen Wetlands Daffi@Ron Manual. Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes_ No_Q1__ upon the criteria set forth in the 19V DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) Project / Site: vi m iti Date: DQ Applicant/ Owner: County: NR Investigator: Stars: t•J..ftt„ Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Ya ? No- ? Community ID: Is the alts. significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Y•s No Transect ID: Is the, area a potential problem area? Yes No_V-_ Plot ID: UL OA-r.4 (explain on reverse if needed) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Sped SUV= 1. tndlwtor i4 Romh ant Ptah species wraturn kunwor 9.?i - 66- PS - . 10. JIMM 4,u,6 y9k 3 3. 11. 4. 13. !I. S. 7 t .13. 14. 10 . . 8. Wain- fAc 18 Percent of Dominant Species that are OBLy FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based L*on Ocenter d an 50% of the Plant Spec ire not Classified as FAC-OBL in t1te National List ame o plot was taken... of Flat Species that Oaf ,= i$ Wetlands. Sample- HYDROLOGY - Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators - Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge _. Aerial Photographs Primary. Indicators: Other - Inundated saturated rkspper 12" Recorded Data Available ?watuma "- - Drift Lines Field Observatlons: - sediment Deposits - Drainage Patterns In Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: n°) Secondary Indicators: - O0died Roots Channels in Upper 12" Depth to Free Water In Pit: Water4tained Leaves Depth to Saturated Sol]: Local Soil survey Data FAC-Neutral Test Otter (Explain in Remarks) tJw? r` .e.te• ?p?tlt , Remarks: yq?raons wr6•r k (? hf a i.+e Jp JJ ?:! Zv1.?r? .?,«? (J?t/i.?I ?PIw?I?'I IV ?Mflfrl SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Drainage Class: Taxonomy (Subgroup): Conflrm:Mapped Type? Yes..._ No_ profile. Description: Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors =Mottlt Textuie, Concretions, linchesl Horizon tMunsell Wall on a L AbundancelConjint structure. '00 4lik ACA, V& 50% tbagw nrl Hydric Soli Indicators: _ Histosol _vleoncntions _ Hlsdc Eplpedon Hlgh''Oiganlo Content In Surface Layer In Sandy Solis _ Sulfldic Odor -,Organic StreakhA In Sandy Soils Aqulo Moisture Regime -Listed On Local Hydric Soils List educing Conditions Usted on National Hydric Soils List- Gleyed or Low-Chmma Colors -Other (Explain In Remarks) Remarks: Colin ?..n[L /so?.aL? Ciw?? A..J ••? C•'c?/•?)?J ?o e,,.t i?.lc.a,js .c ivyI;c rw! :ly?• WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytlc Vegetation Present? Yes /t-No Is the Sampling Point Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes -,01C--No Within a Wetland? Yes!t- No_ Hydric Soils Present? Yes _ A __No Remarks: Location Army Corps of Engineers not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 ieation Manual. DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) Project/Site: (Allt- 0A sAk 41L 01& Date: 06 Applicant i Owner: Tow @4 '" County:., Investigator. State: A/G Do. normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes, 0_ No, Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes Noh1._ N ? Y ? Transact ID: Plot ID: o es Is the area a potential problem area . (explain on reverse if needed) VEGETATION ©oeninant Plan t aMGles Stratum dtcator -- Qwdnant plant $Deef" Stratum stor L FA c, 2. ,. + 10. 3. . 11. 4. .?.,¦a 12. 6. ,? .ra L..?L 1 13. 6. 14. T._ t h a 15. 16 8. . Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Bassi Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant are not Classified as FAC-OBL In the National List af.Plant Species that Oc= in Wetlands. Sampl plot was taken... HYDROLOGY Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators: Other Inundated _5iturated In Upper 12" No Recorded Data Available - Water Marks - - Drift Lines Field Observations: _._, sediment Deposits - Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: a- (in.) Sec n ary Indicators• els in Upper 12" Channels to Free Water in Pit: t?,) Water-stained Leaves - Local Sell survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: 0) - I ) - FAC-Neutral Test - Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: M/ S,.v? ?e ?...I?ev ;A ?aclta?s 40A 5.6440,.+?4,. ,,, #&' lL.? s f s• ?rw?Mi rs«• j?.,,.1 ra.,,.J ..? oa.? fa.1 i•??' G?ra„.ld SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Drainage Class: Taxonomy tSubgroup): Confirm Mapped Typp? Yes_ No_ Prodfi U?acriotbn: Depth Matrix Colon . Mottle colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (Instlesl Horizon (Munsel Moled 0-j_ (Munsell Moist) AbundancslContrast Kuri. etc. ?d.M/ldnS ?LIWA r, 11% Aso yip `? 2o'!ao I.cm ° - Hydrlc Soil Indicators: Histosol )CContrition `. Histle Epipedon _. High Otpanic Content WSu faei Layer in Sandy Solis _ SuMdlc Odor -Organic Streakkiiii In Sand Solis AQuiefMoisturs Regime -listed On Local HydrIc Soils List Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydro Solis List Gleyed or Low-Chrome Colors Other (Explain In Remarks) Remarks: e??e?? t'-d.•(.:•r w« 1 /r?.. Gl....• Gi1.i? tv?t,m otseiw S.: / : • ?«.?•i tc?? G•-r}L fit s F . ?s,Fl.el e. WETLAND DETERMINATION ' Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Solis Present? Yes No;.- Yes __!?!:7 No _ Yes -,gL_ No Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes)L No Remarks: Location Army Corps of Engineers not classified as a wetland =don Manual. upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987-COE Wetlands Determination Manual) fe k fiP t) O k W ?I Date: 'eh 800 - _d a - Project/ Site: _ Applicant / Owner: d6 Call 64 County: Investigator. n c. state---. Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes o? No _- Community IDs 7 t ID Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No?- ransec : Plot 10: 13 LPL (explain on reverse if needed) VEGETATION Dominant Pla i. nt soaclea ftabxa Indicator " k ?ftG Dominant Plant 3mcles Mrstum (ndUcator 9. drt% 10. - 3. , 1 -,;) W . 11. 4. vt W 12. &a Ql3[ .13. f lu D 14. 7. 1S. 8. 1 ti. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding RAC-). IOU _ Remarks: Wetland Vesetation Present Based Upon Gkeatef than 50% of the Plant SpodeCsgare not Classified as FAC-OBL in the National Last of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample/ plot was taken... HYDROLOGY Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators Stream, Lake, or Tide/ Gauge Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators: Other -.inundated _-Saturated In Upper 12" No Recorded Data Available - Water Marks - - Drift Lines Field Observations: Sediment Deposits Dminape Patterns In Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: O.2 (tn•) Secondary Indicators: Free Water In Pit: Depth to (in.) -x- O?ttdised Rootts Channels in Upper 12" _ Water-Stained Leaves Local Solt Survey Data. Depth to Saturated soli: FAC-Neutral Test - Other (Explain In Remarks) Remarks: .S ?"a?wdr, Leta ')`'? `o,DChe(7 G„?j-?? h0<r ?sw'?ca .,..lcv '??c.. •? ?r?YJent-. SOILS t= . I Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Drainage Class: Taxonomy (Subgroup): Conflrm Mapped Typ®? Yes_ No Profile DescrtotTon: Depth Matrix Colon Mchesl _ Horizon iMunsaii Moist) ' Moire Colon Mottle Texture, Concretions, (Munson MobN AbundancelCoritrast StructuEt. etc. ?, -? SfCy 3010 ,??? I?kyls?, ?_ ? 2 Slh ? ?? ?CSZtt?n Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histosol -Concretions Matto Epipedon -High Organic Content In Surface-Layer in Sandy Soils _ Suifldia Odor Organic Streaking In Sandy Solis _A&.Aqulo Moisture Regime . Usted On Local Hydric Solis Ust Reducing Conditions Usted on National Hydria Solis Ust Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain M Remarks) Remarks: ?i•.?a ('Q1s" &.J fG?e.? ?w. di?:^t i.,,.. L ? r .,Z?JG rr?oI {'a., t WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes_ !LL No Is the Sampling Point Wetland. Hydrology Present? Yes oc-- No Within a Wetland? Yes No- Hydrlo Soils Present? Yes _jt<, No Remarks: Location (desc not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineeri W lineation Manual. DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) Project I Site: Date: Applicant / Ow er: To-wo a4 ty: Conn Investigator: State: Do normal clrcuttstances exist on the site? Yes o? Community ID- . Is the site s grilflcantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No A Transact ID: Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No= Plot ID: (explain on reverse if needed) VEGETATION Dominant Plant SmIes 31taturn motor 1. Oct • lw?t? ate. 2. 3. Dominant Plant species Shiftm Ind star 9. 10. 11. - ?? 4. /01 ? 12. 5. .13. 6..T ..? /J2'. .0,1-rI l 14. T. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). I17D Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Basal Upon Greeter than 50% of the Piaat re not Cls siAed as FAC-QBL in the National List of Pima Species Ow Occur in Wetlands. Samp a plot was talm... HYDROLOGY - Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge - Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators: Other - Inundated "aturated In Upper 12" No Recorded Data Available - Water Marks -' - Drift Lines Field Observations: Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: .r (la) Secondary Indicators: Depth to Free Water in Pit: _ Ottidtred Roots Channels In Upper 12" Water-Stained Leaves Local Soll Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: t19_(In.) FAC-Neutral Test - Other (Explain In Remarks) / Remarks: S.el? .S'a•?h.. fs •? ?? `??? ?^? ?/ • ? (!IC fr?rkV (,yt??il+? I ov I ) SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Drainage Class: Taxonomy (Subgroup): Conflrm Mapped Type? Yes_ No Profile Desdiodon: Depth Matrix Colon (inches) Horizon (Munsa Moiast) Mottle Colon -Mottle Tsxture, Concretions, lMunsellMolstl Ab d lC 8 At V4 un ance onimat tructun, etc. _ 4*0* e/T _Se.P Z?J t S !?•r r._ .. z? r . Z /r 'F4v qll 6JAZ //•.? Hydric Soli Indicators: Histosol _ Concretions _ Hlsdc Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Solis _ Sulfldlc Odor -Organic Streaking M Sandy Soils OtAquic Moisture Regime Reducing conditions -Listed On Local Hydric Soils List -Listed on National Hydrie Soils List OtGigyed or Low-Chroma Colors .-...Other (Explain in Rennarks) Remarks: row r.?er...? Colors ,,,,: f t .s d•cr c?..la,... f,st.. •.? in ` Pl't .(`)6 ? J WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes o? No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes 9L No Remarks: Location (des not classified as a wetland Army Corps of Engineers W lineation Manual. Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes K No upon the criteria set forth in the 1997 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) Project/Site: Date: sha tC Applicant / Owner: 74,.,ft &4 6114 County: Investigator: low State: Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes-!!L- No. Community ID%.^ Is the site signlhcantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No Transect ID: Is the area a potential problem area? Yes Plot ID: (explain an reyprse if needed) VEGETATION Dominant Pla 1. nt Swiss stratum Inatirator , a a? t?+G Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 9. 2. 10. 3, r 11. 4. 12.. .13. IL !r 14. 7. •.r.«. 15. 8. 18. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding. FAG). 1-00 Remarks: Wedand Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 509E of the Plant S are not Classified as FAC-0BL in tho National List of Plant Species thst Occvr in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken... HYDROLOGY Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators _ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge - Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators: _ Other ,.Inundated _,,,Saturated In Upper 12" No Recorded Data Available Water Marks _ Drift Lines Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits _ Drainage Patterns In Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: (iu•) Secondary Indicators: Depth to Free Water in Pit: Olldlzed Roots Channels in Upper Ir Water•Stalned Leaves _ Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: FAC-Neutnd Test Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: J SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Drainage Class: Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No_ Pre}Ni Description: Depth Matrix Colors l Horizon (Munsell Moistl aw Mottle Colon Mottle Texture, Concretlons, (Munsell Molsti AbundancelCgptrast M etc "a 0--- , , 3 /S le..r. Sc _ !s -- a Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histosol _Histic Epipedon _ Concretions -High Organic Content In Surface Layer In-'96 dy Soils _ Sulfldlc Odor Organic Streaking In Sandy Solis _ Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed On Local Hydric Solis List _ Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Solis List _ Gleyed or Low-Chroms Colors _ Other (Explain In Remarks) Remarks: /10 roar c,.4,f'j dF j+cjd??? WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Watiand Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? Remarks: Location (describe) Army Corps of Engincen Wetlands Yes _&_L- No Is the Sampling Point Yes _ No !?_-'- Within a Wetland? Yes_ No-2ys- Yes _ No ssified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 Manual.