20110164 Ver 1_401 Application_20110211

2 0 1 10 1 6 4
wA
o -r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ? Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NSA or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ?X Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
? Yes ? No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ? No
If. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in-lieu fee program.
? Yes No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In
below. ? Yes NX No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ?X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Kornegay Farm Pond #2
2b. County: Johnston
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Princeton
2d. Subdivision name: NA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: NA
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Worley Road LLC D & P Land LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Deed Book 1172 Page 613 FEB
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): NA
R. A
3d. Street address:
L no
a g
610 Worley Rd.
3e. City, state, zip: Princeton NC 27569
3f. Telephone no.: 919-936-0211
3g. Fax no.: 919-936-3213
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Wilson Spencer
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Spencer Family Farms Inc.
5c. Street address: 985 Spencer Rd
5d. City, state, zip: Faison NC £8394- a g 3 ??,,
5e. Telephone no.: 910-990-1681
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 10
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 04 P 12 012
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.412 Longitude: 78.1778
1 c. Property size: acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Moccascin Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV;NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
site is vegetated on hardwood trees. Land adjacent to the site is Farmland dedicated to row crops and farmstead with numerous buildings
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 2
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 900
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
provide irrigation water for row crops
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Site will be cleared of vegatation&disposed of.Site will be excavated w/hydralic excavatar&spoil will be placed on non-act land.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ?X Yes ? No ? Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ?X Preliminary ? Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company:
Other: DWQ-Stream
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
DWQ and USCOE 12-14-2010
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ?Yes ? No ? Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ?X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ?X Buffers ? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T 2b.
Type of impact 2c.
Type of wetland 2d.
Forested 2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other) 2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W2 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W3 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W4 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W5 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W6 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T) 3b.
Type of impact 3c.
Stream name 3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)? 3e.
Type of
jurisdiction 3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet) 3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 Choose one
S2 Choose one
S3 Choose one
S4 Choose one
S5 Choose one
S6 Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T 4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable) 4c.

Type of impact 4d.

Waterbody
type 4e.

Area of impact (acres)
01 Choose one Choose
02 Choose one Choose
03 Choose one Choose
04 Choose one Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number 5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
Pi Irrigation 600
P2 Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? [J Yes ?X No if yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation. then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ?X Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Catawba ? Randleman ? Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number -
Permanent P or
Temporary (T 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Stream name 6e.
Buffer
mitigation

required? 6f.
Zone 1
impact

(square
feet 6g.
Zone 2
impact

(square
feet
B1 -T Pond for Irr UT to R Moccasin Swamp Yes/No no 36,000 24,000
B2 Yes/No
B3 Yes/No
B4 Yes/No
B5 Yes/No
B6 Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts: 36,000 24,000
6i. Comments: Buffers will be planted & BMP's will be used.BMP's to be used will be crop rotations,(1/2 of which will be no till)crop residue mgt.,con-
tour farming,follow soil sample recommendations, nutrient management, cover crops,& install grassed water way on east side of pond.
Page 5 of 10
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Because we need to irrigate 300 plus acres
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All debris and spoil will be removed and or stabilized on non wet lands
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ?X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank
? Payment to in-lieu fee program

? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:

3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Makin a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires Yes X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: Buffers will be planted and BMP's will be used
Page 7 of 10
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? ?X Yes ? No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ?X No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?

3b.
Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply): ? Phase 11
? NSW
? USMP
? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review

4a.

Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply): ?Coastal counties
?HQW
?ORW
?Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes ? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ?Yes Q No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ?Yes ? No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ?Yes No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat? Yes No
? ?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts? ? Yes ? No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ? No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
? Yes ? No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?

Applicant/Agent's-PrAted Name n ent's nature
(Agen s signature if
valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.) Date
Page 10 of 10
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
January 14, 2011
610 Worley Road
Princeton, NC 27569
Dee Freeman
Secretary
NBRRO# 10-234
Johnston County
BASIN:
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233) ? Tar-Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259)
? Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial Determination ? Isolated Wetland Determination
Project Name: Kornegay Pond
Location/Directions: Near 610 Worley Road
Subject Stream: UT to Raccoon Swamp
Date of Determination: 12/14/2010
Feature -E/-I/P- Not
Subject Subject Start* Stop* Soil
Survey_ USGS
To o
A NA X
(throughout) X X

*E/IIP = Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Johnston County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Quality.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Ian McMillan, DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit, 2321 Crabt&ge Blvd.,
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. N Caro ina
lVatmna ly
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection
Intemet: www.ncwaterquality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Phone [phone] Customer Service
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Johnston County
Page 2 of 2
If you dispute the Director's determination you may file a petition for an administrative hearing. You must file the
petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of the receipt of this notice of decision. A
petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours.
The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 am and 5:00
pm, except for official state holidays. To request a hearing, send the original and one (1) copy of the petition to the
Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. The petition may also be
faxed to the attention of the Office of Administrative Hearings at [phone], provided the original and one (1)
copy of the document is received by the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5) days following the date of
the fax transmission. A copy of the petition must also be served to the Department of Natural Resources, c/o Mary
Penny Thompson, General Counsel, 1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sixty (60)
days.
The owner/future owners should notify the Division of Water Quality (including any other Local, State, and Federal
Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated above). This
project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be directed to the
Division of Water Quality (Central Office) at (919)-733-1786, and the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh
Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
Respectfully,
Lauren Witherspoon
Environmental Senior Specialist
cc: Wetlands/ Stormwater Branch
RRO/SWP File Copy
MSRMaps: Print Page 1 of 1
Send To Printer Back To MSR Maps Change to 11x17 Print Size Show Grid Lines Change to Landscape
EUSGS 18 km W of Goldsboro North Carolina United States 01 Jul 1988
•14

s a rv?
rye ?? f
M 100 200, 300, Image courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey
yds 100, 200 300
© 2010 Microsoft Corporation. Terms of Use Privacy Statement
b
http://msrmaps.com/Printlmage.aspx?T=2&S=11 &Z=17&X=1890&Y=9806&W=1 &qs=610+Worley+Roa... 1/14/2011
su?? Qc?
-------- j by
mol
_ '' t r
fLrrERY
-,-hy.
- pond ??o ?oa 920 iseo cc

Sod Map-Johnston uounly, Norin uaroima
Map Unit Legend
Johnston County, North Carolina (NC101)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AO1
Bb Bibb sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes,
frequently flooded 4.8 2.1%
BoA Bonneau sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes 9.5 4.1%
DoA Dorian fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes,
rarely flooded 27.1 11.7%
GeB Gilead sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes 0.7 0.3%
GoA Goldsboro sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 35.7 15.4%
Ly Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 27.2 11.7%
NoA Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 47.5 20.4%
Ra Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 79.6 34.3"x°
UcB Uchee loamy coarse sand, 2 to 6 percent
slopes 0.1 0.1%
Totals for Area of Interest 232.2 100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 11/16/2010
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
Soil Map-Johnston County, North Carolina
35° 25' 13"
35'24'41"
(V
N
O
n
tV
N
O
n

w.Y
ire: ONO.
o
0
- °o
a
M
Map Scale: 1:4,730 if printed on Asize (8.5" x 11") sheet.
0
N Meters
0 45 90 180 270
,L\V Feet
0 150 300 600 900
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
? Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
N
0
W
10/29/2010
Page 1 of 3
35° 25' 13"
35° 24'41"

35°25 1"
35° 24' 53"
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
35° 261"
35° 245Y
+ Map Scale: 1:1,180 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet.
0
N Meters
A 0 10 20 40 60
N Feet
0 45 90 180 270
O
CL
m
N
U
7
O
N
N
O
Uc
C
O
N
U
0
o 0_

? o

N rn
C
O
N m
m ? L
d
E2 >
0 a) -o N
3 C 0

r
v
Z
v
)
co O
c`

N
O
m 4
)
3
(n r
C 0
O E
0)
U 0
Z .
m
m w O O N -
N ma O
O

x E z

N 16 CO

z T M U
0
0 m

U Q)

V7
N
N h
w ..
V) y N CD N
0
Z r 0 t 7
Q av 3 d C Q
:1 z
L
O p N

i
Z 'p

1 V p

n/ m
'N
N O
Q E
t )
N N f? a
->
m m.
c a) N N
° a
LL j U

m ?.p e- C
Z
o
s
0 m c
a
LL o
a c
° a0i aN E o c? c °
CL E?^m
d?E 4)
? a)
E a d
v t °m
?
? °o cy>,
°

Q
a E
N o a
w N m c
o> m
3 I E
`

:t

O

m

(D

.0

m J m N
-
c
Z

-]

y

rn
o N
a
ma
L c a)
a)
° `
°
N
0
D

°
E
a) m
m
.
-.
r

o c

m (n
m
Q
t:
m

o a
o
Z E a
??? ; m a
aMN

U in 2 o
c ° ;2
>> .?

a o
N a) z
N N
m m 'T
?US
`2 a N
0 N>
(n a)
Z w

U r Z a
O -a. m
O)
N
H a E 7
in3U ?r° -
v°?in o v o

O
a
N
N
O
U N
N
a1
U

(a
r

C
O

p N
O
7 a
N
N
N N
= N a
y N Q N
?
al
U r U. ' a m N m m y IX
U) W
> O C C7 U O U O rn a d g
7
J
A
LL y fq

Z
d z?.
a 0
a
W c
U) t
R O
r
t c'+! 1 '
,
° r
W
J
CL
a
o °
(n

y
N

'N-' N N C

N

?' N Ql
O

0
.
a r
m
'
N
CL
a o p N
CL

3 " 0

O c
O_
2
a
CL
a a UJ °a E a
U)

:
°
o
LL
O

N
o
> >

C
LL r

N

c
o
O

0

aU > v o `o N ¢ U
O
w

d 'p C

m A O
O

m U U (7 0

J >
N

J C

d U

d' G
C C > Y
V a O
COW.S OCLO
U U U U Fn (n M N

c a

0

N A

CL

® X • X

<

O OO

>

+ .. ICI O .(? q IIf Cl
Q N
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Johnston County, North Carolina (NC101)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in A01 Percent of A01
Bb Bibb sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes,
frequently flooded 2.5 94.7%
GeB Gilead sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes 0.1 3.3%
NoA Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0.1 2.0%
Totals for Area of Interest 2.6 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils
or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the
maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits forthe properties of the soils. On the landscape,
however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability
of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend
beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic
class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic
classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas
for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes
other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally
are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used.
Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified
by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the
contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with
some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been
observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially
where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations
to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness
or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic
classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments
on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If
10
Custom Soil Resource Report
intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to
define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each
description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties
and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons
that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity,
degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such
differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the
detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly
indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The
pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all
areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or
anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical
or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and
relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-
Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that
could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of
the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be
made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up
of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material
and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
11
Custom Soil Resource Report
Johnston County, North Carolina
Bb-Bibb sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period. 210 to 265 days
Map Unit Composition
Bibb, undrained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Johnston, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Description of Bibb, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: Frequent
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 5w
Typical profile
0 to 6 inches: Sandy loam
6 to 60 inches: Sandy loam
60 to 80 inches: Loamy sand
Description of Johnston, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Very poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding: Frequent
12
Custom Soil Resource Report
Frequency of ponding: Frequent
Available water capacity. High (about 9.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 7w
Typical profile
0 to 30 inches: Mucky loam
30 to 34 inches: Loamy fine sand
34 to 80 inches: Fine sandy loam
GeB-Gilead sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Map Unit Composition
Gilead and similar soils: 80 percent
Description of Gilead
Setting
Landform: Ridges on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Clayey marine deposits
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
high (0.00 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 2e
Typical profile
0 to 5 inches: Sandy loam
5 to 15 inches: Sandy clay loam
15 to 29 inches: Clay
29 to 38 inches: Clay loam
38 to 80 inches: Sandy clay loam
13
Custom Soil Resource Report
NoA-Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period. 210 to 265 days
Map Unit Composition
Norfolk and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Description of Norfolk
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 40 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 1
Typical profile
0 to 9 inches: Loamy sand
9 to 14 inches: Loamy sand
14 to 70 inches: Sandy clay loam
70 to 100 inches: Sandy clay loam
Minor Components
Rains, undrained
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, carolina bays on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
14
f
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Pond site- F 21210 T2239 City/County: Sampling Date: 12 - 14 - 2010
Applicant/Owner: Danny Kornegay State: North Carolina Sampling Point: Wetland
Investigator(s): R Brooks, Section/Township/Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainageway Local Relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): I
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: ` Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:Bibb NWI Classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? ® YES ? NO (If no, explain in remarks)
Are Vegetation ?, Soil El, or Hydrology ? significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? ® YES E] NO
Are Vegetation ?, Soil E], or Hydrology ? naturally problematic? (If needed, explain in remarks)
SUlvllvlwKY UP kINDINUb- Attach site ma showing
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES ? NO
Hydric Soil Present? ® YES ? NO
Wetland Hydrology Present? ® YES ? NO
Remarks: Meets all wetland criteria.
features, etc.
Is the sampled area within a wetland? ® YES ? NO
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)-- [LSurface Soil Cracks (136)
? Surface Water (Al) ® Water Stained Leaves (139) ? Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
® High Water Table (A2) ? Aquatic Fauna (B13) ® Drainage Patterns (B10)
® Saturation (A3) ? Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ? Moss Trim Lines (B16)
? Water Marks (B1) ? Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ? Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
? Sediment Deposits (132) ? Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)? Crayfish Burrows (C8)
? Drift Deposits (133) ? Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ? Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
? Algal Mat or Crust (134) ? Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ? Geomorphic Position (D2)
? Iron Deposits (135) ? Thin Muck Surface (0) ? Shallow Aquitard (133)
? Inundation Visible on ? Other (Explain in Remarks) ? FAC-Neutral Test (135)
Aerial Imagery (B7)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? E] YES ENO Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? ® YES E] NO Depth (inches): 5 Wetland Hydrology Present? ® YES ? NO
Saturation Present? ® YES ? NO Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: Meets hydrology indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers 1 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot Size: )
1. Nyssa sylvatica var. biflora OBL
2. Liquidambar Styraciflua FAC+
3. Magnolia virginiana FACW+
4.
5.
6.
7.
Sapling Stratum (Plot Size: )
1. F. liqustrina FAC
2. Magnolia virginiana FACW+
3. Acer rubrum FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: )
1. F. liqustrina FAC
2. Ilex opaca FAC-
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot Size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size: )
1. Smilax laurifolia FACW+
2.
3.
4.
5.
% Cover Species? Status
40 YES OBL
4 NO FAC+
10 NO FACW+
= Total Cover
20 YES FAC
20 YES FACW+
15 YES FAC
= Total Cover
50 YES FAC
5 NO FAC-
= Total Cover
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW or FAC: 6 (A)
Total number of Dominant
species across all strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW or FAC: 100_ (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % of Cover: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x5=-
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree- All woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling- Woody plants of tree species less than
3 in. DBH but greater than or equal to 0.5 in.
(1 cm) in diameter near the base, regardless of
height.
Shrub- Woody plants of shrub species less than
3 in. DBH, regardless of height.
Herb- All herbaceous (non-woody) plants,
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size.
Includes woody seedlings of tree species less
than 0.5 in. (1 cm) in diameter near the base.
Woody Vine- All woody vines, regarless of
height.
= Total Cover
5 YES FACW+
= Total Cover
Remarks: Dominance of hydrophytic vegetation.
lrc Armu 9".- of I
- - '- -"b L Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region

SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redoximorphic Features
inches Color (moist) Color (moist) % Type' Location2 Texture
0- 3 IOYR 3/ 1 / S
3 - 8 IOYR 3 / 1 / SL
8- 2 IOYR 5 / 1 / SIL

'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Coated Sand Grains 'Location: PL=Pore Linine. M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol (A1) ? Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
? Histic Epipedon (A2) ? Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
? Black Histic (A3) ? Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
? Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ? Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
? Stratified Layers (A5) ? Depleted Matrix (173)
? Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) ? Redox Dark Surface (F6)
? 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) ? Depleted Dark Surface (177)
? Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) ? Redox Depressions (F8)
? 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ? Marl (F10) (LRR U)
® Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ? Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
? Thick Dark Surface (A 12) ? Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ? Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
?Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) ? Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
? Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ? Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
? Sandy Redox (S5) ? Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
? Stripped Matrix (S6) ? Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
? Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
? 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
? 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
? Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150 A,B)
? Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (LRR P, S, T)
? Anomalus Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
? Red Parent Material (TF2)
? Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
? Other (Explain in remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless they are disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soils Present? ® YES ? NO
Remarks: Meets hydric soil indicators.
%jo ril,uy %_U1 Ps u1 nnguneers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
• N
N
O
r
35° 25' 13" ¦

0
0
rn
0
0
n
Soil Map-Johnston County, North Carolina

av .NIA
a ` m" Aa
.Ragas: ;,`
35° 24' 41., 1 "NamAm"'MUN 'IL 1111111111111111111111111111111111117
756000 756100 756200 756300 7564
in
Map Scale: 1:4,730 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet.
G
N Meters
A 0 45 90 180 270
N Feet
0 150 300 600 900
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
a? Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
lpw
N
N
O
0
r
¦ 35'25'13"
35° 24'41"
N
O
m
10/29/2010
Page 1 of 3
AD-1026 (Page 2) (04-20-06) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Form Approved - OMB No. 0560-0185
HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND CONSERVATION (HELC) AND WETLAND
CONSERVATION (WC) CERTIFICATION
(See Page 3 for Nondiscrimination, Public Burden and Privacy Act Statements).
1. Name of Producer 2. I.D. Number Last 4 digits only) 3. Crop Year
Dann or 0, 99 V4 1 X11
l
d
l
l
dit
? If "YES"
if
F
L YES NO
d pro
uce an agricu
tura
commo
y
, or,
you are a
arm
oan
4. Do you have y interest in land that produces or cou
Applicant continue with Item 5. If "NO", and you are not a farm loan applicant, go to Item 12 and sign and date.
5. For farm loan applicants only: Will you conduct any activities for fish production, trees, vineyards, shrubs, building construction,
or other non-agricultural purposes on lands for which a wetland determination has not been completed by NRCS?
6. Are you a landlord or tenant on any farm that will not be in compliance with HELC and WC provisions? If "YES", enter the farm
number or contact your County FSA Office before completing this form. Farm Number:
(Contact your county FSA office if you are unsure of the HEL or wetland determinations applicable to your farming interests.)
7. Do any of your landlords refuse to comply with HELC requirements on any farms? If "YES", enter the farm number or contact your
County FSA Office before completing this form. Farm Number.
8. List affiliated persons with farming interests. See Page 3 for an explanation. Enter "NONE", if applicable.
YES NO
9. During the crop year entered in Item 3 above, or the term of a requested USDA loan, did you or will you plant and produce an agricultural
commodity on land for which a highly erodible determination has not been made?
10. Since December 23, 1985, or during the current crop year, or during the term of a requested USDA loan, has anyone performed, or will
anyone perform any activities to:

A. Create new drainage systems, or conduct land leveling, fillip dredging, land clearing, excavation, or stump removal, that has NOT
been evaluated by NRCS? If "YES", indicate year(s):Oi'
B. Improve or modify an existing drainage system that has NOT been evaluated by NRCS? If "YES", indicate year(s):
C. Maintain an existing drainage system that has NOT been evaluated by NRCS? If "YES", indicate the year(s):
Note: Maintenance is the repair, rehabilitation, or replacement of the capacity of existing drainage systems to allow for the continued use of wetlands
currently in agricultural production and the continued management of other areas as they were used before December 23, 1985. This allows a person to
reconstruct or maintain the capacity of the original system or install a replacement system that is more durable or will realize lower maintenance or costs.
11. If "YES" to Items 5,10A and/or 10B or 10C enter the following for the land the answer applies to:
A. Farm and/or tract/field number: 9j Q 0)
B. Activity:
C. Current land u (specify crops): Il
D. County: Qohff&n
A "YES" answer in Items 5, 9 or 10 authorizes FSA to refer this AD-1026 to NRCS. If you check "YES" to Item 10C, NRCS does not have to
conduct a certified wetland determination. (Contact your County FSA Office if you are unsure about the answers to Items 5, 9 and 10)
uous AD-1026 Certification:
have read the AD-1026 Appendix and understand and agree that my eligibility for certain USDA program benefits is contingent upon this
ertification of compliance with highly erodible land and wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985 as amended, and if a
etermination is made that results in a violation and ineligibility, I agree to refund all applicable payments.
• I agree to the terms and conditions stated on AD-1026 Appendix on all land in which I have or will have an interest and understand that I
am responsible for any non-compliance with these provisions.
• I agree that I will file a revised AD-1026 if there are any changes in my operation or activities that may affect compliance with these
provisions.
• I understand that affiliated persons are also subject to compliance with these provisions and their failure to comply or file AD-1026 will
result in loss of eligibility to persons or enterprises with whom they are affiliated. (See Page 3 of this form for affiliated persons.)
2. Signature of Olo. I hereby certify that the information on thisform is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, an
Producer I auth * NRCS to make a HEL and/or certified wetland determination on the tract or farm
nuns listed above.
foZ.-?--/o
ucer's Signature Date (MM-DD-YYYY
13. Referral to NRCS (Completed by FSA) 13A. Signature of FSA Representative 138. Date (MM-DD-YYYY)
Sign and date if a NRCS determination is
needed for any reason including a "YES" A^ ?M I r1?? 0
r/1
answer in Items 5, 9, 10A, 10B, or 10C. v '(/y t dqAk4V1;i11)
ORIGINAL - FSA COPY NRCS COPY ? PRODUCER'S COPY 0

r