20070675 Ver 1_Application_20070413

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
524 S. NEW HOPE ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27610
919-212-1760 • FAX [phone]
www.esinc.cc
April 12, 2007
Ms. Cyndi Karoly ~ ~``^
N.C. Division of Water Quality _~==-v
401/Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Re: Timber Creek
Isolated Wetland Permit Application
Nash County, NC
Ms. Karoly:
2 0 0 7 0 6 7 5
ESI is submitting the attached permit application to NCDWQ on behalf of the applicant
for Timber Creek. This application specifically requests authorization to impact an
isolated wetland located within the boundaries of Timber Creek, which is located off Old
Carriage Road in western Nash County. ESI has delineated the entire site and the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineered reviewed and approved the delineation in February 2007.
During that visit, ACOE determined that the wetland in question is isolated from Waters
of the US and is not subject to Section 404 regulations.
Stocks Engineering, PA is serving as the project engineer and ESI is serving as the
applicant's environmental consultant. Please call me if you have any questions or
comments regarding this permit application. As always, thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Jeff Harbour, PWS
Ecology Division Manager
Cc: Kevin Yarnell
Attachments
ER07-018.01
r~~
i
2 ,~*. k ~..~ti
.. ~.__ ~ .. ~. .. ._ ..- R ~~q~
~.9~
;~~, ~,-t x ~ 2011
~,n!,."~i;~~
JACKSONVILLE • ST. AUGUSTINE • COCOA • JUPITER • DESTIN • SAVANNAH • ATLANTA • RALEIGH • CHARLOTTE • ASHEVILLl:

20070675
~- s rte
~.
~.~.•,
Office Use Only: ~ Fonn Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this. project:
^ Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ® Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NA
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
2
Owner/Applicant Information
5
,....a a '7 ~.~. M 3 ~~ 4 b l k
y v ~.
Name: Richard Davenport ,~~;~ i^d,~° ~~ ~
Mailing Address: 3540 Hunter Hill Road ~tr~o~^~~~' "~~~~~`~"~'~" ~~~~~`"`~~
Rocky Mount, NC 27804
Telephone Ielumber: 252-443-0923 Fax l~;umber:
E-mail Address:
Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jeff Harbour
___ __- __
Company Affiliation: Environmental Services, Inc.
Mailing Address: 524 S. New Hope Road
Raleigh, NC 27610
Telephone Number: 919-212-1760 Fax Number: 919-212-1707
E-mail Address: jharbour(a~,esinc.cc
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 13

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Timber Creek
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 3821 0048 1001
4. Location
County: Nash Nearest Town: Red Oak
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Timber Creek
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
US Highway 64 East to Old Carriage Road exit (SR 1603). This is the last exit before you
cross I-95 Go north on SR 1603 and pass under power line easement. Site is on left after
pass Reges Store Road (SR 1601).
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or ,utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum}: 35.992121 °N -77.904740 °W
6. Property size (acres): Approximately 60.9 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Pig Basket Creek
8. River Basin: Tar-Pamlico
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 13

9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Site is currently comprised of a mixed pine/hardwood
community with some successional wetlands associated with the power line easement along
the southwest boundary
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The applicant proposes to construct a 33-lot residential development. Typical equipment will
be used during construction including bulldozers graders back-hoes, dump trucks, etc.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to provide
33 lots each with a minimum size of 30 000 feetz. One small isolated wetland (0.138
acre) is proposed to be impacted as part of the development process
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Thomas Brown of the US Arm~Corps of Engineers reviewed the wetland delineation on 7
February 2007 Mr Brown agreed with the delineation and indicated that the wetland proposed
for impact in this application is isolated and not subject to jurisdiction under Section 404.
V. Future Project Plans
A ~-. +....v ~4 o n4inir~a4n~1 fnr +l,.:s rr^~Pct? If so ~escr:be the antlclnated ~x/nrk
ire airy iu~w~. peiiui~ requests a.ua~.aY w ~.,. . y ~.. , .. y ,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated for this project
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 13

Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
The isolated wetland in question is proposed to be impacted as a result of this residential
development The wetland will be bisected by one of the proposed roads that will serve the
development
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and floodln~.
--r-'---
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map) --~ r - - - -

Type of Impact
Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.)
Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no)
Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet)
Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 Fill Forested (Isolated) no 700 0.138

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.138
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 10.2 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
mast he included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact

Number
(indicate on ma)

Stream Name

Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average

Stream Width
Before Impact Impact

Length
(linear feet) Area of

Impact
(acres)

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 13

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
~; 11 vn4i..., llrarl rrinrt flnnr~ina (~ralna OA 117111011 P.a(IC- P,tC_
____, ----
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma ) _ . ------~ -- - -o---a~ -
Name of Waterbody

(if applicable)

Type of Impact
Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,

ocean, etc.)
Area of
Impact

(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List t
he cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres):
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.138
Open Water Impact (acres):
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ®Yes ^ No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
The wetland determined to be isolated by USACE is 0 138 acre in size and is proposed to be
impacted b~this development
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): U uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: - - -
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constrain.±s such as topography, b>.lilding ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 13

were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The Timber Creek development is being designed with lots that are a minimum of 30,000 feet2 in
order to reduce the amount of impervious surface area. The main wetland system associated
with Pig_Basket Creek and the associated riparian buffers have been avoided completely by the
proposed site plan The small isolated wetland lies almost in the center of the property and
impacts are unavoidable due to necessary infrastructure development All necessary Best
Management Practices (BMPs) will be utilized during the construction to avoid erosion and
sediment issues.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation. plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete,
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current
version.).
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is currentlyproposed because the amount of isolated wetland impact does not
meet the criteria outline in the State General Permit for Impacts to Isolated Wetlands and
Isolated Waters.
Updated 1.1/1/2005
Page 10 of 13

2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http•//www ncee~net/pages/inlieureplace.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed,
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federaUstate) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been fmalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional- Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 13

2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
* Impact Required
Zone ,,,~..,...~ ~ e*, Multiplier r,r;+;rt~+;,,,,
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Not applicable
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
Please see attached information from the project engineer, Stocks En ing_ Bering, PA
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewage will be handled by individual septic systems on each lot. There is no public sewer
system available for the proposed protect area-
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 13

XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
No other constraints are known at this time,
_`
~~~
Applicant/A s 'gnature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorizationletter from the applicant is prove e .
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 13 of 13

/5/2007

By: `

Directions:
> In the two green spaces in the box below, enter the average lot size and the percent of the right-of--way that is
impervious within the development.
> In the table below, for the type of land cover listed for each column, enter acreages in the green boxes beneath.
> In the "Lot Area" column, be sure to enter acreage within lots that is protected by a conservation easement, the Tar-
Pamlico buffer rule, or wetland rules in the green box in the lower lefthand corner (enter "0" if there is none). If lots
are drawn to exclude protected lands that are part of the total development acreage, enter the acreage of those protected
lands as wooded pervious in the "Community Areas" column.
> The spreadsheet will compute all values in the light blue shaded boxes.
> NOTE: In the "Community Areas" column, you will need to ensure that the various component acreages sum to the
value in the "TOTAL" box at the top. The spreadsheet will not correct for inconsistencies. Any inconsistency between
the total value and the sum of individual acreages will carry over to column (5).
1~~p F
Average lot size ~ `~ ~~ t `~4 I " ac (Must show building footprints if lot size < 0.13 ac.
impervious in right-of--way ~ ~~' ~`~~ ,a.,~ ,_
(1} (2) (3) (4) (5)
Type of Land Cover Lot area Right-of-way area Community areas Sum of Columns
(ac} (ac) (ac) (2), (3), and (4)
TOTAL 56.9 4.0 0.0 60.9
Transportation impervious 3.9 1.3 5.2
Roof impervious 2.6 ~~.y._,. 2.6
Managed pervious 50.5 2.7 0.0 53.1
Wooded pervious 0.0 0.0 0.0

Tar-Pamlico Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 2B . X258 Last t~4odified 4/5/2007
Piedmont of the Tar-Pamlico River ~aSill:
Includes Oxford, Henderson, Rocky Mount and Tarboro as well as Franklin, Nash and Edgecome Counties
Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus Loading Calculation Worksheet (Automated)
Project Name:
Date:
gy, Checked By:
Directions (same for pre-development and post-development tables):
> Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the values in light blue.
> Compare total areas of development in pre- and post- tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)), and also for consistency with
the site plans. If all of these values are not the same, there is an ereor that must be corrected.
> Unless drainage onto the development from offsite is diverted around or through the site. offsite catchment area draining in must
be included in the acreage values and treated.
Type of Land Cover Area S.M. Normula ,~-verage ~,ivii.. ~.u~uu,u .~.~~. a~~ .-.•_~ ~~•~~•~~
acres 0.46 + 8.3 of TN m /L 2 3 * 4 of TP m /L 2 * 3 * 6
Transportation impervious 0.46 2.60 0.00 0.19 0.00
Roof impervious 0.46 1.95 0.00 0.11 0.00
Managed pervious 0.46 1.42 0.00 0.28 0.00
(lawn/landscaped)

Managed pervious 0.46 4.23 0.00 1.23 0.00
(cropland)

Managed pervious 0.46 2.04 0.00 0.62 0.00
(pasture)

Wooded pervious 'x.46 0.94 26.35 0.14 3.92

Fraction Impervious (I) =
0.00 TN Loading
(lbtyr) _ 26.35 TP Loading
((b/yr) _ 3.92
TN Exp. Coeff. 43
0 TP Exp. Coeff. 0,06
Total Area of Development = 60.93 (Iblac/yr) . (lb/ac/yr)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Type of Land Cover Area S.M. Formula Average EMC Column Average EMC Column
acres) 0.46 + 8.3I of TN m /L 2 3 * 4 of TP m /L 2 * 3 6
Transportation impervious 5.2 1.52 2.60 20.65 0.19 1.51
Roof impervious 2.6 1.52 1.95 7.67 0.11 0.43
Managed pervious 53.1. 1.52 1.42 114.93 0.28 22.66
Wooded pervious 0.0 1.52 0.95 0.00 0.14 0.00
Fraction Impervious (I) = 0.13 TN Loading
(Ib/yr) _ 143.26 TP Loading
(lb/yr) _ 24.61
TN Exp, Coeff.
2
35 TP Exp. Coeff.
0.40
Total Area of Develo ment =
p b0.93 (lblac/yr) . (Ib/ac/yr) -
Note: The nutrient loading goals are 4.0 lb/ac/yr for TN and 0.41b/ac/yr for TP. If the post-development nutrient
loading is below these levels, then no BMP is necessary. Otherwise, the next worksheet calculates
post-development TN and TP loadings after BMPs are installed.

Peak Flow Exemption Calculation for Development
Option #1: Pre-Post Development Flow increase is less than 10% 1-year storm
Predevelopment Runoff 0 0 #DIV/0!
Post- Development Runoff 0 Change % change
Option #2: Total impervious Surface Calculation less than 15% of total project area
.~ = ~ f ~~` ; ~,~- ~ ~~ ~ 7.80 60.93 0.127958
~_, ~,. ~, ~,.,,~ ~.~~4x:~ w~..~ <..~,,~ u
Transportation PLUS Rooftop Total Project
Impervious Impervious Impervious Acreage Impervious

_ _ fh, )79 /J ~f~ `~ ` -..t 11\`~~-- YI -_I ._~/~/o_ 1 ~.t~- -f°.. ~ -,,~
-' I ~---~- ~ /l ~~ (/ / ~///~~~ ~`.~i`~a _.-~'~5.~~ ~ `-'l ~~ ~~~ ~ tlll ,. 111) '1~T
I ~~ '/J ADO: ^, i \ t', i ii `~ 1~1
~' 7/ \J ( / / / t~\ it i
`i-.I `1 ~ `.~ t l _r• { ~ , ter-- 11 ~I ~ ~ „ i
Y/ ~ 1 ~
~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lrti /i ~, ~, ~ ~I' ~ ~ ~ \ ~ i
\
.,
_.
_ 1. ~ j ~~
r/ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~
1 Ve /~ i T~ ~ ~ n tt °- )
,. ~ _
__
~w 7,~ ~ .-~ ~ ~" \ - , t ,~ . oo I
,, _ .
x:11 ~ 1 ~~._ ~---?(~ ~~%~ . ~ ~ ,~~,, ~-~- ,1,~~ u ~ ,? ~J ~ r,~ v ~ ~~
~~t .,~~ ~ , ;f ,. ~ ~~, _ ~~;_~ ,~
~ • ~ e /~~ -0 ~ 1` ~ i ~J'i~ (.._ - Ath~e is f~lo_'~ ~ ~ r ~'ti
Bf ( Imo: ~ 1 t \~_-~ -~~. !1'YI l \ '. ! ~ N~
I Nael~ ~' .. ~ t ( ID HS ~- I _ r ti
/ /~'~1 ~, hem; `2oit , ' ,~ ~~~ c~"""+~.~c~ ~.
_~__ }-~ v ,5_ ! 1, ~' f Eoursef,
H `..% i \\ . ~ \ ~ - ,r16Qi/ ~.~ ~.. ,mac : ~ _~ `\ ~', .
.-
~, , ~._ I ,
I (~ ~ ~ ~ - ~c~` it-~~ F l~ , I
I
~.
._
_ _ _
I ~
/ , \~ / //: ^~./ ' r ~' _ -_~ _ 'f mac-- -
~ i ~ / /~ i / r vI ~ i,~ v v ~ ~ ~ ~ / /
~ ~ ~ I ~ ' AAA ~ ~,_ ~//~
`, /~ ,-- i ~/ / / ~ "%. -~~~ 1 IJ yF~ `~ ~ ~J Via,-
`~'` ~ ~~ ...mss=~~` / ~ o , ~ ~ i i ~' ~ ~3P l~,ii ,~~~ '~/ r! .i'. ,
I I ~ I - 1 , I ~ ,.
-. ~.~ r - __- -
Project Boundary" =~ ~, ' _ \,__~''~ ~ ` ~ //~ _ --_~~~ ' ` '; J~ ~,\
/-~ \\
'Location and extent is approximate. ' ( '; f t~.. ~ _~^~~ f L-- ~_ ~ ~ rt = ``;,; ~' ~l`,~-~r~~ _=~.-
e ~% ~~ ~ •~ ~ f i I~ ~ ~ ",
o•
Feet ` fi ' -
Source: USGS Digital Raster Graphics, Nashville ° ~ ~ ' (( u ~\
(1974), Red Oak (1963), Drake (1963), and Rocky 1~\ ~ ~: '- ~ ~. '~ ~ ~'fJ J' .gam-_`!~ ~`~)'
Mount (1974), NC Quadrangles; Project boundary j. °" ~ ~ ~, i~~ ( A}II o
\ (u
provided by Stocks Engineering, PA. \' i ~ '`` •.
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for T ~{ 1'11 ~ ~t ~ / \ + ~ ~~~ ! ;
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and ~ U '~ / 1 ~~~/ - ~ ,~~~ - -' '~
is not suitable for legal or ergineedrg purposes. L ~r r _ ~ ~ ~'~\ _~~~' - ? _~`,% ~~ ~ -
~~ '//._
ENVIRONMENTAL '' ,~' Project: ER07018.01
SERVICES, INC. Project Location ¢ : Date: A r 2007
524 S. New HOpe Road Timber Creek ' ~` P
Raleigh, North Carolina 27610
^_R (9'9'2'2-,760 Nash County, North Carolina DnNn/Chkd: KT/JH
[phone] FAX
w.vw. environmentalservicesine ~m Figure: 1
'rgeas\LUU/1U7a\U7\acatl\h IC;_lorat.tlwg, 422007 4:30:11 PM

i~
P:\GeoGra\Projec[s\2007\018\01\acad\FIG_exisicond.dwg, 4/10/2007 855:06 AM

WV fO~LS~B LOOUOI/4'6MP~ue~d `JI~\Peoe\l0\8l0\LOOZ\spefad\w~oa~\:d
g :aan6i~ woo oursaawas/e/uawua~nua mn+n~
eui~ae~ u~oN `~(~uno~ yseN ~~o9«
i~zis~e
Hrisrd :p~u~iU~a ~aaa~ aaglU~l -
OlBLZ eugaepypoN'yBia~ea
peoaadoHmaN S6ZS
LOOZ ady :ale4 suoi~lpuo~ ails pasodo~d '~ul `S~~IAx~S
60'8lOLOb~ :}aa(oad 'lt'.LN~WN0211AN~

i~~~
~ :~
i
~ L az , ~
.8f-.S N i m
~, ~ ;~ ! ~_
_/
~~ '
Y-
A ~J
~d~~ ~~d~~~d~ ~7~
~, d i 'N
r
.aaY
I ', ~-
I ~--
~ ~,~ ~ cs"
,; ,,, ~
w
Y ^ - - Ml M'
l 4 ..
l
~ ~ ^~
i f a~ n ~ C y a
/"
... ~ _ ~ _
- _ ^ _ $ 8 S
- o
,_ ,. ~^II
a,
_ ~
_- ~
~~ W
, _-
y r %i-- ', _
,~- ~ , --_
R ~.
U ,y ~ ~p ~_ _ __. ..
~ `d~Q I t d~
F 1~. B
v ' ~ - '~ W
.~ Y
~~ , ~. _.~
9Y
_ _~ \ ~1~
W x '. ~, -
, ., _
.~~~ ~ Ma ___ . W
s ax
.,, ~ ~ 1 ' 4
,. _
_ _ o m ,
,.
_ _ i
I W a
j R , • al __
~ ~_
ice/ ~
_ ~ ~ o ~, .
~ --- -a .-. ~..
i' tea: ~ ~ Q _ „„
,' ~k ~ E
~ _
_~-
~.
/" _ ~ `~ ~~
/ ~,xY ~ a ~_~ __~_ _.;
..,~ why
~ ~ ~" oR ~ -~w ice. _- ~+i
\ ~\ ~ $. '~ ~ C _ _ ~
..
_~ ~
~-
., ,o ~,
- , -~ v
~~ _~~
ry8g
1,,
N &&
~ Id
/1Z 3Jb r'3 ~~
S3/1 ~-~dO~d ,1 N sz x~°e Q 3a /
3,W~S3~N~ 3/Vi7 77yj
0
(O
O
ti
~ O
3 ] ~^ ¢
~~ ~~:
_~ ~a
~ ~=W~
>-.< >
~a
~L yoi
^$~ ~r
~a
l~
'. ~`. W 9
~., a'
Nab ,~ ~~ ~
a a `~~° wes
a' ~ -~ x
- V Q W ~y,~
_- ~, yG
S ~\ U W~
^'1 ~ ° ti'~ ` N ~
X ~R ~~- ~,
Y
' _ ~
-~ M1
~ C
D
1 _.- - _- ' _ .-
_ FF
0~8 3
~~
~ .g ~ _
o r
- __
v
i ~. ~~
'p
Y
I,' S ~~n
it ~' ~`
--- _
~..
% ~ /~
,,
.o>^~ ~
``, \~
1
p ~~
1,\ \ &
~ 8
~=
~~~ '~~
~~
\°~
~~~
~~~~,
~ ~y
6~ I
O
~- x/tl
y ~____
r,. __
e~
/ /
~~
~~, `I
~RJG~ g2~
JPMeQ°~P151 pP
OE~O
~ ~ og
,~
•C ~ ~
~~ o 3a '"o~g"z
~ c ~~ ~in

~' ~ "d ~ ~
f0 ~ C 7 (n
"~ (U m f0
vi ac ~~~'~~~
~w ~~~~~~
~y a;~~~

7 C N C C

N ~ r
2'o mo~a `o`
~ m _ o, ~

N ~ ~ ~' ~
~ •
• m
C d ~ " ~ d d ~ n
~o n r nH $.
`
L o d
~c 8
m E
~°'
~ ~ N ~ ~
0 ®~
~ I (0
V
O
J m
.
'
~
Z ~m
o E °c
N KENO:.'
p p~ -`c
~. ..
.. -
(

z Y ,-
o~^.~
~ ~~ ~~
o~1°ry~~
~~ i b
~, W~~
m
o ~'
~ti