20070309 Ver 1_More Info Received_20070318

N
•w E~1 BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC.
308D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Telephone [phone] -Fax [phone]
S
April 18, 2007
Mr. Jamie Shern
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Ste 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
RE: Revised PCN Application
Blalock's Glen Subdivision
DWQ Project # 07-0309
BLC Project #: 60030
Dear Mr. Shern and Mr. McMillan:
07 •0309
Mr. Ian McMillan
401 Oversight/Exp Review Permitting Unit
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attached is a revised PCN application for the subject project. The second road crossing
of a stream channel along the property boundary has been eliminated from the project as
advised by both agencies. We have also addressed NC Division of Water Quality's
concerns regarding the avoidance of isolated wetland impacts from well construction and
provided diffuse flow provision measures including supporting worksheets, calculations,
and operations and maintenance agreement to comply with the riparian buffer rules.
If you have any questions or require more information, please do not hesitate to contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC.
(.t - ~~L~~2'L.~fi~~-
Jennif A. Burdette
Environmental Specialist
Attachments
c: Lester Stancil -Stancil & Associates

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 0 7 0 3 0 9
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information x
.._ ,,
1. Owner/Applicant Information ~ ~ 1
Name: Ms. Dianne B. Jones
Mailing Address: 7885 Panther Lake Road ~ `,"i
Willow Springs, North Carolina 27592
Telephone Number: 919/552-4320 .Fax Number: NA
E-mail Address: NA
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jennifer A. Burdette
Company Affiliation: Burdette Land Consulting, Inc.
Mailing Address: 308D W Millbrook Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Telephone Number: 919/841-9977 Fax Number: 919/841-9909
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Updated 11/1/2005
Page I of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Blalock's Glen Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1607-01-7265
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Fuquay-Varina
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Blalock's Glen (proposed)
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The site is located
approximately 1200 feet southwest of Rock Service Station Road (SR 2736) and 3500 feet
southeast of Barber Bridge Road's intersection with Rock Service Station Road, east of
Angier, Wake County, North Carolina. Figure 1 depicting the location of the property on the
US Geological Survey (USGS) Angier, NC 7.5-minute quadran lg e topographic map was
provided in the original PCN application submitted for the project.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.5934243 °N 78.6622658 °W
6. Property size (acres)
116
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UTs to Middle Creek and Middle Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Agricultural fields and a large pond currently occupy the
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 2 of 9

site. Land use in the vicinity of the site consists primarily of residential subdivisions with a
few agricultural fields.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project is a residential subdivision in which access roads will be constructed to provide
access for individual lots. Heavy equipment typical for road construction will be used to
complete the~roject
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to develop lots
suitable for single-family dwellings.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USAGE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. In April of 2006, Jennifer Burdette of Burdette Land Consulting Inc.
conducted a riparian buffer, wetlands, and surface waters evaluation for the proposed project
area. On July 7, 2006, Mr. Monte Matthews of the USAGE conducted a field verification the
wetland delineation. Maps and data forms in support of the delineation were provided prior to
the verification meeting. Duringour site meeting BLC consulted with Mr. Matthews regarding a
proposed road stub to the western property line. This road stub would cross a jurisdictional
stream channel prior to its termination at the property line to satisfy the requirements for a
proposed collector road according to Wake County Planning's Throu~hfare Plan. On July 24,
2006 Ms. Jean B. Manuele of the USAGE sent the letter to the property owner stating that
similar permit requests have not been reviewed favorably and historically have been withdrawn
by applicants, modified to eliminate the jurisdictional impacts, or denied. A copy of this letter
was provided in the original PCN application. However, Wake County maintains that the road-
stub is required because the letter did not represent an actual denial. On March 8, 2007, the
applicant received a letter from NCDWQ requirin dg evelopment planned for the other side of the
stream channel or a potential connecting road. The road stub serves only for a potential future
road connection; therefore, it has been eliminated from the project accordingly.
On June 6, 2006, BLC met Ms. Periann Russell on the site to conduct buffer determinations for
those surface waters subject to the Neuse River Basin riparian buffer rules (NBRRO 06-150).
Ms. Russell's written documentation of the site meeting was provided with the original PCN
application.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 3 of 9

Future permit requests are not anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, tnust be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed impacts consist
of one road crossing of a buffered stream channel and minor jurisdictional and isolated
wetlands impacts associated with one of the road crossings and well construction. A revised
Figure 3 with Insets A and B are attached to show the details of these impacts.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) ( es/no) (linear feet)
1 (inset A) fill forested no 0 0.001
2 (inset B) fill herbaceous no 65 0.007
Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 24
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 UT to Middle Ck culvert/ri ra P 8 109 0.02

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 109 0.02
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 4 of 9

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill excavation rlrerluin~_ fln~rlinh_ draina~e_ bulkheads_ etc_
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)

NA
Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.02
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.008
Open Water Impact (acres): NA
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.028
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 109
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ®Yes ^ No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
The proposed well construction would impact 0.007 acre of isolated wetland (see inset B).
NCDWQ's letter requesting additional information mentioned previously also requested
relocation of the wells on lot numbers 35 and 36 to avoid impacts to isolated wetland. These
lots are valued at approximately $60,000 each for a total economic loss of $120,000 to the
applicant to avoid impacts to an isolated wetland that is not high quality (linear ditches or
drainages) and small enough to be below the threshold for written notification of isolated
wetland impacts. Therefore, the applicant contends that relocating these wells to lot numbers
35 and 36 would be impractical.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 9

VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The applicant retained
Burdette Land Consultin>?, Inc. to conduct a preliminary investigation of surface waters and
wetlands on the subject property during the preliminary design stages of the project to avoid
impacts to the maximum extent practicable. Stream impact 1 is necessary to access high rg ound
separated by a buffered stream channel and pond.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 9

description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The applicant avoided impacts to streams and wetlands where possible and minimized
stream channel impacts that were unavoidable to the maximum extent practicable. A 50-
foot-wide riparian buffer will be maintained around stream channels present within the
development in accordance with Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Rules and will serve as a
permanent, vegetative buffer to the stream channels and pond on the site. BLC believes
stream channel and wetland mitigation should not be required. The impact to a stream
channel (109 LF) is less than 1501inear feet. Impacts to,iurisdictional wetlands (0.007 acre)
is less than the U5ACE's 0.10-acre threshold for wetland mitigation and impacts to
jurisdictional and isolated wetlands (0.015 acre) is less than the NCDWQ's 1-acre threshold
for wetland mitigation.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 9

X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 7,740 3 (2 for Catawba) NA
2 8,885 1.5 NA
Total 10,625 NA
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Because the proposed road crossing is
peroendicular and does not exceed 150 linear feet of stream channel or one-third acre of
r~arian buffer impact, BLC does not believe riparian buffer mitigation should be required for
the project.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The site does not currently contain impervious
acreage. Upon completion of the proiect. Keith Roberts. PE, does not anticipate that the percent
impervious surface for the project will exceed 15%, which is the Wake County maximum for the
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 9

Maintenance of riparian buffers is anticipated to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream
from the property. It is important to note that the proposed subdivision does not include curb and
gutter. As requested in the aforementioned NCDWO letter requesting additional information
Keith Roberts, PE designed four grass swales upon consultation with Ms. Annette Lucas of
NCDWQ re~ardin~ compliance with the diffuse flow provision of the riparian buffer rules
Worksheets, supporting calculations, and an operations and maintenance agreement for the
proposed gassed swales are attached.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated from the proposed project will be disposed of through individual septic
systems approved by Wake County.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: The
proposed infrastructure serves only the proposed residential subdivision• therefore it is not
anticipated to result in additional development.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA
Agent's mature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 9

-~, ~ /~,
a
rsorJr®
\ \ lIS7ZAM) '
~11 ~ ~
v ~ /
/ / I 1
1 ~ ~ ~ ~'
~~!
~~
~~ V ~ ~
_ ;~ ~
~\ - ~/~
~~ `~'i~/ i,"""~ ~~ ,
IM•/) ' T
~~
-~i
,f1 ~ ,
//~ f~(r ,~(l
' i
6 ~~ ~
/ /,
~;~ ~ 1, ~ ~
~`~I ` ~ ~
~~
/ II _
~- ~~- t_~
ns
luxrsD~cnoxec
Irarrevas
\/~
I
I~IH J ~ I CS ~ ~ ' /
,~ ~ ~
~_. ,l ~ ~.
__, -w.., _ _ ~ ~,
t ~ ~ 5~~ ~6v (~}, Z r:e 60 d' S2 69 ~R/ I 1
°r , ~~ ' i
~- I~~
O s«,rw.rr
III ,`~ - - ~ ~ ~~ / /0 1
i%~~1
l
1^
~~~~ ®OI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~-
/~
~~~ Y
~1 I
'~ ~~~ ~ '111 ! ~ ~ . ~i , ~- ~~` 1
®~ INSET A : ,-~ ~ ~ ~Q' ~ (~ ( . _1 ~ _ 2`~ Job ~_
i`~l ~ '~
/ / ~\~~ \ \ ~ _ _ 1
~\ ~ \ \
rceonua ' ` _
~` ,~ ~ \ ® ~
_ _ ~ / ,_
\\~ ~ // ~.
' i
JUR/SDIL770XdL ,~ _ ~
JUR/SDlG770NAL 1/Bl7,dNA4 i
ASf7ANAS
'~ _ _
i ~ _,~J
i ~ r
i v'
-~> 1 r
~ ~
1' 1
'~ \\~,i
~~ ~~
W
Y~
..
SURFACE WATERS & WETLANDS OVERALL IMPACT MAP
BLALOCK'S GLEN SUBDIVISION
TRIPLE J DEVELOPMENT, LLC
FUQUAY-VARINA, WAKE COUNTY, NC
••N•• GRAPHIC SCALE DATE: 04/18/07
• ••• 1" = 300' SCALE: I" = 300'
w E=~ BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. DRAWN BY: TMB
308-D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 300' 0 300' 600' CHK'D BY: JAB
't'elephone (919) R41-9977- Fax [phone] PROJECT k: 60030
S
I~1<;[;K1~:113
i ~ ~ f 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i
~ - ! ~
~ ,~
/

i
NWT ~ SW'ALE , '
r~ -_ .~
JURI I XONAL , ~ '
WET D,~ ~ __
% ~ ' ~ --
i
r
r= _ ~
r' 2 ;W DA=6. 0 A ~ I
Sx~ ~ ~ ~, ,
~ `~~ ~
~!' N~ 2~
/ ~"'
~ •' N
~~
~,. rr i
•./
~~
~1; ~ ~~ ~;
r ~.~~--~j~ _
--
INV. Old ~ 22b.. _ _ -- __
,/ ~ IMPACTS
~ i ,
~,
'~ - ;~r~_ ~; ~ ZONE 1 = ~ 0 SF
0.178 AC
//~ i ~
~ ' iii j / ~~ ZONE 2 = 2885 SF
~ ~'"~ 0.066 AC
- / 14~
~ , i / ~ j~ CHANNEL = 109LF
-i
it ~~ i' / JURISDICTIONAL
i ~ r ~ WETLANDS = 50 SF
' 0.001 AC
,~ v _ ~ -
Gw-PHIC SCALE IMPACT MAP N
1"=50'
50' 0 50' BLALOCK'S GLEN SUBDIVISION
TRIPLE J DEVELOPMENT, LLC
FUQUAY-VARINA, WAKE COUNTY, NC
•''-N"'- DATE: 04/18/07 CHK'D BY: JAB
w E~IBURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. DRAWN BY: TMB
308D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 INSET A
Telephone [phone]-Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 60030
-S

X
Bu~'fe

~ ~
1
1
,,
~ rJ
1~
,o
'.
X
--- _ ISOLA TEL
_--- W~T~.AND
,-
'\~ 1 ~
/ ~ \` ~ i
1 ~
~-~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ , ' ~
.;
~~, ~~;
1
\1
do o~,
i~
,~
,,~
~ ~
~ ~,
,~
,/ r \
I / _
L /
1
/ /
I
/ /
I
~ ~
~ \ / r

IMPAi
~ JUFd~~
WE~"l.~
ISOLA

/r

%I~
I,~OLATED
W$~'LAND
~ 1
1

~~
~;
= 321 SF
0.007AC
= 324SF
0.007AC
52
'i
\\ ,~
GRAPHIC SCALE IMPACT MAP N
1"=60'
so' o so' BLALOCK'S GLEN SUBDIVISION
TRIPLE J DEVELOPMENT, LLC
FUQUAY-VARINA, WAKE COUNTY, NC
•'••N•''• DATE: 04/18/07 CHK'D BY: JAB
w E = BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. DRAWN BY: TMB
308D W Millbrook Road, Suite200-Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 INSET B
Telephone [phone]- Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 60030
S

Received 04 10 2007 09;24
Apr.10. 2007 1~11AM
No.8846 F. 2
DWQ Project No. ~ 7"" ~ 0
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • GRASSED SWALE WORKSHEET
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : A o
Contact Person, fan~I~ .B/R ~~' rL,ne.~' Phone Number: - 2d
Swale ID: w f' ~
Gress Swale Length
Tributary Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Max, Velocity from 2 Yr. Storm
Max. Velocity from 10 Yr. Storm
Mln. side slopes
Steepest Effective Slope
Cover Crop
Ion' ft.
3 ac.
Z ac.
1.9 q fps
. 2~ I (o fps
3 ~ I ratio
. d ~ -- ftlft
G (.~55
(at least 100 ft. per tributary acre)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the Swale)
(on•site and off-site drainage to the Swale)
(2 fps max.)
(3:1 min.)
(check dams may be used)
11. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. li a
n'quirement has not been met, aftech an explanation o1 why. At a minimum,. a complete stormwater management plan submittal Includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan end a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional Information and will subsiantlelly de{ay final review and approval of the project.
II nts Initials
KMK_ Vegetation Plan provided on plans
KruG The underlying soils are permeable and non-compacted
1CM,C Swale carries only stormwater flow
,ri-y~_Water table depth is greater than 1 foot.
_ K1wiC Plan details for the Swale provided,
KwuC Plan details for the Inlets end outlets are provided.
A~inIC Check darns provided.
1CJWJC- The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair, and at least twice
annual mowing,
I'~~K The operation and maintenance agreement signed end notarized by the responsible party Is provided.

Rece'~ved 04 10 2007 09:24
Apr~10~ 2001 1:11AM
No~8846 F• 3
DWQ ProJectNo. 07' Dap 9
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • GRASSED SWALE WORKSHEET
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please completa the following information):
Project Name : 1 ~a~ s G =
Contact Person: i bnn a Qc c o~~ J' Phone Number (~19) S S.t. -' 3Z o
Swale ID: ~[Z )
Grass Swale Length
Tributary Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Max, Velocity from 2 Yr. Storm
Max. Velocity From 10 Yr, Storm
Mln. side slopes
Steepest Effective Slope
Cover Crop
J o o ~ ft.
, 9 ac.
'! ac.
1.94 fps
_ Z. 12 fps
~, t _- ratio
. D2 ftlft
6RA5S
11. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
(at least 100 ft, per tributary acre)
(on-site and off-alts drainage to the Swale)
(on-site end off-site drainag® to the Swale)
(2 fps max,)
(3:1 min.)
(check dams may be used}
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been mat and supporting documentation is attached. !f a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully ex®cuted operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project,
ants Initials
Xn„c Vegetation Plen provided on plans
rdl, The underlying soils are permeable and non-compacted
-(nrt Swale carries only stormwater flow
Xn+~C -Water table depth is greater than 1 foot.
/cn,a< Plan details for the Swale provided.
A'nc Plan details for the inlets and outlets are provided.
x,.~ Check dams provided,
nC The operation and maintenance agreement Includes annual erosion and vegetation repair, and at least twice
annual mowing,
K.R The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.

Race+ved 04 10 2007 09;24
Apr.10. 2001 7~11AM
OWQ Project No. D 7- D 30 9
DIVISION OFWATER QUALRY -GRASSED SWALE WORKSHEET
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information);
Project Name
Contact Perso~~3 /~ Phone Number:
Swale ID.
Grass Swale Length
Tributary Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Max, Velocity from 2 Yr. Storm
Max. Velocity from 10 Yr, Storm
Min. side slopes
Steepest Effective Slope
Cover Crop
~' ft.
IS ac.
ec.
I. LS fps
~ fps
3: ~ ratio
. 0 4 _ tt/ft
C
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
No.88~6 P. 1
(at least 100 ft. per tributary acre)
(on-site end off-site drainage to the Swale)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the Swale)
(Z fps maK.)
(3:1 min,)
(check dams may be used)
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met end supporting documentation is attached, If a
requlroment has not been met, attach en explanation of why At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications shovuing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package v/ill result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Aaalicanks Initials
K~ vegetation Plen provided on plans
,C.,-t,~ The underlying soils are permeable end non-compacted
KM~, Swale carries only stormwaler flow
~ Water table depth is greater than 1 foot.
~~ Plan details for the Swale provided.
X-AbC Plan details for the Inlets end outlets are provided.
JrM~ Check dams provided.
~/-rR The operation and maintenance agreement Includes annual erosion and vegetation repair, end at least twice
annual mowing.
fU~l~ The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.

Received 0~ 10 2007 09:24
Rpr~10. 2001 7~11AM
DWQ Project No. D 3~
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - GRASSED SWALE WORKSHEET
No,8846 P~ 4
I, PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information)'
Project Name : 6
Contact Person, n,,,.-~.,, ~4/n/oc~ ~/on J Phone Number; ZD
Swale ID: Sw'r!y)
Grass Swale Length
Tributary Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Max, Velocity from 2 Yr. Storm
Max. Velocily from 10 Yr, Storm
Mln. side slopes
Steepest Effective Slope
Cover Crop
10 0' ft,
. 3 ac,
1 ac.
~ 7 fps
_~ fps
3 ~ ~ ratio
04 ftlft
L Rns~
(at least 100 ft. per tributary acre)
(on•slte and off-site drainage to the swele)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the swale)
(2 fps max.)
(3.1 min,)
(check dams may be used)
II, REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to Indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, e[tach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal Includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing ell BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement, An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project•
I ants Initials
,riwc _Vegetation Plan provided on plans
..x The unde~fying soils are permeable and non-compacted
~,.~a Swale carries only stormwater flow
~,h Water table depth is greater than 1 foot.
`K/ha Plen details for the swale provided.
!X,_y~_Plan details for the inlets and outlets ere provided.
,~,~r Check dams provided•
,r,,,,~ The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair, and at least twice
annual mowing.
Kai The opera~lion and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.

Rere:ivied 04 02 2007 16:24
Avr• 2, 2001 2~11PM
NITROGEN SWA,LE CALCULATIONS
BLALOCKS GLEN SUBDIVISION
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
No•8185 P. 1
SUBMITTED BY: DEVELOPMENT CONSULT[NG SERVICES, INC.
1401 AVERSBORO ROAD, SUITE 206
GARNER, NC 27529
(919) 625-041 I
l;'AX [phone]
,`~~~NiuUry~~r
.~`''~~N eARp''%
o ...
4 i ~
~~ 2~ 2B ~ 2 D1
s~
i
'~~~ !~, R00..~~

Received 04 02 2007 16:24
~pr~ 2. 2001 2~12PM
C3~A~ac~ Gt,~:N l Sw1~~~ cRLCu~g7ion~S
~~ ~~ ~~
.9 R~
NW St,~RIE
JAR= 3 A~ .
SE Swr~t.~
fifty . 1S ~}c.
Qua c ~ ~,~ (. ~ ~C ~.~~ lq1~,~(, is fly) ~ . sz ~~s
•SlJ Sw A L~
No~8785 P~ 2

Recei,~~ed 04 02 2007 16:24
Avr• 2. 2007 2:12PM
Ditshelpe
ch Pdek Fbw VebcitN (Ipso Area (eq.It.J HpdrevOc
R~diu fl Narmel
De kh R
0 0.1 1.87 0.91 0,09 0,09
.;~ BGef kUtSllaN hYItWlJtN47:
Llrveinforeed Vegel l
s = o.aaoa
t ~1
rw$K°o~'oaar1
Nor to scale
Re~h Marer Phase Ve , T e ShcType Mennngo h ermissibl~ Cebulared Selew emarks
Sta hParrdn ,Dmei ShearStreaf pd~ 6heer6hm kpafJ Factor
6rraighk Llrn~inlgrced 9uneh 0,030 x.20 0.21 19,66 STABLE
C 75.95x ClgyLoem 0.050 0.029 1,73 STABLE
No~8185 P, 3

Received 04 02 2007 16;24
- Apr. 2. 2001 2~12PM
No.8185 F• 4
H1f~RAULIC RESULTS
me ergs
cfc ee eW
Period hn e o W pc lee cq, I, y reul a
Rad'uc R ormel
De th 1
a~ 0.1 1.86 0,80 0.07 0.07
i ears:
Unrenlorced
3.0, D40D
i ~1
' kdid1~i11v~00 ft
No[ to Scale
ee e[ere T SviTyvc Mannnp's'n Pamisxbls Calculated S~afe~r emer
5!e b Pallern Sheer 5lreea ~psfl Shear Shea IysfJ Faclar
Slrai~pht Unrainforced Branch D.D~O d,20 0,19 23.b2 STABLE
C 75-95X CleyLoem D,OAO 0,02 2,D9 STABLE

Received 04 02 2007 16:25
Apr. 2. 2001 2:12PM
No.8185 P. 5
I-Nbl~uuC pl~~~.!_L~a^
Diarherpa Peak Flaw Vdoci~ ((pa) lUea laa.lt) Hydraulic
f Nosmel
e h h
p.1 0.1 1.91 1.60 0.15 0.15
.8 eoree dDE51GN Ff1EgUENt,7;
Unfdrdoraed Wegel l
5 = 0.0200
1 ~1
'Width =~.00 I!
Nd l0 5cele
Reach Matadd T e or ypo Manninpi'n Parmisabla Calculated SafeW Remarks
SW b Paltetn daea a ene t Shear Stress (pd) 6heer Sales (psf] Foctcr
9lnipht Unreinlorced Bunch 0.080 42p Q.19 22,D2 S?ABLE
C 75.95X CIS Loam 0.050 0,026 1,94 STABLE

Received 04 02 2007 16;25
Avr• 2. 2001 2~12PM
No~8785 P• 6
Hv~ ~uclaesu~Ts
Dischaes oa low WdoelW (Ips) rLea leaH.l Hyduulic ormd
nls Paniad rs Radu:H De Ht
.0 0.1 1.99 3.51 0,26 A.27
1 INFR pF5111 T'S
3acroa iutawnrncwuu•r,r.
Utuelnlorned Vegel l
S - 0.0100
1 ~ 'UJi®t~itt~2.DOH ~'
Not to Scelc
Reaeh Matsrid T e P'he a Sol Type Maminp'a'n' Pamisarbla Colc atc elpty Remeka
Sty ~ tt a Denal Shear Seesa (pel Shear Stress [paf] Factor
Straight Unrekdnreed bunch 0,030 1.~0 0.77 24.59 STABLE
C 75.95X CkvLcem 0.050 0.023 2.17 STABLE

GRASSED SWALE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Name of Project:
Blalock's Glen
Address:
T~I <. ~0~ D SC6~ cS't!~ 01i'YI's i~D~'I i ~f / s C ~ ry h~ed~ B1C ~~G ~~I TG ~'~7C%~U~7 ~~
~s~r/6rry~ /~i c C~J~e 3~is') ~r~ oL l/~~/o~ /~f/n car .Or .%~ ~~ ,8r~~~~-~ ~I~i
Maintenance activities shall be performed as follows: ~aS~ d~ /~9~~ ~ ~r~~- ~j r/~~
MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY FREQUENCY
Post-construction monitoring-inspect for vegetation, Check after every heavy rainfall for first 6 months
settling, erosion, or concentrated flow following construction.
Remove excess sediment, especially from the Once annually
upstream edge, to maintain original contours and
grading
Repair any erosion and regrade the swale to ensure Once annually
that the runoff flows evenly in a thin sheet through
the swale
Inspect vegetation and revegetate the swale to Once annually
maintain a dense growth of vegetation
Mow grass to a maximum height of 6" Twice annually
GRASSED
SWALE ID LOCATION ON SITE (DESCRIBE) HOW WILL IT BE ACCESSED?
~ Nh/ /~ v,L~/Q~~ ~r S~~a~ ei-osSi~
L vaa~a le Or.v~
2 N~ ~, ,
3 S~ ~ , ~ >
4 S~ ~~ ~.
5
6
Page 1 of 2

r
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the
maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with the system or prior to any
changes to the system or responsible party.
Print name
Dianne Blalock Jones
Title: Owner
Address: 7885 Panther Lake Rd Willow S~rin~ N C 27592
Phone:
Signat~
Date: `~ /~ - u ' ~
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of the
Tots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president.
I Nancy S . Stancil , a Notary Public for the State of North Carolina
County of Johnston , do hereby certify that Dianne Blalock Jones
personally appeared before me this 12th day of April 2007 ,and acknowledge the
due execution of the forgoing grassed swale maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and official seal,
~„ sutr;r~~
5. ~S * ~~.
tee,, r,4f± ~ ~ ;.
i
+~
_ _ ~~
/f~f!lii~i~is.~`
SEAL
My commission expires 7-4-2009
Page 2 of 2

N~
:~W E~i BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC.
308D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Telephone [phone] -Fax [phone]
S
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
US Army Corps of Engineers North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Central Office
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120 Mail Service Center 1650
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615 Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
To Whom It May Concern:
By signing below, the current property owner gives representatives of Burdette Land
Consulting, Inc. permission to act as their authorized agent for jurisdictional and isolated waters
and riparian buffer determinations, delineation, and permitting for the subject project. This
authorization includes permission to enter the site to conduct site meetings with US Army Corps
of Engineers and NC Division of Water Quality personnel, as necessary.
Project Name: Blalock's Glen Subdivision
BLC Project #: 60030
Current Property Owner or Easement Holder:
Name: Dianne B. Jones
(include contact person if a corporation, partnership, or government)
Mailing Address:
7885 Panther Lfake Road
Willow Springs, NC 27592
Telephone: [phone]
Signature ,
~`~,~p~
Fax:
Dianne B. Jones
Print Name (include title, if appropriate)
Date