20110135 Ver 1_Application_20110209

o?Oy?F WATFyQ9 1I
FEB 0 8 2011 fJEttli•MdQERQUNJiY
wef rlYRQlNn CTrYlIreNA1Ht BRANCIt
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: non-reporting

Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
I
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 3 and NWP 13 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ? No For the record only for Corps Permit:

® Yes ? No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu ,
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ®No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Proposed repair to shoulder/fill slope adjacent to UT to Little River on SR 2353
(Morphus Bridge Rd).
2b. County: Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Wendell
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT Division 5
3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): N/A
3d. Street address: 2612 N. Duke Street
3e. City, state, zip: Durham, NC 27704
3f. Telephone no.: [phone]
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h. Email address: wbowman0mcdot.gov
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) N/A
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) N/A
Page 1 of 8
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
s.
;a
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification '-
'
-
•. Y. r,
.
": •:: Y,T4 rn< am-, r
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A
1 b. Coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Site: Latitude: 35.7806 Longitude: -78.3305
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: < 0.01 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to Little River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-V NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The shoulder section and fill slope have collapsed. Site is surrounded by wooded/agricultural lands.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
NONE
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
120 ft
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: Repair shoulder and fill slope to minimized risk of roadway collapse.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Dewater, drain work site, remove
debris jam of accumulated sediments and woody debris (minimize disturbance to leaf litter and vegetation), repair failure
by some type of hard armoring option: either steel sheeting retaining wall, rock plating backfill underlined with filter fabric,
or back fill held by ground driven anchors with pressure plates underlined with filter fabric and bi-axil geo grid matting
plated with rip rap, shoulder section between edge of pavement and rock armoring should be seeded and matted with
excelsior matting, dewaterin measures will be removed. Equipment may include a backhoe, excavator, and trucks.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
? Yes ® No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: N/A
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type

Final
El Preliminary El
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: N/A
Name (if known): N/A Other: N/A
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
N/A
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
? Yes ®No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
4
ti
i
Page 2 of 8
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
1
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ®No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 21b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.'
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ? T N/A N/A ? Yes ? Corps N/A
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total Wetland Impacts: NONE
2h. Comments: N/A
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
Site 1 ® P ? T
Stream 1 hard armoring UT to Little River ® PER
? INT ® Corps
® DWQ 3 120
Site 1 ? P ®T
dewatering
UT to Little River ® PER ® Corps
3 120
Stream 1 ? INT ® DWQ concurrent
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 120
3i. Comments: restoring bank by hard armoring slope only, no surface water loss proposed
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number - waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or (if applicable)
Temporary T
01 ? P ? T N/A N/A N/A N/A
4f. Total open water impacts NONE
4g. Comments: N/A

Page 3 of 8
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use purpose of (acres)
number pond d
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1 N/A 'N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
P2
5f. Total NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE
5g. Comments: N/A
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ®No if yes, permit ID no: N/A
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): N/A
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): N/A
5k. Method of construction: N/A
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ?Tor-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason for Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T required?
Site ? P ? T ? Yes
Buffer Impact 1 ? No
Site ? P ? T ? Yes
Buffer Impact 1 E] No

6h. Total buffer impacts NONE NONE
6i. Comments: N/A
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The impacts to stream are necessary to repair shoulder and fill slope. The work will utilize the space within the existing
transportation facility down the fill slope. This repair cannot be performed without reestablishing the toe of fill.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices for protection of surface waters and riparian buffers will be
enforced during project construction.
Page 4 of 8
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10. 2008 Version
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ®No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ? Mitigation bank
? Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type N/A Quantity N/A
3c. Comments: N/A
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: N/A linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): N/A square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: N/A acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: N/A acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: N/A acres
4h. Comments: N/A
6. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ®No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 N/A N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
Zone 2 N/A N/A 1.5 N/A
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: NONE
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). N/A
6h. Comments: N/A
Page 5 of 8
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a . Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b . If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes No
Comments: this repair will not alter storm water runoff at this site
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a . What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 20%
2b . Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Impacts only to stabilize fill slope
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, na rrative description of the plan: N/A
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Wake County
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached? N/A
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HOW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): N/A
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? N/A ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? N/A ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? N/A ? Yes ? No
Page 6 of 8
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered 'yes' to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? ,
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments: N/A
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): N/A
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
N/A
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment' methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 7 of 8
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ® Yes ? No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ? No
impacts?
® Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? NCDOT Office of Natural Environment survey and informal consultation with USFWS by onsite meeting. A
biological conclusion of May Affect but Not Likely to Adversely Affect was rendered. Concurrence on this biological
conclusion requested from USFWS Field Office. Copies of this concurrence will be forwarded to the USACE and NCDWQ
offices by USFWS.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish ®
El Yes No
habitat?
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
hh>tttom://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh coral/ims/viewer.htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
HPO's historic layer using GIS ArcView database
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
81b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: N/A
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? htto:ncfloodmaps.coml

J. W. Bowman, P.E.
4 02/08/11

Applicant/Agent's Printed Name ApplicanUAgent's Signatur
(Agent's signature Is valid only It an authorization I from the applicant
Date
... is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

A.
0
WP
J
d
-0
U
d
3
N -
Fill
o.
0
L?
a
u

0
3 N ?
v 4 Q

? a
3
N

y
It
Existing Site Condition:
The shoulder and associated fill slope have failed along SR 2353 (Morphus Bridge Road)
approximately 200ft west of the intersection at SR 2352 (Corbin Road). A contributing
debris jam will be removed from just across the channel. The resulting failure has left a
vertical raw bank for a distance of approximately 60ft at a depth of around 8ft. The
conditions here are unsafe in that this cut face is as close as 1 ft away from the edge of
pavement in some spots. Due to the instability in this area, continued erosion is sending
sediment loads downstream and the fill slope and shoulder are getting more and more
dangerous. This site must be repaired and the Wake County Maintenance forces are
pursuing several options which are presented below. Please note that additional repair
beyond the raw portion may be required by taking the repair up to the face of the
headwall to the pipe crossing under Morphus Bridge Road. The repair may be less than
but will not exceed 120 liner feet of hard armoring to the stream bank.
Repair Description(s):
Option # l: Reset the fill slope in the original location by using steel sheeting as a
retaining wall. Soil material would be back filled against the linked sheeting and then the
shoulder and resulting fill slope would rest against the top of the sheeting. Soil slope
above the sheeting would be armored with rip rap underlined with filter fabric. The
shoulder section will be vegetated by use of seeding and matting for long term
stabilization. This option would provide room to install guardrail.
Option #2: Re-set the fill slope in the original location by backfilling with soil material
and then stabilize the new slope with rip rap armoring underlined with filter fabric. If the
slope is too steep to support rock on fabric, less fabric will be used higher up the slope
and replaced with thicker amounts of rip rap armoring. The shoulder section will be
vegetated by use of seeding and matting for long term stabilization.
Option # 3: Re-set the fill slope in the original location by backfilling with soil material
and then stabilize the new slope with driven ground anchors with pressure plates
underlined with filter fabric and bi-axil geo grid matting, plated with rip rap armoring.
The shoulder section will be vegetated by use of seeding and matting for long term
stabilization.
Each of these options would involve the same methods of maintaining a dry work area.
-Dewater segment of stream next to the failed fill slope using sand bags wrapped in
plastic and/or sheet piling upstream and sandbags wrapped in plastic downstream of
repair.
-Set clean water pump on shoulder of road west of failure and run hose out of way
through wooded area across stream.
-Pump around water to re-enter stream just below downstream sandbags (use a piece of
plastic in the streambed or another energy dissipator method to allow water to exit hose
without causing turbidity or scour to the streambed or stream bank).
-Prior to repair, pump out any clean water trapped within the work limits on downstream
so that site is dry.
-Use mud pump and sediment bag to pump out and treat any dirty water, should the work
limits become wet during the repair.
-Remove debris jam of accumulated sediments and woody debris (minimize disturbance
to leaf litter and vegetation.
-If raw dirt areas result on the stream bank from debris removal, stabilize using native
seed and coir fiber matting with wooden stakes).
-Repair failure.
-Shoulder section between edge of pavement and rock armoring would be seeded and
matted for restoring vegetation here.
- No remaining disturbed areas will exist once rock armoring and/or matting is in place.
-All dewatering measures will be removed.
T

!W
* io?A

ti f???v?l? ?? i?Y .•
.,y f
r ^'
14
?oi

r
-. .s l . "` ^ ? af
• .r_wat= tit"
'
• 7
?
fi
;;d 7
:?'? f}? '
t"