20100621 Ver 1_Mitigation Bank Prospectus_20110209

'lpm®l~~l
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ~.
"~ WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS j Q''~'~
~////" Washington Regulatory Field Office
Past Office Box 1000
~. Washington, North Carolina 27889.1000
IN REPLY REFER TO
January 31, 2011
Regulatory Division
Action ID Nd. SAW-2010-02113 / Neu-Con Umbrella Wetland Mitigation Bank -Howell
Woods Stream and Wetland Preservation
Mr. Norton Webster
Environmental Banc and Exchange, L.L.C.
Project Manager
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Dear Mr. Webster:
FEB 0 9 2011
DEI~ • WATER alWJ1Y
YVE1l11NDS AND STI)RMNIATER BRANCH
This correspondence is in reference to the 135 acre Howell Woods StreamlWetland
Preservation Mitigation Bank located between Mill Creek and the Neuse River approximately
7.5 miles southeast of Smithfield, in Johnston County, North Carolina.
Pursuant to the Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) entitled, Neu-Con Umbrella Wetland
Mitigation and Stream Restoration Bank, dated March 8, 2001 and Amendment I for said
instrument effective Apri110, 2009, for stream preservation, the projected credit total shall be
available for sale and debiting, provided the restoration requirements have been met and the
following minimum requirements have been satisfied with regard to the Bank:
a. The Banking Instrument is executed and the Site Specific Mitigation Plan has
been approved by the MBRT (IRT).
b. Credits are established consistent with Section I,F,3 of the MBI and the Site
Specific Mitigation Plan,
c. A conservation easement is placed on the Bank Site or approved phase of a
Bank Site that generates the preservation credits.
d. Appropriate financial assurances of a type and amount acceptable to the Corps
and the MBRT (IRT) have been established, only if such preservation acreage is used in
conjunction with restoration, creation or enhancement acreage and such financial assurance is
necessary for the restoration, creation and enhancement acreage.
By copy of this correspondence, we confirm that you have satisfied the above requirements
and 3,633 stream mitigation credits and 20 wetland mitigation credits are available for use

provided they follow the guidelines established in SectionI,F.4 of the MBI and the associated
amendment I, These guidelines require that for every one-foot of stream impacts or one acre of
wetland impacts authorized by a Section 404 permit, two credits will be debited from the Bank.
One of those credits must be a restoration credit and the remaining credit may be made up of any
combination of restoration, enhancement, creation or preservation credits, as selected by the
sponsor and approved by the Corps during its permit process.
Enclosed for the IRT members is the final Howell Mitigation Preservation Letter Plan dated
January 2011.
Thank you-for your time and cooperation, The Wilmington District is committed to providing
the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so, please
complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at
http://pert.nwp.usace.army.mil/survey.html. If you have any questions, please contact me at the
Washington Regulatory Field Office, telephone (910) 2S1-4SS8.
Sincerely,
,W ,
William J. Biddlecome
Regulatory Project Manager
Copies Furnished (with Enclosure);
Ms, Lauren Witherspoon
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27b09~
Mr. Travis Wilson
Eastern Region Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conversation Program
1142 I-SS Service Road
Creedmoor, North Carolina 27522
2

Ms. Tammy Hill
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Ms. Beck Fox
USEPA/Wetlands Regulatory Section
1349 Firefly Road
Whittier, North Carolina 28789
Mr. Gary Jordan
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Ron Sechler
National Marine Fisheries Service
101 Pivers Island Road
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516

ID~~I~~j
HOWELL WOODS STREAM AND WETLAND
PRESERVATION SITE
,TOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA n
ACT[oN ID; 2010-02113 ~ ~ "° ~0~~
~~ 0 9 2011
PRESERVATION LETTER s~os~ti~ H
Pr°epared, for:
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh, NC 27606
Prepared by:
WK Dickson & Company, Inc.
720 Corporate Center Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
[phone]
January 2011

January 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ I
II. STUDY AREA ...................................................................................................................... 6
Physiography, Topography, and Drainage ................................................................................ .. 6
Soil Mapping ............................................................................................................................. .. 6
Protected Species ....................................................................................................................... .. 6
Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................... .. 9
Environmental Screening .......................................................................................................... .. 9
[II. EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................ .. 9
Hydrology .................................................................................................................................. .. 9
Stream Assessment .................................................................................................................... ]0
Wetland Assessment .................................................................................................................. ]0
Water Quality ............................................................................................................................ 11
Natural Communities ................................................................................................................. I 1
Bottomland Hardwood Forest ............................................................................................... 12
Cypress-Gum Swamp ............................................................................................................ 14
IV. MITIGATION ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................... 14
Water Quality Assessment ........................................................................................................ 14
Unique Ecological Attributes .................................................................................................... 16
Wetland Mitigation Credits ....................................................................................................... 17
V. ADMINISTRATIVE AND REGULATORY ISSUES .................................................... 17
HUC Service Area ..................................................................................................................... 17
Monitoring ................................................................................................................................. 17
Credit Release ............................................................................................................................ 17
Conservation Easement ............................................................................................................. 18
Financial Assurances ................................................................................................................. 18
VI. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................18
VII. REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................19
t
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
Preservation Letter -Howell Woods Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site

January 2011
List of Figures
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map ....................................................................................................... 3
Figure 2. USGS Map ...................................................................................................................... 4
Figure 2A. Mill Creek Vicinity Map .............................................................................................. 5
Figure 3. Soils Map ........................................................................................................................ 7
Figure 4. Proposed Easement and Forest Types ........................................................................... 13
Figure SA. Neuse River Hydrograph 2005-2010 ......................................................................... 15
Figure SB. Mill Creek Hydrograph 2005-2010 ............................................................................ l5
List of Tables
Table 1. Howell Woods Mitigation Summary ................................................................................ 2
Table 2. Howell Woods Stream and Wetland Preservation Soils .................................................. 6
Table 3. Protected Species in Johnston County .............................................................................. 8
Table 4. Proposed Stream Preservation ........................................................................................ 10
Table 5. Howell Woods Vegetation Plot Summary ..................................................................... 12
Appendices
Appendix A Correspondence
Appendix B EDR Reports
Appendix C Routine Wetland Data Forms
Appendix D Vegetation Survey Data
Appendix E Easement Monitoring Data Sheet
Appendix F Sample Deed of Easement
Appendix G Sh•eam Quality Assessment Forms
11
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
Preservation Letter -Howell Woods Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site

January 2011
I. INTRODUCTION
This Preservation Letter presents 27,250 LF of stream preservation and 100.6 acres of forested
wetland preservation at the Howell Woods Mitigation Site in Johnston County, North Carolina
(Figure 1). The Howell Woods site is located between Mill Creek and the Neuse River
approximately 7.5 miles southeast of Smithfield. The proposed easement encompasses 135 acres
of Bottomland Hardwood Forest and Cypress-Gum Swamp on the Neuse River floodplain.
Specifically, the site is located at Latitude 35.380 Longitude -78.284, and is mapped on the Four
Oaks NE and Newton Grove, NC USGS Quadrangles (Figure 2). The proposed Howell Woods
easement protects the north side of Mill Creek. The southern side of Mill Creek across from the
Howell Woods easement is protected under existing conservation easements established for
Westbrook, Cox, and Cox I[ mitigation sites (Figure 2A).
The Howell Woods Environmental Learning Center is anon-profit entity owned and operated by
Johnston County Community College. The 2,800-acre property is actively managed for timber
production, wildlife, fishing, environmental education, and passive recreation. A sand quarrying
lease provides additional funding for operating expenses. The proposed permanent conservation
easement area is currently mature hardwood forest with a high timber value. A letter from Mr.
David Johnson, President of Johnston Community College, addresses the current goals and
objectives of the college (Appendix A). The current Strategic Plan for Howell Woods forest
management plan does not identify these proposed preservation areas for timber harvest. The
current Strategic Plan does call fora "standard no cut or no disturbance for any blue-line stream
or other identified wetland on Howell Woods to be a minimum of 100 feet as measured from the
bank of the stream or edge of the wetland and wider when possible." The core fund raising, public
relations, and marketing section specifically allows and encourages the pursuit of permanent
protection of these habitats through various legal mechanisms to achieve the college's goals. As
quoted from Mr. Johnson's letter, "should circumstances prevail, the college expects to change its
plan and allow for property disturbance in order to achieve planned financial objectives for
Howell Woods." It is foreseeable that future economic and management factors will lead to
timber harvesting in this bottomland hardwood forests given the considerable projected yield
from the mature stands. Recordation of the proposed permanent conservation easements will
protect the high-value forests that buffer the streams in perpetuity.
The purpose of this project is to generate sh•eam and wetland preservation mitigation credits for
the Neu-Con Umbrella Mitigation Bank. The site is consistent with applicable federal guidance
and the provisions of the Neu-con Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI). The legal limits of the
preservation site will be finalized when the conservation easement is recorded. The parcel
boundaries and proposed easement limits displayed in the report are based on Johnston County
GIS data and GIS data provided by the Howell Woods Environmental Learning Center. The final
recorded conservation easement will be consistent with the Neu-Con MBI Section LF, IILE.
Consistent with the Neu-Con MBI, mitigation credits may be used to offset stream and wetland
impacts authorized by Section 404 permits. Typically, credits will be debited at a 2: l ratio
(Section LF.3 Neu-Con MBI). One of these credits must be restoration, and the remaining credit
maybe any combination of restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation. The Howell
Woods Mitigation Site stream and wetland mitigation credits will be used in conjunction with
restoration credits in the hydrologic unit code (HUC) 03020201. The stream preservation is
presented with a mitigation ratio of 7.5:1, and has a total of 3,633 stream mitigation credits. The
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
Preservation Letter -Howell Woods Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site

January 2011
wetland prese-vation is presented with a mitigation ratio of 5:1, and has a total of 20 wetland
mitigation credits (Table 1).
Table L Howell Woods Mitigation Summary
This report presents the results of background data collection, enviromnental screening,
ecological evaluation, and site assessment. Specific methodologies and results are desa~ibed in
detail in subsequent sections.
WK Dickson & Ca., Inc. 2
Preservation Letter -Howell Woods Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site

~ ~~ ~
0
a
Legend
Preservation Easement
Howell Woods Boundary
CoxlWestbrook Easement Boundaries
Wilkins Properly
® ~
W C
S

` ~, ~ ... i
~NASH 1 t~~ ~f '
~t ~ Sown ~~ ~ I ~ . ~ r-,_
WAKE ~ '~ ti Fond ~ -.. I _
WILSON ti Y*`~~ ~ I,
t ,,, ~ ~ , .
JOHNSTON ~ 1 ti ~~` ~ ~ '~`~`~~~!~`
"` k `1 `' ~ ' l~ y' <
~~ - -- - - --1 _ ~ .y _-~ _'~' _ -- _ _ .. J ._ . _ _.
HARNET~, ® WAYNE ~ :.~ bt ~ ~ ~ i' 1 r,•,,.
t ~'~ ~ \~~. ,I
~~~ ~ ~;~~ w~ ~ I ~.
t f ~LL -u,; r r~r ~ '' r+ C'p'l l (•V •, ~~~_ ... ~:
/ r 't' Y
` 1 i 4 1 l
Y
~1 l ~ ~ }1 it I ~ I ~ ~~l I 1i
'IL` IiV :' 1 5 I .
•~ ~ t
--' ' I r+ 4r.~.ar- t
~--• ri ~
I ~~ ~~ I ~i~~~~ i
~~~-t ~ r r { I' _ ~~~s~~l
- ~ & ~~ jt ~ 7 ) ~~i, j ~ ~ T ~ ~ ;1
. ,
~ ~~~~ ~~ 67Y11 _ r~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ d,•,, ~ ~+' ~~' I
'Y~ C'fIa1I / T 1' F ~ ~ ' I ~ + ~. 1
1 1 ~
- y r \+r~~f ~ ~ii ~' ~-.-.,-~,~. it I, I i ! t \~'^
'~-~~~ y~~i~i!'~ ,{174 l ;Y I. i; i 5~ ~ _, r - r -
{{ ~,, _(' .
.F . ,I ~~ ~ 1 ~ ~'N . - _ i ~'L-} rF!,.~ ,~ . j ~$ ere, r'
.~,. J ~ ,~ ~ 1 1
F
I} r ~
Legend ~' ~ '~ ii I _ ~' ''
-- Streams ,~,'~, ~I ,~ 'r ~ ~,~ t~ ~ : Fu ,
a Preservation Easement ~ ~ ' 1 ~ s
+~ ,, ~ I ~ ~,~ ~~ I
„A u~ ,,~ ~,7, 1 , ~ , ...
Howell Wootls Boundary -~.~, ;,,r 1i ~ w '~ i ~ ~j I!
CoxlWestbrookEasementBoundaries r.e~7 ~'h, '~ t'~ ~~, ~ ~j~~`.~,I ~'f 3•`' `J ~ .,
ri~ui~~@c J ~' , I y+~ + ~ ~l I~ ..1 i - ~ - - r -' ,-~-' -~ _ _ _...1 r ..`tom.

i~
ii
~~
.... ~r~ •<-~aw~-r~w~~-.. _. r.~~. c ._ 1~5.-.J~~I +Y`ryl~t
{ /
I, ~ i`ti .
t^ ~.~
,,
~_ ,I µ ~ `.
~~
~~ ~ _
i, ' ~ 'I'„
1 ~l
~' ~ '~
~~, ( r. ~~ rl,+
~•~« _
t ~ ._
~' a~ ~ ~~ "~~~~~~ ~.
~,~ J
_ ;+, ~Y 1, i _4~t _ t l'`~-,
~ by
I ~_ _ I i, i
1~ ~ ~ f
F~ f... .-~ ~r - _. ,.~ ~~ti ~
tJ .t-... ~I ._J ~~-.
J~`~ "i^0. Westbook Site ~ _~ _~, ~ f ` ~ ~,
~- i ~ i
Cox Site
Cox II Site
~l; ~ J ,~. ~ , ,~ 4 ~ ~ ~ -. I
`~~~r'P . ',,,,. ~ ~~~` ~ ,~ i
!f1{', -_
~ ! 7 ! 7 1 r I ~.
Legend
-Streams
a Howell Wootls Preservation Easement
CoxlCox II1WestbrooklWilkins Conservation Easements
® " Figure 2A.
w E
Stream
s
,~` ~~ ~
~,~' f)
„1
~ ~ ~ ,t
r ~ r
_ ~.-. --~
~ {-. r ._~_.-- K-
..
~i
~~ ~,
{ ~ ~ ~ Wilkins Site
!i rr
II 1
r
Mill Creek Vicinity Map
Howell Woods o 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
& Wetland Preservation 1 in -1,000 ft
January 2011

January 2011
II. STUDY AREA
PHYSIOGRAPHY, TOPOGRAPHY, AND DRAINAGE
The Howell Woods mitigation site is located in the Upper Neuse River Basin within the USGS
HUC 03020201 and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) sub-basin 03-04-04. The
site is in the Coastal Plain Physiographic Province, but is close to the Fall Line. The underlying
geology is the Cape Fear Formation, and is composed of sandstone, muddy sandstoue, and clay.
The site is located on the Neuse River Floodplain, and has relatively flat topography with
elevations ranging from 84 to 108 feet above mean sea level (NAD 27) based upon USGS
mapping (Figure 2). The preservation area drains into Mill Creek and, uhimately, the Neuse
River. Natw•al drainage patterns throughout the watershed have been largely unaltered. A few
sloughs, drainage ways, and dirt roadbeds influence the drainage patterns on the Howell Woods
property. The dominant land use in the project vicinity is woodlands and agricultural production.
A sand and gravel pit is leased out on the property. The proposed conservation easements consist
of forested stream buffers and Bottomland Hardwood Forest wetlands.
SOIL MAPPING
There are six soil types mapped across the proposed preservation area (Table 2). The
predominant soil type within the sU•eam preservation buffer is the Wehadkee-Chastain association
(81 percent). This soil unit is frequently flooded, and exits on 109.4 acres throughout the northern
portions of the preservation site (Figure 3). The soils found along Mill Creek in the southern
portions of the site consist of Alta vista fine sandy loam, Bibb sandy loam, Roanoke loam,
Tarboro loamy sand, and Warne loam. All soils are either occasionally or frequently flooded,
with the exception of Tarboro loamy sand, which is rarely flooded.
Table 2. Howell Woods Stream and Wetland Preservation Soils
Map
S mbal
Soil T ~ e
H drolo Area
acres Percent
AaA Alta vista fine sandy loam Occasionally flooded 0.2 0.1
Bb Bibb sandy loam Frequently flooded 23.1 17.1
Ro Roanoke loam Occasionally flooded 0.1 0.1
Ta Tarboro loamy sand Rarely Flooded L2 0.9
Wh Warne loam Occasionally flooded 1.0 0.7
Ww Wehadkee-Chastain association Frequently flooded 109.4 81.0
7~otal: 135.0 100.0
The Wehadkee-Chastain and Bibb soils are poorly drained. Warne soil is somewhat poorly
drained, and Alta vista is moderately well-drained. All of the soil map emits on the preservation
site are on the North Carolina hydric soil list except Tarboro loamy sand.
PROTECTED SPECIES
The Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database and US Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) county listing
were used to identify state and federally protected species that occur in Johnston County. These
species are listed in Table 3. No protected species were observed during the field evaluations
conducted on the site. Suitable habitat for Virginia least tt•illium (Trillium pusillann var.
virgrniamrm) and cerulean warbler (Dendroica cerzrlea) are found on the site. In 2000, Harry
LeGrand noted the call of a male cerulean warbler at the site.
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
Preservation Letter -Howell Woods Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site

b
~ N~~a_,
~;: ,i v k ~

i
`t *
n
~ i,e~
~' ~ }
r ry;~y ;
~ `
`' : ~ ~
~' "`
r
`~'
..

1 ~~ ~~a .
~ ~..
~ t
Y
'w 0
ryry~
4~ ~
~ M/
~ ~ Rc+
q
~;~~: '~.
' S
S
~' ~ 1 ~ ~ , ,
I °~
4 f
~R~/
,a ~ ~ 5,91
-~
f°
_. ~; ,, .
ti
~1 f~F ~. , F' ~ ~y~'j _ '~. t~W
~ r~ ~
'~`
~ ~,
t `~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~_
a~ °~
~~ ',~~ _ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
Gb .~ °~~ . ~•..§~
.~ ~
i
e..,+' t
~ ~ ~'°~~ ~ ,,,~,. r;~; ~a
e ~~ ~
~ ~ ® ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~y
„_
y-
1, %c,°S s ~ "i 1
F 5 is
~r;*~hL i~z MIII Creek-segment2 ~ 'Mill ~~~ ~ ~ ''~~'x^~
r s 9m
} p ~ K a Fad ~t r ~ ' ~ _ ~ if ~,y~w
Legend !{~_ ~ ~ ! ~
...
Preservation Streams ` j r r
HydricSoils ~ ~~
.
Non-hydric Soils ~; -+ R~
® Preservation Easement ~ wu! ~ ~' ~ _ 'p~
4~
Howell Woods Boundary '~;~,;`~ a ~~ ~ '. ~ ~~,
CoxlWestbrook Easement Boundaries ~'~ - ~ ' i
S q-.• , i'
® " Figure 3. Soils Map
w r E Howell Woods 0 750 1,500 3~OFeet
Stream & Wetland Preservation
s January 2011 1 in =1,500 ft

January 2011
The Howell Woods stream and wetland preservation will help to maintain water quality in Mill
Creek and the Neuse River. This could provide benefits to state and federally listed species that
utilize the Neuse River and other riverine habitats downstream of the Howell Woods site.
Protected species that might benefit from improved downstream water quality include the state
threatened Creeper mussel ($h~ophi~hrs undulates) and Bald Eagle (Haliaeetars IearcocePhales), as
well as the federally endangered Dwarf Wedge mussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) and Tar River
Spiny mussel (Elliptio steuastansana).
Table 3. Protected Species in Johnston County
Common Name Scientific name Federal
Status State
Status Habitat
Present
Vertebrate
Roanoke bass Amblo lites cavi ions FSC SR Y
American eel An villa rosh•ata FSC None Y
Cerulean warbler Dendroicn cerarlea FSC SC Y
Bald ea le Haliaeehrs (eucoce hales BGPA T Y
Least Brook Lam re Lana etra ae tera None T Y
Lo erhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus None SC N
Neese River Waterdo Necturus lewisi None SC Y
Pinewoods shiner** L thrurus raaattrtinus FSC None N
Carolina madtom Notm•us arriosus FSC T Y
Red-cockaded wood ecker Picoides borealis E E N
Invertebrate
Dwarf wed emussel Alasmidonta hetea°odon E E Y
Trion le Floater Alasmidonta undadata None T Y
Yellow lance Elli do lanceolata FSC E Y
Ca e Fear S ike Elli do marsu iobesa None SC Y
Roanoke Slabshell EAi do roanokensis None T Y
Tar Rivers in mussel Elli do steinstansana E E Y
Atlantic i toe Ftrsconnia masoni FSC E N
Yellow lam mussel Lanz sibs cariosa FSC E Y
Eastern Lam mussel Lam sibs radiata None T Y
Green floater Lasmi ono sarbviridis FSC E Y
North Carolina S in Cra fish Orconectes carolinensis None SC N
Cree er Stro hitus undulates None T Y
Notched Rainbow Villosa constricta None SC N
Vascular Plant
Bo s icebush Linder°a sarbcoriacea FSC T N
Carolina bo mint Macbridea caroliniana FSC T Y
Michaux's sumacs Rhars raaichauxii E E-SC N
S rin -flowerin oldenrod Solida o versa FSC T N
Vir inia least trillium* Trillizrm usillum var, vir iniamnn FSC E N
BGPA Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
E Endangered
T Threatened
FSC Federal Species of Concem
SC Special Concern
SR Significantly Rare
* Historic
** Obscure
USFWS:
Updated: 09-22-2010
Accessed: 12-07-2010

NC NHP:
Search performed on Tuesday 7, December 20 LO
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
Preservation Letter -Howell Woods Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site

January 2011
The NHP database lists ten element occurrences within the Howell Woods site. Individual species
occurrences include thick-pod white wild indigo (Baptisia alba), water violet (Hoftonia inflata),
and Carolina bogmint (Macbridea carolinrana). None of these species are federally listed as
threatened or endangered. Significant natural communities include cypress-gum swamp
(brownwater subtype) and coastal plain bottomland hardwoods (brownwater subtype). A
significant natural heritage area (SNHA) designation encompasses most of the site.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
A search of the files at the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office revealed no historic
structures within aone-mile radius of the proposed preservation site. No structures were observed
during site visits. A review of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) database shows
the Bentonville Battleground, an 1865 Civil War battle site covering several square miles, is
located approximately 0.5 mile south of the proposed Howell Woods preservation site. No
impacts to cultural resources are expected from this project.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING
An Environmental Data Resources (EDR) Radius Map with GeoCheck report was ordered to
perform an environmental screening of the preservation site (Appendix B). An historic photo
report and an historic mapping report were also reviewed. The EDR GeoCheck report includes
searches of 15 Federal Databases and 55 State and Local databases. None of these databases
revealed any mapped database occunrences. Forty-two unmapped database elements were
identified. Based on the element sheet addresses, none was in the project vicinity or immediately
up-gradient of the proposed conservation easement.
III. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The site is located on the floodplain of the Neuse River between Smithfield and Goldsboro. The
floodplain iswide-reaching four miles across-and is part of the Middle Neuse River Macrosite
described by the NHP in the Johnston county Natural Areas Inventory (June 2001). This area is
described as having a number of unique sites, although most are unprotected and in private
ownership. This extensive and mature forest provides habitat far neo-tropical migrating birds and
upland game species. The NHP has identified this area on the Neuse River as a significant
floodplain in North Carolina, especially in the extent of mature Bottom Land Hardwood Forest.
HYDROLOGY
Due to the flat topography, the floodplain is subject to frequent flooding from the Neuse River,
bringing high sediment loads to this site. A number of streams and sloughs on this extensive
floodplain drain the adjacent upland and the nearly level floodplain, connecting numerous
wetland habitats and providing diverse aquatic habitat. In addition, these streams provide a
drainage network after flood events.
In general, hydrology of the wetlands on the floodplain are derived from flooding of the Neuse
River, causing over bank flooding of the stream channels and seasonal high water table elevation
controlled by level topography and stream water surface elevation. The wetland assessment found
that the preservation area is almost entirely jurisdictional wetland. Small areas ofnon-wetland are
present, including access roads, dredge spoil, and small areas of slightly elevated topography.
Within the preservation area, Mill Creek, a perennial stream (S1), and three smaller perennial
unnamed tributaries are present, Sl-A, S1-B, and S1-C (Figure 3). These smaller perennial
streams flow six to nine months or more, and have stow to stagnant current during the driest
times. These streams rely on rainfall and groundwater flow from the numerous wetlands located
WK Dickson & Co., Inc. 9
Preservation Letter -Howell Woods Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site

January 2011
across the floodplains. Other more variable hydrology influences are flood events and beaver
impoundments. The perennial stream S 1 is divided into two segments. These streams converge
and flow into Mill Creek.
STREAM ASSESSMENT
The Mill Creek portion of this preservation site is a large, perennial stream with a sand bed, deep
pools, and frequent riffles (Table 4). This section of Mill Creek supports recreational fishing and
a significant aquatic site downstream. Mill Creek is adjacent to existing permanent conservation
easements for the Cox, Cox II, and Westbrook mitigation sites. The proposed preservation
includes Mill Creek and four unnamed hibutaries, totaling 27,250 linear feet of stream channel.
Table 4. Proposed Stream Preservation

Reach Name
Len th F Channel
Width -feet Channel
De th feet
Mill Creek-segment 1 6,665 20 to 40 4 to 8
Mill Creek-segment 2 148 20 to 40 4 to 8
Sl-segment 1 2,523 25 to 30 2 to 6
S 1-segment 2 1,171 25 to 30 4 to 6
S 1-A 8,644 15 to 20 2 to 4
S l-B 6,418 15 to 30 2 to 4
S 1-C 465 15 to 25 2 to 4
S2 1216 25-30 2 to 6
Total 27,250
Mill Creek has an approximate width of 20 to 40 feet, and bank heights of four to eight feet. The
Unnamed Tributary to Mill Creek 1 (S1) is divided into three segments. S1 has been dredged in
the past, but is stable, and supports a mature forest buffer. The this segment varies as the channel
width changes. Sl-A, S1-B, and S1-C are first-order streams that have low gradients, and become
stagnant in low-flow periods. They have mucky bottoms, and cypress trees and aquatic vegetation
are common throughout. These swamp streams provide important physical, water quality, and
biological functions in the Upper Neuse Watershed.
WETLAND ASSESSMENT
Due to the uniform nature of the site, flat topography, and allowance for small non-wetland
inclusions, a wetland delineation was not performed on the proposed preservation site. Rather,
five representative locations along the buffer were selected for a more detailed vegetation
analysis and wetland assessment as described in Natural Communities Section below.
A wetland determination data form (Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain region) was completed for
this community (Appendix C). This included recording the dominant vegetation in each stratum,
soil boring to at least 18 inches, and recording primary and secondary wetland hydrology
indicators (USAGE, 1987).
The wetland assessment found that the preservation area is mostlyjurisdictional wetland. Small
areas ofnon-wetland are present in areas of slightly elevated topography. An elevated berm (6.0
acres) composed of spoil material on the right bank (west) of S l was not included in the wetland
preservation area. The vegetation is dominated by FAC and FACW species and is described in
detail in the Natural Communities section of this report. Both soil mapping and on-site soil
WK Dickson & Co., Inc. 10
Preservation Letter -Howell Woods Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site

January 2011
borings demonstrate hydric soils are present across the proposed preservation site. Soils map
units are described above. Wetland hydrology indicators included water table within 12 inches of
the surface, water stained leaves, crayfish chimneys, and positive FAC-neutral test. Onsite
wetlands primarily have a Cowardin classification of Palustrine Forested Broad-leaved Deciduous
Saturated/Temporarily Flooded (PFO1B/A).
WATER QUALITY
Mill Creek and the unnamed tributaries are classified as WS-IV NSW by DWQ. The primary
classification "WS-IV" indicates waters as a Water Supply IV -Highly Developed watershed.
These waters are used as sources of water supply for drinking, culinary, or food processing
purposes where a less developed watershed classification (WS-1, II or III) is not feasible. WS-[V
waters are generally in moderately to highly developed watersheds or protected areas. These
waters are also protected for Class C uses. Class C waters support aquatic life and secondary
recreational uses. The supplemental classification NSW denotes nutrient sensitive waters that are
subject to excessive growth of microscopic or macroscopic vegetation, and may need additional
nutrient management. Mill Creek discharges into the Neuse River approximately six miles
downstream of the mitigation site. The Neuse River is listed as Water Supply V, Nutrient
Sensitive Waters at its confluence with Mill Creek. Water Supply V waters are protected as water
supplies, which are generally upstream and draining to Water Supply IV waters or waters used by
industry to supply their employees with drinking water or as waters formerly used as water
supply. These waters are also protected for Class C uses.
Much of the flood plain surrounding these streams is comprised of wetlands. The streams flow
through the wetlands, interconnecting these habitats. The extensive buffers along these channels
stabilize the soil and wetlands, preventing down-cutting and erosion. The National Wetlands
Inventory (NWI) identifies these streams and the surrounding floodplain as having a Cowardin
classification of Palustrine Forested Broad-leaved Deciduous Temporarily Flooded (PFO1 A). A
wetland assessment was not performed at this site.
NATURAL COMMUNITIES
The site evaluation identified two distinct natural communities along the floodplain: a mature
Bottomland Hardwood Forest and aCypress-Gum Swamp (Figure 4). Detailed descriptions of
the natural communities are provided below.
WK Dickson performed a vegetation survey across the preservation area. Five l/10`h acre plots
were established in representative buffer locations to quantify the forest stand parameters and
delineate the existing natural communities. Within each vegetation plot, all trees ?3-inch DBH
were identified and measured. All shrub species and herbaceous species were identified. The
height of one canopy tree was determined in each plot and representative photographs were taken
at each plot. Species and dbh was recorded and basic vegetation plot data was calculated from
variables collected (Table 5). Although the evaluation identified one community type, a mature
Bottomland Hardwood Forest, aCypress-Gum Swamp is present within the channels and in
limited areas outside the channels. Detailed descriptions of both natural communities are given in
the following sections.
WK Dickson & Co., Inc. I 1
Preservation Letter -Howell Woods Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site

January 2011
Table 5. Howell Woods Vegetation Plot Summary

Plot Basal Area
2
(ft lac) Avg.

DBA (in) Trees per

Acre Tree

Species Total

Species
Natural Community
1 284 173 110 6 18 Mature Bottomland Hardwoods
2 148 7.9 2S0 10 14 Mature Bottomland Hardwoods
3 2G 1 13.5 190 8 17 Mature Bottomland Hardwoods
4 132 8.1 180 4 1 S Mature Bottomland Hardwoods
5 205 9.2 260 6 10 Mature Bottomland Hardwoods
Average 202 11.2 198 7 1 S
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
This community is located in the buffer outside of the channels and grades into the Cypress-gum
swamp community along the edge of channels. The mature hardwoods form a dense canopy. The
shrub and herb sh•ata range for relatively open to locally dense. The canopy height ranges from to
80 to lS0 feet. Several sloughs are present off of the stream channels and offer open water habitat
diversity. Evidence of fre0uent flooding was found across the site, including watermarks on
trunks and infrequent low wrack lines in small shrubs and brush. Flooding was observed for one
week during the site survey, limiting access to portions of the site.
The dominant bottomland trees include cherrybark oak (Querces pagoda), overcup oak (Qaaercars
lyrata), swamp chestnut oak (Qarercus michaarxii), sweetgum (Ligaridambar styraciflea), willow
oak (Qeercus phellos), red maple (Ater rebrunr), green ash (Fra~ines perasylvanica), and
American elm (Ulnaus aanericana). Slightly wetter bottomlands have higher densities of overcup
oak (Qeerces lyrata), and the drier areas contain loblolly pines (Pines taeda). The sub-canopy is
diverse, featw~ing American honlbeam (Carpimas caroliniana), sweetgum, overcup oak, red
maple, and winged ehn (Ulners alata) as dominant species. The shrub layer is variable,
containing possumhaw holly (Iles decidea), American holly (Ilex opaca), and numerous small
saplings. Giant cane (Arendhaaria gigantea) is abundant. The herbaceous layer is mostly sparse
except in areas of thin canopy and canopy gaps, which contain a variety of sedges, common rush
(Juncaas eff""arses), smallspike false nettle (Boehrneria cylindrical), and netted chain fern
(Woodwardia areolata). Woody vines include greenbriar (Smilax sp.), crossvine (Bignonia
capreolatcr), muscadine (Vitis sp.), and poison ivy (Toxicodeaadron radians).
The mature bottomland hardwood community most closely resembles the Coastal Ptaiu
Bottomland Hardwoods (Brownwater Subtype) described in Schafale and Weakley, and is
classified as a Bottomland Hardwood Forest using the draft NC Wetland Assessment Method
(NCWAM) dichotomous key to general NC wetland types. Although Mill Creek originates in the
coastal plain and is a blackwater stream, the regular flooding of the nearby Neese River provides
substantial nutrient input to this forest community within the proposed preservation area.
Therefore, this site is classified as a Brownwater Subtype community. Dishu~bance is minimal
and includes hunting trails and damage from wild boars (Ses scrofa). This is a high quality stream
and wetland ecosystem, and a wetland mitigation ratio of S:1 is recommended.
WK Dickson & Co., Inc. 12
Preservation Letter -Howell Woods Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site

;j
:~
t ~" '4h k~ .'. 'a j '" 3 3 P P
~,~t- ~ t + ,. ~e ~~P~"` x} a x yx ~ t~ ~~ ~*+~~*~#~~~ ~~~ r.~ '> d r: 'b~ ~`y F
~ t~ t~ ~u ~' ~~4~'A F 4r ~'~,~ 'gs ~.+ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ,~ 1} a, .~>a~... y "'.:--
~ 4~ a~ F ~ 3 ~` r ~~ k?
'~ ~ ~~ c,~.. ~ k~,t `+Q„ fir 4• ~ r~ ~ r 1~,r~. '{ ~, ~ y i;
i !;
~te~ +,., r" :^_ r' "' f~. ~~ Data Point 3 R +FSr ~ /{ r ~~ "r«~ ; c ~ -
1 ii 44 b
~. 3~ F r r 1 , ~ '
'N ~7 y j
.,~;~a s ~ i,y~ '~ !. 44.E t~~` ~ ~~{ u~
`i i ~y~~s ~r i, w r• q f ~ yV ! V~~ j~t+ ~~~i
~a~t+~~~ ~~ 'F 4 ~}~ ii, ~, V e ~ :!` F ~ ry v~ ~'r F ~~'1G~1 PIo 2 ~ 3q ~~ ... r.`s
w-ii~ 1 • a~ z 1 '-~ S ?t~'~ .. 1~ ~ y ~ Dada Poml2 y y_ a4 ~ 2f.
~i 1T ~D.bt 1~. tE h. t~ 1E R,~G y 1 fF
'lra ! e ~ + ° o f' ~q
~~' '+!f'~l Y:2 5 i; ~'"r~ .' ~~~r..~ 7~Y~i ,~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~~ti ~ ~~ ~~~7?~ f)/ ~s r ~r~~ _
Q,
'~~ ~ i ,4~~7t^
'4h g ~~~~ y r ,
,M~ ~ f '' ip ,. '. ~~,;~.: w
® PlotslData Points ~ ~ ~ j~~ , 't~ ~~~ , ~ 4 y y '"~
°~ Streams ~- «~- ~~ PmiS°'t"~.~r~',; ~~" ' :'~= ~'+~ ~=
:Data Poin15 ~ ~z,~';tl' i :y 1 a .i~^..
- Roads ~ ` ,~'~~ + r, t ' ~ ~,~ ` 5 , ,
bk f
® Preservation Easement ~` 1 ; ~'! ~ w~7 ~ ~- "` ` , „. ~ , ``~ `~ ~ Ptp, q' '' ~' `
~?-~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~Mr n !~< «iy~ Data Poin14 ~~~ a;>~ ~ ~.
Existing EEP Conservation Easement ~~ ~ „- ~ ' ~ ~, ~~ ~, ; ~ . y "
i ~i Y r vb Y'1 i }. Y
Howell Woods Boundary ~ ~„ L~, q~^;: ~ i~.' `?~~, " ~,,~~
~ ,~~ '~-'' a, ~ ',:t"
Existing EBX Conservation Easements ,~KM1~ ,,,, ~ ; ' 1~~ ~~y fit;, .i~+x~ ~ s
r & ~ -a •.
Natural Communities r ~ ~ ,~t ~~ ~ I' ~ ~ , ~~ ~~,~~`~~*,
xt
Bottomland hardwood forest a ~,~ ~ ~~~~ ~~' ~~ ~~'~' ' Y ~ ~~' °~
+ ~,+,~
~ ~. 3 ~,~ , '~ ~,. ^~ r i
Cypress gum swamp 5~. 1 % t d ' r ~~ ` ~ `~
~ a i d' ~ c `~ aV y ,n 3 ~ ~ ,F,1
~ ~ Figure 4. Natural Communities
0 750 1,500 3,000
w r E Howell Woods Feet
Stream & Wetland Preservation 1 inch =1,500 feet
s January 2011

January 2011
Cypress-Gum Swamp
This swamp community is mostly found adjacent to stream channels, sloughs, and depressions.
This linear forest community is discontinuous along the chancel, has limited canopy breaks, and
shades the channels. It is dominated by bald-cypress (Tarodiaur~ distichurn), swamp tupelo (Nyssa
biflora), and eastern cottonwood (Po~idus deltoicJes). Sweetgum and overcup oak also occur
regularly in this commw~ity along with other individuals common in the Bottomland Hardwood
Forest community. The main understory trees are American hon~beam and Carolina ash
(Fr•axinus caroliniana). Various sedges are present in the shallow water and margins, along with
forbs such as lizard's tail (Saan~an~us cermrrrs) and smallspike false nettle. This commucity is
permanently saturated and semi-permanently flooded due to topography and beaver
impoundments. Smal] areas of open water are present because of wind damage and
microtopography. The water was typically 0-18 inches above the ground surface at the time of the
vegetation survey. Watermarks were visible on many trees.
The mahu~e swamp forest community most closely resembles aCypress-Gum Swamp
(Brownwater Subtype) described in Schafale and Weakley, and is classified as a Riverine Swamp
Forest using the draft NCWAM dichotomous key to general NC wetland types. This community
has few invasive species, and disturbance is limited to hunting trails, beaver impoundments, past
timber harvesting, and damage from wild boars. This is a high quality stream and wetland
ecosystem, and a wetland mitigation ratio of 5:1 is recommended.
IV. MITIGATION ASSESSMENT
The Howell Woods Preservation Site is a unique acd valuable stream and aquatic ecosystem. The
stream and riparian areas provide diverse aquatic habitat and water quality benefits to floodwaters
from the Neuse River and Mill Creek. The adjacent wetland areas provide macy complementary
water quality and habitat functions within the sensitive Neuse River watershed. The discussion
below details the wetland and water quality functions of the site, as well as its unique ecological
attributes.
WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT
The Howell Woods preservation area is frequently flooded by the Neuse River and Mill Creek.
Figure 5A depicts the flood frequency on the Neuse River at the US 70 bridge in Smithfield,
approximately nine miles upstream of the project, for 2004-2008. Figure SB depicts the flood
frequency on the Mill Creek downstream of the site at Cox Mill, approximately three miles
downstream of the project, for 2004-2008. Several flood events have been recorded that
inundated the preservation area.
WK Dickson & Co., Inc. 14
Preservation Letter -Howell Woods Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site

January 2011
USGS 02081510 NEUSE RIVER AT SMITHFIELD, NG
y 2A
w
r
,~ 15
~t I V
u
L
d
~ 1e
c~
a
J
N
c 5
2005 2005 2006 2086 2807 2D87 2D08 2008 2009 2009 2018
- Daily naxinun gage height
- Daily nininun gage height
- Daily Wean gage height
e Period of approved data
Period of provisional data
National Heather Service Floodstage
Figure SA. Neuse River Hydrograph 2005-2010
USGS 02488210 MILL CREEK AT COX MILL, NC
16
14
~
0
~ 12
w
~
10
..~
v
r
8
0
ao
~ 6
r
4
0
2 r
0

2805 2005 2086 2886 280] 2DD7 2888 2808 2009 2009 2010
- 8aily naxinun gage height ~ Period of approved data
- Daily nininun gage height Period of provisional data
- Daily Wean gage height
Figure SB. Mill Creek Hydrograph 2005-2010
WK Dickson & Co., Inc. 15
Preservation Letter - Howell Woods Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site

January 2011
Mill Creek is listed as Class C Nutrient Sensitive Waters by DWQ. The primary classification
"C" indicates waters that support aquatic life and secondary recreational uses, The supplemental
classification denotes nutrient sensitive waters that may need additional nutrient management
because they are subject to excessive growth of microscopic or macroscopic vegetation. Mill
Creek discharges into the Neuse River approximately seven miles downstream of the preservation
site. The Neuse River is listed as Water Supply V Nutrient Sensitive Waters. Water Supply V
waters are protected as water supplies which are generally upsh~eam and draining to Water Supply
[V waters, or waters used by industry to supply their employees with drinking water or as waters
formerly used as water supply. These waters are also protected for Class C uses,
Three ambient water quality-monitoring stations and one benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring
station are located upstream of the project area on Hannah Creek, a tributary to Mill Creek. The
monitoring stations are supported by the NCDWQ Basinwide assessment water quality
monitoring on the Neuse River basin. In addition, there is one benthic macroinvertebrate
monitoring station on Mill Creek downsh~eam of the site at Cox Mill. Hannah Creek receives
discharge from the Benson WWTP.
Hamlah Creek, from its som~ce to NC 96, is on the 303(4) for aquatic life due to a fair benthic
bioclassification and a low dissolved oxygen standards violation. From NC 96 to Mill Creek,
Hannah Creek is Not Rated for aquatic life due to extreme low flow conditions. This site was
rated twice as Good-Fair (1995, 2001), and twice as Fair (1991, 2000). In September 2005 it
received a Not Rated bioclassi6cation. The conditions found at this location in 2005 were
possibly impacted by extreme low flow conditions.
Mill Creek was Not Rated for aquatic life due to the extreme low flow conditions during the most
recent sampling period. This site had been sampled three times before 2005.On each previous
occasion, it was rated Good-Fair.
UNIQUE ECOLOGICAL ATTRIBUTES
The Howell Woods site lies within the NHP-designated Middle Neuse River Macrosite, which
also contains the Cowbone OxbowslSage Pond Natural Area, Brogden Bottomlands, Riverside
Church Bottomlands, Richardson Bridge Bottomlands, and Mill Creek Aquatic Habitat areas
the NHP has designated SNHAs. This area encompasses the Neuse River and floodplain areas
near the preservation site. The Neuse River Waterlog, Roanoke bass, and North Carolina spiny
crayfish are rare species known to occm~ within this macrosite (NC NHP).
This area contains NHP natural community element occurrences for coastal plain bottomland
hardwoods (brownwater subtype) and cypress-gum swamp (brownwater subtype). The Carolina
bogmiut and Cerulean warbler have been observed on the Howell Woods property. The Howell
Woods preservation area provides suitable habitat for a wide range of species, and prevents
potential fragmentation of the Neuse River floodplain in that vicinity. The most desirable species
of hardwoods have demanding site requirements, surviving and growing well only on a
comparatively narrow range of sites. This site is within this narrow range for hardwoods. Quality
of hardwoods is a major consideration in the unique attributes of this site.
This site provides water quality benefits due to its location downstream of a 3034 classified
stream. The water quality benefits directly improve water quality flowing into the Neuse River
and the sensitive species present. The south side of Mill Creek is clu~rently protected ~mder
existing conservation easements established for Westbrook, Cox, and Cox 1[ mitigation sites. The
WK Dickson & Co., Inc. 16
Preservation Letter -Howell Woods Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site

January 2011
proposed Howell Woods easement will protect the north side of Mill Creek adjacent to the
existing mitigation site easement.
WETLAND MITIGATION CREDITS
Based on the high quality wetlands present, the benefits to water quality, and the unique
ecological attributes, the Howell Woods preservation site will generate 3,633 stream mitigation
credits and 20 wetland mitigation credits in HUC 03020201. These credits are based on a 7.5:1
mitigation ratio for streams and a S:l mitigation ratio for wetlands. The site is consistent with
applicable federal guidance and the provisions of the Neu-con Mitigation Banking Instrument
(MBI). The legal limits of the preservation site will be finalized when the conservation easement
is recorded.
V. ADMINISTRATIVE AND REGULATORY ISSUES
HUC SERVICE AREA
The site will serve impacts in HUC 03020201. This HUC encompasses the upper Neuse River
drainage area and its major and minor tributaries. The preserved streams are buffered by
preserved bottomland hardwood forests and cypress-gum swamp wetland. These communities are
considered riverine, as defined in 15A: NCAC2R0502(b) of Regulation.
Consistent with the Neu-Con MBI, the Howell Woods Stream and Wetland Preservation Site will
be used in conjunction with, and will supplement, restoration mitigation acreage being provided
by EBX in HUC 03020201. The use and application of the credits will be consistent with LF.3 of
the Neu-Con BMI. Under no circumstance will the preservation credits exceed 50 percent of the
total credits being provided in HUC 03020201. The preservation credits may also be used in other
authorized HUCs on a case-by-case basis, as approved by the MBRT.
MONITORING
A conservation easement monitoring data sheet has been created, and wiH be required to be
maintained by the North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation, Inc. (Appendix E). The
monitoring sheet will be submitted annually to the Corps and DWQ after each annual site visit.
These data sheets document observed adjacent land uses and naturalist observations, such as
wildlife and plant life. The funding for monitoring is derived from the interest generated off of
the required endowment fee charged by the qualified land trust discussed under the Conservation
Easement section of this Preservation Letter Plan. The qualified land trust determines the amount
of the endowment needed to properly fund the monitoring activities in perpehlity, and the
endowment fee differs from site to site depending on the size and landscape position of the site.
Site visits will be conducted annually unless the North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation, Inc.
is notified of unauthorized activities. Unauthorized activities will be investigated and reported
immediately to the Corps and DWQ. Remedial action will be taken if required by the Corps and
DWQ.
CREDIT RELEASE
The schedule of credit availability will be dictated by the provisions of IV E. l(a) of the Neu-Con
MBI. It provides as follows:
"For preservation acreage, the projected credit total shall be available for sale, and
debiting, provided the following minimum requirements have been satisfied with regard
to the Bank: (i) the Banking Instrument is executed and the Site Specific Mitigation Plan
has been approved by the MBRT; (ii) credits are established consistent with Section LF3
WK Dickson & Co., Inc. 17
Preservation Letter -Howell Woods Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site

January 2011
and the Site Specific Mitigation Plan; (iii) a conservation easemeut is placed ou a Bank
Site or approved phase of a Bank Site; and (iv) appropriate financial assurances of a type
and amount acceptable to the Carps and the MBRT have been established, only if such
preservation acreage is used in conjunction with restoration or creation acreage and such
financial assurance is necessary for the restoration and creation acreage."
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
Consistent with Section II[ G of the Neu-Con MBI, a conservation easement has been placed over
the preserved areas in perpetuity. The easement was recorded in the chain of title, and is held by
North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation, [nc. EBX Neuse [, LLC will pay the required
endowment fee to the North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation, Inc. A sample Deed of
Easement is included in Appendix D. Consistent with Section II[ G2, to the extent a
conservation easemeut is placed on acreage that is approved for credit release and the Bank
Sponsor determines that such acreage will not be debited or used, such acreage may be released
from the preservation requirement upon written notice to, and approval from, the MBRT.
FINANCIAL ASSURANCES
The Neu-Con MBl does not require financial assurances for preservation acreage (Section III F).
Nevertheless, in order for preservation credits to be released, financial assurances must be placed
on any restoration acreage used in conjunction with the preservation acreage (Section IV.E. I ).
EBX presently maintains financial assurances not only for restoration acreage in the HUC, but
also for the land value of the Howell Woods preservation acreage. These financial assurances
exceed the requirements of the Neu-Con MBI.
An endowment is placed with Wetlands America Trust, hre. This endowment is paid to the
Grantee (easement holder) upon execution of the conservation easemeut. Wetlands America
Tnrst, Inc. will not accept the conservation easement unless the endowment is established. The
non-wasting endowment allows for annual site visits as well as some allowance for additional
monitoring activities if these activities are deemed necessary by the Corps and DWQ.
VL CONCLUSIONS
The Howell Woods wetland preservation will generate 3,633 stream mitigation credits and 20
wetland mitigation credits for the Neu-Con Umbrella Mitigation Bank. The site is consistent with
applicable federal guidance and the provisions of the Neu-con Mitigation Banking Instrument
(MBI). The Howell Woods stream and wetland mitigation credits will be used in conjunction
with restoration credits in the hydrologic unit code (HUC) 03020201. The site is presented with
mitigation ratios of 7.5: l for sh•eam preservation and 5: I for wetland preservation.
The preservation easement acreages presented in this Preservation Letter are 135 acres. The legal
limits of the preservation site will be finalized, and the conservation easement will be recorded in
the Johnston County Register of Deeds. The parcel boundaries and proposed easement limits
displayed in the report are based on a plat survey entitled "Conservation Easement Survey of the
Howell Woods Preservation Site for EBX Neuse I, LLC, Johnston County, North Carolina".
WK Dickson & Co., Inc. ~8
Preservation Letter -Howell Woods Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site

January 2011
VII. REFERENCES
EBX [, LLC and US Army Corps of Engineers. 2007. Banking Instrument: Neu-Con Umbrella
Wetland Mitigation and Sh~earn Restoration Bank. 14 pp.
NC NHP. 2001. Midldle Neuse River Macrosite: Johnston Colurty Nahrra] Areas Inventory.
NCDENR. 2010. "Water Quality Stream Classifications for Sh~eams in North Carolina." Water
Quality Section. httpa/portal.ncdeur.org/web/wq.
North Carolina Geological Survey. 1985. Geolo ig c Map of North Carolina. Department of
Nahrral Resources and Community Development. Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 200 L Johnston County Natural Areas Inventory.
Middle Neuse River Macrosite. pp 116 -156
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2008. Threatened and Endangered species workroom.
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles, and C.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas.
University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, N.C. 1,183 pp.
Schafale, Michael P, and Alan S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natur°a! Corrrnrunities off'
North Carolina Third Appr•oxirncrtion. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of
Parks and Recreation, Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, NC. 325 pp.
United States Departrent of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resow~ces Conservation Service.
1994. Soil Survey of Johnston County, Noah Carolina.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2008. "Threatened and Endangered Species in North
Carolina." North Carolina Ecological Services. httpa/www.fws.gov/raleighl
United States Geological Survey. 1986. 7.5 Minute Topographic Map, Four Oaks, NE, and
Newton Grove North NC.
WK Dickson & Co., Inc. 19
Preservation Letter -Howell Woods Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site

�)
- -- - - - - -
� _.-- -
� - - -
. � - -- - -
f
€� L
�)
�� 3
��
_�
.-
E � _ - _ - - - _. _ _ _
[�
l
1 j�
E� ] �. _ - - - - - - - __ - - _. _ _ _ - - - _.
_�
{�._
`..
�(' .�
i
E
�_ _ -_
"It�
(._ � i
SIS
1
t
i. � �
- - -
tf,� � _ __
.�
t-- - - - - -- --- - - -- -- - -
`' ..i

Appendix A
Correspondence

1
,�

~;.
~~~~~
(.;OMMUNITY CaLLEGE
offire of the President
Dr, Davitl N. Johnson June 7, 2010
President
8evedy Gibson ! ~'• William J. Biddlecome
Executive Assistant '. Department Of the larnly
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 100
Board of trustees Washington, NC 27889-1000
Lyn Toney Austin
Chairman ~
Subject: Mitigation Preservation Opportunity
R°bert W. Bryant, Jr. Howell Woods Environmental Learning Center
Viee Chairman JOhnston County, North Carolina
April Culver
Dr. PhyuiS Ethridge ` .Dear Mr. Biddlecome,
Ann Game
I was disappointed to Team from Mr. Ely Perry of Environmental Banc and
Bonn Hatch Exchange (EBX) that the Interagency Review Team (IRT} is considering not
Allen L. Mims, Jr. allowing EBX to obtain Restoration Credits by purchasing a conservation
James Narron ; easement from Johnston Community College's Howell Woods
Douglas V. Oglesby ; Environmental Learning Center. It is my understanding the IK"1' questions
Haywood A. Watson ' whether or not the resources are already protected from human impact due to
Eldridge r. westbr°ok the Howell Woods's Strategic Plan. I am writing to address this concern.
°un~°od w°odau Colle e leadershi believes lacin a conservation easement in
g p P g perpetuity
fulfills the objectives outlined in the Howell Woods Environmental Learning
Joe Lorenzo '~ Center Strategic Plan adopted by the Johnston Community Colle
e Board of
studern g
Trustees on September 3, 2009. This strategic plan is drvided into four core
areas which include 1) natural resources management, 2) outdoor recreation
and operations., 3) outdoor and environmental education, and 4) fund raising
(to include raising funds through the sale of conservation easements), public
relations and marketing. Howell Woods depends on outside funding sources
and other opportunities to sustain its objectives. -The four core objectives are
interdependent with each being important to the mission of Rowell Woods.
', Concern has been raised that the existing resources are already protected
from potential human impacts due to the Strategic Plan. Section I, Goal I I,
Objective 5, Strategy 1, the core natural resource management section (page
22) does call for "standard no cut or no disturbance for any blue-line stream
or other identified wetland on Howell Woods will be a minimum of 100 feet
as measured from the bank of the stream or edge of the wetland and wider
245 c°ne9e Roan when possible, Minimum distance from the bank of the Neuse River or
P.t). Box 2350 ! Hannah/Mill Creek will be 300 feet." However, Section N, Goal 2,
Smithfield, Nc z~5rt Objective 5, the core fund raising, public relations, and marketing section
(918) 209.zoi, (page 39) calls for management to "research and explore options for
vuuvw,johnsto ncc.edu
land/property acquisition, and restorationand/or preservation of habitats and

natural communities on the property through grants, partnerships, mitigation
banks or other conservation easements that will pay for outright
ownership andlarlong-term or pcrpctual casements:' In other words,
should circumstances prevail; the college expects to change its plan and allow
for property disturbance in order to achieve planned financial objectives for
Howell Woods.
Mr. Gordon Woodruff, legal counsel for Johnston Community College
assures college leadership that the strategic plan is just that, a plan, and not a
binding contract which cannot be changed. In fact, JCC sold an easement in
2001 for the purpose of wetland and stream mitigation through the Wetland
Restoration Program (now Ecosystem Enhancement Program). Further, as
you can see on page 42, Appendix 1, Howell Woods has a growth plan
including additional staff. If the future need for funding requires us to cut
portions of the forest that were planned to be buffered greater that the current
laws require, we clearly have the ability to make the necessary change to the
plan (as stated in the last paragraph of the Executive Summary).
Howell Woods has a history of maximizing the use of its resources in a
sustainable manner to achieve its objectives. Please take this commitment
into consideration and allow for these unique natural resources to be
protected in perpetuity through sale of a conservation easement to
Environmental Banc and Exchange. I appreciate your positive review, If I
can provide additional information, please contact me!
Sinc , ly,
Dave J son
President

Appendix B
EDR Reports

Howell Woods
6601 Devils Racetrack Road
Four Oaks, NC 27524
I Inquiry Number: 2792753.2s
June 14, 2010
The EDR Radiu
Vlaa ~ M Resort wi
~~necKC~
440 Wheelers Farms Road
~ Milford, CT 06461
EDR Environmental Data Resources Inc Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary_ ___ ___ _________________ _____________ ES1
Overview Map _ _ _ _ _ _ 2
Detail Map-------------------------------------------------- ------------ 3
Map Findings Summary____ __ ___________ _____ 4
Map Findings________ __ ___ __ _____ ____ 7
Orphan Summary------------------------------- -------- ------------- $
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum___________ _________ _________________ A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A-5
Physical Setting Source Map_________________ ________ __________________ A-16
Physical Setting Source Map Findings _ _ _ _ A-18
Physical Setting Source Records Searched_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . A-25
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer -Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2010 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the ro ert of their res ective owners.
TC2792753.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-05) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of
environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
6601 DEVILS RACETRACK ROAD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
COORDINATES
Latitude (North): 35.378300 - 35° 22' 41.9"
Longitude (West): 78.283100 - 78° 16' 59.2"
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 17
UTM X (Meters): 746811.7
UTM Y (Meters): 3918187.2
Elevation: 88 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map:
Most Recent Revision:
35078-D3 FOUR OAKS NE, NC
1997
South Map:
Most Recent Revision:
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
35078-C3 NEWTON GROVE NORTH, NC
1997
Photo Year: 2006
Source: USDA
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL___________________ National Priority List
TC2792753.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Proposed NPL________________ Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS__________ Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL________________ National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
CERCLIS_______ _____. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
FEDERAL FACILITY_________. Federal Facility Site Information listing
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List
CERC-NFRAP_______________. CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS__________________ CorrectiveAction Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF_________________ RCRA-Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG__________________. RCRA-Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG__________________ RCRA-Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-CESQG_______________ RCRA-Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator
Federal institutional controls /engineering controls registries
US ENG CONTROLS________. Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROL__________Sltes with Institutional Controls
Federal ERNS list
ERNS________________________ Emergency Response Notification System
State- and tribal -equivalent NPL
NC HSDS____________________ Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
State- and tribal -equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS___________ _____. Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF______________________ List of Solid Waste Facilities
OLI__________________________.old Landfill Inventory
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST________________________. Regional UST Database
TC2792753.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
LUST TRUST________________.State Trust Fund Database
INDIAN LUST________________ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
UST__________________________ Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST__________________________RST Database
INDIAN UST_________________. Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
FEMA UST___________________Onderground Storage Tank Listing
State and tribal institutional control /engineering control registries
INST CONTROL____________. No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP_________________________. Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
INDIAN VCP_________________.Uoluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS______________Bvownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS__________ AListing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill /Solid Waste Disposal Sites
ODI__________________________ Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9__________. Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
HIST LF______________________Snlid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI__________________ Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /Contaminated Sites
US CDL_____________________ Clandestine Drug Labs
US HIST CDL________________ National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2______________________ CERCLA Lien Information
LUCIS_______________________. Land Use Control Information System
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS_______________________ Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA-NonGen_______________ RCRA-Non Generators
DOT OPS____________________ Incident and Accident Data
TC2792753.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DOD_________________________ Department of Defense Sites
FUDS________________________ Formerly Used Defense Sites
CONSENT___________________ Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
ROD_________________________ Records Of Decision
UMTRA._____________________ Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
MINES_______________________ Mines Master Index File
TRIS_________________________ Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
TSCA________________________ Toxic Substances Control Act
FTTS_________________________ FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
HIST FTTS___________________ FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
SSTS________________________ Section 7 Tracking Systems
ICIS__________________________ Integrated Compliance Information System
PADS________________________ PCB Activity Database System
MLTS________________________ Material Licensing Tracking System
RADINFO____________________ Radiation Information Database
FINDS_______________________. Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
RAATS_______________________ RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
IMD__ _________________ Incident Management Database
UIC__________________________ Underground Injection Wells Listing
DRYCLEANERS_____________. Drycleaning Sites
NPDES______________________. NPDES Facility Location Listing
INDIAN RESERV_____________ lndian Reservations
SCRD DRYCLEANERS______. Stste Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
COAL ASH___________________ Cosl Ash Disposal Sites
COAL ASH DOE_____________. Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA______________ Cosl Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER_______ POB Transformer Registration Database
EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS
EDR Proprietary Records
Manufactured Gas Plants_____ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC2792753.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped:
Site Name Database(s)
T W SHIRLEY
RAY'S GARAGE
KLEBS PORTA JOHNS
CLOVERLEAF GULFSVC
MCLAMBS AMOCO STATION
HOLTS LAKE LIFT STATION
KING BUILDING
RAY'S GARAGE & AUTO SERVICE
OAK GROVE INN
WALLACE WAREHOUSE -EXEC LOUNG
ALLAN HYATT CHEVROLET
JONES BROTHERS FURNITURE
STANCIL'S AMOCO FOOD SHOP 5
STANCIL'S AMOCO FOOD MART 2
NORRIS GAS & GROCERY
BEASLEY'S STORE
AMOCO FOOD MART
STRICKLAND'S GROCERY
B&S TEXACO
ALSTON R BAREFOOT
BENTONVILLE BATTLEGROUND HST
SOUTH JOHNSTON HIGH SCHOOL
COUNTRY STORE
BAKER'S GAS & GROCERY
PAUL'S RESTAURANT
701 GULF SER
JIFF MART 2
SOUTHERN STATES
C & C SUNOCO
J.G. BARBOUR GROCERY
ALCOHOL BEVERAGE CONTROL CENT
GLENN'S SHELL
BURLINGTON IND. SMITHFIELD PL
GUY C. LEE MANUFACTURING CO.
S.T. WOOTEN CONSTRUCTION CO.
INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC SALES/SER
GARDNER-CREECH OIL CO.
ALAN HYATT CHEVROLET. INC.
KENNEDY FREIGHT LINES. INC.
TIMS ALIGNMENT & BRAKE SER
GARDNER-CREECH OIL CO INC
I-95 EAST AUTOMOTIVE PARTS LLC
LF,HIST LF
HWS,IMD
LF
IMD,LUST,UST
LUST TRUST,LUST,UST,IMD
IMD,LUST
IMD,LUST
IMD,LUST
IMD,LUST
IMD,LUST
IMD,LUST
IMD,UST,LUST
IMD,LUST
IMD,LUST
LUST TRUST,UST
LUST TRUST
LUST TRUST
LUST TRUST
LUST TRUST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
AST
RCRA-NLR
TC2792753.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

OVERVIEW MAP - 2792753.2s
~ Target Property
~ Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
• Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
1 Manufactured Gas Plants
National Priority List Sites
' I Dept. Defense Sites
0 1/2 1 2 Ylles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
//`~ Oil & Gas pipelines Disposal Sites
100-year flood zone
~~ 500-year flood zone
National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Howell Woods CLIENT: WK Dickson
ADDRESS: 6601 Devils Racetrack Road CONTACT: Daniel Ingram
Four Oaks NC 27524 INQUIRY #: 2792753.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.3783 / 78.2831 DATE: June 14, 2010 12:00 pm

Target Property
w Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
• Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
' Manufactured Gas Plants
i Sensitive Receptors
National Priority List Sites
r-~ Dept. Defense Sites
0 1/16 iB 1/4 Miles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
Oil & Gas pipelines Disposal Sites
® 100-year flood zone
500-year flood zone
National Wetland Inventory
0 State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
I 'ITE NAME: Howell Woods
~ r~DDRESS: 6601 Devils Racetrack Road
Four Oaks NC 27524
~ SAT/LONG: 35.3783 / 78.2831
CLIENT: WK Dickson
CONTACT: Danielingram
INQUIRY #: 2792753.2s
DATE: June 14, 2010 12:00 pm
DETAIL MAP - 2792753.2s

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Target Distance Total
Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL 2.000
Proposed NPL 2.000
NPL LIENS 1.000
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL 2.000
Federal CERCLIS list
CERCLIS 1.500
FEDERAL FACILITY 2.000
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List
CERC-NFRAP 1.500
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS 2.000
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF 1.500
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG 1.250
RCRA-SOG 1.250
RCRA-CESOG 1.250
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
US ENG CONTROLS 1.500
US INST CONTROL 1.500
Federal ERNS list
ERNS 1.000
State- and tribal -equivalent NPL
NC HSDS 2.000
State- and tribal -equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS 2.000
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF 1.500
OLI 1.500
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST 1.500
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 NR 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 NR 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
TC2792753.2s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Target Distance Total
Database Properly (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
LUST TRUST 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
INDIAN LUST 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
UST 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0
AST 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0
INDIAN UST 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0
FEMA UST 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0
State and tribal institufional
control /engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
INDIAN VCP 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Lists of Landfill /Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
ODI 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
DEBRIS REGION 9 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
HIST LF 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
INDIAN ODI 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
US CDL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
US HIST CDL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
LUCIS 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA-NonGen 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0
DOT OPS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
DOD 2.000 0 0 0 0 0 0
FUDS 2.000 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONSENT 2.000 0 0 0 0 0 0
TC2792753.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Database
Target
Property
Search
Distance Total
(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 -1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
2.000 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 N R 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 N R 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 N R 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 N R 0
1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
2.000 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
ROD
UMTRA
MINES
TRIS
TSCA
FTTS
HIST FTTS
SSTS
ICIS
PADS
M LTS
RADINFO
FINDS
RAATS
IMD
UIC
DRYCLEANERS
NPDES
INDIAN RESERV
SCRD DRYCLEANERS
COAL ASH
COAL ASH DOE
COAL ASH EPA
PCB TRANSFORMER
EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS
EDR Proprietary Records
Manufactured Gas Plants 2.000 0 0 0 0 0 0
NOTES:
TP =Target Property
NR =Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC2792753.2s Page 6

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
NO SITES FOUND
TC2792753.2s Page 7

O
H
U
~ H
7 ~
~- J F ^
v ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ J F- J~ 7 7 S H F H F F- F- F- ^ F- ~ J ~
N Z U~ LL' LL' LL' ~ U U U U U U U U LL' F 2
m ~ m F F r f- p > » » > ~ ~ ~ cn H
D Q J ~ F.. F-' F J J J J J J J J F ^ ~
~ LZ H ^ S (n (n fn In ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ U H p H (n F- H F- F- F- H p H H H (n F- f- F' H H F- F' F' F' F'
I~ O V d' h c0 V' h d' 1~ r V f~ r r V V h V 'V h V V 1~ V 1~ ~
1~ O N N n r N r N r r N !~ r n N N r N N r N N h N h h
n ~o ~~~m~m~~w~~v>~~w~ u>u~u~~n~n~n~~n~n
~o r~r~~r~i.~~~r~r~r~r~~~n~~r~~r~r~r~~r~r~
N N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
}
Q
a
O
N
N
N
Q
m

Z
N
m
W
N
al
(6
a
N
M
N
~
~ ~
N
~ X ~ ~ F N
~ X M
w
~~ O
° =
~ Mu~i mom a w~ >
~w y
~ ~
z
W '~t
Z
X w ~ ~ Q = O N=_
fn In W F U N ~ H H
^ } W LL' LL'
O ^ _ fn 2>
O O N=
~ M ^ N = 2 S 2 2 S
H F H O H F- F-
LL' ~ ^ m Q: M W 2' W' W'
m 0
gym= _ O
~ O M Q~ 0 0
~=S ~~ m zz
~
M
W
U S M O G
H~mv O ~ O O~ v r~ O O O
z rcn=vz d •'ZZZ
O LL^
O _
N~\ 0'' ^ M^ Q O~ Q C~ O O O
O O W~ M~ m N M O M O
M O
M M M
Z z }} ~ cn
} ~ _ ~ ~ = S ~
}} M w ~
}} m
m m
} m }} Z - }} ~
Z ~
} } }
>
S M M r M> r M~ M~~ S S S S Z ~>>~ >
r~ M>>~ >
>
M S>~~ > M~> O~~ >
n~~C?(?o
~~~~ ~~~~ ~~C~rr~Hm ~~~~00 -C?0OC7~O~000C~C~C7
~
m,
M 2 S S S S 2 2 2 S 2 eD M LL' O a0 M S S S N S S S S S 2 F
S d' S Q: 2 S 2 LL' S d Q_ LL' S 2 S
O ~
z ~ z
J OHa U ~' ~O~ _ OJ OU O
~Z X¢~ ~ W uwi~w ~ ? ~ O z Zt~
d ~ 0 } w w ^ ^ m = 0 Y ~ Q Z } ~ ~ } Z U cn } ~ ~
~ O p ~
w J F W O w 0 0 O >~ Q ~~ U ~ W J W W U ~ Z w W~
>O¢ U ~ m00 F- m m~~ m ~ OJUw ~~F- JOOU
O V m ~ W Q W ~00 Q = ~m0 °CZU ~~Uk~OZQ~zfW.w=~w~
~ W~ (~ ~ ~ 2 W U U Z a6 O ~ Z U Z O W J W U W m U~ Q: W O Q 2 U S Z
~ J ~~ O U Z Q~~? U¢' C¢7 Q O W- O~ W fn w J = LL' W W o6 ~ Q 2 U H O W '~ U a
Hwg~ g}OO}~wmmpQaO~J~mLLC7Oam~ ~m~>(7Jw~~~>-}pQw
QQW~QQWo`~'=tY.>J~°z°=°gUV~~v~i ~`~wz~Q~Q=~z~vmiazo`~'°~z0°=~^w~=ci
N~ J U 2 Q fn O g U` J Q Q Y}} lmL U >O ~ J U U~= W lL Z m~ Z LL' ~ j~~ 7~ Z Y Z}
p~ Q O M ~ W ajf ~ J Z a F- H Q Q J~ J^ U p~ ~ O^ -~ LL O~ Q W O J Q J~ O O W Q g p
- U` 2 I- fn m m ¢ Q Y ~ fn fn O ~ K Y O U m ~ r F- fn ? U` -~ -~ -~ U` m Z ¢ d ¢ (n fn O Y m ¢ (~
M V f~ ~~ N ~ N M o0 N O ~ V' O a0 a0 O aO M W O M a0 (D O N O V' a0 W W (O cD N
eD (O N V 1~ O O O N O h N a0 V O O (O 1~ h O M 1~ V V' m h h ap N O) O> O V O~ 0 0
(p M V O o0 h 1~ O a0 a0 M M O 'V 'V O (O (O N M M M V d' V CO (O (O i~ O N C O !~ V V~ (O O (D
M 1~ V V' h c0 c0 W M M V' V V O~ O c0 V h V (O (O (O (O (D (O (O (O (O (O (O I~ 00 O~ O~ O a0 V d' d' (O N N
^ ~~ m O N N N N~~ (Oh ~ W M c00 ~ O~ V V V V V V V VM' V V V V V dM' V a V h 'V V tt 'V ~~
ar N O d' N N~~~ h N~~ u7 (O (O (O O~ ~ ~ M M M M M M
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W ~ Q In (n (n (n (n In (n (n fn fn fn fn In (n In ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
U
~~ Y O^ Y~~~ Y O O ~ Y Y ~~ Y ~ Y Y^ Y~ ~ Y^^~ Y Y ~ Y Y ~ Y Y^ Y 0 0
w w Q w w Q w w w Q w w w Q Q w O Q w a a w Q w w Q w w w Q Q w a Q w a Q w Q w w
u. W O LL LL O LL w LL O w w W O O u~ O LL O O W O W w O LL LL LL O O LL O O LL O O LL O W W
S 2~ S S~ 2 2 2~ 2 2 S 0 a, 2 S^ LL. S 2 2 S LL. = 2~ S S S 2 2 S~ LL. S~ LL. 2 2 2
f- f_ ~ H H ~ H H F ~ H F- F_ U ~ 7 ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H ~ F- F- F- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 H ~ H H
~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ O O ~ O O ~ O O ~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ O O ~ O O ~ O O ~ O ~ ~
fn fn W (n Cn LL (n (n Cn LL (n !n !n ~ LL LL fn C~ IL (n LL W In w (n fn LL fn (n fn LL LL. U LL LL M LL LL U LL U U

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 03/31/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/02/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 10
NPL Site Boundaries
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/26/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 3
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 4
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 5
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 03/31/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/02/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 10
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/26/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/17/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/30/2010
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC2792753.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal Delisted NPL site list
DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 03/31/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/02/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 10
Federal CERCLIS list
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/26/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities,
private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities
List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 01/29/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/12/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of NPL and Base Realighnment & Closure sites found in the CERCLIS database where FERRO is involved in
cleanup projects.
Date of Government Version: 06/23/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2010
Number of Days to Update: 26
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/30/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/26/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned
Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status
indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined
no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates
this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time.
This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that,
based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 06/23/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/02/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009
Number of Days to Update: 19
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 03/25/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010
Number of Days to Update: 57
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/17/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/30/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC2792753.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED I DATA'CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA -Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010
Number of Days to Update: 87
Federal RCRA generators list
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-LQG: RCRA -Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-SQG: RCRA -Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-CESQG: RCRA -Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators
(CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Federal institutional controls /engineering controls registries
TC2792753.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 12/20/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 12/20/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 82
Federal ERNS list
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2010 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/11/2010 Last EDR Contact: 04/07/2010
Number of Days to Update: 20 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010
Data Release Frequency: Annually
State- and tribal -equivalent NPL
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated h
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2007
Number of Days to Update: 44
State- and tribal -equivalent CERCLIS
azardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/14/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/23/2010
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 03/30/2010 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2010 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/20/2010 Last EDR Contact: 03/22/2010
Number of Days to Update: 14 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC2792753.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEAR6HED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2010 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2010 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/20/2010 Last EDR Contact: 04/07/2010
Number of Days to Update: 13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information.
sites).
Date of Government Version: 03/30/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/20/2010
Number of Days to Update: 12
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
(Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTS.
Date of Government Version: 05/14/2010 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2010 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2010 Last EDR Contact: 05/19/2010
Number of Days to Update: 26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/30/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs
Date of Government Version: 04/16/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/21/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2010
Number of Days to Update: 54
claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2010
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 03/24/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2009
Number of Days to Update: 28
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
TC2792753.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 03/10/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 02/01/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 02/25/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/25/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 46
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 05/04/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 05/03/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 02/19/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/16/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 04/30/2010 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2010 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2010 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2010
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/30/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC2792753.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHEDI DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 03/30/2010 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2010 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/30/2010 Last EDR Contact: 03/29/2010
Number of Days to Update: 30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/12/2010
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 02/11/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 60
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
_ _ INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 03/10/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 05/04/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 02/25/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/25/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 46
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 02/19/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/16/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC2792753.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED t DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/30/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/16/2009
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/12/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 02/01/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 05/03/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/19/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal institutional control /engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 03/30/2010 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2010 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/20/2010 Last EDR Contact: 03/22/2010
Number of Days to Update: 20 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC2792753.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 03/30/2010 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2010 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/20/2010 Last EDR Contact: 03/22/2010
Number of Days to Update: 20 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/2010
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19!2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
State and tribal Brownfields sifes
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 03/31/2008 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2008 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2008 Last EDR Contact: 04/15/2010
Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/26/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Included in the listing are brownfields properties addresses by Cooperative Agreement Recipients and brownfields
properties addressed by Targeted Brownfields Assessments. Targeted Brownfields Assessments-EPA's Targeted Brownfields
Assessments (TBA) program is designed to help states, tribes, and municipalities--especially those without EPA
Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilots--minimize the uncertainties of contamination often associated with
brownfields. Under the TBA program, EPA provides funding and/or technical assistance for environmental assessments
at brownfields sites throughout the country. Targeted Brownfields Assessments supplement and work with other efforts
under EPA's Brownfields Initiative to promote cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields. Cooperative Agreement
Recipients-States, political subdivisions, territories, and Indian tribes become Brownfields Cleanup Revolving
Loan Fund (BCRLF) cooperative agreement recipients when they enter into BCRLF cooperative agreements with the
U.S. EPA. EPA selects BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients based on a proposal and application process. BCRLF
cooperative agreement recipients must use EPA funds provided through BCRLF cooperative agreement for specified
brownfields-related cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 03/02/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/23/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/12/2010
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Local Lists of Landfill /Solid Waste Disposal Sites
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
TC2792753.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009
Number of Days to Update: 137
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007
Number of Days to Update: 17
Source: EPA, Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/20/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2009
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/08/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/23/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /Contaminated Sites
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 08/19/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/29/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2010
Number of Days to Update: 43
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/20/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 09/01/2007
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/2009
Number of Days to Update: 131
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC2792753.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED? DATA CURRENCYTRACKING
Local Land Records
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 02/05/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 60
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 12/09/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/11/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 31
Records of Emergency Release Reports
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/06/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010
Number of Days to Update: 50
Other Ascertainable Records
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/07/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RCRA-NonGen: RCRA -Non Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2010 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2010 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Last EDR Contact: 05/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/23/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
TC2792753.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED l DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2010
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/30/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/01/2009
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/18/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/28/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 04/11/2010 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2010 Telephone: Varies
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2010
Number of Days to Update: 28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/28/2010
Data Release Frequency: Annually
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version: 01/05/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/08/2009
Number of Days to Update: 1
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 02/12/2010 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2010 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2010
Number of Days to Update: 68 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/20/2010
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
TC2792753.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/13/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/2010
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2002
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006
Number of Days to Update: 46
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/12/2010
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, &Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2010
Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, &Rodenticide Act)ITSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA(fSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRAITSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
TC2792753.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT. RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2010
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 04/24/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010
Number of Days to Update: 18
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/29/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/12/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial stovers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 09/01/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/01/2009
Number of Days to Update: 41
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/22/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2010
Data Release Frequency: Annually
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 03/18/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010
Number of Days to Update: 51
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
Date of Government Version: 04/13/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010
Number of Days to Update: 33
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/26/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC2792753.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010
Number of Days to Update: 41
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LOG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2007
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/25/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/06/2010
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
Date of Government Version: 07/21/2006 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/23/2006 Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2010
Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2010
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/25/2010 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2010 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2010 Last EDR Contact: 05/17/2010
Number of Days to Update: 18 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/30/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
TC2792753.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED !DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 03/09/2010 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2010 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/20/2010 Last EDR Contact: 03/29/2010
Number of Days to Update: 20 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/12/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits.
Date of Government Version: 06/07/2010 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2010 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2010 Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2010
Number of Days to Update: 5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/23/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 34
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2010
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 02/10/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 60
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/10/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/09/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 339
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2010
Data Release Frequency: N/A
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/18/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/29/2009
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/14/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
TC2792753.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDSSEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 11/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/18/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2010
Number of Days to Update: 54
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH DOE: Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribu tion permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage,
transportation; use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2007 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2009 Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2010
Number of Days to Update: 13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/23/2010
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS
EDR Proprietary Records
Manufactured Gas Plants: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2007 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/26/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2010
Number of Days to Update: 16 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/06/2010
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC2792753.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED F DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/05/2010
Number of Days to Update: 16
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2010
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 01/04/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2010
Number of Days to Update: 34
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2009
Number of Days to Update: 13
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 11/03/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2010
Number of Days to Update: 10
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/10/2009
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/13/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/23/2010
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/06/2010
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/2010
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 03/22/2010
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/2010
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs
from 1:100,000-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily
gas pipelines.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Rextag Strategies Corp.
Telephone: [phone]
U.S. Electric Transmission and Power Plants Systems Digital GIS Data
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities -schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes -where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals.
TC2792753.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2009 from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA.
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Scanned Digital USGS 7.5' Topographic Map (DRG)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images
are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image
is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection.
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC2792753.2s Page GR-19

GEOCHECK ®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
HOWELL WOODS
6601 DEVILS RACETRACK ROAD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map:
Most Recent Revision:
South Map:
Most Recent Revision
35.37830 - 35° 22' 41.9"
78.2831 - 78° 16' 59.1"
Zone 17
746811.7
3918187.2
88 ft. above sea level
35078-D3 FOUR OAKS NE, NC
1997
35078-C3 NEWTON GROVE NORTH, NC
1997
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC2792753.2s Page A-1

GEOCHECK~ -PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY-
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General ESE
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES

c
0
.~
W
W N fD A N OI A fD
O
1\VI X11
TP
~ N N ~ ~ Oo + W O
OJ W
0
.~
~o ~
~ W N N ~ ~ O ~ 10 W O W 10 N N 1+ r O Oo O
_N O O O O ,p O O O ,p
W
West East
TP
0 1/2 1 Miles
Target Property Elevation: 88 ft.
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC2792753.2s Page A-2

GEOCHECK~ -PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surtace water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Target Property County
JOHNSTON,NC
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property:
Additional Panels in search area:
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Quad at Target Property
FOUR OAKS NE
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
FEMA Flood
Electronic Data
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
37101C -FEMA DFIRM Flood data
Not Reported
NWI Electronic
Data Coverage
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION
MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
Not Reported
TC2792753.2s Page A-3

GEOCHECK° -PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Mesozoic Category: Stratified Sequence
System: Cretaceous
Series: Woodbine and Tuscaloosa Groups
Code: uK1 (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
Geologic Age and Rock stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
TC2792753.2s Page A-4

SSURGO SOIL MAP - 2792753.2s
~. \
! ~ i
~~
~~' / ~_ ~/
\\ ~ ~ ;~
\ ~;
-~ ,~ ,,
`\~ ~ ;;
A ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~~ ~~~, ;
~~ ~ v l
~~ /
~ \ ~~~- ___ J 1 ,~
,~\
_- --
.,
~~--
- ...~ -
--- ~ ~
~,_~
,,;
~- -- -~ .,
_!-_ _ ~
~ ~;
' 1 ` ~ ,J ~ ,
~-~ ~~ ~ I
i_--
\ ` ~- -
6 ~ ~_'_- ----
~ ~ ~ ,~ i
i~ ~
-, ~
i~ ,i
i
.~
~.. i % ~ %
~_---- ~"
i
~ Target Property ° 01fi ~' 'ail'"'
,^~,j SSURGO Soil
~'~% Water
SITE NAME: Howell Woods CLIENT: WK Dickson
ADDRESS: 6601 Devils Racetrack Road CONTACT: Daniel Ingram
Four Oaks NC 27524 INQUIRY #: 2792753.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.3783 / 78.2831 DATE: June 14, 2010 12:00 pm
Coovriaht o 2010 EOR. Inc. :p 2010 Tele Ntlas Rel. 07/200?.

GEOCHECK®-PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data.
Soil Map ID: 1
Soil Component Name: Wehadkee
Soil Surface Texture: loam
Hydrologic Group: Class D -Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Soil Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Hydric Status: All hydric
Corrosion Potential -Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 15 inches
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
Boundary Classification hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 0 inches 7 inches loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6.5
Materials (more SOILS, Gravels, Min: 4 Min: 4.5
than 35 pct. Clean gravels,
passing No. Poorly Graded
200), Silty Gravel.
Soils.
2 7 inches 57 inches loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6.5
Materials (more SOILS, Gravels, Min: 4 Min: 4.5
than 35 pct. Clean gravels,
passing No. Poorly Graded
200), Silty Gravel.
Soils.
3 57 inches 83 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6.5
Materials (more SOILS, Gravels, Min: 4 Min: 4.5
than 35 pct. Clean gravels,
passing No. Poorly Graded
200), Silty Gravel.
Soils.
TC2792753.2s Page A-6

GEOCHECK®-PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 2
Soil Component Name: Roanoke
Soil Surface Texture: loam
Hydrologic Group: Class D -Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Soil Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Hydric Status: All hydric
Corrosion Potential -Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 0 inches 7 inches loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 141 Max: 5.5
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.01 Min: 3.5
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay.
Soils. FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50% ,silt.
2 7 inches 9 inches loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 141 Max: 5.5
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.01 Min: 3.5
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay.
Soils. FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50% ,silt.
3 9 inches 51 inches clay Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 141 Max: 5.5
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.01 Min: 3.5
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay.
Soils. FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50% ,silt.
TC2792753.2s Page A-7

GEOCHECK~ -PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
Boundary Classification hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
4 51 inches 70 inches loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 141 Max: 5.5
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.01 Min: 3.5
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
' 200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay.
Soils. FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50% ,silt.
Soil Map ID: 3
Soil Component Name:
Soil Surface Texture:
Hydrologic Group:
Soil Drainage Class
Wahee
fine sandy loam
Class D -Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Somewhat poorly drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential -Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 31 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 0 inches 9 inches fine sandy loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 3.5
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), silt.
Soils.
TC2792753.2s Page A-8

GEOCHECK®=PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
2 9 inches 42 inches clay Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and. Min: 4 Min: 3.5
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), silt.
Soils.
3 42 inches 59 inches loamy sand Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 3.5
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), silt.
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 4
Soil Component Name: Altavista
Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C -Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential -Uncoated Steel: Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 46 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 0 inches 7 inches fine sandy loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6.5
Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 Min: 3.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
TC2792753.2s Page A-9

GEOCHECK®-PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
Boundary Classification hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
2 7 inches 14 inches fine sandy loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6.5
Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 Min: 3.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
3 14 inches 42 inches sandy clay loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6.5
Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 Min: 3.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
4 42 inches 59 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6.5
Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 Min: 3.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 5
Soil Component Name: State
Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B -Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential -Uncoated Steel: Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 153 inches
TC2792753.2s Page A-10

GEOCHECK° -PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic

Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 0 inches 7 inches fine sandy loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 141 Max: 6.5
Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 Min: 3.6
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200), Silty COARSE-GRAINED
Soils. SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Sil Sand.
2 7 inches 12 inches loamy fine sand Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 141 Max: 6.5
Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 Min: 3.6
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200), Silty COARSE-GRAINED
Soils. SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Sil Sand.
3 12 inches 38 inches sandy clay loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 141 Max: 6.5
Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 Min: 3.6
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200), Silty COARSE-GRAINED
Soils. SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Silt Sand.
4 38 inches 42 inches fine sandy loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 141 Max: 6.5
Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 Min: 3.6
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200), Silty COARSE-GRAINED
Soils. SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Sil Sand.
5 42 inches 59 inches stratified sand Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 141 Max: 6.5
to fine sandy Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 Min: 3.6
loam than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200), Silty COARSE-GRAINED
Soils. SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Sil Sand.
Soil Map ID: 6
Soil Component Name: Tarboro
Soil Surface Texture: sand
Hydrologic Group: Class A -High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained to
excessively drained sands and gravels.
Soil Drainage Class: Somewhat excessively drained
TC2792753.2s Page A-11

GEOCHECK® -PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential -Uncoated Steel: Low
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
Boundary Classification hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 0 inches 9 inches sand Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 141 Max: 6.5
materials (35 SOILS, Sands, Min: 141 Min: 4.5
pct. or less Clean Sands,
passing No. Poorly graded
200), Silty, or sand.
Clayey Gravel COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand. SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Cla a sand.
2 48 inches 98 inches gravelly sand Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 141 Max: 6.5
materials (35 SOILS, Sands, Min: 141 Min: 4.5
pct. or less Clean Sands,
passing No. Poorly graded
200), Silty, or sand.
Clayey Gravel COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand. SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Cla a sand.
3 9 inches 48 inches sand Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 141 Max: 6.5
materials (35 SOILS, Sands, Min: 141 Min: 4.5
pct. or less Clean Sands,
passing No. Poorly graded
200), Silty, or sand.
Clayey Gravel COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand. SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Cla a sand.
Soil Map ID: 7
Soil Component Name:
Soil Surface Texture:
Hydrologic Group:
Soil Drainage Class:
Augusta
clay loam
Class C -Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Somewhat poorly drained
TC2792753.2s Page A-12

GEOCHECK° -PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCESUMMARY
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential -Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 46 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 9 inches 18 inches clay loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6 Min:
Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 4.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200), Clayey
Soils.
2 18 inches 59 inches clay loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6 Min:
Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 4.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200), Clayey
Soils.
3 59 inches 70 inches coarse sandy Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6 Min:
loam Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 4.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200), Clayey
Soils.
4 0 inches 9 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6 Min:
Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 4.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200), Clayey
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 8
Soil Component Name: Tomotley
Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B/D -Drained/undrained hydrology class of soils that can be
drained and are classified.
Soil Drainage Class: Poorly drained
TC2792753.2s Page A-13

GEOCHECK®-PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Hydric Status: All hydric
Corrosion Potential -Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 15 inches
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
Boundary Classification hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 0 inches 7 inches fine sandy loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 141 Max: 6 Min:
Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 4 3.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200), Silty COARSE-GRAINED
Soils. SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Sil Sand.
2 7 inches 42 inches sandy clay loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 141 Max: 6 Min:
Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 4 3.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200), Silty COARSE-GRAINED
Soils. SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Sil Sand.
3 42 inches 50 inches fine sandy loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 141 Max: 6 Min:
Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 4 3.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200), Silty COARSE-GRAINED
Soils. SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Sil Sand.
4 50 inches 72 inches loamy sand Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 141 Max: 6 Min:
Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 4 3.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200), Silty COARSE-GRAINED
Soils. SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Sil Sand.
LOCAL /REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and informing an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
TC2792753.2s Page A-14

GEOCHECI(®-PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
Federal USGS 1.000
Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile
State Database 1.000
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No PWS System Found
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
NORTH CAROLINA NATURAL HERITAGE ELEMENT OCCURRENCES
ID Class
NC50000281
NC50004295
NC50009202
NC50009413
NC50014746
NC50016316
NC50016397
NC50018938
NC50019379
NC50021368
Natural Community Occurrence
Plants
Natural Community Occurrence
Animal
Plants
Plants
Plants
Natural Community Occurrence
Plants
Plants
TC2792753.2s Page A-15

GEOCHECK -PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
NORTH CAROLINA NATURAL HERITAGE ELEMENT OCCURRENCES
ID Class
NC50021786 Plants
NC50022435 Natural Community Occurrence
NORTH CAROLINA SIGNIFICANT NATURAL HERITAGE AREAS DATABASE:
ID Name
NC10000653 BROGDEN BOTTOMLANDS
NC10000661 BROGDEN BOTTOMLANDS
NC10001838 HOWELL WOODS
NC10001839 HOWELL WOODS
NC10001840 HOWELL WOODS
NC10001841 HOWELL WOODS
NC10001842 HOWELL WOODS
NC10001843 HOWELL WOODS
NC10001844 HOWELL WOODS
NC10001845 HOWELL WOODS
NC10001846 HOWELL WOODS
NC10001847 HOWELL WOODS
NC10001848 HOWELL WOODS
NC10001849 HOWELL WOODS
NC10001850 HOWELL WOODS
NC10001851 HOWELL WOODS
NC10001852 HOWELL WOODS
NC10001853 HOWELL WOODS
NC10001886 HANNAH CREEK SWAMP
NC10003350 HOWELL WOODS
NC10003403 MILL CREEK AQUATIC HABITAT
TC2792753.2s Page A-16

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 2792753.2s
I
;': ~ ,,;.
.;
~~
~~
,,,
i'
~''~~ . _ - ,7 ,,,
\'~Y.
,~

j
.~~
0 ~\
\\ ; \.
~~-
NC
N County Boundary
/~/ Major Roads
/~/ Contour Lines
O Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater c ~
® Water Wells c v
© Public Water Supply Wells
CG Cluster of Multiple Icons
0 1/4 1/2 1 Miles
Groundwater Flow Direction ~ Wildlife Areas
Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location ~~ Natural Areas
Groundwater Flow Varies at Location Rare & Endangered Species
SITE NAME: Howell Woods CLIENT: WK Dickson
ADDRESS: 6601 Devils Racetrack Road CONTACT: Daniel Ingram
Four Oaks NC 27524 INQUIRY #: 2792753.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.3783 / 78.2831 DATE: June 14, 2010 12:00 pm

GEOCHECK®-.PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance Database EDR ID_~lumber
NC_NHEO NC50000281
GISID: 262106
Classification by Type: Natural Community Occurrence
Occurrence Status: Extant
NC_NHEO NC50004295
GIS ID: 141200
Classification by Type: Plants
Occurrence Status: Extant
NC_NHEO NC50009202
GISID: 232107
Classification by Type: Natural Community Occurrence
Occurrence Status: Extant
NC_NHEO NC50009413
GIS ID: 651714
Classification by Type: Animal
Occurrence Status: Extant
NC_NHEO NC50014746
GISID: 232558
Classification by Type: Plants
Occurrence Status: Extant
NC_NHEO NC50016316
GISID: 32257
Classification by Type: Plants
Occurrence Status: Extant
NC_NHEO NC50016397
TC2792753.2s Page A-18

GEOCHECK®-`PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
North Carolina Locations of Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites:
GISID: 131200
Classification by Type: Plants
Occurrence Status: Extant
GISID: 332313
Classification by Type: Natural Community Occurrence
Occurrence Status: Extant
GISID: 232558
Classification by Type: Plants
Occurrence Status: Extant
NC_NHEO NC50018938
NC_NHEO NC50019379
NC_NHEO NC50021368
GISID: 232558
Classification by Type: Plants
Occurrence Status: Extant
NC_NHEO NC50021786
GISID: 141200
Classification by Type: Plants
Occurrence Status: Extant
NC_NHEO NC50022435
GISID: 232107
Classification by Type: Natural Community Occurrence
Occurrence Status: Extant
NC_SNHA NC10000653
Site Name: BROGDEN BOTTOMLANDS
Quality: PRIMARY
Acres per Polygon: 667.92
TC2792753.2s Page A-19

GEOCHECK®-PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance Database EDR ID Number
NC_SNHA NC10000661
Site Name: BROGDEN BOTTOMLANDS
Quality: SECONDARY
Acres per Polygon: 5.05
NC_SNHA NC10001838
Site Name: HOWELL WOODS
Quality: Not Reported
Acres per Polygon: .52
NC_SNHA NC10001839
Site Name: HOWELL WOODS
Quality: Not Reported
Acres per Polygon: •2
NC_SNHA NC10001840
Site Name: HOWELL WOODS
Quality: Not Reported
Acres per Polygon: 1.79
NC_SNHA NC10001841
Site Name: HOWELL WOODS
Quality: Not Reported
Acres per Polygon: 2.03
NC_SNHA NC10001842
Site Name: HOWELL WOODS
Quality: Not Reported
Acres per Polygon: .41
NC_SNHA NC10001843
TC2792753.2s Page A-20

GEOCHECK®-PHYSICAL SETTING'SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
North Carolina -Significant Natural Heritage Areas:
Site Name: HOWELL WOODS
Quality: Not Reported
Acres per Polygon: .76
NC_SNHA NC10001844
Site Name: HOWELL WOODS
Quality: Not Reported
Acres per Polygon: .79
NC_SNHA NC10001845
Site Name: HOWELL WOODS
Quality: Not Reported
Acres per Polygon: 3.08
NC_SNHA NC10001846
Site Name: HOWELL WOODS
Quality: Not Reported
Acres per Polygon: 1.13
NC_SNHA NC10001847
Site Name: HOWELL WOODS
Quality: Not Reported
Acres per Polygon: 1.85
NC_SNHA NC10001848
Site Name: HOWELL WOODS
Quality: Not Reported
Acres per Polygon: .93
NC_SNHA NC10001849
Site Name: HOWELL WOODS
Quality: Not Reported
Acres per Polygon: 1.96
TC2792753.2s Page A-21

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL'SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS.
Map ID
Direction
Distance Database EDR ID Number _
NC_SNHA NC10001850
Site Name: HOWELL WOODS
Quality: Not Reported
Acres per Polygon: 2.95
Site Name: HOWELL WOODS
Quality: Not Reported
Acres per Polygon: .49
Site Name: HOWELL WOODS
Quality: Not Reported
Acres per Polygon: .51
Site Name: HOWELL WOODS
Quality: Not Reported
Acres per Polygon: .37
NC SNHA NC10001851
NC_SNHA NC10001852
NC_SNHA NC10001853
Site Name:
Quality:
Acres per Polygon:
HANNAH CREEK SWAMP
Not Reported
181.21
NC_SNHA NC10001886
NC_SNHA NC10003350
Site Name: HOWELL WOODS
Quality: Not Reported
Acres per Polygon: 3497.99
NC_SNHA NC10003403
TC2792753.2s Page A-22

GEOCHECK~-PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
North Carolina -Significant Natural Heritage Areas:
Site Name:
Quality:
Acres per Polygon:
MILL CREEK AQUATIC HABITAT
Not Reported
127.26
TC2792753.2s Page A-23

GEOCHECK®-PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
State Database: NC Radon
Radon Test Results
County Result Type Total Sites Avg pCi/L
JOHNSTON Statistical 9 0.22
JOHNSTON 15 0.48 0.00-2.20
Federal EPA Radon Zone for JOHNSTON County: 3
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L.
Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
Range pCi/L
-0.20-0.80.
Result Type
Non-Statistical
Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 27524
Number of sites tested: 1
Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L
Living Area - 1st Floor 0.000 pCi/L 100%
Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported
Basement Not Reported Not Reported
4-20 pCi/L % >20 pCi/L
0% 0%
Not Reported Not Reported
Not Reported Not Reported
TC2792753.2s Page A-24

RHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Scanned Digital USGS 7.5' Topographic Map (DRG)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images
are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image
is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection.
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2009 from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA.
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC2792753.2s Page A-25

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL /REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surtace
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or hight quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
NC Game Lands: Wildlife Resources Commission Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC2792753.2s Page A-26

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC2792753.2s Page A-27

Howell Woods
6601 Devils Racetrack Road
Four Oaks, NC 27524
Inquiry Number: 2792753.6
June 14, 2010
440 Wheelers Farms Road
~ Milford, CT 06461
EDR Environmental Data Resources Inc soo.352.0050
www.edrnet.com

Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Site Name:
Howell Woods
6601 Devils Racetrack Road
Four Oaks, NC 27524
Client Name:
WK Dickson
3101 John Humphries Wynd
Raleigh, NC 27612
EDR Inquiry # 2792753.6
Contact: Danielingram
6/14/10
~_
~~R EirJ~ro!~ni~_i~l;i! li,!t,~ Ftr~Sr_rur_-='s Inr
The complete Sanborn Library collection has been searched by EDR, and fire insurance maps covering the target
property location provided by WK Dickson were identified for the years listed below. The certified Sanborn Library
search results in this report can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn and entering the certification
number. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of
maps by Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection.
Certified Sanborn Results:
Site Name: Howell Woods
Address: 6601 Devils Racetrack Road
City, State, Zip: Four Oaks, NC 27524
Cross Street:
P.O. # NA
Project: Howell Woods Mi
Certification # 3AA1-46E6-87F6
UNMAPPED PROPERTY
This report certifies that the complete holdings
Library, LLC collection have been searched
supplied target property information, and fire
covering the target property were not found.
Sanborn® Library search results
Certification # 3AA1-46E6-87F6
The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million
Sanborn fire insurance maps, which track historical
of the Sanborn Property usage in approximately 12,000 American
cities and towns. Collections searched:
based on client
insurance maps
/ Library of Congress
/ University Publications of America
/EDR Private Collection
The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866T'"
Limited Permission To Make Copies
WK Dickson (the client) is permitted to make up to THREE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map
accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made
directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is
conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request.
Disclaimer -Copyright and Trademark notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be
concluded from this Report that coverage information far the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR
IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE
MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTEES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL
RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF
ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL,
INCIDENTAL CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk
levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing
any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an
environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be
construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2010 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are
the property of their respective owners.

2792753 - 6 page 2

Howell Woods
6601 Devils Racetrack Road
Four Oaks, NC 27524
Inquiry Number: 2792753.3
June 14, 2010
440 Wheelers Farms Road
Milford, CT 06461
EDR Environmental Data Resources Inc 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com

EDR Historical Topographic Map Report
Environmental Data Resources, Ines (EDR) Historical Topographic Map Report is designed to assist professionals in
evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topographic Map Report
includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the early 1900s.
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer -Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc.
It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO
WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should the
be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the
information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2010 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map
of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks
used herein are the property of their respective owners.

Historical Topographic Map
r ~ . .~ -, x
I ~ _
,: ~. ~~
' ~~~-~.. aQcecnr cn,val~0 ~1V t7.Ny' ! •
i d i
I• ~ 1. ~ - ia~` ~
1 4~. O'
t
x - . M • '~'
,• ,
-„ . _ ~ -_~
,~ aM~ ,~ ~` :~_ O
I 4. s i ~ }a> ,J
~' ~' ''°~' 1 ,~ •' fi
~~ _ . ~~ . ~~~ I; ~ i 1 }
~: AN(;DFS ( _
},e
I o ~ ~ ~4 ~~~ i i
ti ~' a ~,,~1v L.~ 3- ~YFRkI-
a e lli-1 ~,v f:}K<< _~~~ve :r-`~5s,~ l`~=:: ~- ~~t _ IIUI~W -_ ..~y~,-
(~ )I _ L ___ _ jed a ~s~~ ~' ~'ti Pi FRGFS f(RRYi
I ~-~ a.~.
i !! / ,
Y ~ ~ ~ / i ~ ~ - ~FL '~-. J -. sue,. ~ <~: • ~~
t~ 14 f~ ,y ~ ..• ~ I
A,. ,` ! ~, ~ f ,~ ' ham. ~~ ~ .+ ...
~ -- --- .:.... .l -. ~, s,. ~: ~ .
~ ~Sti'lcldrultl ~ f ~~>> S'~ ~ •_
I~ ~ - ~~~ ~ 1 M1YIYIII 1~ ! ~` ~ i __ ~.uf.v.s['•^t.c-. ~- ... ~:n ..µ'~v. ~`~~
~.~~ _ -.z.~.:.~ ~ 4 ~ 1 i" 111 I ~;
e
I t _,
L~ t
y .- A lt.,.,..1~t~u
I ; ~' __ ~__f y- ~ 1 fd
I ',`~ _ ~ ` ~~, ~~.., ~~ ~ - ~ l ~ it ,~
~ 1 6u1 ~11 `I :. ~ ~1.. ,~~ ~ Plu~crr~
I TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Howell Woods CLIENT: WK Dickson
N NAME: FOUR OAKS ADDRESS: 6601 Devils Racetrack Road CONTACT: Daniel Ingram
I MAP YEAR: 1908 Four Oaks, NC 27524 INQUIRY#: 2792753.3
I 1 LAT/LONG: 35.3783 / -78.2831 RESEARCH DATE: 06/14/2010
I SERIES: 15
SCALE: 1:62500

Historical Topographic Map
=~,,~ w i ~,;~
~:
x ~~
IIAi ~', ilA ~ ~-,
i ... ~~~~ ~ ~ ... `~- i A ~~~ r
,1 ~ /
` I r
,~ ~: ;.
~a. ~~ ` '1 i ' _ I ~ , ~ -- , Ica,
y ~- ~~
a-r~. 98 ~ ~' "'lki. ~ ' -.cgs ,. ...`
~4 ~
v) j ~ ~ ~
~. T
.. a _.. i ` I i ~ ,
VVV
ay "" i t
- ~' -a. -,~ .a. ''~' .S tUAII ~
~ I NPIII~ i ... .1
~ - ,f ~ .. ~` ~ I
4~ ~ } 9u j
i~ / I' I
~ ~ ~ i c
~ /~
r ~ I i ~,
I i ,r
<. i , ,,dap w ~ ..
46 i ~ I ~ _.
/ I `a ~ ~.
(( j~~j _ a
' / V• / ~. 147 ,Y ~~.
`~~
~- r ,
I ---.~ '_ - ~ ---~
.~
i I ,~. ~. 1
y
I / ~ ' ~ `-.
)R ~~/ '4S ' ~~~ -7f1n !4] !~(; • INTERIOR-GEOLOGICA4 SURVEY, RESTON,V
TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Howell Woods CLIENT: WK Dickson
N NAME: FOUR OAKS NE ADDRESS: 6601 Devils Racetrack Road CONTACT: Daniel Ingrarrl
T MAP YEAR: 1986 Four Oaks, NC 27524 INQUIRY#: 2792753.3
LAT/LONG: 35.3783 / -78.2831 RESEARCH DATE: 06/14/2010
SERIES: 7.5
SCALE: 1:24000
~-
"~-

Historical Topographic Map
~;
_ ~, ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ I ~ ~,
+. 1+.
~qtH
.i. .+d1. ~' ~ ~-~-le-~--w?.ti+Mt~ / aft- - '~-W~ _ _
- ~/ i
-_ -_. - -_ ___-_. -_ - _t -t iiY. ~ 1~ 2
F ,t, 'e~ -s- `
I ~ -w -~ -- ~ ~ 1 ~u~ i ~W~. ~._ - .r. 1
I 97 ~ ~ r : + _~ ~ r '1~- *~ may. ~~ i
~.
-- -
t '" ~ - -s- .,~.. J ;}`-ter--- _ _- ._ - ---- - _._ ,r
I ,- „~ --- - - -
,,, - .~
'"' ~- ~. ''' ,. ~~` ~ Swan w ~r ~ ~'".~ ~~ ~-
I _ w. _ .~.~ ,»- Pond '_{ - ... ~ %;
_ ~,
.~ ~ .~
I _. ~ _ ~ i
_ ~, ~,. ~, w ,~. -
~ ~ ';
t~ ~l
I\ .. ~ / ~
' x s~ ~ _ '
~___ ~ ~ ~ ~, r ,!.. _,i
e - - -- - ~, .. -~- _,_ - ~- IF
~A __--- - ~ ----- -
,, __
\ ~ ~ ~ .~
/J/ ~
. j
.,..
.r._ ` , .. .w. a! .~ -- a +~-
-, ~--_ _ -
11._~ ~~ i _ -- --- - - --- - - -
.t i w ~. ,~ - ~; f
.~.
,t _ ' w ~ ~ ,~ ~, ,,: f x
'Y" - - y. MF Y.~
~ ~ ~_ I
i
~', i
rt-~ - ',
-_
~dF nron~ 'd71 'dN_ 'dQ°OJnF
I TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Howell Woods CLIENT: WK Dickson
N NAME: FOUR OAKS NE ADDRESS: 6601 Devils Racetrack Road CONTACT: Daniel Ingram
I MAP YEAR: 1997 Four Oaks, NC 27524 INQUIRY#: 2792753.3
I 1 LAT/LONG: 35.3783 / -78.2831 RESEARCH DATE: 06/14/2010
I SERIES: 7.5

1 SCALE: 1:24000

Historical Topographic Map
X45 ~ ~ ~w ~ , ".'n Una i t Y F( '
t' ~ ~ ~
I
Cr ~ ~i i ,.
i
a ~ ~ ~.
~.l ,- ,, _ -- -
~t; i j ;
f ,~~
,,oa ,~ .. ... - I
`\ - -
~~~~f~~ C) ~..
1. ~ ~. ~~, i ;- ~ x;89
~ .~ ,__ Q
~ ~ ~~
~ ~-/
' , I ~ ~~~ ~
,~~ ~ ~ ~.
r -
f~ 1 ~ `
i iS BJ ~~/ l
a ' ~~,_! ~~ ~-~
~ ~~ , ~ -z_ ~.~ ~~~
~~ J \~ ~'+~.: _.,,~ -•.. 'Bentonville ' ° ~j ~ li~~ ~~
Cem 1 - ^~
.~ ~ ~ . ~ ~_ ~ ~ rya i ~ it ~ ~ ~
i ( ~ BM :1.16 1 ~ ~ , _ I. ~ ---iNj /` f ~ ~ r
~ ~~ 1. ~ ~ / ')~~ ~ ~i ~'~ ;k
~ l .., ~~ /~ i ~ ~
`~ - .
~ 1 !tfeKfonv~~ y ~ ~ ~) ~ t: ~ ~1,~ 1. ~~ ~~ t~ J_ ~T Cl~gO A ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~_
~ ~ ~ , ~Iigi~ ~~"~,~ ~ ~ ~ RESEFiYA710N
/ ~.~ ~ 1 ', ~~ ~ ~ ~ , -its '~ ~
~' ~ ,l - ~ r, _ ~~. ,
V ~~
~ ~ ~ ,~ %~,-~~ t t - -~ ~ ~ - ~ -- ~ ' I ~~ `
f~- r
r1i z
ADJOINING QUAD
NAME: NEWTON GROVE NORTH SITE NAME: Howell Woods CLIENT: WK Dickson
N MAP YEAR: 1986 ADDRESS: 6601 Devils Racetrack Road CONTACT: Daniel Ingram
T Four Oaks, NC 27524 INQUIRY#: 2792753.3
SERIES: 7.5 LAT/LONG: 35.3783 / -78.2831 RESEARCH DATE: 06/14/2010
SCALE: 1:24000
_~
`~
`~

Historical Topographic Map
~ '45 17'30" '41 ! '48 `49 s77 5c
~~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .a-~--~ ,
I ~_ . ;~
I\ ., i ~ ~- - ~ ~ ~ ~ 3,~~ _ ~ _
"..
~ V W. I I
dl ' - - ,T
j
~~
I ss / "1_ ~, ~ - -- j ~ -
~ ~ ~I~
,. ~
,~~ ~_
y
~p
;_
~ ~ --- -- --- .o.
.-.
,.
,,
~- - -
~.. ~, c~_ -,,~ ,
(~. ~ ~ --
L1 v -
\ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~, . i ~( iii .,~ r~ _ ~ , ~~.
_-
._ '
' ~ ~~
~ ~ _ __ _
-- ----- _ - ..1--
- ...
I\ ~ 1 --~- ~--
~ /~ r ~
~ ,a"_
i -~-~i~J +i,
t 1
1 ( ~ ~. '~ ~ 1 I ~
~. ~
J~~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ " ~ r r , i Betrtonvllle ~ ~ ! ) ~ ~ ~ ~
~ (' ~ l ~~ ~ ~ f~:Cem 1 {pt ~ , ~ i ~ ,
,,
JJ(~ r
i ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ r ' - ,1. / /~~ --
I ~ ~ ,~ ~(~l ~ /~, _ ~ ~i( ~~ ~
~ ~ , ~
I ~tq~! ~~ ) ; .) 1 (ioti~ ' ~ ~.. t 1~' ~ j 1~~ ~ ~ isn.~ CAEi SCOUT ~ ~
)))) ~ r
~ ~~ ~) ~ i ~, Chf' i ~ ,' 11191,) ~_ q ~~~~ ` ~ ~r ~ ~' ( `RESE ATION ~ i.~i1F ~ ~ a5
,;
,,
~ ~ ~,
~~ ,
L, ~ _
~, .~ ,i(utc ~,B r i ~ I,( ~~ v f' ~~ ~ r '~
~'~ i ,- ~ ~ '~ I F} ~ ~~'. ~,~~ ,
~~~ ~ ~: 111 ~ r~ ~~ - i -~ ~' 1 1p- 1
~~~111 ~ v i ~I I ii ~, ~I ~ I
I ;, 1. ~ l , ~,~ ~) ~ r , t~: ~ ~ ~~ , ~~~'~~~ ~ '~ ,7 : :~= ' ~ ~ ~ ~.l • ~~~,
ADJOINING QUAD
I NAME: NEWTON GROVE NORTH SITE NAME: Howell Woods CLIENT: WK Dickson
N MAP YEAR: 1997 ADDRESS: 6601 Devils Racetrack Road CONTACT: Daniel Ingram
I Four Oaks, NC 27524 INQUIRY#: 2792753.3
I 1 SERIES: 7.5 LAT/LONG: 35.3783 / -78.2831 RESEARCH DATE: 06/14/2010
I
I SCALE: 1:24000

NA.

EBX
_0—
x `r
a
or
�,.
s _
Source: USGS 1973
Historical Aerials - 1973
Howell Woods o 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
Stream Preservation 1 inch = 0.5 miles
June 23, 2010
l
EBX
_0—
x `r
a
or
�,.
s _
Source: USGS 1973
Historical Aerials - 1973
Howell Woods o 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
Stream Preservation 1 inch = 0.5 miles
June 23, 2010

~°°~,~ }"

:r~~
~ z
~>
~_.
~-

N
W ~ E
s
~"
'`~~,
~. ~~z
~:
-~
~_`
t i #"`. '. .~ ~, 85 ~' gay
},~.. ~~,
F
t - f
,i`~ ~', ~ ~'~'
~ _, ~ ~
,. , ~ `
,~
,. ~! ~~~~
"~~~. ~ ~ ~~' ,Source: USGS 1999:
Historical Aerials - 1999 0 0.25 0.5 1
Howell Woods Miles
Stream Preservation 1 inch = 0.5 miles
June 23, 2010

Appendix C
Routine Wetland Data Forms

(~rii't' ~tni~
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Howell Woods City/County: Johnston County Sampling Date: 2010-11-30
Applicant/Owner: EBX Neuse I, LLC/Johnston County Community College State: NC Sampling Point: Plot 1
Investigator(s): George Lankford Section, Township, Range:
floodplain Local relief ) p ( ) ~
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): (concave, convex, none :none Sloe % : 1 0
LRR P/T 35.3813654076 -78.2746239254 NAD83
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
soil Map unit Name: Wehadkee-Chastain association NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ~ No 0 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ~, Soil ~, or Hydrology ~ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ~ No
Are Vegetation ~, Soil ~, or Hydrology ~ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ~ No ~ Is the Sampled Area
H dric Soil Present? Yes x ~ ~ No 0
y ~ No © within a Wetland? Yes x.
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reguired• check all that apply) ~ Surtace Soil Cracks (B6)
Surtace Water (A1) _0 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ~ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
High Water Table (A2) ~ Aquatic Fauna (B13) x® Drainage Patterns (B10)
0 Saturation (A3) ~ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ~ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) ~ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ~ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
a Drift Deposits (B3) ~ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ~ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
© Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
l,..I Thin Muck Surface (C7) XXg Geomorphic Position (D2)
1,...t Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ~ Other (Explain in Remarks) ~ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
~
th
i
h
~ D
No
Surface Water Present? Yes (
nc
es):
ep
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches):
~
Saturation Present? Yes ~ No ~ Depth (inches): No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
includes ca ilia frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Meet FAC neutral test - (3 FACW, OBL-0 FACU, UP)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Interim Version

VEGETATION -Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: PIOt 1

Tree Stratum (Plot size: 0.10 acre ) Absolute Dominant Indicator
%
c
S
i
? Dominance Test worksheet:

Quercus phellos o
ov
80 / er
pec
es
Status
Q FACW- Number of Dominant Species
10
1 o That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
2 Liquidambar styraciflua 75% ©x FAC+
Quercus lyrata 35% 0 OBL Total Number of Dominant 10
s Species Across All Strata: (B)
a Acer rubrum 30% ~ FAC

5
~ Percent of Dominant Species °
100 /o
. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(~B)
6.
~ © Prevalence Index worksheet:
220% Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 0.10 acre ) =Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
1 Carpinus caroliniana 20% ~ FAC FACW species x 2 -
2 Ilex opaca 20% ~ FAC- FAC species x s -
s Ilex decidua 10% ~ FACW- FACU species x a =
4. ~ UPL species x 5 =
5. © Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
~ ~ Prevalence Index = B/A =
50%
= Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 0.10 acre ) _ Dominance Test is >50%
1 Ulmus rubra 1 % Q FAC _ Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2, Q _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4. Q 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5 © be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

6. ~ Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
~' ~
1 °/
° Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 0.10 acre ) =Total Cover approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
7
6
l
i
i
(
.
cm) or
arger
n d
ameter at breast height (DBH).
1 Arundinaria gigantea 2% 0 FACW
2 Rubus argutus 2% ~ FAC Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3, ~ than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4' ® Sh
b
W
d
l
l
i

0 ru
-
oo
y p
ants, exc
ng woody vines,
ud
5. approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.

~ Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
~~ herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
g © plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
~ 3 ft (1 m) in height.
g
10. © Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
11. 0
12.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 0.10 acre 4%
) =Total Cover
Smilax rotundifolia 4% FAC
1 ~
2 Toxicodendron radicans 3% ~ FAC
s Bignonia capreolata 1 % ~ FAC
4. 0
5 ~ Hydrophytic
o
8 /0 Vegetation
P
0
=Total Cover resent? Yes
No
Remarks: (If observed, list morpholo ical adaptations below).
Vegetation Is mature forest with a dense canopy. Understory is limited and sparse.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: PIOt 1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
finches) Color (moist) % Color (moistl % Tyoe Loc Texture Remarks
0-4 10 YR 3/4 SL
4-13 10 YR 5/2 80% 7.5 YR 6/1 5 D M SiL
7.5 YR 5/8 15 C M
13-22 10 YR 7/2 75% 7.5 YR 5/8 25 C M SC
~T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
H dric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ~ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
~
~_ Histic Epipedon (A2) T
~t
1....~Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) ~ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR'S)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) ~ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ~ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
- Stratified Layers (A5) ~x Depleted Matrix (F3) ~ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
MLRA 1536
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) )
®Redox Dark Surface (F6) (
-
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) p
IW.tDepleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
~
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
~_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F10) (LRR U) fl Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
~, Thick Dark Surface (A12) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
~ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
,
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
~
Depth (inches): No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes

US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Interim Version

Print=Fc~~i~~
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjecUSite: Howell Woods city/county: Johnston County Sampling Date: 2010-11-30
ApplicanUOwner: EBX Neuse I, LLC/Johnston County Community College State: NC Sampling Point: Plot 2
Investigator(s): George Lankford Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): ~%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P/T Lat: 35.3685332349 Long: -78.2705694467 Datum: NAD83
soil Map unit Name: Wehadkee-Chastain association NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ~ No 0 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ~, Soil 0, or Hydrology ~ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ~ No 0
Are Vegetation ~, Soil ~, or Hydrology 0 naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ~ No ~ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x ~ ~ ~ No 0
0 No © within a Wetland . Yes x
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reguiredl
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that aoolyl ~ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Surface Water (A1) _~ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ~ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (613)
~ ~ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) T
7
Lt Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ~ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
x Water Marks (B1) ~ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) [~ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (82) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (CS)
Drift Deposits (B3) ~ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ~ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (65) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
l~.d Thin Muck Surface (C7) x Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
~
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ®Other (Explain in Remarks) ~
~
!=t FAC-Neutral Test (D5).
Field Observations:
~
th
i
h
~ D
No
Surface Water Present? Yes (
nc
es):
ep
Water Table Present? Yes ~ No ~ Depth (inches):
0
~
Saturation Present? Yes ~ No ~ Depth (inches): No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
includes ca ills frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Meet FAC neutral test - (2 FACW, OBL-0 FACU, UP)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Interim Version

VEGETATION -Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: PIOt 2

Tree Stratum (Plot size: 0.10 acre Absolute Dominant Indicator
%
S
i
? St
t Dominance Test worksheet:
)
Quercus michauxii u ove
65 / r
pec
es
us
a
0 FACW- Number of Dominant Species
10
1 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
2 Carya aquatica 65% ®x OBL
g Acer rubrum 45% ~ FAC Total Number of Dominant 10
Species Across All Strata: (B)
a Liquidambar styraciflua 40% ©FAC

5.
~ Percent of Dominant Species
or FAC: 100% (pig)
That Are OBL
FACW
6. ,
,
~ © Prevalence Index worksheet:
215% Total % Cover of: Multiply bV:
0.10 acre
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) =Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
1 Carpinus caroliniana 20% ~ FAC FACW species x 2 =
2 Acer rubrum 10% ~ FAC FAC species x 3 =
3. © FACU species x 4 =
4. ~ UPL species x 5 =
5. ® Column Totals: (A) (B)
6. 0
~ © Prevalence Index = B/A =
30% Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:

Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 0.10 acre ) = Total Cover
_ Dominance Test is >50%
1 Carpinus caroliniana 5% ©x FAC _ Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2 Acer rubrum 5% ~ FAC _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
s Ilex opaca 5% ®x FAC-
a Ilex decidua 2% ©FACW- 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5 © be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6. 0 Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
y~ ~
°
17 /o Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,

0.10 acre =Total Cover approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1 Arundinaria gigantea 2% ~ FACW
2 © Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3, ® than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4 ©
. Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5. 0 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6' ©

0 Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
7. herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
t3 ~ plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
~ 3 ft (1 m) in height.
9
10. © Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
12.
0.10 acre
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 2%
) =Total Cover
Smilax rotundif
li 2% FAC
o
a
1 ~
2. 0
3.
4.
5 ~ Hydrophytic
o
2 /0 Vegetation
0
=Total Cover Present? Yes
No
Remarks: (If observed, list morpholo ical adaptations below).
Vegetation is mature forest wit~i a dense canopy. Understory is limited and sparse.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: PIOt 2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of maicators.~
Depth Matrix
finches) Color (moist) % Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-5 7.5 YR 5/1 85% 7.5 YR 5/8 15% C M SiC
5-21 7.5 YR 7/1 85% 7.5 YR 5/8 15% C M SiC
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
H dric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) ~Polyvalue Below Surface (SS) (LRR S, T, U) ~ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) ,Q 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Q Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) ~ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,6)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ~ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) ~ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
MLRA 1538)
- Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (F6) (
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) fl Red Parent Material (TF2)
LRR T
U)
TF12
rf
©
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) ,
) (
ace (
Very Shallow Dark Su
Redox Depressions (F8) _
~_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F10) (LRR U) ,~ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Q Thick Dark Surface (A12) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
l
ti
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) ema
c.
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or prob
1506)
MLRA 150A
F18
d V
rti
R
d
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ,
) (
e
c (
e
uce
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No

US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Interim Version

Pri~i Forth f ~~
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Howell Woods City/County: Johnston County sampling Date: 2010-11-30
Applicant/Owner: EBX Neuse I, LLC/Johnston County Community College State: NC Sampling Point: Plot 3
Investigator(s): George Lankford Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): flOOdplaln Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): ~%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P/T Lat: 35.3747887234 Long: -78.2823420674 Datum: NAD83
soli Map unit Name: Wehadkee-Chastain association NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ~ No ~ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ~, Soil 0, or Hydrology ~ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No
Are Vegetation ~, Soil ~, or Hydrology ~ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x® No ~ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ~ No ~ ~ No 0
within a Wetland. Yes x.
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ~ No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reguired• check all that apply) ~ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) _~ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ~ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (B8)
High Water Table (A2) 0 Aquatic Fauna (B13) ~ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) ~ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ~ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
[~ Water Marks (B1) ~ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ~ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
1!"~~ Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) ~ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ~ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
® Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
10..1 Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2)
t.J Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ~ Other (Explain in Remarks) ~ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
~
0 D
h
th
i
No
Surtace Water Present? Yes es):
(
nc
ep
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No ~ Depth (inches): 26
26
~
Saturation Present? Yes ~ No ~ Depth (inches): No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
includes ca ills frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Meet FAC neutral test - (2 FACW, OBL-0 FACU, UP)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Interim Version

VEGETATION -Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Plot 3

Tree Stratum (Plot size: 0.10 acre Absolute Dominant Indicator
% C
S
i
? St
t Dominance Test worksheet:
)
Quercus I rata
Y ov
90% er
pec
es
a
us
x
OBL
©
Number of Dominant Species $
1. , That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 Ulmus rubra 80% ~x FAC-
Acer rubrum 50% x© FAC Total Number of Dominant 8
3 Species Across All Strata: (B)
a Betula nigra 10% ©FACW

5
~ Percent of Dominant Species o
100 /o
• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(~B)
6.
~ © Prevalence Index worksheet:
230% Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
Sa_pling Stratum (Plot size: ) OBL species x 1 =
1. ~ FACW species x 2 =
2. ~ FAC species x 3 =
3. © FACU species x 4 =
4. 0 UPL species x 5 =
5. ~ Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
y ~ Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:

Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 0.10 acre ) = Total Cover
_ Dominance Test is >50%
1. Q _ Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2 Ilex decidua 3% Q FACW- _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3. 0
4. ~ 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5 © be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6. © Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7.
3°/
° Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,

0.10 acre =Total Cover approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1 Microstegium vimineum 5% ~ FAC+
Dulichium arundinaceum 1 % ©OBL Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2 roximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
ap
3. ~ p
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4 ~
.
0 Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5. approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6. ©

~ Herb-All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
7• herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
8 © plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
~ 3 ft (1 m) in height.
g
10. © Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
11. 0
12.
0.10 acre
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 6%
) =Total Cover
Viti
t
di
f
li 2% FAC
s ro
un
a
o
a
1 ~
2 Smilax rotundifolia 2% ~ FAC
3 Toxicodendron radicans 2% ~ FAC
4.
5 ~ Hydrophytic
°
6 /o
=Total Cover Vegetation
Present? Yes 0 No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Vegetation is mature forest. Understory is limited and sparse.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: PIOt 3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tyae Loc Texture Remarks
0-4 10 YR 4/1 90% 10 YR 4/6 10% C M CL
4-12 7.5 YR 2.5/1 90% 7.5 YR 4/6 10% C M CL
12-22 7.5 YR 7/1 90% 5 YR 5/8 10% C M SC
22-26 7.5 YR 7/1 90% 5 YR 5/8 10% C M SL
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
H dric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) OPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ~ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
~_ Histic Epipedon (A2) ~Thln Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) ,~ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) ,~ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ~ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
- Stratified Layers (A5) x Depleted Matrix (F3) ~ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
x
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) - Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
-
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) p
l...tDepleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
~
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
~_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F10) (LRR U) ~ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
[~ Thick Dark Surface (A12) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Q Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
0
Depth (inches): No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes

Concentrations occur as both soft masses and as linings of ped interspace where present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Interim Version

Print Fo mxp .~
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Howell Woods city/county: Johnston County Sampling Date: 2010-11-30
ApplicanUOwner: EBX Neuse I, LLC/Johnston County Community College State: NC Sampling Point: Plot 4
Investigator(s): George Lankford Section, Township, Range:
floodplain none o
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (/o ): 1 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P/T Lat: 35.3597798628 Long: -78.2722796796 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map unit Name: Wehadkee-Chastain association NWI classification: PF01 F
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 0 No ~ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ~, Soil ~, or Hydrology ~ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ~ No
Are Vegetation ~, Soil 0, or Hydrology ~ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No ~ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No 0 0 No
0 No ~ within a Wetland? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply) ®Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Q Surface Water (A1) _~ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) 0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) ©Aquatic Fauna (B13) ~ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) ~ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ~ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) ~ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ~ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
a Drift Deposits (B3) ~ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ~ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
© Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
!~ Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2)
!~1 Shallow Aquitard (D3)
© Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ©Other (Explain in Remarks) ~ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
0
©x D
i
h
th
No
Surface Water Present? Yes nc
es):
ep
(
Water Table Present? Yes ~ No ~ Depth (inches): 18
18
~
Saturation Present? Yes ~ No 0 Depth (inches): No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Meet FAC neutral test - (4 FACW, OBL-0 FACU, UP)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Interim Version

VEGETATION -Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Plot 4

Tree Stratum (Plot size: 0.10 acre ) Absolute Dominant Indicator
%
c
S
i
? St Dominance Test worksheet:

Betula nigra o
ov
55 / er
pec
es
atus
©x FACW Number of Dominant Species
~
1 o That Are OBL, FACW
or FAC:
(A)
2 Quercus laurifolia 55% ~ FACW ,
QUerCUS lyrata 40% Q OBL Total Number of Dominant 7
g Species Across All Strata: (B)
4 Acer rubrum 10% ^FAC

5'
~ Percent of Dominant Species
or FAC: 100% (pig)
That Are OBL
FACW
Q ,
,
6.
~ © Prevalence Index worksheet:
160% =Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
Saplino Stratum (Plot size: ) OBL species x 1 =
1. ~ FACW species x 2 =
2. ~ FAC species x 3 =
3. ~ FACU species x 4 =
4. ~ UPL species x 5 =
5. © Column Totals: (A) (B)
6. 0
7.
Prevalence Index = B/A =

= Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 0.10 acre ) _ Dominance Test is >50%
1 Betula nigra 55% ®x FACW _ Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2 Acer rubrum 10% ^x FAC _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4, ® 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

6. ~ Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7 ®
65°/
° Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 0.10 acre ) =Total Cover approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
7
(
.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1 Panicum virgatum 5% ~ FAC+

© Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2• a
roximatel
20 ft (6 m) or more in hei
ht and less
3. 0 pp
y
g
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4 ®
.
~ Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5. approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6. ©

0 Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
~• herbaceous vines
regardless of size. Includes woody
8 Q ,
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
10. Q Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
12.
0.10 acre
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5%
) =Total Cover
Vitis rotundifolia 2% FAC
1 ~
2. 0
3. 0
4.
5 ^ Hydrophytic
o
2 /0
=Total Cover Vegetation
Present? Yes ~ No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Vegetation Is mature forest. Understory is limited.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point: Plot 4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks
0-5 7.5 YR 4/1 93% 7.5 YR 4/3 7% C M/PL SL
5-28 7.5 YR 5/1 85% 7.5 YR 4/6 15% C M SCL
7.5 YR 6/1 5% D M -
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
H dric Soil Indicators:
l
A1
Hi
t
T
U)
value Below Surface (S8) (LRR S
OPol Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
~ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q (
)
s
oso
Histic Epipedon (A2) ,
,
y
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) ~ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Q Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) ~ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,8)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ~ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
- Stratified Layers (A5) ~x Depleted Matrix (F3) ~ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) ©Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_~Depleted Dark Surface (F7) (MLRA 1538)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
LRR T
TF12
U
~
Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) ,
) (
)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (
~_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F10) (LRR U) fl Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Q Thick Dark Surface (A12) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
i
[~ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
1508)
MLRA 150A
F18
V
ti c.
unless disturbed or problemat
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ,
er
c (
) (
Reduced
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ~ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Interim Version

Print F~ rn
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Howell Woods City/County: Johnston County Sampling Date: 2010-11-30
ApplicanUOwner: EBX Neuse I, LLC/Johnston County Community College State: NC Sampling Point: Plot 5
Investigator(s): George Lankford Section, Township, Range:
floodplain Local relief )none p (o) °
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): (concave, convex, none : Sloe /o : 1 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P/T Lat: 35.361723261 Long: -78.2791689486 Datum: NAD83
soil Map unit Name: Wehadkee-Chastain association NWI classification: PF01 F
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ~ No 0 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ~, Soil ~, or Hydrology ~ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No _
Are Vegetation ~, Soil ~, or Hydrology ~ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No ® Is the Sampled Area
H dric Soil Present? Yes ® ~ No
y ~ No ® within a Wetland? Yes x-
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reguired• check all that apply) ~ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Q Surface Water (A1) _~ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ®Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
High Water Table (A2) ~ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ~ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) ~ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ~ Moss Trim Lines (616)
[x~ Water Marks (B1) ~ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ~ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
1~"i~ Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (CS)
Drift Deposits (B3) ~ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ~ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
Iron Deposits (65) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
6,_l Thin Muck Surface (C7) XXg Geomorphic Position (D2)
L,.II Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ~ Other (Explain in Remarks) 0FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
0
0 D
i
h
th
No
Surface Water Present? Yes nc
es):
ep
(
Water Table Present? Yes ~ No ~ Depth (inches):
0
~
Saturation Present? Yes ~ No 0 Depth (inches): No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
includes ca illa Erin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Meet FAC neutral test - (3 FACW, OBL-0 FACU, UP)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Interim Version

VEGETATION -Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Plot 5

Tree Stratum (Plot size: 0.10 acre ) Absolute Dominant Indicator
%
c
S
i
? St
t Dominance Test worksheet:
ov er
pec
es
a
us Number of Dominant Species
1 QUerCUS lyrata o
50 /o ~ OBL That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
2 Acer rubrum 45% 0 FAC
3 Liquidambar styraciflua 40% ~ FAC+ Total Number of Dominant 6
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.

5
~ Percent of Dominant Species o
100 /o
. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(p/B)
6.
~ © Prevalence Index worksheet:
135% =Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 0.10 acre ) OBL species x 1 =
1 Ilex decidua 40% 0 FACW- FACW species x 2 =
2. ~ FAC species x 3 =
3. © FACU species x 4 =
4. ~ UPL species x 5 =
5. © Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
? ~ Prevalence Index = B/A =
40% Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
= Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) _ Dominance Test is >50%
1. 0 _ Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2 Ilex decidua 2% QX FACW- _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4, ~ 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5 ~ be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

6. © Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7.
2% Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
0.1 O acre =Total Cover approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1 Panicum virgatum 2% x© FAC+

2
© Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
• approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3. © than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4 ~
.
0 Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5. approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6 ©
'
~ Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
7. herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
8 © plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
© 3 ft (1 m) in height.
g
10. © Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
12.
2% =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )

1.
2.
3.
4.
5 ~ Hydrophytic
Vegetation
0
= Total Cover Present? Yes
No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptat ions below).
Vegetation is mature forest. Understory is limited and sparse.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point: Plot 5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-6 7.5 YR 4/3 7.5 YR 2.5/3 5% C M SL
6-15 7.5 YR 6/1 7.5 YR 4/6 25% D M SCL
15-24 7.5 YR 6/1 7.5 YR 5/8 35% C M SCL
2.5 YR 5/8 5% C M
'Type• C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. `Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
H dric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) ©Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ~ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2) ~Thln Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) ~ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) ,~ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ~ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
= Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) ~ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
MLRA 1536
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) )
(
~ Red Parent Material (TF2)
R
T
U
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) ,
)
R
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (L
~_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F10) (LRR U) ~ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A )
Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ~ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Interim Version

Appendix D
Vegetation Survey Data

WK Dickson Co., Inc.
Preservation Plan -Howell Woods Wetland Mitigation Site
Plot 1 Tenth Acre Plot Size 4,356 SF
Species
Indicator Basal Area
Common Name Scientific Name dbh Status (SF) Height
Red maple Acer rubrum 9.9 FAC 0.5
Red maple Acer• rzrbraui~ 14.7 FAC 1.2
American hornbeam Ca~prnus carolinrann 5.3 FAC 0.2
American holly Ilex opncn 6.2 FAC- 0.2
American holly Ilea- opncn 3.9 FAC- 0.1
Sweet gum Liquidanabarstnrcrciflua 24.4 FAC+ 3.2
Sweet gum Grquidambnr sh~raciflua 25.0 FAC+ 3.4
Overcup oak Quercus lyratn 13.0 OBL 0.9
Overcup oak Quercus lyrntn 6.3 OBL 0.2
Willow oak Quercus phellos 37.5 FACW- 7.7
Willow oak Quercus phellos 44.5 FACW- IO.H I ~~ I~cct
Basal Area (SF/AC) 284
Average dbh 17.3
Tree per acre 110
No tree species 6
Total species 18

WK Dickson Co., Inc.
Preservation Plan -Howell Woods Wetland Mitigation Site
Plot 2 Tenth Acre Plot Size 4,356 SF
Species
Indicator Basal Area
Common Name Scientific Name dbh Status (SF) Height
Red maple Acer rubrtnn 10.7 FAC 0.6
Red maple Acer rrrbrun~ 5.5 FAC 0.2
Red maple Acer rtrbrum 4.0 FAC 0.1
Red maple Acer r•zrbrann 3.0 FAC 0.0
Red maple Acer• rubrarrn 6.0 FAC 0.2
American hornbeam Cnr~hrus caroliniar~n 3.6 FAC 0.1
American hornbeam Carphrus carolirrinna 3.8 FAC 0. t
American hornbeam Cnr~irrus car•olnriann 3.6 FAC 0.1
American hor7~beam Car/~inars caroliniann 3.5 FAC 0. l
American hornbeam Carpinus caroliniarra 3.8 FAC 0.1
American hornbeam Cctrpinus cnroliniana 3.9 FAC 0.1
Shagbark hickory Caren ovnta 20.7 FACU 2.3
Posstunhaw holly Iles decidua 4.0 FACW- 0.1
American holly ller opaca 3.0 FAC- 0.0
Sweet gum Ligaridnmbar stt~rnciflarn 13.5 FAC+ 1.0
Sweet gum Liquidrnnbnr styr-nci~lara 3.2 FAC+ 0.1
Sweet gum Liyuidrnnbnr st~n•aciflua 3.1 FAC+ 0.1
Sourwood Oxydendrurn arba•erora 5.2 NI 0.1
Swamp chestnut oak Quercars naiclrauxii 16.9 FACW- 1.6
Swamp chestnut oak Quercus michaurii 14.6 FACW- 1.2
Swatnp chestnut oak Qarercus naichntrrri 12.4 FACW- 0.8
Willow oak Querczrs phe//os 30.6 FACW- 5.1 127 Feet
Slippery elm U/rrnrs rzrbra 6.6 FAC 0.2
Slippery elm U/mus rubs 10.2 FAC 0.6
Sli ei elm U/mars rzrbrn 3.1 FAC 0.1
Basal Area (SF/AC) 148
Average dbh 7.9
Tree per acre 250
No tree species 10
Total species 14

WK Dickson Co., Inc.
Preservation Plan -Howell Woods Wetland Mitigation Site
Plot 3 Tenth Acre Plot Size 4,356 SF
Species
Indicator Basal Area
Co-nmon Name Scientific Name dbh Status (SF) Height
Red maple Acer rrrbrrnn 1 1.3 FAC 0.7
Red maple Acer• rrrbrunr 8.6 FAC 0.4
Red maple Acer rzrbrann 4.6 FAC 0.1
Red maple Acer rrrbrrnn 31.0 FAC 5.2
River Birch Betuln nigrn 1 1.7 FACW 0.7
River Birch Betula nigrn 8.4 FACW 0.4
American hornbeam Cnrpinus carolinrnna 5.8 FAC 0.2
Cockspnr hawthorn Crataegus crus-galli l 7.0 FAC- 1.6
Green ash Fraxinus~enns)~Ivanica 5.0 FACW O.l
Sweet gum Liquidmrrbnr shn•aciflua 3.5 FAC+ 0.1
Overcup oak Quercus l~~rntcr 21.5 OBL 2.5
Overcup oak Quercus lprutu 25.0 OBL 3.4 86 Feet
Overcup oak Quercus lyr•atn 7.4 OBL 0.3
Overcup oak Quercus lprata 16.5 OBL 1.5
Slippery elm U/mus rubrn 19.9 FAC 2.2
Slippery elm Uhnus rubrn 12.9 FAC 0.9
Slippery elm U/mars rubrn 14.6 FAC 1.2
Slippery elm U/mus rubs 15.5 FAC 1.3
Slippery elm Uhnus rubs 15.8 FAC 1.4
Basal Area (SF/AC) 242
Average dbh 13.5
Tree per acre 190
No tree species 8
Total species 17
t
r •~< ~
~: w
~. ~ ~ `~~ ~ ~
~ 11 ~,
`~~ ~t;'
}

~
~
r.
1
7 #
~<~'~ ~;!
'
: ti
K4 j S ~~~
~ t3 t ~+q 4~ 1
i ~~ ~ ~ ~t } f i..
,~.•r. $

tY 5 ,ijrR? i+g
er Y~ 'AW • ~

~ ~ .E'
~
~
F
. M~ sr "
. _
+
~
'
f+u Y
~'"~
... 4
1 ~ -fv
y,*~ rk;•,4«ax
~.. ~, v ..
P 4 <
~ ~ c
~r~ yyr(wp*
.,
.
~ A ~,
. ~ _
i
.
•
,
~
w
~~
} ~ ..~
~,.~- G
p '
l E.;
.
n
~
y
~
lt!*
y rya ~ ~,-, R1S rY titi,~. i k :• s Y~ ~ 3
`
~ ;
4,

WK Dickson Co., Inc.
Preservation Plan -Howell Woods Wetland Mitigation Site
Plot 4 Tenth Acre Plot Size 4,356 SF
Species
Indicator Basal Area
Common Name Scientific Name dbh Status (SF) Height
Red maple Acer rt~brtnn 12.9 FAC 0.9
Red maple Acer rmbrzm7 15.2 FAC 1.3
Red maple Acer rubrun~ 6.3 FAC 0.2
Red maple Acer rubrun~ 3. I FAC 0.1
Red maple Acer rubran~a 3.6 FAC 0.
River Birch Betuln nrgrn 8.4 FACW 0.4
River Birch Beluln nigrn 4.8 FACW 0.1
River Birch Betuln nigrn 4.6 FACW 0.1
River Birch Betuln nrgrn 3.3 FACW 0.1
River Birch Behiln nigrn 3.3 FACW 0.1
River Birch Betuln nigrn 3.7 FACW 0.1
River Birch Behiln nigrn 3.0 FACW 0.0
River Birch Betirln nigrn 3.1 FACW 0.1
River Birch Betirln nrgrn 3.5 FACW 0.1
River Birch Betcrln nigrn 7.0 FACW 0.3
River Birch Beh~ln nigrn 3.0 FACW 0.0
Laurel oak Quercus lcnn•ifolia 35.5 FACW 6.9 1 15 Feet
Overcup oak Quercus lyratn 21.6 OBL 2.5
Basal Area (SF/AC) 132
Average dbh 8.1
Tree per acre 180
No tree species 4
Total species 15

WK Dickson Co., lnc.
Preservation Plan -Howell Woods Wetland Mitigation Site
Plot 5
Species
Common Name
Tenth Acre Plot Size 4,356 SF
Indicator Basal Area
Scientific Name dbh Status (SF) Height
Red maple Acer rubrum 12.7 FAC 0.9
Red maple Acer rub~zn~a 5.4 FAC 0.2
Red maple Acer rubrum 10.9 FAC 0.6
Red maple Acer rarb~zm~ 9.8 FAC 0.5
Red maple Acer rubrum 12.3 FAC 0.8
American hornbeam Ca~~inus caroliniana 3.9 FAC 0.1
Green ash Fraxinus pennsnh~auicn 8.5 FACW 0.4
Green ash Frm-iuus pei~usylvauica 5.6 FACW 0.2
Green ash Fraxinus peuusplvanica 3.0 FACW 0.0
Possumhaw holly Iles decidun 3.5 FACW- 0.1
Possumhaw holly I/ex decidua 5.5 FACW- 0.2
Possumhaw holly Iles decidara 4.0 FACW- 0.1
Possumhaw holly Ilex decidun 4.9 FACW- 0.1
Possumhaw holly Ilex decidun 5.7 FACW- 0.2
Possumhaw holly Ilex decidun 6.9 FACW- 0.3
Possumhaw holly Ilex decidua 3.5 FACW- 0.1
Possumhaw holly Ilex decidun 3.7 FACW- 0.1
Possumhaw holly Ilex decidz~a 4.6 FACW- 0.1
Possumhaw holly Ilex decidua 3.8 FACW- 0.1
Possumhaw holly Ilex decidara 4.5 FACW- 0.1
Sweet gum Liquidambar stvraci_flua 27.4 FAC+ 4.1
Overtop oak Quercus lyrata 34.0 OBL 6.3 1 l2 Feet
Overtop oak Quercus lyrata 8.2 OBL 0.4
Overtop oak Quercus lyrata 19.0 OBL 2.0
Overtop oak Qarerczrs lyrata 21.8 OBL 2.6
Overtop oak Quercus lyrata 5.1 OBL 0.1
Basal Area (SF/AC) 205
Average dbh 9.2
Tree per acre 260
No tree species 6
Total species 10

Appendix E
Easement Monitoring Data Sheet

NEUCON MITIGATION BANK
CONSERVATION EASEMENT SITE MONITORING DATASHEET
Submit copies to:
Environmental Banc and Exchange
909 Capability Drive
Suite 3100
Raleigh, NC 27606
Phone:[phone] Fax:[phone]
NAME: DATE:
SITE: TIME:
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF OBSERVATIONS:
Observed Conditions of Easement Area: (General condition relative to last observation)
Observed Conditions of Adjacent Properties: (General condition relative to last observation)
Human Presence: (I.E. trash, hunting, clearing, forestry, campfires)
Wildlife Observations: (Observed birds and mammals and or evidence of their presence)
Vegetation Observations: (Observed changes or stresses in general plant community)
Hydrological Observations: (Observed flood levels or water marks)
Remarks and Other Observations:

Appendix F
Sample Deed of Easement

2008
COMPLIANCE WITH WETLAND & BUFFER REGULATIONS
In accordance with Title 15 A NCAC 2H .0500, the following DEED NOTIFICATION shall be recorded in
the County Registry prior to the conveyance of easements. Said Deed Notification shall
apply to easements in County, North Carolina as shown on plans titled
(insert easement name) prepared by
(insert name of designer) dated date:
"A portion of this lot has been determined to meet the requirements for designation as a wetland, stream or
protected stream buffer. Any subsequent fill or alteration of this area shall conform to the requirements of the
-state rules adopted by the State of North Carolina in force at the time of the proposed alteration. The intent of
this provision is to prevent additional wetland, stream or buffer filling or draining, so the property owner should
not assume that a future application for filling or draining would be approved. The property owner shall report
the name of the easement in any application pertaining to said rules. This covenant is intended to ensure
continued compliance with all rules adopted by the State of North Carolina and therefore the State of North
Carolina may enforce benefits. This covenant is to run with the land and shall be binding on all Parties and all
persons claiming under them".
Signature
Owner's name:
Address:
City, State, Zip Code: _
Phone Number: (~
STATE OF North Carolina
COUNTY
1, , a Notary Public of the State of North Carolina,
County, hereby certify that owner personally appeared before me this day and executed by above certification.
Witness my hand and notorial seal, this day of , 2008
Notary Public
My commission expires:

Appendix G
Stream Quality Assessment Forms

USAGE AID# DWQ # -~ - -Site # (indicate on attached map)
Provtde the followrng mformatron for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: ~o~^'~-l~ W oociS ~f2St/.ia~~ ~-- 2. Evaluator's
3. Date of evaluation: ~ ( `') ` 20 [ 0
4. Time of evaluation:,
5. Name of stream: ~~- S?~1-N~~.M "2 ~\ J~oa~ rr'+1 G• 1' 6. River basin: .NHS ~
_ 7 2nZ
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: "' ~~~ '~'~ 10. County: ~4 ~~ ~ t`Oy-
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):
Longitude (ex. -77,55661
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
~v~e~f' I~Dod (~roPe£~'I _
I4. Proposed channel work (if any): S~It.,K. Ire ~'t.r' u0.-~~ ~'`
15. Recent weather conditions; Yo~~~`, C_ ~Ot~~
16. Site conditions at time of visit: ~~1 V R~
i7. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters ~~Nutrient Sensitive Waters „Water Supply Watershed (I-IV}
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES ~ If yes, estimate the water surface area;
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map4 ~ NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ~ NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _____% Residential _% Commercial ~% Industrial ^% Agricultural
~% Forested _% Cleazed /Logged ,_% Other
22. Bankfull width: .~~ " ~~ 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3' tl ~'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ~at (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%} -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>IO%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends ~equent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): g~ Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Lare
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USAGE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
~,~,~ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
/3 s ~~'

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These chazacteristics are not assessed. in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
„~,~ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: ~t ~ Wood/ ~/et~f/ya~~~+- 2. Evaluator's name: ~f ~~
3. Date of evaluation: ~ ~-' ~ ' ~/ ~ 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: ~i L ~ C ~«. ~ 6. River basin: I`~+i~'St
rd
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated: '" 2 OV O 4/~
I1. Site coordinates (if known}: prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex, 34.872312}:
8. Stream order: ~ 3
10. County: J0L.n3fiDn
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude (ex. -77.556611
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho {Aerial} Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
o k.~~ and ~f~~~:r~^ L
14. Proposed channel work (if anynr): ~~t' Sam/ ua~i e.~ n
15. Recent weather conditions; Co.r ~'~ C.1ov~a+-~
I6. Site conditions at time of visit: t,C~~ ~ wt..~
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -,-,Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters V~lutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES ~If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soii Survey? ~ NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential ,_,,_% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
~% Forested _% Cleared /Logged _% Other ( '
22. Bankfull width: 2- ~ '" 5 ~ ~ 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ~at (0 to 2%) Gentie (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%} -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends ~equent meander --,-Very sinuous raided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet {located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse}: ~~
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting tt~om the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version Ob/03, To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams..

USACE AID# _ ~ - DWQ # ~ Site # (indicate on attached map)
;,~,~ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: i
1. Applicant's name: I~owe.1( W ood S 4~rT.Se/ua„tton 2. Evaluator's name: ~C,'V
3. Date of evaluation: 1 ~ ` °l - 2a -0 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: s 2 "U T ~ M; V 1 CrtR ~, ~ 6. River basin: 1~e,~.Sti
7. Approximate drainage area: r`' ~t7d ~ g'e'l 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: ~' 1' 2 0 ~ 10. County: So ~.~ S ~'o~.
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
12. Subdivision name (if any):.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): Longitude (ex. -77.556611):
Method location determined (circle}: GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial} Photo/GI5 Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
i4. Proposed channel work (if any): ~''e S~u~~'' °r'
15. Recent weather conditions: ~~'~~7. ~,1ou~d-1
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Coo ~ w t,~
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Ilabitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters -Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-1V)
1 S. is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES iG,~ If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ~ NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
~% Forested _% Cleared /Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 10" 2 D '~ 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): ~' y ~f
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _/'Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight ,Occasional bends Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. [f a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): ~ b
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Englneers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change --version 06/03. To Comment, please ca11919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
„~,~ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for th!e~stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: f~ owe U W do a S ittS,tr uo~~"i ~ 2. Evaluator's name: ~ S
3. Date of evaluation: >>' ~~ 2ot~
5. Name of stream: S ~ " ~ l,(nnang(,d ~r ~ b.
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated: ``'' 3 ~~~ ~' ~
1I. Site coordinates {if known}: prefer in decimal degrees.
Ladtude(ex,34.872312):
4. Time of evaluation:
6. River basin: N tu.S ~.
8. Stream order:
10. County: ~olnnS~"~/~
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude (ex. -77.55661
Method location determined (circle}: GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
q,.,~fl c~D~I s Qr ~'~
14. Proposed channel work (if any):~~45 e..f` U ~.-~'i o n
15. Recent weather conditions: Qo,r-H C \uu..cl,
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Cook 1 y.Q.~'
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 ^Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters ^Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES ~ If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ~ NO 20. Does channel appeaz on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential _% Commercial ~% Industrial _% Agricultural
1 ~ % Forested ____.% Cleared /Logged _% Other ( ,
22. Bankfull width: 3S ' Sa f d 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): a ~ ~ Fr
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ~lat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>I O%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends ~quent meander -Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest}, the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): ~ g Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Laic
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please ca11919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams..

USACE A[D# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
;,~,~ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following,,i``nformation for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: C'1 W Pf$.~ie,f~l~~~r ~ 2. Evaluator's name: ~ 5 ~ ~
3. Date of evaluation: 1 ~ '~ 'L d f p 4. Time of evaluation:
`~ i~
5. Name of stream: ~ ~ .. Gam Gwf 6. River basin: ~V La ~e
7. Approximate drainage area: '~' S0 y a ~ ~ 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: r-- ~f ODO 'F'f` 10. County: JDh n S ~4^'
I1. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude {ex. 34.872312):
Longitude (ex, -77.55661 l
Method location determined (circle}; GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed chneneE work (if any~)j: Tic c S~ /t/ ~_~re~•-~-
15. Recent weather conditions: r~ ~Y C l0 ~~l
16. Site conditions at time of visit: C o0l r,.~~e.t
I7. ]dentify any special waterway classifications known: -Section IO Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters ,-,Outstanding Resource Waters !/Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
I8. ]s there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES N~ If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map YE NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed Land use: % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
l'D'~ % Forested _% Cleared /Logged _% Other
22. Bankfull width: '~ b ` S O ~r "t"' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): ^' ~ " y Ff
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ~t (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends '!requent meander -Very sinuous aided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation, If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the dream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): ~ 8 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature care
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please ca11919-87b-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
These characteristics are not assessed. in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map}
Provide the followmg information for the stream reach under assessment.
1. Applicant's name: N bwt 11 W oe ~ S f f e5 uva~'.~ 2. Evaluator's name: 3S'~
3. Date of evaluation; ~ ~ ' q " 2 u l 0 4. Time of evaluation:.
1 ~` ,~
S. Name of stream: 5 r'- Sep] rt1 t,n/ ~ Swc~ 1~o~c~ 6. River basin:
J
7. Approximate drainage azea: ~ 40 J ek c~8 ~ 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: ^~ /n~ ~ '~" 10. County
N

.j off,. S i~•-
li. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): Longitude (ex. -77.SS6611):
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) PhotoJGIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
Now-( wdodf Prone ~'~
14. Proposed channel work (if any}: ~~ e S u ya~'}'~ a r•
15. Recent weather conditions: ~N '~lol C 1uu ~y
lb. Site conditions at time of
x
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters )Outstanding Resource Waters vNutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18, Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appeaz on USGS quad map? YE NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed Iand use: _% Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
/~~ % Forested .___,,,% Cleared /Logged _% Other
22. Bankfull width: ^' 1 S ~~' 23. Bank height {from bed to top of bank): ~f ~ S ~ f
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ~at (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends ~equent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2}: Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e,g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach, The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse}: 7 6 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Aate
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03, To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26,
~,~;~ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET _

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.