19990231 Ver 2_Report_20110203

u
' PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
WWA PROJECT No. 210039.00

1
CHOWAN FIVER ANALYSIS
FOR
1

1

1
r4UCarq
PLATE MILL
PO Box 4119
Lynchburg VA 24502
Phone: [phone]
NUCOR STEEL - HERTFORD MILL
HERTFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
October 20, 2010
Prepared by.
W-
ENGINEERS
SURVEYORS
PLANNERS
ASSOCIATES
www v^msociates.net
North Carolina Finn
License No. G3594
20,
/
??ry
M
???IIIIIII//,/
\\ N C ARO
? ? •'0?•? S,O/IjR• 9 i
0,377053
i??iBFRT IF
3040 Avemore Square Place
Charlottesville, VA 22911
Phone: [phone]
i
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES M V C O R
WWA PROJECT NO. 210039.00 PLATE MILL
CHOWAN RIVER ANALYSIS
B®? o
FOR
?' ? -°s'gN9s9TFR?
NUCOR STEEL - HERTFORD MILL 'n R
HERTFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

i
OWES S
October 20, 2010
037053 _
F. WN???\\??
Prepared by.
w'? ENGINEERS
am SURVEYORS
PLANNERS
ASSOCIATES
PO Box 4119 www.wwassociates.net 3040 Avemore Square Place
North Carolina Firm Charlottesville, VA 22911
Lynchburg VA 24502 License No. G3594
l ' Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
LA
TABLE OF CONTENTS im
Page
SECTION 1 - Introduction
1.1 Background ................................................................................................... . 1-1
1.2 Scope of Document ....................................................................................... . 1-1
SECTION 2 - Chowan River Analysis
2.1 Chowan River Basin Description .................................................................. . 2-1
2.2 Water Use ...................................................................................................... . 2-2
2.2.1 Factors Affecting Water Demand ...................................................... . 2-2
2.2.2 Total Water Use in Basin .................................................................... 2-2
2.2.3 Local Water Supply Plans ................................................................... 2-2
2.2.4 Self-supplied Use ................................................................................ 2-3
2.2.5 Registered Water Withdrawals ........................................................... 2-4
2.3 Water Availability .......................................................................................... 2-4
2.4 Impact Analysis ............................................................................................. 2-5
SECTION 3 - Salt Water Intrusion ................................................................................. 3-1
SECTION 4 - Approach and Sweep Velocities .............................................................. 4-1
SECTION 5 - Summary and Recommendations
5.1 Summary ........................................................................................................ 5-1
5.2 Recommendations .......................................................................................... 5-1
APPENDICES Tab
Raw Water Intake Study (WW Associates) ........................................................................A
Aquatic Resources, LLC Fish Study dated July 6, 2010
Johnson Screens Quotation
Site Visit Report/Telephone Logs
River Flow Data Analysis ...................................................................................................B
Registered Water Withdrawals ........................................................................................... C
Local Water Supply Plans ...................................................................................................D
Hertford County, North Carolina i Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
W WA Project No. 210039.00 River Analysis - Raw Water Intake
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Background
The Nucor Steel, Hertford Mill manufactures steel plate, which requires water for cooling
and process applications. Currently, Nucor uses groundwater wells as their raw water
source. Recent testing has indicated an increased amount of chloride ions in this well
water. Nucor Steel has determined that an alternate source of water from the Chowan
River should be investigated. WW Associates was retained to conduct this investigation
and to design an intake system and pipeline to transport the raw water to an existing
storm water pond. A raw water screen intake study previously completed by WW
Associates is provided in Appendix A for reference and addressed the following design
considerations:
¦ Nucor Requirements
¦ Environmental Considerations
¦ Screen Types
' Siting
¦ Facility Layout
¦ Raw Water Pump Station
¦ Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Construction of a raw water intake structure is proposed in the Chowan River to provide
raw water for process and cooling for Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill. The system would
consist of pile supported cylindrical intake screens with an air-burst backwash system,
water intake piping, a raw water pump station, a transmission line from the raw water
pump station to Storm Water Pond No. B 1, a stormwater pond pump station, and a water
treatment facility. The intake would be designed to operate in conjunction with the water
treatment facility for approximately 8 hours per day to produce 1 mgd of treated water.
1.2 Scope of Document
The purpose of this intake study is to provide a preliminary site assessment and data
search to develop the criteria necessary to determine the feasibility of the project and
Hertford County, North Carolina 1-1 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
W WA Project No. 210039.00 River Analysis - Raw Water Intake
1.0 Introduction im
design constraints. This report provides an analysis and comment on three components
required for the design of the raw water intake:
• An analysis of the Chowan River Basin is presented that compares current and
proposed water withdrawals from the basin.
¦ The potential for salt-water intrusion will be discussed.
Sweep and approach velocities for the intake structure will be discussed.
Hertford County, North Carolina 1-2 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
W WA Project No. 210039.00 River Analysis - Raw Water Intake
2.0 Chowan River Analysis
2.1 Chowan River Basin Description
The Chowan Basin in North Carolina is the lower quarter of a larger basin that drains
4,973 square miles, mostly in southeastern Virginia. The Chowan Basin is divided into
the Meherrin River and Chowan River sub-basins. The merging of the Nottoway and
Blackwater Rivers at the Virginia-North Carolina state line forms the Chowan River.
These two rivers drain 2,460 square miles of land south and southeast of Petersburg,
Virginia. The lower 487 square miles of the total 1,637 square miles of the Meherrin
River sub-basin are in North Carolina. The Meherrin River joins the Chowan River north
of Winton, NC and then continues south to merge with the Albemarle Sound near
Edenton, NC. The Chowan Basin is part of the Albemarle-Pamlico estuarine system, the
second largest estuarine system in the United States.
Figure 2-1
Hertford County, North Carolina 2-1 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
WWA Project No. 210039.00 River Analysis - Raw Water Intake
2.0 Chowan River Analysis
2.2 Water Use
2.2.1 Factors Affecting Water Demand
This basin is populated by less than 1% of North Carolina's residents. It contains all or
part of 19 municipalities and five counties. From 1990 to 1997 only two of the five
counties had a population increase (Chowan and Gates). The basin is sparsely developed
with only 3% of land area classified as "urban/build up" in the 1997 Natural Resource
Conservation Service assessment. This assessment classified 87% of the area of the basin
as cultivated cropland or forest. Overall demand for water increases during the growing
season, especially in agricultural areas and in communities where irrigated residential
landscaping is popular.
2.2.2 Total Water Use in Basin
The U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) 1995 summary of water use estimated total water
use in the basin at 12.6 million gallons per day (mgd), with about one quarter coming
from surface water sources. Total basin population was estimated at 54,250, with total
residential water demand estimated at 3.9 mgd. About half of the residents were served
by public water systems. Overall, public water systems supplied 3.1 mgd from ground
water for both residential and non-residential uses. The remaining residential water
demand was met by 1.5 mgd of self-supplied ground water. No surface water was used
to meet residential demand in North Carolina.
2.2.3 Local Water Supply Plans
Units of North Carolina local government that supply or plan to supply water to the
public are required to develop a Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP). The Division of
Water Resources (DWR) reviews LWSPs and maintains a database of the LWSP
information. This summary is based on data contained in the 1997 LWSPs. LWSPs were
submitted by 21 water systems using water from this basin. (Chowan County had not
submitted a 1997 LWSP, so its 1992 LWSP data was used in these summaries.) These
Hertford County, North Carolina 2-2 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
WWA Project No. 210039.00 River Analysis - Raw Water Intake
WIA
2.0 Chowan River Analysis
basin pumped 5.6 mgd of ground water to supply customers in 1997. The total available
capacity for these systems, as reflected in their combined 12-hour yields, is 13.6 mgd.
Heavy ground water pumping in southeastern Virginia has caused a decline in water
levels over most of the North Albemarle area. Much of this decline in water level is due
to withdrawals by Union Camp Corporation in Franklin, Virginia. Gates County has
reported a rate of decline of about two feet per year in their water supply wells.
2.4 Impact Analvsis
River flow data has been collected from available USGS stations within the basin. The
summary of this data presented in Appendix B illustrates flow conditions for the Chowan
and its major tributaries. To understand the impacts of the proposed Nucor withdrawal,
we must first evaluate current withdrawals. In 1997, the State of North Carolina reported
a total registered withdrawal volume of 43.536 mgd. This is equivalent to approximately
0.012% of the average 3,600 mgd flow in the Chowan River near Winton, NC.
The addition of the proposed 3 mgd withdrawal by Nucor increases total withdrawals in
the basin to 46.536, or 0.013% of the average daily flow. The 3 mgd withdrawal itself
will account for 0.001% of the average daily flow in the Chowan River near Winton. The
North Carolina Division of Water Resources projects a 16% increase in demand for water
within the basin by the year 2020. When Nucor's 3 mgd withdrawal is included in this
projection, a total use of 49.5 mgd is projected, or 0.014% of the average daily flow.
Evaluation of impacts during low flow conditions is somewhat subjective due to the flow
characteristics of the estuary. Flow data compiled in Appendix B illustrates both positive
and negative flows of considerable volume due to tidal influences. While the rivers flow
rate may approach zero as it changes from positive to negative, its volume would remain
apparently constant.
Hertford County, North Carolina 2-5 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
W WA Project No. 210039.00 River Analysis - Raw Water Intake
q JA
XX"
3.0 Salt Water Intrusion
As indicated in Section 1 of this report, the Chowan River is characterized as an estuary.
The confluence of the river with the Albemarle-Pamlico is approximately 31 miles down
stream from the Nucor facility and 70 miles inland of Oregon Inlet. This is the river's
closest connecting point to the open ocean. The U. S. Geological Survey (USGS)
indicates lunar tidal influence at Oregon Inlet varies up to 2 feet. Tidal flux within the
Chowan due to lunar and wind influence are reported at one and four feet respectively.
The USGS also reports directional reversal of flow as far as 78 miles upstream of the
Albemarle Sound near Franklin, VA.
While intrusion of salt water into the estuary is reported to be infrequent, the potential for
its occurrence does exist. A typical chloride concentration of less than 50 mg/L is
provided by USGS. The highest recorded concentration near Winton, NC occurred in
December 1958 when a maximum chloride concentration of 398 mg/L was recorded
three months after Hurricane Helen swept the coast of North Carolina,
Based upon the information provided, WW Associates recommends maintaining the
currently available groundwater wells for use as a backup water source during saltwater
intrusion events. The existing groundwater supply piping at the facility will be connected
to the new raw water piping and valved to allow easy switchover during these events.
Hertford County, North Carolina 3-1 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
W WA Project No. 210039.00 River Analysis - Raw Water Intake
4.0 Approach and Sweep Velocities E
As indicated in the Raw Water Screen Intake Study, we understand that there are no
published design criteria for intake screens in North Carolina. Approach and sweep
velocities are typically used as design criteria for intake screens. Approach velocity is
defined as the water velocity vector measured perpendicular to the screen face as water
passes through the screen mesh. Sweep velocity is defined as the water velocity vector
component parallel and adjacent to the screen face.
These criteria have been established to minimize impacts to indigenous aquatic life.
Design Criteria for Fish Screens in Virginia: Recommendations Based on a Review of
the Literature, published by the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries
(VDGIF) in April 1999, recommends a maximum approach velocity of 0.25 ft/s, with
sweep velocities equal to or greater than the approach velocity to ensure aquatic life is
protected. Johnson Screens, the intake screen manufacturer, has indicated it uses this
approach velocity criteria as its slot velocity for intake screens in Virginia. Section
316(b) of the Clean Water Act requires a maximum "through-the screen" velocity of 0.5
ft/s for cooling water intakes at electrical power plants.
As previously stated in this report, both lunar and wind influenced tides are a reality
within the Chowan River. When these tidal influences combine with changing inflow,
the potential for stagnation occurs. An average velocity for the Chowan at the U.S.
Highway 17 Bridge near Edenhouse was reported to be 0.29 ft/s in 1977. This velocity is
based upon an average cross sectional area of 136,300 fe and a flow of 40,000 ft3/sec.
While this location is approximately 30 miles down stream from the Nucor facility, it
provides a base reference for potential velocities near the intake structure. Unfortunately,
the age of the cross-sectional information may not make it suitable for use today. The
passage of time and hurricanes, most recently Isabel, may have resulted in changes to the
channel geometry since this study was done in the 1970s.
Johnson Screens, the intake screen manufacturer, has indicated that it has provided intake
screens for a number of raw water intakes in North Carolina. Johnson Screens has based
its previous North Carolina screen designs on the 0.5 ft/s velocity criteria presented in
Hertford County, North Carolina 4-1 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
W WA Project No. 210039.00 River Analysis - Raw Water Intake
4.0 Approach and Sweep Velocities
Section 316(b). However, to ensure a conservative design with minimal impact to
aquatic life, we recommend using the 0.25 ft/s approach velocity criteria accepted in
Virginia.
Hertford County, North Carolina 4-2 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
WWA Project No. 210039.00 River Analysis - Raw Water Intake
5.0 Summary and Recommendations
5.1 Summary
An analysis of the Chowan River in Hertford County, North Carolina was conducted for
Nucor Steel Inc. This analysis reviewed river flow data and withdrawal impacts, the
potential for salt water intrusion, and required approach and sweep velocities for a raw
water intake. Information was collected from Nucor, as well as state and federal
government agencies. Based upon the available data, the following conclusions can be
drawn:
• Current and project registered daily raw water withdrawals from the Chowan
River basin in North Carolina account for less than 0.02% of the river's average
daily flow near Winton, NC.
' The Chowan River is a tidally influenced estuary from its confluence with the
Albemarle Sound, and extending upstream beyond the Virginia / North Carolina
State line. Both lunar and wind influences are present.
• The potential for salt-water intrusion does exist, and is heightened during
hurricane season.
• Protection of aquatic resources requires the consideration of approach and sweep
velocities, as well as an appropriately sized mesh opening. Intake screens with 1
mm (0.039-inch) openings and designed for a maximum 0.25 ft/s approach (slot)
velocity addresses these requirements.
5.2 Recommendations
Given the conclusions drawn above, WW Associates can make the following
recommendations:
Proceeding to the design phase of the project.
• A current analysis of the chloride concentration should be conducted to verify the
accuracy of the data previously reported by USGS in 1977. Additional analysis is
recommended to determine the chloride concentration that will require a
Hertford County, North Carolina 5-1 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
W WA Project No. 210039.00 River Analysis - Raw Water Intake
5.0 Summary and Recommendations im
temporary switchover from the raw water intake to the existing groundwater well
system.
Hertford County, North Carolina 5-2 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
W WA Project No. 210039.00 River Analysis - Raw Water Intake
Appendices

Tab
Raw Water Intake Study (WW Associates) ........................................................................A
Aquatic Resources, LLC Fish Study dated July 6, 2010
Johnson Screen Quotation
Site Visit Report/Telephone Logs
River Flow Data Analysis ...................................................................................................B
Registered Water Withdrawals ........................................................................................... C
Local Water Supply Plans ...................................................................................................D
Hertford County, North Carolina
WWA Project No. 210039.00
ii Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
River Analysis - Raw Water Intake
Appendix A to
WW ASSOCIATES
RAW WATER INTAKE STUDY
-j
Hertford County, North Carolina
WWA Project No. 210039.00
A Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
River Analysis - Raw Water Intake
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
WWA PROJECT No. 210039.00
October 20, 2010
Prepared by:
RAW WATER SCREEN INTAKE STUDY
FOR
NUCOR STEEL - HERTFORD MILL
HERTFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1"'r1uCc3Fq
PLATE MILL
wENGINEERS
SURVEYORS
W21 PLANNERS
ASSOCIATES
PO Box 4119
Lynchburg VA 24502
Phone: [phone]
3040 Avemore Square Place
Charlottesville, VA 22911
Phone: [phone]
www.wwassociates.net
North Carolina Firm
License No. C-3594
TABLE OF CONTENTS im
Page
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SECTION 1 - Introduction
1.1 Background ............................. ....................................................................... 1-1
1.2 Scope of Services .................... ....................................................................... 1-1
SECTION 2 - Existing Conditions
2.1 Nucor Requirements ............... ....................................................................... 2-1
2.2 Environmental Considerations .......................................................................2-1
2.3 Screen Types ........................... ....................................................................... 2-2
2.4 Siting ....................................... ....................................................................... 2-3
2.5 Facility Layout ........................ ....................................................................... 2-4
2.6 Raw Water Pump Station ........ ....................................................................... 2-6
2.7 Nutrient Sensitive Water ......... ....................................................................... 2-7
SECTION 3 - Summary
3.1 Recommendations ..........................................................................................3-1
APPENDICES Tab
Aquatic Resources, LLC Fish Study, dated July 6, 2010 ...................................................A
Johnson Screen Quotation ................................................................................................... B
Site Visit Report/Telephone Logs .......................................................................................C
Hertford County, North Carolina i Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
W WA Project No. 210039.00 Raw Water Screen Intake Study

r1
Executive Summary IVA
A raw water intake structure will be constructed in the Chowan River to provide raw
water for process and cooling for the Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill facility. The structure
will consist of pile-supported cylindrical intake screens with an air-burst backwash
system, water intake piping, a raw water pump station, and transmission piping to transfer
raw water from the pump station to either Stormwater Pond B 1 or a new water treatment
plant. The intake will be designed to operate in conjunction with the new water treatment
plant to produce 1 mgd of process water over an 8-hour period.
The purpose of this intake study is to provide a preliminary site assessment and data
search to develop the criteria necessary to determine the feasibility of the project and the
design constraints. This report addresses environmental considerations, intake screen
types, layout and site recommendations. Additional evaluations are provided in a report
entitled Chowan River Analysis for Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill concerning gauged river
flow data and cumulative effect of the new intake in relation to other intake structures in
Chowan River Basin.
Hertford County, North Carolina E-1 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
W WA Project No. 210039.00 Raw Water Screen Intake Study
1.0 Introduction ED
1.1 Background
The Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill facility manufactures steel plate. The plate mill uses
water for cooling and process applications. Currently, Nucor uses underground wells as
its raw water source. Testing has indicated an increased amount of chloride ions in this
well water. Nucor Steel has therefore determined that an alternate raw water source from
the Chowan River should be investigated. WW Associates was retained to conduct this
investigation and to design an intake system and piping system to transport the raw water
to an existing stormwater pond at the facility. WW Associates scope of services is as
follows:
1.2 Scone of Services
Phase 1
1. Field Investigation
1.1 Field investigation of the site was performed during the initial site visit to assess
the existing conditions of the site and to determine what factors may influence
location of the intake structure.
1.2 Site drawings and maps, including topographic mapping, underwater contour
data, dock and stormwater detention pond as-built drawings if available, will be
collected to aid with the conceptual layout of the intake structure and related
improvements.
1.3 Information, including existing reports, personnel input, and additional
documentation will be collected to aid with the conceptual layout of the intake
structure and related improvements.
2. Raw Water Intake Conceptualization
Hertford County, North Carolina 1-1 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
WWA Project No. 210039.00 Raw Water Screen Intake Study
1.0 Introduction
2.1 The recommended location for the intake will be identified.
2.2 Applicable guidelines for design of intake structures will be discussed.
2.3 It is our understanding that there are no published design criteria for intake
screens in North Carolina. Therefore, general design guidelines for intake
screens in Virginia will be utilized. Considerations for layout of the intake
include:
¦ Screen design criteria and construction guidelines.
¦ Screen location and orientation.
¦ Screen mesh size, shape, and material.
¦ Approach velocity and minimum screen area.
¦ Sweeping velocity.
¦ Cleaning.
¦ 1 mgd intake capacity.
2.4 The effects of nutrient sensitive water on intake structure operation will be
evaluated.
2.5 Existing gauged riverflow data will be collected. The effect of the proposed
intake during normal and low flow conditions and the cumulative effect of the
proposed intake in relation to other intake structures in the Chowan River Basin
will be evaluated based on existing riverflow data. The potential for saltwater
intrusion into the intake will also be evaluated based on existing riverflow data.
3. Report Preparation
Hertford County, North Carolina 1-2 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
WWA Project No. 210039.00 Raw Water Screen Intake Study
1.0 Introduction
3.1 A report detailing the findings of the Raw Water Intake Conceptualization will
be prepared.
The gauged river flow data is currently being evaluated. Results of this evaluation are
summarized in a separate WW Associates report entitled Chowan River Analysis for
Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill.
Hertford County, North Carolina 1-3 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
WWA Project No. 210039.00 Raw Water Screen Intake Study
W.A
XzrM
2.0 Existing Conditions
2.1 Nucor Requirements
Nucor currently withdraws process water from its groundwater well system at the rate of
approximately one million gallons per day (mgd). This water is pumped to a holding
pond. Water is drawn from this holding pond, treated, and added as make-up water to the
cooling water and process water systems. Future requirements indicate a need for new
process water at the rate of one mgd over an 8-hour period. The presence of chloride ions
in the well water may indicate salt water intrusion into the groundwater source, rendering
it unsuitable for Nucor's needs. Based on this information, Nucor is investigating the
Chowan River as a fresh water source. Analysis furnished by Nucor Steel has indicated
that the Chowan River water is suitable chemically for Nucor's needs with traditional
water treatment technologies.
2.2 Environmental Considerations
Two environmental considerations are important in the design of a water intake facility.
The first consideration concerns the protection of fish in the Chowan River from
excessive mortality loss during egg and larvae stages.
Studies have been conducted to assess the requirements for water intake structures in
regarding the protection of fish. One report, Design Criteria for Fish Screens in
Virginia: Recommendations Based on a Review of the Literature, published in April
1999 by the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (VDGIF), contains
significant background information and recommendations for the design of water intake
structures in freshwater Virginia locations. This study reviewed information on 104 fish
species for eggs, 58 for pro-larvae, 51 for post-larvae, and 56 for juveniles. This study
contained the following recommendations:
• Mesh opening - 1 mm (0.039-inch)
• Approach velocity - 0.25 feet per second
Approach direction oriented perpendicular to stream flow
Hertford County, North Carolina 2-1 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
W WA Project No. 210039.00 Raw Water Screen Intake Study
2.0 Existing Conditions
• Sweeping velocity equal to or greater than approach velocity
• Provision of a backwash system for cleaning the screen.
A second study, Distribution of Anadromous Alosa spp. (Clupeidae) Eggs and Larvae in
the Vicinity of the NUCOR Facility, Chowan River, North Carolina in 2010, prepared by
Aquatic Resources, LLC, dated July 6, 2010, addresses those fish species found in the
Chowan River at the Nucor port site. A copy of this study is provided in Appendix A for
reference. A review of this study indicates that all the species found at the Nucor site
were included in the report referenced in the paragraph above. This study further
indicated that the majority of Alosa eggs were captured from the lower water column, one
meter above the substrate, and the majority of Alosa larvae were taken from the upper
one meter of water column. To minimize impact on fish, the study recommends locating
the water intake between these two strata.
The second consideration concerns the protection of the screen from damage by debris.
Debris floating downriver can strike and damage the intake screens unless the screens are
shielded from the debris. This shielding can be accomplished by installation of piles
upstream from the water intake. The piles will keep debris from striking the water intake.
The water intake can also be protected by locating it away from the water surface and the
streambed, the two locations most prone to debris occurrence.
2.3 Screen Tvnes
Screen types are discussed in the VDGIF report Design Criteria for Fish Screens in
Virginia: Recommendations Based on a Review of the Literature. Screen types can be
placed in one of two categories: moving or fixed. The two most common moving
screens are the vertical traveling screen and the rotating drum screen. These moving
screens are both suited for those situations requiring large withdrawal volumes. Since the
withdrawal rates for the Nucor mill are relatively low, and considering the mechanical
Hertford County, North Carolina 2-2 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
WWA Project No. 210039.00 Raw Water Screen Intake Study
2.0 Chowan River Analysis im
systems supplied 5.4 mgd of water to 41,851 persons. Table 2-1 summarizes the LWSP
population served with water from this basin and water use for 1997.
Table 2-1
1997 LWSP System Water Use from Chowan Basin (mgd)
LWSP Residential Non-Residential) Total
Sub-Basin Population Use Use Use*
Meherrin River 1 11,061 1 1.03 1 0.56 1 1.6
Total 41,851 3.5 1.4 5.3
*Total use also includes unaccounted-for water and system process water
Residential demands dominated water use in these systems requiring 67% of total
demand while non-residential use accounted for 26% of total demand and 7% was
unaccounted-for water. Water systems that get water from this basin are expecting their
service populations to grow by about 16% to 48,580 by 2020. Water demand for these
systems is projected to grow about 21% to 6.4 mgd over the same period. In the 1997
LWSPs, only one of the 20 systems using water from this basin reported that their peak
demands will exceed their water treatment capacity by 2010.
2.2.4 Self-Supplied Use
The USGS estimated that self-supplied users, excluding power-generating facilities,
accounted for 9.4 mgd of the 12.6 mgd total of water used from this basin, as shown in
Table 2-2. Agriculturally associated uses dominated the self-supplied water use.
Irrigation (50%) and livestock (33%) together accounted for 83% of self-supplied water.
Domestic uses accounted for 15% while commercial and industrial uses each accounted
for about 1% of self-supplied water use. Table 2-2 summarizes water uses by sub-basin
and specific uses as well.
Hertford County, North Carolina 2-3 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
WWA Project No. 210039.00 River Analysis - Raw Water Intake
2.0 Chowan River Analysis im
Table 2-2
1995 USGS Estimated Self-supplied Water Use (mgd)
Sub-basin Domestic Livestock Industrial Commercial Irrigation Total
Chowan River 0.78 1.85 0.03 0.02 3.47 6.15
Meherrin River 0.68 1.30 0.02 0.03 1.26 3.29
Basin Total 1.46 3.15 0.05 0.05 4.73 9.44
2.2.5 Registered Water Withdrawals
Anyone withdrawing 1.0 mgd or more of surface or ground water for agricultural uses or
100,000 gallons per day for other uses is required to register that withdrawal with DWR.
Registered withdrawals in this basin are summarized in the Table 2-3.
Table 2-3
Registered Water Withdrawals for 1999

S
b
b
i Agricultural Non-agricultural Total
u
-
as
n
#
mgd
#
mgd
#
mgd
Chowan River 24 24.929 2 2.1 26 27.042
Meherrin River 12 16.494 0 0 12 16.494
Total 36 41.436 2 2.1 38 43.536
Both registered non-agricultural water withdrawals in the basin were for industrial uses.
All of the 36 registered agricultural water withdrawals were for irrigation purposes.
2.3 Water Availability
Local Water Supply Plans indicate that none of the water systems in these sub-basins
withdraw surface water as a source of supply. Eighteen of the LWSP systems in the
Hertford County, North Carolina 2-4 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
W WA Project No. 210039.00 River Analysis - Raw Water Intake
2.0 Existing Conditions
and electrical requirements for moving screens, these screen types will not be considered
further.
The second screen category is the fixed screen. Fixed screens can be used for the
withdrawal rates required for the Nucor mill. Fixed screens typically are constructed in
one of two configurations. The first of these, known as a stationary screen, consists of a
flat screen in front of the intake. This is a relatively simple design, but can be difficult to
keep clean of debris. A cleaning mechanism, such as mechanically driven brushes, may
be necessary to clean the screen.
The second configuration consists of stationary cylinder screens. This configuration is
also relatively simple, and has the advantage of being easier to keep clean than the
stationary flat screen. The screen is constructed of Type 304 stainless steel and is
typically cleaned by air backwash. Debris lifted off the screen surface is transported
downstream. The design also creates a natural fish bypass system. Catalog information
on this type screen is included in Appendix B for reference.
2.4 Siting
The water intake facilities will require some maintenance and inspection. Construction
of the pipeline transporting water to the stormwater pond will require access for
construction equipment. An area providing these features is the existing port and port
road. As shown in Figure 2-2, the upstream side of the port road is open and has the
space required for the pump station. This side of the road also is available for the
pipeline construction. The opposite side of the road is already occupied by the
stormwater pump station and stormwater pipeline.
Hertford County, North Carolina 2-3 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
W WA Project No. 210039.00 Raw Water Screen Intake Study

t
2.0 Existing Conditions Zz
2.5 Facility Layout
The intake screen can be located on the shore side of the barge dolphins as indicated in
Figure 2-3. Based on record drawings provided by Nucor, the water depth at this location
is approximately 15 feet, deep enough to allow the intake screen to be below the surface
layer and above the bottom layer per the recommendations discussed in the Aquatic
Resources study. The water depth closer to shore is not adequate, and the intake screen
would be subject to damage from vessels if located further from shore. An alternate
intake screen location could be considered downstream of the barge dock behind existing
barge dolphins.
The intake screen and offshore pipeline will be supported on steel H-piles. Steel H-piles
will also be used as barriers to protect the intake screen from damage from debris. A 3-
inch airburst pipe will be located on the downstream side of the water intake pipe,
allowing the water intake pipe to protect the smaller air pipe from damage from debris.
The airburst backwash system creates a violent turbulent action on the water surface in
the immediate vicinity of the intake screens. Figure 2-4 shows this turbulence at the
Appomattox River Water Authority in Chesterfield County, Virginia. A warning system
consisting of signs and horns will be required to protect boaters in the immediate area
when the backwash system operates.
Hertford County, North Carolina
WWA Project No. 210039.00
2-4 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
Raw Water Screen Intake Study
Figure 2-1: Upstream Side of Barge Dock
Figure 2-2: Upstream Side of Port Road
CHOWAN RIVER
DOLPHIN
WALKWAY
H
NEW BARRIER
PILES
NEW INTAKE
SCREEN
(TYP OF 2)
- WINCH
PLATFORMS
BARGE
DOCK
NEW 24" RAW
WATER INTAKE
PIPE
NORMAL _ WATERLINE
NEW RAW WATER
PUMP STATION
No. 1
NEW 18" RAW WATER -
TO STORMWATER POND
B1 OR NEW WATER
TREATMENT PLANT

?Q
Elf Q
00
a_ ll?
STORMWATER
PUMP STATION
2.0 Existing Conditions
The water intake screen size will be a function of the required flow rate and slot velocity.
An individual intake screen will be 27 inches in diameter, 84 inches long, with a 20-inch
pipe discharge. A quotation prepared by Johnson Screens for the screening equipment is
included in Appendix B of this report for reference. The intake screens are often
designed in multiple configurations. Two screens will yield a rate of 1 mgd over an 8-
hour period. Two screens also allow some flexibility if a screen has to be removed from
service for maintenance or repair.
The two screens will be connected to a common supply header pipe sized to minimize
friction losses. The size of the supply header piping will likely be 24-inch diameter. The
supply header piping will terminate at a new raw water pump station located onshore on
the upstream side of the port road.
2.6 Raw Water Pump Station
The raw water pump station will include multiple constant speed vertical turbine pumps
connected to a steel piping header with discharge gate and check valves. A wetwell will
be located below grade as a suction well for the vertical turbine pumps. We recommend
that the pump motors, controllers, and electrical power supply, as well as the airburst
Hertford County, North Carolina 2-6 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
WWA Project No. 210039.00 Raw Water Screen Intake Study
Figure 2-4: AR WA Raw Water Intake - Airburst
2.0 Existing Conditions
system for the intake screens, be located inside a building enclosure to protect the
equipment from the elements and to minimize the potential for freezing.
2.7 Nutrient Sensitive Water
We understand that the Chowan River is considered nutrient sensitive water. We do not
believe this condition will have a significant impact on the design and operation of the
new raw water intake. Potential biological growth on the intake screen will be controlled
with the operation of the airburst system.
Hertford County, North Carolina 2-7 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
W WA Project No. 210039.00 Raw Water Screen Intake Study
3.0 Summary
3.1 Recommendations
WW Associates recommends constructing a raw water intake facility with a 1 mgd
capacity based on 8 hours of normal operation. Specific recommendations regarding the
intake screen system are summarized in the following paragraphs.
Two stationary cylindrical screens are the recommended screen choice, with an airburst
backwash system. The screen features include 1 mm (0.039-inch) mesh openings, a
maximum slot velocity of 0.25 feet per second, and an approach direction perpendicular
to the stream flow. The screens will be located on the shore side of the barge dolphins,
approximately 80 feet from shore, on the upstream side of the port road. The intake
screen will be located approximately five feet above the river bottom to comply with the
elevation recommendations discussed in the Aquatic Resources study. The airburst
piping will be located on the downstream side of the intake pipe. The intake screens and
piping will be supported on steel H-piles.
The intake screens will discharge into a 24-inch raw water supply header connected to an
on-shore raw water pump station. The pump station will be equipped with a building
housing multiple vertical turbine pumps and the airburst backwash system associated
with the intake screens.
Hertford County, North Carolina 3-1 Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
WWA Project No. 210039.00 Raw Water Screen Intake Study
Appendix A (Raw Water Screen Intake Study) im
AQUATIC RESOURCES, LLC
FISH STUDY DATED JULY 6, 2010
Hertford County, North Carolina A Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
W WA Project No. 210039.00 Raw Water Screen Intake Study
Distribution of Anadromous Alosa spp. (Clupeidae) Eggs and Larvae in the Vicinity of
the NUCOR Facility, Chowan River, North Carolina in 2010
Stephen McIninch, PhD
Greg Garman, PhD
Aquatic Resources, L.L.C.
2711 Buford Road; Box 233
Richmond, Virginia 23235
July 6, 2010
f
Background
The Albemarle Sound, and the Chowan River in particular, historically supported a
substantial commercial fishery for anadromous (migratory) clupeid fishes, including
American shad (Alosa sapidissima), hickory shad (A. mediocris), blueback herring (A.
aestivalis), and alewife (A. pseudoharengus) (Hightower et al. 1996; Carmichael 1999).
The Chowan River contributed up to 95 percent of the total Alosa catch from the
Albemarle Sound as recently as 1969 (Pate 1973). Estimates of annual recruitment
averaged 28 million fish in the Chowan River from 1972-1985, but have since declined to
around 4 million fish (Carmichael 1999). As a result, spawning stock biomass has
declined from 14.6 million pounds in 1972 to 1.3 million pounds in 1998 (Carmichael
1999). Excessive exploitation, accompanied by poor recruitment, has significantly
reduced abundance of anadromous clupeid fishes throughout North Carolina coastal
waters during the last 15 years (Carmichael 1999).
The North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF) developed a river herring
management plan for the Chowan River in 2000. By 2001, the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources developed habitat protection plans for North
Carolina's coastal watersheds to protect and restore economically important marine and
estuarine fisheries. Loss of spawning and nursery areas represents a significant threat to
fishery habitats within the Chowan River system (Noble et al. 2001). Even if exploitation
is reduced significantly, Alosa population growth will be constrained until recruitment of
juvenile clupeids, together with the condition and abundance of spawning and nursery
habitats, improves significantly (Hightower et al. 1996; Carmichael 1999; Noble et al.
2001).
Distribution of Anadromous Clupeid Fishes in the Chowan River
One historical DMF study identified adult blueback herring spawning activity in the
Chowan River at Tunis (SSR 1402) in April 1979, while river herring and American shad
larvae were collected within Spikes Creek and Barnes Creek in May 1979 (Johnson et al.
1981). Creed (1985) collected adult blueback herring at Williams' Fishery, near the
junction of the Meherrin and Chowan rivers, during April 1980 and 1981. American shad
juveniles were noted from the Meherrin River in September 1982 and blueback herring
juveniles in August-October 1983 (DMF unpubl. data). More recently, juvenile blueback
herring, hickory shad (Alosa mediocris), and American shad were captured at Tuscarora
Beach, located just upstream from the Nucor plant, in September 1995, June 1999, and
July-August 2001, respectively (DMF unpubl. data). Historically, adult clupeids were
collected in April and May from the Chowan River and its tributaries, and juveniles were
captured from June to October.
The relative abundance of juvenile clupeids throughout the Chowan River (Meherrin
River to Arrowhead Beach) has declined substantially from 1972 to 2001 (Carmichael
1999). Limited spawning and nursery areas for anadromous clupeids exist in the river
reach from Winton to Pilands Crossroads, especially near Tuscarora Beach. Biologists
note that successful recovery of Alosa populations is dependent primarily upon improved
recruitment of juvenile clupeids, and may be hindered by traditional-style industrial water
intakes, discharges, degraded water quality, and the modification or loss of spawning and
nursery habitats (Rulifson 1994; Carmichael 1999; Noble et al. 2001). In 2003, NUCOR
contracted with Aquatic Resources, LLC to conduct monitoring for early life history
stages of Alosa spp. in the vicinity of the plant. Collections during the Spring and early
Summer, 2003 with standard gear and methods included eggs and larvae of blueback
herring, alewife, and American shad.
Study Objective
This report describes the temporal and spatial distribution of early life history stages
(eggs and larvae) of anadromous clupeid fishes (Alosa spp.) in the Chowan River,
specifically in the vicinity of the NUCOR facility, Hertford County, North Carolina,
during the period April-May, 2010. A secondary objective is to compare 2010 results to
collections made by similar methods in the same locations during Spring, 2003.
Methods
Conical ichthyoplankton nets (1-m length; 0.5-m diameter; 500 micron mesh) were fitted
with lightweight sample buckets and deployed in passive sets. Plankton nets were
deployed at fixed locations and depths for 15 minute intervals, retrieved, and the contents
of the net and bucket were preserved in 5% buffered formalin with Rose Bengal stain.
Samples were processed in the laboratory by examination for eggs and larvae under a
dissection microscope (x20). All recovered Alosa (target) eggs and larvae were identified
to species using published taxonomic criteria and preserved in 70% ETOH. Eggs and
larvae from non-alosine fishes were enumerated and identified to genus, where feasible.
All samples were archived in 70% ETOH following processing.
Samples were collected along two transverse (i.e., perpendicular to the channel) transects:
a.) adjacent to a proposed intake location at the NUCOR facility (N36° 21' 46.6" and
W76° 47' 24.0") and b.) approximately 1-km upstream of NUCOR (N36° 22' 19.2" and
W76° 50' 54.3"). At each transect, North and South Margin sites and Channel sites were
established using differential GPS, based on pre-determined depth criteria (< 3 m for
Margin; > 7 m for Channel). At Margin sites, nets were fished 1-m below the surface and
1-m above the river substrate. At Channel sites, an additional mid-water net was
deployed, for a total of three synoptic samples at each Channel location (see image
below). The vertical arrangement of nets at both Margin and Channel locations ensured
that the distribution of eggs and larvae throughout the water column was sampled
adequately, i.e., results were representative of the entire water column. Collections were
made approximately weekly for 8 weeks beginning 2 April and ending 31 May, 2010. A
total of 112 collections, representing all sampling locations combined, were processed
(Appendix A).
Diagram depicting deployment of 0.5-m conical ichthyoplankton nets in the Chowan
River, North Carolina. Refer to text for a more detailed explanation of sampling methods
and locations
```Concrete Block
Results
Water temperatures during the study period ranged between 10° and 25° C. A total of
141 eggs and larvae (all species combined) were captured during 8 sampling dates
reported herein. This number is substantially lower than total numbers collected in
2003 (McIninch and Garman 2003), in part because the 2010 study was more limited in
scope and duration. Alosa spp. eggs and larvae accounted for 62 percent of the 2010
catch (n= 88); all four alosine species, including American shad, hickory shad,
blueback herring, and alewife, were represented in collections. In contrast, collections
in 2003 were dominated numerically by alewife (A. pseudoharengus) and no hickory
shad were collected. Fishes represented by non-target eggs and larvae in 2010 included
white perch, striped bass, gizzard shad, largemouth bass, inland silverside, and the
families Cyprinidae and Catostomidae. Summaries of target (alosine) egg and larval
fish collections are presented as Figures 1-3. A complete record of all catch data is
presented in Appendix A.
Temporal distribution
The first captures of target species were made during the 2 April, 2010 collection and
included both blueback herring and American shad. Target species densities were highest
on 9 April (Figure 1) and declined thereafter. No target species were represented in any
collections after 5 May, 2010. Results-including the relatively small number of eggs
(cp. larvae) collected-suggest that spawning by alosines in this reach of the Chowan
River began before the first collection date in 2010. A previous and comparable study in
the same Chowan River locations (McIninch and Garman 2003) collected alewife eggs
and larvae as early as 26 March, 2003 and other alosine taxa as late as 12 June, 2003.
Spatial distribution
Just over half (50.8 %) of all Alosa spp. eggs were captured at the upstream location; 49.2
% were taken from the downstream (Intake) transect (Figure 1). Roughly equivalent
proportions of target eggs and larvae were collected from Margin versus Channel habitats
(Figure 2). This distribution pattern is similar to the results of the 2003 study in the same
locations.
Vertical distribution
A majority of target eggs and larvae were collected from the lower water column (1-m
above the substrate; Figure 3). The substrate-oriented (benthic) nets accounted for 55.1
O/C
of all Alosa eggs and larvae captured in 2010 in both Margin and Channel habitats. The
relatively higher densities of eggs and larvae in benthic nets was most pronounced during
the initial sampling dates, when the eggs of target species were more common in
collections. Eggs of Alosa spp. are strongly to moderately demersal (i.e., negatively
buoyant) and are, therefore, typically associated with benthic habitats.
Conclusions
Based on the current study, relatively few alosine eggs or larvae (<9 % of total Alosa
spp. catch) were collected in the vicinity of the NUCOR facility and the proposed
intake location (south margin) during the period April-May, 2010. It is likely, however,
that target species were actively spawning prior to the first 2010 sampling event. These
results are consistent with 2003 findings for the same locations. Although impingement
and entrainment mortality of target eggs and larvae will be influenced by the design,
location, and operation of the proposed intake structure, this study suggests that the
potential for intake-related mortality in Alosa spp. early life history stages during the
April-May period is relatively low for the NUCOR south margin location, based on the
relative spatial distribution of the most vulnerable life stages in 2003 and 2010.
Specifically, these results suggest that a non-benthic (i.e., > 1 meter off the bottom)
placement of the proposed intake would minimize impingement and entrainment of
alosine eggs and larvae.

r?
i?

?•...., Lvviui %-a?v????a
locations during the period April-May, 2010. A more detailed description of collection
locations is provided in the text.
locations and associated with specific riverine habitat types. Sampling ?waslconducted
a
during the period April-May, 2010. A more detailed description of collection locations
and habitats is provided in the text.
?l

Figure 3. Vertical distribution of alosine eggs and larvae at two Chowan River, North
Carolina locations during the period April-May, 2010. A more detailed description of
collection locations and depths is provided in the text.
Literature Cited and Related Publications
Baker, W.D. 1968. A Reconnaissance of Anadromous Fish Runs into the Inland Fishing Waters
of North Carolina. Completion Report for Project AFS-3, North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission, Raleigh, NC.
Blackford, C.M. 1916. The shad - a national problem. Transactions of the American Fisheries
Society 46:5-14.
Boreman, J. 1981. American Shad Stocks Along the Atlantic Coast. Laboratory
Reference Document No. 81-40, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Fisheries
Center, Woods Hole Laboratory, MA.
Carmichael, J. 1999. Status of Blueback Herring in the Chowan River, North Carolina, 1972-
1998. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division
of Marine Fisheries, Morehead City.
Chowan River Basinwide Water Quality Plan, May 2002. North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, Raleigh.
Chowan River Juvenile Alosa Abundance Data, 1972-2001. North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Marine Fisheries, Morehead City.
Crecco, V.A., and M. Gibson. 1990. Stock Assessment of River Herring from Selected Atlantic
Coast Rivers. Special Report No. 19, Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, Washington,
DC.
Creed, R.P. Jr. 1985. Feeding, diet, and repeat spawning of blueback herring, Alosa aestivalis,
from the Chowan River, North Carolina. Fishery Bulletin 83(4):711-716.
Everett, G. 1983. The Impact of Pulp Mill Effluent on the Chowan River Herring Fishery. North
Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality,
Raleigh.
Hightower, J.E., A.M. Wicker, and K.M. Endres. 1996. Historical trends in abundance of
American shad and river herring in Albemarle Sound, North Carolina. North American Journal
of Fisheries Management 16(2):257-271.
Holland, B.F., H.B. Johnson, and M.W. Street. 1975. Anadromous Fisheries Research Program,
Northern Coastal Area, North Carolina. Progress Report for Project AFCS-11, North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Marine Fisheries,
Morehead City.
McIninch, S. and G. Garman. 2003. Distribution of Alosa spp. Eggs and Larvae in the Vicinity of
the NUCOR Facility, Chowan River, North Carolina. Final Report to NUCOR, Aquatic
Resources, Richmond, Virginia.
Johnson, H.B., and ten co-authors. 1981. Biology and Management of Mid-Atlantic Anadromous
Fishes Under Extended Jurisdiction. Special Scientific Report No. 36, North Carolina Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Marine Fisheries, Morehead City,
and Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point.
Pate, P.P., Jr. 1973. Age and size composition of commercial catches of blueback herring and
alewife in Albemarle Sound, NC, and its tributaries. Pages 560-569 in A.L. Mitchell, editor.
Proceedings of the 27 Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Game and Fish
Commissioners, Columbia, SC.
Roelofs, E. W. 1951. The edible finfishes of North Carolina. Pages 109-140 in H.F. Taylor, editor.
Survey of Marine Fishes of North Carolina. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
Rulifson, R.A. 1994. Status of anadromous Alosa along the east coast of North America. Pages
134-158 in J.E. Cooper, R.T. Eades, R.J. Klauda, and J.G. Loesch, editors. Anadromous Alosa
Symposium, Tidewater Chapter, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
Schaaf, W.E. 1998. Status of the Blueback Herring (Alosa aestivalis) in the Chowan River, North
Carolina. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of
Marine Fisheries, Morehead City.
Smith, W.B. 1963. Survey and Classification of the Chowan River and Tributaries, North
Carolina. Final Report for Project F-14-R, Job 1-F, North Carolina Wildlife Resource
Commission, Raleigh.
Street, M.W. Anadromous Fish Spawning Areas. GIS layer and metadata. North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Marine Fisheries,
Morehead City.
Winslow, S.E. 1994. American shad fisheries of North Carolina with emphasis on the Albemarle
Sound area. Pages 72-80 in J.E. Cooper, R.T. Eades, R.J. Klauda, and J.G. Loesch, editors.
Anadromous Alosa Symposium, Tidewater Chapter, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
--------- 1995. North Carolina Alosid Management Program. Completion Report for
Project AFCS-47, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources, Division of Marine Fisheries, Morehead City.
--------. 1998. North Carolina Alosid Management Program. Completion Report for Project
NA560- FAO 125, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources, Division of Marine Fisheries, Morehead City.
Winslow, S.E., and six co-authors. 1983. North Carolina Anadromous Fisheries
Management Program. Completion Report for Project AFCS-16, North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Marine
Fisheries, Morehead City.
Appendix A. Results of ichthyoplankton
sampling at two Chowan River, North Carolina
locations during the Spring and early Summer,
2010. Specific sampling locations are provided in
the text. The following codes are used in the tables
that follow: YS=yolk sac larva, PYS=post-yolk sac
larva.
Date Site Location Samaie Species Number Staae
North Menidia
2-Apr-10 INTAKE Margin Surface beryllina 1 YS
Bottom Alosa aestivalis 1 PYS
South
INTAKE Margin Surface No fishes 0
Bottom Alosa aestivalis 1 PYS
Morone
americana 1 YS
INTAKE Channel Surface No fishes 0
Midwater No fishes 0
Bottom Alosa aestivalis 3 PYS
North
UPRIVER Margin Surface No fishes 0
Bottom Alosa aestivalis 1 PYS
Alosa
sapidissima 1 YS
South
Margin Surface No fishes 0
Bottom Alosa aestivalis 1 PYS
Channel Surface Alosa aestivalis 2 PYS
Midwater Alosa aestivalis 1 PYS
Moxostoma sp. 1 YS
Bottom Alosa aestivalis 1 PYS
Date Site
16-Apr-
10
INTAKE
INTAKE
Location Sample Species
North
Margin
South
Margin
INTAKE Channel
North
UPRIVER Margin
South
UPRIVER Margin
UPRIVER Channel
Alosa
Surface sapidissima
Bottom Alosa aestivalis
Number Staae
Surface Alosa aestivalis 1 + 1
Morone
Bottom americana
Notemigonus
Surface No fishes
Midwater Alosa aestivalis
Notemigonus
Bottom Morone saxatilis
Surface Alosa mediocris
Bottom Alosa aestivalis
Morone
americana
Surface No fishes
Bottom Alosa mediocris
Alosa aestivalis 1 + 1
Morone
Surface americana
Midwater Alosa aestivalis 4+1
Morone
americana
Bottom Alosa aestivalis
Morone
americana
1 PYS
2 PYS
YS +
PYS
1 YS
1 PYS
0
2 PYS
1 PYS
2 PYS
1 PYS
1 PYS
1 egg
0
1 PYS
egg +
YS
1 PYS
YS +
PYS
1
1 YS
2 PYS
Date Site Location Sample Species
23-Apr-
10
North
INTAKE Margin Surface No fishes
Bottom Morone saxatilis
South
INTAKE Margin
INTAKE Channel
Surface No fishes
Bottom Alosa aestivalis
Morone saxatilis
Surface No fishes
Midwater Alosa aestivalis
Morone saxatilis
Bottom No fishes
North
UPRIVER Margin
South
UPRIVER Margin
UPRIVER Channel
Surface No fishes
Bottom No fishes
Alosa
Surface sapidissima
Alosa aestivalis
Bottom No fishes
Surface No fishes
Midwater Morone saxatilis
Bottom No fishes
Number Stage
0
1 YS
0
1 egg
1 YS
0
1 PYS
3 YS
0
0
0
2 YS
1 PYS
0
0
1 YS
0
Date Site Location Sample Species Number Stage
12-May-
10
North
INTAKE Margin Surface No fishes 0
Bottom No fishes 0
South
INTAKE Margin Surface No fishes 0
Bottom No fishes 0
INTAKE Channel Surface No fishes 0
YS +
Midwater Dorosoma 1 +4 PYS
Bottom No fishes 0
North
UPRIVER Margin Surface No fishes 0
Bottom No fishes 0
South
UPRIVER Margin Surface No fishes 0
Bottom Micropterus 1 YS
UPRIVER Channel Surface No fishes 0
YS +
Midwater Dorosoma 6+7 PYS
Bottom Dorosoma 1 PYS
unident. 1 PYS
Date Site Location Sample Species
21-May-
10
North
INTAKE Margin Surface No fishes
Bottom No fishes
South
INTAKE Margin Surface No fishes
Bottom No fishes
INTAKE Channel Surface No fishes
Midwater No fishes
Bottom Dorosoma
North
UPRIVER Margin
Surface No fishes
Bottom No fishes
South
UPRIVER Margin
UPRIVER Channel
Surface No fishes
Bottom No fishes
Surface No fishes
Midwater No fishes
Bottom No fishes
Number Staae
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 YS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Date Site Location Sample Species
31-May-
10
North
INTAKE Margin Surface No fishes
Bottom No fishes
South
INTAKE Margin
Surface No fishes
Bottom No fishes
INTAKE Channel
North
UPRIVER Margin
South
UPRIVER Margin
UPRIVER Channel
Surface No fishes
Midwater No fishes
Bottom No fishes
Surface No fishes
Bottom No fishes
Surface No fishes
Bottom No fishes
Surface No fishes
Midwater No fishes
Bottom No fishes
Number Staae
Appendix B (Raw Water Screen Intake Study)
mmmm?
JOHNSON SCREENS QUOTATION
Hertford County, North Carolina B Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
W WA Project No. 210039.00 Raw Water Screen Intake Study
Jason Clark
From: Watson, Mark E (Johnson Screens) [[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 11:45 AM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Cook, Linda S; Rzeznik, Larry; Steve Rea
Subject: Nucor Steel - 0.25 fps option
Attachments: Water Process Master Install List.xls; Johnson Screens - Intake Sketch - Chowen NC - 0.25
fps option.doc; Hydroburst Selection Chart - Horz 60 - 400 Gal.pdf
Jason - As we discussed - attached is our install list. You can sort by state and see that we have many NC installations
and that they are all based on 0.5 fps maximum slot velocity as previously proposed. Just for comparison - this job sized
for 0.25 fps (which is a Virginia standard) would be (2) T-27HC screens (see attached) and they would cost about $8,400
each. The Hydrobrust would get larger also and would need to be a 120 gallon reciever and 3 inch air lines and would be
about $26,000. Thanks - Mark
Mark Watson
Johnson Screens
508-347-9309
CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION
The information contained in this message is privileged, confidential, and protected from
disclosure.
This message is intended for the individual or entity addressed herein.
If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this
communication to others.
Also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your
system.
The sender totally disclaims, and will not accept, any responsibility or liability for
the unauthorized use,
or the consequences of any unauthorized use, of this communication or message.
1

c a)
ti E
N

-1 i-
O
a)
? U
N .?
N 00
N
CA
N
c
0
U
J
0
0
Q
OD
O
N
_C
O
M
O
O
L
N
()
t
U
N
I
a)
rn
c
cc
_O
m
_c
•L
-F+
a)
U
U O
O
.V
N y
j CO a
i N N
a)
O
c
LL.
0
N
N
co
U
Q ^
? C
a) .O
a) U
E a)
ca c
c
?0
..c
C:
O
NO
N
c
0
co
c
a)
? U
z
N c
cu
o
m ?
Y U
(Q
c
E
x
cu
N
!Z
tn
N
O
I I
A
U
_O
a)
0
c
LM
a)
0
CL
r )
O - ?
II (O CO
to N U)
O a)
? II C
+.
Ca m
_•2CO
O
O M
I- ?
fB
a) E II
E 0 a)
f?
co CL
W Q
E
C
N
L
U
U)
O
y
Ic
O
c
N
Q
Q
Hydroburst Selection Chart
60 = 400 Gallon Horizontal Air Receiver
i
=R
OUTLET
I P;;? FLANGE
ASSEMBLY
oaa
®ao
000
6.00 --I ?--- C --?

Outlet
Model # Flange Size
60H* 2"
80H 2" Dimension
"A"
47.63"
" Dimension
"B"
56.50"
" Dimension
"C"
33.00" Dimension
"D"
20.00" D ted
t**
BS
M
62.63 56.50 20.00" 20.00" BS
120H " "

200H 3" 65.00
" 60.50
" 24.00" 24.00" BS

240H T 74.00
" 66.50
" 30.00" 30.00" 18.00" 1200
BS

400H 4" 83.75
92
" 66.50
" 30.00"
" 30.00" 18.00" 1300 LBS

Air Compressor Rotated 90 dearees for Modal A .00
nH 72.50 36.00 36.00" 21.00" 1800 LBS
?sumacea vveignt based on 7 Valve Hydroburst System - Add 50 Ibs for each additional valve
Component Description
Main Air Receiver 200 PSIG MWP
Air Compressor 5 HP (10 HP for Model 400H )
Less Than 15 Minute Recharge
Control Panel NEMA 4
Valve Assembly Ball Vale - 1" & 1.5" Size
Butterfly Vale - 2" to 4" Size
Manifold Assembly 1, 2, 3 or 4 Vale
Specifications
Johnson Intake Screens - Nucor Steel Page 1 of 4
Section 1 - General
1.01 WORK INCLUDED:
A. This section of the specifications covers the furnishing and installation of the Johnson Intake Screens and
appurtenances as shown on the drawings and specified herein.
B. The following items are a part of this section and shall be furnished by one manufacturer to ensure a properly
designed and integrated intake system.
(2) Johnson Intake Screen assemblies of all-welded continuous slot Vee-Wire® construction.
2. Johnson Hydroburst® System for air flushing of screen surface for debris removal. (Section 4)
1.02 QUALITY ASSURANCE:
A. The entire intake screen system shall be furnished by a single manufacturer who shall comply with the following:
The equipment manufacturer must maintain an ongoing quality assurance program, including ISO-9000
certification.
All welders must maintain certification to ASME Section IX. Copies of certifications shall be provided
upon request.
The single manufacturer supplying this equipment must be able to furnish proof of over (100) installations
and (20) years of manufacturing equipment of similar technology.
1.03 SUBSTITUTIONS:
A. Manufacturers other than that which is specified and/or not meeting EVERY provision of the specification shall be
required to submit a complete and detailed PRE-QUALIFICATION PACKAGE to the engineer at least (15) days
prior to the bid. Any PRE-QUALIFICATION PACKAGE must contain as a minimum:
1. Detailed layout drawings
2. Supporting flow distribution data via a CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) analysis.
3. Weld certifications
4. Evidence of a recognized ongoing quality assurance program.
5. Detailed component specifications and catalog cuts as required.
6. Detailed list of ALL VARIATIONS required from the original design, referencing appropriate sections of
the specifications and locations on the drawings.
7. Full installation reference list of at least (50) customers that includes similar proposed equipment.
B. Manufacturers qualifying will be recognized by addendum a minimum of (5) days prior to the bid. Contractors shall
include all costs associated with any redesign required with their bid.
Page 2
C. Manufacturers not meeting this specification in EVERY WAY or are not PRE-QUALIFIED and approved by the
engineer as outlined above will not be considered for use in this project.
Section 2 - Products
2.01 GENERAL:
A. All system components and equipment utilized in the intake screen system, including the system described in Section
1.01 shall be furnished as a complete integrated system by one manufacturer; Johnson Screen, New Brighton, MN.
2.02 CAPACITY
A. The intake assembly capacity shall be 1 MGD (over 8 hours) at a maximum through-slot velocity, as a result of water
withdrawal, of 0.25 feet per second. The corresponding average through-slot velocity shall be 80% - 90% of the
maximum velocity. At this flow rate the pressure drop through the entire intake assembly shall be approximately 0.12
psi at the rated flow. The hydraulic design of this system is based on this maximum headloss - screens that exceed
this headloss are not acceptable. The manufacturer's clean screen assembly headloss must be stated in the bid
documents.
B. The total intake assembly capacity of 1 MGD (over 8 hours) shall be handled by (2) Johnson Screens Model T-27HC
intake tee screen assemblies.
C. Evidence of the intake assembly capacity and flow distribution shall be able to be provided by a Computational Fluid
Dynamic (CFD) analysis, supplied by the manufacturer. Any proposed alternates MUST provide a CFD to support the
flow distribution claims. The CFD Analysis Method must be verified by actual physical testing.
2.03 STRENGTH
A. The intake assembly shall be designed to withstand a differential hydrostatic collapse pressure of 15 feet of water.
B. Design stress used for determining strength of the assembly shall be no more than 90% of the published yield strength
of the material used. Strength calculations verifying compliance with these criteria shall be provided upon request.
2.04 CONSTRUCTION
A. The intake screen surface wire shall be Johnson Screens Vee-Wires number 63.
B. The surface wire, support beam and stiffener structure shall be an all-welded matrix designed to provide the specific
strength with minimal interference with the through screen flow pattern.
C. End plates and tee body shall be a minimum of 0.15 inches thick. All structural butt welds shall be full penetration
fillet welds and shall be the thickness of the thinner component.
2.05 SLOT OPENING SIZE
A. The screen slot size shall be 0.039 inches.
B. Slot size shall be controlled and continuously monitored during manufacture.
1. For slot openings of 0.040" through 0.100" the mean slot size shall be within +/- 0.002" with a standard
deviation no greater than 0.002" throughout the assembly.
2. For slot openings greater than 0.100" the mean slot size shall be within +/- 0.003" with a standard deviation
no greater than 0.003" throughout the entire assembly.
2.06 MATERIALS
A. The main outlet flange shall mate with a 20 inch flange with a flange pattern equal to AWWA C-207, Table 1, Class
D.
B. The Hydroburst air connection (based on a maximum of 100 feet of airline run) shall mate with a 3 inch flange with a
flange pattern equal to AWWA C-207, Table 1, Class D.
C. The intake screen material shall be manufactured of 304 stainless steel material.
Page 3
Section 3 - Screen Submittals
3.01 SCREEN SUBMITTALS
A. Upon request, the intake screen manufacturer shall submit:
1. Drawing(s) showing screen diameter, screen length, assembly length, interface dimensions for outlet and air
backwash dimensions, materials of construction and assembly weight.
2. Weld Certifications.
3. Evidence of a statistical control program.
4. Provide supporting flow distribution data where calculation methods are verified by physical flow
distribution tests.
Section 4 - Hydroburst® Air Backwash System
4.01 GENERAL
A. The intake screen supplier shall provide, as part of the overall intake screen system, an air backwash system designed
to remove debris from the screen surface by delivering a suitable volume of compressed air to the inside of the screen
body. The exiting air shall scour the screen surface to maintain adequate design flow and through slot velocity
characteristics.
4.02 PRODUCTS
A. The Hydroburst air backwash system shall consist of an integrated system of compressor, receiver tank, valves and
control panel. All components shall be skid or tank mounted and arrive on site ready to operate. Any system
provided requiring field assembly and not ready to operate shall not be acceptable.
1. The compressor shall be a reciprocating type and shall be sized to recover from each backwash in 15
minutes.
2. The receiver shall be a 120 gallon receiver, ASME coded for 200 psig, sized for the system piping and to
displace THREE SCREEN VOLUMES of air AT THE SCREEN during a backwash to provide suitable
debris removal and cleaning. Two of three volumes shall be delivered in the first second of the backwash
cycle.
3. The receiver shall be equipped with a 4 inch isolated pressure gauge, safety valve and automatic drain
valve.
4. The system shall include two (2) 3 inch butterfly valve rated at 200 psi with standard ANSI class 125/150
flanges. There shall be one valve per screen and shall be sized to match the tank flange and the backwash
piping.
B. Automatic Operation: (Optional)
1. The above butterfly valve(s) shall be provided with a pneumatic actuator with direct mounted solenoid
valves, position indicator and position switches.
2. The system shall include a suitably sized air receiver interconnected and charged by the main receiver to
allow valve operation.
3. A NEMA 4 control panel shall be included that will contain as a minimum, the motor starter for the
compressor, control power transformer and a PLC or relay logic to perform the specified control
functions.
4. The controls shall allow timed automatic or manual initiated air cleaning cycles. A cycle consists of
cleaning all intake system screens.
5. The control system included shall allow a full week duration of programmed Hydroburst cycles.
C. Interconnecting piping between the intake screen assembly and the Hydroburst System is by others. All
interconnecting wiring to automated valving and power connections is done by others.
4.02 SUBMITTALS and MANUALS
Page 4
A. Included in the intake screen submittals shall be all associated Hydroburst equipment catalog information, system
sizing criteria and drawings. All dimensional and operational information will be provided. All interconnecting wiring
and piping information will be included.
B. Six (6) Copies of an Intake System with a Hydroburst System Standard O&M Manuals shall be provided. Additional
copies shall be priced at $100 per copy.
* * * End of Section * * *
Appendix C (Raw Water Screen Intake Study)
SITE VISIT REPORT/TELEPHONE LOGS
Hertford County, North Carolina C Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
WWA Project No. 210039.00 Raw Water Screen Intake Study
DOCUMENTATION FORM
Date: July 28, 2010
To: File
From: Jason A. Clark, P.E.
Subject: Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill Raw Water Intake
Hertford County, North Carolina
VWVA Project No.: 210039.00
W.j
ZMW ENGINEERS
SURVEYORS
PLANNERS
ASSOCIATES
I spoke with David Cox, Technical Guidance Supervisor for NC Wildlife Resource Commission
(www.ncwildlife ora), on Wednesday, July 28 concerning the intake design at Nucor Steel. The
following items were discussed:
1. David indicated there is not a regulatory requirement for an articulating intake.
According to him, he was discussing ideas with Nucor personnel and Fritz Rohde for an
intake that would fluctuate with the river level. David's concern was with seasonal
variations in river level and ensuring the intake would not have an adverse impact on fish
larvae typically located close to the water surface.
2. I explained that a fish study had been performed and that we were proposing a fixed
intake located approximately 5 feet above the river bottom in accordance with the study's
recommendations. David stated that if the data shows the intake elevation is not a
problem for surface larvae, then the issue would no longer be a concern.
3. David also indicated that our primary point of contact with his organization will be Maria
Dunn, Permit Coordinator, in their Washington, NC office (Telephone: [phone], E-
Mail: maria.dunn@ncwildlife or). Maria was apparently unable to attend the previous
Nucor meeting, and David was filling in for her.
P.O. Box 4119 ¦ Lynchburg, VA 24502 ¦ Telephone [phone] ¦ Fax [phone]
...........................................
-
Lynchburg ¦ Charlottesville
?l
SITE VISIT REPORT
Date: March 5, 2004
Subject: Nucor Steel - Hertford
Chowan River Raw Water Intake
Preliminary Engineering Report
Field Investigation
WWA Project No.: 204032.01
W
ENGINEERS
SURVEYORS
PLANNERS
ASSOCIATES
On Friday, 5 March 2004, Jim McGill from WW Associates, Lynchburg, Virginia, conducted a
field investigation at the Nucor Plate Mill, Hertford County, North Carolina. The field
investigation was a part of an engineering study concerning the feasibility of constructing a raw
water intake on the Chowan River. The primary contacts at the Nucor mill were Terry Hairston,
the Environmental Manager, Lester Hart, Maintenance Manager, and Chuck Ruffing,
Construction Coordinator.
The purpose of this investigation was multifold. The following items were included in the
agenda:
• Discuss the project requirements with Nucor personnel.
• Visit the dock area and review possible locations for an intake facility.
• Collect drawings, reports, and other data helpful in developing the intake design.
• Gain a better knowledge of Nucor's use of the process and cooling water system.
Terry Hairston stated that the preferred location for the intake facility was at the existing barge
unloading port facility. This location offers the advantages of already having the access road and
available space for an intake facility. We visited the barge unloading port facility, assessing the
possible locations for an intake system, and taking several photographs of the area. We also
obtained copies of drawings and the geotechnical report for the dock construction.
Page I of 2
The upstream side of the barge unloading dock was determined to be the best location for an
intake facility since there was room for the facility and for a discharge pipeline running along the
west side of the port road from the intake facility to the existing stormwater pond. The east side
of the road already has a pipeline running alongside.
The flow rates needed by Nucor are as follows:
• Current: 1 MGD
• Future: 2 MGD
0 Ultimate: 4 MGD
We visited the Water Treatment Plant and reviewed water usage and treatment processes with
the plant operator using the SCADA system. Water is taken from the stormwater pond, treated,
and used for process and cooling water. The water from the stormwater pond is added to water
in the existing system as make-up.
Page 2 of 2
Appendix B 2W
II
RIVER FLOW DATA ANALYSIS
Hertford County, North Carolina B Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
W WA Project No. 210039.00 River Analysis - Raw Water Intake
C
O
a
E
O
U
C?
^C ?
?" CCI
Q
a?
O
ir.
Q
O
U
w M

W Z M
Z
Z LO

O ?t

ti co

O LO

r?

O
Z N
Cl W
\ O c-
M O
O O
\ O \

Q w
N
(D
Cl)
00
-
r
M
LO
00
O
O C
o
J
00 V
M LO C
m
U)
D
U ? o
c
'a
_
U

N
N
Ix Z M " S

W J fl-
M o
E 3
m
Z J O LO IT (0
I
M
O
?
O
O
d m

(n
N
O
O

?
O

0

M
O

M
O C:l
rn

J
M
00
N

00 N

`-

O c

o L
W

O d (Y)
LO
o
w
U Q 00 0
2 T o
? o
o
?
N
X M
H N 0. 0
0
Z

N (0 co
p u) O
O V- m 0)

rn
Z
Z O CO O
c-
O 0) a
`O
>Q>
> O
M
LQ M
r r
O
OD
M
o\0 ?-
2
o

O Z
d
M
LO LO

E
2 o
U > ? w
o
L_ f0
1? ? N
Q O Y j
YU ? 16 C

W
Z
LO

Q' W
N p
0) O
O
C*j
C) O
p N
N o c
i

C) C:) r o
i O
0 :3
i
z
W (n
O U)
(? \ co ?
N
P,: n
r p
04 af0i
co
Z
Q J) N ?
O O CL N
O o >
2 O_
Q
O
Y
O m
W O

?Z O
rn jp m
N
W Y o o o rn N O
0
A)

Z N

O
_
C)
N
CO
6
00
?
O
O
O
\
p
O
O
N

a

Q
LL
(D
N
CMO
N
N
00
O
m o
7
( n O O rn N
gW
0
_ °
mZ Y Q

O p
v?
O
O
U c

'
O v
Q O
O >,
N Z
O L L p
8 O Q Q 0 rn

a) -0
a
d
0
U)
O-
?
m
W
T
n
U O ;
O U 0 _ O
3 .
" a U `
0 "a .3; O "a Q a-
Q Q' t
Q o W' 0 7 Q/ U O O d' N
tf
rna Z
2
p
M
Ix
N
15
m N
0
c
N W > .
N O Q C Q
FL-
L

Q n H U
Appendix C

REGISTERED WATER WITHDRAWALS
Hertford County, North Carolina C Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
W WA Project No. 210039.00 River Analysis - Raw Water Intake
Water Withdrawal Registration Page 1 of 4
Your query returned 17 results
Registration #: > 0375_0001
Owner: STUART PIERCE FARMS, INC.
Facility Name:
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
County: HERTFORD
Use Type(1): IRRIGATION
Source Type(1): STREAM
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for 1999: 0.729 MGD
Registration #: >.0104-0002
, Owner: BRINKLEY FARMS, INC.
Facility Name:
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
County: HERTFORD
Use Type(1): IRRIGATION
Source Type(1): STREAM
Source Type(2): LAKE OR POND
Registration #: > 0-04z.Q001
Owner: BRINKLEY FARMS, INC.
Facility Name: BAUGHAN FARM
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
County: HERTFORD
Use Type(1): IRRIGATION
Source Type(1): STREAM
Source Type(2): LAKE OR POND
Other Source(2): STREAM
Registration #: > 0015-0004
Owner: BEASLEY FARMS INC.
Facility Name: BEASLEY FARMS
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
County: BERTIE
Use Type(1): IRRIGATION
Source Type(1): STREAM
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for 1999: 1.152 MGD
Registration #: > 0104-0002
Owner: BRINKLEY FARMS, INC.
Facility Name: CJ FARM
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES - WATER SUPPLY PLANNING Updated ;
Water Withdrawal Registration Page 2 of 4
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
County: HERTFORD
Use Type(l): IRRIGATION
Source Type(l): STREAM
Source Type(2): LAKE OR POND
Registration #: > 9_Q15-0005
Owner: BEASLEY FARMS INC.
Facility Name: COWAN FARM
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
County: HERTFORD
Use Type(l): IRRIGATION
Source Type(l): STREAM
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for 1999: 1.872 MGD
Registration #: > 0196-0001
Owner: UNITED PIECE DYE WORKS - P.D. ACQUISTION
Facility Name: EDENTON FACILITY
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
County: CHOWAN
Use Type(l): INDUSTRIAL
Source Type(l): STREAM
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for 1999: 0.820 MGD
Registration #: > 0054-oa04
Owner: GILLAM FARMS
Facility Name: SURE FARM
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
County: HERTFORD
Use Type(l): IRRIGATION
Source Type(1): STREAM
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for 1999: 0.461 MGD
Registration #: > 0015-0011
Owner: BEASLEY FARMS INC.
Facility Name: LIBERTY HILL
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
County: CHOWAN
Use Type(l): IRRIGATION
Source Type(l): STREAM
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for 1999: 0.008 MGD
Registration #: > 0015-0001
Owner: BEASLEY FARMS INC.
Facility Name: OAKLAND FARM
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
County: BERTIE
Use Type(l): IRRIGATION
Source Type(l): STREAM
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for 1999: 1.872 MGD
Registration #: > 0_15710
Owner: BEASLEY FARMS INC.
Facility Name: POWELL FARM
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Water Withdrawal Registration Page 3 of 4
County: CHOWAN
Use Type(1): IRRIGATION
Source Type(1): STREAM
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for 1999: 1.872 MGD
Registration #: > 0015-0009
Owner: BEASLEY FARMS INC.
Facility Name: PRUDEN FARM
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
County: HERTFORD
Use Type(1): IRRIGATION
Source Type(1): STREAM
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for 1999: 1.440 MGD
Registration #: > 0015-0003
Owner: BEASLEY FARMS INC.
Facility Name: QUARTER FARM
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
County: BERTIE
Use Type(1): IRRIGATION
Source Type(1): STREAM
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for 1999: 1.152 MGD
Registration #: > M5--Q-0-0-1
Owner: PERRY & PERRY INC.
Facility Name: SAUNDERS FARM PUMPS
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
County: BERTIE
Use Type(1): IRRIGATION
Source Type(1): STREAM
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for 1999: 3.729 MGD
Registration #: > 90150008
Owner: BEASLEY FARMS INC.
Facility Name: SHARP FARM
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
County: CHOWAN
Use Type(1): IRRIGATION
Source Type(1): STREAM
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for 1999: 1.584 MGD
Registration #: > 0054-0005
Owner: GILLAM FARMS
Facility Name: WICCACON FARM
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
County: HERTFORD
Use Type(1): IRRIGATION
Source Type(1): STREAM
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for 1999: 1.440 MGD
Registration #: > 0015-0007
Owner: BEASLEY FARMS INC.
Facility Name: WILLIAMS FARMS
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
County: HERTFORD
Water Withdrawal Registration
Use Type(1): IRRIGATION
Source Type(],): STREAM
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for 1999: 1.872 MGD
Page 4 of 4
site maintained by
Water Withdrawal Registration
Pagel of 2
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone] - Web: www.ncwater
1999 WATER WITHDRAWAL REGISTRATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Registration #: 0375-0001
Owner: STUART PIERCE FARMS, INC. Facility Name: N/A
Contact: PATE PIERCE
Address: 107 DT ROAD
State: NC
Phone: [phone]
W'IT DRAWAL
Title: N/A
City: AHOSKIE
Zip: 27910
Fax: [phone]
Type of Water Use(1): IRRIGATION
Type of Source(1): STREAM
Name of Water Source: AHOSKIE CREEK
County: HERTFORD
Description of Location:
Average Daily Withdrawal by Month:
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal
(MGD) (MGD)
Jan 0 0.000 Jul 10 0.729
Feb 0 0.000 Aug 10 0.729
Mar 0 0.000 Sep 0 0.000
Apr 0 0.000 Oct 0 0.000
May 0 0.000 Nov 0 0.000
Jun 10 0.729 Dec 0 0.000
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for all days used: 0.729 million gallons per day
............ ........ _........ _....
Max. Daily Withdrawal During Year: 0.973 million gallons per day
___-------.-........ _...... ..__.._..... . -.._
Daily Withdrawal Capacity of Facility: 1.440 million gallons per day
IRMATITON WORKSHEET
How many days For days irrigated, how For days irrigated, how Average Daily
Month did you irrigate many acres per day did many inches per day were Withdrawal for Dal
in each month? you irrigate on average? applied on average? Used (in gallons)
Jan 0 0.00 0.00 0.000
Water Withdrawal Registration Page 2 of 2
Feb 0 0.00 0.00 0.000
Mar 0 0.00 0.00 0.000
Apr 0 0.00 0.00 0.000
May 0 0.00 0.00 0.000
Jun 10 45.00 0.60 0.730
Jul 10 45.00 0.60 0,730
Aug 10 45.00 0.60 0.730
Sep 0 0.00 0.00 0.000
Jun 0 0.00 0.00 0.000
Nov 0 0.00 0.00 0.000
Jun 0 0.00 0.00 0.000
Average Daily Amount 0.730
for All Days Irrigated
Acres Inches Gallons Pumped
Maximum Irrigation in a 45.00 0.80 0.973
Single Day 1999
Daily Irrigation Capacity 50.00 0.80 1.081
site maintained by
Water Withdrawal Registration
Page 1 of 2
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone] - Web: www.ncwater
1999 WATER WITHDRAWAL REGISTRATION
iGENML INFORMATION
Registration #: 0104-0002
Owner: BRINKLEY FARMS, INC. Facility Name: CJ FARM
Contact: L. M. BRINKLEY, JR. Title: PRESIDENT
Address: 445 JACKIE BRINKLEY RO AD City: AULANDER
State: NC Zip: 27605
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
WTHDRAWAL
Type of Water Use(1): IRRIGATION
Type of Source(1): STREAM
Type of Source(2): LAKE OR POND
Name of Water Source: AHOSKIE CREEK, DUG POND
County: HERTFORD Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Description of Location:
Average Daily Withdrawal by Month:
Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal
(MGD) (MGD)
Jan 0 0.000 Jul 0 0.000
Feb 0 0.000 Aug 0 0.000
Mar 0 0.000 Sep 0 0.000
Apr 0 0.000 Oct 0 0.000
May 0 0.000 Nov 0 0.000
Jun 0 0.000 Dec 0 0.000
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for all days used: 0.000 million gallons per day
.... ..... _........ _........._ ..................... . ... ..
Max. Daily Withdrawal During Year: 1.100 million gallons per day
Daily Withdrawal Capacity of Facility: 2.200 million gallons per day
It'J'1TiIDRt'aWA ..
Type of Water Use(1): IRRIGA'T'ION
Type of Source(1): N/A
Water Withdrawal Registration
Name of Water Source: N/A
County: HERTFORD Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Description of Location:
Average Daily Withdrawal by Month:
Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal
(MGD) (MGD)
Jan 0 0.000 Jul 0 0.000
Feb 0 0.000 Aug 0 0.000
Mar 0 0.000 Sep 0 0.000
Apr 0 0.000 Oct 0 0.000
May 0 0.000 Nov 0 0.000
Jun 0 0.000 Dec 0 0.000
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for all days used: 0.000 million gallons per day
Max. Daily Withdrawal During Year: 2.200 million gallons per day
Daily Withdrawal Capacity of Facility: 1.100 million gallons per day
Page 2 of 2
site maintained by
Water Withdrawal Registration
Page 1 of 1
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone] - Web: www.ncwater
1999 WATER WITHDRAWAL REGISTRATION
+GENML INFORMi271ON
Registration #: 0104-0001
Owner: BRINKLEY FARMS, INC. Facility Name: BAUGHAN FARM
Contact: L. M. BRINKLEY, JR.
.................................................................................................. Title:
..................... PRESIDENT
............................................................................. ...............
Address: 445 JACKIE BRINKLEY ROAD City: AULANDER
State: NC Zip: 27805
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
W?i- DRAWAL
Type of Water Use(1): IRRIGATION
Type of Source(1): STREAM
Type of Source(2): LAKE OR POND
Name of Water Source: WELL, POND, AHOSKIE CREEK
County: HERTFORD Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Description of Location:
Average Daily Withdrawal by Month:
Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal
(MGD) (MGD)
Jan 0 01000 Jul 0 0.000
Feb 0 0.000 Aug 0 01000
Mar 0 0.000 Sep 0 0,000
Apr 0 0.000 Oct 0 0.000
May 0 0.000 Nov 0 0.000
Jun 0 0.000 Dec 0 0.000
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for all days used: 0.000 million gallons per day
Max. Daily Withdrawal During Year: 1.500 million gallons per day
Daily Withdrawal Capacity of Facility: 2.000 million gallons per day
site maintained by
Water Withdrawal Registration
Page 1 of 1
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone] - Web: www.ncwater
1999 WATER WITHDRAWAL REGISTRATION
GENERA. INEDI'tMA110N
Registration*: 0015-0004
Owner: BEASLEY FARMS INC. Facility Name: BEASLEY FARMS
Contact: RANDY MIZELLE Title: MANAGER
Address: P.O. BOX 38 City: COLERAIN
State: NC Zip: 27924
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
WITHDRAW
Type of Water Use(1): IRRIGATION
Type of Source(1): STREAM
Name of Water Source: CHINKAPIN SWAMP
County: BERTIE Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Description of Location:
Average Daily Withdrawal by Month:
Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal
(MGD) (MGD)
Jan 0 0.000 Jul 16 1.152
Feb 0 0.000 Aug 16 1.152
Mar 0 0.000 Sep 16 1.152
Apr 0 0.000 Oct 0 0.000
May 0 0.000 Nov 0 0.000
Jun 4 1.152 Dec 0 0.000
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for all days used: 1.152 million gallons per day
............. .... .... ........ ..__..-._ _._......
Max. Daily Withdrawal During Year: 1.152 million gallons per day
_.._............ ......... ......._
Daily Withdrawal Capacity of Facility: 1.152 million gallons per day
site maintained by
Water Withdrawal Registration
Page I of 2
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone] - Web: www.ncwater
1999 WATER WITHDRAWAL REGISTRATION
GENE AL INFORMA110M
Registration #: 0104-0002
Owner: BRINKLEY FARMS, INC. Facility Name: CJ FARM
Contact: L. M. BRINKLEY, JR.
...............................................
..
..
.
.. Title:
....... ............. ........ PRESIDENT

...._............._..............
.........
..
..
..
......
..
Address: 445 JACKIE BRINKLEY ROAD City: AULANDER
State: NC Zip: 27805
Phone: [phone]
........... ........ ................ ...... ........................._ Fax: [phone]
......................
WTHDR AWAL
Type of Water Use(1): IRRIGATION
Type of Source(1): STREAM
Type of Source(2): LAKE OR POND
Name of Water Source: AHOSKIE CREEK, DUG POND
County: HERTFORD Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Description of Location:
Average Daily Withdrawal by Month:
Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal
(MGD) (MGD)
Jan 0 0.000 Jul 0 01000
Feb 0 0.000 Aug 0 0.000
Mar 0 0.000 Sep 0 0.000
Apr 0 0.000 Oct 0 0.000
May 0 0.000 Nov 0 0.000
Jun 0 0.000 Dec 0 0.000
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for all days used: 0.000 million gallons per day
Max. Daily Withdrawal During Year: 1.100 million gallons per day
Daily Withdrawal Capacity of Facility: 2.200 million gallons per day
VVMID1 AWAL
Type of Water Use(1): IRRIGATION
Type of Source(1): N/A
Water Withdrawal Registration
Name of Water Source: N/A
County: HERTFORD
Description of Location:
Average Daily Withdrawal by Month:
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Page 2 of 2
Avg. Daily Withdrawal Avg. Daily Withdrawal
Month Days (MGD) Month Days (MGD)
Jan 0 0.000 Jul 0 0.000
Feb 0 0.000 Aug 0 0.000
Mar 0 0.000 Sep 0 0.000
Apr 0 0.000 Oct 0 0.000
May 0 0.000 Nov 0 0.000
Jun 0 0.000 Dec 0 0.000
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for all days used: 0.000 million gallons per day
Max. Daily Withdrawal During Year: 2.200 million gallons per day
Daily Withdrawal Capacity of Facility: 1.100 million gallons per day
site maintained by
Water Withdrawal Registration
Page 1 of 1
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mali Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone] - Web: www.ncwater
1999 WATER WITHDRAWAL REGISTRATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Registration #: 0015-0005
Owner: BEASLEY FARMS INC. Facility Name: COWAN FARM
Contact: RANDY MIZELLE Title: MANAGER
Address: P.O. BOX 38 City: COLERAIN
State: NC Zip: 27924
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
WITHDRAWAL
Type of Water Use(S): IRRIGATION
Type of Source(1): STREAM
Name of Water Source: STONEY CREEK
County: HERTFORD Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Description of Location:
Average Daily Withdrawal by Month:
Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal
(MGD) (MGD)
Jan 0 0.000 Jul 16 1.872
Feb 0 01000 Aug 16 1.872
Mar 0 0.000 Sep 16 1.872
Apr 0 0.000 Oct 0 0.000
May 0 0.000 Nov 0 0.000
Jun 4 1.872 Dec 0 0.000
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for all days used: 1.872 million gallons per day
Max. Daily Withdrawal During Year: 1.872 million gallons per day
Daily Withdrawal Capacity of Facility: 1.872 million gallons per day
site maintained by
Water Withdrawal Registration
Page 1 of 2
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone] - Web: www.ncwater
1999 WATER WITHDRAWAL REGISTRATION
GEt MAL INFORMA11ON'
Registration #: 0196-0001
Owner: UNITED PIECE DYE WORKS - P.D.
ACQUISTIO N
Contact: HAROLD W. LLOYD JR.
Address: 125 DYE PLANT ROAD
State: NC
Phone: [phone]
Facility Name: EDENTON FACILITY
Title: TECHNICAL MANAGER
City: EDENTON
Zip: 27932
Fax: [phone]
WITH DRAWAL
Type of Water Use(1): INDUSTRIAL SIC Code: 2269
Type of Source(1): STREAM
-------------
Name of Water Source: CHOWAN RIVER
County: CHOWAN Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Description of Location:
Average Daily Withdrawal by Month:
Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal
(MGD) (MGD)
Jan 22 1.030 Jul 18 0.720
Feb 23 1.000 Aug 26 0.780
Mar 28 0.850 Sep 26 0.850
Apr 25 0.750 Oct 24 0.790
May 23 0.750 Nov 21 0.780
Jun 26 0.750 Dec 17 0.820
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for all days used: 0.820 million gallons per day
Max. Daily Withdrawal During Year: 1.350 million gallons per day
Daily Withdrawal Capacity of Facility: 1.500 million gallons per day
DISCHARGE
Type of Discharge(1): NPDES DISCHARGE Permit #: NCO003867
Type of Discharge(2): LAND APPLICATION Permit #: WQ0000800
Water Withdrawal Registration
Name of receiving water body: CHQWAN RIVER
County: CHQWAN Sub-basin: CHQWAN RIVER (04-1)
Description of Location:
Average Daily Discharge by Month:

Month
Days Avg. Daily Discharge Month Days Avg. Daily Discharge
(MGD) (MGD)
Jan 22 1.030 Jul 18 0.720
Feb 23 0.480 Aug 26 0.780
Mar 28 0.850 Sep 26 0.850
Apr 25 0.750 Oct 24 0.740
May 23 0.750 Nov 21 0.780
Jun 26 0.750 Dec 17 0.820
Avg. daily discharge for all days discharged: 0.820 million gallons per day
Max. daily discharge during year: 1.350 million gallons per day
Daily discharge capacity of facility: 1.500 million gallons per day
Page 2 of 2
site maintained by
Water Withdrawal Registration
Page 1 of 1
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone] - Web: www.ncwater
1999 WATER WITHDRAWAL REGISTRATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Registration #: 0054-0004
Owner: GILLAM FARMS Facility Name: EURE FARM
Contact: WILEY B. GILLAM III Title: OWNER
Address: P.O. BOX 367 City: HARRELLSVILLE
State: NC Zip: 27842
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
WTIVIDT WAL
Type of Water Use(1): IRRIGATION
Type of Source(1): STREAM
Name of Water Source: WICCACON RIVER
County: HERTFORD Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Description of Location:
Average Daily Withdrawal by Month:
Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal
(MGD) (MGD)
Jan 0 0.000 Jul 0 0.000
Feb 0 0.000 Aug 0 0.000
Mar 0 0.000 Sep 0 0.000
Apr 0 0.000 Oct 0 0.000
May 0 0.000 Nov 0 0.000
Jun 0 0.000 Dec 0 0.000
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for all days used: 0.461 million gallons per day
Max. Daily Withdrawal During Year: 0.461 million gallons per day
Daily Withdrawal Capacity of Facility: 0.461 million gallons per day
site maintained by
Water Withdrawal Registration
Page 1 of 1
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone] - Web: www.ncwater
1999 WATER WITHDRAWAL REGISTRATION
GENERAL 1NFORMA110h1
Registration #: 0015-0011
Owner: BEASLEY FARMS INC. Facility Name: LIBERTY HILL
Contact: RANDY MIZELLE Title: MANAGER
Address: P.O. BOX 38 City: COLERAIN
State: NC Zip: 27924
Phone: [phone]
........................ ..................................................... Fax:
............... 252-356-1234
..........................................................
WITi"1DRAWAL
Type of Water Use(i): IRRIGATION
Type of Source(1): STREAM
Name of Water Source: CHOWAN RIVER
County: CHOWAN Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Description of Location:
Average Daily Withdrawal by Month:
Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal
(MGD) (MGD)
Jan 0 0.000 Jul 16 01008
Feb 0 0.000 Aug 16 0.008
Mar 0 0.000 Sep 16 0.008
Apr 0 0.000 Oct 0 0.000
May 0 01000 Nov 0 0.000
Jun 4 0.008 Dec 0 0.000
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for all days used. 0.008 million gallons per day
Max. Daily Withdrawal During Year: 0.008 million gallons per day
Daily Withdrawal Capacity of Facility: 0.008 million gallons per day
site maintained by
Water Withdrawal Registration
Page 1 of 1
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone] - Web: www.ncwater
1999 WATER WITHDRAWAL REGISTRATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Registration #: 0015-0001
Owner: BEASLEY FARMS INC. Facility Name: OAKLAND FARM
Contact: RANDY MIZELLE Title: MANAGER
Address: P.O. BOX 38 City: COLERAIN
State: NC Zip: 27924
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
VWHDRAWAL
Type of Water Use(1): IRRIGATION
Type of Source(1): STREAM
Name of Water Source: LOOSING BRANCH
County: BERTIE Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Description of Location:
Average Daily Withdrawal by Month:
Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal
(MGD) (MGD)
Jan 0 0.000 Jul 18 1.872
Feb 0 0.000 Aug 18 1.872
Mar 0 0.000 Sep 18 1.872
Apr 0 0.000 Oct 0 0.000
May 0 01000 Nov 0 01000
Jun 0 0.000 Dec 0 0.000
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for all days used: 1.872 million gallons per day
Max. Daily Withdrawal During Year: 1.872 million gallons per day
Daily Withdrawal Capacity of Facility: 1.872 million gallons per day
site maintained by
Water Withdrawal Registration
Page 1 of 1
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone] - Web: www.ncwater
1999 WATER WITHDRAWAL REGISTRATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Registration #: 0015-0010
Owner: BEASLEY FARMS INC. Facility Name: POWELL FARM
Contact: RANDY MIZELLE
............. . .............. ...... .... .............. ....--.._......__... Title:
. -............_....... MANAGER
_..................................................................
Address: P.O. BOX 38 City: COLERAIN
State: NC Zip: 27924
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
VVIT II)RAWAL
Type of Water Use(1): IRRIGATION
Type of Source(1): STREAM
Name of Water Source: DEEP SWAMP BRANCH
...1-1- ..........................
County: CHOWAN Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Description of Location:
Average Daily Withdrawal by Month:
Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal
(MGD) (MGD)
Jan 0 0,000 Jul 16 1.872
Feb 0 0.000 Aug 16 1.872
Mar 0 0.000 Sep 16 1.872
Apr 0 0.000 Oct 0 0.000
May 0 0.000 Nov 0 0.000
Jun 4 1.872 Dec 0 0.000
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for all days used: 1.872 million gallons per day
.. ............................. .
Max. Daily Withdrawal During Year: 1.872 million gallons per day
--..-- ---.........-_.- ............. ............................... ..
Daily Withdrawal Capacity of Facility: 1.872 million gallons per day
site maintained by
Water Withdrawal Registration
Page I of 1
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone] - Web: www.ncwater
1999 WATER WITHDRAWAL REGISTRATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Registration #: 0015-0009
Owner: BEASLEY FARMS INC. Facility Name: PRUDEN FARM
Contact: RANDY MIZELLE
Address: P.O. BOX 38
State: NC
Phone: [phone]
WIMD32 WAL
Title:
.................... MANAGER
................. .................... ... ...................
............ .
City: COLERAIN
Zip: 27924
----- ------------ - --------
Fax:
............ 252-356-1234
.......................................... .................................
Type of Water Use(1): IRRIGATION
Type of Source(1): STREAM
Name of Water Source: DEEP SWAMP BRANCH
County: HERTFORD Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Description of Location:
Average Daily Withdrawal by Month:
Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal
(MGD) (MGD)
Jan 0 0,000 Jul 16 1.440
Feb 0 0.000 Aug 16 1,440
Mar 0 0.000 Sep 16 1.440
Apr 0 0.000 Oct 0 0.000
May 0 0.000 Nov 0 0.000
Jun 4 1.440 Dec 0 0.000
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for all days used: 1.440 million gallons per day
Max. Daily Withdrawal During Year., 1.440 million gallons per day
Daily Withdrawal Capacity of Facility: 1,440 million gallons per day
site maintained by
Water Withdrawal Registration
Page 1 of 1
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone] - Web: www.ncwater
1999 WATER WITHDRAWAL REGISTRATION
GENEP,AL INFORMA110 N
Registration #: 0015-0003
Owner: BEASLEY FARMS INC. Facility Name: QUARTER FARM
Contact: RANDY MIZELLE Title: MANAGER
Address: P.O. BOX 38 City: COLERAIN
State: NC Zip: 27924
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
1il DRAWAL
Type of Water Use(1): IRRIGATION
Type of Source(1): STREAM
Name of Water Source: CHOWAN RIVER
County: BERTIE
Description of Location:
Average Daily Withdrawal by Month:
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal
(MGD) (MGD)
Jan 0 0,000 Jul 16 1.152
Feb 0 0.000 Aug 16 1.152
Mar 0 0.000 Sep 16 1.152
Apr 0 0.000 Oct 0 01000
May 0 0.000 Nov 0 0.000
Jun 4 1.152 Dec 0 0.000
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for all days used: 1.152 million gallons per day
Max. Daily Withdrawal During Year. 1.152 million gallons per day
Daily Withdrawal Capacity of Facility: 1.152 million gallons per day
site maintained by
Water Withdrawal Registration
Page 1 of)
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone] - Web: www.ncwater
1999 WATER WITHDRAWAL REGISTRATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Registration #: 0265-0001
Owner: PERRY & PERRY INC. Facility Name: SAUNDERS FARM PUMPS
Contact: N. F. PERRY JR. Title: PRESIDENT
Address: P.O. BOX 125 City: COLERAIN
State: NC
Phone: [phone]
MMDRAWAL
Zip: 27924
Fax: [phone]
Type of Water Use(I.): IRRIGATION
Type of Source(s): STREAM
Name of Water Source: CHOWAN RIVER
County: BERTIE Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Description of Location:
Average Daily Withdrawal by Month:
Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal
(MGD) (MGD)
Jan 0 01000 Jul 15 4.054
Feb 0 01000 Aug 5 3.243
Mar 0 0.000 Sep 0 0.000
Apr 0 0.000 Oct 0 0.000
May 0 0.000 Nov 0 0.000
Jun 5 3.243 Dec 0 0.000
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for all days used: 3.729 million gallons per day
........._.__......... .............. _....... .........
Max. Daily Withdrawal During Year: 4.054 million gallons per day
--.1- .........___.._..._?......__.?__._.._ --
Daily Withdrawal Capacity of Facility: 4.054 million gallons per day
IRRIGATION WORKSHEET
How many days For days irrigated, how For days irrigated, how Average Daily
Month did you irrigate many acres per day did many inches per day were Withdrawal for Da)
in each month? you irrigate on average? applied on average? Used (in gallons)
Jan 0 0100 0.00 0.000
Water Withdrawal Registration Page 2 of 2
Feb 0 0.00 0100 0.000
Mar 0 0.00 0.00 0.000
Apr 0 0.00 0.00 0.000
May 0 0.00 0.00 01000
Jun 5 120.00 1.00 3.243
Jul 15 150.00 1.00 4.054
Aug 5 120.00 1.00 3.243
Sep 0 0.00 0.00 0.000
Jun 0 0.00 0.00 0.000
Nov 0 0.00 0.00 0.000
Jun 0 0.00 0.00 0.000
Average Daily Amount 3.730
for All Days Irrigated
Acres Inches Gallons Pumped
Maximum Irrigation in a 150.00 1.00 4.054
Single Day 1999
Daily Irrigation Capacity 150.00 1.00 4.054
site maintained by
Water Withdrawal Registration
Page 1 of 1
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone] - Web: www.ncwater
1999 WATER WITHDRAWAL REGISTRATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Registration #: 0015-0008
Owner: BEASLEY FARMS INC. Facility Name: SHARP FARM
Contact: RANDY MIZELLE Title: MANAGER
Address: P.O. BOX 38 City: COLERAIN
State: NC Zip: 27924
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
VffTF) RAW
Type of Water Use(1): IRRIGATION
Type of Source(1): STREAM
Name of Water Source: WICCACON RIVER
County: CHOWAN Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Description of Location:
Average Daily Withdrawal by Month:
Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal
(MGD) (MGD)
Jan 0 0.000 Jul 16 1.584
Feb 0 0,000 Aug 16 1.584
Mar 0 0.000 Sep 16 1.584
Apr 0 0.000 Oct 0 0.000
May 0 0.000 Nov 0 0.000
Jun 4 1.584 Dec 0 0.000
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for all days used: 1.584 million gallons per day
Max. Daily Withdrawal During Year: 1.584 million gallons per day
Daily Withdrawal Capacity of Facility: 1.584 million gallons per day
site maintained by
Water Withdrawal Registration
Page 1 of I
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone] - Web: www.ncwater
1999 WATER WITHDRAWAL REGISTRATION
GENE ML INFOR MA110N
Registration #: 0054-0005
Owner: GILLAM FARMS Facility Name: WICCACON FARM
Contact: WILEY B. GILLAM
....._.. ..................................................................... III Title:
......................... OWNER
...........................................................
Address: P.O. BOX 387 City: HARRELLSVILLE
State: NC Zip: 27942
Phone: [phone]
.................... .............._....................................... Fax:
......._.................... 252-356-2951
.............................................................. .
Wi'f°1n92, WAL
Type of Water Use(1): IRRIGATION
Type of Source(1): STREAM
Name of Water Source: WICCACON RIVER
County: HERTFORD Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Description of Location:
Average Daily Withdrawal by Month:
Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal
(MGD) (MGD)
Jan 0 0.000 Jul 0 0.000
Feb 0 0.000 Aug 0 0.000
Mar 0 0.000 Sep 0 0.000
Apr 0 0.000 Oct 0 0.000
May 0 0.000 Nov 0 0.000
Jun 0 0.000 Dec 0 0.000
Aug. Daily Withdrawal for all days used: 1.440 million gallons per day
Max. Daily Withdrawal During Year: 1.440 million gallons per day
Daily Withdrawal Capacity of Facility: 1.440 million gallons per day
site maintained by
Water Withdrawal Registration
Page 1 of 1
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone] - Web: www.ncwater
1999 WATER WITHDRAWAL REGISTRATION
GENEML INFORMATION
Registration*: 0015-0007
- - -
- ------- ----- -----
Owner: BEASLEY FARMS INC. Facility Name: WILLIAMS FARMS
Contact: RANDY MIZELLE
...........................................
.
..............
.......
.. Title:
...................... MANAGER
.........--....................._....---..................._.............._ _ ..........
_ .
...
.
.
.
Address: P.O. BOX 38 City: COLERAIN
State: NC Zip: 27924
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
WITHDRAWAL
Type of Water Use(1): IRRIGATION
Type of Source(1): STREAM
Name of Water Source: WICCACON RIVER
County: HERTFORD
Description of Location:
Average Daily Withdrawal by Month:
Sub-basin: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal Month Days Avg. Daily Withdrawal
(MGD) (MGD)
Jan 0 0.000 Jul 16 1.872
Feb 0 0.000 Aug 16 1.872
Mar 0 0,000 Sep 16 1.872
Apr 0 0.000 Oct 0 01000
May 0 0.000 Nov 0 0.000
Jun 4 1.872 Dec 0 0.000
Avg. Daily Withdrawal for all days used: 1.872 million gallons per day
Max. Daily Withdrawal During Year: 1.872 million gallons per day
Daily Withdrawal Capacity of Facility: 1.872 million gallons per day
site maintained by
Appendix D
LOCAL WATER SUPPLY PLANS
Hertford County, North Carolina D Nucor Steel - Hertford Mill
WWA Project No. 210039.00 River Analysis - Raw Water Intake
1997 Local Water Supply Plan Data for the Chowan River (04-1) Basin
Page 1 of 1
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Web: www.ncwater.org
LWSP Systems Serving Chowan River (04-1)
Water System County
A OSKIE Hertford
gUJ_ANDE Bert?o
BERTIE CO Be
jUp
RWS
COFI LD e o d
EDENTON Chowan
TAE CO Gates
gA;TESVILLE Gates
HERTFORD_._CQ Hartford
POWELLSVILLE Bet g
RICH SQUARE Northam
Mio-NA Hertford
Totals:
1997
1997 Average Sub-Basins in
Population Daily Service Area
Water Use
(in MGD)
4,562 0.703 CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
1,366 0.155 CHOWAN RIVER (04-1), ROANOKE RIVER (14-1)
6,076 0.294 ROANOKE RIVER (14-1), CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
417 0.040 CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
5,475 0.803 CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
8,840 0.806 CHOWAN RIVER (04-1), ALBEMARLE SOUND (12-1)
383 0.045 CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
650 0.172 MEHERRIN RIVER (04-2), CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
672 0.066 CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
ROANOKE RIVER (14-1), MEHERRIN RIVER (04-2), CHOWAN
1,050 D.142 RIVER (04-1)
822 0.185 CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
30,313 3.411
Go Back tom. inj enu
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for AULANDER (04-08-015)
Page 1 of 5
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Web: www.ncwater.org
1997 LOCAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN FOR AULANDER
(Information in this LWSP may be corrected or updated at any time by the water system or NCDWR)
Part 1: Water Supply System Report for 1997
SECTION 1: GENERA! INFORMATION
05/18/2004
1-A. Water System: AULANDER 1-B. PWS ID#: 04-08-015 Status of 1997 Plan: ADOPTEE
1-C. River Basin Name: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1) , ROANOKE RIVER (14-1)
1-D. County: BERTIE
1-E. Contact: TOMMY HALE Title: WATER/WASTEWATER OPERATOR
1-F. Address: PO BOX 100 City: AULANDER State: NC Zip Code: 27805
1-G. Phone: [phone]-H. Fax: [phone]-I. E-mail: TOWN D ULANDER(@COSTALNOM
1-3. Type of Ownership: MUNICIPALITY
SECTION 2: WATER USE INFORMATION
2-A. Population Served in 1997: Year-Round: 1,366
Seasonal: N/A
2-0. Total Water Use for 1997 including all purchased water: 57.000 Million Gallons
2-C. Average Annual Daily Water Use in 1997: 0.155 MGD
2-D. Average Annual Daily Water Use by Type (MGD)
Metered Connections Non-Metered Connections
Type of Use Number Average Use Number Estimated Average Use
(1) Residential 542 0.141 0 0.000
(2) Commercial 34 0.006 0 01000
(3) Industrial 1 0.004 0 0.000
(4) Institutional 3 0.001 0 0.000
(5) Sales to other Systems
(Ca) Backwash
(7) Subtotal
(8) Avg. Annual Daily Water Use
(9) Unaccounted-for Water
Water Use Note:
Total
Average Use
0.141
0.006
0.004
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.152
0.155
0.003
2-E. Average Daily and Maximum Day Water Use by Month (MGD)
Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day
Use Use Use Use Use Use
Jan 0.158 0.373 May 0.142 0.241 Sep 0.163 0.248
Feb 0.132 0.185 Jun 0.151 0.386 Oct 0,144 0.221
Mar 0.141 0.239 Jul 0.198 0.361 Nov 0,174 0.275
Apr 0.141 0.284 Aug 0.170 0,402 Dec 0,173 0.268
Avg Daily/Max Water Use Note:
2-F, largest Water Users and their Average Annual Daily Use (MGD)
Water User Average Daily Use
GOLDEN PEANUT COMPANY 010060
„_ I- . . .r . n r...nnn. nn n1r rii nlnnnA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for AULANDER (04-08-015) Page 2 of 5
COOKE MOTOR COMPANY 0.0050
FAMILY DINER 0.0040
EASTERN FUELS 0,0030
STEPHENSON'S LAUNDROMAT 0.0020
JERNIGAN CLEANERS 0.0010
Largest User Note:
2-G. thru 2-H. Water Sales to Other Water Systems: NONE
SECTION 3: WATER SUPPLY SOURCES
3-A. thru 3-C. Surface Water Supplies: NONE
3-D. thru 3-E. Water Purchases From Other Water Systems: NONE
3-F. Ground Water
Withdrawals
Screen Facility Limiting
Name Well Casing Depth Well Pump Avg. Daily Max.
D 12-Hr Daily Output R
No rof Depth Depth Int
Dia. Death ay
Meter? Supply or
Well (ft') (ft') Top Bottom (in.) (ft) MGD # of MGD (MG) Capacity Tyofe E
(ft.) (ft.) Days MGD Facility
2 396 396 173 396 8 145.0 Y 0.097 215 0.171 0.234 0.468 R R
3 221 221 145 162 12 140.0 Y 0.109 323 0.180 0.252 0.504 R R
Type of Facility: R = Raw Wate r Pumps, T = Treatment Facilities, M = Transmission Main, D = Distribution System, 0 = Oth er
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
Ground Water Note.
3-6. What is the Total 12-Hour Supply of all wells available for Regular Use? 0.486 Million Gallons
3-H. Are ground water levels monitored? Y How often? WEEKLY
3-I. Does this system have a wellhead protection program? N
3-3. Water Treatment Plants: NONE
3-1K. What is the system's finished water storage capacity? 0.275 Million Gallons
SECTION 4: WASTEWATER INFORMATION
4-A . Average Daily W astewater Discharges (MGD)
Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily
Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge
Jan 0.326 Apr 0,194 Jul 0,213 Oct 0.060
Feb 0.192 May 0.027 Aug 0,245 Nov 0.096
Mar 0.044 Jun 0.143 Sep 0.070 Dec 0.089
4-13. Was tewater Discharge and/or Land Application Permits
NPDES or Permitted Design Avg. Annual
Land Capacity
C Daily Name of
Sub-Basin
Application Dec. 31, 1997 (MGD) Discharge Receiving Stream
Permit Number (MGD) (MGD)
. , - , ! 1r 1 11 nnnnn.l nn n1 G- r11 0 /n rlr1A
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for AULANDER (04-08-015) Page 3 of 5
WQ0000777 0.341 0.341 0.120 FT. BRANCH/AHOSKIE CHOWAN RIVER
CREEK (04-1)
Wastewater Note:
4-C. Wastewater Discharge Interconnections: NONE
4-D. Number of sewer service connections: 560
4-E. Number of water service connections with septic systems: 0
4-F. Are there plans to build or expand wastewater treatment facilities in the next 10 years? Y Please
Explain: Within next 5 yrs the Town of Aulander is planning to extend sewer to South Aulander and Millennium in
Hertford County.
SECTION 5: WATER CONSERVATION AND DEMAND MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
5-A. What is the estimated total miles of distribution system lines? 11.50 Miles
5-B. Primary Types and Sizes of Distribution Lines
Asbestos Cement Cast Iron Ductile Iron Galvanized Iron Polyvinyl Chloride Other
(AC) (CI) (DI) (GI) (PVC)
Size Range (inches) 12 6 b
% of lines 1 % 94 % 0 % 0 % 5 % 0 %
5-C. Were any lines replaced in 1997? N Linear feet replaced:
5-D. Were any new water mains added in 1997? N Linear feet added:
5-E. Does this system have a program to work or flush hydrants? Y How often? MONTHLY
5-F. Does this system have a valve exercise program? Y How often? QUARTERLY
5-G. Does this system have a cross-connection control program? N
5-H. Has water pressure been inadequate in any part of the system? N
Please Explain:
5-I. Does this system have a leak detection program? Y What type of equipment or methods are used?
Fisher XLT-20
5-3. Has water use ever been restricted since 1992? N
Please Explain:
5-K. Does this system have a water conservation plan? N
5-L. Did this system distribute water conservation information in 1997? N
5-M. Are there any local requirements on plumbing fixture water use which are stricter than the NC State
Building Code? N
Please Explain:
5-N. Does this system have a program to encourage replacement or retrofit of older, higher water-use
plumbing fixtures? N
5-0. Does this system have a water shortage or drought response plan? N
5-P. Is raw water metered? Y
5-Q. Is finished water output metered? Y
5-R. Do you have a meter replacement program? Y
5-S. How many meters were replaced in 1997? 100
5-T. How old are the oldest meters in the system? 5 years
5-1.1. What type of rate structure is used? FLAT RATE
5-V. Are there meters for outdoor water use, such as irrigation, which are not billed for sewer services?
N # of meters
5-W. Does this system use reclaimed water or plan to use it within the next five years? N # of
connections MGD
SECTION 6: SYSTEM MAP (On file with NCDWR)
Part 2: Water Supply Planning Report for 1997
. . . .n . II 1 11 ^-An w nn n1 e r 11 0 11Wnnn
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for AULANDER (04-08-015)
SECTION 7: WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS
7-A. Population to be Served
1997 2000 2010 2020
Year-Round 1,366 1,450 1,500 1,550
Seasonal Not Applicable
Population Note:
7-8. Projected Avg. Daily Service Area Demand (MGD)
1997 2000 2010 2020
(1) Residential 0.141 0.144 0.146 0.148
(2) Commercial 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006
(3) Industrial 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005
(4) Institutional 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
(5) Backwash 0.000 0.000 01000 0.000
(6) Unaccounted-for water 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006
(7) Service Area Demand 0.155 0.159 0.163 0.166
Projected Service Area Demand Note:
Page 4 of 5
7-C. Is non-residential water use expected to change significantly through 2020 from current levels of
use? N
If yes, please explain:
7-D. Future Supplies
Source or Facility Name PWSID Source Type Additional Supply (MGD) Year On-line R or E
Aulander 04-08-015 ground 0.864 R
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
Future Supply Note:
7-E. What is the Total Amount of Future supplies available for Regular Use? 0.864 MGD
7-F. Future Sales Contracts: NONE
SECTION 8: FUTURE WATER SUPPLY NEEDS
8-A. Avg. Daily Demand as Percent of Supply
Available Supply (MGD) 1997 2000 2010 2020
(1) Existing Surface Water Supply 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(2) Existing Ground Water Supply 0.486 0.486 0.486 0.486
(3) Existing Purchase Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(4) Future Supplies 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(5) Total Available Supply 0.486 0.486 0.486 0.486
Avg. Daily Demand (MGD) 1997 2000 2010 2020
(6) Service Area Demand 0.155 0.159 0.163 0.166
(7) Sales Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(8) Future Sales Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(9) Total Avg. Daily Demand 0.155 0.159 0.163 0.166
(10) Demand as Percent of Supply 31.90/a 32.7% 33.5% 34.2%
. .. ... . . . , 11 , 1 )p 7 /i._._ n.Yn AnA nn Ale
c /1 o le's nn n
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for AULANDER (0408-015)
Page 5 of 5
(11) Additional Supply Needed to Maintain 80% (MGD) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
System Notes: Usage of water does not exceed 80% of demand
8-B. Will demand exceed 800/h of available supply before the year 2020? N
8-C. Are peak day demands expected to exceed the water treatment plant capacity by 2010?
If yes, what are your plans for increasing water treatment capacity?
8-D. Does this system have an interconnection with another system capable of providing water in an
emergency? N
If not, what are you plans for interconnecting? No plans for Interconnecting but plans are In effect to have
generators at well sites for emergency use.
8-E. Has this system participated In regional water supply or water use planning? N
If yes, please describe:
8-F. List the major water supply reports or studies used for planning: n/a
SECTION 9. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE NEEDS
Is technical assistance needed:
9-A. to develop a local water supply plan? N
9-B. with a leak detection program? N
9-C. with a demand management or water conservation program? Y
9-D. with a water shortage response plan? Y
9-E. to identify alternative or future water supply sources? Y
9-17. with a capacity development plan? Y
9-G. with a wellhead or source water protection plan? Y
9-H. with water system compliance or operational problems? N
9-I. with Consumer Confidence Reports? N
9-3. Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system
deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.), or your ability to meet present and future
needs:
Financial Problems. The Town of Aulander needs for new storage or more storage to be able to meet the need of future
growth for Aulander from Nucor Steel MITI In Roanoke-Chowan area. The Town will possibly need to dig a new well In the
Future.
Get i992,Local Water Sup& Plar?for HULA iDER
Get DEH-Public Water Supply Section data for AULANDER
Sub .....
. . . . - + I - 1 11 -AAA na n1 f- C/10111r11)A
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for BERTIE CO RWS (04-08-085)
Page 1 of 6
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Web: www.ncwater.org
1997 LOCAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN FOR BERTIE CO RWS
(Information in this LWSP may be corrected or updated at any time by the water system or NCDWR)
Part 1: Water Supply System Report for 1997
SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION
05/18/2004
1-A. Water System: BERTIE CO RWS 1-B. PWS ID#: 04-08-085 Status of 1997 Plan: ADOPTEC
1-C. River Basin Name: ROANOKE RIVER (14-1) , CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
1-D. County: BERTIE
1-E. Contact: RICKY SPIVEY SR Title: WATER DEPT SUPERVISOR/OPERATOR
1-F. Address: PO BOX 487 City: WINDSOR State: NC Zip Code: 27963
1-G. Phone: [phone]-H. Fax: [phone]. E-mail: RKSPIVEYSR@A0LjC_0
1-3. Type of Ownership: COUNTY
SECTION 2: WATER USE INFORMATION
2-A. Population Served in 1997: Year-Round: 6,076
Seasonal: NIA
2-5. Total Water Use for 1997 including all purchased water: 107.280 Million Gallons
2-C. Average Annual Daily Water Use in 1997: 0.294 MGD
2-D. Average Annual Daily Water Use by Type (MGD)
Metered Connections Non-Metered Connections
Type of Use Number Average Use Number Estimated Average Use
(1) Residential 2,392 0.227 0 0.000
(2) Commercial 8 0.004 0 0.000
(3) Industrial 0 0.000 0 0.000
(4) Institutional 4 0.013 0 0.000
(5) Sales to other Systems
(6) Backwash
(7) Subtotal
(8) Avg. Annual Daily Water Use
(9) Unaccounted-for Water
Water Use Note:
Total
Average Use
0.227
0.004
0.000
0.013
0.000
0.000
0.244
0.294
0.050
2-E. Average Daily and Maximum Day Water Use by Month (MGD)
Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day
Use Use Use Use Use Use
Jan 0.227 0.418 May 0.314 0.494 Sep 0.326 0.439
Feb 0.217 0,291 Jun 0.276 0.439 Oct 0.378 0.752
Mar 0.217 0.276 Jul 0.356 0,811 Nov 0,309 0.452
Apr 0.236 0.300 Aug 0.349 0.596 Dec 0,311 0.416
Avg Daily/Max Water Use Note:
2-F. Largest Water Users and their Average Annual Daily Use (MGD)
Water User Average Daily Use
BERTIE HIGH SCHOOL 0.0090
. - . . . - . . .n . n e+ A^A nn nnc GH 0/?1!\!1A
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for BERTIE CO RWS (04-08-085)
LEA LUMBER CO 0.0030
SOUTHWESTERN MIDDLE SCHOOL 0.0030
COLERAIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 0.0010
ADAM LAUNDRYMAT 010010
WILLOUGHBY TRAILER PARK 0.0010
ASKEWVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 0.0010
Largest User Note:
2-G. Water Sales to Other Water Systems
Water Supplied to, Average Daily Amount Contract Amount Pipe Size(s) R

Water System PWSID
MGD
# of Days
MGD Expiration Date
Inches or
E
HARRELLSVILLE 04-46-040 0.000 0 10/14/2016 6 E
POWELLSVILLE 04-08-040 0.000 0 07/11/2015 6 E
WINDSOR 04-08-010 0.000 0 0.500 09/12/2016 6 E
WINDSOR 04-08-010 0.000 0 0.500 11/10/2014 6 E
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
Water Sales Note:
2-H. What Is the Total Amount of Sales Contracts for Regular Use? 0.000 MGD
SECTION 3: WATER SUPPLY SOURCES
3-A. thru 3-C. Surface Water Supplies: NONE
3-D. Water Purchases From Other Water Systems
Water Supplied By: Average Daily Amount Contract Amount R
Pipe Size(s) Inches or
Water System PWSID MGD # of Days MGD Expiration Date E
HARRELLSVILLE 04-46-040 0.000 10/14/2016 6 E
POWELLSVILLE 04-08-040 0.000 07/11/2015 6 E
WINDSOR 04-08-010 0.000 0.500 09/12/2016 6 E
WINDSOR 04-08-010 0.000 0.500 11/10/2014 6 E
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
Water Purchase Note:
3-E. What is the Total Amount of Purchase Contracts available for Regular Use? 0.000 MGD
Page 2 of 6
3-F. Ground Water
Withdrawals
Screen Facility Limiting
Name or Well Casing Depth Well Pump
?
i
t Avg. Daily Max.
Day 12-Hr
S
l Daily Output R
No. of Depth Depth D
h Meter
a. Dep upp
y or
Well (ft-) (ft-) Top Bottom (in.) (ft,) # of (MG) Capacity Type E
(ft.) (ft.) MGD Days MGD MGD
Facility
ASKEWVILLE 345 340 312 345 8 345.0 Y 0.045 283 0.103 0.094 0.094 0 R
5
HARRELL 3B 412 412 228 402 10 402.0 Y 0.055 98 0.140 0.144 0.144 0 R
. .. ... . I • , • 11 1 i ir. .. ..._1. /1 ------ ^17n AAA AO Ane c/1 0 /1)PVXA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for BERTTE CO RWS (04-08-085)
Page 3 of 6
HARRELL 4 409 377 289 399 10 399.0 Y 0.128 193 0.453 0.317 0.317 0 R
HECKSTALL 367 340 322 355 10 355.0 Y 0.092 364 0.537 0.288 0.288 0 R
2
SPIVEY 1 365 340 326 351 10 351,0 Y 0,092 338 0.247 0.288 0.288 0 R
Type of Facility: R = Raw Water Pumps, T = Treatment Facilities, M = Transmission Main, D = Distribution System, O = Other
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
Ground Water Note:
3-G. What is the Total 12-Hour Supply of all wells available for Regular Use? 1.131 Million Gallons
3-H. Are groundwater levels monitored? Y How often? MONTHLY
3-I. Does this system have a wellhead protection program? N
3-3. Water Treatment Plants: NONE
3-K. What is the system's finished water storage capacity? 1.000 Million Gallons
SECTION 4: WASTEWATER INFORMATION
4-A. Average Daily Wastewater Discharges (MGD)
Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily
Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge
Jan Apr Jul Oct
Feb May Aug Nov
Mar Jun Sep Dec
4-B. Wastewater Discharge and/or Land Application Permits: NONE
4-C. Wastewater Discharge Interconnections: NONE
4-D. Number of sewer service connections: 0
4-E. Number of water service connections with septic systems: 2,250
4-F. Are there plans to build or expand wastewater treatment facilities in the next 10 years? N Please
Explain:
SECTION 5: WATER CONSERVATION AND DEMAND MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
5-A. What is the estimated total miles of distribution system lines? 116.00 Miles
5-6. Primary Types and Sizes of Distribution Lines
Asbestos Cement Cast Iron Ductile Iron Galvanized Iron Polyvinyl Chloride Other
(AC) (CI) (DI) (GI) (PVC)
Size Range (inches) 6-8 2-12
% of lines 0 % 0 % 2 % 0 % 98 % 0 %
5-C. Were any lines replaced in 19977 Y Linear feet replaced: 11,000
5-113. Were any new water mains added in 1997? N Linear feet added:
5-E. Does this system have a program to work or flush hydrants? Y How often? MONTHLY
5-F. Does this system have a valve exercise program? Y How often? ANNUAL
5-G. Does this system have a cross-connection control program? N
5-1111. Has water pressure been inadequate in any part of the system? N
Please Explain:
5-I. Does this system have a leak detection program? N What type of equipment or methods are used?
5-J. Has water use ever been restricted since 1992? N
. .- . , ,n 1 ,. .'./".n AAA nn nnC rJi oIrl ArlA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for BERTIE CO RWS (04-08-085) Page 4 of 6
Please Explain:
5-K. Does this system have a water conservation plan? N
5-L. Did this system distribute water conservation information in 1997? N
5-M. Are there any local requirements on plumbing fixture water use which are stricter than the NC State
Building Code? N
Please Explain:
5-N. Does this system have a program to encourage replacement or retrofit of older, higher water-use
plumbing fixtures? Y
5-0. Does this system have a water shortage or drought response plan? N
5-P. Is raw water metered? Y
S-Q. Is finished water output metered? Y
5-R. Do you have a meter replacement program? Y
5-S. How many meters were replaced in 1997? 20
5-T. How old are the oldest meters in the system? 25 years
5-U. What type of rate structure is used? INCREASING BLOCK
5-V. Are there meters for outdoor water use, such as irrigation, which are not billed for sewer services?
N # of meters
5-W. Does this system use reclaimed water or plan to use it within the next five years? N # of
connections MGD
SECTION 6: SYSTEM MAP (On file with NCDWR)
Part 2: Water Supply Planning Report for 1997
SECTION 7: WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS
7-A. Population to be Served
1997 2000 2010 2020
Year-Round 6,076 7,346 8,870 10,644
Seasonal 6,076 7,346 8,870 10,644
Population Note:
7-B. Projected Avg. Daily Service Area Demand (MGD)
1997 2000 2010 2020
(1) Residential 0.227 0.367 0.444 0.532
(2) Commercial 0.004 0.005 0.010 0.015
(3) Industrial 0.000 0.000 0.000 01000
(4) Institutional 0.013 0.015 0.015 0.015
(5) Backwash 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(6) Unaccounted-for water 0.050 0.060 0.070 0.080
(7) Service Area Demand 0.294 0.447 0.539 0.642
Projected Service Area Demand Note:
7-C. Is non-residential water use expected to change significantly through 2020 from current levels of
use? N
If yes, please explain:
7-D. Future Supplies
Source or Facility Name PWSID Source Type Additional Supply (MGD) Year On-line R or E
Well 7b 04-08-085 ground 0.252 1998 R
Well6 04-08-085 ground 0.252 1998 R
Well 8 & 9 04-08-085 ground 0.504 2000 R
. ... - . i. .....+A.,. nn nnr C11 0 1n nnA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for BERTIE CO RWS (04-08.085) Page 5 of 6
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
Future Supply Note:
7-E. What is the Total Amount of Future Supplies available for Regular Use? 1.008 MGD
7-F. Future Sales Contracts: NONE
SECTION 8: FUTURE WATER SUPPLY NEEDS
8-A. Avg. Daily Demand as Percent of Supply
Available Supply (MGD) 1997
(1) Existing Surface Water Supply 0.000
(2) Existing Ground Water Supply 1.131
(3) Existing Purchase Contracts 0.000
(4) Future Supplies 0.000
(b) Total Available Supply 1.131
Avg. Daily Demand (MGD) 1997
(6) Service Area Demand 0.294
(7) Sales Contracts 0.000
(8) Future Sales Contracts 0.000
(9) Total Avg. Daily Demand 0.294
(10) Demand as Percent of Supply 26.0%
(11) Additional Supply Needed to Maintain 80% (MGD) 0.000
2000 2010 2020
0.000 01000 0.000
1.131 1.131 1.131
0.000 0.000 0.000
1.008 1.008 1.008
2.139 2.139 2.139
2000 2010 2020
0.447 0.539 0.642
0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000
0,447 0.539 0.642
21.0% 25.0% 30.0%
0.000 0.000 0.000
System Notes: Population growth Is do to county wide system growth. Per capital water use was 37 gpd pc In 1997.
(50 gpd pc will be used in the future.)
8-B. Will demand exceed 80% of available supply before the year 2020? N
8-C. Are peak day demands expected to exceed the water treatment plant capacity by 2010? N
If yes, what are your plans for Increasing water treatment capacity?
8-D. Does this system have an interconnection with another system capable of providing water in an
emergency? Y
If not, what are you plans for interconnecting?
8-E. Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? Y
If yes, please describe: Bertle has connected with other systems
8-F. List the major water supply reports or studies used for planning: DEH water usages reports,
SECTION 9: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE NEEDS
Is technical assistance needed:
9-A. to develop a local water supply plan? Y
9-8. with a leak detection program? N
9-C. with a demand management or water conservation program? N
9-D. with a water shortage response plan? N
9-E. to identify alternative or future water supply sources? N
9-F. with a capacity development plan? N
9-G. with a wellhead or source water protection plan? N
9-H. with water system compliance or operational problems? N
9-I. with Consumer Confidence Reports? Y
9-3. Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system
deficiencies or needed Improvements (storage, treatment, etc.), or your ability to meet present and future
needs:
Need Flnanclal assistance for water line extension
/.! /AAnA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for BERTIE CO RWS (04-08-085) Page 6 of 6
Get DEH-Public Water Supply Section data for BERI'IE CO RWS
5utimil:
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for COFIELD (04-46-030)
Page 1 of 5
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Web: www.ncwater.org
1997 LOCAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN FOR COFIELD
(Information in this LWSP may be corrected or updated at any time by the water system or NCDWR)
Part 1: Water Supply System Report for 1997
SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION
1-A. Water System: COFIELD 1-B. PWS ID#: 04-46-030
1-C. River Basin Name: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
1-D. County: HERTFORD
1-E. Contact: DEWEY BURKE Title: MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR
1-F. Address: PO SOX 99 City: COFIELD State: NC Zip Code:
1-G. Phone: [phone]-H. Fax: [phone]-I. E-mail:
1-3. Type of Ownership: MUNICIPALITY
05/18/2004
Status of 1997 Plan: COMPLETEC
27922
TOWNOFCOFIELD aQCOASTAL.NET
SECTION 2: WATER USE INFORMATION
2-A. Population Served in 1997: Year-Round: 417
Seasonal: N/A
2-B. Total Water Use for 1997 including all purchased water: 14.510 Million Gallons
2-C. Average Annual Daily Water Use In 1997: 0.040 MGD
2-D. Average Annual Daily Water Use by Type (MGD)
Metered Connections Non-Metered Connections
Type of Use Number Average Use Number Estimated Average Use
(1) Residential 171 0.022 0 0.000
(2) Commercial 4 0.001 0 0.000
(3) Industrial 2 0.001 0 0.000
(4) Institutional 3 0.000 0 0.000
(5) Sales to other Systems
(6) Backwash
(7) Subtotal
(8) Avg. Annual Daily Water Use
(9) Unaccounted-for Water
Water Use Note:
Total
Average Use
0.022
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.024
0.040
0.016
2-E. Average Daily and Maximum Day Water Use by Month (MGD)
Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day
Use Use Use Use Use Use
Jan 0.040 0.047 May 0.041 0.049 Sep 0.041 0.042
Feb 0.041 0.064 Jun 0.040 0.043 Oct 0.038 0.041
Mar 0.040 0,042 Jul 0.041 0.046 Nov 0,040 0.045
Apr 0,039 0.044 Aug 0.042 0.043 Dec 0.037 0,045
Avg Daily/Max Water Use Note:
2-F. Largest Water Users and their Average Annual Daily Use (MGD)
Water User Average Daily Use
PURDUE GARAGE 0.0008
r 11 n inns e
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for CORELD (04-46-030)
WILLIAM INDUSTRIAL 0.0004
SPIVEY'S ENTERPRISES 0.0002
DUCK THRU 0.0002
ST. PAUL HOLINESS CHURCH 010001
Largest User Note:
2-G. thru 2-H. Water Sales to Other Water Systems: NONE
Page 2 of 5
SECTION 3: WATER SUPPLY SOURCES
3-A. thru 3-C. Surface Water Supplies: NONE
3-D. thru 3-E. Water Purchases From Other Water Systems: NONE
3-F. Ground Water
Withdrawals
Screen Facility Limiting
Name Well Casing Depth Well Pump Avg. Daily Max. 12-Hr Daily Output R
No rof Depth Depth Dia. Int
Death Meter? Day Supply or
Well (ft-) (ft-) Top Bottom (in') (ft.) MGD # of MGD (MG) Capacity Tofe E
(ft.) (ft.) Days MGD Facility
001 226 206 206 226 6 147.0 Y 0.021 365 0.045 0.065 0.065 0 R
002 417 397 397 417 6 210.0 Y 0.019 365 0.033 0.072 0.072 O R
Type of Fa cility: R = Raw Wate r Pumps, T = Treatment Facilities, M = Transmission Main, D = Distribution System, 0 = Other
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
Ground Water Note:
3-G. What is the Total 12-Hour Supply of all wells available for Regular Use? 0.137 Million Gallons
3-H. Are ground water levels monitored? N How often?
3-I. Does this system have a wellhead protection program? N
3-3. Water Treatment Plants: NONE
3-K. What is the system's finished water storage capacity? 0.008 Million Gallons
SECTION 4: WASTEWATER INFORMATION
4-A. Average Daily Wastewater Discharges (MGD)
Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily
Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge
Jan Apr Jul Oct
Feb May Aug Nov
Mar Jun Sep Dec
4-B. Wastewater Discharge and/or Land Application Permits: NONE
4-C. Wastewater Discharge Interconnections
Wastewater Wastewater Avg. Daily Amount Discharged or
Discharger Receiver Received Contract Maximum
(MGD)
Name PWSID Name PWSID MGD # of Days
..- . .. 11 . 1 it 1 11 n- A A i nnn f11 [111%AfXA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for COFIELD (04-46-030)
COFIELD 04-46-030 WINTON 04-46-020 0.042 365
Page 3 of 5
0.040
4-D. Number of sewer service connections: 170
4-E. Number of water service connections with septic systems: 10
4-F. Are there plans to build or expand wastewater treatment facilities in the next 10 years? N Please
Explain:
SECTION 5: WATER CONSERVATION AND DEMAND MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
5-A. What is the estimated total miles of distribution system lines? 5.00 Miles
5-B. Primary Types and Sizes of Distribution Lines
Asbestos Cement Cast Iron Ductile Iron Galvanized Iron Polyvinyl Chloride Other
(AC) (CI) (DI) (GI) (PVC)
Size Range (inches) 4 2-4
% of lines 60 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 40 % 0 %
5-C. Were any lines replaced in 1997? N Linear feet replaced:
5-D. Were any new water mains added in 1997? N Linear feet added:
5-E. Does this system have a program to work or flush hydrants? Y How often? QUARTERLY
5-F. Does this system have a valve exercise program? Y How often? QUARTELRY
5-G. Does this system have a cross-connection control program? Y
5-H. Has water pressure been inadequate in any part of the system? N
Please Explain:
5-I. Does this system have a leak detection program? N What type of equipment or methods are used?
5-3. Has water use ever been restricted since 1992? N
Please Explain:
5-K. Does this system have a water conservation plan? N
5-L. Did this system distribute water conservation information in 1997? N
5-M. Are there any local requirements on plumbing fixture water use which are stricter than the NC State
Building Code? N
Please Explain:
5-N. Does this system have a program to encourage replacement or retrofit of older, higher water-use
plumbing fixtures? N
5-0. Does this system have a water shortage or drought response plan? N
5-P. Is raw water metered? Y
S-Q. Is finished water output metered? Y
5-R. Do you have a meter replacement program? Y
5-S. How many meters were replaced in 1997? 80
5-T. How old are the oldest meters in the system? 19 years
5-1.1. What type of rate structure is used? FLAT RATE
5-V. Are there meters for outdoor water use, such as irrigation, which are not billed for sewer services?
N # of meters
5-W. Does this system use reclaimed water or plan to use it within the next five years? N # of
connections MGD
SECTION 6: SYSTEM MAP (On file with NCDWR)
Part 2: Water Supply Planning Report for 1997
SECTION 7: WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS
7-A. Population to be Served
1997 2000 2010 2020
Year-Round
Seasonal
417 427 438 445
Not Applicable
. 11 n--A-. II inn r. /I nvn AAA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for COFIELD (04-46-030)
Population Note:
7-B. Projected Avg. Daily Service Area Demand (MGD)
1997 2000 2010 2020
(1) Residential 0.022 0.024 0.024 0.025
(2) Commercial 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
(3) Industrial 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
(4) Institutional 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(5) Backwash 01000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(6) Unaccounted-for water 0.016 0.017 0.017 0.018
(7) Service Area Demand 0.040 0.043 0.043 0.044
Projected Service Area Demand Note:
Page 4 of 5
7-C. is non-residential water use expected to change significantly through 2020 from current levels of
use? N
If yes, please explain:
7-D. Future Supplies: NONE
7-F. Future Sales Contracts: NONE
SECTION 8: FUTURE WATER SUPPLY NEEDS
8-A. Avg. Daily Demand as Percent of Supply
Available Supply (MGD) 1997 2000 2010 2020
(1) Existing Surface Water Supply 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(2) Existing Ground Water Supply 0.137 0.137 0.137 0.137
(3) Existing Purchase Contracts 0.000 0.000 01000 0.000
(4) Future Supplies 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(5) Total Available Supply 0.137 0.137 0.137 0.137
Avg. Daily Demand (MGD) 1997 2000 2010 2020
(6) Service Area Demand 0.040 0.043 0.043 0.043
(7) Sales Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(8) Future Sales Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 01000
(9) Total Avg. Daily Demand 0.040 0.043 0.043 0.044
(10) Demand as Percent of Supply 29.0% 31.0% 32.0% 32.0%
(11) Additional Supply Needed to Maintain 80% (MGD) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
System Notes:
8-B. Will demand exceed 800/a of available supply before the year 2020? N
8-C. Are peak day demands expected to exceed the water treatment plant capacity by 2010? N
If yes, what are your plans for increasing water treatment capacity?
8-D. Does this system have an interconnection with another system capable of providing water in an
emergency? N
If not, what are you plans for interconnecting? NOT NECESSARY - YIELD SUFFICIENT FOR FUTURE DEMAND
8-E. Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? N
If yes, please describe:
8-F. List the major water supply reports or studies used for planning: 92 LWSP, DEH monthly usage reports,
monthly sewer billing reports, water billing reports
, i, n In n n A
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for COMELD (04-46-030) Page 5 of 5
SECTION 9: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE NEEDS
Is technical assistance needed:
9-A. to develop a local water supply plan? Y
9-13. with a leak detection program? Y
9-C. with a demand management or water conservation program? N
9-D. with a water shortage response plan? N
9-E. to identify alternative or future water supply sources? N
9-F. with a capacity development plan? N
9-G. with a wellhead or source water protection plan? N
9-H. with water system compliance or operational problems? N
9-I. with Consumer Confidence Reports? N
9-3. Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system
deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.), or your ability to meet present and future
needs:
Considering an elevated storage tank and replacing 2-inch water lines with 6-Inch lines. Cofield had to lower Intake In
well one.
Get 1992 Local Water Supply Plan for COFIELD
Get DEH-Public Water Supply Section data for COFIELD
?5ubmlt
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for POWELLSVILLE (04-08-040)
Pagel of 5
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Web: www.ncwater.org
1997 LOCAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN FOR POWELLSVILLE
(Information In this LWSP may be corrected or updated at any time by the water system or NCDWR)
Part 1: Water Supply System Report for 1997
SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION
05/18/2004
1-A. Water System: POWELLSVILLE 1-8. PWS ID#: 04-08-040 Status of 1997 Plan: ADOPTEE
1-C. River Basin Name: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
1-D. County: BER-RE
1-E. Contact: HELEN CAMPBELL Title: TOWN CLERK
1-F. Address: PO BOX 22 City: POWELLSVILLE State: NC Zip Code: 27967
1-G. Phone: [phone]-H. Fax: [phone]-I. E-mail: OP WELSV@ALBEMARLE,CO-K
1-3. Type of Ownership: MUNICIPALITY
SECTION 2: WATER USE INFORMATION
2-A. Population Served in 1997: Year-Round: 672
Seasonal: N/A
2-B. Total Water Use for 1997 including all purchased water: 24.090 Million Gallons
2-C. Average Annual Daily Water Use in 1997: 0.066 MGD
2-D. Average Annual Daily Water Use by Type (MGD)
Metered Connections Non-Metered Connections
Type of Use Number Average Use Number Estimated Average Use
(1) Residential 255 0.042 0 0.000
(2) Commercial 1 0.001 0 0.000
(3) Industrial 0 0.000 0 0.000
(4) Institutional 1 0.002 0 0.000
(5) Sales to other Systems
(6) Backwash
(7) Subtotal
(8) Avg. Annual Daily Water Use
(9) Unaccounted-for Water
Water Use Note:
Total
Average Use
0.042
0.001
0.000
0.002
0.000
0.000
0.045
0.066
0.021
2-E. Average Daily and Maximum Day Water Use by Month (MGD)
Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day
Use Use Use Use Use Use
Jan 0.044 May 0.047 Sep 0.050
Feb 0.044 Jun 0.046 Oct 0.046
Mar 0.046 Jul 0.047 Nov 0.041
Apr 0.047 Aug 0.048 Dec 0.040
Avg Daily/Max Water Use Note:
2-F. Largest Water Users and their Average Annual Daily Use (MGD)
Water User Average Daily Use
C J WHITE MIDDLE SCHOOL 0.0020
,. ,,, -?- -- --- nQ nnn V1 Qi')nf)A
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for POWELLSVILLE (04-08-040)
RED APPLE MARKET
Largest User Note:
0.0010
2-6. thru 2-H. Water Sales to Other Water Systems: NONE
SECTION 3: WATER SUPPLY SOURCES
3-A. thru 3-C. Surface Water Supplies: NONE
3-D. thru 3-E. Water Purchases From Other Water Systems: NONE
3-F. Ground Water
Page 2 of 5
Withdrawals
Facility Limiting
Name Well Casing Screen
Depth Well Pump
Intake Avg. Daily Max.
Day 12-Hr Daily Output R
or Depth Depth
No. O
f Dia.
h Meter? Supply
(MG)
T
e or
E
(ft.) (ft-)
Well (in.) (ft.)
Top Bottom MGD # of MGD Capacity
of
(ft.) (ft,) Days MGD Facility
1 400 125 125 270 6 Y 0.033 366 0.072 0.072 0.072 0 R
2 400 125 125 270 6 Y 0.033 366 0.072 0.072 0.072 0 R
Type of Facility: R = Raw Wate r Pumps. T = Treatment Facllilles, M =Transmission Main, D = Distribution System, 0 = Other
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
Ground Water Note:
3-G. What is the Total 12-Hour Supply of all wells available for Regular Use? 0.144 Million Gallons
3-H. Are groundwater levels monitored? N How often?
34. Does this system have a wellhead protection program? Y
3-3. Water Treatment Plants: NONE
3-K. What is the system's finished water storage capacity? 0.000 Million Gallons
SECTION 4: WASTEWATER INFORMATION
4-A. Average Daily Wastewater Discharges (MGD)
Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily
Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge
Jan Apr Jul Oct
Feb May Aug Nov
Mar Jun Sep Dec
4-B. Wastewater Discharge and/or Land Application Permits: NONE
4-C. Wastewater Discharge Interconnections: NONE
4-D. Number of sewer service connections: 0
4-E. Number of water service connections with septic systems: 257
4-F. Are there plans to build or expand wastewater treatment facilities in the next 10 years? N Please
E=xplain:
, . , „ ^"4 AnA nn ^An c/toinnr%A
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for POWELLSVILLE (04-08--040) Page 3 of 5
SECTION S. WATER CONSERVATION AND DEMAND MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
5-A. What Is the estimated total miles of distribution system lines? 7.00 Miles
5-B. Primary Types and Sizes of Distribution Lines
Asbestos Cement Cast Iron Ductile Iron Galvanized Iron Polyvinyl Chloride Other
(AC) (CI) (DI) (GI) (PVC)
Size Range (inches) 6
% of lines 0 % 0 0 % 0 % 100 % 0 %
5-C. Were any lines replaced in 1997? N Linear feet replaced:
5-D. Were any new water mains added in 1997? N Linear feet added.
5-E. Does this system have a program to work or flush hydrants? Y How often? MONTHLY
5-F. Does this system have a valve exercise program? N How often?
5-G. Does this system have a cross-connection control program? N
5-H. Has water pressure been inadequate in any part of the system? N
Please Explain:
5-I. Does this system have a leak detection program? Y What type of equipment or methods are used?
5-3. Has water use ever been restricted since 1992? N
Please Explain:
5-K. Does this system have a water conservation plan? N
5-L. Did this system distribute water conservation information in 1997? N
5-M. Are there any local requirements on plumbing fixture water use which are stricter than the NC State
Building Code? N
Please Explain:
5-N. Does this system have a program to encourage replacement or retrofit of older, higher water-use
plumbing fixtures? N
5-0. Does this system have a water shortage or drought response plan? N
5-P. Is raw water metered? N
5-Q. Is finished water output metered? N
5-11. Do you have a meter replacement program? N
5-S. How many meters were replaced in 1997? 2
5-T. How old are the oldest meters in the system? years
5-U. What type of rate structure is used? FIAT RATE
5-V. Are there meters for outdoor water use, such as irrigation, which are not billed for sewer services?
N # of meters
5-W. Does this system use reclaimed water or plan to use it within the next five years? N # of
connections MGD
SECTION 6: SYSTEM MAP (On file with NCDWR)
Part 2: Water Supply Planning Report for 1997
SECTION 7: WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS
7-A. Population to be Served
1997 2000 2010 2020
Year-Round 672 656 634 611
Seasonal Nat Applicable
Population Note:
7-B. Projected Avg. Daily Service Area Demand (MGD)
1997 2000 2010 2020
(1) Residential 0.042 0.041 0.040 0.038
(2) Commercial 01001 0.001 0.001 0.001
. 11 1 1 11 1 11 nnn LnA nn ^An c11 n1,iAAA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for POWELLSVILLE (04-08-040) Page 4 of 5
(3) Industrial 0.000 01000 0.000 0.000
(4) Institutional 01002 0.002 0.002 0.002
(5) Backwash 01000 0.000 01000 0.000
(6) Unaccounted-for water 0.021 0.020 0.020 0.020
(7) Service Area Demand 0.066 0.064 0.063 0.061
Projected Service Area Demand Note:
7-C. Is non-residential water use expected to change significantly through 2020 from current levels of
use? N
If yes, please explain:
7-D. Future Supplies: NONE
7-F. Future Sales Contracts: NONE
SECTION 8: FUTURE WATER SUPPLY NEEDS
8-A. Avg. Daily Demand as Percent of Supply
Available Supply (MGD) 1997 2000 2010 2020
(1) Existing Surface Water Supply 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(2) Existing Ground Water Supply 0,144 0.144 0.144 0.144
(3) Existing Purchase Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(4) Future Supplies 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(5) Total Available Supply 0.144 0.144 0.144 0.144
Avg. Daily Demand (MGD) 1997 2000 2010 2020
(6) Service Area Demand 0.065 0.064 0.063 0.061
(7) Sales Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(8) Future Sales Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(9) Total Avg. Daily Demand 0.065 0.064 0.063 0.061
(10) Demand as Percent of Supply 45.1% 44.4% 43.6% 42.4%
(11) Additional Supply Needed to Maintain 80% (MGD) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
System Notes:
8-B. Will demand exceed 80% of available supply before the year 2020? N
8-C. Are peak day demands expected to exceed the water treatment plant capacity by 2010?
If yes, what are your plans for increasing water treatment capacity?
8-D. Does this system have an interconnection with another system capable of providing water in an
emergency? N
If not, what are you plans for interconnecting?
8-E. Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? N
If yes, please describe:
8-F. List the major water supply reports or studies used for planning: N/A
SECTION 9: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE NEEDS
Is technical assistance needed:
9-A. to develop a local water supply plan? Y
9-0. with a leak detection program? Y
9-C. with a demand management or water conservation program? N
9-D. with a water shortage response plan? N
9-E. to identify alternative or future water supply sources? N
r 11 n ?nnn n
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for POWELLSVILLE (04-08-040) Page 5 of 5
9-F. with a capacity development plan? N
9-G. with a wellhead or source water protection plan? N
9-W. with water system compliance or operational problems? N
9-I. with Consumer Confidence Reports? N
9-3. Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system
deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.), or your ability to meet present and future
needs:
Get 1992 Local Water ply Plan for POWELLSVILLE
Get DEN-Public Water Supply Section data for POWELLSVILLE
. . .- , I- . r. .+....-. -- -.n Z' 11 ri lfl INAA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for WINTON (04-46-020)
Page 1 of 5
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Web: www,ncwater.org
1997 LOCAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN FOR WINTON
(Information in this LWSP may be corrected or updated at any time by the water system or NCDWR)
Part 1: Water Supply System Report for 1997
SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION
05/18/2004
1-A. Water System: WINTON 1-B. PWS ID#: 04-46-020 Status of 1997 Plan: ADOPTED
1-C. River Basin Name: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
1-D. County: HERTFORD
1-E. Contact: BOBBY DARDEN Title: TOWN ADMINISTRATOR
1-F. Address: PO BOX 134 City: WINTON State: NC Zip Code: 27986
1-G. Phone: [phone]-H. Fax: [phone]-I. E-mail: town haalE winto0jLc.com
1-1. Type of Ownership: MUNICIPALITY
SECTION 2: WATER USE INFORMATION
2-A. Population Served in 1997: Year-Round: 822
Seasonal: N/A
2-8. Total Water Use for 1997 including all purchased water: 67.630 Million Gallons
2-C. Average Annual Daily Water Use in 1997: 0.185 MGD
2-D. Average Annual Daily Water Use by Type (MGD)
Metered Connections Non-Metered Connections
Type of Use Number Average Use Number Estimated Average Use
(1) Residential 406 0.109 0 01000
(2) Commercial 14 0.006 0 0.000
(3) Industrial 11 0.026 0 0.000
(4) Institutional 33 0.018 4 0.001
(5) Sales to other Systems
(6) Backwash
(7) Subtotal
(8) Avg. Annual Daily Water Use
(9) Unaccounted-for Water
Water Use Note:
Total
Average Use
0.109
0.006
0.026
0.019
0.000
0.000
0.160
0.185
0.025
2-E. Average Daily and Maximum Day Water Use by Month (MGD)
Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day
Use Use Use Use Use Use
Jan 0.133 0.205 May 0.139 0.196 Sep 0.132 0.164
Feb 0.139 0,157 Jun 0.145 0.176 Oct 0.137 0.203
Mar 0.384 0.760 Jul 0.155 0.200 Nov 0.128 0,179
Apr 0.462 0.710 Aug 0.146 0.255 Dec 0.125 0.175
Avg Daily/Max Water Use Note:
2-F. Largest Water Users and their Average Annual Daily Use (MGD)
Water User Average Daily Use
EASCO ALUMINUM CORP 0.0259
... 11 + , tr ill ....r%17MAr%A Ar nnn C/101nnAA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for WINTON (04-46-020) Page 2 of 5
HERTFORD CO 0.0094
ELK'S NATIONAL SHRINE 0.0057
TOWN & COLLEGE CLEANERS 0.0022
C S BROWN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 0.0017
RED APPLE MARKET 0.0013
S & D TOURS 0.0011
METHODIST HOME FOR BOYS 0.0006
SYLVIA HALL HOME FOR ADULTS 0.0006
Largest User Note:
2-G. thru 2-H. Water Sales to Other Water Systems: NONE
SECTION 3: WATER SUPPLY SOURCES
3-A. thru 3-C. Surface Water Supplies: NONE
3-D. thru 3-E. Water Purchases From Other Water Systems: NONE
3-F. Ground Water
Withdrawals
Facility Limiting
Name Well Casing Screen
Depth Well Pump
a Avg. Daily Max.
Day 12-Hr Daily Output R
or
Depth
of
Depth
Dia. De
th
Meter?
Supply
(MG)

pe
T
or
E
(ft-)
We (ft.) Top Bottom (in.) (ft) MGD # of MGD Capacity o
(ft.) (ft.) Days MGD Facility
1 374 21 354 374 8 62.0 Y 0.030 340 0.213 0.310 0.310 0 R
2 398 197 340 354 10 59.0 Y 0.086 336 0.710 0.403 0.403 0 R
3 415 395 395 415 10 62.0 Y 0.065 337 0.760 0.432 0,432 0 R
Type of Facility: R = Raw Water Pumps, T = Treatment Facilities, M = Transmission Main, ? = Distribution System, O = Other
R = Regular Use, E = Emergen cy Use
Ground Water Note:
3-G. What is the Total 12-Hour Supply of all wells available for Regular Use? 1.145 Million Gallons
3-1-1. Are groundwater levels monitored? N How often?
3-I. Does this system have a wellhead protection program? U
3-3. Water Treatment Plants: NONE
3-K. What is the system's finished water storage capacity? 0.200 Million Gallons
SECTION 4: WASTEWATER INFORMATION
Average Daily
Discharge
Jan 0.266
Feb 0.258
Mar 0.276
4-A. Average Daily W
Average Daily
Discharge
Apr 0.259
May 0.284
Jun 0.282
astewater Discharges (MGD)
Average Daily
Discharge
Jul 0.266 Oct
Aug 0,267 Nov
Sep 0.253 Dec
Average Daily
Discharge
0.270
0.263
0.249
. - , I ,r 1 11 .-.n/YnAnA A/_ nnn
C11 O11)nnA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for WINTON (04-46-020) Page 3 of 5
4-B. Wastewater Discharge and/or Land Application Permits
NPDES or Permitted Design Avg. Annual Nameof
Land Capacity Daily
Receiving
Capacity
Sub-Basin
Application D Discharge Stream
ec. 31, 1997 (MGD)
Permit Number (MGD) (MGD)
LAND MEHERRIN RIVER (04-
WQ0001602 0.235 0.235 0.266
APPLICATION 2)
Wastewater Note:
4-C. Wastewater Discharge Interconnections
Wastewater Wastewater Avg. Daily Amount Discharged or
Contract Maximum
Discharger Receiver Received (MGD)
Name PWSID Name PWSID MGD # of Days
COFIELD 04-46-030 WINTON 04-46-020 0.042 365 0.040
4-D. Number of sewer service connections: 418
4-E. Number of water service connections with septic systems: 53
4-F. Are there plans to build or expand wastewater treatment facilities in the next 10 years? Y Please
Explain: The Town will expand WWTP In next 2 years If Hertford Co receives bid for private federal prison; If not,
WWTP will be expanded to accommodate future growth In users (industrial and residential).
SECTION 5: WATER CONSERVATION AND DEMAND MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
5-A. What is the estimated total miles of distribution system lines? 12.00 Miles
5-B. Primary Types and Sizes of Distribution Lines
Asbestos Cement Cast Iron Ductile Iron Galvanized Iron Polyvinyl Chloride Other
(AC) (CI) (ICI) (GI) (PVC)
Size Range (inches) 6 .75 6
% of lines 40 % 0 % 0 % 15 % 45 % 0 %
5-C. Were any lines replaced in 1997? N Linear feet replaced:
5-D. Were any new water mains added in 1997? N Linear feet added:
5-E. Does this system have a program to work or flush hydrants? Y How often? SEMI-ANNUAL
5-F. Does this system have a valve exercise program? N How often?
5-G. Does this system have a cross-connection control program? N
5-H. Has water pressure been inadequate in any part of the system? N
Please Explain:
5-I. Does this system have a leak detection program? N What type of equipment or methods are used?
5-3. Has water use ever been restricted since 1992? N
Please Explain:
S-K. Does this system have a water conservation plan? N
5-L. Did this system distribute water conservation information in 1997? N
5-M. Are there any local requirements on plumbing fixture water use which are stricter than the NC State
Building Code? N
Please Explain:
5-N. Does this system have a program to encourage replacement or retrofit of older, higher water-use
plumbing fixtures? N
5-0. Does this system have a water shortage or drought response plan? N
5-P. Is raw water metered? N
5-Q. Is finished water output metered? Y
5-R. Do you have a meter replacement program? N
5-S. How many meters were replaced in 1997? 35
5-T. How old are the oldest meters in the system? 25 years
5-U. What type of rate structure is used? DECREASING BLOCK
5-V. Are there meters for outdoor water use, such as irrigation, which are not billed for sewer services?
Y # of meters 2
.. .n . , 11 n.^AAA Ai nnn c/IolnnnA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for WINTON (04-46-020)
5-W. Does this system use reclaimed water or plan to use it within the next five years? N * of
connections MGD
SECTION 6: SYSTEM MAP (On file with NCDWR)
Part 2: Water Supply Planning Report for 1997
SECTION 7: WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS
7-A. Population to be Served
1997 2000 2010 2020
Year-Round 822 797 781 762
Seasonal Not Applicable
Population Note:
7-13. Projected Avg. Daily Service Area Demand (MGD)
1997 2000 2010 2020
(1) Residential 0.109 0.106 0.104 0.101
(2) Commercial 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006
(3) Industrial 0.026 0.027 0.032 0.037
(4) Institutional 0.019 0.019 01019 0.019
(5) Backwash 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(6) Unaccounted-for water 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
(7) Service Area Demand 0.185 0.1B3 0.186 0.188
Projected Service Area Demand Note:
Page 4 of 5
7-C. Is non-residential water use expected to change significantly through 2020 from current levels of
use? N
If yes, please explain:
7-D. Future Supplies: NONE
7-F. Future Sales Contracts: NONE
SECTION 8: FUTURE WATER SUPPLY NEEDS
8-A. Avg. Daily Demand as Percent of Supply
Available Supply (MGD) 1997
(1) Existing Surface Water Supply 0.000
(2) Existing Ground Water Supply 1.145
(3) Existing Purchase Contracts 0.000
(4) Future Supplies 0.000
(5) Total Available Supply 1.145
Avg. Daily Demand (MGD) 1997
(6) Service Area Demand 0.185
(7) Sales Contracts 0.000
(8) Future Sales Contracts 0.000
2000 2010 2020
0.000 0.000 0.000
1.145 1,145 1.145
0,000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000
1.145 1.145 1.145
2000 2010 2020
0.183 0.186 0.188
0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0,000

1997 Local Water Supply Plan for WINTON (04-46-020)
(9) Total Avg. Daily Demand
(10) Demand as Percent of Supply
(11) Additional Supply Needed to Maintain 800/o (MGD)
System Notes:
Page 5 of 5
0.185 0.183 0.166 0.188
16.0% 16.0% 16.0% 16.0%
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
8-13. Will demand exceed 80% of available supply before the year 2020? N
8-C. Are peak day demands expected to exceed the water treatment plant capacity by 2010?
If yes, what are your plans for Increasing water treatment capacity?
8-D. Does this system have an interconnection with another system capable of providing water In an
emergency? N
If not, what are you plans for interconnecting? There are plans to extend the Town's water lines as part of an
USDA funded project. If Hertford Co extends their water system as planned, the Town of Winton's system can become
interconnected with
8-E. Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? N
If yes, please describe:
8-F. List the major water supply reports or studies used for planning: Water Usage Reports, Water Billing
Reports
SECTION 9: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE NEEDS
Is technical assistance needed:
9-A. to develop a local water supply plan? N
9-13. with a leak detection program? Y
9-C. with a demand management or water conservation program? N
9-D. with a water shortage response plan? N
9-E. to identify alternative or future water supply sources? N
9-F. with a capacity development plan? N
9-G. with a wellhead or source water protection plan? Y
9-H. with water system compliance or operational problems? N
9-I. with Consumer Confidence Reports? N
9-3. Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system
deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.), or your ability to meet present and future
needs:
Future needs of the Winton WS Included replacing old water meters and cutoff valves. The Town also may need to
accommodate future Industries that can potentially spin-off from the recently announced steel mill locating close to
Winton. The Town of Winton now has three certified water system operators to manage the system.
Get 1992 Local Water Suppy?lan -for WII TON
Get DEH-Public Water Supply Section data for WINTON
. • II . • .n , H Ann AnA A/ A^f% C110Pl AnA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for RICH SQUARE (04-66-020)
Page 1 of 5
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Web: www.ncwater.org
1997 LOCAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN FOR RICH SQUARE
(Information in this LWSP may be corrected or updated at any time by the water system or NCDWR)
Part 1: Water Supply System Report for 1997
SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION
05/18/2004
1-A. Water System: RICH SQUARE 1-B. PWS ID#: 04-66-020 Status of 1997 Plan. COMPLETES
1-C. River Basin Name: ROANOKE RIVER (14-1) , MEHERRIN RIVER (04-2), CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
1-D. County: NORTHAMPTON
1-E. Contact: FRANCES FUTRELL Title: CLERK
1-F. Address: PO BOX 336 City: RICH SQUARE State: NC Zip Code: 27869
1-G. Phone: [phone]-H. Fax: [phone]-I. E-mail: N/A
1-3. Type of Ownership: MUNICIPALnY
SECTION 2: WATER USE INFORMATION
2-A. Population Served in 1997: Year-Round: 1,050
Seasonal: N/A
2-B. Total Water Use for 1997 including all purchased water: 52.070 Million Gallons
2-C. Average Annual Daily Water Use in 1997: 0.142 MGD
2-D. Average Annual Daily Water Use by Type (MGD)
Metered Connections Non-Metered Connections
Type of Use Number Average Use Number Estimated Average Use
(1) Residential 434 0.100 0 0.000
(2) Commercial 25 0.002 0 0.000
(3) Industrial 1 0.001 0 0.000
(4) Institutional 1 0.010 0 0.000
(5) Sales to other Systems
(6) Backwash
(7) Subtotal
(a) Avg. Annual Daily Water Use
(9) Unaccounted-for Water
Water Use Note:
Total
Average Use
0.100
0.002
0.001
0.010
0.027
0.000
0.140
0.142
0.002
2-E. Average Daily and Maximum Day Water Use by Month (MGD)
Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day
Use Use Use Use Use Use
Jan 0.128 0.129 May 0.128 0.129 Sep 0.173 0.175
Feb 0.146 0.148 Jun 0.133 0.134 Oct 0.133 0.134
Mar 0.126 0.127 Jul 0.132 0.133 Nov 0.167 0.169
Apr 0,127 0.128 Aug 0.130 0.130 Dec 0.170 0.172
Avg Daily/Max Water Use Note:
2-F. Largest Water Users and their Average Annual Daily Use (MGD)
Water User Average Daily Use
NORTHAMPTON CO-RICH SQUARE 0.0270
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for RICH SQUARE (04-66-020) Page 2 of 5
ROANOKE VALLEY NURSING HOME 0.0100
MYLCRAFT MFG. 0.0010
Largest User Note:
2-G. Water Sales to Other Water Systems
Water Supplied to: Average Daily Amount Contract Amount Pipe Size(s) R
or
Water System PW5ID MGD # of Days MGD Expiration Date Inches E
NORTHAMPTON CO - RICH SQUARE 04-66-055 0.027 365 11/01/1998 6 & 8 R
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
Water Sales Note: RICH SQUARE AS OF 11/1/1998 NORTHAMPTON COUNTY WILL NOT BE PURCHASING WATER
FROM THE TOWN.
2-H. What is the Total Amount of Sales Contracts for Regular Use? 0.027 MGD
SECTION 3: WATER SUPPLY SOURCES
3-A. thru 3-C. Surface Water Supplies: NONE
3-0. thru 3-E. Water Purchases From Other Water Systems: NONE
3-F. Ground Water
Withdrawals
Screen Facility Limiting
Name Well Casing Depth Well Pump Avg. Daily Max. 12-Hr Daily Output
n a
Day R
pth Meter?
Supply
Na raf Depth Depth Dia.
Ty
e
MG or
E
o f
) Capacity
Well (ft-) (ft-) Top Bottom (in.) (ft.} MGD # of MGD (
(ft.) {ft.} Days MGD Facility
1 300 N 0.071 346 0.002 0.012 0.120 0 R
2 300 200 209 293 N 0.075 365 0.002 0.012 0.120 O R
Type of Facility: R = Raw Water Pumps, T = Treatment Facilities, M = Transmission Main, D = Distribution System, O = Other
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
Ground Water Note: CASING, SCREEN AND PUMP INTAKE DEPTHS ARE UNKNOWN. WELL DIAMETER ARE ALSO
UNKNOWN. AVERAGE DAILY WITHDRAWALS WERE ESTIMATED. FACILITY LIMITING DAILY OUTPUT IS 12 HOUR
SUPPLY.
3-G. What is the Total 12-Hour Supply of all wells available for Regular Use? 0.240 Million Gallons
3-H. Are ground water levels monitored? Y How often? BY STATE
3-I. Does this system have a wellhead protection program? Y
3-3. Water Treatment Plants: NONE
3-K. What is the system's finished water storage capacity? 0.200 Million Gallons
SECTION 4: WASTEWATER INFORMATION
4-A. Average Daily Wastewater Discharges (MGD)
Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily
Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge
Jan 0.030 Apr 0.080 Jul 0.060 Oct 0.070
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for RICH SQUARE (04-66-020)
Feb 0.070 May 0.050 Aug 0.080 Nov
Mar 0.090 Jun 0.080 Sep 0.090 Dec
4-13. Wastewater Discharge and/or land Application Permits
NPDES or Permitted
Design Avg. Annual
Name
Land Capacity Capacity Daily
Receiving
n
Application Dec. 31, 1997 (MGD) Discharge
Stream
Permit Number (MGD) (MGD)
NCO025437 0.150
Wastewater Note:
4-C. Wastewater Discharge Interconnections: NONE
Page 3 of 5
0.080
0.080
Sub-Basin
0.070 BRIDGERS CREEK ROANOKE RIVER (14-
1)
4-D. Number of sewer service connections: 461
4-E. Number of water service connections with septic systems: 0
4-F. Are there plans to build or expand wastewater treatment facilities in the next 10 years? N Please
Explain:
SECTION 5: WATER CONSERVATION AND DEMAND MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
S-A. What is the estimated total miles of distribution system lines? 10.00 Miles
Size Range (inches)
of lines
5-8. Primary Types and Sizes of Distribution Lines
Asbestos Cement Cast Iron Ductile Iron Galvanized Iron Polyvinyl Chloride Other
(AC) (CI) (DI) (GI) (PVC)
4-6 6 4-12
45 % 25 % 0 % 0 % 30 % 0 %
5-C. Were any lines replaced in 1997? N Linear feet replaced:
5-D. Were any new water mains added in 1997? Y Linear feet added: 2,650
5-E. Does this system have a program to work or flush hydrants? Y How often? QUARTERLY
5-F. Does this system have a valve exercise program? N How often?
5-G. Does this system have a cross-connection control program? N
5-H. Has water pressure been inadequate in any part of the system? N
Please Explain:
5-I. Does this system have a leak detection program? N What type of equipment or methods are used?
5-3. Has water use ever been restricted since 1992? N
Please Explain:
5-K. Does this system have a water conservation plan? N
5-L. Did this system distribute water conservation information in 1997?
5-M. Are there any local requirements on plumbing fixture water use which are stricter than the NC State
Building Code? N
Please Explain:
5-N. Does this system have a program to encourage replacement or retrofit of older, higher water-use
plumbing fixtures? N
5-0. Does this system have a water shortage or drought response plan? N
5-P. Is raw water metered? N
5-Q. Is finished water output metered?
5-R. Do you have a meter replacement program? N
5-S. How many meters were replaced in 1997?
5-T. How old are the oldest meters In the system? years
5-Il. What type of rate structure is used? DECREASING BLOCK
5-V. Are there meters for outdoor water use, such as irrigation, which are not billed for sewer services?
N # of meters
S-W. Does this system use reclaimed water or plan to use it within the next five years? N # of
connections MGD
rl+nlnnnA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for RICH SQUARE (04-66-020)
Page 4 of S
SECTION 6: SYSTEM MAP (On file with NCDWR)
Part 2: Water Supply Planning Report for 1997
SECTION 7: WATER DEMAND PR03ECTIONS
7-A. Population to be Served
1997 2000 2010 2020
Year-Round 1,050 1,000 950 900
Seasonal Not Applicable
Population Note:
7-B. Projected Avg. Daily Service Area Demand (MGD)
1997 2000 2010 2020
(1) Residential 0.100 0.090 0.080 0.070
(2) Commercial 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
(3) Industrial 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
(4) Institutional 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010
(5) Backwash 01000 0.000 01000 0.000
(6) Unaccounted-for water 0.002 0.000 01000 0.000
(7) Service Area Demand 0.115 0.103 0.093 0.083
Projected Service Area Demand Note:
7-C. Is non-residential water use expected to change significantly through 2020 from current levels of
use? N
If yes, please explain:
7-D. Future Supplies: NONE
7-F. Future Sales Contracts: NONE
SECTION 8: FUTURE WATER SUPPLY NEEDS
8-A. Avg. Daily Demand as Percent of Supply
Available Supply (MGD) 1997 2000 2010 2020
(1) Existing Surface Water Supply 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(2) Existing Ground Water Supply 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240
(3) Existing Purchase Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 01000
(4) Future Supplies 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(S) Total Available Supply 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240
Avg. Daily Demand (MGD) 1997 2000 2010 2020
(6) Service Area Demand 0.115 0.103 0.093 0.083
(7) Sales Contracts 0.027 0.000 0.000 0.000
(8) Future Sales Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 01000
(9) Total Avg. Daily Demand 0.142 0.103 0.093 0.083
(10) Demand as Percent of Supply 59.0% 43.0% 39.0% 35.0%
(11) Additional Supply Needed to Maintain 80% (MGD) 0.000 01000 0.000 0.000
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for RICH SQUARE (04-66-020) Page 5 of 5
System Notes: FUTURE SALES CONTRACTS WE WILL NOT BE SELLING WATERTO NORTHAMPTON COUNTY AFTER
11/1/1998.
8-13. Will demand exceed 80% of available supply before the year 2020? N
8-C. Are peak day demands expected to exceed the water treatment plant capacity by 2010? N
If yes, what are your plans for increasing water treatment capacity?
8-D. Does this system have an interconnection with another system capable of providing water in an
emergency? Y
If not, what are you plans for interconnecting?
8-E. Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? N
If yes, please describe:
8-F. List the major water supply reports or studies used for planning:
SECTION 9: TECHNICAL. ASSISTANCE NEEDS
Is technical assistance needed:
9-A. to develop a local water supply plan? N
9-13. with a leak detection program? N
9-C. with a demand management or water conservation program? N
9-D. with a water shortage response plan? N
9-E. to identify alternative or future water supply sources? N
9-F. with a capacity development plan? N
9-G. with a wellhead or source water protection plan? N
9-H. with water system compliance or operational problems? N
9-I. with Consumer Confidence Reports? N
9-3. Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system
deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.), or your ability to meet present and future
needs:
The Town will not be selling water to Northampton County which is our largest customers as of 11-1-98
Get 1992 Local Water Sappy Plan for R-M SQUARE
Get DEH-Public Water Supply Section data for RICH SQUARE
rSubmif
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for HERTFORD CO (04-46-045)
Page 1 of 5
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Web: www.ncwater.org
1997 LOCAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN FOR HERTFORD CO
(Information in this LWSP may be corrected or updated at any time by the water system or NCDWR)
Part 1: Water Supply System Report for 1997
SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION
05/18/2004
1-A. Water System: HERTFORD CO i-B. PWS ID#: 04-46-045 Status of 1997 Plan: COMPLETEC
1-C. River Basin Name: MEHERRIN RIVER (04-2), CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
1-D. County: HERTFORD
1-E. Contact: DOUG BRINKLEY Title: RURAL PUBLIC WORKS MGR.
1-F. Address: PO BOX 116 City: WINTON State: NC Zip Code: 27986
1-G. Phone: [phone]-H. Fax: [phone]-I. E-mail: N/A
1-3. Type of Ownership: COUNTY
SECTION 2: WATER USE INFORMATION
2-A. Population Served in 1997: Year-Round: 650
Seasonal: N/A
2-B. Total Water Use for 1997 including all purchased water: 41.220 Million Gallons
2-C. Average Annual Daily Water Use in 1997: 0.172 MGD
2-D. Average Annual Daily Water Use by Type (MGD)
Metered Connections Non-Metered Connections
Type of Use Number Average Use Number Estimated Average Use
(1) Residential 0 0.117 0 0.000
(2) Commercial 0 0.007 0 0.000
(3) Industrial 0 0.000 0 0.000
(4) Institutional 0 0.010 0 0.000
(5) Sales to other Systems
(6) Backwash
(7) Subtotal
(8) Avg. Annual Daily Water Use
(9) Unaccounted-for Water
Total
Average Use
0.177
0.007
0.000
0.010
0.000
0.000
0.194
0.172
0.000
Water Use Note: NUMBER OF METERED CONNECTIONS IS UNKNOWN. UNACCOUNTED FOR WATER IS UNKNOWN.
2-E. Average Daily and Maximum Day Water Use by Month (MGD)
Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day
Use Use Use Use Use Use
Jan May 0.075 0.422 Sep 0.185 0.436
Feb Jun 0.084 0,531 Oct 0.196 0.320
Mar Jul 0.170 0.628 Nov 0.217 0.286
Apr Aug 0.182 0.319 Dec 0.247 0.399
Avg Daily/Max Water Use Note: SYSTEM CAME ON LINE IN MAY.
2-F. Largest Water Users: NO DATA
2-G. thru 2-H. Water Sales to Other Water Systems: NONE
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for HERTFORD CO (04-46-045)
SECTION 3: WATER SUPPLY SOURCES
3-A. thru 3-C. Surface Water Supplies: NONE
3-D. Water Purchases From Other Water Systems
Water Supplied By: Average Daily Amount Contract Amount R
Pipe Size(s) Inches or
Water System PWSID MGD # of Days MGD Expiration Date E
AHOSKIE 04-46-010 0.002 150 6 R
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
Water Purchase Note: COST IS $1.87 PER 1,000 GALLONS.
3-E. What is the Total Amount of Purchase Contracts available for Regular Use? 0.002 MGD
3-F. Ground Water
Page 2 of 5
Withdrawals
Screen Facility Limiting
Name Pump Max. Daily Output
ut
Well Casing Depth Well Avg. Daily 12-Hr Y P
or Depth Depth Dia. Intake Meter? Day Supply
Weof (ft.) (ft-) Top Bottom (in.) Depth
MGD
# of
MGD
(MG)
Capacity
Type
(ft.) (ft.) Days MGD Facility
1 320 272 272 283 10 108.0 Y 0.360 0.360 O
2 335 278 278 325 10 92.0 Y 0.188 104 0.422 0.360 0.360 O
3 343 298 298 333 10 63.0 Y 0.191 113 0.531 0.360 0.360 0
Type of Facility: R = Raw Water Pumps, T =Treatment Fa cilities, M = Transmission Main, D = Distribution System, O = Other
R = Regular Use, E = Emergen cy Use
Ground Water Note: 0=12 HOUR SUPPLY.
3-G. What is the Total 12-Hour Supply of all wells available for Regular Use? 1.080 Million Gallons
3-1-1. Are groundwater levels monitored? Y How often? NO SET TIME
3-I. Does this system have a wellhead protection program? Y
3-3. Water Treatment Plants: NONE
3-K. What is the system's finished water storage capacity? 0.000 Million Gallons
SECTION 4: WASTEWATER INFORMATION
4-A. Average Daily Wastewater Discharges (MGD)
Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily
Discharge Discharge Discharge
Jan Apr Jul Oct
Feb May Aug Nov
Mar Jun Sep Dec
4-B. Wastewater Discharge and/or Land Application Permits: NONE
4-C. Wastewater Discharge Interconnections: NONE
Average Daily
Discharge
R
or
E
R
R
R
4-D. Number of sewer service connections: 0
4-E. Number of water service connections with septic systems: 0
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for HERTFORD CO (04-46-045)
Page 3 of 5
4-F. Are there plans to build or expand wastewater treatment facilities in the next 10 years? N Please
Explain:
SECTION 5: WATER CONSERVATION AND DEMAND MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
S-A. What is the estimated total miles of distribution system lines? 86.50 Miles
5-B. Primary Types and Sizes of Distribution Lines
Asbestos Cement Cast Iron Ductile Iron Galvanized Iron Polyvinyl Chloride Other
(AC) (CI) (DI) (GI) (PVC)
Size Range (inches) 2-12
% of lines 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 100 % 0 %
5-C. Were any lines replaced In 1997? N Linear feet replaced:
5-D. Were any new water mains added in 1997? Y Linear feet added: 456,720
5-E. Does this system have a program to work or flush hydrants? Y How often?
5-F. Does this system have a valve exercise program? N How often?
S-G. Does this system have a cross-connection control program? Y
5-H. Has water pressure been inadequate in any part of the system? N
Please Explain:
5-I. Does this system have a leak detection program? N What type of equipment or methods are used?
5-3. Has water use ever been restricted since 1992? N
Please Explain: System brand new
5-K. Does this system have a water conservation plan? N
5-L. Did this system distribute water conservation Information in 1997? N
5-M. Are there any local requirements on plumbing fixture water use which are stricter than the NC State
Building Code? N
Please Explain:
5-N. Does this system have a program to encourage replacement or retrofit of older, higher water-use
plumbing fixtures? N
5-0. Does this system have a water shortage or drought response plan? N
S-P. Is raw water metered? Y
5-Q. Is finished water output metered? N
5-R. Do you have a meter replacement program? N
5-S. How many meters were replaced in 1997?
5-T. How old are the oldest meters in the system? 1 years
S-U. What type of rate structure is used? DECREASING BLOCK
5-V. Are there meters for outdoor water use, such as irrigation, which are not billed for sewer services?
N # of meters
5-W. Does this system use reclaimed water or plan to use it within the next five years? N # of
connections MGD
SECTION 6: SYSTEM MAP (On file with NCDWR)
Part 2: Water Supply Planning Report for 1997
SECTION 7: WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS
7-A. Population to be Served
1997 2000 2010 2020
Year-Round 650 1,350 1,500 1,700
Seasonal Not Applicable
Population Note:
httn•//river phnr ctnta nr me/rai_ihin/fnvUVPh Pva/r /fnv.uRh/l?x,cn97?ntld_d?i_f)d? 5/1 R/7Md
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for HERTFORD CO (04-46-045)
7-13. Projected Avg. Daily Service Area Demand (MGD)
1997 2000 2010 2020
(1) Residential 0.177 0.367 0.408 0.462
(2) Commercial 0.007 0.015 0.017 0.019
(3) Industrial 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001
(4) Institutional 0.010 0.021 0.023 0.026
(5) Backwash 0.000 01000 0.000 0.000
(6) Unaccounted-for water 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(7) Service Area Demand 0.194 0.404 0.448 0.508
Projected Service Area Demand Note:
Page 4 of 5
7-C. Is non-residential water use expected to change significantly through 2020 from current levels of
use? Y
If yes, please explain: This system Is under Its first year, many changes are anticipated.
7-D. Future Supplies: NONE
7-F. Future Sales Contracts: NONE
SECTION 8: FUTURE WATER SUPPLY NEEDS
8-A. Avg. Daily Demand as Percent of Supply
Available Supply (MGD) 1997 2000 2010 2020
(1) Existing Surface Water Supply 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(2) Existing Ground Water Supply 1.080 1.080 1.080 1.080
(3) Existing Purchase Contracts 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
(4) Future Supplies 0.000 0.000 01000 0.000
(5) Total Available Supply 1.082 1.082 1.082 1.062
Avg. Daily Demand (MGD) 1997 2000 2010 2020
(6) Service Area Demand 0.194 0.404 0.448 0.508
(7) Sales Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(8) Future Sales Contracts 0.000 0.000 01000 0.000
(9) Total Avg. Daily Demand 0.194 0.404 0.448 0.508
(10) Demand as Percent of Supply 18.0% 37.0% 41.0% 47.0%
(11) Additional Supply Needed to Maintain 80% (MGD) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
System Notes:
8-B. Will demand exceed 800/4 of available supply before the year 2020? N
8-C. Are peak day demands expected to exceed the water treatment plant capacity by 2010? N
If yes, what are your plans for increasing water treatment capacity?
8-D. Does this system have an interconnection with another system capable of providing water in an
emergency? N
If not, what are you plans for interconnecting?
8-E. Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? N
If yes, please describe:
8-F. List the major water supply reports or studies used for planning: NONE
SECTION 9: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE NEEDS
Is technical assistance needed:
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for HERTFORD CO (04-46-045) Page 5 of 5
9-A. to develop a local water supply plan? Y
9-B. with a leak detection program? N
9-C, with a demand management or water conservation program? N
9-D. with a water shortage response plan? N
9-E. to identify alternative or future water supply sources? N
9-F. with a capacity development plan? N
9-G. with a wellhead or source water protection plan? N
9-1-11. with water system compliance or operational problems? N
9-I. with Consumer Confidence Reports? N
9-3. Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system
deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.), or your ability to meet present and future
needs:
NO COMMENT.
Get DEH-Public Water Supply Section data for HERTFORD CO
?Submll
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for GATESVILLE (04-37-010)
Page I of 5
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Web: www.ncwater.org
1997 LOCAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN FOR GATESVILLE
(Information In this LWSP may be corrected or updated at any time by the water system or NCDWR)
Part 1: Water Supply System Report for 1997
SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION
05/18/2004
1-A. Water System: GATESVILLE 1-B. PWS ID#: 04-37-010 Status of 1997 Plan: COMPLETEC
1-C. River Basin Name: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
1-D. County: GATES
1-E. Contact: C H CARTER III Title: WATER MANAGER
1-F. Address: PO 80X 357 City: GATESVILLE State: NC Zip Code: 27938
1-G. Phone: [phone]-H. Fax: [phone]-I. E-mail: N/A
1-3. Type of Ownership: MUNICIPALITY
SECTION 2: WATER USE INFORMATION
2-A. Population Served in 1997: Year-Round: 383
Seasonal: N/A
2-B. Total Water Use for 1997 including all purchased water: 16.000 Million Gallons
2-C. Average Annual Daily Water Use in 1997: 0.045 MGD
2-D. Average Annual Daily Water Use by Type (MGD)
Metered Connections Non-Metered Connections
Type of Use Number Average Use Number Estimated Average Use
(1) Residential 151 0.039 0 0.000
(2) Commercial 20 0.005 0 0.000
(3) Industrial 0 0.000 0 0.000
(4) Institutional 0 0.000 0 0.000
(5) Sales to other Systems
(6) Backwash
(7) Subtotal
(8) Avg. Annual Daily Water Use
(9) Unaccounted-for Water
Water Use Note:
Total
Average Use
0.039
0.005
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.044
0.045
0.001
2-E. Average Daily and Maximum Day Water Use by Month (MGD)
Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day
Use Use Use Use Use Use
Jan May Sep
Feb Jun Oct
Mar Jul Nov
Apr Aug Dec
Avg Daily/ Max Water Use Note:
2-F. Largest Water Users and their Average Annual Daily Use (MGD)
Water User Average Daily Use
GATES CO FARM SERVICE 0.0012
1 11 A In nn A
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for GATESVILLE (04-37-010)
GATES CO VIDEO PLUS
Largest User Note:
0.0010
2-G. thru 2-H. Water Sales to Other Water Systems: NONE
Page 2 of 5
SECTION 3: WATER SUPPLY SOURCES
3-A. thru 3-C. Surface Water Supplies: NONE
3-D. Water Purchases From Other Water Systems
Water Supplied By: Average Daily Amount Contract Amount R
Pipe Size(s) Inches or
Water System PWSID MGD # of Days MGD Expiration Date E
GATES CO WS 04-37-020 0.045 365 6 R
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
Water Purchase Note:
3-E. What is the Total Amount of Purchase Contracts available for Regular Use? 0.045 MGD
3-F. thru 3-I. Ground Water Supplies: NONE
3-3. Water Treatment Plants: NONE
3-K. What is the system's finished water storage capacity? 0.000 Million Gallons
SECTION 4: WASTEWATER INFORMATION
4-A. Average Daily Wastewater Discharges (MGD)
Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily
Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge
Jan Apr Jul Oct
Feb May Aug Nov
Mar Jun Sep Dec
4-8. Wastewater Discharge and/or Land Application Permits: NONE
4-C. Wastewater Discharge Interconnections: NONE
4-D. Number of sewer service connections: 0
4-E. Number of water service connections with septic systems: 171
4-F. Are there plans to build or expand wastewater treatment facilities in the next 30 years? Please
Explain: N/A
SECTION 5: WATER CONSERVATION AND DEMAND MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
5-A. What is the estimated total miles of distribution system lines? 4.10 Miles
5-13. Primary Types and Sizes of Distribution Lines
Asbestos Cement Cast Iron Ductile Iron Galvanized Iron Polyvinyl Chloride
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for GATESVTLLE (04-37-010) Page 3 of 5
(AC) (CI) (DI) (GI) (PVC) Other
Size Range (inches) 8,10 8 4,6
% of lines 22 % 0 % 2 % 0 % 76 % 0 %
5-C. Were any lines replaced in 1997? N Linear feet replaced:
5-D. Were any new water mains added in 1997? Y Linear feet added: 100
5-E. Does this system have a program to work or flush hydrants? Y How often? 90 DAYS
S-P. Does this system have a valve exercise program? N How often?
5-G. Does this system have a cross-connection control program? N
5-H. Has water pressure been inadequate in any part of the system? N
Please Explain:
5-I. Does this system have a leak detection program? Y What type of equipment or methods are used?
Same as county
5-3. Has water use ever been restricted since 1992? N
Please Explain:
S-K. Does this system have a water conservation plan? N
5-L. Did this system distribute water conservation information in 1997? N
5-M. Are there any local requirements on plumbing fixture water use which are stricter than the NC State
Building Code? N
Please Explain:
S-N. Does this system have a program to encourage replacement or retrofit of older, higher water-use
plumbing fixtures? N
5-0. Does this system have a water shortage or drought response plan? N
5-P. Is raw water metered?
5-Q. Is finished water output metered? Y
5-11. Do you have a meter replacement program? Y
5-S. How many meters were replaced in 1997? 27
5-T. How old are the oldest meters in the system? 26 years
5-U. What type of rate structure is used? FLAT RATE
5-V. Are there meters for outdoor water use, such as irrigation, which are not billed for sewer services?
N # of meters
5-W. Does this system use reclaimed water or plan to use it within the next five years? N # of
connections MGD
SECTION 6: SYSTEM MAP (On file with NCDWR)
Part 2: Water Supply Planning Report for 1997
SECTION 7: WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS
7-A. Population to be Served
1997 2000 2010 2020
Year-Round 383 408 450 475
Seasonal Not Appllcable
Population Nate:
7-13. Projected Avg. Daily Service Area Demand (MGD)
1997 2000 2010 2020
(1) Residential 0.039 0.039 0.040 0.041
(2) Commercial 0.005 0.005 0.006 0.006
(3) Industrial 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(4) Institutional 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(5) Backwash 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(6) Unaccounted-for water 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
(7) Service Area Demand 0.045 0.045 0.046 0.047
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for GATESVILLE (04-37-010) Page 4 of 5
Projected Service Area Demand Note:
7-C. Is non-residential water use expected to change significantly through 2020 from current levels of
use? N
If yes, please explain:
7-D. Future Supplies: NONE
7-F. Future Sales Contracts: NONE
SECTION 8: FUTURE WATER SUPPLY NEEDS
8-A. Avg. Daily Demand as Percent of Supply
Available Supply (MGD) 1997 2000 2010 2020
(1) Existing Surface Water Supply 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(2) Existing Ground Water Supply 0.000 0.000 0.000 01000
(3) Existing Purchase Contracts 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045
(4) Future Supplies 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(5) Total Available Supply 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045
Avg. Daily Demand (MGD) 1997 2000 2010 2020
(6) Service Area Demand 0.045 0.045 0.046 0.047
(7) Sales Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(8) Future Sales Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(9) Total Avg. Daily Demand 0.045 0.045 0.046 0.047
(10) Demand as Percent of Supply 100.0% 100.0% 102.0% 105.0%
(11) Additional Supply Needed to Maintain 800/o (MGD) 0.011 0.011 0.012 0.014
System Notes: We close our two wells and purchase water from the county system because of high testing cost.
These wells are still in good condition for future use If needed.
8-13. Will demand exceed 80% of available supply before the year 2020? N
S-C. Are peak day demands expected to exceed the water treatment plant capacity by 2010?
If yes, what are your plans for increasing water treatment capacity?
8-D. Does this system have an interconnection with another system capable of providing water In an
emergency? Y
If not, what are you plans for interconnecting?
8-E. Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? N
If yes, please describe:
8-F. List the major water supply reports or studies used for planning:
SECTION 9: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE NEEDS
Is technical assistance needed:
9-A. to develop a local water supply plan? N
9-13. with a leak detection program? Y
9-C. with a demand management or water conservation program?
9-D. with a water shortage response plan?
9-E. to identify alternative or future water supply sources? Y
9-F. with a capacity development plan?
9-G. with a wellhead or source water protection plan?
9-H. with water system compliance or operational problems?
9-I. with Consumer Confidence Reports?
9-7. Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system
deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.), or your ability to meet present and future
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for GATESVILLE (04-37-010) Page 5 of 5
needs:
Get DEH-Public Water Supply Section data for GATESVILLE
,Sutittlti
I I 1 1 . . I I II 1 I I I 1 If /119/1 n n A n /'1 f1 1 A 1 I. - I- ^ I1 A
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for GATES CO (04-37-020)
Page 1 of 5
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Web: www.ncwater.org
1997 LOCAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN FOR GATES CO
(Information In this LWSP may be corrected or updated at any time by the water system or NCDWR)
Part 1: Water Supply System Report for 1997
SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION
05/18/2004
1-A. Water System: GATES CO 1-0. PWS ID#: 04-37-020 Status of 1997 Plan: ADOPTEC
1-C. River Basin Name: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1) , ALBEMARLE SOUND (12-1)
1-D. County: GATES
i-E. Contact: HENRY FURE Title: WATER SUPERVISOR
1-F. Address: PO BOX 148 City: GATESVILLE State: NC Zip Code: 27938
1-G. Phone: [phone]-H. Fax: [phone]-I. E-mail: N/A
1-3. Type of Ownership: COUNTY
SECTION 2: WATER USE INFORMATION
2-A. Population Served in 1997: Year-Round: 8,B40
Seasonal: N/A
2-B. Total Water Use for 1997 including all purchased water: 294.140 Million Gallons
2-C. Average Annual Daily Water Use in 1997: 0.806 MGD
2-D. Average Annual Daily Water Use by Type (MGD)
Metered Connections Non-Metered Connections
Type of Use Number Average Use Number Estimated Average Use
(1) Residential 3,130 0.615 0 0.000
(2) Commercial 2 0.022 0 0.000
(3) Industrial a 0.000 0 0.000
(4) Institutional 5 0.017 0 0.000
(S) Sales to other Systems
(6) Backwash
(7) Subtotal
(8) Avg. Annual Daily Water Use
(9) Unaccounted-for Water
Water Use Note:
Total
Average Use
0.615
0.022
0.000
0.017
0.090
0.000
0.746
0.806
0.060
2-E. Average Daily and Maximum Day Water Use by Month (MGD)
Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day
Use Use Use Use Use Use
Jan 0.705 0.912 May 0.808 1.106 Sep 0.894 1.021
Feb 0.658 0.889 Jun 0.974 1.354 Oct 0.876 1.040
Mar 0.669 0.796 Jul 0.990 1,346 Nov 0.741 0.832
Apr 0.693 0.790 Aug 0.939 1.045 Dec 0.707 0.841
Avg Daily/Max Water Use Note:
2-F. Largest Water Users and their Average Annual Daily Use (MGD)
Water User Average Daily Use
CHOWAN CO 0.0500
1,}{,,.11a- ??,.,, ,?.+?--.,,,i..,.::,:. '2-7 rnn cn0 111 AnA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for GATES CO (04-37-020)
GATESVILLE 0.0480
DOWN EAST 0.0129
NC DEPT OF CORRECTIONS 0.0103
INDIAN NECK FARM 0.0090
SOUTHERN PINE MHP 0.0088
WAYNE PYRUM 0.0047
GATES CO HIGH SCHOOL 0.0042
WILLIAM ROUNTREE 0.0030
GATES CO BUCKLAND SCHOOL 0.0026
Largest User Note:
2-G. Water Sales to Other Water Systems
Water Supplied to: Average Daily Amount Contract Amount Pipe Size(s) R

Water System PWSID MGD # of Days
MGD Expiration Date Inches or
E
CHOWAN CO 04-21-015 0.050 304 6 R
GATESVILLE 04-37-010 0.048 365 6 R
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
Water Sales Note:
2-H. What is the Total Amount of Sales Contracts for Regular Use? 0.098 MGD
SECTION 3: WATER SUPPLY SOURCES
3-A. thru 3-C. Surface Water Supplies: NONE
3-D. Water Purchases From Other Water Systems
Water Supplied By: Average Daily Amount Contract Amount R
Pipe Size(s) Inches or
Water System PWSID MGD # of Days MGD Expiration Date E
CHOWAN CO 04-21-015 0.000 0 6 E
PERQUIMANS 04-72-025 0.000 0 6 E
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
Water Purchase Note:
3-E. What is the Total Amount of Purchase Contracts available for Regular Use? 0.000 MGD
3-F. Ground Water
Page 2 of 5
Withdrawals
Screen Facility Limiting
Name Well Casing Depth Well Pump
Intake Avg. Daily Max.
Day 12-Hr Daily Output
or Depth
f Depth Meter?
Dia. Supply
T
Wel[
(ft') (ft') Top Bottom (In') (ft) MGD # of MGD (MG) Capacity ype
(ft,) (ft,) Days MGD Facility
1 420 400 400 420 12 195.0 Y 0.219 365 0.360 0.720 R
2 400 220 220 230 12 165.0 Y 0.276 365 0.468 0.936 R
3 375 345 345 375 12 140.0 Y 0.311 365 0,662 1.296 R
Type of Facility: R = Raw Water Pumps, T = Treatment Facilities, M = Transmis sion Main, D = Distribution System, 0 = Other
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
.. 11 . , , . . 11
, 1 ,I.
1 H - A^A .1 rs Il /,A
rl,n1l1!
R
or
E
R
R
R
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for GATES CO (04-37-020) Page 3 of 5
Ground Water Note:
3-G. What is the Total 12-Hour Supply of all wells available for Regular Use? 1.490 Million Gallons
3-H. Are ground water levels monitored? N How often?
3-I. Does this system have a wellhead protection program? N
3-3. Water Treatment Plants
Water Treatment Plant Name Permitted Capacity (MGD) Source(s)
GATES CO WP 0.000 Ground water
Treatment Plant Note:
3-K. What is the system's finished water storage capacity? 0.500 Million Gallons
SECTION 4: WASTEWATER INFORMATION
4-A. Average Daily Wastewater Discharges (MGD)
Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily
Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge
Jan Apr Jul Oct
Feb May Aug Nov
Mar Jun Sep Dec
4-13. Wastewater Discharge and/or Land Application Permits: NONE
4-C. Wastewater Discharge Interconnections: NONE
4-D. Number of sewer service connections: 0
4-E. Number of water service connections with septic systems: 3,132
4-F. Are there plans to build or expand wastewater treatment facilities in the next 10 years? N Please
Explain:
SECTION 5: WATER CONSERVATION AND DEMAND MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
5-A. What is the estimated total miles of distribution system lines? 315.00 Miles
5-13. Primary Types and Sizes of Distribution Lines
Asbestos Cement Cast Iron Ductile Iron Galvanized Iron Polyvinyl Chloride Other
(AC) (CI) (DI) (GI) (PVC)
Size Range (inches) 4-6 2-12
% of lines 0 % 0 % 1 % 0 % 99 % 0 %
5-C. Were any lines replaced in 1997? N Linear feet replaced:
5-D. Were any new water mains added in 1997? N Linear feet added:
5-E. Does this system have a program to work or flush hydrants? N How often?
5-F. Does this system have a valve exercise program? N How often?
5-G. Does this system have a cross-connection control program? N
5-H. Has water pressure been inadequate in any part of the system? N
Please Explain:
5-I. Does this system have a leak detection program? N What type of equipment or methods are used?
5-3. Has water use ever been restricted since 1992? N
Please Explain:
5-K. Does this system have a water conservation plan? N
1,++-./1,7......,1,.,. ,+.,+......,. 1.... 1--1- .....,.L. --1-- Ir .... -1-11....._n'71) AnA 1?y nnn C11n1nnnA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for GATES CO (04-37-020)
Page 4 of 5
S-L. Did this system distribute water conservation information in 1997? N
S-M. Are there any local requirements on plumbing fixture water use which are stricter than the NC State
Building Code? N
Please Explain:
5-N. Does this system have a program to encourage replacement or retrofit of older, higher water-use
plumbing fixtures? N
5-0. Does this system have a water shortage or drought response plan? N
S-P. Is raw water metered? N
S-Q. Is finished water output metered? Y
S-R. Do you have a meter replacement program? N
5-S. How many meters were replaced in 1997?
5-T. How old are the oldest meters In the system? 18 years
5-U. What type of rate structure is used? DECREASING BLOCK
5-V. Are there meters for outdoor water use, such as irrigation, which are not billed for sewer services?
N # of meters
5-W. Does this system use reclaimed water or plan to use it within the next five years? N # of
connections MGD
SECTION 6: SYSTEM MAP (On file with NCDWR)
Part 2: Water Supply Planning Report for 1997
SECTION 7: WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS
7-A. Population to be Served
1997 2000 2010 2020
Year-Round 8,840 9,459 9,743 10,717
Seasonal Not Applicable
Population Note:
7-B. Projected Avg. Daily Service Area Demand (MGD)
1997 2000 2010 2020
(1) Residential 0.615 0.710 0.730 0.805
(2) Commercial 0.022 0.030 0.040 0.050
(3) Industrial 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(4) Institutional 0.017 0.020 0.030 0.040
(5) Backwash 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(6) Unaccounted-for water 0.060 0.070 0.080 0.090
(7) Service Area Demand 0.714 0.830 0.880 01985
Projected Service Area Demand Note:
7-C. Is non-residential water use expected to change significantly through 2020 from current levels of
use? N
If yes, please explain:
7-D. Future Supplies: NONE
7-F. Future Sales Contracts: NONE
SECTION 8: FUTURE WATER SUPPLY NEEDS
It Ann AnA nrr nnn rl.n1-A
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for GATES CO (04-37-020) Page 5 of 5
8-A. Avg. Daily Demand as Percent of Supply
Available Supply (MGD) 1997 2000 2010 2020
(1) Existing Surface Water Supply 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(2) Existing Ground Water Supply 1.490 1.490 1.490 1.490
(3) Existing Purchase Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(4) Future Supplies 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(5) Total Available Supply 1.490 1.490 1.490 1.490
Avg. Daily Demand (MGD) 1997 2000 2010 2020
(6) Service Area Demand 0.714 0.830 0.880 0.985
(7) Sales Contracts 0.098 0.060 0.080 0.100
(8) Future Sales Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(9) Total Avg. Daily Demand 0.812 0.890 0.960 1.050
(10) Demand as Percent of Supply 54.0% 60.0% 64.0% 70.0%
(11) Additional Supply Needed to Maintain 800/b (MGD) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
System Notes:
8-B. Will demand exceed 80% of available supply before the year 2020? N
8-C. Are peak day demands expected to exceed the water treatment plant capacity by 2010? N
If yes, what are your plans for increasing water treatment capacity?
&D. Does this system have an interconnection with another system capable of providing water in an
emergency? Y
If not, what are you plans for interconnecting?
8-E. Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? N
If yes, please describe:
8-F. List the major water supply reports or studies used for planning: NONE
SECTION 9: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE NEEDS
Is technical assistance needed:
9-A. to develop a local water supply plan? N
9-13. with a leak detection program? N
9-C. with a demand management or water conservation program? N
9-D. with a water shortage response plan? N
9-E. to identify alternative or future water supply sources? N
9-F. with a capacity development plan? N
9-G. with a wellhead or source water protection plan? N
9-H. with water system compliance or operational problems? N
9-I. with Consumer Confidence Reports? N
9-3. Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system
deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.), or your ability to meet present and future
needs:
In the very near future we plan to construct a 300,000 gallon overhead tank. This will Increase our storage capacity plus
Insure a more even pressure.
Geii992 Local Water Supply Plan for GATES CO
Get DEH-Public Water Supply Section data for GATES CO
Submlt_?
_1_11__._?^Met.nA '117 nnn a/1nlei nnA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for EDENTON (04-21-010)
Page 1 of 6
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Web: www.ncwater.org
1997 LOCAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN FOR EDENTON
(Information In this LWSP may be corrected or updated at any time by the water system or NCDWR)
Part 1: Water Supply System Report for 1997
SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION
05/18/2004
1-A. Water System: EDENTON 1-B. PWS XD#: 04-21-010 Status of 1997 Plan: ADOPTEE
1-C. River Basin Name: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
1-D. County: CHOWAN
1-E. Contact: ANNE-MARIE KNIGHTON Title: TOWN MANAGER
1-F. Address: PO BOX 300 City: EDENTON State: NC Zip Code: 27932
1-G. Phone: [phone]-H. Fax: [phone]-I. E-mail: ANNE-MARIE. KNIGHTONC?NCMAIL.NET
1-3. Type of Ownership: MUNICIPALITY
SECTION 2: WATER USE INFORMATION
2-A. Population Served in 1997: Year-Round: 5,475
Seasonal: N/A
2-B. Total Water Use for 1997 including all purchased water: 293.100 Million Gallons
2-C. Average Annual Daily Water Use in 1997: 0.803 MGD
2-D. Average Annual Daily Water Use by Type (MGD)
Metered Connections Non-Metered Connections
Type of Use Number Average Use Number Estimated Average Use
(1) Residential 1,454 0.412 0 0.000
(2) Commercial 420 0.076 0 0.000
(3) Industrial 45 0.087 0 0.000
(4) Institutional 25 0.046 0 0.000
(5) Sales to other Systems
(6) Backwash
(7) Subtotal
(8) Avg. Annual Daily Water Use
(9) Unaccounted-for Water
Water Use Note:
Total
Average Use
0.412
0.076
0,087
0.046
0.003
0.020
0.643
0.803
0.160
2-E. Average Daily and Maximum Day Water Use by Month (MGD)
Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day
Use Use Use Use Use Use
Jan 0.645 0.747 May 0.604 1.099 Sep 0.799 0.997
Feb 0.621 0.815 Jun 0.891 1.323 Oct 0.783 1.131
Mar 0.618 0,738 Jul 0.913 11085 Nov 0.747 0.846
Apr 0.812 0.812 Aug 1.014 1.183 Dec 0.693 1.216
Avg Daily/ Max Water Use Note:
2-F. Largest Water Users and their Average Annual Daily Use (MGD)
Water User Average Daily Use
MOORE CO. 0.0717
+ , „ r + , , , . + , n + l ` + It n -+n A n • /? + n + n r 11 n !n ^^ A
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for EDENTON (04-21-010)
SEABROOK 0.0238
CHOWAN HOSPITAL 0.0226
GEORGE ]ONES 0.0166
EDENTON PRIMETIME 0.0110
COMMERCIAL READY MIX 0.0093
BRITTHAVEN 0.0057
TAVEL HOST INN 0.0056
EDENTON CHOWAN SCHOOLS 0.0045
BURGER KING 0.0032
Largest User Note:
2-G. Water Sales to Other Water Systems
Water Supplied to: Average Daily Amount Contract Amount Pipe Size{s) R
or
Water System PWSID MGD # of Days MGD Expiration Date Inches E
CHOWAN CO WATER 04-21-015 0.011 91 10 E
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
Water Sales Note:
2-H. What is the Total Amount of Sales Contracts for Regular Use? 0.000 MGD
Page 2 of 6
SECTION 3: WATER SUPPLY SOURCES
3-A. thru 3-C. Surface Water Supplies: NONE
3-D. thru 3-E. Water Purchases From Other Water Systems: NONE
3-F. Ground Water
Withdrawals
Screen Facility Limiting
Name or Well Casing Depth Well Pump
Intake Avg. Daily Max.
Day 12-Hr Daily Output R
No. of Depth Depth Dia.
Depth Meter? Supply or
Well (ft.) (ft-) Top Bottom (in.) # of (MG) Capacity Type
f E
(ft,) (ft,) MGD
Days MGD o
MGD Facility
BEAVER 260 200 210 255 10 140 0 Y 0.277 365 0.725 0.363 0.725 R R
HILL-3
FREEMASON 272 200 212 267 10 100.0 Y 0.262 365 0.634 0.317 0.634 R R
- 1A
VIRGINIA 358 140 219 355 10 80.0 Y 0.264 365 0.720 0.360 0.720 R R
ROAD -2
Type of Facility: R = Raw Water Pumps, T = Treatment Facilities, M = Transmission Main, D = Distribution System, 0 = Other
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
Ground Water Note:
3-G. What is the Total 12-Hour Supply of all wells available for Regular Use? 1.040 Million Gallons
3-H. Are ground water levels monitored? Y How often? MONTHLY
3-I. Does this system have a wellhead protection program? Y
3-3. Water Treatment Plants
Water Treatment Plant Name Permitted Capacity (MGD) Source(s)
• , • Ir ni n1/L c11a111nf%A
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for EDENTON (04-21-010)
BEAVER HILL WATGER PLANT 0.000 GROUND WATER
FREEMASON WATER PLANT 0.000 GROUND WATER
Treatment Plant Note:
3-K. What is the system's finished water storage capacity? 0.850 Million Gallons
SECTION 4: WASTEWATER INFORMATION
4-A. Average Daily Wastewater Discharges (MGD)
Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily
Discharge Discharge Discharge
Jan 0.936 Apr 0.742 Jul 0.523 Oct
Feb 0.924 May 0.727 Aug 0.592 Nov
Mar 0.914 Jun 0.519 Sep 0.531 Dec
4-B. Wastewater Discharge and/or Land Application Permits
NPDES or Permitted
Design Avg. Annual
Name of
Land Capacity Capacity Daily
Receiving
Application Dec. 31, 1997
(MGD) Discharge Stream
Permit Number (MGD) (MGD)
NPDES0007552 0.020 0.020 0.020 FILBERT CREEK
WQ0004332 1.076 1.076 0.663 LAND
APPLICATION
Wastewater Note:
4-C. Wastewater Discharge Interconnections: NONE
Page 3 of 6
Average Daily
Discharge
0.511
0.513
0.524
Sub-Basin
CHOWAN RIVER (04-
1)
CHOWAN RIVER
4-D. Number of sewer service connections: 2,000
4-E. Number of water service connections with septic systems: 0
4-F. Are there plans to build or expand wastewater treatment facilities in the next 30 years? Y Please
Explain: The treatment plant Is at 75% capacity, plans are to expand Sprayfields.
SECTION 5: WATER CONSERVATION AND DEMAND MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
5-A. What is the estimated total miles of distribution system lines? 35.00 Miles
5-B. Primary Types and Sizes of Distribution Lines
Asbestos Cement Cast Iron Ductile Iron Galvanized Iron Polyvinyl Chloride Other
(AC) (CI) (DI) (GI) (PVC)
Size Range (inches) 2-12 2-12 2 2,6
of lines 0 % 50 % 35 % 10 0/0 5 % 0 %
5-C. Were any lines replaced in 1997? Y Linear feet replaced: 3,500
5-D. Were any new water mains added in 1997? N Linear feet added:
5-E. Does this system have a program to work or flush hydrants? Y How often? MONTHLY
5-F. Does this system have a valve exercise program? N Wow often?
5-G. Does this system have a cross-connection control program? N
5-H. Has water pressure been Inadequate in any part of the system? N
Please Explain:
5-I. Does this system have a leak detection program? Y What type of equipment or methods are used?
Monthly records comparing total water pumped/total water billed
. .. .,. , . , . Ir , .l..lr_____ __1_11------ nr/nAnA n1 nln c11017nnA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for EDENTON (04-21-010)
Page 4 of 6
5-3. Has water use ever been restricted since 1992? N
Please Explain:
5-K. Does this system have a water conservation plan? N
5-1L. Did this system distribute water conservation information in 1997? N
5-M. Are there any local requirements on plumbing fixture water use which are stricter than the NC State
Building Code? N
. Please Explain:
5-N. Does this system have a program to encourage replacement or retrofit of older, higher water-use
plumbing fixtures? N
5-0. Does this system have a water shortage or drought response plan? N
5-P. Is raw water metered? Y
5-Q. Is finished water output metered? Y
5-R. Do you have a meter replacement program? Y
5-S. How many meters were replaced in 1997? 75
5-T. How old are the oldest meters in the system? 5 years
5-U. What type of rate structure is used? DECREASING BLOCK
5-V. Are there meters for outdoor water use, such as irrigation, which are not billed for sewer services?
Y # of meters 25
5-W. Does this system use reclaimed water or plan to use it within the next five years? N # of
connections MGD
SECTION 6: SYSTEM MAP (On file with NCDWR)
Part 2: Water Supply Planning Report for 1997
SECTION 7: WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS
7-A. Population to be Served
1997 2000 2010 2020
Year-Round 5,475 5,768 5,941 6,119
Seasonal Not Applicable
Population Note:
7-B. Projected Avg. Daily Service Area Demand (MGD)
1997 2000 2010
(1) Residential 0.412 0.433 0.441
(2) Commercial 0.076 0.079 0.081
(3) Industrial 0.087 0.092 0.093
(4) Institutional 0.046 0.048 0.049
(5) Backwash
(6) Unaccounted-for water
(7) Service Area Demand
Projected Service Area Demand Note:
0.020 0.021 0.021
0.160 0.168 0.171
0.800 0.840 0.856
2020
0.455
0.083
0.096
0.050
0.022
0.176
0.882
7-C. Is non-residential water use expected to change significantly through 2020 from current levels of
use? N
If yes, please explain:
7-D. Future Supplies
Source or Facility Name PWSID Source Type Additional Supply (MGD) Year On-line R or E
New Well 04-21-010 ground 0,020 2000 R
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
,.. ,,, , . . i . , Ir t ._._/_.lr_______t/t____._n-InhnA n? non rMCJlnnnA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for EDENTON (04-21-010) Page 5 of 6
Future Supply Note:
7-E. What is the Total Amount of Future Supplies available for Regular Use? 0.200 MGD
7-F. Future Sales Contracts: NONE
SECTION 8: FUTURE WATER SUPPLY NEEDS
8-A. Avg. Daily Demand as Percent of Supply
Available Supply (MGD) 1997 2000 2010 2020
(1) Existing Surface Water Supply 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(2) Existing Ground Water Supply 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040
(3) Existing Purchase Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(4) Future Supplies 0.000 0.200 0.200 0.200
(5) Total Available Supply 1.040 1.240 1.240 1.240
Avg. Daily Demand (MGD) 1997 2000 2010 2020
(6) Service Area Demand 0.800 0.840 0.856 0.882
(7) Sales Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(8) Future Sales Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(9) Total Avg. Daily Demand 0.800 0.840 0.856 0.882
(10) Demand as Percent of Supply 77.0% 68.0% 69.0% 71.1%
(11) Additional Supply Needed to Maintain 80% (MGD) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
System Notes:
8-e. Will demand exceed 80% of available supply before the year 2020? N
8-C. Are peak day demands expected to exceed the water treatment plant capacity by 2010? N
If yes, what are your plans for increasing water treatment capacity?
S-D. Does this system have an Interconnection with another system capable of providing water in an
emergency? Y
If not, what are you plans for interconnecting?
8-E. Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? N
If yes, please describe:
8-F. List the major water supply reports or studies used for planning: N/A
SECTION 9: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE NEEDS
Is technical assistance needed:
9-A. to develop a local water supply plan? N
9-13. with a leak detection program? N
9-C. with a demand management or water conservation program? N
9-D. with a water shortage response plan? N
9-E. to identify alternative or future water supply sources? N
9-F. with a capacity development plan? N
9-G. with a wellhead or source water protection plan? N
9-H. with water system compliance or operational problems? N
9-I. with Consumer Confidence Reports? Y
9-3. Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system
deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.), or your ability to meet present and future
needs:
Town has applied for loan from State for Clean Water Revolving Fund, to help finance upgrade needed to Beaver Hill
WTP as well for Installation of new well near Beaver Hill Treatment
Get 1992 Local Water Supply Plan for EDENTON
11 , , r • , • it 1 / it 1 H ^/^AnA ny nin r11nlnnn A
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for EDENTON (04-21-010)
Get DEN-Public Water Supply Section data for EDENTON
Submit
Page 6 of 6

1997 Local Water Supply Plan for AHOSKIE (04-46-010)
Page 1 of 5
North Carolina Division of Water Resources - Water Supply Planning Section
1611 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1611 - Phone, [phone] Fax: [phone] Web: www.ncwater.org
1997 LOCAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN FOR AHOSKIE
(Information In this LWSP may be corrected or updated at any time by the water system or NCDWR)
Part 1: Water Supply System Report for 1997
SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION
05/18/2004
1-A. Water System: AHOSKIE 1-B. PWS ID#: 04-46-010 Status of 1997 Plan: ADOPTEC
1-C. River Basin Name: CHOWAN RIVER (04-1)
1-D. County: HERTFORD
1-E. Contact: BRYAN LEWIS Title: ASST DPW
1-F. Address: PO BOX 767 City: AHSOKIE State: NC Zip Code: 27910
1-G. Phone: [phone]-H. Fax: [phone]. E-mail: N/A
1-3. Type of Ownership: MUNICIPALITY
SECTION 2: WATER USE INFORMATION
2-A. Population Served in 1997: Year-Round: 4,562
Seasonal: N/A
2-0. Total Water Use for 1997 including all purchased water: 256.490 Million Gallons
2-C. Average Annual Daily Water Use in 1997: 0.703 MGD
2-D. Average Annual Daily Water Use by Type (MGD)
Metered Connections Non-Metered Connections
Type of Use Number Average Use Number Estimated Average Use
(1) Residential 2,122 0.495 8 0.000
(2) Commercial 257 0.069 0 0.000
(3) Industrial 33 0.022 0 0.000
(4) Institutional 103 0.086 0 0.000
(5) Sales to other Systems
(6) Backwash
(7) Subtotal
(8) Avg. Annual Daily Water Use
(9) Unaccounted-for Water
Water Use Note:
Total
Average Use
0.495
0.069
0.022
0.086
0.000
0.000
0.672
0.703
0.031
2-E. Average Daily and Maximum Day Water Use by Month (MGD)
Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day Average Daily Maximum Day
Use Use Use Use Use Use
Jan 0.706 0,846 May 0.775 1.076 Sep 0.714 0.807
Feb 0.724 0.878 Jun 0.828 1.232 Oct 0.633 0.726
Mar 0.724 0.849 Jul 0.740 1.049 Nov 0,571 0.741
Apr 0,712 0.796 Aug 0.749 0,909 Dec 0.559 0,955
Avg Daily/Max Water Use Note:
2-F. Largest Water Users and their Average Annual Daily Use (MGD)
Water User Average Daily Use
RC HOSPTIAL 0.0332
.. ,,, , , • In , . ,r , n ---A-1 AI nyn rhn/nnnA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for AHOSKIE (04-146-010)
KERR IND. 0.0244
GUARDIAN CARE 0.0191
RC HOUSING AUTHORITY 0.0158
HERTFORD CO SCHOOLS 0.0103
THETFORD PROPERTY 0.0090
PACEMAKER PROP (AHOSKIE INN) 0.0077
TOMAHAWK MOTEL 0.0065
ACADEMY ST CAR WASH & LAUNDRY 0.0056
TANDEM INC (MCDONALDS) 0.0029
Largest User Note:
2-G. thru 2-H. Water Sales to Other Water Systems: NONE
Page 2 of 5
SECTION 3: WATER SUPPLY SOURCES
3-A. thru 3-C. Surface Water Supplies: NONE
3-D. thru 3-E. Water Purchases From Other Water Systems: NONE
3-F. Ground Water
Withdrawals
Screen Facility Limiting
Name Well Casing Depth Well Pump
Intake Avg. Daily Max.
Day 12-Hr Daily Output R
or
f Depth Depth Dia.
I Meter? supply
(MG)
T
e or
E
Well (ft.) (ft-) Top Bottom (
n') (ft) MGD # of MGD Capacity of
(ft.) (ft.) Days MGD Facility
01 453 268 268 448 10 188.0 Y 0.076 365 0.720 0.324 0.648 R R
02 267 166 166 262 8 120.0 Y 0.041 365 0,173 0.087 0.173 R R
03 200 180 180 200 10 140.0 Y 0.175 365 0.468 0.234 0.468 R R
03A 145 132 132 142 6 120.0 Y 0.050 365 0.111 0.050 0.111 R R
04 213 162 162 182 10 145.0 Y 0.362 365 0.433 0.215 0.433 R R
Type of Facility: R = Raw Wate r Pumps, T = Treatment Facilities, M = Transmission Main, D = Distri bution System, O = Other
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
Ground Water Note:
3-G. What is the Total 12-Hour Supply of all wells available for Regular Use? 0.910 Million Gallons
3-H. Are ground water levels monitored? N How often?
3-I. Does this system have a wellhead protection program? Y
3-3. Water Treatment Plants: NONE
3-K. What is the system's finished water storage capacity? 0.850 Million Gallons
SECTION 14: WASTEWATER INFORMATION
4-A. Average Daily Wastewater Discharges (MGR)
Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily
Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge
Jan 0.476 Apr 0.810 Jul 0.748 Oct 0.785
... I . . . In . I In I If -^A^ A A/ ^IA !/I nInn AA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for AHOSKIE (04-46-010) Page 2 of 5
KERR IND. 0.0244
GUARDIAN CARE 0.0191
RC HOUSING AUTHORITY 0.0156
HERTFORD CO SCHOOLS 0.0103
THETFORD PROPERTY 0.0090
PACEMAKER PROP (AHOSKIE INN) 0.0077
TOMAHAWK MOTEL 0.0065
ACADEMY ST CAR WASH & LAUNDRY 0.0056
TANDEM INC (MCDONALDS) 0.0029
Largest User Note:
2-G. thru 2-H. Water Sales to Other Water Systems: NONE
SECTION 3: WATER SUPPLY SOURCES
3-A. thru 3-C. Surface Water Supplies: NONE
3-D. thru 3-E. Water Purchases From Other Water Systems: NONE
3-F. Ground Water
Withdrawals
Screen Facility Limiting
Name Well Casing D epth Well Pump
Intake Avg. Daily Max.
Day 12-Hr Daily O utput R
or
No. of Depth Depth Dia.
i Meter? supply
(MG)
T
pe or
E

well (ft.) (ft.) Top Bottom (
n.) (ft)
MGD # of
MGD
Capacity
o
(ft.) (ft.) Days MGD Facility
01 453 268 268 448 10 188.0 Y 0.076 365 0.720 0.324 0.648 R R
02 267 166 166 262 8 120.0 Y 0.041 365 0.173 0.087 0.173 R R
03 200 180 180 200 10 140.0 Y 0.175 365 0.468 0.234 0.468 R R
03A 145 132 132 142 6 120.0 Y 0.050 365 0.111 0.050 0.111 R R
04 213 162 162 182 10 145.0 Y 0.362 365 0.433 0.215 0.433 R R
Type of Facility: R = Raw Wate r Pumps, T = Trea tment Fa cilities, M = Transmis sion Main, D = Distribution System, O = Oth er
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
Ground Water Note:
3-G. What is the Total 12-Hour Supply of all wells available for Regular Use? 0.910 Million Gallons
3-H. Are ground water levels monitored? N How often?
34. Does this system have a wellhead protection program? Y
3-3. Water Treatment Plants: NONE
3-1K. What is the system's finished water storage capacity? 0.850 Million Gallons
SECTION 4: WASTEWATER INFORMATION
4-A. Average Daily Wastewater Discharges (MGD)
Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily
Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge
Jan 0.476 Apr 0.810 Jul 0.748 Oct 0.785
11 . _ , . , ,n , , In 1 11 -.^A^A A? -I^ Z' /In In nnA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for AHQSKIE (04-46-010) Page 3 of 5
Feb 1.107 May 1.244 Aug 0.958 Nov 0.504
Mar 0.955 Jun 1.070 Sep 0.299 Dec 0.236
4-B. Wastewater Discha rge and/or Land Application Permits
NPDES or Permitted Design Avg. Annual
Land Capacity
Capacity Daily Name of Sub-Basin
Application Dec. 31, 1997 (MG©) Discharge Receiving Stream
Permit Number (MGD) (MGD)
IRRIGATION LAND CHOWAN RIVER
WQ 0003885 0.901 0.901 0.825 APPLICAITON (04-1)
Wastewater Note:
4-C. Wastewater Discharge Interconnections: NONE
4-D. Number of sewer service connections: 2,236
4-E. Number of water service connections with septic systems: 24
4-F. Are there plans to build or expand wastewater treatment facilities in the next 10 years? Y Please
Explain: Wooten Co. of Raleigh, NC has preliminary plans to expand existing WWTP tp 1.0 mgd or better. Contact
Person : Ford Chambllss (Wooten Co.) 919-828-0531.
SECTION 5: WATER CONSERVATION AND DEMAND MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
5-A. What is the estimated total miles of distribution system lines? 35.00 Miles
5-B. Primary Types and Sizes of Distribution Lines
Asbestos Cement Cast Iron Ductile Iron Galvanized Iron Polyvinyl Chloride Other
(AC) (CI) (DI) (GI) (PVC)
Size Range (inches) 6-8 6-8 2 2-16
Q/o of lines 45 % 39 % 0 % 1 % 15 % 0 %
5-C. Were any lines replaced in 1997? Y Linear feet replaced: 10,000
5-D. Were any new water mains added in 1997? Y Linear feet added: 500
5-E. Does this system have a program to work or flush hydrants? Y Haw often? SEMI-ANNUAL
5-F. Does this system have a valve exercise program? N How often?
5-G. Does this system have a cross-connection control program? Y
5-H. Has water pressure been inadequate in any part of the system? N
Please Explain:
5-I. Does this system have a leak detection program? N What type of equipment or methods are used?
We do not have a formal leak detection program; however, we have a Fisher Mod XLT 20 leak detector.
5-3. Has water use ever been restricted since 1992? N
Please Explain:
5-K. Does this system have a water conservation plan? N
5-L. Did this system distribute water conservation information in 1997? N
5-M. Are there any local requirements on plumbing fixture water use which are stricter than the NC State
Building Code? N
Please Explain:
5-N. Does this system have a program to encourage replacement or retrofit of older, higher water-use
plumbing fixtures? N
5-0. Does this system have a water shortage or drought response plan? N
5-P. Is raw water metered? Y
5-Q. Is finished water output metered? Y
S-R. Do you have a meter replacement program? Y
5-S. How many meters were replaced in 1997? 250
5-T. How old are the oldest meters in the system? 20 years
5-U. What type of rate structure is used? DECREASING BLOCK
5-V. Are there meters for outdoor water use, such as irrigation, which are not billed for sewer services?
Y # of meters 48
5-W. Does this system use reclaimed water or plan to use it within the next five years? N # of
. , . Ir , I Ir III ... ^-rIAAA Al '111A crtninnAA
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for AHOSKIE (04-46-010) Page 4 of 5
connections MGD
SECTION 6: SYSTEM MAP (On file with NCDWR)
Part 2: Water Supply Planning Report for 1997
SECTION 7: WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS
7-A. Population to be Served
1997 2000 2010 2020
Year-Round 4,562 5,435 5,545 5,624
Seasonal Not Applicable
Population Note:
7-B. Projected Avg. Daily Service Area Demand (MGD)
1997 2000 2010 2020
(1) Residential 0.495 0.579 0.591 0,602
(2) Commercial 0.069 0.090 0.092 0.093
(3) Industrial 0.022 0.025 0.025 0.026
(4) Institutional 0.086 0.106 01108 0.110
(5) Backwash 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(6) Unaccounted-for water 0.031 0.016 0.017 0.017
(7) Service Area Demand 0.703 0.816 0.832 0.849
Projected Service Area Demand Note:
7-C. Is non-residential water use expected to change significantly through 2020 from current levels of
use? Y
If yes, please explain: Planned annexation
7-D. Future Supplies: NONE
7-F. Future Sales Contracts
Water Supplied to: Contract Amount and Duration
Pipe Size(s) Inches R or E
System Name PWSID MGD Year Begin Year End
HERTFORD CC) RURAL WATER 04-46-045 0.009 1998 2 R
R = Regular Use, E = Emergency Use
Future Sale Note:
7-G. What is the Total Amount of Future Sales Contracts for Regular Use? 0.009 MGD
SECTION 8: FUTURE WATER SUPPLY NEEDS
8-A. Avg. Daily Demand as Percent of Supply
Available Supply (MGD) 1997 2000 2010 2020
(1) Existing Surface Water Supply 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(2) Existing Ground Water Supply 0.910 0.910 0.910 0.910
1 .. 11 1 1 . . , . 7• I r. I J M 1 11 ^-^ A A A A/ n t n r 11 n I- n- A
1997 Local Water Supply Plan for AHOSKIE (04-46-010)
Page 5 of 5
(3) Existing Purchase Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 01000
(4) f=uture Supplies 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(5) Total Available Supply 0.910 0.910 0.910 0.910
Avg. Daily Demand (MGD) 1997 2000 2010 2020
(6) Service Area Demand 0.703 0.816 0.832 0.849
(7) Sales Contracts 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(8) Future Sales Contracts 0.009 0.009 0.009 01009
(9) Total Avg. Daily Demand 0.712 0.824 0.841 0.857
(10) Demand as Percent of Supply 78.0% 91.0% 92.0% 94.0%
(11) Additional Supply Needed to Maintain 800/6 (MGD) 0.000 0.120 0.141 0.162
System Notes: See Attachment, 9-3
8-e. Will demand exceed 800/b of available supply before the year 2020? Y
8-C. Are peak day demands expected to exceed the water treatment plant capacity by 2010?
If yes, what are your plans for increasing water treatment capacity?
8-D. Does this system have an interconnection with another system capable of providing water in an
emergency? Y
If not, what are you plans for interconnecting?
8-E. Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? N
If yes, please describe:
8-F. List the major water supply reports or studies used for planning: Water Use Reports, local billing reports,
and local water & sewer expansion studies.
SECTION 9: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE NEEDS
Is technical assistance needed:
9-A. to develop a local water supply plan? N
9-8. with a leak detection program? Y
9-C. with a demand management or water conservation program? Y
9-D. with a water shortage response plan? Y
9-E. to identify alternative or future water supply sources? N
9-F. with a capacity development plan? Y
9-G. with a wellhead or source water protection plan? N
9-H. with water system compliance or operational problems? N
9-I. with Consumer Confidence Reports? Y
9-3. Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system
deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.), or your ability to meet present and future
needs:
See Attachment 1
Cgt 1992 Local Water Supply Plan for AHQSKIE
Get DEH-Public Water Supply Section data for AHOSKIE
Submit;:
biro-//rlwr.Plmr.Ctatn nr, ins/noi-hin/foxweh Px?/r. /fnxwah/lwcn97?^Od-r1?-f11() S/i RIIMM