20090565 Ver 1_Monitoring Plan_20110204

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
1 February 2011
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 2009-00832
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Division of Water Quality
NC Department of Environment & Natural Resources
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Dear Ms. Karoly,
Dg- oSLPS
FEB 0 3 2011
UENR - WATER QUALITY
WERMIDS AND STQRMWATER BRANCH
This correspondence is in reference to Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Bank that is being developed by Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Development Company c/o: Mr.
Taylor Downing, in coordination with NCSU Natural Resource Foundation c/o: Mr. David
Ashcraft, located on the east side of Gum Branch Road (SR 1308), within Bachelors Delight
Swamp watershed, north of Jacksonville, Onslow County, North Carolina. The purpose of this
letter is to provide you with a final draft of the mitigation banking instrument (MBI) and to
request your agency's signature on this document. In addition, we have enclosed a CD copy of
the approved October 2010 mitigation plan and survey boundary of the bank property.
Pursuant to 60 FR 228, p.58610, 3. Agency Roles and Coordination, "No agency is
required to sign a banking instrument; however, in signing a banking instrument, an agency
agrees to the terms of that instrument." Please review the attached final version carefully; and if
you are in agreement with the terms of the MBI, please sign your appropriate signature block and
return it to our office within 30 days of your receipt of this letter. Please note that the mitigation
restoration plan, along with an e-mail copy of this MBI, has been provided to the team member
of your agency; and that the Wilmington District Office of Counsel has reviewed the property
disposition and disposal provisions in the MBI and agrees that these provisions provide adequate
preservation assurances for the Bank property.
For your information, our review of the instrument has been completed and the
Wilmington District Engineer is anticipating signing the mitigation banking instrument upon the
30-day time period. Please note that credits will not be released until items in Section VII of the
MBI have been finalized.
Thank you again for your time and for your agencies participation in the review of this
bank. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me, at the Wilmington
Regulatory Field Office, telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
Mickey Sugg, Project Manager
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Enclosure
DISTRIBUTION (with enclosure):
Mr. Jim Gregson, Director
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557-3421
Ms. Jennifer Derby, Chief
Wetlands Section - Region IV
Water Management Division
Environmental Protection Agency
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. Pete Benjamin
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh North Carolina 27636-3726
Ms. Molly Ellwood
North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Mr. Pace Wilber
National Marine Fisheries Service
Habitat Conservation Division
Post Office Box 12559
Charleston, South Carolina 29422-2559
Copy Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. Ron Sechler
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Ms. Becky Fox
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Wetlands Regulatory Section- Region IV
1307 Firefly Road
Whittier, North Carolina 28789
Mr. Steve Sollod
North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Mr. Glenn Catts
Hofmann Forest Liaison
College of Natural Resources
NCSU
2023 Biltmore Hall
Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
Mr. Christian Preziosi
Land Management Group, Inc.
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
Mr. Taylor Downey
Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Development
Company
1412 Eatonton Hwy Suite 700
Madison, Georgia 30850
Mr. David Ashcraft
NC State Natural Resources Foundation,
Inc.
Campus Box 8010
Room 3060, Biltmore Hall
Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
(Version June 2009)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement entitled
"Agreement To Establish Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank in
Onslow County, North Carolina":
N.C. Division of Water Quality:
By:
Date:
Cyndi Karoly, Branch Chief
Wetland and Stormwater Branch
19
(Version June 2009)
Attachment
CD of Barra II Wetland Mitigation Bank - July 2010 Mitigation Plan
21
BACHELORS DELIGHT
STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION BANK
Onslow County, North Carolina
FINAL MITIGATION PLAN
Sponsor.
Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Development Company
1412 Eatonton Highway, Suite 700
Madison, GA. 30650
Prepared by:
AkUMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP rmf.
Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 2522
Wilmington, N.C. 28402
and.
Florence & Hutcheson Consulting Engineers
Raleigh, NC
October 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION .......................
A. Project Overview ..................
B. Site Location ........................
C. Watershed Characterization
II. MITIGATION GOALS .....................
A. Protect Purpose .........................
B. Geographic Service Area (GSA)
III. SITE DESCRIPTION .............................
A. Community Types ............................
B. Vegetation .......................................
C. Soil Characteristics ..........................
D. Hydrology/Hydraulic Characteristics
IV. STREAM RESTORATION PLAN .............
A. Introduction ..........................................
B. Priority I Stream Restoration ...............
C. Zero Order Stream Restoration ...........
D. Stream Enhancement ..........................
E. Stream Preservation ............................
F. Stream and Wetland Buffer ..................
V. WETLAND RESTORATION PLAN ..........
A. Riparian Wetland Restoration ..............
B. Riparian Wetland Enhancement..........
C. Riparian Wetland Preservation ............
D. Non-Riparian Wetland Restoration ......
E. Non-Riparian Wetland Preservation ....
F. Reference Wetland/Stream Monitoring
VI. BANK IMPLEMENTATION
VII. POST-CONSTRUCTION MONITORING ........................
A. Wetland Restoration/Enhancement Success Criteria
B. Stream Restoration Success Criteria .........................
C. Stream Enhancement Success Criteria .....................
VIII. SITE MANAGEMENT..........
A. Adaptive Management....
B. Long-Term Management
2
2
2
3
4
4
5
6
6
6
7
7
..8
..8
..9
13
17
21
24
26
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
36
36
39
43
43
43
44
IX. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................45
X. SOURCES OF INFORMATION ......................................................................................................46
LIST OF FIGURES, TABLES, AND APPENDICES
Figure 1 ....................
Figure 2 ...................
Figure 3 ...................
Figure 4 ....................
Figure 5 ...................
Figure 6 ...................
Figure 7 ...................
Figures 7A. thru 7D.
Figure 8 ....................
Figure 9 ...................
Figure 10A. thru 10E
...... Project Vicinity Map
USGS Topographic Map
...................................2' LIDAR Topographic Map
................. Geographic Service Area (GSA) Map
...........................Onslow County Soil Survey Map
...............................1998 Aerial Photography Map
........................................... Restoration Plan Map
....................................... Restoration Plan Sheets
Typical Plan View and Cross-Section of Wet Ford
................................ Proposed Planting Plan Map
......................................... Monitoring Plan Sheets
Table 1. Excluded 14-Digit Hydrologic Units
Table 2. Restoration Totals by Stream Reach
Table 3. Wetland Mitigation Acreages
Table 4. Planting Plan for Small Stream Swamp Community
Table 5. Non-Riparian Wetland Planting Plan
Table 6. Projected Stream and Wetland Credit Totals
Table 6A. Summary of Credits by Mitigation Type
Table 7. Project Milestone Schedule
Table 8. Proposed Stream Cross-Sections
Table 9. Proposed Longitudinal Profiles by Stream Reach
Appendix A. Ecoregion Map
Appendix B. Approved Jurisdictional Wetland Plat
Appendix C. Site Photographs
Appendix D. USACE Stream Assessment Data Forms
Appendix E. Reference Reach Study/HEC-RAS Modeling
Appendix F. Historic Aerial Photography
Appendix G. Stream Buffer Effectiveness Correction Factor (SBCF) Maps
Appendix H. NCWAM Assessment
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On behalf of the bank Sponsor, Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Development Company (WREDCO),
Land Management Group (LMG) is submitting the following comprehensive mitigation plan for the
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project. The bank site (approximately 363 acres)
encompasses land owned by both WREDCO and The Endowment Fund of North Carolina State
University. The site is located near Jacksonville, NC in the headwaters of the New River, a major
tributary of the White Oak River Basin (Cataloging Unit 03030001). The project area consists of a
network of channelized headwater wetland and stream systems that have been historically altered
as a result of silvicultural and agricultural management practices. These practices have
compromised the functions of both the wetlands and streams within the project boundaries and
degraded water quality in the New River watershed.
The goal of the project is to restore the natural hydrologic conditions that existed prior to the
initiation of intensive land management in the early 1970s. At the present time, drainage within the
headwaters of each of the on-site streams has been modified to artificially increase or decrease the
functional size of the surrounding watershed. As a result, channels may become dehydrated due
to lack of flow (associated with truncated watersheds) or may experience erosion due to excessive
flow velocities (associated with artificially enlarged watersheds). These alterations have been
exacerbated by extensive logging within the floodplains and channelization throughout the lower
reaches.
Stream and wetland restoration activities will involve the backfilling and/or plugging of ditches in the
headwaters of each of the reaches and construction of new stream channels where appropriate.
The project will also utilize a zero order restoration approach for headwater streams which maintain
a natural watershed of approximately 25 to 83 acres.
The following restoration plan provides specific information regarding the technical approach for
the proposed stream and wetland restoration activities. Information regarding the proposed
monitoring procedures and long-term stewardship of the project are also included.
1
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Project Overview
The Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank site (approximately 363 acres)
consists predominantly of channelized headwater wetland and stream systems that have been
historically altered as a result of silvicultural and agricultural management practices. The site is
located just east of Gum Branch Road, approximately six miles north of Jacksonville, NC, in
Onslow County. The site consists of rolling terrain and is bisected by three main stream systems
(Hewitts Branch, Huffmans Branch, and Bachelors Delight Swamp). While a majority of the site
contains moderately well-drained soils, several areas along the eastern and western sections
contain poorly-drained soils associated with interstream divide landscape positions. During the
early 1970s, a network of drainage ditches was installed throughout these areas to lower
groundwater tables and intercept surface water. Site drainage flows south through the Bachelors
Delight Swamp, a third order tributary of the New River - part of the White Oak River Basin
(Cataloging Unit 03030001) (DWQ Subbasin 03-05-02). Based upon detailed site investigations,
16,761 If of stream restoration, 5,928 If of stream enhancement and 11,400 If of stream
preservation is proposed. A total of 60 ac of riparian wetland habitat has also been targeted for
restoration. Non-riparian wetland restoration, located throughout the interstream flats, will comprise
approximately 85 ac of the proposed project area. As a result, the restoration effort will allow for
increased stream habitat, floodwater storage, nutrient retention/sediment reduction, and intact
headwater wetland habitat for resident and migratory fauna.
B. Site Location
The tract is located east of the junction of Gum Branch Road and Quaker Bridge Road in northern
Onslow County, NC (refer to Figure 1). It is bordered on the northeast by the Hofmann Forest.
The site is located approximately 6 miles north of Jacksonville. The attached USGS 7.5-minute
topographic quadrangle (Jacksonville North quad) depicts the location of the site relative to
mapped blue-line streams and canals (Figures 2-3).
2
C. Watershed Characterization
The bank site is located within the White Oak River watershed (DWQ Subbasin 03-05-02). The
subbasin consists of managed forestry tracts, low-density residential and high density commercial
developments along the Gum Branch Road corridor. Population growth within the subbasin is
primarily focused in the areas north of Jacksonville and south of Richlands. Streams and
waterbodies within the watershed are susceptible to impairment from nutrient loading and low
ambient dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations. According to the White Oak River Basinwide
Water Quality Plan (NC DWQ 2005), a majority of the waterbodies within the subbasin are
impaired due to nutrient enrichment and periodic fecal coliform bacteria contamination.
Surface waters within the project area drain south to Bachelors Delight Swamp, a third order
tributary of the New River. The NC DWQ surface water body classification for Bachelors Delight
Swamp is C-NSW. Class "C waters are defined as those waters protected for secondary
recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish consumption, aquatic life (including propagation), survival and
maintenance of biological integrity, and agriculture. Secondary recreation includes wading,
boating, and other uses involving human body contact with water where such activities take place
in an infrequent, unorganized, or incidental manner. Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) is a
supplemental classification intended for waters needing additional nutrient management due to
being subject to excessive growth of microscopic or macroscopic vegetation. Best management
practices (BMPs), including riparian buffer setbacks, are implemented within NSW basins to help
offset or minimize nutrient loading to susceptible waters.
The site formerly consisted of several expansive areas of Mesic Pine Flatwood communities
dissected by multiple, small stream swamp systems in the headwater areas. Non-riverine
headwater wetlands (pocosin and swamp forest), characteristic of the outer Coastal Plain, existed
throughout the broad interstream flats in the eastern and western borders of the proposed project
area. These type of wetlands support a number of functions/values including, but not limited to the
following: groundwater recharge; floodwater storage and attenuation; filtration and storage of
nutrients, sediments, and/or toxic substances; and refuge/feeding habitat for resident and migratory
fauna. Stream systems work in concert with these wetlands to attenuate flood velocities, provide
aquatic habitat, and elevate the surrounding water table. At the present time, these functions have
3
been compromised through silvicultural management and agricultural practices (including ditching,
clear-cutting, conversion to fields, agri-chemical runoff, etc.). The New River and its tributaries
have exhibited significant water quality impairments associated with low DO, high total nitrogen,
and high total phosphorous. High nutrient concentrations originate from non-point source loading
associated with intensive agricultural practices common throughout the watershed. These
impairments tend to be exacerbated by channelization of streams and ditching of adjacent
headwater wetlands, resulting in diminished nutrient uptake and nutrient/sediment loading to down-
gradient waters.
II. MITIGATION GOALS
A. Project Purpose
The goal of the proposed bank is to provide high-quality compensatory mitigation for permitted
impacts within the White Oak Basin via the restoration, enhancement, and preservation of streams
and wetlands. The proposed activities will restore both the hydrologic and vegetative components
of four separate stream and wetland communities within the headwaters of Bachelors Delight
Swamp. The following categories of functions have been targeted for restoration or enhancement
within the Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank:
• BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLING -The restored stream and headwater wetland systems will
capture drainage from the surrounding watershed, dissipating energy in the downstream
environment. The increased retention times will allow for a suite of biotic and abiotic
processes to convert nitrogen and other nutrients into different forms that may be readily
consumed by the surrounding plant community. This retention also allows for sediment to
settle out of solution, reducing downstream pollution. Flow within the system will also
provide a valuable conduit for organic matter which will support downstream food webs.
Cessation of agricultural production within the headwaters will also reduce the nutrient and
sediment delivery to downstream waters.
• HYDROLOGIC/HYDRAULIC - The watershed restoration approach will provide for the re-
establishment of characteristic headwater wetland hydrology and contribute to natural flow
4
regimes for downstream tributaries. Restoration of riparian wetlands and headwater
wetland flats will result in the expansion of the surface and subsurface water storage
component of the ecosystem. The increase in storage volume will reduce peak discharge,
prolong baseflow, and contribute to channel stability.
• PLANT and ANIMAL HABITAT- Plantings associated with the various habitats will restore
the pine and native hardwood assemblages that existed prior to silvicultural and
agricultural management. When coupled with the variation in topography, these areas
provide valuable heterogeneity which supports a more diverse food web within the
ecosystem. This diversity provides a variety of food sources and refuge habitat for local
and migratory species. Increases in plant diversity will also be generated through the
development of microhabitats and organic matter inputs to the soil surface.
• AQUATIC HABITAT - Restoration of the existing watershed boundaries through the
removal of existing drainage ditches will restore natural flow regimes to several reaches
within the project area. New channel construction will also create numerous niche habitats
through the installation of woody debris, natural pools, etc. Restoration of seasonally
driven flow will rehydrate existing channels throughout the headwaters of Hewitts Branch,
Huffmans Branch, and Bachelors Delight Swamp. Both methods of restoration will allow
for macro-invertebrate and amphibian communities to repopulate these previously
inaccessible areas.
B. Geographic Service Area (GSA)
The tract is located within the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain (Ecoregion 63) as defined by Griffith et
al. (2002) "Ecoregions of North Carolina" (refer to Appendix A). This ecoregion encompasses the
area defined as the `Carolina Flatwoods' - a subregion occurring along nearly level, poorly drained
areas in the outer Coastal Plain including the White Oak River Basin.
The proposed project will serve as a general use wetland and stream mitigation bank serving the
White Oak River Basin (USGS Cataloging Unit 03030001). Note that the GSA has been amended
based upon comments from the IRT and now excludes the 14-Digit Cataloging Units located to the
south and east of HWY 17 in Pender and New Hanover Counties (Figure 4).
5
Table 1 provides a list of the excluded units.
Table 1. Excluded 14-Digit HUCs
14-Digit Cataloging Unit
03030001040005
03030001040010
03030001040020
III. SITE DESCRIPTION
A. Community Types
The tract consists of a variety of former wetland habitat types which coincide with the existing
gradients in topography, drainage patterns, and soil types. The primary wetland types targeted for
restoration are Coastal Plain small stream swamp and wet pine flatwoods. Based upon the
recently developed NC Wetland Assessment Manual (WAM), the targeted community types for the
bank site are (1) Non-Riparian Wetland Pine Flat; (2) Non-Riparian Wetland Pocosin; and (3)
Riparian Non-Riverine Headwater Wetland. Based upon the Cowardin classification for wetland
and deepwater habitats (Cowardin et al. 1979), the wetland community types to be restored are
Palustrine Scrub-Shrub and Forested Wetlands (i.e., broad-leaved deciduous, needle-leaved
deciduous, needle-leaved evergreen, and broad-leaved evergreen). Changes in restored
community types will coincide with changes in topography and soil types across the site.
B. Vegetation
The predominant land use of the tract and surrounding area is silvicultural (managed pine
plantation of various stand stages). Since the tract has been affected by prescribed drainage
improvements for forestry production, species indicative of drier, upland conditions are more
prevalent in areas currently targeted for riparian restoration and/or enhancement. These species
include old field blackberry (Rubus alumnus), dog fennel (Eupatonum capillifolium), bracken fern
(Pteridium aquilinum), broom-sedge (Andropogon glomeratus), and loblolly pine (Pins taeda).
Non-target species such as sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua) and red maple (Acer rubrum) are
dominant througout large sections of riparian habitat. More desirable species such as loblolly bay
6
(Gordonia lasianthus), fetterbush (Lyonia lucida), American holly (//ex opaca), red bay (Persea
borbonia), and sweet bay (Magnolia virginiana) were observed in isolated areas. Characteristic
hardwoods of the small stream swamp community (e.g. black gum, water tupelo, bald cypress) are
either sparse or absent in the upper stream reaches targeted for restoration. The species
assemblage has clearly shifted in response to long-term site drainage and timber management.
C. Soil Characteristics
The tract is located within a dissected drainage network and includes broad, flat interstream areas
along the perimeter of the project site. Moderately well-drained soils, such as the Goldsboro unit,
are found near the intersections of the existing stream channels. These units transition to the
somewhat poorly-drained Lynchburg series and to the poorly-drained Rains series, situated in the
headwater landscape positions of the existing channels and adjacent to the Hofmann Forest.
Bottomland areas associated with the lower portions of Bachelors Delight Swamp are mapped as
Muckalee loam, a poorly-drained unit commonly associated with active floodplains throughout the
Coastal Plain (refer to Figure 5).
D. Hydrology/Hydraulic Characteristics
The tract is located within a watershed that has historically received drainage improvements for the
purposes of increased timber productivity and/or crop yield (Figure 6). These improvements have
resulted in changes to functional watershed size and disrupted natural flow patterns throughout the
headwaters of this area. An intensive drainage network exists throughout the 156 ac. of cultivated
land in the northeastern portion of the project site. These activities have increased the size of the
Bachelors Delight Swamp drainage area while concurrently diverting flow from Huffmans Branch
and other tributaries. As a result, these other tributaries exhibit significantly reduced flow and lack
evidence of overbank flooding.
Evidence of drained hydric soils (i.e. low-chroma, friable soils exhibiting a relatively high
percentage of uncoated sand grains) was observed throughout the areas mapped as the Rains soil
series. Areas mapped as Goldsboro and Lynchburg have been bedded, but lack a significant
network of drainage improvements. These conditions are reflected in the current wetland
delineation that received USACE approval in October 2007 (refer to Appendix B).
7
Drainage improvements have also directly impacted streams throughout the lower portions of the
watershed. These impacts have increased the cross-sectional area of the natural stream, limiting
interaction with the surrounding floodplain and increasing flow velocities during peak flow events.
In addition, the straightening and excavation of stream channels has resulted in the removal of
large woody debris and other in-stream habitat, reducing biological diversity within the system.
Appendix C documents existing conditions throughout each of the main reaches targeted for
restoration.
IV. STREAM RESTORATION PLAN
A. Introduction
Like other small, blackwater streams of the Coastal Plain, Bachelors Delight Swamp and its
tributaries are susceptible to water quality impairment resulting from non-point source discharges
of contaminants - including nitrogen, phosphorous, and a suite of organophosphate-based
herbicides and pesticides. Currently, intensive agricultural practices in the headwaters, in addition
to concentrated development along the Gum Branch Road corridor, contribute to decreased water
quality of downstream waters. Ditches, channelized tributaries, and canals drain an approximate
ten-square mile area within the watershed. These surface waters serve as direct conduits for
sediment, nutrients, and other pollutants entering both the Bachelors Delight Swamp and the New
River. The channelization of streams contributes to channel instability and reduced attenuation on-
site. This, in turn, results in increased flooding and bank erosion for down-gradient areas. The
natural replenishment of fine sediments and nutrients from floodwaters onto the floodplain wetlands
within the site has been virtually eliminated so that sediment accumulation is occurring along the
stream bed and nutrients are being shunted downstream. The physical alteration of the stream
bed adversely affects biological communities through direct mortality, habitat loss, and shifts in
species composition. See Appendix D for additional stream assessment information.
8
Restoration of a natural, sinuous channel will provide the variety of habitat features necessary to
support a diverse invertebrate and bacterial community. The re-establishment of these
communities increases the uptake of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) within the stream system.
As DOC is processed, the microbial loop is established, forming a key component of the food web
(Allan, 1995).
Restoration of the natural channel will also assist in the maintenance of an elevated water table
throughout the adjacent floodplain. Elevation of the water table allows for the reestablishment of
hydric soil conditions, which aid in the transformation and sequestration of pollutants. Construction
of an appropriate channel pattern and profile will also reduce flow velocities, increase residence
time, and promote overbank flooding (resulting in the replenishment of fine sediments and nutrients
to adjacent floodplain wetlands).
Each of the four stream reaches targeted for restoration exhibit similar geomorphic positions.
Thus, it is anticipated that the identified functions to be restored or enhanced are fairly uniform
throughout the project area (Figure 7). Table 2 provides specific information for each of the four
sections of the project.
B. Priority I Stream Restoration
The Priority I approach will be applied to reaches that have experienced extensive manipulation to
the natural channel and have been disconnected from their natural drainage basins. The physical
manipulations to the channels have removed a majority of the in-stream structures and increased
the cross-sectional area, resulting in a disconnection from the surrounding floodplain.
Disconnection and/or redirection of flows in the headwaters have dehydrated several reaches on
the northern side of Maready Road, further compromising the aquatic functions within each stream.
Design parameters for this approach were based on the naturally occurring watershed boundaries
and corresponding flow characteristics throughout the site. A reference reach was defined near
the intersection of BD-2 and BD-3 where a distinct shift from a braided, zero order system to a
defined channel was observed. The functional watershed size at this transition point was
determined to be 83 acres. This 83 acre threshold was then applied to reaches targeted for
9
restoration throughout the site. Areas containing a post-construction watershed of greater than 83
acres were designed using Priority I techniques, while those maintaining smaller drainage areas
incorporated zero-order design elements. Assessments conducted at the reach were also used to
determine the dimensionless ratios which determine the final geometry of the Priority I reaches.
Table 2. Restoration Totals by Stream Reach
Name Restoration Enhancement L2 Preservation
Hewitts Branch
HE-1 5,103
HE-2 1,900
HE-3 500
HE-4 3,000

Huffmans Branch
HU-1 3,445
HU-1A (Zero-Order) 171 1,200
HU-2 (Zero-Order) 1,233
HU-3 2,000

Bachelor's Delight
Swamp
BD-1/2 (Zero Order) 447
BD-3 1,700
BD-4 (Zero Order) 2,107
BD-4A (Zero Order) 1,274
BD-5 1,728
BD-5A (Zero Order) 949
BD-5B (Zero Order) 0
BD-5C (Zero Order) 0
BD-5D (Zero Order) 0
BD-6 1,700
BD-7 3,600

Half Moon Creek
HM-1 (Zero Order) 901
HM-1 1,131

TOTAL 16,761 5,928 11,400
10
Construction of the restored channel will occur directly adjacent to the existing ditch. Spoil material
generated from the excavation of the new channel will be used to backfill the existing ditch and
restore natural contours within the floodplain. Natural woody material will be used to construct the
in-stream structures throughout each section. Hard structures will not be used. Rather, natural
materials (such as root wads and log vanes) will assist with channel stabilization and grade control.
Hydrologic Modeling: Hydrologic Engineering Center's River Analysis System (HEC-RAS Version
4.0) is a software package designed to perform one-dimensional, steady flow, analysis of water
surface profiles for a network of natural and constructed channels. HEC-RAS uses two equations,
energy and/or momentum, depending upon the water surface profile. The model is based on the
energy equation. The energy losses are evaluated by friction (Manning's equation) and
contraction/expansion (coefficient multiplied by the change in velocity head). The momentum
equation is used in situations where the water surface profile rapidly varies, such as hydraulic
jumps and stream junctions.
Backwater analysis was performed for the existing and proposed conditions for both bankfull and
100-year discharges. In addition to steady flow data, geometric data is also required to run HEC-
RAS. Geometric data consists of establishing the connectivity of the river system, which includes
cross-section data, reach lengths, energy loss coefficients (friction losses, contraction, and
expansion losses), and stream junction information.
Bankfull Discharge Analysis: HEC-RAS was used to evaluate how the discharge of the restored
channel flows within the proposed channel geometry. This evaluation verifies that the proposed
plan, dimension, and profile would adequately convey the discharge at the bankfull stage; the point
where water begins to overflow onto the floodplain. Bankfull discharge estimates were determined
using on-site conditions, the published regional curve, and the mini-regional curve created by
Ko/Florence & Hutcheson.
11
Rise/No-Rise Analysis: A HEC-RAS analysis has been prepared and completed on existing and
proposed conditions of the project channel(s). The resulting data output has been analyzed to
determine if the design channel is adequately conveying its bankfull discharge, and to determine if
a rise, fall, or no-rise in water surface elevations during the 100-year flood event has occurred.
See Appendix E for specific information from the reference reach and modeling outputs.
Hewitts Branch - HE-7: The headwaters of this reach have experienced extensive logging and
drainage manipulation since the early 1970s. At the present time, several drainage ditches to the
west of and adjacent to Maready Road bisect the natural watershed, reducing flows to the existing
channel. Extensive logging within the area has also removed target species and a majority of the
mature loblolly pines. As a result, little functional habitat remains throughout this reach.
Construction of the single thread channel will involve grading activities designed to re-establish
proper elevations and hydrology. The initial grading work will remove existing silvicultural bedding
and contour the stream valley corridor to the original grades. Following these activities, each of the
ditches within the headwaters of Hewitts Branch will be backfilled to the existing grade,
approximately +52' MSL. Removal of a portion of the existing access road will provide source
material for the proposed backfilling. Woody debris from recent logging events will be utilized
throughout this section to enhance habitat and microtopography within the valley.
Approximately 2,000 If of single thread channel will be constructed on the western side of Maready
Road. Construction activities for this section will take place within a 400' corridor. A permanent
rock ford (see typical on Figure 8) will be constructed at the intersection of Maready Road,
replacing an existing culvert. At the present time, the existing culvert maintains an invert elevation
similar to the incised channel located downstream. The new culverts will raise the invert elevation
to approximately +50' MSL, which will reconnect the stream to the existing floodplain.
An additional 3,000 If of channel will be constructed downstream of this intersection. As the valley
becomes more defined in this section, the need for contouring will be minimized. Rather, the
proposed earthwork will focus on channel construction while repairing logging damage and
backfilling of the existing channelized feature. Following these activities, this section will be
12
planted with hardwood species associated with the target small stream swamp community. An
estimated total of 5,103 If of restoration, extending from the intersection of the main branch to the
zero order tributary, is proposed for this area (Figure 7).
Huffman Branch - HU-7: A similar approach will be utilized for this reach, which has been
channelized north of Maready Road. Construction work will focus on the backfilling of ditches
associated with an access road in the northern section of the project. This will re-establish a
drainage connection to a majority of the 110 ac. natural watershed. Installation of new culverts will
also be installed at the intersection of existing access road and Maready Road. An estimated total
of 3,445 If of restoration, extending north from Maready Road is proposed for this area (Figure 7).
Half Moon Creek - HM 7: The headwaters of this reach have been managed for silvicultural
production for over 30 years. As a result, extensive channel modification and removal of the
characteristic riparian vegetation has occurred throughout the entire reach. Given the level of prior
disturbance, the stream corridor will be re-graded to achieve appropriate elevations and contours
throughout the existing valley.
Backfilling of the existing channel will occur between Maready Road and the southern project
boundary. Existing spoil piles and bedding will provide a majority of the source material for this
stage of the project. Removal of non-target species such as loblolly pine and sweet gum will occur
throughout the 200' wide valley to allow for grading activities to reestablish a gradual transition
between riparian and non-riparian habitats. When completed, a functional watershed exceeding 80
acres will provide hydrologic input to downstream section of the reach, restoring up to 1,131 If of
first order stream. Note that zero order stream construction will occur upstream of this section
providing an additional 901 If of restoration within the headwaters.
C. Zero Order Stream Restoration
A zero order approach will be applied to the headwater streams associated with the project. The
restoration design criteria will be consistent with current publish guidelines for the Coastal Plain
(USACE, 2007). Headwater (zero order) streams generally lack a defined bed and bank and are
located in smaller watersheds that are typically greater than 25 acres. Prior to developing the site
13
design, several tools were utilized to define the extent of the zero order stream systems within the
project area. These tools include 1' contour (LIDAR) data, soil survey data, historic aerial
photography, and on-site reference reach surveying. These data were then compared to the
proposed post-project watershed size to determine the applicability of the zero order approach.
Based on an analysis of the data collected, watersheds between 25 and 83 acres in size are
considered suitable for zero order restoration techniques. See Appendix F for historic aerial
photography of the site.
The length of the valley will be used to determine the final linear footage of zero-order stream
restoration. Areas outside of the 100-ft wide corridor (but still within the valley) are targeted for
riparian wetland restoration. Plantings consistent with small stream swamp and riparian wetland
communities of the outer Coastal Plain will be established as part of the restoration effort. Figure 7
depicts the layout of the stream component of this project.
Restoration of the ecosystems will re-establish diffuse, braided flow patterns throughout the
identified valley corridor. This will be achieved through removal of existing silvicultural bedding and
backfilling and/or plugging of ditches throughout the upper watershed. These activities will allow
runoff to sheet flow across the site and access the restored riparian headwater system. The
elevation of water table depths will also provide valuable base flow.
Huffman Branch - HU- IA: A small section of zero order restoration is proposed directly upstream
of HU-1. Proposed construction activities will be identical to those associated with the downstream
reach, but will transition into a braided system for approximately 171 If. Modeling indicates that the
watershed associated with this section will not support flow within a single thread channel. As a
result, this section will transition into a zero order, headwater system.
Huffman Branch - HU-2: This reach will be restored through the backfilling and/or grading of the
existing ditch network in the headwaters. Ditches along the access road are currently diverting
flow from approximately 40 acres to the western tributary (HU-1), resulting in the dehydration of a
majority of the reach. Construction activities will restore a hydrologic connection throughout the 60
acre watershed, restoring 2,273 If of zero order stream and associated riparian habitat.
14
Bachelors Delight Swamp - BD2: The drainage connection between the headwaters of this reach
and the downstream section of Bachelors Delight Swamp (BD-3) has been severed by the
construction of Maready Road. Extensive bedding and logging have also reduced the extent of
riparian habitat associated with this reach. Restoration of this section will reestablish a hydrologic
connection through the installation of properly sized culverts underneath Maready Road. These
features will reestablish the connection to the 60 acre drainage basin, sufficient to provide flow to
approximately 447 If of zero order stream.
Conditions along the northern side of Maready Road have also deteriorated due to logging
practices. Any existing silvicultural bedding will be removed and recontoured to reestablish the
natural valley slope. Channelized sections of BD-1 and 2 will also be backfilled to the natural
grade. As a result of these activities water tables within the surrounding areas will be elevated,
supporting the target riparian community and zero order stream system.
Bachelors Delight Swamp - BD-4A: The headwaters of this reach have been managed for
agricultural production since the 1970s. As a result, a majority of the hardwood species have been
removed and only a limited number of bald cypress saplings remain. Several large collector canals
and a network of lateral ditches currently direct flow to the eastern branch of Bachelors Delight
Swamp (BD-5). These manipulations have reduced the hydrologic input from the natural
watershed significantly and have compromised the aquatic functions of the stream throughout
much of the reach.
Proposed construction activities will focus on reestablishing the hydrologic connection between the
headwaters and the downstream section of this reach. Existing field ditches within the footprint of
the proposed zero-order stream will be backfilled and contoured to match the proposed grades of
the valley. Backfilling of laterals in the vicinity of the zero-order valley will help restore natural
hydrologic inflows (via groundwater contributions and overland flow). The footprint of the proposed
zero order system will be based on historic aerial photography (1938) which includes two narrow
corridors within the headwaters. Note that a critical component of the headwater restoration will be
the backfilling and removal of the collector canal located on the southwestern boundary of the
15
NCSU property. This canal currently dissects the headwater valley and directs flow to the south
and east (into the canal that drains to BD-5). Removal of this canal will allow for unimpeded flow
from the restored headwater valley to BD-4. Final elevations will be contoured to facilitate drainage
into the downstream section of the reach. Following construction activities, a majority of the 80
acre drainage basin will be restored, supporting up to 1,274 If of zero order stream restoration.
Bachelors Dg/ ht Swamp - BD-4: The downstream section of this reach has also experienced
flow reductions due to the extensive hydrologic modifications within the headwaters. These
modifications have effectively removed natural hydrologic input from a majority of the reach
resulting direct mortality to the aquatic species. The proposed construction activities associated
with BD-4A will restore the natural drainage pathways, rehydrating the existing braided channel
system. As indicated above, the boundary canal between WREDCO and NCSU property will be
removed and contours graded to match the valley floor. This will provide unimpeded flow from the
restored headwaters to BD-4. Additional earthwork associated with BD-4 will be limited to the
section directly adjacent to Maready Road. At the present time, the existing culverts are clogged
with debris, severing the hydrologic connection to the downstream portion of the reach. As a
result, approximately 600-800 If of braided channel has been submerged on the north side of
Maready Road. These culverts will be removed and replaced with a permanent rock ford which will
facilitate natural drainage to the downstream section of the reach (refer to typical on Figure 8).
Combined construction activities for the reach will restore up to 2,107 If of zero order stream
habitat.
Bachelors De/ yht Swamp - BD-5A: Conditions within the headwaters of this reach are similar to
BD-4A. However, due to the existing drainage network constraints from the adjacent tract
(Hofmann Forest), the opportunity to restore the entire subbasin is not feasible. As a result, only
the western branch has been targeted for zero order stream restoration. Construction within the
open fields will remove existing crowns and backfill and/or plug three lateral ditches. The collector
canal located on the southwest boundary of the field will also be plugged and backfilled. Final
elevations will be contoured to facilitate drainage through the existing wetlands located to the south
of the fields. The lower section of BD-5A is also dissected by a forestry road that extends from
Maready Road northeast to the boundary of the WREDCO and NCSU properties. Restoration
16
work will include the removal of this spoil road and contouring of the valley to match grades
between BD-5A and BD-5. Following completion of all construction activities, the functional
drainage area for this reach will exceed the 25 acre minimum threshold and support flow for up to
1,157 If of zero order stream
Half Moon Creek - HM IA: This section will connect with the single thread channel construction
currently proposed for the downstream section of HM-1. Construction activities will occur on the
north side of Maready Road. During this stage of construction the existing culvert will be removed
and replaced with a permanent rock ford (refer to Figure 8) to facilitate diffuse flow from the
upstream portion of the reach. Work within the headwaters will include backfilling of approximately
2,000 If of existing ditch and recontouring within the 200' wide valley. Following the earthwork
phase, all disturbed areas will be planted with a mixture of hardwood species associated with the
target small stream swamp community. Based on the existing watershed boundary, up to 901 If of
zero order stream will be restored.
D. Stream Enhancement
The proposed enhancement activities will focus on sections to the south of Maready Road, where
direct impacts to the aquatic system are less acute. Stream enhancement will be achieved through
a variety of approaches across the site. Overall, management activities have reduced the aquatic
functions within several reaches via the alteration of storm-driven hydraulics and removal of in-
stream habitat. In addition, the placement of spoil material within the adjacent floodplain
compromises stream/floodplain interaction.
Hewitts Branch - HE-3: This section, located south of Maready Road, includes approximately 500
If of stream that has been historically impacted by road construction and silvicultural management
practices. Areas directly adjacent to the road bed have been channelized and culverted to control
runoff and drainage in the vicinity of the constructed road. The existing culvert has not been
maintained and flows are currently restricted due to sediment deposition on the upstream and
downstream sides. As a result, natural flow is impeded.
Channelization has disconnected the stream from the adjacent floodplain. In addition to this
17
disturbance, a large ditch that parallels the entire western edge of the floodplain intercepts surface
water and groundwater input to the adjacent stream. Spoil piles from the excavation of the stream
currently serve as an artificial boundary to the existing wetlands and divert flow towards HE-1. In
addition to compromising stream function, the incised channel adversely affects the hydroperiod of
the adjacent riparian wetlands. Overall, management activities have reduced the aquatic functions
within this reach via the alteration of storm-driven hydraulics and removal of in-stream habitat. In
addition, reduced connectivity of the wetland floodplain reduces the potential for nutrient/pollutant
retention.
Enhancement of aquatic function will be achieved through the restoration of seasonal variation in
flow dynamics via removal of the road bed and the installation of the wet ford. The restoration of a
natural flooding regime (amplitude, timing, etc.) will promote the re-establishment of characteristic
riparian vegetation. The existing ditch along the western edge of the stream valley will also be
filled and restored to the existing grade. Enhancement of riparian wetland hydrology will contribute
to stream baseflow (particularly important to stream function during periods of reduced surface
water inflow). Based upon the observed conditions, 500 If of Level II Enhancement is proposed for
this section.
Huffman Branch - HU-3: This section, located south of Maready Road, includes approximately
2,000 If of stream that has been disturbed by road construction and silvicultural management
practices. Due to the flow restrictions present along Maready Road, this section drains only a
small percentage of its natural watershed. As a result, sections of the channel now resemble
braided systems normally associated with headwater wetland areas. Extensive evidence of
historic logging within the floodplain was also observed throughout the reach, as indicated by the
presence of an expansive clear-cut along the western edge of the existing wetlands. Non-target
vegetative assemblages dominated by sweet gum and red maple saplings and trees ranging in age
from 10 to 20 years are also present along the eastern section of the floodplain.
HU-3 exhibits relative morphological stability along much of its reach. Therefore, enhancement will
not require earth work along this section of the tributary. The enhancement of aquatic function will
be realized as a result of the reestablishment of natural hydrologic inflows that have been altered
18
by prior land-use practices). Restoration of upstream stream channels (both first order and zero
order tributaries) and riparian wetlands will result in functional benefits to downstream waters. The
natural hydroperiod of HU-3 has been compromised by prior channelization and
compartmentalization of the contributing watershed. These land-use practices have resulted in
modifications to channel morphology, floodplain interaction, flow regime, and sediment transport.
The combined effects of upstream channelization and compartmentalization via the road bed that
bisects the stream reach results in more acute, episodic discharge to HU-3. Characteristic pulsed
flooding events will be achieved via the restoration of upstream channels and the removal of an
approximate 25-ft wide road bed. A stream valley (wet ford) will be graded within the area of the
existing road bed. The existing under-sized culverts will be removed. The eastern ford will
reestablish the connection to a 55-acre drainage area associated with HU-2 that is currently
serviced by an 18" diameter culvert. The western ford will provide an unrestricted connection to
the 300-acre drainage area associated with HU-1 and will expand the natural hydrologic
connection to both the restored channel and floodplain associated with the restoration of the HU-1
reach. This connection will support nutrient cycling, invertebrate passage, and reduced flow
velocities within the section targeted for enhancement.
Approximately 3,300 native hardwoods will also be planted within the adjacent riparian zone to help
re-establish the appropriate small stream swamp community. This revegetation within the
floodplain will stabilize the areas along the western floodplain that remain sparsely vegetated
following the logging activities that occurred in 2007-08. Plantings along the eastern edge will
occur in areas currently dominated by non-target species such as red maple and sweet gum. As
these plantings mature, they will provide additional shading for the stream channel and refuge
habitat for larger fauna.
Bachelors De/ yht Swamp - BD-5: This section includes 1,728 If of existing channel located
downstream from BD-5A. A majority of this section has been channelized to accommodate
drainage from the adjacent forestry operations. Enhancement of aquatic function within this area
will be achieved through the removal of the existing soil road and spoil piles located within the
floodplain. Following the removal of these features, natural valley contours will be restored to
facilitate overland flow into the existing channel. The restored floodplain will serve to filter
19
pollutants and remove sediment, thus improving water quality throughout the reach.
An existing conditions HEC-RAS model (models the channel with the culvert) was completed for
BD5 which depicts increased water surface elevations for the bankfull, 10 and 100 year storm
events when compared with the proposed conditions model (models the channel without the
culvert and road bed). The existing and proposed conditions were modeled 500 feet upstream and
downstream of the culvert at the soil road to determine the impact on the natural hydrologic regime.
The model results show that the culvert has an increase in water surface elevations of 2.58 feet for
the bankfull storm, 1.76 feet for the 10 year storm and 1.32 feet for the 100 year storm event when
compared with proposed conditions at the inlet of the culvert. These results quantify the extent and
frequency of ponding that occurs under the current conditions. Based on these results, removal of
the existing culvert will restore natural hydraulics and hydrology within the valley of BD5. These
activities will support sediment and debris transport through the system and restore habitat for
fauna and flora that has previously been negatively impacted by unnatural inundation.
Bachelors De/ipht Swamp - BD-6: BD-6 includes approximately 1,700 If of stream enhancement
along its northwestern and southeastern reaches. Functional uplift along BD-6 will be achieved
through the reestablishment of a hydrologic connection to restored headwater and riparian
wetlands of BD-4, BD-4A, BD-5, and BD-5A. Restoration of upstream zero-order streams, re-
connection of natural watersheds, and removal of flow impediments will contribute to the
enhancement of stream function throughout BD-6. The reestablishment of a characteristic, pulsed
hydrologic regime will promote channel equilibrium, floodplain interaction, and associated
nutrient/sediment retention.
The southeastern section of BD-6 receives continual, increased inflow from a large borrow pit/pond
located immediately east of Maready Road and adjacent to BD-5. A portion of the borrow pit was
excavated from the floodplain of BD-5. Flow from BD-5 is re-directed into this pond prior to
discharging to BD-6 via a submerged pipe. As a result, the receiving watershed is subject to
modified water quality conditions and flow regimes. The altered hydrologic connection between
BD-5 and BD-6 also disrupts the passage of semi-aquatic and aquatic fauna between these
reaches. Proposed enhancement activities will include the removal of the borrow pit via grading
20
(i.e. infilling) and contouring to pre-disturbance elevations and planting of characteristic riparian
vegetation. The outlet pipe underneath Maready Road will be replaced by a large wet ford that will
span the natural valley and provide adequate drainage for the upstream watershed. The result will
be unimpeded, natural flow to downstream segments.
Characteristic hydrologic inflow to the northwestern section of BD-6 will be also be reestablished
through the installation of a wet ford at the intersection of Maready Road. While this section
exhibits relative morphologic stability, hydrologic input from BD-4 is restricted by a poorly
functioning, undersized culvert at the existing road. As a result, flow is not sufficient to maintain
proper channel geometry and reduces the frequency and amplitude of overbank flooding of the
adjacent riparian wetlands. These conditions persist until the reach connects with the perennial
section of Bachelors Delight Swamp (BD-7) (near the confluence of the northwestern and
southeastern sections of BD-6). As a result, floodplain benefits (including nutrient
exchange/transformation and sediment retention) are compromised along this reach of BD-6.
Restoration of the headwater stream and wetlands of BD-4 and BD-4A and the reestablishment of
unimpeded flow regimes will promote channel equilibrium and enhanced stream/floodplain
interaction.
E. Stream Preservation
The Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank site is situated at the headwaters of the New River
watershed, immediately north of the more heavily urbanized areas of Jacksonville, NC. Road
corridors within the immediate vicinity of the bank site (including Gum Branch Road and Western
Boulevard corridors) continue to experience significant residential and commercial expansion
associated in large part with the 2005 federal Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission
(BRAC) and resultant population growth. Preservation of headwater streams and wetlands in
urbanized watersheds is an important component of maintaining and supporting habitat
structure/function and water quality functions of downstream waters (particularly in areas
susceptible to near-term perturbations associated with population growth and development). The
stream preservation reaches of the Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank site are situated at the down-
gradient terminus of the project. Note that a single-family neighborhood is currently under
construction on the parcel directly south of the bank site. Preservation of the streams and
21
wetlands within the lower reaches of the property provides an opportunity to establish a protected
corridor from restored upstream areas to down-gradient waters.
The White Oak River Basin supports some of the most "biologically significant habitats along the
entire U.S. Atlantic Coast" (NCDENR 2007). Habitat conservation within the basin is the focus of
the Onslow Bight Conservation Forum, a landscape-scale collaborative conservation effort. One of
the major goals of this effort (and as supported by the State of NC) is the buffering of military bases
and the protection of natural areas off military lands. The preservation component of the proposed
bank site and the connectivity that it would provide to Hoffman Forest is consistent with such goals.
It is important to note that the receiving waters of New River support expansive areas of primary
nursery area (PNA) and consist of Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) as defined by 15A NC
Administrative Code 031 .0101 and 15A NCAC 02B .0225, respectively. Preservation of
contributing stream reaches is important for the continued functioning of these identified coastal
resources. Areas of New River south of US Hwy 17 also contain submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAV) beds considered Critical Habitat Area under Marine Fishery Council rules. SAV provides
important nursery habitat for many species (including blue crabs, penaeid shrimp, and red drum).
Predatory fish also utilize SAV habitat for foraging. SAV growth and distribution in particularly is
limited by water quality impairments (such as turbidity associated with upstream sediment loading).
Restoration and preservation of streams that drain to coastal waters is consistent with the goals
and recommendations of the Coastal Habitat Protection Program (CHPP) of the NC Division of
Marine Fisheries (DMF). Strategies and recommendations of CHPP include the enhancement and
protection of habitats from physical impacts and incentives to reduce non-point source pollution via
minimizing losses to wetlands and streams. Preservation of the Bachelors Delight streams is
consistent with these strategies.
A number of federally-listed species have been identified as occurring within the larger White Oak
River Basin. A majority of these species are associated with wetland and aquatic habitats. Listed
rare species include the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), Croatan crayfish
(Procambarus piumimanus), Carolina gopher frog (Rana capito), oak toad (Bufo quercicus), and
black swamp snake (Phaiacrocoraxauritus). Of the nearly 100 rare species of vascular plant in the
22
White Oak River Basin, sixty-eight (68) are associated with wetland habitats (NCDENR 2007).
Preservation of stream corridors provides functional benefits to the habitats that support these
species.
Approximately 2 miles of Coastal Plain stream will be preserved in conjunction with the
development of the bank site (Figure 7). The areas targeted for preservation range from braided
headwater channels to large bottomland hardwood ecosystems. Stream channels within these
areas retain the characteristic dimension, plan, and profile relative to their watershed. As a result,
the stream/floodplain interaction remains intact and functional. Substantial in-stream habitat, such
as overhanging roots mats, snags, and leaf packs also support a diverse invertebrate community
within each reach (See Appendix D). In addition, sufficient canopy coverage also exists to regulate
stream temperatures during summer months.
Hewitts Branch - HE-2: The upper reach of the Hewitts Branch tributary (HE-2), north of Maready
Road, has experienced relatively minor silvicultural impacts, and retains a wide, intact wetland
community. Preliminary data suggest that this reach would be classified as a DA5 channel. As
with most headwater systems, a majority of the flow is directed through a series of braided
channels of varying widths and depths. The gentle, sloping topography ranging from +40' MSL to
+50' MSL supports a broad floodplain canopy comprised of several native hardwood species.
These species include mature water oak (Quercus nigra), swamp chestnut oak (Quercus
michauxii), and American holly.
Approximately 1,900 If of braided channel have been proposed for preservation in this reach. The
adjacent riparian wetlands have also been targeted for preservation based upon the native
hardwood assemblage composition and lack of silvicultural disturbance.
Hewitts Branch - HE-4: The remaining length of Hewitts Branch, south of the intersection of HE-1,
has been targeted for preservation. The section includes approximately 3,500 If of a high quality
second order stream that has experienced minimal impact from the surrounding silvicultural
management activities. Data indicate that this reach would be classified as a C5 channel. A
distinct valley is present throughout the lower reaches of the branch with elevations ranging from
23
+30' MSL to +45' MSL. The floodplain is comprised of a natural assemblage of native hardwoods
such as black gum, swamp chestnut oak, and water oak. Approximately 400' of intact floodplain
are present throughout this area.
Huffman Branch - HU-IA: This section, located to the north of HU-1, contains approximately
1,200 If of small, zero order stream channel. The canopy is comprised of a natural assemblage of
native species such as black gum, red bay, and wax myrtle (More//a cerifera). While existing trees
and shrubs indicate logging within the last 10 to 20 years, the stream appears to be stable and
functional. Preservation of the reach as part of the bank project will ensure long-term protection of
the reach and its associated functions.
Bachelors Delight Swamp - BD-3: This section, located downstream of BD-1/2, has been targeted
for preservation. Located on the south side of Maready Road, this section includes approximately
1,700 If of high quality first order stream that maintains a relatively stable channel and associated
floodplain. Approximately 150' of intact floodplain are present throughout this area with a well-
defined valley that ranges from +32' to +46' MSL. The floodplain is comprised of a natural
assemblage of native species such as black gum, red bay, and water oak.
Bachelors Qg/ ht Swamp - BD-7: The remaining section of Bachelors Delight Swamp
encompasses approximately 3,600 If of high quality second-order stream that has been minimally
impacted by the adjacent logging operations (Figure 7). A distinct valley is present throughout this
section with elevations ranging from +28' MSL to +46' MSL. The floodplain is comprised of a
natural assemblage of native hardwoods such as black gum, swamp chestnut oak, and water oak
and would be categorized as a bottomland hardwood ecosystem. Approximately 800' of intact
floodplain are present throughout this area.
F. Stream and Wetland Buffer
Per the 2008 Mitigation Rule, compensatory mitigation may include "the protection and
maintenance of terrestrial resources, such as non-wetland riparian areas and uplands, when these
resources contribute to or improve the overall ecological functioning of aquatic resources in the
watershed" (CFR 332.3(c)(2)). In addition, the North Carolina IRT recently released a draft of the
24
'Regulatory Guidance for the Calculation of Stream and Buffer Mitigation Credit for Buffer Widths
Different from Standard Minimum Widths NC (Version 4.57 Draft)': The purpose of the guidance is
to provide a mechanism by which stream mitigation credits may be adjusted (upward or downward)
when proposed stream buffers differ from the standard, minimum width (i.e. 50 feet in piedmont
and coastal plain streams). Within the guidance, specific criteria are identified for the application of
the stream buffer effectiveness correction factor (SBCF). Providing additional buffer width (in
excess of 50 feet) will result in a corresponding increase in stream mitigation credit. The proposed
buffer widths for Bachelor's Delight Mitigation Bank are a minimum of 151 ft (corresponding to a
13% increase in stream credit). The actual area of uplands along each reach is variable depending
upon the width of the valley corridor to be restored, enhance, or preserved. The entire width of the
buffer area (both within existing valley corridors and within adjacent uplands) will be protected via
the conservation easement deed to be recorded for the site. Appendix G provides additional
information on specific stream reach totals based upon the application of the SBCF. The proposed
buffer area is also depicted in Figure 7.
Upland buffer areas that have been recently clear-cut (outside of existing valleys) will be restored
via the planting of longleaf pine (Pins palustris). Based upon project design, approximately 129
acres of upland buffer will be restored and protected in perpetuity via the conservation easement
deed. Of this acreage, approximately 35 acres are associated with first order streams and thus are
incorporated into the SBCF calculations. The upland buffer areas exhibit moderately well-drained
to well-drained sandy soils (Goldsboro and Norfolk series). The upland restoration effort is
intended to restore the Atlantic Mesic Longleaf Woodland community (Peet and Allard, 1993) that
existed prior to anthropogenic disturbances., In addition to longleaf pine, this community includes
southern red oak (Quercus falcata), post oak (Quercus stellata), and water oak. A diverse
herbaceous layer may also develop if fire suppression is minimized. Restoration of this diverse
community offers an excellent opportunity to restore conditions that existed in the late 19th century.
In light of the effort to restore and preserve this upland community type in adjacent uplands, a more
favorable ratio for wetland preservation is requested (see below).
25
V. WETLAND RESTORATION PLAN
A. Riparian Wetland Restoration
Approximately 60 acres associated with the degraded stream systems have been targeted for
restoration. As discussed in the previous section, these areas have been converted to
monoculture pine plantations through silvicultural management activities over the past four
decades. A majority of the targeted areas are located in the transitional zone between the
managed pine stands and the remaining jurisdictional wetlands. The vegetation within these areas
is comprised of red maple, sweet gum, and red bay saplings. Table 3 provides specific information
on the proposed acreages for each wetland type included within the bank site.
Hydrologic Restoration: Characteristic hydrology of riparian areas will be restored through the
reestablishment of natural drainage basins and channel design throughout the site. The proposed
channel work will raise the bed elevation, minimizing subsurface drainage and increasing overbank
flooding within the adjacent floodplain. Restoration of the natural watershed boundaries throughout
the upstream sections will also increase the effective drainage basin size, which will provide
additional hydrologic input. The proposed restoration footprint for these areas was generated
through the use of HEC-RAS modeling, 1' contour LIDAR data, geomorphic data, and observed
field conditions. For example, the existing jurisdictional wetlands associated with HU-1 are found
along the +42' MSL contour. Output from the HEC-RAS modeling projects a flood elevation of 46'
during a 1 Year storm event. This suggests that sufficient hydrologic input from a relatively small
rain event will result in overbank flooding within the valley following stream restoration activities.
These overbank events coupled with the surface inflow of the restored watershed and the elevation
of groundwater levels will re-establish characteristic hydrology of the riparian wetlands.
Vegetative Restoration: The proposed restoration areas will be planted with species typical of a
small stream swamp community (Figure 9). Plantings will include bald cypress (Taxodium
distichum), swamp tupelo (Nyssa biflora), ironwood (Carpinus caroiiniana), and swamp chestnut
oak. Trees will be planted on 9-ft spacings, corresponding to 538 trees per acre. It is expected
that other characteristic species will recruit naturally into these restored areas upon successful
hydrologic restoration.
26
Table 3. Wetland Mitigation Acreages
Type Proposed Acreage
Riparian Restoration 60
Riparian Enhancement 28
Riparian Wetland Preservation 48
Non-Riparian Restoration 85
Non-Riparian Preservation 13
SBCF/Upland Buffer 129
TOTAL 363
Table 4 provides more information regarding species quantities and composition for the small
stream swamp community.
Table 4. Planting Plan for Small Stream Swamp Community
Small Stream Swamp 60 ac. Riparian Restoration

Common Name Scientific Name % Composition # Planted
Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum 30 9,684
Swamp Tupelo Nyssa biflora 25 8,070
Red Bay Persea borbonia 20 6,456
River Birch Betula nigra 15 4,842
Ironwood Carpinus caroliniana 10 3,228

TOTAL 32,280
B. Riparian Wetland Enhancement
Approximately 28 acres of existing jurisdictional wetlands have been targeted for enhancement. At
the present time, these areas are located along narrow fringes adjacent to the degraded stream
systems. Characteristic vegetation has been altered through silvicultural management activities
that included clear-cutting, bedding, and ditching. While these areas technically meet the criteria
for jurisdictional wetlands, excavation and maintenance within the existing channels has
27
compromised the natural hydroperiod. As a result, flooding duration and frequency has been
reduced.
Existing wetlands that have been degraded by prior channel excavation will be enhanced via
stream restoration. Elevation of the channel bed and reconnection of the stream to the adjacent
floodplain will re-establish characteristic riparian wetland hydrology. Any areas in which vegetation
is removed as part of the stream restoration effort will be replanted with characteristic riparian
wetland species. As a result of the stream restoration, a natural hydrologic regime and habitat
assemblage will replace the current degraded system. These activities will contribute to additional
biogeochemical cycling and habitat utilization throughout the existing jurisdictional wetland
footprint.
C. Riparian Wetland Preservation
Approximately 48 acres of habitat located along the existing stream reaches has not been
adversely impacted by prior site management activities exhibit relatively natural wetland conditions.
As such, these areas will remain intact and functional via incorporation into the conservation
easement. This area was examined using the methodology outlined in NCWAM User Manual and
data sheets are provided in Appendix H. A relatively mature canopy comprised of native species
(e.g. swamp tupelo and bald cypress) and characteristic sub-canopy species (e.g. ironwood,
American holly, and red bay) was observed throughout the lower reaches of Hewitts Branch,
Huffmans Branch, and Bachelors Delight Swamp. These areas were characterized by natural
hummocks and microtopographic lows capable of retaining 6 to 12 inches of water following
inundation. All floodplains associated with these areas provide ample substrate for sediment and
pollutant retention during high flow events and reduce downstream flow velocities. Protection of
these corridors will also provide valuable habitat connectivity to the vast protected headwater
wetlands of the adjoining Hofmann Forest. Given the relatively undisturbed condition of these
riparian wetlands, calculated NC WAM rating, and the incorporation of upland buffers across the
entire bank site (see Section III (F) above), a 5:1 ratio is proposed for the riparian wetland
preservation.
28
D. Non-Riparian Wetland Restoration
Approximately 85 acres within the project boundary have been targeted for non-riparian wetland
restoration (Figure 7). This area has been actively cultivated for several decades for the
production of soybeans, cotton, and other commodity crops. As part of the conversion to
agricultural fields, an extensive network of ditches and canals was installed to improve drainage. A
majority of the soils are mapped as Pantego loam, a very poorly drained series commonly
associated with shallow depressional areas and broad, interstream flats in the Coastal Plain.
Spacing between the laterals ranges between 330' and 350'. Lateral ditches range in depth from
3'-4', and the larger collector canals range from 5'-7'.
Hydrologic Restoration: Restoration of the 85 acres of non-riparian wetland habitat will be achieved
via the backfilling and/or plugging of ditches. In addition, removal of the collector canals along the
southern boundary of the fields will allow for surface water to sheetflow into the restore stream
channels. Installation of ditch plugs and associated grading work along secondary and tertiary
ditches will restore characteristic wetland hydrology to the streamhead pocosin and wet pine flat
habitats (refer to Figure 9). Doing so will restore natural groundwater hydroperiods and provide for
increased surface storage.
Vegetation Restoration: Following construction activities the area will be planted with characteristic
wetland species coinciding with gradients in landscape position and anticipated hydrologic
conditions (Figure 9). Plantings will be designed to transition from the small stream swamp
community to a fringe of streamhead pocosin. The streamhead pocosin, located on the outer
valley fringe, will be characterized by a higher density of pond pine concurrent with a decrease in
abundance of bald cypress and black gum. Areas of slightly higher topography occurring within
interstream flats will be planted with increased abundance of pond pine. The shrub layer will be
comprised of American holly and loblolly bay. Other characteristic shrub species (e.g. inkberry,
fetterbush, American titi) will likely volunteer into the area due to the proximity to Hofmann Forest.
Tree seedlings will be planted on 9-ft spacings (equivalent to a density of 538 stems/acre). Shrub
species will be planted on 8-ft spacings (equivalent to a density of 680 stems per acre). Table 5
provides additional information on species and quantities.
29
Functional Restoration: Restored wetlands will intercept runoff from adjacent crop fields, dissipate
stormwater velocity, and enhance nutrient and sediment trapping. These restored functions are
likely to have discernible benefits to water quality and habitat downstream. Vegetative restoration
will provide for increased foraging and refuge habitat for resident and migratory species. In light of
acute development pressures in this region of eastern North Carolina, the White Oak River Basin is
particularly susceptible to loss of wetland functions and associated watershed impacts. By
providing for successful restoration of an expansive non-riparian wetland system, the Bachelors
Delight Wetland and Stream Mitigation Bank will help to replace wetland functions critical to water
quality and wildlife habitat in the area.
Table 5. Non-Riparian Wetland Planting Plan
Streamhead Pocosin 9 ac. Non-Riparian Restoration
Common Name Scientific Name % Composition # Planted
Swamp Tupelo Nyssa biflora 25 1,345
Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum 20 1,076
Pond Pine Pinus serotina 20 1,076
Atlantic White Cedar Chamaecyparis thyoides 15 807
Tulip Poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 15 807
Sweetbay Magnolia virginiana 10 538
TOTAL 5,649
Wet Pine Flat 76 ac. Non-Riparian Restoration
Common Name Scientific Name % Composition # Planted
Pond Pine Pinus serotina 40 30,558
Sweetbay Magnolia virginiana 15 11,459
Red Bay Persea borbonia 15 11,459
Inkberry Ilex glabra 15 11,459
Huckleberry Gaylussacia frondosa 15 11,459
TOTAL 76,396
GRAND TOTAL 82,045
E. Non-Riparian Wetland Preservation
Approximately 13 acres of non-riparian wetlands, located within the headwaters of HU-1, will be
30
included within the conservation easement. This area was also rated based on the methodology
described in the NC WAM User Manual which evaluates the overall functions of the system
(Appendix H). Although this block has been managed for silvicultural production, extensive
ditching and/or bedding has been limited to the perimeter of the block. As a result, subsurface
storage has not been significantly impacted, allowing hydrologic input from the block to provide
baseflow for the zero order and first order sections of Huffmans Branch. Ample opportunity for
surface storage, in the form of microtopographic variation within the block was also observed. This
variability modulates peak flow during large rain events which limits the potential for erosion within
the restored channel. Vegetation within the block has been managed for loblolly pine production
but the assemblage does include native hardwoods that have remained undisturbed for 20 years.
The assemblage includes mature loblolly pine, black gum, red maple, and loblolly bay in the
canopy and sub-canopy strata. Understory species include red bay, American titi, high-bush
blueberry, fetterbush, and inkberry. Herbaceous and woody vine species include netted chain fern,
Virginia chain fern, royal fern, and greenbrier. The diverse assemblage is characteristic of
relatively undisturbed non-riparian wetland flats in eastern North Carolina. The relative maturity of
the stand will provide valuable refuge habitat and serve as a corridor for migratory wildlife between
the Hofmann Forest and the surrounding bank site. In light of the functions (both water quality and
habitat) supported by this intact wetland assemblage, a 7:1 ratio is proposed for this section of
preservation.
F. Reference Wetiand/Stream Monitoring
LMG has identified multiple reference areas within the existing wetland stream communities within
the property. The preservation areas of Hewitts Branch (HE-2) contain a stable, intact stream
system and adjacent riparian community. This feature will likely serve as a reference for both zero
order stream and riparian wetland habitat, as no alterations to the existing watershed are proposed
for this section. The lower reach of Hewitts Branch (HE-4) contains a single thread channel stream
and a small stream swamp/bottomland hardwood community suitable for use as a reference area.
Hydrologic monitoring equipment will be installed in these two areas 90 days prior to initiation of
construction activities. An array of three monitoring wells (WM-40s) will be installed across the
existing valley at each of the two locations. These gauges will record water table depths within the
31
riparian wetlands and water depth within the stream channel on a daily basis. The calibration point
of the in-stream well will correspond to the bankfull elevation of the stream channel. As a result,
positive readings (calculated above the calibration point) will provide evidence of overbank
flooding. These data will then be compared to those from the adjacent riparian wetlands to
develop a regression analysis that correlates rainfall to stream discharge. Similar monitoring
techniques will be applied to those areas targeted for restoration and enhancement in order to
determine the success of the proposed design.
VI. BANK IMPLEMENTATION
The Bank Sponsor (WREDCO) will enter into a binding agreement with The Endowment Fund of
North Carolina State University to implement the proposed bank. Together, these entities own fee
simple title for the entire bank site. The Sponsor and The Endowment have control of all ditches
affecting groundwater hydrology of the site. Since the restoration is premised on re-establishment
of groundwater hydrology via removal of ditches, all water rights necessary for sustainability of the
bank are secured through the fee simple ownership. Upon execution of the MBI, a conservation
easement deed for The Endowment Fund acreage will be conveyed to the NC State Natural
Resources Foundation (Foundation) (a 501 (c)3 entity).
Both Weyerhaeuser (WEYCO) and the Foundation have demonstrated experience in mitigation
site implementation and habitat restoration. WEYCO has conducted previous wetland restoration
projects in sites in Louisiana and is routinely engaged in reforestation and habitat restoration
projects. Thus, the Sponsor is well-versed in site restoration techniques, reforestation practices,
and site management. In addition, the Foundation is an integral part of the land grant mission of
NC State University. As a result, it is responsible for the procurement and management of tracts of
land throughout North Carolina. The Foundation is also responsible for the operation and
management of the Hofmann Forest Bank located immediately adjacent to the proposed Bachelors
Delight Bank. Design and monitoring expertise is provided by LMG and Ko-Florence Hutcheson
(stream designer). Both LMG and Ko have designed and implemented numerous large-scale
restoration projects for full-delivery (EEP and NCDOT) and project-specific permit mitigation.
32
Many of the site evaluations (e.g. soil profile descriptions, hydrologic monitoring and modeling, and
vegetative surveys) have been completed for the site. One reach (BD-5) continues to be
monitored in the event a viable restoration design can be developed. If data support a viable
restoration approach, then the design for this reach will be submitted prior to plan approval. The
Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) will also be submitted during the plan review. Upon
acceptance of the final mitigation plan by the IRT and execution of the MBI by all parties, the Bank
Sponsor will record a conservation easement deed for the site and will initiate proposed
construction activities. Mitigation bank credits will be calculated using the following standard:
Mitigation Type Ratio
(1) Wetland Restoration 1:1
(2) Wetland Enhancement 2:1
(3) Wetland Preservation (Riparian) 5:1
(4) Wetland Preservation (Non-riparian) 7:1
(5) Stream Restoration 1:1
(6) Stream Enhancement (Level II) 1.5:1
(7) Stream Preservation 2.5:1
In addition, the SBCF will be incorporated for determination of the total stream credits. Table 6
provides a summary of the credits for both the stream and wetland components of the bank site.
Table 6A provides a breakdown of quantities (acreage/linear feet) and credits by mitigation type.
Use of credits from the Bank to offset wetland and stream impacts authorized by federal permits or
state water quality certifications must be in compliance with the Clean Water Act, Section 404
(b)(1) guidelines and other applicable federal and state legislation, regulations, and policies. Prior
to release of bank credits, the following requirements will be met: (1) approval of the final mitigation
plan and execution of the MBI; (2) recordation of the conservation easement deed; and (3)
establishment of appropriate financial assurances. Given the aforementioned ratios for wetland
and stream restoration, it is estimated that 249 wetland restoration equivalent credits and 26,507
stream credits will be derived from the establishment of the Bachelors Delight Wetland and Stream
Mitigation Bank.
33
Table 6. Projected Stream and Wetland Credit Totals
Streams (linear feet)
Priority 1 Zero Order Enhancement
Type Restoration Restoration (Level 11) Preservation SBCF
Hewitts Branch 5,103 500 4,900 656
Huffmans Branch 3,445 1,404 2,000 1,200 431
Bachelors Delight Swamp 4,777 3,428 5,300
Half Moon Creek 1,131 901 147
TOTAL 9,679 7,082 5,928 11,400 1,234
CREDITS 9,679 7,082 3,952 4,560 1,234
GRAND TOTAL 26,507
Wetlands (acres)
Proposed
Type Acreage Credits*
Riparian Restoration 60 60r
Riparian Enhancement 28 14re
Riparian Wetland Preservation 48 1Ore
Non-Riparian Restoration 85 85r
Non-Riparian Preservation 13 2re
Stream/Upland Buffer 129 0
TOTAL 363 171
*r = restoration credit; re = restoration=equivalent credit (refer to page 33 for ratios)
Table 6A. Summary of Credits by Mitigation Type
Mitigation Type Credits
Stream 26,507*
Riparian (Non-Riverine) Wetland 84
Non-Riparian Wetland 87
*Includes credits derived from SBCF
The tentative schedule for establishment of the bank site is outlined in Table 7.
Upon execution of the MBI, a conservation easement deed for the site will be conveyed to the NC
State Natural Resources Foundation (a 501 (c) 3 entity). The terms and conditions of the
conservation easement will ensure the protection of the site in perpetuity. The ownership of the
Bank will reside with the Sponsor until completion of the debiting of the Bank. The Foundation will
34
Table 7. Project Milestone Schedule
Task Project Milestone Projected Completion
1 Approval of Mitigation Plan and Execution of MBI December 2010/Januar 2011
2 Recordation of Conservation Easement Deed February 2011
3 Initiation of Site Earthwork March 2011
4 Mitigation Site Earthwork Completed September 15, 2011
5 Mitigation Site Planting and Installation of Monitoring
Devices January 15 through February 15,
2012
6 Submittal of As-Built Report May 2012
7 First Year Annual Monitoring October 2012
8 Submittal of Monitoring Report #1 to IRT February 15, 2013
9 Submittal of Monitoring Report #2 to IRT February 15, 2014
10 Submittal of Monitoring Report #3 to IRT February 15, 2015
11 Submittal of Monitoring Report #4 to IRT February 15, 2016
12 Submittal of Monitoring Report #5 to IRT February 15, 2017
13 Submittal of Monitoring Report #6 to IRT February 15, 2018
14 Submittal of Monitoring Report #7 to IRT February 15, 2019
15 IRT Close-out Meeting March 2020
be responsible for long-term protection and management of the site. The easement prohibits any
activities (e.g. timbering, farming, building, etc.) that would alter the environmental state of the
Bank site.
The Bank Sponsor will be responsible for securing appropriate financial assurances in the form of
construction, monitoring, and maintenance bonds to cover contingency measures in the event of
Bank default or failure. Performance monitoring will be conducted for a 7-year period subsequent
to project construction. Annual monitoring will evaluate the development of wetland function and
document site performance relative to established success criteria. In addition, monitoring
activities will identify any site deficiencies that may warrant remedial action. Monitoring reports
documenting site success and/or failure will be submitted to the IRT each year. Upon submittal of
annual monitoring reports demonstrating the fulfillment of site success criteria, stream and wetland
credits will be released according the approved credit release schedule.
The Sponsor shall develop accounting procedures for maintaining accurate records of debits
made from the Bank that is acceptable to the IRT. Such procedures shall include the generation
35
of a debit report by the sponsor documenting all credits used at the time they are debited from
the bank. Debit reports shall be provided to each member of the IRT within 30 days of the date
of credit sale. In addition, the sponsor shall prepare an Annual Report to be provided to each
IRT member within thirty (30) days of each anniversary of the date of execution of the MBI,
showing all credits used and the balance of credits remaining. The sponsor's reporting
obligations hereunder shall end upon the sale of all credits or termination of the MBI, whichever
event first occurs.
VII. POST-CONSTRUCTION MONITORING
A. Wetland Restoration/Enhancement Success Criteria
The wetland restoration effort will be evaluated based upon performance criteria related to
vegetative density and wetland hydrology. Monitoring will be conducted at the site an annual basis
for a period of seven (7) years. Note that non-planted individuals of characteristic wetland species
may volunteer into the restored site. Suitable volunteers are an important component to the
restored wetland as they serve as indicators for appropriate hydrologic regimes and provide
increased diversity. The presence of suitable volunteers demonstrates trending of the site toward
vegetative success.
The primary success criteria for the Bachelors Delight Wetland and Stream Mitigation Bank will be:
7. Demonstrated density of planted species to meet or exceed 320 trees per acre at the end of three
years (post-planting), 260 trees per acre at the end of five years, and 270 (seven-year old)
character canopy tree species per acre at the end of seven years. The lRT may allow for the
counting of acceptable volunteer species toward the 270-1ree per acre density upon the review and
evaluation of the annual monitoring data.
2. If within the first three years, any species exhibits greater than 50% mortality, the species will either
be re planted or an acceptable replacement species will be planted in its place.
3. No single volunteer species (most notably red maple, loblolly pine, and sweet gum) will comprise
more than 50% of the total composition at Year 2 or Year 3. If this occurs, remedial action, as
36
approved by the lRT may be required. During Year 4 and Year 5, no single volunteer species,
comprising over 50% of the total composition, may be more than twice the height of the planted
trees. if this occurs, remedial action, as approved by the lRT may be required. The need to
conduct additional volunteer sampling after Year 5 will be determined by the lRT
4. The hydrologic criterion is premised on the specific community type to be restored.
(a) For the non-riparian wetland pine flat, the hydrologic criterion will be the
establishment of a static water table at, or within, 72" of the soil surface for 6% of the
growing season, equivalent to 78 days based upon hydrologic monitoring undertaken
from 07Feb through 30N6 v of each monitoring year. On 07Feb, soil temperature at
three of the monitoring plots will be measured at 72 inches below the soil surface and
documented within the monitoring report. Should earlier monitoring be considered,
the project sponsor must also document biological activity on the site pursuant to the
applicable Regional Supplement to the 7987 Wetland Delineation Manual Earlier
monitoring must be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to
commencement.
(b) For the non-riparian pocosin, the hydrologic criterion will be the establishment of a
static water table at, or within, 72" of the soil surface for 10% of the growing season,
equivalent to 30 days based upon hydrologic monitoring undertaken from 07Feb
through 30N6 v of each monitoring year. On 07Feb, soil temperature at three of the
monitoring plots will be measured at 72 inches below the soil surface and
documented within the monitoring report. Should earlier monitoring be considered,
the project sponsor must also document biological activity on the site pursuant to the
applicable Regional Supplement to the 7987 Wetland Delineation Manual. Earlier
monitoring must be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to
commencement.
(c) For the small stream swamp (headwater riparian) community (zero-order
geomorphic position), the hydrologic criterion will be the establishment of a static
water table at, or within, 72" of the soil surface for 12.5% of the growing season,
equivalent to 38 days based upon hydrologic monitoring undertaken from 07Feb
through 30N6 v of each monitoring year. On 07Feb, soil temperature at three of the
monitoring plots will be measured at 72 inches below the soil surface and
documented within the monitoring report. Should earlier monitoring be considered,
the project sponsor must also document biological activity on the site pursuant to the
37
applicable Regional Supplement to the 7987 Wetland Delineation Manual. Earlier
monitoring must be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to
commencement.
Vegetation Monitoring: The vegetation monitoring protocol is adapted from the accepted methods
used for wetland restoration sites within North Carolina. Given the size of the project, 2% of the
planted wetland areas will be monitored via the establishment of permanent 0.10-acre plots.
These areas include approximately 145 acres in three different habitat types (Figure 10A-10E).
Given the proposed acreage, a total of 29 plots will be established. GPS coordinates for the
centers of each sampling plot will be recorded and included with the `as-built' survey and
subsequent annual monitoring reports. During monitoring, surviving planted individuals and
volunteer individuals will be identified and enumerated within each plot.
Hydrology Monitoring: Shallow groundwater hydrology will be monitored via seven automated
wells (RDS, Inc. WM-20s) located within the non-riparian restoration areas (Figure 10A-10E).
Additional wells (10) will be installed in perpendicular arrays within the riparian zone of the first
order and zero-order stream corridors. Wells will be installed in accordance with installation
methods outlined in the Wetlands Regulatory Assistance Program (WRAP) Technical Note 00-02
(Sprecher, 2000). Water levels will be recorded once daily. Data will be downloaded from the
wells every three months (i.e. once quarterly). Data from well downloads will be compiled and
graphically displayed to demonstrate hydroperiods of monitored areas. The data will be analyzed
in the context of the antecedent rainfall conditions which will also be displayed on well
hydrographs.
Annual monitoring reports will provide quantitative data of vegetative success, qualitative
observations, and conclusions pertaining to mitigation site development. In addition, comparative
hydrographs of the restoration areas and corresponding reference areas will be provided.
Monitoring reports will be submitted to the IRT no later than February 15th of the following year.
Note that the Year 4 and Year 6 monitoring reports will contain only qualitative data regarding the
condition of the restored stream reaches.
38
B. Stream Restoration Success Criteria
The primary success criteria for the First Order Stream systems will be:
Documentation of 2 bankfull events using techniques discussed below within a normal rainfall year
in 3 of the 5 years of monitoring. Additional monitoring maybe necessary in the event of abnormal
climatic conditions.
The primary success criteria for the Zero Order/Headwater Stream systems will be
Documentation of2 flow events using techniques discussed below within a normal rainfall year in 3
of the 5 years of monitoring. Additional monitoring may be necessary in the event of abnormal
climatic conditions.
Level 1 Monitoring will be required for the stream portion of the Bachelors Delight Wetland and
Stream Mitigation Bank as detailed in the Stream Mitigation Guidelines, April 2003. Monitoring will
occur every year for the five year monitoring period. Monitoring reports will be prepared each
monitoring year and will include completed Channel Mitigation Monitoring Sheets with current data,
a discussion of any deviations, and whether they are indicative of a stabilizing or destabilizing
situation.
Level 1 Monitoring includes the following:
(7) Photo-Documentation
Extensive photo documentation is proposed for the stream monitoring phase of this project.
Photos will be taken at all permanent cross-sections on a bi-annual basis (winter and summer) in
addition to any problem areas that may develop after construction is completed. Photos will be
georeferenced to the corresponding cross-section and/or problem area as part of the submitted
report. Photo documentation will also be used to document the health of the riparian area
plantings and the effectiveness of any erosion control measures.
39
(2) Ecological Function
The health of the riparian vegetation will be documented as part of the wetland restoration
monitoring efforts. Multiple 0.10 ac. permanent monitoring plots will be established throughout the
riparian wetland restoration including areas directly adjacent to the restored channel. The success
criteria for wetland restoration is provided in Part A of Section V.
(3) Channel Stability/Survey Procedures
a. Cross-Sections (First Order Channel)
The Bachelors Delight Wetland and Stream Mitigation Bank will restore 9,679 If of first order
Coastal Plain stream. The restoration will mimic low gradient, low velocity stream reaches
characteristic of the outer Coastal Plain. No hardened materials (i.e. rock structures) will be used.
Rather, natural materials (such as root wads and log vanes) will assist with channel stabilization
and grade control. Given the size, uniform design, and gentle slope (0.005) of the proposed
project, cross-sections will be established every 1,000 feet of stream length (totaling 12 permanent
stations). Placement of these stations will be designed to assess the performance of potential
problem areas (e.g. severe erosion, structural failure, etc.). These stations will also be evenly
distributed between riffles and pools throughout the project. Table 8 lists the number of cross-
sections to be monitored for each reach. Refer to Figure 10A-10E for proposed placement of
cross-section monitoring stations.
Table 8. Proposed Stream Cross-Sections.
Reach Name Proposed I Cross-sections
Hewitts Branch (HE-1) 5,103 6
Huffmans Branch (HU-1) 3,445 4
Half Moon Creek HM-1 1,131 2

Total 9,679 12
b. Longitudinal Profiles (First Order Channel)
Guidelines regarding longitudinal profiles for projects totaling over 3,000 If suggest that 30% of the
area be surveyed on an annual basis. Based on this guideline, a total of 4,850 If of profile would
40
be required for the Bachelors Delight project. The 4,850 If of survey will be divided throughout the
individual reaches and will include the permanent cross-sections (Table 9). Data presented in the
annual monitoring reports will be shown in comparison to as-built conditions.
c. Stream Flow Monitoring (First Order Channel)
Documentation of stream flow within the project will also be conducted. Following stream
construction activities, six (6) stream gauges (two in each first order channel) will be installed
(Figure 10A-10E). Three additional gauges will also be installed throughout the areas targeted for
enhancement. These gauges will measure the elevation of water in the channel on a daily basis
and will be used to determine the cross-sectional area of the channel under a variety of flow
conditions.
Table 9. Proaosed Lonaitudinal Profiles by Stream Reach
Reach Name Proposed (If) % of Project Profile (If)
Hewitts Branch HE-1 5,103 53 1,500
Huffmans Branch (HU-1) 3,445 21 1,000
Half Moon Creek (HM-1) 1,131 7 500

9,679 3,000

In addition to these data, velocity measurements will be collected within 24 hours of a 0.5, 1.0, and
2.0 inch rain event at each gauge location during Year 1 monitoring. Measurements will be
collected at 1-foot intervals across the restored channel at depths of 0.5 ft. above the bottom. This
information will be used to compute a total discharge measured in cubic feet per second for each
reach for the duration of the monitoring activities. All data will then be used to develop a
regression analysis which will define the relationship between rainfall events and total stream
discharge. These data will be presented in graphical format with individual bankfull and high flow
events highlighted.
41
d. Stream Flow Monitoring (Zero Order/Headwater)
While the monitoring protocol for restored first order streams is well established, flow
documentation within zero-order stream systems is the topic of on-going research throughout the
Coastal Plain. Both qualitative and quantitative information will be used to document the
occurrence of flow within the proposed restored zero-order stream valley.
Quantitative data will be collected using automated shallow groundwater monitoring wells installed
in perpendicular arrays across the valley to assist in identification of riparian wetlands and to
increase the density of data points for analysis of hydrographs up and across the valley. Arrays
will be approximately 1,000 feet apart (along the long axis) for each valley. The center well in each
array will be in the lowest part of the valley and the number of wells in the array will be dependent
upon width and slope of each valley. Data collected from these wells will then be correlated with
elevation data from the longitudinal profiles to infer flow. Open channel flow monitoring equipment
may be used to calculate specific flow velocities and duration in each of the five restored reaches.
Site visits will also be conducted following rain events to document the upstream extent of
observed flow within each reach. GPS data will be collected to mark this location. These data in
addition to the flow monitoring data will also be used to calibrate a regression analysis which will
establish a relationship between rain event size and stream flow. This analysis will then be
extrapolated to future rain events to highlight the number of flow events on an annual basis.
Qualitative data will be collected during the on-site investigations to document surface water flow.
This shall be accomplished using photographic evidence of observed flow coupled with a
preponderance of field indicators of recent flow events in the form of a natural line impressed on
the bank; shelving; changes in soil characteristics; destruction of terrestrial vegetation; presence of
litter and debris; wracking; vegetation matted down, bent or absent; sediment sorting; leaf litter
disturbed or washed away; scour; deposition; bed and bank formation; water staining; or change in
plant community. All field indicators present will be documented in each monitoring report. All
quantitative and qualitative data will be used to document the upstream limit of flow, which will
provide the basis for length of successful zero order stream restoration (i.e. valley length).
42
While published research supports the restoration of streams with similarly sized watersheds in
eastern North Carolina, inconsistencies in design or construction may result in non-compliance with
the approved mitigation plan. If insufficient flow is observed during the course of post-construction
monitoring the total number of stream credits may be reduced to reflect the extent of documented
flow or converted to wetland credit per the review and approval of the IRT. Prior to any changes in
the amount of available credit, a formal review of the available data would be requested by the
Bank Sponsor.
C. Stream Enhancement Success Criteria
The primary success criterion for the First Order Stream Enhancement will be:
Documentation of increases in flow duration and frequency compared to pre-construction
conditions during periods of normal rainfall.
As discussed in the previous sections, a majority of the stream enhancement will occur through the
reestablishment of interconnectivity with the upstream portions of the watershed. This
reestablishment will increase the functional acreage of the watershed, corresponding to increased
flow frequency and duration in the lower sections of each stream. In order to determine the extent
of flow enhancement, a total of three gauges (one per reach) will be installed 90 days prior to
construction (Figure 10A-10E) within enhancement reaches HE-3, HU-3, and BD-6. Recorded
data will be combined with cross-sectional survey information to determine pre-construction
discharge levels. These data will serve as the baseline for the remainder of the project.
VIII. SITE MANAGEMENT
A. Adaptive Management
The Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank is planned and designed to be self-
sustaining over time, but some active management or maintenance may be necessary to ensure
the long term sustainability of the mitigation efforts. The adaptive management approach involves
analysis of monitoring results to identify potential problems occurring on the site and the
43
identification and implementation of measures to rectify those problems. Remedial actions may
include, but are not limited to, mechanized earth work (e.g. adjustment to the invert elevations of
earthen plugs) or supplemental planting in the event areas do not meet vegetative success criteria.
Prior to initiating any remedial actions the proposed measures will be submitted to the IRT for
review and approval.
Performance and functioning of the mitigation site may be affected by various causative factors,
both natural and anthropogenic. Natural hazards may include invasive species and/or excessive
herbivory. Human errors may include design flaws, construction deviation, and/or inadequate
planting coverage. To minimize these potential problems, the following strategies may be
employed:
1. If herbivory appears to be jeopardizing the survivorship of planted species, discussions
with appropriate agencies will be initiated to determine an appropriate course of action.
2. Beavers will be trapped from the tract if significant damage appears to be caused by
beaver activity.
3. Construction errors will be identified as early as possible via the as-built report. If it
appears as those potential errors jeopardize the integrity of the project, appropriate
remedial action will be identified and submitted to the USACE for concurrence prior to
implementation.
4. Planting errors in spacing density or coverage will be minimized by careful
coordination with planting crews. An account of planted stems will be provided with
the as-built report.
5. If monitoring indicated a potential design flaw, remediation options will be reviewed.
6. In the event groundwater monitoring wells are damaged by bears, barb-wire fencing
and/or other acceptable deterrents may be used to protect wells from further damage.
B. Long-Term Management
The mitigation approach and establishment of mitigation site boundaries has been designed to
minimize long term management issues. As a result, the potential for hydrologic and boundary
conflicts have been minimized. The Sponsor has identified the NC State Natural Resources
44
Foundation, Inc. (a 501 (c)3 entity of North Carolina State University) as a potential grantee of the
conservation easement deed. The recorded conservation easement deed will ensure the
protection of the project in perpetuity.
IX. CONCLUSION
The establishment, use, and operation of the Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Bank will provide a quality compensatory mitigation alternative for authorized wetland impacts
occurring within the White Oak River Basin. The bank will be established and operating in advance
of development impacts in the area. Therefore, its use will help to reduce uncertainty in the CWA
Section 404 permit program by having established compensatory mitigation credit available to
applicants. In addition, the Bank will more effectively replace wetland and stream functions within
the watershed through consolidation of design, implementation, monitoring, and management of
mitigation activities (Fed. Reg., 1995).
Based upon the current USACE jurisdictional determination and detailed site investigations, over
25,000 If of stream and 246 acres of wetlands have been degraded by historical land-use activities
(including ditch excavation and clearing for timber production). The proposed bank will provide for
a watershed-level restoration approach for the headwater complex of the Bachelors Delight
Stream. Through the implementation of the proposed mitigation activities and the placement of a
protective real estate mechanism (i.e. conservation easement), degraded habitats and associated
functions will be restored. Together with the adjacent protected lands of Hofmann Forest, the
project will provide water quality and habitat benefits on a watershed and regional level.
45
X. SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Allan, J.D. 1995. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters. Chapman and Hall.
London.
Cowardin, L.M., et. al. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United
States. US
Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, D.C.
Mitsch, W.J. and J.G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands (Second Edition). Van Nostrand Reinhold, New
York.
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). 2007. May 2007 White Oak
River Basinwide Water Quality Plan.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality. 2001. Watershed Restoration Plan for the White Oak
River Basin. Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality. 2006. Standard Operating Procedures for Benthic
Macroinvertebrates. Raleigh, NC.
N.C. Wetland Functional Assessment Team. 2007. N.C. Wetland Assessment Method (NC
WAM), Draft User Manual. 183 pp.
Peet, R.K. and D.J. Allard. 1993. Longleaf Pine Vegetation of the Southern Atlantic and Eastern
Gulf Coast Regions: A Preliminary Classification. Proceedings of the Tall Timbers Fire
Ecology Conference. No. 18. Tallahassee, Fl. pp. 45-81.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakely. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina. Third approximation. N.C. Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, N.C.
Skaggs, R.W. et al. 1995. Reference Simulations for Evaluating Wetland Hydrology, in Campbell,
K. (ed.), Versatility of Wetlands in the Agricultural Landscape. American Society of
Agricultural Engineers, pp. 1-10.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Marine Fisheries
Service. 1995. Federal Guidance for the Establishment, Use and Operation of Mitigation
Banks; Notice. Vol. 60, No. 228. 10pp.
46
FIGURES
Map source: Nortn Garouna Atlas & Gazetteer. Ng 77.2uus
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank LMG Figure 1.
Onslow County, NC q I)
Vicinity Map
01_09_168 ? Ln vi: cri rnrnt,N Co+uultcr[,

't7? ???fp??? gym.
Q sp. r ?yy
?Yy? 'v1+ r$?'''. `
?yG"r `?''tit? Y) % X44^ q? v
?°? 4 #?''??.? q ?• >?, " <? ?a.? ?, ? ?a aid '" r` ? r
l
I
0 1,200 2,400 3,600
Feet
Bachelors Delight Swamp Mitigation Bank
Onslow County
Figure 3.
2ft. LIDAR Contour Map
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GEOOP -
Environmental Consultants
N Figure 4.
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank Geographic Service Area Map
Onslow County, NC GG
4 8 Miles December 2009 LAND
Environmental Consultants
Gatp?
55
4 y
c
"? Ili s s
?r
f -
1
?-, W H I T E 0 A K P 0 C
s
H O F M A N N F i
?.
zh ?'
gRAPF -
I qA, p0A0 l
w
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: Jacksonville NW Quadrangle 7.5 minute (topographic) 1990. SCALE 1" = 3,000'
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank LMG Figure 2.
Onslow County, NC NIANA,L,111,',I (,xtaI'I,,,,. USGS Topographic Map
01-09-168 `°II.. (Jacksonville NW Quad)
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: NRCS Soils Map.
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
Onslow County, NC
01-09-168
LMG
C 1 c;xuzT,-
Lnv lr in nlen F,T I COnSn font,
SCALE 1" = 1,000'
Figure 5.
NRCS Soil Survey
I J
R+
a'?._ ? 4 9 t ? f 'n Ir Y + Ir. ?
??C. } 1 ... k 4 ..G •YyM ed' ? ?-; •?•. _. ? •1 ;1.gb 4 '^a'l
it Y
,

*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 1998 NAPP aerial photography
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
Onslow County, NC
01-09-168
LMG
LAYI) NIANAGEN'IE:N'r GROUP iu
Ln vfron.r?rt'nra! Consultants
SCALE 1" = 1,000'
Figure 6.
1998 Aerial Photography
HE-2
Wet Ford/
HE-1
HE-4
rl
Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project)
Property Boundary
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration (9,679 It)
Stream Enhancement (-5,928 It)
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 If)
Stream Preservation (-11,400 If)
Riparian Wetland Restoration (60 ac.)
Non-Riparian Wetland Restoration (-85 ac.) o 0 0 o 0
Riparian Wetland Enhancement (-28 ac.)
Riparian Wetland Preservation (-48 ac.)
Non-Riparian Wetland Preservation (-13 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)(-35 ac.)
Upland Buffer (94 ac.)
_:1WETLANDS@009 WETLANDS FILESl01-09-168 --- Onslow 19 Batchelors, DowneydACADIOctober 20101FIg7-RestorationPlan-(
BD-1
HU-2
Wet Ford
BD-3
Wet Ford
BD-7
BD-2
BD-4
6-0 00
00000
0„0„0
Wet Ford s:!
BD-5
D-5
Ford
Wet Ford
HM-1
Slreem Design Provided by.
Ka/Flonance S Hutcheson
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 190
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-851-6066
0 300 600 1,200 2,400
0001011
Project: Dale:
LMG Bachelors Delight Swamp 12117/2008
1. Nil C'dSAWEU M raor,, Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Scale:
Title: 1'=1200'
Post Office Box 2522 Site Design Dia m By:
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 CBM
Telephone: [phone]
Revision Dab:
9115110
Job Number
01-08352
Sheet Number
Figure 7

s HE-2

Wet Ford
d
Wet Ford
HE-7rr
e, HE-3
Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project)
Property Boundary
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration (9,679 I?
Stream Enhancement (-5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 10
Stream Preservation (-11,400 10
Riparian Wetland Restoration (60 ac.)
Non-Riparian Wetland Restoration (-85 ac.) o 0 0 o 0
Riparian Wetland Enhancement (28 ac.)
Riparian Wetland Preservation (-48 ac.)
Non-Riparian Wetland Preservation (-13 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)(-35 ac.)
Upland Buffer (-94 ac.)
L:\WETLANDS\2009 WETLANDS FILES\01-09-168 --- Onslow 19 Batchelors. Downev\ACAD\October 2010\Fia7-RestorationPlan-C
HE-4
steam Design Provided by:
KolFlonnce & Hutcheson
0 250 COO 1,000 5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
J J
Raleigh, NC 27807
919-851-8088
Project: Date: Revision Date:
LM G Bachelors Delight Swamp
St
d W
tl
d Miti
ti
B
k 12117/2009 9/15/10
ream an
e
an
ga
on
an Scale: Job Number
1"=500' 01
08
352
Title: -
-
Post Office Box 2522 Site Design Drawn By: Sheet Number
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 cBM Figure 7A
Telephone: [phone]
t2010.dwa
'7
Y<1 >

HU-2
HU-1

/ '
Ford
H

Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project)
Property Boundary
Existing Roads b _
Stream Restoration (9,679 If) 1
Stream Enhancement (5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 If)
Stream Preservation (11,400 ID
Riparian Wetland Restoration (60 ac.)
Non-Riparian Wetland Restoration (-85 ac.) 0 0 0 0 0
Riparian Wetland Enhancement (-28 ac.)
Riparian Wetland Preservation (-48 ac.) 0 250 500 1,000
Non-Riparian Wetland Preservation (-13 ac.) Project: Date:
Bachelors Delight Swamp 12117/2009
Stream Buffer (SBCF)(~35 ac.) LMG Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Scale:
Title: 1"=500'
Post Office Box 2522 Site Design Drawn By:
Upland Buffer (-94 ac.) Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 CBM
Telephone: [phone]
L:\WETLANDS\2009 WETLANDS FILES\01-09-168 --- Onslow 19 Batchelors. Downev\ACAD\October 2010\Fio7-RestorationPlan-Oct2010.dwo
Steam Design Provided by:
Ko/Flonnce & Hutcheson
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27807
919-851-8088
Revision Date:
9115/10
Job Number.
01-08-352
Sheet Number
Figure 7B
"0" "0`?0
0 00
0 0
0 C, 0
,..• 0 7 00
0 0
p° 0 00
O O?C?
J
BD-2 `? J 0
0000
BD-1 00000
0 0 0
0 00
` Wet Ford 0
eF Wet For i BD 0
BD-3 ?4.
l rC. BD-5
Wet Ford BD-5B
Wet Ford
Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project) -
BD-6 BD 5C ?-
Property Boundary
W & ?
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration (-9,679 It) BD -7 BD-5D
??,• ??-,,
Stream Enhancement (5,928 It)
Zero Order Restoration (7,08210
r
Wet Ford
Stream Preservation (11,40010
Riparian Wetland Restoration (60 ac.)
Non-Riparian Wetland Restoration (-85 ac.) 0 0 0 0 0
Riparian Wetland Enhancement (-28 ac.) 7277277. stream Design Prodded Ill
KelFlonmce 6 Hutcheson
Riparian Wetland Preservation (-48 ac.) 0 250 500 1,000 5121 Kingdom Way, suits lob
0001101 Raleigh, NC 27607
9,
Non-Riparian Wetland Preservation (-13 ac.) 985,A066
Project: Date: Revision Dale:
Bachelors Delight Swamp 1211712009 9/15110
Stream Buffer (SBCF)(35 aC.)GI IF3 rx, lrv stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Scale Job Number.
` 1"=500' 01-08352
Title:
Post Office Box 2522 Site Design Drawn ay sheet Number
Upland Buffer (94 ac.) Wilmington, North Carolina 29402 CBM Figure 7C
Telephone: [phone] L:IWETLANDSP2009 WETLANDS FILESW1-09-168 -- Onslow 19 Bacchelors, DowneylACADIOCtOtber 20101Fig7-RestomtionPlan-Ocl2010.dwg
IRF
IRF _
IRF
Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project)
Property Boundary
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration (9,679 If)
Stream Enhancement (5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 If)
Stream Preservation (11,400 If)
Riparian Wetland Restoration (60 ac.)
Non-Riparian Wetland Restoration (-85 ac.) o 0 0 o 0
Riparian Wetland Enhancement (-28 ac.) ;
Riparian Wetland Preservation (-48 ac.)
Non-Riparian Wetland Preservation (-13 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)(-35 ac.)
Upland Buffer (-94 ac.)
.:METLANDSP2009 WETLANDS FILESW1-09-168 -- Onslow 19 Bacchelors, Downey\ACADIOctober 20101Fig7-RestorationPlan-C
7
PF
0 150 300 600
1111111111111111101
Project: Date:
L1Y117 Bachelors Delight Swamp 1211772009
LM G Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
r:: • Scale:
1"=300
Title:
Post Office Box 2522 Site Design Dram By
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 CBM
Telephone: [phone]
Slnan Design Provided by:
KofFlunnee S Hutcheson
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
919851-6066
Revision Date:
9115110
Job Number.
01-09352
Sheet Number
Figure 7D

Wet Ford
HM-1
PERMANENT FORD CROSSING
SCALE: NTS
WATER DIVERSION
CHANNEL
(2' WIDE x 6" DI
PLAN VIEW
MIN
BANKFULL TO 5 FT
1 10' OUT
J
MIN
BANKFULL WIDTH_ 1 5 FT BANKFULL TO
10' OUT
BANKFULL WIDTH FILTER FABRIC
WATER DIVERSION J BANKFULL
CHANNEL DEPTH
(2' WIDE x 6" DEEP)
CROSS-SECTION
CLASS A RIP RAP/
NATIVE GRAVEL/COBBLE
MIN DEPTH 8 "
COMPACTED/ROLLED
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank FIGURE 8. TYPICAL PLAN VIEW AND CROSS-SECTION OF PERMANENT FORD CROSSING
Final Mitigation Plan - October 2010 (Note: Typical drawing provided by Florence & Hutcheson Consulting Engineers)
lv? ? ??1q:u.,, __ W... ?e :' . i •. ? arc
M.
HE-2
HE-3
HE-1 r,..i
HE-4
F
Legend
Property Boundary
?JV
Existing Roads
"rb
Small Stream Swamp (-60 ac.)
Streamhead Pocosin (-9 ac.)?"?
Wet Pine Flat (-76 ac.) 0 0
Supplemental Plantings ?i
Existing Wetlands (-89 ac.)
L:METLANDS12009 WETLANDS FILESW1-09-168 -- Onslow 19 Batchelors, DowneyWCADIOctober 20101Fig9-PlantingPlan-OctO
HU-1
"t BD-112
HU-2 ,
BD-3
HU-3
BD-7
-o
C.
BD-4A
BD-4
BD-5
BD-6
BD-5C
BD-5D
1 ,t
1
A iL , .
A 1,
JI.
10, . r. to, ei
0 300 600 1,200 2,400
HM-1
LLG
Past Office Box 2522
Imington, North Carolina 28402
Telephone: [phone]
I

1
i
?I 1
,
yr??. t
s? "? herd '?
at: Date:
Bachelors Delight Swamp 1/612010
m and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Scale:
1"=1,200'
Planting Plan Drawn By:
CBM
Revision Date:
NA
Job Number
01-09-168
Sheet Number
Figure 9.

Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project)
Property Boundary
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration (9,679 If)
Stream Enhancement (5,92810
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 If)
Stream Preservation (-11,40010
Riparian Wetland Restoration (-60 ac.)
Wetland Enhancement (-28 ac.) J
Riparian Wetland Preservation (-48 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)(-35 ac.)
Upland Buffer (94 ac.)
Monitoring Plot
Monitoring Well
Stream Gauge •
Stream Cross-Section
Longitudinal Profile
Zero-Order Well Array
_:1WETLANDS@009 WETLANDS FILES101-09-168 -- Onslow 19 Batchelors, DowneyWCADIOctober 20101Fig10-MonitaringPlan-(

0 50 100 200 400

'-K

LMG
Po?un VaSM1p1A%1' i?xncs
ou,Dour-, W Cu.,?el,mrc,
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
Telephone: [phone]
a
`=1
rt: Dale.
Bachelors Delight Swamp 115/2010
in and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Scale:
1"= 200'
Monitoring Plan Drawn By:
CBM
Stwom Design Pmvided by:
KolFlorence a Hutcheson
5121 Krgoom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-851-6066
Reyision Date:
9/21110
Job Number
01-09-168
Sheet Number
Figure 10A

Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project)
Property Boundary
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration (9,679 ID
Stream Enhancement (5,92810
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 ID
Stream Preservation (-11,40010
Riparian Wetland Restoration (-60 ac.)
Wetland Enhancement (-28 ac.)
Riparian Wetland Preservation (-48 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)(-35 ac.)
Upland Buffer (94 ac.)
Monitoring Plot
Monitoring Well
Stream Gauge •
Stream Cross-Section
Longitudinal Profile
Zero-Order WeII Array
_:1WETLANDS@009 WETLANDS FILES101-09-168 -- Onslow 19 Batchelors, DowneyWCADIOctober 20101Fig10-MonitaringPlan-1
0 50 100 200 400

LMG
N FMFNT GRMI w
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
Telephone: [phone]
0t: Dale.
Bachelors Delight Swamp 11512010
m and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Scale:
1"= 200'
Monitoring Plan Drawn By:
CBM
Stream Design Provided by:
Ill t Hutcheson
5121 Gngdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-851-6066
Reyision Date:
8127110
Job Number
01-09-168
Sheet Number
Figure 10B
1 1, 1. 1'
• ,? 1 1 1 1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1 11 1 1 1 1 11 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1
1
1 1 1 11 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 11 1 1 1
1 11 11
11 11 1 1 11 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 11
11 11 111111 111
1 1 '
1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1
1 1
1 u,. 1

.\? 1 1
11 `
1 11 11 1 11 1 1 11 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1
11
1 1 1 1 1 1 y ...
1 1 11 1 11 11 1 1 1 .. ....
1 1 1 1 1 1 ... .....
1 1 1 1 1 1.. ..y
1
1 11 1
1 1 1
1 1 11 1 1 1 °•. .. +
1 1 1" 1 1 i -?' •...
W \
Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project) . "
Property Boundary
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration (-9,679 If)
Stream Enhancement (5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration (-7,082 ID
Stream Preservation (-11,400 It)
Monitoring Plot
Riparian Wetland Restoration (-60 ac.) Monitoring Well
Wetland Enhancement (-28 ac.) !_J F_J F_J F_ Stream Gauge •
Riparian Wetland Preservation (-48 ac.) ® Stream Cross-Section Project: Data:
Bachelors Delight Swamp 1/512010
LMG
Stream Buffer (SBCF)(-35 ac.) Strom and Wetland Mitigation an
ItMln ? u anr' Srale:
Longitudinal Profile _ ,
Title:
Upland Buffer (94ac.) 0 50 100 200 400 Post Office Box2522 Monitoring Plan Drawn By:
Zero-Order Well Array Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 CBM
Telephone: [phone]
_:1WETLANDS@009 WETLANDS FILES101-09-168--Onslow 19 Batchelors, DowneyWCADIOctober20101Fig10-Monita ingPlan-October2010.dwg
1
d
Shea. Design P-1ded by:
Ko/Flomnce & Hutcheson
5121 Kngdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-851-6066
Revision Date:
9/21/10
Job Number
61-09-168
Sheet Number
Figure 10C

Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Co
P
t
B
d
roper
y
oun
ary
Existing Roads
R
ti
679 If
St
t
9
ream
ora
on (
)
es
,
Stream Enhancement (5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 If)

Stream Preservation (11,400 ID

Riparian Wetland Restoration (-60 ac.) -

Wetland Enhancement (-28 ac.)

Riparian Wetland Preservation (-48 ac.)

Stream Buffer (SBCF)(-35 ac.)
Upland Buffer (-94 ac.)
Monitoring Plot
Monitoring Well
Stream Gauge •
Stream Cross-Section
Longitudinal Profile
Zero-Order Well Array
.:1WETLANDS%2009 WETLANDS FILES101-09-168--
0 50 100 200 400
0001011
Sheen Design Provided by:
So/Florence 6 Hutcheson
5121 pngdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh NC 27607
919-851-6066
94 -
Led (NOTE: Acreage And Di
Property Boundary
For Complete Project)
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration (-9,679 ID
Stream Enhancement (5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration (-7,082 ID
Stream Preservation (-11,400 ID
Riparian Wetland Restoration (-60 ac.)
Wetland Enhancement (-28 ac.)
Riparian Wetland Preservation (-48 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)(-35 ac.)
Upland Buffer (94 ac.)
Monitoring Plot
Monitoring Well
Stream Gauge •
Stream Cross-Section
Longitudinal Profile
Zero-Order WeII Array
:1WETLANDS%2009 WETLANDS FILES101-09-168--
x
o°n°o°o°o°o°o
o?ooooo00000
o°o°o° °o°o°o 000
o°o°o°o°o°o°o
00000 000000
0 0 0? o 0 0
0 0 C76? o 0
o°o°o°o°o?Oo
oho°0°0°o°o°o
0 0 0 0
oho°o°o
o°o°o°C
0 000
0 000
00 - o0
o _ c
0
CO00
0
000000
- ?0 0 0
0 'A_ r1
.Am
'49

0 125 250 500 1,000
LMG
r. psi., ?ianncr.?rrM`r cioutr ?,
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
Telephone: [phone]
Dt Dale: Revision Date:
Bachelors Delight Swamp 111202009 9/21/10
m and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Soale: Job Number
1"=500' 01-09-168
Monitoring Plan Drawn 6y: Sheet Number
DBM Figure 10E
APPENDIX A.
ECOREGION MAP
Ecoregions of North Carolina
84° 83° 82° 81° 80° 79° 78° 77° 76°

5
;_ --? ---- ?- 66 - ---- -- 63 ?-a3n'
T - --? 45 -
? 63 €63c
'ZA 66c i --'-----------'-f-- _--_-- - - -----' --
6
t k - /??? 66m -- --- ,- e y63d
63
166 1(
i' 5 3b
?. ,. ..
6i Boone C? 65m63e
_ 66V Winst ?? v `...? ?'.
45f 63
45
o
?
?
36 e?s
g
66<
'j
OGreensboro,, T)urha
+Knoxville ,?,,?•_ ??
o? r l l ?_i 66d+ % 661 + o T
r
r 66 )? ¢66 ? 6 i? (1 66 45g ?Mc&,
Itnu 5 63n -
?
Raleigh P
--? 6'Ca, 36°
e
C
63
1 J
66 6' evi X661 45b 45c C?een 3 63b
/ lc
' e 4 63e
66g 45
?. 45f 65m? L J ?? y?fi3g
' e66d " 45i O b6 66d ?? ?•? - ?- - - ---- -. Charlott? 65c 5 S TE ()63b 63g
35° Fayett i e?
- -? - - - 66 ?Sg + + r r?

w
Greenville 45 ?
3
66 j r - - - - 63h
N 63h

q`.--
651 )
45
f'T .651) ..,?
65p` 63nn
v 1C
J? - - - ?'- 65 ??,-•\/ _ Wilmington
34° r .\_A, _ 63h + +
Athens' J 63 V 340

Myrtle Beach
0
84° 830 820 81 80 79° 78° 77° 76°
45 Piedmont 65 Southeastern Plains Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in
D 45a Southern Inner Piedmont 0 65c Sand Hills the type, quality, and quantity of environmental resources. They
D 45b Southern Outer Piedmont 0 651 Atlantic Southern Loam Plains are designed to serve as a spatial framework for the research,
Level III ecoregion assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and
D 45c Carolina Slate Belt D 65m Rolling Coastal Plain
Level IV ecoregion ecosystem components. The approach used to compile this map is
D 45e Northern Inner Piedmont D 65p Southeastern Floodplains and Low Terraces County boundary based on the premise that ecological regions can be identified
0 45f Northern Outer Piedmont 66 Blue Ridge ----- State boundary through the analysis of the patterns of biotic and abiotic
0 45g Triassic Basins 0 66c New River Plateau phenomena that reflect differences in ecosystem quality and
0 45i Kings Mountain integrity. These phenomena include geology, physiography,
D 66d Southern Crystalline Ridges and Mountains vegetation, climate, soils, land use, wildlife, and hydrology. The
63 Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain D 66e Southern Sedimentary Ridges relative importance of each characteristic varies from one
D 63b Chesapeake-Pamlico Lowlands and Tidal Marshes D 66g Southern Metasedimentary Mountains ecological region to another regardless of the hierarchical level.
63c Nonriverine Swamps and Peatlands ® 66i High Mountains 15 o s o o 60 m; The Ecoregions of North Carolina map was compiled at a scale of
D 63d Virginian Barrier Islands and Coastal Marshes D 66j Broad Basins 1:250,000. Compilation of this map is part of a collaborative
30 20 10 0 60 zo km project primarily between the US EPA, USDA-NRCS, NC DENR,
D 63e Mid-Atlantic Flatwoods D 66k Amphibolite Mountains Albeas well as with other state and federal agencies. Comments and
63g Carolinian Barrier Islands and Coastal Marshes D 661 Eastern Blue Ridge Foothills ? Equal Area Projefion suggestions regarding this map should be addressed to Glenn
D 63h Carolina Flatwoods D 66m Sauratown Mountains Griffith, USDA-NRCS, 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR 97333,
D 63n Mid-Atlantic Floodplains and Low Terraces [phone], email: [e-mail], or to James
Omernik, U.S. EPA - NHEERL, 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis,
OR97333, [phone], email: [e-mail].
APPENDIX B.
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND PLAT
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. 2007 3148 067 County: Onslow U.S.G.S. Quad: Jacksonville North
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Development Co. Agent: Land Management Group Inc.
Address: attn: Sandy McLendon attn: Wes Frvar
1412 Eatonton Hwy Suite 700 P.O. Bog 2522
Madison, GA 30650 Wilmington, NC 28402
Property description:
Size (acres) 2500 Nearest Town Jacksonville
Nearest Waterway Bachelors Delight Swamp River Basin White Oak
USGS HUC 03030001 Coordinates N 34.8542 W 77.4581
Location description The site is located iust north of the intersection of Rhodestown Road and Gum Branch Road on
the east side of Gum Branch Road north of Jacksonville Onslow County.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
_ The wetland on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps.
Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property
which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years.
X The wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
-Regulatory Official identified below on 10/8/2007. Unless there is a change in the law -Pr our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in. Washington, NC, at [phone] to determine
their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Brad Shaver at 910-251-4611.
C. Basis For Determination
The subiect area exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps Delineation Manual and is adiacent to several
tributaries, primarily Bachelors Delight Swamp _a tributary of the New River, a navigable water of the US
D. Remarks
The site was visited durine two separate site visits on 11/28/2006 and 12/5/2006 The site was also h d? rologically
monitored by Land Management Group Inc.
** All Maps are being returned to the consultant for distribution.
E. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the South Atlantic Division, Division Office at the Following
address:
Mr. Michael F. Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-ET-CO-R
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 11/8/2007.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official: __tj flue?'
Date 10/8/2007
Expiration Date 10/8/2012
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/WETLANDS/index html to complete the survey online.
Copy furnished:
McKim & Creed 243 North Front Street Wilmington, NC 28401
NOTIFICATION OF AI)MTNISTRATINT, AI' TAL 01'TIONS ANI) PROC-TSS ANI)
RU'QUFST 110R APP[ A ,
Applicant: Weyerhaeuser Real Estate File Number: 2007 3148 067 Date: 10/8/2007
Attached is: D See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of A
ermission
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of ermission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SIV IION i - l'lik I01bMin,, idzriLili?; your ri,ht? a-nd opiitons rC1-'ard1n2 a<<<?clr>>inistrrlti?c ap[)Cal 01' the abo%c
dccisioil. AdLilt oral H]rormLt',1on may hC l0Lilld at htiiV or
( orps r?:,alauons ??t ; (Tk) fart ; 1.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit,
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return
the form to the district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of
the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your
letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your
concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having
determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the
district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and
conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal
Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must
be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
PROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD
you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of
,
Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the
division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this
notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for funther consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SI:C' 110x' 11 - 1:I:O111-'ST 1 t)I: A1)1,1-r11_ or 0101"('1 1ON? I I\lTl11, 1)1:01,1,1 1, 1) P1:1)\IFI
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
1101\ I OF CON 11('1 I OR Q11FS i IONS Oh I\I'O1Z\lA ION:
If you have questions regarding.this decision If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact: may also contact:
Brad. Shaver Mr. Michael F. Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Project Manager CESAD-ET-CO-R
P.O. Box 1890 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations.
Dater Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
DIVISION ENGINEER:
Commander
U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3490
I Dal
US Army Corers
of Engine-ens
Date: October 8, 2007
ATTENTION PROPERTY OWNER
New Guidance on Jurisdictional Determinations
On June 5, 2007, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) implemented a new method
for performing jurisdictional determinations (JD) pursuant to the Clean Water Act
(CWA). This new process is a result of the recent Supreme Court decisions (United
States v. Rapanos and United States v. Carabell) and now requires the COE to conduct
extensive reviews when determining if certain waterbodies, including wetlands have a
significant nexus (connection) to Traditional Navigable Waters.
Since this Office has reviewed and verbally approved a jurisdictional determination for
your property prior to June 5, 2007, we have finalized this JD using the previous process.
However, if you, as the property owner, are interested in having your property evaluated
under the new guidance or have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Brad
Shaverat 910-251-4611.
S. Kenneth Jolly
Chief, Regulatory Division
MAP - NOT TO SCALE
SHEET 14 OF 14
SHEET A3 OF 14
N
W E
S
N.0 GRID
NAD 83
SHEET 10 OF 14
SHE T 110F/ 4
i
Y

SHEET 12 14
SHEET 9 OF 14
i'
i
SFIET 8 OF?14
]WSEf TB TNAr WS -01` 7X15%T
xes A.w r-NUms Au ASEAs
a wAices:vn"AWS I-LA rzur SLANT IL
SECS CIEw WiW AcrAS tt
RYA CNAMi M W IAwW OARP'/BL9A0 NEYILARa5
iroi ro nicNrc RS s MOAT,
"rNs
L.
a RS' " xc?`"ANOBLmG nu" ATO`mh WA Ps
US AMIY C/p1fPS fi EN?f1iNCFAS REMRSENMIRE
_ IN fFI' I`MX;v
RE
_ 1918hta}
IME
FOR LOCAIMC XFn OCAT WITH S ONO "I I MS Ell -ANTLNNA M'.P WAS SE s PR0.S LYNY R[ MAMUL 1-0
crcdxMMWroE?,A _WenyPON rmenr cuawA cEarNCRffWY-Y (_l)
DiE NL95 BA,Z 5uW NEw Bpa MG (UF. 39-ID-19.92 WB M
L? ?M.ULHK AbI TSWC ANOAMAT EASrID xs
LYtiAM1MlAL Pb._ MW )RE?p, AT 1 SECLW9 SM'[)6PGVCU$ RfApN'C9,
MW BBASE STASACMAL-55CY![W RIEWEE7RENIIATLY
N01FS
1. ALL
WSY Cf9 ASIF HMHAViAL WANG AY US 414mV
fFET N%h'S OIHERW SWAN COYBPED FACTW G.9998',
2 SEABNNS BASED UY NC WO (WO W) C S Bb.
S NEAEPANl - BOON 2N0 PAX 916
A SWLEiAP MAS MN W M4ESRGADLW LIP -NT
SEAPCN A'OP EASEMENTS Q RMWa ENCIMBR.=
REST 0"w LGkNmm OMAERWP, BRE ENOpKE Qi
ANY OR FAPR TMAF AN AOWRAR AM bLWPEN VS VW? V VS ME .S WN awY MIEPt' ABOIfW
b. SLH. A? AND [XMPLMILYTAL CLMY1NY15 MNL NVr
EYAW&D ER C? AS A PART C ThS SLWK.. NO
SrA1EM9lr IS A ? R Ek5RNCF a
t9S&ICA%AIO W OKPV O rANM3 OP EApMTWS
"AT MAY A-T - USE OB orAxawWAT OF mrs
MACr
>. XEUTANAS'_AN. ON WT-ttU ANON BYLAW
AuNAOEMENT (xWA=
d SJ&ACT N ALL FASENNTS -1 OF NMM AAD W LNCUWPMT£9
mnT MAY a 7777 nas-1,
Il RN NC CNhW'ATLY fNCYN d imS PLAY u(RF W 51f0 BY
(V(K
CFS C&S51.1 4 USN' T -5LIF S1W R[[YIIERS THE RAW PAM
IIAB SENT !0 INE NANQN& C-WSIR 5URY£Y- PNW£SSAYG
I6 SNE£TS P-9 ARE- ..'S pVLK
LEGM
* NN Mw
AWL
WWAND8
TOTAL ARRA A-,,- 59 R NIA rB A-
N'ATIM OF TM l6
TOTAL ANEA 19,-. FE 0,. ACRES
SCALE I" - 1000'- 1000'
a 1e? aoo Eaao ,aW
SHEET 7 OF 14
A FICM&aZMD 243
IAIYINCTON, NORTH GAOIINA 16401
TILE: 9110) NYIWB
FAX [phone]
MIR://rmmdtlmvatl.bwn
0
wo
0,
w
cr
WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY PROJECT M ` 009100163
EARTO C FOR PROJ,SVYR ; 0lJ
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE ORA m By :Acs
SEAL
LAWS P
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FIELD BK.: W1013/56 - LJ
coup. FILL: wnDl-aosla91s31t
.=` PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT S EET H : SHEET 1 OF 14
ate
IryJ[ Fl?,r MCIAAAWS 20WNSRP - ONBLOW - NORTX CAROLINA
1..99.0 June Z0, 2007 SCALE: I" - 1000' DWG. N
M
g5 m
g <
m
v
LIE c WETLAND.
RAG TABLE
MC NQ BEARING LENGTH NORTHING EASING
G
C4 34 3.4
4 .4 144s1an
x.u6Bn
c7
w ' 46]111
39eux1 1.x.4
s

ClA NIZ14'171 1267
31.25
M
12m -4
2
246965155
119
MM13'51'E
0,1(1
%64
115)1
316666{b)
119
016 59
5411117 2164PA.01
214744.1
C10A 266472.1 3989!,1
CI 45.110 8466180,95
CA
cu 4x LM
721111164 411117272-
2.sn.
n>
4V wesx4
72649b1 2aee4ul
94861.92
017
CI6 7940114
31627272 14644172
346960.192
C ]e' 45661. 24
1116

Gig

N-E .7'

M.45 W
JB.xm
31.7.7 7466/1881
61
34411.4
G 3%31.64 2V

Cy+

CS2
'A6D0..

34611241 73,11

2
2.64442
G1S
111 f 72441.16
39411.7 114DIa19
3V68011Po
111
C27 30194.4
4194.3 240117201
24904.3
CR 744211 24812229
G1
111 N?44-E W,21' 9401811
N317.ll 4-14724
1411564
030 41.5.4 2481..10
G+
ry ",ad 4315.15
721141.3 2491111
1-4772.1
CU P5 4729.7 14914-05

m 4]216
.
391211.
1 .B7
248=1.19
114 3411131 244723.-
72321-01 2461100
cm
cu 72313 :14244
072
Cw 3134.16
3414)4 7464 n
214711.7
401
Lw 4]14.1
54307.91 xle6va4
214369.14
04 w154.te A1441611
CVM 11. 475w.91 2-11(1
w]A
114 -21WIVE 13,w 31746.36
39711465 214.619
24449.67
131 597IJ6.97
2.65410
CAA 34' 59730.10 344672.4
M2A
GS 7. 3464
MIMI. x16451111is
1444659
=A
CMA
N=1'0?11` 1 r
N10 5740..
58745.6 ae4s3
1.14.m
CY 1.N' 39741.94 2441.00
M7
C51 3.17
816' 7211164
JBDY14 7441.
21641'7.3
1159 ]B'
4 4116911.7 1111461.68
111
qt 4' 546467.
844.1+ 2-707.4
0111 381111.1 1

b1.'
7111.30 -51
2-]51.71
W? 4Z]2 51244 21641013
1195
016 4.]4'
.4' 39616.3
596314 249701.511
1.972].72
37
CW n' 45414
514464 2.91144
1444233
15 s9xmu x14172
L70 4414.4 2466/10.14
044 .4' 72552)14 21641.4
Olz
m 19464.111 244651
073
C7 .
' 5941x53
%41510 2411472.47
34411699
075 5 Y 5171151 245141.4
676
C77
421-111'WW
M26 794461
-113672 -11-
146411
c3 -47 244851.71
30 4846.M 06 24111.{
114 7241)720 21
12

33 x I

movwtiriv

As 544)_11

3.41. 15 m..
141464
2.81964

Cx
WS -
3414.3
4
24432.55
2
7211
-111.
7241601 2601721.15
CB1 1 2 721.96
114

114
Mi_.
NI
May
?70' .0-.
14.26
342401
2 7214
249

111
rn

r
71x16.. 7
2.9755110
:MnSSs
119E 41210.4 301144
- C1
Cw rw
W 411.4
4971 0,7. 2.191.17
2mu.>7
1195 Npmrf4if 2&4X 1"...42 249750.1
1101 4940.65 1
17 %9466.. 249)611
611 u
19
Cif 7 TAT
716651.. w-v
24874.37
CI01 4 n 3 T 60
CiOE 4 316517.4 x461621
mW 41491 24936172
clw 372584
491992 74614.51
-14
444
Sim Con 1 544111 1.940.1

CIS 5 61451.4
4863. 7111911172.
314@724
01119
CIIO
1 44,.4
51583.4 x.-10.94
21456151
111 X % 374.17 24_.1169
0112 46 72114.17 246111..
44
72
m"
6114 379111 -6994.4
CIIS 6662W 17' 5441.1 24100164
0116 M-)e' .4441
0118 - saws' n -044.711 111..4
014
0119 N61'1'm
p 49.14
4641.16 11118.52
2{3151.19
020 %941198 147017092
121 464 13C40.a
<IA

1 199{ 47
211011.
.23
CI1 N
' I
N - T MM.A
69 24318.4
4 11
11118 1
V7 11110.3
1• I 781610.4 1 .4
127
Ow ME) 746264
3002.47 2170110.32
241.
LIE T5W WETLANDS
AS TABLE
FLAG NO. BEAAING LENGTH NORTHING EASING
7500 3L411r.T 11 ]7 40LWLm 216472663
1501 9 '99Dp;L.. a' ,441] 2454551
1502
143
5511 40460.4
4142112 246110.4
21414.4
144
115 )1 .144
642150 10413.01
24.21.
TSY 4514 147)8.06 IWM 44.4
]50]
7701 SJV' 1011 .34
+.]10.17 14 .4
141113464

49' 1
4161,11 .
215455AV
r1o
1710 441191 1:64].1
LIE DNA WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO. BEARING ' LENGTH NORTHING EASIING
P0. 140734 3-01150.05
1N4 1172 444691 249241.17
O I '4' ' 4607201 2169111.21
Nmm 101091.4 x.172.81,.
LINE AN WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO. BEARING LENGTH NORTHING EASTWG

4Y 49010.4
101013.21 2 ..
2476660

JM]
AW

{ ..JR 4601101

406019.01
2.767.67
2.74..1
016

N16
MLVIL?
2&5,r 46065.56

444566 24]14.1

21475441
AM7 - 4410).3 311111171.12
.1 N 401115262 24370.50

AM.
ANIO
11.41WE
1,13?13M
M.51,
27.77 40111-.62
41177.4 246710.62
216362.0
AM11 1 a m032 3.311.52
.12 1 N1
JS SY
aM11bi
2.311..
AM13

AMi1 T
1
40621QBB
40611221
2435).66
243711
AM" 412761 2.1064
AMI6
1111 w612.W
1424.3) 24]11.4
--
-is N M7.0 247"6651
AM19
A
m N-16'. I M74' 1431.13
11111-0.72 24 III4L51
x.764
.
M
021 N 4W3s51 .
241551.1
AM21A
AM. -114A
40538162 2.7114.
24357.1E

-
AMZI
.2.
_X2113=12- 4647.7

4081NIX 2476/161/

24116]2
AY15 a11A,9T 24195684
AlI1] 6643,15 2 .1
AM1
AMA .?ISTE -17' I4m2W
46541)5 21501.,
2484n.1
AMID V04A.13 24613.
AM51 66641.1 241310
AMJ2 14.9.60 24453.76

AMY
N 44)5572
,44.11 9.4X.11
24 1114
A11 10540.10 247247
AMY 40184,61 2472.52

.0111 40714.15
436194 24723.37
24M75.71
Awl
AMU .74242
w710904 2441.

2441.5

AMk
1.r. Y
01.1
671720 2
14mIQ11
2. m
AM47
J w 1 2. .14
M4
AM+A 471924
w.1x 2.7MI0
2461-6.4

AM1A
,vww a .3
444..11 1+1176..
2. man
Y4
72142

N

2 42: 1 ,37172.111
41".56
1144 91
Awl 407241 P.
JI
AMx '4 ,11251 24411E.
AM4
AM56 .man
01231.% 2467114
146723.02
AVm
AM4
wols"
=7V 4072454
671724 2.1016.4
24 17216 1
AM4 4 W1P411 64.1
A- ). 6 2151%7.05
..
AM4 W 1.
0 2 434 '
. .01
AY63
AMq 'l 0
4MM. 24711194
2
AM4
N721CWE
47."' 0
Au4 1
4
AY61
x 0
15379,G.64
:roman
AMA
071 17
41 2.775158
AMn 11,1
0115
AM]a 1

E
1w
rE

11.1 4 on&
41115x61 2444 36
;.IMC
AM3. 39
3 I' 63124 2475-11
.1.
AMn P 7' 07653,52
6114.25 16 51
.62
.7a N 677.15 103103
72472 x 4132.67 34317
AM4
AA4 40md.a
471961 74)114.
243x02
Awl
4 14 4151688 2476631
AM, N 41- 634.1 2437216
AM.
410.5 Hir4'Vl7*E 4' 1033,4
472123 1415114
114621..
N7 6A1.1V 2!634.4
NO SCALE
LIE NA WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO. BEARING LENGTH NOR NO EESRNG

NAI
1010,tl .1672 .4
2414171
V069165] 119)47.0]
NR4 +0414 2424A4

NM
-WC
21,M- 1493.
67282. 21414.4
24614265

.AI
-11- 646..4 2474.,4
x4411 40°72..3
4tl651.6 7+166x11]
7.75172
xA+O
x

Y:. ILYOW
m
27
w21
N41'
.

S
+o?en1 m,
x4
7407
NAIf UTH'P 4048661 24767606
NA4 ?MTVW'E 2713' i
--NAI5 480121 2.7604.06
NAI5
NAIB 1060154 3.31.4
3472
NAT] NimilaWE .16 27263624
E470A1
XA1B 41143..
411672 24070a.61
NA= 4411721 2.174N
NAZI_ 10612641 P.n4A
_
NAP] 10460.4 167776.66
E-3 106161.r 24141.17

x1
5 114.72 2.7601726
.3
NA1 4061124
4611.1 44741-01
14638215
NAV 141:61 xu1461s
NA1 S7419'OrE 17,17' 442414 2
NAA 406211.- 2 Y
RAID 106216.91 2.790115
NAA 10621661
NA. NII21.12 211111.72

NAM 724211.4
01m6.88
werlu 24.0121
248601666
741144
61
NAl6
xAk 4Br1.W .
246 .1
N.437 40846485 Pkm44
448 1 10111.4 2.6011.61
w2eau 7+1143.1
NAw 10626662 E 35
H-
'W
ry I1,x
1W?]6W
1411245
2 v6
x.131-
A W"'52"if 11- 106271.02 -1.-
,A.
NA.
1 101151
481550
3.772395
pA47 106114.11 11
A, N f 101314
.61564 1472113
E1e724-
N 461x62 2.1.
_
HA60
A51 4641.4

1141.08 24741.
21
2.aT..6o
NA53 10x3727 2.451.73
44724 x .

now
146-4.. I
z.49au
nA4
ITT '

1 491514 2 11.
4
NA
nu]
4'
401.1
444x1
-1.M
z465T65,-
ml m 1111
NASA 145114 2.mY..
NAa NVI 406 466 2.616165
xM
I - 2 1 1
N41
mw 7 1014724
4 .8150.,
2.8&71
-ABA _15L78 3.4251
NMb w430. 2.401.
x721 4676.W 01 441.50
x47 483017 24401.61
NAU 44744 :411111x,
N4B 10676x4 3/400.561
NA70
run
HIMWE
jail 106631.4
111 1 3
2.80667
NAn N107r3rw --
-
l'.. .14 2168017.4

14 5
N _4.
411
64.
2.416.
71 .15 2.41161
M
NA 3
44x3 2.61565
Ii
N.43 NM- N .01 2
RAr] 6141 344I433.46
1478
1 105 2.444.43
x7272
x.o n 474724
{14].41 1+4444
741144.4
NA4 40.25
4 11
2
.401
NA4
x7264 11621
,7
10111}1' 2.81
17.18
2.814.15
x4s 19.6172 : Ia1
x724 472461 114141
NMI
.Aft I 3 10]104..
411131 b6
14120.51!
x724 r 4.1.46 sw44a
61411 2 .q
NAK
x72/2 '4 an N.91 21471141

NAw
hiollml,
I— 4071N.111
a.BA i
211163111
NA4
N-WE 6.172 147764
NA"

N
1 4.4.71
wn7a4 E.461.-
x+114661
. IN
8
ME
N4r42'N"E
3-W 10.6727 2.6,84
4NFIQM&cR=
243 NCAW FAWH STREET
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 26401
1LL 910 743-IOw
FAN 810 251-8482
http: //•An.I4M5a11xAmm
ATION SURVEY
WETLANDS DELINE
Iqb 0 46,E
tq R
ffu
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
as
6 DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
L FICZJL4MS MYNSMP - OM4LON - NORM C'AROLW'A
..5 ,n June 29, 2007 NO Srux
PROJECT I: 009100163
PAOJ. SMYR: DLJ
DRAM BY ACS
FIELD BK. : W1013/56 - LJ
COMP. FILE : vLo1-009100167 F
SHEET I : SHEET 2 OF 14
DING. I:
LM ON WETLANDS
L!E ON WETLANDS (WLAIMI®)
LINE r WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE
FLAG No, BEARING LENGTH NORTHING EAGTING
E. -_- 407011147 .9w6.5
4711., 7441.65
F6 f 'W 4691' 10684.11 164437
ro N 'W 4446.01 464489
E4 1 404172'17 21641.
6 9
.1.
w70..N 24531.1
FI ]I'W 1 ] 6724,19 24472A4?
?re
?? o m
v
LIE A WEMNDS
FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO. BEARING IFNGTH NORTHING EA511NG
412 21408.91 9444x."
AIt
M10
NG577'%'E
2&w' I IE,
41470.10 246305.4
2017166
4,09 wham 04141071.18
A5x 465-SVial, .11, 4044.0 2.-a.m
AM7
Ata
NM4!24E
52.W 90184fi18
.41NUl 4.1107.19
1M4IM37
AX3
ANN
N -1420
41415841 44416121
Na=m
AX] ?6.X 214425.50
A301 -.50,66 144421.17
A301 414107,07
b 2
2 440313.
Am

AM
S1t.2z:5I
.1- 104434,89 2843x0
4,27 __ 4018]1,11 241443176
AN5

Amy
40031.12
4025,13
2414459,76
24448182
Ala
4,29.3 405081.12
105x2N 26166
.m
A291 115_7 l.M.
8015".X
4,291 4150122'1 510.0
A
Am m9 40517.4
405117.43
24151259
4,206 NgXjjI MM 24451.3
Amt
wl
_w SWI
N 244160.10
Am6
A -
4161162
/S1k0 2KKin?
21&111.22
N"
m
A 111 -Hi4"
wsiw.xi 185
i
Ami 1510.38
ANI
Azm 111'x2 41615811
105107.33
Ann [
ff
Mm lt6 T 46506Am
A n
A2ia I-4,0613
,Ii
-.BB W
Any
A2
iC 4119406
401x1.66 244&261
20454,35
A273
A272
4

I
41484,10
040815
34541510
414485821
Alm
Ala 4!
7 406215.41
424].10 245490111
2449412
Ala
37,47 405115.10
Ala
A265
N51-O'21M
37.21' 105,514
105165.]3 4464x4.5
2041106,44

A"!
.57WW'E
46.36' 05206,75
105210.05
204118
A192 7 W52211 2.X1166
A"I
4,160 XI
NS t4, 31
4144411 24550554
20664,4
A16 i ' 46529202 9 M
6
A57
A2=0 T.
5al 41526660
055080 31x20
246111.0
A2X 506 1 .519532 . 4. 52
Asxi MITI n,", 4044210 0911.01
A254

A253 .64=31

X 1'
I'
110101.
4X150,15
2MN1a-
1
45.14
5 E
4
I -nal 1155344."
A1X 1 24653511,83
Al. 405249.19 2465314.83
APM
A21
S0-
43.- 4502.41
1'9 .x
140019
24 SNITWE 47.9v 121.81 0647.66
A2w
AIM 405014.11
49794,1 14009.50
2465116.19
Al. Y 4100}ID 2MatlV1
A24P 041092 945114,10
4,21
1 14464,44 =4651x.06
920A 2 0054,63 11500183
A2
ATM Y
] 4047MIS
-4438.11 2"641.66
am

7 n4Y wM am
41414260 2465411.61
4404444,2
04010.85 2044238
A1. S? WE -11 01611.11 20 .M
'M'F 4081836 24X2 5.11
1 1o'1fi2 245X5226
j 1'112 2.45x60
9 .'2'E 41.66,.
4a6E-1 21.69x0
2444511

e NIS.
Ia3614 3.0684-
2.X".74
I 1 Y
1' 1• IaNL" 245140
A"3 N.1.1 aI 447654 2165764.V2
AM 'W 3 04444,54 26x1 M
A2xl M IMXM 74x" X
An0
4,19
9 101364.18
009691 205110.41
20572373
A=le -.tAX 2"W"M
A 1
- 0.6121
405x.10 246X..5
3 4.44
A215 X M 4a37 M 2M5mle
4,24
3
'w
I'll 1.84.15
4a15653P 216x674
-55501,11
A212 41 41402800 34641,0
A211 44 2' 4x4¢12 2IW614
0
AIM
-IIII
-IT IS—
14730.39 2454-4
2 95
19' 1
A2W M, 4a"e.m 2011t1AE
Am6 3739' -MM.n 2 I
Am3
Aml
NI
AY I
III Ix1E5,9
2.5467
A2M
AIN
N 01"55
401"&4 18
2400.32
ADM M
T 4150X," 2 Cl
246440,63
.. X
161 61
240 11
IN
A19a
.1.1 muzu'w 25.0V
lSI 41510731
1011 1.01 B6
24x1607
N
.
4,14
2097
2050856
Ala N • 1044072 245541293
Ata 44,1 0851115 2.5309.10
AI
AiM I 566
1xi.." 2.550 .
444
A191
AI N .1
15410.91 1443266
- M.
Al. 195411.66 2145817,
Ale ea] 3 N
AIN yn."VE 405381.16 2.55916
AI 10667609 14841284
AI
Al. 107131
4163"4,9 9
P 6
Albs 0 21
Af7
AI- Ak92' 4 N
1527719 ¢ 66
2M57M.W
AI"
AI7B
1
4142,
116 4 2.614.-
2466750."
All 866 265]4,07
A174 SII I.., 45414
M P
B
A175 Q0'42'lI'W 26,41' U
474 24667xM
A+- W110"71 II 114887 7 .2
A172
Ain 0
gal -72.72
24x191.38
Am 1X10." 2-3.0
IS w 265841418

A%7 141610
.OS 2464.11
2450".9
07x05 24493281
4,166
754

1

i 4511607
04'41 2466X3.10
0.696-
1.3 1]0'
' IOM'" -X061.82
u I - 4x13215 006"651
4,17
A14 S, I" 1X"4,01
4X01608 2.144..
1
A1X
A=t
IS ", INTI.16

0.91,4 2M6"551

21&038,50
0787 00X50
AIx _71.67_ 11881.2 m
All.

All.

4TT1V3rE

112'
4X14,"
24617.10

24&121.1
475]
AIN
Sm4v4Q-I,
17- 46x662
10XM.W 244611382
2401".
.11
AIN .X74,1
0.4,02 2. .k
244257.0
AIII 1124,50 Y ]4,-30
AI. MJ'WISFE 41.39' 1449166 2M
All
Al.
404421133
A1/S
?l

10V "
703.
Alll 147]
AAA 101 XN =2.
-,SS
1-66.0 LIE A WETLANDS (CONTINIJED)

FLAG TABLE
FUG NO. BEARING LENGTH NORTHING EASTING
440
AIX -Orl 27,77- I4
01811.77 21xk2m
24655.61
Rik -4Na 2-14
A137 R i4NM914
AIM
' 40.7,38 24115020]
Ilk
Al.

A -.8701
Ill3A62 11x443.56
246415,1
A'. 4010130
^. .446 3"51
AlM 4047223 21S 34
A.1
Al. 40-5."
IDI647m R1ee5..06
x4.1721
Ain 10x6.50 H065aX
Alm N--
111 ISAV -VB11. --3S
VI 415 U8 2406X0..
Aim 14X66 1UeX69S
Alm
Al 24
+owM.66 94883822
256351,54
A123 Narlwal" .2M' 01934,70 249646.66
Al.
AIN
4018x2. 20644631
218844.50
_ Aim
A119
S4zzr*1F
0,34' 104fiY.J2
404OW02 240820.0
x415"51
11. 41.67 24016IB
S
M 101051.30 24855719
IS 3 .8641
AILS
AIN --10.64
41107166 34x".07
24."39
A111 -751.11 141&0.10
A112 -.IS _
AIII 100- x476.
A110 4G-MW ¢416 4,
4,1" 40800.10 9-BJM.s
1X
M07 er 1160.41 2456260.0
2 .1
A12 4223' 21410.63 241044222
A105 -449250 x4601.$
Aia -148221 141014,0
4,103
At02
-421E )2
214T -4.84
40114.06 208910.11
20X5-
Alm NN-_ nor 414-0718 240O237
Alm
A11 11NI.X
101-4.47 200ill..
201010.16
A6, 1.MN 2.7051..
A 41.7x10 26103&07
A.
A95 I'MOWE no, 0Mm0
-A41oso 24J0¢6.5a
2.7112.05
A0 N*Q?X*E M32' -444.4 21-9751
603
9 04467.07

0}0.k 2401144,22
A 2.078112
4,. 9
An
NW42'ISFE
4&4T -. -uI. ,w
411122. x.07200
2.12466
AN NSI 24.62' wAm" 2412701
AU nje, IASMSS 2.727842
4,88 -14031 2.707.84
A.

lj&I 040431
-440813 24671=25
R41584A1
Am W alal. -5+x10 4.7410,
414107.66 241738010
AM
AN wasil2er.
ST- 24,11'
I, 41.0.52
405"
4 24673]7.6}
I
A .
-45]6. 24m37.20
An
An "7151 'W 1 ' --n.7A
--41.4 2467 504

-2 347
All N 045289 1.721,66
AI4
A73 '4 1 2.T-.
2.1157.10
A72 S-W 1 247260
An NI N`
6 V a
3 2.7 `48
2Mm887
AGO N - 16 2.611854
Ax 'w 18
r 2-ON42
AS1
Aft M x0893610
MS •W JS 1W41.W 21aa4iz

AS3
31.3, t
47 MUM
-0..
AX 51 2 49
.1 -.3613 24H747.17
Aw 31.1 • 1460& 245]'
AN
ASS
32AV -71
-7=4.15 .731.44
240615853
6"
AM 4
1
? 44' -76661
4471517 --
66.7-1
AN 9- w.7.09 20677.13
MI m..' x 2-6n6N
All NWW4n 4
. -. 24800206
472
A51 M"TITE I 404X1.73
441.14 2.X25.61
IMNN,eI
4,50
sw,nn
a
44"4650
x.841111
A. 1 1.04-
0,187227 66466x6.
708B..n
477 101111.14 2 6610
A. 1 26171.&
A. II2ClfFQrW 1 411flAx
1.91. 2011X,81

A- xIV
"4.-
66+0x610
A-
471
1' -0180
41441,50 DIBxOBOB
x166"]."
Aw 4aA6a26 2.8.8.73
AM 4510.10 2.54"9
A37
A37
147 41X644
-38013+ 24590664
2455094.61
AM
4,. 35 1' 40512747
1051'61 4466x0,]6
2466X66
A% SSW 41514410 1046616
AM
'115017' 105.x.33 2.}0306
4,2 2-380 41312808 $415"
131 4044.02 249083.7
4,w
NSI

12117.70
10513566

241074132
241114E6
Al.
'
' ISIMx
41.101+4,1 2607416
2.'616
All 1yq
p_ ?jtW bNS.. -I-,SA
All _
4,1/
N091=10'E
S, wW6a
w6n19fi 24111,.66
241207.10
Ail- 4441x41 xb17ea1
623 4"071.¢ 2 12
All

MO

• 1'
31.01 661

"127 "

3.71014,5
A18 17 .1' i A- 3 7666
Ate
All
Nal-MWE 'v 405096100
ID6a-.10 207M7.71
241510"
At6
Ais M
1f5g7." 11x.9
254 43166

A1] 40X12,63
101&4,4 2.1.1.5
2111x.xi
472
Atl 110152
401925 2447M
66.7-&W
107
0 swI --W 4164.66 40114,66
AS NlJF21F3WE Sam' 1025,5+ 217MIA0
M
Al 4111600
21
218}X1.0
Al
M

IM -21
10'4,1210 2451X7.82
241574,3
A L .4 3NI54.M
M - 54_ 1M4
Al Bt Nu-, 466080,82 207566-
LIE B WETLANDS
FUG TABLE
FLAG NO. BEARING LENGTH NORTHING
415069
91 EASIIING
1 Ai
52 .
40611511 24>SS1.I
1112 R
03
04 Imn,.2
5061X84 2.151-7
iM7 4Am
BS -
as 421 "
w5tB116 2.269.83
3-14666
57
SWSTM-S

-62x.41

x4rA2SIz
a6
as
mV3I'2a'E
35M, -51 0
.52MI2 101310.0
2 1361.19
BIO 4510135 246 381.4
0I 29 " !ti 12".21 2.127.47
812
all w41J.-
054751
" 247 .is
14] 135
615
014
B15 ONXX 2411
241238.%
BIB 166=064 24573230
all 405207.30 24720631
M 161%x 241135]
SF9 '4 1 IOSm3M 2107X"
am 42920.02 24 M.M

622 aJ
41007210 2Mn01.N
2.1.42
all
42424,21
247041.9)
524
am ISIS
01 Maw
4481016.12
826 -015.66 2 X.40
ax]
826 40.41"
05X03] 1. .101081
24610644
a39 41%1619 3461007.07
630 1o 3187164
531 1x01— .0 2111121.7
a 111010 2411-.21
all
N+r4V5rE
2D.63'
4allm2i
2011m21
W.
all NOMWE
+' I .xi1507
40526050 201135.4
2.7111 T
838
B37 05531
.xi"11 246116M
2071550
Ma 12699.10 2411835]
470
IT—
I.IF
-7S
2-1181M
6- QMNI 2071.0
B0
012 Ile Axn2N
-XI 2011Mx
94407"..
80
544 I 105]6"
-11- 2S7Z0-
x.7066
.
B. I' 10x14.50 .
207311.09
SM 10X%31 945154.06
541 4X07.9 2.134891
B- W5fFlO`E -3a 103S9465 2.139.11
544,
BX
'4'21
I' 45910.9
4,2 4074210
24101.7
BL
852 INISSISS i.
103061.. 2022332
-I..
862
50
NNwI2*w
24,01' -4407.17
405904. 241121,33
2.1015
ex 4828 2.-64
63A 1• M ua11o.64 10721.&
545 a 2.1Xa1e
541
BX 1' W m
IOan
. 3.14666
1
0
aro 1v .
1010x10 46720/
4461"61
BX 428104, 2171165
547 4292814 21720.22
a Y n 2
ll
BW
80 _W.1,
'11 SV 00x610
x 10199.93
411 14
650 405 0 20T'
1
666 4217293 247140.0
aJ
ax
17.75- 415]4
769 2Mn"6P
2.710.9
A" " 166 X 2 ntab
810
611
-111'
ryl 1X07.17
40xiMX 2M7055.2
24101066
511
8513 s IRg104
43060.4 3.14238
244106x66
54/4 4414,10 2.10380
4MI2m 4415.50
015 UI I— 4x11730 2. 10

8
8. "
Sam
"52'47"W
,I
11 4%5651
4x1 31
IM- 2470X15
0121-
207023-
eat _
Nnvgw z 40X1670 24701
06 104,
953 __jLQL_ 40X10.0 248 2
654
086 -x-110
40X"13
24E94314
666 1' MAI' 4152

-1
ax
ne `
-. •
4oszMO5 xix
41X4.0 m
x.e

Bap
I?JI,2Tn 11
24 2100
N
B9 24, 4516. -
1Mam.e9
Bill 19.17 4181"1Z 2 4.6
M
554
665
27.17
711
4518432
MI
. 46 1
2467620
894 t.5' I
I.k 146 ..
24x774,51'
Na 40NIM
.5040,. 2416110.17
.1
"] 1
954 --NI

-11.1 IT

14,45' .SON..

060141
3
1 .
2ft
B"
? -11 4144,8,0 246-144
8100 SX 104pBI,10 24606&."
477 if, -1&391 11NX94
SIM 47.6r 149x66 0
5103
9104 x
N .6' .X30.4
4X052
9105 9066 .60666 6
1
nT nor .3116,52 1
2

054
0 2?
MX i' 3
010
BIN, 1
19
wn! 3

013
2i1M
I
'I

,i4•, •
20aALM

4,111
Bns
'Ir4'e
44,
"
4
N
2166474.&
216611166
711
MI5 11111 4r 1 , 2464060
248661x06
eua 'OL41S May
__
aim 2NMN.5
1'66
N50V
"96 1 2.xel.E1
a,. M297" 15,15'
451 x
31x.@8.79
812
Bill V E
N'7'W.'E
NI 40401..
4621116 P I
240336,7
4,115 T 4x230.fi1 S 0.
Mm 49281. 13
6-1
si" 16627.4,6
029 4595% M03T.a
0130 2166-1.21
BIN IMMT 24863311.85
sin 414411,4 !Hi 140
Bik
614 IaW 1x01."
4&19651 2111MIM
2 71
ww 19166 2 ]T
BIX
007
111 le 21663X,15
20513112
I I 2.521192
039
.,AaW.
III,
I.a
44-x07431
514
21.2y 4x119
l_
1
6641

407MWE

no' 40555
154 94820693
zw1543o
M. 4
.X8266
21
81
1248'. M"17
2402007
814 0,18 24018616
8141
61.
526='31'W
WAT .63684
40630.0 21674.31
2431110741
41648.66 211111.IB
216610..
2406584
218x642

t NQIN'SIFE 21w -513031 14x084"

117
lilL
94
. 14• ' 42x1,11 .610135
x
5
NO SCALE
v 243 NORM FAINT STREET
MLWNCTON. NORM CAROL WA 2511
NEIL (918)) 343-10.
FA9' (MO) 251-9782
Mtp://-... ki-.d.-
LIE TM WETLANDS
F G TABLE
FLAG NO. BEARING LENGTH NORTHING FASTING
1721

rr"'ox
N
N4-rM4fi'W

QM QMS11
404666
1.66 MIS
284aU1
24Meaa6
72
na
Tlx

Lin 414x08
-.3654
1x066.51 2418440.61
21567666
-x,7
Tw6 4 4105,10 246 1
o]
POB
TAB
Tlw
1]07

R

OO' W
1604'
151631
.n

-665.0 2MX27a4
2.501
2080730
21690627

P4kl"14,
n>,4 4x907.66 0-7314
WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
NY
DEVELOPMENT COMPA
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
MCHLAAW TOMMIRIP - ONSLOM -NORTH CAROLWA
17'.01
,- 1..101.0{ r.a a2., zom NO SCALE'
PROJECT p 009100163
PROD Sv : DLJ
DRAWN BY : ADS
FlELO ON. 211013/56 - W
COMP. FILE uw101-009100163 R
SHEET B : SHEET 3 OF 14
DING. A:
LIE PWTIOB WETLANDS
LIE NB WETLANDS
?a a n
5Nm
s° m
v
FLAG TABLE
_FLAG NO, BEARING LENGTH NORTHING EASING
El MI M itav -.5 2-18641
R
© IO
.4763.34 2 .N
2463189.1
EA. m PL +01x.? 24 7N,W

ALDN's PL
9.ONB 9L
11] 141
4041.22 _
11-
3 N
AL016 R
PL M) EN
n .r 4.137
-x$2.62 x19161
1460512.
13.
E12 M __ +N31A55
x4511 21.5).58
2-11.9
¢. 6..5. 9 1.111
114 N 11X58214

Ele
N621Y2a'N
20.19' 2-37
4
5
15 43 2
DO E20 9
-7?AG 247
1 2W 2tn

31 2,15320,141
463 1

N0512,541"

33,93!
4 265451
2x520.23
E2) « 2-EN86

Eli MCI
.raw..
1
2e32aro
Eli Na0wWE 27.24'

ET. .411.67
.531.. 263: 312
21071.1
02 N2WWM'E .541 s -41
E- .11113 246MA
EN
135 x - W
NQAWWE 1..51
41051117 1101219
26]251.15
186 Nf x52%44 246320.21
9

E1
-.1
DIST
7555
! wsJ2.1s
Z 7
4I6JJ12
E3B N + . 21
2
f.
E NMM'03T 4711
. f' -2 9
.903V
w6129A6 1.3
213331.]1
2.31123
.
E. -IVt
N 27.111 40596.? 2.11623
E
E. 45 NxY
M
190 ..44,50
44]6..10 2150606
III 213130,65
ELB
,)
T
0' 105-1;i
405?1 2.Il
14-31-
1..

Ew x111 4 2052.}1
4061168.56 2/6351055
2
9
1,50 N1005'4744 1.25 .570.76 41
2-.2x5
5
RE N . I1' 40.5]1,]6 210152
53
54 N •34'i IF
CiftlAD'ISIF 1.71' 4051-27
405.17 2.1S2A86
246]310.
L54 -U&I
M 755 IE9N? 2102.25
.
F
EM
E%
4594445
1x2468,71
2151162
21191.00
-WE 1.3 4561693 54W1lm
6] 2 1101' .3551,}3 2{
E7

EN
2'11

f

86'
1011.1

10690.11
21112Oll
4
21556.
¢0
N ,2 .635.11 24113991
132 41 9A'1 4057616 214431.51

EN
N 4oeo5G,lo
4016110 24w0Aro
206.9..
E1
E1 x '4
4611' 'E 43.111V
41.11' 40606390
40601074 2.3 0.p
2f-1380
E7 '6x1 1017.74 2x77.4
EN
Em
N ]N 41141},67
45151D 113 7
1 N
EN
En 40916,23
4G61]5.1 245
4140411
014

EA 1 t
146
.1.1 251445

15101,61 21.40.

21310%

14 It-
.811.31
21.11.-
IM
E_7 .241 1 `E x>Y 4525- N.

f_7
141

NISIV3YE

39,90,
45 1
. W.55 15
2-..15
21an.86
M

ml 4.11- 21.51'
106167.13
1139,2
21 .1
411 1
02
15
N14WWE 3767
45417% 11/11204
N OI50
E, .41113% 52 21113)1]
E5
10
N
-51 22
?526.W 2.4159
21160.2

ECA
NOOI
18 2L2N
486 ,M
%0 H ' ' E
3
Y 0 21-71.

4ZZW 246.12.1
23
C?aM
13 21-7.18
21419284
1.17.7C
7B
7, .8505..
N 11641311
34,1 "
79
EDe SMUWIN 51.1f .616%
41Nan 26x21
2140111.5
15 413034 5.
Elm
E03
1103 V?jV,3,
s7s3+)2-W -311
01 15244..
41x56:
4Ex2B17 2 41,1
1,
2.391.
1108 409222 215155
E11 aBi94" 21 1.x4
117
El. 45174,5
-IM 2-31190
31311.
EIN 4115? 2aN41.5
Vic 6 ' .61673 Z 3)037
VI1
1E

35=1017,

ci.,f
401t11B
216556.16
1
4 45N?m
-91.90 .-1
Flt 4581123 21510,80
418110 248315
E117 W M 65 7325 2 0.1
1111
118 .. _ sall 6
6x%1% 2. N
2 410.24
f130
421 8610
-.1' 106
45111.n , Q-1562
3129.2
11123
12 N-0-111 -7, 406155
10611.52 151x,
Z-.."

145
71.4 4124an
100?6..N 24-11.02
11611691
N 1'ZYE -eJ21Jl 2
?
nv 3 26.
.?
1? '13 E
-7- .If'
4I.QZ
x13
2463471.31

Eft 'E
1 1
112i 7,32
-32 21 n
4.
1386 T' IOBxl.S l4EJ50.n
186
EIN 4545.'2
411311 x42361.1
2 4638
EIN

I 40,10.03

.130.1. 2463701.
35
x.31.5
Ell
El 40,519-
.611x,1 x41? Z1
21-02.
El.
V0

wxwArW
.637.60
.61410
",.9%26
3.3,11
041
E142
EI19 106174JI
+x14.1 11.45
213505.62
EI.
EIN
72

.1
1
110 -41
4E611?n 313NJ-
El-
E
-z53
21.4.1
E
l- 197 21.193
fH9 151117 ?.NMN
1160 114X71 40!44x1
[131
E I
M 4004043
4.x497 7
1 .1
l.
El I4e3ass 240.16.?
.
V. 486
45550 .
210.4 7. 3
Etn

111 401NA45

41311 11 1
19-
4x16242
-ON -75' 11l%5 24633K23
EI9
1.1 U 41'
r .J3.
--II 24816672
263211
E162
Ei- 4061141
4530602 286 .-
2115.1.12

I-V .6311 434-?AJS
El.
11
wIrIOW
8.,m* 411230
453219 2483201.16
]1524..
E17 x310.47 21.68x2
E11
E17 -ww x62-.15
1524688 434-?I.v
2463241.5
Elm
Et71
V617'52'W
..M 0632x.1
x6202.91 3.62441
2652007
Etn 4.111- N
EIII 44410.7 4- 2v

V74

Eno
1711
-2C 1
4 Y,6.+I
30.71' 40611LIN

45102x6 246 60

24-28.7
-
LNE F WETI_AAM fCdN u-Fni
FLAG TABLE
FUG NO. BEARING LENGTH NORTHING EASING
On
141 x9044
.. 24431
21
-
F186
EI1 444921.98
105940.1 531IM2N2J
2
416311..
[i%
EIN
--u2mculw-
v-, 91.8E
x57% x6..65
2032%.63
ft1
ON 6.k-.?
444111 246x25,0
2534647
17 154.4 2130592
1186 405mm 21%11'9
ON
E1 45i61C1
4a61Mm 240322600
246123127
1D1 4053571 212220-09
V92 -..78 RW1513
0J
194 JURILEw- ..24'
UAV 405441,
105600,1 NW21.0
21)2141
N
EIN 1558.%
105655,81 213%1.
20=2193
11 S2MWE 19119' 10'? Y.20 21N61.
EIN
EM x55090
405513.% 2131..15
215192.44
Em1
Em0 4054/1.}5
x./3.94 21 51
21110A02
E93
RN IDN40.it
x.1247 2. .%
1 .i,C
175 w Mai -L---
121 27.74 40015514 2-0]72
Elm

E20E OZ4rM'W

soivm*w

-W
+5nN1
?2D0.
440.540
2405&N
E209
110 .5214.40
x75.0 14 .2
24631611,4
f2i1
1712 .5101.
45117,16 24"0..
24618520
1213 4511198 25910500
1214
1213 W4MV .-
01.1 4111156
2 586
EM6
521] 1 M 1
405".2 N .IAN
101115.27
Rla
E1B --1
x1..42 24-II129
2031210
Elm
1211 319 ' >M
IY M
17 4019.13
40.31,75 9x11.,
113114.11
C22 10'40 404601.. 213102-01
E2U 4511. 2463/0113
..
121 611
1' 463
x114.64 2 21
00x5
EV0
101 ,9 2 3
Z II i
E2?

1

?
4Lw
51-78' x4711.

10467393 P.JIDI

2.J

120
.173. .
]6
029 58'50'1 52 101030.m 2.31191
ON
430
E431

NY
.49TH
0.4.63
21.512
246W/12
41=5
E2N .Ie510
401JQ0.1 21116745
21192.0

JEW
149

1 7
40146x%
901-8.5
246 N 55
2111411
RS Yx IZOD,
1..67%
213x,.
1219 184 x04 4043OA.82 24EW4

120
0'01'
61 0TH
14'
6.
.19170
129.41 4
2".551

2
E1x
AY M
.12291
117.0 24OWZW
20.0203
21X5%51
F211
123 NwII CO. ,0111.11
0.U 2463107.51
2130/90
f21 '3.0' 'W 1. 1042 21312%
I
E245 &-sle W
IM-r?-IN 236
.1 -4..43
axa9 240.%01
24x521181
ONO -M S 40431.- 11 ,.,,4
1200
801 SINIO'H-W -Y ,
-11 x4.21
.-Co 21325442
4136}1
147 .400.86 213181111
853
U54 NMWWW
N'W
N MIJ-
21.7 4045275
04M1N 2.31017
21612197
E25 ME PL
ALONG R -
I''232"W
125,64' x431510
.6x.41 2.216,1
24620511
AL6WD R
PL 09
•W 1 r 4.x9.4
4.8X4 24621173,04
2464887.7
E2B 40x1310 110?B135
1260 2E . PL
-PL Y
1 404221M
-1217.00 4402512
2027.64
-, NI Y 'W .4104" 2121051
ALONG PL 1 1.96.31 2.27131
AL060 PL
PL lE 0 ERN : Y
N 1
21,81' x40186
x1610 10?00.Do
2/ m.N
R- ME R PL
&06G PL 10120.12
10181.% --
212155®
AL019 PL N W ft.M 4,mz1 -.51
!1069 PIL N+' 4042'6.1 2.261
ALONG PL
ALONG PL
S34151105ow
113,71' 40420,9
x42 m 2.29814
2102399
ALONG PL
ME 0 78 N
x42071 2 0
1.2371,94
12811E 0 PL 434 1.11 20Z337.0
ALOAS R "
ALONG FL w MS 246%410!1
AL01B PL
'PL 1E MO ENO
1' .-1395
1041951 11924202
24-61
E30B Tk 401 PL
ALONG PL x
NOr4X47E
7Q' x111.1
101540.. 7 .
24S25N
ALOX4 PL

ALONG R
N

1 n

MIJS01 2022510$

211 291
ME MG C.,

1
40120.-
Z.ix5-
N1 ME m K PL
E 7 243 7
ALONG PL
PL SIB TO )19 • E DrM N
40497,5 260
2141/651
B 2.=..w
E
€nI 861
-4--
410d .411.05
4x5922 2011.1
2402190S0
2 00.18
-- N ro PL
_AjQ2EAy2_
JIM' wN1,11 5.
A1d. PL
PL ME 027 N-21-
Noeve-w-w 41.11'
57,10' 1250522
45130.1 1.71 .84
2121151
UN] 400187.40 x-10,"
132 105244. 2100230
-2
E20 R ro PL 405219.7
405367/.20 24021-
202062.-
9x116 PL
PL ME 0 -N 45341.>1
15155 21X.0.9
202x16
EJN
EIN
[07

E -
101 2 1.
210.
1

ENO
Daw 11
09.51 N
2.
200807
E,1
D- ?4W. 4(9114
205140.7 1155
1182]0.4
-N
EN
4.568517.
.
4011
21951
F
-IT 151,4
201011 24092.13
24/20112
9']2'if31 .IL'_ _.5=1.51 _-201 5=0
21.6748 $5' x570193 2112964
1250
101 105]x10
01,24 221"4.1
2449 A
6.5 ]124

405 G2 2181
,1f
2401112
-X5 45]40
405817. 2x444111
911931 M

ENT 4051585
xs1]n 211D445
211.0x0
E; 1059514 16}5164

11 ME 9 C0
135
-1
-WWW 4064 1

4.191.
4035}611 14106129

2411819
8141211
FLAG TABLE
FUG N0. BEARING LENGTH NORTHING EASING
415 rW 11594 .67x0.2 2.15!1.6
x301 . 400.x5 1-7
003 TW 44' x312.0 4x402.
Tea
003 455
10715.5 zum5l,x
2x191?
i
T=OT 'E 7,55 .,10.1
.614111 2x-as
2.215
TJ5 wnMES 25714&.
TND
TNO
1311
4' 'E
N
2 .07.5
.4441
404021 251721
Z19xNx
2491x1
?II
FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO REAPING LENGTH NORTHING BASTING
RP9 3.1@lY,y 4' 40749- 245x4,63
1x0
802 Je,l' wIfW.12
.43,22 P V .13
245lCi.10
R2- 40111511 -C.D.
Rm2
R205 w131.N
.61.9.5 E {1
P1xx1
841 42-,1
I 111,W I2
840] '. ai71x 245101

NorazWE .0x442 x4,4.1
bnmOs
11-02

RN11 4002x.
.1325. 2x455.
215x5642
Rn]
93.] -WIVE .}2565
.1311.9 243x01.32
2451810.15
19 x44 p,2
,PIS a]A10.19
1"1.35
121
1217 NII
- .1x52

44415 26411111

21540..19
8219 w]4Mx :1111..675
8219
1?0 -wVrg

NOI 11- .011144
.14..
2140-n
x21 .i-1.39 u119.n
12 .740x73 .0609680
R?3
821 OCII 24011,4
x739221
}x405,.
RP26 .6135- 243x90."
C.. .)5>ffi 41.1601
RRl
R"8 w>N3.01
.6131500 2512x5
2,446
R4?
1210 863.
4204.}1 247121]]
2.43.1
8231
RU2 " " .38583
135 21101.
44.12,1
820 .1340" 25419.:
R4.
8215
111 .67311.7
401 N i.
20" 3
RxN x10 P w}.0.51 2491651/
R237 401'AA00 41x1.13
3671
R
f . .41.18
.TIIA.ii 21.901]
P10454-
R2. 2w
R241
-?WW
C1.1' .1x-,1
.4111 2315"44
2
-
I
PJ1
P311

t

4048` 02
1,011.93
15
211-46x1
2x11
P311
V-
Q7176.03 2AN ..

8310
M
.7 .1 M
PVS-N
P.NR
4300 Im3.0
?725140 1 4.
254351.41
I
7 M .131140 NN071
"

M M .10106 245401.73
1164?529
91 I . .149x8
-9.115
-9.115
.
1-'17%
145430
LNE P.T WETLANDS
RAG TABLE
FLAG 40. BEARING LENGTH NORTHING EASIING
PI 11-41'1- -29 .1154 24551.51
%
P1

NOSU12*W

2%02' 4GOI
4011.2A 24551.11

24513,?
PI
Pe x1/11
4015251 2491443]
445511X5
P7
PB 4.31
x1111 24617.94
255044@
PI Nwullw? COL.,

540,03 1043
11
PII 41412 21E5012w
P1x
P2
-W?rvv
1211'
bA25x x4560590
2
414
415
-111-1 4081.2
4441.5 .
26.x1
24550-54
411
PIl 2W 9.3912
906.6.12 14514.1
2a544p.
P1a 40635531 25
PI2

EL

IISIW3?
.26
27 10-591
40831x5 -Go.
215519607
PN
P2
4083127 24552255
25526143

P2
-W?IE .%'
-w 356259
x5?25 252275
249.60
P2C .115894 x1651.?
P? 412468 2x5.1.9
P21
P28
19' w 1164
.82].86 849511
249]]21
n6.
0
1 Y
X MI 45191.5rs
.161.- 25Nxa
2455.6."
A

n .-W

6' M -

10. -'al,

lGNDan
413.22.5
11-.52
0 2?01J 14115= w
7 CY6 4011744 24515431
l4
i4
n I,VOCI 1 40-2}.61
40I0C6.1 2152404
415525.04
R
T 'JM
x '11.44 I'
?l .1 -.00
15.7.9 24 24MI5.S126221
0
LM 7300, PB00 WEFL.ANffi
RAG TABLE ---

FLAG _
BEARING
LENGTH
-
NORTHING
- _
EA5NNG
'
1+
31,4' 1 Ow 15
W10l" 2+K 9.V
21Nuz.
.,r 170 9 -

f

IC .. .7157.94
4041.10 240151
2"41-.
21616394
-ONWE -W
ana6%
z4e11s1
10 4017M..N' 29]N.an
2112]9 %

IL

I. 1-.

- x123144 2 266.46
09
206205,46
X+E N 1'I i a 1 2446 .
NI6
Kn Y I, 07= 16
x}}37.72 4 61
2.3361]5
a . 1
Km 4012.]5 31.x.1.1
K21 Nowlirw 41,7V x131,9
2412,5
.

8643

`x

36,18'
x229944
.7416
x.644].41
4.6 '8
K2
K xteel'sf'[ -71 .7N1.90
.
734101 2061

2
.
k" 6730013 2x6230.N
rc27 562xae3 245 Tao

N .144aN
.217!.4 2055
1.9=45111+
-9 .147161
40402 1 6
4.9251 .80
Kx
K0

11 AV 76. 91
401451 245mB.x
2.6 1 .2
KN ' 144 x751.21 2W211-

K
KM
.611]96
.)921
E4NI.m
2154427
17161- :4114..

9% ._W
40TH
.]11.61
4.6}44.
KN
N. M
.M
k' 40251
x416. 241140..
44111x.
rc1

862 'xrW

14'.'0 7

}r 50110,0

x46].11
.
1 J,86
2 11
K. 404492 ",N1G,a
Kw
23.27
.414.-
4.6013_7
- _

S9'Je'24'E
X59A5'50'E 1
.1022-04
.10.1 7
241..4
29601?:
I RF PF 10 18115
FUG TABLE
FLAG NO. BEARING LENGTH NORTHING EA571NG

PTS 462861.x.3
462-6.16 2x18114
20n71
n]
PT4
N--WW
4LnkL 11TH."
.67122 1451Mn
2x77N
PIC -WW __
_
w IV 407931.57 2xnlaa2
PO
FMC %

x1102 2x7581

lx 1
403154.03 21730112
4091203 243111.1E
412
PM5
-51 5t 2x)110.1
2437360.1
PHS
1116
.-wIC-W
,.w 1
40&35D.93 2x67.594
294
Pit]
Pnx
-by -4474
165211
]J 204372OL4
245115.09
P f9 2x7125.30
PM n0 4034..01 2x71441
PI'4x
1 47-7'91"N I.M111 40.1112
-416.12 243 111
2170101 .3.3
1.4 N+wDWwW Y .6444X5 2455961
M
IM .%
a9.m 2x11141
2x1129.
..
Pne we52.e2 2165917:
PI .-44.86 2455611
PIN J4 4004161 !x1101344
1rn ] +o199.m sxe15?
nil
Pis 41-125
96,'5,2 1451-15
4x116961
PTN
419
Y
eN
400594 201
257a1
411
PTN 1 . e
90.]11 Ex05e,03
7
n6.
nx i 404.6770
5 E+110.
l11-031
LIE P 900.T 4100 WERM96
RAG TABLE
RAG NO. BEARING LENGTH NORTHING EASING
405
491 4118161
45113. 26. 10
Ex52.N
P032 4123591 215551."
P95 40n.G0 25510.-
P05
PP057 N2415-48I N.Ce a%7%
1128205 2.125
P1" 1 108204 21%4.1
PIS
4080 I 79
40-X552 2159.2
E15.BB-0E
P11 16651.22 ",551177
PN3 4[4310 251277
96

1
4C-55
40815269 45
2IN
4155O0244
s
PNa 4+16.7.64
4110.2 21551494
-24355144
741 90512.. 2135155
psoa --C7-1 1-1 4055797 24.551555
4969 405199 215.35
2211
PD71 40615510
40.2222 215N6n
24973291
22 40311+.? Q17wJ1
PBA
P974 CI n3y 40910.63
.72.75 2x57.522
4456 N
447. 1517,89 2512.32
PB7. 4011 4 .9J
99]1 401 x N .0
994 MM171E 11,14- 151 "
P975 nw- 4094.3] 2455900.1
POn
PON
405009.52
PI1 X10 Illd'JG9.0

PB0.1 -AIII

+1]67
.
1015..

1 41
P-
?
g IOa057 24551.5
T4U t
Z 109." 415523]
T42
11
2Eri3t
1.1'
1511. 407809.03 3411%1
11.05
210
709
71' 4047131
40716.2 Q4519.]]
24a611.0
2+0
r1 40]4401
1.32.5 a 191.4]
21551.x2
-116 407M.18 P IS
0415 x715.1 2 %
14
To 271]..
15
4 31
Tx1 N 91111-01
I1
a 40144
x484.44 5
345551
Iwo
T i . 367
b 367 9155E0.n
2167444
.,
wl
045
x 42259
.7951 x11n49D
NSm72
Tai
6712 40806217
7 245535.18
2455813.32
T
1K`2 .1
4515.,2 21532,.
145550.?

006
I'
16 01 25
1514.1 4 AN
PIx52u
NO SCALE
LIE R 900 P AM P2M WETI_ANnR
--- FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO. BEARING LENGTH NORTHING LASTING
RUG 406516.62 2x4715®
X51 109538.20 2x473609
A5ax N. 547991
x503 x 3'.'Il' 7, W D 2464]31-
Ras 1 ' .86 aeuo.
- x 44
R5ae N 7.2' 4O914.1 2x02416
:x.5566 2xN5G.4
R5
RIND 1' 400641.75 2x286096
10
8510 x5.45' 944741]5 24.911111
Rsli DO 61, 4@]6,51 2x195618
,512 --' -4' x52114 24316.65
,513 E72-W31-5 4V_ 195.8.24 4050X33
435
,514 109521.49 24557.85
815 '6Y x11.1 IN.22
ROD 1 408078464 24%161.21

' 2x5:06..
4515 slnvvl? 36.2C 40OP
SO 3 2155231.54
R19 OVDITWE MO' 1.43 ..
R5m 10861218 2x5272-
R52 7' 401334 2 n5
R612
8524 40125.m
40860792 2466216..
215346,64
875
8516 SgLaff
4 -M'
-' 4084x8..
41-37 2155353.40
2454.75
,627 1E 10-83% 24034-.71
979 NOWDITN 4051073 2 -
R3? 406407,07 245x2-
ASm .8x172 24.441
R5 m w 1 165 249:9162

32
852
1M.
50
.-
Z455J27
F6N I 19544`56 249356,.
RSN .1e095 2/55215
855 N .9' 410121.35 212547.15
R536 -41-22-0 4096-% 2x55.91
R537 144653.0 2/5393.02
,535
RSN
N 40583190
.186% 245541,0
245161.
150 -WwW x116944 2-C.7ID
36.1 WIW"'W 11 40072596 246547367
R.2
R51J 311 1.
1189556 . t
142115.9
RS- M 32.13'
10e8]02x
219307.1
R51 r4Cw MAV
5164x0
.531.+0
A5" N
1 .68 04 14512.0
R64t 1
?? x91,.34 x5551.44
851 241:.'49 4087x.4 2455187
6..e .. 'W .14x17 2462x"
850 -1
x164
21521.1
F551 N4sl2V"3'W 51,18' i. 2
55123-
R552 -4
119x123 4
2x
R65 5 4191.. 245ln2l
104.14
,551 - 245510.77 1
A '15TH ]. .9215 24190.57
x16
A957
300' 91595
1095492 2.W7
215 l 15577
Am,
IlCYW.
-, 40051.37
a2I22N 24111.0
2111x.%
RON
,560 M.W2VIN 027' 4.1951 2x514175
3651 4O914.114 24
.1
3653 N 1 '1 M 40027.% 00.
1451 75
813 % 2455009.19
8584
R503 48.40.2 545110.1

R 1129
3656 -. ' 15A4591 2411115
R607 Na?ww -W 1001401 E 10621
R10 N 'W'W x ,IC 245500&26
A 0
R510 .099 ,57
401112 2+554..
24515197
8371
R572 N -''IVV
NUM'WE 1 4551.92
4091 44205.2
44511173
R573 NC-1ICv .11, N 215M81
8574 4509? 2 %
Fall N 401767,1 21660$172
875
RS12 40910.
+.0214 2x189%
2 B
-71 40911.59 xbIB22E0
R$79 -T 45643.23 246072.25
850
851
044
-CY 4
001
1095
1
.519.52
2
852
IM3 S05-42'511*01 -4W x901
1679
x15 2xI619.92
2154142
Rw -XICT x925.9 21x47,35
155
R5.
-4elm-E
-CG- 400165.0
407542 25-91.31
2W 09
Rk/
RNO 400INI
4 Nx.S 24391x11
24551.7
RNI 4091,7 2.519.11
R503
Itl.

IrE
7' x0557.11
40NI512 15
2+5491.60
8585 M x2519 2455100.00
455lW41-W M 2/501.25
R77 -MT 1171' 10941.33 2651036
8245 400361.12 .650526.
8598 -WT 40-55 2x506473
,800 40001.75 2199284
4130 .99.9 2.fi0-69
129 . . - . 2x529.57
PM a%43.57 2-9.00
421 41 x9202 29,67..
426
4225 51354'0] x97]0
49107./2 2159.,72
255174
P24 13, .946.85 2154x31
25 . 2 N
422 865 8' 2.43 x890.0. 25155.0
P221
Pa0
slew,57*w
Ism' .9.101
40492141 -
2110790
P219 10915'9 94.7171
P?8 .1' lO881 45 2464950.72
P J
41- 1. 14 95491
P210 .11.5 2-.1.21
P 5
P0+
.571.2 .14
245158153
P213 N 1 405762 26 2 x19
P212 N262r4V'W 108152.1 20x155
P211 x5.1.? 24611591
MID :910X5 2.54.-
427 401196 24.752-02
495
Pmt
wwww
2 .6'110.11
157.1. 2x140.52
2-9190.5
421
1205
M I x11792
4006117 2-1712.5
2454691..
P204 x8602.90
2.75.
P203 157,.5 258119
P202 W&.30rorE MAC' x7152 251.03
P21 '1.43 1515% 42.2
`700 W x575569 24.926.73
P
P301
3.5
...... 1081214

09 245410.51

2.01
P- NJOJSNW 12 2..442
P303 -'2r. 26,43' 2
46UR 2x5%44

a x ' MN
x24meE 1'M5SD1
4-
431 x 5173 21445715
P J 20,731 686 2x458.4
D 10 .180.5 2454647.04

411
Y
401x62 ID
2x45-x
PJI2 419 61
J J 581,1 x4545554
4511
432 .055H3119
.660,5 2465C118
v 24.5]552
46hfK1V1C71.Y,EM
243 NORTH FRONT STREET
WMINGTRI, NORTH CARO,NA 28401
IFIE `910 313-I'4
FA% f 9210 251-6281
hlty', //4407 dlmvee0[Nn
LINE P 400J E5W WETLAEOB
FLAG TABLE

FLAG -40,
BEARING
LENGTH _
NORTHING
LASTING
Pao
Pal Ni 41202,11
412.1., 24.11.4
+540639
P402 MII'52'E U.71' 41215: 2x4lzt.a
P402A N.VZC'IVE I-1 4144417 2x4113.5
PI- 412072.31 241156.97
PE1 34502,13
PS
P12 I' x19651.
x192140 1x415.1
21415n
P5p1 13TH T' x1-14 14.149.92

FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO.
RI5 BEARING LENGTH NORTHING
4-1fl9 BASTING
2.511111
R)1
I
R
ED
41100.10
4-7N.N
2455420.69
21.111
4103 S27' 5211' 11.11558 245516715
R]N
Rm5 wowo-
50274B'22E -2-
0,W- 4f-49.14
414.93 NBk55
215545x%
R7M

1111

so-31,50-W

DI
x1452%
41-509
.5915
2155120 IS
8108
R71G '"'S
{ 14x.48
1- 2553n..
N.m
I 8.42 i 19.86
R11E
R713
,63 I.k
2154MO0
nll
716 3.61
2- 31.4.2
2151221
1716
4717
'E 03
3. 1455449.31
2159.1
8116 411 21 ...
R719 4.62 245556121
RYm NI ' •E /4,68
721
8722 5
100 246MM
215..15
1.13 245565012
,111 34 Al 2455701
Rn5
Al?
R71i
1 '
918'05'1'40 414010,15
/+}41.5
}811.40 21x01684
.45510.1
140.955
LIE R 400 VI ETLAND9
FUG TABLE
RAG N0. BEARING LENGTH NORTHING EASING
,400 11' ' 411.1.89 245121..
1,41
Rat Y
M
1109.. 4131161
2 9
137x3.06
Rw 'a {1-.N 2"167.1
8101 N72-4W17'W 41., 41 x
Ras 41311.67 4500.70
R I I' 325177 4116522
8607 01 -W'l 5J.37 . x,7291.7 258-.74
x401
R98
8610 -211

N.Irww ODAV
0'
.. 21&f- 414-1609
1NOI.N
41525.75 245398.14
24608128
26. I.n
R4N
361E
N1J N E 4.

5 41150.31
7
11061.87 2xll10.18
96
2054.1
NH
N -'W IIN0791
1 s1 25337692
Pbl.3?
Ntx N 413772.5 245

R41]
118
41]]5x4
41= 9 W
2403138161362
1"011.
WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
f 6s) <y FOR

' `r WEYERHAEUSER
REAL ESTATE
E,e,
t DEVELOPMENT COMPANY

o
i PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
y,
RlWAADS 7VWNSHJP -- ONSLOE - VORM
fI' ROLNA
Juna, e Z9, 211, 20 8007 NO O SCALE
SCALE
PROJECT 4: 0 100163
PRIM SVYA : DLJ
DRAWN BY : AGE
FIELD BK. : .67013/56 - LJ
COMP. FILE : vN101-009100163-2
SHEET N : SHEET 4 OF 14
DWG. III
LIE NB00 WETL4F479
LINE L WETLANDS
$a
Yg N
LNE P wI
AS TABLE
FLAG 570. BEARING LENGTH N1WxhIING EASING
vi 10]011]4 205116.16

PJ
w 419..0
101891.1 µn0.5
2.578.16
1686µ,U 2651431
PS 4.1214
4681461 1658.16
3 .i4
Pr 4.1451 245150
PB
vB 1.84176
4.176. Y 71.1
1 21
P11
PI2 1061.E1
111.1 21651]0.9
211115.4]
PIS 4.7123 E058µ,1
PI4
1._..41
- 4pf 0.M
10,71 1µ8113V
20111132
117
P1 1"
4.65.1 2111
]4m5µ.11

1611.53 .
1.714.
PIB 4.0.010 0/141.14
.Bend 2.5154.
P22 wffir.i] 06515n6
P23
PI4
940-
- 166412.
160µ).n 3
4.4
P3M
PS wv:wl3lw

1!1534?'31'E 189"

M86' 4.µ1.m
4.11.1 2µ763162
3
w 42716 20510..
P27
106.8,0'
206509.1
P3
P. 4.1681
109.8. 2.011.82
2185.0.15
P.
P!1 92 14! 16Iu m x41/ .20

PN 1682-1
w8n7a 20&50,1
20x0&.
P. nor 4.1.31 E451911
168124 .3 1068117
w 4.1m.µ 21651..14
P1

Pn

W 4' w601.u
16
wn 20
1950
242
Pa 40510.1 265]141
P1
Pa %7WI2'E 4,78'
0. 41x7141
10690,14 2µ81M50
w 4o1a.W 176]0.1

F4i
' 'F 165051
405884.18 2.6121
2µ9681m

Pµ
'I 405989.1
4111.1 1412µ14112101I
1

Pw
1 w67n.a
4a1µ.62 2k191..
.1181
1. 41)0.. I416Y6a
419 4.61oeii 2µ1n
P5u w 1.6-..b 4466
451
V.
71.26'
/0552691
245-119

Pm
N 9
.19142 x 3
2 0
484
Px N1 017'45'W µ
161x76 20x321
P1 w I-y 14ISMI- 1 w
451
P1 N-T?elkf
1,175IN-2r, 15.1y
2"r 10]01.14
x211 24557618
40180.18
Pm 40127.97
4.111.14
P.
Pm 16!109.1
n. 110 !.91
116519.1
491

PoJ
SN'W2,131.

9
11o.,
7 7
2µ5518a

116 .0
Pot 7 ' W 90818.,01 20 111
4111.xi 14811.07
Pee .a 5165-t9.
Phi a 2 1 5
P1
469 ?,rm*w 1
slow 42-811 2163110.23
2µ19951J
Pn
11111413,E
215o' 4 m 24"W.37
P72
Pit µ102n 2µf9-.n

PIS
E 16583,0
10516]5 2161.6..
20761680
.15]55 2.501101
P
. R2111174"

Y 23,881 10%16.8

16192.31 2051725

1166761.14
n!
Pn
4.1421)11

2
5
P1
Pm

Nlfilw?rE _ss

.17 4a11a16
16161. .76&
Eµ.]ax
2µJ181
16.1.15 24511961
P1 Sjf?V26*W 1611,14 2051M.61
1µ5a531
,n
P1
1'01' 156-3
711,65 10.0.00
20.34.1
Peg 11 2µ'416S
PW 16116,. 1004.1
491
PA2
493
y w
'1416 a1ma
165514.51
76192.1 E000m
2464.1.98
145103,74
494 '14r. 16x1414 4µS,111
4x5 9.-J, 21901516
1614 165w9
.µ
a

PBB '
1 ' 41.71
10615291 Pµ430.1
Zµ4n8m

v1 'I
x V 4.490
11 2047.4]
M

,142 7 ' 4 I.

r -11 11
16-5 201 m

2w1M2m
411 4111.44 1µµ21.w
1110
1110 40x1898
1118.26 m
2µµ..0
1113 r ' 161771 2µ011A6
,lit

1
J N 4 ' 11112.1

1.590.0 2µ I,
2076 m
1
%14 NII52rorw
N-WE 1. 4."]1&14

.6503
02 216.1

26µ1A1
%1e NW4r2r, 10,14' .
a5m552 z ee
%n m 1668..14 ..

%ie
P120
15 n5y
1o117w
16118.
z
1 1
P120 N1' 1 405168.18 a .

%:1 N-M-W 19.15'

-
4osle,n
442
PIS
%U '
1
JIM 100101.94 0 1,

14818&0..
%24
NM-
27,77' N
P1a +011.1 :M4aao2
P13 .m 11..116
Pln 1 IOCWI.M 00015.90
Pla
1121 1663x.8
4.842,- 104501r4
2µ41S17
,170
Pln
SIOW50,
..
61,39, 41771.0
_1x50 16010.30
20µ11.M

%a gal:
401.16
tw+e1-
%3l 165x876 20437.
%34
%m 1051E.
23 1.1610 471
204737.W
%a
0
%n
%
N,51r.,w
20.2e ..111
16x162 =1
4
218471781
1x5
PI
%a 1p5-1
511µ ?0Na15
4111
%w 716
161214 a 1431
1 n
11 42A

.711"Wly

M73*
1.818..
411118
M
216

PIN Mir
16611898
1 6
%w 76400«2 1164.716
PI4! 05.1)1.1

965901
-
1016 1.60
01641
pi.
III
- _!111.x] Y1H a
PI" S, 41021 1144
%m 4asl,en 1042 .
%6P 4a53zu 342 n. I
%
117
241410.61
0142
:155 2
11 4
6p1tt
46mffin 2 I
2.18151

M.BO 111n.x
41]..13 2-21-1
216421)M
P16 05180.69 24.4121LM
162 1
4193 p 10184.1
409on.0 104114.81
118433,.
Pia
-42
1
m
w
2bµ19.5)

%m 6
.
40ao2- -17
14011Ami
0
Piei 41010 0.4µe3
PI1 40550176
Pla
Pita
711 a5al.w
411].] 2 W
2016}]41
Ptn 4185176 20111..

1173
1172
1M
,-n7*

-yR2E;p_„ -MAIL.-

--,fi 161)
1.36

41140.18

414113.x1
%14 161471.. 014111.41
Pi)5 . Inn
PIM n 4a1-
Din 4.x1.1 2
1
%n 40...41 I . 9
%n 4.x1.11 24.4]1.1
Pfeu 4.412.0 21641..
111E P w nAN78 (CONTME6)

FLAG NO.
%BI
Pmt

P1m
15
411
Plm
BEARING

SsIVIVI
1 RAG TABLE
LENGTH

1
NORTHING
169141&

16916..
405371
1652µ,5p
IOm
401721
LASTING
2µ15a.1]

zuuze.w
2µµ26.n
216µ)1.i4
x16428)
204411
PIA]

pin
P11
%76
PI91
%92
%1 wmffia

16511759
165.514
44211..
4.950..
1616814.
!768081 10414&1

2M4111-
916/11112
1µ1670.5t
-3K4d115
24.01053
361.
PIB4
P1A5
Pf9/ Rf ro FI 4..581
1046461
47634. 118.14.3
2..61.4
24Affi57w
LIE R Wn ALOA
FLAG TABLE
FIAO NO. BEARING LENGTH NORTHING EASING
RI n7111 WDE 415597.16 24%13165
R2 -dOrP 41%10,42 24u11µ
R3 93, 05, 41554716 0x31.01 .
R4 41556Qµ 2.21.48 1
425 _S57?9'191E 7719t), 415NSm 24542,5714

Re .'W52 L
4w5m.u
24x1..1
qi 41502614 24515211
R6 41x42- 01314.3)
R3 1 41966.19 2045.,.
10
R11
N4rW'IeE
46,91' 4534k11
415311 14x31161
.61316 .1)
.2 humUn 1.1• 41 90 2047n.n
13 Hlsll'x' 4154Rnw 24510116
PI4 11541,22 24101.16
RIS 05.4.10 200138E
116 134' 41x611 21545014
817 alxn.26 E1616.,n
,H8 41502.1. 2/.515.42
it. .11.05 1µ451.29
R76 41x2239 245..11
R21
812
46'0 .i 41576.19
41 14.1 1 M
24060100
RD
Wr43'03"E
64,62' 115628.79
11&4624.
IQ4 --- ALAL 415µ7.34 2µ4m591
RS stwaWw .-St; 2µw99.74
m 1E 042.0 21546x.
1127 14943,. 2M. j7
:
876

R3
R. 415m4.%7_

415]4211kt
1151{.14
245161&.
I
2450193
2µ47I1.
11 I' 415µ4d{ 0x115
Bn
R0 ]R
03WIly,
M.46' 415412.
41MIL72 76551
2wµ029
RN 57.16' 415N9.. 24.125]
R0
R1 I a
41539.55 24516)094
245176061
RJr Y 1 11!1911 2-7..
Rm • 41UM..81 2451099.16
RJD S W 4151nPo 20481x.
Rw m 50.10' 415IM91 24541.31
841

RIl
Rµ

d'
WE
m3y 061815

415.951
414014.. 2µ16i0.69

90161551
2403,n
RM 1 11.1 414991.0 2454237.57
R45 1 059 4{49. .35 20µ211115
Rw N2121"Al -- 41µ25N 2454)34..
M] 110]43 2µ4OSG
Rµ
R0 Y1'E 410721
11µ0µ 1µ01n
49581 .
421 41µ11.11
3µ501Q9]
R51 11492175 1465.310
Rm 414911 2451.46e
R9 I' 415)1,91 2µ50623
R5.
R0 Nurt 52,73, 415.o,u
4197919 24-.10
2465153.
16
R57 -26,
u. 415.6µ
411.5.31 -,-
246199.51
R1 r,451WIrE 21,111 41496521 2452..44
no
no 11410.89
M49S.a 101114
2/55]81,.
Pm
RIM Nlim'W"
IMS-5414"E
15,00' 41490].]4
410.160 21-]1342
241676.'3
-_1 N 2195m4m
14
m --
51'0 11.11
Moo, 41µ71a5
41µa13 246S501.42
21.394.
"I
R67 W-46-51-E 1 4102660
1102211 2455n781
24/411.93
R1 1113' 81411.3 2/141085
no 414141 05Sµ1.6]
110 > ' 4.17.35 x41414.1
R71 Y lom 411680 24:950 ,U
072
RI) 1,— 3149
,1' 1I n
1161.59 2466µ0.66
2µN99.1
R74 Namule .is, 14 4 ]1119510
166 114 2µ5u1,92
516
R7
I
X32, 414941.61
ll1 111 24
2/SS08
R 0 1149750 2455649.
Rn
4260
N3n4'57-r
51 m, /1/96420
414%.51 2
2455721.90
P.I
RU 41.4.11
41.659/ 9159151,1
4914.
571 II 9 2155 a
Ref NZOWOVE
ulay 41.6232 140614,
US
08 41W
4151351 0 4414
2051µ.N
Rm
R1

N3I,3iIWE .9s'

ll 4151MOO
11511u 2415iiAE2w
24169604
R.
Rw a 4152119
5751138 246154.
30.371
Rol
R93 10,16, 411.,24 1407661
24..a49
Ra
Ra
572W14"
1-
59,12, 41.2436
415411.1 21..20
24.114.58
R1 415353,50 ]461...
RVA
µ. ro PL 0531].51
415.717 ]40.6,19
216110,
LIE MOD WETLALA8
FLAG TABLE _
FLAG 570. BEARING LENGTH NORTHING ASTING
MOG1 p 4.19 18 uou471 '
4)42.;4 .480)1.
01
NOG 41u9.1
4MS1a0) 214 111
PwE-
5901 -hQLJIZQX 1.0 200!131
NOa .11µt4 .80592®
Y • 'W 16x8134) 24w3n.87
042
.076

MI5'3rWW

37,W 40019]

1 100.161

0-310,31
7610 7 ] 111 04214258
MI" 4.rn.6 24-"
012
0413 40.-,99
161.16 200.WI.W
24993
590014 N-80.95 157.]...8
lOClS 1 9.04
0118 !52
16}x219 2em7 Y.52
1p1r
I 40.91,1 2.042..
YpCl61W E W

ALONC%
lw
1.491,.
1664170
276.1.14
211618.
DL PE w M01 410.78 4450)11.
LBE Iwenmm
FLAG TABLE ?._
FLAG NO. BEAAINO LENGTH NORTHING EASIING
1115
1442 .13671
4.5121 01 01552
201)12
41] w 11103.
X12 1422 201101.27
Ifn 16818.. 2µ1141.m
-
In0 4.1055 2
1' 1676114 211.02
Ilm r I 1101.5
0611]14

111
140 26
.91]2
42.x15
4.a7.µ
2.108.6
2013210
x 2131
Iia 161951 1µ114&l3
1462
1161 10-)$50
1.1 Y4101a
201mra
1181 21,57, 12 IV3.
1150 4.35. 2 1418.16
1476 401220 P.143.94
1
n 1
OR

105/076

1466
IM
1
2x14951
111 4.2.!2.66 2µ111.6A
1151

IIU
JORM
Y 1614191

4.11,24 901612.00

9µ161S69
Iml 1681141 4164169,1
11w 40111
142.5)1 201111
10100.73
uM 4142.1 :ut454.73
1141
1116 4)14x0
16141!.98 31141.
091µS11
110 1' 16717. 21B1µ149
u.
I1µ
11.1 16.883
--- 4100
2481476..
1142
1141 1
51 167 b1
H 201+t7W
20143259
I. Slsulww 242.5 4)143.17 40145161
TIN w 16.1' a11o1.16 24142216
111 3 .1 40111.30 24--
1137 161991
.35041 241
z.1118.
1465 w
ULM' 4DM10.u 20139.1

140
X w 4DMI_
.16-57 24101.71
201291.,16
1131
1460 'N
N1 ' w
I .18395
16190611 20111..
2011..5
113
11W X
X 16)11
1677371 1 11 ,.
246141,6
nn 17 .11 1614.7.- 201176.14
1476
II76
41 -7
wmau 2461 .1
a.10610
1424 w 1618101 361.116
1143
1192
Y .711414
.14111 101001,1
590.141
111 w1µ8.95 0
arn6n 9014
111) 40m].µ 1.1W108
m
111.
Ills 40n0.71
w11µ

1115

1114
IIIS
$671,V2rf
29,10,
16.76.11
-mm M2
1112
1111 w11am
4)76..16
1110 WIIW4.r _j=L_ 16711. 10IN3It t
I .1E1 µ
I'm I&Iw 16110.1 1 JS.11
'101
3142
111 a111u
1615&.53
16]76
01 3111011
Ew1

uG .

1611651 4.1-1
0)181
z.114].1
n.
not 6]111
16742.0 .61]00.11
101211
nm 6 x 1 ,.
1f1
10

l Cf
`
161486
1674/1 20101.2
2 I
114 n
" 16.1205 1611 m
190 4 246114520
lµ
I. 4) I M
MWI.67
161401.6r 201216.
201

In
w1nEu =L.
2.13120
141
190 MVlr37W 66,M, 01153
4 2.1311.1
14513121
11 S51514?05'W 6855' 7Mdn
_1x1919 61310

116
1 a12nm
w13N,84 P01-AU
2461261.25
10
la 115,W
wI21Pl6? 9w1M..u
P.121,1
182
]m µ .01.13 20114144
2011120
I anon 201 J1
tm 'I' 1671..1 10131832
1 w7t102
41409032 20114107 1
41612911

In
I16 1159,
161.4.1
1617661
xMU16w
201x9..
145 0701n z"IJ101
04
173
'w !AN 40111!,3

168.524 N41TIpw
0
61) 79
IM
I. 11x'
3
.16' 101911.4
/1114.24 E.15116
407910
In

IAA ]x
M
357' 7615)5

4
101114.
2010144
167
IB 1
.-849118
= 20101.0
]µ161.w
0

I- ,ff

1 32

16171352
2 1/ n
20176
01
m -1351
76 .1 2.10 m
.10x1
p: .m 4.143.4 .142742
0
Im
S-41E
419- 166111.0
161411.10 25&42
2

1'
166160) 11-1
2-0151.61
I%
159 WW'43'E am, 12681 0811 62
In
IN I9.
9 16767 . 1
4.183. --
1.1.816
Im
4 40130.63 3161.1.18
lu 30.
' 41-194 ].100.10
IU
151 1 4r *14557194
4111.1 20fµ0.
2e14141
.1 sx),3m WE 4.427 12
W
BO
149

m1w
10
L
2,itiM7112
2µ1µ3.1a
10 4117zw 1
571 1131147215
4.02.5 zuuxel
1160.1
u afa 14-461

1µ
4130.16 94111 1
2414!1.26
593
111 3.1143.16
4.3042 x
1 M
In

11 1067145..

1)0.11 201...
.63
2.131214
.w 201].1]
v
!M

10.

a
442112

201611
7
l
I. n' 16190.
1.&111 2.1l9µ
f4µ11
In
IN 1141
1.912. 314)1
918141541
3314 21
b
4. 10eI..eV l
1511,19
la
119 011164
f1z3 36152&.
20111.1
111
rib %111.1
16601510 20114.
201&5946
126 4.044.1 241.14 r

I.
123 -
a
405961,87
016912 '
1 b
322 16391 2
1.3519)
f1
p0
17 2 191.31
2161611.w
Ii9 4.14.1 Pwt d
8
In
161750 -Wa.
01140..
576 4119.3 IM1iMn
145 165.1.. 4261 Ma
1E6B1p1 101711.
116
l 7614)0 !
4110,) H81n8/1
P00µ4
H
51 9
411319 ! 20110633
]IO ..17.1 1 1153.
10. 4[1"91

le
m mll
x611 .
11 7616.10 1.314&99
le
m
4.514.. .1t
416,
14 To TO IL
16151.1
_1..10.1
UM WE VIETUMS
FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO. BEARING LENGTH NOAiHING
' EASING
PL TE ro i
1117 0 x
7
.
405
4261] .0116]
9 1U11661
i41e
3411-1-tI
M -5
n
1..514 3188140.1
NOOS
OES
4'
4af4n1.45
umn

NOW
NftIW4gW
31,93,
405W1.µ
4 .
21551565E
241r.m
0IAt
19EB 63
41.161
24172)..
40@
YOnO yE
Mf' 4.It9.W
4.11255 P 1176
2µp71515
YOEII
M1t1 {

aff 1692011
-MI- 3 IJ
z 1
N s
4-14 165-
-1127 x3 081456.99
1µ1O6)9
4tt15
M 7 r -3.73

YOm) _
1 .16M
6]511.79 29?)0.9e
2
Yale
Np09 -11114
16139.24 .u
010X47
NaEw
MM21 N 519.16
4.450.. 2µm41.95
11
1 249.9476
.OCO
191E1J -7
19514.}!
1611
0 34509.,10
24
1.
.U5
0E15 NWIrift M44' .
46191.0 .
2430.1-3
Ya27 411..0 1
-C2, N-'111 W.71, w51µ51 246010
x 7' 1.5}90.1 2µ111w
013
uF9J0 4.141
165)0111 1 2 7,µ
21101419
I X01 2wYE0g3
11..11 411213,01I 2 .M

Na.

Z
Z
N'
.
-7.0
208.

YOE. Nt
ID
w6
1µ.01
24597610E
VOFa
i' w6effire 31691742
145µp111
MM7
MOE31 -11
419..1 3011.)11
YaJO
YOWL x31 1111.91
1600876 41111,11
n
4
YJEw N14?14W 18115, 4016151 1,14
0E0
Yaa N
III
S". 11014.1

1.762.1 1 .1

249085 l
Y 1664442 21E1W.
YOEM 4om1,18 2µ9u.
Yn0 NW µ6P1495
w 16112.
0E.
0E0
0150 ' .6-76
16B.8µ
0 g
59151 Nd
1 14' 4014.
14276.9
Aam W' w 40661..

15E54
WO'
40199x1 2
x195 1116 816511
0Ex '.• 1.42n.µ
µ811a 216111450
3.114
wE1 1p14µ12 1190
It 18 70 1 2 2.114.
0Ea 11141.911 21591}4.16
91421
-112 'N'
71' 4.1].49
1607631 2µ1Po.19
x0591425
IOE43 X3r51' 1.141.2 . w
Ypa4 xl 21158.
Ya1 Y i' "71 24 7 -
YOFA6
m-] N S1 N N
W 442 -
4..7 59 141141.0
2µ9S115
LNE"WeTLANOB
F AG TABLE
FLAG NO. BEARING LENGTH NORTHING LASTING -1
x011 4x.441 3076.,74.
x082 16118. z+eous.a
M
04
Hal
N-'25N
-s
14
4.31 161541
2
I 1..02
7
mm -11. .11
10 2.-
..
245045114
"ON
NOn 169 .60 20016148
V Q11 m,0 20761.11
Y

NG1a
M7WIrW 169119,13 276µp.1
Yan 4811.3 .tl
2 1681126 21164160
MY915 I wµ6061 241.5.58
Y.I4

Mam

I

10y
oo
-0.30
x460.0..
2
11.18 761m.0 .µ .9
Y.n 1010.11 1µ0N1.11
M[91e 'Y 1421103 2 215
003 16µm 116761.

M13 161114
1691090 2.02160
216117.&

r•w
42.2e M1
2
.M4 t pyy 27,12- 44)x1.19 145µ10d1
.Do"
u.S N5,4?TMFW 6e' 161..3
0 1761.88
2
10.50
u ]
Y 1 1
m

YOB.
N
..' 16

16114 R4PoIJA3

2161
n.9.,• 17
40µ1n 241
mnm
MO531 1
691' f0µ 3 27611.10
Y.J1
uau
14.85' w1µ.
lams 20.995
-22
000 i 4111,12 14801140
0936 -11- 0150 1 1011 Di.m 146761411
NO SCALE
41.1 A M CLM
243 NORM FRONT STREET
NBWNGTEN, NORM CAROUNA 28401
TELL (916 313-IV
2 2
nHp://%wn-ko-W c3Sro
LIE J WE7utm8 (CONirU®)
FLAG TAB E
FUG N0. BEARING LENGTH NORTHING LASTING
nd ).- N90m 1 9.50
865 i 1'
-. -!4s? 24m160µ
140
m

51611121 9

-.1, 4421 .

?Z. P.11n.µ

61'
Jim 31,02' 4.36952 2µ18p222
J11 3)?'? • 401437 2µ1621.a
m
1. 40031.17
a92ffi12 2418190
2461&0..
.nn 48i8936 201644.34

AN 16016891
162114,16 24112%
2011242
76 4.1110 201 S.a
076 16420.. 2010..15
4175 1 U.77' 16..5.8.
4)114.2)
201x241
xb ma.-
.7o

M
4210.3]
40µ1n
201014.16
2461907.76
.
J m 414 2 462007.51,
J11 1154-401't 109116.1
4.2431 2M=7.71
2µ1470.91
A84

51
.9-11
16931..
420
20x155.1
5 60340 10213922
JIB1 I N_-1 n 164371. 1µ2I 19
Rm
nm 47631415
wmrax 2461.131
5181818

Jlµ 1611)..
4.&421 2M1ean
20111114
J19x

,141
1611326
4.214
18 2014
0+.81

1162142.3
)194
JI1
.. 16931.4]
4 5.16 24eme.u
21613.21
140 '
1
: 111.

.a

.0.1

)
1
.
1 1
169213.4

9011D1 14
24k-x
4106
E01462a
Jla 01131191 41461
300 NISIVIMIE 71 1a1065
1
.µ 102611.57

J1m
R1,1 4
433
476101 1.9631,53
POSN,a
1276 4.165. 2.x11.81
J21 1695161
2
,
.11
J1a
30]
Xn' 4.x428
1.51414 ..
.16x
40
93
204-&1
3. m•r 1681122
'
2451414..

JIO
IN

4
40180,1
161x,14
20210.20
31631)85
311 w 40 µ12a 2046823
112
J13
1 no- Rzor
r 3
41%I.µ 1.22
5487617.
14 wOH,S 57111.1
316 z 1432
4216
4217 N
Y 4.89.53
4.&451 201.1. '
2
83

Jne
' ?N 9A

JOAX
+a41,a 4
62.00
xMEwd!
)210
3S
n 40141.00
7641.72 x63186
x026"14
J91 409.0,56 2
312 101)10.0 104614.1

a24 323

. I'
-s
4o9n11 2

i 11111
335 n. +.27438 216281.13
J1ID x 1120.0 20108.64
a.
376

"
4.0561 9 105,15
14620614
S",www 41S2 1.281.14 ? zlmnzn
0 214
Jan 1 41 Eµ390.-
3
)231 St
r 09-461
16917.4 2412x.14
40106,1)
16991x+ 1M11-
30
31 n 579-0.9'
169171.42 101.61)
R

1431
4a171a MW
1-µ2p31..
3a
31 16311.1
4..418 1.200131
1453163
316 16761413 2-M1
)241
So.w 161637. 30111µ91
-2 S14'-WWW
µ
2.1501-
IL
J9u -`f W 20, 4.1151 101 1e
J- ?01 µ.µ0 1µ1m].62
aw .
Je
)247
1 2461ma12
1
341
J1µ W M A

I . ? -,1

013919 .1
2 261 "1.n
20111.
WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
FOR
9.e sEnt 4F s WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
113. F DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
?L RNCHL4NAS TOWNmHr - 00&1411 - NORTH CAROLINA
i., 19.64 1x146 29, 2007 NO Sous
PROJECT M : 009100163
PROJ. SV117 CLJ
DRAWN BY : ACS
FIELD BN : W1013/56 - W
COMP, FILE ; 94101-009100183-R
SHEET 0 : SHEET 5 OF 14
DWG. y:
LAE J w1E1LAND8
L14F ? MOD 11E11+1N,1B
FUG TABLE
FLAG 570, BEAPoNG LENG11 NGRIMINC EASING
Yoos E,ay' 4punsr :16.151
MOO4 PE n x421. S-III2'3 11521.2 1µV96572
wsa4ol 541111
P OE 10 031 N59m,Qc`w I .IV
10&11&% 1 9.16
LPE wo wen Ame

LIE H WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE
FUG NO. BEARING LENGTH NORTHING FASTING
[ Rw1 R ro
643 IRf 'x 050'
v 46857,"
108589.2 1464193..
101118.18
x3
Hi 9-21' 1 11
46}741= 24641015
1461177.8
Xs I'4' 410' .e7M9/ 2010"61
x s 'ssl aae* an .es
x]
HB sn34X'9
4T
' 4s33*
18 46rMr
41
0116= :460285
14
x01851
H9 5
H
x.'452 'W & . .
X10 4474879 111,.117
468 1 24B3Bn.11

N13 2
r5 218R52d0
2
141Ta937
H15 -V5 I' r m

6.13 311=
3.13 2"MM74
61 OY
1-2.04
3/608]0.
1
. 11025'27 A]' 2bRd0.m
.85X1] x0161=1
.e1-18 203511,54
,SOYM'r`
S02'arl
0701
14 Sw
203 .m
2
35r .
II-21 2191
H32 51 1 "9.77 1031600
HM -WVa 1690'
t] .1]61.95
.17132 2 m
--
H36 .sr 0704.m 2034-.=
HI a3" 0'00.0
.r"1." 246
2183136."
Mm .4' 085285 383"185
X19 alt ' -SKM 246 47
X. -TITE al" 0]51610 115"2233

W3 b1011J
.1050 N7W2M
2033X8
NN
INS 477856.
013-85 105116"
2b"4M16
2.=15..
X11 IM2M97 14"22.
X0 07855)1 M181
2
xw 0778,77 "M 2X8577

WI 077-.2
07 2b31Mm
1011X0

X52
35
-6
401026
60

1154 469"w
061149.71 10361"
2030711
1155 .6912. 2
x85
X57
W 212p'_
b5L' 0853485
wr.A1 24611850]
21"0111
x85 .61077 146311.11
x39

0 4677x-

106881,17
.
146130=.85
10
4
1161 08641.. II483w10
x" .885285 10"800
x" .?$}T_ 105362. 1463Rd.
854 Y --.7:_ ."ma 20"8578
N"
x% 1-4 0549885
0307.1 24B1w42J
21"2al,m
116] N-213% n7v 1601.0 15
NO

N" 1641339

0819685
103281,77
20.11
Hm 1 42 Ia
X11

HIS
'IV 4819.16

10".
,
' 11631-n

INN 0859-S
'
X73 .663
1
A
.
401610.]1 IS
10061,44
H]4
Hn 174577.41 20.m.fi]
Hm 408522" 14639..61
H77 . 4 20X247

XM
T
185eu61111 4
2b]Ji1.14
xIm 01 1J
H.
x85 _ 116191.85
14"0185
H"
x84 M-7
85
85 2. 16. 8
2031 ,m
"
H- 0
9 2mX0
2
v M-2
1 10]01 r
x
85 .
a zb3

4
0601.19 I4
x03]6
1685 H. www.6 w 2

119111= Oitll 46991 38
5
24"4026
ALC OTCII
ALM-IG 0111 E7-69
0 .32 1050 .M
=031},87
AL-w 0101 -.1.1.25
E41 0'1,
AL.G afal MIN
.72310
10JSn.-
ALaG aT-I
AIWG OHW .776 1
0110. Sr 11068077
20JSM.
AL-C OGOI f 1' 01
7

-1960 ONM =3
01d"11 0aam-l
3.11
u6C olrzx 1 1b a1
llgm dn4 .

nX
NI-Q-11-10
4Jkw 4
24 A

pTCX 2.X1416
24".101
ull
71,0110 0101 'd' Y g 2.72.18
IP:N
ALONG DTM
M?IWZITE 24W5711
2035
163
b13
-11
21611260
g=al 20a5a,m
DITCH
AL
"W4n2-4 1' 4-85114
0- 10
2"
AL6C gICN
manml 22 4037.19
71-10 0101 48569.11 10110,15
.520110 piCN w311J1 m3Wl%JIl
AIAiC piAl i 0854'3.21 2 71
Acow aTCN
ALMS -ICX --Hummx- -1 48591110
712 9852 5
MORN
AIAIO 01.01 185 16
ALMG (X- N"75,16% j- 185X4.85 340W".
ALa10 mW
ZZ M- 485X0,14 20178501
u0N0 aiW It 20-UII!
uqn
ALONG 1-.785
ImSm.- 1b3700.w
i
ITCH
ALON 10377.25
.47110 GITCN lm
ulxla -1- w 71
-4DITm 0005904 1453611.0
N-w 0=1.11
]LG10 T-i 12
40796" A 11,1
2076.
M01w T.
46TI.SJ
=
ALONG NTM

Dl- 01}14,08
16]11,11 2008527
204985,2
alp
41018 .8851.85 z04121JG
AL.- -T-1 46"7.91 94M56AI
nE W R
M-G R 40mMm
0716. 20IN
L. ..
LINE S WETLANCB
RAG TABLE
FUG NO BEARING LENGTH NORTHING EASTIFG
51
aA -aaalm
.85 208151.1.1
20920,77
II 'W 4857720 =

" 18592
= 74
2a0 1402"n
a
e 1000.= 2MY20.).m
2
04

R

1'w -I.
-
.
30885"
S7

0

nw5rw
-7.
4085
-79
4-08].11

2077-2
247=85.77
I
a 190]1,81
406851.93 248519477
2139118.8
ll
ex Y 4a66M6] 21H110.W
611 -ITE .7' 06770.41 20911177
Rl
a4 'W
W
1 41,618185
40/11876 zlanw,n
215915
Ms
Ms 4679.85
+OE5w.2 -a-
119911109
31 ' 'W 1 465-a 21011010
35 ' 11 85011,11
al rw 7 1-SM41 2159106]4
530
#I Malr3mwrw
Y ' 11
Barr
?? 406416.0
485101.90 2WImm
215985
512 y 1638685 24.-9..
su
511 -VIV
1 w 11142-61
1671"]] 208577.13
2485-].0
Sm 2b90a6.m
am 1 -V.. 77.11 21585".85
637

m

r 0laIm

-l
4 8511077

2
2
xlwG2n
W
401111.81
216.618
a.
sw
"I "^x
r '4'F 108501.
4am26s7 x150085.
1Mwmin
"2 .685.85

3'w
'n'x t
931 .0767.6
485 W'4a 0850..
909 .851.0

S0
911
08
Im80aM 2
S42 0 .W 2081VV.
90 0856161 24087778
414
RMSIYE .57X85 216mMW
Sb 1-.9.85 2 m
S0 058-a 2 8r
M] 1-r n z "
31 1 11
-nom
985
961 Ar 4 7.81
. W.I. 2 141

Z u0
1.32
2
S
M r 107710 1 177
954 18577 .r 2 , I
!- UM, .3666 W 1 33
sa
9"
1 w mm
{2591.74 z x.
241858588
985 4-10.85 2485770.77
ffi W3186. 1078585
850
S61 406111"
0"]119 14516)172
.m
5" .585601' m 1.m
551 1,19 8550816.-
]1 2456851sT
-5
985 0X7785
40520." 8511]77..
210C]BT
20.41 2008X.85
858 4r 01858.60 2
979 4-77 20 3.
1X.
0 0850,73
.77
2
m {8585].74 G]
V72 r 406-.11 248580177
nS
914 00821]8
0$-.91 .7"1.64
24aerG.n
V11 -71 -4. wW-r
Sm 4851".16 M-301'7

sn
485 N 1.
05M1.1]
4061"."
8015 m
0
NMvq,ITw i .19 2 Ia

S
WM' 03"9.
85
NIMOO
146a00.
SIN n NM7fwW IO.R
.W
mmms.71
21-3140
Sm 40Me 24000.
854 46852m - 20641582
859
.7

1 1850664
100]=77 245M182
11501685
681 ]' 06116.0 14000.0
SONS 46210 1485

851
m
I
0685724
1853.77 .24
10.
345w".u
4062.17 IIb3w.a
5" 163--5 1b
sw +6546" ab9ul-77
.n
574 ?Z,
24
S27 185X=,"
4mma." ?
599 M"
1605091 W
7
.
I"
I6 485 t." 20027701
4 -vat n
si. 00 00 11
.I
W
9101
116
466140

4008MSJ
a45Wn37
85561"3]
a- nw [phone]
LINE LD WETLADS
FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO, BEARING LENGTH NORTHING EASING
01 ro YBI 1' W 01959985 ..)3975
YDI W J99693m 1 )mm
.2 6152 d92Jl.T) 20.11.
N-G arCN
-G -H 1'W
'W ._202'
6 .858585
R180M 1096677
1 54"
BLCNG-TCH "X 2 92' 37787.85 30901.85
M03
M?4 TF TO PL lokw 85818076
85740.- 1 41p639,14
209117"
PLOXU R 1 1996-•2 219952/,77
PL TIE TO 141 .95X3] 100.111,6
MD) TE TD PL 'W jq?
3965-m
1 "
R
A 39811610 47111.85
IE
nII T
PL TO 116
X
wB"0.M
109851.85
046 3E PS PL
ALaIG R 3wbaM
).44585 2
208431.19
M-w PL 1 ]WNd59 117285.77
MUw R 6 398]"11 200M.w
uaw n sanlro" 34
1 arale,ll x1710185
A- PL X
' 891085 zuswxu
6G PL
NmG PL .1851.11
w.6Mn 1b10p6.-
20.1164
AICNG PL JN 059 I ra
1 WE 0 M015 ` )7110.16 E AI
ml6 TE 10 PE '
d1. 85911231 203082.94
-0 PL
712x0 PL .0111,0
-*W7 -W 2071341
NN ,5
K TE 70.85 .a 10671378
YD19 IwAy d9"ee.il 20859772
-919 -HEX PL
&MI PL

pc I-V
.778,85
.98810
=181107.0
348876
01
. M coal
MD. M421'55TE -w 3966k.m
wean ea .
24231.18
xurw
41
M-
MDa 7' .
JBB7.4t
J981110 .
01851.51
20-54
]s
Mom
YD- "W .6150,30 ,
20661124
Men M m PL 301..2 10851676
AL I tt 1,127V211'01 aSW w111M 101100,85
Mq0 n W ftno 2855604
IL-w PL 3ma35.?e 200850,15
Mk0 tt
R m TO Mora V7.M&A2`a %W .85=41
0 s
2468,[0"
MD3 iE ro PL 32776. 20801,52
71,60IL 3741770 2 ,"
PL
FL TIE ro Y.3 11-1 Ll .8538,7
11751
0 245052385
24583190
N0"A
?731wlolw
U52' .
.2X 145WM0
M". 1 8116112.
MDIm
C3m '4W31-1 --- JAE 8 2189360.74
2064073
Y 1 2
ww
NDSR KIVVI&V 2 N,"
Y"X 24991"85
MW2 t .
MOSa
m ro Fl I sl sw
l(A4G Pl.
NON] PL 1
PL --swm?w 11V 26 0
Mom MW07*W WIN' 85 2085X447
-7 T9 TO R - M12 Of
Ho. PL 3.413.0 2b ,m
AI-6G K
PL nE M x985 0179
.5440- 24pa332
210PIM-
w TEN R JBwR.M 001999.11
uaxc a 7' .enzls a .m
G PL 3176- 27617
FL TIE ro MDAI S?lWll'W 85"7112 2-5916.74
uDA1
Ae
39X3.19 2b1915Fe
--
&362
IIID" 111 TG PL JB"n.7d 2
LIE TSIB WETLANDS
FUG TABLE
FLAG NO. BEARING 7 LENGTH NORTHING FASTING
i]m 4011X22 4bnnal
iJa 1013116 2b7A057
T2d 4" 285 31685620
Tma nTW 077856 2b7M1.R
1Re 01616.09 08514.
TSm
1.851 451608.m
477171
=1 27"11
107nd,n
nm .
mnm. S0n0M
36 .1077.6 2.7-05
nio b]r1-0 207656=
nll TO PI. bna.05
21576#.85
LINE T50D WETLANDS
FLAG TABLE
FLAG N0. ?RNO LENGM NORTHING EASING
1685 40818585 9058-"
TSN 1859=117 110826."
T3- 21561-11
i5W 40W2." 1101150
i5M 408577.77 16T6LM
1585
Is6 40082J.R
127-.6 2082-1
mX
16x"3 20"21-
1858 4mn a 85 11613
-01,17 b
771010 PTH 4-01.85 145eWi.ee
LIE PW NER ANCB
..."- FLAG TABLE
FLAG NO. BEARING LENGTH NORTHING _I EASING
PT, TO Plol .1718] 2458511.85
PIA 1 /0166191 2458580
--I~

P,- b d.
07851.
10777785 zblem.-

PIm%o 7711 wmaa] 2078010
407738.. ms]arlsc
NO SCALE
BOUNDARY LINE TABLES

u'e TA51F A- B ur6 TALK o- 0 LINE TA BLE LINE -ABL E
1.11E 2AAWG of"711-1 LINE BEA9Nw ux6
ols llNE LENGTH BEARING LINE -LENGTH BLARING
Li
Lx m1J
w.4s 1.
va i
Ss
1847 U9 53796'51'
'
- Lua 211,85
-6 r

u
LV
w
1677

Ln
A
1,11
1 v5
LM
ns7
'3N7
'w x
sm1 •3
LI.
ua
2X85
x
m

mTo-M-E 2111
26
41 L

L4 77
.m
2.852 L73 "
I R 8551'"'w
1T"'W 1,153
`131
1mm
-m
_g
l .
2-
xl.b LM
L

1 I"08
122 1
L75 IS
-n 155
Ln3 277.6
".m
1,9
? II1 L
Lm 2
n
51.21 LM
1.77 17,.1
5677 1134• W
NIT18' Llm
Lm 10.11
1611
N
u1
LIZ net
.85 L
Lao 1820
bR L78
LM 11
M" 11'u
"1a6'4B'W use
Llr 77.77
BR.52
1,1]
L1i 61.08
41,77 LBI
1. 5].31
1 19
.1 0 t'1GW Llm
1,10 I
99.9]
I L1a
Sll]Y S1.R2
1 lb

L" 8271

164.12

YSW 1,181

1,1" 99.35

2115
u1 851147
107 1,u 65M " u'w ua 1X17
MBE Two F-P Lm M' LMS 08411
LIO
1,30 -,
72a4 Lm

UJ BEARING I ..Mw ..

mS 1.m

l6] 1210

mm SW

r

1,10

132"
1 -YO
51x43 Lw
1,w 13085
852
Lft A
3 M 5-91VT'011
x 35' 'w
1,25
3-ae 1,11
1,p n.a
IMIi 1,2
1,91 m" sbu' p
LIT
u5 . l1.0
I 1.r
Lr n.u
Imae u2 3.85

1 m' b
am1R
LZ]
ud 11- 13
nl+ L.
1,0 18133

10111 W 11.0
as S93fOVW
w or
1,2 85.3
685 1.
LW i x55.-
1X.0 L
L97 .IS
85
0 1
x1639' 1

.2
mnilml? I...
1 m Lw
1,93
1 2 L74

L% ,
19,56
218 1

xl 1'
LX
LM _
_ 11021
.0,94 t%
Ln u15
9552 Lim
4104 15.75
3211 111
11
'
7

Lm
Lm
513
.b
1,2
1,2
73'
r.m
L1a

I7a 11
4
1

1,v
Lm
nm.v
.
185
ua
-
::
I
mR
u-
7711
I --E

' r6
l0

334
uox
LI03
uvl
16,16 um
u6 a.R
naR

IA2
510
853
1,104
105
8569
9].w LLiI01m 0861

1,970
l0
W 15.57
1294 Lt6
LIO Imn
01.53 1,16
L
0 55.64
131,15 -VVft
R.. 31au L
'
' 120,
Hale

l4I j
L
l
ll
4
11981
j
1 IS j
.1
Ui 1E
8514 T 6
85/91x0 -
p '
'64 .2" W

1,w
8.19
L112 w

UXAMMX 1511

850 "

1110 13Mm

I0A6
24,70
-r
Lfll
1114 _
_
6
..15
Li72
1,112
11185
51.2
l-5
1,0 214
11¢85 015
ul1
1 1,11,5
L12 X52
114.36
L.
Lm i -
fAW llp
1,111 Ntswn 473
85.10 Ll.
Llm -"
a
01.
'JI m"
85.85 1.99
u 7.11
n 1,121
u2 X75
m

Lea
LBI
JMi]
".
u1,
LISS

74
85
LIN
L1m .
w
Lee
Les 0 'x3
8085 LIS

I Z4
24

I_ .
11.8
95. MJI 8.14
eMa 1
la1
L" 11.=11
210 L!
-
1185 7751 us
L!" S4.b 41

LI

89,85
IM7II
Lia
LIM

LIm
61.01
30,-
0
74
LYE
Nll
2
u? -41
-m un
Ltm .
2607
WN5
2
1,111
LI. 4619
0'1¢ u.
LI0 -43
n6R • '.2
r r5
1,131 51'52 1,141 85.18
Lla
2 89X
57
8 Lug 3.w
1,1
1. f . LI.
M 5147
n"
LM
1,10 10-
Li.
1,10 9.0
5534

,4NR<JM&CRMD
243 NORTH FRONT STREET
WWINCI-!, NORTH CM NA 26401
TEIE: 1910 33-1040
FAM?, (910 251-8262
htty: //Wn.meAYno-aA.L-n
L WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
FOR
REAL ESTATE
q WEYERHAEUSER
s r F! DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
S j PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
IFFFP RICHIANBS TOWNSLHP - ONSLOW - NORTH CAROLINA
...0. 1- 29, 2007 NO SCALE
PROJECT IN : 009100163
PROD. SV : OLJ
DRAWN By ACS
FIELD BK. 1 W1013/56 - LJ
COMP. FILE : -101-009100163-6
SHEET N ' SHEET 6 OF 14
DWG. k :
LINE FT WETLANDS
?m
m
m
n
m
m
v
N
n
m
0
a
z
0
c?
U
z
xi
RA1rr rwr7x
wI
se sw
usam

4NFKM&CREM
>4
° WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
FOR

SCALE t" = 10p p
.
= a SEA'. REAL ESTATE
WEYERHAEUSER

IN N 'Im 500 113 NORTH FRONT STREET
WILM ' NORTH CARpNA 7B401
iV
T DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
IEIE (910 "' M6
FAX: ((910 R51-87az
hltp://,m.Mlmvwdwm E
(. ,
MCMANW TOWMMP - OMOW - NOME CAROLINA
nine EB, 2007 SLAGS 1' =200'
PROJECT N OD9100163
PROD. SWR DLJ
DRAWN BY :ACS
FIELD BK.: W1013/56 - LJ
COMP. RILE : _131-33910I63-R
SHEET N :SHEET 7 OF 14
DWO. # :

?j
r (
C7
f
so *
?? WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
FOR PROJECT y : 009100163
PROI S'NR : ow
:
DRAWN BY Acs
SCALE: 1•.2? """"""" o
H
2
?
?
p WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE FIELD B
013/58 - U
-?-N 217 NORTH FRONT STREET
SEAL
`
a DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
L t
roua
. FlE 101-ooslomsa?
rr
R u 0 ew W"INCTp, NORTH CAROLINA 2&0
WE 9107 ]IS-1W8 L9B S? PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT SHEET E : SHEET 6 OF 14
hNp: FAX:: [phone]
//rnnmxWnaee0.xn 1. RICNANDS TOIFNSHID - ONSLOA' - NORTH CAROLINA

'
DATE Ime 89, 2007 SCAIS: Y a 800 D%0.
d? 8
re-
PROJECT / : 009100185
PROJ. SVYR : DW
DRAWN BY ;ACS
FIELD BK NT013/58 - LJ
COMP. FILE : vx101-009100163 A
OF 14
SHEET / : SHEET 901F11463
OWO. #
?? WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
FOR
g°` a WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
243 NORTH FROM STREET Lin DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
I?T?bd_,ft w?uwiNCrai• NORTH cxiwNA za+m 4y ?' PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
FA910? 343-104a X f 910 751-8267 E. .^" RICHWNAW TOWNSHIP - ONSWIV - NOR777 CAROWNA
Mtp; //www.mdimamd.con
.n.,4 Jmw BB, 5007 SCAM 1, =200'
Lamm
s m?
\\
44
\ a nuu
u°a
\ ^un 0uae !?
V rx ?"+
\ Y+ ?.uw
\ M'
\ ...?Ir?. :..vana
\
\ 'rtN. ? ? cua

?( ?pLL 11
'?u
.„•!
=
e WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
FOR
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE PROJECT y:DDSlootea
PROJOs. SV sure aJ
DRAWN By Acs
SCALE. r zoo' "
243 NOIM FRONT STREET '1"
CARDUNA 2MI
NORT v
a
seA? " t
d Ldpr°
4 DEVELOPMENT COMPANY P 2e X01 /55BOSia J

SHEET
eer to c tc
s
MLMNM,
H
ESBw)) S }IWB b, $1 PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT n
r
FAIL (BIC)131-A2E1 JOKE RICIRANA4 TOIWNSL? - ONSLOI - NOM CAROLING
enp://m maN cratl.am ?
Z1•oy Nn° 29, 2007 SCALE. 1*- 200'
ovre. N
oArE,
N
?m
a
x,
0
i
iMCt I
EXC£Pnge
PnB t (pO76l
P llOi
A't!. A , re30 Po0 ?., x'105
P60?'
t A, PNef'
\P]15rr-? PPia'^ , 460 n0J 11,104 50. F7
V 1 rv , ! 0.25 ACRES
a? 1m9 mad ''- iu+B
z
R4 6
F4Se ? ?. •'nrU
? ruse
n -?
i i31)
/ 431
RG
51.2W 50, F.
1.18 ACRES
W?
15,60$ Sa FF. ?I l t
0.36 ACRES
zw Y, 1
3 1 {
AA •?
t a 1 is aaN A' a ??\m?
?o , i ;LAS ?a
!A 5 t 11 v . /
1 SI ?IOEf
1 ,?YZ" `\ r 11
7?q Aoe??ASr r f iMLrA6
Intl \ (? - IA3,0AR4EAA FT 9H .uDEM0
/ frAYN'60'W _ 110 AIRCI
? Ia361 \ ? r/%
/ ee
i.JEJS?
/? \ 76a95e(ni ii maMwx)
$ s
S,
? ro '':?,YOE10
I e
C- BIF(W MARSHBURN , 6
A OB )6A PB N
DYSM169- 1?"?\1
b'36' "W
?g 49.13' HIE MOEI TO W)
;7KT e
I¢FPTN!
LE0E D
? rmw
I. ...??? anwt
SCALE: I' - 22010'
o'-do
/4 4Iv q? M&CREM
?/ IMMC N. NORTH AA00NA 26401
-- 910 343-ION
FAX [phone]
http'??w4M.mvdmua6,arn
WETLANDS DELINENATION SURVEY
sPa WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
Lae PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
RICNUNOS TOWNa7NP - ONSLOIF - NORTH CAROLINA
-- W June 28, 2007 SCALE: 1' = 200•
PROJECT Y : 0091001-
PRO7, sWR : 0LJ
CRAwN BY : ACS
HELD BK. M013/16 - U
COMP, RLE v 101-009100163 F
SHEET # : SHEET 11 OF 14
Dwc. A '.

WE

MIS
H2O
FT..
E5 NSO
R]e
NW
Hla
\ x50
\
\
i
l

..'. ? 0310
wl

'?
^
I
O'I
6/
'
y
7
+1LIy ::JO
a
nm
AREA
.115101 S0. fi.
1.61 ACRES
U
i
ca.?
1 ; a
rr H?. 6
'Ly `:a{ ?8O506A(TEyE6 N CORNE
Tl v_..fll
X46 15ZY
].ea (rc
A
,2Y (AE E10 TO W)
0
\a
R3a ri
m
0
'o :

fj?('+^?pMD?'?
06
?

4 WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY

FOR PH ROJd SVM R : 119111163
. :1LJ
oeAUDN By : ACS
SCALE: 1• = mu ,
v-+u++'' g '
` WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE Eiao 11.111111/es - LJ
143 NORTH FRONT MEET SEAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY CONP. qLE : _101-COS100163 R
a`lao iHoo eoo awiNCmr NORTH eARwowA :aw
me 3DUNA o y?
am?c PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT nit t : sHeer Iz OF In
FA% (811 Yel-9E87
Mp://Xrr.mdma.M.can ( RICHLANW TOWNSHIP - ONSLOR - NORTH CAROLINA

'
^
41 07 -200
Iw1e e8, x007 SCAIB: 1 DWC. 4
DAre f
N
ro
ro
Z
O
U
U
7
m
?? s m
v
1
V?
6
L
l
?r
I(IV
RA
7$9]850 fi
/O.B7 ACRES
u
\' P500
I ?-Id2[,116/1NE7lAA219
1
!\ \ Iw
t;71 ,, ? }NIr9 `?,?
-7, IS \ \ bYMA7FOWEiIAAMA4\
IA•8D
!m a.xa wama u
I?
1
1
L.,
\

\
PBM, ?, \
IS ?EILW
PB9 '

\ ?
n ?la .w. rc
\ \
vrm
0.75 ACRES
\ ` r510 'j 1
\?k Ve}ll 3 f 1
r

\ ?
TRACT 1

\ 44?
ru`?"Fpt ?'
vRes rom
B ?
?i h5
+
aV .
'.IQ i, "nJ
P595
j
e
? \ \, i n': a y'°?
xt.x? ?? 9SHyt? t _
°v lna
i
?
BBY1 OE'E ? ,I{PO \ ?
-
J+R'1'f +}A.+.P !Oti ?? .
+ 0
?
,;J07 FG ?

SCALE: 1' - 200'
o so u
A 11"W&CREM
243 NORTH FRONT SVEET
NIU9NGTCN, NORTH CAROUNA 28401
1ELE 910) 3{3-10iB
FA# 970} 251-8287
AGp:/j;". ckiT-d-
WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY
FUR
sFAL i
REAL ESTATE
WEYERHAEUSER
?e DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
J2ramum3 TOIINSIl6 - ONSWW - NORTH CAROLINA
fuse 29.2007 Sum 1"- 200,
PROJECT IF ', 009100165
PROs. SVYR Du
DRAWN BY', ACS
FlELD BK. W1013/56 - LJ
COMP. FILE : -101-009100163_R
SHEET 1: SHEET 13 OF 1+
DWG. J
1-,--i
ulow
a
U 'im rorx
a
2 '+?gvralm'
eW R'n?
?TWF
S' (¶E RIM 10 OJwER)
im - M
v
WETLANDS DELIT1ON SURYEY PROJECT q 009100163
PROJ. svB .

SCALE r . sao

0 M ?-?-+

243 NORTH FRONT s?6n V'Vw?L
•'
eta m
WILMINGTON,
TELL (9100? xslaa
fA%: (910) 281-8'[82
eu9:/M*. %v lraa

^ SEAL
w
cn
g0

t

DATE 09
WEYEKIEGWER REAL ESTATE

DE aOFMENT COMYAJI
PORTION OF ON&LOW 19 TRACT

4T
RAMAW 4YlhN9? - ON.4LOE -NORM C LIxA
rm, ae a667 scArs r = AC
DRAWN By : us
nFJn BK. : vnola/ss - w

,FIELD Flw: 101 -'009100163R
6x6¢? p :SHE a or u

WG'. ?:
APPENDIX C.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
1) View of channelized section of HU-2
Batchelors Delight Mitigation Bank
Restoration Plan
01-09-168
LMG
LAND IIIANAGENIEN-1 GROUP-,
f+?vi?cunn a?rt?l Corisullc?nts
Site Photographs
2) View of cultivated fields adjacent to boundary ditch
3) View of existing conditions at HU-1
4) View existing valley in the headwaters of HU-1
Batchelors Delight Mitigation Bank
Restoration Plan
01-09-168
LMG
LAND IIIANAGENIEN-1 GROUP-,
f+?vi?cunn a?rt?l Corisullc?nts
Site Photographs
5) View of floodplain adjacent to HU-1
Batchelors Delight Mitigation Bank
Restoration Plan
01-09-168
LMG
Ln:V 11 nlel\nC;lA1L'q7 GROUP-,
.
f+?vr.cunnerrtol Coresultams
Site Photographs
6) View of HE-4 Preservation
7) View of Impounded area of HU-2 (north of Maready Rd.)
8) View of ponded channel in BD-4 (north of Maready Rd.)
Batchelors Delight Mitigation Bank
Restoration Plan
01-09-168
LMG
LAND 111ANAGENIEN-1 GROUP-,
f+?vi?cunn a?rt?l Corisultc?nts
Site Photographs
APPENDIX D.
USACE STREAM ASSESSMENT DATA FORMS
Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
0 1,200 2,400 3,600 Onslow County
Feet
LMG
LANll MANAGEMhN'1' GUOUP nc
Env--ntul Consultants
USACE AID#
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment. Hewl
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/8/09
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
4. Time of evaluation: 10:45
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: first
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8640 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4668
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an mar ?s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any):proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: mild,
16. Site conditions at time of visit: warm, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
50 % Forested 50 % Cleared / Logged D-% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 8 feet 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 32 Comments: Form was completed under drought conditions. Although the
low score accurately reflects the fact that it is a man-made ditch. it is likelv to have water in the channel and/or flow durina the winter
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/8/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
FE11 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AQP
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

# ECOREGION POINT RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 1
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 2
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 5
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 1
U (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplaln
0-4
0-4
0-2 2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 0
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points) 0
F'.
13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
a (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
1
H (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 0
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6 1
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 1
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 3
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 32
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID#
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment. Hew2
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/8/09
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
4. Time of evaluation: 12:30
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: first
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8627 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4630
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an mar ?s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any):proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: mild
16. Site conditions at time of visit: warm, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
50 % Forested 50 % Cleared / Logged D-% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 7 feet 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2.5 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 37 Comments: Form was completed under drought conditions. Although the
low score accurately reflects the fact that it is a man-made ditch. it is likelv to have water in the channel and/or flow durina the winter
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/8/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
FE11 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AOQV
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

# ECOREGION POINT RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 1
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 1
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 2
U (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplaln
0-4
0-4
0-2 2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 0
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 3
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 2
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 3
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points) 0
F'.
13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
a (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
2
H (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
1
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 0
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6 2
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 1
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 4
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 37
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID#
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment. Hew3
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/8/09
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch
7. Approximate drainage area: +/_ 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 13: 00
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: first
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8648 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4604
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an mar ?s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel preservation
15. Recent weather conditions: mild
16. Site conditions at time of visit: warm, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Smvey? YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
50 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 4 feet
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
50 % Cleared / Logged D-% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 41/o) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous X Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 73 Comments: proposed area for stream preservation
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/8/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
FE11 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AOQV
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

# ECOREGION POINT RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 4
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 5
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 3
U (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplaln
0-4
0-4
0-2 3
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 5
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 4
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 5
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 5
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points) 5
F'.
13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
4
a (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
2
H (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 1
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6 5
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
3
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 2
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 3
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 73
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID#
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment. Hew4
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/8/09
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch
7. Approximate drainage area: +/_ 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 14:20
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: second
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8610 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4612
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an mar ?s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel preservation
15. Recent weather conditions: mild
16. Site conditions at time of visit: warm, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Smvey? YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
50 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 10 feet
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
50 % Cleared / Logged D-% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 41/o) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous X Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 82 Comments: proposed area for stream preservation
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/8/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
FE11 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AOQV
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

# ECOREGION POINT RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 4
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 5
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 5
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 3
U (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplaln
0-4
0-4
0-2 4
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 5
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 6
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 5
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 5
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points) 5
F'.
13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
a (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
2
H (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 2
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6 6
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
4
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
3
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 2
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 4
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 82
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID#
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment. Hew5
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/9/09
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 12: 00
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: first
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8676 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4600
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an mar ?s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel preservation
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Smvey? YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
40 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 3 feet
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
60 % Cleared / Logged D-% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 6"-1'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 41/o) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous X Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 74 Comments: proposed area for stream preservation
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/9/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
FE11 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AOQV
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

# ECOREGION POINT RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 5
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 3
U (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplaln
0-4
0-4
0-2 4
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 5
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 5
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 5
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 5
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points) 3
F'.
13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
a (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
3
H (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 2
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6 5
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
3
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 2
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 4
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 74
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID#
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment. Huf2
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/8/09
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch
7. Approximate drainage area: +/_ 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 15: 00
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: first
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8575 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4552
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an mar ?s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: mild
16. Site conditions at time of visit: warm, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Smvey? YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
60 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 6 feet
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
40 % Cleared / Logged D-% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 41/o) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):47 Comments: proposed area for stream restoration spoil pile running along west
side of ditch channel
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/8/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
FE11 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AQP
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

# ECOREGION POINT RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 2
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 3
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 4
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 1
U (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplaln
0-4
0-4
0-2 2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 3
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 1
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points) 3
F'.
13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
a (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
1
H (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 0
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6 2
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 1
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 3
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 47
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID#
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment. Huf3
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/9/09
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch
7. Approximate drainage area: +/_ 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 14: 00
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: first
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8595 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4528
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an mar ?s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Smvey? YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
40 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 2
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
60 % Cleared / Logged D-% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2.5'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 41/o) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 31 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/9/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
FE11 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AQP
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

# ECOREGION POINT RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 2
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 0
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 1
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 1
U (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplaln
0-4
0-4
0-2 1
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 0
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 1
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points) 0
F'.
13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
4
a (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
1
H (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 0
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6 1
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 1
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 4
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 31
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID#
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment. Huf4
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/13/09
5. Name of stream: Hewitts Branch
7. Approximate drainage area: +/_ 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 15:45
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: first
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8577 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4539
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an mar ?s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
40 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 13'
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE NO
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
60 % Cleared / Logged D-% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2.'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 41/o) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 37 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/9/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
FE11 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AQP
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

# ECOREGION POINT RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 3
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 1
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 2
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 2
U (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplaln
0-4
0-4
0-2 2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 1
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 1
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points) 2
F'.
13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
a (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
1
H (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 0
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6 1
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 1
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 3
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 37
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID#
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment.
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/13/09
5. Name of stream: Batchelors Deliqht Swam
7. Approximate drainage area: +/_ 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 12: 00
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: First
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8575 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4396
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aeoto/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an ?s and atta ch map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, rain
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
22. Bankfull width: 2
40 % Forested
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
60 % Cleared / Logged D-% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 6"
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 41/o) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends X Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):46 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/13/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
FE11 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Bat
-AQP
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

# ECOREGION POINT RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 0
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 4
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 2
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 1
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 3
U (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplaln
0-4
0-4
0-2 3
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 3
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 3
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points) 3
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 5
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 4
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
F'.
13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
4
a (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
0
H (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 0
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6 1
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 4
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 46
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID#
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment.
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/13/09
5. Name of stream: Batchelors Deliqht Swam
7. Approximate drainage area: +/_ 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 13:30
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: Zero
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8561 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4405
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aeoto/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an ?s and atta ch map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, rain
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
22. Bankfull width: 50'
40 % Forested
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
60 % Cleared / Logged D-% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 6"
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 41/o) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends X Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 51 Comments: Swamp, there is no channel
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/13/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
FE11 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Bat
-AQP
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

# ECOREGION POINT RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 3
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 2
U (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplaln
0-4
0-4
0-2 3
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 3
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 3
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 4
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points) 2
F'.
13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
a (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
2
H (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 0
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6 1
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
4
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 2
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 4
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 51
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID#
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment.
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/13/09
5. Name of stream: Batchelors Deliqht Swam
7. Approximate drainage area: +/_ 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 10: 30
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: First
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8538 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4377
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aeoto/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an ?s and atta ch map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, rain
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
22. Bankfull width: 7
40 % Forested
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
60 % Cleared / Logged D-% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3"
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 41/o) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):41 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/13/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
FE11 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Ba3
-AQP
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

# ECOREGION POINT RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 4
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 1
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 1
U (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplaln
0-4
0-4
0-2 2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 3
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 1
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 4
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points) 0
F'.
13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
a (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
1
H (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 0
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6 1
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 1
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 4
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 41
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID#
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment.
Applicant's name: WREDCO attn: Sandy McLendon
3. Date of evaluation: 1/13/09
5. Name of stream: Batchelors Deliqht Swam
7. Approximate drainage area: +/_ 200 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 feet
2. Evaluator's name: Corev Novak
4. Time of evaluation: 15: 00
6. River basin: New River
8. Stream order: First
10. County: Onslow
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 34.8533 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 77.4394
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aeoto/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an ?s and atta ch map identifying stream(s) location):
(see GIS map showing data points)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): proposed channel restoration
15. Recent weather conditions: variable
16. Site conditions at time of visit: cold, rain
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
22. Bankfull width: 6
40 % Forested
0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
60 % Cleared / Logged D-% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3"
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 41/o) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander X Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 72 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 1/13/09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
FE11 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Ba4
-AQP
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

# ECOREGION POINT RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 3
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 3
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 5
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 2
U (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplaln
0-4
0-4
0-2 3
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 3
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 4
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 4
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 5
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 N/A
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points) 3
F'.
13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
a (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
3
H (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 2
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6 5
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
4
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 N/A
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 3
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 2
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 72
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
APPENDIX E.
REFERENCE REACH STUDY/HEC-RAS MODELING
Morphological Characteristics of Bachelors Delight: HM-1 and Reference
Reach: Bachelors Delight: HE-1
County: Onslow County, INC
Design by: CLS
Checked by: RVS

ITEM Existing Conditions Existing Conditions Reference Reach Proposed Conditions Proposed Conditions
LOCATION
HE-1 Up
HE-1 Down BD-2 - Downstream of Soil
Road
HE-1 Up
HE-1 Down
STREAM TYPE No stream associated. G5 - B5 E5 E5 E5
DRAINAGE AREA, Ac - Sq Mi 179 Ac - 0.28 S Mi 227 Ac - 0.35 S Mi 83 Ac - 0.13 S Mi 83 Ac - 0.13 S Mi 182 Ac - 0.28 S Mi
BANKFULL DISCHARGE, cfs 5.8 cfs 1.0 cfs 2.0 cfs 4.4 cfs
BANKFULL X-SECTION AREA (Abkf), ft2 6.09 ft2 2.6 ft2 2.9 ft2 8.4 ftZ
BANKFULL MEAN VELOCITY, fps 0.95 fps 0.4 fps 0.6 fps 0.8 fps
BANKFULL WIDTH (Wbkf), ft The valley's natural 5.4 ft 4.1 ft 6.0 ft 8.0 ft
BANKFULL MEAN DEPTH (dbkf), ft drainage course has been 1.13 ft 0.63 ft 0.57 ft 0.76 ft
WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO W d
( bkf/ bkf) routed to roadside dithces,
therefore no data could be
4.8
6.5
10.5
10.5
BANKFULL MAX DEPTH (d_o, ft collected on channel 1.31 ft 0.88 ft 0.86 ft 1.14 ft
BANK HEIGHT RATIO dimension. 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
TYPICAL BANK HEIGHT ABOVE BANKFULL 2.62 ft 0.88 ft 0.86 ft 1.14 ft
WIDTH Flood-Prone Area (Wfpa), ft 11.6 ft 50.0 ft 50.00 ft 50.00 ft
ENTRENCHMENT RATIO (ER) 2.15 12.2 8.3 6.3
MEANDER LENGTH (Lm), ft 12.6 - 12.6 ft 18.0 - 60.0 ft 24.0 - 80.0 ft
RATIO OF Lm TO Wbkf The valley's natural Stream has been 3.1 - 3.1 3.0 - 10.0 3.0 - 10.0
RADIUS OF CURVATURE, ft drainage course has been channelized and
h th
t
i
ht
d th
2.0
ft
12.0 -
18.0 ft
16.0 -
24.0 ft
RATIO OF Rc TOW
bkf routed to roadside dithces,
therefore no data could be e
s
ra
g
ene
roug
vay
displaying no natural
0.5-
1.1
2.0 -
3.0
2.0 -
3.0
BELT WIDTH, ft collected on channel ,
meander pattern. 9.6- 9.6 ft 10.1 - 34.4 ft 13.5 - 45.9 ft
MEANDER WIDTH RATIO pattern. 2.3- 2.3 1.7 - 5.7 1.7 - 5.7
SINUOSITY (K) 1.02 1.25 1.30 1.17
VALLEY SLOPE, ft/ft 0.0028 ft/ft* 0.0049 ft/ft* 0.0027 ft/ft 0.0028 ft/ft 0.0049 ft/ft
AVERAGE SLOPE (S), ft/ft 0.0010 ft/ft** 0.0024 ft/ft 0.0012 ft/ft 0.0015 ft/ft
RIFFLE SLOPE, ft/ft 0.0010 ft/ft 0.0136 ft/ft 0.0014 ft/ft 0.0018 ft/ft
RATIO OF RIFFLE SLOPE TO AVERAGE
SLOPE
1.0
5.7
1.2
1.2
POOL SLOPE, ft/ft 0.0010 ft/ft 0.0000 ft/ft 0.0000 ft/ft
RATIO OF POOL SLOPE TO AVERAGE SLOPE

P
l
ti
l
d
0.4
0.0
0.0
MAX POOL DEPTH, ft The valley's natural oo
cross-sec
ona
an
lon
itudinal data not 1.26 ft 1.14 ft 1.52 ft
IO POOL DEPTH TO AVERAGE
RAT
BANKFUL L DEPTH drainage course has been
routed to roadside dithces, g
collected because the

channel appears to have

2 0

2.0

2.0

POOL WIDTH, ft therefore no data could be
collected on channel slope
and feature spacing. little to no naturally forming
pools because the channel
has been straightned

7.18

ft

6.60

ft

8.80

ft

RATIO OF POOL WIDTH TO BANKFULL WIDTH through the valley.

1.76

1.10

1.10
POOL TO POOL SPACING, ft 0.00 -1 0.00 ft 3.3 - 12.9 ft 6.0 - 30.0 ft 8.0 - 40.0 ft
RATIO OF POOL TO POOL SPACING TO
11BANKFULLWIDTH
0.00-1
0.00
0.8-
3.2
1.0 -
5.0
1.0 -1
5.0
* Valley Slope, and Sinuosity were taken from topographical data obtained on the entire site for existing conditions (i.e. data was not taken along reach lengths).
** Average Slope was taken along a reach length for existing conditions.
Morphological Characteristics of Bachelors Delight: HU-1 and Reference
Reach: Bachelors Delight: HU-1
County: Onslow County, NC
Design by: CLS
Checked by: RVS

ITEM Existing Conditions Reference Reach Reference Reach Proposed Conditions Proposed Conditions
LOCATION
HU-1 BD-2 - Downstream of Soil
Road
BD-5 Zero Order Bachelors Delight: HU-1
Zero Order Channel Bachelors Delight: HU-1
Single Thread Channel
STREAM TYPE E5 E5 Zero Order Zero Order E5
DRAINAGE AREA, Ac - Sq Mi 64 Ac - 0.10 Sq Mi 83 Ac - 0.13 Sq Mi 20 Ac - 0.03 Sq Mi 75 Ac - 0.12 Sq Mi 157 Ac - 0.25 Sq Mi
BANKFULL DISCHARGE, cfs 2.9 cfs 1.0 cfs BD-5's remnant, realtively 3.0 cfs
BANKFULL X-SECTION AREA (Abkf), fz 2.79 fz 2.58 fz undisturbed zero order Existing ditch/channel to
b
fill
d t
i
ti
d 7.3 fz
BANKFULL MEAN VELOCITY, fps 1.03 fps 0.40 fps channel is indicative of a e
e
o ex
s
ng groun
at low point of valley. 0.8 fps
BAN KFULL WIDTH ( °bkf), ft 4.7 ft 4.1 ft natural zero order stream. 7.0 ft
VALLEY TOE OF SLOPE WIDTH NA NA 52.0 ft 15.0 ft NA
BANKFULL MEAN DEPTH (dbkf), ft 0.59 ft 0.63 ft 0.67 ft
WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO ( °bkddbkf) 8.0 6.5 No meander pattern is to 10.5
BANKFULL MAX DEPTH (dm_), ft 0.82 ft 0.88 ft be constructed for zero
d
h
l 1.00 ft

BANK HEIGHT RATIO
1.10
1.00 or
er c
anne
.
Restoration of the
1.00
TYPICAL BANK HEIGHT ABOVE BANKFULL 0.90 ft 0.88 ft s zero
valley
s
order l
i
i
t
di
l floodplain's natural 1.00 ft
WIDTH Flood-Prone Area (Wfpa), ft
13.5
ft
50.0
ft s
var
ous
ow
po
n
s
sp
ay
where saturation and groundwater hydrology
grou
25.00 ft
ENTRENCHMENT RATIO (ER) 2.87 12.22 overland flows have and surface water flows
i
t
i
t
d 3.6
MEANDER LENGTH (Lm), ft 13- 13 ft caused depressions, n even
s)
s expec
e
(ra
to create natural braided 21.0 - 70.0 ft
RATIO OF Lm TO Wbkf Stream has been 3.1 - 3.1 however, no discernable
h
l h
f
d t low points throughout the 3.0 - 10.0
channelized and
t
i
ht
d th
h th c
anne
as
orme
o
convey valley. Proposed valley 14.0 - 21.0 ft
RATIO OF Rc TOW
bkf s
ra
g
ene
roug
e
vall displaying no natural
y
0.5-
1.1 width was determined

i
t
f th
2.0 -
3.0

BELT WIDTH, ft ,
meander pattern.
9.60-
9.60 ft us
ng con
ours o
e
valley floor following ditch
11.8 -
40.2 ft
MEANDER WIDTH RATIO 2.35 - 2.35 ft fill. 1.7 - 5.7
SINUOSITY (K) 1.03 1.25 1.20
VALLEY SLOPE, ft/ft 0.0038 ft/ft* 0.0027 ft/ft 0.0017 ft/ft 0.0038 ft/ft 0.0038 ft/ft
AVERAGE SLOPE (S), ft/ft 0.0014 ft/ft** 0.0024 ft/ft 0.0016 ft/ft
RIFFLE SLOPE, ft/ft 0.0058 ft/ft 0.0136 ft/ft 0.0019 ft/ft
RATIO OF RIFFLE SLOPE TO AVERAGE
SLOPE
4.2
5.7
1.2
POOL SLOPE, ft/ft 0.0007 ft/ft 0.0010 ft/ft 0.0000 ft/ft
RATIO OF POOL SLOPE TO AVERAGE SLOPE 0.5 0.4 0.0
MAX POOL DEPTH, ft 1.32 ft 1.26 ft 1.33 ft
RATIO OF POOL DEPTH TO AVERAGE
BANKFULL DEPTH
2.2
2.0
2.0
POOL WIDTH, ft
7.2
ft
7.2
ft
7.70
ft
RATIO OF POOL WIDTH TO BANKFULL WIDTH
1.5
1.8
1.10
POOL TO POOL SPACING, ft 43.42 - 43.42 ft 3.34- 12.94 ft 7.0 - 35.0 ft
RATIO OF POOL TO POOL SPACING TO
BANKFULL WIDTH
9.24-
9.24
0.82-1
3.16
1.0 -
5.0
* Valley Slope, and Sinuosity were taken from topographical data obtained on the entire site for existing conditions (i.e. data was not taken along reach lengths).
** Average Slope was taken along a reach length for existing conditions.
Morphological Characteristics of Bachelors Delight: HU-2 and Reference
Reach: Bachelors Delight: HU-2
County: Onslow County, INC
Design by: CLS
Checked by: RVS

ITEM Existing Conditions Reference Reach Proposed Conditions
LOCATION
HU-2
BD-5 Zero Order
Bachelors Delight: HU-2
STREAM TYPE G-5 Zero Order Zero Order
DRAINAGE AREA, Ac - Sq Mi 55 Ac - 0.09 S Mi 20 Ac - 0.03 S Mi 55 Ac - 0.09 S Mi
BANKFULL DISCHARGE, cfs 1.4 cfs BD-5's remnant
realtively
BANKFULL X-SECTION AREA (Abkf), ft2 1.05 ft2 ,
undisturbed zero order Existing ditch/channel to be
fill
d t
i
ti
d
t l
BANKFULL MEAN VELOCITY, fps 1.30 fps channel is indicative of a e
o ex
s
ng groun
a
ow
point of valley.
BANKFULL WIDTH (Wbkf), ft 3.3 ft natural zero order stream.
VALLEY TOE OF SLOPE WIDTH 15.0 ft 52.0 ft 15.0 ft
BANKFULL MEAN DEPTH (dbkf), ft 0.32 ft
WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO (Wbkddbkf) 10.3
BANKFULL MAX DEPTH (dm), ft 0.54 ft No meander pattern is to be
constructed for zero order
BANK HEIGHT RATIO 3.52 channel. Restoration of the
TYPICAL BANK HEIGHT ABOVE BANKFULL 1.90 ft dis
la s
oivalleynts
s va zero rious order low
la s floodplain's natural
WIDTH Flood-Prone Area (Wfp,), ft 4.6 ft p
p
y
p
where saturation and groundwater hydrology and
ENTRENCHMENT RATIO (ER) 1.39 overland flows have surface water flows (rain
t
i
t
d t
t
MEANDER LENGTH (Lm), ft caused depressions, even
s)
s expec
e
o crea
e
natural braided low points
RATIO OF Lm TO Wbkf Stream has been however, no discernable
h
l h
f
d t throughout the valley.
RADIUS OF CURVATURE, ft c
th
and
d th
t
i
ht
h th
t
i
ht c
anne
as
orme
o
convey flow. Proposed valley width was

RATIO OF Rc TO Wbkf r
r
s
ra
g
eneoug
e
s
ra
g
ene
vally
displaying no natural determined using contours of

th
ll
fl
f
ll
i
dit
h
BELT WIDTH, ft ,
meander pattern. e va
ey
oor
o
ow
ng
c
fill

MEANDER WIDTH RATIO .
SINUOSITY (K) 1.01
VALLEY SLOPE, ft/ft 0.0044 ft/ft* 0.0017 0.0044
AVERAGE SLOPE (S), ft/ft 0.0060 ft/ft
RIFFLE SLOPE, ft/ft 0.0060 ft/ft
RATIO OF RIFFLE SLOPE TO AVERAGE
SLOPE
1.0
POOL SLOPE, ft/ft
RATIO OF POOL SLOPE TO AVERAGE SLOPE
MAX POOL DEPTH, ft Pool cross-sectional and
RATIO OF POOL DEPTH TO AVERAGE
BANKFULL DEPTH longitudinal data not
collected because the

POOL WIDTH, ft channel appears to have
little to no naturally forming
pools because the

RATIO OF POOL WIDTH TO BANKFULL WIDTH channel has been
straightned through the
valley.
POOL TO POOL SPACING, ft
RATIO OF POOL TO POOL SPACING TO
BANKFULL WIDTH
* Valley Slope, and Sinuosity were taken from topographical data obtained on the entire site for existing conditions (i.e. data was not
taken along reach lengths).
** Average Slope was taken along a reach length for existing conditions.
Morphological Characteristics of Bachelors Delight: BD-2 and Reference
Reach: Bachelors Delight: 1313-2
County: Onslow County, INC
Design by: CLS
Checked by: RVS

ITEM Existing Conditions Reference Reach Proposed Conditions
LOCATION
BD-2
BD-5 Zero Order
Bachelors Delight: BD-2
STREAM TYPE F-5 Zero Order Zero Order
DRAINAGE AREA, Ac - Sq Mi 64 Ac - 0.10 S Mi 20 Ac - 0.03 S Mi 65 Ac - 0.10 S Mi
BANKFULL DISCHARGE, cfs 0.4 cfs BD-5's remnant
realtively
BANKFULL X-SECTION AREA (Abkf), ft2 1.70 ft2 ,
undisturbed zero order Existing ditch/channel to be
fill
d t
i
ti
d
t l
BANKFULL MEAN VELOCITY, fps 0.26 fps channel is indicative of a e
o ex
s
ng groun
a
ow
point of valley.
BANKFULL WIDTH (Wbkf), ft 5.2 ft natural zero order stream.
VALLEY TOE OF SLOPE WIDTH ft 52.0 ft 30.0 ft
BANKFULL MEAN DEPTH (dbkf), ft 0.33 ft
WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO (Wbkddbkf) 15.8
BANKFULL MAX DEPTH (dm), ft 0.60 ft No meander pattern is to be
constructed for zero order
BANK HEIGHT RATIO 3.33 channel. Restoration of the
TYPICAL BANK HEIGHT ABOVE BANKFULL 2.00 ft dis
la s
oivalleynts
s va zero rious order low
la s floodplain's natural
WIDTH Flood-Prone Area (Wfp,), ft 6.6 ft p
p
y
p
where saturation and groundwater hydrology and
ENTRENCHMENT RATIO (ER) 1.27 overland flows have surface water flows (rain
t
i
t
d t
t
MEANDER LENGTH (Lm), ft caused depressions, even
s)
s expec
e
o crea
e
natural braided low points
RATIO OF Lm TO Wbkf Stream has been however, no discernable
h
l h
f
d t throughout the valley.
RADIUS OF CURVATURE, ft channelized and
t
i
ht
d th
h th c
anne
as
orme
o
convey flow. Proposed valley width was

RATIO OF Rc TO Wbkf s
ra
g
ene
roug
e
displaying no natural
vall Y determined using contours of

th
ll
fl
f
ll
i
dit
h
BELT WIDTH, ft .
meander pattern. e va
ey
oor
o
ow
ng
c
fill

MEANDER WIDTH RATIO .
SINUOSITY (K) 1.00
VALLEY SLOPE, ft/ft 0.0002 ft/ft* 0.00171 1
AVERAGE SLOPE (S), ft/ft 0.0002 ft/ft**
RIFFLE SLOPE, ft/ft 0.0002 ft/ft
RATIO OF RIFFLE SLOPE TO AVERAGE
SLOPE
1.0
POOL SLOPE, ft/ft
RATIO OF POOL SLOPE TO AVERAGE SLOPE
MAX POOL DEPTH, ft Pool cross-sectional and
RATIO OF POOL DEPTH TO AVERAGE
BANKFULL DEPTH longitudinal data not
collected because the

POOL WIDTH, ft channel appears to have
little to no naturally forming
pools because the

RATIO OF POOL WIDTH TO BANKFULL WIDTH channel has been
straightned through the
valley.
POOL TO POOL SPACING, ft
RATIO OF POOL TO POOL SPACING TO
BANKFULL WIDTH
* Valley Slope, and Sinuosity were taken from topographical data obtained on the entire site for existing conditions (i.e. data was not
taken along reach lengths).
** Average Slope was taken along a reach length for existing conditions.
Morphological Characteristics of Bachelors Delight: BD-4Aa, BD-4Ab, BD-5A and Reference
Reach: Bachelors Delight: BD-4Aa, BD-4Ab, and 5A
County: Robeson County, NC
Design by: CLS
Checked by: RVS

ITEM Existing Conditions Existing Conditions Existing Conditions Reference Reach Proposed Conditions Proposed Conditions Proposed Conditions
LOCATION
BD-4Aa
BD-4Ab
BD-5A
BD-5 Zero Order Bachelors Delight: BD-
4Aa Bachelors Delight: BD-
4Ab
Bachelors Delight - BD-5a
STREAM TYPE Agricultural Field Agricultural Field Agricultural Field Zero Order Zero Order Zero Order HEADWATER CHANNEL
DRAINAGE AREA, Ac - Sq Mi 24.32 Ac 0.04 Sq Mi 7.68 Ac 0.01 Sq Mi 9.86 Ac 0.02 Sq Mi 20 Ac - 0.03 Sq Mi 24 Ac - 0.04 Sq Mi 8 Ac -10.01 Sq Mi 10 Ac -10.02 Sq Mi
BANKFULL DISCHARGE, cfs BD-5's remnant, realtively
( bit) z
BANKFULL X-SECTION AREA A ft
undisturbed zero order Existing ditch/channel to

b
fill
d t
i
ti
d Existing ditch/channel to

b
fill
d t
i
ti
d Existing ditch/channel to be

fill
d t
i
ti
d
t t

BANKFULL MEAN VELOCITY, fps channel is indicative of a e
e
o ex
s
ng groun
at low point of valley. e
e
o ex
s
ng groun
at low point of valley. e
o ex
s
ng groun
a
o
point of valley.
BANKFULL WIDTH (Wbkf), ft natural zero order stream.
VALLEY TOE OF SLOPE WIDTH 52.0 ft 30.0 ft 30.0 ft 30.0 ft
BANKFULL MEAN DEPTH (dbkf), ft
WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO (Wb,/dbl) Existing conditions are Existing conditions are Existing conditions are No meander pattern is to No meander pattern is to
DEPTH (d
BANKFULL MAX max), ft
BANK HEIGHT RATIO dominated by agricultural
fields with lateral drainage
ditches. Remnant dominated by agricultural
fields with lateral drainage
ditches. Remnant dominated by agricultural
fields with lateral drainage
ditches. Remnant

' be constructed for zero
order channel.
Restoration of the be constructed for zero
order channel.
Restoration of the No meander pattern is to be
constructed for zero order
channel. Restoration of the
TYPICAL BANK HEIGHT ABOVE BANKFULL channels or valleys have channels or valleys have channels or valleys have BD-5
s zero order valley
di
l
i
l
i
t floodplain's natural floodplain's natural floodplain's natural
WIDTH Flood-Prone Area
?fia), ft been plowed over through been plowed over through been plowed over through sp
ays var
ous
ow po
n
s
where saturation and
groundwater hydrology
groundwater hydrology
groundwater hydrology and

ENTRENCHMENT
(ER) years of agricultural
practices
essentially
Y years of agricultural
practices
essentially filling
p Y g years of agricultural
practices
essentially filling
Y g
overland flows have and surface water flows

i
t
i
t
d and surface water flows

i
t
i
t
d surface water flows (rain

t
i
t
d t
t
MEANDER
LENGTH (Lm),
( ), ft ,
filling in all low points. ,
in all low points. ,
in all low points. caused depressions, (ra
n even
s)
s expec
e
to create natural braided (ra
n even
s)
s expec
e
to create natural braided even
s)
s expec
e
o crea
e
natural braided low points
RATIO OF Lm TO Wb?t however, no discernable
h
l h
f
d t low points throughout the low points throughout the throughout the valley.

RADIUS OF CURVATURE, ft c
anne
as
orme
o
convey flow.
valley. Proposed valley
valley. Proposed valley
Proposed valley width was
RATIO OF Rc TO Wbkf width was determined
i
t
f th width was determined
i
t
f th determined using contours o
th
ll
fl
f
ll
i
dit
h
BELT WIDTH, ft us
ng con
ours o
e
valley floor following ditch us
ng con
ours o
e
valley floor following ditch e va
ey
oor
o
ow
ng
c
fill.
MEANDER WIDTH RATIO fill. fill.
SINUOSITY (K)
VALLEY SLOPE, ft/ft 7003 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.001
AVERAGE SLOPE (S), ft/ft
RIFFLE SLOPE, ft/ft
RATIO OF RIFFLE SLOPE TO AVERAGE
SLOPE
POOL SLOPE, ft/ft
RATIO OF POOL SLOPE TO AVERAGE SLOPE
MAX POOL DEPTH, ft
RATIO OF POOL DEPTH TO AVERAGE
BANKFULL DEPTH
POOL WIDTH, ft
RATIO OF POOL WIDTH TO BANKFULL
WIDTH
POOL TO POOL SPACING, ft
RATIO OF POOL TO POOL SPACING TO
BANKFULL WIDTH
Morphological Characteristics of Bachelors Delight: HM-1 and Reference
Reach: Bachelors Delight: HM-1
County: Onslow County, INC
Design by: CLS
Checked by: RVS

ITEM Existing Conditions Reference Reach Reference Reach Proposed Conditions Proposed Conditions
LOCATION
HM-1 BD-2 - Downstream of Soil
Road
BD-5 Zero Order Bachelors Delight: HM-1
Zero Order Channel Bachelors Delight: HM-1
Single Thread Channel
STREAM TYPE G5 - E5 E5 Zero Order Zero Order E5
DRAINAGE AREA, Ac - SgMi 62 Ac- 0.10 S Mi 83 Ac- 0.13S Mi 19.84S Mi 0.03S Mi 22 Ac-0.04S Mi 83 Ac- 0.13S Mi
BANKFULL DISCHARGE, cfs 2.2 cfs 1.0 cfs
BD-5's remnant
realtively 2.0 cfs
BANKFULL X-SECTION AREA (Abkf), ftZ 2.20 ft 2 2.6 ftZ ,
undisturbed zero order Existing ditch/channel to
b
fill
d t
i
ti
d 6.3 ft2
BANKFULL MEAN VELOCITY, fps 1.01 fps 0.4 fps channel is indicative of a e
e
o ex
s
ng groun
at low point of valley. 0.7 fps
BANKFULL WIDTH (Wbkf), ft 2.9 ft 4.1 ft natural zero order stream. 6.0 ft
VALLEY TOE OF SLOPE WIDTH NA NA 52.0 ft 30.0 ft NA
BANKFULL MEAN DEPTH (dbkf), ft 0.75 ft 0.63 ft 0.57 ft
WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO (Wbkddbkf) 3.9 6.5 No meander pattern is to 10.5
BANKFULL MAX DEPTH (dm_), ft 1.01 ft 0.88 ft be constructed for zero
order channel 0.86 ft

BANK HEIGHT RATIO
2.97
1.00 .
Restoration of the
1.00
TYPICAL BANK HEIGHT ABOVE BANKFULL 3.00 ft 0.88 ft s zero order valley
dis
la s
la
s various low
oints floodplain's natural 0.86 ft
WIDTH Flood-Prone Area W ft
( ?a),
7.5
ft
50.0
ft p
p
y
p
where saturation and groundwater hydrology
gro
30.00 ft
ENTRENCHMENT RATIO (ER) 2.57 12.2 overland flows have and surface water flows
i
t
i
t
d 5.0
MEANDER LENGTH (Lm), ft 12.6 - 12.6 ft caused depressions, n even
s)
s expec
e
(ra
to create natural braided 18.0 - 60.0 ft
RATIO OF Lm TO Wbkf Stream has been 3.1 - 3.1 however, no discernable
h
l h
f
d t low points throughout the 3.0 - 10.0

RADIUS OF CURVATURE, ft channelized and

t
i
ht
d th
h th
2.0 -
4.4 ft c
anne
as
orme
o
convey flow. valley. Proposed valle
Y
12.0 -
18.0 ft

RATIO OF Rc TO Wbkf s
ra
g
ene
roug
e
vall displaying no natural
Y
0.5 -
1.1 width was determined

i
t
f th
2.0 -
3.0

BELT WIDTH, ft .
meander pattern.
9.6 -
9.6 ft us
ng con
ours o
e
valley floor following ditch
10.1 -
34.4 ft
MEANDER WIDTH RATIO 2.3- 2.3 fill. 1.7 - 5.7
SINUOSITY (K) 1.02 1.25 1.26
VALLEY SLOPE, ft/ft 0.0039 ft/ft* 0.0027 ft/ft 0.002 ft/ft 0.0039 ft/ft 0.0039 ft/ft
AVERAGE SLOPE (S), ft/ft 0.0069 ft/ft** 0.0024 ft/ft 0.0019 ft/ft
RIFFLE SLOPE, ft/ft 0.0128 ft/ft 0.0136 ft/ft 0.0023 ft/ft
RATIO OF RIFFLE SLOPE TO AVERAGE
SLOPE
1.8
5.7
1.2
POOL SLOPE, ft/ft 0.0025 ft/ft 0.0010 ft/ft 0.0000 ft/ft
RATIO OF POOL SLOPE TO AVERAGE SLOPE 0.4 0.4 0.0
MAX POOL DEPTH, ft 1.34 ft 1.26 ft 1.14 ft
RATIO OF POOL DEPTH TO AVERAGE
BANKFULL DEPTH
1.8
2.0
2.0
POOL WIDTH, ft
5.0
ft
7.18
ft
6.60
ft
RATIO OF POOL WIDTH TO BANKFULL WIDTH
1.7
1.76
1.10
POOL TO POOL SPACING, ft 26.15 - 39.31 ft 3.3 -1 12.9 ft 6.0 - 30.0 ft
RATIO OF POOL TO POOL SPACING TO
BANKFULL WIDTH
8.96 -
13.46
0.8 J
3.2
1.0 -
5.0
* Valley Slope, and Sinuosity were taken from topographical data obtained on the entire site for existing conditions (i.e. data was not taken along reach lengths).
** Average Slope was taken along a reach length for existing conditions.
APPENDIX F.
HISTORIC AERIAL PHOTGRAPHY

2,N?'' fs ?'Fi4r
' 4 i?t? wd •` 11
? Ik?t ?. r
iF, 11 jl I FY'at: .
??. ?. ? .s v1f'F H

iy
? f I
Sa ti3
c
A '
1
fT?'a

jF

y V,
Ma• r ,
r F y
i7

*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 1938 Onslow County Aerial
SCALE 1" =1600'
? ? ?t,x •1", rF!?,r(,
1F i. t ?e ? a r Jrhh4,•?? , t„ ?. t r - ?. • 7
7"?!t''! `?d? • ? t?.a `w?9+'u?" ti r - ? ? r%* i -tr,. ` {r !3+ a 4 ! * "'a1 "' +1 f T
''? xe?,+r??? ?v wy ?i?r.} 1 n t` >.? ( K ? - ? •, *? r n id..? t ° 1 4 e I r 1 i ? ': f! ? i'
? .•? h ? nom... ?^" t r.. ;4 .1 '„e? eZe ? r? . ' , .t,.
r it ,e e- .++ ?f L y i ',•? it +•
1?k• r t.•, 5„ .F ? to :? '` t ?.` { ?{ , i ! : {
ti
?. ?, is f ?,, "? t"vii i• { 6 1 ?1 'rr?r91 iyr 'r
yYt )k° kkjr kiy i 4r1 rf 9 t t 't8y 1 4 w :t ? t ,
AF ?? I 1? 1 ! a? it ! 4 C r r?7 ??r r?
r
F3. a
Y4 ^ j
A,?i ?i • Fri a? i"" s ?r ^, .? «?it? '?,bt'd?? P ¢ ????„??
?!i G f .? i { d ,? e. t ! 7 i ? ?' • ? .f . ' ? 4' =?''.? fY?p"v B ?'?aai ?'1 u ? a }
M . 5? Lr P 'n ? r ? aR' r .L G (( 3+? .
I "
? ? I Vli ?Y 5 ';irn? /
.. ?? I I } r i 1•. A.?? tl.?t ?. , jP ' do f?N ^" '.
y 8 li % ,F r. A + 4 r s4 r?
y d ?.
Ill T
4_I r •
A ?
z 2 a
v
a 1.
i
.. ?f l
?-r
f 1 1. 3
?' . r nV
Q?
r ?? ?;; I A F .) L, 4 :•f ? ? a?, r ` ;, - ,?,r. ?, ?1 ? S ':.nl?rr„
Y + t «
4, A
' ! rc? rrg
c r
`y s? n d2
r
F' ..F r ??., r?lC ?1f\`Tn?I p? S? f ?t v 4a n ;lf K.• H..
Ip ?! f `' 1 day t k+,,
IMP
It? 7 ? jr-.a19 ra,
. r •+aC r esJlf .,... A ?? r l[`.F .%'i t +4., ??? .?l ?ILL+- a: ?? 1f l ?! -? 9 ff f ?fi ? ?I j ?;
_I' ? • , IJ ? .- .. i f ? tr y p'v' ? ;t iN.
r8{
}i fi 1' .? it i' ( .iv ' 1 +° ", " If ••I /1':J.
! o C 1 y . ?. It
.,p• fir' }r M. ?` rC i':,: n'? •i r•?,,fr, .r/ t' ,.f if 1
r 1
4 , r.2?' trt ( Y' { ',(} ',r rI *?:
it ?, (( tln ! 4 '--.'r 'I•,. ;r
`. ? 4 7n v t r. W'.' Yn r r
r(?4
.3 1 , f r Y' (:. r ,r, jt t J / ryi}A? ??! 1
<t4 ii461 .n '1i z?° r ttt f.-?i?r/a ,YrA•f '"'?J, ?' - f`
:nr7 .? 4a n +-•"e.'1. '>.w'f :tJ, i., r'r' '1!: }/?{f
fY+ ld' d. •.jr, 'u,i' • N '4: a . r N
f n {"' i,?r yJ .a` vl• q' rrr. IT
'f U r ',:? 1N a' P i br S4' n .?(.,Y .at'
AJI,
?1 Y. ? ti '?. Ci ^Y "" W:;w d n ra.; ? a? r'w i.f i'° ? :-r ,•.r Y i. rj ^' n?' ? ? y r'f 1?.+? klF .,y r'.4 ? : Aa1k i P ,"" jY t ? i? . ,d .S' 4 w• lar 4 ;.Lt (1 S, r 1 ,?
r ej?.f -',? r ? •.• X }? F ?F J.. C' f ?, j: a)•jfr L FT _.. '(%i ? i •a 1 .rYr? 'r r iF.
:X a Ir rt . 1 •4?
'?. d' r ?"• 1 ..i + .l'n. }t r c.4?? ,+' ^ fi i F'y P r •4 '
Wi• ?::? 1;'• ? !' t r? '' ?J ? ,i ?l 1} ? ? r1 ?? 1' 'r 1?Y ? ? Y,? {J ra 47 ;I "' 9".,
"• d .r f +t ;'?' '?i:raY.,,? 4''! v .-c q"? '1%e i .i(. f fy},? y
,? ,?7i' 7 ? 'y • jV t?_ ? ? •"r? q,? ?.,?I>. t1? ? t N? ? tw4r? • F ?r '?'Y. ;f
w r' ? r
4'1 r'? e• ? 1? +,.y•r t ?M. r?, '.', y at J?1?15.;1%.' I ?,. inF4#'ti !r # ? :. 11 'C.!?. t { ???.rc ?t ?2{f ?'' c'YR1? _" f?.,,t1. , ?{'4.w' a`+ ?%tf
4• ? ??.,`?yN""+ ?. "I";{''' ? #??'?*("?[( a'?.y 'I'?,." 41,fwu!. i F?flf?.?? "°?•'" ??r ' u9,4uvY?? , rF- '4f ?'?t? `•?f ??', r? 1•t{'r, -
+ V.. . ?.. ,I !... W. 4tf f AZk ?':.' .r. a. ??r?; t"?,?? t?1,:k- ?t,?"'?+l. i« ?" *° ...... .. ?` w All
?• ?`r f ? . N CY ? .b Fr .?3 ?..: 6rir#tv lt...?r ' .rs P?
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 1949 Onslow County Aerial
SCALE 1" =1600'

1
>` 1 e J - s ? r r x
u F
ty yS,? rr?-
ri?. r 1 ;X? ti
G SQ A •'4 4y, I
.56
HS
I SA
1 } ! ?, air ? rhd, ? fP
n ?t r r?'kt
1 ?yiy b G
??u M rr R? - Z0 d? " ` 1{t4- ??
??''•? ( -, 4 ? , E A
A ?Q f ? J Y ?1 b"
? r ! 1
?_•fE l - f 1 tl1^
iili F + . >i??? ? Y ? r I J +s+ 1'?'t4 •'„?•?' P i?,'`.?c.', ? M-
,yv t '
-.} 18A
1, ?d
t:'r ti',''?, ? ?' ` ?r? ?7vY``f .y r r ? ?`p;!w'F yJ?t4 ?? F r;'A'r.
.w s V f s ?3 .' iar i r+ h,i
'? ?'f u x 1 ci k ?. ??al+}". y
I < ? Is .. l4? _ ? ? ,. r,?L ^??"yt ,,.n ' ??? •' - w ik +j?'?i njss???»k
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank ?LMG
Onslow County, NC
*Boundaries are approximate and are 01-09-168
www
not meant to be absolute. .LMGroup.net
December 2009 Phone: [phone].LMG.1078
Map Source: 1960 Onslow County Aerial Fax: [phone]
P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402
1960 Aerial
SCALE 1" =1600'
• Y
x?
A.IK
? k
r? ? y
N-1 Ask
! 1
' r
r
f
? k3;,
1
41
I?' y :'?;?'?•i •r r=' ..7.11 ,.? ? ? ? ? • ,:
., you ? F{ '4 .??*p • ?ti '7e
Y ?Irr.. ?,yv,h J?. V ? ' i YI?JY / 'C `+ -1'•?c1 ?k i
?. ?. ? ? ?{'?,? ' ?_ f..'. .,?. `y Yid ?`!_ /. ,. ,•,?.L;._
9 ` 4 •'? N
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 1970 Onslow County Aerial
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank 1LMG
Onslow County, NC
01-09-168
www.LMGroup.net 1970 Aerial
December 2009 Phone: [phone].LMG.1078
Fax: [phone]
P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402
( 47P dw7
1lS
a
;;rZ
tit{ L
1
.:• k C J
,u
SCALE 1" =1600'

• t

,
•-r ?y i ? 4
..+.1 y1+? - Y It`? S +?!`r$ - .. ? .? km? ??_ }l, _ '1'li ? r ?_ ?? ,?C q.••6+?"?
d
_., r .l
l
?
y
'
?
•
?
.
'
'
,
"
`
?
's
y_ `V• n
-.
, .l
C ,i.., .--
T
;
? l 1't'
f
•'5i.•
?",
:v
?Ir; !
•\
'1, _
?.. '??l-. ?C'?.yl::` r ;•??i? ?i.' = ., ' L ''?. r e ,t.; ?? ? y:,r, •?.... '.i: y ,r•* ,y a
•r. ?T ,-a ? ` .r. 3n ? p(V,. k '? .. . ,'"? + 7 ?, . ! "? _ - v '..'?r 4r ? r" ?.? F,.
?? ?• A-•:';•1 +" \:..:?>7»' ,I fr ?hl _ _ _ "_?.. i,p`r i.t - i3? it `f?' ?. ?7.+ _ _ _

?Y
?F
K ?
J
_:
,.
"'1-`
-
t
l-
- r ;?i
'?
?1
~L - r r'
d:'
'
?
?
se
,
??
,
v
?
?
?
,
. ,
,?
}r ?
.aF
11
A I
, t?,
+
. A"
F1?u? r;?
~ ? .?. .. r_.++w-
t n .'+'.?" . .. ; _: tti. ,. 4'R?: i;': , .)l`?lrS„ ' ?r3 •j .'>n•,r •l?. tp'
t T -a
, ?A ?' - _ ? •N, P'y?a . { 1„? ,??. ?t,r _ 1 IP s??S'yµ rra ? ? i}?ih K ??•s M1??'t?,r rry .
Ark,-r. _Y -?.j , ?<+. .:di. fit, l: '.? 1 r,•,:. _ C xl t ?' t w z ;? - ; ? - -
,hI ,i..: .r??. .1•. ,d ?.'1 ft _ w - ',
?, ?}
`r. ?
?
t
? _
, ?
: yr ?
_
r
we.?-- 1 ,??' +yr: ?' c.. i`• r '' -
`tl7?t _d
1
`' r ? T v`a}"i-' -..
?,
,
,
J?
c•t.i ?,? /'. i.l '{'t\
?• i?. -
._ _ L .u6 -171C' -y'? ?
`'
4?? ' \ t
?'t
!' •
9
?
Y
s
2
.
_ _
1,,•9 ?
•/I'. ? f '7?
,_ - , ?7. L• -? ?;.'' "Iti`y ! > '-.k. K"L t k - .
' 'M -
+ .0•'4+, _ -
• ' / I j' . i`. ?? ' • 1'i A . ,.'?!•'x '. k ?y,.' ,?r. t??`'r-'?T '?V. - t ,fir ,?}y? ?; a it Mir i s J,ti
W'_
0-w
,r* '? r' ?. `'r fit :,?! ,• J F .,? k:,. .„ 4,'' I rr'•. ' r . F:t ?< '`" .r. '? ?.`?^??ay? s a St ?,?'? :
r trt!!. d ' *^ i 1. ,4 w .r ., _ _ 1 `'??? b _irf' ,i ?.. it' _. ?.,7c. ?k'Rti ~ ; + •,Y d
`-k •h?. .'a _ t .'(, t.. `r` !. ?}? "'..,{?.nw'Y;^b, ti.. j -.1•. ... ,. , Y; .? six :•a„? v:`
J`? ,a *? + t ` r ti .? w• 4q: \ ?? tit ' +
,? ?_ w+a `?? -,'.:? '`? ? `It 4* fit' y1i, ? v.r??fc7.h3?? ?, vt?'_ '? 7`,''' ?'s ?'., ?•
?
1
x
?? '
r.' ; `t'c{ ?` t 4• ?3.L ,, tears 1 4+?
f ,=,u
?• '
rr,Pyy: 4 v4?
`•^..n S "
L.,. ?
t f?
...
?? J Z
'
^
'
?
?
r
•
\-
.
.,
?
?rL?`
1
•
•
)._ .. y,. ` ,,..
4a"1,:iMQ' AMt" \.'
''u,1.4 _
71-
+? ?? '9 `F? ''?? ?1 ,,.,V,:?,, r t ? ti N ,' ?c, r,?..? ! •r ' , t r '?, - \ j,, ?

A•
C
n
1'I Fr,
1 a .fi li I y
y ,
F
'
`
?
.
.
v
r f:i!
1? • ?i ,,jyI y v.r _
r
r
.
1y'%?
F

\ y}? y dr i7 • i>
' .. ? tl 1 r 3
?
T _ /7V
ft
17 Ak ; ?N ,.?.li' ... .• !1? •? ? ai Rf?i • f I .?. ? r N
'v" a i4 r mar{t ti,: 4"
• ty?
? '.
•: Fr
'' " ;L 4{
'
+
.rte T7!
"f
?tb?'rt''b'? K • ?.r?. i? ;,?? f "l"f ,r3i'raFl,? ?" 1`? {?,? . ? ,1{, ti r r ' ??'?'+
4
L: .C
,, ' ? t
K b
?„
.?
rG R•
^ ?
? ?M14
r
'
?
?

i,,
?
? 4
,
.r,
?,
'I
1>? . .?-
_
1
:1 ]
4r `•
L r' 1"
J ? •?? ,- ',a`:;'r:' '' !'•3'; •?#: .,. ? , •y^ e?:q.' .:r.:4't • l?` r? '.t F ?"-'?`?:._',"?r,?,• -:i+ _ _. ? ?j, ,,?,? s'
.2 nr II
ll F
A
?-?' _
?
?
_
s
LI,
f
`
??, x?
r/ - '-' 'I
?y,? ?,,i• ''
Y .'{q pw fw ''id

Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
Onslow County, NC 1LMG
*Boundaries are approximate and are 01-09-168 -
www.LMGroup.net
2001 Aerial
not meant to be absolute. December 2009 Phone: [phone] r1.866.LMG.1078
Map Source: 2001 Onslow County Aerial Fax: [phone]
P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402 SCALE 1" -1600'
APPENDIX G.
STREAM BUFFER EFFECTIVENESS
CORRECTION FACTOR (SBCF) MAPS

i
Wet Ford
- -------------- ---
,s

Wet Ford
Fes` `

10W --

- - - - - - - - - - - -
--- - ----

Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project)
Property Boundary
Reach HeWttts Branch (HE-1)
Existing Roads Design Length 5,103 If - - -
Stream Restoration (-9,679 If) Section
' North Side Average Buffer BCF Multiplier South Side Average Buffer BCF Multiplier Total Credits
1 (0-500
) 400 1.13 262 1.13 565
2 (500'- 1.000) 267 1.13 199 1.13 565 'tea ,. v
Stream Enhancement (^'5,928 If) 3 (1,000'- 1,500') 186 1.13 199 1.13 565
4(1,500-2,000') _ 306 1.13 1 161 1_ 1.13 565
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 If) 5 (2,000'- 2,500') 284 1.13 137 1.1 558
6 (2,500'- 3,000) 189 1.13 159 1.13 565
Stream Preservation (-11,400 If) 7 (3.000'-3,500')
'
' 197 1.13 198 1,13 565
8(3,506
-4,000
) 197 1.13 197 1.13 565
9 (4,000

'- 4,500')

178

1.13

174

1
.13
565
Slreom 0erlan
e
parian Wetland Restoration (-60 ac.)
Ri

`
------ 10 (4,500.5,000') 175 1.13 182 1.13 565

.
Hutch
son
KolFlorenae L Hutcheson
11 (5,000'- 5,103) 160 1.13 192 1.13 116 ! 5121 Krgdom way, suite 100
Wetland Enhancement (-28 ac.) r' Ra1elgh, NC 29609
TOTAL 5,759 919-851-6x66

Riparian Wetland Preservation (-48 ac.)
B
P`°'e
h
l
D
li
htS -

° Rev

1iao0
11
12010 9/1
/10
?
L?'?1G ac
e
ors
e
g
wamp 5
6
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Stream Buffer SBCF 35 ac. ?"? scale '°b"umber
1"=200' 01
09
168
Title: -
-
0 50 100 200 400 Post Office Box 2522 HEA (Downstream) Drawn By: Sheet Number
Upland Buffer (-94 ac.) Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 SBCF Sections1-6 CBM
Figure 1
Telephone: [phone] .
_:1WETLANDS@009 WETLANDS FILES101-09-168 -- Onslow 19 Batchelors, DowneylACADlOctober 20101AppG-SBCFLayouts-Oct2010.dwg
M
N
1
Wet Ford
Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project)
Property Boundary
Reach Hewitts Branch (HE-1)
Existing Roads Design Length 5,10311
Stream Restoration (9,679 ID Section North Side Average Buffer BCF Multiplier south
1 (0-500') 400 1.13
Stream Enhancement (5
928 If) 2 (5°0.1.600')
' 267 1.13
, 3 (1,000
-1.500') 186 1.13
4 (1.500 -2.0(
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 If) 5 (2000 -2.5(
6 (2500' - 3.0(
Stream Preservation (-11,400 ID 7 (3,000'- 3-5(
8 (3,500' - 4.0(

Riparian Wetland Restoration (-60 ac.) 9 (4.000' - 4,5(
10 (4,560.5,0

- 11 (5.000-- 5.1
Wetland Enhancement (-28 ac.)
Riparian Wetland Preservation (-48 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)(35 ac.) I?
Upland Buffer (-94 ac.)
.:1WETLANDS12009 WETLANDS FILES101-09-188 -- Onslow 19 Batchelots, Downey\ACADIOctober 2010tAppG-SBCFLayouts-01
60
1.13
ro
?J

Side Average Buffer BCF Multiplier Total Credits
262 1.13 565
199 1.13 565
199 1.13 565
_
161 1.13 565
137 1.1 558
159 1.13 565
198 1.13 565
197 1.13 565
174 1.13 565 Stream Design Provided by:
182 113 565 Ko/Flcrence L Hutcheson
192 1.13 116 5121 Kngdom Way, Suite loo
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-851-6066
TOTAL 5,759
Project: Dale: Revision Date:

LMG
4
1/5(20 10
Bachelors
l
an
9/15110

- and
Wetl
d Mitigation Bank
Stream
l ANnvasm:FMI11 cR'I
P
. Scale: Job Number:
- -'..:.,, ..:,.
r,,.,..^.e, 1..=200' 01-09-166
Title:
0 50 100 200 400 Post Office Box 2522 HEA(Upstream) Dmvm By Sheet Number
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 SBCF Sections 7-11 CBM
Fi
ure 2
Telephone: [phone] g
.

1 1
1 11 1 1 1 1 11
11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
wl 1 1 1 1
1 1 a?1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! ?` 1
1 1, 11 1 1. 1. 1 11 1 ? 1 1 s? ?; ?? 11
1
1
1
1 1
`''°
CC 1 1 ,
1 1 1
1 1
1
L
1 ?1 1
1
1 1
1 1 1
1
1 1_. ?.Ot1 1 1 1
1 ,? 1 ; 1 1
1 1 1
1
1 1
11 1 1
1 1 1 1 1

, ? 1 1 1 1 1

1
1 1 1 11 1
1
1 1 1
1

1 1
•
•
?. 1 ..
.
... ......
Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Com plete Project) 1
1 1 .
Property Boundary

Existing Roads
Reach Huffm a ns Branch (HU-1)
Stream Restoration (-9,679 If) Design (Length 3,445 If
Stream Enhancement (5,928 If) Section East Side Average Buffer BCF Multiplier West Side Average Buffer BCF Multiplier Total Credits
1 (0 -172) 159 1.13 112 1.1 189
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 ID 2 (172'- 672) 179 1.13 183 1.13 565
3 (672'- 1. 172') 194 1.13 297 1.13 565
Stream Preservation (11,400 If) 1 4 (1,172 1.672) 180 1.13 300 1.13 565
5 (1,672'- 2,172) 166 1.13 225 1.13 558
Riparian Wetland Restoration (-60 ac.) ---------- 6 (2,172' 2,672') 167 1.13 177 1.13 565
7(2,672'-3,172) 171 1.13 162 1.13 565 Stream Design Provided by.
IrTJT _
Wetland Enhancement (28 ac.) J 8 { 3,172'- 3,445') 173 1.13 124 1.1 304 Ke/fierenee S Hutcheson
5121 Kngdom Wag Salle 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Riparian Wetland Preservation (-48 ac.) ® TOTAL 3,676 919-1551-6966
Project: Date: Revision Dale:
LMG answamp vW2o,o
Bachelors 9/15110
Stream (SBCF)(
u?rNPxl
I aNn p+e+? Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
. Srele: Job Number
Title: 1'=200' 01-09-166
Upland Buffer (-94 ac.) 0 50 100 200 400 Post Office Box 2522 HU-1SBCFSections l-8 Dram By: Sheet Number
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 CBM Figure 3

Telephone: [phone] .
L:IWETLANDS12009 WETLANDS FILES101-09-188 -- Onslow 19 Batchelors, Downey\ACAD1October 20101AppG-SBCFLayouts-0d2010.dwg
.f?`. ?
- - Wet Ford

Legend (NOTE: Acreage And Distances Provided Are For Complete Project)
Property Boundary
Existing Roads
Stream Restoration (9,679 If)
Stream Enhancement (-5,928 If)
Zero Order Restoration (7,082 If) Reach
Design Length
Stream Preservation (-11,400 If) Section
1 (0-500.)
Riparian Wetland Restoration (-60 ac.) Y 2 (500 -1,000")
3 {1,000' -1.131
Wetland Enhancement (-28 ac.) ' "
Riparian Wetland Preservation (-48 ac.)
Stream Buffer (SBCF)(-35 ac.)
Upland Buffer (-94 ac.)
_:1WETLANDS@009 WETLANDS FILES101-09-168 -- Onslow 19 Batchelors, DoxneylACADIOctober 20101AppG-SBCFLayouts-Oct201(
Half Moon Swamp (HNC-1)
1,131 If
East Side Average Buffer
227
183
160
_ -1
27
_ -ten,
BCF Multiplier West Side Average Buffer BCF Multip
1.13 230 1.13
1.13 176 1.13
1.13 J 167 1.13
TOTAL
0 50 100 200 400
r Total Credits
565
565
148
1,278
LMG
l 1 AI AnIiPost Office Box 2522
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
Telephone: [phone]
d: Dale.
Bachelors Delight Swamp 1/512010
m and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Boale:
1"= 200'
HM-1 SBCF Sections 1-3 I Drawn By:
CBM
Stream Design Provke0 or.
Ko/Florence 8 Hutcheson
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
919851-6066
Revision Date:
9115/10
Job Number
01-09-168
Sheet Number
Figure 4.
APPENDIX H.
NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORMS
NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 3.0
c:aicuiator version ;s.u
Wetland Site Name Bachelor's Delight - BD7 Date 6/2/10
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization CN,DB / LMG
Level III Ecoregion Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain Nearest Named Water Body Bachelors Delight Swamp
River Basin White Oak USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03030001
M Yes Fl No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Lonaitude (deci-dearees) 34.85371 / -77.44935
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note below if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in recent past
(for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ? Yes ® No
Describe effects of stressors that are present.
Regulatory Considerations
Select all that apply to the assessment area.
? Anadromous fish
? Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
? NCDWQ riparian buffer rule in effect
? Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
? Publicly owned property
? N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
? Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
? Designated NCNHP reference community
® Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (Check all that apply)
® Blackwater
? Brownwater
? Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ? Lunar ? Wind ? Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ? Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ? Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition -assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in
the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the
assessment area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
®A ®A Not severely altered
?B ?B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
less diversity [if appropriate], artificial hydrologic alteration)
Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration - assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub-surface storage capacity and duration
(Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of ditching guidance for North Carolina
hydric soils (see USACE Wilmington District website) for the zone of influence of ditches in hydric soils. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered
to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding
regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
?B ?B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
?C ?C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
Water Storage/Surface Relief- assessment area/wetland type condition metric
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
?A ?A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
®B ®B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
?C ?C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
?D ?D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
?A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
®B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
?C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot
4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
?A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoxymorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
?C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoxymorphic features
?D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
?E Histosol or histic epipedon
?A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
®B Soil ribbon ? 1 inch
?A No peat or muck presence
®B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub-surface pollutants or discharges (Sub)
Examples of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
?B ?B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
?C ?C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
Land Use - opportunity metric
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
drainin g to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment
area (5M), and within 2 mi les and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
?A ?A ?A > 10% impervious surfaces
®B ®B ?B < 10% impervious surfaces
?C ?C ?C Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
?D ?D ?D ? 20% coverage of pasture
?E ?E ®E ? 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
?F ?F ?F ? 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
?G ?G ?G ? 20% coverage of silvicultural land characterized by a clear-cut < 5 years old
?H ?H ?H Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
that prevent drainage or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer -assessment area condition metric
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes ?No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? Descriptor E should be selected if ditches effectively bypass the buffer.
®A ? 50 feet
?B From 30 to < 50 feet
?C From 15 to < 30 feet
?D From 5 to < 15 feet
?E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
?<_ 15-feet wide ®> 15-feet wide ? Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
®Yes ?No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
? Exposed - adjacent open water with width ? 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area -wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the appropriate width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT)
and the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
®A ®A 100 feet
?B ?B From 80 to < 100 feet
?C ?C From 50 to < 80 feet
?D ?D From 40 to < 50 feet
?E ?E From 30 to < 40 feet
?F ?F From 15 to < 30 feet
?G ?G From 5 to < 15 feet
?H ?H < 5 feet
9. Inundation Duration - assessment area condition metric
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
?A Evidence of short-duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
?B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
®C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition - assessment area condition metric
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
?B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
?C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
?A ?A ®A ? 500 acres
?B ?B ?B From 100 to < 500 acres
®C ?C ?C From 50 to < 100 acres
?D ?D ?D From 25 to < 50 acres
?E ?E ?E From 10 to < 25 acres
?F ?F ?F From 5 to < 10 acres
?G ?G ?G From 1 to < 5 acres
?H ?H ?H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
?I ?I ?I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
?J ?J ?J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
?K ?K ?K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness - wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
?A Pocosin is the full extent (? 90%) of its natural landscape size.
?B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas - landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, urban landscapes, maintained
fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet wide.
Well Loosely
®A ?A ? 500 acres
?B ?B From 100 to < 500 acres
?C ?C From 50 to < 100 acres
?D ?D From 10 to < 50 acres
? E ? E < 10 acres
?F ?F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
?Yes ?No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect - wetland type condition metric
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
permanent features such as fields, development, two-lane or larger roads (? 40 feet wide), utility line corridors wider than a two-lane road,
and clear-cuts < 10 years old. Consider the eight main points of the compass.
®A No artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
?B No artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
?C An artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) directions or assessment area is clear-cut
15. Vegetative Composition - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
®A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
?B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
?C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected strata are unnaturally absent or dominated by exotic
species or composed of planted stands of non-characteristic species or inappropriately composed of a single species.
16. Vegetative Diversity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
?A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
?B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
?C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).
17. Vegetative Structure - assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ?No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
?A ? 25% coverage of vegetation
?B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
®A ®A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
?B ?B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
?C ?C Canopy sparse or absent
®A ®A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
?B ?B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
?C ?C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
?A ?A Dense shrub layer
®B ®B Moderate density shrub layer
?C ?C Shrub layer sparse or absent
?A ?A Dense herb layer
®B ®B Moderate density herb layer
?C ?C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags - wetland type condition metric
®A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
?B NotA
19. Diameter Class Distribution - wetland type condition metric
®A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
?B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
?C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris - wetland type condition metric
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
®A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
?B NotA
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion - wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
22. Hydrologic Connectivity- assessment area condition metric
Evaluate for riverine wetlands only. Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill,
sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
?B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
?C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
?D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Channel anastomosed. Dry conditions at time of observation.
NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 3.0
Rating Calculator Version 3.0
Wetland Site Name Bachelor's Delight - BD7 Date of Assessment 6/2/10
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization CN,DB / LMG
Presence of stressor affecting assessment area (Y/N) NO
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Ratina Summar
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM
Sub-surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Particulate Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Soluble Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Physical Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure Condition HIGH
Veqetation Composition Condition HIGH
Function Ratina Summar
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Habitat Condition HIGH
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH
NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 3.0
c:aicuiator version ;s.u
Wetland Site Name BDMB - NCSU Block Date 6/2/10
Wetland Type Pine Flat Assessor Name/Organization CN,DB - LMG
Level III Ecoregion Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain Nearest Named Water Body Huff mans Branch
River Basin White Oak USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03030001
M Yes Fl No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Lonaitude (deci-dearees) 34.86681 / -77.45574
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note below if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in recent past
(for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ? Yes ® No
Describe effects of stressors that are present.
Roadside ditches may be affecting hydrology near the roads (outside edges of forest block). Bedding for silviculture has altered the ground
surface but not severely.
Regulatory Considerations
Select all that apply to the assessment area.
? Anadromous fish
? Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
? NCDWQ riparian buffer rule in effect
? Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
? Publicly owned property
? N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
? Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
? Designated NCNHP reference community
? Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (Check all that apply)
? Blackwater
? Brownwater
? Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ? Lunar ? Wind ? Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ? Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ? Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition -assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in
the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the
assessment area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
®A ®A Not severely altered
?B ?B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
less diversity [if appropriate], artificial hydrologic alteration)
Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration - assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub-surface storage capacity and duration
(Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of ditching guidance for North Carolina
hydric soils (see USACE Wilmington District website) for the zone of influence of ditches in hydric soils. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered
to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding
regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
®A ?A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
?B ®B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
?C ?C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
Water Storage/Surface Relief- assessment area/wetland type condition metric
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
?A ?A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
?B ?B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
®C ®C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
?D ?D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
?A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
?B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot
4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
®A Sandy soil
?B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoxymorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
?C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoxymorphic features
?D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
?E Histosol or histic epipedon
®A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
?B Soil ribbon ? 1 inch
®A No peat or muck presence
?B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub-surface pollutants or discharges (Sub)
Examples of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
?B ?B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
?C ?C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
Land Use - opportunity metric
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
drainin g to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment
area (5M), and within 2 mi les and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
?A ?A ?A > 10% impervious surfaces
®B ®B ®B < 10% impervious surfaces
?C ?C ?C Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
?D ?D ?D ? 20% coverage of pasture
?E ?E ?E ? 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
?F ?F ?F ? 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
?G ?G ?G ? 20% coverage of silvicultural land characterized by a clear-cut < 5 years old
?H ?H ?H Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
that prevent drainage or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer -assessment area condition metric
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
?Yes ®No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? Descriptor E should be selected if ditches effectively bypass the buffer.
?A ? 50 feet
?B From 30 to < 50 feet
?C From 15 to < 30 feet
?D From 5 to < 15 feet
?E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
?<_ 15-feet wide ?> 15-feet wide ? Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
?Yes ?No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
?Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
? Exposed - adjacent open water with width ? 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area -wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the appropriate width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT)
and the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
®A ®A 100 feet
?B ?B From 80 to < 100 feet
?C ?C From 50 to < 80 feet
?D ?D From 40 to < 50 feet
?E ?E From 30 to < 40 feet
?F ?F From 15 to < 30 feet
?G ?G From 5 to < 15 feet
?H ?H < 5 feet
9. Inundation Duration - assessment area condition metric
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
®A Evidence of short-duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
?B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
?C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition - assessment area condition metric
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
?B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
?C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
?A ?A ®A ? 500 acres
®B ?B ?B From 100 to < 500 acres
?C ?C ?C From 50 to < 100 acres
?D ?D ?D From 25 to < 50 acres
?E ?E ?E From 10 to < 25 acres
?F ?F ?F From 5 to < 10 acres
?G ?G ?G From 1 to < 5 acres
?H ?H ?H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
?I ?I ?I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
?J ?J ?J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
?K ?K ?K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness - wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
?A Pocosin is the full extent (? 90%) of its natural landscape size.
?B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas - landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, urban landscapes, maintained
fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet wide.
Well Loosely
®A ?A ? 500 acres
?B ?B From 100 to < 500 acres
?C ?C From 50 to < 100 acres
?D ?D From 10 to < 50 acres
? E ? E < 10 acres
?F ?F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
?Yes ?No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect - wetland type condition metric
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
permanent features such as fields, development, two-lane or larger roads (? 40 feet wide), utility line corridors wider than a two-lane road,
and clear-cuts < 10 years old. Consider the eight main points of the compass.
®A No artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
?B No artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
?C An artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) directions or assessment area is clear-cut
15. Vegetative Composition - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
?A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
?B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
?C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected strata are unnaturally absent or dominated by exotic
species or composed of planted stands of non-characteristic species or inappropriately composed of a single species.
16. Vegetative Diversity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
?A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
?B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
?C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).
17. Vegetative Structure - assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ?No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
?A ? 25% coverage of vegetation
?B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
?A ?A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
?B ?B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
?A ?A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
®B ®B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
?C ?C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
®A ®A Dense shrub layer
?B ?B Moderate density shrub layer
?C ?C Shrub layer sparse or absent
?A ?A Dense herb layer
®B ®B Moderate density herb layer
?C ?C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags - wetland type condition metric
?A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
19. Diameter Class Distribution - wetland type condition metric
?A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
?B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
®C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris - wetland type condition metric
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
?A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion - wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
22. Hydrologic Connectivity- assessment area condition metric
Evaluate for riverine wetlands only. Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill,
sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision.
?A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
?B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
?C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
?D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Dry conditions at time of observation.
NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 3.0
Rating Calculator Version 3.0
Wetland Site Name
Wetland Type
BDMB - NCSU Block Date of Assessment 6/2/10
Pine Flat Assessor Name/Organization CN,DB - LMG
Presence of stressor affecting assessment area (Y/N) YES
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Ratina Summar
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition HIGH
Sub-surface Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Particulate Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Soluble Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Physical Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Pollution Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition HIGH
Veqetation Composition Condition NA
Function Ratina Summar
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition HIGH
Water Quality Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Habitat Condition MEDIUM
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH
NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 3.0
c:aicuiator version ;s.u
Wetland Site Name BDMB- HU1A- Zero Order Date 6/2/10
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Corey Novak - LMG
Level III Ecoregion Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain Nearest Named Water Body Huff mans Branch
River Basin White Oak USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03030001
M Yes Fl No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Lonaitude (deci-dearees) 34.86371 / -77.45233
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note below if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in recent past
(for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ? Yes ® No
Describe effects of stressors that are present.
Roadside ditches may be affecting hydrology near road.
Regulatory Considerations
Select all that apply to the assessment area.
? Anadromous fish
? Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
? NCDWQ riparian buffer rule in effect
? Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
? Publicly owned property
? N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
? Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
? Designated NCNHP reference community
® Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (Check all that apply)
® Blackwater
? Brownwater
? Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ? Lunar ? Wind ? Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ? Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ? Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition -assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in
the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the
assessment area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
®A ®A Not severely altered
?B ?B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
less diversity [if appropriate], artificial hydrologic alteration)
Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration - assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub-surface storage capacity and duration
(Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of ditching guidance for North Carolina
hydric soils (see USACE Wilmington District website) for the zone of influence of ditches in hydric soils. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered
to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding
regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
?A ?A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
®B ®B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
?C ?C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
Water Storage/Surface Relief- assessment area/wetland type condition metric
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
?A ?A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
®B ®B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
?C ?C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
?D ?D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
?A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
?B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot
4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
?A Sandy soil
?B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoxymorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
®C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoxymorphic features
?D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
?E Histosol or histic epipedon
?A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
®B Soil ribbon ? 1 inch
®A No peat or muck presence
?B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub-surface pollutants or discharges (Sub)
Examples of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
?B ?B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
?C ?C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
Land Use - opportunity metric
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
drainin g to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment
area (5M), and within 2 mi les and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
?A ?A ?A > 10% impervious surfaces
®B ®B ®B < 10% impervious surfaces
?C ?C ?C Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
?D ?D ?D ? 20% coverage of pasture
?E ?E ?E ? 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
?F ?F ?F ? 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
?G ?G ?G ? 20% coverage of silvicultural land characterized by a clear-cut < 5 years old
?H ?H ?H Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
that prevent drainage or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer -assessment area condition metric
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
?Yes ®No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? Descriptor E should be selected if ditches effectively bypass the buffer.
?A ? 50 feet
?B From 30 to < 50 feet
?C From 15 to < 30 feet
?D From 5 to < 15 feet
?E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
?<_ 15-feet wide ?> 15-feet wide ? Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
?Yes ?No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
?Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
? Exposed - adjacent open water with width ? 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area -wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the appropriate width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT)
and the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
®A ®A 100 feet
?B ?B From 80 to < 100 feet
?C ?C From 50 to < 80 feet
?D ?D From 40 to < 50 feet
?E ?E From 30 to < 40 feet
?F ?F From 15 to < 30 feet
?G ?G From 5 to < 15 feet
?H ?H < 5 feet
9. Inundation Duration - assessment area condition metric
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
®A Evidence of short-duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
?B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
?C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition - assessment area condition metric
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
?B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
?C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
?A ?A ®A ? 500 acres
?B ?B ?B From 100 to < 500 acres
?C ?C ?C From 50 to < 100 acres
?D ?D ?D From 25 to < 50 acres
?E ?E ?E From 10 to < 25 acres
®F ?F ?F From 5 to < 10 acres
?G ?G ?G From 1 to < 5 acres
?H ?H ?H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
?I ?I ?I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
?J ?J ?J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
?K ?K ?K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness - wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
?A Pocosin is the full extent (? 90%) of its natural landscape size.
?B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas - landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, urban landscapes, maintained
fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet wide.
Well Loosely
®A ?A ? 500 acres
?B ?B From 100 to < 500 acres
?C ?C From 50 to < 100 acres
?D ?D From 10 to < 50 acres
? E ? E < 10 acres
?F ?F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
?Yes ?No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect - wetland type condition metric
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
permanent features such as fields, development, two-lane or larger roads (? 40 feet wide), utility line corridors wider than a two-lane road,
and clear-cuts < 10 years old. Consider the eight main points of the compass.
®A No artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
?B No artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
?C An artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) directions or assessment area is clear-cut
15. Vegetative Composition - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
?A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
®B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
?C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected strata are unnaturally absent or dominated by exotic
species or composed of planted stands of non-characteristic species or inappropriately composed of a single species.
16. Vegetative Diversity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
®A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
?B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
?C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).
17. Vegetative Structure - assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ?No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
?A ? 25% coverage of vegetation
?B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
?A ?A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
?B ?B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
®A ®A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
?B ?B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
?C ?C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
®A ®A Dense shrub layer
?B ?B Moderate density shrub layer
?C ?C Shrub layer sparse or absent
?A ?A Dense herb layer
®B ®B Moderate density herb layer
?C ?C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags - wetland type condition metric
?A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
19. Diameter Class Distribution - wetland type condition metric
?A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
®B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
?C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris - wetland type condition metric
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
?A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion - wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
22. Hydrologic Connectivity- assessment area condition metric
Evaluate for riverine wetlands only. Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill,
sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
?B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
?C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
?D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Dry conditions at time of observation.
NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 3.0
Rating Calculator Version 3.0
Wetland Site Name BDMB- HU1A- Zero Order Date of Assessment 6/2/10
IiVICY IVVVQI?-
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization LMG
Presence of stressor affecting assessment area (Y/N) YES
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Ratina Summar
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition HIGH
Sub-surface Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Particulate Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Soluble Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Physical Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure Condition HIGH
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Ratina Summar
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition HIGH
Water Quality Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Habitat Condition HIGH
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH
(Version June 2009)
AGREEMENT TO ESTABLISH THE BACHELORS DELIGHT MITIGATION BANK
IN ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(USACE Action ID No. 2009-00832)
This Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) is made and entered into on the day of
, 2010, by the Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Development Co. (WREDCO),
hereinafter Sponsor, and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), and each of the following
agencies, upon its execution of this NMI, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U. S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), the North
Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC), the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (NCDCM), and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). The
Corps, together with the State and Federal agencies that execute this NMI, are hereinafter
collectively referred to as the Interagency Review Team (IRT).
WHEREAS the purpose of this agreement is to establish a mitigation bank (Bank) providing
compensatory mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts separately authorized by Section 404
Clean Water Act permits and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act permits in appropriate
circumstances;
WHEREAS the Sponsor has entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) (dated
October 2010) with the Board of Trustees of the Endowment Fund of North Carolina State
University (ENDOWMENT FUND) and NC State Natural Resources Foundation, Inc.
(FOUNDATION) to implement and operate a wetland and stream mitigation bank, a subset of
which is located on property owned by the ENDOWMENT FUND (see attached survey);
WHEREAS the Sponsor is the record owner of that certain parcel of land containing
approximately 252 acres located in Onslow County, North Carolina, described in the Bachelors
Delight Mitigation Bank Restoration Plan (October 2010 Mitigation Plan), and as shown on the
attached survey (Property A);
WHEREAS Endowment Fund is the record owner of that certain parcel of land containing
approximately 111 acres, located in Onslow County, North Carolina, described in the Bachelors
Delight Mitigation Bank Restoration Plan (Mitigation Plan), and as shown on the attached survey
(Property B);
WHEREAS the agencies comprising the IRT agree that the combined sites totaling 363 acres
(Property A and Property B as identified above) are a suitable mitigation bank site, and that
implementation of the Mitigation Plan is likely to result in net gains in wetland and/or stream
functions at the Bank site, and have therefore approved the Mitigation Plan;
WHEREAS the Foundation has certain rights regarding the use and management of the Bank
site under the MOA referenced above with the Endowment Fund and WREDCO;
(Version June 2009)
THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed among the parties to this agreement that the following
provisions are adopted and will be implemented upon signature of this MBI.
Section L• General Provisions
A. The Sponsor is responsible for assuring the success of the restoration, enhancement, and
preservation activities at the Bank site, and for the overall operation and management of the
Bank. The Sponsor assumes the legal responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation
once a permittee secures credits from the Sponsor and the DE receives documentation that
confirms the Sponsor has accepted responsibility for providing the required compensatory
mitigation.
B. The goal of the Bank is to restore, enhance, and preserve first order streams, zero order
streams, riparian (non-riverine) wetlands, and non-riparian wetlands and their functions to
compensate in appropriate circumstances for unavoidable wetland and stream impacts authorized
by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act permits and or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act
permits in circumstances deemed appropriate by the Corps after consultation, through the permit
review process, with members of the IRT.
C. Use of credits from the Bank to offset wetland impacts authorized by Clean Water Act
permits must be in compliance with the Clean Water Act and implementing regulations,
including but not limited to the 404(b)(1) Guidelines, the National Environmental Policy Act,
and all other applicable Federal and State legislation, rules and regulations. This agreement has
been drafted in accordance with the regulations for Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of
Aquatic Resources effective June 9, 2008 (33 CFR Parts 325 and 332) (Mitigation Rule").
D. The IRT shall be chaired by the District Engineer (DE) of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District. The IRT shall review documentation for the establishment of mitigation
banks. The IRT will also advise the DE in assessing monitoring reports, recommending remedial
measures, approving credit releases, and approving modifications to this instrument. The IRT's
role and responsibilities are more fully set forth in Sections 332.8 of the Mitigation Rule. The
IRT will work to reach consensus on its actions.
E. The DE, after consultation with the appropriate Federal and State review agencies through the
permit review process, shall make final decisions concerning the amount and type of
compensatory mitigation to be required for unavoidable, permitted wetland impacts, and whether
or not the use of credits from the Bank is appropriate to offset those impacts. In the case of
permit applications and compensatory mitigation required solely under the Section 401 Water
Quality Certification rules of North Carolina, the N.C. Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) will
determine the amount of credits that can be withdrawn from the Bank.
F. The parties to this agreement understand that a watershed approach to establish compensatory
mitigation must be used to the extent appropriate and practicable. Where practicable, in-kind
compensatory mitigation is preferred.
(Version June 2009)
Section II: Geographic Service Area
The Geographic Service Area (GSA) is the designated area within which the bank is authorized
to provide compensatory mitigation required by DA permits. The GSA for this Bank shall
include the White Oak River Basin, Hydrologic Unit 03030001 in North Carolina (refer to
Figure 4 of the Mitigation Plan). Note that following 14-digit Hydrologic Unit Codes (HUCs) of
the White Oak River Basin are excluded from the identified GSA: (1) 03030001040005; (2)
03030001040010; and (3) 03030001040020.
The service area is based on the location and scope of the project which will generate tangible
water quality benefits in one of the main tributaries of the White Oak River through the cessation
of agri cultural/silvi cultural land use activities and the restoration of headwater stream and
wetland ecosystems. Use of a Bank site to compensate for impacts beyond the GSA (including
areas within the excluded 14-digit HUCs identified above) may be considered by the Corps or
the permitting agency on a case-by-case basis.
Section III: Mitigation Plan
Any Mitigation Plan submitted pursuant to this agreement must contain the information
listed in 332.4(c)(2) through (14) of the Compensatory Mitigation Rule.
A. The Bank site is a currently managed for silvicultural and agricultural production. A more
detailed description of the baseline conditions on the site is contained in the Mitigation Plan.
B. The Sponsor will perform work described on Section 4 and Section 5 of the Mitigation Plan,
including 9,679 linear feet (If) of Priority I stream restoration, 7,0821f of zero-order stream
restoration, 5,928 if of Level II stream enhancement, and 11,4001f of stream preservation.
Additional work within the Bank will restore 60 acres (ac.) of riparian (non-riverine) wetlands
and 85 ac. of non-riparian wetlands. A total of 28 ac. of riparian (non-riverine) wetland
enhancement; 48 ac. of riparian (non-riverine) wetland preservation; 13 ac. of non-riparian
wetland preservation; and 129 acres of stream buffer/upland buffer will also be included within
the Bank. The work associated with the Bank will include backfilling of existing ditches,
construction of new stream channels, and planting of native hardwood seedlings.
The purpose of this work, and the objective of the Bank, is to restore, enhance, and preserve the
wetlands and stream systems associated with headwaters of Bachelors Delight Swamp.
Development of the Bank will reduce nutrient inputs, stormwater discharge, and flow velocities
in a watershed that is experiencing rapid development.
C. The Sponsors shall monitor the Bank Site as described in Section 7 of the Mitigation Plan,
until such time as the IRT determines that the success criteria described in Section 7 of the
Mitigation Plan have been met.
(Version June 2009)
D. The members of the IRT will be allowed reasonable access to the Property for the purposes
of inspection of the Property and compliance monitoring of the Mitigation Plan.
Section IV: Reporting
A. The Sponsor shall submit to the DE, for distribution to each member of the IRT, an annual
report describing the current condition of the Bank and the condition of the Bank in relation to
the success criteria in the Mitigation Plan. The Sponsor shall provide to the DE any monitoring
reports described in Section 7 of the Mitigation Plan.
B. The Sponsor shall provide ledger reports documenting credit transactions as described in
Section VIII of this NMI.
C. Each time an approved credit transaction occurs, the Sponsor must notify the DE within 30
days of the transaction.
Section V: Remedial Action
A. The DE shall review the monitoring reports, and may, at any time, after consultation with the
Sponsor and the IRT, direct the Sponsor to take remedial action at the Bank site. Remedial
action required by the DE shall be designed to achieve the success criteria specified in the
Mitigation Plan. All remedial actions required under this section shall include a work schedule
and monitoring criteria that will take into account physical and climactic conditions.
B. The Sponsor shall implement any remedial measures required pursuant to the above.
C. In the event the Sponsor determines that remedial action may be necessary to achieve the
required success criteria, it shall provide notice of such proposed remedial action to all members
of the IRT. No remedial actions shall be taken without the concurrence of the DE, in
consultation with the IRT.
Section VI: Use of Mitigation Credits
Description of Wetland Community Types:
A. Wetland community types found in a mitigation bank will be described in accordance with the
procedures found in the NC Wetland Assessment Method (NC WAM, USACE, 2007). It is
expected that impacts to the NC WAM types listed below will be compensated by the Mitigation
Types as listed in order to qualify as "In-Kind" mitigation. Exceptions to the use of "In-Kind"
mitigation may be allowed at the discretion of the permitting agencies on a case-by-case basis.
(Version June 2009)
Table 1. Wetland Community Types
Mitigation Type NCWAM Type

CAMA Coastal Wetland Salt/Brackish Marsh*
Riparian (Riverine) Riverine Swamp Forest/Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh, Tidal
Freshwater Marsh
Riparian (Non-Riverine) Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Wetland, Flood-
Plain Pool, Mountain Bog*
Non-Riparian Non-Riverine Swamp Forest, Seep, Small Basin Wetland,
Pocosins, Estuarine Woody, Pine Flat, Pine Savannah,
Hardwood Flat
Table 2. Mitigation Types and Quantities (acres/If)
Streams (linear feet)
Priority 1 Zero Order Enhancement
Type Restoration Restoration (Level 11) Preservation SBCF
Hewitts Branch 5,103 500 4,900 656
Huffmans Branch 3,445 1,404 2,000 1,200 431
Bachelors Delight Swamp 4,777 3,428 5,300
Half Moon Creek 1,131 901 147
TOTAL 9,679 7,082 5,928 11,400 1,234
RATIO 1:1 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 NA
CREDITS 9,679 7,082 3,952 4,560 1,234
GRAND TOTAL 26,507
Wetlands (acres)
Proposed
Type Acreage Ratio Credits"
Riparian Restoration 60 1:1 60r
Riparian Enhancement 28 2:1 14re
Riparian Wetland Preservation 48 5:1 10re
Non-Riparian Restoration 85 1:1 85r
Non-Riparian Preservation 13 7:1 2re
SBCF/Upland Buffer 129 NA 0
TOTAL 363 171
*r=restoration credit; re= restoration-equivalent credit
(Version June 2009)
Table 3. Mitigation Credits by Stream and Wetland Type
Mitigation Type Quantity (If/ac) Credits
Stream 34,089 26,507*
Riparian (Non-Riverine) Wetland 136 84
Non-Riparian Wetland 98 87
*Includes credits derived from Stream Buffer Correction Factor (SBCF)
B. It is anticipated by the parties that in most cases in which the DE, after consultation with the
IRT, has determined that mitigation credits from the Bank may be used to offset wetland impacts
authorized by Section 404 permits and/or Section 10 permits, that the Restoration Equivalents, as
enumerated above, constitute credits that are considered to be equal to restoration credits for the
purposes of compensatory mitigation. Therefore, the use of Restoration credits or Restoration
Equivalents credits, or any combination thereof, is acceptable to the DE for any permit
requirement so long as the required amount of credits are debited for a given mitigation
requirements. It is also understood that in order to satisfy mitigation requirements imposed by
the NC Division of Water Quality, restoration impact amounts must be at a minimum of 1:1 such
that for every one acre of impact, at least one acre of mitigation must be in the form of
restoration. Additionally, decisions regarding stream mitigation will be made consistent with
current policy and guidance and will be made on a case by case basis. Wetland and stream
compensation ratios are determined by the DE on a case-by-case basis based on considerations of
functions of the wetlands and/or streams impacted, the severity of the wetland and/or stream
impacts, the relative age of the mitigation site, whether the compensatory mitigation is in-kind,
and the physical proximity of the wetland and/or stream impacts to the Bank site.
C. Notwithstanding the above, all decisions concerning the appropriateness of using credits from
the Bank to offset impacts to waters and wetlands, as well as all decisions concerning the amount
and type of such credits to be used to offset wetland and water impacts authorized by Department
of the Army permits, shall be made by the DE, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
and implementing regulations and guidance, after notice of any proposed use of the Bank to the
members of the IRT, and consultation with the members of the IRT concerning such use. Notice
to and consultation with the members of the IRT shall be through the permit review process.
Section VII: Credit Release Schedule
All credit releases must be approved by the DE, in consultation with the IRT, based on a
determination that required success criteria have been achieved.
A. Credit Release Schedule for Forested Wetlands: If deemed appropriate by the IRT, fifteen
percent (15%) of the Bank's total restoration credits shall be available for sale immediately upon
completion of all of the following:
(Version June 2009)
1. Execution of this MBI by the Sponsor, the DE, and other agencies eligible for membership
in the IRT who choose to execute this agreement;
2. Approval of the final Mitigation Plan;
3. Mitigation bank site has been secured;
4. Delivery of the financial assurance described in Section IX of this MBI; and
5. Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism described in Section X of this MBI, as
well as a title opinion covering the property acceptable to the DE.
The Sponsor must complete the initial physical and biological improvements to the Bank site
pursuant to the Mitigation Plan no later than the first full growing season following initial
debiting of the Bank. Subject to the Sponsor's continued satisfactory completion of all required
success criteria and monitoring, additional restoration mitigation credits will be available for sale
by the Sponsor on the following schedule:
1. 15 % upon completion of all initial physical and biological improvements made pursuant
to the Mitigation Plan (total 30%);
2. 10% after first year, if interim success measures are met (total 40%);
3. 10% after second year, if interim success measures are met (total 50%);
4. 10% after third year, if interim success measures are met (total 60%);
5. 10% after fourth year, if interim success measures are met (total 70%);
6. 10% after fifth year, if Success Criteria are met (total 80%);
7. 10% after sixth year, if vegetative Success Criteria are met (90%); and
8. 10% after seventh year, if vegetative Success Criteria are met (100%).
Provided that all Success Criteria are met, the IRT may allow the Sponsor to discontinue
hydrologic monitoring after the fifth year. The Sponsor will be required to monitor vegetation
for an additional two years after the fifth year for a total of seven years.
B. Credit Release Schedule for Streams: The following credit release schedule applies only to
those stream projects where Restoration or Enhancement I has been performed where pattern,
dimension, and profile, or dimension and profile (respectively) have been improved. Projects
constructed on the outer coastal plain that are subject to the Coastal Plain Information Paper
(USACE/DWQ 2007) where an engineered stream channel was not constructed, will be subject
to the criteria enumerated for wetlands above.
If deemed appropriate by the IRT, fifteen percent (15%) of the Bank's total stream credits shall
be available for sale immediately upon completion of all of the following:
1. Execution of this MBI by the Sponsor, the DE, and other agencies eligible for membership
in the IRT who choose to execute this agreement;
2. Approval of the final Mitigation Plan;
3. Mitigation bank site has been secured;
4. Delivery of the financial assurance described in Section IX of this MBI; and
(Version June 2009)
5. Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism described in Section X of this NMI, as
well as a title opinion covering the property acceptable to the DE.
Table 4A. Credit Release Schedule for Wetlands
Percentage of Wetland Cumulative
Projected Credits
Task Credits Released (% Credits
Completion Date Released
cumulative) Released
1.0 Signing of the NMI; 1/15/11 15(15) 25.6 25.6
Recordation of Conservation
Easement Deed; Delivery of
Financial Assurances
2.0 Completion of Physical and 2/2012 15(30) 25.6 51.2
Biological Improvements
3.0 Year 1: Fulfill Success 1/2013 10(40) 17.1 68.3
Criteria
4.0 Year 2: Fulfill Success 1/2014 10(50) 17.1 85.4
Criteria
5.0 Year 3: Fulfill Success 1/2015 10(60) 17.1 102.5
Criteria
6.0 Year 4: Fulfill Success 1/2016 10(70) 17.1 119.6
Criteria
7.0 Year 5: Fulfill Success 1/2017 10(80) 17.1 136.7
Criteria
8.0 Year 6: Fulfill Success 1/2018 10(90) 17.1 153.8
Criteria
9.0 Year 7: Fulfill Success 1/2019 10(100) 17.2 171
Criteria
TOTAL 100% 171
Subject to the Sponsor's continued satisfactory completion of all required success criteria and
monitoring, additional stream credits will be available for sale by the Sponsor on the following
schedule:
1. 15 % upon completion of all initial physical and biological improvements made pursuant
to the Mitigation Plan (total 30%);
2. 10% after first year, provided channel is stable and all other success measures are met
(total 40%);
3. 10% after second year, provided channel is stable and all other success measures are met
(total 50%);
4. 10% after third year, provided channel is stable and all other success measures are met
(total 60%);
5. 10% after fourth year, provided channel is stable and all other success measures are met
(total 70%);
6. 15% after fifth year, provided channel is stable and all other success measures are met
(total 85%).
(Version June 2009)
A reserve of 15% of the Bank's total stream credits shall be released any time after two bank-full
events have occurred, in separate years, provided the channel is stable and all other Success
Criteria are met. In the event that less than two bank-full events occur during the monitoring
period, remaining credit release shall be at the discretion of the IRT.
Table 4B. Credit Release Schedule for Streams

Projected Percentage of Wetland Credits Cumulative
Task
Completion Date Credits Released (%
Released Credits
cumulative) Released
1.0 Signing of the NMI; 1/15/11 15 (15) 3,976 3,976
Recordation of Conservation
Easement Deed; Delivery of
Financial Assurances
2.0 Completion of Physical and 2/2012 15 (30) 3,976 7,952
Biological Improvements
3.0 Year 1: Fulfill Success 1/2013 10(40) 2,651 10,603
Criteria
4.0 Year 2: Fulfill Success 1/2014 10(50) 2,650 13,253
Criteria
5.0 Year 3: Fulfill Success 1/2015 10(60) 2,651 15,904
Criteria
6.0 Year 4: Fulfill Success 1/2016 10(70) 2,650 18,555
Criteria
7.0 Year 5: Fulfill Success 1/2017 15(85) 3,976 22,531
Criteria
8.0 Documentation of Two TBD 15(100) 3,976 26,507
Bank-full Events in Separate
Years
TOTAL 100% 26,507
Section VIII: Accounting Procedures
A. The Sponsor shall develop accounting procedures acceptable to the IRT for maintaining
accurate records of debits made from the Bank. Such procedures shall include the generation of
a ledger by the Sponsor showing credits used at the time they are debited from the Bank. All
ledger reports shall identify credits debited and remaining by type of credit and shall include for
each reported debit the Corps ORM ID number for the permit for which the credits were utilized
and the permitted impacts for each resource type. Each time an approved credit transaction
occurs, the Sponsor must notify the DE within 30 days of the transaction.
B. The Sponsor shall prepare an annual ledger report, on each anniversary of the date of
execution of this agreement, showing all credits used, any changes in credit availability (e.g.,
(Version June 2009)
additional credits released, credit sales suspended), and the beginning and ending balance of
credits remaining. The Sponsor shall submit the annual report to the DE, for distribution to each
member of the IRT, until such time as all of the credits have been utilized, or this agreement is
otherwise terminated.
Section IX: Financial Assurances
A. The Sponsor shall provide financial assurances in a form acceptable to the IRT sufficient to
assure completion of all mitigation work, required reporting and monitoring, and any remedial
work required pursuant to this NMI. These financial assurances are provided in the form of two
performance bonds. A construction bond, in the sum of $500,000, represents 30% of the
projected construction, planting, and contingency costs associated with the activities described in
the Mitigation Plan. The monitoring bond, in the sum of $70,000, represents 10% of the
projected monitoring costs for the seven (7) year schedule described in the Mitigation Plan.
B. Financial assurances shall be payable at the direction of the DE to his designee or to a
standby trust. Financial assurances structured to provide funds to the Corps of Engineers in the
event of default by the Bank Sponsor are not acceptable.
C. A financial assurance must be in the form that ensures that the DE receives notification at
least 120 days in advance of any termination or revocation.
Section X: Long-Term Protection
A. The North Carolina State Natural Resources Foundation (Foundation), a registered 501(c)3
entity, will serve as the holder of the conservation easement (CE) for the Bank. The Foundation
will maintain the CE in perpetuity and provide for the long-term protection of the land through
annual monitoring activities. Title to the land will reside with the current owners, WREDCO
(Tract A) and The Endowment Fund of North Carolina State University (Tract B). Refer to the
attached conservation easement plats for both tracts (Appendix B). The CE shall be perpetual,
preserve all natural areas, and prohibit all use of the property inconsistent with its use as
mitigation property, including any activity that would materially alter the biological integrity or
functional and educational value of wetlands or streams within the Bank site, consistent with the
Mitigation Plan. The purpose of the CE will be to assure that future use of the Bank site will
result in the restoration, protection, maintenance and enhancement of wetland functions
described in the Mitigation Plan.
B. The Sponsor shall deliver a title opinion acceptable to the DE covering the mitigation
property. The property shall be free and clear of any encumbrances that would conflict with its
use as mitigation, including, but not limited to, any liens that have priority over the recorded
preservation mechanism.
10
(Version June 2009)
C. Subsequent to the recording of the CE, the Sponsor may convey the Bank Site property either
in fee or by granting an easement to a qualified land trust, state agency, or other appropriate
nonprofit organization. The Sponsor is responsible for ensuring that that the CE is re-recorded to
ensure that it remains within the chain of title. The terms and conditions of this conveyance shall
not conflict with the intent and provisions of the CE nor shall such conveyance enlarge or modify
the uses specified in the CE.
The CE must contain a provision requiring 60 day advance notification to the DE before any
action is taken to void or modify the CE, including transfer of title to, or establishment of any
other legal claims over, the project site.
Section XI: Long-term Management
A. The Foundation (as identified above) will be responsible for the long-term management of
the site. The primary objective of the long-term management is to ensure the protection of the
site in its natural state.
B. An endowment will be provided to the Foundation by the Sponsor to assist with the long-
term management expenses of the Bank site.
Section XIL• Default and Closure
A. It is agreed to establish and/or maintain the Bank site until (i) credits have been exhausted or
banking activity is voluntarily terminated with written notice by the Sponsor provided to the DE
and other members of the IRT; and (ii) it has been determined and agreed upon by the DE and
IRT that the debited Bank site has satisfied all the conditions herein and in the Mitigation Plan.
If the DE determines that the Bank site is not meeting performance standards or complying with
the terms of the instrument, appropriate action will be taken. Such actions may include, but are
not limited to, suspending credit sales, adaptive management, decreasing available credits,
utilizing financial assurances, and terminating the instrument.
B. Any delay or failure of Bank Sponsor shall not constitute a default hereunder if and to the
extent that such delay or failure is primarily caused by any act, event or conditions beyond the
Sponsor's reasonable control and significantly adversely affects its ability to perform its
obligations hereunder including: (i) acts of God, lightning, earthquake, fire, landslide, or
interference by third parties; (ii) condemnation or other taking by any governmental body; (iii)
change in applicable law, regulation, rule, ordinance or permit condition, or the interpretation or
enforcement thereof, (iv) any order, judgment, action or determination of any federal, state or
local court, administrative agency or government body; or (v) the suspension or interruption of
any permit, license, consent, authorization or approval. If the performance of the Bank Sponsor
is affected by any such event, Bank Sponsor shall give written notice thereof to the IRT as soon
II
(Version June 2009)
as is reasonably practicable. If such event occurs before the final availability of all credits for
sale, the Sponsor shall take remedial action to restore the property to its condition prior to such
event, in a manner sufficient to provide adequate mitigation to cover credits that were sold prior
to such delay or failure to compensate for impacts to waters, including wetlands, authorized by
Department of the Army permits. Such remedial action shall be taken by the Sponsor only to the
extent necessary and appropriate, as determined by the IRT.
C. At the end of the monitoring period, upon satisfaction of the performance standards, the
Sponsor may submit a request to close out the bank site to the DE. The DE, in consultation with
the IRT, shall use best efforts to review and comment on the request within 60 days of such
submittal. If the DE determines the Sponsor has achieved the performance standards in
accordance with the mitigation plan and all obligations under this NMI, the DE shall issue a
close out letter to the Sponsor.
Section XIII: Miscellaneous
A. Any agency participant may terminate its participation in the IRT with notice in writing to all
other parties to this agreement. Termination shall be effective seven (7) days from placing
written notices in the United States mail. Member withdrawal shall not affect any prior sale of
credits and all remaining parties shall continue to implement and enforce the terms of this NMI.
B. Modification of this MBI shall be in accordance with the procedures set forth in 332.8 of the
mitigation rule.
C. No third party shall be deemed a beneficiary hereof and no one except the signatories hereof,
their successors and assigns, shall be entitled to seek enforcement hereof.
D. This MBI constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter
hereof and supersedes all prior agreements or undertakings.
E. In the event any one or more of the provisions contained in this MBI are held to be invalid,
illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceablility will not
affect any other provisions hereof, and this MBI shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or
unenforceable provision had not been contained herein.
F. This NMI shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of North Carolina
and the United States as appropriate.
G. This MBI may be executed by the parties in any combination, in one or more counterparts,
all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
H. The terms and conditions of this MBI shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of the
parties hereto and their respective successors.
12
(Version June 2009)
1. All notices and required reports shall be sent by regular mail to each of the parties at their
respective addresses, provided below.
Sponsor:
Mr. Taylor Downey
Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Development Company
1412 Eatonton Hwy Suite 700
Madison, GA 30850
Corps:
Mr. Mickey Sugg
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
EPA:
Ms. Jennifer Derby
Wetlands Section - Region IV
Water Management Division
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
FWS:
Mr. Pete Benjamin
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
NMFS:
Mr. Ron Sechler
National Marine Fisheries, NOAA
Habitat Conservation Division
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
NCWRC:
Ms. Molly Ellwood
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
13
(Version June 2009)
NCDCM:
Mr. Steve Sollod
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
NCDWQ:
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
14
(Version June 2009)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement entitled
"Agreement To Establish The Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank in Onslow County, North
Carolina":
Sponsor:
By:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers:
Date:
By: Date:
15
(Version June 2009)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement entitled
"Agreement To Establish The Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank In Onslow County,
North Carolina":
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency:
By: Date:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service:
By: Date:
National Marine Fisheries Service:
By: Date:
N.C. Division of Water Quality:
By: Date:
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission:
By: Date:
N.C. Division of Coastal Management:
By: Date:
16
(Version June 2009)
List of Appendices
Appendix A: Bachelors Delight Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank - Final Mitigation
Plan (October 2010)
Appendix B: Conservation Easement Plats (Tract A and Tract B)
Appendix C: Map - Geographic Service Area
Appendix D: Construction Costs
Appendix E: Maintenance and Monitoring Costs
Appendix F: Performance Bonds
Appendix G: Conservation Easement Deed
17
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF ONSLOW
/NFFMW FUIMSf R
I, REVIEW OFFICER OF ONSLOW
A'G'l4A04
?.M
COUNTY, CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF THE o
A
MAP/PLAT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATION IS AFFIXED MEETS THE ? A
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR RECORDING. X

REVIEW OFFICER

X
DATE CKSONWIlE

rn
d
m
a
8

FILED FOR REGISTRATION AT M O,CLOCK
CAW LEJMW
THIS OF AD e
10
IN PLAT CABINET -SLIDE / AT
VICINITY MAP - NOT TO SCALE
o_ REGISTER OF DEEDS

IGC
SURVEYOR'S NOTES:
1. BEARINGS BASED ON NC GRID (NAD 83) CORS 95,
2. REFERENCES: DEED BOOK 2710 PAGE 918,
DEED BOOK 516 PAGE 408.
3. SURVEYOR HAS MADE NO INVESTIGATION OR INDEPENDENT
SEARCH FOR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, ENCUMBRANCES,
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, OWNERSHIP, TITLE EVIDENCE, OR
ANY OTHER FACTS THAT AN ACCURATE AND CURRENT TIRE
SEARCH MAY DISCLOSE
4. SUBSURFACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS WERE NOT
EXAMINED OR CONSIDERED AS A PART OF THIS SURVEY. NO
STATEMENT IS MADE CONCERNING THE EXISTENCE OF
UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD CONTAINERS OR FACILITIES
THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS TRACT.
5. SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAYS, AND OR
ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD THAT MAY EFFECT THIS PROPERTY.
%
/ WF
/ WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
/ DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
DEED BOOK 2710 PAGE 916
? i
WF
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES NCSU
DEED BOOK 516 PAGE 409

SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION:
EGEND I, DAVID L JONES, JR, L-3672, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY
NOW/FORMERLY SUPERVISION FROM INFORMATION SHOWN IN DEED BOOKS AND (OR)
IRONRODSET MAPS REFERENCED ON THIS PLAT; THAT ONES NOT ACTUALLY
IRON ROD FOUND SURVEYED APPEAR AS BROKEN LINES AND WERE PLOTTED FROM
INFORMATION AS NOTED ON THE PUT; THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION
AS CALCULATED BY LATITUDES AND DEPARTURES WAS GREATER THAN
1:10,000; THAT THE AREA IS COMPUTED BY COORDINATE METHOD;
THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH G.S. 47-30 AS
AMENDED. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, LICENSE NUMBER, AND
SEAL THIS THEY OF Dec AD.,---Z-..o
THIS SURVEY IS OF ANOTHER CATEGORY, SUCH AS THE RECOMBINATION
OF EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT-ORDERED SURVEY, OR OTHER
EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION.
THAT THE CPS SURVEY MADE WAS UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND THE
FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS USED TO PERFORM THIS SURVEY.
i
J
/
CLASS OF SURVEY. C - RURAL AND FARMLAND SURVEY
POSITIONAL ACCURACY: 0.098
TYPE OF CPS FIELD PROCEDURE OPUS
DATES OF SURVEY: JANUARY 3, 2007
DATUM/EPOCH: NC GRID NAD53 COBS' 96
PUBUSHED/FIXED-CONTROL USED:;KEWSVILLE-CORS'_,
GEOID MODEU GEOID 03 ' '.
COMBINED GRID FACTOR: 0.999899370'
UNITS: U.S. SURVEY FEET '
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, LICENSE NUMBER AND SEAL
DAY OF
DAVID-. JONES, JR.
PROFESSIONAL LAND
SCALE: 1'= 200'
0 100 200 460 600
4 N14OM&CREM
243 NORTH FRONT STREET
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
NORTH CAROLINA FIRM LICENSE NUMBER: C-0342
CONSERVATION EASEMENT SURVEY
OF 20.81 ACRES FOR
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES NCSU
PORTION OF HOFMANN FOREST
DEED BOOK 516 PAGE 408
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP - ONSLOW COUNTY - NORTH CAROLINA
JULY 6, 2010
JOB NUMBER: DD910-0166
SCALE: 1' = 200'
CAD NUMBER: VM101-009100166
PIES: DU
PARTY CEIIEF: JR/AR
CAD TECH. ACS
FEW BOOK/PAGE: W1206/31-..
DRAWING NUMBER: 2010-052
SHEET 1 OF 1
m
m
B
3
0
rc
U
Z
NIP
THE BOARD OF TRUSTE
DEED BOOK 516 PAC
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF ONSLOW
RENEW OFFICER OF ONSLOW COUNTY,
ME BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF THE MAP/PLAT
IS CQtTIFlCATI ON IS AFFIXED MEETS THE STATUTORY
S FOR RECORDING.
OFFICER
:GISTRATION AT M O,CLOCK
_ OF AD _
INET DUDE
REGISTER OF DEEDS
N
gyp{^G?W\\\FVEST p-
Y ?,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES:
1. BEARINGS BASED ON NC GRID (NAD 83) COPS 96.
2. REFERENCES: DEED BOOK 2710 PAGE 916.
DEED BOOK 516 PAGE 408.
D
VIFORMERLY
V ROD SET
N ROD FOUND
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION:
/
/ i
I I
i i
i
i
Y
i
i

i
i?
i/
SCALE: 1" = 300'
0 150 300 800 900
243 NORTH FRONT STREET
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
NORTH CAROLINA FIRM LICENSE NUMBER: C-0342
r+
3. SURVEYOR HAS MADE NO INVESTIGATION OR INDEPENDENT
SEARCH FOR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, ENCUMBRANCES,
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, OWNERSHIP, TITLE EVIDENCE, OR
ANY OTHER FACTS THAT AN ACCURATE AND CURRENT TITLE
SEARCH MAY DISCLOSE
4. SUBSURFACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS WERE NOT
EXAMINED OR CONSIDERED AS A PART OF THIS SURVEY. NO
STATEMENT IS MADE CONCERNING THE EXISTENCE OF
UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD CONTAINERS OR FACILITIES
THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS TRACT.
5. SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAYS, AND OR
ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD THAT MAY EFFECT THIS PROPERTY.
I, DAVID L JONES, JR. L-3672, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY
SUPERVISION FROM INFORMATION SHOWN IN DEED BOOKS AND (OR)
MAPS REFERENCED ON THIS PLAT; THAT LINES NOT ACTUALLY
SURVEYED APPEAR AS BROKEN UNES AND WERE PLOTTED FROM
INFORMATION AS NOTED ON THE PLAT; THAT THE PATIO OF PRECISION
AS CALCULATED BY LATITUDES AND DEPARTURES WAS GREATER THAN
1:10,000; THAT THE AREA IS COMPUTED BY COORDINATE METHOD;
THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH G.S. 47-30 AS
AMENDED. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, LICENSE NUMBER, AND
SEAL THIS THE-J-DAY OF A.D,-:Xbko
THIS SURVEY IS OF ANOTHER CATEGORY, SUCH AS THE RECOMBINATION
OF EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT-ORDERED SURVEY, OR OTHER
EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION.
THAT THE GPS SURVEY MME WAS UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND THE
FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS USED TO PERFORM THIS SURVEY.
CLASS OF SURVEY: C - RURAL AND FARMLAND SURVEY
POSITIONAL ACCURACY: 0.098
TYPE OF GPS FIELD PROCEDURE: OPUS
DATES OF SURVEY: JANUARY 3, 2007
DATUM/EPOCH: NC GRID NAD83 COPS 96
PUBLISHED/FIXED-CONTROL USED: KENANSVILLE COPS
GEOID MODEL GEOID 03
COMBINED GRID FACTOR:
UNITS: U.S. SURVEY FEET
CONSERVATION EASEMENT SURVEY
OF 89.98 ACRES FOR
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES NCSU
PORTION OF HOFMANN FOREST
DEED BOOK 516 PAGE 408
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP - ONSLOW COUNTY- NORTH CAROLINA
JULY 6, 2010

JOB NUMBER: 00910-0166
SCALE: 1" - 300,
CAD NUMBER: VM101-009100166
PIS: DU
PARTY CHIEF: JR/AK
CAD TECH: ACS
FIELD BOOK/PAGE: W1206/31-..
DRAWING NUMBER 2u10-053
SHEET 1 OF 1
i
i TTT
X
m
m
°a
a
0
U
Z
ELEV. 45.10'
NO GRID NAD 83
I
MATCH L
N/F
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
DEED BOOK 2710 PAGE 916
--X- - MATCILM V
wl
w
N
A

TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
NORTH CAROLINA FIRM LICENSE NUMBER: C-0342
CONSERVATION EASEMENT SURVEY
FOR
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP - ONSLOW COUNTY - NORTH CAROLINA
JULY 6, 2010
LEGEND
N/F = NOW/FORMERLY
DB = DEED BOOK
MB - MAP BOOK
PG - PAGE
. IRON ROD SET
IRF0 =IRON ROD FOUND
IPF0 = IRON PIPE FOUND
CMFEI = CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND
- - - - - - PROPERTY LINE
\ J

30B NUMBER: 06910-0166
SCALE: 1' = 200'
CAD NUMBER: VB101-609100166
PLS; DEM
PARTY CHIEF: CB,MC,DWAK
CAD TECH: ACS
FIELD BOOK/PAGE: W1239/16
DRAWING NUMBER: 2010-06-
SHEET 6 OF 11

N \
SUNSET COVE DEVELOPMENT INC.
DB 2527 PG 580
MB 39 PG 105
kqT%AXe
SCALE: I"= 200' C D
243 NORTH FRONT STREET
6 160 260 400 800 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
N/f
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
DEED BOOK 1710 PAGE 916
Ij , JI
-- -Z -- wraHLME or -7-
N1'F
REYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
DEED BOOK 1710 PACE 916
31
LEGEND
i
N/F - NOW/FORMERLY
DB = DEED BOON
MB = MAP BOOT(
PG = PAGE
• - IRON ROD SET
IRF0 - IRON ROD FOUND
IPF0 = IRON PIPE FOUND
CMFD = CONCRETE MONUMENT FWD
-.. - -. -........ = PROPERTY LINE
SCALE: 1" = 200'
0 100 200 460 600
Ll022
IRF
m
\ U
Z
L92$9L 2 Sy ?' \\\
BEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE %l \\
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY /
DEED BOO( 2710 PAGE 916
\
i
AO
243 NORTH FRONT STREET
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
NORTH CAROLINA FIRM LICENSE NUMBER: C-0342
CONSERVATION EASEMENT SURVEY
FOR
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP - ONSLOW COUNTY - NORTH CAROLINA
JULY 6, 2010
JOB NUMBER, OD910-0166
SCALE: 1" - 200'
CAD NUMBER: VB101-009100166
PIS: DEM
PARTY CHIEF: CB.MC.DWAK
CAD TECH: ACS
FD LD BOO"AGE: W1239/16
DRAWING NUMBER: 2D`.u-7e9
SHEET 7 OF 11

m
W
O
6
Z
O
U
U
Z
RBC N9J
N 406820.0690
E 2464896.7085
N 406646.6200
E 2464176.2900

\ N
? N
? N
LEGEND
/ N/F - NOW/FORMERLY 1
DB = DEED BOOK
TAB = MAP BOOK
PG = PAGE
0 - IRON ROD SET
IRF0 - IRON ROD FOUND
IPF0 = IRON PIPE FOUND
CMFE1 = CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND
.. _...._..... = PROPERTY UNE
J
SCALE: I"= 200'
6 160 260 400 600
N/P
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
DEED BOOK 2710 PAGE 916
N/F
RODGERS TRACT
DB 958 PG 304
IRF
1.
1V4IQM&CREED
243 NORTH FRONT STREET
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
NORTH CAROLINA FIRM LICENSE NUMBER: C-0342
N/F
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
DEED BOOK 2710 PAGE 916
`V
?g
? ;
g-l
i
CONSERVATION EASEMENT SURVEY
FOR
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP - ONSLOW COUNTY - NORTH CAROLINA
JULY 6, 2010
JOB NUMBER: 00910-0166
SCALE: 1- - 200'
CAD NUMBER: VB101-009100166
PLS: DEM
PARTY CHEEF: CB,MC.DWAK
CAD TECH: ACS
FIELD BOOK/PAGE: W1239/16
DRAWING NUMBER: 201G-OC9
SHEET 8 OF 11
LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1 218.21 N42'13'36"W
L2 157.75 N0225'55"E
L3 28.13 SB55744W
L4 135.08 N7557'53'W
L5 134.08 N6736'56'W
1-6 130.21 N5246'48'W
1-7 127.92 N4720'05"W
La 63.76 N4720'05"W
L9 87.12 N46'5Vl-rW
L10 100.86 N4818'06"W
L11 35.53 N7254'18'W
L12 81.80 N8755'00"W
L13 37.03 SBB'41'34"W
L14 74.31 S7139'02"W
L15 12.99 S7139'02'W
L16 69.36 S71 *39'02"W
L17 118.72 S7139'02"W
L18 126.07 S73'4354'W
L19 155.11 N5659'58'W
L20 225.39 N3225'50"W
L21 55.66 N3711'26"E
L22 86.76 N3711'26"E
L23 215.38 S8858'18"E
L24 79.98 N71 *39'02'E
L25 8236 N71'39'00E
L26 65.28 N71'39'02"E
L27 67.76 N68'41'34"E
L28 87.60 N5333'5B"E
L29 143.72 S8755'00"E
L30 150.06 S7254'1 WE
L31 181.24 54818'08"E
L32 90.08 S4658'1 7'E
L33 62.65 S472W05"E
L34 111.27 S4720'05'E
L35 68.00 2'46'48'E
L36 6296 S5736'56"E
L37 53.87 S755r53'E
L38 175.04 N655744'E
L39 143.28 536'09'01"E
L40 98.62 S30'3221'E
L41 79.18 S3218'43'E
L42 111.68 S0225'56'W
L43 13.12 S0225'56'W
L44 43.96 S4024'34'E
L45 349.94 542'48'13"W
L46 366.70 N43'03'55"E
L47 418.56 s7r49'43"E
L48 20244 N4228'30'E
L49 385.82 S85'40'1 0'E
L50 359.61 S39'4r05'E
L51 90.40 S78'41'21'E
L52 25.79 S2505'10'E
L53 193.29 S2505'10'E
L54 286.88 S7324'01'E
L55 135.73 N4201'37"E
L56 53.96 N70'42'49"E
L57 89.50 S6857'13"E
L58 94.73 S3522'52E
L59 97.09 S1826'05"E
L60 121.28 S741r08'E
L61 65.73 N0237'19"E
L62 67.86 N44'41'37"E
L63 40.22 N8638'02"E
L64 99.38 N1020'27'E
L65 345.41 578'38'41"E
L66 37.47 57504'34"E
L67 23.18 56812735"E
L68 8.90 S5121'21'E
L69 15.62 S2634'39'E
L70 109.59 S1114'02"E
L73 4.45 58152'20"W
L74 56.40 578'48'39"W
L75 85.81 N76'45'20'W
L76 141.98 N8235'40'W
L77 35.48 S5757'57'W
L78 76.84 S1700'59"E
L79 27.80 S1653'13"W
L80 73.11 S33'4742'W
L51 LIT 36 S24-4731'W
L82 62.60 S43'02'35"W

LINE TABLE (CONTINUES)
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L83 48.31 S4733'20'W
L84 53.70 S5923'36"E
L55 65.01 50554'51"E
L86 130.44 511'26'35"W
L87 43.84 S05M2'56"W
Les 106.16 S1329'35"W
L89 49.46 S20'55'11"E
L90 132.59 SD9'16'07'W
L91 48.97 S1226'38°W
L92 50.88 S53'01'06"W
L93 109.27 S2015'33"W
L94 78.86 S1 5'53'42"W
L95 26.98 S2714'30'E
L96 36.09 S13MO'35'E
L97 6251 S3028'39"E
L98 101.13 S3Y'42'43"E
L99 189.69 543'59'41"W
LIDO 80.49 578'55'00'
L101 89.80 S5014'54'E
L102 9281 $47'05'21"W
L103 145.50 579'48'50"E
L1 D4 61.18 53825'49"E
L705 42.09 S2219'54"E
Li 06 130.50 S2439'01"W
L107 65.50 S2820'17'W
L108 145.95 S1 0'09'50"E
L109 171.52 S2555'23'E
L110 75.53 519'44'19"E
L111 69.17 S3605'18'W
L112 166.53 S5011'42E
L113 167.87 N3956'57E
L114 59.14 S27'IW13"E
L115 113.86 SD6'04'12'W
L116 102.09 531'44'46°
L117 38.41 S0934'39"E
L118 116.81 S0636'40'E
L119 44.80 SD659'03'E
L120 29.60 55536'29"W
L121 123.02 S29'02'59"E
L122 71.59 N3224'02'E
L123 5270 SQ2 W03"E
L124 115.60 S1211'31'W
L125 71.85 S36'49'54W
L126 26.88 S5116'42"W
L127 88.29 N08'38'28"W
L128 215.42 SSB'42'11°W
L129 25.00 588'4217"W
L130 54.34 NOB12' 5'W
L131 93.85 N2511'53"W
L132 69.32 N52'49'04°W
L133 45.82 N31'49'23"W
L134 53.75 N36'3r38"E
N
L135 90.39 N2000'31"W
1-136 54.65 NBB59'41'W
L137 88.39 N51'02'14"W
L138 47.51 N46'04'53"W
L139 121.90 N0218'05'E
L140 91.46 N34'4422"W
L141 16208 N1929'04"W
L142 88.36 N76'19'27 W
L143 8276 N12'02'42"W
L144 75.05 S825r4O'E
L145 3202 S77'5718'E
L146 23.80 NBB'02'51'E
L147 78.95 N071 2'43"W
L148 69.43 N5058'30"W
L149 59.87 N06'35'30"W
L150 98.16 N2804'09"E
L151 115.57 N68'03'0.5"W
L152 74.47 N10'36'26'E
L153 114.90 S79'45'58'E
L154 71.07 N0724'13'E
L155 54.59 N6836'53"W
L156 103.88 N27'51'37W
L157 111.85 N1306'36'W
L155 78.98 N4926'15"W
L159 8267 N3711'39°E
L160 95.26 N42'00'01"W
L161 41.75 N322224°W
Li 62 80.16 N55'34'06"E
LINE TABLE (CONTINUES)
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L163 29.08 N0224'43'E
L164 49.10 N2120'5VW
L165 54.50 N8251'03"W
L166 45.66 N815W40"W
L167 53.99 N0871-18'
-
L168 84.09 N79-03'1 3-E
L169 29.00 N1838'49'
L170 75.54 N1231'03'E
L171 120.53 N63'11'14"W
L172 40.88 N6724'25'W
L173 135.99 N4252'49'W
L174 129.44 N52'49'54'W
L175 54.35 N3 40'W
L176 32.84 N37'02'10"E
L177 67.91 57206' "E
L178 163.20 5563 '28'
L179 69.59 53712'15
1-180 9218 563'05'58"E
L181 74.48 56631'55"
L152 116.49 N 95B' r
L183 53.95 N0110' 4"E
L104 46.36 N25'42'18'
L185 74.78 N2321'55'E
L186 71.01 N4918'56'W
L187 81.27 N8301'39"W
L1 B8 10283 N01'0Y49'E
L169 148.48 N38'05'05'W
L190 165.68 N4321'27"W
L191 448.12 N6412'49"W
L192 582.79 N51'07*10'W
L193 31251 S57*49'36'W
L194 713.55 N7620'09'W
L195 54.11 NOI10-33'
L196 125.70 N0111'18"E
L197 86.23 N12W40"W
L198 25210 N02'43'3B"W
L199 135.85 N3744'26"W
L200 328.22 N3820'57"W
L201 148.17 N8655'1 4"W
L202 75.78 N4755'56"W
L203 225.10 N38'51'27'W
L204 58.42 N18'49'52"W
L205 221.50 N091r56'W
L206 158.08 N053r22'W
L207 50.88 N41'38'51"E
L208 90.60 N4328'58"E
L209 7&62 N2000'01'E
L210 7205 N16'44'53"W
L211 137.01 N03'48'54"E
L212 41.58 N6120'20'E
L213 29.33 S4905'01'E
L214 194.65 512'47'51"E
L215 160.15 S16'06'30"W
L216 208.39 S120r28"W
L217 109.50 513'45'06°E
L218 41.10 S1606'13°W
L219 157.01 S23'4r41"E
L220 95.48 S50'44'OrE
L221 44.90 S6059'56'E
L222 53.07 N2000'01"E
L223 51.76 $6959'59"
L224 55.65 S04'08'29"W
L225 7242 S551 1'48'E
L226 58.70 N302558"E
L227 139.91 N3915'46'E
L228 104.59 N2458'25"E
L229 83.26 N1929'59"E
L230 61.06 N3519'19'E
L231 131.61 N5459'59'W
L232 56.26 N6028'35"E
L233 76.06 S8352'34"E
L234 15269 N4929'31'
L235 144.31 N46'0r3O'E
L236 25.90 S62'45'32'
L237 77.43 58354'59"E
L238 17.90 S1 8'45'05'E
L239 56.30 S07'36'50"W
L240 85.79 S2556'40"W
L241 77.19 S6500'01"W
L242 105.24 S33'08'43"W
&c=
243 NORTH FRONT STREET
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
NORTH CAROLINA FIRM LICENSE NUMBER: C-0342
LINE TABLE (CONTINUES)
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L243 93.99 531'50'36"W
L244 113.49 556'49'55E
L245 47.79 S35'00'01'W
L246 119.40 S8725'1 3'W
L247 157.44 S35'00'01"W
L248 74.19 S13'42'55"W
L249 70.19 N8932'46'W
L250 88.34 S10-Ir35'W
L251 180.81 S475rO7'E
L252 80.71 S34'41'57'E
L253 49.38 S2316'58"W
L254 94.51 541'00'48"E
L255 77.32 S2612'52"E
L256 237.47 S12'42'07'E
L257 10.38 NB000'01"E
L258 135.59 N4225'45"E
L259 129.02 N6315'03'
L260 6255 N042r00"
L261 59.57 N3W40'26'
L262 46.22 N822r19'E
L263 23.15 S35 '06"
L264 78.89 50116'12E
L265 171.18 S8911'03"E
L266 83.67 N56'06'49"E
L267 200.57 N23'01'34E
L25B 76.02 N793rO4"E
L269 85.55 N44'01'55'
L270 105.69 N61'59'50"E
L271 93.07 N4816'01°
L272 35.73 S7620'4r
L273 194.61 S10'0r32'W
L274 73.23 N6032'47'W
L275 83.44 S37'38'16'W
L276 5219 N69'48'15"W
L277 178.01 S41'4r15'W
L278 53.95 S0303'1 9'W
L279 90.68 S3032'1 4'W
L280 88.02 5845 '33°W
L281 86.23 S86.35'13'W
L282 161.92 N81'06'07"W
L283 131.58 S4526'52"W
L284 130.36 S50'01'21"W
L205 4265 SD620'40"W
L286 80.68 S49'43'1 7"W
L287 66.68 S0154'07'W
L288 73.74 S2829'40"W
L289 14.04 5482550"W
L290 23.17 S64'44'07'W
L291 70.92 N7812'14'W
L292 326.80 54432'33"E
L293 20.51 S451)72rW
L294 82.14 N7611'55"W
L295 71.21 S34'31'30'W
L296 106.61 S54!34'1 3'W
L297 54.69 54130'08"W
L298 65.27 S53'0r50'W
L299 133.39 S585r38"W
L300 7239 S1826'05'E
L301 84.74 57754'08"W
L302 110.76 S4223'52'W
L303 68.65 S2159'04'W
L304 147.21 S6608'1 2'W
L305 59.78 S3646'55'W
L3D6 46.45 S13'02'05"W
L307 115.65 S1455'58"E
L308 95.42 521'4536"W
ON 23.60 S122740'W
L310 81.32 S20'33'21 "E
L311 93.98 567'4122"W
1-312 64.09 N6117'12°W
L313 55.18 S3952'58'W
L314 47.38 S2224'03"W
L315 39.92 S1715'58'E
L316 54.56 S4620'07"E
L317 146.18 S0735'35'W
L318 5258 S7229'21'E
L319 60.28 S3009'34E
L320 80.78 S35'42'16"W
L321 89.70 S8252'5rE
1-322 84.90 503*W08'W
CONSERVATION EASEMENT SURVEY
FOR
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP - ONSLOW COUNTY - NORTH CAROLINA
JULY 6, 2010
LINE TABLE (CONTINUES)
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L323 77.53 58416'39"E
L324 54.04 S4459'59'E
L325 72.47 S0236'02'W
L326 53.98 S1359'04'E
L327 9246 N883235
L328 29.81 N04'05'D9'E
L329 4296 N5739'34"E
L330 44.37 N4016'11"E
L331 171.24 ND8103'55"E
L332 72.37 N2617'32"W
L333 44.60 N0620'01"W
L334 60.75 N3839'37"E
L335 64.81 N6914'15"E
L336 47.88 N46'46'05"E
L337 60.19 N17'38'2rE
L338 22.40 N44'55'14"E
L339 97.86 N4038'41"E
L340 11.75 N3 4'18"W
L341 57.05 N24'05'43"W
L342 58.71 N0917'26'W
1-343 57.23 N03'05'29'W
L344 43.55 N74'40'31'W
L345 97.53 N18 5'18"E
L346 36.10 N1 345'20"E
L347 93.14 N5452'24"E
L348 51.92 S8158' "E
L349 114.68 N 458'54'
L350 57.52 N781 3'36'E
L351 59.64 N79V1'15"
L352 36.49 S791)2'31"E
L353 37.97 N71'39' 6'E
L354 42.10 N861B'DB°
LW5 35.18 N7822'25'
L356 41.30 N7150' 0"E
L357 42.95 N88'48'33'E
L358 38.52 N64'09'58'E
L359 57.73 N78'04'57E
L360 39.99 N 89'16'03"E
L361 40.40 N6421'14'E
L362 55.00 N7131'04'E
L363 44.82 N5111'20"E
L364 203.36 S4452'33'E
L365 218.36 S44'46'23'W
L366 1220 S3604'13'W
L367 19.15 S53'49'46'W
L368 27.52 S10 '52'W
L359 97.65 S33106'03'E
L370 40.81 S48W05*E
L371 13.43 S2823'14°E
L372 51.92 SD8'46'24"E
L373 20.63 S221 6'40'W
L374 6207 19'44"W
L375 9.05 S6624'15'W
L376 56.74 S7928'47'W
L377 11.66 N8334'34"W
L378 55.31 N663755"W
L379 85.31 S72'OW16'W
ON 5266 N74'41'36°W
L381 19.74 S75'44'1rW
L382 19.74 51636'03"W
L383 57.59 S1258'04"E
L385 17.53 S65'00'08"W
L386 27.70 N8900'28'W
L387 12.89 S7211'48"W
L388 12.89 S3436'21"W
L389 24.87 S1548'37W
L390 9.22 S2908'16"W
L391 9.22 S55'4734W
L392 48.82 S59'0713"W
L393 159.87 N0904'31°W
L394 89.01 S41'45'19'W
L395 60.87 S12'41'46"W
L396 86.94 5163754"W
L397 80.31 SOO'32'34'E
L398 45.56 S0231'33'E
L399 128.71 S1 8'51'56"W
L400 95.60 S4916'41"W
L401 35.35 523'41'53"W
L402 62.27 53251'22"W
L403 124.06 S0322'01"W
JOB NUMBER: 00910-0166
SCALE: 1" - 200'
CAD NUMBER: VB101-O09100166
PIS: OEM
PARTY CHERF: CB.MC.DW,AK
CAD TECH: ACS
FIELD BOO"AGE: W1239/16
DRAWING NUMBER: 2070-9e9
SHEET 9 OF 11
LINE TABLE (CONTINUES)
E LENGTH BEARING
4 26. 25 51034'43"E
5 2&89 506'01'24"E
j
6 43.32 53624'37W
7 64.44 537'31'35°W
8 842.35 576'05'52"W
9 52.88 S76V5'S2"W
L
0 43.24 N35'04'11"W
L411 16.24 N14'49'48W
L412 20.31 N0352'46'W
L413 26.82 N01 '06'59'W
L414 52.11 N1 25'58"E
L415 27.01 N3329'01"E
L416 100.06 N1550'03"W
L417 57.75 N3525'33"E
L418 54.40 N66'48'O6"E
L419 55.05 N2944'43°E
L420 96.70 N435235°W
L421 67.28 N2323'13°W
L422 106.28 N37-WOO'E
L423 92.56 N8 11'54"W
L424 93.00 N1 826'05'W
L425 33.82 N75'58'26'E
L426 131.52 N04'4D'47"W
L427 45.17 N45'00'01'
L426 107.58 N4045'18'W
L429 64.59 N1110'11"W
L430 61.52 N3532'17'E
L431 65.54 N0425'04"W
L432 1.52 N5.21'01"W
L433 13.12 N085725°W
L434 165.49 NG8'5r25'W
L435 155.98 N6931'07"E
L436 42.85 55350'29'E
L437 38.67 N432744"E
L438 45.18 N652242°E
L439 38.59 N32'45'29'E
L440 70.74 N4530'34°E
L441 52.58 N0158'33'W
L442 76.63 N0738'1rE
L443 56.39 N2r42'07'W
L444 92.65 N0519'33"W
L445 85.84 N5126'38"E
L446 109.58 N0515'10"E
L447 68.05 N705425'E
L448 60.37 N3636'27'E
L449 86.21 N7658'37"E
L450 45.14 N66M2'21"E
L451 22.57 N5330'42"E
L452 19.19 N1751'29"W
L453 45.33 N3556'39'W
L454 96.33 N0723'39"W
L455 79.78 N2732'11'E
L456 118.65 N6120'27 E
L457 86.50 NB6'05'30E
L458 65.84 N7055'18"E
L459 28.05 N88'44'00"E
L460 56.49 N3052'53'E
L461 106.79 N06'06'57°E
L462 112.38 587'42'25"E
L463 4200 N31-45-25-E
L464 37.62 N7317'51"E
L465 20.28 N451)7'27'E
L466 707.25 N76'09'00°E
L457 77.21 S42'30'42E
L468 106.47 5441)1'13'W
L469 196.28 55729'10"W
L470 188.86 S73V4'44"W
L471 65.21 511'4255"W
L472 103.99 54024'00'W
L473 86.66 53352'49"E
L474 152.03 SD8'lS32'W
176.34 50811'09'E
40.20 S35V0'01'W
134.33 53718'50'E
184.89 S15'56'23'W
I 58.52
t 534'36'15"W
13&03 51255'57'W
49.46 S3V36'39'E
L482 1 95 .70 S12'53'49"W
122
.09
52700'39W
W
Lj
LINE TABLE (CONTINUES)
LINE LENGTH BEARING
1-484 204.45 S63'50'55
L485 59.05 S64V6'55'E
L486 30.46 S26'48'11'
1-487 26.02 N7837'S5"W
1-488 205.41 S04'43'12"E
L489 120.78 55255'48°W
L490 61.42 5265V21'E
L491 2.20 S58'01'39°W
L492 68.21 S7O'I8'52°W
L493 97.44 N4321'4rW
L494 78.25 N24-IF22-W
L495 246.37 N5817*44'W
L496 123.44 N3327'41"W
L497 63.04 NO '38'04"W
L498 247.41 N0523' "E
L499 322.40 N1453'14'E
L5DO 161,84 N142650E
L501 65.67 N2242'36"W
L502 320.40 N0226'17'W
L503 72.49 N1219'08'W
L504 181.33 NDV44'5rE
L505 57.10 N11TV21"W
L505 156.45 N2615'33'E
4&34 N66 8'4rW
60.66 N4454'37 E
69.35 N6128'S8°
L51 46.27 N7410'48"E
g 132.77 N29'05'43E
397.99 N521)4'46°E
154.27 N5342'06'E
159.94 N19VW39"W
L515 99.23 N5337'09"W
L516 87.71 N1714'44"W
L517 83.27 N0244'48°W
L518 162.40 N0949'42"E
L519 70.78 N25V1'45"E
1-520 200.03 N3527'46'E
L521 116.59 N6429'51°E
L522 8271 S26'40'54'E
L523 213.51 S423r30°W
1-524 153.64 53030'59'W
L525 195.09 50119'44'E
L526 119.14 54410'53'E
L527 74.15 53154'42"E
L528 72.65 N40-17'04'E
L529 275.34 N58'38'00°E
L530 146.76 N6256'16"E
L531 264.54 N00'30'59"W
L532 187.15 N123V03"W
98.30 N4434'55'E
65.26 53852'18'E
8264 51610*57 E
73.24 51110'08'E
p 54.51 SO642'42'W
181.17 SD031'57 E
97.28 51112'13'W
L540 113.37 51112'13'00
L541 83.19 N70'3B'06"E
L542 65.48 N055B'47 E
L543 281.86 N2435'1C"
L544 109.47 N33V8'35'E
L545 69.72 SBO'48'24"E
L546 366.13 51811'21"W
L547 91.47 S8D12'36°E
L548 220.31 N6959'20"E
L549 67.78 N1525507W
L550 50.25 N18'30'1WE
L551 59.44 57529'28'E
1-552 92.15 51752'40'E
L553 70.06 S89V4'37°E
L554 255.15 N2820'49"E
L555 141.04 N41'30'53'E
L556 187.53 N43'37'42"E
L557 159.54 N3153'40"E
L550 84.89 N1010'53"E
L559 82.72 N3834'10"W
L560 10223 58118'00"W
L561 48.17 N3759'56"W
L562 79.45 N401 3'01"E
L563 162.69 N2958'35°W
LINE TABLE (CONTINUES)
UNE LENGTH BEARING
L564 129.33 579201"W
L565 105.71 N6924'22"W
1-566 72.25 N1337'20'E
1-567 80.17 S7647'20'E
L563 47.75 N1618'03"W
L569 117.15 N10'34'21'E
L570 47.60 58436'02"E
L571 116.36 N3126'S0"E
1-572 8&55 N0151'11'W
L573 63.52 N75'30'29'
L574 101.15 N75'30'29'E
L575 77.58 58359'39"E
L576 105.33 7'37'E
L577 26.85 S4338' 1"W
L578 103.81 55119'25W
L579 96.50 S4O°45'31"W
L580 69.30 $30'06'21"W
L581 109.50 S10'00'24"E
L582 112.52 52739'5rE
L553 106.90 45'51'E
L554 155.92 S 54'37°E
L585 51.42 53532'37 E
L586 135.79 N43'58' 8'E
L587 59.53 N55'09'55'E
L588 174.28 NB9'00'43'E
L589 87.48 58717'23"
L590 46.65 N5658'39
L591 63.21 N64 *25'59"E
L592 B8.64 N51'35'19"E
L593 41.32 N5050'39"E
L594 7&31 N1010'03'W
L595 120.5,V N 20-56'38"W
L596 221.131' S41'51'53"E
L597 60.8x' 5171r32°W
L598 75.10 S '30'42"W
L599 49.58 S30'06'43°W
L6DD 61.75 5611455"W
L601 151.55 S72U7*31'W
L602 229.21 57657'06"W
1-603 93.62 52850'19"E
L804 53.87 53459'52°W
L605 144.92 57358'02°W
L506 155.25 58018'06"W
L607 174.24 54418'59"W
L608 237.61 5301)4'44"W
L609 179.94 53354'33W
L610 76.25 S33'04'04°W
1-611 99.26 5735993"E
L612 20&67 5511)1'02°E
L613 47.73 N5732'1 5"E
L614 59.91 58932'51
L615 112.07 N26V6'36"E
1-616 145.77 N54'08'D6'E
L617 95.62 N5712'54E
L618 54.06 S51'43'25"E
L619 67.07 S29'42'17'W
L620 100.84 S49'02'14°W
L621 150.04 S49'54'34W
1-622 34.38 54119'22°E
L623 107.57 N6136'05°E
L624 50.41 55353'46'E
L625 127.23 SD411'32'W
L626 51.07 S633r51°E
L627 66.91 N37'41'00'
L628 32.71 N4953'1 2"E
L629 72.40 N76'34'21'E
L630 166.48 51951'55"W
L631 142.37 57013'34"E
L632 8224 N57V8'17"E
L633 37.06 S66'49'57"E
L634 83.05 5021)7'S0'W
L635 40.49 54353'07'E
L836 56.06 S6927'2r
L637 5&27 N64'36'03"E
L638 136.34 N0018' 3°
L639 100.02 N09'40'14°
L640 74.84 N4819'07"E
L641 156.64 N44'42'03°E
L642 196.28 N16'46'06"E
L643 104.55 N1935'40"E
243 NORTH FRONT STREET
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
NORTH CAROLINA FIRM LICENSE NUMBER C-0342
LINE TABLE (CONTINUES)
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L644 144.75 N3 28'09°E
L645 161.23 N3r46'19°
L646 116.31 N47'45'15"E
L647 31.32 N47'W15'E
L648 250.10 S41'46`45°E
L849 127.10 55058'10°W
L650 185.15 54423'49W
L651 135.77 5141)1'15°W
L652 55.93 52520'08"W
L653 86.31 51757'15°E
L654 101,00 588M2'08'E
L855 197.34 55839'49°E
L656 112.87 55839'49'E
L657 515.35 51125'42"W
L658 167.97 N28V ' 8°W
L659 84.09 1355'36'W
L660 6&62 N1 234'38'W
L681 97.89 563 8'11"W
L662 210.08 N7 30'14°W
L563 142.95 N731)4'03'W
L664 39.56 S17MV3 °W
L665 77.03 50823'31"W
L666 83.91 S52-31'21 '
LS87 135.36 S43-46-31°
1-668 129.37 N7634°14°W
L669 108.46 N 5'25'W
L670 36.85 S43°40'44W
L671 86.94 55616'53'W
L672 131.98 50216'38°W
L673 210.75 5511)4' 5"E
L674 223.60 N89'42'36'E
L675 106.38 N7156'46°E
L676 223.50 N7678'53'E
L677 137.66 511 '34"W
L678 53.13' N585VO6"E
L679 145.38 S76Ur57"W
L680 75.64 520'4548"W
L681 85.56 N4426'16'W
L682 36.95 556'49'14'00
L693 62.56 52610'16'W
L684 70.55 N8850'52°W
L685 94.53 N59'5947W
L686 13213 N6518'38"W
L657 51.51 N5613'13°W
L668 61.32 N4739' 9'W
L639 10204 N36'49'S5"W
L590 54.26 N0637'15°W
L691 46.87 N '47'21'W
L692 64.67 N1311'23°W
L693 37.61 N201414'E
L694 87.51 N63'1 5'55"W
L695 59.52 N6759'39"W
L696 83.62 N69'44'3 'W
L697 92.35 N7513'O5'W
L698 23.38 58415'55°W
L699 66.19 Sir49'43'E
L700 66.29 7'40'07'
L701 66.44 54817'31"E
L702 124.92 55335'23'E
L703 51.75 5111)0'43"W
L704 91.06 N801 8'20"W
L705 43.66 54412'55°W
L706 73.24 NBO'57*05°W
L707 68.62 N20'41'20'E
L708 56.50 N1112'44"W
L709 105.31 N41'S0'19'W
L710 85.13 N1957'20"W
L711 72.28 N0528'37°W
L712 108.12 N4738'03'W
L713 19.24 58714'40"W
L714 134.53 52351'41"W
L715 76.10 N45°5SOB"W
L716 135.05 N09'41'13'E
L717 67.38 N64'1 2'09'W
L718 150.90 N6115'42°W
L719 0.00 53413'42"W
L720 127.00 53413'24"W
L721 60.18 N671,05"W
L722 81.76 N17'41'45"E
L723 53.02 N4835'14'W
LINE TABLE (CONTINUES)
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L724 76.22 N0237'21"W
L725 60913 N47 7'43'W
L726 31.12 S873r54'W
L727 70.14 N74V3'5 W
L723 62.70 N5429'31°W
L729 79.53 56725'33"W
L730 12241 504'56'30"W
L731 55.18 S11'23'48'
L732 109.47 S11'05'58"E
L733 170.03 SD2'Ir38'
L734 121.45 S141)8'14"W
L735 31.88 52125'41"E
L736 100.48 735'45'E
L737 131.81 S4229'1 O"E
L738 82.47 S46'41'01"E
L739 205.60 548'05'58'
L740 92.94 S41V1'
L741 96.33 53932'37"W
L742 148.78 N4513'49'W
L743 105.75 N45'49'40'W
L744 139.34 N43'05'17'W
L745 105.74 N4125'2rW
L746 81.89 N3116'47W
L747 110.17 N1658'09'W
L743 176.51 N0722'51'E
L749 172.54 N04'08'20'W
L750 190.27 N1 1)5'50°W
1 24&47 S76'03'54"W
2 45.11 511183E
3 73.88 N7757'37 W
4 113.45 S55'4r24'W
R
5 83.43 50628'22°W
6 146.01 S23'46'S5'E
7 77.85 S46'46'15"E
L75a 93,00 574'40'43°W
L759 130.12 N 39'13'05"W
L760 146.27 N1 1'50'42"W
L761 4&91 N7854'41'W
L762 151.67 58427' 'W
L763 68.78 S45V4'48°W
L764 92.74 53032'47'W
L765 91.72 54839'44"W
L785 19&74 S6340'41"W
L767 208.58 54712'31'W
L768 17&16 562'07'20°W
L769 98.75 N4723'48°W
L770 258.02 N78'43'05°W
LT71 31.94 N5520'41'E
L772 103.47 N541O'04"E
L773 26.25 N4531'30"E
L774 23.55 N19'41'51"E
L775 74.78 N3320'15"E
L776 95.76 N7158'12°E
L777 34.97 NB754'25'E
L778 43.89 N3824'25°E
L779 33.80 N7432'55'E
L780 5217 N0439'1rW
L781 82.22 N6751'44E
L782 53.40 N49'45'32'E
L783 38.51 N36'40'12"
L784 98.91 N4830'54'E
L785 34.44 N5445'02'E
L786 27.24 N54'45'02'E
L787 71.56 N0154'11"E
L785 39.00 N28V4'4rW
L789 128.66 N2058'43'W
L790 35.31 N01'S5'41"E
L791 80.80 N1353'34"W
L792 78.48 N07'08'25"W
L793 34.13 N09'42'2rE
L794 33.42 N3123'01°W
L795 72.68 N5750'32'W
L796 51.34 N5615' 9"W
L797 44.19 N7829'53"W
L798 31.11 N7225'44"W
L799 34.77 N5556'09"W
1-800 26.94 N66'4900W
L801 49.46 N6353'30"W
L802 48.27 N38'44'52W
L803 63.78 NOB'46'36'W
CONSERVATION EASEMENT SURVEY
FOR
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP - ONSLOW COUNTY- NORTH CAROLINA
JULY 6, 2010
JOB NUMBER: 00910-0166
SCALE: 1" = 200'
CAD NUMBER: 18101-009100166
PLS: DEM
PARTY CHIEF: CB,MC,DWAK
CAD TECH: ACS
FIELD BOOK/PAGE: W1239/16
DRAWING NUMBER: 201 a-0"9
SHEET 10 OF 11
LINE TABLE (CONTINUES)
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L804 40.87 N463B'38"E
L805 28.51 N0018'16'W
L806 36.28 N1535'55"E
L807 70.39 N30'22'22"W
L808 89.89 N721,08"E
L809 46.18 N2213'18'E
L810 39.29 N46'21'50"E
L811 39.79 N4319'55'E
L812 43.62 N11'06'07"E
L813 26.56 N57!WO1"E
L814 15.47 N1434'07'E
L815 60.39 N39'OB'38"E
L816 47.09 NO130'34'E
L817 39.88 N36W54"E
L818 77.33 N3616'10"W
L819 79.60 N12'4418"E
L820 57.10 N53'29'10'E
L821 52.45 N7273'01"E
L822 127.44 SO 37'S5"E
L823 928.75 5372729"E
L824 51.84 T32'31'W
L825 29.70 N8579°12"W
L826 28.97 S81 '40'W
L827 4219 N6572'39'W
L820 72.20 568'42'24 W
L829 115.70 $5638'05"W
L830 62,95 S14'46'52'E
L831 50.27 S0412'52'W
L832 105.75 S1630'50'E
L833 23.77 S3724'47"E
L834 30.16 S0614'37"E
L835 36.31 S26'06'39"E
L836 44.51 S2118'27E
L837 78.90 S1415'59'E
L83B 28.76 S41'1 8`25'E
L839 53.11 S157W44"E
L840 60.51 S0279'42"E
L541 48.91 S33'40'49'W
L842 99.92 S4501'53'W
L843 144.58 5050734"E
L844 95.48 S30'43'28"W
L845 63.97 S7934'47W
L846 52.45 S7478'13°W
L847 46.09 N6936'13'W
L848 79,11 S54'20'28"W
L849 30.00 S7936'32"W
L850 31.91 SBB04'25"W
L851 19.86 S3808'31'W
L852 69.94 S55'26'25"W
L053 21.30 S7338'55"W
L854 42.34 SIB3B'OB"W
L855 41.82 S8952'01'W
L856 30.72 546'25'19"W
L557 7.81 S5208'24W
L858 21.56 S29'37'10"W
L859 76.99 S4536'33"W
L860 3202 SBO'11'37'W
L861 49.94 S4106'40'W
L862 335.18 N4100'53"W
L863 151.78 N6934'21"E
L864 185.97 NBT42'38"E
L865 181.88 N6810'43'
L866 128.86 N5409'43"E
L867 137.91 N68'26'01"E
L86B 154.75 N71'15'32"E
L869 119.93 N81'25'07E
L870 18214 N6430'28"E
L871 146.67 N36'45'29"E
L872 93.29 N36'45'29'E
L873 106.21 NO409'39'W
L874 21.29 N1135'21"W
L875 58.83 N1 00737W
L876 66.14 N0101'32E
L877 80.73 N1231'53"W
L878 14295 N050750'W
L879 83.83 N2643'43"E
LOBO 116.42 N1931'52"E
L881 488.83 S37°2729"E
1862 64.76 S3644'29"E
1863 101.52 53833'49"W
LINE TABLE (CONTINUES)
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L884 46.76 S28'41'03'W
L885 41.20 500'21'22"E
LBBB 11221 517'00'35"W
L807 45.23 S88'04'22'W
L888 56.04 S7410'49'W
L889 58.77 S24'28'02"W
L890 29.88 S3222'07°W
1-891 38.50 S241 8'29"W
L892 28.20 N78'04'27'W
L893 28.34 S11°45'46"W
L894 67.02 5473559"W
L895 64.52 N88'07°07E
L896 41.37 S4912'06'E
L897 10.03 S7618'23'E
L898 33.16 S48'54'14"E
L899 57.04 S73'4V39"E
L900 30.68 S743W°DO'E
L901 36.24 53932'09°E
L902 39.54 N6105°48"E
L903 50.95 S5O'W43"E
L904 38.80 $463729"E
L905 34.27 S27-IV22"E
L906 2292 S40'52'02°E
L907 6235 847°55'24E
L908 42.26 S1706'OS"W
L909 22.70 S1514'52"W
L910 34.18 S2128'50"E
L911 37.48 S5631'04°E
L912 33.67 5622748"E
L913 25.11 S5735'05"E
L914 20.38 S743O'20'E
L915 18.06 S87'25'34E
L916 27.62 N8655'50'E
L917 29.21 733'07'
L918 40.94 N64'38'36"E
L919 54.09 S40'40'15'E
L920 2234 57343'41"E
L921 56.24 D14'44"E
L922 52.29 S0976'27"E
L923 21.86 S4400'20'W
L924 41.45 S7054'25'W
L925 1298 N8914'41"W
L926 39.27 N7711'43"W
L927 31.56 N7903'15'W
L928 3274 N2400'26"W
L929 42.25 N75'43'56'W
L930 57.13 N761722'W
L931 1294 S68'58'28"W
L932 37.19 N8106'28"W
L933 32.98 N6827'13"W
L934 46.95 N26'4B'16"W
L935 17.19 N5502'18'W
L936 39.87 N5555'55'W
L937 18.03 N2350'37W
L938 24.68 N5008'O6"W
L939 30.97 N31'3712"W
L940 29.13 N3924'38"W
L941 51.24 N1135'47W
L942 34.17 N291 9'56"W
L943 40.78 N53°44'03"W
L944 33.59 S3817'06"W
L945 55.44 N3810'40"W
L946 40.14 S42'24'08"W
L947 80.59 N41'46'21"W
L948 40.01 N6155'57W
L949 34.58 S55'22'18'W
L950 55.75 N27'22'28"W
L951 43.14 56301'32"W
L952 6236 556'45'19"W
L953 43.74 N3951'42'W
L954 98.15 S19°25'47W
L955 77.03 N7833'17'W
L956 39.33 S7639'10"W
L957 34.96 S3114'12"W
L958 67.35 S82'1 6'20'W
L959 17.78 N24'29'2YW
L960 27.91 S8832'44W
L951 40.25 58313'19"W
L962 29.49 N71°32'41"W
L963 3241 S80'45'03 'W
1 ?? .. 1 I? y 5!?
' .1 C f ' .
LINE TABLE (CONTINUES)
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L964 24.03 SBB'52'11'W
L965 39.66 S1539'33"W
L966 36.98 S570514°W
L967 21.94 537'59'15"W
L968 67.87 S24'41'21'E
L969 25.35 S16'58'36"E
L970 19.58 S3B09'48"E
L971 70.78 542'03'49"E
L972 8721 S580D'26"E
L 773 70.79 S60'29'01'E
L974 101.16 569'49'19'
L975 7207 S7505'46'E
L976 66.70 S 01'41"E
L977 55.24 S6406'58'E
L978 35.21 SO 51'44"E
L979 43.25 S0004'37E
L980 31.51 S87'49'5"W
L981 73.76 502'28'25"E
L982 6256 S6507'38'W
L983 57.83 N6954'52"W
L984 93.76 N8305'48'W
L985 123.31 NO11715'
L986 18.61 N6538'32'W
L987 8216 539'25'1 'W
L988 117.55 N8401'53"W
L989 5260 N0300'03"E
L990 81.39 N27'49'57"E
L991 38.92 N0013'49'W
L992 38.37 N70'49'34"W
L993 41.94 N36'39'19'W
L994 45.81 N7912'48"W
L995 66.81 SiT48'19°W
L996 64.51 N7218'01"W
L997 66.73 NOT35' 3"E
L996 18.42 N06'22'1 4"E
L999 39.15 NO6'4O'34"E
L1000 36.24 N12'24'19"E
L1001 40.05 N07'O9'1VW
L1002 34.27 N2613'04"W
L1003 41,55 S7714'1 0"W
L1004 16.87 S7415'12"W
L1005 37.33 S8914'03'W
L1006 29.26 S46'39'57"W
L1007 24.73 S3752'54'W
L1008 27.61 S4007'52'W
L1DD9 15.95 S4835'40°W
L1010 27.41 S3021'1B'W
L1011 4282 55816'21"W
L1012 74.92 N801 8'39"W
L1013 69.04 S1352'21'E
L1014 7247 58310'15"W
L1015 23.64 N2932'31"W
L1018 49.84 '51"W
L1017 18.72 N8702'51'W
1-1018 43.75 N69'25'25"W
L1019 23.67 N8513'30'W
L1020 50.46 N7030'05"W
L1021 49.68 S33'Or32'W
L1022 17.78 S2235'30"E
L1023 28.21 51034'59"E
L1024 21.04 529-2 '35'
L1025 36.51 S57'21'38"E
L1026 33.57 S63'1 5'35"E
L1027 1259 S5233'03"E
L1028 25.16 S7618'22"E
L1029 3203 S5438'51"
L1030 44.88 S5031'44'E
L1031 31.87 S2400'30"E
L1032 43.77 S451719'E
L1033 56.83 S531 7'24"E
L1034 58.20 SO7'35'11"W
Li 035 58.80 56246'04"E
L1038 81.64 S463T1B"W
L1037 64.10 S57'37'50'W
L1038 46.54 S4444'00'W
L1039 50.87 N7103'13"W
L1040 60.77 N0105'38"W
L1041 40.19 N26-20'1 9"E
L1042 6283 N0639'20'E
L1043 20.77 N2133'52"W
243 NORTH FRONT STREET
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
NORTH CAROLINA FIRM LICENSE NUMBER: C-0342
LINE TABLE (CONTINUES)
UNE LENGTH BEARING
17.29 N48'3447'W
45 18.52 N48 1YW
46 24.10 N37-01'39'W
N
47 31.11 N 02'00'W
48 26.41 N72*W45'W
49 18.42 N732W20'W
50 33.14 S8519'OB'W
L1051 103.10 N3838'36'W
L1052 34.40 N1217'02'E
53 36.33 2314'OO'
54 2 3.09 N '49'45"W
55 48.61 N6352'28'W
56 211.18 N1110' 7E
R
57 138.08 S7536'51'W
58 17.20 N6633'51"W
59 53.26 S6902'33"W
60
Lio 83.30 N3533'1 'W
L1061 100.66 N1013'49"W
L1062 58.60 N8236'28"E
L1063 73.74 N1859'19'E
L1064 74.34 S48'43'19"E
L1065 48.53 N08'2745"E
L1066 7263 N65 '41"E
L1067 75.37 S5919'38'E
L1058 62.96 S0615'01'W
L1069 10.29 S140T18"W
L1070 5227 S14'06'58"E
L1071 19.34 S71'31'06"W
Li 072 10.24 S4215'06"E
L1073 30.31 501'24'19"E
L1074 2244 11 5'33'W
L1075 88.38 N4614'15'E
L1076 2281 N4T46'19"E
L1077 50.21 N5434'09"
L1078 1272 N4353'28'E
L1079 66.31 N300747'
L10BO 48.33 N6815'36"E
L1081 41.49 N27'08'28'E
L1082 44.88 N221724W
L1083 39.79 N35W25"E
L1084 51.00 N0549'48°W
L1085 57.19 N3630'47"E
L1086 78.43 N4204'OB"E
L1087 140.40 S5912'59"E
L1088 69.90 S17'2716'W
L1089 34.06 S11 T 4'W
L1090 35.03 S13'49'52'W
1-1091 285 S1833'04'W
L1092 44.14 S63'38'18"E
L1093 27.87 S2628'57"E
L1094 17.68 S7T41'46"E
L1095 94.24 S6705'35E
L1096 120.19 51945'31"W
L1097 6&48 S8442'17'W
L1098 47.57 S180732W
L1099 20.21 S7532'17'W
L11oo 84.67 N55'20'20"W
L1101 21.06 N6915' "W
L1102 28,96 S06'41'36"W
L1103 73.05 55116'45"W
L1104 39.49 S52'35'2YW
L1105 81.09 588121'20"W
L1106 108.95 N6326'52'W
L1107 5209 N85'31'51"W
L1108 19.82 S30'46'32"E
L1109 34.86 N3131'08'
L7110 71.70 N37"26"E
11111 65.96 N28'53'27E
11112 259X1 N1217'00'
L1113 161.66 N04'4346'E
L1114 130.90 N0336'16'
L1115 149.12 NO67f32'E
L1116 16&59 N3916'13"W
L1117 65.19 N30'41'58"W
1-1118 181.03 N3723'00"W
L1119 251.10 N39'21'40'W
L1120 19.73 N875716"E
L1121 328.61 5783557E
L1122 101.97 S7903'06"E
L1123 231.87 S2556'16'E
LINE TABLE (CONTINUES)
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1124 247.57 13'02°E
L1125 54.33 52539'25
L1125 295.19 504'46'14°
L1127 167.71 SO443'46'W
L1128 215.22 535b4°W
L1129 44.90 S2010'48°E
L1130 219.68 S1613'39°W
L1131 78.96 S8938'47"W
L1132 125.54 S09'M47W
L1133 260.02 N7834' 'W
L1134 135.58 N153514"
L1135 65.03 N13W29'E
L1136 163.45 N3334'39'E
L1137 116.29 NB4'4754'E
L1138 113.83 S69'SD'55'
L1139 84.41 54417'39'
L1140 135.22 S1411'46°W
L1141 85.72 51313'48'
11142 166.25 S16 5'03"E
L1143 115.85 N805 '28"W
11144 279.77 N80'41'00'W
11145 57.26 N79'26'21'W
CONSERVATION EASEMENT SURVEY
FOR
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP - ONSLOW COUNTY - NORTH CAROLINA
JULY 6, 2010
JOB NUMBER: 00910-0166
SCALE: 1' = 200'
CAD NUMBER: VB101-009100166
PLS: DEM
PARTY CHEF: CB,MC,DWAK
CAD TECH: ACS
FIELD BOOK/PAGE: W1239/16
DRAWING NUMBER: Mir M169
SHEET 11 OF 11
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA E
COUNTY OF CNSLOW
eaFFMtiW FVREST
RVC,XAMS RENEW OFFICER OF ONSLOW
COUNTY, CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF THE h-VY E `q
M/PLAT TO WHICH THIS CERFICATION IS
STATUUTO Y REQUIREMENTS FFORRRECORDNG. AFFIXED MEETS THE
SHEET 2
SHEET 3

m
n
m
z
v
Hu
z
LEGEND
N/F - NOW/FORMERLY 1
DB = DEED BOOK
MB = MAP BOOK
PG - PAGE
0 = IRON ROD SET
IRF0 = IRON ROD FOUND
IPFO = IRON PIPE FOUND
CMFO = CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND
----- =PROPERTY LINE /
SCALE: 1' = 1000'
6 560 1000 2000 3000
12.21 ACRES
SHEET 5
SHEET 4
RENEW OFFICER
DATE:
FILED FOR REGISTRATION AT M O,CLOCK
THIS OF AD _
IN PLAT CABINET ?SUDE

Kttll?
REGISTER OF DEEDS
VICINITY MAP - NOT TO
2.97 ACRES
1.20 ACRES ? 0.42 A SURVEYOR'S NOTES:
? 1. BEARINGS BASED ON NC GRID (NAD 83) CORS 96.
45.15 ACRES 2. REFERENCES: DEED BOOK 2710 PAGE 916.
DEED BOOK 516 PAGE 408.
3. SURVEYOR HAS MADE NO INVESTIGATION OR INDEPENDENT
SEARCH FOR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, ENCUMBRANCES,
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, OWNERSHIP, TITLE EVIDENCE, OR
w ANY OTHER FACTS THAT AN ACCURATE AND CURRENT TITLE
w SEARCH MAY DISCLOSE,
a
4. SUBSURFACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS WERE NOT
EXAMINED OR CONSIDERED AS A PART OF THIS SURVEY. NO
59'67 N U
STATEMENT IS THE NDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD IOOMER THIS
17.83 ACR THAT MAY Y AFF AFFECT THE HE USE USE OR DEVELOPMENT OF OF THIS TRACT.
\? \ 5. SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAYS, AND OR
ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD THAT MAY EFFECT THIS PROPERTY.
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION:
SHEET 6 SHEET 7 \ 1, DAVID L JONES, JR, L-3872, CERTIFY THAT THIS PUT WAS DRAWN
?- V UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY
\ SUPERVISION FROM INFORMATION SHOWN IN DEED BOOKS AND (OR)
MAPS REFERENCED ON THIS PLAT; THAT LINES NOT ACTUALLY
r ?•? / SURVEYED APPEAR AS BROKEN LINES AND WERE PLOTTED FROM
INFORMATION AS NOTED ON THE PLAT; THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION
AS CALCULATED BY LATITUDES AND DEPARTURES WAS GREATER THAN
\ \? 1:10,000; THAT THE AREA IS COMPUTED BY COORDINATE METHOD;
THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH G.S. 47-30 AS
AMENDED. WTMESMY ORIGINAL SIGMTURE, LICENSE N BER, AND
SEAL THIS TH Y OF-J)t e AD.,
SHEET 8 THIS SURVEY IS OF ANOTHER CATEGORY, SUCH AS THE RECOMBINATION
OF EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT-ORDERED SURVEY, OR OTHER
1•???_ 3.00 ACRES EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION. MAD
UNDER
SUP FOLLLOWINGGINFORMATION WASE USED TO PERFORM THIS SURVEY. THE
F- y j(_
it
_ CLASS OF SURVEY., C - RURAL AND FARMLAND SURVEY
POSITIONAL ACCURACY: 0.098
TYPE OF CPS FIELD PROCEDURE: OPUS
OVERALL ACREAGE: 251.96 ACRES /
DATES OF SURVEY. JANUARY 3, 2007
DATUM/EPOCH: NC GRID NAD53 CORS,46
PUBLISHED/FIXED-CONTROL USED,KENANSNLLE CORE
ASTLE-HAYNECORS
NEW BERN 2 CORS
GEOID MODEU GEOID 03 COMBINED GRID FACTOR: 099899370-/ - _. UNITS; U.S. SURVEY FEET r ' 3
MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, LICENSE NUMBER; AND SEAL THIS
- DAY OF ?AD'?
r - ( °T per
- DAVID JONES;-JR.
PROFESSIONAL LAND SU R 9; 872 ; e
??'T?/T'??r CONSERVATION EASEMENT SURVEY JOB NUMBER: 00910-0166
&CF?'T?'? L FOR SCALE: 01 = 9100'
1.l M
CAD NUMBER: V81D1-OD910D166
243 NORTH FRONT STREET WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE PL9: DEM
PARTY
? cB.MCJSAx
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401 DEVELOPMENT COMPANY CAD
TECH- ACS
TELEPHONE: [phone]
'
FAX: [phone] PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT - 251.96 ACRES F>EID BOOK/PAGE: W1239/18
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP - ONSLOW COUNTY - NORTH CAROLINA DRAWING NUMBER: 201 o-oss
NORTH CAROLINA FIRM LICENSE NUMBER: C-0342 JULY 6, 2010 SHEET 1 OF ll
1
air
z
O
Z
Ll --7
N/F
HOFFMAN FOREST
MB 21 PG 140

i?
i
i

1

?S
INSET "A"
SCALE 1"=20'
LEGEND
N/F - NOW/FORMERLY
DB - DEED BOOK
MB = MAP BOOK
PG = PAGE
• - IRON ROD SET
IRF0 - IRON ROD FOUND
IPF0 - IRON PIPE FOUND
CMFE1 = CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUN
.PROPERTY LINE
SCALE: 1" = 200'
6 160 260 460 800
N/F
NEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
MB 53 PAGE 3
INSET "A"
NFM&CRMD
243 NORTH FRONT STREET
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
NORTH CAROLINA FIRM LICENSE NUMBER: C-0342
NA-
WYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
DEED BOOK 2710 PAGE 916
N/1-
REYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
DEED BOOK 2710 PACE 916
IRS
CONSERVATION EASEMENT SURVEY
FOR
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP - ONSLOW COUNTY- NORTH CAROLINA
JULY 6, 2010
N/F
HOFFMAN FOREST
MB 21 PG 140
.I
.I
70B NUMBER: DD910-0166
SCALE: 1' - 200'
CAD NUMBER: VB1 01 -0091 D01 66
PIS: DEM
PARTY CHIEF: CB.MC.DWAK
CAD TECH: ACS
FIELD BOOK/PAGE: W1239/16
DRAWING NUMBER: 20`0-069
SHEET 2 OF 11
N/F
HOFFMAN FOREST
MB 21 PG 140
_ 2d SOI ROAD
IP
IRS
3
o?
rN
00
N
T IRS
SOVW33•W
15.70
IRS
INSET "B"
SCALE 1"=20'
,1
8< 1
N/F
KEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DELELOPMENT COMPANY
DEED BOOK 2710 PACE 916
SEE INSET "B"
MA1CHM Or - - ? ? _
SCALE: 1'= 200' Xl:M "-M
243 NORTH FRONT STREET
D 160 260 400 600 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
NORTH CAROLINA FIRM LICENSE NUMBER: C-0342
HOFFMAN FOREST
CONSERVATION EASEMENT SURVEY
FOR
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP - ONSLOW COUNTY- NORTH CAROLINA
JULY 6, 2010
LEGEND
N/F = NOW/FORMERLY
DB - DEED BOOK
MB - MAP BOOK
PG - PAGE
0 = IRON RDD SET
IRF0 = IRON ROD FOUND
IPF0 - IRON PIPE FOUND
CMFEI - CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUN
----- - PROPERTY LINE
H
00??J
m
m
g
a
o_
2 ?
L36 11.60 z
y3 33.21'
4 33.26'
J V ??
70B NUMBER: 00910-0166
SCALE: 1' - 200'
CAD NUMBER: VB101-009100166
PIS: DEM
PARTY CHIEF: CB.MC.DW.AK
CAD TECH: ACS
FIELD BOOB/PAGE: W1239/18
DRAWING NUMBER: 2ma-0169
SHEET 3 OF 11
2
n I
2aas
"?" 1 > r I
_ i I. e I
l
m
W
r7
D
6
z
O
2
LEGEND
i
N/F - NOW/FORMERLY
DB - DEED BOOK
MB - MAP BOOK
PG = PAGE
0 = IRON ROD SET
IRF0 -IRON ROD FOUND
IPF0 - IRON PIPE FOUND
CMFEI - CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUN
--- -- - PROPERTY LINE
N/F
REYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
DEED BOOK 2710 PAGE 916
M&Cn10
REBAR AND CAP
N 406646.6200
E 2464178.2900
ELEV.45 .10'
NO GRID NAD 83
N/F
KEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
DEED BOOK 2710 PAGE 916
M&C N9J
REBAR AND CAP
N 406620.0690
E 2464896.7085
ELEV. 47.67
NO GRID NAD 83
N /F
JEAN BRUCE WESTON
DB 501 PG 74
MB5PG97
MATCMMM y
J
? N

CONSERVATION EASEMENT SURVEY JOB NUMBER: 00910-0166
/????''',TTT,???[///??'' j(t?
FOR SCALE: 1' - 200'
SCALE: I"= 200' - 1.1 iV.1116d CAD NUMBEST VB101-009100166
243 NORTH FRONT STREET WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE Pas: DEM
6 100 200 460 Soo WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401 DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PARTY CIS'' CB.MC.DWAK
TELEPHONE: [phone] PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT CAD TECH: ACS
FIELD BOOK/PAGE: W7239/16
FAX: [phone] RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP - ONSLOW COUNTY - NORTH CAROLINA DBAWWG NUMBER: aD-D59
NORTH CAROLINA FIRM LICENSE NUMBER: C-0342 JULY 6, 2010
SHEET 4 OF 11

HOFFMAN FOREST
i
I
i
LEGEND
`I
I
7
I
I
I
I
I
I
N/F = NOW/FORMERLY
DB - DEED BOOK
MB - MAP BOOK
PG - PAGE
• = IRON ROD SET
IRF0 = IRON ROD FOUND
IPF0 - IRON PIPE FOUND
CMFEI - CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUN
- - - - - PROPERTY LINE
MA1C?Il1lE G
M1
KEYERHAEU REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
DEED BOOK 2710 PAGE 916
S
w

1

1
?
°a
a
0

N
HOFFMAN FOREST
MB 21 PG 140
Fl ?I,W
\
!6 ? A
of
ap
?a\
_ ,D s
r
P cb \
5246'
V5 1gti ?`
11111
- _ - - - - J
N/F
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
DEED BOOK 2710 PAGE 916
SCALE: 1" = 200'
6 160 260 460 Boo
243 NORTH FRONT STREET
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
NORTH CAROLINA FIRM LICENSE NUMBER: C-0342
CONSERVATION EASEMENT SURVEY
FOR
WEYERHAEUSER REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
PORTION OF ONSLOW 19 TRACT
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP - ONSLOW COUNTY - NORTH CAROLINA
JULY 6, 2010
JOB NUMBER: 00910-0166
SCALE: 1' - 200'
CAD NUMBER: VB101-009100168
PLB: DEM
PARTY CHEEF: CB.MC,DWAK
CAD TECH: ACS
FMD BOOK/PAGE: W1239/16
DRAWING NUMBER: 20'" 169
SHEET 5 OF 11