20110040 Ver 1_Application_20110111

1@@R
D
'190
,' 11 0040
Office Use '0 y:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification C Form
A. A Iicant Information
1. Processing
I a . Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:

Section 404 Permit E] Section 10 Permit
I
1 b . Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number. or General Permit (GP) number. 31
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
If. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ® Yes ? No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Z Yes ? No
2. Project Information

2a.
Name of project: Beaufort 314 Bridge To Pipe Replacement SR 1721, Little Creek Road Over Little
Creek
WBS Element Number 213.200711
2b. County: Beaufort
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Pantego
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: 213-20071111
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. WA
3c.-Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): N/A
3d. Street address: 105 Pactolus Highway NC 33 P.O. Box 1587
3e. City, state, zip: Greenville, INC 27835
3f. Telephone no.: 252-830-3490
3g. Fax no.: 252-830-3341
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page I of 10
'" `• ` ""'" PCN Form =Version 1.3 Decemh&`10, 2008 Veision4
4, S
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Division 2 Environmental Officer
4b. Name: Jay B. Johnson
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
North Carolina Depratment of Transportation
4d. Street address: P.O. Box 1587
4e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835
4f. Telephone no.: 252-830-3490
4g. Fax no.: 252-830-3341
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: N/A
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Sc. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Beaufort 314 SR 1721, Little Creek Road Over Little
Creek
Latitude: N 35.499939 Longitude: - W
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 76.638432
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
I c. Property size: N/A acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Little Creek, a Tributary of Pungo Creek '
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C;NSW
2c. River basin: Tar-Pamlico
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
SR 1721, Little Creek Road is a paved secondary state highway. Woodlands and Agriculture dominate the landscape.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
357 Square Feet of Coastal Wetland Impacts For The Bridge To Pipe Replacement.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
60' This site is part of a longer adjacent stream system
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Bridge To Pipe Replacement , the existing bridge has deteoriated and needs replacing.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Existing 26' Long Timber Bridge will be replaced with a Proposed 14' -0"x 8'-7"x40' CAAPA. Excavators,Dump
Trucks,and Crane Trucks will be used for the Bridge To Pipe Replacement.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ? Yes ®No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past.
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type

Final
? Preliminary El
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Stephen Lane Other. NCDCM
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
August,2010
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown'
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
® Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number- Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
0 Sq
Ft
? No ? DWQ .
.
W2 ? P.? T t ? Yes ? Corps 0 Sq
Ft
? No ? DWQ .
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
OSq
Ft
? No ? DWQ .
.
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
0 Sq
Ft
? No ? DWQ .
.
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0 Sq. Ft.
2h. Comments: No 404 Wetland Impacts 357 Sq. ft. Coastal Impacts
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ®P ? T Culvert Little Creek ® PER
? INT ? Corps
® DWQ
30'
44'
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 44LF
3i. Comments: 44 Linear Feet of Stream Impacts
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number- (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ®P ? T Little Creek Fill Tributary 0.006
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts 240 Sq. Ft. 0.006 Acres
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.

Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose Wetland Impacts (acres) - Stream Impacts (feet) Upland

b (acres)
num
er of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total None
5g. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ®Tar-Pamlico ? Other: None
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary impact required?
B1 ? P ? T El Nos 0 Sq. Ft. 0 Sq. Ft.
B2 ? P ? T 0 Nos 0 Sq. Ft. 0 Sq. Ft.
B3 ? P ? T ?? Nos 0 Sq. Ft. OSq. Ft.
6h. Total buffer impacts 0 Sq. FL 0 Sq. Ft.
6i. Comments: No Buffer Impacts Coastal Marsh
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
There are No 404 Wetland Impacts for this Project; However, There are 357 Square Feet of Coastal Impacts, 240 Sq. ft. of
Open Water Impacts, and 44 Linear Feet of Stream Impacts due to the installation of a proposed pipe to replace the existing
timber bridge. The Wetland Impacts have been minimized to the greatest extent feasible.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Use of existing roadway to operate construction equipment; no equipment will enter wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this

project?
? ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in-lieu fee program

El Pennittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Perrnittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December. 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes ®No ,
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: None
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
N/A
6h. Comments:
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Storm Water will diffuse flow through vegetated uplands before entering ® Yes ? No
wetlands.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A Roadway/Bridge Project %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The Project will diffuse flow through vegetated uplands before entering wetlands.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? N/A
? Phase II
? NSW
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ?
USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other. WA
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
® Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
® Other. NPDES Permit
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version .
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la . Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes' to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered 'yes' to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 21-1.0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 21-1.1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered 'yes' to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): .
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ®No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes' to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered 'no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ®No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act El Yes ®No
impacts?
El Raleigh
Sc. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCDMF, NCWRC, and NCDCM
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ® Yes ? No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC and Mr. Kevin Hart,NCDMF
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCDOT HEU Historic Architecture and Archaeology HEU
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Pipe designed to no-rise standards
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM Maps
Jay B. Johnson January 4,
2011
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Ii UAg s Signature
' Date
v lid o if an horieaton letter from the applicant
(Agent's signature
s provided.)
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

07 $ 3 (?
ALTeRNRTE STR?XlVRE m
® C-0 Cord SIRE. j ?u

?+oo
r
110 _
/cc- ` - ?,
FIVP eEvr19.A i
k4-m ++C-?e wtv 9
P.lelcn?l?'S5' :?>

G'1C,D
loot
90-
6 -.)C. A,,,` 1I0 s
f6)r
/oral, P reA= )58Ce.tr,
?I
??` Jar
/df?a
MOO
-sr"a.lot?a- I
--/O.ko ,CvrE _ S/db
Praf;, G'r,? _
- Gr..O,i4h Gr, l.?O/e
eear, 2 'A ?r?rye
100yr. Scour I!j
.1??__... N 07 ScOU-
-
_J?idp.. rL "9$9 ?L. 9,
ICB?r: Cu??rd..'?j..a SLO4r /GOyr? /lbufr+re?f Scau•- yr
YS _ Y, " o. -YA
Iarl•8s?_ r, Yµ
y<:., W yS. I.o (a,a7)ti)il)J-f(1s?Lrtl
O.T CCjtrAcf:,W
N Ag?rL/. ?Y AA..fno_t sew Y- .`; c!
Sutton, Michael W
From: Steffens, Thomas A SAW [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 4:21 PM
To: Sutton, Michael W
Subject: RE: Beaufort 314
I'll cover it under an RGP 31.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sutton, Michael W [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 3:45 PM
To: Steffens, Thomas A SAW .
Subject: RE: Beaufort 314
Good Afternoon Mr. Tom..... Hope all is well with you today...... There will be
approximately 240 Sq. Ft. of Open Water Impacts, 44 Linear feet of Stream Impacts, 360 Sq.
Ft. Coastal Wetland Impacts , and Zero 404 Wetland Impacts....... Thank You,Sir.... mike
-----Original Message----- -
From: Steffens, Thomas A SAW [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 10:25 AM
To: Sutton, Michael W
Subject: RE: Beaufort 314
Mr. Mike,
Can you tell me the approximate amount of waters and wetland fill associated with this
project? That will help determine which permit I'll be sending.
Thanks
toms
-----Original Message-----
From: Sutton, Michael W [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:32 PM
To: Steffens, Thomas A SAW
Subject: Beaufort 314
Good Afternoon, Mr. Tom.... Division 2 plans to replace Beaufort 314, an existing timber
bridge with a proposed pipe. This project is CAMA Jurisdictional. Please advise which
permit you will use for this project(NWP 3; RGP 31,RGP 291,etc.) NCWRC has a moratorium
from February 15 to June 15 for this project. Please see attachments in the following e-
mails for your use in this matter..... Thank You,Sir.... mike
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.

Moratorium RE Beaufort 314.txt
From: Wilson, Travis w.
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 2:24 PM
To: Sutton, Michael W
Cc: Rogerson, Maria A; Johnson, Jay B
subject: RE: Beaufort 314
WRC recommends an in-water work moratorium from Feb 15 to June 15 for the
construction of this project.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sutton, Michael w
sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:53 PM
To: Wilson, Travis W.
CC: Rogerson, Maria A; Johnson, Jay B
subject: Beaufort 314
Good Afternoon Mr. Travis .... Division 2 plans to replace Beaufort 314. Please advise
if a moratorium exists in this location and if so, the dates of that moratorium.
Attached are maps for your use...Thank You..... mike
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records
Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Page ,1
NCDMF Beaufort 314.txt
From: Hart, Kevin
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 7:51 AM
To: Sutton, Michael W
Cc: Johnson, Jay B; Garcy ward ([e-mail]); Lane, Stephen
subject: RE: Beaufort 314
Mike,
I believe I spoke with Stephen Lane regarding this project last month, and if i
remember correctly the pipe opening will be as larger than the current bridge
opening. if this is correct, we support WRC's moratorium of Feb 15 to June 15 for
this project.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Sutton, Michael w
sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 2:51 PM
To: Hart, Kevin
Cc: Johnson, Jay B; Garcy ward ([e-mail]); Lane, Stephen
subject: FW: Beaufort 314
Good afternoon Mr. Kevin.... Division 2 plans to replace Beaufort 314,an existing
timber bridge with a proposed pipe. we would like to receive any concerns that NCDMF
may have in this matter. Please see Mr. Travis Wilson's determination below.
Attached are maps for your use in making determinations .... Thank You.... mike
-----original Message-----
From: Wilson, Travis w.
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 2:24 PM
To: Sutton, Michael W
CC: Rogerson, Maria A; Johnson, Jay B
subject: RE: Beaufort 314
WRC recommends an in-water work moratorium from Feb 15 to June 15 for the
construction of this project.
-----original Message-----
From: Sutton, Michael W
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:53 PM
To: Wilson, Travis W.
CC: Rogerson, Maria A; Johnson, Jay B
subject: Beaufort 314
Good Afternoon Mr. Travis.... Division 2 plans to replace Beaufort 314. Please advise
if a moratorium exists in this location and if so, the dates of that moratorium.
Attached are maps for your use... Thank You..... mike
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records
Law and may Fe disclosed to third parties.
Page 1
Project Tmd ang No. (Intemat Use)
10-08-0009
NO SURVEY REQUrRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: 2C.200711 County: Beaufort
WBS No: 2C.200711 Document:
F. A. No: Funding: ® State ? Federal
Federal (USACE) Permit Required? ® Yes ? No Permit Type: GP 31 and CAMA GP
Project Description: Replace existing bridge with a 14 foot long by 8 feet 7 inch CAAPA pipe on SR
1721 Little Creek Road over Little Creek.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description ofreview activities, results of review, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, historic designations roster, and indexes was undertaken on 8/26/2010.
Based on this review, there are no existing NR properties in the Area of Potential Effects. No properties
recorded in that document appear to be present in the project APE.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE: Current plans call for replacement of the
existing bridge with a pipe set in the same location of the existing bridge. Only change from the existing
bridge is a 1.4 percent increase in grade to the approach to the crossing. There will be no impact to any
land beyond the existing right of way. Additional fill within the right of way will constitute the majority
of construction.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: Map(s)
CDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL NO SURVEY REQUIRED
ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE (CIRCLE ONE)
"No Survry Regtured"farm far Miwr TrauportaHaa Prolectr m Qm1UeE in the 1007 Programmatic Agreement.
NCDOTArchaeolov C& Hlrl ncArchltecnve Grmtw

Projeci Tmcking No. (Inlernal Uk)
10-08-0009
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
WBS No: 2B.20071 I
County: Beaufort
Document:
F.A. No.• Funding- ®State ? Federal
Federal (USACE) Permit Required? ® Yes ? No Permit Type:
Project Description:
Replace Bridge No. 314 on SR 1721 (Little Creek Rd.) over Little Creek.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, relevant background reports, historic designations roster, and indexes was
undertaken on August 24, 2010. Based on this review, there were no existing NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS
properties in the Area of Potential Effects Beaufort County GIS mapping (2007) including aerial
photography and tax information revealed no structures more than 50 years old exists within the APE.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
The Beaufort County Historic Architecture Survey was conducted in 1979. No historic structures were
identified near the APE of this project. The Beaufort County Tax Parcel Data is considered valid for the
purposes of determining the likelihood of historic resources being present. .
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached:
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL
NO SURVEY REQUIRED
"No Survey Requlyd"formforYm, 7-ponalim Pmiec ar Qua11fledw the 2007Pmg..Xic Agreement.
NCDOTArrhaeolagy&Hwonc Archal ure Groqu
Rol osv9 - P:
15.
_ 4T_ -_ _ .n33
ii of e 1 - I - D?nC
1
r s - _ y -- ..
mt 3932 L'NI m0
N i
G 4 1 t?bt Persimmon Tree Pt" 0
e
Y D
/;- ?.? • _ > Windmill
\ n31
oint
,] / \ (x/' `' bid' /. $3« Ert94?b'
Norflick UIh ?T
Shore EF'a 72 1
SV A'
yy" p l
52.'e f. a..: r /'1 v '-?.?? B •A? •aT H' a`-4 - yr
_ _ i -yam- ys .. . q. y-
CT S?adYO?`• (. I :'? 1. ?/ y ?4A ?V \'•.vi"? 1930W0'nN.
s: 00 ER o8-3o G:
Archbe11
3.5 o-v,
] i? Lq 1721
oavi3 `? }• A TA701
7 J QQ
-29
J_
n n?; i ?ko?,,rbj? 179 r2s
640 000
vD Q? L/>• '_. '?- (' ut / ( 9 L5 FEET
' _Vft !- a » x
% 5 '??J ?..\. / %' -•9 WOOOSTOC
'u 1 ?. i I7R • o?c
\ J x ] / I \1 B27
Sutton, Michael W
From: Steffens, Thomas A SAW [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 4:21 PM
To: Sutton, Michael W
Subject: RE: Beaufort 314
I'll cover it under an RGP 31.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sutton, Michael W [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 3:45 PM
To: Steffens, Thomas A SAW
Subject: RE: Beaufort 314
Good Afternoon Mr. Tom..... Hope all is well with you today...... There will be
approximately 240 Sq. Ft. of Open Water Impacts, 44 Linear feet of Stream Impacts, 360 Sq.
Ft. Coastal Wetland Impacts , and Zero 404 Wetland Impacts....... Thank You,Sir.... mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Steffens, Thomas A SAW [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 10:25 AM
To: Sutton, Michael W
Subject: RE: Beaufort 314
Mr. Mike,
Can you tell me the approximate amount of waters and wetland fill associated with this
project? That will help determine which permit I'll be sending.
Thanks
toms
-----Original Message-----
From: Sutton, Michael W [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:32 PM
To: Steffens, Thomas A SAW
Subject: Beaufort 314
Good Afternoon, Mr. Tom.... Division 2 plans to replace Beaufort 314, an existing timber
bridge with a proposed pipe. This project is CAMA Jurisdictional. Please advise which
permit you will use for this project(NWP 3; RGP 31,RGP 291,etc.) NCWRC has a moratorium
from February 15 to June 15 for this project. Please see attachments in the following e-
mails for your use in this matter..... Thank You,Sir.... mike
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.
1
ACAMA / ADREDGE & FILL NY
55253
GENERAL PERMIT
Q Previous permit # -
?_ New ?Modification ?Complete Reissue ?Partial Re issue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources 0--7 _ ?3 a
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC
,s niLy,? ule?tt-t-
Applicant Name project Location: County
Address O j?, X 1?1 d--7 Street Address/ State Road/ Lot#(s) s6: 1-7 21/
'It < StateNCZIP 1-7S'3i nII c?' ,1?r'j1? r SWO )-7 (9
Phone # ()f -' "1D Fax # ' 3 l Subdivision _
Authorized Agent JAV City r N L Zip ':,--7'?/o

Ew ,v_F7A ?ES L?P75
E? 15W ?
Phone #(
) River
Basin
A
Affected
Affecte -'OEA DHHF ?IH ?UBA ?N/A _
/
Adj. W[r. Body Ll+rjc `f?zn at man unkn
El laws: ?FC p
c (/'eeK
p cw
ORW: yes lfo) PNA yes / no Crit.Hab. yes / no
y
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
Type of Project/ Activity
:) I' X ;L-0
Pier (dock) length -
Finger Per(s)
Groin length
number _
Bulkhead/ Riprap length
avg distance offshore
matt distance offshore -"
Basin. channel
c,; Lam- C, k. (Scale: h)1A
i
cubic yards
Boat ramp

Boathouse/ Boaddt

Beach Bulldozing
)f?
Other _

Xyo CNj??t
i i

_

- i
" "'_ -
..... _ .. _
Shoreline Length
SAV: not sure yes
Sandbags: notsure yes , .. ..._:. .. ..... ..-_
Moratorium: Na !
es no . - . _ .._ .._ ... . _

Photos: _ _ _
_
no - -- -------- - -
Waiver Attached: yes no
A building permit may be required by: r ly_
1 See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
Notes/ Special Conditions LLP b!,, l n -'wt ?'t>-" vs/c 'k' l; t
CC
^ Hu .. Lt Trc:•. Fe k',-, Y /S -?-; jr? c /s
p'%_, ..j
"r
'" .t? C„I?ra 1" l,'V"Z+ 41
Y
/-'?
?c?n ?/.. .L3' ?vr?+'J/rr Cur'Es:lnJ J?.. 11 ? ,.. ?!j i?zc./ {inr: n? ..ll In-N.. }r.r' s.?:.-/(. ??.a-i.l:n 1.:v }ac S"
?L,ero.-li "f°.c .tirr••..n, - ,c" o r 1sv / yc/'m,r l-l
A?O?VLSD L'1
pAgent or Applicant a - '
Y,*A h?acestatementon t dc plianbackof permit "'.
Zf?.l Do7r'(
Application Fee(s) - - Check# -
I
PermitPen,it ffic?er'45igtwre
1-1-/If
Issuing Date Expiration Date -
Lod PlanningJurisdicdon '..RoverHe Name

Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s).
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certify that this project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
ITar- PamlicoRiverBasinBufferRules Other:
17 Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Quality Contact the Division of Water Quality at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the Wilmington
Regional Office (910-796-7215) for more information on how to comply with these buffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Raleigh Office
Mailing Address:
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638
Location:
2728 Capital Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-733-2293
Fax:[phone]
Morehead City Headquarters
400 Commerce Ave
Morehead City, NC 28557
252-808-2808/1-888ARCOAST
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -above
New River Inlet- and Pamlico Counties)
Elizabeth City District
1 367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
2S2-264-3901
Fax: [phone]
(Serv es: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare. Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Berrie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-796-7215
Fax: 910-39S-3964
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow -below New River Inlet- and
Pender Counties)

- BEAUFORT 314
BRIDGE TO PIPE REPLACEMENT
SR 1721, LITTLE CREEK ROAD OVER LITTLE CREEK
RANSOMVILLE AND PANTEGO USGS QUAD MAPS AND SHEET NUMBERS 9AND 15
OF THE SOIL SURVEY OFBEAUFORT COUNTY
REPLACE EXISTING 26TONG BY 20. POUT TO OUT) TIMBER BRIDGE
WITHA 14'-0" BY 8'-7" CAAPA FIRM PANEL 7604 J
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 2B.200711 MAP NUMBER 3 72 0 76 0400 J
LITTLE CREEK C ASW AUGUST 19, 2010
PAMLICO 03020104 TAR-PAMLICO BASIN
,aWlnomill
BEAUFORT 314
4Point -P U N Y= 645240.6260
Norfllck
X=2702814.3928 N35 A_30?_ooll
r e ^ ?lQ W76 -38W8"
y t
N35.499939 DEGREES w x
K3_ W 76.638432 DEGREES CAI
f'! B A •3? H_ C 1 I
dir}1
C 11 5
I .. - _. lwn0rt 1
' u \ - Shoro
------------------ ----
m
.. _.'??_/ _11191
1 _1
e
W
CK ?.
un ao steck,q, gt
inch = 2,000 feet
,a 0 7001,400
2,800 4,200
i

5,600
= Feet
. ,,
BEAUFORT 314
S BRIDGE TO PIPE REPLACEMENT
SR 1721, LITTLE CREEK ROAD OVER LITTLE CREEK
RANSOMVILLEAND PANTEGO USGS QUAD MAPSAND SHEET NUMBERS SAND 15
OF THE SOIL SURVEY 0FBE,4UFORT COUNTY
REPLACE EXISTING 26 SONG BY20.1'(OUT TO OUT) TIMBER BRIDGE
6t WITHA 14'-0"BY8! 7" CAAPA
FIRM PANEL 7604 J
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 2B.200711 MAP NUMBER 3720760400 J
LITTLE CREEK C;NSW AUGUST 19, 2010
PAMLICO 03020104 TAR-PAMLICO BASIN
BEAUFORT 314
Y= 645240.6260
• X= 2702814.3928
Ds w N35^-30'-00"
L W76^-38W8"
aA es N35.499939 DEGREES
• .
Sb• W 76.638432 DEGREES
To as t
At • To Aag,
0
Se Cu •
N
e ao
Sb
Ds CnB
Ds
°es ° W E
S
Aa%
D
m
Ds U`
m
J M#
i
o m
Sb At
w Ds To
woodstook Rd °mm TA
$b y
O c° Me
Ro Ta6
Cf
1 inch= 2,000 feet TaBe
0 7001,400 2,800 4,200 5,600.
Feet
w
r-AaAl

e: °
? m m
3 z e

a ?

?Q
Z O
¢
?¢ W
Y

i
p o

In DNN

U a
? 3 Y

? w
2 a i W
p
? p d? 1°
2
'
o
.. tw O tw ?O Y 2
c
, 5 oWW ti
' ? ?? I ? ?? W 2 ? ? m
Y? m p NOWW p?p
?? ?? Wo lWi
'^ •ti W W
' W N
W W p,
3 It 3
a 3
±
3X? ?o
?I I e ln
333Q
- ?1 I I N N 3 O p V1 V1 C
E

W ?
w mma 3?a
O 3

?
W U
W W?? ?? ? Z?
?
q
n
W
?
? I

I
I
Q
N 3
? m m W
P
I
n W W W j u '
°0 I j
O
I
? cl, ° e s£ I00f £ e£
"
?vl?,?
s o In ?N;?m vx,?{ h?
to O V 1 6 If z 1 1-x{ I
I ?
?
:
N
m
SV 71 1
?
Ca
]
- L m
3
W I ] 2
- a
3'3 U
W ?66?3 v 0 $ ® / W
N 2 ? ? ? ?R ? I ~ ~®® NL ? ? b£ ? 3 C Q

j ? reb m ?1 ? ti
W
W O
3 Wo
?- m WI W
?
U J W
N °p' m -
O m Q 6Z
I n F
"
Il
'1 LU
W
N 0 d 0 9 avp Q am fl ?
W

W ?
m pO W
U vf/
Q £
b2 I
0
66£ I C

$
° I
pIP£
I B/ f 2
7

? In° W
Oli W W
) W to
U f, d 99
4 I a y
I 4? V ? c
VfO
IV
W
W °
W
W S
?
O f i ?I
71 m y I
/I yQ. v"i i
m tpil O ZE 0-
m Cl_
U m / p W I V 3
?V in
?(

m
/ I
i Vf W
O

I _
I^
= 2p2 ???
?3
Q
y3 ?Nx N 11
U ? ? ? ? I ? $ I ¢ 3 ? ? g
01 ?`rmmp ? i

< In W
O I I I I a U 2 J Z m p
? 2 a 3 1 I 2 ¢ v=i 2
k v
LL
W
2 w
° tiN
Oe A 4. WQ N v Y
00
p x
t
o
O v
?W
WNW
oW ??

ILL
W" 6f I

I I

I Q
Z? U 3 W
? W
p
W

X w
W
???
m
ti £3l

I I Y=?j
3 W all W
W ¢ Y
r

2
?n
W g
LAU 'w N
o
n W
Z
z
.
U W Q ?

a ? ?a
ol
? o, c?
m I
I i
I 2
?
2? al W
J ? J m
? O Qj N
£8 GVN
Ol
Z U ? = m W a ?pO
3
2i? ON Y 2 ti3aaW t I v V1 ¢ h W
N
i U
g °p ? `° °
° c
b
N
W ¢
m mmi
° I a $ 8 "
W r\
Y
a ?
8 W W v
0: j
LWi

t 6
? ? ? C J?
4
1 li j? 2
N g- I o f
el 3 o Q ~ 1
Y?
p o ¢] ti
I

? w
k ?

I

E I

I
I
? a
tl
i4
I
1
I ?z I
I
t
66/LI,
se?s1 oi0z-u -I
I I
I I
I
I I
Y V
L
^x Y
cJ y
1
1? ? v
C.r n
1
i
c
Z

i
81
a8

1
I
I
1
i

u
I
1
I
I ? M

11
CO
I
z
F-
N W
+
O I ?
.-1 1 W
I ?
°
Q
1\ Q
1 \

M ? \ V
?? I I \
I pp I \
- I I
1 I I
I
O I I ' '
' H
I

Q
I ?n
I I
I
/y
LL
?-
f 1 I
I I I
I I I
LJ
J
(
n
v ' I I I M
W
I- I
I I Y
'
H

O II O

_ ...
.. ... .
. O
I ° O cn
.--I
I co co W
J
L
W °
Q
O
~ Y
W H
Y
N I

Z W

0
1
3: U W
m

t0
i O

Z
F
I-I
Z W I
Iw F--i F
O a is N Z
O
Q
CL 0
O I<
i U X
W H to
U O CD :D
N U

O O
cr i H
IH O
J
W Q <
W
M
Q a I x
I co w
m J
H
T---I
- ? X W
' O
Z>- D H 0-
Q

I O

0 V)

W CD cn t0 O W

? O I
X O N
C\j

O.
`
ON
I
H
CL m 2 O
C r F-@ J V l
.. 0 .. ' I CD Q C] LL F-
IT
"--' IM
p i
I 0
W Z W H Z
H J 7r d' LLI
in W (V
I
I
O Co
Ln, :z Zm
W C D - CL F- I N U Q:? p ..

... N
O -2 i O X(3'jWCL HZ

-:. W _
? CL W
F. L
J
I 10?
11 W.--?0V)f- W
..
m CL W L
a
N
to

_bb/(I/B
I}

ubP'elVo'd\61C?. J"c.O\queweaoye°tl 3OOIN9V......B\5133fOdd,jfwnooO nW\vo„n%,w\cougJeg pu° juewnvon\:?
1 IS:S1 0102-1]0-I